for over half a century since magnetostrictive technology has been in use for linear positioning devices , there has been many configurations intended to improve on its performance . from the early units that were used for data conversion from analog to digital as u . s . pat . no . 2 , 995 , 736 , referenced here in its entirety demonstrates , the technology has progressively been adapted to be used for many other applications involving linear positioning . for over half that time , magnetostrictive probes were adapted to be used for fuel level determination . due to constraints in tank entry ports , and the volatile nature of gasoline , restraints were maintained in introducing electrical equipment inside fuel tanks . with time , more knowledge was acquired . during that same time , electrical components were shrinking in size as well as power requirements . with this , it became possible to use miniaturized electrical elements in a probe . the proposed adaptation of a magnetostrictive probe takes advantage of all of this miniaturization to benefit in shrinking the components to a degree where some circuitry could be relocated inside a small tube , thus making it possible to relocate the signal pickup to the foot of the probe . this is achieved without compromising the size of the tube in order to accommodate sufficient space for a floatation device . hunter et al . u . s . pat . no . 5 , 076 , 100 here referenced in its entirety explains the operation of a magnetostrictive probe where , due to an interaction between two magnetic fields , a twist is produced in a waveguide medium and propagates in both directions . pickup elements are placed strategically at one end of the waveguide , in this case at the canister &# 39 ; s end , and the arrival of the twist gets detected , amplified and measured . by convention many manufacturers positioned the dampers mostly at the foot of the probe . in this invention , the location of the pickup is reversed to be at the foot of the probe instead of the canister . this arrangement will grant many benefits as will be discussed in the details to follow . the major departures from the convention found in this invention are mechanical in nature . all electrical standards of the operation of the probe remain the same . in the case of an intelligent probe , a central processing unit detailing the many functions of the probe is in place . parameters such as fuel , water , and temperature are measured as in the standard fashion . in this probe a further element is introduced . strategically , a data validation magnet 115 is put in place where the detector used to be located inside the canister . this magnet 115 needs to be read at predetermined intervals to allow this measurement to evaluate the integrity of any other height measurement performed by the probe . current generator , signal amplifier , signal detector , inhibit generator , gate generator , counter , and data transmission circuits all remain the same as in basic circuits of any magnetostrictive probe . if temperature is involved , further circuitry is added to perform this function . all of this is controlled by the asic or microprocessor that was programmed to perform each function at a predetermined sequence . once the twist is produced and the waves travel through the wire , there results two components associated with every wave produced . both longitudinal and a torsional components are running in the wire , of which the desirable one is the torsional wave , that runs ⅓ slower than the longitudinal wave . this characteristic makes it more appealing since it will also exhibit ⅓ more resolution with any given reading than its counterpart . with all of these waves running up and down the wire , if not suppressed , they would cause the system to be very noisy and render a stable measurement almost impossible . to resolve this problem , damping elements are put in place to attenuate the redundant waves in the wire . the more efficient a damping system is , the quieter the base line for the measurement will be , and better readings will result from the sensor . conventional probes place the damping element at the foot of the probe therefore creating a dead zone where no measurement could be performed . in this new arrangement , the principal damping elements 113 and 114 will be located inside the canister away from the active zone of the measurement . a cavity is also available under the pickup coil 150 where a small sleeve damper could be inserted to further attenuate redundant waves from reflecting back into the pickup coil and alter the natural symmetry of the obtained signal . this bottom detection necessitates that the amplification takes place near the ultrasonic pickup elements to avoid introducing noises in the micro level signals that are produced at the detector . if those signals were to be channeled to the other end of the probe to be amplified , the signal to noise ratio would be so deteriorated that there would be no discernible signal left to be measured . this problem is resolved with the repositioning of the amplifier in board 170 near the pickup coil 150 . in lieu of having a reference magnet at the end of the probe , make use of a reflector or simply use dampers to attenuate the residual noises in the wire ; this new approach occupies this region with the pickup coil . the advantages resulting from this strategic relocation are beneficial principally when a probe is used as a tank monitoring device . it is also of benefit if a measurement relative to the bottom of the probe is needed . conventional top detection systems are affected by many factors such as temperature , vibration , magnetic risers . due to its near proximity to ground surface , any stray electromagnetic influences could be detected by the ultrasonic pickup and ruin what would have otherwise been a good reading . for leak detection to be reliable when performed with the information obtained from the level gauge , it needs to be derived from an accurate height measurement . however , with the ultrasonic pickup located in the opposite end of the probe in relation to the level in the tank as is done in prior art , ascertaining an accurate level involves extra processes that are rendered unnecessary with this relocation of the pickup . the stability of the measurement , from the standpoint of temperature and interference to the detection apparatus , makes for a more precise tank leak detection capability as offered by this inverse signal detection method . a magnetostrictive probe used in an underground tank is often located in an area where vehicles are allowed to drive over the manhole . in this case , ground vibrations are transferred to the probe and results in stray longitudinal waves that are intercepted by the detector . although those signals may not be high enough to form discernible signals that could trigger the comparator output , they certainly constitute baseline noises that perturb the integrity of other readings . this new arrangement offers some attenuation to such waves due to the damping effect provided by the fuel in the tank . since the detection end is always located inside the fluid , when such vibration occurs , it gets dissipated in the liquid and the residual that may reach the detector is rather insignificant . the benefits are even greater when the tank is full . refer to fig1 where a system level of magnetostrictive probe 100 is illustrated showing it located inside a tank through riser pipe 950 . this riser pipe in turn is enveloped by an outer jacket 900 forming a sump cavity 901 . that location , when considered in light of a fueling environment construction , is located below the pavement and protected by a large steel cover . this arrangement may be sturdy enough to allow a vehicle of a few tons to run over the cavity without collapsing it , but is by nature a very poor location for placing the detection circuit of a sensitive sensor such as a magnetostrictive probe . with critical determinations to be performed as a tank level detector and leak detector , the precision to be obtained from a probe needs to be better than 0 . 0005 ″. with temperature and vibrations affecting the system , even in cases where the electronics can read with a very high resolution , the measurement obtained is degraded by reason of the detector &# 39 ; s location . ultrasonic pickups such as coil 150 found in this invention are very stable over the temperature range that this probe could encounter in this kind of environment . however , the magnetostrictive wire 130 by contrast is a sensitive element when it comes to its operation over temperature . its grain structures are largely influenced by temperature and the permeability of the system is affected to the point where the detected signal suffers negatively in the presence of rising temperature . on account of the pickup locations , detections in probes are affected by a wide range in temperature in the course of a given day that could span over 30 ° c . in a 24 hour period . when changes in season take place in northern and southern hemispheres , the effect in the course of a year is even more drastic . anyone familiar to the operation of a magnetostrictive probe can attest that variances in temperature of such order affects more than the expansion and contraction of the mechanical parts forming the probe , but can shift the accuracy of the system simply by changing the slew rate of the signals , therefore , causing errors in the heights measured as well . by repositioning the detector , whether it is a pickup coil or a piezoelectric crystal , to a location that is not subjected to such a wide variance in temperature , the performance of the system will be made drastically more stable . this invention accomplishes this in relocating the ultrasonic pickup to the foot of the probe . by taking advantage of the geothermal stability of underground tanks , or simply the thermal mass of the fuel even in cases where the tank is used aboveground , a more stable reading can be obtained due to the fact that the detection will benefit from the wire not being affected by sudden changes in temperature . another effect of temperature that degrades the performance of a magnetostrictive probe is the expansion and contraction of the whole frame of the probe . many schemes have been derived to help reduce such an impact in probe performance but each and every one comes at a price . whether with tension applied to the wire or not , a measurement is affected when the structure of its frame is changing with temperature . the aim is always to maintain constant tension in the wire which could add some complexity to the mechanical design . when tension is changing in a wire used for a linear positioning device , the torque in the wire causes the signal &# 39 ; s velocity of propagation to be affected , and the measurement suffers as a result . with no tension , the wire is left to ride with the tube causing the point of references to change , thus causing instability and errors in the measurement as well . with this inversion , the added benefit of the data validation magnet is introduced to allow studying the changes in the wire , and algorithms could be devised to correct the errors . the data validation magnet is primarily intended to take advantage of its fixed location on the wire to help determine the integrity of a height measurement , particularly if the system is used in a noisy environment . whether the source of the noise is electrical or mechanical , this test allows the system to verify the integrity of other height readings and either accepts or simply rejects them if found to be unacceptable . this measurement is taken at the time of calibration of the probe and is stored into memory to serve as a reference to test the integrity of other readings . this reading is from a known height , and the fuel or water heights gathered must never be greater than that validation reference reading . where a parity check on a transmitted data fails to detect errors in the transmission , this piece of information is used to accept or reject that data . the criterion for discarding the data is based on the fact that no reading should be greater than that particular reference height . by reason of the location of magnet 115 at the farthest possible location at the other extremity of wire 130 , no other distance measurement should be greater than that validation reference gate . the data validation magnet 115 by reason of its location inside riser pipe 950 is also used to help overcome any stray magnetic signals imposed on the wire by the giant bar magnet this pipe sometimes becomes . since the presence of the data validation magnet is in near proximity to the waveguide , the resulting signal coming from it will be greater than the one coming from the pipe , therefore nulling its effect in the system . the repositioning of the pickup assembly to the bottom of the probe also places it away from the giant magnetic field resulting from riser pipe 950 . this field causes a distortion in the domain magnetization and results in distorted signals when the ultrasonic pickup is located inside the canister . the consequences of this magnetic field on the ultrasonic pickup could be so disastrous that the operation of the probe could be completely compromised . in order to fully take advantage of this configuration , the bottom of the probe is set to remain at the bottom of the tank eliminating any variations associated with either the tank or the probe due to temperature changes and other geological shifts imposed on the tank . great consideration was taken into keeping the bottom pickup assembly always at the very bottom of the probe . this is achieved by means of the bottom compression assembly made up of spring 160 , and the spacers 121 and 122 acting as carriers for spring 160 . that assembly exerts a downward force against the bottom pickup assembly 140 by way of the amplifier board 170 . spring 160 is set to have a rate of approximately 6 pounds and is calibrated to be at the middle of its range and allowed to compress or expand in relation to change in temperature that gets transmitted through inner tube 104 . that inner tube 104 is secured to spacer 121 and allowed to run freely through spacer 122 . when changes in length of inner tube 104 occurs , the spring varies and tries to change in relation to the motion to maintain a downward pressure against board 170 , which then is transmitted to the bottom pickup assembly 140 . tube 104 bridging the two spacers 121 and 122 , as illustrated in fig3 , along with the amplifier board &# 39 ; s section 175 represented in fig1 , form a framing for the bottom compression assembly preventing it from twisting and permitting it to maintain its rigidity . inner tube 104 is to be made of aluminum or stainless steel but could be a rigid plastic tube that cannot be easily bent under the pressure of the 6 pound spring 160 . it is to be secured to frame 105 and to spacer 121 so that all expansion and contraction of the system gets transmitted to tube 104 . as such , the motion would be intercepted by spring 160 which in turn would work at maintaining the bottom pickup assembly 140 in its fixed place . the goal of maintaining waveguide 130 under tension would negatively impact the consistency of signal propagation in the wire , due to changes in temperature , without the proper operation of the tensioning assembly 110 seen in fig2 . there , the spring gets adjusted to accommodate changes in tube length which are far greater than those of the magnetostrictive wire 130 . fig2 also shows the internal assembly of probe 100 . that view illustrates the repositioning of the assembly where the waveguide wire runs closely along the edge . this will place it closer to tube 102 , putting the wire closer to the magnets located inside the floats as illustrated in fig1 . with this arrangement in fig1 , the wire will be affected by stronger fields from magnet 301 resulting in stronger signals . this arrangement serves not only at shifting the wire away from the center of the probe where more room is created to position the amplifier board 170 , but it also serves the other means of achieving higher signal levels . the termination of the wire at the bottom of the probe could be made by many approaches . in this arrangement , it is represented as two 90 ° angle bends that are channeled through bottom pickup assembly 140 by way of channels 145 seen in fig9 b . the loop takes the wire back to a location where it can be mechanically secured to the assembly while making electrical contact with terminal 171 as illustrated in fig3 . coming from the pickup coil 150 before being bent into the first 90 ° angle , the wire needs to be supported in order to remain as a straight piece as it is going through the pickup coil . to correct the assembly from having any deviation in this arrangement , a centering piece 146 is shown in fig3 that perform this very role . in order to keep the outer shell of the probe at ground potential , the protective measure against a cathodic reaction is customarily to protect the lower region of a probe with a plastic isolation boot . for that purpose , this design calls for boot 106 to be placed at the end of the probe . the likeliness exists that some steel tanks may have some low residual magnetization all throughout the tank structure . in view of this , the provision is made for a small piece of mu shield metal 180 to be incorporated inside the boot where it could serve as a barrier preventing the small magnetic field from affecting wire 130 and causing any disturbance to the signal detection . due to the location of the amplifier board 170 at the very foot of the probe , and the remainder of the circuitry located inside the canister on top of the probe , supply voltages and control signals need to be provided to the board . to accommodate for this , fig8 shows spacers 120 located at 12 ″ intervals along the skeleton of the probe with cavity 123 that is intended to harness the wires connecting the boards . the wires are not represented in the picture . temperature sensors situated inside tube 102 are also connected to a harness running along the outside of spacers 120 . this harness connects the sensors to the measuring circuitry while keeping them near the pipe where they can sense the temperature of the nearby fuel . spacers 120 in this arrangement are configured to perform many duties . they are arranged as the skeleton of the probe located at 12 ″ intervals . they also are used as the carriers 121 and 122 supporting the spring 160 where together they form the bottom compression assembly . for easy assembly of the waveguide wire inside the inner tube 104 , provision is made where the wire can be pushed through the inner tube and later be isolated from touching the side of the said tube by means of isolators 190 . insertion of those isolators is facilitated by means of holes 107 situated along the inner tube at 6 ″ intervals . holes 107 are also used to lock spacers 120 in place without the need of setscrews . provision is made from the spacers to have snaps that mate into those holes . the bottom compression assembly is strategically located near the end of the probe where the downward force exerted by the spring would work at keeping the bottom pickup assembly 140 always situated at the tip of the probe . for this to be done , however , a spring is needed that happens to be right in the path of the water float &# 39 ; s magnet 301 . for that reason , the spring could easily become magnetized and act as a fixed positioned magnet . to prevent this from happening , the spring to be used is to be constructed of a nonmagnetic material such as copper , beryllium , or brass , etc . the bottom compression assembly uses the amplifier board 170 to push against the pickup assembly 140 . for that reason , board 170 needs to be sturdy enough to not bow under the pressure exerted by spring 160 . the outer tube 102 when joined to frame 105 needs to be secured in place to prevent it from dislodging from the frame and causing the tensioning of the probe to become undone . by way of hole 105 - b shown in fig6 , the tube can be secured to the frame with the use of a setscrew . the inner tube 104 is also secured to the frame by way of hole 105 - c seen in fig6 and to spacer 121 by means of a setscrew . this will allow the tube to move with expansion and contraction of the structure of the probe while keeping pressure to the bottom pickup assembly at all times . most of the circuitry needed to control the probe would be located inside the frame . locations on both sides of the frame are available where circuit boards could be mounted and secured to the frame by way of holes 105 - a seen in fig6 . from those boards , connection to the outside monitoring console could be established through connector 101 , also seen in fig6 . the temperature harness as well as interconnects between the boards could also be attached to the satellite boards not represented . this construction detailed in this invention constitutes one embodiment of the construction of the “ magnetostrictive probe with inverted signal detection ” concept . it remains that anyone skilled in the art will realize that other aspects of this invention not mentioned constitute other embodiments related to the spirit of the technique utilized and remain within the scope of this invention .