ITEM 1. Business 4
Item 1A.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
The purchase of shares of capital stock of the Company involves many risks. A prospective investor should carefully consider the following factors before making a decision to purchase any such shares:
The Company Has Historically Lost Money and Losses May Continue in the Future:
Except for 2009 when the Company booked a net operating gain of $514,737 including an unrealized appreciation in value of our stock option investment of $805,900, the Company has historically lost money. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company had a net investment loss of $122,173 excluding our realized and unrealized gain from investments. Accordingly, we may experience significant liquidity and cash flow problems if we are not able to raise additional capital as needed on acceptable terms. No assurances can be given we will be successful in reaching or maintaining profitable operations and future losses are likely to occur.
The Company has incurred losses since its inception and, as a result, has an accumulated deficit of $8,421,673 at December 31, 2012. The net investment loss was $122,173 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012 compared to a net investment loss of $127,996 for the same period last year. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern depends upon obtaining sufficient financing to maintain adequate liquidity until such time as operations produce positive cash flow. However, there can be no assurance these actions will be successful.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if the Company was forced to discontinue its operations.
The Company's cash expenses are very large relative to its cash flow which requires the Company continually to sell shares from its investments. This could result in substantial dilution to our shareholders equity or our ability to continue in operations should additional capital not be raised:
For years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company had no investment income and had operating expenses of $122,173 and $127,996 respectively. Consequently, the Company was required to sell shares of the Company's inventory of investment common stock to raise the cash necessary to pay ongoing expenses. Net proceeds from the sale of securities in 2012 amounted to $76,639. This practice is likely to continue for the foreseeable future and could lead to continuing dilution in net asset value for the Company's stockholders. Moreover, there is no assurance the Company will be able to find investors willing to purchase Company shares at a price and on terms acceptable to the Company, in which case, the Company could further deplete its cash resources.
Regulations governing operations of a business development company will affect the Company's ability to raise, and the way in which the Company raises additional capital. This could result in the Company not being able to raise additional capital and accordingly cease operations:
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, the Company is permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts such that asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of portfolio assets declines, the Company may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, the Company may be required to sell a portion of its investments and, depending on the nature of the Company's leverage, repay a portion of its indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous and result in unfavorable prices. Applicable law requires that business development companies may invest 70% of its assets only in privately held U.S. companies, small, publicly traded U.S. companies, certain high-quality debt, and cash. The Company is not generally able to issue and sell common stock at a price below net asset value per share. The Company may, however, sell common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire common stock, at prices below the current net asset value of the common stock if the Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which the Company's securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of the Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount)
The success of the Company will depend in part on its size, and in part on management's ability to make successful investments:
If the Company is unable to select profitable investments, the Company will not achieve its objectives. Moreover, if the size of the Company remains small, operating expenses will be higher as a percentage of invested capital than would otherwise be the case, which increases the risk of loss (and reduces the chance for gain) for investors.
The Company's investment activities are inherently risky:
The Company's investment activities involve a significant degree of risk. The performance of any investment is subject to numerous factors which are neither within the control of nor predictable by the Company. Such factors include a wide range of economic, political, competitive and other conditions which may affect investments in general or specific industries or companies.
The Company's equity investments may lose all or part of their value, causing the Company to lose all or part of its investment in those companies:
The equity interests in which the Company invests may not appreciate in value and may decline in value. Accordingly, the Company may not be able to realize gains from its investments and any gains realized on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any losses experienced. Moreover, the Company's primary objective is to invest in early stage companies, the products or services of which will frequently not have demonstrated market acceptance. Many portfolio companies lack depth of management and have limited financial resources. All of these factors make investments in the Company's portfolio companies particularly risky.
The Company's common stock is trading at a substantial discount to net asset value:
The following summarizes the Company's approximate net asset value per common share and corresponding stock price:
As of December 31, 2012
2011 2010 2009 2008
Net Asset Value $0.09 $0.10 $0.41 $0.45 $0.31
Stock Price* 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.11
*Stock Price is the closing price as of the last trading day in December of each corresponding year.
At present the Company is trading at a discount to Net Asset Value. In 2005, the Company's common stock traded at a substantial premium to its net asset value. Moreover, as the Company utilizes and monetizes its investment assets for its continuing operating needs the Net Asset Value may decrease, potentially affecting the price of the Company's common stock.
Our common stock is traded on the "Over-the-Counter Pink Sheet" market, which may make it more difficult for investors to resell their shares due to suitability requirements:
Our common stock is currently traded on the Over the Counter Pink Sheets under the symbol (RONE) where we expect it to remain in the foreseeable future. Broker-dealers often decline to trade in OTC Pink Sheet stocks given the markets for such securities are often limited, the stocks are more volatile, and the risk to investors is greater. These factors may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of their shares. This could cause our stock price to decline.
We could fail to retain or attract key personnel who are required in order for us to fully carry out our business plan:
The Company's operations and ability to implement its business plan are dependent upon the efforts of its key personnel, the loss of the services of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company will likely be required to hire additional personnel to implement its business plan. Qualified employees and consultants are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future. Competition for skilled, creative and technical talent is intense. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. Any failure by the Company to retain the services of existing employees and consultants or to hire new employees when necessary could have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Our future success depends in significant part on the continued services of Charles J. Newman, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and CFO. We have no employment agreement with or company life insurance on Mr. Newman.
The Company operates in a highly competitive market:
The Company faces competition from a number of sources, many of which have longer operating histories, and significantly greater financial, management, marketing and other resources than the Company. The Company's ability to generate new portfolio clients depends to a significant degree on its reputation among potential clients and partners, and its ability to reach acceptable investment terms with potential clients relative to competitive alternatives. In the event that the reputation of the Company is adversely impacted, or that potential portfolio clients perceive competitive alternatives to be superior, the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company could be adversely affected.
Our officers and directors have the ability to exercise significant influence over matters submitted for stockholder approval and their interests may differ from other stockholders:
Our executive officers and directors have the ability to appoint a majority to the Board of Directors. Accordingly, our directors and executive officers, whether acting alone or together, may have significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our Board for approval, including issuing common and preferred stock, appointing officers, which could have a material impact on mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and the power to prevent or cause a change in control. The interests of these board members may differ from the interests of the other stockholders.
Our share ownership is concentrated:
The Company's officers, directors and principal stockholders, together with their affiliates, beneficially own approximately 70% of the Company's voting shares. As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, will exert significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the assets, as well as any charter amendment and other matters requiring stockholder approval. In addition, these stockholders may dictate the day to day management of the business. This concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control and may have a negative impact on the market price of the Company's common stock by discouraging third party investors. In addition, the interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with the interests of the Company's other stockholders.
We may change our investment policies without further shareholder approval:
Although we are limited by the Investment Company Act of 1940 with respect to the percentage of our assets that must be invested in qualified investment companies, we are not limited with respect to the minimum standard that any investment company must meet, neither are we limited to the industries in which those investment companies must operate. We may make investments without shareholder approval and such investments may deviate significantly from our historic operations. Any change in our investment policy or selection of investments could adversely affect our stock price, liquidity, and the ability of our shareholders to sell their stock.
The Company's common stock may be subject to the penny stock rules which might make it harder for stockholders to sell:
As a result of our stock price, our shares are subject to the penny stock rules. Because a "penny stock" is, generally speaking, one selling for less than $5.00 per share, the Company's common stock may be subject to the foregoing rules. The application of the penny stock rules may affect stockholders' ability to sell their shares because some broker-dealers may not be willing to make a market in the Company's common stock because of the burdens imposed upon them by the penny stock rules which include but are not limited to:
Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rules 15g-1 through 15g-6, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell Company securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors.
Rule 15g-2 declares unlawful any broker-dealer transactions in penny stocks unless the broker-dealer has first provided to the customer a standardized disclosure document.
Rule 15g-3 provides that it is unlawful for a broker-dealer to engage in a penny stock transaction unless the broker-dealer first discloses and subsequently confirms to the customer the current quotation prices or similar market information concerning the penny stock in question.
Rule 15g-4 prohibits broker-dealers from completing penny stock transactions for a customer unless the broker-dealer first discloses to the customer the amount of compensation or other remuneration received as a result of the penny stock transaction.
Rule 15g-5 requires that a broker-dealer executing a penny stock transaction, other than one exempt under Rule 15g-1, disclose to its customer, at the time of or prior to the transaction, information about the sales persons compensation.
Potential shareholders of the Company should also be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) "boiler room" practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses.
Limited regulatory oversight may require potential investors to fend for themselves:
The Company has elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act which makes the Company exempt from some provisions of that statute. The Company is not registered as a broker-dealer or investment advisor because the nature of its proposed activities does not require it to do so; moreover it is not registered as a commodity pool operator under the Commodity Exchange Act, based on its intention not to trade commodities or financial futures. However, the Company is a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result of this limited regulatory oversight, the Company is not subject to certain operating limitations, capital requirements, or reporting obligations that might otherwise apply and investors may be left to fend for themselves.
The Company's concentration of portfolio company securities:
The Company will attempt to hold the securities of several different portfolio companies. However, a significant amount of the Company's holdings could be concentrated in the securities of only a few companies. This risk is particularly acute during this time period of early Company's operations, which could result in significant concentration with respect to a particular issuer or industry. The concentration of the Company's portfolio in any one issuer or industry would subject the Company to a greater degree of risk with respect to the failure of one or a few issuers or with respect to economic downturns in such industry than would be the case with a more diversified portfolio. At December 31, 2012, 91% of the Company's asset value resulted from a single portfolio holding.
The unlikelihood of cash distributions:
Although the Company has the corporate power to make cash distributions, such distributions are not among the Company's objectives. Consequently, management does not expect to make any cash distributions in the immediate future.
Because many of the Company's portfolio securities will be recorded at values as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors, the prices at which the Company is able to dispose of these holdings may differ from their respective recorded values:
The Company values its portfolio securities at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and market prices to the extent necessary to reflect significant events affecting the value of such securities. The Board of Directors may retain an independent valuation firm to aid it on a selective basis in making fair value determinations. The types of factors that may be considered in fair value pricing of an investment include the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison of the portfolio company to (other) publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow of the portfolio company, and other relevant factors.
Because such valuations are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate during short periods of time, and may be based on estimates. Determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. As a result, the Company may not be able to dispose of its holdings at a price equal to or greater than the determined fair value. Net asset value could be adversely affected if the determination regarding the fair value of Company investments is materially higher than the values ultimately realized upon the disposal of such securities.
The lack of liquidity in the Company's portfolio securities would probably prevent the Company from disposing of them at opportune times and prices, which may cause a loss and/or reduce again:
The Company will frequently hold securities in privately held companies. Some of these securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of such investments may make it difficult to sell such investments at advantageous times and prices or in a timely manner. In addition, if the Company is required to liquidate all or a portion of its portfolio quickly, it may realize significantly less than the values recorded for such investments. The Company may also face other restrictions on its ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that the Company has material non-public information regarding such portfolio company. If the Company is unable to sell its assets at opportune times, it might suffer a loss and/or reduce a gain. Restrictions on resale and limited liquidity are both factors the Board will consider in determining fair value of portfolio securities. Moreover, even holdings in publicly-traded securities are likely to be relatively illiquid because the market for companies of the type in which the Company invests tend to be thin and usually cannot accommodate large volume trades.
Holding securities of privately held companies may be riskier than holding securities of publicly traded companies due to the lack of available public information:
The Company may hold securities in privately-held companies subject to higher risk than holdings in publicly traded companies. Generally, little public information exists about privately held companies, and the Company will be required to rely on the ability of management to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential risks and returns involved in investing in these companies. If the Company is unable to uncover all material information about these companies, it may not make a fully informed investment decision, and it may lose some or all of the money it invests in these companies. These factors could subject the Company to greater risk than holding securities in publicly traded companies and negatively affect investment returns.
The market values of publicly traded portfolio companies are likely to be extremely volatile:
Our clients tend to be early stage biotech companies. As a result, their operations and futures are highly dependent on their ability to develop products and successfully bring them to the marketplace. Unlike more seasoned companies with historical financial projections that can be used to evaluate performance, our clients typically do not possess such historical figures. Accordingly, the publically traded shares of our portfolio companies will generally be thinly traded and may be subject to volatile swings in value.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Company does not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our operation. Our offices are located at 10002 E. Calle De Las Brisas, Scottsdale, AZ 85255. The primary purpose of our office is to have a physical location at which to receive mail. Our part-time employee and consultants work from virtual offices. We believe the use of virtual offices will be adequate for our present business needs.
Item 3.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of the date of this annual report and subsequent events, there are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings relating to our company or properties to which we are a party, and to our knowledge there are no other material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which have a material interest adverse to us.
Item 4.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLSOURES
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock is currently traded on the Over the Counter Pink Sheets under the symbol RONE where we expect it to remain in the foreseeable future. Broker-dealers often decline to trade in OTC Pink Sheet stocks given the markets for such securities are often limited, the stocks are more volatile, and the risk to investors is greater. These factors may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of their shares. This could cause our stock price to decline.
Quarter Ending Quarterly High Quarterly Low
Dec. 31, 2012 $ 0.25 $0.02
Sep. 30, 2012 $ 0.10 $0.04
Jun. 30, 2012 $ 0.09 $0.04
Mar. 31, 2012 $ 0.09 $0.04
Dec. 31, 2011 $ 0.06 $0.06
Sep. 30, 2011 $ 0.06 $0.06
Jun. 30, 2011 $ 0.15 $0.15
Mar. 31, 2011 $ 0.08 $0.08
Dec. 31, 2010 $ 0.06 $0.03
Sep. 30, 2010 $ 0.06 $0.03
Jun. 30, 2010 $ 0.10 $0.06
Mar. 31, 2010 $ 0.10 $0.03
Notwithstanding the forgoing, our common stock is sporadically and thinly trading. Accordingly, although there appears to be quotation information, the Company does not believe that there exists an established public market for our securities. Further, there can be no assurance the current market for the Company's common stock will be sustained or grow in the future.
Holders of record
As of March 15, 2013, there were:
621 shareholders of our common stock; and
5 shareholders of our preferred stock.
The Company feels the actual number of common stock holders may be significantly higher as 2,386,067 common shares are held in street name which is 65.7% of the total common shares outstanding.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Except as otherwise noted, the securities described were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Each such issuance was made pursuant to individual contracts, which are discrete from one another and are made only with persons who had knowledge of and access to sufficient information about the Company to make an informed investment decision and were sophisticated in such transactions. No commissions were paid in connection with the transactions described below unless specifically noted. The information relates as to all securities of the Company sold by the Company within the past three years which were not registered under the Securities Act. Including sales of reacquired securities, as well as new issues, securities issued in exchange for property, services, or other securities, and new securities resulting from the modification of outstanding securities:
There were no sales of Regal One Corporation unregistered securities in 2012 or 2011.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
1995 Employee & Consultant Incentive Benefit Plan
Our board of directors adopted the 1995 Employee & Consultant Incentive Benefit Plan ("1995 Stock Plan") on May 3, 1995, and it was subsequently approved by our stockholders. The 1995 Stock Plan provided for the grant of stock options or stock to our employees, directors, and consultants. The 1995 Stock Plan originally provided for the issuance of 3,000,000 shares of which 2,019,014 are issued and outstanding. As of December 31, 2012, there were no outstanding options to purchase any additional shares under the plan as the plan has been cancelled.
Item 6.
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Financial Position as of December 31:
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
--------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $467,401 $460,662 $1,521,219 $1,676,604 $1,181,256
Total liabilities $149,899 $91,020 $19,465 $41,138 $60,528
Net assets $317,502 $369,642 $1,501,754 $1,635,466 $1,120,728
Net asset value per
outstanding share $0.087 $0.102 $0.413 $0.450 $0.308
Common shares
outstanding 3,633,067 3,633,067 3,633,067 3,633,067 3,633,067
Operating Data for the last five fiscal years ended December 31:
2011 2010 2009 2008
--------------------------------------------------------
Total investment income $- $- $- $- $-
Total expenses 122,173 127,996 165,436 298,027 314,952
Payable settlement gain - - 63,484 - -
Net investment loss $(122,173) $(127,996) $(101,952)$(298,027)$(314,952)
Stock dividends $- $600 $- $- $-
Item 7.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a financial services company which coaches and assists biomedical companies through the use of our network of professionals in listing their securities on over the counter or national exchanges. Typically these services are provided to early stage biomedical companies who can benefit from our network of professionals and other partners. As a result of our clients' early stage of development, they typically have limited resources and compensate us for our services in capital stock. Accordingly, although our primary business is to provide consulting services and not to be engaged, directly or through wholly-owned subsidiaries, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, we may nonetheless be considered an investment company as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act). In order to lessen the regulatory restrictions associated with the requirements of the 1940 Act, on June 16, 2005 we elected to be treated as a Business Development Company (BDC) in accordance with sections 55 through 65 of the 1940 Act. Results reported prior to 2005 are based on prior operations.
Managerial Assistance
As a business development company we will offer and provide upon request managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. As defined under the 1940 Act, managerial assistance means providing "significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations, or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company."
Financial Condition Overview
The Company's total assets were $467,401 and its net assets were $317,502 at December 31, 2012, compared to $460,662 and $369,642 at December 31, 2011. Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations changed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 to a decrease of $52,140 from a decrease of $1,131,512 in 2011. The decrease was mainly attributable to the unrealized losses in our stock investment and warrants during 2011. Net investment loss (total operating expenses) decreased by $5,823 compared to 2011.
During 2012, the Company realized a gain of $76,639 on the sale of investment securities and also had unrealized depreciation in its investment portfolio of $30,006. The Company sold 70,500 shares of portfolio stock at an investment cost of $3,026. The Company also booked an unrealized gain in investments in warrants of $23,400 due to change in the fair value of the stock warrants.
During 2012 the Company increased liabilities by approximately $58,900 which was primarily a result of an increase in a note payable with a related party.
The Company's unrealized appreciation (depreciation) varies significantly from period to period as a result of the wide fluctuations in value of the Company's portfolio securities. Our financial condition is dependent on a number of factors including the ability of each portfolio company to effectuate its respective strategies with the Company's help. These businesses are frequently thinly capitalized, unproven, small companies that may lack management depth, and may be dependent on new or commercially unproven technologies, and may have no operating history.
The company has incurred losses since its inception and, as a result, has an accumulated deficit of $8,421,673 at December 31, 2012. The net investment loss was $122,173 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to a net investment loss of $127,996 for the same period last year. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern depends upon obtaining sufficient financing to maintain adequate liquidity until such time as operations produce positive cash flow. However, there can be no assurance these actions will be successful.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if the Company was forced to discontinue its operations.
Result of Operations for the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2012 and 2011
Investment Income
We anticipate generating revenue in the form of capital gains or losses on equity securities that we acquire in portfolio companies and subsequently sell. Potentially, we also anticipate receiving dividend income on any common or preferred stock that we own should a dividend be declared. The Company did not have any investment income during 2012 or 2011.
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was a gain of $70,033 and a loss of $1,003,516, respectively. The significant loss during 2011 was primarily related to the decrease in the share price of Neuralstem, Inc.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist mostly of fees paid to outside attorneys, consultants, and accountants in connection with the advisory services we provide our clients and to a lesser extent for general overhead.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, operating expenses were $122,173 compared to $127,996 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease of $5,823 for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the comparable period of 2011 is primarily attributable to decreases in legal expenses. The Company plans to decrease its operational expenses in 2013 if no more companies are added to our portfolio.
Net Investment Income/(Loss)
For the twelve months ending December 31, 2012, our net investment loss amounted to $122,173. This compares to a loss of $127,996 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The 2012 operating expenses consisted primarily of legal fees, professional services and consulting fees.
The Company anticipates our net investment loss will increase upon the addition of more companies to our portfolio, and if we can hold onto the securities of our portfolio companies for long term capital growth. Currently we have been selling the securities in our investment portfolio to finance our operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2012, we had $467,401 in assets consisting of: $19,121 in cash, $22,708 in prepaid insurance, and $425,572 in investments.
For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012, we satisfied our working capital needs from cash on hand at the beginning of the period and the net proceeds from the sale of marketable securities in the amount of $79,309. As of December 31, 2012, the Company's net asset value (Equity) was $317,502.
From inception, the Company has relied on the infusion of capital through capital share transactions and loans. The Company plans to either: (i) dispose of its current portfolio securities to meet operational needs; or (ii) borrow against such securities via a traditional margin account or other such credit facility. Any such dispositions may have to be made at inopportune times and there is no assurance that, in light of the lack of liquidity in such shares, they could be sold at all, or if sold, could bring values approximating the estimates of fair value set forth in the Company financial statements. Additionally, in the event the Company enters into a margin agreement with regard to any portfolio securities, a decrease in their market value may result in a liquidation of such securities which could greatly depress the value of such securities in the market.
Because our revenues, if generated, tend to be in the form of portfolio securities, such revenues are not of a type capable of being used to satisfy the Company's ongoing monthly expenses. Consequently, for us to be able to avoid having to defer expenses or sell portfolio companies' securities to raise cash to pay operating expenses, we are constantly seeking to secure adequate funding under acceptable terms. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to do so. Further, if the Company is unable to secure adequate funding under acceptable terms, there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as a going concern.
Contractual Obligations
Less than 1-3 3-5 More than
Total 1 year years years 5 years
Insurance financing $16,519 $16,519 $ - $ - $ -
Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management's most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. In preparing the financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the financial statements, management has utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. As our expected operating plans occur we will describe additional critical accounting policies in the notes to our financial statements in addition to those discussed below.
Set forth below is a summary of the significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies that management believes are important to the preparation of our financial statements. Certain of our accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. These significant accounting estimates include:
Valuation of Portfolio Investments
At December 31, 2012, the Company owned 280,000 common shares of Neuralstem, Inc. held as an investment. These shares had a valuation of $305,200 based on the closing market price of the stock. 70,500 shares were sold in 2012 to finance Company operations. 217,500 of these shares are not restricted and are freely tradable with 62,500 shares being restricted as they are held as collateral for a note payable to a related party.
Regal One also has one ten year warrant for 1,000,000 common shares of Neuralstem at an exercise price of $5 per share which is significantly above the present fair market value of Neuralstem shares. There is currently no market for Neuralstem stock options. The price of the publicly traded common stock is used as a significant input in the valuation process.
As of December 31, 2012, using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model, a $118,800 value has been assigned to this warrant including a 10% discount assigned by management due to low trading volume of Neuralstem common stock. Regal recorded a $23,400 unrealized gain on the investment in 2012 due to increases in the fair value as determined by the Black-Scholes model.
The Board of Directors is responsible for determining in good faith the fair value of the securities and assets held by the Company. The Investment Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted provisions for valuation of the portfolio as described in Note 1 under Fair Value Accounting through ASC 820. The Investment Committee bases its determination on, among other things, applicable quantitative and qualitative factors. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of securities, the nature of the business of the portfolio company, the marketability of and the valuation of securities of publicly traded companies in the same or similar industries, current financial conditions and operating results of the portfolio company, sales and earnings growth of the portfolio company, operating revenues of the portfolio company, competitive conditions, and current and prospective conditions in the overall stock market. Without a readily recognized market value, the estimated value of some portfolio securities may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if there was a ready market for such equity securities.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our business activities contain high elements of risk. The Company considers a principal type of market risk to be a valuation risk. All assets are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Board of Directors (which is based, in part, on quoted market prices of similar investments).
Market prices of common equity securities in general, are subject to fluctuations which could cause the amount to be realized upon sale to differ significantly from the current reported value. The fluctuations may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the Company's portfolio companies, the relative prices of alternative investments, general market conditions and supply and demand imbalances for a particular security.
Neither the Company's investments nor an investment in the Company is intended to constitute a balanced investment program. The Company will be subject to exposure in the public-market pricing and the risks inherent therein. For a further discussion of the risk associated with the Company, please refer to the section of this annual report entitled "Risk Factors".
Item 8.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements for Regal One Corporation are annexed in PART IV of this report.
Item 9.
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Effective February 5, 2013, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Regal One Corporation (“Regal” or the “Registrant” or the “Issuer”) engaged the Minneapolis, MN firm of Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell and Co. P.L.L.P as the Independent Registered Public Accountant to audit Regal One Corporation’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2012. During the Registrant’s two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period, Regal One Corporation did not consult with Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell and Co. P.L.L.P. or any of its members about the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction or any other matter. The decision to change accountants was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Regal consisting of Charles J. Newman (Chairman), Bernard L. Brodkorb, and Malcom R. Currie.
The engagement effective February 5, 2013 of Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell and Co. P.L.L.P. as the new Independent Registered Public Accountant for Regal Once Corporation necessarily results in the termination or dismissal of the principal accountant which audited Regal One Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, Seale and Beers, CPA’s, Las Vegas, NV.
During the Registrant’s two most recent years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the subsequent interim periods, there were no disagreements between the Registrant and Seale and Beers, CPA’s concerning any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which disagreements, if not resolved to Seale and Beers, CPA’s satisfaction would have caused them to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their reports; there were no reportable events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v)of Regulation S-K.
Seale and Beers, CPA’s report dated April 16, 2012 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, but did include an emphasis-of- matter paragraph describing the conditions that raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Regal has provided Seale and Beers, CPA’s with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested from Seale and Beers, CPA’s a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether Seale and Beers, CPA’s agrees with the statements made by Regal One Corporation in response to Item 304 (a) of Regulation S-K and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company's management, under the direction, supervision, and involvement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has carried out an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") of the Company. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer has concluded that disclosure controls and procedures in place at the Company are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.
(b) Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the direction, supervision and participation of the Company's management, including our Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officers, the Company's management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO-Framework"). Based on the results of this evaluation under the COSO Framework, management has concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2012.
The Company has not established adequate financial reporting monitoring activities to mitigate the risk of management override. Specifically, there is a lack of segregation of duties as there is only one officer/employee overseeing the finance department. Although the controls are not effective, this material weakness did not result in any material misstatements in our financial statements.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules for non-accelerated filers by the Securities and Exchange Commission permitting the company to provide only management's report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
No stock options were issued or stock grants granted during fiscal year 2012. Regal's Chief Executive Officer did not receive any salary or other compensation other than direct expense reimbursements.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers
None in 2012.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our directors, executive officers and significant employees as of December 31, 2012. Except as noted below each director will hold office until the next annual meeting of our stockholders or until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.
Name Age Current Position Position
Held Since
Charles J. Newman 67 Chairman of the Board,
CEO, CFO, Secretary,
Treasurer, and Director 2008
Dr. Malcolm Currie 85 Director 1995
Bernard L. Brodkorb 71 Director 2009
CHARLES J. NEWMAN is the present Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer appointed on June 16, 2008. Mr. Newman is a private investor with corporate management experience. From 1982 to the present, Mr. Newman has been serving as Chief Executive Officer of NCJ Corporation from 1985 to the present. Mr. Newman has been serving as the Chief Executive Officer of Mid America Venture Capital Fund, Inc. Mr. Newman has been serving since 1988 as the Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln Loan and Finance Corporation, National Acceptance Corporation and Ambassador Finance Co., Inc. and Director of Mid America Capital Corp. Since 1992 Mr. Newman has served as the President and Director of the Max and Gertrude Newman - Charles and Phyllis Newman Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable foundation as defined by the US Internal Revenue Service Code. From 2000 to the present, Mr. Newman has served as Vice-President and Director of Doubletree Capital Partners, LLC. He is also a Director of North Central Capital Corporation.
DR. MALCOLM CURRIE was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors in 1995 and CEO, CFO of the Company in August 2001 and served in those capacities until June 16, 2008. He remains in his position as Director. From 1969 to 1973, Dr. Currie was the Undersecretary of Research and Engineering for the Office of Defense. From 1973 to 1977, Dr. Currie was President of the Missile Systems Group for Hughes Aircraft Corporation. From 1977 to 1988, Dr. Currie started as Executive Vice President and eventually became Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Hughes Aircraft Corporation. From 1992 to present, Dr. Currie has been Chairman Emeritus of Hughes Aircraft Corporation. Dr. Currie is also on the Board of Directors of LSI Logic, Enova Systems, and Innovative Micro Technologies. Dr. Currie obtained a graduate MBA from the University of California, Berkeley, and a PhD in Engineering and Physics at the University of California, Berkeley.
BERNARD L. BRODKORB was appointed to the Board of Directors on February 1, 2009. Mr. Brodkorb has served on the Board of Directors of ISA Internationale Inc., a public company, for over eleven years. He has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer from February 2001 to present. Mr. Brodkorb has been an independent practicing licensed Certified Public Accountant (CPA) within the State of Minnesota for many years, and has extensive experience in financial and accounting matters relating to both private and public companies, including auditing, financial consulting, and advising on corporate taxation. He is a member of the Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Item 11.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
For the year ended December 31, 2012 there was no executive or director compensation. One director received consulting fees for work performed not related to being a director.
INDEMNIFICATION
As permitted by the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Florida, the Company has the power to indemnify any officer or director who was or is a party to or threatens to become a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that the officer or director of the corporation acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Company. Any such person may be indemnified against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and settlements in defense of any action, suit or proceeding. The Company maintains directors and officers liability insurance which provides protection and coverage for directors and officers.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers, directors, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity securities to file an initial report of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such officers, directors and ten percent (10%) shareholders are also required by the SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
In 2012 Charles J. Newman filed a periodic Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership on Form 4. Based solely on review of copies of such forms received by the Company, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required, we believe its executive officers, directors and ten percent (10%) shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
At the end of fiscal year 2012, there were no outstanding equity awards, unexercised options exercisable or unexercisable, and no equity incentive plan awards that are vested or not vested due to Officers of the Company or outside consultants.
SUMMARY NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the compensation for our non-employee board of directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012:
Nonqualified
Fees Earned Non-Equity Deferred
Or paid Stock Option Incentive Compensation All Other
Name in Cash Awards Awards Compensation Earnings Compensation Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$0 0 0 0 0 0. 0
No additional Director compensation has been authorized for services for the period from January 1, through December 31, 2012 and through the date of this Form 10-K report filing.
Item 12.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information, to the best knowledge of the Company, as of March 29, 2013 with respect to each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, each director and officer, and all directors and officers as a group.
Name and Address Common Share Percent of
of Equivalents Common Share
Beneficial owner beneficially owned Equivalents owned (1)
Charles J. Newman, Officer and Director
P.O. Box 25610
Scottsdale, AZ 85255 2,234,300 16.39%
Malcolm Currie, Director (2)
11300 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 800
Los Angeles, California 90064 2,024,200 14.85%
C.B. Family Trust (Richard Babbitt)(3)
10104 Empyrean Way
Los Angeles, California 90067 1,400,000 10.27%
AB Investments LLC (4)
4235 Cornell Road
Agoura, CA 91301 3,841,500 28.18%
Aaron Grunfeld (5)
10390 Santa Monica Blvd., 4th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90025-5057 1,200,000 8.80%
Bernard L. Brodkorb, Director
2560 Rice Street
Saint Paul, MN 55113 47,000 0.34%
All Officers and Directors as a Group 4,305,550 31.58%
(1) Includes (i) 3,633,067 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012, and (ii) 10,000,000 maximum common shares upon the conversion of the Series B preferred class, and totals to 13,633,067 fully diluted common share equivalents outstanding. Each share of Preferred Stock is convertible into 100 shares of voting common stock. Of the Preferred Stock outstanding, 30,585 shares (30.6%) are held by a Director of the Company (Dr. Malcolm Currie, 20,242 shares and Charles Newman, 10,343 shares).
(2) 20,242 Series B preferred shares convertible into 2,024,200 common shares.
(3) 14,000 Series B preferred shares convertible into 1,400,000 common shares.
(4) 38,415 Series B preferred shares convertible into 3,841,500 common shares.
(5) 12,000 Series B preferred shares convertible into 1,200,000 common shares.
Item 13.
Item 13. TRANSACTIONS AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The Board has adopted a policy relating to the approval of transactions with related persons that are required to be disclosed in statements by SEC regulations, which are commonly referred to as "Related Person Transactions." A "related person" is defined under the applicable SEC regulation and includes our directors, executive officers and 5% or more beneficial owners of our common stock. The Board administers the procedures with regards to related person transactions. Approval of a related person transaction requires the affirmative vote of the majority of disinterested directors. In approving any related person transaction, the disinterested directors must determine that the transaction is fair and reasonable to the Company.
Summarized below are certain transactions and business relationships between Regal One Corporation and persons who are or were an executive officer, director or holder of more than five percent of any class of our securities during the last two fiscal years:
For the year ended December 31, 2012, Mr. Bernard L. Brodkorb who is a Director of Regal received $58,650 in fee compensation for providing accounting and financial reporting services not related to his duties as a Director of Regal One Corporation. He received $58,650 for these services in 2011 and no compensation for being a Director.
Item 14.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by the Company's auditors (Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell, and Co. P.L.L.P.) for the professional services rendered in connection with the annual audit of the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $11,000.
Audit Related Fees: None
Tax Fees: None
All Other Fees: None
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included as part of this Annual Report on form 10-K. References to "the Company" in this Exhibit List mean Regal One Corporation, a Florida corporation.
Exhibit
Number Description
31.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350*
* Filed herewith
Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statements required by Item 15 of this form are filed as a separate part of this report following Part IV:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and at December 31, 2011
Statement of Investments as of December 31, 2012
Statement of Investments as of December 31, 2011
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Statements of Operations
Statements of Cash Flows
Statements of Financial Highlights
Notes to Financial Statements Pages 33-41
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements and the notes thereto.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Regal One Corporation
By:
/S/ Charles J. Newman
Charles J. Newman
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and
Chairman of the Board
Dated: April 11, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME TITLE DATE
/s/ Charles J. Newman Chief Executive Officer, April 11, 2013
Charles J. Newman Chief Financial Officer, and
Chairman of the Board
/s/ Malcolm Currie Director April 11, 2013
Malcolm Currie
/s/ Bernard L. Brodkorb Director April 11, 2013
Bernard L. Brodkorb
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Regal One Corporation.
St. Paul, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet, including the schedule of investments, of Regal One Corporation (a Florida Corporation)(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012, and the related statements of changes in net assets, operations, cash flows and financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2012. The financial statements of Regal One Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, were audited by other auditors whose report dated April 10, 2012, included an emphasis-of-matter paragraph describing conditions that raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Regal One Corporation’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial highlights. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provided a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Regal One Corporation as of December 31, 2012, and the results of its operations, its cash flows, and its financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and recurring negative cash flows from operating activities, and has an accumulated deficit which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P.
Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 11, 2013
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
ASSETS -------------- ------------------
Assets:
Investments:
Investments in non-affiliated companies $ 357,447 $ 374,535
Investments in non-affiliated companies
Pledged to secure note payable - officer 68,125 60,313
-------- -----------
Total investments 425,572 434,848
Cash 19,121 3,106
Prepaid insurance 22,708 22,708
---------- -----------
Total assets $ 467,401 $ 460,662
========== ===========
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 27,550 $ 25,600
Accounts payable - related party 72,950 18,800
Note payable - officer 47,366 45,000
Accrued interest-notes payable 1,433 1,020
Dividends payable 600 600
---------- ---------
Total liabilities 149,899 91,020
========== ===========
NET ASSETS
Preferred stock, no par value
Series A - 50,000 shares authorized, none issued
or outstanding - -
Series B - 500,000 shares authorized, 100,000
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012
and 2011
500 500
Common stock, par value $0.001,
50,000,000 shares authorized; 3,633,067 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012
and 2011
3,633 3,633
Additional paid-in capital 8,373,060 8,373,060
Losses and distributions in excess of earnings (8,421,673) (8,376,140)
Net unrealized appreciation on investments 361,982 368,589
----------- -----------
Total net assets 317,502 369,642
----------- -----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS $ 467,401 $ 460,662
============ ===========
Net asset value per outstanding share of common
stock $ 0.087 $ 0.102
============ ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2012
Equity Investments:
Fair
Description Percent Carrying Cost Market
Company
of Business Ownership Investment Value Affiliation
Neuralstem, Inc.(CUR)
Biomedical company 1% $ 12,018 (1) $305,200 No
Neuralstem Warrant
Biomedical company 50,000 (2) 118,800 No
LMP Money Market Trust
Money Market Fund 372 (3) 372 No
Rampart Detection Systems
Manufacturing 1,200 (4) 1,200 No
--------- ---------
Total Investments
$ 63,590 $ 425,572
(1) As of December 31, 2012, there were 280,000 Neuralstem shares held reported on a fair value basis valued at the closing market price of $ 1.09 with no reduction in fair market value applied. 70,500 shares were sold during 2012. 62,500 shares have been classified as Investments in non-affiliated companies - Pledged to secure note payable - officer.
(2) Regal also has a ten year Neuralstem warrant to purchase 1,000,000 common stock shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share which is significantly above the present fair market value of Neuralstem shares. As of December 31, 2012 using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, a $118,800 value was assigned to these warrants including a 10% discount assigned by management due to the low trading volumes of Neuralstem stock. There is currently no market for Neuralstem options carried as an investment. At December 31, 2011 Regal valued the investment at $95,400.
To calculate the December 31, 2012 value of the Neuralstem warrant, management used the following factors in a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model:
Number of shares in warrant: 1,000,000
Date option was issued: 9/15/2005
Remaining term of option in years: 2.7
Neuralstem Common Stock closing price on 12/31/2012: $1.09
Annual volatility: 75.033%
Discount Rate based on Daily Treasury Bills long term rates on 12/31/12: 0.25%
Management estimated discount applied to fair market value: 10.0%
(3) The Company had $372 in a money market fund at 12/31/2012.
(4) Regal purchased common stock valued at $1,200 as an investment in Rampart Detection Systems Ltd.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2011
Equity Investments:
Fair
Description Percent Carrying Cost Market
Company
of Business Ownership Investment Value Affiliation
Neuralstem, Inc.(CUR)
Biomedical company 1% $ 15,044 (1) $338,233 No
Neuralstem Warrant
Biomedical company 50,000 (2) 95,400 No
LMP Money Market Trust
Money Market Fund 15 (3) 15 No
Rampart Detection Systems
Manufacturing 1,200 (4) 1,200 No
--------- ---------
Total Investments
$ 66,259 $ 434,848
(1) As of December 31, 2011, there were 350,500 Neuralstem shares held reported on a fair value basis valued at the closing market price of $0.965 with no reduction in fair market value applied. 19,500 shares were sold during 2011. 62,500 shares have been classified as Investments in non-affiliated companies - Pledged to secure note payable - officer.
(2) Regal also has a ten year Neuralstem warrant to purchase 1,000,000 common stock shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share which is significantly above the present fair market value of Neuralstem shares. As of December 31, 2011 using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, a $95,400 value was assigned to these warrants including a 10% discount assigned by management due to the low trading volumes of Neuralstem stock. There is currently no market for Neuralstem options carried as an investment.
To calculate the December 31, 2011 value of the Neuralstem warrant, management used the following factors in a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model:
Number of shares in warrant: 1,000,000
Date option was issued: 9/15/2005
Remaining term of option in years: 3.7
Neuralstem Common Stock closing price on 12/31/2011: $0.965
Annual volatility: 64.548%
Discount Rate based on Daily Treasury Bills long term rates on 12/31/11: 0.50%
Management estimated discount applied to fair market value: 10.0%
(3) The Company had $15 in a money market fund at 12/31/2011.
(4) Regal purchased common stock valued at $1,200 as an investment in Rampart Detection Systems Ltd.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For the For the
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
2012 2011
OPERATIONS: ---------- -----------
Net investment loss
$ (122,173) $ (127,996)
Net realized gain on investments 76,639 35,815
Unrealized depreciation of investments (30,006) (445,331)
Unrealized appreciation(depreciation)
of warrant investment
23,400 (594,000)
------------ ----------
Net decrease in net assets
resulting from operations (52,140) (1,131,512)
SHAREHOLDER ACTIVITY:
Declared dividend - (600)
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS (52,140) (1,132,112)
NET ASSETS:
Beginning of period 369,642 1,501,754
End of period 317,502 369,642
Average net assets $343,572 $935,698
TOTAL NET ASSET VALUE RETURN (15.2%) (121.0%)
Ratios to average net assets:
Net expenses $118,656 $125,446
Net investment loss (52,140) (1,132,112)
Per share ratio expenses 3.4% 3.5%
Per share ratio net investment loss (1.4%) (31.2%)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011
----------- ----------
Investment income $ -- $ --
Operating expenses:
Professional services 27,201 33,952
Accounting fees- related party 58,650 58,650
Interest expense 3,467 1,607
Other selling, general and
administrative expenses 32,855 33,787
--------- --------
Total operating expenses 122,173 127,996
--------- --------
Net investment loss (122,173) (127,996)
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized gain on investments 76,639 35,815
Net unrealized depreciation on investments (30,006) (445,331)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
in warrant investment 23,400 (594,000)
-------- --------
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
on investments
70,033 (1,003,516)
-------- ---------
Net decrease in net assets resulting
from operations $ (52,140) $ (1,131,512)
========== ===========
Per share information:
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic 3,633,067 3,633,067
Diluted (1) 13,633,067 13,633,067
Net investment loss per share:
Basic and diluted $ (0.034) $ (0.035)
========== ===========
Net decrease in net assets resulting from
Operations per share:
Basic and diluted $ (0.014) $ (0.311)
========== ===========
(1) Includes Series B Preferred Shares convertible at 100 for 1.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011
------------------ ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net decrease in net assets from operations $ (52,140) $(1,131,512)
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease
in net assets from operating activities:
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities (76,639) (35,815)
Unrealized decrease in investments
in portfolio companies 30,006 445,331
Unrealized (increase) in investment in options (23,400) 594,000
Proceeds from sale of investments 79,309 36,651
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expense -- 487
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses 56,100 25,535
--------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 13,236 (65,323)
Cash Flows from financing activities:
Increase in officer loans 2,779 46,020
Dividends payable -- (600)
--------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities 2,779 45,420
Net change in cash 16,015 (19,903)
Cash at beginning of period 3,106 23,009
---------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 19,121 $ 3,106
============= ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Per Common Share Unit Operating Performance
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
2012 2011
---------------- -----------
OPERATIONS:
Net investment loss from operations $ (0.033) $ (0.034)
Net realized gain on portfolio securities 0.021 0.009
Net change in unrealized
depreciation of portfolio securities (0.008) (0.123)
Net change in unrealized
depreciation of option investments (0.006) (0.163)
Interest expense (0.000) (0.000)
--------- --------
Net decrease in net assets
from operations (0.014) (0.311)
SHAREHOLDER ACTIVITY
Declared dividend -- --
-------- --------
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS $(0.014) (0.311)
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ 0.102 0.413
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD $ 0.087 0.102
========= =======
TOTAL NET ASSET VALUE LOSS (15.2%) (121.0%)
========= ========
RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Net assets, end of period $317,502 $369,642
=========== ===========
Ratios to average net assets:
Net expenses 34.5% 13.4%
Net investment loss (15.2%) (121.0%)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business
Regal One Corporation (the "Company" or "Regal One"), located in Scottsdale, Arizona, is a Florida corporation initially incorporated in 1959 as Electro-Mechanical Services Inc., in the state of Florida. Since inception we have been involved in a number of industries. In 1998 we changed our name to Regal One Corporation.
On March 7, 2005, our board of directors determined that it was in our shareholders best interest to change the focus of the company's operation to that of providing financial services through our network of advisors and professionals, and to be treated as a business development company ("BDC") under the Investment Company Act of 1940. On September 16, 2005, we filed a Form N54A (Notification of Election by Business Development Companies), with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which transforms the Company into a Business Development Company (BDC) in accordance with sections 55 through 65 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Company began reporting as an operating BDC in the March 31, 2006 10Q-SB.
Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, ("U.S. GAAP").
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company uses estimates and assumptions in accounting for the following significant matters, among others: the valuation of portfolio investments and the assumptions used as part the going concern analysis. It is at least reasonably possible that these estimates will change in the future. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The Company periodically reviews estimates and assumptions, and the effects of any such revisions are reflected in the period in which the revision is made.
Valuation of Portfolio Investments
Investments are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. On a quarterly basis the Company performs an analysis of each investment to determine fair value as follows:
Securities for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. The Company may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of the Company's investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value assets. When doing so, the Company determines whether the quote obtained is sufficient according to GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. If determined adequate, the Company uses the quote obtained. The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of the Company’s warrant investments.
Investment Classification
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, "Control Investments" are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. Under the 1940 Act, "Affiliated Investments" are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, "Non-affiliated Investments" are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments. The Company has no control investments or affiliated investments as defined under the 1940 Act.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash consists of balances and may include instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and cash equivalent balances on deposit with investment brokerage firms.
Net Decrease in Net Assets from Operations per Share
Basic net decrease in net assets from operations per share is computed by dividing the net decrease in net assets from operations amount adjusted for cumulative dividends on preferred stock (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period (denominator). Diluted net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per share amounts reflect the maximum dilution that would have resulted from the assumed exercise of stock options and from the assumed conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. Diluted net decrease in net assets from operations per share is computed by dividing the net decrease in net assets from operations amount adjusted for cumulative dividends on preferred stock by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. For all periods presented the above potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation as their effect is anti-dilutive.
Income Taxes
The Company has not elected to be a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on sales of investments for which the fair values are in excess of their tax basis. Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability approach for financial reporting. The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Management has established a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized in future years. For years before 2009, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs when incurred. There were no advertising fees incurred during the period.
Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation
Gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific identification method. The Company measures realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, but considering unamortized upfront fees and prepayment penalties. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation will reflect the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.
NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the creation of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company does not currently generate operating revenue and must liquidate the Company's investment portfolio to provide cash flow for its operations. The Company is actively seeking sources of revenue for its consulting services but does not have contractual obligations now or in the near future to generate revenue. This fact and the declining market value of the portfolio investment stock it owns due to sales of inventory securities and volatile market conditions has raised substantial doubt regarding Regal's ability to continue as a going concern. In response, management will continue to liquidate assets as necessary while actively searching out new equity investors and continue to rely upon current shareholders to provide loans or additional investment to meet the Company’s ongoing obligations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 3 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCICAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities;
Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that
are observable, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3 Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are
both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable
(supported by little or no market activity).
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The carrying value of cash, and accounts payable, note payable officer, and accrued interest approximates fair value due to the short maturity nature of these instruments.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012:
Fair
Level of Carrying Cost Market
Equity Investments: Investment Investment Value
Neuralstem, Inc.(CUR) Level 1 $ 12,018 $305,200
LMP Money Market Trust Fund Level 1 372 372
Investment Deposit Level 2 1,200 1,200
Neuralstem Warrant Level 3 50,000 118,800
--------- ---------
Total investments $ 63,233 $425,572
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2011: Fair
Level of Carrying Cost Market
Equity Investments: Investment Investment Value
Neuralstem, Inc.(CUR) Level 1 $ 15,044 $338,233
LMP Money Market Trust Fund Level 1 15 15
Investment Deposit Level 2 1,200 1,200
Neuralstem Warrant Level 3 50,000 95,400
--------- ---------
Total investments $ 66,259 $434,848
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012 and 2011
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) are:
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2011
$ 95,400
Net change in unrealized appreciation
of stock options
23,400
---------
Ending balance as of December 31, 2012
$ 118,800
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2010
$ 689,400
Net change in unrealized depreciation
of stock options
(594,000)
---------
Ending balance as of December 31, 2011
$ 95,400
The table below presents the significant unobservable inputs used to value the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments:
Level 3 financial
Significant unobservable inputs
Significant unobservable inputs
instruments by valuation technique
as of December 31, 2012
Warrants
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model:
Expected term
2.7 years
Risk free rate
0.25%
Annual volatility
75.033%
Fair value of stock
$1.09 per share
Dividend rate
0%
Liquidity discount
10%
NOTE 4 - EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
Common Stock
The Company has 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001, authorized with 3,633,067 issued and outstanding shares. If all outstanding preferred equity were converted the outstanding shares would increase to 13,633,067.
Preferred Stock
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation allows for segregating the preferred stock into separate series. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had authorized 50,000,000 shares of total preferred stock; 50,000 shares of Series A preferred stock with no shares outstanding; 500,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock were authorized and 100,000 shares of Series B preferred stock were outstanding.
Holders of Series A preferred stock shall be entitled to voting rights equivalent to 1,000 shares of common stock for each share of preferred. The Series A preferred stock has certain dividend and liquidation preferences over common stockholders.
Holders of Series B preferred stock shall be entitled to voting rights equivalent to 100 shares of common stock for each share of preferred. The Series B preferred stock had been entitled to a non-cumulative dividend of 8.75% of revenues which exceed $5,000,000. In 2004, the Series B class shareholders' voted by a large majority to void the dividend preference. At the option of the holder of Series B preferred stock, each share is convertible into common stock at a rate of 100 shares of common for each share of preferred. In connection with the acquisition of O2 Technology on February 9, 2004, the Share Exchange agreement required that the Series B preferred as a class be restricted to a cumulative conversion into no more than 10,000,000 common shares. This reduction was sought by the Company and was agreed to by 98.5% of the Series B class, effecting a compression of the outstanding Series B preferred from 208,965 shares to the now outstanding 100,000 shares. For the years ended December 31, 2012, and 2011, no dividends have been declared on the Series A or Series B convertible preferred stock.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS
Neuralstem, Inc.
At December 31, 2012, the Company owned 280,000 common shares of Neuralstem, Inc. held as an investment. These shares had a valuation of $305,200 based on the closing market price of the stock. 70,500 shares were sold in 2012 to finance Company operations. 217,500 of these shares are not restricted and are freely tradable with 62,500 shares being restricted as they are held as collateral for a note payable to a related party.
Regal One also has one ten year warrant for 1,000,000 common shares of Neuralstem at an exercise price of $5 per share which is significantly above the present fair market value of Neuralstem shares. There is currently no market for Neuralstem stock Options. The price of the underlying publicly traded common stock is used as a significant input in the valuation process.
As of December 31, 2012, using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model, a $118,800 value has been assigned to this warrant including a 10% discount assigned by management due to low trading volume of Neuralstem common stock. Regal recorded a $23,400 unrealized gain on the investment in 2012 due to increase in the fair value as determined by the Black-Scholes model.
The Board of Directors is responsible for determining in good faith the fair value of the securities and assets held by the Company. The Investment Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted provisions for valuation of the portfolio as described in Note 1 under Fair Value Accounting through ASC 820. The Investment Committee bases its determination on, among other things, applicable quantitative and qualitative factors. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of securities, the nature of the business of the portfolio company, the marketability of and the valuation of securities of publicly traded companies in the same or similar industries, current financial conditions and operating results of the portfolio company, sales and earnings growth of the portfolio company, operating revenues of the portfolio company, competitive conditions, and current and prospective conditions in the overall stock market. Without a readily recognized market value, the estimated value of some portfolio securities may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if there was a ready market for such equity securities.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES
The Company has not elected to be a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on sales of investments for which the fair values are in excess of their tax basis. Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability approach for financial reporting. The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had a federal operating loss carry forward of $2,672,423 and $2,719,071 respectively. Under IRC Section 172(b)(3), the taxpayer elects to relinquish the entire two year carryback period with respect to any regular tax and AMT net operating loss incurred during the current tax year. Regal became a BDC in June 2005. The deferred tax expires in the periods between 2019 to 2030.
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following components for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
2012 2011
--------- ----------
Current:
Federal -- --
State -- --
Deferred: -- --
Components of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:
Deferred tax assets: 2012 2011
--------- --------
Net operating loss carry forward $1,143,797 $ 1,163,762
------------ ----------
Total deferred tax assets $1,143,797 $ 1,163,762
Less: Valuation allowance (1,143,797) (1,163,762)
------------ ----------
Net deferred tax assets $ -- $ --
FASB authoritative guidance requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,143,797 and $1,163,762, respectively. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Net Deferred Tax Assets are not presented on our Balance Sheets.
Reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate is as follows at December 31:
2012 2011
Federal statutory tax rate (34.0)% (34.0)%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit (8.8)% (8.8)%
Increase in valuation allowance 42.8 % 42.8%
Effective tax rate 0% 0%
NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
For the year ended December 31, 2012 Bernard L. Brodkorb who is a Director of Regal received $58,650 in fee compensation for providing accounting and financial reporting services not related to his duties as a Director of Regal One Corporation and no compensation for his Director duties. In 2011 he received $58,650 for these services and no compensation for being a Director. As of the year ended December 31, 2012, Bernard L. Brodkorb has a balance owed in accounts payable of $72,950 for services rendered. There was $18,800 owed in accounts payable due to Bernard L. Brodkorb for services rendered as of December 31, 2011.
The Company has an outstanding note payable due to Charles J. Newman in the amount of $47,366 with accrued interest due of approximately $1,433 as of December 31, 2012. The note accrues interest at 6% per annum and is collateralized with 62,500 shares of Neuralstem common stock held as an investment. The note was due in full with interest at the option of the Company on December 31, 2012. Although the option to pay in full is upon the Company, these notes are considered to be in default as of the date of this filing.
NOTE 8 - Legal Proceedings
As of the date of this report and subsequent events, there are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings relating to our company or properties to which we are a party, and to our knowledge there are no other material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which have a material interest adverse to us.
REGAL ONE CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012 and 2011
Note 9 - Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2012:
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Investment income
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Net loss
$
(37,005)
$
(33,773)
$
(24,202)
$
(23,726)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
$
21,435
$
(138,465)
$
171,377
$
(106,487)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per common share:
Basic
$
0.006
$
(0.038)
$
0.047
$
(0.029)
Diluted
$
0.002
$
(0.038)
$
0.013
$
(0.029)
For the year ended December 31, 2011:
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Investment income
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Net loss
$
(33,125)
$
(43,372)
$
(45,559)
$
(4,332)
Net decrease in net assets from operations
$
(351,162)
$
(310,809)
$
(221,470)
$
(248,071)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per common share:
Basic
$
(0.097)
$
(0.086)
$
(0.061)
$
(0.067)
Diluted
$
(0.097)
$
(0.086)
$
(0.061)
$
(0.067)