Item 1a. Risk Factors
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the Company may not be able to proceed with its planned operations and your investment may be lost entirely.
RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Business
We have extremely limited assets and ceased generating revenue.
We have little assets and have had limited revenues since inception. We will not receive revenues until we complete funding through debt, equity, or Joint Venture financing.
We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a debt, equity, or Joint Venture financing or consummate a business combination with a profitable business. This may result in our incurring a net operating loss that will increase unless we consummate an acquisition of an oil and gas producing properties that are profitable. We cannot assure you that we can identify any oil and gas properties that will be profitable at the time of its acquisition by the Company or ever.
We will need to raise additional capital.
We will require additional financing. Any debt or equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, would increase expenses, and may involve restrictive covenants. We may be required to raise additional capital, at times and in amounts, which are uncertain, especially under the current capital market conditions. Under these circumstances, if we are unable to acquire additional capital or are required to raise it on terms that are less satisfactory than desired, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Risks related to our business operations:
Environmental and Occupational Regulations will impact our operations.
We are subject to various federal, state, provincial, and local international laws and regulations concerning occupational safety and health as well as the discharge of materials into, and the protection of, the environment. Environmental laws and regulations relate to, among other things:
·
assessing the environmental impact of drilling, workover or construction activities;
·
the generation, storage, transportation and disposal of waste materials;
·
the emission of certain gases into the atmosphere;
·
the monitoring, abandonment, reclamation and remediation of well and other sites, including sites of former operations; and
·
the development of emergency response and spill contingency plans.
The costs of environmental protection and safety and health compliance are significant. Compliance with environmental, safety and health initiatives can be costly. There is no assurance that we will be able to comply with these regulations. If we cannot comply with these regulations, we will be forced to cease all operations in which case you will lose your entire investment. We cannot predict with any reasonable degree of certainty our future exposure concerning such matters.
We are subject to exploration and production regulation
Our oil and gas operations are subject to various federal, state, provincial, tribal, and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations relate to matters that include, but are not limited to:
·
acquisition of seismic data;
·
location of wells;
·
drilling and casing of wells;
·
hydraulic fracturing;
·
well production;
·
spill prevention plans;
·
emissions and discharge permitting;
·
use, transportation, storage and disposal of fluids and materials incidental to oil and gas operations;
·
surface usage and the restoration of properties upon which wells have been drilled;
·
calculation and disbursement of royalty payments and production taxes;
·
plugging and abandoning of wells; and
·
transportation of production.
Our operations also are subject to conservation regulations, including the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or proration units; the number of wells that may be drilled on the Oil and Gas Lease and the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties. In the United States, some states allow the forced pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration, while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases, which may make it more difficult to develop oil and gas properties. In addition, state conservation laws generally limit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose certain requirements regarding the ratable purchase of production. The effect of these regulations is to limit the amounts of oil and gas we can produce from our wells and to limit the number of wells or the locations at which we can drill.
Public policy, which includes laws, rules and regulations, can change
Our operations are generally subject to federal laws, rules and regulations. In addition, we are also subject to the laws and regulations of various states and local governments. Pursuant to public policy changes, numerous government departments and agencies have issued extensive rules and regulations binding on the oil and gas industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Changes in such public policy have affected, and at times in the future could affect, our operations. Political developments can restrict production levels, enact price controls, and change environmental protection requirements, and increase taxes, royalties and other amounts payable to governments or governmental agencies. Existing laws and regulations can also require us to incur substantial costs to maintain regulatory compliance. Our operating and other compliance costs could increase further if existing laws and regulations are revised or reinterpreted or if new laws and regulations become applicable to our operations. Although we are unable to predict changes to existing laws and regulations, such changes could significantly affect our profitability, financial condition, and liquidity, particularly changes related to hydraulic fracturing, income taxes and climate change as discussed below.
Hydraulic Fracturing - The U.S. Congress is currently considering legislation to amend the federal Safe Drinking Water Act to require the disclosure of chemicals used by the oil and natural-gas industry in the hydraulic-fracturing process. Currently, regulation of hydraulic fracturing is primarily conducted at the state level through permitting and other compliance requirements. This legislation, if adopted, could establish an additional level of regulation and permitting at the federal level.
Environmental matters and costs can be significant
As an operator of oil and gas properties, we are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on us for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from our operations in affected areas. Any future environmental costs of fulfilling our commitments to the environment are uncertain and will be governed by several factors, including future changes to regulatory requirements. There is no assurance that changes in or additions to public policy regarding the protection of the environment will not have a significant impact on our operations and profitability.
Insurance does not cover all risks
Exploration, development, production, and processing of oil and gas can be hazardous and involve unforeseen occurrence including, but not limited to blowouts, cratering, fires, and loss of well control. These occurrences can result in damage to or destruction of wells or production facilities, injury to persons, loss of life, or damage to property or the environment. We do not maintain insurance at this time against losses or liabilities in accordance with customary industry practices. However, insurance against all operational risks is not available to us.
We have generated limited revenues from operations. We have a history of losses and losses are likely to continue in the future.
We have generated limited revenues from operations. Cumulative losses as of May 31, 2012 totaled ($1,701,109). We have incurred significant losses in the past and we will likely continue to incur losses in the future unless our development program proves successful. Even if our development program produces oil and gas, there can be no assurance that we will be able to commercially exploit these resources, or generate sufficient revenues to operate profitably.
We will require additional financing to continue our development operations.
We will require significant working capital to continue our current development program. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure additional funding to meet our objectives or if we are able to identify funding sources, that the funding will be available on terms acceptable to the Company. Should this occur, we will have to significantly reduce our development programs, which will limit our ability to secure additional equity participation in acquisitions of oil and gas leases or in various joint ventures.
There are no confirmed proven reserves of oil and gas reservoirs on any properties from which we may derive any financial benefit.
Neither the Company nor any independent petroleum geologist has confirmed that our leasehold interests can be commercially developed. In order to carry out additional development and/or exploration programs of any potential oil or gas deposits, we will require substantial additional funding.
We have no history as a company engaged in oil and gas development or exploration.
We have no history of earnings or cash flow from oil and gas operations. If we are able to proceed to production, commercial viability will be affected by factors that are beyond our control such as the particular attributes of the deposit, the fluctuation in the prices of oil and gas, the cost of construction and operating an oil or gas well, prices, and refining facilities, the availability of economic sources for energy, government regulations including regulations relating to prices, royalties, restrictions on production, quotas on exploration, as the costs of protection of the environment.
If our exploration costs are higher than anticipated, then our profitability will be adversely affected.
We are currently proceeding with development and/or exploration of our leasehold interests on the basis of estimated development/exploration costs. If our development/exploration costs are greater than anticipated we may be forced to terminate our operations until such time as we generate additional revenues to fund our operations. Factors that could cause development/exploration costs to increase are adverse weather conditions, difficult terrain, unknown or unexpected results when we re-enter a well, increased government regulation and shortages of qualified personnel.
We face many operating hazards.
The development and operation of an oil or gas well involves many risks, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. These risks include, among other things, ground fall, flooding, environmental hazards, and the discharge of toxic chemicals, explosions and other accidents. Such occurrences may result in work stoppages, delays in production, increased production costs, damage to or destruction of mines and other producing facilities, injury or loss of life, damage to property, environmental damage, and possible legal liability for such damages.
We do not maintain liability insurance.
We do not maintain liability insurance. As such, if we are found liable for any action, whether intentional or unintentional, we will be required to satisfy the liability with our own funds. Currently we have nominal assets and any monetary award would likely result in the close of our operations. Even assuming a significant increase in our assets and we secure liability insurance, the amount of the coverage may be insufficient to cover to insure against any award. Since the Company may not be able, or may elect not to insure, this may result in a material adverse change in the Company’s financial position. The nature of these risks is such that liabilities may exceed policy limits, in which event the Company would incur substantial uninsured losses.
There may be insufficient oil and gas reserves to develop any of our properties and our estimates may be inaccurate.
There is no certainty that any expenditures made in the development/exploration of any properties will result in discoveries of commercially recoverable quantities of oil or gas. Most development/exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially extractable deposits of oil or gas and no assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery will in fact be realized or that any identified leasehold interest will ever qualify as a commercially developed. Estimates of reserves, deposits, and production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental regulations and requirements, weather, unexpected or unknown results when we re-enter a well, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations, and work interruptions.
Short term factors relating to reserves, such as the need for orderly development of the wells may also have an adverse effect on our development/exploration, drilling and on the results of operations. There can be no assurance the production of insignificant amounts of oil can be duplicated in a larger exploration program. Material changes in estimated reserves, development/drilling costs may affect the economic viability of any project.
We have no proven reserves.
All of our leasehold interests are without known bodies (reserves) of commercial oil or gas. Development of these properties will follow only upon obtaining satisfactory development/exploration results. The long-term profitability of the Company’s operations will be in part directly related to the cost and success of its development/exploration and development programs. Oil and gas development/exploration and development are highly speculative businesses, involving a high degree of risk. Few properties, which are explored, are ultimately developed into producing oil and gas fields. There is no assurance that our development/exploration and development activities will result in any discoveries of commercial quantities of oil and gas. There is also no assurance that, even if commercial quantities of oil or gas are discovered, a well can be brought into commercial production. Production/discovery of oil and gas is dependent upon a number of factors, not the least of which is the technical skill of the development/exploration personnel involved. The commercial viability of a well is also dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as worldwide economy, the price of oil and gas, government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, and environmental protection.
During our operations we may experience certain unanticipated conditions may arise or unexpected or unusual events may occur, including fires, floods, or earthquakes. It is not always possible to fully insure against such risks and we may decide not to take out insurance against such risks as a result of high premiums or for other reasons. Should such liabilities arise, they may reduce or eliminate any future profitability and may result in a decline in the value of the securities of the Company.
We face fluctuating oil and prices.
The price of oil and gas has experienced significant price movements over short periods of time and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations (including, the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies) interest rates, global or regional consumption patterns, speculative activities and increases in production due to improved exploration and d production methods. The supply of and demand for oil and gas are affected by various factors, including political events, economic conditions and production costs in major producing regions.
Drilling operations are hazardous, raise environmental concerns and raise insurance risks.
Drilling operations are by their nature subject to a variety of risks, such as, flooding, environmental hazards, the discharge of toxic chemicals and other hazards. Such occurrences may delay development or production, increase production costs, or result in a liability. We may not be able to insure fully or at all against such risks, due to political or other reasons, or we may decide not to take out insurance against such risks as a result of high premiums or other reasons. We intend to conduct our business in a way that safeguards public health and the environment and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Environmental hazards may exist on properties in which we hold an interest which are unknown to us and may have been caused by prior owners. Changes to drilling laws and regulations could require additional capital expenditures and increase operating and/or reclamation costs. Although we are unable to predict what additional legislation, if any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory requirements could render certain operations uneconomic.
Our estimates of resources are subject to uncertainty. The cost of employing this technology maybe cost prohibitive or the cost may exceed the benefit.
Under current SEC standards, proved reserves are those quantities of oil and natural gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations. The term “reasonable certainty” implies a high degree of confidence that the quantities of oil and/or natural gas actually recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. Reasonable certainty can be established using techniques that have been proved effective by actual production from projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir or by other evidence using reliable technology that establishes reasonable certainty. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that have been field-tested and have demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation.
In order to establish reasonable certainty with respect to our leases, we would have to employ technologies that have been demonstrated to yield results with consistency and repeatability. The technical data used in the estimation of proved reserves include, but are not limited to, electrical logs, radioactivity logs, core analyses, geologic maps and available downhole and production data, seismic data and well test data. Generally, oil and gas reserves are estimated using, as appropriate, one or more of these available methods: production decline curve analysis, analogy to similar reservoirs or volumetric calculations. Reserves attributable to producing wells with sufficient production history are estimated using appropriate decline curves or other performance relationships. Reserves attributable to producing wells with limited production history and for undeveloped locations are estimated using performance from analogous wells in the surrounding area and technical data to assess the reservoir continuity. In some instances, particularly in connection with exploratory discoveries, analogous performance data is not available, requiring us to rely primarily on volumetric calculations to determine reserve quantities. Volumetric calculations are primarily based on data derived from geologic-based seismic interpretation, open-hole logs, and completion flow data. When using production decline curve analysis or analogy to estimate proved reserves, they would be limited to estimates to the quantities of oil and gas derived through volumetric calculations.
The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available geological, geophysical, engineering, and economic data, the precision of the engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. The estimates of reserves and future cash flows are based on various assumptions and are inherently imprecise. Even though these estimates may be reasonable and logical, actual future production, cash flows, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves may vary substantially from these estimates. Also, the use of a discount factor for reporting purposes may not necessarily represent the most appropriate discount factor, given actual interest rates and risks to which the oil and natural gas industry in general are subject.
If we are unable to obtain all of our required governmental permits, our operations could be negatively impacted.
Our future operations, including exploration and development activities, required permits from various governmental authorities. Such operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire all required licenses or permits or to maintain continued operations at our properties.
We are subject to numerous environmental and other regulatory requirements.
All phases of drilling and development/exploration operations are subject to governmental regulation including environmental regulation. Environmental legislation is becoming stricter, with increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and heightened responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There can be no assurance that possible future changes in environmental regulation will not adversely affect our operations. As well, environmental hazards may exist on a property in which we hold an interest that was caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties and of which the Company is not aware at present.
Government approvals and permits are required to be maintained in connection with our drilling and development/exploration activities. We will require permits for our operations and there re is no assurance that delays will not occur in connection with obtaining all necessary renewals of such permits for the existing operations or additional permits for any possible future changes to the Company’s operations, including any proposed capital improvement programs. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions there under, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in drilling operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of our activities and may be liable for civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws, regulations and permitting requirements, or more stringent application of existing laws, may have a material adverse impact on the Company resulting in increased capital expenditures or production costs, reduced levels of production at producing properties or abandonment or delays in development of properties.
There is no assurance that there will not be title or boundary disputes.
Although we have investigated the right to explore and exploit our properties and obtained records from government offices, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute the title to any of our properties or that any property may be subject to prior unregistered agreements and transfers. The title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.
Local infrastructure may impact our development/exploration activities and results of operations.
Our activities depend, to one degree or another, on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges and power and water supplies are important determinants that affect capital and operating costs. Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena sabotage or government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect the activities and profitability of the Company.
There may be challenges to our title in our properties.
While we intend to conduct our own due diligence prior to committing significant funds to any project, oil and gas properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and title may be affected by undetected defects. Should this occur, we face significant delays, costs and the possible loss of any investments or commitment of capital.
Because of the speculative nature of completing development programs and drilling for oil and gas, there are significant risks that our business will fail.
Oil and gas development/exploration is extremely risky. We cannot provide any assurances that our activities will result in commercially exploitable reserves of oil and gas. Development/exploration for oil and gas is a speculative venture necessarily involving substantial risk. Any expenditure that we make may not result in the discovery of commercially exploitable reserves.
The market for oil and gas is volatile. This will have a direct impact on the Company’s revenues (if any) and profits (if any) and will probably have an adverse affect on our ongoing operations.
The price of both oil and gas has fluctuated significantly over the past few years. This has contributed to the renewed interest in oil and gas exploration. However, in the event that the price of either oil or gas falls, the interest in exploratory ventures may decline and the value of the Company’s business could be adversely affected.
Government regulation or changes in such regulation may adversely affect the Company’s business.
The Company intends to engage experts to assist it with respect to its operations. The Company deals with various regulatory and governmental agencies and the rules and regulations of such agencies. No assurances can be given that it will be successful in its efforts or dealings with these agencies. Further, in order for the Company to operate and grow its business, it needs to continually conform to the laws, rules, and regulations of such jurisdiction. It is possible that the legal and regulatory environment pertaining to the development/exploration and development of oil and gas properties will change. Uncertainty and new regulations and rules could increase the Company’s cost of doing business or prevent it from conducting its business.
We are in competition with companies that are larger, more established and better capitalized than we are.
Many of our potential competitors have:
●
greater financial and technical resources;
●
longer operating histories and greater experience in oil and gas
We may not be able to generate revenue sufficient to maintain operations
To date, we have generated limited revenue. We have incurred significant losses since inception and there can be no assurance that we will be able to reverse this trend. Even if we are able to successfully identify commercially exploitable oil and gas reserves, there is no assurance that we will have sufficient financing to exploit these reserves, generate revenues, or find a willing buyer for the properties.
We have no proven reserves, extremely limited operations and no operating revenues.
We currently have no revenues from operations and no proven reserves. Reserves, by definition, contain mineral deposits in a quantity and in a form from which oil and gas may be economically and legally extracted or produced. We have not established that either oil or gas exists in any quantity in the property, which is the focus of our exploration efforts, and unless or until we do so, we will have nominal revenues.
Development/Exploration for economic deposits of oil and gas is speculative.
Our business is very speculative since there is generally no way to recover any of the funds expended on development/exploration unless the existence of commercially exploitable reserves are established and the Company can exploit those reserves by either commencing drilling operations, selling or leasing its interest in the property, or entering into a joint venture with a larger e company that can further develop the property. Unless we can establish and exploit reserves before our funds are exhausted, we will have to discontinue operations, which could make our stock valueless.
Our operations are subject to environmental risks.
Our operations are subject to strict environmental rules and regulations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with these rules. Environmental legislation is evolving in some jurisdictions in a manner, which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect our projects
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive and the success and future growth of our business depend upon our ability to remain competitive in identifying and developing properties with sufficient reserves for economic exploitation.
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive and fragmented with limited barriers to entry, especially at the exploratory stages. We compete in national, regional, and local markets with large multi-national corporations and against start-up operators hoping to identify an oil or gas property. Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources than we do. This puts us at a competitive disadvantage if we choose to further exploit development opportunities.
The loss of key members of our senior management team could adversely affect the execution of our business strategy and our financial results.
We believe that the successful execution of our business strategy and our ability to move beyond the exploratory stages depends on the continued employment of key members of our senior management team. If any members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our financial results and our business could be materially adversely affected.
We operate in a regulated industry and changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce our revenues.
Our organization is subject to extensive and complex, federal and state laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with the laws and regulations that are directly applicable to our business, we could suffer civil and/or criminal penalties or be subject to injunctions or cease and desist orders.
We will hire third party companies to undertake our development programs.
We will have to hire employees or retain independent companies to oversee or perform our development operations. We currently do not have sufficient funds for either. As such, even with exploitable deposits of oil or gas, we may not be able to develop our leasehold interests.
Risks Related to Our Stockholders and Shares of Common Stock
Our stock price may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile. We believe investors should expect continued volatility in our stock price. Such volatility may make it difficult or impossible for you to obtain a favorable selling price for our shares.
We have a large number of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock.
We have a large number of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, which our management may issue without further stockholder approval, thereby causing dilution of your holdings of our common stock. Our management will continue to have broad discretion to issue shares of our common stock in a range of transactions, including capital-raising transactions, mergers, acquisitions and in other transactions, without obtaining stockholder approval, unless stockholder approval is required. If our management determines to issue shares of our common stock from the large pool of authorized but unissued shares for any purpose in the future, your ownership position would be diluted without your further ability to vote on that transaction.
Shares of our common stock may continue to be subject to price volatility and illiquidity because our shares may continue to be thinly traded and may never become eligible for trading on a national securities exchange.
While we may at some point be able to meet the requirements necessary for our common stock to be listed on a national securities exchange, we cannot assure you that we will ever achieve a listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. Our shares are currently only eligible for quotation on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, which is not an exchange. Initial listing on a national securities exchange is subject to a variety of requirements, including minimum trading price and minimum public “float” requirements, and could also be affected by the general skepticism of such markets concerning companies that are the result of mergers with inactive publicly-held companies. There are also continuing eligibility requirements for companies listed on public trading markets. If we are unable to satisfy the initial or continuing eligibility requirements of any such market, then our stock may not be listed or could be delisted. This could result in a lower trading price for our common stock and may limit your ability to sell your shares, any of which could result in you losing some or all of your investments.
The market valuation of our business may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control and the value of your investment may fluctuate correspondingly.
The market valuation of emerging growth companies, such as us, frequently fluctuate due to factors unrelated to the past or present operating performance of such companies. Our market valuation may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
·
changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our financial performance, although there are currently no analysts covering our stock;
·
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes, particularly among securities of emerging growth companies;
·
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
·
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new technologies, acquisitions, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
·
variations in our quarterly operating results;
·
fluctuations in related commodities prices; and
·
additions or departures of key personnel.
As a result, the value of your investment in us may fluctuate.
Investors should not look to dividends as a source of income.
In the interest of reinvesting initial profits back into our business, we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, any economic return will initially be derived, if at all, from appreciation in the fair market value of our stock, and not as a result of dividend payments.
Our common stock may be subject to penny stock regulations, which may make it difficult for investors to sell their stock.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks”. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, which specifies information about penny stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. If our common stock becomes subject to the penny stock rules, holders of our shares may have difficulty selling those shares.
We have never paid dividends on our common stock.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not presently intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that any funds available for payment of cash dividends will be re-invested into the Company to further our business strategy.
We expect to issue more shares in an equity financing, which will result in substantial dilution.
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the Company to issue 5 billion shares of common stock. Any equity financing effected by the Company may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, our common stock issued in any equity financing transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Our board of directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued in connection with a business combination or otherwise, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holders of common stock might be materially adversely affected.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties.
Executive Offices:
Our executive offices are currently located at 12518 NE Airport Way, Suite 148 No. 156 Portland Oregon 97230, an office leased by Peter Matousek, one of our executives. Mr. Matousek provides this office rent free. This office space is currently sufficient for our needs and we expect it to be sufficient for the foreseeable future or until such time as we acquire a target company.
Oil and Gas Leases
The Company has no oil and gas leases as of May 31, 2012.
The Company had the following oil and gas leases in the State of Kentucky as of May 31, 2011:
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On May 10, 2011, the Company accepted an Offer to Purchase from Lea Kennedy d/b/a LuxemBarings (“Purchaser”) to purchase $10 million of the Company’s common stock based on the average of 5 consecutive trading day’s close prior to date of closing. The Offer to Purchase was scheduled to close on or before June 24, 2011. The Purchaser failed to complete the transaction, after mutually agreed extensions of the closing date. The Company has retained legal counsel to take legal action against the Purchaser for failing to complete the purchase transaction and for damages to the Company as a result of the failure to complete the transaction. The Company has recognized losses and damages in the financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2012.
Item 4.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of the Security Holders.
The Company obtained the written consent of the stockholders holding a majority, 86.51%, of the outstanding voting rights of the Company on September 1, 2011 (the "Consent"). The Consent approved the election of Mr. Kevin M. Grapes and Jerry G. Mikolajczyk as directors of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending August 31, 2012. Mr. Mikolajczyk, Mr. Lynch and Mr. Matousek termed out as directors of the Company on August 31, 2011.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
A.
Market Information
Our common stock trades on the Over-the-Counter-Bulletin Board under the symbol ("XNRG"). There is a very limited market for our common stock, with very limited trading activities. Until October 2009 there was no posted bid or ask price for our common stock. The following table shows the high and low closing sales prices for our Common Stock for the two most recent fiscal years. The quotations reflect inter dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The information is derived from information received from online stock quotation services.
*The price of the common stock has been adjusted to reflect an 80:1forward split of our common stock in August 2010.
B.
Holders
As of May 31, 2012, the Company had 58 active shareholders of record. This number does not include an indeterminate number of shareholders whose shares are held by brokers in street name.
C.
Transfer Agent
Our transfer agent is Holladay Stock Transfer, Inc. whose address is 2939 N. 67th Place #C, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 and their telephone number is (480)481-3940.
D.
Dividends
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as our Board may declare from time to time from any surplus that we may have. We have not paid dividends on our common stock since the date of our incorporation and we do not anticipate paying any common stock dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that any earnings will be retained for development and expansion of our businesses and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors considered relevant by our Board and will be subject to limitations imposed under Nevada law.
E.
Equity Compensation Plan
Executive and Board Compensation
The Company entered in a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Wayne St. Cyr as the Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development on December 21, 2010 for a ten day period ending December 31, 2010 which was extended for a 12 month term to December 31, 2011, whereby the Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development is paid $10,000 per month. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Ct. Cyr and has retained Mr. St. Cyr on a month to month basis. In addition to his duties as Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development, Mr. St. Cyr is the Corporate Secretary for the Company. Mr. St Cyr is paid $10,000 per month.
The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement for Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk for a 12-month period commencing on June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2012. Mr. Mikolajczyk is hired through a service company, and will be paid $120,000 in cash payments for the services of Mr. Mikolajczyk. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Mikolajczyk. Mr. Mikolajczyk continues to work for the Company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $10,000 per month.
The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek for a 12-month period commencing June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2012 whereby Mr. Matousek will be paid $90,000 in cash payments. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Matousek. Mr. Matousek continues to work for the Company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $7,500 per month.
The Company had Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Peter Matousek, Mr. Donald Lynch and Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk which ended on August 31, 2011 whereby Mr. Matousek, Mr. Lynch and Mr. Mikolajczyk will be paid 5,000 shares per month in stock of the Company. The stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. On August 31, 2011, directors Peter Matousek, Donald Lynch and Jerry G. Mikolajczyk termed out.
The Company entered into Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Kevin M. Grapes and Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk as directors of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending August 31, 2012. Both Mr. Grapes and Mr. Mikolajczyk will receive 5,000 shares per month of the Company’s common stock in consideration for them serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. This amount includes all costs related to the engagement Director of the Company except 3rd party or travel expenses.
On May 21, 2012, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes resigned as a Board member.
On May 22, 2012, Company entered into a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Dr. William D. Spier as a director of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending May 31, 2013.
On May 25, 2012, Company entered into a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek as a director of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending May 31, 2013.
Both Dr. Spier and Mr. Matousek will receive 5,000 shares per month of the Company’s common stock in consideration for them serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. This amount includes all costs related to the engagement Director of the Company except 3rd party or travel expenses.
The Company authorized and approved an aggregate of 136,129 shares for the period ended May 31, 2012 with an average price of $0.0333 per share to the Board pursuant to a Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes, Mr. Peter Matousek and Dr. William D. Spier. The Company issued 105,000 of the 136,129 shares to the Board as of May 31, 2012.
The table below represents the shares issued or reserved to the Board with the 5-Day Average Share Closing Price:
Field Operations Services Compensation
The Company entered into an Oil And Gas Field Operations Services agreement with Mr. Michael Grubb to provide his services exclusively as Manager of Field Operations for Xun Oil Of Kentucky, Inc. and Nux Holdings Of Kentucky, Inc., wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. The Company agreed to pay common shares of the Company in lieu of cash as bonuses for the following:
·
Acquisition of the first oil and gas lease for the Company during the month of February, 2011, - 10,000 shares;
·
Production of oil, recorded as revenue, during the month of February, 2011, - 20,000 shares;
·
Acquisition of 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th lease before the end of March 31, 2011, - 10,000 shares;
·
Acquisition of 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th lease before the end of April 30, 2011, - 10,000 shares;
·
Acquisition of 11th 12th, 13th, 14th, and 15th lease before the end of May 31, 2011, - 10,000 shares;
·
An aggregate of 15 oil wells refurbished/re-entered/reworked producing oil before May 31, 2011, 60,000 shares.
The Company issued 10,000 common shares on February 28, 2011 for $1,100 pursuant to an Oil and Gas Field Operations Services agreement with the Company for bonuses earned. The employment contract with Mr. Grub terminated on July 31, 2011 and was not renewed by the Company.
F.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
We issued shares of our common stock to investors which were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, or Regulation D or Regulation S promulgated thereunder. All recipients had adequate access, through their relationships with us, to information about us.
On November 30, 2010 the Company issued 1,259,000 common shares for a $62,950 for Accounts Receivable assignment, refer to NOTE 21: ACCOUNTS RECIEVABLE PURCHASE of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 30, 2010 the Company issued 741,000 common shares for $37,050 cash in a negotiated transaction with an investor to fund the ongoing operations of the Company.
On April 12, 2012 the Company issued 18 Million shares for $900,000 pursuant to a twenty-four month investment banking agreement.
G.
Stock Redemption
The Company redeemed on March 28, 2011, 140 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $87,500 or $0.000625 per share from Peter Matousek, the Company’s president and director, at the time. Also on March 28, 2011, the Company redeemed 60 million shares of the Company’s common stock from four shareholders. The purchase price for the 60 million totaled $37,500 or $0.000625 per share. With the redemption of the 200 million shares, the Company reduced its issued and outstanding shares to 312,501,000 shares of common stock as of March 28, 2011.
Item 6.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
Not applicable.
Item 7.
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) is management’s assessment of the historical financial and operating results of the Company during the period covered by the financial statements. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects upon the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting the Company will be those anticipated by management. Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
Introduction
We are an independent oil and natural gas development and production company. Our basic business model is to increase shareholder value by finding and developing oil and gas production through the development activities, which include drilling offset oil and gas wells and re-entering oil and gas wells, that have historical oil and gas production or are currently producing oil and gas, and selling the production from these, worked over wells at a profit. To be successful, we must, over time, need to complete our goal of raising sufficient funds to drill offset wells or complete development programs over the next year and then sell the resulting production at a price that is sufficient to cover our operating expenses, administrative costs and interest expense, plus offer us a return on our capital investment.
We have a limited operating history of oil and gas production and no proven reserves, no production and negative cash flow. To date, we have had limited revenues and have not been able to generate sustainable positive earnings on a Company-wide basis. Our management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will ever operate profitably. As a result of our limited operating history, we are more susceptible to the numerous business, investment and industry risks that have been described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10K.
Our longer-term success depends on, among many other factors, the production of grade oil and gas properties and on the prevailing sales prices for oil and natural gas along with associated operating expenses. The volatile nature of the energy markets makes it difficult to estimate future prices of oil and natural gas; however, any prolonged period of depressed prices would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations are focused on identifying and evaluating prospective oil and gas properties and funding projects that we believe have the potential to produce oil or gas in commercial quantities subject to the Company obtaining the necessary funding for the offset drilling or development programs.
During the past two fiscal years, we have been involved in searching for an acquisition that would provide us with revenue and positive cash flow. Our inability to generate revenue for the 12 month period ending May 31, 2012 is due primarily to difficulties in our ability to raise sufficient funds necessary to close on the acquisition of an oil producing, cash flow positive, property in Texas during the past fiscal year. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in raising sufficient funds to accomplish our goals and objectives.
Results Of Operations For Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2012 as compared to May 31, 2011.
Revenues
We generated limited revenues, with no revenue for the fiscal period ending May 31, 2012 and $4,637 for the fiscal period ending May 31, 2011. Our operations to date have been financed by the sale of our common stock and third party loans. Operating expenses decreased for the year ended May 31, 2012 which totalled $585,774 as compared to $614,592 for the year ended May 31, 2011. Our largest single operating expense to date has been professional fees totalling $540,033 for the year ended May 31, 2012 as compared to $577,234 for the year ended May 31, 2011. Most of these expenses have been incurred in connection with our attempts to establish field operations and in connection with ongoing corporate activities. General and Administrative expenses, including professional fees, totalled $557,330 and $614,876 respectively.
We incurred a net loss of $985,517, which includes an one-time impairment charge of $399,743, compared to the net loss of $614.592 for the period ending May 31, 2012.
Until we obtain additional funding to complete our oil and gas well development program, we do not anticipate generating additional revenues, and any revenues that we generate may not be sufficient to cover our operating expenses. In which case we may have to cease operations and you may lose your entire investment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Assets and Liabilities
Our primary financial resource is our base of our unproven oil and gas leases. Our ability to fund our capital expenditure program is dependent upon the availability of capital resource financing. In the next fiscal year, we plan on spending approximately $5,000,000 in new capital investments for a 30 well offset drilling program, however our actual expenditures may vary significantly from this estimate if our plans for to obtain financing changes during the year. Factors such as changes in operating margins due to changes in the price of oil and gas and the availability of capital resources could increase or decrease our ultimate level of expenditures during the next fiscal year.
The changes in our capital resources at May 31, 2012 compared with May 31, 2011 are:
Our working capital deficit increased by $886,078, from ($570,239) as of May 31, 2011 to ($1,456,318) as of May 31, 2012. This increase in the deficit was due to the amount of resources that was expended to purchase oil and gas leases in Texas, and complete all the necessary SEC filings.
Over the last year, we have repositioned our Company to better meet our corporate goals and objectives, which have allowed us to move forward with our goals and objectives of being an oil and gas producing company. Our business is capital intensive. Our ability to grow is dependent upon favorably obtaining outside debt and capital and generating cash flows from operating activities necessary to fund our investment activities. There is no assurance that we will be able to achieve profitability. Since our future operations will continue to be dependent on successful development activities and our ability to seek and secure capital from external sources, should we be unable to achieve sustainable profitability this could cause any equity investment in the Company to become worthless.
Major sources of funds in the past for us have included the debt or equity markets. We will have to rely on these capital markets to fund future operations and growth. Our business model is focused on the development (workover programs) on our properties. Our ability to generate future revenues and operating cash flow will depend on successful completion of our planned programs and the acquisition of oil and gas producing properties, which may very likely require us to continue to raise equity or debt capital from outside sources.
The Company has ongoing capital commitments to develop certain leases pursuant to their underlying terms. Failure to meet such ongoing commitments may result in the loss of the right to participate in future development programs on certain leases or the loss of the lease itself. These ongoing capital commitments require us to seek capital from sources outside of the Company. The current uncertainty in the credit and capital markets, and the economic downturn, may restrict our ability to obtain needed capital.
Cash Flows
Changes in the net funds provided by or (used in) each of our operating, investing and financing activities are set forth in the table below:
May 31, 2012
May 31, 2011
Increase (Decrease)
Percentage Change
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
47,870
$
(97,977)
$
145,847
148.86%
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
$
(408,087)
$
(23,840)
$
384,247
1,611.78%
Net cash provided by financing activities
$
335,149
$
124,500
$
210,649
169.20%
Cash Flow Used in Operating activities:
Cash flow from operating activities is derived from the limited production of our oil and changes in the balances of payables, or other non-oil property asset account balances. For the year ended May 31, 2012, we had a positive cash flow from operating activities of $47,870, in comparison to a negative cash flow of $97,977 for the year ended May 31, 2011. The increase of $145,847 was the result of an increase in our payables balance. Variations in cash flow from operating activities may affect our level of development expenditures. Our expenditures consist primarily of our General and Administrative (G&A) expenses, which consist of consulting and professional services, employee compensation, legal, accounting, travel and other G&A expenses, which we have incurred in order to address necessary organizational activities.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Cash flow from investing activities is derived from the acquisitions of our oil and gas property, plant and equipment and Other Assets. Cash used in investing activities for the year ended May 31, 2012 was ($403,087), an increase of $384,247 from the ($23,840) for the year ended May 31, 2011.
Cash Flow from Financing activities:
Cash flow from financing activities is derived from long-term liability account balances or in equity, account balances excluding retained earnings. Cash flow provided by financing activities was $335,149 for the year ended May 31, 2012. This is in comparison to $124,500 provided by financing activities for the year ended May 31, 2011. The increase of $210,649 in funds was borrowed for the acquisition of oil and gas leases and for our G&A expenses. We anticipate it will be necessary to rely on additional funding from the debt financing and from capital markets in the current fiscal year.
Our business is capital intensive. Our ability to grow is dependent upon favorably obtaining outside capital and generating cash flows from operating activities necessary to fund our investment activities. There is no assurance that we will be able to achieve profitability. Since our future operations will continue to be dependent on successful development activities and our ability to seek and secure capital from external sources, should we be unable to achieve profitability this could cause any equity investment in the Company to become worthless.
We have no ongoing revenues to satisfy our ongoing liabilities. Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. Unless we secure equity, debt financing or Joint Venture partners, of which there can be no assurance, or identify a profitable acquisition candidate, we will not be able to continue any operations.
Plan of Operation For Fiscal Year 2013
We will attempt to source equity or debt financing, or Joint Venture partners for our operating costs and for our oil and gas well drilling programs or attempt to identify a profitable acquisition candidate. We have had discussions with several companies and individuals for funding and/or Joint Ventures. However, we have not come to terms with any company or individual as of May 31, 2012. We will attempt to finance our operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing.
Critical Accounting Policies
Financial Reporting Release No. 60, which was released by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), encourages all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. The Company’s financial statements include a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Use of Estimates - Management’s discussion and analysis or plan of operation is based upon the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates, including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and long-lived assets. Management bases these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We review the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property, if any, exceeds its fair market value.
The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting and according to the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting No. 7 (“SFAS 7”), “Accounting and Reporting for Development Stage Enterprises”. The Company is considered a development-stage entity.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs")." Under ASU 2011-04, the guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements to ensure that fair value has the same meaning in U.S. GAAP and in IFRS and that their respective fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are the same. ASU 2011-04 is effective for public entities during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operation and financial condition.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income," ("ASU 2011-05") which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders' equity. Instead, comprehensive income must be reported either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operation and financial condition.
There were various other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries. None of the updates are expected to a have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements. We do not anticipate entering into any off-balance sheet arrangements during the next 12 months.
Item 7A.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information otherwise required by this Item.
Item 8.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Our financial statements have been examined to the extent indicated in its reports by Weinberg & Baer LLC, Certified Public Accountants, and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and pursuant to Regulation S-X as promulgated by the SEC and are included herein:
REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Xun Energy, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Xun Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries (a Nevada corporation in the development stage) as of May 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and from inception (December 20, 2007) through May 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Xun Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and from inception (December 20, 2007) through May 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company is in the development stage, and has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs. As such, it has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of May 31, 2012, the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its planned business objectives. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan regarding these matters is also described in Note 5 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Weinberg & Baer LLC
Weinberg & Baer LLC
Baltimore, Maryland
September 13, 2012
XUN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of MAY 31, 2012 and MAY 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
XUN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
XUN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2012 AND 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
XUN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAY 31, 2012
NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
The Company is engaged primarily in the acquisition, work-over development, and production of oil and gas properties. Such activities are concentrated in North American onshore, primarily in the United States in the State of Kentucky, Texas and Pennsylvania. The Company plans to acquire producing or near producing oil and gas properties that will provide cash flow and an upside for future development. We will be scouting for additional properties in and around Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Kansas and in Canada.
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on December 20, 2007 as Real Value Estates, Inc. On July 20, 2010, the Company changed its name to Xun Energy, Inc. and on February 7, 2011, the Company established two subsidiaries in the State of Kentucky. The Company acquired three oil and gas leases in the State of Kentucky on February 28, 2011 and began production of oil on one of its leases in March 2011.
On April 18, 2011, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) disclosing that the Company is no longer considered a shell and has completed a development program on one of its wells.
On February 6, 2012, the Company established a subsidiary in the State of Florida.
NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and we have eliminated all significant intercompany balances and transactions in consolidation.
FISCAL YEAR
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a May 31 fiscal year end.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Xun Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS)
The Company has adopted the International Financial Reporting Standards code of accounts. However, the Company’s consolidated statements are completed using USA GAAP.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are the same as basic earnings (loss) per share due to the lack of dilutive items in the Company.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company may, from time to time, invest cash in excess of our immediate operating requirements in short-term time deposits and money market instruments generally with original maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less. The Company considers all liquid investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates, and changes in these estimates are recorded when known. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following:
·
Estimates of proved reserves and related estimates of the present value of future net revenues;
·
Carrying value of oil and gas properties;
·
Estimates of the fair value of reporting units and related assessment of goodwill for impairment;
·
Income taxes;
·
Asset retirement obligations;
·
Legal contingencies and environmental risks and exposures.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The Company follows the successful efforts (“SE”) cost method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. Accordingly, only those expenses associated with successfully locating new oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized. For unsuccessful (or "dry hole") results, the associated operating costs are immediately charged against revenues for that period.
All costs incidental to the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and gas properties, including costs of undeveloped leasehold, and leasehold equipment, are capitalized. Please refer to INTANGIBLE ASSETS - LEGAL AND CONTRACTUAL - RIGHTS in this NOTE for further detail.
Internal costs incurred that are directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities undertaken by the Company for its own account, and that are not related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities, are also capitalized.
Interest costs incurred and attributable to unproved oil and gas properties under current evaluation and major development projects of oil and gas properties are also capitalized. All costs related to production activities, including workover costs incurred solely to maintain or increase levels of production from an existing completion interval, are charged to expense as incurred.
Indirect costs, such as General and Administrative costs, are allocated to capital costs at a rate of 10% of the direct costs associated with the acquisition, exploration, and development activities undertaken by the Company for its own account.
Capitalized costs are depleted by an equivalent unit-of-production cost method, converting gas to oil at the ratio of six thousand cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil. Depletion is calculated using the capitalized costs, including estimated asset retirement costs, plus the estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing or working over an oil or gas well, proved reserves, net of estimated salvage values.
Depletion is charged for each barrel of oil equivalent until the oil or gas well is no longer deemed economical for production of oil or gas. An over recovery of depletion by the Company may result from oil and gas wells producing more oil and gas than the reserve reports estimated. The over-recovery will be charged to income on a quarterly basis after the Company reviews the over-recovery and deducts an allowance for remediation, well capping and abandonment and future maintenance or development costs.
Costs associated with unproved properties are excluded from the depletion calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties. The Company assesses its unproved properties for impairment quarterly. Significant unproved properties are assessed individually.
No gain or loss is recognized upon disposal of oil and gas properties unless such disposal significantly alters the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves.
Depreciation and amortization of other property and equipment, including corporate and other midstream assets and leasehold improvements, are provided using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives ranging from three to 39 years. Interest costs incurred and attributable to major midstream and corporate construction projects are also capitalized.
The Company recognizes liabilities for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, such as producing well sites, when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of such assets and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The initial measurement of an asset retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its fair value, with an offsetting asset retirement cost recorded as an increase to the associated property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet. If the fair value of a recorded asset retirement obligation changes, a revision is recorded to both the asset retirement obligation and the asset retirement cost. The asset retirement cost is depreciated using a systematic and rational method similar to that used for the associated property and equipment.
EXPLORATION
The Company does not explore for oil and gas deposits. The Company may drill a new well, which is categorized as an offset well to an existing well that is producing oil or gas. The Company’s current business model does not include “wild cat” or exploratory drilling.
DEVELOPMENT - WORKOVER PROGRAM
The Company’s development - workover program consists of re-entering or completing a workover on an oil or gas well that has a historical evidence of oil or gas production or that is currently producing oil and gas at a fractional output compared to when the oil and gas wells first came into production. Workover activities include one or more of a variety of remedial operations on a producing well or inactive well to try to increase production. All costs of a workover are capitalized and amortized (depletion) on a per-unit of barrel equivalent of production.
DEVELOPMENT - OFFSET DRILLING
The Company's development - offset drilling program consists of drilling new wells within a proven and producing property. Well locations are selected by geologists based on known and historical data from producing oil and gas wells within the property or adjoining properties. All costs of drilling a new offset well are capitalized and amortized (depletion) on a per-unit of barrel equivalent of production.
RESERVES
The Company does not have proven reserves of oil or gas on its current oil and gas leases.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - LEGAL AND CONTRACTUAL - RIGHTS
The Company capitalizes the expenses incurred for acquiring oil and gas leases. The oil and gas leases are contracts between mineral owner, otherwise known as the lessor and the Company or working interest owner, otherwise known as the lessee in which the lessor grants the lessee the rights to explore, drill and produce oil, gas and other minerals for a specified primary term and thereafter as long as oil, gas, or other minerals are being produced in paying quantities. This lease gives the lessee a working interest. The oil and gas lease is granted in exchange for royalty payments to the lessor.
The capitalized costs include but are not limited to: the acquisition cost of the oil and gas leases, legal, travel, consultant studies, reserve reports, financing charges including an overhead allocation on closing. Many of the oil and gas leases have production covenants, which if not complied with during the term of the lease, the Company may forfeit the oil and gas lease. On a yearly basis, the oil and gas leases are reviewed for expiry and or non performance by the Company of any of the covenants in the oil and gas leases. The detailed analysis of our Oil and Gas Rights are as follows:
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Oil and gas sales are recognized when production is sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, delivery has occurred, title has transferred, and collectability of the revenue is probable. Delivery occurs and title is transferred when production has been delivered to a pipeline, railcar, truck, or a tanker lifting has occurred. Cash received relating to future production is deferred and recognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met. Taxes assessed by governmental authorities on oil and gas sales are included in the Cost of Goods in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses are reported net of amounts reimbursed by working interest owners of the oil and gas properties operated by the Company.
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of such instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency, or credit risks arising from these financial statements.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are provided in accordance with FASB ASC 740. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the year of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
RECLAMATION BONDS
Included in Other Assets as of May 31, 2012, is a Bond with the State of Kentucky for $500. The State of Kentucky requires a bond to be posted for each well should the Company fail to perform with the proper plugging and abandonment of any well. Bond deposits vary by the well depth.
NOTE 3: OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
The Other Current Assets account consists of inventory and prepaid expenses. During the year, the Company entered into a twenty-four month agreement with Charles Morgan Securities Inc. (“CMS”) pursuant to which CMS will provide consulting services in connection with the Company’s business affairs and assist the Company in raising capital. As one of the considerations for the services to be provided by CMS, the Company paid CMS eighteen million shares of the Company on execution of the agreement. The Company charged $900,000 as a prepaid financial services expense and is amortizing the prepaid expense over 24 months. The detailed analysis of the Other Current Assets is as follows:
NOTE 4: ADVERTISING
The Company’s policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred. The Company had not incurred any advertising expense as of May 31, 2012.
NOTE 5: GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has net losses for the period from inception (December 20, 2007) to May 31, 2012. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Comnpany has negative working capital and has no cash. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to meet its obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Management is planning to raise additional funds through debt or equity offerings. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful in these efforts. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful generating profits from its oil and gas operations.
NOTE 6: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.
On December 20, 2007, pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement, we sold 80 million (post forward split) shares of our common stock to Ms. Marina Karpilovski, the Company's former President and a director, for cash payment to us of $1,000. We believe this issuance was deemed to be exempt under Regulation S of the Securities Act, as no advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities, the offering and sale was made only to Ms. Karpilovski who is a non-U.S. citizen, and transfer was restricted by us in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act.
On December 20, 2007 pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement, we sold 320 million (post forward split) shares of our common stock to Mr. Michael Zazkis, the Company's former Secretary, Treasurer, and a director, for cash payment to us of $4,000. We believe this issuance was deemed to be exempt under Regulation S of the Securities Act, as no advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities, the offering and sale was made only to Mr. Zazkis who is a non-U.S. citizen, and transfer was restricted by us in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act.
On March 28, 2011, the Company entered into Redemption Agreement with Peter Matousek, the Company’s president and director, which provides in part for the Company to redeem from Mr. Matousek 140 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $87,500 or $0.000625 per share. On May 31, 2011, Mr. Matousek assigned the Note Payable to Comtax Services, Inc.
The Company issued an aggregate of 142,500 shares for the period ending May 31, 2012 with an average price of $0.0518 per share to the Executive and Board pursuant to a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek and a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek, Mr. Donald Lynch, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes, Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, and Dr. William D. Spier, refer to NOTE 18: EXECUTIVE AND BOARD COMPENSATION for additional detail.
Prior to June 1, 2011, our President, CEO and Director, Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, performed services for the Company on a consulting contract through a consulting agency, Comtax Services, Inc. (Comtax). From April 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011, Comtax charged a fixed monthly fee of $2,500, a minimum of 10 hours per month for Mr. Mikolajczyk, an aggregate of $27,500 for the 11 months for Mr. Mikolajczyk’s services to the Company. For the period March 1, 2011 to May 31, 2011, Comtax charged the Company an aggregate of $387,275 (1,106.5 hours) for the services of Mr. Mikolajczyk. The Company is indebted to Comtax an aggregate of $805,653 as of May 31, 2012 which consists of loans payable - $286,600 (see NOTE 12), trade payables $412,115 and Long Term Note Payable - Less than 3 years - $106,938 including accrued interest. Comtax acquired the Long Term Notes Payable - Less than 3 years for $87,500 from our former President and CEO, Peter Matousek, (see NOTE 14), and $18,750 from two other shareholders. Comtax is the largest single creditor to the Company comprising of 50.9% of the Company’s total liabilities.
Mr. Mikolajczyk was an officer of Comtax until his resignation on May 31, 2011 and terminated his consulting contract with Comtax as of May 31, 2011 prior to accepting his executive and director positions with the Company.
NOTE 7: INCOME TAXES
The Company uses the liability method, where deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes. During each fiscal year from 2008 thru 2012, the Company incurred net losses and, therefore, has no tax liability. The net deferred tax asset of approximately $595,388 (assuming a 35% effective tax rate) generated by the loss carry-forward has been fully reserved.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States, the states of Kentucky and Florida.
The Company did not identify any material uncertain tax positions on tax returns filed, nor did the company recognize any interest or penalties for unrecognized tax benefits.
NOTE 8: NET OPERATING LOSSES
As of May 31, 2012, the Company has a net consolidated operating loss carry-forward of approximately $1,701,109, which will expire 20 years from the date the loss was incurred. Included in the net operating loss is the forfeiture of the Kentucky oil and gas leases including an impairment charge of $399,743 incurred by the Company for failure to close on the West Crockett oil and gas leases, refer to NOTE 23: AQUISITION OF CROCKETT ENERGY CORPORATION.
NOTE 9: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AUTHORIZED
The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001. All common stock shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable, and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.
On July 20, 2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State, which increased the Company’s authorization to issue 5,000,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock, refer to NOTE 16: CORPORATE ACTION.
On November 30, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the allocation of 4,000,000 of the 50,000,000 authorized Preferred Shares of the Company as Series A Preferred Shares with the following rights:
·
Convertible to one hundred (100) common shares of the Company for each one (1) Series A Preferred Share
·
Voting rights equal to one hundred (100) votes for each Series A Preferred Share
The consideration for one (1) Series A Preferred Share is set at $0.50.
ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING
On December 20, 2007, the Company issued 400,000,000 (post forward split) common shares to its Directors for cash of $5,000.
Since inception (December 20, 2007) to November 30, 2009, the Company accepted subscriptions for 110,416,000 (post forward split) common shares from 37 investors under a private placement which closed on March 31, 2008. The private placement was not subject to any minimum investment and was priced at $0.0005 per share (post forward split). The Company accepted the subscriptions on various dates throughout the year.
The Company issued 1,259,000 common shares on November 30, 2010 for $62,950 for Accounts Receivable assignment, refer to NOTE 19: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASE.
The Company issued 741,000 common shares on November 30, 2010 for $37,050 cash in a negotiated transaction with an investor to fund the ongoing operations of the Company.
The Company issued 10,000 common shares on February 28, 2011 for $1,100 pursuant to an Oil and Gas Field Operations Services agreement with the Company.
The Company redeemed on March 28, 2011, 140 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $87,500 or $0.000625 per share from Peter Matousek, the Company’s president and director, at the time. Also on March 28, 2011, the Company redeemed 60 million shares of the Company’s common stock from four shareholders. The purchase price for the 60 million totaled $37,500 or $0.000625 per share. With the redemption of the 200 million shares, the Company reduced its issued and outstanding shares to 312,501,000 shares of common stock as of March 28, 2011.
The Company authorized and approved an aggregate of 112,500 shares for the period ending May 31, 2011 with an average price of $0.1263 per share to the Executive and Board pursuant to a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek and a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek and Mr. Donald Lynch. During the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011, the Company issued 75,000 of the 112,500 shares to the Executive and Board with the remaining 37,500 shares issued on June 6, 2011.
The Company issued 18 Million shares on April 12, 2012 for $900,000 pursuant to a twenty-four month agreement with Charles Morgan Securities Inc.
The Company authorized and approved an aggregate of 136,129 shares for the period ended May 31, 2012 with an average price of $0.0333 per share to the Executive and Board pursuant to Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Peter Matousek, Mr. Donald Lynch, Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes and Dr. William D. Spier, refer to NOTE 18: EXECUTIVE AND BOARD COMPENSATION for additional detail. The Company issued 31,129 of the 136,129 shares to the Board on June 25, 2012.
NOTE 10: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs")." Under ASU 2011-04, the guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements to ensure that fair value has the same meaning in U.S. GAAP and in IFRS and that their respective fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are the same. ASU 2011-04 is effective for public entities during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operation and financial condition.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income," ("ASU 2011-05") which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders' equity. Instead, comprehensive income must be reported in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operation and financial condition.
There were various other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries. None of the updates are expected to a have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 11: CHANGE OF CONTROL
On February 9, 2010 certain shareholders sold and transferred an aggregate of 400,000,000 (post forward split) shares of Common Stock representing approximately 78.37% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company to certain buyers (“Buyers”), at $0.000625 per share, post forward split, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000 (the “Purchase Price”). Such transaction is hereinafter referred to as the “Takeover” or the “Transaction”.
The table below represents the ownership and percentage of control by each of the new shareholders:
In connection with the Agreement, there was a change in the majority of the Company’s Board of Directors. Upon the consummation of the Takeover, Marina Karpilovski President and Director, and Michael Zazkis, Secretary, Treasurer & Director resigned and Mr. Donald Lynch was appointed as Director and Executive Officer of the Company and Mr. Peter Matousek was appointed as Director and Executive Officer of the Company.
On May 31, 2011, Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, our President, CEO and Director, acquired 180,000,000 common shares of the company from Mr. Peter Matousek, former President, CEO and Director of the Company. The common share acquisition by Mr. Mikolajczyk gave him control of 57.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. Subsequent to May 31, 2011, Mr. Mikolajczyk has acquired additional shares directly and indirectly in the Company. As of Mr. Mikolajczyk’s last Form 4 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2012, Mr. Mikolajczyk is beneficial owner of 188,504,421 (57.01%) of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.
NOTE 12: LOAN PAYABLE
The Company had a loan in the amount of $60,000, which consisted of two unsecured Promissory Notes, which accrued interest at 8% per annum with Global Power and Water Industries, Inc. (GPWI). On November 30, 2010, the Company acquired from a third party shareholder the Accounts Receivable of $147,965, discounted, from GPWI, the Promissory Notes holder. The Company offset the Promissory Notes against the Accounts Receivable purchased, pursuant to a successful civil action by the seller of the Accounts Receivable. Refer to NOTE 19: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASE for additional detail.
The Company has loans in the amount of $286,600, is non-interest bearing, with COMTAX. The loans from COMTAX have been provided to the Company as working capital. COMTAX is a shareholder of the Company with stock holdings of 4.75% in the Company.
The Company issued two Promissory Notes, one for $100,000 and the second for $30,000, with Altmann Revocable Living Trust, Rlt. (ALRT), totaling $130,000 due on or before December 31, 2012 with interest calculated at 8% per annum. The Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with ALRT on February 13, 2012 for the acquisition of 100% of ALRT's interest in Crockett Energy Corporation (CEC), refer to NOTE 23, AQUISITION OF CROCKETT ENERGY CORPORATION, which resulted in a negotiated assumption by the Company of the loans that CEC had with ALRT in the amount of $30,000. ALRT also loaned the Company 100,000 on February 14, 2012.
NOTE 13: LOAN PAYABLE - RELATED PARTY
The Company had a loan in the amount of $25,000 from Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, our President, CEO, and Director as of May 31, 2011. The loan is non-interest bearing and was due on July 10, 2011 and was extended to July 29, 2011. The $25,000 was provided to the Company on May 10, 2011, which was used for a deposit into an Escrow Account for the purpose of facilitating an Offer to Purchase shares of the Company dated May 10, 2011 by Lea Kennedy d/b/a LuxemBarings. The $25,000 was returned to the Company from the Escrow Agent on July 27, 2011 and paid back to Mr. Mikolajczyk on July 29, 2011.
NOTE 14: LONG TERM LIABILITIES - NOTES - 3 YEARS AND LESS
On March 28, 2011, the Company entered into Redemption Agreement with Peter Matousek, the Company’s president and director, which provides in part for the Company to redeem from Mr. Matousek a total of 140 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $87,500 or $0.000625 per share. On May 31, 2011, Mr. Matousek assigned the Note Payable to Comtax Services, Inc.
Also on March 28, 2011, the Company entered into similar redemption agreements with four other shareholders, which in total provide for the redemption of 60 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price for the 60 million totaled $37,500 or $0.000625 per share.
The terms of the stock redemption, agreement is a non-callable 3-year note. The principal will accrue interest at the rate of 0.55% (IRS Short Term AFR - April 2011) per annum, until March 31, 2014 (the “Maturity Date”). Principal plus all accrued interest will be due on the Maturity Date.
NOTE 15: LONG TERM LIABILITIES - NOTES - 3 YEARS AND LESS - RELATED PARTY
Our President, CEO and Director, Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, acquired a Note Payable by the Company from one of the shareholders of the Company on July 15, 2011. The Note Payable is in the amount of $9,375. The principal, $9,375, will accrue interest at the rate of 0.55% (IRS Short Term AFR - April 2011) per annum, until March 31, 2014 (the “Maturity Date”). Principal plus all accrued interest will be due on the Maturity Date.
NOTE 16: CORPORATE ACTIONS
A Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors on May 15, 2010 and approved by the written consent of the holders of a majority of the Company’s shareholders owning a majority of the outstanding issued and outstanding voting shares. The Certificate of Amendment provided for the Company to:
·
Change its name from Real Value Estates, Inc. to Xun Energy, Inc.;
·
Increase the number of authorized shares of its common stock from 100 million shares $0.0001 par value to 5 billion shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value; and
·
An 80:1 forward split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock.
On July 20, 2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to effect the name change to Xun Energy, Inc. and to increase the authorized common stock to 5 billion shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value.
On August 3, 2010, the corporate action became effective whereby the 6,380,200 issued and authorized shares of common stock were forward split resulting in 510,416,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
NOTE 17: COMMITMENTS
The Company entered in a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Wayne St. Cyr as the Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development on December 21, 2010 for a ten day period ending December 31, 2010 which was extended for a 12 month term to December 31, 2011, whereby the Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development is paid $10,000 per month. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Ct. Cyr and has retained Mr. St. Cyr on a month to month basis. In addition to his duties as Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development, Mr. St. Cyr is the Corporate Secretary for the Company. Mr. St Cyr is paid $10,000 per month.
The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement for Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk for a 12-month period commencing on June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2012. Mr. Mikolajczyk is hired through a service company, and will be paid $120,000 in cash payments for the services of Mr. Mikolajczyk. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Mikolajczyk. Mr. Mikolajczyk continues to work for the Company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $10,000 per month.
The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek for a 12-month period commencing June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2012 whereby Mr. Matousek will be paid $90,000 in cash payments. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Matousek. Mr. Matousek continues to work for the Company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $7,500 per month.
NOTE 18: EXECUTIVE AND BOARD COMPENSATION
The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek for a 12-month period ending August 31, 2011 whereby Mr. Matousek was to be paid $30,000 in cash payments and 2,500 shares per month in stock of the Company. The stock was valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. The Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek terminated on May 31, 2011 upon his resignation as the President and CEO of the Company.
The Company had Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Peter Matousek, Mr. Donald Lynch and Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk which ended on August 31, 2011 whereby Mr. Matousek, Mr. Lynch and Mr. Mikolajczyk will be paid 5,000 shares per month in stock of the Company. The stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. On August 31, 2011, directors Peter Matousek, Donald Lynch and Jerry G. Mikolajczyk termed out.
The Company entered into Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Kevin M. Grapes and Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk as directors of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending August 31, 2012. Both Mr. Grapes and Mr. Mikolajczyk will receive 5,000 shares per month of the Company’s common stock in consideration for them serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. This amount includes all costs related to the engagement Director of the Company except 3rd party or travel expenses. On May 21, 2012, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes resigned as a Board member.
On May 22, 2012, Company entered into a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Dr. William D. Spier as a director of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending May 31, 2013.
On May 25, 2012, Company entered into a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek as a director of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending May 31, 2013.
Both Dr. Spier and Mr. Matousek will receive 5,000 shares per month of the Company’s common stock in consideration for them serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. This amount includes all costs related to the engagement Director of the Company except 3rd party or travel expenses.
The Company authorized and approved an aggregate of 136,129 shares for the period ended May 31, 2012 with an average price of $0.0333 per share to the Board pursuant to a Board Member Compensation Agreements with Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes, Mr. Peter Matousek and Dr. William D. Spier. The Company issued 105,000 of the 136,129 shares to the Board as of May 31, 2012.
The table below represents the shares issued or reserved to the Board with the 5-Day Average Share Closing Price:
NOTE 19: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASE
The Company, on November 30, 2010, entered into an Accounts Receivable Assignment (the “Assignment”) with Comtax whereby Comtax assigned to the Company $147,965 in accounts receivable due Comtax from Global Power and Water Industries, Inc. (Global) in consideration for 1,259,000 common shares of the Company at a share price of $.05 for a total of $62,950. The $62,950 equals the monies owed by the Company to Global in the form of Promissory Notes and interest due in March 2011 and April 2011 discussed in NOTE 12.
Since entering the Assignment, Comtax has filed a civil action on December 16, 2010, Case Number 05-2010-CA-064575, with the County of Brevard, in the State of Florida, seeking judgment against Global for $147,965 plus interest, costs and other relief this court deems just and proper. On January 22, 2011, Comtax was awarded a Clerk of Courts default judgment, Brevard County, Florida. On April 12, 2011, the Circuit Court of the 18th Judicial Circuit, Brevard County, Florida, granted final judgment in favour of Comtax for $151,269.41 against Global.
The Company used the Comtax accounts receivable of $62,950 from Global and offset it against the Promissory Notes and interest payable by the Company to Global of $62,950, netting each other out and providing a cash flow saving of $62,950 to the Company. The remaining balance of the judgment, $88,319.41 is uncollectible and was charged against Paid In Capital.
NOTE 20: TERMINATED LETTER OF INTENT
On December 9, 2010, the Company executed a Letter of Intent with Global Energy Acquisitions, LLC (“Global”) which provided in part for the Company to acquire from Global a 51% gross royalty interest in up to 500 producing oil wells in Kentucky. Closing of the transaction was subject to completion by each party of their own due diligence and the negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement.
After further review, Global elected to terminate the Letter of Intent and neither party will be under any contractual obligation to the other with respect to closing the transaction. However, the Company remains subject to certain provisions of the Letter of Intent following its termination including, but not limited to the binding conditions of the Letter of Intent until January 31, 2012.
NOTE 21: COMMON SHARES PURCHASE LITIGATION
On May 10, 2011, the Company accepted an Offer to Purchase from Lea Kennedy d/b/a LuxemBarings (“Purchaser”) to purchase $10 million of the Company’s common stock based on the average of 5 consecutive trading day’s close prior to date of closing. The Offer to Purchase was scheduled to close on or before June 24, 2011. The Purchaser failed to complete the transaction, after mutually agreed extensions of the closing date. The Company has retained legal counsel to take legal action against the Purchaser for failing to complete the purchase transaction and for damages to the Company as a result of the failure to complete the transaction. The Company has recognized losses, at cost, in the financial statements for the period ended May 31, 2012.
NOTE 22: EXECUTIVE AND BOARD CHANGES
On May 31, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Jerry G. Mikolajczyk as a director of the Company for a three-month period ending August 31, 2011 whereby Mr. Mikolajczyk will be paid 5,000 shares per month in stock of the Company. The stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000.
On May 31, 2011, Mr. Matousek, our President and CEO, advised that the roles and responsibilities are increasing for the Company and that Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, while as consultant to the Company, has been instrumental in developing and building the Company to its current status including funding and operations. Mr. Matousek advised that it is in the best interests for the Company and the Shareholders that Mr. Mikolajczyk have authority to continue developing the Company and have authority to make decisions at an Executive Level of the Company. Subsequently, Mr. Matousek resigned as President, CEO and CFO and the Company appointed Jerry G. Mikolajczyk as Interim President, CEO and CFO until a permanent President and CEO is recruited and a permanent CFO is recruited. The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement for Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk for a 12-month period commencing on June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2012. Mr. Mikolajczyk is hired through a service company, and will be paid $120,000 in cash payments for the services of Mr. Mikolajczyk. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5,000,000. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Mikolajczyk. Mr. Mikolajczyk continues to work for the Company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $10,000 per month.
The Company also appointed Mr. Peter Matousek as the Company’s Vice-President of Investor Relations. The Company entered into a Management and Financial Service Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek for a 12-month period commencing June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2012 whereby Mr. Matousek will be paid $90,000 in cash payments. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5 million. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Matousek. Mr. Matousek continues to work for the Company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $7,500 per month.
On August 31, 2011, directors Peter Matousek, Donald Lynch and Jerry G. Mikolajczyk termed out. On September 1, 2011, the Company obtained the written consent of the stockholders holding a majority, 86.51%, of the outstanding voting rights of the Company (the "Consent"). The Consent approved the election of Kevin M. Grapes and Jerry G. Mikolajczyk as directors of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending August 31, 2012.
On May 21, 2012, Mr. Kevin M. Grapes resigned as a Board member.
On May 22, 2012, Company entered into a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Dr. William D. Spier as a director of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending May 31, 2013.
On May 25, 2012, Company entered into a Board Member Compensation Agreement with Mr. Peter Matousek as a director of the Company for a term of one (1) year ending May 31, 2013.
Each Board member will receive 5,000 shares per month of the Company’s common stock in consideration for them serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock will be valued based on the average of the 5 trading day close price prior to each month end. This amount includes all costs related to the engagement Director of the Company except 3rd party or travel expenses. The terms and conditions will be renegotiated upon the successful consummation of a Business Combination through the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation with, a company that has substantial additional capital and or operating revenues; or the Company is able to finance operating expenses with additional debt or through equity financing of not less than $5 million.
NOTE 23: AQUISITION OF CROCKETT ENERGY CORPORATION
On February 13, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement, Bill of Sale - ALRT, which provides in part, for the Company to acquire from Altmann Revocable Living Trust, RLT (ALRT) 100% of all of its rights, title and interest in Common Voting Shares of Crockett Energy Corporation (CEC) for 45 million Units of the Company. The Purchase Price is $2.25 million.
A unit is defined as one (1) common voting share and one (1) warrant to purchase a common share of the Company. The Company's warrants in this transaction shall entitle Altmann Revocable Living Trust, RLT the right to acquire one (1) common voting share of the Company at the following exercise prices based on the following time periods:
·
Exercise price of $ .50 per share prior to Nov 30, 2012;
·
Exercise price of $1.00 per share prior to May 31, 2013;
·
Exercise price of $2.00 per share prior to May 31, 2014;
·
Exercise price of $2.00 per share prior to May 31, 2014;
·
Exercise price of $3.00 per share prior to May 31, 2015;
·
Exercise price of $4.00 per share prior to May 31, 2016.
On February 14, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement, Bill of Sale - Mikolajczyk, which provides in part, for the Company to acquire from Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, our President, CEO and Director, 100% of all of his rights, title and interest in Common Voting Shares of Crockett Energy Corporation (CEC) for $1.00.
Closing of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent including but not limited to CEC acquiring the producing West Crockett Oil and Gas leases based in Crockett County, Texas with a total acreage of 2,320.5 acres, more or less, with 100% Working Interest, 75% Net Revenue Interest and CEC, as a minimum, securing financing of $5 million to complete a 10 well drilling and development program on the West Crockett Oil and Gas Leases.
CEC, incorporated in Wyoming on November 14, 2011, is in the business of exploring, developing, operating, and investing in, acquiring, selling, managing and drilling oil and gas properties. CEC has limited assets, which includes a Purchase and Sales Agreement (PSA), entered into on January 31, 2012, between CEC (Buyer) and Edwin S. Nichols, Thad Purcell, Barry L. Benton, Vesta, LP, Sean Sassin, Renee Sassin, James C. Gibson, and Susan G. Godwin (collectively “Seller”) and Edwin S. Nichols Exploration, Inc. ("Operator"), which provides in part, for the Company to acquire Seller’s rights, title and interests in and to the oil, gas and mineral leases covering the James T Padgitt Lease, (Texas RRC lease # 332) containing 596 acres of land, more or less; the Clara Couch “H” Lease, (Texas RRC lease # 326) containing 80 acres of land, more or less; the Clara Couch “B” Lease, (Texas RRC # 325) containing 542 acres of land, more or less; Jeff Owens Fee Lease, (Texas RRC # 331) containing 462.5 acres of land, more or less; the J. W. Owens “D” Lease, (Texas RRC lease # 330) containing 160 acres of land, more or less and the J. W. Owens Lease, (Texas RRC lease # 329) containing 480 acres of land, more or less, all lands being located in Crockett County, Texas, without limitation, interests in oil, gas and/or mineral leases covering any part of the lands, production payments, and net profits interests in any part of the lands or leases, and other leasehold interests in oil, gas and other minerals in any part of the lands, SAVE AND EXEPT that it is the intent of the Seller to assign 100% Working Interest, being 75% Net Revenue Interest to the Buyer in and to each of the above leases and that the Seller shall retain as an Overriding Royalty Interest unto himself, free and clear of all costs of any nature except that the Seller shall be responsible for paying its proportionate share of Ad Valorem and Severance Tax, the difference between the currently outstanding Royalty and Overriding Royalty Interest and 25%. The PSA required the Buyer to provide a non refundable deposit of $250,000 in addition to the $25,000 paid by the Buyer to the Seller as the initial deposit required by the Letter Of Intent between the Buyer and Seller. The Buyer has fulfilled its obligation in providing the non-refundable deposit, which will be applied to the purchase price of $17 million on closing originally scheduled for on or before April 30, 2012.
On March 13, 2012, CEC assignment of 100% of the Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA), dated January 31, 2012, between Crockett Energy Corporation ("CEC" or "Buyer") and Edwin S. Nichols, Thad Purcell, Barry L. Benton, Vesta, LP, a Texas limited partnership, Sean Sassin, Renee Sassin, James C. Gibson, and Susan G. Godwin (collectively the "Seller") to Xun Oil Corporation (Xun Oil), a Florida corporation, or its assigns. Xun Oil Corporation agreed to assume all obligations of the PSA.
On April 30, 2012, Xun Oil and the Seller entered into an amendment to the PSA to extend the closing date to on or before June 29, 2012. As consideration for the extension of the Closing, Xun Oil agrees to (i) release immediately the $250,000 earnest money held in escrow to the Seller which will be credited to the purchase price, or should the transaction fail to close, the Seller will retain the $250,000 earnest money and (ii) pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum on $16,750,000, which represents the difference between the $17,000,000 purchase price and $250,000 earnest money, during the period May 1, 2012 to closing or June 29, 2012, which occurs first. The payment of interest shall be made as follows:
a.
On or before May 14, 2012, the sum of $85,356.00, representing the interest due for the entire month of May;
b.
If closing does not occur on or before June 1, 2012, on or before June 1, 2012, the sum of $19,273.97, representing the interest due for June 1-7, 2012;
c.
If closing does not occur before June 8, 2012, on or before June 8, 2012, the sum of $19,273.97, representing the interest due for June 8-14, 2012;
d.
If closing does not occur before June 15, 2012, on or before June 15, 2012, the sum of $19,273.97, representing the interest due for June 15-21, 2012; and
e.
If closing does not occur before June 22, 2012, on or before June 22, 2012, the sum of $19,273.97, representing the interest due for June 22-29, 2012.
On May 22, 2012, Xun Oil and the Seller entered into an amendment to the PSA to extend the interest due date from May 14, 2012 to May 29, 2012.
On May 29, 2012, Xun Oil did not make the interest payment as required under the PSA dated January 31, 2012, as amended. The PSA, by its terms, automatically terminated.
With the PSA automatically terminated, the Bill of Sale - ALRT between ALRT and the Company dated February 13, 2012, by its terms, automatically terminated and the Bill of Sale - Mikolajczyk between Jerry G. Mikolajczyk and the Company dated February 14, 2012, by its terms, automatically terminated.
NOTE 24: COMMERCIAL LOAN OFFER
On February 20, 2012, Xun Oil Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an agreement, Commercial Loan Offer, which provides in part, for the Company to receive from PRIVATE COLLATERAL LENDERS CORP. (PCLC) $33 million in financing for the acquisition of the West Crockett Oil and Gas Leases (West Crockett) and the future development of West Crockett.
The commercial loan terms are:
·
Principal Amount: $33 million United States Dollars (USD).
·
$20,000,000 Senior Debt. + $13,000,000 Subordinate for future development.
·
Interest Rate on Senior Debt: 6 %
·
Interest Rate on Subordinate: 6 %
·
Payment Amount: $1,200,000 (Interest Reserve).
·
Payment Frequency: Prepaid for One (1) Full Year
·
Date of First Regular Payment: One (1) Year from Closing.
·
Final Interest Adjustment Date: April 30, 2012.
·
Term - Last Payment Date: 12 Months from First Draw.
·
Term in Months: 12 (automatically renewable - same interest)
·
Amortization in Months: 300
·
Origination Fee: 3 % of the Gross Financing payable at draw down. This amount shall be deducted from Gross Proceeds at Times of Disbursal.
Closing of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent including but not limited to: Property and public liability insurance including all risk insurance (with extended coverage endorsement) on the Borrower’s real and personal property as required including lands, buildings, equipment and inventory in amounts and from an insurer acceptable to PCLC showing PCLC as low payee or mortgagee by way of standard mortgage endorsement, a refundable by guarantee Commercial Loan Underwriting Fee to PCLC of $360,000 CDN, confirmation that all Federal Revenue Agency accounts of the corporation are current, evidence that all business taxes are paid to date, and documentation to include, but not limited to the following:
·
Professional Evaluation showing full debt-service capacity of wells. (Security).
·
Résumé of Evaluator of Crockett (Texas) oilfields Property.
·
Stock Ownership Documentation.
·
Assignment Letter from the Owner of said properties.
·
Development Plan. (Business Plan)
·
Résumés of Principals
·
Final Approval by PCLC’s lawyer and underwriter of all Documents presented to PCLC by Borrower.
With the PSA between Xun Oil and the Sellers in NOTE 23: AQUISITION OF CROCKETT ENERGY CORPORATION automatically terminated, the Commercial Loan Offer, by its terms, is automatically terminated. The Company advanced US$38,884.25 to PCLC as of May 31, 2012 of which US$8,274 remains in escrow with PCLC's attorney.
NOTE 25: TERMINATED ASSIGNMENT OF DRILLING PERMIT
On March 5, 2012, the Company terminated the assignment of its Kentucky drilling permit for XUN002 whereby the Company assigned its Kentucky drilling permit, on January 20, 2012 for XUN002 on the forfeited Tillett Lease to Cook Oil Company, LLC. (COCL) in consideration of an override royalty of 2.5% of the value of all oil produced and removed under the permit and the net proceeds received by COCL from the sale of all gas and casing head gasoline produced and sold under the Permit.
NOTE 26: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August 31, 2012 the Company entered into an Oil and Gas Well Location Agreement with Vencedor Energy Partners (Assignor). The agreement allows the Company to drill 30 offset oil and gas wells on 3 producing oil and gas leases in Venango County, Pennsylvania.
The Company paid $585,000.00 00 in the form of 11,700,000 shares of common stock (Shares) of the Company for the rights.
The Company will have 100% working interest in the wells and Net Revenue Interest as follows:
Lease Name
Net Revenue Interest Breakdown
Rice
Master Lease Lessor - 12.5% Royalty, Master Lease Lessee 2.5% Override royalty interest, Assignor - 2.5% Override royalty interest; and the Company - 82.5% royalty interest;
Lalley
Master Lease Lessor - 12.5% Royalty, Master Lease Lessee 2.5% Override royalty interest, Assignor - 2.5% Override royalty interest; and the Company - 82.5% royalty interest; and
Corse
Master Lease Lessor - 15.0% Royalty, Master Lease Lessee 2.5% Override royalty interest, Assignor - 2.5% Override royalty interest; and the Company - 80.0% royalty interest.
The Agreement allows the Company to have the exclusive right to explore, operate, produce all naturally-occurring oil, gas, casing-head gas or gasoline, gas condensate and/or all other liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons and other marketable or non-marketable substances produced (Oil and Gas) from Oil and Gas deposits contained within and under the well location and any and all other rights and privileges necessary, incident to, or convenient for the economical operation of the well location and other lands for the production of Oil and Gas to the Company. A well location is defined as a circle having a radius of l50 feet with the well, to a depth as allowed in the Master Lease, at the center thereof.
The Company owns the rights and may select up to 30 well locations from the following:
Lease Name
Locations
Rights
Rice
Up to 10
One well per location, to a depth from the surface through the Speechley sands which depth is approximately 2,200 feet on the Premises alone for producing oil and gas by any means, and all rights necessary convenient and incident thereto, granted pursuant to the Master Rice Lease.
Lalley
Up to 8
One well per location, to a depth from the surface through the Speechley sands which depth is approximately 2,200 feet on the Premises alone for producing oil and gas by any means, and all rights necessary convenient and incident thereto, granted pursuant to the Master Lalley Lease.
Corse
Up to 15
One well per location, to a depth from the surface through the Speechley sands which depth is approximately 2,000 feet on the Premises alone for producing oil and gas by any means, and all rights necessary convenient and incident thereto, granted pursuant to the Master Corse Lease.
If Company does not begin or provide proof of funds or funding for the first well on or before 90 days and does not begin or provide proof of funds or funding for 3 more wells on or before 150 days of the execution of this Agreement, then the Company will have forfeited its rights and the Agreement shall terminate and unwind and the Assignor agrees to return the Shares (11,700,000) to the Company.
After completing 8 wells and if Company does not complete any of the remaining 22 well drilling provision set forth in the Agreement within the 2 years from the date of the execution of the Agreement, then the Company will forfeit its rights to the well locations not completed. The Company will retain its rights for the well locations completed and will retain an Override Royalty of Seven and one half per cent (7.5%) on the well locations forfeited.
The Company has 2 years from the date of execution of the Agreement to complete the drilling of the 30 well locations and has the option to acquire an additional 15 well locations for the same terms and conditions of the Agreement after the first 30 wells locations have been completed.
The Company will provide funding in groups of 4 to 6 wells to optimize economies of scale, with the exception of the first 4 wells which can be funded on an individual basis.
The Company agreed to have Assignor the designated Operator of the Oil and Gas Well Locations which includes all the responsibilities as a designated operator in the State of Pennsylvania which includes the duties of managing and supervising the drilling and completions of the Oil and Gas Locations.
THE COMPANY WILL NEED TO RAISE FUNDS TO DRILL THE OIL AND GAS WELLS AND THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT THE COMPANY WILL BE SUCCESSFUL IN RAISING THE FUNDS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE 1 OR ANY OF THE 30 OFFSET OIL AND GAS WELLS.
On August 31, 2012, Xun Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a twenty-four month Financing Facilities Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Prodigy Asset Management, LLC (“PAM”) pursuant to which PAM will provide consulting services in connection with the Company’s business affairs and assist the Company in raising capital. In consideration of the services to be provided by PAM, the Company will pay PAM (i) a prepaid retainer fee of $1 million in the form of 20 million common shares of the Company within 14 days of execution of the Agreement, (ii) a fee of $4,800.00 within 30 days of execution of the Agreement and (iii) a facilitators fee of 5% of the gross amount of an equity investment, 3% of the gross amount of a sub-debt credit facility and 2% of the gross amount of a senior credit facility within five days of funding.
On August 31, 2012, Jerry G. Mikolajczyk was re-appointed as a director by the Board of Directors of Xun Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for another one-year term ending August 31, 2013. Mr. Mikolajczyk has been a director of the Company since May 31, 2011 and is also our President, CEO and CFO. In consideration for Mr. Mikolajczyk’s service as director, the Company will issue 5,000 shares per month of the Company’s stock, which will be valued based on the average of the five trading day close price prior to each month end. In addition, the Company will reimburse Mr. Mikolajczyk for the preapproved cost of airfare, travel expenses and disbursements made on behalf of the Company.
On September 4, 2012, Xun Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) signed a twelve month Financial Consulting Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Vaquero Private Capital, Inc. (“VPC”) effective as of June 1, 2012, pursuant to which VPC will provide consulting services in connection with the Company’s business affairs and assist the Company in raising capital. In consideration of the services to be provided by VPC, the Company will pay VPC (i) a prepaid fee of $810,000 in the form of 16.2 million common shares of the Company upon execution of the Agreement and (ii) a success fee not to exceed 5% of any financing acceptable in whole or in part by the Company due upon closing of a loan/investment.
Item 9.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
On March 11, 2009, we dismissed the auditing firm of Moore & Associates, Chartered Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (“Moore and Associates”) and approved the engagement of Weinberg & Associates LLC, Certified Public Accountants. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 and the subsequent interim periods until the change, there were no disagreements with Moore & Associates, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Moore & Associates, would have caused them to make reference in connection with their report to the subject matter of the disagreement, and Moore & Associates, Chartered has not advised the Company of any reportable events.
Item 9A.
Item 9A.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of May 31, 2012 and, based on their evaluation, and, have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the year ended May 31, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, we assessed, as of May 31, 2012, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was based on criteria established in the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment using those criteria, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012, was effective.
Internal control over financial reporting is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:
·
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
·
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and
·
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Evaluation of Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Item 9B.
Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The following information sets forth the names of our officers and directors, their present positions, and some brief information about their background as of the date of this filing:
Name:
Position:
Held Since:
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk
President/Chief Financial Officer/Director
June 2011
Wayne St. Cyr
Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development
January 2011
Peter Matousek
Vice President - Investor Relations/Director
June 2011
William D. Spier
Director
May 2012
Peter Matousek
Director
May 2012
Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk
Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk was a key consultant to the Company who identified the opportunities available to us in Kentucky, helped negotiate our contracts, and assisted the Company with its financial reporting over the two years including SEC filings and our financial statements. Mr. Mikolajczyk consulted to the Company from March 2010 to May 31, 2011. On May 31, 2011, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Mikolajczyk as our President, CEO, CFO, and a director of the Company.
Mr. Mikolajczyk has had an extensive career in the oil and gas, construction, and mining industries. Mr. Mikolajczyk has worked for Fortune 500 companies such as BP Resources (British Petroleum), SCI Group of Companies, Husky Oil, Syncrude, Bechtel, Guy F. Atkinson and INCO. He has worked as a heavy equipment operator on surface and open pit mining operations.
After completing his Business Administration diploma, Mr. Mikolajczyk went on to obtain his professional designation as a Certified General Accountant (CGA) and Certified Internal Auditor (CIA). As a professional accountant and auditor, he has been involved with planning, designing, and testing operations to ensure that the operations are efficient and effective.
In 2008, Mr. Mikolajczyk was awarded “CFO of the Year” for the application of his knowledge and expertise in a turnaround assignment for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), a $3.3 Billion asset transportation authority in Silicon Valley (San Jose, California).
Mr. Mikolajczyk has an aggregate of 41 years of experience, which include:
·
Twenty-two (22) years of C-Level experience.
·
Ten (10) years in the Oil and Gas Industry evaluating and analyzing systems and operations to improve effectiveness, increase profits, and streamline operations without compromising controls.
·
Eighteen (18) years in the Mining Industry with operational experience in tar sands, copper, gold, limestone and precious stones. Mines were both open pit and deep rock (shaft) as well as alluvial and placer mining operations.
·
Twenty Seven (27) years of experience in the Construction Industry ranging in Oil and Gas, Mining, Transportation and Housing sectors. Specialty is Project Control and Reporting.
Mr. Mikolajczyk, through consulting agencies, has provided various consulting services to clients, which included, but not limited to:
·
Global Power and Water Industries, Inc.
·
VTA (Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority)
·
MineCore International, Inc.
·
Platinum Works, Inc.
·
Blue Green Corp
·
J.M.E.L. International, Inc.
·
Nova Petrochemicals
·
BP Resources
Mr. Mikolajczyk is an acknowledged speaker and presenter. He has moderated various panels on P3’s (Private Public Partnerships) projects such as the Confederation Bridge, the longest bridge in North America, joining Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick in Canada, which Mr. Mikolajczyk was involved in the bidding, award and financing of the project. Mr. Mikolajczyk also presented a paper to the 1990 Western Regional Conference of the Institute of Internal Auditors entitled: "Is Your Project Control Out of Control?" and a paper in 1991 to the Institute of Internal Auditors, Calgary Chapter, entitled: "Operational Audit of the Procurement Function".
Mr. Wayne St. Cyr.
Mr. Wayne St. Cyr is our Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development and our Corporate Secretary.
Mr. St. Cyr comes to us leaving a distinguished 10 year career with RBS Group (Royal Bank of Scotland) which includes a six-time recipient of the President's Award for exceeding company objectives. During his tenure at RBS/Citizens Financial Group, he was responsible for developing the key alliances with Citizens Bank.
Mr. St. Cyr’s education includes an Associates degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing.
Mr. Peter Matousek.
Mr. Matousek is the Vice President of Investor Relations. He served as the Company’s President and CEO from February 2010 to May 2011 and as a director from February 2010 to August 2011 before his term expired.
Mr. Matousek is an international consultant and entrepreneur with a European background. He attended University of Maryland University College and Warner Pacific College, where he earned degrees in Associates of Arts and Bachelors of Business Administration.
Mr. Matousek is member of the United States Navy and a Veteran of Foreign War and recently served in Operation Iraqi Freedom. He received the Army Achievement Medal, Navy Achievement Medal and Honorable Discharge.
Mr. Matousek has worked extensively with the public markets for companies throughout the United States and Canada in the financial and natural resource sector, including oil & gas and precious metal mining. He has represented numerous companies in the capacity of Investor & Public Relations. He speaks German, Czech, English and Russian.
Mr. William D Spier, PhD
Dr. Spier has been an advisor in economics and business development to private equity funds in the U.S. and Europe for the past six years. Prior to that, he was a business growth consultant to major proprietary and public institutions of higher education with 5-1 year appointments.
Dr. Spier was Senior Vice President for Whitman Medical and Executive Director for Ultrasound Technical Services, a reporting issuer, for 13 years during which he was responsible for the founding and growth of the pioneering institute for medical ultrasound training which expanded to 15 major markets in the U.S. For two years, Dr. Spier was affiliated with Diamond Turk & Company, a specialist firm on the American Stock Exchange.
From 1969 to 1981, Dr. Spier held various positions with the New York Board of Education and was a graduate instructor at Washington University, St. Louis and Assistant Professor of Sociology at St. Louis University. Dr. Spier was a member of the United States Teacher Corps.
Dr. Spier received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Hobart College, his Masters degree from the Washington University, St. Louis and his Doctorate in Sociology with concentration in political economy from Washington University, St. Louis.
Dr. Spier has an extensive history of publications and has authored more than fifty business plans for both start-ups and mature companies. He is a member of economic, education and medical societies and participates on the board of public companies. He is often a visiting instructor at NYC and metropolitan-area institutions of higher education for graduate level teaching.
Penalties or Sanctions
To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors, officers or stockholders holding a sufficient number of securities to affect materially the control of the Company, has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority or been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor making an investment decision.
Personal Bankruptcies
To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors, officers or stockholders holding a sufficient number of securities to affect materially the control of the Company, nor any personal holding company of any such person has, within the last ten years become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or been subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of that person.
Compensation of Directors
Our directors do not receive cash compensation for their services as directors. However, each director receives 5,000 shares of common stock per month and will have their out of pocket expenses such as travel for Board meetings reimbursed by the Company.
Terms of Office
Our directors are appointed for one-year terms to hold office or until the next annual general meeting of the holders of our common stock or until removed from office in accordance with our by-laws.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors and/or officers.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
For companies registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, based solely on a review of the copies of reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with on a timely basis for the period which this report relates.
Corporate Governance
We do not have an independent Board of Directors. We do an audit committee. We do not have a compensation committee or nominating committee. As our operations expand, we hope to name additional members to our Board of Directors. We do not have sufficient funds to secure officer and directors insurance and we do not believe that we will be able to retain an independent Board of Directors in the immediate future.
We have not yet adopted a Code of Ethics.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Mr. Jerry G. Mikolajczyk was appointed our acting president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer on May 31, 2011 effective June 1, 2011. His employment contract terminated on May 31, 2012. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Mikolajczyk and has retained Mr. Mikolajczyk on a month to month basis. The Company pays Mr. Mikolajczyk $10,000 per month.
Mr. Wayne St. Cyr was appointed our Executive Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Development on January 1, 2011. His employment contract terminated on December 31, 2011. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Ct. Cyr and has retained Mr. St. Cyr on a month to month basis. The Company pays Mr. Wayne St. Cyr $10,000 per month.
Mr. Peter Matousek was appointed our Vice President - Investor Relations on May 31, 2011. His employment contract terminated May 31, 2012. The Company has not renewed the contract with Mr. Matousek and has retained Mr. Matousek on a month to month basis. The Company pays Mr. Peter Matousek $7,500 per month.
The following table discloses compensation paid during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 to the Company’s Officers and the most highly compensated executive officer whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 (Collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”). No restricted stock awards, long-term incentive plan payouts or other types of compensation, other than the compensation identified in the table below, were paid to the Named Executive Officers during these fiscal years.
Name and Principal Position
Year
Ended
May 31
Salary*4
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Total
($)
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, President/CEO/CFO
$120,000
$120,000
Wayne St. Cyr, Executive Vice President
$120,000
$120,000
Peter Matousek, VP-Investor Relations*1
$90,000
$90,000
Name and Principal Position
Year
Ended
May 31
Salary*4
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Total
($)
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, President/CEO/CFO
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, Consultant*2
$409,775
$409,775
Wayne St. Cyr, Executive Vice President
$50,000
$50,000
Peter Matousek, VP-Investor Relations*1
$27,500
$27,500
Dennis T. Kushner, President/CEO/CFO*3
$9,250
$9,250
*1 - Former President/CEO during 2011
*2 - Gross paid to agency, Comtax Services, Inc. which Mr. Mikolajczyk was an officer of until May 31, 2011
*3 - Former President/CEO during 2010 and a portion of 2011
*4 - Does not include stock compensation as Board members, refer to Item 5.E of this Form 10-K
Stock Options Granted/Exercised in Last Year
The Company has never issued any stock options.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth certain information as of May 31, 2012 respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock by: (i) all persons known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock, (ii) each current officer and director and Named Executive Officer, and (iii) by all executive officers and directors as a group.
Name
No. of Shares of Common Stock (1)
Percent of Class (2)
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk
190,560,521
57.6378%
Kevin M. Grapes*3
22,030,000
6.6628%
Peter Matousek
82,500
0.0249%
William D. Spier
-0-%
(All officers and directors
190,643,021
57.6582%
as a group (3) member)
(1)
Represents the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock beneficially owned by the shareholder.
(2)
Based on 330,643,500 issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
(3)
Resigned from the Board on May 21, 2012.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Except as described below, none of the following persons has any direct or indirect material interest in any transaction to which we are a party during the past two years, or in any proposed transaction to which the Company is proposed to be a party:
A.
any director or officer;
B.
any proposed nominee for election as a director;
C.
any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our common stock; or
D.
any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same house as such person or who is a director or officer of any parent or subsidiary.
Potential Conflict of Interest
Prior to June 1, 2011, our President, CEO and Director, Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, performed services for the Company on a consulting contract through a consulting agency, Comtax Services, Inc. (Comtax). From April 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011, Comtax charged a fixed monthly fee of $2,500, a minimum of 10 hours per month for Mr. Mikolajczyk, an aggregate of $27,500 for the 11 months for Mr. Mikolajczyk’s services to the Company. For the period March 1, 2011 to May 31, 2011, Comtax charged the Company an aggregate of $387,275 (1,106.5 hours) for the services of Mr. Mikolajczyk. The Company is indebted to Comtax an aggregate of $805,653 as of May 31, 2012 which consists of loans payable - $286,600, trade payables $412,115 and Long Term Note Payable - Less than 3 years - $106,938 including accrued interest. Comtax acquired the Long Term Notes Payable - Less than 3 years for $87,500 from our former President and CEO, Peter Matousek, and $18,750 from two other shareholders. Comtax is the largest single creditor to the Company comprising of 50.9% of the Company’s total liabilities.
Mr. Mikolajczyk was an officer of Comtax until his resignation on May 31, 2011 and terminated his consulting contract with Comtax as of May 31, 2011 prior to accepting his executive and director positions with the Company.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
AUDIT FEES. The aggregate fees for professional services rendered was $5,500 and $8,597 for the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively, and $6,000 and $6,000 for the reviews of the financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES. The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and not reported under the caption "Audit Fee." There were no such fees billed for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011.
TAX FEES. Tax fees for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services was $1,500 for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2012 and $500 for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011.
ALL OTHER FEES. Other than the services described above, there were no other services provided by our principal accountants for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011.
We did not have an audit committee as of May 31, 2012. Therefore, our entire Board of Directors (the “Board") serves in the capacity of the audit committee. In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, our Board obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement describing all relationships between the auditors and us that might bear on the auditors' independence as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, "Independence Discussions with Audit Committees."
Our Board discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence, including fees for non-audit services, and satisfied itself as to the auditors' independence. The Board also discussed with management and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of its internal controls. The Board reviewed with the independent auditors their management letter on internal controls.
Our Board discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all matters required to be discussed by auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, "Communication with Audit Committees". Our entire Board, acting in the capacity of the audit committee reviewed the audited financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 with the independent auditors. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the Company's financial statements and the independent auditors have the responsibility for the examination of those statements. Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with the independent auditors our Board of Directors approved the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and recommended that they be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2012, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)
The following report and financial statements are filed together with this Annual Report:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BALANCE SHEETS AT MAY 31, 2012 AND 2011
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2012 AND 2011 AND CUMULATIVE FROM INCEPTION (DECEMBER 20, 2007).
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2012 AND 2011 AND CUMULATIVE FROM INCEPTION (DECEMBER 20, 2007).
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(b)
Index to Exhibits
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Xun Energy, Inc.
Date: September 13, 2012
By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk
CEO/President
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk
Jerry G. Mikolajczyk, President
September 13, 2012
CEO/CFO
BY: /s/ Peter Matousek
September 13, 2012
Peter Matousek, Director
BY: /s/ William D. Spier
September 13, 2012
William D. Spier, Director