Item 1. Business
This form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those set forth under the caption "Factors That May Affect Future Results" under "Item 7: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
Business Overview
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("ESI" or "The Company") provide electronics manufacturers with equipment necessary to produce key components and circuitry used in wireless communications, computers, automotive electronics and many other electronic products. Our equipment enables these manufacturers to reduce production costs, increase yields and improve the quality of their products. We believe we are the leading supplier of advanced laser systems used to improve the production yield of semiconductor devices, high-speed test and termination equipment used in the high-volume production of miniature passive electronic components and advanced laser systems used to fine tune electronic circuitry. Additionally, we produce a family of mechanical and laser drilling systems for production of high-density interconnect (HDI) circuit boards and advanced electronic packaging, as well as machine vision products for manufacturers of semiconductors and other electronic products.
Electronics Industry Overview
The electronic content of common items such as communication products, automobiles and computers, continues to increase. For example, automobile manufacturers now routinely include electronic ignition, anti-lock brakes, electronic fuel injection and other electronic systems in place of components that in the past were predominantly mechanical. In addition, markets for consumer-oriented electronic products such as wireless telephones, fax machines, pagers, digital cameras and computers have developed rapidly as increasingly affordable products have been introduced that are smaller, lighter and more easily portable.
The increasing demand for electronic products has been accompanied by the need for faster, smaller, and more complex, less expensive and higher quality electronic devices and circuits. To achieve these higher performance attributes and smaller device sizes, electronic device manufacturers are increasing the circuit densities in these devices and tuning them to precise electrical values. Manufacturers of wireless telephones, for example, must use miniaturized circuits to accommodate the size limitations of their finished products. These circuits must also be tuned to operate within precise frequency specifications, enabling the existing wireless frequency bands to accommodate more users without interchannel interference.
Smaller and lighter requirements also decrease the physical dimensions used in electronic interconnections within the electronic device, its surrounding package and the HDI circuit board on which it is mounted. Higher operating speeds of computers and communications products also require more input and output channels within these packages and between the packages and the HDI circuit board.
The highly competitive consumer markets for electronic products drive the need for increasingly less expensive devices and components. Electronic devices and components are produced in large unit volumes and their production and testing is highly automated, utilizing a variety of manufacturing equipment. Manufacturers continuously seek to achieve reduced costs by improving the throughput, yield and quality of device and component production.
For example, semiconductor device manufacturers are transitioning from the use of 200mm and smaller silicon wafers to 300mm wafers. This enables manufacturers to fit significantly more electronic devices on a single silicon wafer. In addition, decreasing circuit densities enable more devices to be produced on a silicon wafer by reducing the size of each device on the wafer. The use of larger wafers and the design of smaller devices increases the throughput and capacity of electronic device manufacturing facilities, or fabs. The increasing circuit densities also require the use of newer materials, such as copper, to create these miniaturized electronic circuits.
To improve production yield, or the number of acceptable devices produced per silicon wafer, device manufacturers are utilizing advanced yield improvement systems, such as memory repair, in the manufacture of memory devices such as Dynamic Random Access Memory, or DRAM, and non-memory devices such as logic with embedded memory, digital signal processors (DSPs) and high-end electronic game chips.
As semiconductor manufacturers move toward higher densities and more complex architectures, machine vision has also emerged as a critical technology. By allowing manufacturers to achieve greater precision, increased equipment speed and fewer errors, machine vision is enabling technology in the semiconductor manufacturing process, from wafer production through final assembly and packaging. In addition, the manufacture and placement of components in the surface mount assembly area requires the high-speed and accuracy that can be obtained through integrated machine vision solutions.
Our Solution
We believe our products address the needs of electronic component manufacturers by providing them with measurable production benefits including improved yield, increased throughput, greater reliability and enhanced flexibility, resulting in a high return on investment. Our production systems are designed to be upgraded to accommodate the next generation of technology, providing customers the flexibility to add capacity or improve product performance at a reasonable incremental cost.
Our customers serve a wide range of electronic applications. The largest end-market applications for electronic devices and circuits that are produced using our systems are:
•Computers and home entertainment devices;
•Wireless telephones;
•Pagers and personal digital assistants; and
•Automotive electronics.
We design and manufacture products that target several markets within the electronics industry. Our products include:
Semiconductor Yield Improvement Systems
Our yield improvement product line is designed and developed to cost-effectively meet the production challenges faced by semiconductor manufacturers, including shrinking circuit sizes, material changes and increased wafer sizes. Our yield improvement products also have enabling technology allowing them to be adapted for use with next generation devices.
Electronic Component Manufacturing Systems
We design and manufacture automated test, production, handling and visual inspection equipment used in the manufacture of miniature multi-layer ceramic capacitors, or MLCCs, and other passive components including arrays, inductors and varistors, which are used in very large numbers in nearly all types of electronic circuits.
Advanced Electronic Packaging Equipment
Our laser and mechanical drilling products enable manufacturers to make electronic products smaller, lighter and faster. Our products are designed to provide a cost-effective method for increasing the density of vias, or holes, used to create electrical connections between layers in high density circuit boards and electronic packages in a wide variety of materials, including traditional glass reinforced circuit boards, copper and new organic compounds.
Vision and Inspection Systems
We provide semiconductor and electronics manufacturers with machine vision solutions for automated process control and visual inspection for the handling and assembly of semiconductors, printed wiring boards (PWBs) and discrete electronic components. Our semiconductor automation and inspection product line includes turnkey wafer handling and inspection systems and device package handling and inspection systems.
Circuit Fine Tuning Systems
Our circuit fine tuning systems tune the operating parameters of electronic circuits. These laser-tuning systems precisely adjust the frequency in wireless communication devices and in numerous automotive electronics assemblies such as engine control circuits. Our product line also incorporates our overall strength in precise laser machining/trimming and very high speed handling to offer cost-effective solutions for specialized micro machining applications and trimming of passive components embedded in circuit boards. Historically, our circuit fine-tuning business has served as an incubator for our new businesses, including our semiconductor yield improvement and advanced packaging systems businesses.
Our Strategy
•Focus on businesses where we are a market leader. We intend to expand the application of our existing technology to grow our overall market opportunity in those markets in which we currently maintain a leadership position. We also intend to maintain our market leadership by developing new products having greater speed and capabilities.
•Develop new high-value businesses. We plan to utilize our core competencies in technology innovation, global operations, multiple technology integration and customer collaboration to develop innovative solutions that will enable us to grow into attractive new markets. Our advanced electronic packaging equipment is an example of a new business developed from these resources.
•Continue to invest in research and development to maintain our technological leadership. We intend to further develop our technology leadership by maintaining a significant level of investment in research and development. Our key technological capabilities include laser/material interaction, image processing and optical character recognition, motion control capabilities and small parts handling. We consider our continuing ability to develop intellectual property to be an important component of our future success.
•Expand our business by acquisitions. We intend to continue to acquire businesses and technologies that complement our existing businesses in order to enhance our current product line and to enter new markets. In the last 10 years we have successfully completed nine acquisitions.
•Increase the value of our products to our customers. We are focused on improving the yield, throughput and productivity of our customers by utilizing our technology, global infrastructure, superior customer service and our ability to integrate multiple technologies.
Our Products
Semiconductor Yield Improvement Systems. As circuit densities in semiconductor memory devices such as DRAM have increased, manufacturers have built redundant cells into their memory designs and connected them with small links on the device surface. During the manufacturing process, wafers with hundreds of individual memory devices are tested identifying defective cells. Our laser systems are then used to cut links to disconnect the defective portion and to replace it with one of the redundant cells.
•Our 9200 and 9300 Series systems address the yield improvement needs of semiconductor manufacturers that utilize 200mm wafers.
•Our 9800 Series systems are designed specifically for the 300mm wafer market. This series can be installed to initially process 200mm wafers and can be later converted to 300mm wafer processing.
Electronic Component Manufacturing Systems. We design and manufacture products that combine high-speed, small parts handling technology with microprocessor-based systems to provide highly automated, cost-effective solutions for MLCC manufacturers. MLCCs are used in circuits that process analog and digital signals or operate at high frequencies in products such as computers, video equipment and communication products.
•Test Systems: These products employ high-speed handling and positioning techniques to precisely load, test and sort MLCCs based on their electrical energy storage capacity, or capacitance, and their electrical energy leakage, or dissipation factor.
•Termination Systems: These products apply a conductive material to the ends of ceramic capacitors permitting connection of the device in a circuit on a high-density PWB.
•Visual Inspection Systems: These products perform six-sided automated inspection of MLCCs and arrays for dimensional criteria and defects.
•Consumable Products: We also produce consumables such as carrier plates and termination belts; both of which are used to hold capacitors while conductive material is applied.
Advanced Electronic Packaging Systems. Our products are targeted at small via applications requiring the highest accuracy and smallest hole dimensions, allowing manufacturers to produce vias as small as 25 microns. By comparison, a human hair is approximately 100 microns in diameter. We offer drilling and routing technology to address the rapidly changing applications in integrated circuit (IC) packages, multi-chip modules and HDI circuit boards. Our laser-based systems utilize either ultraviolet or CO2 laser technology and come in single-head or dual-head configurations depending on customer requirements.
•Our 5300 Series single-head laser drills utilize lasers to drill via holes as small as 25 microns in a wide variety of materials, including epoxy, resins, resin-coated copper and fiber reinforced FR4.
•Our 5400 Series laser drills perform the same function as our 5300 Series, but operate at a significantly higher throughput rate due to the simultaneous operation of two drill heads.
•We also manufacture a line of mechanical drills that achieve high accuracy and throughput in drilling holes as small as 75 microns.
Vision and Inspection Systems. Our products include both machine vision subsystems sold to original equipment manufacturers, (OEMs) and multi-function, stand-alone inspection systems sold to end users. In the OEM marketplace, we have concentrated our efforts on selling complete vision solutions and integration expertise to suppliers of semiconductor and electronics equipment. We have also developed and acquired new products to provide complete stand-alone inspection systems for
semiconductor wafer sorting, inspection and defect review and integrated circuit mark and lead inspection.
We offer machine vision solutions that reduce application development time and shorten time- to-market for producers of equipment used to manufacture semiconductors and electronics. Products include patented specialized lighting, wafer alignment and identification products and application specific solutions for the surface mount industry.
•Our machine vision systems are customer-specific solutions used to perform pick and place, wire bonding and other functions. They consist of:
•Computer architecture;
•Camera technology;
•Advanced lighting and optics; and
•Application-specific software modules.
Our semiconductor automation and inspection product line includes turnkey wafer handling and inspection systems and IC package handling and inspection systems. Semiconductor wafer fabricators use our equipment to sort and inspect wafers throughout all phases of processing. These modular systems combine multiple handling and inspection functions onto single platforms. Device manufacturers and contract packaging houses use our equipment for mark and lead inspection and tape and reel packaging. Our systems inspect traditional leaded devices as well as newer leadless devices.
•Our semiconductor automation and inspection product line includes our 800 Series package inspection systems used in the test, assembly and packaging phase of semiconductor production.
Circuit Fine Tuning Systems. We design and manufacture application-specific laser systems that adjust the electrical performance of a product or assembly containing many circuits by removing a precise amount of material from one or more components in the circuit. This is done to achieve the desired electrical specification for the entire product. This process is called "functional trimming," and is performed while the product or assembly is under power. For example, in wireless phones, laser trimming of a few selected components in the product is used to tune the product to the desired frequency.
Our circuit fine tuning systems also adjust the resistance value of discrete resistors manufactured on ceramic substrates for use in surface mount technology end products. Typically, these discrete devices are produced at resistance values 30% below nominal levels and need to be trimmed to resistance value with very high accuracy. Our systems meet the demands for high-volume, high-accuracy miniature resistor trimming through precise positioning of the laser beam and high-speed measurement capability.
Our circuit fine tuning systems include:
•Our Model 2300 Trimming Systems which trim chip resistors;
•Our 4000 Series Laser Trimming Systems which are used to trim thick- and thin-film hybrid circuits on ceramic and organic substrates; and
•Our recently introduced 2700 Series laser processor which is used in multiple applications, including the micromachining of disk heads, optoelectronic components and other electronic circuits.
Customers
Our top twelve customers by revenue over the last three years, listed alphabetically, were:
AVX
Kemet
Samsung
Canon
Kulicke & Soffa
Taiyo Yuden
Hyundai
Kyocera
Texas Instruments
IBM
Phillips (Phycomp)
Winbond Electronics
In fiscal years 2001, 2000 and 1999, no customer exceeded 10% of sales. Sales outside the U.S. accounted for 72.2%, 72.3% and 55.9% of our net sales for fiscal years 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The most significant sales outside the U.S. were to Taiwan, Japan and Europe, which represented 22.1%, 20.5%, and 12.9% of our net sales for fiscal 2001, respectively.
Sales, Marketing and Service
We sell our products worldwide through direct sales and service offices located in or near: Ann Arbor; Boston; Minneapolis; Portland (Oregon); Austin; San Diego; Los Angeles; Tokyo; Oita; and Nagoya, Japan; Seoul, Korea; Taipei and Chungli, Taiwan; Singapore; Guangzhou and Shanghai, China; Munich, Germany; West Sussex, England and Paris, France. We serve customers in additional countries through manufacturers' representatives.
We have a substantial base of installed products in use by leading worldwide electronics manufacturers. We emphasize strong working relationships with these customers to meet their needs for additional systems and to facilitate the successful development and sale of new products to these customers.
We maintain service personnel wherever we have a significant installed base. New systems are tested prior to delivery to ensure they meet our product specifications and requirements. We offer a variety of maintenance contracts and parts replacement programs.
Backlog
Backlog consists of written purchase orders for products, spare parts and service, which we expect to ship within twelve months. Backlog was $56.8 million at June 2, 2001, versus $168.7 million at June 3, 2000 and $22.9 million at May 31, 1999.
Research, Development and Technology
We believe that our ability to compete effectively depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and expand our expertise in core technologies and product applications. The primary emphasis of our research and development is to advance our capabilities in:
•Lasers and laser/material interaction;
•High-speed, micron-level motion control systems;
•Precision optics;
•High-speed, small parts handling;
•Image processing and optical character recognition;
•Real-time production line electronic measurement;
•Real-time operating systems; and
•Systems integration.
Our research and development expenditures for fiscal years 2001, 2000, and 1999 were $51.3 million (10.3% of net sales), $35.1 million (11.1% of net sales), and $31.3 million (15.2% of net sales), respectively.
Competition
Our markets are dynamic and highly competitive. The principal competitive factors in our markets are product performance, reliability, service, technical support, product improvement, price, established relationships with customers and product familiarity. We believe that our products compete favorably with respect to these factors. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering and manufacturing resources, and larger distribution networks than we do. Some of our customers develop, or have the ability to develop, similar manufacturing equipment. There can be no assurance that competition in our markets will not intensify or that our technological advantages may not be reduced or lost as a result of technological advances by competitors or customers, or changes in electronic device processing technology.
Our principal competitor for semiconductor yield improvement systems is GSI Lumonics. For electronic component manufacturing equipment, our competitors include Tokyo Weld, Kanebo and Humo in Japan, as well as manufacturers that develop systems for internal use. Our advanced electronic packaging systems compete with mechanical drills manufactured by companies such as Hitachi Via Mechanics, Excellon and Pluritec and laser systems provided by GSI Lumonics, Sumitomo, Mitsubishi and Hitachi Via Mechanics. Our vision products compete with vision suppliers such as Cognex, ICOS Systems, and Robotic Vision Systems. There are also numerous other vision companies and captive vendors in Japan, North America and Europe. Major competitors for circuit fine tuning systems include NEC and GSI Lumonics.
Manufacturing and Supply
Our largest production facilities are located in Portland, Oregon, Klamath Falls, Oregon and San Diego, California. Portland's manufacturing operations consist of electronic subassembly and final system assembly for semiconductor yield improvement, advanced electronic packaging, and circuit fine tuning product lines. Electronic component manufacturing products are produced in our facilities in San Diego, California and Klamath Falls, Oregon. Our vision systems are manufactured in our facilities in Ann Arbor, Michigan and Minneapolis, Minnesota.
We use qualified manufacturers to supply many components of our products. Our systems use high performance computers, peripherals, lasers and other components from various suppliers. Some of the components we use are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. An interruption in the supply of a particular component could require substitutions that would have a temporary adverse impact on us. We believe our relationships with our suppliers are good.
Employees
As of June 2, 2001, we employed 1,383 people, including 306 in engineering, research and development, 557 in manufacturing and 520 in marketing, sales, technical support, customer service and administration. Many of our employees are highly skilled, and our success will depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain such employees, who are in great demand. We have never had a work stoppage or strike and no employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties
Patents and Other Intellectual Property
We have a policy of seeking patents, when appropriate, on inventions relating to new products and improvements which are discovered or developed as part of our ongoing research, development and manufacturing activities. We own 80 United States patents and 102 patents issued outside of the United States. During fiscal 2001 we have applied for 19 new patents in the United States and 37 new patents outside of the United States. Additionally, as of June 2, 2001 we had 16 patent applications pending in the United States and 130 patent applications pending outside of the United States. Although our patents are important, we believe that the success of our business depends to a greater degree on the technical competence and innovation of our employees.
We rely on copyright protection for our proprietary software. We also rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. There can be no assurance that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets.
Properties
Our executive and administrative offices, as well as a manufacturing facility, are located in a three-building complex located on 15 acres in Portland, Oregon. We own the buildings, which contain 196,500 square feet of space. In June 2001 we began construction of a 62,000 square foot corporate headquarters building in Portland, Oregon. We plan to complete construction in September 2002. We also own a 60,000 square foot plant on 10 acres of land in Escondido, California, a 29,000 square foot building on 3 acres of land near Minneapolis, Minnesota and a 53,000 square foot plant on 31 acres of land in Klamath Falls, Oregon.
In addition, we lease 14,875 square feet of industrial space in Canton, Massachusetts; 9,900 square feet of office and industrial space in Santa Ana, California; 13,905 square feet of office and industrial space in San Marcos, California; 21,945 square feet of office and industrial space in Ann Arbor, Michigan; and other office and service space in several additional locations in the United States, and in eight foreign countries.
We believe the productive capacity of these facilities to be adequate and suitable for the requirements of our business.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Legal Proceedings
On February 14, 2001, Cognex Corporation (Cognex) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Cognex Corporation v. Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., No. 01-10287 RCL). The lawsuit alleges that our CorrectPlace ver. 5.0 product infringes United States Patent 5,371,690, which is owned by Cognex. The patent concerns the inspection of surface mount devices that are attached to the surface of an electronic circuit board. Cognex seeks injunctive relief, damages, costs and attorneys' fees. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the action and intend to pursue them vigorously. Discovery has commenced in this case. Additionally, certain of our customers have notified us that, in the event it is subsequently determined that their use of CorrectPlace ver. 5.0 infringes any patent, they may seek indemnification from us for damages or expenses resulting from this matter.
We initiated litigation against Dynamic Details, Inc. and GSI Lumonics, Inc. for patent infringement in March 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Electro Scientific Industries v. Dynamic Details, Inc. and GSI Lumonics, Inc., No. SACV00-272 AHS (ANx)).
We believe that Dynamic Details and GSI Lumonics are violating our U.S. patent 5,847,960 entitled "Multi-tool Positioning System". The complaint alleges that Dynamic Details infringes our patent 5,847,960 and that GSI Lumonics has actively induced infringement of, and contributorily infringed, our patent 5,847,960. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages. Dynamic Details, Inc. and GSI Lumonics, Inc. have filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of our patent 5,847,960.
We initiated litigation against General Scanning, Inc. for patent infringement in December 1996 in the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California (Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. v. General Scanning, Inc. No. C-96-4268 SBA). On April 2, 1999 a federal court jury issued a verdict upholding the validity of our link blowing patent, U.S. patent 5,265,114 entitled "System and Method for Selectively Laser Processing a Target Structure of One or More Materials of a Multimaterial, Multilayer Device". The jury found our U.S. patent 5,473,624 entitled "Laser System and Method for Selectively Severing Links" invalid. On April 8, 1999, the same jury awarded us $13.1 million in damages, and also concluded that General Scanning's infringement was willful. On July 8, 1999 the court entered a permanent injunction, prohibiting General Scanning from making, using, selling, or offering for sale in the United States memory repair systems and upgrade kits equipped with 1.3 micron lasers. This judgment was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on April 18, 2001. On May 24, 2001, GSI Lumonics, Inc., the successor to General Scanning, paid us $15.3 million in satisfaction of the judgment, including interest.
Separately, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued an order granting a request by General Scanning to re-examine our patent 5,265,114. On July 27, 2000 the Patent Office issued a non-final first office action in its re-examination of our patent 5,265,114 stating that some of the claims of the 5,265,114 patent were unpatentable. On May 30, 2001 the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexamination Certificate indicating the claims of the 5,265,114 are patentable and confirmed. We expect a final office action to issue from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that allows all of the claims of the 5,265,114 patent before the end of fiscal 2002.
Numerous users of our products have received notice of patent infringement from the Lemelson Medical, Educational & Research Foundation Limited Partnership ("Partnership") alleging that their use of our products infringes certain patents transferred to the Partnership by the late Jerome H. Lemelson. Certain of these users have notified us that, in the event it is subsequently determined that their use of our products infringes any of the Partnership's patents, they may seek indemnification from us for damages or expenses resulting from this matter.
Item 4.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter ended June 2, 2001.
Executive Officers
Our executive officers, and their ages and positions as of June 29, 2001, are as follows:
Mr. VanLuvanee joined us in 1992 as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director. From 1991 to 1992, Mr. VanLuvanee was President, Chief Executive Officer and a director at Mechanical Technology, Inc., a supplier of contract research and development services and a manufacturer of technologically advanced equipment. From 1990 to 1991, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of BCT Spectrum, Inc., a supplier of vacuum deposition systems. From 1984 to 1990, he was President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of Kulicke and Soffa Industries, a supplier of capital equipment and consumables to the microelectronics industry. Mr. VanLuvanee is also a director of Micro Component Technology, Inc., a leading manufacturer of automated test handling equipment, and FEI Company, which designs, manufactures and markets focused ion beam workstations and both ion and electron emitter and focusing column components.
Mr. Belter joined us in May 1997 as a Vice President and General Manager of our Electronic Component Systems business. Prior to joining us, Mr. Belter served as a consultant to us in marketing and product development for one year. Mr. Belter has extensive prior experience in the electronic component industry, including four years as President and General Manager of Johanson Dielectrics and ten years as President and General Manager of Kyocera Northwest, North American Electronic Components.
Mr. Dooley was elected Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2000. He joined us in 1992 as the Controller of Electronic Component Systems business and was named Corporate Controller in 1994. In 1996 he was named Director of Portland Manufacturing. Prior to joining us he held various financial management positions at IRT Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, INTERMEDICS, Inc., and Johnson and Johnson, Inc.
Mr. Glasgow joined us in June 1998 as Vice President of Sales. Prior to joining us, Mr. Glasgow worked for ADE as Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Customer Support, where he was responsible for all sales and service activities. In addition, Mr. Glasgow previously worked for us, and a company we acquired, XRL, Inc., from 1987 to 1997 in various sales positions including Director of Worldwide Sales for semiconductor products from 1995 to 1997.
Ms. Harper joined us in May 1997 as Treasury and SEC Reporting Manager, was named Corporate Controller in 1998, and Vice President of Finance in April 1999. From 1995 to 1997, Ms. Harper was Accounting Manager at Instromedix Incorporated, a medical electronics manufacturer. She held a number of management positions with ARCO Oil and Gas Company from 1980 to 1991.
Mr. Kapral joined us in May 2000 as Vice President responsible for our vision-based businesses. Prior to joining us, Mr. Kapral was both a corporate vice president and a business unit president of SGL Carbon Group, a major supplier to semiconductor manufacturers, with responsibility for SGL's semiconductor activities in North America and Europe.
Mr. Kurdock joined us in February 1997 as Vice President and General Manager of Portland Operations. During the five years prior to joining us, Mr. Kurdock served as Vice President of the Surface Mount Division for Universal Instruments and previously held senior operating positions with the Silicon Valley Group and Perkin Elmer.
Mr. Longe joined us in October 2000 as Corporate Vice President. In May 2001 he was named Vice President of Worldwide Sales. From 1992 until he joined ESI, he was with Evapco, Inc., where he was Vice President and Managing Director of Asia-Pacific operations and, prior to that, Vice President of the Industrial Products Group. His earlier experience included senior management positions with IMECO, a subsidiary of York International.
Mr. Reinhart joined us in 1993 as Communications and Contracts Manager and was named Director of Business Development in April 1995. Mr. Reinhart was elected a Vice President in September 1996 and was elected Corporate Secretary in June 1998. His experience includes finance, venture funding, mergers and acquisitions and administration in high-technology businesses.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters
Common Stock Prices/Dividends
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol ESIO. The following table shows, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock during the last five fiscal years. We currently intend to retain our earnings for our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
The approximate number of shareholders of record at June 2, 2001 was 780.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Fiscal 1998 excludes a pretax charge of $14.6 million in merger-related expenses associated with the acquisitions of Chip Star, Inc. ("Chip Star"), Dynamotion Corporation ("Dynamotion") and Applied Intelligence Systems, Inc. ("AISI").
Fiscal 1999 excludes a pretax charges of $2.8 million in merger-related expenses associated with the acquisitions of Testec, Inc. ("Testec"), and MicroVision Corp. ("MicroVision") and $1.4 million in trial-related, non-recurring litigation expenses.
Fiscal 2001 excludes a pre-tax gain of $13.9 million in connection with the litigation award from GSI Lumonics, net of $2.5 million of legal fees and expenses directly related to the award, and $1.4 million of interest received.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2001 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended June 3, 2000
Revenue for fiscal 2001 was $496.2 million, which was 56.6% or $179.2 million higher than for fiscal 2000. The increase was due to higher sales of electronic component systems, semiconductor yield improvement systems and circuit fine tuning systems. These increases were partially offset by slightly lower sales of vision and inspection systems. Advanced electronic packaging equipment sales remained relatively flat. For both fiscal 2001 and 2000, electronic component systems represented the largest percentage of revenues at 44.6% and 37.2%, respectively.
Gross margin for fiscal 2001 was 58.0%, up from 54.6% in the prior fiscal year. This increase in gross margin as a percentage of net sales was due primarily to increased capacity utilization resulting from higher unit volume, as well as faster growth of higher margin product revenue.
Selling, service and administrative expenses were $106.1 million, an increase of $25.5 million or 31.6% from fiscal 2000. The increase in fiscal 2001, as compared to fiscal 2000, was primarily due to increases in our selling and marketing infrastructure, higher commission expenses and higher costs of incentive and benefit programs. Selling, service and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales from 25.4% to 21.4%, primarily due to higher net sales.
Our future operating results depend to a considerable extent on our ability to maintain a competitive advantage in the products and services we provide. We continue to make substantial investments in our research and development efforts. Accordingly, research, development and engineering expenses for fiscal 2001 increased to $51.3 million from $35.1 million for the prior year. As a percentage of sales, research, development and engineering expenses decreased from 11.1% for fiscal 2000 to 10.3% for 2001. The decrease as a percentage of net sales was due to higher net sales for fiscal 2001.
Non-recurring operating income consisted of a $13.9 million gain in connection with the GSI Lumonics litigation award net of $2.5 million of legal fees and other expenses directly related to the award settlement.
Interest income rose to $9.8 million, an increase of $7.1 million from fiscal 2000. The increase is due to increased cash and related investments as a result of a significant increase in earnings as well as $1.4 million of interest received related to the GSI Lumonics litigation award.
The effective tax rate of 33.3% for fiscal 2001 is higher than the fiscal 2000 effective rate as a result of relatively lower foreign sales corporation benefit on significantly higher earnings and a lower utilization of net operating losses in fiscal 2001. The lower effective tax rate as compared to the statutory federal tax rate is largely a result of the benefit of our foreign sales corporation.
Net income for the year ended June 2, 2001 was $99.9 million, equaling $3.71 per basic share or $3.58 per diluted share. Net income for the year ended June 3, 2000 was $40.9 million, equaling $1.55 per basic share or $1.49 per diluted share. Excluding the non-recurring GSI litigation award settlement, fiscal 2001 net income was $91.5 million, equaling $ 3.39 per basic share or $3.28 per diluted share.
Fiscal Year Ended June 3, 2000 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 1999
Revenue for fiscal 2000 was $316.9 million, which was 53.7% or $110.7 million higher than for fiscal 1999. The increase was due to higher sales of electronic component systems, vision and inspection systems, semiconductor yield improvement systems and circuit fine tuning systems. These increases were partially offset by lower sales of advanced electronic packaging equipment. For fiscal 2000, electronic component systems represented the largest percentage of revenues at 37.2%. Semiconductor yield improvement systems contributed the highest revenues for fiscal 1999 at 31.5% of sales.
Gross margin for the year ended June 3, 2000 was 54.6%, up from 49.9% in the prior fiscal year. This increase in margin from the prior fiscal year is driven by changes in product mix, higher average selling prices due to strong industry demand, and increased overhead absorption due to higher unit volumes.
Selling, service and administrative expenses were $80.6 million, an increase of $22.9 million or 39.8% from fiscal 1999. Selling, service and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales from 27.9% to 25.4%. The absolute dollar increase is attributable to higher commission expenses and an increase in the profit sharing and bonus accruals associated with increased sales volume and profits.
Research, development and engineering expenses for the year ended June 3, 2000 increased to $35.1 million from $31.3 million for the prior year. Research, development and engineering expenses decreased as a percentage of sales to 11.1% for 2000 from 15.2% for the prior year due to increased sales.
Fiscal 1999 includes non-recurring expenses of $4.2 million, including $2.8 million in merger-related expenses for professional service fees and expenses associated with consolidating operations, and $1.4 million for incremental legal fees and trial expenses for intellectual property litigation.
The effective tax rate of 31.8% for the year ended June 3, 2000 was essentially flat compared to fiscal 1999. The lower effective tax rate as compared to the statutory federal tax rate is largely a result of the benefit of our foreign sales corporation.
Net income for the year ended June 3, 2000 was $40.9 million, equaling $1.55 per basic share or $1.49 per diluted share. Net income for the year ending May 31, 1999 was $7.5 million, equaling $0.29 per basic share or $0.28 per diluted share. Excluding non-recurring expenses, fiscal 1999 net income was $10.4 million, equaling $0.40 per basic share or $0.39 per diluted share.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity at June 2, 2001: existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $163.1 million, accounts receivable of $86.5 million, and a $7.0 million line of credit, none of which was outstanding at June 2, 2001. We have no long-term debt and a current ratio of 7.0:1. Working capital increased to $264.6 million at June 2, 2001, from $204.8 million at June 3, 2000.
We may acquire or invest in complementary businesses, product lines or technologies. These acquisitions or investments may require additional debt or equity capital to fund such activities. A summary of cash flow activities follows:
Reflects net purchase of $30.3 million in marketable securities during fiscal 2001 and net purchase of $38.8 million of marketable securities during fiscal 2000.
Total cash and marketable securities increased from $98.4 million on June 3, 2000 to $163.1 million on June 2, 2001.
Operating Activities: Operating cash flows were $89.1 million in 2001 largely due to higher net income and partially offset by net changes in working capital accounts. Trade receivables increased $15.1 million due to increased sales in comparison to last fiscal year. Inventory increased by $17.3 million from June 3, 2000 as a result of increased sales causing need for larger inventories. Increases in raw materials and finished goods were directly related to increased sales. Current liabilities increased $11.7 million due to higher compensation accruals, which resulted from higher volume of business and increased profitability.
Investing Activities: Net cash of $60.5 million was used in investing activities. We made net purchases in marketable securities of $30.3 million and purchases in the amount of $27.8 million for construction of our Klamath Falls facility, to upgrade computing and manufacturing capabilities, and to renovate and improve utilization of office and manufacturing space.
Financing Activities: Net cash of $5.0 million was generated by stock option exercises and sales under the employee stock purchase plan.
Capital Commitments: We have capital commitments of approximately $12.0 million for construction of a 62,000 square foot corporate headquarters building located on the Portland, Oregon campus. We expect that the facility will be completed in September 2002. In Taiwan, we have capital commitments of $7.0 million for construction of a 17,000 square foot sales office and demonstration center, which we expect to be completed August 2002.
Factors That May Affect Future Results
The statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation, statements containing the words "believes," "expects," and similar words, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to risk and uncertainties. From time to time we may issue other forward-looking statements. We caution investors that such forward-looking statements are subject to an inherent risk that actual results may materially differ. The following information highlights factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. Factors that may result in such variances include, but are not limited to, the following:
Industry Volatility
Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers of electronic devices, including miniature capacitors, semiconductor memory devices and circuits used in wireless communications equipment, including pagers and wireless phones, automotive electronics and computers. The markets for products manufactured by our customers are cyclical and have historically experienced periodic downturns, which have had a negative effect on the demand for capital equipment.
Customer Concentration
Ten large multinational electronics companies constituted 30.7% of our fiscal 2001 sales and therefore the loss of any of these customers would be significant.
Technological Change and Competition
The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. We believe that our future success will depend on our ability to develop and manufacture new products and product enhancements, and to introduce them successfully into the market. Failure to do so in a timely fashion could harm our competitive position. The announcements or introductions of new products by our competitors or us may adversely affect our operating results, since these announcements may cause customers to defer ordering products from our existing product lines.
International Trade and Economic Conditions
International shipments accounted for 72.2% of sales for fiscal 2001 compared to 72.3% of sales for fiscal 2000. About 58.0% of our fiscal 2001 product sales are to customers in Asia versus 62.3% for fiscal year 2000. A substantial number of orders that we received from Asia were secured by letters of credit. We expect that international shipments will continue to represent a significant percentage of net sales in the future. A continued or additional decline in the economies of any of the countries in which we do business would negatively affect our operating results because of our significant dependence on international revenues. Other risks involved with international trade include changes in demand resulting from fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, as well as factors such as government financed competition, changes in trade policies, tariff regulations, difficulties in obtaining United States export licenses and the difficulties of staffing and managing foreign operations.
Most of our sales are transacted in dollars and all of our products are made in the United States. Many Japanese customers pay in yen; therefore, we hedge these sales transactions to mitigate currency risk. Our European and Asian sales subsidiaries' operating expenses are denominated in their respective local currencies. These transactions represent approximately 10.8% of fiscal 2001 consolidated operating expenses and are split 43.5% and 56.5% respectively between Europe and Asia. Changes in the value of the local currency, as measured in US dollars, will commensurately increase or decrease operating expenses.
Euro Conversion
Our information technology systems will allow for transactions to take place in both local currencies and the Euro, with the eventual elimination of the local currency. We plan on converting our European subsidiaries' local currencies to Euro during fiscal 2002. We do not believe that the introduction of the Euro has or will have a material adverse affect on our results of operations.
Foreign Sales Corporation Benefit
In February 2000, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) provisions violated U.S. obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). As a result, Congress repealed the FSC rules effective October 1, 2000, subject to certain transition rules. Congress then enacted legislation for an alternative to the FSC. In June 2001, the WTO ruled that these new provisions also violated U.S. obligations under GAAT. The legislation creating an FSC alternative remains law, and barring its repeal, we believe that this legislation will result in a tax benefit similar to that under the FSC rules and that there should be no material effect on our effective tax rate or on our financial statements.
Acquisitions
We have made, and may in the future make, acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses with complementary products, services and/or technologies. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including management assimilation and costs in connection with integration of the operations, technologies, and products of the acquired companies, possible impairment of acquired intangible assets, and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies. In addition, the Financial Accounting Standards Board has disallowed the pooling-of-interests method of acquisition accounting. This could result is significant charges resulting from amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with future acquisitions, and may alter our acquisition strategy. The inability to manage these risks effectively could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Key Suppliers
We use numerous vendors to supply materials used in production. Although we make reasonable efforts to ensure that parts are available from multiple suppliers, some key parts are available only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. If we do not receive parts for production in a timely and cost effective manner, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Manufacturing Delays or Interruptions
We depend on manufacturing flexibility to meet the changing demands of our customers. Any significant delay or interruption of manufacturing operations as a result of software deficiencies, natural disasters, or other causes could result in ineffective manufacturing capabilities or delayed product deliveries, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Capacity Expansion
We have completed a 53,000 square-foot manufacturing facility on a 31-acre parcel in Klamath Falls, Oregon. In June 2001, we began construction of a 62,000 square foot corporate headquarters building in Portland, Oregon. Both projects have been funded with existing capital resources and internally generated funds. Our company's capacity expansion involves risks. For example, the electronics industry has historically been cyclical and subject to significant economic downturns characterized by over-capacity and diminished demand for products of the type manufactured by us. Unfavorable economic conditions affecting the electronics industry in general, or any of our major customers, may affect our ability to successfully utilize our additional manufacturing capacity in an effective manner, which could adversely affect our operating results.
Direct Sales in Asia
ESI has established direct sales and service organizations in China, Taiwan, Korea, and Singapore. Previously, we sold our products through a network of commission-based sales representatives in these
countries. Our shift to a direct sales model in these regions involves risks. For example, we may encounter labor shortages or disputes that could inhibit our ability to effectively sell and market our products. ESI is also subject to compliance with the labor laws and other laws governing employers in these countries and we will incur additional costs to comply with these regulatory schemes. Additionally we will incur new fixed operating expenses associated with the direct sales organizations: in particular payroll related costs and lease expenses. If amounts saved on commission payments formerly paid to our sales representatives do not decrease sufficiently to offset these expenses, our operating results may be harmed.
Patent Infringement
Our business is characterized by continual technological change, with frequent introductions of new products and technologies. As a result, companies often design and develop similar products to those introduced by others, increasing the risk that their products and processes may give rise to claims that they infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. This inherent risk of infringement could cause us to incur significant litigation costs or other expenses. For more information, please see Item 3: Legal Proceedings.
Stock Market Volatility
The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarterly variations in operating results, announcements of new products by us or our competitors, market conditions generally affecting companies in our industry, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.
The stock market and specifically the stock prices of technology companies have been very volatile. This volatility is often not related to the operating performance of these companies. This broad market and industry volatility may reduce or increase the price of our common stock, without regard to our operating performance. Due to this volatility, the market price of our common stock could significantly decrease.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 2, 2001, our investment portfolio includes marketable debt securities of $94.6 million. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. These securities are classified as Securities Available for Sale; therefore, the impact of interest rate changes is reflected as a separate component of shareholder's equity. Due to the duration of our investment portfolio, an immediate 10% increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on our financial condition or the results of our operations.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and do not use them for trading purposes. Derivatives are used to manage well-defined foreign currency risks. We enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge the value of accounts receivable denominated in Japanese yen. The impact of exchange rates on the forward contracts will be substantially offset by the impact of such changes on the underlying transactions. The effect of an immediate 10% change in exchange rates on the forward exchange contracts and the underlying hedged positions, denominated in Japanese yen, would not be material to our financial position or the results of our operations.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999
(in thousands, except per share data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000 and May 31, 1999
(in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999
(in thousands)
Cash payments for interest were not significant in 2001, 2000 or 1999.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share data unless otherwise noted)
Business Environment
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. We design and manufacture sophisticated products used around the world in electronics manufacturing including: laser manufacturing systems for semiconductor yield improvement, production and test equipment for the manufacture of surface mount ceramic capacitors, laser and mechanical advanced electronic packaging production systems, machine vision systems and circuit fine tuning systems. We serve the global electronics market from our headquarters in Portland, Oregon and through subsidiaries located in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
We use financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, securities held for sale, trade receivables and financial instruments used in hedging activities. We invest our cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and readily marketable debt securities. We place our investments with high credit quality financial institutions and limit the credit exposure from any one institution or instrument. To date, the amount of losses experienced on these investments have not been material. We sell a significant portion of our products to a small number of large electronics manufacturers: 30.7% of fiscal 2001 revenue was derived from ten customers. Our operating results could be adversely affected if the financial condition and operations of these key customers decline.
Concentrations of Other Risks
Our operations involve a number of other risks and uncertainties including but not limited to the cyclicality of the electronics market, rapidly changing technology, international operations and hedging exposures. Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations for additional commentary.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial statements.
Stock Split
Our Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split to shareholders of record at the close of business February 23, 2000, effective February 24, 2000. All per share and shares outstanding data in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements have been retroactively restated to reflect the stock split.
Change in Fiscal Year End
On September 30, 1999, we elected to change our fiscal quarters to correspond with a four week, five week, four week quarter, which means each quarter will end on a Saturday. Previously, the quarters ended on the last day of the calendar month. The fiscal year now ends on the Saturday following or directly preceding May 31, whichever Saturday is the fewest number of days from May 31.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for 1999 and 2000 to conform to the 2001 presentation.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize systems, spare parts and other product revenue when the product has been delivered, risk of loss has passed to the customer and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. We design, market and sell our products as standard configurations. Accordingly, customer acceptance provisions are based on seller-specified criteria, which we demonstrate prior to shipment. Revenue on new products is deferred until we have established a track record of customer acceptance on these new products. When customer-specified objective criteria exist, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance if we cannot demonstrate the system meets these specifications prior to shipment.
Revenue associated with service or maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the life of the contract, which is generally one year. See Recent Accounting Pronouncements for more information.
Product Warranty
We generally warrant our systems for a period of up to 12 months for material and labor to repair and service the system. A provision for the estimated cost related to warranty is recorded upon shipment.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Taxes on Income
Deferred income taxes have not been provided on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries, as we believe any U.S. tax on such earnings would be substantially offset by associated foreign tax credits.
Comprehensive Income
We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" (SFAS 130). SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income includes net income and "other comprehensive income" which includes charges or credits to equity that are not the result of transactions to shareholders. Our only material components of "other comprehensive income" are cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale.
Net Income Per Share
We compute net income per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" (SFAS 128). SFAS 128 requires the dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share and other additional disclosures. Basic earnings per share is computed
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares and share equivalents (stock options) outstanding.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
Inventories are principally valued at standard costs, which approximate the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Costs utilized for inventory valuation purposes include material, labor and manufacturing overhead.
Depreciation and Capitalization Policies
Depreciation is determined on the straight-line method based on the following useful lives, buildings, 25 to 40 years; building improvements, 5 to 15 years; and machinery and equipment, 3 to 10 years.
Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are charged to expense. Major improvements and additions are capitalized. When property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in other expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
Revenue Recognition
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" in December 1999. As allowed by SAB 101, we adopted SAB 101 in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001. Due principally to the fact that we have historically tested our products prior to shipment to ensure they meet seller specified acceptance criteria, the adoption of SAB 101 was not material to our financial statements.
Hedging Activities
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133) in June 1998. SFAS 133, as amended by SFAS 138, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The standard requires us to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The change in the derivative's fair value related to the ineffective portion of a hedge, if any, will be immediately recognized in earnings. We expect to adopt this Standard at the beginning of our fiscal year 2002. The effect of adopting this standard will not have a material effect on our financial position or our results of operations.
Business Combinations, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30,
2001. Use of the pooling-of-interest method will be prohibited on a prospective basis only. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Thus, amortization of goodwill, including goodwill recorded in past business combinations, will cease upon adoption of that Statement, which for ESI will be fiscal 2002. We do not expect that the adoption of either SFAS No. 141 or SFAS No. 142 to have a significant impact on the financial condition or results of operations of ESI.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Major classes of property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
Line of Credit
We have a short-term revolving line of credit with a large foreign bank totaling $7 million. This line expires in September 2001. We expect to renew the line through 2002. At our option, the interest rate is prime or LIBOR plus 1.25 percent. There were no borrowings outstanding at June 2, 2001 or June 3, 2000.
Employee Benefit Plans
We have an employee savings plan under the provisions of section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. We contributed $1,489, $1,123, and $950 to the plan for the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999, respectively.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method as defined by the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," (SFAS 109). Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax balances of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The net deferred tax asset as of June 2, 2001 and June 3, 2000 consists of the following tax effects relating to temporary differences and carryforwards:
At June 2, 2001 there were net operating losses of $10,484 available for U.S. federal income tax purposes. These losses were principally acquired as part of prior acquisitions and expire on various dates through 2013. These losses are subject to certain limitations caused by the change in ownership. Accordingly, their utilization in future periods may be restricted. Given these limitations, some of these losses may not be realizable, and accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded.
The components of income before income taxes and the provision for income taxes are as follows:
The tax benefit related to stock option exercises has been recorded as an increase to common stock rather than a reduction to the provision for income taxes.
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the federal statutory income tax rate to the provision for income taxes as reported is as follows:
Consolidated income tax payments amounted to $47,804, $12,856, and $4,361 for the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999, respectively.
Earnings Per Share
We compute net income per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 128, "Earnings Per Share" (SFAS 128). All earnings per share amounts in the following table are presented to conform to the SFAS 128 requirements
The number of options to purchase shares of common stock that were excluded from the table above (as the effect would have been anti-dilutive) were 1,252,048, 1,208,599, and 1,154,116 for the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999, respectively.
Commitments and Contingencies
We have limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and do not use them for trading purposes. Derivatives are used to manage well-defined foreign currency risks. We enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge the value of accounts receivable denominated in a foreign currency. Foreign exchange contracts have gains and losses that are recognized at the end of each fiscal period. At June 2, 2001 and June 3, 2000, we had forward exchange contracts totaling $27,302 and $35,491, respectively. In general, these contracts mature in less than one year and the counterparties are large, highly rated, widely recognized banks; therefore, risk of credit loss as a result of nonperformance by the banks is minimal. The use of derivatives does not have a significant effect on our financial position or the results of its operations.
We lease certain equipment, automobiles and office space under operating leases, which are non-cancelable and expire on various dates through 2009. The aggregate minimum commitment for rentals under operating leases beyond June 2, 2001 is as follows:
Rental expense for all operating leases was $1,690 in 2001, $1,314 in 2000, and $1,854 in 1999.
Legal Matters
On February 14, 2001, Cognex Corporation (Cognex) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (CognexCorporation v. Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., No. 01-10287 RCL). The lawsuit alleges that our CorrectPlace ver. 5.0 product infringes United States Patent 5,371,690, which is owned by Cognex. The patent concerns the inspection of surface mount devices or SMDs that are attached to the surface of an electronic circuit board. Cognex seeks injunctive relief, damages, costs and attorneys' fees. Although neither the extent nor the outcome of this investigation can be determined at this time, ESI does not believe that the outcome will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Employment Commitment
In June 2001 ESI, in conjunction with our construction of Klamath Falls facility, entered into a Development Agreement with the State of Oregon, the City of Klamath Falls, Oregon, Klamath County, Oregon, Klamath Community Development Corporation (KCDC), and others. We are required to reimburse KCDC $200,000 plus accrued interest and the State of Oregon $375,000 plus accrued interest in the event that we do not create at least 200 Full-Time-Equivalent jobs over 5 years (as defined in the Development Agreement) at our Klamath Falls, Oregon manufacturing facility.
Capital Commitments
We have capital commitments of approximately $12.0 million for construction of a 62,000 square foot corporate headquarters building located on the Portland, Oregon campus. It is expected that the facility will be completed in September 2002. In Taiwan, Asia we have capital commitments of approximately $7.0 million for construction of a 17,000 square foot sales office and demonstration center which is expected to be completed August 2002.
Securities
We classify our marketable securities as Securities Available for Sale in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. All of our marketable debt securities are invested in high credit quality securities. The amortized cost of these securities approximates fair market value.
During fiscal 2001 and 2000, proceeds of $40,046 and $27,361, respectively, resulted from the sale or maturity of securities. There were no material realized gains or losses associated with these sales or maturities. Unrealized gains or losses are reported in a separate component of shareholders' equity. Information regarding our marketable securities is as follows:
Shareholder Rights Plan
We renewed our Shareholder Rights Plan in May 1999 and accordingly declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of Common Stock, payable to holders of record on June 4, 1999. On March 1, 2001, we amended and restated our Rights Agreement appointing Mellon Investor Services as the Rights Agent, successor to First Chicago Trust Company of New York. Under certain conditions, each Right may be exercised to purchase 1/100 of a share of Series A No Par Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $270, subject to adjustment. The Rights are not presently exercisable and will only become exercisable following the occurrence of certain specified events. Generally the Rights become exercisable after a person or group acquires or commences a tender offer that would result in beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of our outstanding Common Stock. In addition, the Rights become exercisable if any party becomes a beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of the our outstanding Common Stock and is determined by the Board of Directors to be an adverse party. If a person or group acquires 15 percent of our outstanding Common Stock or the Board of Directors declares a person to be an Adverse Person, each Right will be adjusted to entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise, Common Stock or, in certain circumstances, other assets of ours having a value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right. If, after the Rights become exercisable, we are acquired in a merger or other business combination, each Right will be adjusted to entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise, Common Stock of the acquiring company having a value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right, depending on the circumstances. The Rights expire on May 7, 2009 and may be redeemed by the Company for $0.001 per Right. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights and until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on our earnings.
Stock Plans
In September 1989, the shareholders approved the adoption of the 1989 Stock Option Plan (the "1989 Plan") pursuant to which 1,000,000 shares of our Common Stock have been reserved for issuance. In September 1998, shareholders approved additional shares under this plan increasing the total available to 4,400,000. In September 2000, the shareholders approved the adoption of the 2000 Stock Option Incentive Plan (the "2000 Incentive Plan") which replaced the 1989 Plan. There are 2,000,000 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2000 Incentive Plan plus any shares that are available for grant under the 1989 Plan or that may become available for grant under the 1989 Plan through the expiration, termination, forfeiture or cancellation of grants. Options under the 2000 Incentive Plan generally vest 25% per year over a 4 year period from the date of grant, expire ten years from the date of grant, and are exercisable at prices generally not less than the fair market value at the grant date. The 2000 Incentive Plan allows for automatic annual grants to non-employee directors for 6,000 shares of Common Stock on July 31 of each year, with an option price equal to the closing market price on the date of the grant, a ten-year term and a four-year vesting schedule. The 2000 Incentive Plan allows for grants of incentive stock options, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or non-statutory stock options. Stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with options, although no options have been granted which include stock appreciation rights.
In September 1990, the shareholders approved the adoption of the 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") pursuant to which 300,000 shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance to participating employees. In September 1998, shareholders approved additional shares under this plan increasing the total available to 900,000. Eligible employees may elect to contribute up to 15 percent of their cash compensation during each pay period. The ESPP provides for one 12-month offering period beginning January 8 of each year. During the offering period, participants accumulate funds in an account via payroll deduction. At the end of the offering period, the purchase price is determined and the accumulated funds are used to automatically purchase shares of our common stock. The purchase price per share is equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock (a) on the enrollment date of the offering period or (b) on the date of purchase.
In September 1996, the shareholders approved the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1996 Plan") pursuant to which 300,000 shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance to participating employees. In September 1998, shareholders approved additional shares under this plan increasing the total available to 500,000. The 1996 Plan allows for the grants of stock bonuses, restricted stock or performance-based awards. Our restricted stock grants vest based on certain performance criteria that are tied to our stock price. During fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, we recorded $1,372, $2,498 and $499, respectively, of compensation expense related to restricted stock grants.
In April 2000, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the 2000 Stock Option Plan (the "2000 Plan") pursuant to which 1,000,000 shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance. The 2000 Plan allows for grants to non-officer employees of non-statutory stock options, stock bonuses or restricted stock. In April 2001, the Board of Directors approved 1,250,000 additional shares under this plan increasing the total shares available to 2,250,000.
We account for our stock option plans and our employee stock purchase plan in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting Principles Board's Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), "Accounting For Stock Issued to Employees." In 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting For Stock Based Compensation." SFAS 123 provides an alternative to APB 25. We continue to account for our employee stock plans in accordance with the provisions of APB 25. Accordingly, we have elected to provide pro forma disclosures as required by SFAS 123.
We have computed, for pro forma disclosure purposes, the per share value of all options granted under the stock option plan to be $20.87, $29.19 and $22.36 for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The pro forma value of options granted under the employee stock purchase plan is immaterial for 2001, 2000 and 1999. These computations were made using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, as prescribed by SFAS 123, with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2001, 2000 and 1999:
The total value of options granted would be amortized on a pro rata basis over the vesting period of the options. Options generally vest equally over four years. If we had accounted for these plans in accordance with SFAS 123, our net income and net income per share would have decreased as reflected in the following pro forma amounts for the fiscal years ended as follows:
The following table summarizes activity in the stock plans for the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999.
In addition to the options above, we had 72,600, 122,450 and 156,946 of restricted stock grants outstanding as of June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000 and May 31, 1999, respectively, none of which were exercisable.
The following table sets forth the exercise price range, number of shares outstanding at June 2, 2001, weighted average remaining contractual life, weighted average exercise price, number of exercisable shares and weighted average exercise price of exercisable options by groups of similar price and grant date:
Segment Reporting
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS 131), effective May 31, 1999. SFAS 131, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers and the countries in which the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. An operating segment is defined as a component that engages in business activities, whose operating results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker, and for which discrete financial information is available. Based on the provisions of SFAS 131, ESI operates in one segment. We manage our resources and assess our performance on an enterprise-wide basis. We provide electronic manufacturers with equipment necessary to produce key components used in wireless communications, computers, automotive electronics and many other electronic products. Our products enable these manufacturers to reduce production costs, increase yields and improve the quality of their products. These products include semiconductor yield improvement systems, electronic component manufacturing systems, advanced electronic packaging equipment, vision and inspection products and circuit fine tuning systems. Since ESI operates in one segment, all financial segment information required by SFAS 131 can be found in the consolidated financial statements.
The following data represents sales by product line for the years ending:
We have geographic operations in the United States, Europe and Asia. Transfers between geographic areas are made at prevailing market prices. Operating income is total revenue less operating expenses. In computing operating income, none of the following items have been added or deducted: interest income, other income or expense or the provision for income taxes. Identifiable assets are those assets of ours that are identified with the operations in each geographic location. Corporate assets are primarily cash and cash equivalents and securities available for sale.
Export sales included in United States sales to unaffiliated customers for the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999 were as follows:
The most significant sales outside the U.S. were to Taiwan and Japan, which represented 22.1% and 20.5% of our net sales for fiscal 2001, respectively.
In fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, there were no sales to any one customer in excess of 10% of consolidated net sales.
The following data represents segment information for the years ended:
1Includes $2,773 in non-recurring operating expenses associated with the acquisition of MicroVision and Testec and $1,407 in trial-related expenses associated with the General Scanning lawsuit
2Includes net non-recurring operating gain of $11.4 million related to the GSI Lumonics litigation award. Acquisitions
MicroVision Corp.
On January 29, 1999, we completed the acquisition of MicroVision, a provider of integrated, vision-based inspection and automation solutions for use in semiconductor front-end and back-end applications, located in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The acquisition consideration consisted of 2,037,000 shares of ESI stock. The transaction has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests and, accordingly, all data included in the Consolidated Financial Statements has been restated.
Testec, Inc.
On December 21, 1998, we completed the acquisition of Testec, a provider of electrical test systems for the passive component marketplace, located in Phoenix, Arizona. The acquisition consideration consisted of 1,000,000 shares of ESI common stock. The transaction has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests and, accordingly, all data included in the Consolidated Financial Statements have been restated.
The following is a reconciliation of certain restated amounts with amounts previously reported. Testec and MicroVision activity shown for fiscal 1999 is for the period from June 1 to December 21 and January 29, respectively, their dates of acquisition.
Non-Recurring Operating Items
In fiscal 2001, we received $13.9 million for a litigation award from GSI Lumonics. We incurred $2.5 million of legal fees and other related expenses directly in connection with the litigation award. We also were awarded $1.4 million of interest related to the GSI Lumonics litigation award. The $11.4 million net award is included in non-recurring operating items and $1.4 million is included in interest income on the income statement.
In fiscal 1999, we incurred $2,773 in professional service fees and expenses associated with the acquisitions of Testec and MicroVision. In addition, we incurred $1,407 in incremental trial-related legal costs associated with the General Scanning lawsuit. Both of these amounts are included in non-recurring operating items on the income statement.
Quarterly Financial Information
(Unaudited)
1For fiscal 2001, fourth quarter net income and per share amounts include pre-tax non-recurring operating items of $11.4 million related to the litigation award from GSI Lumonics, and $1.4 million of accrued interest.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (an Oregon corporation) and subsidiaries as of June 2, 2001 and June 3, 2000 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 2, 2001 and June 3, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Portland, Oregon
June 29, 2001
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The information required by this item is included under "Election of Directors" in our Proxy Statement for our 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information with respect to our executive officers is included under Item 4 of Part I of this Report. No information is required to be included for Item 405 of Regulation S-K for fiscal 2001.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is included under "Board Compensation," "Executive Compensation" (excluding the performance graph) and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in our Proxy Statement for our 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is included under "Voting Securities and Principal Shareholders" in our Proxy Statement for our 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information required by this item is included under "Executive Compensation" in our 2001 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules.
The following financial statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on the pages indicated.
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
All schedules are omitted, as the required information is inapplicable or not significant.
(b) Exhibit List
3-A.
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1991.
3-B.
Articles of Amendment of Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-B of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1999.
3-C.
2001 Restated Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 3, 2001.
3-D.
Articles of Amendment of Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 2, 2000.
4-A.
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2001, between the Company and Mellon Investor Services, relating to rights issued to all holders of Company Common Stock.
10-A.
ESI 1983 Stock Option Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-E of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1986.
10-B.
ESI 1989 Stock Option Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-B of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1997.
10-C.
Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Company and each of its corporate officers.1
10-D.
1996 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-E of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1997.1
10-E.
2000 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-F of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2000.
10-F.
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and each of its directors and corporate officers.
21.
Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.
Consent of Independent Public Accountants.
24.
Powers of Attorney.
(c)Reports on Form 8-K. No reports of Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended June 2, 2001.
1Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on July 25, 2001.
Signature
Title
(1) Principal Executive, Financial and
Accounting Officers
/s/ *DONALD R. VANLUVANEE Donald R. VanLuvanee
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ JAMES T. DOOLEY James T. Dooley
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(2) Directors
/s/ *DAVID F. BOLENDER David F. Bolender
Chairman of the Board
/s/ *LARRY L. HANSEN Larry L. Hansen
Director
/s/ *W. ARTHUR PORTER W. Arthur Porter
Director
/s/ *VERNON B. RYLES, JR. Vernon B. Ryles, Jr.
Director
/s/ *GERALD F. TAYLOR Gerald F. Taylor
Director
/s/ *JON D. TOMPKINS Jon D. Tompkins
Director
/s/ *KEITH L. THOMSON Keith L. Thomson
Director
*By: /s/ JAMES T. DOOLEY James T. Dooley
as Attorney-in-Fact
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NO.
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
3-A.
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1991.
3-B.
Articles of Amendment of Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-B of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1999.
3-C.
2001 Restated Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 3, 2001.
3-D.
Articles of Amendment of Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 2, 2000.
4-A
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2001, between the Company and Mellon Investor Services relating to rights issued to all holders of Company Common Stock.
10-A.
ESI 1983 Stock Option Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-E of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1986.
10-B.
ESI 1989 Stock Option Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-B of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1997.
10-C.
Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Company and each of its corporate officers.
10-D.
1996 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-E of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1997.
10-E.
2000 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-F of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2000.
10-F.
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and each of its directors and corporate officers.
21.
Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.
Consent of Independent Public Accountants.
24.
Powers of Attorney.
PART I
PART II
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands)
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME For the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999 (in thousands, except per share data)
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY For the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000 and May 31, 1999 (in thousands)
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the years ended June 2, 2001, June 3, 2000, and May 31, 1999 (in thousands)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
PART III
PART IV
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX