ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General Development of Business
Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II, a Michigan Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), acquired, maintains, leases, operates and ultimately will dispose of income producing residential real properties consisting of eight manufactured housing communities (the "Properties"). The Partnership was organized and formed under the laws of the State of Michigan on November 7, 1986. Its principal offices are located at 280 Daines Street, Birmingham, Michigan 48009 and its telephone number is (248) 645-9220.
The Partnership filed an S-11 Registration Statement in November 1986, which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 1986. The Partnership thereafter sold 3,303,387 units (the "Units") of beneficial assignment of limited partnership interest representing capital contributions by unit holders (the "Unit Holders") to the Partnership of $20 per unit. The sale of all 3,303,387 Units was completed in December 1987, generating $66,067,740 of contributed capital to the Partnership.
The Partnership originally acquired seven properties in 1987 and acquired two additional Properties in 1988. Paradise Village was sold in 2007. Today the Partnership owns eight manufactured home communities. They are Ardmor Village, Camelot Manor, Country Roads, Dutch Hills, El Adobe, Stonegate, Sunshine and West Valley. The Partnership does not intend to acquire any other communities.
The Partnership operates the Properties as manufactured housing communities with the primary investment objectives of: (1) providing cash from operations to investors; (2) obtaining capital appreciation; and (3) preserving capital of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that such objectives can continue to be achieved.
On August 20, 1998, the Partnership borrowed $30,000,000 (the “Loan”) from GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation. It secured the Loan by placing new mortgages on seven of its nine properties. The note is payable in monthly installments of $188,878, including interest at 6.37% through March 2009. Thereafter, the monthly installment and interest rate will be adjusted based on the provisions of the Loan Agreement through the note maturity date of September 2028. The Partnership used the proceeds from the Loan to refinance the Partnership’s outstanding indebtedness of $30,045,000, which was incurred in a 1993 mortgage financing transaction.
Financial Information About Industry Segment
The Partnership's business and only industry segment is the operation of its eight manufactured housing communities. Partnership operations commenced in April 1987, upon the acquisition of the first two Properties. For a description of the Partnership's revenues, operating profit and assets please refer to Items 6 and 8.
Description of Business
General
The Sunshine Village, Ardmor Village and Camelot Manor Properties were acquired from affiliates of Genesis Associates Limited Partnership, the General Partner of the Partnership (the "General Partner"). The other six communities were purchased from unaffiliated third parties. The Partnership rents home sites in the Properties to owners of manufactured homes. It was intended that the Partnership would hold the Properties for extended periods of time, originally anticipated to be seven to ten years after their acquisition. The General Partner has the discretion to determine when a Property is to be sold; provided, however, that the determination of whether a particular Property should be disposed of will be made by the General Partner only after consultation with an independent consultant, Manufactured Housing Services Inc. (the "Consultant"). In making their decision, the General Partner and Consultant will consider relevant factors, including, current operating results of the particular Property and prevailing economic conditions, with a view to achieving maximum capital appreciation to the Partnership while considering relevant tax consequences and the Partnership's investment objectives.
As described in Form 8-K dated March 13, 2007, the Partnership had entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property with a private buyer for the Paradise Village Manufactured Housing Community located in Tampa, Florida. On May 17, 2007, the buyer closed on the purchase for a price of $11,725,000 less closing costs for a net proceeds amount of $11,323,000. The Partnership recognized a gain on sale of property totaling $5,739,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Partnership distributed approximately $3 million from the sale with the balance of the proceeds being maintained in reserve until such time as the General Partner determines the optimal use of the funds. As a result of the sale, the Partnership has classified the Paradise Village community and associated financial results as “discontinued operations” in the accompanying financial statements for all historical periods.
Competition
The business of owning and operating residential manufactured housing communities is highly competitive, and the Partnership may be competing with a number of established companies having greater financial resources. Moreover, there has been a trend for manufactured housing community residents to purchase (where zoning permits) their manufactured home sites on a collective basis. This trend may result in increased competition with the Partnership for residents. In addition, the General Partner, its affiliates or both, has and may in the future participate directly or through other partnerships or investment vehicles in the acquisition, ownership, development, operation and sale of projects which may be in direct competition with one or more of the Properties.
Each of the Properties competes with numerous similar facilities located in its geographic area. The Davie/Fort Lauderdale area contains approximately seven communities offering approximately 3,447 housing sites competing with the Partnership’s Sunshine Village. The Partnership’s Ardmor Village competes with approximately fourteen communities in the Lakeville, Minnesota area offering approximately 3,655 housing sites. The Partnership’s Camelot Manor competes with approximately twelve communities in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area offering approximately 2,700 housing sites. In the Jacksonville, Florida area, the Partnership’s Country Roads competes with approximately eleven communities offering approximately 4,017 housing sites. The Partnership’s Dutch Hills and Stonegate Manor compete with approximately twelve other communities in the Lansing, Michigan area offering approximately 3,878 housing sites. In the Las Vegas, Nevada area, the Partnership’s West Valley competes with approximately ten other communities offering approximately 2,428 housing sites and the Partnership’s El Adobe competes with fourteen other communities offering 4,163 home sites. The Properties also compete against other forms of housing including apartments, condominium complexes and site built homes.
Governmental Regulations
The Properties owned by the Partnership are subject to certain state regulations regarding the conduct of the Partnership operations. For example, the State of Florida regulates agreements and relationships between the Partnership and the residents of Sunshine Village and Country Roads. Under Florida law, the Partnership is required to deliver to new residents of those Properties a prospectus describing the property and all tenant rights, Property rules and regulations, and changes to Property rules and regulations. Florida law also requires minimum lease terms, requires notice of rent increases, grants to tenant associations certain rights to purchase the community if being sold by the owner and regulates other aspects of the management of such properties. The Partnership is required to give 90 days notice to the residents of Florida Properties of any rate increase, reduction in services or utilities, or change in rules and regulations. If a majority of the residents object to such changes as unreasonable, the matter must be submitted to the Florida Department of Professional Business Regulations for mediation prior to any legal adjudication of the matter. In addition, if the Partnership seeks to sell Florida Properties to the general public, it must notify any homeowners’ association for the residents, and the association shall have the right to purchase the Property on the price, terms and conditions being offered to the public within 45 days of notification by the owner. If the Partnership receives an unsolicited bona fide offer to purchase the Property, it must notify any such homeowners’ association that it has received an offer, state to the homeowners’ association the price, terms and conditions upon which the Partnership would sell the Property, and consider (without obligation) accepting an offer from the homeowners’ association. The Partnership has, to the best of its knowledge, complied in all material respects with all requirements of the States of Florida, Michigan, Minnesota and Nevada, where its operations are conducted.
Employees
The Partnership employs three part-time employees to perform Partnership management and investor relations’ services. The Partnership retains an affiliate, Uniprop AM, LLC, as the property manager for each of its Properties. Uniprop AM, LLC is paid a fee equal to the lesser of 5% of the annual gross receipts from each of the Properties or the amount which would be payable to unaffiliated third parties for comparable services. Uniprop AM, LLC retains local managers on behalf of the Partnership at each of the Properties. Salaries and fringe benefits of such local managers are paid by the Partnership and are not included in any property management fee payable to Uniprop AM, LLC. The yearly salaries and expenses for local managers range from $15,000 to $42,000. Community Managers are utilized by the Partnership to provide on-site maintenance and administrative services. Uniprop AM, LLC as property manager, has overall management authority for each property.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
The following risks and uncertainties could cause our business, financial condition or results of operations to be materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be able to pay distributions on our Units, the net asset values of the Units could decline, and a Unit holder might lose all or a portion of its investment.
1.
Real Estate Investments. The Partnership’s investments are subject to the same risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate including: the uncertainty of cash flow to meet fixed or variable obligations, adverse changes in economic conditions, changes in the investment climate for real estate, adverse changes in local market conditions, changes in interest rates and the availability of mortgage funds or chattel financing, changes in real estate tax rates, governmental rules and regulations, acts of God and the inability to attract or retain residential tenants.
Residential real estate, including manufactured housing communities, is subject to adverse housing pattern changes and uses, vandalism, rent controls, rising operating costs and adverse changes in local market conditions such as a decrease in demand for residential housing due to a decrease in employment. State governments also often regulate the relationship between manufactured housing community owners and residents.
The manufactured housing industry is now in the seventh consecutive year of declining unit sales due, in part, to lack of financing for the purchase of manufactured homes intended to be sited in land-lease communities.
2.
The General Partner and its Affiliates have Conflicts of Interest. Although the General Partner has a fiduciary duty to manage the Partnership in a manner beneficial to the Unit holders, the directors and officers of the General Partner have a fiduciary duty to manage the General Partner in a manner beneficial to its owners. Furthermore, certain directors and officers of the General Partner are directors or officers of affiliates of the General Partner. Conflicts of interest may arise between the General Partner and its affiliates and the Unit holders. As a result of these conflicts, the General Partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the interests of the Unit holders.
3.
Reliance on General Partner’s Direction and Management of the Properties. The success of the Partnership will, to a large extent, depend on the quality of the management of the Properties by the General Partner and affiliates of the General Partner and their collective judgment with respect to the operation, financing and disposition of the Properties. To the extent that the General Partner and its affiliates are unable to hire and retain quality management talent, the Partnership’s financial results and operations may be adversely affected.
4.
Federal Income Tax Risks. Federal income tax considerations will materially affect the economic consequences of an investment in the Properties. The tax consequences of the Partnership’s activities are complex and subject to many uncertainties. Changes in the federal income tax laws or regulations may adversely affect the Partnership’s financial results and its ability to make distributions to the Unit holders. Additionally, the tax benefits enjoyed by the Unit holders may be reduced or eliminated.
5.
Limited Liquidity of the Units. The transfer of Units is subject to certain limitations. The public market for such Units is very limited. Unit Holders may not be able to liquidate their investment promptly or at favorable prices, if at all.
6.
Competition. The business of owning and operating residential manufactured housing communities is highly competitive. The Partnership competes with a number of established communities having greater financial resources. Moreover, there has been a trend for manufactured housing community residents to purchase home sites either collectively or individually. Finally, the popularity and affordability of site built homes has also increased in recent years while the availability of chattel financing has decreased. These trends have resulted in increased competition for tenants to occupy the Partnership properties.
7.
Management and Control of Partnership Affairs. The General Partner is vested with full authority as to the general management and supervision of the business affairs of the Partnership. The Unit Holders do not have the right to participate in the management of the Partnership or its operations. However, the vote of Unit Holders holding more than 50% of the outstanding voting interests is required to: (a) amend the Partnership Agreement; (b) approve or disprove the sale of one property or a series of transactions of all or substantially all of the assets of the Partnership; (c) dissolve the Partnership; (d) remove the General Partner; or (e) approve certain actions by the General Partner that the Consultant recommends against.
8.
Uninsured Losses. The Partnership carries comprehensive insurance, including liability, fire and extended coverage, and rent loss insurance which is customarily obtained for real estate projects. There are certain types of losses, however, that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable such as certain damage caused by a hurricane. If such losses were to be incurred, the financial position and operations of the Partnership as well as the Partnership’s ability to make distributions would be adversely affected.
9.
Environmental Matters. Because the Partnership deals with real estate, it is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. Changes in such laws, rules and regulations may cause the Partnership to incur increased costs of compliance which may have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Partnership and its ability to make distributions to Unit holders.
10.
No Guarantee of Distributions. The General Partner may withhold cash for extended periods of time if such cash is necessary to build cash reserves or for the conduct of the Partnership’s business. A Unit holder will be required to pay federal income taxes, and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on the Unit holder’s share of the Partnership’s taxable income, whether or not cash distributions are made by the Partnership. A Unit holder may not receive cash distributions from the Partnership equal to the holder’s share of taxable income or even equal to the tax liability that results from the Unit holder’s share of the Partnership’s taxable income.
11.
The Partnership May Not be Able to Generate Sufficient Working Capital to Fund its Operations. There can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate sufficient working capital from operations to operate the business or to fund distributions. Further, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will be able to borrow additional funds on terms favorable to the Partnership, if at all, to meet unanticipated working capital needs or to make distributions to the Unit holders.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The Partnership purchased all eight manufactured housing communities for cash. As a result of the Loan, seven of the eight Properties are now encumbered with mortgages.
Each of the Properties is a modern manufactured housing community containing lighted and paved streets, side-by-side off-street parking and complete underground utility systems. The Properties consist of only the underlying real estate and improvements, not the actual homes themselves. Each of the Properties has a community center, which includes offices, meeting rooms and game rooms. Each of the Properties, except Stonegate Manor, has a swimming pool. Several of the Properties also have laundry rooms, playground areas, garage and maintenance areas and recreational vehicle or boat storage areas.
The table below contains certain information concerning the Partnership's eight properties.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On January 17, 2008, a Housing Discrimination Complaint was filed with the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is specifically in relation to West Valley located in Las Vegas, NV. At this time, an investigation has been ordered, and no determination has been made as to whether the complaint has any merit. The Partnership does not anticipate a material financial liability, if any, as an outcome to this complaint.
ITEM4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The voting privileges of the Unit Holders are restricted to certain matters of fundamental significance to the Partnership. The Unit Holders must approve certain major decisions of the General Partner if the General Partner proposes to act without the approval of the Consultant. The Unit Holders also have a right to vote on the removal and replacement of the General Partner, dissolution of the Partnership, material amendments to the Partnership Agreement and the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets, except in the ordinary course of the Partnership's disposing of the Properties. Such matters must be approved by Unit Holders holding in the aggregate more than 50% of the then outstanding voting interests. No matters were submitted to the Unit Holders for a vote during 2007.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
There is no established public trading market for the Units of the Partnership and it is not anticipated that one will ever develop. During the last twelve months, less than five percent (5.0%) of the Units have been transferred, including transfers due to death or intra-family transfers. The Partnership believes there is no formal secondary market, or the substantial equivalent thereof, and none will develop.
The General Partner calculates the estimated net asset value of each Unit by dividing (i) the amount of distributions that would be made to the Unit Holders in the event of the current sale of the Properties at their current appraised value, plus cash reserves less the outstanding balances of the mortgages on the mortgaged Properties and sales expenses (but without consideration to tax consequences of the sale), by (ii) 3,303,387. In February 2008, the Properties were appraised at an aggregate fair market value of $76,650,000 plus cash reserves of $8,715,423. Assuming a sale of the eight properties in February 2008, at the appraised value plus the cash reserves less payment of 3% selling expenses and mortgage debt, the net aggregate proceeds available for distribution to the Unit Holders is estimated to be $57,378,732 or $17.37 per Unit. There can be no assurance that the estimated net asset value could ever be realized. As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership had 3,299 Unit Holders holding 3,303,387 units.
The following table sets forth the distributions per limited partnership unit for each calendar quarter in the last two fiscal years. Distributions were paid in the periods immediately subsequent to the periods in which such distributions were declared.
The Partnership intends to continue to declare quarterly distributions. However, distributions are determined by the General Partner and will depend on the results of the Partnership’s operations.
The Partnership has no equity compensation plans.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes selected financial data for the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
(1) As described in Form 8-K dated March 13, 2007, the Partnership had entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property with a private buyer for the Paradise Village Manufactured Housing Community located in Tampa, Florida. On May 17, 2007, the buyer closed on the purchase for a price of $11,725,000 less closing costs for a net proceeds amount of $11,323,000. The Partnership recognized a gain on sale of property totaling $5,739,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Partnership distributed approximately $3 million from the sale with the balance of the proceeds being maintained in reserve until such time as the General Partner determines the optimal use of the funds. As a result of the sale, the Partnership has classified the Paradise Village community and associated financial results as “discontinued operations” in the accompanying financial statements for all historical periods.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Capital Resources
The capital formation phase of the Partnership began on April 1, 1987 when Sunshine Village and Ardmor Village were purchased by the Partnership and operations commenced. It ended on January 15, 1988 when El Adobe, the Partnership's last property, was purchased. The total capital raised through December 1987 was $66,067,740 of which approximately $58,044,000 was used to purchase the nine Properties after deducting sales commissions, advisory fees and other organization and offering costs.
As described in Item 1, the Partnership borrowed $30,000,000 from GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation in August 1998. The note is payable in monthly installments, including interest at 6.37% through March, 2009, at which point the interest rate will change to 8.37%. Thereafter, the monthly installment and interest rate will be adjusted based on the provisions of the agreement through the note maturity date of September 2028. The Loan was secured by mortgages on the Partnership’s Ardmor Village, Camelot Manor, Dutch Hills, El Adobe, Stonegate Manor, Sunshine Village and West Valley Properties. The Partnership used the proceeds from the Loan to refinance the Partnership’s outstanding indebtedness of $30,045,000, which was incurred in a 1993 mortgage transaction.
Future principal and interest payments under the note are scheduled to be $2,266,536 for 2008, $4,533,072 for 2009 and 2010 combined, $4,533,072 for 2011 and 2012 combined and $36,264,576 thereafter. In addition all excess cash flows, as defined in the agreement, must be applied toward principal after funding of required reserves and payment of normal operating expenses. The Partnership intends to refinance this indebtedness during 2008.
The General Partner acknowledges that the mortgages pose some risks to the Partnership, but believes that such risks are not greater than risks typically associated with real estate financing.
As described in Form 8-K dated March 13, 2007, the Partnership had entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property with a private buyer for the Paradise Village Manufactured Housing Community located in Tampa, Florida. On May 17, 2007, the buyer closed on the purchase for a price of $11,725,000 less closing costs for a net proceeds amount of $11,323,000. The Partnership recognized a gain on sale of property totaling $5,739,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Partnership distributed approximately $3 million from the sale with the balance of the proceeds being maintained in reserve until such time as the General Partner determines the optimal use of the funds. As a result of the sale, the Partnership has classified the Paradise Village community and associated financial results as “discontinued operations” in the accompanying financial statements for all historical periods.
Liquidity
The Partnership has, since inception, generated adequate amounts of cash to meet its operating needs. The Partnership retains cash reserves, which it believes will be adequate to maintain the Properties. All funds in excess of operating needs, amounts sufficient to pay debt service, and cash reserves are distributed to the Unit Holders on a quarterly basis. While the Partnership is not required to maintain a working capital reserve, the Partnership has not distributed all of the cash generated from operations or from the sale of Paradise Village in order to maintain capital reserves. As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership had $8,715,423 in cash balances.
In February of 1994, the Partnership distributed $23,119,767 to the Unit Holders, or $7.00 per $20.00 Unit held. Of this amount, $13,572,978 (or $4.11 per Unit), was applied to the then shortfall in the Unit Holders’ 10.0% cumulative preferred return, and $9,546,789 (or $2.89 per Unit), was a partial return of the Limited Partners' original capital contributions.
Results of Operations
Distributions
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership made distributions to the Unit Holders of $4,030,132, which is equal, on an annualized basis, to a 7.1% return on their adjusted capital contributions ($1.22 per $17.11 Unit). Distributions paid to Unit Holders in 2006 totaled $1,189,219 and $2,675,743 was paid in 2005.
The distributions paid in 2007 were less than the amount required for the annual 10.0% preferred return to the Unit Holders by approximately $1,622,000. As described in Note 8 to the Partnership’s financial statements, the cumulative preferred return deficit through December 2007 was approximately $41,916,000. No distributions can be made to the General Partner in regard to its incentive management interest until the cumulative preferred return deficit has been distributed to the Unit Holders. At December 31, 2007, the unpaid amount to be distributed to the General Partner was approximately $11,659,000.
Revenue and Net Income
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, net income from Continuing Operations was $104,147, $27,523 and $454,798 and gross revenue from Continuing Operations was $9,855,795, $10,623,618 and $11,326,203, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, net income from Discontinued Operations was $5,680,247, $40,412 and $67,433 and gross revenue from Discontinued Operations was $6,558,805, $1,363,518 and $1,516,067, respectively.
Partnership Management
Certain employees of the Partnership are also employees of affiliates of the General Partner. The Partnership paid these employees an aggregate of $160,164, $138,288, and $120,077, in 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively, to perform partnership management and investor relation services for the Partnership.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on various related matters such as derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have any impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 was issued to eliminate the diversity in practice surrounding how public companies quantify financial misstatements. SAB No. 108 requires that registrants quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in a misstated amount that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have any impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. This Statement was to become effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in November 2007, the effective date was partially deferred by the FASB for one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair market value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”), which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of the company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. SFAS 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards, including fair value measurement disclosures in SFAS 157. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of Statement 157. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s financial position and results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
In the course of developing and evaluating accounting policies and procedures, we use estimates, assumptions and judgments to determine the most appropriate methods to be applied. Such processes are used in determining capitalization of costs related to real estate investments and potential impairment of real estate investments.
Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Revenue from the sale of manufactured homes is recognized upon transfer of title at the closing of the sale transactions. Expenditures for property maintenance are charged to operations as incurred, while significant renovations are capitalized. Depreciation of the buildings is recorded on the straight-line method using an estimated useful life of thirty years.
In determining the fair value of real estate investments, the Partnership engaged an independent valuation firm to appraise the fair value of each property using the discounted cash flow or comparable sale methods. These methods consider future cash flow projections on a property by property basis, future capitalization rates, current interest rates and current market conditions of the geographical location of each property. In preparing these financial statements, the Partnership’s management has made its best estimates and judgment of certain amounts included in the financial statements. Nevertheless, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Property Operations
Overall, as illustrated in the table below, the Partnership's eight properties had a combined average occupancy of 54% for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to 59% for the fiscal year December 31, 2006, and 66% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. The average monthly rent (not weighted average) was approximately $435 per home site for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $425 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $418 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The manufactured housing industry in general has experienced lower retail sales over the past three years due to restrictive financing and the ease at which site-built homes can be acquired and financed.
The following table summarizes gross revenues and net operating income for the Partnership and Properties during 2007, 2006, and 2005.
Net Operating Income (“NOI”) is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, plus depreciation, interest expense, partnership management expense, and other expenses. The Partnership believes that NOI is useful to investors and the Partnership’s management as an indication of the Partnership’s ability to service debt and pay cash distributions. NOI presented by the Partnership may not be comparable to NOI reported by other companies that define NOI differently, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2007 to Year Ended December 31,
Total revenues from continuing operations decreased $767,823 to $9,855,795 in 2007, compared to $10,623,618 in 2006. The decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in occupancy, and lower home sale volume from 34 sales in 2006 to sales in 2007. The decrease in occupancy is due primarily to increased foreclosures on home mortgages, which frequently results in the home being moved out of the property and lower new home sales.
The Partnership’s operating expenses from continuing operations decreased $844,447, to $9,751,648 in 2007, compared to $10,596,095 in 2006. With the exception of property tax expense, all expenses decreased in 2007 compared to 2006 due primarily to cost saving initiatives implemented by the Partnership.
As a result of the aforementioned factors, net income from continuing operations increased $76,624 from $27,523 in 2006 to $104,147 in 2007.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2006 to Year Ended December 31, 2005
Total revenues from continuing operations decreased $702,585 to $10,623,618 in 2006, compared to $11,326,203 in 2005. The decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in occupancy due to increased foreclosures on home mortgages, which frequently results in the home being moved out of the property and lower new home sales.
The Partnership’s operating expenses from continuing operations decreased $275,310, to $10,596,095 in 2006, compared to $10,871,405 in 2005. Home sale expense decreased due to the decreased volume of home sales.
As a result of the aforementioned factors, net income from continuing operations decreased $427,275 from $454,798 in 2005 to $27,523 in 2006.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
The General Partner believes it is important to disclose certain recent events to the Unit Holders along with a description of the actions taken by the General Partner to respond to the events.
During 2007, industry conditions remained depressed due to the lack of available retail financing. Reduced retail home sales for manufactured homes and high default rates on chattel mortgage loans for manufactured homes continued through 2007. In addition, the affordability and ease of financing site built homes continued to provide competition for the manufactured housing industry. As a result, occupancy levels have decreased in recent years, and management does not expect a short term turnaround. As lending standards for site built homes begin to tighten because of high default rates in that market, demand for manufactured housing may increase but this increase, if it occurs, may take years to materialize.
The Partnership continued to receive payments from FEMA for the housing of displaced residents due to Hurricane Wilma in 2005 at Sunshine Village, located in Davie, Florida. However, as these residents find permanent housing, the number of sites FEMA paid for has decreased in 2007, and will most likely fall to zero in 2008. The FEMA contract is on a month to month basis and can be cancelled at any time by either FEMA or the Partnership.
As described in Form 8-K dated March 13, 2007, the Partnership had entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property with a private buyer for the Paradise Village Manufactured Housing Community located in Tampa, Florida. On May 17, 2007, the buyer closed on the purchase for a price of $11,725,000 less closing costs for a net proceeds amount of $11,323,000. The Partnership recognized a gain on sale of property totaling $5,739,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The proceeds of the sale will be maintained in reserve until such time as the General Partner determines the optimal use of the funds. As a result of the sale, the Partnership has classified the Paradise Village community and associated financial results as “discontinued operations” in the accompanying financial statements for all historical periods.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Partnership is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowing activities. There is inherent roll over risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the Partnership’s future financing requirements.
Note Payable: At December 31, 2007 the Partnership had a note payable outstanding in the amount of $25,687,191. Interest on this note is at a fixed rate of 6.37% through March 2009, at which time the rate will be reset to 8.37%. This note is collateralized by certain properties within the fund.
The Partnership does not enter into financial instruments transactions for trading or other speculative purposes or to manage its interest rate exposure.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following Partnership’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and supplementary data are filed with this Report:
(i)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(ii)
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and
(iii)
Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
(iv)
Statements of Partners' Equity for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(v)
Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
(vi)
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2007
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There has been no change in the Partnership's independent registered public accounting firm nor have there been any disagreements during the Partnership’s most recent two fiscal years.
ITEM 9A(T).
ITEM 9A(T).
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Partnership maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Partnership’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a - 14(c). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report (the-evaluation date), the Partnership conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a - 14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the evaluation date, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. There has been no change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during its most recently completed quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.
This annual report does not include an attestation report from the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The Partnership, as an entity, does not have any officers or directors. The General Partner, Genesis Associates Limited Partnership is a Michigan limited partnership, of which Uniprop, Inc. is the General Partner.
Information concerning officers of Uniprop, Inc., during the last five years or more is as follows:
Paul M. Zlotoff, 58, became the Chairman of Uniprop, Inc. in May 1986 and was its President from 1979 through 1997. He is also the sole owner of GP P.I. Associates Corp, the general partner of P.I. Associates, the general partner of Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund, a public limited partnership which owns and operates four manufactured housing communities. Mr. Zlotoff currently, and in the past, has acted as the general partner for various other limited partnerships owning manufactured housing communities and some commercial properties.
Joel Schwartz, CPA, 46, became Chief Financial Officer of Uniprop Inc. on June 1, 2004. Mr. Schwartz is responsible for all financial affairs including accounting operations, banking relationships, raising mortgage capital, asset management and investor relations. From 1998 to 2004, Mr. Schwartz was Chief Financial Officer for Village Green Companies. From 1990 to 1998, Mr. Schwartz was Project Manager for Ford Motor Land Services Corporation. Mr. Schwartz was also an Associate at Plante & Moran CPA’s from 1983 to 1989. Mr. Schwartz received his B.A. from Michigan State University in 1983 with a major in accounting and received an MBA from the University of Michigan in 1990.
Jody Burttram, 47, became Independent Director of Genesis Associates in 2007. As Independent Director, Mr. Burttram is responsible for the oversight and approval of management decisions and planning for the Partnership. Currently, Mr. Burttram is Principal of Harbinger Capital Advisors LLC, a boutique investment banking firm located in Orlando, Florida. Mr. Burttram was Chief Operating Officer of Century Capital Markets and CNL Capital Corp. from 1998 to 2005. Previously, Mr. Burttram was Vice President International Banking, First Union National Bank from 1983 to 1992.
Roger Zlotoff, 47, is Vice President and became Chief Operating Officer of Uniprop, Inc. in 2004. He has been with Uniprop since October 18, 1999. Mr. Zlotoff is primarily responsible for raising equity capital, managing partnership investments, evaluating acquisitions of existing properties and leading the development process for new properties. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Zlotoff served as Director of Business Development for Vistana, Inc. in Orlando, FL. Previously, Mr. Zlotoff was Managing Director for Sterling Finance International from 1994 to 1997 and was a corporate banker with First Union National Bank from 1988 to 1994. Mr. Zlotoff received his B.A. from the University of Central Florida as a philosophy major, and received his Masters Degree in International Business from the University of South Carolina.
Paul M. Zlotoff and Roger Zlotoff are brothers.
CODE OF ETHICS
Because the Partnership has no executive officers, the Partnership has not adopted a code of ethics for the Partnership. A code of ethics has been established for the Directors, Officers, and Employees of Uniprop. A copy of the Code of ethics is available at no charge upon request.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership has no executive officers and therefore, no officers received a salary or remuneration exceeding $100,000 during the last fiscal year. The General Partner of the Partnership and an affiliate, Uniprop AM, LLC, received certain compensation and fees during the fiscal year in the amounts described in Item 13. Depending upon the results of operations and other factors, the Partnership anticipates that it will provide similar compensation to the General Partner and Uniprop AM, LLC. during the next fiscal year.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS
The Partnership is a limited partnership duly formed pursuant to the Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, of the State of Michigan. The General Partner, Genesis Associates Limited Partnership, is vested with full authority as to the general management and supervision of business and the other affairs of the Partnership, subject to certain constraints in the Partnership Agreement and consulting agreement. Unit holders have no right to participate in the management of the Partnership and have limited voting privileges only on certain matters of fundamental significance. To the knowledge of the Partnership, no person owns of record or beneficially, more than five percent of the Partnership's Units.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The following discussion describes all of the types of compensation, fees or other distributions paid by the Partnership or others to the General Partner or its affiliates from the operations of the Partnership during the last fiscal year, as well as certain of such items which may be payable during the next fiscal year. Certain of the following arrangements for compensation and fees were not determined by arm's length negotiations between the General Partner, its affiliates and the Partnership.
Paul M. Zlotoff has an interest in the original sellers of Sunshine Village and Ardmor Village and is entitled to share in a contingent purchase price with respect to each Property, when and if the Properties are sold and the sellers become entitled thereto. The maximum amounts which could be payable to Paul M. Zlotoff are as follows: Sunshine Village, $1,108,260 and Ardmor Village, $946,236. The cash purchase price and contingent purchase price for each Property were determined by reference to the average of two independent real estate appraisals which were obtained by the General Partner. Such appraisals are only estimates of value and are not necessarily indicative of the actual real estate value. Each seller will become entitled to any unpaid contingent purchase price upon the sale, financing or other disposition of each such Property, but, only after the receipt by each Unit Holder of aggregate distributions equal to the sum of (i) his 10% cumulative preferred return plus (ii) 125% of his capital contribution. The actual amounts to be received, if any, will depend upon the results of the Partnership's operations and the amounts received upon the sale, financing or other disposition of the Properties and are not determinable at this time. The Partnership does not anticipate any such amount will become payable during the next fiscal year, nor do unpaid amounts carry over from year to year.
The Partnership will pay an Incentive Management Interest to the General Partner for managing the Partnership's affairs, including: determining distributions, negotiating agreements, selling or financing properties, preparing records and reports, and performing other ongoing Partnership responsibilities. This incentive management interest is 15% of distributable cash from operations in any quarter. However, in each quarter, the General Partner's right to receive any net cash from operations is subordinated to the extent necessary to first provide each Unit Holder his 10% cumulative preferred return. During the last fiscal year, the General Partner received no distributions on account of its Incentive Management Interest from operations because distributions were approximately $1,622,000 less than the 10% cumulative preferred return due Unit Holders. Any such amounts of Incentive Management Interest unpaid in a taxable year will be accumulated and paid from distributable cash from capital transactions, but only after each Unit Holder has first received his 10% cumulative preferred return and 125% of his capital contribution. For 2007, approximately $1,110,000 was accumulated for the General Partner, and the General Partner's aggregate accumulated Incentive Management Interest as of December 2007 was $11,659,000. The actual Incentive Management Interest from operations to be accumulated or paid during the next fiscal year will depend upon the results of the Partnership's operations and is not determinable at this time. The Partnership does not anticipate any such amount will be distributed to the General Partner during the next fiscal year and will again be accumulated with payment deferred. No distributions of Incentive Management Interest may be made to the General Partner until the 10% cumulative preferred return of approximately $41,916,000, as of December 31, 2007, is first distributed to the Unit Holders. In February of 1994, as part of the 1993 mortgage financing with mortgage backed securities held with Bankers Trust, $23,119,767 was distributed to the Unit Holders, $13,572,978 of which eliminated the Unit Holders' preferred return deficit through December 31, 1993.
The Partnership must also pay an Incentive Management Interest from capital transactions to the General Partner for its services rendered to the Partnership. The General Partner will be entitled to receive its share of distributable cash from capital transactions after (i) each Unit Holder has received aggregate distributions in an amount equal to the sum of (a) his 10% cumulative preferred return plus (b) 125% of his capital contribution, (ii) any contingent purchase prices have been paid, and (iii) any property disposition fees to Uniprop AM, LLC have been paid. The General Partner's share of distributable cash from capital transactions so payable will be (i) 100% of such distributable cash from capital distributions until the General Partner's share of the aggregate capital distributions made under section 11c(iii) and 11c(v) of the Partnership Agreement equal 25% and (ii) thereafter, 25% of such distributable cash from capital transactions. No Incentive Management Interest from capital transactions was paid to the General Partner for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The Partnership does not anticipate that any such amounts will be paid or become payable to the General Partner during the next fiscal year.
Uniprop AM, LLC received and will receive property management fees for each Property managed by it. Uniprop AM, LLC is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Properties and for the payment of the costs of operating each Property out of the rental income collected. The property management fees are equal to the lesser of 5% of the annual gross receipts from the Properties managed by Uniprop AM, LLC, or the amount which would be payable to an unaffiliated third party for comparable services. During the last fiscal year, Uniprop AM, LLC received property management fees totaling $449,123. The actual amounts to be received during the next fiscal year will depend upon the results of the Partnership's operations and are not determinable at this time.
Certain employees of affiliates of the General Partner were paid an aggregate of $160,164 during 2007 to perform partnership management, and investor relation services for the Partnership. It is anticipated comparable amounts will be paid in the next fiscal year. Uniprop Homes, Inc., a related entity, received commissions totaling $47,221 in 2007 for certain services provided as a broker/dealer of manufactured homes for the communities. Uniprop Homes, Inc. represented the communities in the sale of new and pre-owned homes to community residents.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The Partnership retained BDO Seidman, LLP to audit its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Partnership also retained BDO Seidman, LLP to provide other services in 2007and 2006.
The aggregate fees billed to the Partnership for professional services performed by BDO Seidman, LLP were as follows.
Audit fees: pertain to the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements, including reviews of the interim financial statements contained in the Partnerships Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Tax fees: pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including preparation of tax returns and partners Schedule K-1 processing.
The services performed by BDO Seidman, LLP in 2007 and 2006 were pre-approved by the General Partner.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Financial Statements
(1)
The following financial statements and related documents are filed with this report:
(i)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(ii)
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and
(iii)
Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
(iv)
Statements of Partners' Equity for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(v)
Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
(2)
The following financial statement schedule is filed with this report:
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(3)
Exhibits
The following exhibits are incorporated by reference to the S-11 Registration Statement of the Partnership filed November 12, 1986, as amended on December 22, 1986 and January 16, 1987:
3(a)
Certificate of Limited Partnership for the Partnership
3(b)
Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II Agreement of Limited Partnership
4(a)
First Amendment to Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II Agreement of Limited Partnership (April 1, 1987)
10(a)
Form of Management Agreement between the Partnership and Uniprop AM, LLC.
10(b)
Form of Consulting Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Consultant
The following exhibits are incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997:
4(b)
Form of Beneficial Assignment Certificate (BAC) for the Partnership (Originally submitted with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987.)
10(c)
Contingent Purchase Price Agreement with Sunrise Broward Associates, Ltd. (As last submitted with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.)
10(d)
Contingent Purchase Price Agreement with Ardmor Associates Limited Partnership. (As last submitted with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.)
10(e)
Incentive Acquisition Fee Agreement between the Partnership and Uniprop, Inc. (As last submitted with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.)
The following exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K that was filed on September 8, 1998:
10(f)
Mortgage notes, made as of August 20, 1998, between Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II and GMAC CMC.
The following exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005:
10(g)
Second Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner, and Consultant, January 9,
10(h)
Line of Credit Loan Agreement between the Partnership and National City Bank, October 19, 2005.
The following exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K that was filed on January 17, 2007
10(i)
Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property between Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II and Nelson C. Steiner for the sale of Paradise Village.
The following exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K that was filed on March 13, 2007
10(j)
Termination of Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property between Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II and Nelson C. Steiner for the sale of Paradise Village and Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property between Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II and a private buyer for the sale of Paradise Village.
The following exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K that was filed on May 17, 2007
10(k)
Closure of the Sale of Paradise Village between Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II and a private buyer.
The following exhibits are attached to this Report:
31.1
Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
32.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
99.1
Letter summary of the estimated fair market values of the Partnership's eight manufactured housing communities, as of March 1,
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II, a Michigan Limited Partnership, has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: March 28, 2008
By:
/s/ Susann Szepytowski
Susann Szepytowski
Principal Accounting Officer
(Controller of Uniprop, Inc.)
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
METHOD OF FILING
PAGE
3(a)
Certificate of Limited Partnership for the Partnership
Incorporated by reference to the S-11 Registration Statement of the Partnership filed November 12, 1986, as amended on December 22, 1986 and January 16, 1987 (the "Registration Statement").
3(b)
Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II Agreement of Limited Partnership
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement.
4(a)
First Amendment to Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II Agreement of Limited Partnership (April 1, 1987)
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement.
4(b)
Form of Beneficial Assignment Certificate (BAC) for the Partnership (originally filed with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
10(a)
Form of Management Agreement between the Partnership and Uniprop AM, LLC
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement.
10(b)
Form of Consulting Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Consultant
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement.
10(c)
Contingent Purchase Price Agreement with Sunrise Broward Associates, Ltd. (originally filed with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
10(d)
Contingent Purchase Price Agreement with Ardmor Associates Limited Partnership (originally filed with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
10(e)
Incentive Acquisition Fee Agreement between the Partnership and Uniprop, Inc. (originally filed with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
10(f)
Mortgage Notes, made on August 20, 1998 between Uniprop Manufactured Home Communities Income Fund II and GMAC CMC
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on September 8, 1998.
10(g)
Second Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Consultant January 9, 2005
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
10(h)
Line of Credit Loan Agreement between the Partnership and National City Bank October 19, 2006
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
10(i)
Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property for the sale of Paradise Village January 17, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2007.
10(j)
Termination of Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property for the sale of Paradise Village January 17, 2007. Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property for the sale of Paradise Village March 13, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2007.
10(k)
Closure of the Sale of Paradise Village May 17, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2007.
31.1
Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed herewith.
31.2
Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed herewith.
*32.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed herewith.
*32.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed herewith.
99.1
Letter summary of the estimated fair market values of the Partnership's eight manufactured housing communities, as of March 1, 2008.
Filed herewith.
* This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Partnership, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants
West Big Beaver, Suite 1900
Troy, Michigan 48084-4906
Telephone: (248) 362-2100
Fax: (248) 362-4459
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II (a Michigan limited partnership), as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income, partners’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed under Item 15 of Form 10-K. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
Troy, Michigan
March 14,
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Balance Sheets
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Statements of Income
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Statements of Partners’ Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Statements of Cash Flows
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
1.
Summary of Accounting Policies
Organization and Business
Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II, a Michigan Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) acquired, maintains, operates and will ultimately dispose of income producing residential real properties consisting of nine (eight after the 2007 sale of one property) manufactured housing communities (the “properties”) located in Florida, Michigan, Nevada and Minnesota. The Partnership was organized and formed under the laws of the State of Michigan on November 7, 1986.
In accordance with its Prospectus dated December 1986, the Partnership sold 3,303,387 units of beneficial assignment of limited partnership interest (“Units”) for $66,068,000. The Partnership purchased nine properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $56,000,000. Three of the properties costing approximately $16,008,000 were previously owned by entities which were affiliates of the general partner.
The general partner is Genesis Associates Limited Partnership. Uniprop Beneficial Corporation was the initial limited partner who assigned to those persons purchasing units a beneficial limited partnership interest when the minimum numbers of units were sold.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of (1) assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and (2) revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash, accounts payable and notes payable approximate their fair values.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over a period of thirty years except for furniture and equipment which is depreciated over a period ranging from three to ten years.
Accumulated depreciation for tax purposes was $26,777,000 and $30,307,000 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Long-lived assets such as property and equipment are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of these assets. When any such impairment exists, the related assets will be written down to fair value.
Manufactured Homes and Improvements
Manufactured homes and improvements are stated at the lower of cost or market and represent manufactured homes held for sale. No reserve was considered necessary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Financing Costs
Costs to obtain financing have been capitalized and are amortized using the straight-line method over the 30-year term of the related mortgage note payable.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income attributable to leases is recorded when due from the lessees. Revenue from the sale of manufactured homes is recognized upon transfer of title at the closing of the sale transactions.
Other Revenue
Other revenue consists of interest income, rental late fees, utility charges and miscellaneous income. Income from utility charges is recognized based upon actual monthly usage.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
Income Taxes
Federal income tax regulations provide that any taxes on income of a partnership are payable by the partners as individuals. Therefore, no provision for such taxes has been made at the partnership level.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on various related matters such as derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have any impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 was issued to eliminate the diversity in practice surrounding how public companies quantify financial misstatements. SAB No. 108 requires that registrants quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in a misstated amount that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have any impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. This Statement was to become effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in November 2007, the effective date was partially deferred by the FASB for one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair market value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”), which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of the company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. SFAS 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards, including fair value measurement disclosures in SFAS 157. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of Statement 157. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s financial position and results of operations.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
2.
Other Assets
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, “Other Assets” included cash of approximately $237,000 and $168,000, respectively, in an escrow account for property taxes, insurance, and capital improvements, as required by the Partnership’s note payable agreement. The cash is restricted from operating use.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, “Other assets” also included cash of approximately $123,000 and $123,000 in a security deposit escrow account for three of the Partnership’s properties, which is required by the laws of the state in which they are located and is restricted from operating use. Also included are accounts receivable of $993,000 and $883,000 and prepaid costs of $116,000 and $270,000, respectively.
3.
Note Payable
In 1998, the Partnership entered into a $30,000,000 note payable agreement. The borrowings are secured by mortgages on most of the Partnership's properties. The note is payable in monthly installments of $188,878, including interest at 6.37%, through March, 2009, at which point the rate will be adjusted to 8.37%. Thereafter, the monthly installment and interest rate will be adjusted based on the provisions of the agreement through the note maturity date of September 2028.
Future maturities on the note payable for the next five years and thereafter are as follows: 2008 - $622,000; 2009 - $305,000; 2010 - $208,000; 2011 - $226,000; and 2012 - $245,000; and thereafter - $24,081,000. The Partnership intends to refinance this note during 2008.
4.
Line-of-Credit
The Partnership had a $1,500,000 renewable line of credit with a bank that expired in October 2007. This line of credit was not renewed. There was no outstanding balance at December 31, 2006.
5.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities consisted of:
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
6.
Related Party Transactions
Management Agreement
The Partnership has an agreement with an affiliate of the general partner to manage the properties owned by the Partnership. The management agreement is automatically renewable annually, but may be terminated by either party upon sixty days written notice. The property management fee is the lesser of 5% of annual gross receipts from the properties managed, or the amount which would be payable to an unaffiliated third party for comparable services.
Fees and Expenses
During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the affiliate earned property management fees from continuing operations of $427,000, $467,000, and $477,000, respectively, as permitted in the Agreement of Limited Partnership. These fees are included with “Administrative” expenses in the respective statements of income. The Partnership was owed $5,600 and $14,900 by the affiliate at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Contingent Purchase Price
A general partner of Genesis Associates Limited Partnership has an interest in the sellers of two of the properties acquired by the Partnership and is entitled to share in a contingent purchase price that will not exceed $2,054,000. Additional amounts to be paid, if any, will depend upon the results of the Partnership's operations and the amounts received upon the sale, financing or other disposition of the related properties, and are not determinable at this time. The Partnership does not anticipate any such amount will become payable during the next fiscal year.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
7.
Reconciliation of Financial Statement Income and Taxable Income
8.
Partners’ Capital
Subject to the orders of priority under certain specified conditions more fully described in the Agreement of Limited Partnership, distributions of partnership funds and allocations of net income from operations are principally determined as follows:
Distributions
Distributable cash from operations in the Agreement (generally defined as net income plus depreciation and amortization) is to be distributed to unit holders until they have received a 10% cumulative preferred return. After the unit holders have received their 10% cumulative preferred return, all remaining cash from operations is distributed to the general partner in the form of an incentive management interest until the total amount received by the general partner is equal to 15% of the aggregate amount of cash distributed from operations in a given year. Amounts payable to but not paid to the general partner will be accumulated and paid from future capital transactions after the unit holders have first received their 10% preferred return and 125% of their capital contributions. Thereafter, 85% of distributable cash from operations is to be paid to the unit holders and 15% to the general partner.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
Annual distributable cash from operations was less than the amount required for the annual 10% preferred return to the unit holders by approximately $1,622,000, $4,463,000, and $2,976,000 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No distributions can be made to the general partner until the cumulative preferred return deficit of approximately $41,916,000 as of December 31, 2007 has been distributed to the unit holders.
At December 31, 2007, the general partner’s cumulative incentive management interest to be distributed was approximately $11,659,000. The actual amount to be accumulated or paid in the future depends on the results of the Partnership’s operations and is not currently determinable; however, no such distribution to the general partner is anticipated during fiscal year 2008.
Allocation of Net Income
Net income is principally allocated 99% to the unit holders and 1% to the general partner until the cumulative amount of net income allocated to the unit holders equals the aggregate cumulative amount of cash distributable to the unit holders. After sufficient net income has been allocated to the unit holders to equal the amount of cash distributable to them, all the net income is to be allocated to the general partner until it equals the amount of cash distributed to it.
9.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Interest paid during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $1,680,000, $1,716,000, and $1,751,000, respectively.
10.
Discontinued Operations
As described in Form 8-K dated March 13, 2007, the Partnership had entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real and Personal Property with a private buyer for the Paradise Village Manufactured Housing Community located in Tampa, Florida. On May 17, 2007, the buyer closed on the purchase for a price of $11,725,000 less closing costs for a net proceeds amount of $11,323,000. The Partnership recognized a gain on sale of property totaling $5,739,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The proceeds of the sale will be maintained in reserve until such time as the general partner determines the optimal use of the funds. As a result of the sale, the Partnership has classified the Paradise Village community and associated financial results as “discontinued operations” in the accompanying financial statements for all years presented.
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
The major classes of assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations included in the accompanying balance sheets were as follows:
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
11.
Interim Results (Unaudited)
The following summary represents the unaudited results of operations of the Partnership, expressed in thousands except per unit amounts, for the periods from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007:
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
12.
Contingencies
On January 17, 2008, a Housing Discrimination Complaint was filed with the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This action is specifically in relation to the Partnership’s West Valley property located in Las Vegas, NV. At this time, an investigation has been ordered, and no determination has been made as to whether the complaint has any merit. No amounts have been provided for this matter as of December 31, 2007.
Uniprop Manufactured
Housing Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund II
(a Michigan limited partnership)
Notes to Schedule III
December 31, 2007
1.
Reconciliation of Land
The following table reconciles the land from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007:
2.
Reconciliation of Buildings and Improvements
The following table reconciles the buildings and improvements from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007:
3.
Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation
The following table reconciles the accumulated depreciation from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007:
4.
Tax Basis of Buildings and Improvements
The aggregate cost of buildings and improvements for federal income tax purposes is equal to the cost basis used for financial statements purposes.