Item 1.
Description of Business
THE COMPANY
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas in 1953, but the principal business of the Company, as described in this report, started in 1971, and was closed down in 2007. The Company has no further operating activities and is now a shell company.
Based upon its current financial position, and an evaluation of the prospects for continuing to operate, the Company has concluded that it should sell the Company or identify a merger partner. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in completing such a transaction or be able to maintain sufficient liquidity over a period of time that will allow it to carry out this action, in which case the Company might be forced to dissolve or seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy statutes, or both.
The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
Available sources of liquidity at December 31, 2012 include cash and cash equivalents of less than $1,000.
EMPLOYEES
We have no employees.
Item 1A.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
The Company Has No Means to Generate Revenue
We have no source of revenue. Our cash balance has been diminished by general and administrative expenses.
The Market For Our Stock Is Not Liquid And The Stock Price Is Subject To Volatility
Our stock is quoted on the OTCQB of the OTC Marketplace under the symbol of "REAL", where low trading volume and high volatility is often experienced. While a few firms make a market in our stock, the historically low trading volume and relatively few market makers of our stock make it more likely that a severe fluctuation in volume, either up or down, will significantly impact the stock price. There can be no assurance that these market makers will continue to quote our stock and a reduction in such market makers would negatively impact trading liquidity. Further, with our constrained resources and increased cost and time associated with implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley, it may not be possible for us to remain listed on the OTC Bulletin Board in the future as a fully reporting company. Lastly, the uncertainty of the future of the Company may limit the liquidity of our stock. This and the existing limited market and volume in the trading of our stock, may result in our stockholders having difficulty selling our common stock. The trading price of our common stock has been, and will likely continue to be, subject to wide fluctuations due to the uncertainty of the future of the Company, general market fluctuations and other events and factors, some of which may be beyond our control.
Item 1B.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 2.
Item 2.
Description of Properties.
Not applicable
Item 3.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
Not applicable.
Item 4.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5.
Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
The Company’s common stock trades in the over-the-counter bulletin board market under the symbol REAL. The high and low sale prices for 2012 and 2011 are set forth below.
The Company paid no cash dividends in 2012 or 2011 and had 190 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2012, not counting the shareholders who hold the Company stock in street name.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2012:
No shares of common stock were repurchased by the Company in 2012 or 2011.
Item 6.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
Not applicable.
Item 7.
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based on the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any exist. The Company evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values and disclosure of amounts recorded or disclosed in the financial statements of the Company.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our audited financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company’s current circumstances raise substantial doubt about the likelihood that the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis and other parts of this report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as current expectations and assumptions. From time to time, the Company may publish forward-looking statements, including those that are contained in this report, relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company’s business include, but are not limited to, its ability to maintain sufficient working capital, adverse changes in the economy, the ability to attract and maintain key personnel, its ability to identify or complete an acceptable merger or acquisition, and future results related to acquisition, merger or investment activities. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, including those set forth elsewhere in this report. The Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $25,000, compared to $24,000 used by operations during 2011. The usage of cash in 2012 was attributable to the net loss, which in turn resulted from general and administrative expenses. The principal items contributing to the $25,000 usage of cash in 2012 were a loss of $27,000, offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $2,000.
Financing activities provided cash flows of $26,000 in 2011and $22,000 in 2012.
The Company is now a shell corporation. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
Based upon its current financial position, and an evaluation of the prospects for continuing to operate, the Company has concluded that it should sell the Company or identify a merger partner. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in completing such a transaction or be able to maintain sufficient liquidity over a period of time that will allow it to carry out this action, in which case the Company might be forced to dissolve or seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy statutes, or both.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenues and Gross Profit
Revenues and gross profit for 2012 and 2011 are reported as zero for both years, as all operations were discontinued as of September 30, 2007.
General and Administrative
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses primarily consist of legal, accounting and other professional services.
G&A expenses increased from $24,000 in 2011 to $27,000 in 2012.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company recorded no provision or benefit for Federal income taxes in 2011 or 2012. Benefits from the tax loss carryforwards have been fully offset by valuation allowances since realization cannot be assured.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
None.
Item 7A.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not applicable.
Item 8.
Item 8.
Financial Statements
The financial statements of the Company and the related report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm thereon are included in this report on pages 12 through 18.
Item 9.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Not applicable
Item 9A.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The financial statements of the Company for 2011 and 2012 have been audited by the independent registered public accounting firm of Ramirez Jimenez International CPAs who were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data, including minutes of all meetings of stockholders and the Board of Directors. This annual report does not include an attestation report from the accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, known to the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Item 9B.
Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10.
Directors Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.
The following table sets forth the name, age and position with the Company of (i) each of the persons appointed to the Company's Board of Directors and (ii) each of the persons appointed as Executive Officer(s) of the Company as described herein:
Below is the biography of the current members of the Board of Directors:
Jay A. Gottlieb is a private investor in various companies since 1998. He is involved in analysis and investment in undervalued special situations and shell corporations. He presently owns between 5% and 25% of several public companies and from 2008 to 2010 was a member of the Board of Directors of Golf Trust of America, Inc. (NYSE Amex:GTA). From 1992 to 1998 he was the editor of an investment service that analyzed and published extensive data on companies planning initial public offerings. From 1977 to 1991, Mr. Gottlieb was the President and Chairman of the Board of The Computer Factory, Inc.(NYSE), a nationwide organization involved in retail and direct sales, servicing and leasing of personal computers. From 1969 to 1988, he was President of National Corporate Sciences, Inc., a registered investment advisory service. Mr. Gottlieb holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from New York University.
Michael Pearce is Chairman of Pernix Therapeutics Holdings, Inc (NYSE Amex:PTX), a specialty pharmaceutical company. From November 2007 to March 2010, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Golf Trust of America, Inc. (NYSE Amex:GTA). Mr. Pearce has been a private investor in various companies since 2002, with emphasis in distressed securities of publicly traded entities. From late 1999 through 2001, he served as Chief Executive Officer of iEntertainment Network. From 1996 to 1998, he served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing of publicly traded VocalTec Communications, later returning in 1999 in a consulting capacity to its Chairman on matters pertaining to strategic alternatives, business development and mergers and acquisitions. From 1983 to 1996, he was employed in various technology industry management positions, including Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Ventana Communications, a subsidiary of Thomson Corporation; Vice President of Sales at Librex Computer Systems, a subsidiary of Nippon Steel; and National Sales Manager at Hyundai Electronics America. From 1979 to 1983, he attended Southern Methodist University.
Gregg Schneider is a private investor who specializes in undervalued publicly traded securities. During the past seventeen years, Mr. Schneider has been an active dealer in numismatic items, specializing in U.S. rare coins and currency. Mr. Schneider attended two years of courses at UCLA and is involved in several charitable organizations.
Joshua Krom is the President of Realty Asset Management, LLC, a full service real estate company which has specialized in acquiring and rapidly repositioning distressed properties with the goal of maximize its investors’ returns. Mr. Krom has significant experience in the financial analysis of residential portfolios, retail, industrial and apartment buildings. He is a member of some of the most prominent national Real Estate Owned organizations. Prior to forming Realty Asset Management, LLC, Mr. Krom practiced real estate and corporate law. He is a licensed attorney and real estate broker in California and a licensed real estate broker in Nevada. Mr. Krom received his Juris Doctorate degree from Emory University School of Law where he was a Dean’s Honors recipient. He graduated with High Honors from the University of California, Santa Barbara where he received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Communications.
Ron Gutterson has for 16 years been President and Chief Operating Officer of Sage Solutions Inc., a New York based computer technology organization. During this period, he has rendered technology services to the major Fortune 100 corporations of America in the manufacturing, banking, and brokerage industries. For ten years prior, Mr. Gutterson was Vice President of Sales for the International Operations division of a major home furnishings convertor based out of New York. He holds a B.S. in Economics and an MBA in Finance.
Directors serve a one-year term and hold office until their successors are elected by the shareholders, unless they shall sooner resign.
Item 11.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
Summary compensation table
The Company has not paid any salary to its officers or Directors in 2012 or 2011.
Under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan (“Option Plan”), which expired in 2006, stock option grants were available for officers, directors, and key employees. The objective of the Option Plan was to promote the interest of the Company by providing an ownership incentive to officers, directors, and key employees, to reward outstanding performance, and to encourage continued employment. The Board of Directors, which acted as the Plan Administrator, determined to whom options were granted, the type of options, the number of shares covered by such options and the option vesting schedule. All options were issued at market value on the date of the grant and generally had a ten-year contractual term with graded vesting.
Outstanding equity awards
The following table discloses information regarding all option awards, to executive officers, to purchase the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2012.
Option Awards
(1)
All issued options are vested and became exercisable on January 20, 2007.
Director Compensation
None
Item 12.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Principal shareholders
Based on information available to the Company through filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the following persons or groups beneficially owned 5% or more of the 13,513,333 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2012.
In January 2011, the Company issued 1,083,333 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $13,000. In April 2011, the Company issued 500,000 shares for a total of $8,000. In January 2012, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares to Jay Gottlieb and Gregg Schneider at $0.016 per share for a total of $24,000.
Security ownership of management
As of December 31, 2012, the amount of common stock owned by the directors of the Company was:
Item 13.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
All directors other than Jay Gottlieb and Gregg Schneider are independent.
Item 14.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant’s Fees and Services
Aggregate fees paid or payable to Ramirez Jimenez International CPAs in connection with their services during fiscal years 2012 and 2011 are listed below:
Audit Fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of Reliability’s annual financial statements and the review of Reliability’s quarterly financial statements.
Tax Fees: Consists of tax compliance/preparation and other tax services. Tax compliance/preparation consists of fees billed for professional services related to federal, state and international tax compliance. Other tax services consist of fees billed for other miscellaneous tax consulting and planning.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or incorporated by reference:
Financial Statements: as referenced in Item 8 hereof
_______
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Reliability Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Reliability Incorporated (Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Reliability Incorporated as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has no operating activities. It is now a shell company and its future plans are uncertain. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Ramirez Jimenez International CPAs
Irvine, California
February 26, 2013
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
BALANCE SHEET
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Weighted average shares in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Shares in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2012
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has no operating activities and is now a shell company. The Company has concluded that it should sell the company or identify a merger partner. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in completing such a transaction or be able to maintain sufficient liquidity over a period of time that will allow it to carry out these actions, in which case the Company might be forced to liquidate or seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy statutes, or both.
The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
Two of the Company's stockholder/officers have advanced cash to the Company on a short-term non-interest bearing basis to pay for ongoing general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2012, $3,000 had been advanced and is reflected as loans from officers.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
For the purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid cash investments that mature in three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-(Continued)
December 31, 2012
STOCK OPTIONS
Compensation cost relating to stock-based payments, including grants of employee stock options, is recognized in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued on the grant date. The Company recognized the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as compensation expense in its statement of operations on a straight line basis, over the vesting period.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are provided under the asset and liability method and reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. The Company establishes valuation allowances when the realization of specific deferred tax assets is subject to uncertainty. The Company records no tax benefits on its operating losses, as the losses will have to be carried forward and realization of any benefit is uncertain.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Since the Company generated net losses in 2011 and 2010, outstanding stock options would have been anti-dilutive and were not considered in these calculations.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying values of cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and loans from officers at December 31, 2012 and 2011 approximated fair value due to their short maturity or nature.
2. INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2012, the Company had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $15 million that will expire commencing in 2023 through 2031. These carryforwards may be subject to certain limitations on annual utilization in the event of a change in ownership, as defined by tax law. The Company has established valuation allowances to fully offset the deferred income tax assets related to these loss carryforwards, based upon the available evidence that indicates that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the tax benefits. The Company’s income tax returns remain subject to examination for the years 2009 through 2012 for federal and state purposes.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-(Continued)
December 31, 2012
3. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consist of the following (in thousands):
4. EMPLOYEE STOCK SAVINGS PLAN
The Reliability Incorporated Employee Stock Saving Plan (the “Plan”) (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2000) was terminated effective November 16, 2006, with all accounts fully vested as of such date. The Company filed the termination of the Plan with the Internal Revenue Service to request a favorable letter of determination and notified all employees covered by the Plan of its termination, and their rights to final payment thereunder. The Company received a favorable letter of determination from the Internal Revenue Service.
The Plan allowed eligible United States employees to contribute up to 100% of defined compensation to the Plan and to elect to have contributions not be subject to Federal income taxes under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matched employee contributions to the Plan at a rate equal to 50% of the employee’s contribution, but the Company’s matching contribution was limited to 2% of the employee’s defined compensation. The Company also made a voluntary contribution of an amount equal to 1% of the defined compensation of all participants. The Company also contributed a profit sharing amount based on the profits of the Company. The maximum profit sharing contribution was 5% of compensation. The Company registered and reserved 500,000 shares in 1992, and registered and reserved 500,000 additional shares in 2001, of common stock for sale to the Plan. The Plan did not purchase any shares from the Company during the two-year period ending in 2012. At December 31, 2012, 354,300 reserved shares remain unissued under the 2001 registration statement. There are no plans to issue the reserved shares as the plan has been terminated.
5. STOCK OPTION PLAN
Under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”), no further option grants are allowed after February 26, 2007, but options theretofore granted remain in effect until satisfied or terminated pursuant to the Option Plan. No options were granted under the Option Plan during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-(Continued)
December 31, 2012
At December 31, 2006, all options were fully vested; thus no further stock option expense has been recorded related to the Option Plan. The weighted-average remaining contractual term, as of December 31, 2012, was 3.80 years for outstanding and exercisable options. There were no options exercised and none that expired or were canceled during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 370,000 options outstanding under the Option Plan which are exercisable at a weighted average price of $.21 until July 19, 2016, when they expire.
6. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
During January 2011, the Company issued 1,083,333 shares of common stock for proceeds of $13,000. During April 2011, the Company issued 500,000 shares for proceeds of $8,000.
On January 17, 2012 the Board voted to issue 1,500,000 shares to its officers, Jay Gottlieb and Gregg Schneider, at $0.016 per share for a total of $24,000. The issuance provided cash of $19,000 and the repayment of $5,000 of Loans from officers
7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January, 2013 Jay Gottlieb, the Company’s President, loaned $12,000 to the Company on an interest-free basis to assist in funding its operating expenses. No other material subsequent events have occurred since December 31, 2012 that require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.