ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana on February 8, 1983. As used herein, the term “Company” refers to Lakeland Financial Corporation, or if the context dictates, Lakeland Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lake City Bank (the “Bank”), an Indiana state bank headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana. Also included in the consolidated financial statements prior to December 27, 2006 is LCB Investments, Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake City Bank, which is a Bermuda corporation that managed a portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio. On December 27, 2006, all securities were transferred to Lake City Bank from LCB Investments, Limited. On December 18, 2006, LCB Investments II, Inc. was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake City Bank incorporated in Nevada and it began managing a portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio in January 2007. On December 21, 2006, LCB Funding, Inc., a real estate investment trust, incorporated in Maryland was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of LCB Investments II. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
General
Company’s Business. The Company is a bank holding company as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company owns all of the outstanding stock of Lake City Bank, Warsaw, Indiana, a full-service commercial bank organized under Indiana law. The Bank recognizes a wholly-owned subsidiary, LCB Investments II, which manages a portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio. The Company conducts no business except that incident to its ownership of the outstanding stock of the Bank and the operation of the Bank.
The Bank’s deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank’s activities cover all phases of commercial banking, including checking accounts, savings accounts, time deposits, the sale of securities under agreements to repurchase, commercial and agricultural lending, direct and indirect consumer lending, commercial and residential real estate mortgage lending, retail and merchant credit card services, corporate cash management services, retirement services, bond administration, safe deposit box service and trust and brokerage services.
The Bank’s main banking office is located at 202 East Center Street, Warsaw, Indiana. As of December 31, 2007, the Bank had 43 offices in twelve counties throughout northern Indiana.
Bank’s Business. The Bank was originally organized in 1872 and has continuously operated under the laws of the State of Indiana since its organization. The Bank’s activities cover all phases of commercial banking, including checking accounts, savings accounts, time deposits, the sale of securities under agreements to repurchase, commercial and agricultural lending, direct and indirect consumer lending, commercial and residential real estate mortgage lending, retail and merchant credit card services, corporate cash management services, retirement services, bond administration, safe deposit box services and trust and brokerage services. The interest rates for both deposits and loans, as well as the range of services provided, are consistent with those of all banks competing within the Bank’s service area.
The Bank competes for loans principally through a high degree of customer contact, timely loan review and approval, market-driven competitive loan pricing and the Bank’s reputation throughout the region. The Bank believes that its convenience, quality service and high touch, responsive approach to banking enhances its ability to compete favorably in attracting and retaining individual and business customers. The Bank actively solicits deposit-related customers and competes for customers by offering personal attention, professional service and competitive interest rates.
Market Overview. While the Company operates in twelve counties, it currently defines operations by four primary geographical markets. They are the South Region, which includes Kosciusko and portions of contiguous counties; the North Region, which includes portions of Elkhart and St. Joseph Counties, the Central Region, which includes portions of Elkhart County and contiguous counties; and the East Region, which includes Allen and contiguous counties. The South Region includes the city of Warsaw, which is the location of the Company’s headquarters. The Company has had a presence in this region since 1872. It has been in the North and Central Regions, which includes the cities of Elkhart, South Bend and Goshen, since 1990. The Company opened its first office in the East Region, which includes the cities of Fort Wayne and Auburn, in 1999. The Company also operates a loan production office in Indianapolis, which is staffed by a commercial loan officer and was opened in 2006.
The Company believes that these are well-established and fairly diverse economic regions. The Company’s markets include a mix of industrial and service companies with no business or industry concentrations. Furthermore, no single industry or employer dominates any of the markets. Fort Wayne represents the largest population center served by the Company’s full-service branch system with a population of 206,000, according to 2000 U.S. Census Bureau data. South Bend, with a 2000 population of 108,000, is the second largest city served by the Company. Elkhart, with a 2000 population of 52,000, is the third largest city that the Company currently serves. As a result of the presence of offices in twelve counties that are widely dispersed, no single city or industry represents an undue concentration. In addition, the Indianapolis market represents a substantial future opportunity given its position as the largest metropolitan market in the state.
Expansion Strategy. The Company’s expansion strategy is driven primarily by the potential for increased penetration in existing markets where opportunities for market share growth exists. Additionally, management considers growth in new markets with a close geographic proximity to its current operations. These markets are considered when the Company believes they would be receptive to its strategic plan to deliver broad based financial services with a commitment to local communities. Since the early 1990’s, the Company has focused on growth through de novo branching in locations that management believes have potential for creating new market opportunities or for further penetrating existing markets. The Company also acquired the Fort Wayne, Indiana office of Indiana Capital Management Bank & Trust in late 2003 to augment the existing wealth advisory and investment management business and further penetrate the Fort Wayne market. In late 2005, the Company added significant capabilities to the wealth advisory and investment management business in Fort Wayne with the addition of three seasoned trust professionals. The Company opened a new branch facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana in late 2007 to house the Company’s Fort Wayne based Wealth Advisory Services and to serve the south western market of Fort Wayne. The new location is a full-service branch facility. As noted earlier, the Company entered the Indianapolis market in 2006 and anticipates that it will expand in the future with full-service banking locations. In new markets, the Company believes it is critical to attract experienced local management with a similar philosophy in order to provide a basis for success.
The Company also considers opportunities beyond current markets when the Company’s Board of Directors and management believes that the opportunity will provide a desirable strategic fit without posing undue risk. The Company does not currently have any definitive understandings or agreements for any acquisitions or de novo expansion, other than the Indianapolis market.
Products and Services. The Company is a full-service commercial bank and provides commercial, retail, wealth advisory and investment management services to its customers. Commercial products include commercial loans and technology-driven solutions to commercial customers’ cash management needs such as internet business banking and on-line cash management services in addition to retirement services, bond administration and health savings account services. Retail banking clients are provided a wide array of traditional retail banking services, including lending, deposit and investment services. Retail lending programs are focused on mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and traditional retail installment loans, including indirect automotive financing. The Company provides credit card services to retail and commercial customers through an outsourced retail card program and merchant processing activity. The Company also has an Honors Private Banking program that is positioned to serve the more financially sophisticated customer with a menu including investment management and trust services, executive mortgage programs and access to financial planning seminars and programs. The Bank’s Prospero Program is dedicated to serving the expanding financial needs of the Latino community. The Company provides wealth advisory clients with traditional personal and corporate trust and investment services. The Company also provides retail brokerage services, including an array of financial and investment products such as annuities and life insurance.
Forward-looking Statements
This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The factors, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries are detailed in the “Risk Factors” section included under Item 1a.
ITEM 1a. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, shareholders or prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors:
Our business is concentrated in and dependent upon the continued growth and welfare of our primary market areas.
We operate primarily in four geographical markets, all of which are located in Northern Indiana and are further described in the “Business” section included under Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-K. We have developed a particularly strong presence in the South Region, which includes Kosciusko County and portions of contiguous counties, the North Region, which includes portions of Elkhart and St. Joseph County, and the Central Region, which includes portions of Elkhart County and contiguous counties. These regions represent the more mature markets. In addition, we have experienced rapid growth in the East Region, which includes Allen and DeKalb Counties. The Company also operates a loan production office in Indianapolis, which is staffed by a commercial loan officer and was opened in 2006. Our success depends upon the business activity, population, income levels, deposits and real estate activity in these markets. Although our customers’ business and financial interests may extend well beyond these market areas, adverse economic conditions that affect these market areas could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans to us and generally affect our financial condition and results of operations. Because of our geographic concentration, we are less able than other regional or national financial institutions to diversify our credit risks across multiple markets.
We may experience difficulties in managing our growth and our growth strategy involves risks that may negatively impact our net income.
As part of our general growth strategy, we may expand into additional communities or attempt to strengthen our position in our current markets by opening new branches and acquiring existing branches of other financial institutions. To the extent that we undertake additional branch openings and acquisitions, we are likely to continue to experience the effects of higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations, which may have an adverse effect on our levels of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets. Other effects of engaging in such growth strategies may include potential diversion of our management’s time and attention and general disruption to our business.
Although we do not have any current plans to do so, we may also acquire banks and related businesses that we believe provide a strategic fit with our business. We may also engage in de novo bank formations as we have in the past and intend to do in the Indianapolis market in the future. To the extent that we grow through acquisitions and de novo bank formations, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately and profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks and businesses will involve similar risks to those commonly associated with branching, but may also involve additional risks, including:
•
potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of banks and businesses we acquire;
•
exposure to potential asset quality issues of the acquired bank or related business;
•
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of banks and businesses we acquire; and
•
the possible loss of key employees and customers of the banks and businesses we acquire.
The banking and financial services business in our market is highly competitive. Our competitors include large regional banks, local community banks, savings and loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market mutual funds, credit unions, farm credit services and other non-bank financial service providers. Many of these competitors are not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as we are and are able to provide customers with a feasible alternative to traditional banking services.
Increased competition in our market may also result in a decrease in the amounts of our loans and deposits, reduced spreads between loan rates and deposit rates or loan terms that are more favorable to the borrower. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow and remain profitable. If increased competition causes us to significantly discount the interest rates we offer on loans or increase the amount we pay on deposits, our net interest income could be adversely impacted. If increased competition causes us to relaxour underwriting standards, we could be exposed to higher losses from lending activities. Additionally, many of our
competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and larger lending limits and offer a broader range of financial services than we can offer.
Our profitability is significantly driven by the spread between the interest rates earned on investments and loans and the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Like most banking institutions, our net interest spread and margin will be affected by general economic conditions and other factors, including fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government, that influence market interest rates and our ability to respond to changes in such rates. At any given time, our assets and liabilities will be such that they are affected differently by a given change in interest rates. As a result, an increase or decrease in rates, the length of loan terms or the mix of adjustable and fixed rate loans in our portfolio could have a positive or negative effect on our net income, capital and liquidity. We measure interest rate risk under various rate scenarios and using specific criteria and assumptions. A summary of this process, along with the results of our net interest income simulations is presented at “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included under Item 7a of Part II of this Form 10-K. Although we believe our current level of interest rate sensitivity is reasonable and effectively managed, significant fluctuations in interest rates may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, risks of nonpayment, risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral and risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions. We attempt to minimize our credit risk through prudent loan application approval procedures, careful monitoring of the concentration of our loans within specific industries, a centralized credit administration department and periodic independent reviews of outstanding loans by our loan review department. However, we cannot assure you that such approval and monitoring procedures will reduce these credit risks.
The majority of the Bank’s loan portfolio is invested in commercial and commercial real estate loans. These loans represent higher dollar volumes to fewer customers. As a result, we may assume greater lending risks than other community banking-type financial institutions that have a lesser concentration of such loans and are more retail oriented. Our lending activity and the risks commonly associated with such lending are further described in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” section included under Item 7 of Part II of this Form 10-K.
Commercial and industrial and agri-business loans were $1.241 billion, or approximately 81% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2007. Our commercial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Most often, this collateral is accounts receivable, inventory, machinery or real estate. Credit support provided by the borrower for most of these loans and the probability of repayment is based on the liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement of a personal guarantee, if any exists. Whenever possible, we require a personal guarantee on commercial loans. As a result, in the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. The collateral securing other loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.
Our loan portfolio has a large concentration of commercial real estate loans, which involve risks specific to real estate value.
Real estate lending (including commercial, construction, and, to a much lesser extent, residential) is a large portion of our loan portfolio. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Although a significant portion of such loans are secured by real estate as a secondary form of collateral, continued adverse developments affecting real estate values in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio. Additionally, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the control of the borrower or lender could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties.
If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then we may not be able to realize the amount of security that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for loan losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
At December 31, 2007, consumer loans totaled $50.5 million, or 3%, of our total loan and lease portfolio. Consumer loans typically have shorter terms and lower balances with higher yields as compared to one-to four-family residential loans, but generally carry higher risks of default. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on these loans.
Our allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb potential losses in our loan portfolio.
We established our allowance for loan losses pursuant to our established guidelines and practices and maintain it at a level considered adequate by management to absorb loan losses that are inherent in the portfolio. The amount of future loan losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, which may be beyond our control, and such losses may exceed current estimates. At December 31, 2007, our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.04% and as a percentage of total non-performing loans was 212%. Although management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable incurred losses on any existing loans, we cannot predict loan losses with certainty, and we cannot assure you that our allowance for loan losses will prove sufficient to cover actual loan losses in the future. Loan losses in excess of our reserves may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional information regarding our allowance for loan losses and the methodology we use to determine an appropriate level of reserves is located in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” section included under Item 7 of Part II of this Form 10-K.
Our continued pace of growth may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.
We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. We anticipate that our existing capital resources will satisfy our capital requirements for the foreseeable future. However, we may at some point need to raise additional capital to support our continued growth. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth, branching, de novo bank formations and/or acquisitions could be materially impaired.
Our community banking strategy relies heavily on our management team, and the unexpected loss of key managers may adversely affect our operations.
Much of our success to date has been influenced strongly by our ability to attract and to retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services and familiar with the communities in our market areas. Our ability to retain executive officers, the current management teams, branch managers and loan officers of our bank subsidiary will continue to be important to the successful implementation of our strategy. It is also critical, as we grow, to be able to attract and retain qualified additional management and loan officers with the appropriate level of experience and knowledge about our market areas to implement our community-based operating strategy. The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and are subject to supervision and regulation by a number of governmental regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions. Regulations adopted by these agencies, which are generally intended to provide protection for depositors and customers rather than for the benefit of shareholders, govern a comprehensive range of matters relating to ownership and control of our shares, our acquisition of other companies and businesses, permissible activities for us to engage in, maintenance of adequate
capital levels and other aspects of our operations. These bank regulators possess broad authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law. The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at any time and we cannot predict the effects of these changes on our business and profitability. Increased regulation could increase our cost of compliance and adversely affect profitability. For example, new legislation or regulation may limit the manner in which we may conduct our business, including our ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans and achieve satisfactory interest spreads.
We have a continuing need for technological change and we may not have the resources to effectively implement new technology.
The financial services industry is constantly undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our market areas. Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products to those that we will be able to offer, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, we cannot provide you with assurance that we will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to our customers.
There is a limited trading market for our common shares, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price shareholders paid for them.
Although our common shares are listed for trading on the Global Select Market of the NASDAQ Stock Market, the trading in our common shares has less liquidity than many other companies quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the market of willing buyers and sellers of our common shares at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. We cannot assure you that volume of trading in our common shares will increase in the future.
System failure or breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.
The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event, as well as from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems caused by hackers. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us and may cause existing and potential customers to refrain from doing business with us. Although we, with the help of third-party service providers, intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to prevent such damage, there can be no assurance that these security measures will be successful. In addition, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we and our third-party service providers use to encrypt and protect customer transaction data. A failure of such security measures could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud and data processing system failures and errors.
Employee errors and misconduct could subject us to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm our reputation. Misconduct by our employees could include hiding unauthorized activities from us, improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of our customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject us to financial claims for negligence.
We maintain a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. Should our internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If LCB Funding, Inc. fails to qualify as a real estate investment trust, we may be subject to a higher consolidated effective tax rate.
The Bank holds certain commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans and other loans, and mortgage-backed investment securities in a real estate investment trust through its wholly-owned subsidiary LCB Investments II, Inc., which is incorporated in Nevada. Qualification as a real estate investment trust involves application of specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to various asset tests. If LCB Funding, Inc. fails to meet any of the required provisions for real estate investment trusts, or there are changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof, it could no longer qualify as a real estate investment trust and the resulting tax consequences would increase our effective tax rate or cause us to have a tax liability for prior years.
ITEM 1b.
ITEM 1b. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Location
Main/Headquarters
202 East Center St.
Warsaw
IN
Warsaw Drive-up
East Center St.
Warsaw
IN
Akron
102 East Rochester
Akron
IN
Argos
100 North Michigan
Argos
IN
Auburn
1220 East 7th St.
Auburn
IN
Bremen
1600 State Road 331
Bremen
IN
Columbia City
601 Countryside Dr.
Columbia City
IN
Concord
4202 Elkhart Rd.
Goshen
IN
Cromwell
111 North Jefferson St.
Cromwell
IN
Elkhart Beardsley
864 East Beardsley St.
Elkhart
IN
Elkhart East
22050 State Road 120
Elkhart
IN
Elkhart Hubbard Hill
58404 State Road 19
Elkhart
IN
Elkhart Northwest
1208 North Nappanee St.
Elkhart
IN
Fort Wayne North
302 East DuPont Rd.
Fort Wayne
IN
Fort Wayne Northeast
10411 Maysville Rd.
Fort Wayne
IN
Fort Wayne Southwest
10429 Illinois Rd.
Fort Wayne
IN
Fort Wayne Jefferson Blvd
6851 W. Jefferson Blvd.
Fort Wayne
IN
Goshen Downtown
102 North Main St.
Goshen
IN
Goshen South
2513 South Main St.
Goshen
IN
Granger
12830 State Road 23
Granger
IN
Huntington
1501 North Jefferson St.
Huntington
IN
Kendallville East
631 Professional Way
Kendallville
IN
LaGrange
901 South Detroit
LaGrange
IN
Ligonier Downtown
222 South Cavin St.
Ligonier
IN
Ligonier South
1470 U.S. Highway 33 South
Ligonier
IN
Medaryville
Main St.
Medaryville
IN
Mentone
202 East Main St.
Mentone
IN
Middlebury
712 Wayne Ave.
Middlebury
IN
Milford
State Road 15 North
Milford
IN
Mishawaka
5015 North Main St.
Mishawaka
IN
Nappanee
202 West Market St.
Nappanee
IN
North Webster
644 North Main St.
North Webster
IN
Pierceton
202 South First St.
Pierceton
IN
Plymouth
862 East Jefferson St.
Plymouth
IN
Rochester
507 East 9th St.
Rochester
IN
Shipshewana
895 North Van Buren St.
Shipshewana
IN
Silver Lake
102 Main St.
Silver Lake
IN
South Bend Northwest
21113 Cleveland Rd.
South Bend
IN
Syracuse
502 South Huntington
Syracuse
IN
Warsaw East
3601 Commerce Dr.
Warsaw
IN
Warsaw North
420 Chevy Way
Warsaw
IN
Warsaw West
1221 West Lake St.
Warsaw
IN
Winona Lake
99 Chestnut St.
Winona Lake
IN
Winona Lake East
1324 Wooster Rd.
Winona Lake
IN
The Company leases from third parties the real estate and buildings for its Milford and Winona Lake East offices. In addition, the Company leases the real estate for its four freestanding ATMs. All the other branch facilities are owned by the Company. The Company also owns parking lots in downtown Warsaw for the use and convenience of Company employees and customers, as well as leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture and fixtures necessary to operate the banking facilities.
In addition, the Company owns buildings at 110 South High St., Warsaw, Indiana, and 114-118 East Market St., Warsaw, Indiana, which it uses for various offices, a building at 113 East Market St., Warsaw, Indiana, which it uses for office and computer facilities, and a building at 109 South Buffalo St., Warsaw, Indiana, which it uses for training and development. The Company also leases from third parties facilities in Warsaw, Indiana, for property management facilities, in Elkhart, Indiana, for computer facilities and office space in Indianapolis, Indiana, for a loan production office.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business to which the Company and the Bank are a party or of which any of their property is subject.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
* The trading ranges are the high and low prices as obtained from The Nasdaq Stock Market.
** Share and per share data has been adjusted for a 2-for-1 stock split on April 28, 2006.
The common stock of the Company began being quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol LKFN in August, 1997. On December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately 458 shareholders of record and estimates that it has approximately 2,200 shareholders in total.
The Company paid dividends as set forth in the table above. The Company’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders is largely dependent upon the dividends it receives from the Bank, and the Bank is subject to regulatory limitations on the amount of cash dividends it may pay. See “Business - Supervision and Regulation - The Company - Dividend Payments” and “Business - Supervision and Regulation - The Bank - Dividend Payments” for a more detailed description of these limitations.
The following table provides information about purchases by the Company and its affiliates during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The shares purchased during the periods were credited to the deferred share accounts of seven non-employee directors under the Company’s directors’ deferred compensation plan.
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The stock price performance graph below shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
The graph below compares the cumulative total return of the Company, the Nasdaq Market Index and a peer group index.
* Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2001 and dividends were reinvested.
The peer group indexis comprised of all financial institution holding companies in the United States with total assets between $1.0 billion and $3.0 billion dollars whose equity securities were traded on an exchange or national quotation service.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
*Share and per share data have been adjusted for a 2-for-1 stock split on April 28, 2006.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (continued)
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Lakeland Financial Corporation is the holding company for Lake City Bank. The Company is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana and operates 43 offices in twelve counties in northern Indiana and a loan production office in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Company earned $19.2 million for the year 2007 versus $18.7 million for 2006, an increase of 2.6%. The increase was driven primarily by a $2.2 million increase in net interest income and a $1.3 million increase in noninterest income. In addition, the Company’s effective tax rate decreased to 30.3% for 2007 compared to 33.7% for 2006. Offsetting these positive impacts was a $2.5 million increase in noninterest expense and a $1.7 million increase in the provision for loan losses. The Company earned $18.7 million for the year 2006 versus $18.0 million for 2005, an increase of 4.3%. The increase was driven primarily by a $2.1 million increase in net interest income and a $553,000 increase in noninterest income. Offsetting these positive impacts was a $1.7 million increase in noninterest expense and a $164,000 increase in the provision for loan losses.
Basic earnings per share for the year 2007 was $1.58 per share versus $1.55 per share for 2006 and $1.51 for 2005. Diluted earnings per share for the year ended 2007 was $1.55 per share versus $1.51 per share for the year ended 2006 and $1.46 for the year ended 2005. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilutive impact of stock options granted under an employee stock option plan.
The Company’s total assets were $1.989 billion as of December 31, 2007 versus $1.837 billion as of December 31, 2006, an increase of $152.4 million or 8.3%. This increase was primarily due to a $154.2 million increase in commercial loans from $1.086 billion at December 31, 2006 to $1.241 billion at December 31, 2007.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
versus 2006
The Company reported record net income of $19.2 million in 2007, an increase of $490,000, or 2.6%, versus net income of $18.7 million in 2006. Net interest income increased $2.2 million, or 4.3%, to $54.6 million versus $52.3 million in 2006. Net interest income increased primarily due to increases in average earning assets, particularly a 14% increase in commercial loans as a result of our strategic focus on commercial lending. Interest income increased $12.4 million, or 11.8%, from $105.6 million in 2006 to $118.0 million in 2007. The increase was driven primarily by increases in average earning assets, as well as a 14 basis point increase in the tax equivalent yield on average earning assets over the year. Interest expense increased $10.2 million, or 19.2%, from $53.2 million in 2006 to $63.4 million in 2007. The increase was primarily the result of a 36 basis point increase in the Company’s daily cost of funds over the year. The Company had a net interest margin of 3.22% in 2007 versus 3.38% in 2006. Average earning assets increased by $148.7 million from $1.6 billion in 2006 to $1.7 billion in 2007. This loan
growth was led by significant growth in Elkhart and Allen Counties and with balanced growth in the Bank’s other regions. Deposits increased to fund the loan growth during 2007, driven primarily by increases of $23.9 million in average brokered deposit balances, $20.5 million in interest bearing transaction accounts and $39.1 million in average other time deposit account balances. Management believes that the growth in the loan portfolio will likely continue in a measured fashion as a result of our strategic focus on commercial lending and in conjunction with the general expansion and penetration of the geographical markets the Company serves, as well as our expansion in the Indianapolis market.
Nonaccrual loans were $7.0 million, or 0.46% of total loans, at year end versus $13.8 million, or 1.02% of total loans, at the end of 2006. There were five relationships totaling $6.7 million classified as impaired as of December 31, 2007 versus five relationships totaling $13.3 million at the end of 2006. The decrease in impaired and nonperforming loans resulted from the transfer to other real estate of a single borrowing relationship, a residential and commercial real estate developer. Net charge-offs were $3.0 million in 2007 versus $955,000 in 2006, representing 0.21% and 0.08% of average daily loans in 2007 and 2006. Total nonperforming loans were $7.4 million, or 0.49% of total loans, at year end 2007 versus $14.1 million, or 1.04% of total loans, at the end of 2006. The provision for loan loss expense was $4.3 million in 2007, resulting in an allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2007 of $15.8 million, which represented 1.04% of the loan portfolio, versus a provision for loan loss expense of $2.6 million in 2006 and an allowance for loan losses of $14.5 million at the end of 2006, or 1.07% of the loan portfolio. The higher provision in 2007 versus 2006 was attributable to a number of factors, but was primarily a result of an increase in net charge-offs, general growth in the loan portfolio, as well as higher allocations on specific watch list credits. The level of loan loss provision is also influenced by other factors related to the growth in the loan portfolio, such as emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentration, new industry lending activity, general economic conditions and historical loss percentages. In addition, management gives consideration to changes in the allocation for specific watch list credits in determining the appropriate level of the loan loss provision. Management’s overall view on current credit quality was also a factor in the determination of the provision for loan losses. The Company’s management continues to monitor the adequacy of the provision based on loan levels, asset quality, economic conditions and other factors that may influence the assessment of the collectability of loans.
Noninterest income was $19.6 million in 2007 versus $18.3 million in 2006, an increase of $1.3 million, or 7.2%. The 2007 increase was driven by a $592,000, or 23.2%, increase in wealth advisory fees. Additionally, noninterest income increased due to a $201,000, or 15.6%, increase in investment brokerage fees. Merchant card fee income increased due to higher volume activity in interchange and merchant fees as well as new business generation. Loan, insurance and service fees increased $191,000, or 8.3%, driven by higher fee income on debit card activity. Offsetting these increases was a decrease of $109,000, or 5.6%, in other income.
Noninterest expense increased $2.5 million, or 6.4%, from $39.7 million in 2006 to $42.3 million in 2007. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $1.4 million, or 6.4%, driven by normal salary increases and higher health care cost, which represented approximately $542,000 of the total increase. Data processing fees and supplies increased $449,000, or 18.3%, driven by higher data processing fees, software license fees and maintenance fees related to new services offered to clients. Net occupancy expense increased from $2.5 million in 2006 to $2.7 million in 2007, primarily as a result of higher maintenance and repair costs and higher property tax expense.
As a result of these factors, income before income tax expense decreased $658,000, or 2.3%, from $28.2 million in 2006 to $27.6 million in 2007. Income tax expense was $8.4 million in 2007 versus $9.5 million in 2006. Income tax as a percentage of income before tax was 30.3% in 2007 versus 33.7% in 2006. The decrease in the tax rate was driven by the formation of a captive real estate investment trust in the fourth quarter of 2006, which provides the Company with an alternative vehicle for raising capital should the need arise. Additionally, the ownership structure of this real estate investment trust provides certain state income tax benefits which also lowered the Company’s effective tax rate. Net income increased $490,000, or 2.6%, to $19.2 million in 2007 versus $18.7 million in 2006. Basic earnings per share in 2007 was $1.58, an increase of 1.9%, versus $1.55 in 2006. The Company’s net income performance represented a 14.8% return on January 1, 2007, stockholders’ equity versus 16.5% in 2006. The net income performance resulted in a 1.04% return on average daily assets in 2007 versus 1.10% in 2006.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
versus 2005
The Company reported record net income of $18.7 million in 2006, an increase of $763,000, or 4.3%, versus net income of $18.0 million in 2005. Net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 4.1%, to $52.3 million versus $50.3 million in 2005. Net interest income increased due to growth in commercial loans. Interest income
increased $24.9 million, or 30.9%, from $80.6 million in 2005 to $105.6 million in 2006. The increase was driven primarily by increases in average earning assets, as well as an 85 basis point increase in the tax equivalent yield on average earning assets over the year. Interest expense increased $22.9 million, or 75.4%, from $30.4 million in 2005 to $53.2 million in 2006. The increase was primarily the result of a 121 basis point increase in the Company’s daily cost of funds over the year. The Company had a net interest margin of 3.38% in 2006 versus 3.71% in 2005. Average earning assets increased by $194.7 million from $1.4 billion in 2005 to $1.6 billion in 2006. The primary driver was a $181.7 million increase in the average daily loan balance. This loan growth was led by significant growth in the Fort Wayne market and with balanced growth in the Bank’s other regions. Deposits increased to fund the loan growth during 2006, driven primarily by increases of $62.8 million in average interest bearing transaction accounts, $38.1 million in average public fund deposits, $33.0 million in average brokered deposit balances and $75.1 million in the average other time deposit account balances.
Nonaccrual loans were $13.8 million, or 1.02% of total loans, at year end versus $7.3 million, or 0.61% of total loans, at the end of 2005. There were five relationships totaling $13.3 million classified as impaired as of December 31, 2006 versus five relationships totaling $6.9 million at the end of 2005. The increase in impaired and nonperforming loans resulted from the addition of a single borrowing relationship with aggregate loans totaling $7.6 million. The borrower was engaged in commercial and residential real estate development in northern Indiana. Borrower collateral, including real estate, and personal guarantees of its principals supported this credit, although there could be no assurances that full repayment of the loans would result. Net charge-offs were $955,000 in 2006 versus $460,000 in 2005, representing 0.08% and 0.04% of average daily loans in 2006 and 2005. Total nonperforming loans were $14.1 million, or 1.04% of total loans, at year end 2006 versus $7.5 million, or 0.63% of total loans, at the end of 2005. The provision for loan loss expense was $2.6 million in 2006, resulting in an allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2006 of $14.5 million, which represented 1.07% of the loan portfolio, versus a provision for loan loss expense of $2.5 million in 2005 and an allowance for loan losses of $12.8 million at the end of 2005, or 1.07% of the loan portfolio. The higher provision in 2006 versus 2005 was attributable to a number of factors, but was primarily a result of general growth in the loan portfolio as well as higher allocations on specific watch list credits, including the large additional impaired credit relationship mentioned above. The level of loan loss provision was also influenced by other factors related to the growth in the loan portfolio, such as emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentration, new industry lending activity, general economic conditions and historical loss percentages. In addition, management gave consideration to changes in the allocation for specific watch list credits in determining the appropriate level of the loan loss provision. Management’s overall view on current credit quality was also a factor in the determination of the provision for loan losses. The Company’s management continued to monitor the adequacy of the provision based on loan levels, asset quality, economic conditions and other factors that may influence the assessment of the collectability of loans.
Noninterest income was $18.3 million in 2006 versus $17.7 million in 2005, an increase of $553,000, or 3.1%. The 2005 noninterest income included a one-time gain of $863,000 which resulted from the sale of the Company’s retail credit card portfolio. The 2006 increase was driven by a $727,000, or 23.4%, increase in wealth advisory and investment brokerage fees. Additionally, noninterest income increased due to a $518,000, or 7.7%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts due largely to increased overdraft activity resulting in more overdraft charges as well as an increase in the per item fee implemented in 2006. Loan, insurance and service fees increased $308,000, or 15.5%, driven by higher fee income on Visa check cards. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $353,000, or 37.8%, in net gains on sales of real estate mortgages held for sale. As experienced by the industry generally, this decrease was the result of the decreased level of mortgage activity during 2006 resulting from rising mortgage interest rates during the year.
Noninterest expense increased $1.7 million, or 4.4%, from $38.1 million in 2005 to $39.7 million in 2006. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $1.8 million, or 8.9%, driven by higher incentive-based compensation as well as normal salary increases and staff additions. Net occupancy expense decreased from $2.8 million in 2005 to $2.5 million in 2006, primarily as a result of lower maintenance expense. Equipment expense decreased from $1.9 million in 2005 to $1.8 million in 2006, primarily as a result of lower depreciation expense. Depreciation expense was lower as a result of decreased depreciation on equipment leased under operating lease arrangements. Many existing operating leases became fully depreciated and there were few new operating leases during 2006.
As a result of these factors, income before income tax expense increased $798,000, or 2.9%, from $27.4 million in 2005 to $28.2 million in 2006. Income tax expense was $9.5 million in both 2006 and 2005. Income tax as a percentage of income before tax was 33.7% in 2006 versus 34.5% in 2005. An increase in the Company’s income derived from tax-advantaged sources contributed to the lower tax rate in 2006. Net income increased $763,000, or 4.3%, to $18.7 million in 2006 versus $18.0 million in 2005. Basic earnings per share in 2006 was $1.55, an increase of 2.7%, versus $1.51 in 2005. The Company’s net income performance represented a 16.5% return on January 1, 2006, stockholders’ equity versus 17.7% in 2005. The net income performance resulted in a 1.10% return on average daily assets in 2006 versus 1.20% in 2005.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had 43 offices serving twelve counties in northern Indiana and one loan production office in Indianapolis. The Company added a new full-service branch facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana during 2007. The new facility houses the Company’s Fort Wayne based Wealth Advisory Services and serves the south western market of Fort Wayne. The new facility replaces a limited-service leased facility in downtown Fort Wayne. Since 1996, the Company has added seventeen new offices through acquisition and internal growth. The Company will consider future acquisition and expansion opportunities with an emphasis on markets that it believes would be receptive to its business philosophy of local, independent banking.
Total assets of the Company were $1.989 billion as of December 31, 2007, an increase of $152.4 million, or 8.3%, when compared to $1.837 billion as of December 31, 2006.
Total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $52.0 million, or 43.5%, to $67.7 million at December 31, 2007 from $119.7 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily attributable to a corresponding increase in the Company’s loans.
Total securities available for sale increased by $31.6 million, or 10.7%, to $327.8 million at December 31, 2007 from $296.2 million at December 31, 2006. The increase was a result of a number of activities in the securities portfolio. Paydowns from prepayments of $40.0 million were received, and the amortization of premiums, net of the accretion of discounts, was $473,000. Maturities, calls and sales of securities totaled $35.1 million. These portfolio decreases were offset by securities purchases totaling $104.0 million. The fair value of the securities increased $3.2 million as a result of the falling yield curve environment during 2007. The investment portfolio is managed to limit the Company’s exposure to risk and contains mostly collateralized mortgage obligations and other securities which are either directly or indirectly backed by the federal government or a local municipal government. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $45.3 million of collateralized mortgage obligations which were not issued by the federal government or government sponsored agencies, but were rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s. The investment portfolio did not contain any corporate debt instruments or trust preferred instruments as of December 31, 2007.
Real estate mortgages held for sale decreased by $1.6 million, or 75.3%, to $537,000 at December 31, 2007 from $2.2 million at December 31, 2006. The balance of this asset category is subject to a high degree of variability depending on, among other things, recent mortgage loan rates and the timing of loan sales into the secondary market. During 2007, $37.5 million in real estate mortgages were originated for sale and $38.9 million in mortgages were sold, compared to $38.6 million and $37.1 million in 2006. As experienced by the industry generally, this lower volume of real estate mortgages originated was caused primarily due to the uncertainty in the residential real estate market.
Total loans, excluding real estate mortgages held for sale, increased by $169.9 million, or 12.6%, to $1.524 billion at December 31, 2007 from $1.354 billion at December 31, 2006. The mix of loan types within the Company’s portfolio continued a trend toward a higher percentage of the total loan portfolio being in commercial loans. The portfolio breakdown at year end 2007 reflected 82% commercial and industrial and agri-business, 15% residential real estate and home equity and 3% consumer loans compared to 80% commercial and industrial and agri-business, 14% residential real estate and home equity and 6% consumer loans at December 31, 2006.
At December 31, 2007, the allowance for loan losses was $15.8 million, or 1.04% of total loans outstanding, versus $14.5 million, or 1.07%, of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2006. The process of identifying probable credit losses is a subjective process. Therefore, the Company maintains a general allowance to cover probable incurred credit losses within the entire portfolio. The methodology management uses to determine the adequacy of the loan loss reserve includes the following considerations.
The Company has a relatively high percentage of commercial and commercial real estate loans, most of which are extended to small or medium-sized businesses. Commercial loans represent higher dollar loans to fewer customers and therefore higher credit risk than other types of loans. Pricing is adjusted to manage the higher credit risk associated with these types of loans. The majority of fixed rate mortgage loans, which represent increased interest rate risk, are sold in the secondary market, as well as some variable rate mortgage loans. The remainder of the variable rate mortgage loans and a small number of fixed rate mortgage loans are retained. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. However, if economic conditions would become unfavorable certain borrowers may experience difficulty and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require further increases in the provision for loan losses.
Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the principal is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred credit losses relating to specifically identified loans based on an evaluation, as well as other probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon a monthly review of those credits. An appropriate level of general allowance is determined after considering the following factors: application of historical loss percentages, emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentrations, new industry lending activity and current economic conditions. Federal regulations require insured institutions to classify their own assets on a regular basis. The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans - substandard, doubtful and loss. The regulations also contain a special mention category. Special mention is defined as loans that do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification, but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention. Assets classified as substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish specific allowances for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution must either establish specified allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss, or charge off such amount. At December 31, 2007, on the basis of management’s review of the loan portfolio, the Company had loans totaling $79.3 million on the classified loan list versus $69.7 million on December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $39.4 million of assets classified special mention, $39.7 million classified as substandard, $244,000 classified as doubtful and $0 classified as loss as compared to $26.9 million, $42.6 million, $100,000 and $0 at December 31, 2006.
Allowance estimates are developed by management taking into account actual loss experience, adjusted for current economic conditions. The Company discusses this methodology with regulatory authorities to ensure compliance. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the Company’s loan portfolio and are applied to individual loans based on loan type. In accordance with FASB Statements 5 and 114, the allowance is provided for losses that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date and is based on past events and current economic conditions, and does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. For a more thorough discussion of the allowance for loan losses methodology see the Critical Accounting Policies section of this Item.
The allowance for loan losses increased $1.3 million from $14.5 million December 31, 2006 to $15.8 million at December 31, 2007. Pooled loan allocations increased $728,000 from $4.2 million at December 31, 2006 to $4.9 million at December 31, 2007, which was primarily a result of an increase in pooled loan balances of $159.9 million year over year. Specific loan allocations increased $926,000 from $9.7 million at December 31, 2006 to $10.6 million at December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily due to additions to the classified loan list as well as increases in the specific allocations on two commercial credits. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses decreased $316,000 from $638,000 at December 31, 2006 to $322,000 at December 31, 2007.
The Company has experienced growth in total loans over the last three years of $520.5 million, or 51.9%. The concentration of this loan growth was in the commercial loan portfolio. Commercial loans comprised 82%, 80% and 81% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Traditionally, this type of lending may have more credit risk than other types of lending because of the size and diversity of the credits. The Company manages this risk by adjusting its pricing to the perceived risk of each individual credit and by diversifying the portfolio by customer, product, industry and geography. Management has historically considered growth and portfolio composition when determining loan loss allocations. Management believes that it is prudent to continue to provide for loan losses in a manner consistent with its historical approach due to the loan growth described above and current economic conditions.
As a result of the methodology in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the provision for loan losses was $4.3 million in 2007 versus $2.6 million in 2006. At December 31, 2007, total nonperforming loans decreased by $6.7 million to $7.4 million from $14.1 million at December 31, 2006. Loans delinquent 90 days or more that were included in the accompanying financial statements as accruing totaled $409,000 versus $299,000 at December 31, 2006. Total impaired loans decreased by $6.6 million to $6.7 million at December 31, 2007 from $13.3 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in impaired and nonperforming loans primarily resulted from the transfer to other real estate of a single borrowing relationship, a residential and commercial real estate developer. The majority of the balance of nonperforming and impaired loans is a single commercial credit of $4.2 million and $5.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The borrower filed chapter 11 bankruptcy late in the third quarter of 2004 and the plan for reorganization was approved late in the third quarter of 2005. Borrower collateral and the personal guarantees of its principals support this credit. The $6.7 million in impaired loans are all in nonaccrual status. The Company allocated $2.3 million and $3.4 million of the allowance for loan losses to the impaired loans in 2007 and 2006. A loan is impaired when full payment under the original loan terms is not expected. Impairment is
evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage, consumer, and credit card loans, and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.
Management has observed a regional softening in economic conditions in the Company’s markets, as well as slow downs in certain industries, including residential and commercial real estate development, recreational vehicle and mobile home manufacturing and other regional industries. The Company believes that the impact of these industry-specific issues will be mitigated by its overall expansion strategy, which promotes diversification among industries as well as a continued focus on enforcement of a strong credit environment and an aggressive position on loan work-out situations. The allowance for loan loss to total loans percentage was 1.04% in 2007, and 1.07% in 2006. The Company’s total nonperforming loans were 0.49% of total loans at year end 2007 versus 1.04% of total loans at the end of 2006. However, the Company’s overall asset quality position can be influenced by a small number of credits due to the focus on commercial lending activity.
Total deposits increased by $3.2 million, or 0.2%, to $1.479 billion at December 31, 2007 from $1.476 billion at December 31, 2006. The increase resulted from increases of $42.9 million in other certificates of deposit, $9.5 million in money market deposit accounts and $5.2 million in certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over. These increases were offset by decreases of $25.1 million in brokered deposits, $18.7 million in interest bearing transaction accounts, $7.5 million in public fund certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over and $3.1 million in demand deposits.
Total short-term borrowings increased by $128.7 million, or 68.6%, to $316.2 million at December 31, 2007 from $187.5 million at December 31, 2006. The increase resulted from increases of $70.0 million in federal funds purchased, $48.2 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $10.0 million in other short-term borrowings, primarily short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and $428,000 in U.S. Treasury demand notes.
The Company believes that a strong, appropriately managed capital position is critical to long-term earnings and expansion. Bank regulatory agencies exclude the market value adjustment created by SFAS No. 115 (AFS adjustment) from capital adequacy calculations. Excluding this adjustment from the calculation, the Company had a total risk-based capital ratio of 11.5% and a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 10.5% as of December 31, 2007. These ratios met or exceeded the Federal Reserve’s “well-capitalized” minimums of 10.0% and 6.0%, respectively.
The ability to maintain these ratios is a function of the balance between net income and a prudent dividend policy. Total stockholders’ equity increased by 12.4% to $146.3 million as of December 31, 2007 from $130.2 million as of December 31, 2006. The increase in 2007 resulted from net income of $19.2 million, as well as the following factors:
•
cash dividends of $6.6 million,
•
a favorable change in the AFS adjustment for the market valuation on securities held for sale of $1.9 million, net of tax,
•
positive pension liability adjustment of $232,000, net of tax,
•
$243,000 for the acquisition of treasury stock and
•
$1.2 million related to stock option exercises.
Total stockholders’ equity increased by 14.9% to $130.2 million as of December 31, 2006 from $113.3 million as of December 31, 2005. The increase in 2006 resulted from net income of $18.7 million, as well as the following factors:
•
cash dividends of $4.5 million,
•
a favorable change in the AFS adjustment for the market valuation on securities held for sale of $989,000, net of tax,
•
positive minimum pension liability adjustment of $95,000, net of tax,
•
an adjustment to initially apply SFAS NO. 158 of $448,000, net of tax,
•
$210,000 for the acquisition of treasury stock and
•
$2.0 million related to stock option exercises.
The 2007 AFS adjustment was primarily related to a 339 basis point decrease in the two to five year U.S. Treasury rates during 2007. Management has factored this into the determination of the size of the AFS portfolio to assure that stockholders’ equity is adequate under various scenarios.
Critical Accounting Policies
Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Some of the facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that a loan will not be repaid. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Allocations of the allowance are made for specific loans and for pools of similar types of loans, although the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged against the allowance. A provision for loan losses is taken based on management’s ongoing evaluation of the appropriate allowance balance. A formal evaluation of the adequacy of the loan loss allowance is conducted at least monthly and more often if deemed necessary. The ultimate recovery of all loans is susceptible to future market factors beyond the Company’s control.
The level of loan loss provision is influenced by growth in the overall loan portfolio, emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentration, new industry lending activity, general economic conditions and historical loss analysis. In addition, management gives consideration to changes in the allocation for specific watch list credits in determining the appropriate level of the loan loss provision. Furthermore, management’s overall view on credit quality is a factor in the determination of the provision.
The determination of the appropriate allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires significant estimates. The Company has an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that generally includes consideration of the following factors: changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers’ ability to repay. Consideration is not limited to these factors, although they represent the most commonly cited factors. With respect to specific allocation levels for individual credits, management generally considers the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows and the valuation of collateral as the primary measures. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon an ongoing review of those credits. With respect to pools of similar loans, we generally use percentage allocations based upon historical analysis. We may also adjust these allocations for other factors cited above. An appropriate level of general allowance for pooled loans is determined after considering the following: application of historical loss percentages, emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentration, new industry lending activity and general economic conditions. It is also possible that the following could affect the overall process: social, political, economic and terrorist events or activities. All of these factors are susceptible to significant change. As a result of this detailed process, the allowance results in two forms of allocations, specific and general. These two components represent the total allowance for loan losses deemed adequate to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
Commercial loans are subject to a dual standardized grading process administered by the credit administration and internal loan review functions. A credit grade is assigned to each commercial loan by both the commercial loan officer and the loan review department. These grade assignments are performed independent of each other and a loan may or may not be graded the same. The grade given by the loan review department is the assigned in the Company’s loan system for individual credits. The need for specific allocation of the loan loss reserve is considered for individual credits when graded special mention, substandard, doubtful or loss. Other considerations with respect to specific allocations for individual credits include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) does the customer’s cash flow or net worth appear insufficient to repay the loan; (b) is there adequate collateral to repay the loan; (c) has the loan been criticized in a regulatory examination; (d) is the loan on non-accrual; (e) are there other reasons where the ultimate collectibility of the loan is in question; or (f) are there unique loan characteristics require special monitoring. Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to an individual credit that we believe indicates the loan is impaired.
Allocations are also applied to categories of loans not considered individually impaired but for which the rate of loss is expected to be consistent with or greater than historical averages. Such allocations are based on past loss experience and information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values. In addition, general allocations are made for other pools of loans, including non-classified loans. These general pooled loan allocations are performed for similar portfolios of consumer and residential real estate loans, and loans within certain industry categories believed to present unique risk of loss. General allocations of the allowance are primarily made based on a five-year historical average for loan losses for these portfolios, judgmentally adjusted for economic factors and portfolio trends.
Due to the imprecise nature of estimating the allowance for loan losses, the Company’s allowance for loan losses includes an unallocated component. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses incorporates the Company’s judgmental determination of inherent losses that may not be fully reflected in other allocations, including factors such as the level of classified credits, economic uncertainties, industry trends impacting specific portfolio segments, broad portfolio quality trends and trends in the composition of the Company’s large commercial loan portfolio and related large dollar exposures to individual borrowers.
Mortgage Servicing Rights Valuation
The Company adopted SFAS No. 156 on January 1, 2007, and for sales of mortgage loans beginning in 2007, mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are initially recognized as assets for the full fair value of retained servicing rights on loans sold. For sales of mortgage loans prior to January 1, 2007, a portion of the cost of the loan was allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair values. Subsequent measurement uses the amortization method where all servicing rights are expensed in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. Impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of the rights, using groupings of the underlying loans as to type and interest rate. Fair value is determined based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions.
To determine the fair value of MSRs, the Company uses a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. In using this valuation method, the Company incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, which include estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, ancillary income, late fees, and float income. The Company compares the valuation model inputs and results to published industry data in order to validate the model results and assumptions.
The most significant assumption used to value MSRs is prepayment rate. In general, during periods of declining interest rates, the value of MSRs decline due to increasing prepayment speeds attributable to increased mortgage refinancing activity. Prepayment rates are estimated based on published industry consensus prepayment rates. Prepayments will increase or decrease in correlation with market interest rates and actual prepayments generally differ from initial estimates. If actual prepayment rates are different than originally estimated, the Company may receive less mortgage servicing income, which could reduce the value of the MSRs. Other assumptions used in estimating the fair value of MSRs do not generally fluctuate to the same degree as prepayment rates, and therefore the fair value of MSRs is less sensitive to changes in these other assumptions.
The servicing assets had a fair value of $2.5 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2007, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of mortgage servicing rights to an immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions are as follows:
Fair value of mortgage servicing assets
$
2,483
Constant prepayment speed (PSA)
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
(109
)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(210
)
Discount rate
9.4
%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
(71
)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(139
)
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in value based on a 10% and 20% variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the value of the servicing asset is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
On a monthly basis, the Company evaluates the possible impairment of MSRs based on the difference between the carrying amount and the current fair value of MSRs. For purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment, the Company stratifies its portfolios on the basis of certain risk characteristics, including loan type and interest rate. If impairment exists, a valuation allowance is established for any excess of amortized cost over the current fair value, by risk stratification, through a charge to income. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular strata, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income.
Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards:
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This Statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and should be determined based on assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or liability. This
Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions should include assumptions about risk as well as the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. Additionally, this Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that provides the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. The
Company plans to adopt this standard as of January 1, 2008. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The Company plans to adopt this standard as of January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities as of January 1, 2008.
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 160 improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing certain accounting and reporting standards requirements. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 06-04, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted. EITF Issue 06-04 requires that for an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement within the scope of this Issue, an employer should recognize a
liability for future benefits in accordance with Statement 106 (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists) or Opinion 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract) based on the substantive agreement with the employee and all available evidence should be considered in determining the substance of the arrangement, such as the explicit written terms of the arrangement, communications made by the
employer to the employee, and the determination of whether the employer or the insurer is the primary obligor for
the postretirement benefit. The Company does not have any postretirement benefit on endorsement split-dollar life insurance and therefore does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109 (SAB No. 109), Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings supersedes SAB 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments which stated that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, a company should not incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan. SAB 109 states that the expected net future cash
flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in measuring fair value for all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also states that internally-developed intangible assets should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, and SAB 109 retains that view. SAB 109 is effective for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
No other new accounting standards have been issued that are not yet effective that are expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Liquidity
Management maintains a liquidity position that it believes will adequately provide funding for loan demand and deposit run-off that may occur in the normal course of business. The Company relies on a number of different sources in order to meet these potential liquidity demands. The primary sources are increases in deposit accounts and cash flows from loan payments and the securities portfolio. Given current prepayment assumptions, the cash flow from the securities portfolio is expected to provide approximately $82.2 million of funding in 2008.
In addition to these primary sources of funds, management has several secondary sources available to meet potential funding requirements. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $235.0 million in Federal Funds lines with correspondent banks and may borrow up to $150.0 million at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. The Company had all of its securities in the available for sale (AFS) portfolio at December 31, 2007. Therefore, the Company may sell securities to meet funding demands. Management believes that the securities in the AFS portfolio are of high quality and would therefore be marketable. Approximately 69% of this portfolio is comprised of Federal agency securities or mortgage-backed securities directly or indirectly backed by the Federal government. In addition, the Company has historically sold the majority of its originated mortgage loans on the secondary market to reduce interest rate risk and to create an additional source of funding.
During 2007, cash and cash equivalents decreased $52.0 million from $119.7 million as of December 31, 2006 to $67.7 million as of December 31, 2007. The primary driver of this decrease was an increase in loan balances of $178.5 million, which is net of approximately $37.5 million of loans originated and sold in 2007. Another use of funds was purchases of securities of $104.0 million. Sources of funds were proceeds from short-term borrowings of $128.7 million, proceeds from maturities, calls and principal paydowns of securities of $43.6 million, proceeds from loan sales of $39.5 million and proceeds from the sale of securities of $31.6 million.
During 2006, cash and cash equivalents increased $37.0 million from $82.7 million as of December 31, 2005 to $119.7 million as of December 31, 2006. The primary driver of this increase was an increase in deposit balances of $209.5 million. Other sources of funds were proceeds from maturities, calls and principal paydowns of securities of $46.8 million and proceeds from loan sales of $37.7 million. The primary use of funds was a $156.1 million increase in net loans, which is net of approximately $38.6 million in loans originated and sold during 2006. Other uses of funds were purchases of securities of $74.2 million and payments on short-term borrowings of $24.1 million.
During 2005, cash and cash equivalents decreased $21.2 million from $103.9 million as of December 31, 2004 to $82.7 million as of December 31, 2005. The primary driver of this decrease was an increase in net loans of $199.1 million, which is net of approximately $43.9 million of loans originated and sold during 2005. Other uses of funds were purchases of securities of $68.4 million and payments on long-term borrowings of $10.0 million. Sources of funds were a net increase in deposits of $150.8 million, proceeds from maturities, calls and principal paydowns of securities of $51.0 million and proceeds from loan sales of $46.4 million. Other sources of funds were proceeds from short-term borrowings of $25.9 million and proceeds from the sale of securities of $6.3 million.
The following tables disclose information on the maturity of the Company’s contractual long-term obligations and commitments. Certificates of deposit listed are those with original maturities of 1 year or more.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
During the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to make loans and open-ended revolving lines of credit. The Company follows the same credit policy (including requiring collateral, if deemed appropriate) to make such commitments as is followed for those loans that are recorded in its financial statements.
The Company’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance is represented by the contractual amount of the commitments. Management does not expect any significant losses as a result of these commitments. Off-Balance Sheet transactions are more fully discussed in Note 19.
Inflation
The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the growth of total assets, it believes that it is difficult to assess the overall impact. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of the inflationary changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”) coincides with changes in interest rates. The price of one or more of the components of the CPI may fluctuate considerably and thereby influence the overall CPI without having a corresponding affect on interest rates or upon the cost of those goods and services normally purchased by the Company. In years of high inflation and high interest rates, intermediate and long-term interest rates tend to increase, thereby adversely impacting the market values of investment securities, mortgage loans and other long-term fixed rate loans. In addition, higher short-term interest rates caused by inflation tend to increase the cost of funds. In other years, the reverse situation may occur.
ITEM 7a.
ITEM 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Asset/Liability Management (ALCO) and Securities
Interest rate risk represents the Company’s primary market risk exposure. The Company does not have material exposure to foreign currency exchange risk, does not own any significant derivative financial instruments and does not maintain a trading portfolio. The Board of Directors annually reviews and approves the ALCO policy used to manage interest rate risk. This policy sets guidelines for balance sheet structure, which are designed to protect the Company from the impact that interest rate changes could have on net income, but does not necessarily indicate the effect on future net interest income. Given the Company’s mix of interest bearing liabilities and interest bearing assets on December 31, 2007, the net interest margin could be expected to decline in a falling interest rate environment and conversely, to increase in a rising rate environment. Beginning with the September 18, 2007 meeting the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) started lowering the target federal funds rate. In the three meeting from September 2007 through December 2007 the FOMC lowered the rate from 5.25% to 4.25%. Despite these rate cuts, the yield on earning assets increased from 6.75% for 2006 to 6.89% for 2007. The increase in the yield on earning assets was offset by an increase in the rates paid on deposit accounts. The rate paid on deposit accounts and purchased funds increased from 3.96% for 2006 to 4.35% for 2007. The combined result of the increase in the yield on earning assets and the increase in the rates paid on deposits and purchased funds was a decrease in the net margin from 3.38% for 2006 to 3.22% for 2007. Future changes in the net interest margin will be dependent upon multiple factors including further actions by the FOMC during 2008 in response to economic conditions, competitive pressures in the various markets served, and changes in the structure of the balance sheet in as a result of changes in customer demands for products and services.
The Company utilizes a computer program to stress test the balance sheet under a wide variety of interest rate scenarios. The model quantifies the income impact of changes in customer preference for products, basis risk between the assets and the liabilities that support them and the risk inherent in different yield curves, as well as other factors. The ALCO committee reviews these possible outcomes and makes loan, investment and deposit decisions that maintain reasonable balance sheet structure in light of potential interest rate movements. Although management does not consider GAP ratios in this planning, the information can be used in a general fashion to look at asset and liability mismatches. The Company’s cumulative repricing GAP ratio as of December 31, 2007 for the next 12 months using a rates unchanged scenario was a negative 18.22% of earning assets.
The Company’s investment portfolio consists of U.S. Treasury securities, agencies, mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. During 2007, purchases in the securities portfolio consisted primarily of agency securities, whole-loan securities and municipal bonds. As of December 31, 2007, the Company’s investment in mortgage-backed securities represented approximately 76% of total securities and consisted primarily of CMOs and mortgage pools issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities are each guaranteed by their respective agencies as to principal and interest. The whole-loan securities purchased were all super senior securities that met specific criteria established by the Asset Liability Management Committee of the Company. All mortgage securities purchased by the Company are within risk tolerances for price, prepayment, extension and original life risk characteristics contained in the Company’s investment policy. The Company uses Bloomberg analytics to evaluate and monitor all purchases. As of December 31, 2007, the securities in the AFS portfolio had approximately a two and three-quarter year average life with approximately 10% price depreciation in the event of a 300 basis points upward movement. The portfolio had approximately 5% price appreciation in the event of a 300 basis point downward movement in rates. As of December 31, 2007, all mortgage securities were performing in a manner consistent with management’s original expectations.
The following table provides information regarding the Company’s financial instruments used for purposes other than trading that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For loans, securities and liabilities with contractual maturities, the table present principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by contractual maturities, as well as the Company’s historical experience of the impact of interest-rate fluctuations on the prepayment of residential and home equity loans and mortgage-backed securities. Core deposits such as deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings and money market deposits that have no contractual maturity, are shown under Year 1, however historical experience indicates that some portion of the balances are retained over time. Weighted-average variable rates are based upon rates existing at the reporting date.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (in thousands except share and per share data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include Lakeland Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lake City Bank (the “Bank”), together referred to as (the “Company”). Also included in the consolidated financial statements prior to December 27, 2006 is LCB Investments, Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake City Bank, which is a Bermuda corporation that managed a portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio. On December 27, 2006, all securities were transferred to Lake City Bank from LCB Investments, Limited. On December 18, 2006, LCB Investments II, Inc. was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of Lake City Bank incorporated in Nevada manages a portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio beginning in 2007. On December 21, 2006 LCB Funding, Inc., a real estate investment trust incorporated in Maryland, was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of LCB Investments II, Inc. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
The Company provides financial services through its subsidiary, Lake City Bank, a full-service commercial bank with 43 branch offices in twelve counties in northern Indiana. The Company also operates a loan production office in Indianapolis, which is staffed by a commercial loan officer and was opened in 2006. The Company provides commercial, retail, trust and investment services to its customers. Commercial products include commercial loans and technology-driven solutions to meet commercial customers’ cash management needs such as internet business banking and on-line cash management services. Retail banking clients are provided a wide array of traditional retail banking services, including lending, deposit and investment services. Retail lending programs are focused on mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and traditional retail installment loans. The Company provides credit card services to retail and commercial customers through its retail card program and merchant processing activity. The Company also has an Honors Private Banking program that is positioned to serve the more financially sophisticated customer with a menu including brokerage and trust services, executive mortgage programs and access to financial planning seminars and programs. The Company’s Prospero Program is dedicated to serving the expanding financial needs of the Latino community. The Company provides trust clients with traditional personal and corporate trust services. The Company also provides retail brokerage services, including an array of financial and investment products such as annuities and life insurance. Other financial instruments, which represent potential concentrations of credit risk, include deposit accounts in other financial institutions.
Use of Estimates:
To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, the fair values of financial instruments and the fair value of loan servicing rights are particularly subject to change.
Cash Flows:
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, demand deposits in other financial institutions and short-term investments with maturities of 90 days or less. Cash flows are reported net for customer loan and deposit transactions.
Securities:
Securities are classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. Trading securities are bought for sale in the near term and are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized holding gains and losses included in income. Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity.
Purchase premiums or discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities or over estimated lives for mortgage-backed securities. Gains and losses on sales are based on the amortized cost of the security sold and recorded on the trade date. Securities are written down to fair value when a decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary, as more fully disclosed in Note 2.
The Company does not have any material derivative instruments, nor does the Company participate in any significant hedging activities.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Real Estate Mortgage Loans Held for Sale:
Loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or market on an aggregate basis. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings.
Loan sales occur on the delivery date agreed to in the commitment agreement. The Company retains servicing on the majority of loans sold. The carrying value of loans sold is reduced by the amount allocated to the servicing right. The gain or loss on the sale of loans is the difference between the carrying value of the loans sold and the funds received from the sale.
Loans:
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, deferred loan fees and costs, and an allowance for loan losses.
Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term. All mortgage and commercial loans for which collateral is insufficient to cover all principal and accrued interest are reclassified as nonaccrual loans, on or before the date when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent. When a loan is classified as a nonaccrual loan, interest on the loan is no longer accrued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed and interest income is subsequently recorded only to the extent cash payments are received. Accrual status is resumed when all contractually due payments are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Consumer installment loans, except those loans that are secured by real estate, are not placed on a nonaccrual status since these loans are charged-off when they have been delinquent from 90 to 180 days, and when the related collateral, if any, is not sufficient to offset the indebtedness. Advances under consumer line of credit programs, are charged-off when collection appears doubtful.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any are credited to the allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, internal loan grade classifications, economic conditions and other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or as future events change. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified as special mention, substandard, doubtful or loss on the Company’s watch list. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors.
A loan is impaired when full payment under the original loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage and consumer loans, and on an individual loan basis for other loans. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Mortgage and commercial loans, when they have been delinquent from 90 to 180 days, are reviewed to determine if a charge-off is necessary, if the related collateral, if any, is not sufficient to offset the indebtedness.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Investments in Limited Partnerships:
Investments in limited partnerships represent the Company’s investments in affordable housing projects for the primary purpose of available tax benefits. The Company is a limited partner in these investments and as such, the Company is not involved in the management or operation of such investments. These investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company records its share of the partnership’s earnings or losses in its income statement and adjusts the carrying amount of the investments on the balance sheet. These investments are evaluated for impairment when events indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The investment recorded at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $334,000 and $373,000 and is included with other assets in the balance sheet.
Foreclosed Assets:
Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the balance of repossessed assets and real estate owned was $2.4 million and $106,000 and are included with other assets on the balance sheet.
Land, Premises and Equipment:
Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets. Premises assets have useful lives between 7 and 40 years. Equipment assets have useful lives between 3 and 10 years.
Loan Servicing Rights:
The Company adopted SFAS No. 156 on January 1, 2007, and for sales of mortgage loans beginning in 2007, loan servicing rights are initially recognized as assets for the full fair value of retained servicing rights on loans sold with the income statement effect recorded in gains on sales of real estate mortgage loans held for sale. For sales of mortgage loans prior to January 1, 2007, a portion of the cost of the loan was allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair values. Subsequent measurement uses the amortization method where all loan servicing rights are expensed in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues.
Impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of the rights, using groupings of the underlying loans as to loan type, term and interest rates. Any impairment of a grouping is reported as a valuation allowance. Fair value is calculated on a loan by loan basis and is determined based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions, specifically prepayment speeds, discount rates, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, ancillary income, late fees, and float income.
Servicing fee income/(loss), amortization and changes in the valuation allowance are included in loan, insurance and service fees. Fees earned for servicing loans are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal. Late fees and ancillary fees related to loan servicing are not material.
Bank Owned Life Insurance:
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company owned $20.8 million and $20.1 million of life insurance policies on certain officers to provide life insurance for these officers. At December 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company also owned $719,000 and $500,000 of variable life insurance on certain officers related to a deferred compensation plan. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized, which is the cash surrender value adjusted, beginning January 1, 2007, for other changes or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles arising from branch acquisitions and trust deposit relationships arising from a trust acquisition. Core deposit intangibles are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives, which is 12 years. Trust deposit relationships are initially measured at fair value and then amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives, which is 10 years.
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock:
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock is carried at cost in other assets and is periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recoverability of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.
Repurchase Agreements:
Substantially all repurchase agreement liabilities represent amounts advanced by various customers. Securities are pledged to cover these liabilities, which are not covered by federal deposit insurance.
Long-term Assets:
Premises and equipment, core deposit and other intangible assets and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.
Benefit Plans:
The Company maintains a 401(k) profit sharing plan for all employees meeting age and service requirements. The Company contributions are based upon the percentage of budgeted net income earned during the year. The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan which covered substantially all employees until the plan was frozen effective April 1, 2000. Funding of the plan equals or exceeds the minimum funding requirement determined by the actuary. Pension expense is the net of interest cost, return on plan assets and amortization of gains and losses not immediately recognized. Benefits are based on years of service and compensation levels. An employee deferred compensation plan is available to certain employees with returns based on investments in mutual funds. The Company maintains a directors’ deferred compensation plan. Effective January 1, 2003, the directors’ deferred compensation plan was amended to restrict the deferral to be in stock only and deferred directors’ fees are included in equity. The Company acquires shares on the open market and records such shares as treasury stock.
Stock Compensation:
Effective January 1, 2006, employee compensation expense under stock options is reported using Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. Previously all awards were recorded under the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123(R) was adopted using the modified prospective method and no restatements were made to prior periods. The following table provides comparative information on the effects of stock-based compensation expense on net income and earnings per share, as if Statement 123 had been applied for 2005.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
There is no pro forma effect for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 since stock based compensation was recorded under Statement 123(R) in 2007 and 2006. Included in net income for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 was employee compensation expense of $174,000 and $188,000, and a related tax benefit of $70,000 and $76,000 respectively.
Income Taxes:
Annual consolidated federal and state income tax returns are filed by the Company. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Income tax expense is recorded based on the amount of taxes due on its tax return plus net deferred taxes computed based upon the expected
future tax consequences of temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities,
using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, as of January 1, 2007. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no affect on the Company’s financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments:
Financial instruments include credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and standby letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. The fair value of standby letters of credit is recorded as a liability during the commitment period in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45.
Earnings Per Common Share:
Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issue of the financial statements. The common shares included in Treasury Stock for 2007 and 2006 reflect the acquisition of 96,020 and 86,785 shares, respectively of Lakeland Financial Corporation common stock that have been purchased under the directors’ deferred compensation plan described
above. Because these shares are held in trust for the participants, they are treated as outstanding when computing the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share.
Comprehensive Income:
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale during the year and changes in defined benefit pension plans, which are also recognized as a separate component of equity.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Loss Contingencies:
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Restrictions on Cash:
The Company was required to have $5.7 million and $6.8 million of cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements at year-end 2007 and 2006. These balances do not earn interest.
Dividend Restriction:
Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the Company or by the Company to its shareholders. These restrictions pose no practical limit on the ability of the Bank or Company to pay dividends at historical levels.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 18. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.
Industry Segments:
The Company’s chief decision-makers monitor and evaluate financial performance on a Company-wide basis. All of the Company’s financial service operations are similar and considered by management to be aggregated into one reportable operating segment. While the Company has assigned certain management responsibilities by region, the Company's chief decision-makers monitor and evaluate financial performance on a Company-wide basis. The majority of the Company's revenue is from the business of banking and the Company's assigned regions have similar economic characteristics, products, services and customers. Accordingly, all of the Company’s operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Adoption of New Accounting Standards:
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156 (SFAS No. 156), Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS No. 156 requires the recognition of a servicing asset or servicing liability when entering into a servicing contract to service a financial asset and requires all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value. Further SFAS No. 156 permits a choice of subsequent measurement methods for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities between the current amortization method and the fair value measurement method. At initial adoption, SFAS No. 156 permits a one time reclassification of available for sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights, without calling into question the treatment of other available for sale securities under Statement 115, provided the securities are identified in some manner as offsetting the exposure to changes in fair value of servicing assets or servicing liabilities that are subsequently measured at fair value. Finally, SFAS No. 156 requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Company elected the amortization method for subsequent measurement of its servicing assets. The adoption of this standard did not have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
During 2007 the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 requires that realization of an uncertain income tax position be “more likely than not” before it can be recognized in the financial statements. Further, FIN 48 prescribes the benefit to be recorded in the financial statements as the largest amount more likely than not to be realized assuming a review by tax authorities having all relevant information and applying current conventions. FIN 48 also clarifies the financial statement classification of tax-related penalties and interest and sets forth new disclosures regarding unrecognized tax benefits. The adoption of this standard did not have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
During 2007 the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 06-05, Accounting for Purchase of Life Insurance - Determining the Amount that Could be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4. EITF Issue No. 06-05 requires a policyholder to consider any additional amounts included in
the contractual terms of the policy in determining the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract; to determine the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract assuming the surrender of an
individual-life policy (or certificate by certificate in a group policy); not to discount the cash surrender value
component of the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract when contractual restrictions on the ability to surrender a policy exist, as long as the holder of the policy continues to participate in the changes in the cash surrender value as it had done prior to the surrender request; and if a group of individual-life policies or a group policy only allows for the surrender of all of the individual-life policies or certificates as a group, then the policyholder should determine the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract on a group basis. The adoption of this standard did not have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards:
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This Statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and should be determined based on assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or liability. This
Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions should include assumptions about risk as well as the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. Additionally, this Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that provides the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. The
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Company plans to adopt this standard as of January 1, 2008. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The Company plans to adopt this standard as of January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities as of January 1, 2008.
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 160 improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing certain accounting and reporting standards requirements. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 06-04, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted. EITF Issue 06-04 requires that for an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement within the scope of this Issue, an employer should recognize a
liability for future benefits in accordance with Statement 106 (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists) or Opinion 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract) based on the substantive agreement with the employee and all available evidence should be considered in determining the substance of the arrangement, such as the explicit written terms of the arrangement, communications made by the
employer to the employee, and the determination of whether the employer or the insurer is the primary obligor for
the postretirement benefit. The Company does not have any postretirement benefit on endorsement split-dollar life insurance and therefore does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109 (SAB No. 109), Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings supersedes SAB 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments which stated that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, a company should not incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan. SAB 109 states that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in measuring fair value for all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also states that internally-developed intangible assets should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, and SAB 109 retains that view. SAB 109 is effective for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
No other new accounting standards have been issued that are not yet effective that are expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Reclassifications:
Certain amounts appearing in the financial statements and notes thereto for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
NOTE 2 - SECURITIES
Information related to the fair value of securities available for sale and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31 is provided in the tables below.
Information regarding the fair value of available for sale debt securities by maturity as of December 31, 2007 is presented below. Maturity information is based on contractual maturity for all securities other than mortgage-backed securities. Actual maturities of securities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay the obligation without prepayment penalty.
Securities with carrying values of $239.5 million and $188.4 million were pledged as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, as collateral for deposits of public funds, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, borrowings from the FHLB and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.
NOTE 2 - SECURITIES (continued)
Information regarding securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 is presented below. The tables distribute the securities between those with unrealized losses for less than twelve months and those with unrealized losses for twelve months or more.
All of the following are considered to determine whether or not the impairment of these securities is other-than-temporary. All of the securities are backed by the U.S. Government, government agencies, government sponsored agencies or are A rated or better, except for certain non-local municipal securities. None of the securities have call provisions (with the exception of the municipal securities) and payments as originally agreed are being received. There are no concerns of credit losses and there is nothing to indicate that full principal will not be received. Management considers the unrealized losses to be from interest rate movement rather than credit quality concerns and no loss is expected to be realized unless the securities are sold. The Company does not have a history of actively trading securities, but keeps the securities available for sale should liquidity or other needs develop that would warrant the sale of securities. While these securities are held in the available for sale portfolio, the current intent and ability is to hold them until a recovery in fair value or maturity.
NOTE 3 - LOANS
NOTE 4 - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Impaired loans were as follows:
The Company is not committed to lend additional funds to debtors whose loans have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring. For December 31, 2007 and 2006 the total for impaired loans were also included in the total for nonaccrual loans. Total impaired loans decreased by $6.6 million to $6.7 million at December 31, 2007 from $13.3 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in impaired and nonperforming loans resulted primarily from the transfer to other real estate of a single borrowing relationship, a residential and commercial real estate developer. The majority of the balance of nonperforming and impaired loans is a single commercial credit of $4.2 million and $5.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The borrower filed chapter 11 bankruptcy late in the third quarter of 2004 and the plan for reorganization was approved late in the third quarter of 2005. Borrower collateral and the personal guarantees of its principals support this credit.
NOTE 5 - SECONDARY MORTGAGE MARKET ACTIVITIES
Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of these loans were $245.3 million and $244.7 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006. Net loan servicing income/(loss) excluding adjustments to the valuation allowance included in loan, insurance and service fees was $206,000, $165,000 and $41,000 for 2007, 2006 and 2005. Late fees and ancillary fees are not material. Information on loan servicing rights, which are included in other assets, follows:
Fair value at year end 2007 was determined using discount rates ranging from 5.0% to 9.5%, prepayment speeds ranging from 94 to 917, depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of .33%. Fair value at year end 2006 was determined using discount rates ranging from 5.0% to 9.5%, prepayment speeds ranging from 106 to 1233, depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of .34%.
NOTE 6 - LAND, PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
NOTE 7 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Acquired Intangible Assets
NOTE 8 - DEPOSITS
The aggregate amount of time deposits, each with a minimum denomination of $100,000, was approximately $384.3 million and $411.7 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
NOTE 9 - SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repo accounts”) represent collateralized borrowings with customers located primarily within the Company’s service area. Repo accounts are not covered by federal deposit insurance and are secured by securities owned. Information on these liabilities and the related collateral for 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
The Company retains the right to substitute similar type securities, and has the right to withdraw all collateral applicable to repo accounts whenever the collateral values are in excess of the related repurchase liabilities. At December 31, 2007, there were no material amounts of securities at risk with any one customer. The Company maintains control of these securities through the use of third-party safekeeping arrangements.
NOTE 10 - BORROWINGS
All notes require monthly interest payments and were secured by residential real estate loans and securities with a carrying value of $247.9 million at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, the Company owned $4.6 million of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, which also secures debts to the FHLB. The Company is authorized to borrow up to $150 million at the FHLB.
NOTE 11 - SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
Lakeland Statutory Trust II, a trust formed by the Company, issued $30.0 million of floating rate trust preferred securities on October 1, 2003 as part of a privately placed offering of such securities. The Company issued subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for the proceeds of the trust. Subject to the Company having received prior approval of the Federal Reserve if then required, the Company may redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, but in all cases in a principal amount with integral multiples of $1,000, on any interest payment date on or after October 1, 2008 at 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The subordinated debentures must be redeemed no later than 2033. These securities are considered as Tier I capital (with certain limitations applicable) under current regulatory guidelines. The floating rate of the trust preferred securities and subordinated debentures was 7.880%, 8.410% and 7.580% at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The holding company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $928,000 and is included in other assets.
NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
In April, 2000, the Lakeland Financial Corporation Pension Plan was frozen. The Company also maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for select officers that was established as a funded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Only one current officer of the Company is a participant in the SERP plan and there are 7 total participants. The measurement date for both the pension and SERP plans is September 30 for 2007 and 2006, but will be December 31 for 2008.
NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan was $2.4 million and $2.5 million for December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP plan was $1.3 million and $1.4 million for December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively.
The estimated net loss (gain) for the defined benefit pension plan and SERP plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $57,000 for both plans.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is developed in consultation with the plan actuary. It is primarily based upon industry trends and consensus rates of return which are then adjusted to reflect the specific asset allocations and historical rates of return of the Company’s plan assets.
NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
The asset allocations at the measurement dates of September 30, 2007 and 2006, by asset category are as follows:
The Company’s investment strategies are to invest in a prudent manner for the purpose of providing benefits to participants. The investment strategies are targeted to maximize the total return of the portfolio net of inflation, spending and expenses. Risk is controlled through diversification of asset types and investments in domestic and international equities and fixed income securities. Certain asset types and investment strategies are
prohibited including: commodities, options, futures, short sales, margin transactions and non-marketable securities. The target allocation is 60% equities and 40% debt securities although acceptable ranges are: 55-65% equities and 35-45% debt securities.
Contributions
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Other Employee Benefit Plans
The Company maintains a 401(k) profit sharing plan for all employees meeting age and service requirements. The Company contributions are based upon the percentage of budgeted net income earned during the year. The expense recognized was $858,000, $836,000 and $844,000 in 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Effective January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the Lake City Bank Deferred Compensation Plan. The purpose of the deferred compensation plan is to extend full 401(k) type retirement benefits to certain individuals without regard to statutory limitations under tax qualified plans. The expense recognized was $83,000, $49,000 and $38,000 in 2007, 2006 and 2005. The plan is funded solely by participant contributions and does not receive a company match.
Under employment agreements with certain executives, certain events leading to separation from the Company could result in cash payments totaling $2.4 million as of December 31, 2007. On December 31, 2007, no amounts were accrued on these contingent obligations.
NOTE 13 - OTHER EXPENSE
NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense included ($36,000), ($25,000) and ($28,000) applicable to security transactions for 2007, 2006 and 2005. The differences between financial statement tax expense and amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% for 2007, 2006 and 2005 to income before income taxes were as follows:
NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES (continued)
The net deferred tax asset recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, consisted of the following:
In addition to the net deferred tax assets included above, the deferred income tax asset/liability allocated to the unrealized net gain/loss on securities available for sale included in equity was ($71,000) and $1.2 million for 2007 and 2006. The deferred income tax asset allocated to the pension liability included in equity was $807,000 and $966,000 for 2007 and 2006.
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal tax return and a combined unitary return in the State of Indiana. These returns are subject to examinations by authorities for all years after 2003. The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No.48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007, and the adoption had no material impact on the financial statements. Should the accrual of any interest or penalties relative to unrecognized tax benefits be necessary, it is the Company’s policy to record such accruals in its income taxes accounts; no such accruals exist as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company had no accrued liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
NOTE 15 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at both year-end 2007 and 2006 were $1.7 million. In addition, the amount owed directors for fees under the deferred directors’ plan as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $1.4 million and $1.2 million. The related expense for the deferred directors’ plan as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $267,000, $266,000 and $212,000.
Thomas A. Hiatt was appointed to the Board of Directors by the incumbent directors, with such appointment effective January 9, 2007. Mr. Hiatt is the Managing Director and Co-founder of Centerfield Capital Partners, headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana (“Centerfield Capital”). The Bank currently has approximately $272,000 invested in investment funds managed by Centerfield Capital and has committed to fund an additional $728,000, or less than 2.0% of the funds managed by Centerfield Capital.
NOTE 16 - STOCK OPTIONS
Effective December 9, 1997, the Company adopted the Lakeland Financial Corporation 1997 Share Incentive Plan, which is shareholder approved. At its inception there were 1,200,000 shares of common stock reserved for grants of stock options to employees of Lakeland Financial Corporation, its subsidiaries and Board of Directors. The plan expired on December 8, 2007 and therefore there were no options available for future grants as of December 31, 2007. The stock option plan requires that the exercise price for options be the market price on the date the options are granted. The maximum option term is ten years and the options vest over 5 years. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control or retirement (as defined in the Plan). The Company has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy option exercises.
The fair value of each option award is estimated with the Black Scholes option pricing model, using the following weighted-average assumptions as of the grant date for options granted during the years presented. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock over the immediately preceding expected life period, as well as other factors known on the grant date that would have a significant effect on the stock price during the expected life period. Prior to 2006, the expected option life for all awards was the vesting period of the option. For grants in 2006, the expected option life used was primarily the average of the vesting period of the option and the years to expiration of the option. For grants in 2007, the expected option life used was the historical option life of the similar employee base or Board of Directors. The turnover rate is based on historical data on the similar employee base as a group and the Board of Directors as a group. The risk-free interest rate is the U.S. Treasury rate on the date of grant corresponding to the expected life period of the option.
NOTE 16 - STOCK OPTIONS (continued)
A summary of the activity in the stock option plan as of December 31, 2007 and changes during the period then ended follows:
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the periods ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $7.05, $6.59 and $5.76. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the periods ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $1.4 million, $2.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
Cash received from option exercise for the periods ending December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $771,000, $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercise totaled $396,000, $692,000 and $485,000, respectively for the periods ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
As of December 31, 2007, there was $330,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.52 years.
NOTE 17 - CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON RETAINED EARNINGS
The Company and Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, that the Company and Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
NOTE 17 - CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON RETAINED EARNINGS (continued)
As of December 31, 2007, the most recent notification from the federal regulators categorized the Company and Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company and Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Company’s or Bank’s category.
The Bank is required to obtain the approval of the Department of Financial Institutions for the payment of any dividend if the total amount of all dividends declared by the Bank during the calendar year, including the proposed dividend, would exceed the sum of the retained net income for the year to date combined with its retained net income for the previous two years. Indiana law defines “retained net income” to mean the net income of a specified period, calculated under the consolidated report of income instructions, less the total amount of all dividends declared for the specified period. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $28.7 million was available to be paid as dividends to the Company by the Bank.
The payment of dividends by any financial institution or its holding company is affected by the requirement to maintain adequate capital pursuant to applicable capital adequacy guidelines and regulations, and a financial institution generally is prohibited from paying any dividends if, following payment thereof, the institution would be undercapitalized. As described above, the Bank exceeded its minimum capital requirements under applicable guidelines as of December 31, 2007. Notwithstanding the availability of funds for dividends, however, the FDIC may prohibit the payment of any dividends by the Bank if the FDIC determines such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
NOTE 18 - FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following table contains the estimated fair values and the related carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2007 and 2006. Items which are not financial instruments are not included.
For purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following assumptions were used as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock is considered to approximate cost. Security fair values are based on market prices or dealer quotes, and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security and information about the issuer. Real estate mortgages held for sale are based upon the actual contracted price for those loans sold but not yet delivered, or the current Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation price for normal delivery of mortgages with similar coupons and maturities at year-end. The estimated fair value of loans is based on estimates of the rate the Company would charge for similar loans at December 31, 2007 and 2006, applied for the time period until estimated repayment. The estimated fair value for demand and savings deposits is based on their carrying value. The estimated fair value for certificates of deposit and borrowings is based on estimates of the rate the Company would pay on such deposits or borrowings at December 31, 2007 and 2006, applied for the time period until maturity. The estimated fair value of variable rate short-term borrowed funds is considered to approximate carrying value. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements. The estimated fair value of other financial instruments approximate cost and are not considered significant to this presentation.
While these estimates of fair value are based on management’s judgment of the most appropriate factors, there is no assurance that, were the Company to have disposed of such items at December 31, 2007 and 2006, the estimated fair values would necessarily have been achieved at that date, since market values may differ depending on various circumstances. The estimated fair values at December 31, 2007 and 2006 should not necessarily be considered to apply at subsequent dates.
NOTE 19 - COMMITMENTS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISKS AND CONTINGENCIES
During the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to make loans and open-ended revolving lines of credit. Amounts as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, were as follows:
The index on variable rate commercial loan commitments is principally the Company’s base rate, which is the national prime rate. Interest rate ranges on commitments and open-ended revolving lines of credit for December 31, 2007 and 2006, were as follows:
Commitments, excluding open-ended revolving lines, generally have fixed expiration dates of one year or less. Open-ended revolving lines are monitored for proper performance and compliance on a monthly basis. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company follows the same credit policy (including requiring collateral, if deemed appropriate) to make such commitments as is followed for those loans that are recorded in its financial statements.
The Company’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance is represented by the contractual amount of the commitments. Management does not expect any significant losses as a result of these commitments.
NOTE 20 - PARENT COMPANY STATEMENTS
The Company operates primarily in the banking industry, which accounts for substantially all of its revenues, operating income, and assets. Presented below are parent only financial statements:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTE 21 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
Stock options for 14,000 and 5,000 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for 2007 and 2006 because they were antidilutive.
NOTE 22 - SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED) (in thousands except per share data)
* Per share data has been adjusted for a 2-for-1 stock split on April 28, 2006.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Lakeland Financial Corporation
Warsaw, Indiana
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lakeland Financial Corporation (“Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lakeland Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Lakeland Financial Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 7, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
South Bend, Indiana
February 7,
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9a.
ITEM 9a. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a) An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued their report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That report follows under the heading, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
c) There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls during the previous fiscal quarter, ended December 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Lakeland Financial Corporation
Warsaw, Indiana
We have audited Lakeland Financial Corporation’s (the “Company”) internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Lakeland Financial Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Lakeland Financial Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Lakeland Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and our report dated February 7, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
South Bend, Indiana
February 7,
ITEM 9b.
ITEM 9b. OTHER INFORMATION
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information appearing in the definitive Proxy Statement, dated as of March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information appearing in the definitive Proxy Statement, dated as of March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHARELHOLDER MATTERS
The information appearing in the definitive Proxy Statement, dated as of March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets forth the following information as of December 31, 2007 for (i) all compensation plans previously approved by the Company’s shareholders and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by the Company’s shareholders:
(a)
the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights;
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Number of securities to be
Weighted-average
Number of securities
issued upon exercise of
exercise price of
remaining available
Plan category
outstanding options
outstanding options
for future issuance
Equity compensation plans
approved by security
holders(1)
506,513
$11.16
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security
holders
$ 0.00
Total
506,513
$11.16
(1) Lakeland Financial Corporation 1997 Share Incentive Plan adopted on April 14, 1998 by the Board of Directors.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information appearing in the definitive Proxy Statement, dated as of March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information appearing in the definitive proxy statement, dated as of March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibit No.
Document
Incorporated by reference to
3.1
Amended and Restated Articles
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
of Incorporation of Lakeland
Form S-8 filed with the
Financial Corporation
Commission on April 15, 1998
3.2
Bylaws of Lakeland
Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company’s
Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1996
4.1
Form of Common Stock Certificate
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003
10.1
Lakeland Financial
Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s
Corporation 1997 Share
Form S-8 filed with the
Incentive Plan
Commission on April 15, 1998
10.2
Form of Indenture for Trust Preferred
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Issuance
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003
10.3
Lakeland Financial Corporation 401(k)
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form
Plan
S-8 filed with the Commission on
October 23, 2000
10.4
Amended and Restated Lakeland
Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form
Financial Corporation Director’s Fee
10-K for the fiscal year ended
Deferral Plan
December 31, 2002
10.5
Form of Change of Control Agreement
Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form
entered into with David M. Findlay and
10-K for the fiscal year ended
Kevin L. Deardorff
December 31, 2001
10.6
Form of Change in Control Agreement
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form
entered into with Michael L. Kubacki and
10-K for the fiscal year ended
Charles D. Smith
December 31, 2000
10.7
Employee Deferred Compensation Plan
Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form
and Form of Agreement
10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004
10.8
Schedule of Board Fees
Attached hereto
10.9
Form of Option Grant Agreement
Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004
10.10
Executive Incentive Bonus Plan
Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004
21.0
Subsidiaries
Attached hereto
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered
Attached hereto
Public Accounting Firm
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Attached hereto
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) and
13(a)-15(f)/15d-15(f)
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Attached hereto
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) and
13(a)-15(f)/15d-15(f)
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Attached hereto
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Attached hereto
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date: February 29, 2008
By /s/Michael L. Kubacki
Michael L. Kubacki, Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
Title
Date
/s/Michael L. Kubacki
Michael L. Kubacki
Principal Executive Officer and Director
February 29, 2008
/s/David M. Findlay
David M. Findlay
Principal Financial Officer
February 29, 2008
/s/Teresa A. Bartman
Teresa A. Bartman
Principal Accounting Officer
February 29, 2008
/s/Robert E. Bartels, Jr.
Robert E. Bartels, Jr.
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/L. Craig Fulmer
L. Craig Fulmer
Director
February 29, 2008
___________________________________
Thomas A. Hiatt
Director
February 29, 2008
___________________________________
Allan J. Ludwig
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/Charles E. Niemier
Charles E. Niemier
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/Emily E. Pichon
Emily E. Pichon
Director
February 29, 2008
S1
/s/Richard L. Pletcher
Richard L. Pletcher
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/Steven D. Ross
Steven D. Ross
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/Donald B. Steininger
Donald B. Steininger
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/Terry L. Tucker
Terry L. Tucker
Director
February 29, 2008
/s/M. Scott Welch
M. Scott Welch
Director
February 29, 2008
S2
Exhibit
Subsidiaries
3.
LCB Investments II, Inc., a subsidiary of Lake City Bank incorporated in Nevada to manage a portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio.
4.
LCB Funding, Inc., a subsidiary of LCB Investments II, Inc. incorporated under the laws of Maryland to operate as a real estate investment trust.