referring to fig1 a three phase brushless motor 1 comprises three motor windings 2 , 4 , 6 , generally designated as phases a , b and c , connected in a star network . one end of each coil is connected to a respective terminal . the other ends of the coils are connected together to form the star centre 7 . the free ends are connected to a switching circuit arranged as an h - bridge . the switching circuit comprises a three phase bridge 8 , one for each phase of the motor . each arm 10 , 12 , 14 of the bridge comprises a pair of switches in the form of a top transistor 16 and a bottom transistor 18 connected in series between a supply rail 20 and ground line 22 . the motor windings 2 , 4 , 6 are each tapped off from between a respective complementary pair of transistors 16 , 18 . the transistors 16 , 18 are turned on and off in a controlled manner by a motor controller 21 , which is shown in detail in fig3 of the drawings , to provide pulse width modulation of the potential applied to each of the phase windings , thereby to control the potential difference applied across each of the windings 2 , 4 , 6 and hence also the current flowing through the windings . this in turn controls the strength and orientation of the magnetic field produced by the windings , which sets the torque produced by the motor . a current measuring device in the form of a resistor 24 is provided in the ground line 22 between the motor 1 and ground so that the controller 21 can measure the total current flowing through all of the windings 2 , 4 , 6 . in order to measure the current in each of the windings the total current has to be sampled at precise instances within the pwm period where the voltage applied to each terminal of the winding ( and hence the conduction state of a particular phase ) is known . if preferred a separate current sensor could be provided for each phase . the controller in this example uses a space vector modulation ( svm ) algorithm although any modulation technique can equally be used within the scope of the present invention and this should not be construed as limiting . each winding 2 , 4 , 6 in a three phase system can only be connected to either the supply rail 20 or the ground line 22 and there are therefore eight possible states of the switches of the control circuit . using 1 to represent one of the phases being at positive voltage and 0 to represent a phase connected to ground , state 1 can be represented as [ 100 ] indicating phase a at 1 , phase b at 0 and phase c at 0 , state 2 is represented as [ 110 ], state 3 as [ 010 ], state 4 as [ 011 ], state 5 as [ 001 ], state 6 as [ 101 ], state 0 as [ 000 ] and state 7 as [ 111 ]. each of states 1 to 6 is a conducting state in which current flows through all of the windings 2 , 4 , 6 , flowing in one direction through one of them and in the other direction through the other two . state 0 is a zero volt state in which all of the windings are connected to ground and state 7 is a zero volt state in which all the windings are connected to the supply rail . during normal operation when the switching circuit is being controlled by the controller 21 to produce pulse width modulation , each of the phases 2 , 4 , 6 will normally be turned on and off once in each pwm period . the relative lengths of time that are taken up in each state will determine the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field produced in each winding , and hence the magnitude and direction of the total torque applied to the rotor . the motor control circuit of fig1 and 2 can be used in many applications , and in this embodiment forms part of an electric power steering system . the steering system includes a torque sensor 26 that measures the torque in a steering column , and feeds this to a torque controller 28 . the torque controller calculates a torque demand signal that is indicative of the torque that is to be produced by the motor . the torque demand signal comprises a series of discrete values , output at a sample rate of m samples per second . this signal is converted into a current demand signal in the rotating − q frame according to the angular position of the motor rotor . the current controller causes the motor to operate and provide the demanded torque . this torque is applied by the motor to the steering system , making it easier for a driver to turn the steering wheel . the system therefore has two closed loops — the torque controller loop and the current controller loop as shown best in fig3 , the current controller feeds the current demand signal into a subtractor 32 along with a measure of the actual current flowing in the motor , expressed in the d - q frame and derived from the output of the current sensor 24 . the output of the subtractor is an error signal indicative of the difference between the demanded d - q current and the actual measured d - q current . the error signal is fed to the input of a proportional - integral ( pi ) controller stage 34 that converts the current error signal which is in the d - q frame into a voltage signal in the d - q frame , and this is then converted into three phase voltages uvw by a dq - uvw converter 36 . this is then converted into the required pwm voltage signals for each phase using the chosen svm modulation technique by a pwm converter . the controller constantly attempts to drive the error signal to zero , which ensures that the current in the motor phases matches the demanded current . in a practical system , the outer steering ( torque ) loop will produce updated torque demand signal values at a rate m that is lower than the rate at which the current controller operates . the update rate of the demand signal during normal operation is m samples per second , where m determines a first sample update rate . as shown in fig5 , the torque controller includes a downsampling circuit which is operable under certain operating conditions of the motor to downsample the torque demand signal , i . e . to provide a torque demand signal in which the values are update at a lower , second , rate m / n , where n is typically an integer value . this downsampled torque demand signal is then used by the current controller . the downsampling circuit receives at an input a measure of motor velocity , and determines that he motor is in the certain condition where downsampling is beneficial when the motor velocity is below a threshold level , for example a velocity of 5 mph or 2 mph . the benefit of this approach is that high frequency components of the noise , generally anything above 40 hz for example as any noise below that will typically be road noise caused as the vehicle drives along a road — will not be passed through to the current controller at the low or zero velocities . this helps to reduce the effects of this high frequency noise , such as acoustic noise which may arise if the current controller reacts to the noise . downsampling effectively reduces the bandwidth but is beneficial compared with alternative bandwidth reducing circuits using filters . phase lag of the system is not compromised as much as if a straight forward filter was used therefore the effect on the stability of the system is reduced . the applicant has found that at the first rate the noise floor gets amplified within the control loop , but the transmission path plays an important part in exaggerating the noise . under no load conditions — the motor is still susceptible to noise but at a slightly lower gain from the controller ( high frequency path gain of the torque controller is pretty constant under these conditions ). the downsampling of the torque demand signal from the first rate to a second , lower rate , effectively reduces the bandwidth of the signal without introducing any lag ( only a small fixed lag ) in the signal . this reduces the band of noise the system is exposed to while introducing only minimal effective delay unlike traditional filtering methods which introduce dynamic delays . it is notable that the functions which utilizes these signals within the current controller are still running at their normal rates — receiving torque demand signals at the first rate even though they change in value at the lower second rate under certain conditions — which means that even though the signal is static the function still uses the value for calculations , i . e ., the function would see the same value for multiple iterations before seeing a change as shown in fig4 . for a signal sampled at 1 ms with a downsample factor of 4 , there would be 4 constant values before a new value is updated , or the bandwidth gets reduced by a factor of 4 from 1 khz to 250 hz . this is shown in fig4 . as seen in fig5 , this prevents the signal from varying at higher rates than the downsampled bandwidth . but this introduces the problem of aliasing , as the motor now gets bigger steps when rotating , this manifests as a high frequency noise in the system . the theoretical explanation is provided in the sections that follow . down sampling the output on the interface with the motor reduces the bandwidth . this gives possibility of higher amplitude aliased content which owing to the higher bandwidth of the motor could cause unexpected behaviour . the design was augmented to reduce the motor bandwidth sufficiently to attenuate the aliased content but still keep enough bandwidth to allow for the controller to act without any lag in the active dynamic region of the electro mechanical system which typically , in a steering system , has a bandwidth of around 50 hz . fig5 shows the effect of downsampling on the high frequency noise on the torque signal , the high frequency noise is substantially reduced with only minimal delay in the signal . although the downsampling provides a very clean time domain signal as seen in the previous diagram , it introduces other problems in the frequency domain . downsampling the signal may produce aliasing — when a signal is downsampled the frequency band which the signal has content is reduced . this would be fine if the signal was only used at the rate it was sampled , but since the execution rate remains ( the first rate ) the input to the current controller sees the same value multiple times which in terms of frequency content manifests as reflected spectral content . this is shown in fig6 . to overcome possible problems caused by aliasing , the drive circuit of this embodiment uses a high quality , low noise , velocity signal fed into the downsampling circuit to cause the circuit to ramp in and out of down sampling . fig7 shows the strategy used to vary downsampling rate with motor velocity . the downsampling is achieved by feeding the torque demand signal at the first rate into a sample and hold circuit , the output of which is sampled at the first rate and the sample and hold circuit holding a value at the second rate . the sample and hold circuit effectively captures the value of the torque demand signal and holds it for an integer number of samples , say 2 samples if the second rate is half the first rate , or 3 samples if the second rate is a third of the first rate . with variable downsampling the rate at which the sample and hold circuit samples and holds the input signal is varied . the applicant has appreciated that dynamics are only introduced when the column is rotating ; if the down sampling is backed off to a lower value when the column is rotating would prevent the motor from reacting to the high frequency reflected spectra . the velocity signal is produced using an algorithm that uses the time elapsed for a fixed position change of the motor to determine velocity , in this case the lowest possible position change that can be measured ( i . e . motor electrical position ) was used . the amount of downsampling applied has three possible levels and the velocity signal calculated is used to transition between the different levels . for purposes of development for different front axle loads , both the amount of downsampling possible at each level and the velocity thresholds are kept tuneable . for example , if a position change of 7 . 5 electrical degrees ( minimum resolution in position possible ) happened in δt , the velocity of the signal was calculated as the different motor velocity levels and the corresponding downsampling levels are shown in the table below , down sampling of the signals through the system provides a good improvement to the overall noise levels in the system under rumble conditions — this does produce some unwanted side effects in aliasing but can be contained with a corresponding setting in the motor control loop . in accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes , the principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiments . however , it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope .