Item 1.
Business.
Introduction
Electro-Sensors, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company” or “ESI”) is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of industrial production monitoring and process control systems.
In addition, through our subsidiary ESI Investment Company, we periodically make strategic investments in other businesses and companies, primarily when we believe that such investments will facilitate development of technology complementary to our existing products. Although we invest in other businesses and companies through our subsidiary ESI Investment Company, we do not intend to become an investment company and intend to remain primarily an operating company. Our primary investment is 273,267 shares of Rudolph Technologies, Inc., which is accounted for using the available-for-sale method.
Unless indicated otherwise, the terms “Company” and “ESI” when used herein, include Electro-Sensors, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2012, ESI had two consolidated subsidiaries: ESI Investment Company and Senstar Corporation. Senstar Corporation does not have any business operations.
ESI was incorporated in Minnesota in July 1968. Our executive offices are located at 6111 Blue Circle Drive, Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55343-9108. Our telephone number is (952) 930-0100.
Products
We manufacture and sell several different types of monitoring systems that measure actual machine production and operation rates, as well as systems that regulate the speed of related machines in production processes.
Our original products-speed monitoring systems-compare machine revolutions per minute or speed against acceptable rates as determined by the customer. The monitors generally have the same relative operating principle and use a non-contacting sensing head that translates the speed of a rotating shaft into analog readouts. The systems include a signal-generating pulser disc or wrap that attaches to a rotating shaft, the sensing device, and a control unit. The systems vary in complexity, from a simple system that detects slow-downs or stoppages, to more sophisticated systems that warn of deviations from precise tolerances and that permit various subsidiary operations to be determined through monitoring the shaft speed.
The speed monitoring systems include a line of digital products that translate sensor impulses from its production monitoring systems into digital readouts indicating production counts or rates, such as parts, gallons, or board feet. The speed monitoring systems also include alarm systems, tachometers, and other devices that translate impulses from the sensors into alarm signals, computer inputs, or digital displays that are usable by the customer.
Three production monitoring devices that do not operate by measuring shaft speeds are also in the speed monitoring systems product line. These devices are the tilt switch, vibration monitor, and slide gate position monitor. A tilt switch is designed to alert the operator when a storage bin or production system reaches a certain capacity (e.g., when grain fills a silo). A vibration monitor will alert an operator when the vibration of a machine in a production system exceeds or is below a specified level. The slide gate position monitor is used in plant operations to provide feedback of the position of a slide gate. As part of our Electro-Sentry Hazard Monitoring system, we also have temperature sensors that are used to monitor bearing temperature and belt misalignment.
We have several products used in drive control systems that regulate the speed of motors on related machines in a production sequence to ensure that the performances of various operations are coordinated. The products consist of a line of digital control products for motors that require a complete closed loop PID (Proportional Integral Derivative) control. The closed loop controllers coordinate production speed among process motors and reduce waste.
We have a sales agreement with Motrona GmbH (the West German manufacturer of control and interface devices), giving us rights to distribute in the United States the products manufactured by Motrona GmbH. These products interface with our products on various applications.
We believe that manufacturing companies can achieve significant savings in both time and materials by adding production monitoring and drive control technology to existing manufacturing processes to coordinate operation of related machines. We intend to continue to market our products to this “retro-fit” market and also to companies building new manufacturing machinery or processing systems.
In 2008, we introduced our Electro-Sentry Hazard Monitoring System, which integrates our sensors for bearing temperature, belt misalignment, and shaft speed with a programmable logic controller and touch screen interface to create a complete system for hazard monitoring. By doing this, we are enabling our customer to locate which part of the material handling system is operating incorrectly, typically in less than ten seconds. This is done by using visual diagrams on the touch screen.
We expect to continue to expend resources in new product development and the marketing of new and existing products for use in production monitoring applications. We continue to expand our line of hazard monitoring products with new system displays and sensors to meet the requirements of a wider customer base. In 2012, we introduced the Electro-Sentry 16 hazard monitoring system and added new features to the Electro-Sentry 1 system. Other new products included a new ST420 shaft tachometer and several sensor mounting products.
Our customers have diverse applications for our products in the grain, feed, bio-fuels, power generation, water utilities and waste water treatment, mining, chemical, and other processing areas. We are continuing to look for new industries to expand sales and may also consider acquiring compatible businesses as part of our growth strategy. Our corporate web site provides significant information and product application knowledge to existing and prospective customers and also direct knowledge to our sales partners. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference herein and is not a part of this Form 10-K.
Marketing and Distribution
We sell our products primarily through home office sales people who deal directly with customers and a number of manufacturer’s representatives and distributors located throughout the United States, Mexico, China, Canada, Chile, Bolivia, Colombia, Malaysia, Singapore, Great Britain, Australia, Egypt, El Salvador, Guatemala, Korea, Puerto Rico, Taiwan, and Turkey. The sensing and control units are sold under the Electro-Sensors, Inc. brand as a range of products from simple sensors to complex motor speed controllers. These products are sold to businesses in all major standard industrial classifications, including grain, feed, biofuels, food processing, chemicals, agricultural, mining, utility, forest products, steel, tire, glass and electronics. Any business that uses machinery with a rotating shaft is a potential customer.
We advertise in national industrial periodicals that cover a wide range of industrial products and attend several local, national and international tradeshows designated for the industry throughout the year. A corporate website and other related industry websites are also used for advertising and marketing purposes.
Competition
Competition for our monitoring products arises from a broad range of industrial and commercial businesses. Design, quality and multiplicity of application, rather than price, are the focus of competition in selling these products. We face substantial competition for our production monitoring systems. Many of these competitors are well established and larger than us in terms of total sales volume. Among our larger competitors are Danaher Controls, Red Lion Controls, Control Concepts, 4B Elevator Components Ltd., Durant Corporation, and Contrex, Inc. We believe our competitive advantages include that our products are sold as ready-to-install units and that our products have a wide range of applications. Our major disadvantages include the fact that our major competitors are much larger, have a broader variety of sensing instruments, and have larger sales forces and established names.
Suppliers
We purchase parts and materials for our production monitoring systems from various manufacturers and distributors. In some instances, these materials are manufactured in accordance with proprietary designs. Multiple sources of these supplies and materials are readily available, and we are not dependent on any single source for these supplies and materials. We have not experienced any problem of short supply or delays from our suppliers.
Customers
We are not dependent upon a single or a few customers for a material (10% or more) portion of our sales.
Patents, Trademarks and Licenses
The name “Electro-Sensors” is trademark registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, as Reg. No. 1,142,310. We believe our trademark has been and will continue to be useful in developing and protecting market recognition for our products.
We hold six patents relating to our production monitoring systems. Pursuant to a sales agreement with Motrona GmbH, a West-German manufacturer of control and interface devices, we hold rights to distribute in the United States the products manufactured by Motrona GmbH.
Governmental Approvals
We are not required to obtain governmental approval of our products.
Effect of Governmental Regulations
We do not believe that any existing or proposed governmental regulations will have a material effect on our business.
Research and Development
We invest in research and development programs to develop new products in related markets and to integrate state of the art technology into existing products. We incurred research and development expenses attributable to our production monitoring systems of $443,000 and $437,000 during 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our development projects are undertaken based upon the identified specific needs of our customer base.
Our future success is dependent in part upon our ability to develop new products in our varying segments. Difficulties or delays in our ability to develop, produce, test and market new products could have a material adverse effect on future sales growth.
Compliance with Environmental Laws
Compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws has only a nominal effect on current or anticipated capital expenditures and has had no material effect on earnings or on our competitive position.
Employees
As of March 22, 2013, we had 29 employees, of which 28 are full-time and one is part-time. We believe that our relations with our employees are good. None of our employees are members of unions.
Our ability to maintain a competitive position and to continue to develop and market new products depends, in part, on our ability to retain key employees and qualified personnel. If we are unable to retain and/or recruit key employees, product development, marketing and sales could be negatively impacted.
Fluctuations in Operating Results.
We have experienced fluctuations in our operating results in the past, and may experience fluctuations in the future, which may affect the market price of our Common Stock. Sales can fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Some of these factors are: product competition and acceptance, timing of customer orders, cancellation of orders, the mix of products sold, downturns in the market and economic disruptions. Because fluctuations can happen, we caution investors that results of our operations for preceding periods may not be indicative of how we will perform in the future. There can be no assurance that we will experience continued earnings growth.
Further, investments held by our subsidiary, ESI Investment Company, are subject to significant positive and negative changes in value. In particular, our significant investment in Rudolph Technologies, Inc. has experienced substantial value fluctuations, both negative and positive, which are expected to continue. Our current intention is to continue to gradually liquidate our investment securities to finance our working capital needs as required.
Expending Funds for Changes in Industry Standards, Customer Preferences or Technology.
Our business depends upon periodically introducing new and enhanced products and solutions for customer needs. The development of products requires us to commit financial resources, personnel and time, usually in advance of significant market demand for such products. In order to compete, we must anticipate both future demand and the technology available to meet that demand. There can be no assurance that our research and development efforts will lead to new products or product innovations that can be made available to or will be accepted by the market.
Cautionary Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We have made, and may continue to make, forward-looking statements with respect to our business and financial matters, including statements contained in this document, other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reports to shareholders. Forward-looking statements generally include discussion of current expectations or forecasts of future events and can be identified by the use of terminology such as “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “will,” and similar words or expressions. Any statement that does not relate solely to historical fact should be considered forward-looking. Our forward-looking statements generally relate to our growth strategy, future financial results, product development and sales efforts. Forward-looking statements are made throughout this Annual Report, but primarily in this Item 1 and Item 7 -Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and include statements relating to management’s intentions that we not become an investment company, our expectations and intentions with respect to growth, statements relating to management’s beliefs with respect to our marketing and product development, our expectations and beliefs with respect to the value of our intellectual property, our beliefs with respect to our competitive position in the marketplace, our beliefs with respect to the effect of governmental regulations on our business, our beliefs with respect to our employee relations, our intention with respect to gradually liquidating our investment securities to finance working capital needs, our expectations and beliefs with respect to the future performance of our investment securities, the adequacy of our facilities, expansion of the number of our manufacturer’s representatives and exclusive distributors, our intention to develop new products, the possibility of acquiring compatible businesses as part of our growth strategy, and our expectations with respect to our cash requirements and use of cash. Forward-looking statements cannot be guaranteed and actual results may vary materially due to the uncertainties and risks, known and unknown, associated with such statements, including our ability to successfully develop new products and manage our cash requirements. We undertake no obligations to update any forward-looking statements. We wish to caution investors that the following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect our actual results of operations and cause such results to differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements made in this document and elsewhere by us or on our behalf. It is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results. As such, investors should not consider any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks, uncertainties or potentially inaccurate assumptions. These factors include:
•
our ability to successfully develop new products;
•
our ability to quickly and successfully adapt to changing industry technological standards;
•
our ability to comply with existing and changing industry regulations;
•
our ability to manage cash requirements;
•
our ability to attract and retain new manufacturer’s representatives and exclusive distributors;
•
our ability to attract and retain key personnel, including senior management;
•
our ability to adapt to changing economic conditions and manage downturns in the economy in general; and
•
our ability to keep pace with competitors, some of whom are much larger and have substantially greater resources than us.
Item 1A.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
Not applicable.
Item 2.
Item 2.
Properties.
We own and occupy a 25,400 square foot facility at 6111 Blue Circle Drive, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343-9108. All operations are conducted within this facility. The facility is in excellent condition and we continue to maintain and update the facility as necessary. The facility is anticipated to be adequate for our needs in 2013.
Item 3.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
We are not the subject of any legal proceedings as of the date of this filing. We are not aware of any threatened litigation.
Item 4.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market of The Nasdaq Stock Market® under the symbol “ELSE”. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low reported last sales prices for our Common Stock for each period indicated as reported on the Nasdaq system.
Based on data provided by our transfer agent, management believes that as of March 21, 2013, the number of share owner accounts of record was approximately 92.
We paid annual cash dividends on our Common Stock of $0.16 per share in 2012 and 2011.
From time to time, we may be required to repurchase some of our equity securities as a result of obligations described in Note 9 to our 2012 consolidated financial statements. We did not repurchase any equity securities during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Item 6.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
Not applicable.
Item 7.
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors discussed under “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of Fiscal Year 2012 vs. Fiscal Year 2011
Net Revenues
Net revenues for 2012 increased $383,000 to $6,498,000, or 6.3%, when compared to net revenues for 2011.The increase was spread across a broad range of our sensors and control products in the industrial markets that we serve and was driven largely by increased customer demand in connection with capacity expansion and plant retro-fit projects.
Cost of Sales
Our cost of sales increased $245,000 from $2,613,000 to $2,858,000, or 9.4%, when comparing fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2011. This increase was primarily a result of increased sales and increased costs of materials and labor. We continue our efforts to maintain or reduce production costs by manufacturing products in the most cost effective manner.
Gross Margins
Gross margin for 2012 was 56.0% compared to 57.3% for the prior year. The slight decrease in the gross margin was due to the increased cost of materials and labor.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased by $47,000, or 1.7%, when comparing 2012 to 2011.
Selling and marketing costs decreased by $25,000, or 1.8%, when comparing 2012 to 2011. The decrease was due to a decrease in advertising and marketing expenses resulting from a change in the mix of direct advertising and tradeshows, offset by increases in wages and benefit expense (due to changes in the compensation package and higher commissions due to increased sales), travel (due to attendance at additional tradeshows and increased customer visits), trade shows (due to additional local and regional shows) and outside sales representatives’ commissions related to the increase in sales.
General and administrative costs increased by $66,000, or 6.9%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in expanded XBRL reporting requirements and depreciation expense due to upgrades in our enterprise software and related hardware. These increases were offset by decreases in expenses relating to repairs and maintenance of our building.
Research and development costs increased $6,000, or 1.4%, in 2012 when compared with 2011. The increase in research and development costs was due to an increase in lab testing fees for product testing and approval for hazardous locations and legal expenses related to patent applications, offset by decreases in the cost of lab materials and contract engineering expenses (due to the development and installation of the Electro-Sentry 1 system in 2011).
Operating Income
Operating income increased by $91,000 in 2012 from $740,000 to $831,000, an increase of 12.3% compared to 2011. The increase in operating income was mainly due to the increase in net sales.
Non-Operating Income
ESI Investment Company continues to provide us with an alternative source of earnings through investments in available-for-sale securities and other investments; however, our intent is to remain an operations-based company. Our investments in available-for-sale securities are subject to significant positive and negative changes in value. In addition to income from the sale of investments, we also realize interest income from our short-term holdings.
Non-operating income for fiscal year 2012 increased by $742,000 to $811,000. The increase was driven primarily by an increase in the gain on the sale of investments. In December 2012, the Company started liquidating its investment in Rudolph Technology, which resulted in a gain of $794,000. In December 2011, the Company’s investment in PPT Vision was liquidated, which resulted in a gain of $72,000. The 2011 gain from investments was offset by a loss of $18,000 on disposal of property and equipment related to building maintenance. There was no such loss on disposal of property in 2012.
Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related deferred tax effect, are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Dividends on marketable equity securities are recognized in income when declared.
Realized gains and losses, including losses from declines in value of specific securities determined by management to be other-than-temporary, are included in income. Realized gains and losses are determined on the basis of the specific securities sold.
Interest income decreased $2,000, or 33.3%, when comparing fiscal year 2012 to the same period in 2011.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded as other income earn-out payments related to the sale of the AutoData Systems Division to Auto Data Inc. of $13,000 and $3,000, respectively.
Loss From Discontinued Operations
On September 16, 2011, the Company sold its entire interest in its AutoData Systems Division to Auto Data Inc. (ADI). The purchase price will be paid as an earn-out based on three percent of the software, hardware, and maintenance contracts that ADI sells over the next five years (four percent while ADI continues to occupy our building). The transaction was intended to allow us to focus on our core markets.
For the year ended December 31, 2011 the AutoData Systems Division had an operating loss, net of income taxes, of $50,000.
Net Income After Tax
We reported net income after tax for 2012 of $1,086,000, as compared to net income of $548,000 in 2011, an increase of $538,000, or 98.2%. Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.32 and $0.31, respectively in 2012, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.17 in 2011.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material effect on our financial condition, changes in the financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents were $1,102,000 and $5,476,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was mainly due to investing activities, as described below.
Cash from operating activities of $732,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily a result of our net income adjusted for the gain on the sale of investments, and changes in accounts receivable, inventories, and income tax activity. Cash from operating activities increased $423,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 due to an increase in net income of $538,000. The net change in trade receivables was due a decrease of $57,000 in the balance at December 31, 2012 compared to the prior year and an increase of $118,000 in the balance at December 31, 2011 when compared to the prior year. This was due to a decrease in outstanding accounts receivable balances as of December 31, 2012, partially due to the 2011 balance including a $71,000 receivable for the sale of PPT Vision stock. The net change in inventories was due to an increase of $102,000 in the balance at December 31, 2012 compared to the prior year and an increase of $188,000 in the balance at December 31, 2011 when compared to the prior year. The increase as of December 31, 2012 was smaller than the increase as of December 31, 2011 due to the type of new products introduced in 2012 compared to 2011. The net change in income taxes was due to an increase in the payable balance of $330,000 at December 31, 2012 compared to the prior year and an increase in the receivable balance of $37,000 at December 31, 2011 when compared to the prior year. The increase in the net payable was due to taxes due on gain on sale of investments. These increases were offset by the change in the gain on sale of investments. The gain on sale of investment was $794,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $73,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011, a change in the adjustment to net income of $721,000.
Cash used in investing activities was $4,571,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to cash from investing activities of $5,106,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The significant increase in cash used in investing activities was due to an increase in net purchases of Treasury Bills with maturity dates of more than three months, with only a purchase of $5,249,000 during 2012, compared to net proceeds of $5,200,000 during 2011. During 2011, we had $9,500,000 in Treasury Bills mature and purchased $4,300,000 in Treasury Bills. We purchased $169,000 and $82,000 of property and equipment in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We received $874,000 on the sale of investments during 2012 compared to $2,000 during 2011.
Cash used in financing activities was $535,000 and $522,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we paid aggregate dividends of $543,000 each year. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had $8,000 and $10,000, respectively, in stock purchases under our 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Also, in the year ended December 31, 2011, $11,000 in stock options were exercised.
We intend that our ongoing cash requirements will be primarily used for capital expenditures, researching potential acquisitions, acquisitions, research and development, and working capital. Management believes that cash on hand and any cash provided by operations will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements through at least the next 12 months.
Our primary investment is 273,267 and 343,267 shares of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (“Rudolph”), as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, listed on the Nasdaq stock market. The Rudolph investment is accounted for using the available-for-sale method. The fair value of the Rudolph investment totaled $3,673,000 and $3,134,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our Rudolph shares are subject to fluctuations in price and could have a negative effect on our liquidity. Liquid securities are periodically sold as deemed appropriate by management. The market value of the Rudolph stock as of March 20, 2013 was $2,947,000.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make decisions based upon estimates, assumptions, and factors it considers relevant to the circumstances. Such decisions include the selection of applicable accounting principles and the use of judgment in their application, the results of which impact reported amounts and disclosures. Changes in economic conditions or other business circumstances may affect the outcomes of management’s estimates and assumptions.
Significant estimates, including the underlying assumptions, consist of the economic lives of property and equipment, realizability of accounts receivable, and valuation of deferred tax assets/liabilities, inventory and investments. It is at least reasonably possible that these estimates may change in the near term.
Economic lives of property and equipment
We estimate the economic useful life of property and equipment used in the business. Expected asset lives may be shortened or an impairment recorded based on a change in the expected use of the asset.
Realizability of accounts receivable
We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on prior history and the aging of our accounts receivable. We are unable to predict which, if any, of our customers will be unable to pay their open invoices at a future date.
Valuation of deferred tax assets/liabilities
We estimate our deferred tax assets and liabilities based on current tax laws and rates. The tax laws and rates could change in the future to either disallow the deductions or increase/decrease the tax rates.
Valuation of inventory
We purchase inventory based on estimated demand of products. It is possible that the inventory we have purchased will not be used in the products that our customers need or meet future technological requirements.
Valuation of investments
Our investments in equity securities are valued at market prices in an open market. The prices are subject to the normal fluctuations that could be either negative or positive.
Additional information regarding our significant accounting policies is provided below in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1, Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies.
Item 7A.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not applicable.
Item 8.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Electro-Sensors, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Minnetonka, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Electro-Sensors, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012, and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012. Electro-Sensors, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Electro-Sensors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of business:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Electro-Sensors, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, ESI Investment Company and Senstar Corporation. Senstar has no operations. Intercompany accounts, transactions and earnings have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated entity is referred to as “the Company” or “ESI”.
Electro-Sensors, Inc. manufactures and markets a complete line of speed monitoring and motor control systems for industrial machinery. The Company utilizes leading-edge technology to continuously improve its products and make them easier to use, with the ultimate goal of manufacturing the industry-preferred product for every market served. The Company’s products are sold through an internal sales staff, manufacturer’s representatives, and distributors to a wide variety of manufacturers, OEM’s and processors to monitor process machinery operations. The Company markets its products to a number of different industries located throughout the United States, Asia, Central America, Canada, and Europe.
In addition, through its subsidiary ESI Investment Company, the Company periodically makes strategic investments in other businesses and companies, primarily when the Company believes that such investments will facilitate development of technology complementary to the Company’s products. Although ESI, through its subsidiary ESI Investment Company, invests in other businesses or companies, ESI does not intend to become an investment company and intends to remain primarily an operating company. The Company’s primary investment is 273,267 shares of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (“Rudolph”) which is accounted for using the available-for-sale method. See Note 2 for additional information regarding its investments. The Company’s investments in securities are subject to normal market risks.
Significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized below:
Use of estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates, including the underlying assumptions, consist of the economic lives of property and equipment, realizability of accounts receivable, valuation of deferred tax assets/liabilities, inventory and investments. It is at least reasonably possible that these estimates may change in the near term.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are invested in commercial paper, money market accounts and may also be invested in three month Treasury Bills. Cash equivalents are carried at cost plus accrued interest which approximates fair value.
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in primarily one bank deposit account, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.
Trade receivables and credit policies
Accounts receivable are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. Accounts receivables are stated at the amount billed to the customer. Customer account balances with invoices over 90 days are considered delinquent. The Company does not accrue interest on delinquent accounts receivable.
Payments of accounts receivable are allocated to the specific invoices identified on the customer’s remittance advice or, if unspecified, are applied to the earliest unpaid invoices.
The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected. Management individually reviews all accounts receivable balances that exceed 90 days from the invoice date and based on an assessment of current creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. Management uses this information to estimate the allowance.
Available-for-sale securities
The Company’s investments consist of equity securities, primarily common stocks, government debt securities, commercial paper, and money market funds. The estimated fair value of publicly traded equity securities is based on quoted market prices, and therefore subject to the inherent risk of market fluctuations.
Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the date individual investments are acquired, and evaluates the appropriateness of such classification at each balance sheet date.
Since the Company does not buy and sell investments with the objective of generating profits on short-term fluctuations in market price, the investments in marketable equity securities have been classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related deferred tax effect, are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and within accumulated comprehensive income. Dividends on marketable equity securities are recognized in income on the ex-dividend date.
Realized gains and losses, including losses from declines in value of specific securities determined by management to be other-than-temporary, are included in income. Realized gains and losses are determined on the basis of the specific securities sold.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s policies incorporate the guidance for accounting for fair value measurements of financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company’s policies also incorporate the guidance for fair value measurement related to nonfinancial items that are recognized and disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
•
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
•
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
•
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company currently has no nonfinancial or financial items that are measured on a nonrecurring basis.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, treasury bills, commercial paper, money market funds, trade receivables, accounts payable, and other working capital items approximate fair value at December 31, 2012 and 2011 due to the short term maturity nature of these instruments.
Inventories
Inventories include material, labor and overhead and are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided over estimated useful lives by use of the straight line method. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Major improvements and betterments are capitalized.
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including, but not limited to, discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals.
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its production monitoring equipment when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company may offer discounts to its distributors or quantity discounts that are recorded at the time of sale. The Company recognizes revenue on products sold to customers and distributors upon shipment because the contracts do not include post-shipment obligations. In addition to exchanges and warranty returns, customers have refund rights. Our standard products are used in a wide variety of industries, returns are minimal and insignificant to the financial statements and are recognized when the returned product is received by the Company. In some situations, the Company receives advance payments from its customers. Revenue associated with these advance payments is deferred until the product is shipped or services performed.
Advertising costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Total advertising expense was $89,000 and $184,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Research and development
Expenditures for research and development are expensed as incurred. We incurred expenses of $443,000 and $437,000 during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Depreciation
The cost of property and equipment is depreciated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives.
Estimated useful lives are as follows
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $71,000 and $57,000, respectively.
Income taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided on an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. The difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities is determined annually. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for those differences that have future tax consequences using the currently enacted tax laws and rates that apply to the periods in which they are expected to affect taxable income. Income tax expense is the current tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the net change in the deferred tax assets and liabilities, excluding the portion of the deferred liability allocated to other comprehensive income. Deferred taxes are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that realization of the related deferred tax asset is not assured. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not to be sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.
The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Net income per common share
EPS excludes dilution and is determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities and other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
The following information presents the Company’s computations of basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented in the statements of operations.
Stock Compensation
The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) model with the assumptions included in the table below. The Company uses historical data among other factors to estimate the expected price volatility, the expected option life and the expected forfeiture rate. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option. At December 31, 2012, the Company had one stock-based employee compensation plan. On July 18, 2012, the Company granted each of its four outside directors options to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock, recognizing compensation expense of approximately $6,000 based on the grant date fair value.
The assumptions made in estimating the fair value of the options on the 2012 grant date based upon the BSM option-pricing model are as follows:
The Company calculates expected volatility for stock options and awards using historical volatility as the Company believes the expected volatility will approximate historical volatility.
There were no options granted in the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2011, two employees exercised options to purchase a total of 4,500 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2012, one outside director forfeited options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock.
Note 2. Investments
The cost and estimated fair value of the investments are as follows:
Realized gains and losses on investments are as follows:
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s significant investment in equity securities is 273,267 and 343,267, respectively, shares of Rudolph Technologies (Rudolph), accounted for under the available-for-sale method. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the aggregate value of the Company’s Rudolph shares as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange was approximately $3,673,000 and $3,134,000, respectively, with an approximate cost of $36,000 and $45,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold 70,000 shares of Rudolph stock and reported a gain of $794,000 in other income.
As of December 30, 2011, the shareholders of PPT Vision (PPT) voted to accept an offer to merge with Datalogic Scanning Holdings, Inc. (Datalogic). The terms of the merger required Datalogic to purchase all of the shares outstanding. Electro-Sensors, Inc. recognized a $72,000 gain on the sale of its PPT shares to Datalogic. The Company received the funds for their shares of PPT in January 2012.
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income are as follows:
Note 3. Fair Value Measurements
The following table provides information on those assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The fair value of the money market funds, commercial paper, and treasury bills are based on quoted market prices in an active market. Available for sale securities include equity securities that are traded in an active market. Closing stock prices are readily available from active markets and are used as being representative of fair value. The Company classifies these securities as level 1.
Note 4. Inventories
Inventories used in the determination of cost of goods sold are as follows:
Note 5. Property and Equipment
The following is a summary of property and equipment:
Note 6. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses include the following:
Note 7. Commitments
Lease commitments
The Company is leasing office equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through 2013.
Minimum lease payments required under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
Rental expense charged to operations was $27,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Note 8. Common Stock Options and Stock Purchase Plan
Stock options
The 1997 Stock Option Plan includes both nonqualified and incentive stock options. Payment for the shares may be made in cash, shares of the Company’s Common Stock or a combination thereof. Under the terms of the plan, incentive stock options are granted at 100% of fair market value on the date of grant and may be exercised at various times depending upon the terms of the option. The nonqualified stock options were granted to directors to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock. All existing options expire 10 years from the date of grant or one year from the date of death.
The following table summarizes the activity for outstanding incentive stock options to employees of the company:
(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as approximately the difference between the weighted average exercise price of the underlying awards and the Company’s estimated current fair market value at December 31, 2012.
The following table summarizes the activity for outstanding director stock options:
(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as approximately the difference between the weighted average exercise price of the underlying awards and the Company’s estimated current fair market value at December 31, 2012.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a period of 1-2 years. To the extent the forfeiture rate is different than we have anticipated, stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.
Stock-based compensation
Pursuant to the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”), the Company is authorized to grant options to purchase up to 450,000 shares of its Common Stock. As of December 31, 2012, options to purchase an aggregate of 21,980 shares were outstanding and exercisable under the Option Plan, and 250 shares were available for issuance pursuant to awards that may be granted under the Option Plan in the future.
Stock purchase plan
The 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) allows employees to set aside up to 10% of their earnings for the purchase of shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The purchase price is the lower of 85% of the market value at the date of the grant or the exercise date, which is six months from the date of the grant. Under the ESPP, the Company is authorized to sell and issue up to 150,000 shares of its Common Stock to its full-time employees. During 2012 and 2011, 2,335 shares and 3,078 shares, respectively, were issued under the ESPP. At December 31, 2012, 71,956 shares were available for future issuance pursuant to the ESPP.
Note 9. Benefit Plans
Employee stock ownership plan
The Company sponsors an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) that covers substantially all employees who work 1,000 or more hours during the year. The ESOP has, at various times, secured financing from the Company to purchase the Company’s shares on the open market. When the Plan purchases shares with the proceeds of the Company loans, the shares are pledged as collateral for its debt. The shares are maintained in a suspense account until released and allocated to participant accounts. The Plan owns 148,382 shares of the Company’s stock at December 31, 2012. All shares held by the Plan have been released and allocated. The dividends paid by the Company on shares held by the Plan are allocated to the participant accounts. The Plan had no debt to the Company at December 31, 2012.
The Company had compensation expense for contributions of $18,000 to the ESOP plan for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
In the event a terminated ESOP participant desires to sell his or her shares of the Company’s stock and the shares are not readily tradable, the Company may be required to purchase the shares from the participant at their fair market value. At December 31, 2012, 148,382 shares of the Company’s stock, with an aggregate fair market value of approximately $559,000, are held by ESOP participants who, if terminated, would be subject to the repurchase requirement.
Profit sharing plan and savings plan
The Company has a salary reduction and profit sharing plan which conforms to IRS provisions for 401(k) plans. The Company may make profit sharing contributions with the approval of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors approved Company contributions of $18,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, in addition to its matching of 401(k) salary reductions, which totaled $61,000 and $64,000 for 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Note 10. Discontinued Operations
On September 16, 2011, the Company sold its entire interest in its AutoData Systems Division to Auto Data Inc. (ADI). The purchase price will be paid as an earn-out based on three percent of the software, hardware, and maintenance contracts that ADI sells over the next five years (four percent while ADI continues to occupy our building). As of December 30, 2012 and 2011, ADI owed the Company approximately $0 and $3,000, respectively, under the earn-out. The amount is included in other assets on the balance sheet.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized approximately $13,000 and $3,000, respectively, as other income from ADI under the earn-out agreement.
The division, a separate operating segment as described in Note 12, designed and marketed desktop software based systems that read hand printed characters, checkmarks and bar code information from scanned or faxed forms, in addition to collecting and reporting data from web forms.
The financial results of the discontinued operation are as follows:
The effect of the discontinued operation on the financial position of the Company, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:
Note 11. Income Taxes
The components of the income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 differs from the amount obtained by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income due to the following:
The components of the net deferred tax liability consist of:
The Company is subject to the following material taxing jurisdictions: U.S. and Minnesota. The tax years that remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service are 2009 through 2012. The tax years that remain open to examination by the Minnesota Department of Revenue are 2008 through 2012. We have no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions as of January 1, 2012 or December 31, 2012.
Note 12. Segment Information
Prior to September 16, 2011, the Company had three reportable operating segments based on the nature of its product lines: Production Monitoring, AutoData Systems, and Investments. The AutoData Systems segment was sold on September 16, 2011 as described in Note 10. The operations of that segment are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements and are excluded from the presentation of segment information from continuing operations in this note. The reclassification of AutoData Systems to discontinued operations had no impact on the results of operations presented for the Production Monitoring or Investments segments.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company has two reportable operating segments: Production Monitoring and Investments. The Production Monitoring Division manufactures and markets a complete line of production monitoring equipment, in particular speed monitoring and motor control systems for industrial machinery. ESI Investment Company holds investments in marketable and non-marketable securities.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1. In evaluating segment performance, management focuses on sales and income before taxes. The Company has no inter-segment sales.
The following is financial information relating to the continuing operating segments:
Note 13. Subsequent Events
On January 23, 2013, the Company declared a $.04 dividend on its common stock, payable on February 22, 2013 to shareholders of record as of February 8, 2013.
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company has sold 7,500 shares of Rudolph Technology stock for proceeds of $104,000 resulting in a gain on the sale of $103,000.
On March 18, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized and approved the Electro-Sensors, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”), subject to approval by the stockholders on or before March 18, 2014.
Item 9.
Item 9.
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The person serving as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, the person serving as the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework.” These criteria are in the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. The Company’s assessment included extensive documenting, evaluating and testing the design and operating effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the person serving as the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer has concluded that the Company’s internal controls were effective as of December 31, 2012.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2012, which were identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Item 9B.
Other Information.
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 24, 2013 (“Annual Meeting”).
Item 10.
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance - Code of Ethics and Business Conduct” and “Corporate Governance - Audit Committee” that appear in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting. Information concerning the Company’s executive officers is included in the sections referred to above.
Item 11.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Executive Compensation” that appears in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting.
Item 12.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by Item 12 relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” that appears in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting.
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2012 about the Company’s equity compensation plans.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
(1) Includes 250 shares issuable pursuant to the 1997 Stock Option Plan and 71,956 shares issuable pursuant to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Item 13.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Corporate Governance - Independence,” “Election of Directors” and “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” that appear in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting.
Item 14.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by Item 14 relating to principal accounting fees and services is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Disclosure of Fees Paid to Independent Auditors” that appears in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements.
Reference is made to the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on Page 11 hereof.
Financial Statement Schedules.
The Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted either because they are not required or because the information has been included in the financial statements or the notes thereto included in this Annual Report.
Exhibits.
See “Exhibit Index” on the page following the signatures.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
(Power of Attorney)
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints BRADLEY D. SLYE as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all said attorney-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Bradley D. Slye
Chairman, President and Director (CEO and CFO)
March 22, 2013
/s/ Joseph A. Marino
Director
March 22, 2013
/s/ Geoffrey W. Miller
Director
March 22, 2013
/s/ Michael C. Zipoy
Director
March 22, 2013
/s/ Jeffrey D. Peterson
Director
March 22, 2013
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
EXHIBIT INDEX TO FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2012
Commission File No. 0-9587
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
^3.1
Registrant’s Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended-incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s 1991 Form 10-KSB
^3.2
Registrant’s Bylaws, as amended to date-incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s 1997 Form 10-KSB
4.1
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
^*10.1
Electro-Sensors, Inc.’s 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan - incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1996 Proxy Statement for the Company’s 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
^*10.2
Electro-Sensors, Inc.’s 1997 Stock Option Plan and forms of Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Agreements thereunder-incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s 1997 Form 10-KSB
*10.3
Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Directors
*10.4
Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officers
Subsidiaries of Registrant (Name and State of Incorporation):
ESI Investment Company-Minnesota
Senstar Corporation-Minnesota
24.1
Power of Attorney (see Signature page)
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1
Letter to Shareholders dated March 5, 2013
99.2
Investor Information
The following financial information from Electro-Sensors, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2012, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.**
^
Incorporated by reference to a previously filed report or document-SEC File No. 0-9587
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
**
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings.