fig1 a and 1 b depict an exemplary solids placement system 10 , which includes an extension sleeve assembly 12 that is secured to the lower end of a packer assembly 14 . the exemplary solids placement system 10 is a system for the placement of gravel within a wellbore 16 during gravel packing . however , those of skill in the art will appreciate that a similar arrangement may be used for disposal of proppants and other solids within a wellbore . it is noted that the details of gravel packing and proppant placement operations generally are well known to those of skill in the art and , therefore , will not be described in detail herein . however , the general outline of an exemplary gravel packing tool and system 10 is described in order to illustrate one use of the blast liner assembly of the present invention . the packer assembly 14 is a through - tubing packer assembly in that , once set , it can permit a service tool to be passed through its axial center . at the beginning of a gravel packing operation , the packer assembly 14 and extension sleeve assembly 12 are run into the wellbore 16 . the packer assembly 14 is set against the cased side of the wellbore 16 , and an annulus 18 is thereby defined between the extension sleeve assembly 12 and the side of the wellbore 16 . in this situation , it is desired to place gravel 20 within the annulus 18 below the packer 14 . the extension sleeve assembly 12 has a generally cylindrical body 22 and defines an interior bore 24 with a pair of gravel flow ports 26 disposed therethrough . the extension sleeve assembly 12 also includes a blast liner retainer section , generally shown at 28 . a rotatable blast liner 30 , the structure and operation of which will be described shortly , is retained within the blast liner retainer section 28 . the solids placement system 10 also includes a service tool , generally shown at 32 , which is disposed through the packer assembly 14 and into the bore 24 of the extension sleeve assembly 12 . the service tool 32 is suspended upon a tubing string 34 that extends to the surface of the wellbore 16 . the tubing string 34 defines an axial flowbore 36 along its length . the other portion of the service tool 32 is a gravel placement tool 38 , which is secured to the lower end of the tubing string 34 and defines an axial , interior flowbore 40 along its length as well . reverse recirculation ports 42 are disposed through a lower portion of the gravel placement tool 38 . the use of such recirculation ports in gravel packng tools is well understood by those of skill in the art and , therefore , will not be described in any detail herein . annular elastomeric seals 44 surround the gravel placement tool 38 at intervals along its length and serve to provide fluid sealing . the flowbore 40 of the gravel placement tool 38 contains a ball seat 46 . located just above the ball seat 46 is a lateral gravel flow port 48 . turning now to fig2 , and 4 , the structure and operation of an exemplary rotatable blast liner 30 is now further described . fig2 , and 4 depict a blast liner 30 having a generally tubular liner body 50 with a pair of annular recessed portions 52 , 54 upon the outer surface 56 of the blast liner 30 . the radially inner surface 58 of the blast liner 30 includes a lower diversion portion 60 proximate the lower axial end 62 of the liner body 50 . the diversion portion 60 features a plurality of angled flow channels 64 . the flow channels 64 are formed between inwardly projecting vanes 66 , as shown in fig2 and 3 . alternatively , flow channels may be formed by milling angled grooves 64 ′ into the radially inner surface 58 of the blast liner body 50 , as in alternative blast liner 30 ′ illustrated in fig4 . referring again to fig1 a and 1 b , when the service tool 32 is disposed into the extension sleeve assembly 12 , it is landed by the interengagement of landing shoulders ( not shown ), in a manner known in the art . when landed , the lateral gravel flow port 48 of the service tool 32 is located adjacent an upper portion of the rotatable blast liner 30 . an annular space 70 is defined between the blast liner 30 and the outer radial surface 72 of the gravel placement tool 38 . in order to begin placing gravel , a ball plug 74 is dropped into the flowbore 36 of the tubing string 34 and lands upon the ball seat 46 . once the ball plug 74 is seated , any fluids or slurries that are pumped down the flowbore 36 from the surface will be forced to exit the flowbore 36 through the gravel flow port 48 . in operation , flow of gravel slurry out of the gravel flow port 48 and through the annular space 70 to the gravel flow ports 26 will induce rotation of the blast liner 30 within the liner retaining section 28 in the direction opposite that in which the flow is being diverted by the diverter section 60 of the blast liner 30 due to the principal of equal and opposite reaction of forces . arrow 76 in fig3 illustrates the direction of the rotation of the blast liner 30 , while arrows 78 in fig3 illustrate the direction of diversion of slurry by the diversion portion 60 . rotation of the blast liner 30 within the liner retaining section 60 will prevent a single small area of the blast liner 30 from being exposed to the blast of slurry exiting the gravel flow port 48 . wear and abrasion damage will be spread substantially evenly about the circumference of the inner surface 58 of the blast liner 30 as the liner 30 is rotated , rather than the erosion wear being concentrated upon one angular area of the liner 30 . as a result of the rotation of the liner 30 , the life of the blast liner 30 , and the solids placement system 10 , overall , is extended as compared to a stationary sleeve , which would develop a hole at the point of impact . fig1 a and 2 illustrate an exemplary annular primary wear , or impingement , area 80 having upper boundary 82 and lower boundary 84 upon the inner radial surface 58 of the blast liner 30 . the primary wear area 80 is the portion of the inner radial surface 58 of the blast liner 30 that lies proximate the gravel flow port 48 and receives the primary erosion wear from gravel exiting the port 48 . it is noted that annular bearings 86 , 88 , visible in fig3 reside within the recessed portions 52 , 54 , respectively , to provide for standoff of the blast liner 30 from the liner retaining section 28 of the extension sleeve assembly 12 and helps ensure ease of rotation of the blast liner 30 within the liner retaining section 28 . fig5 a and 5 b depict portions of an alternative embodiment for a blast liner assembly , generally indicated at 90 , that is constructed in accordance with the present invention . the blast liner assembly 90 is used within the solids placement system 10 described earlier . in this embodiment , the blast liner 30 , 30 ′ is caused to move axially as well as rotationally within the liner retaining section 28 during use , thereby further increasing the area of the sleeve that is exposed to wear and abrasion damage . because the damage is spread upon a larger area , there is less severe damage to any point area upon the sleeve . the blast liner assembly 90 includes the blast liner 30 radially surrounding the gravel placement tool 38 and the liner retaining section 28 within the body 22 of the extension sleeve assembly 12 . it is noted that , although a blast liner 30 is depicted in fig5 a and 5 b , a blast liner having milled grooves to form the flow channels , such as exemplary blast liner 30 ′ might be used as well in the blast liner assembly 90 . additionally , the blast liner assembly 90 includes an erodable or wearable bushing 92 that is retained within the liner retaining section 28 below the blast liner 30 . the wearable bushing 92 is formed of a readily erodable material , such as fiberglass , ceramic , or plastic . as the blast liner 30 ( or 30 ′) rotates within the liner retaining section 28 , as described above , during flow of gravel slurry , the frictional engagement of the lower end of the blast liner 30 ( or 30 ′) with the bushing 92 will cause the bushing 92 to gradually wear away . fig5 a depicts the blast liner assembly 90 at the onset of flowing of gravel slurry , while fig5 b depicts the assembly after slurry has been flowed for a period of time . as can be seen by a comparison of fig5 a and 5 b , the bushing 92 has become much shorter axially due to the frictional wear upon it provided by the blast liner 30 / 30 ′. as a result , the blast liner 30 / 30 ′ moves progressively downwardly within the liner retaining section 28 . as the liner 30 or 30 ′ moves downwardly within the liner retaining section 28 , the annular impingement area 80 is expanded axially as the upper boundary 82 of the impingement area progressively moves upwardly upon the inner surface 58 of the liner body 50 . referring now to fig6 and 7 , a further embodiment is depicted for a blast liner assembly 100 constructed in accordance with the present invention . the blast liner assembly 100 includes a blast liner 30 ″ that is retained within the liner retaining section 28 ′ of the extension sleeve assembly 12 . the liner retaining section 28 ′ is inscribed with a lug track 102 , which is continuous . details of the lug track 102 are better understood with reference to fig7 , which depicts the liner retaining section 28 ″ in cross - section apart from other components . the lug track 102 of the liner retaining section 28 ″ is essentially a double - helix that includes a first helical path 104 which , in the manner of a spring , is made up of individual spiral winds 106 that are sequentially disposed along the length of the retaining section 28 ″. the winds 106 are formed in a first spiral direction . for example , as illustrated in fig7 , the path 104 and winds 106 proceed downwardly along the length of the retaining section 28 ″ when traversed in a clockwise direction . the lug track 102 also includes a second helical path 108 that is inscribed within the retaining section 28 ″. the second helical path 108 includes multiple individual spiral winds 110 , which are oriented in a second spiral direction from the first winds 106 . as depicted in fig7 , the second helical path 108 and winds 110 proceed axially upwardly along the length of the retaining section 28 ″ when traversed in a clockwise direction . both axial ends of the spiral paths 106 , 110 are joined to one another at a joining point 112 . only one joining point 112 is depicted in fig7 . however , it will be understood that the opposite end of each spiral path 106 and 110 will be joined at a similar joining point at their opposite ends . as a result of the joining points 112 , a continuous double - helical path is provided for the lug track 102 . fig6 illustrates that a lug 114 projects outwardly from the outer surface of the blast liner 30 ″ and resides within the lug track 102 . when the blast liner 30 ″ is then rotated within the liner retaining section 28 ′ by flow of slurry , as described previously , the lug 114 will be moved along the lug track 102 imparting axial movement to the blast liner 30 ″. this axial movement of the liner 30 ″ will cause the impingement area 80 to become axially larger . approximate upper and lower boundaries 82 , 84 of the annular impingement area 80 are illustrated in fig6 . those of skill in the art will recognize that the above - described devices and methods , although described in relation to a gravel packing arrangement , are also readily applicable to other solids placement arrangements , such as fracturing tools that place solid proppants within a wellbore . those of skill in the art will also recognize that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the exemplary designs and embodiments described herein and that the invention is limited only by the claims that follow and any equivalents thereof .