ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
KeyCorp (also referred to herein as the "Corporation") is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries. Accordingly, the right of KeyCorp, its security holders and its creditors to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of its banking and other subsidiaries is necessarily subject to the prior claims of the respective creditors of such banking and other subsidiaries, except to the extent that claims of the Corporation in its capacity as creditor of such banking and other subsidiaries may be recognized.
KeyCorp, organized in 1958 under the laws of the state of Ohio and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, and is engaged primarily in the business of commercial and retail banking. At December 31, 1996, it was one of the nation's largest bank holding companies with consolidated total assets of approximately $67.6 billion. Its subsidiaries provide a wide range of banking, fiduciary and other financial services to its corporate, individual and institutional customers through three primary lines of business: Corporate Banking, National Consumer Finance and Community Banking. These services are provided across much of the country through a network of banking subsidiaries operating more than 1,200 full-service banking offices in 15 states, a 24-hour telephone banking call center services group and nearly 1,900 ATMs as of December 31, 1996. At February 28, 1997, the Corporation and its subsidiaries had approximately 26,963 full-time equivalent employees.
In addition to the customary banking services of accepting deposits and making loans, the bank and trust company subsidiaries provide specialized services, including personal and corporate trust services, personal financial services, customer access to mutual funds, cash management services, investment banking services and international banking services. Through its subsidiary banks, trust companies and registered investment adviser subsidiaries, KeyCorp provides investment management services to institutional and individual clients, including large corporate and public retirement plans, Taft-Hartley plans, foundations and endowments, and high net worth individuals. In addition, investment management subsidiaries serve as investment advisers to the proprietary mutual funds offered by other affiliates.
KeyCorp provides other financial services both inside and outside of its primary banking markets through its nonbank subsidiaries. These services include accident and health insurance on loans made by subsidiary banks, venture capital, community development financing, securities underwriting and brokerage, automobile financing and other financial services. KeyCorp is an equity participant in joint ventures with a number of other unaffiliated companies in Electronic Payment Services, Inc., which operates ATMs throughout the country, and Integrion Financial Network, L.L.C., which is building a platform for electronic banking.
The following financial data is included in the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference as indicated below:
The executive offices of KeyCorp are located at 127 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1306, and its telephone number is (216) 689-6300.
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
The information presented in Note 2, "Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestitures," beginning on page 49 of the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
COMPETITION
The market for banking and related financial services is highly competitive. KeyCorp and its subsidiaries ("Key") competes with other providers of financial services, such as other bank holding companies, commercial banks, savings associations, credit unions, mortgage banking companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, investment management firms, investment banking firms, broker-dealers and a growing list of other local, regional and national institutions which offer financial services. Key competes by offering quality products and innovative services at competitive prices.
In recent years, mergers between financial institutions have added competitive pressure to Key's core banking services. In addition, competition is expected to intensify as a consequence of interstate banking laws now in effect in the majority of states which permit banking organizations to expand geographically. Further, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the "Interstate Act") removed the restrictions on interstate acquisitions of banks and bank holding companies as of September 29, 1995. The act also authorizes nationwide interstate branching and bank mergers effective June 1, 1997, although states may "opt-in" and permit branching sooner, or "opt-out" and prohibit branching into or out of that state. See "Supervision and Regulation--Interstate Banking and Other Recent Legislation" herein.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
The following discussion addresses certain of the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to bank holding companies and their subsidiaries, and provides certain specific information regarding Key. Regulation of financial institutions, such as Key, is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") and the banking system as a whole, and generally is not intended for the protection of shareholders or other investors.
In the following discussion, references to statutes and regulations are brief summaries thereof and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of such statutes and regulations. In addition, there are other statutes and regulations not described below that apply to the operation of banking institutions. Changes in the applicable laws, and in their application by regulatory agencies, cannot necessarily be predicted, but they may have a material effect on the business and results of KeyCorp.
General
As a bank holding company, KeyCorp is subject to the regulation, supervision and examination of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve Board") under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHCA"). Under the BHCA, bank holding companies may not, in general, directly or indirectly acquire the ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares, or substantially all of the assets, of any company, including a bank, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. In addition, bank holding companies are generally prohibited under the BHCA from engaging in commercial or industrial activities.
The Corporation's banking subsidiaries are also subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by applicable Federal banking agencies. On January 13, 1997, KeyCorp converted all of its state-chartered bank subsidiaries, with the exception of KeyBank of Washington, to national banks. KeyBank of Washington's charter was converted on March 5, 1997. Key Bank USA, National Association ("KeyBank USA"), Key Trust Company of Florida National Association and KeyBank National Association in Ohio, New York,
Washington, Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming and New Hampshire (all of which are separate banking subsidiaries) are national banking associations with full banking powers, subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"). Also on January 13, 1997, KeyCorp converted all of its state-chartered trust company subsidiaries except Society Trust Company of New York to national bank charters that limit their powers to trust-related fiduciary activities. These are Key Trust Company of Ohio, National Association, Key Trust Company of Indiana, National Association, and KeyTrust Company National Association in New York, Alaska, Maine, Washington and Wyoming (all of which are separate trust company subsidiaries). These entities are also subject to the regulation, supervision and examination of the OCC, although they are not regulated as banks for purposes of the BHCA. Society Trust Company of New York is a state-chartered trust company subsidiary subject to regulation by the banking authorities in the State of New York. Because the deposits in all of the Corporation's banking subsidiaries are insured (up to applicable limits) by the FDIC, the FDIC also has certain regulatory and supervisory authority over all such banking subsidiaries.
The Corporation also has other financial services subsidiaries that are subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, as well as other applicable state and Federal regulatory agencies. For example, the Corporation's brokerage and asset management subsidiaries are subject to supervision and regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and state securities regulators, and the Corporation's insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation by the insurance regulatory authorities of the various states. Other nonbank subsidiaries of the Corporation are subject to other laws and regulations of both the Federal government and the various states in which they are authorized to do business.
Dividend Restrictions
The principal source of cash flow to the Corporation, including cash flow to pay dividends on the Corporation's common and preferred shares and debt service on the Corporation's debt, is dividends from its banking and other subsidiaries. Various Federal and state statutory and regulatory provisions limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Corporation by its banking subsidiaries without regulatory approval.
The approval of the OCC is required for the payment of any dividend by a national bank if the total of all dividends declared by the board of directors of such bank in any calendar year would exceed the total of: (i) the bank's net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for the current year plus (ii) the retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for the preceding two years, less any required transfer to surplus or a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. In addition, a national bank can pay dividends only to the extent that retained net profits (including the portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined and interpreted by regulation). All of the Corporation's banking subsidiaries and trust company subsidiaries, with the exception of Society Trust Company of New York, are national banks and are subject to these restrictions. Until the Corporation's state-chartered banks were converted to national banks, they were subject to similar restrictions under state law.
In addition, if, in the opinion of the applicable Federal banking agency, a depository institution under its jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the institution, could include the payment of dividends) the agency may require, after notice and hearing, that such institution cease and desist from such practice. The OCC and the FDIC have indicated that paying dividends that would deplete a depository institution's capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound practice. Moreover, under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the "FDI Act"), an insured depository institution may not pay any dividend if payment would cause it to become undercapitalized or if it is undercapitalized. See "Regulatory Capital Standards and Related Matters -- Prompt Corrective Action." Also, the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC have issued policy statements which provide that FDIC-insured depository institutions and their holding companies should generally pay dividends only out of the current operating earnings.
Holding Company Structure
Transactions Involving Banking Subsidiaries. The Corporation's banking subsidiaries are subject to Federal Reserve Act restrictions which limit the amount of funds or other items of value that can be transferred from such subsidiaries to either the Corporation and (with certain exceptions) the Corporation's nonbanking subsidiaries. Any such loans or extensions of credit are required to be secured in specified amounts.
Source of Strength Doctrine. Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its subsidiary banks and, under appropriate circumstances, to commit resources to support each such subsidiary bank. This support may be required by the Federal Reserve Board at times when the Corporation may not have the resources to provide it, or, for other reasons, would not otherwise be inclined to provide it. Certain loans by a bank holding company to a subsidiary bank are subordinate in right of payment to deposits in, and certain other indebtedness of, the subsidiary bank. In addition, the Crime Control Act of 1990 provides that in the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, any commitment by a bank holding company to a Federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.
Depositor Preference. The FDI Act provides that, in the event of the "liquidation or other resolution" of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors of such institution (including claims by the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors) and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver would be afforded a priority over other general unsecured claims against such an institution, including Federal funds and letters of credit. If an insured depository institution fails, insured and uninsured depositors along with the FDIC will be placed ahead of unsecured, nondeposit creditors, including a parent holding company, in order of priority of payment.
Liability of Commonly Controlled Institutions. Under the FDI Act, an insured depository institution which is under common control with another insured depository institution is generally liable for any loss incurred, or reasonably anticipated to be incurred, by the FDIC in connection with the default of such commonly controlled institution, or any assistance provided by the FDIC to such commonly controlled institution which is in danger of default. The term "default" is defined generally to mean the appointment of a conservator or receiver and the term "in danger of default" is defined generally as the existence of certain conditions indicating that a "default" is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance.
Regulatory Capital Standards and Related Matters
Capital Guidelines. The Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the OCC have adopted substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital guidelines for United States banking organizations. Under these risk-based capital standards, the minimum consolidated ratio of total capital to risk-adjusted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) required by the Federal Reserve Board for bank holding companies, such as Key, is currently 8%. At least one-half of the total capital must be comprised of common equity, retained earnings, qualifying noncumulative, perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of qualifying cumulative, perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets ("Tier I capital"). The remainder may consist of hybrid capital instruments, perpetual debt, mandatory convertible debt securities, a limited amount of subordinated debt, other preferred stock and a limited amount of loan and lease loss reserves ("Tier II capital"). As of December 31, 1996, Key's Tier I and total capital to risk-adjusted assets ratios were 7.98% and 13.01%, respectively.
In addition to the risk-based standard, Key is subject to minimum leverage ratio guidelines. The leverage ratio is defined to be the ratio of a banking organization's Tier I capital to its total consolidated quarterly average assets less goodwill and certain other intangible assets. These guidelines provide for a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for bank holding companies that have the highest supervisory rating. All other bank holding companies must maintain a minimum leverage ratio of at least 4% to 5%. Neither Key nor any of its banking affiliates has
been advised by its primary Federal banking regulator of any specific leverage ratio applicable to it. As of December 31, 1996, Key's Tier I leverage ratio was 6.93%.
The Corporation's banking subsidiaries are also subject to capital requirements adopted by their respective primary Federal regulatory agency which are substantially similar to those imposed by the Federal Reserve Board on bank holding companies. The Corporation's national bank subsidiaries are subject to the capital requirements of the OCC. Prior to their conversion to national banks, the Corporation's state-chartered bank subsidiaries were subject to FDIC capital requirements. As of December 31, 1996, each of the Corporation's banking subsidiaries had capital in excess of all minimum regulatory requirements.
Prompt Corrective Action. The "prompt corrective action" provisions of the FDI Act group FDIC-insured depository institutions into five broad categories based on their capital ratios. The five categories -- "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized" and "critically undercapitalized" -- are based upon an institution's total, Tier I and leverage capital ratios. Under the regulations, an institution is: (i) "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater and is not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure; (ii) "adequately capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4% or greater (3% in certain circumstances) and is not "well capitalized"; (iii) "undercapitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of less than 4% or a leverage ratio of less than 4% (3% in certain circumstances); (iv) "significantly undercapitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of less than 3% or a leverage ratio of less than 3%; and (v) "critically undercapitalized" if its tangible equity is equal to or less than 2% of average quarterly tangible assets. An institution may be downgraded to, or be deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than is indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters.
Each KeyCorp banking subsidiary is considered to be "well capitalized." An institution's capital category, as determined by applying the prompt corrective action provisions of law, may not constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial condition or prospects of the Corporation or its banking subsidiaries, and should be considered in conjunction with other available information regarding Key's financial condition and results of operations.
FDIC INSURANCE
Under the FDIC's risk-related insurance assessment system, all insured depository institutions are required to pay annual assessments to the Bank Insurance Fund (the "BIF") or the Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF") of the FDIC. The assessments are based on the institution's risk classification which, in turn, is based on an assignment of the institution by the FDIC to one of three capital groups and to one of three supervisory subgroups. The capital groups are "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized" and "undercapitalized". The three supervisory subgroups are Group "A" (for financially solid institutions with only a few minor weaknesses), Group "B" (for those institutions with weaknesses which, if uncorrected, could cause substantial deterioration of the institution and increase the risk to the deposit insurance fund) and Group "C" (for those institutions with a substantial probability of loss to the insurance fund, absent effective corrective action).
On August 8, 1995, the FDIC amended its regulations on insurance assessments to establish a new assessment rate schedule of $.04 to $.31 per $100 of domestic deposits in replacement of the previous schedule of $.23 to $.31 per $100 of domestic deposits for institutions whose deposits are subject to assessment by the BIF. The new BIF schedule became effective on June 1, 1995. Assessments collected in accordance with the previous assessment schedule that exceed the amount due under the new schedule have been refunded with interest, from the effective date of June 1, 1995. For the period commencing June 1 through December 31, 1995, insurance premiums on deposits of all of the Corporation's banking subsidiaries were assessed at the rate of $.04 per $100 of domestic deposits. The BIF rate was reduced further to zero as of January 1, 1996. The FDIC maintained the SAIF assessment rate at $.23 per $100 of insured deposits during 1995 and in 1996 through
the date of enactment of the Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 ("Funds Act") passed by Congress on September 30 to recapitalize the SAIF. In accordance with the Funds Act, effective January 1, 1997, the FDIC will require all insured institutions to begin servicing the bonds issued in the late 1980s to fund government assistance payments made necessary by a higher volume of insolvencies in the thrift industry. The servicing will take the form of an annual assessment equal to $.0129 per $100 of BIF-assessable deposits and $.0644 per $100 of SAIF-assessable deposits. This will result in a 1997 expense of approximately $5 million for the Corporation's banking subsidiaries.
INTERSTATE BANKING AND OTHER RECENT LEGISLATION
On September 29, 1994, the Interstate Act was enacted into Federal law. Under the Interstate Act, commencing on September 29, 1995, bank holding companies were permitted to acquire banks located in any state regardless of the state law in effect at the time. The Interstate Act also provides for the nationwide interstate branching of banks. Under the Interstate Act, both national and state-chartered banks will be permitted to merge across state lines (and thereby establish interstate branches) commencing on June 1, 1997. States are permitted to "opt-out" of the interstate branching authority by taking action prior to the commencement date. States may also "opt-in" early (i.e., prior to June 1, 1997) to the interstate branching provisions. All states in which the Corporation has banking subsidiaries have "opted in" to the interstate branching provisions. As a result, the Corporation plans to consolidate all of its bank subsidiaries (other than KeyBank USA) into one national banking institution in mid-1997. The Corporation continues to evaluate its business opportunities with respect to its trust company subsidiaries, and plans for consolidating these subsidiaries are not yet final.
In addition to the matters discussed above, there have been proposed a number of legislative and regulatory proposals designed to strengthen the Federal deposit insurance system and to improve the overall financial stability of the United States banking system, and to provide for other changes in the bank regulatory structure, including proposals to reduce regulatory burdens on banking organizations and to expand the nature of products and services banks and bank holding companies may offer. It is impossible to predict whether or in what form these proposals may be adopted in the future, and, if adopted, what their effect will be on Key.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The headquarters of KeyCorp, KeyBank National Association (Ohio) and KeyBank USA are located in Key Tower at 127 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1306. Key currently leases approximately 695,000 square feet of the complex, encompassing the first twenty-three floors, the 28th floor and the 54th through 56th floors of the 57-story Key Tower. At December 31, 1996, the banking subsidiaries of KeyCorp owned 711 of their branch banking offices and leased 494 offices. The lease terms for applicable branch banking offices are not individually material, with terms ranging from month-to-month to 99-year leases from inception. Additional information pertaining to KeyCorp's properties is presented in Note 7, "Premises and Equipment," on page 53 of the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, Key is subject to legal actions which involve claims for substantial monetary relief. Based on information presently available to management and Key's counsel, management does not believe that any legal actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of Key.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of security holders of KeyCorp.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
On August 20, 1996, KeyCorp sold an aggregate of 270,263 KeyCorp Common Shares pursuant to the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The sale of the KeyCorp Common Shares was made in connection with an acquisition of a privately held company by KeyCorp. The acquisition was structured as a stock for stock exchange. KeyCorp received shares of the privately held company and future services of certain of the selling stockholders in exchange for KeyCorp Common Shares. In making the sale, KeyCorp relied on the fact that the KeyCorp Common Shares were acquired by no more than 35 persons other than accredited investors and that each non-accredited investor, either alone or together with his purchaser representative(s), was capable of evaluating the investment.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Corporation formed two wholly owned Delaware business trusts, KeyCorp Institutional Capital A ("Capital A") and KeyCorp Institutional Capital B ("Capital B"), which issued $350 million and $150 million, respectively, of corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities of subsidiary trusts holding solely junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures of the Corporation ("capital securities"). Goldman, Sachs & Co. acted as lead underwriter for the Capital A capital securities sold on December 4, 1996, and Credit Suisse First Boston was the sole underwriter for the Capital B capital securities sold on December 30, 1996. The offering price and commission for both transactions was $1,000 per capital security and $10 per capital security, respectively. The capital securities sold by Capital A and Capital B were sold primarily to qualified institutional buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and were therefore exempt from registration. A limited amount of capital securities were sold to institutional investors that are accredited investors within the meaning of Rule 501 (a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Further information pertaining to the capital securities is included in Note 11, "Capital Securities," on page 56 of the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
The dividend restrictions discussion beginning on page 3 of this report and the following disclosures included in the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference:
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The Selected Financial Data presented on page 6 of the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information included under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" presented on pages 1 through 38 of the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Selected Quarterly Financial Data and the financial statements and the notes thereto, presented on page 37 and on pages 42 through 68, respectively, of the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item is set forth in the sections captioned "Issue One -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" and "EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" contained in KeyCorp's definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 15, 1997, and is incorporated herein by reference. KeyCorp expects to file its final proxy statement on or about April 7, 1997.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is set forth in the sections captioned "THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES," "COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" and "EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS" contained in KeyCorp's definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 15, 1997, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information set forth in the sections captioned "COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE AND EQUITY BASED COMPENSATION COMMITTEE JOINT REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION" and "KEYCORP STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE" contained in KeyCorp's definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 15, 1997, is not incorporated by reference in this Report on Form 10-K. KeyCorp expects to file its final proxy statement on or about April 7, 1997.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item is set forth in the section captioned "SHARE OWNERSHIP AND PHANTOM STOCK UNITS" contained in KeyCorp's definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 15, 1997, and is incorporated herein by reference. KeyCorp expects to file its final proxy statement on or about April 7, 1997.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item is set forth in the section captioned "Issue One -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" contained in KeyCorp's definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 15, 1997, and is incorporated herein by reference. KeyCorp expects to file its final proxy statement on or about April 7, 1997.
PART IV
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) (1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements of KeyCorp and its subsidiaries, and the auditor's report thereon, are incorporated herein by reference to the pages indicated in the Financial Review section of KeyCorp's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders:
(a) (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All financial statement schedules for KeyCorp and its subsidiaries have been included in the consolidated financial statements or the related footnotes, or they are either inapplicable or not required.
(a) (3) EXHIBITS*
The Corporation hereby agrees to furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request, copies of instruments outstanding, including indentures, which define the rights of long-term debt security holders.
All documents listed as Exhibits 10.1 through 10.36 constitute management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
* Copies of these Exhibits have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Shareholders may obtain a copy of any exhibit, upon payment of reproduction costs, by writing KeyCorp Investor Relations, at 127 Public Square (Mailcode OH-01-27-1113), Cleveland, OH 44114-1306.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No other reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of 1996.
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED, ON THE DATE INDICATED. KEYCORP
/S/ THOMAS C. STEVENS
-------------------------------------- THOMAS C. STEVENS Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary March 13, 1997
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATE INDICATED.
/s/ Thomas C. Stevens
*By Thomas C. Stevens, attorney-in-fact March 13, 1997