fig1 – 4 illustrates one embodiment of a motorcycle front end 10 and specifically the steering / suspension system 50 , viewed generally from the front in fig1 and 2 , the left side in fig3 , and the rear in fig4 . the front end includes a tire 12 mounted on a wheel 14 and equipped with brake rotors 16 and brake calipers 18 . a fork bottom 20 includes a fork bottom body coupled to the axle 22 and to a pair of male lower fork tubes 24 which slide in a pair of female upper fork tubes 26 . in other embodiments , conventional fork tubes are used , without fork bottoms . a lower triple clamp 28 and an upper triple clamp 30 are coupled to the upper fork tubes and couple them to a steering stem assembly ( not visible ) which rotates within a steering tube 32 which is part of , or coupled to , the frame ( not shown ) of the motorcycle . the front end 10 thus pivots or rotates about a steering axis which is coaxial with the steering tube 32 . this invention differs from the prior art in that at least one of the spring ( suspension ) and / or shock ( damping ) components is coaxially disposed within the steering tube . in one embodiment , a monoshock 34 provides both spring support and damping for the front end , while in other embodiments , a more conventional cartridge system ( not shown ) could be employed within the fork tubes . the bottom end of the monoshock is coupled to a fork buttress 36 . the fork buttress may be coupled to the lower fork tubes or to the fork bottoms . in one embodiment , the fork buttress comprises two halves , each of which is integrally formed with a respective fork bottom , as shown . fig5 illustrates the steering / suspension system 50 of the motorcycle front end 10 , viewed generally from the front and shown in an exploded view . for ease of illustration , only a single fork will be described . the upper fork tube 26 threads into the upper triple clamp 30 . a fork cap 52 seals the open end of the fork tube to prevent gross contamination of the sliding components , but is not necessarily an airtight seal . a stationary fork bushing 54 and a seal 56 fit within the lower end 48 of the upper fork tube , and are held in place by a snap wire 58 . a sliding fork bushing 60 mates with the upper end 62 of the lower fork tube . the stationary and sliding fork bushings provide a low - stiction but tight - tolerance sliding fit of the lower fork tube within the upper fork tube . in practice , the components may need to be assembled in a slightly different manner than suggested by this exploded view , as the bushings are not generally able to slide past each other , and their interference is part of what keeps the telescopic forks from telescoping completely to disassembly . a shock tube 66 rotates within the steering tube 32 on an upper bearing 68 and a lower bearing 70 . a jam nut 72 and washer 74 secure the upper bearing onto the shock tube . a top bolt 76 threads into the shock tube and secures it to the upper triple clamp . the lower end 78 of the lower fork tube threads or otherwise couples to a hole 80 in the upper end 42 of the fork bottom 20 . the upper end of the monoshock 34 fits up into and engages the shock tube , while the lower end of the monoshock engages the fork buttress 36 at the upper end 42 of the fork bottom . the lateral stiffness of the fork bottom is controlled by a tension cable 82 . the lower end 84 of the tension cable engages the fork bottom , while the upper end 86 of the tension cable is engaged and tensioned by a tension adjuster 88 . the tension adjuster and a washer 90 engage a tension adjuster block 92 which fits into a hole 94 in the upper end of the fork bottom . a detent ball 96 retains the tension adjuster within the tension adjuster block and , in some embodiments , provides “ clicker ” adjustment feedback as is commonly present in other motorcycle suspension adjustments such as compression and rebound damping . for aesthetics and aerodynamics , a fork bottom inner cover 98 may be coupled to the inward portion of the fork bottom , covering the tension cable and other components . fig6 illustrates further details of one embodiment of the steering / suspension system 50 , with a cutaway for visibility into the coaxial alignment of the suspension components within the steering tube 32 . the suspension components are illustrated somewhat generically and in a much simplified configuration omitting many details which are not essential to understanding this invention but which are well within the abilities of those of ordinary skill in the art . the suspension components may include one or more load - bearing components such as a coil spring 110 , and one or more damping components 112 . as such , the suspension components may be quite similar to a conventional rear shock such as is conventionally used in modern sportbikes , with the addition of a suitable mounting mechanism 114 adapted for coupling or mating with the fork brace ( not shown ) or other lower mounting component . the suspension components are disposed coaxially with the steering tube 32 , or , more precisely , coaxially with the steering axis . the shock tube 66 is disposed coaxially within the steering tube , and rides on an upper bearing 68 and a lower bearing 70 . the jam nut 72 is threaded onto the shock tube . the top bolt 76 threads into the shock tube and coaxially locates the upper triple clamp 30 with respect to the steering axis . the top bolt is provided with , in one embodiment , an internal hex socket 116 by which the top nut is tightened . in one embodiment , the top nut is further provided with a passage 118 and the shock tube is provided with a passage , through which a tool ( not shown ) can be inserted to adjust various settings of the suspension components , such as compression damping , rebound damping , preload , ride height , and so forth . again , for ease of illustration , these various adjustment mechanisms are not shown on the monoshock . one noteworthy feature of this system is that the ride height of the front end can be adjusted by screwing threaded rod 120 up and down in the shock tube , and this is completely independent of the coupling of the forks to the triple clamps . this represents a marked improvement over the conventional fork systems , in which the rider must loosen the upper and lower triple clamps , slide or pound the upper fork tubes up and down in the triple clamps until a desired amount of protrusion is achieved , then retighten the triple clamps , while hoping that the fork tubes have not shifted and that the two fork tubes are set at exactly the same height . the coaxial monoshock adjustment of this invention enables the rider to adjust the ride height without fiddling with the triple clamps or fork tubes , and it guarantees a single , consistent setting without the possibility of maladjustment between the two forks . the same monoshock principle applies to other adjustments , as well , such as compression damping , rebound damping , and so forth . fig7 illustrates a motorcycle 150 having a front end with the coaxial steering / suspension system of this invention . the skilled reader will readily appreciate that having the suspension components mounted coaxially with the steering head provides several significant advantages . for example : the moment of rotational inertia of the front end is reduced , versus that of a conventional front end in which the suspension components are located out in the fork tubes ; only a single set of suspension components is required , and yet the suspension has the same affect at each side of the front axle , whereas putting a single set of components in e . g . only the left fork of a conventional front end would produce disastrous results ; preload , rebound damping , compression damping , and ride height adjustments can be made with a single adjustment each , versus the two adjustments each that are required in a conventional front end , and can be done without loosening the forks in the triple clamps ; suspension settings cannot accidentally be different on the two sides of the front end , whereas this is a constant danger with a conventional front end ; stiction is reduced ; and yet the familiar and desirable look and feel of a conventional dual fork front end are retained . furthermore , it may often be the case that the total mass of the required suspension is lower when using the present invention , than when using a conventional front end . while the invention has been described with reference to its use in a motorcycle , the invention is not limited to motorcycles , but can be used in bicycles , automobiles , and other vehicles . and while the invention has been shown as using an “ upside - down ” fork , it may alternatively be used with a “ right - side - up ” fork . some components have been illustrated as being of monolithic construction , while other components have been illustrated as being separate components coupled together . the skilled reader will readily appreciate that the designer may elect , within the scope of this invention , to split some components into separate sub - components , or to combine various components into a monolithic whole . the skilled reader will further appreciate that the invention may be practiced in a “ single - sided ” front end , such as that found on some bicycles which have only a single fork . the term “ triple clamp ” should not necessarily be interpreted to mean that two forks are required with the steering tube . the presence of one or more suspension components coaxial with the steering axis does not necessarily prohibit the additional presence of one or more suspension components elsewhere , such as within the forks . the sliding - tube forks may be empty , containing neither springs nor dampers , and may thus be said to have substantially inert suspension characteristics . in some embodiments , the suspension components could be located externally to the outer steering tube , rather than inside it . while it might , at first glance , be assumed to be a negative that the steering tube must , in the present invention , be significantly larger than in a conventional front end , the opposite is actually true . having a very large diameter steering tube , with very large diameter bearings and so forth , reduces frame torque and makes the frame stronger , especially at the points at which the rest of the frame joins the steering tube . when one component is said to be “ adjacent ” another component , it should not be interpreted to mean that there is absolutely nothing between the two components , only that they are in the order indicated . the various features illustrated in the figures may be combined in many ways , and should not be interpreted as though limited to the specific embodiments in which they were explained and shown . those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure will appreciate that many other variations from the foregoing description and drawings may be made within the scope of the present invention . indeed , the invention is not limited to the details described above . rather , it is the following claims including any amendments thereto that define the scope of the invention .