ITEM 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
General
Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. (the "Company") develops and markets sophisticated software for the development and production and pipeline and surface facilities areas of the worldwide oil and gas industry and provides associated interdisciplinary technical support services, consulting and training.
The Company's Exploration and Production Division markets computer- aided production ("CAP") software which provides oil and gas industry professionals with a comprehensive set of powerful cost-effective tools to describe, simulate and predict oil and gas production from reservoirs under alternative simulated development plans. These predictions are used to determine optimal development plans for maximizing recoverable reserves, thereby reducing oil and gas finding costs per equivalent barrel. The Division's consulting services include integrated field development studies, 4-D seismic reservoir management, reserves audits, certifications and valuations, reservoir simulation, enhanced oil recovery and well performance studies and regional stratigraphic and petrophysical evaluations.
The Company's Pipeline and Facilities Division markets software for the simulation and monitoring of oil and gas pipelines, as well as software for various related applications including engineering design, leak detection, optimization of transportation efficiency and pipeline dispatcher training. The Division's consulting services include implementation of real time system projects, leak sensitivity analysis and design studies, operator training and product training courses, real time system tuning and optimization and expert witness testimony.
Consulting services are the single largest element of the Company's business, comprising 68% of the Company's total revenues in 1996. In the Exploration and Production segment, consultants typically use the Company's products to carry out their project work. Consulting services in the E&P segment totaled 71% of total E&P revenues in 1996. In the Pipeline and Facilities division, consulting services and sales of software are quite tightly linked. Consulting services in that division may include the integration of the Company's off-the-shelf software and sometimes may involve various degrees of customization; consulting and training revenues totaled 57% of the revenues of the Pipeline and Facilities division in 1996.
Since its formation in 1968, the Company believes that it has established a reputation for technical excellence of its software products and consulting services in reservoir description, simulation and monitoring. In the late 1980s, the Company recognized the need to provide an integrated system of CAP products that could be more broadly utilized by the oil and gas industry. Also, the availability of increasingly powerful and affordable computers enables the Company's CAP software products to operate on UNIX-based workstations and personal computers, and more recently on DOS/Windows-based personal computers, with capabilities historically available only on mainframe computers. The Company has developed Petroleum WorkBench, an integrated software system that allows effective access to five of the Company's high technology stand-alone CAP products. It is expected that future versions of Petroleum WorkBench will increase the technical breadth of this software package. These developments have had the effect of significantly expanding the market for the Company's CAP software products from its historical market of research experts and technical specialists using mainframe computers to include non- expert industry professionals, such as petroleum engineers and geologists, using workstations or personal computers. These developments have also increased the functionality and ease of use of the Company's CAP products to the oil and gas industry by lowering hardware costs and reducing the need to utilize these experts in order to take advantage of the Company's technology.
The Company's objective is to be a leading provider of high technology computing solutions and quality consulting services in each of its industry areas. The Company's long range goal is to offer a fully integrated set of software products that will permit non-expert professionals to describe, simulate, monitor and manage the complete range of reservoir development and production activities and oil and gas transmission and storage activities of oil and gas fields from personal computers.
The Company's executive offices are located at 1801 California Street, Suite 295, Denver, Colorado 80202 and its telephone number is (303) 292-1111.
History
The Company, a Colorado corporation, was formed in 1968 and, since that time, has developed and marketed sophisticated applications software together with computer-related consulting services, principally for reservoir description and reservoir and pipeline simulation. These technologically complex products have been, and continue to be, sold primarily to major multinational and large independent oil companies for use by research experts and technical specialists. The Company believes that it has established a reputation for technical excellence of its software products and consulting services in reservoir description, simulation and monitoring.
In June 1983, the Company acquired Intercomp Resource Development and Engineering, Inc. ("IRDE"), which had developed additional software products for reservoir simulation. In January 1984, the Company acquired CRC Bethany International, Inc. ("CRC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Crutcher Resources Corporation. The acquisition of CRC provided the Company with software systems that modeled real- time data collected and stored by Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition ("SCADA") systems installed on oil and gas pipelines.
Several trends, including lower oil and gas prices, have driven the oil and gas industry to reduce the risk and cost, and to increase the effectiveness, of development and production activities. This has led many energy companies to reduce budgets, including a decline in the employment of research and technical experts in the various petroleum industry disciplines, in favor of non-expert industry professionals. The Company recognized the need to provide an integrated system of CAP products for use by these non-experts. By 1991, the Company had developed Petroleum WorkBench which provides the industry with broader access to sophisticated engineering solutions. Management believes that these developments, coupled with the availability of increasingly powerful and affordable workstations and personal computers, has opened a significant market for Petroleum WorkBench.
Strategy
Recent Strategy Developments. During the period of December 1995 and January 1996, the Company determined that the cumulative effects of the releases of Windows 95, and Windows NT and new more powerful pentium-based PC's had significantly changed the broad market for corporate computing systems and software. During 1995, the Company successfully released the Windows version of the WorkBench product, constituting a major breakthrough for the Company. The reaction from the marketplace was very positive and the Company made a decision to fundamentally change its emphasis to the personal computer market, instead of the previous strategy of providing products for all segments of computer hardware mainframe, minicomputer, and personal computer markets. This decision was also encouraged by positive reaction from clients in the second half of 1995 to "WB Serve," a personal computer application that allows for transfer of computationally intensive operations to servers and minicomputers.
It then became apparent to the Company that the access point of software users would be based on desktop 32 bit technology. While extremely large and complex software such as that of the Company previously could not have operated on other than mainframe or minicomputer machines, the personal computers which have become available along with the continued enhancements of Distributed Computer Environments (DCE) makes it today possible to operate the software from a desktop PC.
With the acceptance of the Company's Windows interface, which encompasses core software products plus graphical and interactive features of a Windows environment, the Company identified that the personal computer market would not only be another market for the Company's products--it would be the primary market. Accordingly, the Company decided to focus its future market and development activities on this new primary market. The Windows enhancement of the WorkBench software required little change to the code of the application software.
In January 1996, Mr. George Steel, the new chief executive officer, took a strategic view of the situation in which the Company now found itself. He felt that the creeping environmental changes had reached a point that required rapid action and in fact presented the Company with a significant opportunity in the market place.
This recognition resulted in changes in management strategy to focus primarily on the personal computer market in the future. Essentially, this focus leads to a different kind of software environment than before, in which most of the Company's software would be marketed as part of an integrated product, which includes significant non- technical software. Mr. Steel also introduced several other management strategies. Previously, the Company had been striving to achieve aggressive revenue targets, much of which entailed making new sales to new customers, many in widely dispersed international markets and in marketplaces with widely diverging computing platform environments. Mr. Steel's strategy was for the Company to focus on high quality performance in serving existing customers on Windows/PC platforms and thus to make acceptable profits. The consolidated effect was to decrease the levels of revenue targeted and strived for. Mr. Steel believed that these significant changes in strategy were necessary to enable acceptable profitability performance and an adequate rate of return in future periods. Cost reductions were necessary, primarily staff reductions and reductions in the total of planned development expenditures in comparison to expenditure levels in 1995 and prior years. Rapid change was necessary and these strategies led to a narrowing of the computer platforms on which the Company's WorkBench product would be offered.
The Company's strategy is to provide complete, high technology, computing solutions and other services for the development and production of oil and gas reservoirs and the pipeline transportation of oil and gas. The following sections discuss in detail how the Company is executing this overall strategy.
Integration of High Technology Products. Since its formation, the Company has developed a series of software products designed to describe, simulate and monitor oil and gas reservoirs, and to simulate and monitor oil and gas pipelines and surface facilities. These products cover nearly all technologies needed to simulate, study, optimally develop and monitor oil and gas reservoirs and oil and gas pipelines. These products also include nearly all facets of technology necessary for field management and field monitoring in the oil and gas industry. The Company has begun integrating these products, which increases the functionality and ease of use of the high technology solutions provided by the Company's products.
The initial integrated product, Petroleum WorkBench, includes five of the Company's major stand-alone CAP products. It is the Company's intention to continue integrating its stand-alone products until the full breadth of the Company's technology is included within one integrated, easily accessible product, that will allow a single non- expert professional to work in multiple disciplines, using the same database and applications software.
Expansion of Marketing Efforts and Customer Base. The Company believes that by continuing the integration and accessibility of its software, the market for its CAP software and related consulting services can be expanded to increase sales to non-expert industry professionals. The Company intends to intensify its marketing efforts to this larger market, in addition to continuing to market its products to its established customer base of expert users, generally employed by major multinational and large independent oil companies.
Complete Range of Services. The Company believes that offering a complete range of consulting and training services is a critical component of its business. It intends to continue enhancing and expanding the range of consulting services to meet the growing requirements of its customers. The Company also believes that providing sophisticated and comprehensive consulting services promotes and advances acceptance and awareness of its products.
Technical Leadership. The Company intends to continue developing new software products and enhancing existing software products, both internally and through jointly-funded development efforts, to respond to developments by competitors and changes in technology. The Company also intends to continue to attract and retain highly-skilled professionals in computer software programming and various petroleum industry disciplines in order to provide for the development and enhancement of its products and services. Finally, the Company intends to continue to evaluate, and, if attractive, acquire or license products and technologies which it believes are important to achieving its strategy.
PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND CUSTOMERS
CAP Products, Services and Customers
The Company's CAP products and related consulting services address the development and production areas of reservoir description and simulation. The Company's reservoir description products provide for the analysis of well logs and core, the use of 3-D seismic data, analysis of pressure and performance of wells and mapping and analysis of the basic geology and reservoir rock parameters. Reservoir description data is then input into mathematical reservoir simulators offered by the Company to predict future production performance under various simulated development scenarios after matching historical performance. Use of reservoir simulation provides more accurate forecasts of oil and gas recovery and assists in the determination of how reservoirs should be optimally developed. The primary CAP products being marketed by the Company are:
LOGCALC (well log analysis). Used to calculate rock and fluid properties around a wellbore from well logs in order to determine the presence and quantities of hydrocarbons.
INTERPRET/2 (well test analysis). Used to analyze pressure and flow tests of a well to predict reservoir flow capability and other formation parameters such as the location of barriers in the reservoir.
WPM (well productivity model). Used to analyze and simulate the productivity of a well under various alternative completion practices, such as hydraulic fracturing and artificial lift, so that the optimum economics for the well can be achieved.
PVT (pressure-volume-temperature correlations for hydrocarbon fluids). Used to analyze laboratory tests of oil and gas samples gathered from a reservoir to determine the accuracy of the data and to construct equations for use of the data.
SimBest II (reservoir simulator for oil, water and gas). Used to model the behavior of an oil and gas reservoir in order to predict the results of various types of reservoir development options, such as in- fill drilling, water floods and gas injection, in order to determine the optimal development plan for the reservoir. The simulator calculates the flow of oil, water and gas in three dimensions through a complex reservoir, including the flow through the wellbores to the surface.
COMP III, COMP 4 (compositional reservoir simulators for oil, water and gas). Used when the complex fluid behavior in the reservoir requires that oil and gas be defined more precisely by their molecular components such as methane, ethane and propane. These simulators are most often used to simulate and determine the optimum development of gas reservoirs and oil reservoirs undergoing high pressure gas injection.
THERM (thermal reservoir simulator). Used when modeling thermal enhanced oil recovery processes such as steam injection and in-situ combustion. This is the most complex simulator because it also includes mathematical simulation of such thermodynamic factors as combustion reaction kinetics. This simulator is used to predict optimum recovery using thermal enhanced recovery processes for reservoir development.
SimEase (interactive pre/post processor for the Company's reservoir simulators). Used to prepare data easily for input to the Company's reservoir simulators and to view the results in color.
AHM (adaptive history matching system for use with reservoir simulators). Used to help match a reservoir's historical production of oil, gas and water. A final calibrated (history matched) model can then be used to simulate future production under various hypothetical operating scenarios. This software includes such displays as color 3-D and 4-D (showing the passage of time) maps and simulated color visualizations of fluids flowing through the reservoir.
PETROLEUM WORKBENCH (an integrated set of high technology products for reservoir management). This integrated set of products is used to perform reservoir description, simulation and monitoring on a workstation or personal computer. Either an expert or non-expert professional can use this integrated set of products to select optimum reservoir development plans using the highest technology more quickly and efficiently than with non-integrated and individually designed products. The current version of Petroleum WorkBench includes Logcalc, Interpret/2, SimBest II, parts of SimEase and PDA (the Company's production data analysis system), plus various display capabilities including mapping and cross-sections. The Company's strategy for development of Petroleum WorkBench includes making the Company's technology accessible to a much larger market of professionals. Petroleum WorkBench is also a first step toward the future integration of the Company's other products to encompass all technologies necessary to develop and manage oil and gas fields.
Petroleum WorkBench was originally developed for the UNIX operating system because of the size and complexity of the code, the graphics and the need for networking with other desktop computers. These capabilities are now available on the existing DOS/Windows operating systems.
In addition, the Company has a number of other CAP products PROBE (probability analysis for geoscientists), PERMPROBE (statistical reservoir permeability analysis), GEOPROBE (statistical reservoir geology analysis), EORPM (enhanced oil recovery prediction models), CHEMFLOOD (chemical flooding reservoir simulator), N-Hance (enhanced recovery reservoir simulator), OMEGA (gas storage reservoir simulator), OMNET (reservoir simulator for multiple gas storage reservoirs and pipelines), MATBAL (material balance reservoir simulator), VFLOW (wellbore vertical flow simulator), IPS (investment planning system), and GUESS (general uncertainty economic simulator).
The Company also provides consulting and training, on the use and actual application of the Company's products and technology to a client's reservoir management needs. The Company provides consulting services in the areas of geophysics, 4D seismic, geology, petrophysics, reservoir engineering and production and completion engineering. The Company has designed cost-effective exploitation methods, production and injection operations, and enhanced oil recovery schemes. The Company also has performed reserve evaluations and special simulation techniques for artificial lift, horizontal drilling and massive hydraulic fracturing. In addition, the Company has designed development plans of an entire oil field, including the operation and monitoring of well and reservoir performance.
Pipeline and Facilities Products, Services and Customers
The Company's software and related services for the pipeline and surface facilities area simulate and monitor oil and gas pipelines and surface facilities, such as compressor stations, tank farms and pumping stations, for applications including engineering design, leak detection, real time modelling, optimization of transportation efficiency and pipeline operator training. The systems are used in either "real time" or "off-line" mode. In the real time mode, data is continuously collected by a SCADA system from various points along a pipeline, or from surface facilities, and used by the software for simulation and monitoring purposes. In the off-line mode, real-time data is not used and is replaced by user-provided data for engineering or training purposes. The Company's historical focus in this area has been on providing simulation and monitoring software to operators of large and complex pipelines and surface facilities. The current focus of the Company in this area is to develop and market a standardized and modular system that is cost-effective for smaller pipeline systems and also capable of providing solutions for larger pipeline systems. The primary software products being marketed by the Company in this area include:
TGNET (transient gas pipeline network simulator). Used off-line by pipeline engineers to study portions of gas pipeline networks in order to simulate the design and operation of the pipeline system.
TLNET (transient liquid pipeline network simulator). Like TGNET, used off-line for liquid pipeline design and operations studies.
MNET (multiphase pipeline network steady state simulator). Like TGNET, used off-line for pipeline design and operations studies for the simultaneous flow of oil, gas and/or water.
INTERACT (interactive pipeline network simulators). Used by pipeline engineers to plan future flows and to train pipeline dispatchers. INTERACT is comprised of two separate software products for gas and liquid.
PIPELINE MONITOR I and II (leak detection and pipeline management software for intermediate complexity pipeline networks). Real time system used continuously by the pipeline operating staff to detect leaks and to manage pipeline operations. Versions are available for both oil and gas pipelines.
ON-LINE SYSTEM (pipeline leak detection and management software). A series of software modules that can be integrated to provide leak detection plus additional options such as product batch tracking in liquid systems and compressor utilization for complex gas pipeline networks. The software operates continuously in real time, often with full backup computers, to manage complex pipeline operations.
The Company also provides consulting and training, as required by customers who use the technology and/or the products. Training is provided for both the use of the Company's software and to train dispatchers to handle pipeline operational problems such as leaks and product batch tracking. A typical consulting project would be to configure the software system to accurately simulate the customer's actual pipeline and facilities, ensure that the data accurately describes the field operations and then install and test the data running in configuration with the Company's product at the customer's site.
Research and Development
The Company is committed to the continued enhancement of its petroleum industry software and to the development of software and services having new or related applications. The Company's objective is to develop products that are considered to be high quality and technically advanced that will meet the needs of the company's customers and enable them to grow and develop their reserves more cost effectively.
In the CAP area, enhancement of Petroleum WorkBench will continue with the addition of a geostatistics module, conversion to an open architecture and updates to other modules. Development and upgrade of black oil, compositional and thermal simulators will be ongoing.
In the pipeline and facilities area, new versions of all off-line PC products were released in 1996 to run under Windows 95 or Windows NT. Additional enhancements, including graphical network configuration, are also expected for stand-alone PC products in 1997.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company spent $2.9 million for development of new products and the improvement and enhancement of existing products.
MARKETING, SALES AND CUSTOMER SUPPORT
Marketing Strategy
The Company's marketing strategy is to create customer awareness of existing and new products and to publicize its technical expertise through participation at technical meetings and conferences, publication of scientific papers, presentation of technical proposals to existing and potential customers, and sponsorship of product focus groups. The Company continually surveys the market and analyzes the products and services offered by the Company and its competitors in order to identify new developments, market trends and changing preferences and requirements of the market place. The Company will develop marketing plans specifically tailored for its products that identify the appropriate distribution channels to reach the target market or market segment and will permit the effective promotion of the products. The Company supports its customers by providing complete consulting, technical and training services by experts in computer systems and the various technical applications disciplines for all product areas.
Sales Staff, Locations and Customer Support
The Company sells its products, consulting and other services on a worldwide basis primarily through its worldwide direct sales force. Since sales of the Company's products require technical interaction with customers, members of the sales force generally are technically qualified as well as having significant sales and marketing experience. In addition, sales and marketing personnel are actively supported by technical personnel and senior management of the Company.
Sales personnel are located in each of the Company's offices in Denver, Houston, Calgary, London, and Beijing, People's Republic of China. Local sales agents are utilized principally in countries in which local representation is necessary or appropriate. The Company markets certain of its products through resellers and local agents in certain foreign countries.
The Company provides installation and product training, on-site consulting and 24-hour telephone availability of systems and technical experts as part of its customer support services.
BACKLOG
The Company's backlog at December 31, 1996, was $6.7 million, of which 95% is expected to be earned by December 31, 1997.
COMPETITION
The market for most of the products and services offered by the Company is highly competitive, although the number of competitors generally is limited. The principal competitive factors faced by the Company are product functionality and performance, product price in relation to performance, consulting and customer support services. Management also believes that the Company competes effectively due to its broad product line, large customer base and reputation for quality products and expert services. However, sales of the Company's products and services would be adversely affected should competitors introduce new products with better functionality, performance, price or other competitive characteristics.
The principal competitors in the licensing and sale of development and production software are GeoQuest, a division of Schlumberger; Halliburton Company, and a number of smaller competitors.
The competition in the licensing and sale of pipeline and surface facilities software is fragmented with individual companies often marketing only one or two products. Significant competitors in software licensing and supply of related services of real time, on-line products in the leak detection and real-time modeling areas are Stoner and Associates and Lic Consult.
GEOGRAPHIC AND BUSINESS LINE DATA
Geographic Revenue Data
The following table sets forth the Company's consolidated revenues by geographic area for 1996:
Revenue derived from foreign sources amounted to $14,765,000 (78% of total revenue). Foreign revenue is subject to a number of factors such as political instability, changes in protective tariffs, tax policies, and export-import controls. See Note 7 to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on foreign and domestic operations and the Company's United States export revenue.
Much of the Company's business is conducted with large, established U.S. and foreign companies (sometimes acting as government contractors), governments and national petroleum companies of foreign governments. Qualifying foreign receivables are insured, subject to a deductible loss amount, under an insurance policy with the Foreign Credit Insurance Association, an agency of the United States Export- Import Bank. The Company performs credit evaluations when considered necessary and generally does not require collateral.
Business Line Data
The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenue contributed by each of the Company's classes of products and services for 1996:
During 1996, there was no single customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Company's revenue and the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business.
PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
The Company has protected its proprietary computer software by restricting access to the underlying source code through technical means and by requiring its customers to enter into licensing arrangements that are protective of the Company's intellectual property rights in such software. For enforcement of its rights in the software, the Company relies upon laws relating to trade secrets and the misappropriation of confidential business information, as well as unfair competition laws, which are generally recognized in both state and international judicial proceedings. Additionally, the Company obtains federal and international protection of its computer software through federal copyright and the international copyright protection afforded by the Berne Convention with reciprocal copyright protection in over 75 countries. To date, the Company has not sought to patent any of its computer software. While the Company does not rule out obtaining patent protection for computer software at some future time, the present procedure for obtaining patent protection would require the Company to secure a patent in the United States and all foreign countries where the software might be utilized, even though the patentability of software in some foreign countries remains questionable and in the process of patenting the software in the United States the Company would be required to fully disclose the source code to the public through its patent application.
In addition, the Company requires all employees and consultants who have access to its proprietary information and software to execute confidentiality agreements.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1996, the Company employed 99 persons full-time in all locations. The Company also engages technical consultants as required to complete project work.
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of the executive officers and the members of the Board of Directors of the Company as of December 31, 1996. All directors are elected for a term of one year and serve until their successors are elected and qualified.
There are no family relationships among any of the executive officers or directors of the Company.
Mr. Steel joined the Company in January, 1996, and was elected President, Chief Operating Officer and member of the Board of Directors, effective January 15, 1996. He was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in May, 1996. He has extensive technical and managerial experience in the international petroleum industry. He served as General Manager of Snyder Oil Company's affiliate, Command Petroleum, in the Bay of Bengal, India. Prior to that, he served as Vice President of Snyder's Julesburg Rocky Mountain Business Unit. Mr. Steel joined Geophysical Services, Inc. (GSI), the geophysical subsidiary of Texas Instruments, in 1969. In 1992, after GSI had become part of Halliburton Company, he was appointed President of their geophysical subsidiary, Halliburton Geophysical Services (HGS). He has a B.S. degree in Natural Science from St. Andrews in Scotland and holds membership in the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Petroleum Engineers, the American Society for Quality Control and the British Deming Association.
Mr. Baedor graduated from California Polytechnic, Pomona in 1973 with a BSEE in Digital Design. Mr. Baedor is Division Vice President for the Pipeline & Facilities Division, having joined the Company in 1994 as Division Vice President for Sales and Marketing. Previous to joining the Company, Mr. Baedor served as Director, Engineering Systems at Baker Hughes Company. He has 24 years experience, domestically and internationally, in engineering, project management, sales and marketing in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Baedor was also employed with Texas Instruments, The Foxboro Company, Litton Industries and Fluor - Daniel - Williams. Mr. Baedor is a Senior Member, Instrument Society of America (ISA).
Ms. Cavallo is a Certified Public Accountant in Texas and has over eighteen years financial management experience in the oil service industry. She joined the Company in October 1994 and is currently responsible for the consolidation of financial information for each of the operating divisions and the Company in total. Prior to joining SSI, Ms. Cavallo was associated with Highland Resources, Western Oceanic, Inc., and Oceaneering International, Inc., all in Houston. She received her Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Illinois State University in 1967 and holds memberships in the National Certified Public Accountants Association, Texas Certified Public Accountants Association, Treasury Management Association, Houston Chapter of Texas CPAs, and the American Women's Certified Public Accountants Association.
Mr. Frazier joined the Company in September, 1981, and was elected Corporate Secretary in May, 1996. He has worldwide responsibilities for the Company's human resource programs and has extensive managerial experience in all aspects of compensation, employee benefits and pension plans for employees in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Prior to joining SSI, Mr. Frazier served with Coopers & Lybrand for ten years in Florida and Colorado in human resource management positions. He was associated with the Small Business Administration in Florida from 1967-1972, where he was involved in training and management development programs. Mr. Frazier has a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Florida Atlantic University. He is a member of the Society for Human Resource Management and is active in community and civic organizations.
Dr. Parish joined the Company in April, 1982 as Vice President of Technical Products in Europe and is currently Managing Director of SSI UK, Ltd., the Company's United Kingdom subsidiary. He is responsible for the Exploration and Production Consulting division. He served as Division Vice President, Exploration and Production Products, from March, 1987 to October, 1990. From February, 1985 to March, 1987, he was Managing Director of the Company's U.K. subsidiary. Dr. Parish has over twenty years experience in mathematical modeling and software engineering. He graduated from London University with a B.Sc. with honors in mathematics in 1963, and from North Carolina State University with a Ph.D. in statistics in 1969.
Mr. Sofia joined the Company in October 1985 as a senior engineer. He was promoted to manager in 1992 and to Vice President of the Software Business Unit in May 1996. Mr. Sofia heads a team of professionals involved in WorkBench development, customer support, simulation development and sales. Mr. Sofia joined Petro-Canada in September 1982 where he was involved in project engineering, well test interpretation and reservoir/development engineering activities. He received a Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering from McGill University in Montreal in 1982.
Dr. Nichols was employed by Hercules Incorporated in research and development for thirty-five years until his retirement in 1989. For the last ten years he held various managerial positions. He received his B.S. degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1950, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from California Institute of Technology in 1954 and 1957, respectively, all in chemical engineering.
Mr. Price was employed by Chevron Oil Company and Saudi Aramco for over thirty-seven years until his retirement in 1990. For the last eleven years he held various executive positions with Saudi Aramco in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, including Vice President of Petroleum Engineering and Vice President of Exploration and Production. Prior to that time he held various management positions in Chevron's operations in the U.S., Australia and Iran. He is currently a private investor and consultant and is a director of First National Bank, Mexia, Texas; Paragon Wireline Services; Advanced Reservoir Technologies and Middle East Services. He received B.S. degrees in both petroleum engineering and geological engineering from Texas A&M University in 1951 and completed course work for an M.S. degree from the same school in 1953.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
All of the Company's operations are conducted in leased space as follows:
In addition, the Company maintains a small office in Beijing, People's Republic of China.
The Company is presently negotiating a lease on new space for its Denver, Colorado office.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
To the knowledge of management, the only significant claims pending or threatened against the Company or any of its subsidiaries:
Marshall Wolf, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. E. A. Breitenbach, R. J. Hottovy, Jimmy L. Duckworth, and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. On October 5, 1995, a claim was filed in the United States District Court of the District of Colorado alleging that the Defendants, who include the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, its former Chief Financial Officer and a former Executive Vice President, violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10(b)-5 promulgated thereunder in issuing financial reports for the first three quarters of the Company's 1994 fiscal year which failed to comply with generally accepted accounting principles with respect to revenues recognized from the Company's contracts with value added resellers. The Plaintiff seeks to have the Court determine that the lawsuit constitutes a proper class action on behalf of all persons who purchased stock of the Company during the period from May 20, 1994 through July 10, 1995, with certain exclusions, and the Company has not contested whether the claim constitutes a proper class action.
The Defendants and the Plaintiff previously reached agreement for settlement of the claim involving the payment of $1,100,000 in cash, to be provided by the Company's liability insurer in a court- supervised escrow account, and the Company's issuance of warrants to purchase common stock exercisable at the market price of the stock at the time of completion of the settlement, with the number of warrants to be such that their aggregate value is $900,000. Subsequently, the settlement agreement has been modified to eliminate the warrants and to provide for an additional $525,000 in cash, which cash will be provided by the Company. The Company concluded that the foregoing settlement is in its best interests in view of the uncertainties of litigation, the substantial costs of defending the claim and the material amount of management time which would be required for such defense. The Company recorded a $900,000 loss contingency in the second quarter of 1996 relating to the proposed agreement for settlement of the Marshall Wolf claim in accordance with Question 1 of SAB Topic 5:Y. Upon final approval of the modified settlement, the Company will reduce its loss contingency reserve by $375,000, representing the difference between $525,000 and the previously accrued amount of $900,000. Completion of the settlement is subject to final approval of the fairness of the settlement by the Court, with such completion anticipated to occur in May 1997.
Arbitration Number 70T 181 0038 96 D; Kinesix, a division of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. and Kinesix (Europe) Ltd., an English Company - Houston, Texas. The Company, through Kinesix, a division of the Company, entered into a Territory Distributor Agreement with Kinesix (Europe) Ltd. ("KEL"), an unaffiliated entity located in London, U.K. The Distributor Agreement required under most circumstances a decision from the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") before its termination could be effective. On March 4, 1996 the Company commenced arbitration seeking declaration of termination of the Distributor Agreement and money due the Company for receivables outstanding as of December 31, 1995 of $296,000 for which the Company had fully provided. Thereafter, KEL in writing advised its customer base that it had ceased to trade in Kinesix products. As a result of this action by KEL and pursuant to the Distributor Agreement, the Company has declared the Distributor Agreement terminated without the requirement of arbitration. In the interim, on April 1, 1996 KEL filed an answer and counterclaim with the AAA and asserts damages that exceed $1 million without substantiation. It was the opinion of the Company and its counsel that KEL's claim was without merit.
On October 1, 1996, a panel of the American Arbitration Association made an award in favor of KEL against the Company in the aggregate amount of $674,000. Such award was totally unanticipated by the Company and its counsel. On October 21, 1996, the Company filed a petition in a Texas state court seeking to have the award vacated on the grounds that the arbitrators erroneously denied the Company's request for a postponement of the arbitration hearing which prejudiced the Company in view of the claimant's failure to meet its obligation to disclose material testimony to be given at the hearing and that the arbitrators made a gross mistake of law in failing to apply a release and waiver given by the claimant following its knowledge of the complained of acts of the Company. The award in favor of KEL was settled in February 1997 for $575,000. The Company has recognized an expense for the amount of the $674,000 award, which has been included in the loss from operation of the discontinued Kinesix division for the year ended December 31, 1996 and included a liability for $674,000 in the balance sheet as part of other current liabilities.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock was traded on the Nasdaq National Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "SSFT." On July 11, 1995, the Company's stock was delisted from Nasdaq as the result of the Company's failure to remedy its public filing. At March 31, 1997, the Company had approximately 463 stockholders of record. Following are high and low prices of sales of the Company's common stock for the periods indicated:
The Company has not paid dividends on its common stock for several years and does not intend to pay dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on the Company's common stock is also prohibited under the Company's current revolving credit facility.
The Company has had, during the past year, only sporadic trading on its common stock in the over-the-counter market. There is no assurance that such trading will expand or even continue. The Company will seek re-listing on a national exchange as the issues of the Class Action and SEC inquiry are resolved.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(1) The above table sets forth a summary of selected consolidated financial data for the Company as of December 31, 1996 and for the year then ended. The Company has received an extensive comments letter from the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1996 and June 30, 1996 and the financial statements included therein. The Company has responded to those comments and discussions with the Staff are continuing. Resolution of some of the comments may result in certain revisions of those Forms and of the financial statements therein, which would cause comparative information that would be presented in this report to require revision. Accordingly, the Company has not included any comparative financial information in this Form 10-K. When comments made by the SEC have been satisfactorily resolved, the Company will amend this Form 10-K to include comparative data for prior periods. The financial data is derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto. The data should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
(2) Except for historical information contained herein, the statements in this report are forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause the Company's actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Those risks and uncertainties include, among others, the financial strength and competitive pricing environment of the oil and gas service industry, product demand, market acceptance, and new product development. Those and other risks are described in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(3) On October 9, 1996, the Company announced the execution of final contracts for the previously announced sale of the net assets and business of its graphical user interface segment, otherwise known as the Kinesix division, to a group including the former President of the Kinesix division. The sale of this segment of the Company's business was part of management strategy to narrow the focus of the Company's activities to its primary market of the oil and gas industry. The consideration to the Company in the transaction was $410,000 including cash of $376,000 which was received by the Company in October 1996, a note receivable for $32,000, and the purchaser's assumption of liabilities totaling $59,000. The measurement date for accounting for the disposal was August 26, 1996, the date on which management decided to sell the Kinesix division and the disposal date was September 3, 1996, the effective date of the transaction. The transaction resulted in a loss on disposal of $478,000, which includes estimated losses to be incurred by the Kinesix division from the measurement date to the date of disposal of $66,000. From the measurement date to the balance sheet date of September 30, 1996, the Company incurred a net loss of $66,000 in operating the Kinesix division, which was charged to a reserve that was recorded in accounting for the loss on disposal. Loss from operation of the discontinued segment from January 1, 1996 to the measurement date was $878,000, including recognition of an expense of $674,000 related to an award against the Company by the American Arbitration Association, which is discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
The Company develops and markets sophisticated software for the development and production and pipeline and surface facilities areas of the worldwide oil and gas industry and for graphical user interface applications.
The following discussion is management's assessment of the Company's historical financial performance and condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the related Notes thereto.
The Company recognizes software license revenue on delivery provided that a legally-binding licensing agreement containing all material terms has been executed, or there is other persuasive evidence of a binding agreement, there are no remaining significant obligations and that collection of the resulting receivable is probable. In a contract where the remaining obligations are insignificant such as installation, training and testing, the allocable revenue is deferred and recognized upon completion of performance. The Company does not recognize any software revenue until all significant vendor obligations are met. Software maintenance revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Certain combined software and service contracts are accounted for using the percentage of completion method with contract revenue recognized based on: (a) value-added output measures of progress for the software portion of the contract after meeting certain specified contractual criteria, and having used the installed software in completing specifications for the engineering services on the project, which have been accepted by the client, and (b) input measures of work performed on an hours-to- hours basis for the services portion of the contract. Fixed-price contract revenue is recognized using the percentage of completion method, calculated on the ratio of labor hours incurred to total projected labor hours. Losses on contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method are recognized at the time they are identified. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7.2 FINANCIAL POSITION
7.2.1 Overall Financial Position
At December 31, 1996, the Company's working capital ratio was 1.27 to 1, based on current assets of $10.8 million and current liabilities of $8.5 million.
In April and May 1996 the Company completed the following financing and restructuring of convertible debentures and bank revolving line of credit:
In April 1996 Lindner Funds, then a 14% shareholder and currently a 19% shareholder of the Company, invested $5 million in the Company in exchange for a senior secured note at 7% payable in five years and non- detachable warrants to purchase 1.5 million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for five years.
In April 1996 Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. converted $250,000 of principal of its convertible debentures for 282,218 shares of the Company's common stock and converted the balance of $1.5 million principal of its convertible debentures into a senior secured note at 7% payable in five years and a non-detachable stock purchase right to acquire 450,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for five years. The terms of the secured note and non-detachable stock purchase right are substantially the same as for those issued to Lindner Funds.
Effective April 1, 1996 the Company's primary bank and the Export- Import Bank of the United States restructured and renewed a bank line of credit to April 15, 1997. The Company's primary bank established a revolving line of credit pursuant to which the Company may utilize up to $1.5 million for (a) short-term borrowings for working capital purposes and (b) the issuance of letters of credit for bid guarantees, performance bonds and advance payment guarantees. Under the terms of the new bank credit agreement, in April 1996 the Company repaid the $2.9 million balance then owed pursuant to the previous line of credit, using proceeds from the Lindner and Renaissance Senior Secured Notes. In April 1997, the Company and Bank One agreed to extend the credit facility, subject to Export-Import Bank approval. Because of the Company's improved cash position and decreased need for credit, the total amount of the credit facility was decreased from $1.5 million to $900,000 and the term of the facility was extended to October 1997. The interest rate applicable to short-term borrowings under this extended credit arrangement will be equal to the bank's prime rate of interest.
The Lindner and Renaissance transactions will be accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants, by accounting for the notes and the non-detachable warrants as a single obligation with no separate value assigned to the warrants.
The Company has completed the financing and restructuring of the convertible debentures and the bank revolving line of credit described above. The Company believes that it should continue generating positive cash flow from operations as a result of the cost reductions and other measures discussed in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Position. The Company believes that funds expected to be available under the Company's revolving credit facility and internally generated funds should provide the Company with sufficient liquidity and working capital to meet its anticipated short-term and long-term operating needs. Should this not be possible, funding would be sought from alternative sources and/or Company costs would be reduced. There can be no assurances, however, that the Company will generate sufficient positive cash flow from operations to meet its future operating needs or be successful in obtaining any required additional debt or equity financing.
7.2.2 Bank Credit Agreements
7.2.2.1 United States Credit Agreements
Effective April 1, 1996 the Company completed with Bank One a $1.5 million revolving credit facility that is available through April 15, 1997. The collateral for the line is the Company's accounts receivable from non-U.S. domiciled customers to the extent necessary to collateralize the line. All receivables not necessary for the line and substantially all other assets except those of the Canadian subsidiary are collateral for The Lindner Dividend Fund ("Lindner") and Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. ("Renaissance") senior secured notes.
The credit facility is supported by a $1.5 million guarantee from EximBank. The Company will pay 1.25% less than the prime rate of interest on the first $300,000 borrowed under the line and the prime interest rate on the balance. The Company pays EximBank a fee equal to 1.5% of the guarantee and is required to purchase credit insurance for foreign receivables.
As of December 31, 1996 the balances of the revolving credit facility, amounts of short-term cash borrowings and letters of credit outstanding, and credit available under the revolving credit facility were as follows:
Under the terms of the new bank credit agreement, in April 1996 the Company repaid the $2.9 million balance then owed pursuant to the previous line of credit, using proceeds from the Lindner and Renaissance Senior Secured Notes. In October 1996, the Company repaid the amount outstanding pursuant to the new bank credit agreement at September 30, 1996 of $750,000.
In April 1997, the Company and Bank One agreed to extend the credit facility, subject to Export-Import Bank approval. Because of the Company's improved cash position and decreased need for credit, the total amount of the credit facility was decreased from $1.5 million to $900,000 and the term of the facility was extended to October 1997. The interest rate applicable to short-term borrowings under this extended credit arrangement will be equal to the bank's prime rate of interest.
7.2.2.2 United Kingdom Line of Credit.
The term of a bank line of credit of the Company's United Kingdom subsidiary ended in May 1996 and the outstanding balance of $300,000 was repaid along with accrued interest.
7.2.2.3 Canadian Line of Credit
The term of a bank line of credit of the Company's Canadian subsidiary ended in May 1996. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.
7.3 Results of Operations
7.3.1 Revenue
Following is a table of revenue for 1996 (in thousands):
Total revenue for 1996 was $19.0 million. Revenue in the Pipeline and Facilities (P&F) Division was $4.3 million in 1996. Revenue in the Exploration and Production (E&P) Consulting division was $9.8 million, which included revenue recognized of $2.0 million upon collection of a foreign receivable for work performed in 1995 and a payment for cancellation of a contract, all of which had not been previously recognized as revenue. See Section 7.3.6. Revenue in The Petroleum WorkBench division was $4.9 million.
The Company's number of days' sales outstanding in receivables and work in progress has historically been high due to the nature and terms of many of the contracts in which the Company has engaged, and due to the slow-paying nature of several of the countries in which the Company has historically done business. The Company is taking measures to improve contractual terms and to improve business processes to reduce the DSO (days sales outstanding) performance.
7.3.2 Foreign Revenue
Revenue derived from foreign sources during 1996 is set forth below:
Management believes that foreign revenue will continue to be an important factor in the Company's business, primarily as a result of continued penetration of international markets through the Company's strategic marketing efforts. See "Business - Geographic and Business Line Data" for information regarding the particular geographic areas in which the Company generated foreign source revenue during these periods.
7.3.3 Backlog
Backlog at December 31, 1996 was $6.7 million, of which 95% is expected to be earned by December 31, 1997.
7.3.4 Costs of Consulting and Training and Costs of Licenses and Maintenance
In 1996, management took steps to reduce overhead, non-billable staff personnel, and other costs, and to emphasize direct accountability for profitability and cash performance at the division management level.
Costs of consulting and training were $8.4 million in 1996, which was 65% of consulting and training revenue. This includes costs of approximately $700,000 related to revenue recognized upon collection of the foreign receivable and payment for cancellation of a contract referred to above.
Costs of maintenance were $1.2 million in 1996, which was 41% of maintenance revenue.
7.3.5 Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
In 1996, management took steps to reduce overhead, personnel, and other costs. The benefits from these measures resulted in lower costs in the second half of 1996.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $6.6 million in 1996. The expense for 1996 includes provisions for expenses of $600,000 related to severance costs in the second quarter in accordance with EITF 94-3 from personnel reductions, bad debts, and other nonrecurring expenses.
7.3.6 Recovery of Accounts Receivable
In 1996 the Company received payments totaling $3.6 million related to a foreign consulting project. The payments included $1.6 million related to an account receivable that had been reserved for at December 31, 1995 pursuant to the Company's current practice of generally increasing the allowance for doubtful accounts by the amount of any accounts receivable that have aged more than six months. The receipt of the $1.6 million has been reported as a reduction of expenses in the statement of operations under the caption "recovery of accounts receivable." The remaining amount of $2.0 million was reported as revenue in 1996. See Section 7.3.1.
7.3.7 Software Research and Development The following table summarizes total costs of development and enhancement of the Company's software products for 1996. The Company's software development and enhancement costs are accounted for in accordance with FASB Statement No. 86.
The Company continues its commitment to the development and enhancement of its software products. Management has reduced the level of software development activities in comparison to expenditure levels in 1995 and prior years and is focusing primarily on adaptation of the Company's software products to the personal computer market. It is anticipated that the extent of software development and enhancement activity for the foreseeable future will not result in significant increases in the amount of capitalized software in the Company's balance sheet.
7.3.8 Settlement of Class Action Marshall Wolf, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. E. A. Breitenbach, R. J. Hottovy, Jimmy L. Duckworth, and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. On October 5, 1995, a claim was filed in the United States District Court of the District of Colorado alleging that the Defendants, who include the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, its former Chief Financial Officer and a former Executive Vice President, violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10(b)-5 promulgated thereunder in issuing financial reports for the first three quarters of the Company's 1994 fiscal year which failed to comply with generally accepted accounting principles with respect to revenues recognized from the Company's contracts with value added resellers. The Plaintiff seeks to have the Court determine that the lawsuit constitutes a proper class action on behalf of all persons who purchased stock of the Company during the period from May 20, 1994 through July 10, 1995, with certain exclusions, and the Company has not contested whether the claim constitutes a proper class action.
The Defendants and the Plaintiff previously reached agreement for settlement of the claim involving the payment of $1,100,000 in cash, to be provided by the Company's liability insurer in a court- supervised escrow account, and the Company's issuance of warrants to purchase common stock exercisable at the market price of the stock at the time of completion of the settlement, with the number of warrants to be such that their aggregate value is $900,000. Subsequently, the settlement agreement has been modified to eliminate the warrants and to provide for an additional $525,000 in cash, which cash will be provided by the Company. The Company concluded that the foregoing settlement is in its best interests in view of the uncertainties of litigation, the substantial costs of defending the claim and the material amount of management time which would be required for such defense. The Company recorded a $900,000 loss contingency in the second quarter of 1996 relating to the proposed agreement for settlement of the Marshall Wolf claim in accordance with Question 1 of SAB Topic 5:Y. Upon final approval of the modified settlement, the Company will reduce its loss contingency reserve by $375,000, representing the difference between $525,000 and the previously accrued amount of $900,000. Completion of the settlement is subject to final approval of the fairness of the settlement by the Court, with such completion anticipated to occur in May 1997.
7.3.9 Interest Income (Expense) The following table summarizes the components of interest income (expense) 1996. The capitalized interest was included as a component of the capitalized cost of software development projects in progress in accordance with FASB Statement No. 34.
7.3.10 Foreign Exchange Losses The Company is subject to risks associated with its various transactions in foreign currencies, primarily the British Pound and the Canadian Dollar, but the Company currently does not believe they are material. The Company continually monitors its risks and uses forward rates in the setting of exchange rates in the costing and pricing for significant projects to minimize risk. During 1996, the Company reported a net foreign exchange loss of $85,000.
7.3.11 Disposal of Kinesix Division On October 9, 1996, the Company announced the execution of final contracts for the previously announced sale of the net assets and business of its graphical user interface segment, otherwise known as the Kinesix division, to a group including the former President of the Kinesix division. The sale of this segment of the Company's business was part of management strategy to narrow the focus of the Company's activities to its primary market of the oil and gas industry. The consideration to the Company in the transaction was $410,000, including cash of $376,000 which was received by the Company in October 1996, a note receivable for $32,000, and the purchaser's assumption of liabilities totaling $59,000. The measurement date for accounting for the disposal was August 26, 1996, the date on which management decided to sell the Kinesix division and the disposal date was September 3, 1996, the effective date of the transaction. The transaction resulted in a loss on disposal of $478,000, which includes estimated losses to be incurred by the Kinesix division from the measurement date to the date of disposal of $66,000. From the measurement date to the balance sheet date of September 30, 1996, the Company incurred a net loss of $66,000 in operating the Kinesix division, which was charged to a reserve that was recorded in accounting for the loss on disposal. Loss from operation of the discontinued segment from January 1, 1996 to the measurement date was $878,000, including recognition of an expense of $674,000 related to an award against the Company by the American Arbitration Association, which is discussed in Note 9.
7.4 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
7.4.1 Cash Flows from Operating Activities
In 1996, net cash of $1.8 million was provided by operating activities. The most significant individual reason was that in 1996 the Company received a cash payment of $3.6 million related to a foreign consulting contract. See Section 7.3.6.
7.4.2 Cash Flows from Investing Activities
In 1996, net cash of $2.2 million was utilized in investing activities. In 1996, the Company incurred total software development and enhancement costs of $2.9 million, of which $2.0 million was capitalized and $0.9 million was charged to expense as research and development costs.
7.4.3 Cash Flows from Financing Activities
In 1996, net cash of $1.9 million was provided by financing activities which consisted primarily of cash of $5.0 million received from the Lindner Funds financing in April 1996, offset in part by the use of part of such funds for full repayment of bank line of credit borrowings outstanding of $3.1 million, followed by additional borrowings of $750,000 under the new bank line of credit. The $750,000 was repaid in October 1996. The Company also used $1.8 million of the funds received in the Lindner Funds financing to reduce accounts payable.
7.4.4 Inflation
The Company's results of operations have not been affected by inflation and management does not expect inflation to have a significant effect on its operations in the future.
7.5 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
From time to time, the Company or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements, orally or in writing. Such forward-looking statements may be included in, but not limited to, press releases, oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Words or phrases "will likely result", "are expected to", "will continue", "is anticipated", "estimate", "project or projected", or similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"). The Company wishes to ensure that such statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements, so as to maximize to the fullest extent possible the protections of the safe harbor established in the Reform Act. Accordingly, such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the following discussion of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements.
Investors should also be aware of factors that could have a negative impact on the Company's prospects and the consistency of progress in the areas of revenue generation, profitability, liquidity, and generation of capital resources. These include: (i) technological and market conditions in the oil and gas industry and software industry, (ii) possible inability of the Company to attract investors for its equity securities or otherwise raise adequate funds from any source, (iii) increased governmental regulation, (iv) unexpected increases in competition, (v) possible inability to retain key employees, (vi) unfavorable outcomes to litigation to which the Company may become a party.
The risks identified here are not all inclusive. Furthermore, reference is also made to other sections of this report that include additional factors that could adversely impact the Company's business and financial performance. Moreover, the Company operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for Management to predict all of such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on the Company's business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 29
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 30
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR 31 THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 32 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR 33 THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 34
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 52
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
Note:
The Company has received an extensive comments letter from the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1996 and June 30, 1996 and the financial statements included therein. The Company has responded to those comments and discussions with the Staff are continuing. Resolution of some of the comments may result in certain revisions of those Forms and of the financial statements therein, which would cause comparative information that would be presented in this report to require revision. Accordingly, the Company has not included any comparative financial information in this Form 10-K. When comments made by the SEC have been satisfactorily resolved, the Company will amend this Form 10-K to include comparative data for prior periods.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 listed in the Index at Item 8. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
April 14, 1997 Denver, Colorado
SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE-INTERCOMP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (In thousands, except share amounts) December 31, 1996
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE-INTERCOMP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts) For the Year Ended December 31, 1996
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE-INTERCOMP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands) Year Ended December 31, 1996
Continued below
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE-INTERCOMP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) For the Year Ended December 31, 1996
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE-INTERCOMP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Company has received an extensive comments letter from the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1996 and June 30, 1996 and the financial statements included therein. The Company has responded to those comments and discussions with the Staff are continuing. Resolution of some of the comments may result in certain revisions of those Forms and of the financial statements therein, which would cause comparative information that would be presented in this report to require revision. Accordingly, the Company has not included any comparative financial information in this Form 10-K. When comments made by the SEC have been satisfactorily resolved, the Company will amend this Form 10-K to include comparative data for prior periods.
Business
Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. ("the Company") develops and markets sophisticated software for the development and production and pipeline and surface facilities areas of the worldwide oil and gas industry. The Company also provides consulting and technical support services in each of these areas.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. ("the Company") and its wholly- owned subsidiaries after elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.
Revenue
The Company recognizes software license revenue on delivery provided that a legally-binding licensing agreement containing all material terms has been executed, or there is other persuasive evidence of a binding agreement, there are no remaining significant obligations and that collection of the resulting receivable is probable. In a contract where the remaining obligations are insignificant such as installation, training and testing, the allocable revenue is deferred and recognized upon completion of performance. The Company does not recognize any software revenue until all significant vendor obligations are met. Software maintenance revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract.
Beginning in 1991 the Company entered into certain combined software and service contracts pursuant to which the Company provides off-the- shelf software, combined with pipeline engineering services, relating to leak detection and operations analysis of pipeline networks. The engineering services provided pursuant to these contracts include analysis of the characteristics of the client's specific pipeline network and entering these characteristics into the Company's software. The Company also markets the off-the-shelf software for use by clients, as is, without the services included in these contracts. The Company measures progress-to-completion for combined software and services contracts on a value added output basis for the off-the-shelf software portion of the contracts when: (1) a license for the off-the- shelf software has been executed that is enforceable for the customary price of the Company's off-the-shelf software, (2) the off-the-shelf software has been installed on the project computer, and (3) the installed off-the-shelf software has been used for completing and providing to the client specifications for the engineering services on the project, which have been accepted by the client. The Company measures progress-to-completion for the engineering services portion of the contracts based on labor hours incurred. This accounting policy for contract revenue does not apply if programming changes must be made to the software. Contract costs are recognized based on the percentage of completion applied to total estimated project costs, resulting in a constant gross margin percentage over the term of the contract.
Revenue earned in performance of time and material contracts is recognized at contractual rates as labor hours and associated costs are incurred. Fixed-price contract revenue is recognized using the percentage of completion method, calculated based on the ratio of labor hours incurred to total projected labor hours. Revenue accrued under time and material contracts is classified as work in progress on the Consolidated Balance Sheet if contractual milestones for billing have not been reached. Such amounts are later billed in accordance with applicable contract terms. The work in progress amounts at December 31, 1996 are expected to be billed and collected by December 31, 1997. Anticipated losses on contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method are recognized at the time they are identified. Costs incurred for specific anticipated contracts are deferred when recoverability of the costs from the anticipated contract is determined to be probable.
The Company's work-in-progress balance represents revenue earned and recognized for which billing milestones have not yet been reached. The revenue on these contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion method, and related qualifying software development costs are capitalized if the Company retains ownership and the right to market the developed software. In accordance with FASB Statement 68, the funded software development revenues does not recognize revenue for funded development software projects where the Company had a contractual obligation to refund all and/or part of the funding. For such contracts the Company records receipt of funds by recognizing an obligation to repay.
Part of the Company's marketing strategy has been to establish strategic alliances with quality VARs. VARs license the Company's software products for remarketing and sublicensing to end users or to other VARs, either for use on a specific project for a specific customer or for general marketing to the VARs' current and future customers. The Company's VARs are generally substantial companies with long operating histories. The software products licensed to VARs are established, proven products that have been widely accepted in the marketplaces served by the Company.
In some cases, primarily to obtain preferential pricing, a VAR makes an unconditional commitment to pay to the Company a fixed license fee for software to be used on a specific project for a specific customer or an unconditional commitment to pay to the Company a minimum fixed fee for the right of general marketing to the VAR's current and future customers for a specified period, usually one-year. In the case of general marketing rights, a VAR is required to pay license fees as it has transactions with its customers. On the due date or dates of a minimum fixed fee, which are payable either in installments or at the end of the term, the VAR must pay to the Company the amount, if any, required for total payments to equal the required minimum fixed fee amount. General marketing VAR minimum fixed fees are not subject to reduction based on the number of units marketed by a VAR and are not otherwise contingent on whether the VAR is successful in marketing the Company's software products or otherwise.
In accounting for a VAR agreement, the Company recognizes revenue at inception of the contract only if collection is determined to be probable and all other requirements for revenue recognition are met. These include: (a) delivery of all software products on all platforms that a VAR has the right to receive, (b) reviewing the VAR's credit status to determine whether the VAR has the financial capability to make the required fixed minimum payments, regardless of whether the VAR is successful in marketing the Company's software products, (c) determining that the VAR is not new, undercapitalized, or in financial difficulty, and (d) determining that the transaction is viable for both parties.
Capitalized Software Costs
Capitalized software is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company capitalizes costs of purchased software and qualifying internal costs of developing and enhancing its software products after the determination of technological feasibility, in accordance with paragraph 4 of FASB Statement No. 86. Development costs incurred prior to the determination of technological feasibility are expensed as research and development expense as incurred. At each balance sheet date, the Company records a writedown for any software products equal to the excess, if any, of unamortized cost over net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated future gross revenue for a product reduced by the estimated future costs of completion and disposal, including the costs of performing maintenance and customer support.
Amortization of capitalized software costs is determined each year based on the greater of: (1) the amount computed using the ratio of current year gross revenues to the sum of current and anticipated future gross revenue for that product or (2) straight-line amortization over 5 years.
Following is a summary of capitalization and amortization for the Company's software products.
The net carrying value of the software costs and all future capitalized software costs are being amortized over a five-year period, commencing January 1, 1996. Previously, Basic Technology products were amortized using a 13-year life and Other Products were amortized using a 7-year life.
The Company's working capital and cash requirements will continue to be influenced by the level of software research and development costs. During the year ended December 31, 1996, the level of software research and development costs was $2.8 million. In an effort to reduce internal capital requirements for software development projects, the Company actively pursues opportunities to fund software research and development costs through development projects with oil and gas industry partners, government agencies and others. In this type of funded development project, participating companies or other entities provide all or a portion of the funds required to develop or enhance a software product in exchange for access to the resulting software at discounted or nominal prices with the Company retaining ownership and licensing rights to the product. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company generally records as consulting revenue amounts received from these third parties and capitalizes the qualifying portion of related costs incurred as software development costs in accordance with FASB Statement 86.
The Company capitalized interest costs of $165,000 during the year ended December 31, 1996, as part of the cost of software development projects in progress.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, and depreciation and amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of these assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization of property and equipment sold or otherwise disposed of are retired from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in profit or loss in the period realized. Total depreciation expense was $742,000, for the year ended December 31, 1996.
The Company assigns the following useful lives to Property and Equipment :
Computer Software and Equipment: 3 to 5 years
Leasehold Improvements: The lesser of 7 to 10 years or the remaining term of the lease.
Office Furniture and Equipment: 3 to 10 years
Following are the components of property and equipment:
Foreign Currency Translation
Gains and losses from the effects of exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in foreign currencies are included in results of operations. Assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, and their revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Deferred taxes have not been allocated to the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment included in stockholders' equity because there is no intent to repatriate earnings of the foreign subsidiaries.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes whereby deferred tax liabilities or assets are provided in the financial statements by applying the provisions of applicable tax laws to measure the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences that will result in net taxable or deductible amounts in future years as a result of events recognized in the financial statements in the current or preceding years. The types of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts that give rise to significant portions of the temporary differences include: software development expenditures capitalized for books and deducted currently for taxes and related amortization, depreciation of property and equipment, amortization of rental obligations, losses accrued for book purposes, the recognition of software license revenues, and goodwill determined for tax purposes that is not deductible. Investment tax credits are recognized using the flow-through method.
Foreign subsidiaries are taxed according to applicable laws of the countries in which they do business. The Company has not provided U.S. income taxes that would be payable on remittance of the cumulative undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are intended to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time. At December 31, 1996 the undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries were not significant.
Income Per Share
Primary income per common and common equivalent share is computed based on the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares consisting of stock options and redeemable preferred stock outstanding during each period. For 1996 no common stock equivalents are included in the loss per share calculation as they would be antidilutive. Fully diluted income per share assumes the effects of conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including the convertible debentures (see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Fully diluted loss per share is not presented for 1996 because the effects of assumed conversion would be antidilutive.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated financial statements, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. On occasion the Company will have balances in excess of the federally insured amount.
Loan Origination Fees and Costs
Fees and direct costs incurred for the origination of loans are deferred and the interest expense is amortized over the contractual lives of the loans.
Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximated fair value as of December 31, 1996 because of their relatively short maturity.
Carrying amounts of debt issued approximated fair value because interest rates on these instruments approximated market interest rates as of December 31, 1996.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that effect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Use of estimates is significant with regard to capitalized software costs and the related amortization. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE 2 - COMPLETION OF PUBLIC OFFERING OF COMMON STOCK
In 1994, the Company sold 2.4 million newly issued shares of common stock in a public offering from which the Company received net proceeds of $9.7 million, net of related costs of approximately $270,000. The Company used the proceeds from the public offering to repay its bank indebtedness of $5.1 million, to reduce accounts payable, and to increase working capital.
NOTE 3 - BANKING ARRANGEMENTS, LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS AND NOTE PAYABLE
United States Lines of Credit
Effective April 1, 1996 the Company completed with Bank One a $1.5 million revolving credit facility that is available through April 15, 1997 for short-term borrowings for working capital purposes and the issuance of letters of credit for bid guarantees, performance bonds, and advance payment guarantees. The collateral for the line is the Company's accounts receivable from non-U.S. domiciled customers to the extent necessary to collateralize the line. All receivables not necessary for the line and substantially all other assets except those of the Canadian subsidiary are collateral for The Lindner Dividend Fund ("Lindner") and Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. ("Renaissance") senior secured notes.
The credit facility is supported by a $1.5 million guarantee from EximBank. The Company will pay 1.25% less than the prime rate of interest on the first $300,000 borrowed under the line and the prime interest rate on the balance. The Company pays EximBank a fee equal to 1.5% of the guarantee and is required to purchase credit insurance for foreign receivables.
As of December 31, 1996, the borrowing base, amounts of short-term cash borrowings and letters of credit outstanding, and credit available under the revolving credit facility were as follows:
Under the terms of the new bank credit agreement, in April 1996 the Company repaid the $2.9 million balance then owed pursuant to the previous line of credit, using proceeds from the Lindner and Renaissance Senior Secured Notes. In October 1996, the Company repaid the amount then outstanding pursuant to the new bank credit agreement of $750,000.
Interest rates applicable to short-term cash borrowings under the credit facility are equal to 7% on the first $300,000 borrowed and the bank's prime rate of interest on any additional borrowings. Interest rates applicable to short-term cash borrowings related to the bank's payment, if any, under letters of credit issued under the domestic portion of the credit facility are equal to the bank's prime rate of interest plus 2.5%. At December 31, 1996 interest rates applicable to short-term cash borrowings were 9.75% and 10.75% for the foreign and domestic portions of the line of credit, respectively. The Company pays 2% annually for outstanding letters of credit. The agreement requires that the Company meet certain requirements regarding operating results and financial condition and prohibits the Company from paying dividends without the bank's prior written consent.
The Company pays to the EximBank an annual fee of 1.5% of the amount of the guarantee. In addition, the Company is required to purchase credit insurance for foreign receivables at a cost of 0.44% of the amount of the insured receivables. The Company has not made a determination on the filing of claims for insurance recoveries for uncollected foreign accounts receivables.
In April 1997, the Company and Bank One agreed to extend the credit facility, subject to Export-Import Bank approval. Because of the Company's improved cash position and decreased need for credit, the total amount of the credit facility was decreased from $1.5 million to $900,000 in the Company's revolving credit facility and an extension of the term of the facility to October 1997. The interest rate applicable to short-term borrowings under this extended credit arrangement will be equal to the bank's prime rate of interest.
United Kingdom Line of Credit
The term of a bank line of credit of the Company's United Kingdom subsidiary ended in May 1996 and the outstanding balance of $300,000 was repaid along with accrued interest.
Canadian Line of Credit
The term of a bank line of credit of the Company's Canadian subsidiary ended in May 1996. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Renaissance Convertible Debentures
On September 30, 1992 the Company sold a $2.5 million 7-year convertible debenture to Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. ("Renaissance"). Proceeds from the sale of the convertible debenture were used to reduce accounts payable. The debenture bears interest at 11% per annum and is convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $2.50 per share. The conversion price is adjustable if the Company issues significant additional amounts of common stock for consideration less than the conversion price of $2.50 per share. Interest is payable monthly with principal payments of $25,000 commencing October 1, 1995.
On September 15, 1993 the Company sold a $1.0 million 7-year convertible debenture to Renaissance. Proceeds from the sale of the debenture were used by the Company for general working capital purposes. The debenture bears interest at 11% per annum, payable monthly, and is convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $3.25 per share. The conversion price is adjustable if the Company issues significant additional amounts of common stock for consideration less than the conversion price of $3.25 per share. The principal of the debenture is payable in 48 equal monthly installments of $10,000 over a four-year period commencing October 1, 1996 and ending September 1, 2000 and $520,000 on October 1, 2000. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements regarding conversion of a portion of the debentures.
The financing agreement with Renaissance with respect to the debentures requires that the Company satisfy certain financial covenants regarding operating results and financial condition. The Company is in compliance with all loan covenants at December 31, 1996. Renaissance is also entitled to appoint an individual to participate in an advisory capacity to the Company's Board of Directors as long as $850,000 in principal amount of the debentures is outstanding. Commencing on October 1, 1996, the Company has the right at any time upon 90 days prior notice to call both debentures for redemption. A call premium applies to such redemption equal to 15% of the amount redeemed during the fourth year of the debentures, 10% during the fifth year and 8% thereafter. During the initial three years of the debentures, the debentures may be called for redemption at a premium of 20% only if the common stock of the Company has been trading for at least $7.50 per share for 14 trading days prior to the redemption notice and if the Company has earned at least $.40 per share, in the aggregate, for the last four consecutive quarters preceding the notice.
Simultaneously with completion of the Company's 1994 public offering of common stock (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company agreed to change the conversion price of the $2.5 million and $1.0 million convertible debentures to $2.67, the average conversion price of both debentures. Renaissance then converted $1.75 million in principal amount of the $2.5 million convertible debentures into 653,846 shares of common stock, which Renaissance sold in the public offering. The outstanding balance of $1.75 million consists of a balance of $750,000 on the original $2.5 million debenture and the $1 million debenture all of which is convertible at $2.67 per share. The Company reduced paid-in capital by $119,000 for unamortized debt issuance costs related to the converted debentures.
In February 1996, the Company and Renaissance agreed to change the conversion feature of the debentures so that the two debentures which aggregate $1,750,000 in principal will be convertible at $2.39 into 732,218 shares of the Company's no par common stock and made other minor changes in the debentures.
In April 1996 Renaissance converted $250,000 of principal of its convertible debentures for 282,218 shares of the Company's common stock and converted the balance of $1.5 million principal of its convertible debentures into a senior secured note at 7% payable in five years and a non-detachable stock purchase right to acquire 450,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for five years. The terms of the secured note and non- detachable stock purchase right are substantially the same as for those issued to Lindner Funds.
Lindner Financing
In April 1996 Lindner Funds, then a 14% shareholder in the Company and now a 19% shareholder, invested $5 million in the Company in exchange for a senior secured note at 7% payable in five years and non- detachable warrants to purchase 1.5 million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for five years. Lindner Funds is currently a 19% shareholder of the Company.
Long-Term Obligations
The components of long-term obligations are as follows:
Scheduled maturities of the above long-term obligations are $291,000 in 1997, $31,000 in 1998, $17,000 in 1999, none in 2000, $6,500,000 in 2001, and $568,000 thereafter.
NOTE 4 - INCOME TAXES
The components of the provisions for income taxes are as follows:
Following is a summary of United States and foreign pretax accounting income (loss):
Following is a reconciliation of expected income tax provisions computed at the applicable US Federal statutory rate to the provisions for income taxes included in the statements of operations:
The components of deferred taxes in the balance sheets, which were fully eliminated by a valuation allowance, were as follows:
At December 31, 1996 the Company had the following net operating loss, tax credit, and capital loss carry forwards. Included in the net operating loss and credit carry forwards are tax benefits from an acquired company, which can be utilized to offset future taxable income of that acquired company.
In addition, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for U.K. and Canadian income tax purposes of approximately $23.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
NOTE 5 - CAPITAL STOCK
Redeemable Preferred Stock
In April 1990, Halliburton Company, a major oil and gas services supplier, invested $3.0 million in a subordinated convertible debenture of the Company and received non-exclusive rights to market certain of the Company's new products and to incorporate them into Halliburton's product line. During June 1990, following approval by the Company's shareholders for the issuance of 600,000 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock, par value $5.00 per share, the debenture was exchanged for 600,000 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock. The preferred stock was convertible into 600,000 shares of common stock. In September 1990 Halliburton invested an additional $1.0 million in a convertible debenture of the Company. In August 1991 the Company's shareholders authorized an additional 600,000 shares of preferred stock and Halliburton exchanged the $1.0 million debenture for 200,000 shares of such stock which were convertible into 200,000 shares of common stock. Redemption would have been at the greater of $5.00 per common share equivalent or the then market price for the common stock.
In the consolidated balance sheet the preferred stock has been classified outside stockholders' equity in accordance with Rule 5- 02.28 of Regulation S-X, which requires that preferred stock for which redemption may be required under any conditions beyond control of the issuer be classified outside of permanent equity.
In 1994 the Company and Halliburton agreed to amend the conversion and redemption provisions of the 800,000 shares of the Company's preferred stock held by Halliburton. As amended, the preferred stock is convertible into 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock instead of 800,000 shares prior to the amendment. The Company continues to have the right to redeem the preferred stock at any time and also continues to be obligated to do so on the tenth anniversary of the amendment if the preferred stock is still held by Halliburton. The preferred stock continues to not be entitled to receive or accrue dividends unless the Company pays dividends on its common stock, and, as before the amendment, no interest accrues on the mandatory redemption amount. Also, the joint venture of the Company and Halliburton for the development and marketing of reservoir monitoring technology and services was terminated and the Company received a non- exclusive license for the use of certain reservoir monitoring technology patents.
Stock Option Plans
The Board of Directors, at its discretion, may grant options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock to key employees, officers, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Prior to 1984 the options were non-statutory and either vested over a three- year period or were exercisable at any time for a five or ten-year period after the date of grant or at the date of amendment of the options. In 1984 the Company established an incentive stock option plan for key employees, pursuant to which options to purchase up to 350,000 shares of common stock were reserved for grant.
In 1993 the Company adopted a stock option plan for non-employee directors. Pursuant to the plan, each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock upon initial election to the board. Exercise prices are set at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Upon re- election to the Board, for each year to be served, each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price set at the fair market value on the date of the grant. Pursuant to this plan, 10,000 options to purchase shares at an exercise price of $1.38 and 10,000 options to purchase shares at an exercise price of $.50 were issued in 1996 and no options to purchase shares were issued in 1995.
Following is a summary of stock option activity for:
Exercise prices of substantially all outstanding non-statutory options and all outstanding incentive stock options were set at the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. No accounting recognition is given to options granted at exercise prices equal to fair market value at date of grant until they are exercised at which time the proceeds received by the Company are credited to common stock and paid-in capital.
In February 1997 the Company entered into a stock option agreement granting to its Chief Executive Officer the right to purchase 600,000 shares of the Company's common stock through February 10, 2002. The exercise prices are 150,000 shares at $.50 per share, 150,000 shares at $1.00 per share, 150,000 shares at $1.50 per share, and 150,000 shares at $2.00 per share. An option previously granted to the Company's Chief Executive Officer to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.875 per share was cancelled.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123) as of January 1, 1996. SFAS No. 123 allows for the Company to account for its stock option plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, under the intrinsic value method. The Company issued 814,209 stock options to employees during 1996, a portion of which were issued to terminated officers in conjunction with their severance arrangements.
The following table summarizes the difference between the fair value and intrinsic value methods and the proforma net loss and loss per share amounts for the year ending December 31, 1996 had the Company adopted the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 1996: dividend yield of 0.0% expected average annual volatility of 117%; average annual risk-free interest rate of 5.4%; and expected lives of five to ten years.
Because the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options granted prior to January 1, 1996 the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of that to be expected in future years. The impact on future years is not known nor reasonably estimable.
SFAS No. 123 also applies to transactions in which an entity issues its equity instruments to acquire goods or services from nonemployees. Accordingly, the implementation of SFAS No. 123 may have a material effect on the Company's financial statements and the pro forma disclosures in the notes thereto in future periods.
Stock Purchase Plans
The Company has a stock purchase plan, which was adopted in 1991, under which employees and consultants to the Company can elect to receive shares of common stock as payment for compensation, services and expenses. Pursuant to the plan, the Company issued 582 shares in 1996. The Company also has a noncontributory employee stock purchase plan for employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions.
NOTE 6 - RETIREMENT AND COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company maintains a qualified target benefit retirement plan that covers substantially all of its U.S. employees. Company contributions are based on percentages of employee compensation and are allocated to individual accounts for each employee. Employees may voluntarily supplement the Company's contribution to their accounts in amounts up to 10% of salary. Amounts charged to expense for Company contributions were $182,000 in 1996, of which $116,000 is included in accrued salaries and benefits at December 31, 1996 and was paid subsequent to December 31, 1996.
The Company also has a non-contributory employee stock ownership plan that covers substantially all of its U.S. employees. Company contributions are determined by the Board of Directors and can be made in stock or cash. The Board of Directors determined that no contribution would be made for 1996.
The Company has similar retirement benefit plans, including employee stock ownership programs, covering employees of its foreign subsidiaries. The amount charged to expense for these plans was $148,000 in 1996, of which $42,000 is included in accrued salaries and benefits at December 31, 1996.
During 1996 the Company took action to reduce costs by reduction of staff by terminating 10 employees in the WorkBench and General and Administrative areas. The Company accrued termination benefits totaling $101,000, all of which was paid in 1996. Of the total charge to expense, $28,000 is included in cost of licenses and cost of maintenance and $73,000 is included in general and administrative expense.
NOTE 7 - INFORMATION ABOUT OPERATIONS
Foreign and Domestic Operations and United States Export Revenue
Following is financial information about the Company's foreign and domestic operations and United States export sales.
U.S. export revenues by geographic area were as follows:
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company derived $2.3 million, or 12%, of its consolidated revenue from National Nigerian Petroleum Corporation. During 1996, there was no single customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Company's revenue and the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Most of the Company's clients are large, established U.S. and foreign companies (sometimes acting as government contractors), governments, and national oil and gas companies of foreign governments. Qualifying foreign receivables are insured, subject to a deductible loss amount, under an insurance policy with the Foreign Credit Insurance Association, an agency of the United States Export- Import Bank. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition when considered necessary and generally does not require collateral.
At December 31, 1996, accounts receivable, net of doubtful accounts and work in progress, related to the following customer groups:
NOTE 8 - LEASE COMMITMENTS
At December 31, 1996 the Company's minimum rental commitments under operating leases for office space and equipment were as follows:
Total rent expense amounted to $1.4 million in 1996.
The above minimum rental commitments include certain amounts that have been recorded in the balance sheet as long-term accrued lease obligations of $79,000 at December 31, 1996, and short-term accrued lease obligations of $259,000 at December 31, 1996. When these amounts are paid, they will be recorded as a reduction of the accrued lease obligations liability and will not result in expense in the Statement of Operations. The accrued lease obligations relate to differences in the timing of reportable rental expense for accounting purposes and the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in connection with several office lease transactions. The accrued lease obligations will be retired as follows: $260,000 in 1997, $32,000 in 1998 and $8,000 in 1999. These amounts include approximately $73,000 in interest expense that will be recognized representing the total discount to present value of accrued lease obligations.
NOTE 9 - CLAIMS AND CONTINGENCIES
To the knowledge of management, the only claims pending or threatened against the Company or any of its subsidiaries which individually or collectively could have a material adverse effect upon the Company or its financial condition are the following:
Marshall Wolf, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. E. A. Breitenbach, R. J. Hottovy, Jimmy L. Duckworth, and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. On October 5, 1995, a claim was filed in the United States District Court of the District of Colorado alleging that the Defendants, who include the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, its former Chief Financial Officer and a former Executive Vice President, violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10(b)-5 promulgated thereunder in issuing financial reports for the first three quarters of the Company's 1994 fiscal year which failed to comply with generally accepted accounting principles with respect to revenues recognized from the Company's contracts with value added resellers. The Plaintiff seeks to have the Court determine that the lawsuit constitutes a proper class action on behalf of all persons who purchased stock of the Company during the period from May 20, 1994 through July 10, 1995, with certain exclusions, and the Company has not contested whether the claim constitutes a proper class action.
The Defendants and the Plaintiff previously reached agreement for settlement of the claim involving the payment of $1,100,000 in cash, to be provided by the Company's liability insurer in a court- supervised escrow account, and the Company's issuance of warrants to purchase common stock exercisable at the market price of the stock at the time of completion of the settlement, with the number of warrants to be such that their aggregate value is $900,000. Subsequently, the settlement agreement was modified to eliminate the warrants and to provide for an additional $525,000 in cash, which cash will be provided by the Company. The Company concluded that the foregoing settlement is in its best interests in view of the uncertainties of litigation, the substantial costs of defending the claim and the material amount of management time which would be required for such defense. The Company recorded a $900,000 loss contingency in the second quarter of 1996 relating to the proposed agreement for settlement of the Marshall Wolf claim in accordance with Question 1 of SAB Topic 5:Y. Upon final approval of the modified settlement, the Company will reduce its loss contingency reserve by $375,000, representing the difference between $525,000 and the previously accrued amount of $900,000. Completion of the settlement is subject to final approval of the fairness of the settlement by the Court, with such completion anticipated to occur in May 1997.
Arbitration Number 70T 181 0038 96 D; Kinesix, a division of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. and Kinesix (Europe) Ltd., an English Company - Houston, Texas. The Company, through Kinesix, a division of the Company, entered into a Territory Distributor Agreement with Kinesix (Europe) Ltd. ("KEL"), an unaffiliated entity located in London, U.K. The Distributor Agreement required under most circumstances a decision from the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") before its termination could be effective. On March 4, 1996 the Company commenced arbitration seeking declaration of termination of the Distributor Agreement and money due the Company for receivables outstanding as of December 31, 1995 of $296,000 for which the Company had fully provided. Thereafter, KEL in writing advised its customer base that it had ceased to trade in Kinesix products. As a result of this action by KEL and pursuant to the Distributor Agreement, the Company has declared the Distributor Agreement terminated without the requirement of arbitration. In the interim, on April 1, 1996 KEL filed an answer and counterclaim with the AAA and asserts damages that exceed $1 million without substantiation. It was the opinion of the Company and its counsel that KEL's claim was without merit.
On October 1, 1996, a panel of the American Arbitration Association made an award in favor of KEL against the Company in the aggregate amount of $674,000. Such award was totally unanticipated by the Company and its counsel. On October 21, 1996, the Company filed a petition in a Texas state court seeking to have the award vacated on the grounds that the arbitrators erroneously denied the Company's request for a postponement of the arbitration hearing which prejudiced the Company in view of the claimant's failure to meet its obligation to disclose material testimony to be given at the hearing and that the arbitrators made a gross mistake of law in failing to apply a release and waiver given by the claimant following its knowledge of the complained of acts of the Company. The award in favor of KEL was settled in February 1997 for $575,000. The Company has recognized an expense for the amount of the $674,000 award, which has been included in the loss from operation of the discontinued Kinesix division for the year ended December 31, 1996 and included a liability for $674,000 in the balance sheet as part of other current liabilities.
The Company's long-term services contracts generally include provisions for penalty charges for delay in the completion of contracts. Certain contracts in progress at December 31, 1996 have not been subsequently completed by the scheduled dates. Management believes that the delays were not caused by the Company and that no significant penalties will be incurred.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had no recorded insurance recoveries for uncollected foreign accounts receivables.
NOTE 10 - DISPOSAL OF KINESIX DIVISION
On October 9, 1996, the Company announced the execution of final contracts for the previously announced sale of the net assets and business of its graphical user interface segment, otherwise known as the Kinesix division, to a group including the former President of the Kinesix division. The sale of this segment of the Company's business was part of management strategy to narrow the focus of the Company's activities to its primary market of the oil and gas industry. The consideration to the Company in the transaction was $410,000 including cash of $376,000 which was received by the Company in October 1996, a note receivable for $32,000, and the purchaser's assumption of liabilities totaling $59,000. The measurement date for accounting for the disposal was August 26, 1996, the date on which management decided to sell the Kinesix division and the disposal date was September 3, 1996, the effective date of the transaction. The transaction resulted in a loss on disposal of $478,000, which includes estimated losses to be incurred by the Kinesix division from the measurement date to the date of disposal of $66,000. From the measurement date to the balance sheet date of September 30, 1996, the Company incurred a net loss of $66,000 in operating the Kinesix division, which was charged to a reserve that was recorded in accounting for the loss on disposal. Loss from operation of the discontinued segment from January 1, 1996 to the measurement date was $878,000, including recognition of an expense of $674,000 related to an award against the Company by the American Arbitration Association, which is discussed in Note 9.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Note:
The net credit to bad debt expense of $1,057,000 consists of expense charges of $541,000 reduced by credits to bad debt expense for recovery of accounts previously reserved of $1,598,000.
PART IV
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a) 1. Financial Statements. The following financial statements are filed as a part of this Form 10-K: The Index to Consolidated Financial Statements is set out in Item 8 herein.
2. Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement schedules are filed as a part of this Form 10-K:
The Index to Consolidated Financial Statements is set out in Item 8 herein.
3. Exhibits
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated February 8, 1968, (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1984, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated May 28, 1982 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1984, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3 Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated June 7, 1984 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 2-95792, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4 Certificate of Correction to the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated October 23, 1985 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1985, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated August 9, 1991 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K dated August 27, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated June 21, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1990, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.7 Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.8 Amendment to the Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1990, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.9 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated August 9, 1991 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 on Form 8-K dated August 27, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of 0 the Company dated December 14, 1994 increasing the number of shares of authorized stock (filed as Exhibit 3.10 to the Company's Report on Form 10- K/A for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1 Convertible Debenture Loan Agreement for $2,500,000 dated September 30, 1992 between Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. and Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated October 19, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2 First Amendment to the Convertible Debenture Loan Agreement for an additional $1,000,000, dated September 15, 1993, between Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. and Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated October 19, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3 Form of Stockholder Lock-up Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4 Letter Agreement Dated May 5, 1994 between Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc., regarding conversion of debentures (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10. Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock options 1 issued under the informal Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2 Employees Stock Ownership Plan and Trust as restated on January 1, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3 Target Benefit Plan as restated on January 1, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. Defined Contribution Master Plan and Trust Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5 Adoption Agreement #001 Nonstandardized Code Section 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan dated July 1, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6 Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7 Business Loan Agreement for $6.5 million dated September 20, 1994, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc., including Working Capital Guarantee Agreement dated September 29, 1994, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Export-Import Bank of the United States referred to as "Exhibit B" (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8 Promissory Note of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A. for $5,000,000, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9 Promissory Note of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A. for $1,500,000, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated May 30, 1995, extending maturity to July 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated July 15, 1995, extending maturity to August 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated August 15, 1995, extending maturity to September 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994(filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated September 15, 1995, extending maturity to September 30, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated September 30, 1995, extending maturity to October 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15 Business Loan Agreement for $5.13 million dated October 15, 1995, renewing maturity to March 30, 1996, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc., including Working Capital Guarantee Agreement dated September 21, 1995, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Export- Import Bank of the United States referred to as "Exhibit B" (filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated November 15, 1995, in the amount of $500,000.00 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $5.13 million, dated October 15, 1995 (filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17 Letter of Commitment From Lindner Funds dated March 29 ,1996 evidencing the commitment to provide the Company with a loan of $5 million (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18 Letter of Commitment From Renaissance Capital Group, Inc. dated April 4, 1996 to restructure its convertible debentures (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19 Letter of Commitment From Bank One dated April 8, 1996 to restructure and extend a revolving line of credit in the amount of $1.5 million through April 15, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20 Loan Agreement dated April 26, 1996 by and between Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. and Lindner Dividend Fund, and Renaissance Capital Partners III, Ltd. to provide the Company with Loans in the amount of $5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
21 Subsidiaries of the Company
27 Financial Data Schedule
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE
REGISTRANT
The registrant owns all of the outstanding capital stock of the following corporations:
CORPORATION STATE OR PROVINCE OF INCORPORATION
Intercomp Resource Development Province of Alberta, Canada & Engineering, (Canada) Ltd.
In-Situ Research and Province of Alberta, Canada Engineering Ltd.
Microcomp Management Ltd. Province of Alberta, Canada
IRAD Development Ltd. Province of Alberta, Canada
247011 Alberta Limited Province of Alberta, Canada
Scientific Software-Intercomp United Kingdom (U.K.) Limited
Scientific Software Texas, Inc. Texas
SSI Bethany, Inc. Texas
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE-INTERCOMP, INC.
April 15, 1997 /s/ George Steel George Steel Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (a principal executive officer and director)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ George Steel April 15, 1997 George Steel Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (a principal executive officer and director)
/s/ Barbara J. Cavallo April 15, 1997 Financial Controller
/s/ William B. Nichols April 15, 1997 William B. Nichols, Director
/s/ Edward O. Price April 15, 1997 Edward O. Price, Director
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated February 8, 1968, (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1984, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated May 28, 1982 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1984, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3 Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated June 7, 1984 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 2-95792, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4 Certificate of Correction to the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated October 23, 1985 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1985, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated August 9, 1991 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K dated August 27, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated June 21, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Report on Form 10- Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1990, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.7 Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.8 Amendment to the Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1990, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.9 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated August 9, 1991 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 on Form 8-K dated August 27, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.10 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated December 14, 1994 increasing the number of shares of authorized stock (filed as Exhibit 3.10 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1 Convertible Debenture Loan Agreement for $2,500,000 dated September 30, 1992 between Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated October 19, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2 First Amendment to the Convertible Debenture Loan Agreement for an additional $1,000,000, dated September 15, 1993, between Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. and Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated October 19, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3 Form of Stockholder Lock-up Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4 Letter Agreement Dated May 5, 1994 between Renaissance Capital Partners II, Ltd. and Scientific Software- Intercomp, Inc., regarding conversion of debentures (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1 Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock options issued under the informal Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2 Employees Stock Ownership Plan and Trust as restated on January 1, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3 Target Benefit Plan as restated on January 1, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. Defined Contribution Master Plan and Trust Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5 Adoption Agreement #001 Nonstandardized Code Section 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan dated July 1, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6 Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Form S-1 dated May 9, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7 Business Loan Agreement for $6.5 million dated September 20, 1994, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc., including Working Capital Guarantee Agreement dated September 29, 1994, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Export- Import Bank of the United States referred to as "Exhibit B" (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8 Promissory Note of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A. for $5,000,000, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9 Promissory Note of Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A. for $1,500,000, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated May 30, 1995, extending maturity to July 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated July 15, 1995, extending maturity to August 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated August 15, 1995, extending maturity to September 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994(filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated September 15, 1995, extending maturity to September 30, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Company's Report on Form 10- K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated September 30, 1995, extending maturity to October 15, 1995 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $6.5 million, dated September 20, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15 Business Loan Agreement for $5.13 million dated October 15, 1995, renewing maturity to March 30, 1996, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc., including Working Capital Guarantee Agreement dated September 21, 1995, between Bank One, Boulder, N.A. and Export-Import Bank of the United States referred to as "Exhibit B" (filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16 Change in Terms Agreement between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. to Bank One, Boulder, N.A., dated November 15, 1995, in the amount of $500,000.00 relating to original Business Loan Agreement in the amount of $5.13 million, dated October 15, 1995 (filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17 Letter of Commitment From Lindner Funds dated March 29 ,1996 evidencing the commitment to provide the Company with a loan of $5 million (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18 Letter of Commitment From Renaissance Capital Group, Inc. dated April 4, 1996 to restructure its convertible debentures (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19 Letter of Commitment From Bank One dated April 8, 1996 to restructure and extend a revolving line of credit in the amount of $1.5 million through April 15, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Report on Form 10- K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20 Loan Agreement dated April 26, 1996 by and between Scientific Software-Intercomp, Inc. and Lindner Dividend Fund, and Renaissance Capital Partners III, Ltd. to provide the Company with Loans in the amount of $5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
21 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
27 Financial Data Schedule