ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
We were incorporated in Nevada on April 6, 1998.
Our principal executive offices are located at 119 Commercial Street, Suite 190-115, Bellingham, Washington 98225.
Our fiscal year end is December 31 and our shares are traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “ASPZ”. We are also listed in the Mergent Manuals and News Reports.
The Company has one wholly owned subsidiary, Asia Properties (HK) Limited, registered in Hong Kong on November 7, 2007.
Industry
Asia Properties, Inc was established to seek opportunities to invest in real estate and develop resorts in South East Asia.
Our Planned Operations
Following the 2009 worldwide economic downturn, the Company has identified several potential targets of business and is in negotiations with a number of companies.
Website
We currently maintain a website at www.asiaprop.com.
Revenues
Currently we have no revenue generating assets.
Competition
We have no major identified competitors at present time.
Employees
We administer our business through consulting arrangements with our company's officers, directors, other individuals and one full-time employee.
Consultants
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not hire any consultants for financial advisory, administrative, management, business development and strategic planning services.
Offices
We maintained two offices, one at 119 Magnolia Street, Suite 190-115, Bellingham, Washington 98225, telephone number (360) 392-2841.
Our second office is at Two Exchange Square, 8th Floor, 8 Connaught Place, Central, Hong Kong, a shared serviced office leased from The Executive Centre.
Risk Factors
1. We lack an operating history for our current business and have losses that we expect to continue into the future. There is no assurance our future operations will result in profitable revenues. If we cannot generate sufficient revenues to operate profitably, you will lose your investment.
While we were incorporated in 1998, we have just initiated our current business operations. Therefore our current operating history cannot be used to determine our future success or failure. Our net loss since inception is $3,671,074. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon our ability to secure profitable business investments and opportunities. Based upon current plans, we expect to incur operating losses in the immediate future because we will be incurring expenses which will exceed our revenues. If we cannot generate a profit, we will have to suspend or cease operations and you will lose your investment.
2. We spent all of the proceeds from our private placement to maintain our business operations. If we can't raise additional funds, we may be forced to curtail or cease future activities.
We have not initiated our operations. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding when needed, or that such funding, if available, can be obtained on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot obtain needed funds, we may be forced to curtail or cease future activities.
3. Because our operations are all located outside of the United States, any change in the laws of the countries we operate in may adversely affect our business.
All of our operations are in South China, Hong Kong and South East Asia. This exposes us to risks, such as exchange controls and currency restrictions, currency fluctuations and devaluations, changes in local economic conditions, changes in laws and regulations, exposure to possible expropriation or other government actions, and unsettled political conditions. These factors may have a material adverse effect on our operations or on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
4. Our international expansion plans subject us to risks inherent in doing business internationally.
Our long-term business strategy relies on the securing of investment opportunities in South China and South East Asia. We are faced by challenges caused by distance, language and cultural differences, conflicting and changing laws and regulations, foreign laws, international import and export legislation, trading and investment policies, foreign currency fluctuations, the burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations, protectionist laws and business practices that favor local businesses in some countries, foreign tax consequences, higher costs associated with doing business internationally, restrictions on the export or import of technology, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, trade and tariff restrictions, and variations in tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers. These risks could harm our business efforts, and materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
5. We face risks associated with currency exchange rate fluctuations, any adverse fluctuation may adversely affect our operating margins.
Although we are incorporated in the United States, the majority of our activities are transacted in the currencies of the countries we operate in. Conducting business in currencies other than U.S. dollars subjects us to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could have a negative impact on our reported operating results. Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies impact our revenues, cost of revenues and operating margins and result in foreign currency translation gains and losses. Historically, we have not engaged in exchange rate hedging activities. Although we may implement hedging strategies to mitigate this risk, these strategies may not eliminate our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and may involve costs and risks of their own, such as ongoing management time and expertise, external costs to implement the strategy and potential accounting implications.
6. If relations between the United States and China or the countries in South East Asia change for the worse, our stock price may decrease and we may have difficulty accessing the U.S. capital markets.
At various times during recent years, the United States and the countries we operate in have had disagreements over political and economic issues. Any political or trade controversies which may arise in the future between the United States and these countries could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to access U.S. capital markets.
7. The governments of the countries we operate it could change its policies toward private enterprises, which could adversely affect our business.
Our business is subject to and may be adversely affected by political and economic uncertainties and social developments in the countries we operate in. Although the Philippine administrations have been relatively stable and the Chinese government has successfully pursued economic reform policies during the past several years, there is political unrest in Thailand and the Chinese face accusations regarding the valuation of the Renminbi. These governments may continue to pursue these policies or may alter them from time to time to our detriment. Changes in policies, laws and regulations, or in their interpretation or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion, restrictions or prohibitions on dividend payments to stockholders, devaluations of currency or the nationalization or other expropriation of private enterprises could have a material adverse effect on our business. Nationalization or expropriation could result in the total loss of our investments.
Risk Factors (continued)
8. The economic, political and social conditions in the countries we operate in could affect our business.
All of our business, assets and operations are located outside of the United States. In many respects, the economies of the other countries we operate in differs from the economies of most developed countries, including government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange, and allocation of resources.
In particular, while the Chinese economy has transitioned from a planned economy to a market-oriented economy and the Chinese government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of sound corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in China is still owned by the government. The government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry by imposing industrial policies. It also exercises significant control over China's economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Therefore, the Chinese government's involvement in the economy could adversely affect our business operations, results of operations and financial condition.
9. The significant but uneven growth in the economy of China in the past 20 years could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The Chinese government has implemented various measures from time to time to control the rate of economic growth. Some of these measures benefit the overall economy of China, but may have a negative effect on us.
10. Government control of currency conversion and future movements in exchange rates may adversely affect the Company's operations and financial results.
All of our transactions are substantially in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including the Renminbi, Thai Baht, Philippine Peso and the Hongkong Dollar. A portion of such monies will be converted into other currencies to meet our foreign currency obligations. Foreign exchange transactions continue to be subject to significant foreign exchange controls in the countries we operate in and in China, require the approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China. The Chinese government controls its foreign currency reserves through restrictions on imports and conversion of Renminbi into foreign currency. Although the exchange rate of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar has been stable since January 1, 1994, and the Chinese government has stated its intention to maintain the stability of the value of Renminbi
These limitations could affect our ability to obtain foreign exchange through debt or equity financing, or to obtain foreign exchange for capital expenditures.
There can be no assurance that exchange rates will remain stable. Any currency devaluation against the U.S. dollar might increase our cash flow required to satisfy our foreign currency-denominated obligations, adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.
11. Because the Chinese legal system is not fully developed, our legal protections may be limited.
The Chinese legal system is based on written statutes and their interpretation by the Supreme People's Court. Although the Chinese government introduced new laws and regulations to modernize its business, securities and tax systems on January 1, 1994, China does not yet possess a comprehensive body of business law. Because Chinese laws and regulations are relatively new, interpretation, implementation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties and inconsistencies and it may be difficult to enforce contracts. In addition, as the Chinese legal system develops, changes in such laws and regulations, their interpretation or their enforcement may have a material adverse effect on our business operations. Moreover, interpretative case law does not have the same precedential value in China as in the United States, so legal compliance in China may be more difficult or expensive.
12. It may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against our management or us.
All of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, our officers and directors are not based in the United States. As a result, it may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons to originate an action in the United States. Moreover, there is uncertainty that the courts of the countries we operate in will enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or our directors and officers based on the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state, or entertain an original action brought in the countries we operate in based upon the securities laws of the United States or any state.
Investment risks:
13. Because our securities are subject to penny stock rules, you may have difficulty reselling your shares.
Our shares as penny stocks are covered by section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell the Company's securities including the delivery of a standardized disclosure document; disclosure and confirmation of quotation prices; disclosure of compensation the broker/dealer receives; and, furnishing monthly account statements. For sales of our securities, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination and receive from its customer a written agreement prior to making a sale. The imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices could adversely affect a shareholder's ability to dispose of his stock.
Risk Factors (continued)
14. Because we may issue additional shares of common stock in public offerings or private placements, your ownership interest in us may be diluted.
Because in the future we may issue shares of common stock to pay for services, to pay for equipment, or to raise money for our operations, your ownership interest may be diluted which results in your percentage of ownership in us decreasing.
15. Because of the ongoing US-led global economic downturn, our ability to significantly complete our business plan may not materialize.
The recent financial turmoil following from the Wall Street failures has made it very difficult for us to secure financing for our business ventures at this time. This will adversely affect our market capitalization and, therefore, the price of our shares. We plan to engage other similar projects when the viability to finance such projects returns.
16. Because our President and Chief Executive Office, Daniel McKinney, is our only employee at this time, any change in his status with our Company will negatively affect both the operations of our Company as well as our ability to secure funding in the future.
Any change in our sole employee, Daniel McKinney’s involvement with our Company may negatively affect our operations and our ability to execute our business plan. This may affect the value of shares in our Company.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The company does not own any property
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of the date of this report, we know of no legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is the subject, which are pending, threatened or contemplated or any unsatisfied judgments against us.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
During the period covered by this report, no matters requiring a vote were submitted to security holders by means of the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTER AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter Pink Sheets under the symbol “ASPZ”
As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 90 shareholders on record.
Presented below is the high and low bid information of our common stock for the periods indicated. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
We were given our trading symbol “ASPZ” to trade on the NASD OTC Pink Sheets in January, 1999.
On December 31, 2010, the last price of our common stock as reported on the Over- the Counter Pink Sheets was $0.06 per share.
Dividend Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have however, paid stock dividends in April 2007 comprising of one share in Hertz Controller Technologies Corporation for every two shares of Common Stock held in our Company
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no issues of unregistered securities during the period under review.
ITEM 5. (continued)
Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Our company's shares are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses). For transactions covered by the Rule, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and have received the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale.
Consequently, the Rule may affect the ability of broker/dealers to sell our securities and also may affect your ability to sell your shares in the secondary market.
Section 15(g) also imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny securities. These rules require a one-page summary of certain essential items. The items include the risk of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary marketing; terms important to in understanding of the function of the penny stock market, such as "bid" and "offer" quotes, a dealers "spread" and broker/dealer compensation; the broker/dealer compensation, the broker/dealers duties to its customers, including the disclosures required by any other penny stock disclosure rules; the customers rights and remedies in causes of fraud in penny stock transactions; and, the NASD's toll free telephone number and the central number of the North American Administrators Association, for information on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their associated persons.
Transfer agent
Our Transfer Agent is Transfer Online, Inc., 317 SW Alder Street, 2nd Floor, Portland, OR 97204.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section of the report includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking states are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.
Plan of Operation
We are a development stage Company and have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our current business operations. We are not going to buy or sell any plant or significant equipment during the next twelve months. We will not be conducting any product research or development. We do not expect significant changes in the number of employees.
Our specific goal is to identify and secure profitable investment opportunities.
Limited Operating History; Need for Additional Capital
There is no historical financial information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We did not generate revenues from operations in 2010 or 2009. We have recognized losses from operations, and the foregoing discussion of our plan of operation is based in part on our financial statements. These have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The estimates and critical accounting policies that are most important in fully understanding and evaluating our financial statements and results of operations are discussed below.
ITEM 6 (continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We did not sell any common shares during 2010.
We are a development stage company and management has devoted considerable effort to find profitable investment opportunities. As of the date of this report, we have initiated operations, but have not generated any revenues. Our plans during the last year were to acquire a stake in a VIP Club in Macau.
We had a net loss of $179,258 for the year ended December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, we had cash and total assets of $342 and total liabilities of $751,488. Our working capital and stockholders' deficit was $751,146.
Results of Operations
We had no revenues in 2010 and 2009.
PART III
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Asia Properties, Inc.
Financial Statements
Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Asia Properties, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Bellingham, Washington
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Asia Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009 are only for comparison.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits also included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when consolidated in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the company’s recurring losses from operations, stockholders; deficit and inability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations and sustain its operations raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Your truly,
PARKER RANDALL CF
PARKER RANDALL CF (H.K.) CPA LIMITED
Certified Public Accountants
Hong Kong
March 31, 2011
Asia Properties, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
Asia Properties, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND FROM INCEPTION ON APRIL 6, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
Asia Properties, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
From December 31, 2004 Through December 31, 2010
Additional
Common
Stock
Paid in
Donated
Number of
Amount
Capital
Capital
Deficit
Total
shares
$
$
$
$
$
Balance December 31, 2004
7,519,028
1,729,509
270,000
(2,064,981)
(57,953)
Issued for services at $0.26 per share
40,000
10,360
-
-
10,400
Issued for services at $0.50 per share
50,000
24,950
-
-
25,000
Issued for properties at $0.50 per share
600,000
299,400
-
-
300,000
Issued for properties at $1.45 per share
45,000
159,955
-
-
160,000
Issued for properties at $2.55 per share
350,000
899,650
-
-
900,000
Issued for cash at $0.50 per share
1,050,000
1,050
523,950
-
-
525,000
Finders fee paid
-
-
(25,000)
-
(25,000)
Donated capital
-
-
-
60,000
-
60,000
Net loss for the year
-
-
-
-
(247,792)
(247,792)
Balance, December 31, 2005
9,654,028
9,654
3,622,774
330,000
(2,312,773)
1,649,655
Option exercised for cash at $1.00 per share
40,000
39,960
-
-
40,000
Issued for cash at $1.00
105,000
104,895
-
-
105,000
Donated capital
-
-
-
15,000
-
15,000
Net loss for the year
-
-
-
-
(252,278)
(252,278)
Balance December 31, 2006
9,799,028
9,799
3,767,629
345,000
(2,565,051)
1,557,377
Issued for cash at $1.00
55,000
54,945
-
-
55,000
Finders fee paid
2,750
2,747
-
-
2,750
4 for 1 split on 16 April
29,570,334
-
-
-
-
-
Shares cancelled on 24 October 2007
(312,000)
-
-
-
-
-
Net loss for the year
-
-
-
-
(298,260)
(298,260)
Balance December 31, 2007
39,115,112
9,857
3,825,321
345,000
(2,863,311)
1,316,867
Issued for cash at $0.20
225,000
44,775
-
-
45,000
Finders fee paid
11,250
2,239
-
-
2,250
Cancelled due to unsuccessful transfer of property rights
(3,940,000)
(985)
(1,323,460)
-
-
(1,324,445)
Net loss for the year
-
-
-
-
(513,977)
(513,977)
Balance December 31, 2008
35,411,362
9,108
2,548,875
345,000
(3,377,288)
(474,305)
Cancelled due to unsuccessful transfer of property rights
(40,000)
(10)
(35,545)
-
-
(35,555)
Net loss for the year
-
-
-
-
(114,528)
(114,528)
Balance December 31, 2009
35,371,362
9,098
2,513,330
345,000
(3,491,816)
(624,388)
Issued for services
350,000
52,150
-
-
52,500
Net loss for the year
-
-
-
-
(179,258)
(179,258)
Balance December 31, 2010
35,721,362
9,448
2,565,480
345,000
(3,671,074)
(751,146)
See accompanying notes to the financial statements
ASIA PROPERTIES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND FROM INCEPTION ON APRIL 6, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
ASIA PROPERTIES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND FROM INCEPTION ON APRIL 6, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)
(CONTINUED)
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
Asia Properties, Inc.
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2010 and 2009
1. Organization, Development Stage and Going Concern
Asia Properties, Inc. was incorporated in Nevada, the United States of America on April 6, 1998. The Company was formed to seek opportunities to invest in real estate projects, resorts and hotels in Asia.
The management intends to acquire several businesses. Planned principal activities have begun but the Company has not generated significant revenues to date.
The Company had a net loss of $179,258 for the year ended December 31, 2010, an accumulated deficit of $3,671,074 and working capital and stockholders' deficits of $751,146 at December 31, 2010.
The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and to continue to raise funds through debt or equity raises. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded
assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Method of Accounting
The Company maintains its general ledger and journals using the accrual method accounting for financial reporting purposes. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of management. Accounting policies adopted by the Company conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and have been consistently applied in the presentation of financial statements, which are compiled using the accrual basis of accounting.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter - company balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that my subject the Company to concentrations of credit risks consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held in safekeeping by certain large creditworthy financial institutions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchases with original maturities of three months or loss to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the company had US$342 and US$3,628 in cash equivalents respectively.
Loss Per Share
Basis loss per stock is calculated by dividing net loss by weighted - average number of common stocks outstanding during the year, and does not include the impact of any potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. Potential common stocks are not included in included in the computation of loss per stock, if their effect is anti - dilutive
Financial Instruments
The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, short term loans, amount due to related party and, other payables and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of such instruments.
It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, price or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.
The Company did not have any hedging activities during the reporting period
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, DISCLOSURES ABOUT DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (an amendment to SFAS No. 133). This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal year and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and requires enhanced disclosures with respect to derivative and hedging activities. The Group will comply with the disclosure requirements of this statement if it utilizes derivatives instruments or engages in hedging activities upon its effectiveness.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, DETERMINATION OF THE USEFUL LIFE ON INTANTIBLE ASSETS (“FSP No. 142-3”) to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset (under SFAS No.142) and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible asset (under SFAS No. 141(R)). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors to be considered when developing renewal or extension assumptions that are used to estimate an intangible asset’s useful life under SFAS No. 142. The guidance in the new staff position is to be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after December 31, 2008. In addition, FSP No. 142-3 increase the disclosure requirements related to renewal or extension assumptions. The Company does not believe implementation of FSP No. 142-3 have a malarial impact on its financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued statement No. 162, THE HIERARCHY OF GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES. This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “the Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) 14-1 “Accounting for Convertible Debt instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”). FSB APB 14-1 requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non - convertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 on a retroactive basis. As we do not have convertible debt at this time, we currently believe the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 will have no effect on our combined results of operations and financial condition.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statements No. 163, ACCOUNTING FOR FINANCE GUARANTEE INSURANCE CONTRACTS - AN INTERPRETATION OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 60. The premium revenue recognition approach for a financial guarantee insurance contract links premium revenue recognition to the amount of insurance protection and the period in which it is provided. For purposes of this statement, the amount of insurance protection provided is assumed to be a function of the insured principal amount outstanding, since the premium received requires the insurance enterprise to stand ready to protect holders of an insure financial obligation from loss due to default over the period of the insured financial obligation. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, DETERMINING WHETHER INSTRUMENTS GRANTED IN SHARE - BASED PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS ARE PARTICIPATING SECURITIES (“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”). Under FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non - forfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two - class method of computing EPS. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4, DETERMINING FAIR VALUE WHEN THE VOLUME AND LEVEL OF ACTIVITY FOR THE ASSET OR LIABILITY HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASED AND INDENTIFYING TRANSACTIONS THAT ARE NOT ORDERLY (“FSP 157-4”). FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. FSP 157-4 does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, FSP 157-4 requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. The adoption of the provisions of FSP 157-4 is not anticipated to materially impact on the Company’s results of operations or the fair values of its assets and liabilities.
In May 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 165 “Subsequent Events”. The objective of this Statement is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for the interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, which is now codified as FASB ASC 855 “Subsequent Events”. The adoption of FSB ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Effective February 24, 2010, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09. “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements”, which removes the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of the ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSFER OF FINANCIAL ASSETS (“SFAS 166”). This statement is intended to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. This Statement must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. Earlier application is prohibited. This Statement must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 166 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.46(R)”, which is codified as ASC 810. ASC 810 amends FASB Interpretation no.46(R), “Variable Interest Entities” for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and requires and enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a VIE. Under ASC 810, an enterprise has a controlling financial interest when it has a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. ASC 810 also requires an enterprise to assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed when determining whether it has power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. ASC 810 also requires ongoing assessments of whether enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced disclosures and eliminates the scope exclusion for qualifying special - purpose entities. ASC 810 shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. ASC 810 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of ASC 810 on its financial statements and results of operation and is currently not yet in a position to determine such effects.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”, which supersedes all existing non - SEC accounting and reporting standards. The codification does not change GAAP but rater organizes it into a new hierarchy with two levels: authoritative and non - authoritative. All authoritative GAAP carries equal weight and is organized in a topical structure. The adoption of SFAS 169 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which is codified as ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. This Update provides amendments to ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability if not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or that is consistent with the principles of ASC 820. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the assets are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. ASC 820 is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after August 28, 2009. The adoption of this Update did not have a significant impact to the Company’s financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-06, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and Disclosure Amendments for Nonpublic Entities”, and it provides implementation guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes effective for interim and annual reporting period ending on or after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SU No. 2009-06 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, “Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (“ASU 2009-17”). ASU 2009-17 amends the variable - interest entity guidance in FASB ASC ###-##-#### to clarify the accounting treatment for legal entities in which equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without financial support. ASU 2009-17 shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. ASU 2009-17 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of ASU 2009-17 on its consolidated financial statements and results of operation and is currently not yet in a position to determine such effects.
None of the above new pronouncements has current application to the Group, but may be applicable to the Company’s future financial reporting.
3. Property Rights
The Company does not own any property.
4. Related Party Transactions
a) In 2010 and 2009, the Company accrued salary of $60,000 per year to the Chief Executive Officer
b) As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company owed its CEO $618,905 and $486,420 as expense reimbursements and unpaid salary.
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
5. Income Taxes
The Company computes deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss carry forwards. These deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that it is deemed more likely than not that these assets will not be realized through future taxable income. As of December 31, 2010, any available deferred tax asset arising from the Company's net operating loss carry forwards has been eliminated by a full valuation allowance. At December 31, 2010, the Company had a net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $3,600,000 expiring ranging from 2017 through 2028. The resulting deferred tax asset is fully reserved. The loss carry forwards are subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code including Section 382.
6. Common Stock
The following table summarizes common stock issuances and retirements as of December 31, 2010:
a) On April 10, 2010 the Company issued 350,000 shares for services rendered.
b) On December 31, 2009 the Company cancelled the remaining 40,000 shares issued in 2005 for the Thailand land purchase as a result of the non-delivery of title.
c) On December 31, 2008 as a result of non-delivery of good title, the Company cancelled 3,940,000 shares issued in 2005 for the Thailand land purchase.
d) On June 12, 2008 the Company sold 125,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $25,000 and issued 6,250 common shares as a finders fees.
e) On March 5, 2008 the Company sold 100,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $20,000 and issued 5,000 common shares as finders fees.
f) On October 24, 2007 the Company cancelled 312,000 shares.
g) On April 16, 2007 the authorized capital of the Company was increased by means of a 4 for 1 share split from 50,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 each to 200,000,000 shares
h) On April 16, 2007 the Company paid a stock dividend of three common shares for every common share issued and outstanding.
i) On March 10, 2007 the Company sold 25,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $20,000 and issued 2,750 common shares as finders fees.
j) On March 2, 2007 the Company sold 30,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $30,000.
k) Between July and September of 2005, the Company issued 995,000 common shares with an estimated fair value of $1,360,000 to purchase 57 plots of land in Baan Naiyang, Phuket, Thailand.
l) Between April and June 2005 the Company issued 10,000 and 30,000 common shares with an estimated fair value of $2,600 and $7,800 as fees to a consultant and a director respectively.
8. Commitments and contingencies
There is no foreseeable commitment or contingencies for the year ended December 31, 2010
9. Subsequent Events
There were no significant subsequent events.
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
JTC Fair Song CPA Firm was our independent accountants from 2007 to 2009. Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited remain our independent accountants from April 2010.
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, and under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, who is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, such persons conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures.
Based on this evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Company's Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer concluded that these controls are not effective because there is a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weakness identified is that all of the Company's accounting functions, including the preparation of audit and financial statements are carried out and reviewed by our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer. The Company does not have a separate audit committee at this time. The lack of accounting staff results in a lack of segregation of duties and technical accounting experience necessary for an effective internal control system.
The Company recognizes the importance of internal controls. As the Company is currently a development stage company with limited ongoing financial operations, in an effort to mitigate this material weakness to the fullest extent possible, at present the Chief Executive Officer reviews the Company's financial information and reports for reasonableness. All unexpected results are investigated. At any time, if it appears that any control can be implemented to continue to mitigate such weakness, it will be immediately implemented. As the Company grows in size and as its finances allow, management will hire sufficient accounting staff and implement appropriate procedures for monitoring and review of work performed by our financial consultant.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that management document and test the Company's internal control over financial reporting and include in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB a report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting; as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management certifies that this report is complete, that this report complies with all relevant regulatory requirements, and that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, as of December 31, 2010.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Controls
During the year ended December 31, 2010, there have not been any changes in the Company's internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. However, please note the discussion above.
ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
Each of our directors serves until his successor is elected and qualified. Each of our officers is elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he is removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.
The names, addresses, ages and positions of our present officers and directors is as follows:
Name and Address
Age
Position Held
Daniel McKinney
Two Exchange Square, 8/fl
8 Connaught Place, Central, Hong Kong
President and Chief Executive Officer
Geoff Armstrong
27/93 Sokolovska, Prague 18600
Czech Republic
Secretary, and member of the board of directors
Dennis Burns
INVest Train PO Box 362, Tiffin, OH 44883
Investor relations
The persons named above are have held their offices for the last 12 months and are expected to continue until the next annual meeting of our stockholders.
Background of Officers and Directors
Daniel McKinney
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. McKinney founded the Company in April 1998.
From 1981 to 1999, Mr. McKinney established McKinney International, a Hong Kong based company engaged in cutting gemstones and supplying world markets.
From 1982 to 1984, he founded the Hong Kong Gem & Jewelry show.
From 1984 to 1987, he established Wynmere Ltd., Thailand, a direct selling jewelry company with its manufacturing in Bangkok and gemstone sourcing in Hong Kong.
In 1989, he established Coldway Ltd., an investment banking firm.
In 1994, founded Cement Services, Ltd., a construction company, based in Bangkok.
From 1999 to 2001, served as a board member of Sunflower (USA) Ltd., a public company with a large industrial facility in China manufacturing copper pipes.
From 2004 to 2006, served as a director of Savoy Resources Corp, a publicly traded mining company.
From 2005 to present, served as director and CEO of Sino Fibre Communications, Inc., a public telco company. From 2008 to February 2011, severed as director and CEO of Yinfu Gold Corp., a public gold mining company.
Mr. McKinney studied in the Hong Kong International School and read Chemistry and Biology at the Houston Baptist University.
He speaks Cantonese, Thai, and some Portuguese.
Geoff Armstrong
Secretary and Director
Geoff Armstrong has been our secretary and since March 2003.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest.
ITEM 9 (continued)
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
Other than as described in this section, to our knowledge, during the past five years, no present or former director or executive officer of our company:
1) filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, nor had a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or present of such a person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer within two years before the time of such filing;
2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
3) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting the following activities:
(i) acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director of any investment company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;
(ii) engaging in any type of business practice;
(iii) engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodity laws;
4) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described above under this Item, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
5) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission to have violated any federal or state securities law and the judgment in subsequently reversed, suspended or vacate;
6) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated.
Audit Committee and Charter
We do not have a separately designated audit committee of the board. Audit committee functions are performed by our board of directors, all of whom are deemed independent as they do not hold positions as officers of our Company. Our audit committee is responsible for:
(1) Selection and oversight of our independent accountant;
(2) Establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters;
(3) Establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting and auditing matters;
(4) Engaging outside advisors; and,
(5) Funding for the outside auditory and any outside advisors engagement by the audit committee.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
None of our directors or officers have the qualifications or experience to be considered a financial expert. We believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further, because of our limited operations, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
As of the date of this report, we are not subject to section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us for the last three fiscal years ending December 31 for each of our officers. This information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other compensation, if any. The compensation discussed addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid or named executive officers.
Compensation of Directors
There are no contractual arrangements with any member of the board of directors. They have no director's service contracts and are not compensated for their services as directors. The board has not implemented any plan to award options to any directors and we do not have any long-term incentive plans that provide compensation for performance.
Indemnification
Under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the corporation, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a lawsuit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney's fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.
Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of the date of this report, the total number of shares owned beneficially by each of our directors, officers and key employees, individually and as a group, and the present owners of 5% or more of our total outstanding shares. The table also reflects what their ownership will be assuming completion of the sale of all shares in our public offering. The stockholder listed below has direct ownership of his shares and possesses sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares.
[1] The persons named above may be deemed to be a "parent" and "promoter" of our company, within the meaning of such terms under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of his/its direct and indirect stock holdings.
[2] Kouzelne Mesto Ltd. is Czech Republic incorporated company and is owned as to 100% by Geoffrey Armstrong, and officer of the Company.
Changes in Control
There are no arrangements or known persons who may result in a change of control of Asia Properties, Inc.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, and DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company accrued a total of $60,000 as salary to the Company's CEO.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company owed the CEO $618,905 as expense reimbursements and unpaid salary.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
(1) Audit Fees
The aggregate fees for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for our audits of annual financial statements and reviews of financial statements included in our Form 10-KSB and Form 10-QSBs or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those years was:
$6,000
JTC Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$6,000
JTC Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$5,000
JTC JTC Fair Song CPA Firm
(2) Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees for each of the last two years for assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audits or reviews of our financial statements and are not reported in the preceding paragraph:
$0
JTC Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$0
Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$0
JTC Fair Song CPA Firm
(3) Tax Fees
The aggregate fees for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning was:
$0
Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$0
Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$0
JTC Fair Song CPA Firm
(4) All Other Fees
The aggregate fees for each of the last two years for the products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) was:
$0
Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$0
Parker Randall CF (H.K.) CPA Limited
$0
JTC Fair Song CPA Firm
(5) The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full time, permanent employees was 0%.
PART IV
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES and Reports on form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K have been filed
Exhibit No.
Document Description
3.1
Articles of Incorporation(1)
3.2
Bylaws(1)
4.1
Specimen Stock Certificate(1)
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.1
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(1) Incorporated by reference to Form 10-SB Registration Statement filed November 26, 2004.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ASIA PROPERTIES, INC.
By: /s/ Daniel McKinney
Daniel McKinney
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: 12 April 2011