in a particular embodiment , the present application discloses an automated digital subscriber line performance control system comprising a computer system including a logic module to evaluate performance of a plurality of dsl lines and to automatically select a set of dsl lines from the plurality of dsl lines , a line profile database responsive to the computer system , the line profile database providing a plurality of line profiles in response to a request from the computer system , and a digital subscriber line access multiplexer coupled to the computer system . the digital subscriber line access multiplexer is configured to measure a performance parameter of a plurality of physical dsl lines and to change a profile for at least one of the plurality of dsl lines . the set of dsl lines has degraded performance characteristics based on historical performance data . in another embodiment , an automated method of adjusting digital subscriber line ( dsl ) performance is disclosed . the method includes evaluating performance of a plurality of dsl lines ; automatically selecting a set of dsl lines from the plurality of dsl lines , the set of dsl lines having degraded performance characteristics based on historical performance data measuring a performance parameter for each of the set of dsl lines ; removing from the set of dsl lines any dsl lines that have suitable performance based on the measured performance parameter to create a revised set of dsl lines with degraded performance ; and applying one of a plurality of line profiles to each of the physical dsl lines identified by the revised set of dsl lines . referring to fig1 , a system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is illustrated . the system includes a digital subscriber line ( dsl ) control system 102 , an internet network core 110 , and a digital subscriber line access multiplexor ( dslam ) 104 . the system also includes a line profile database 108 and a historical dsl performance database 106 coupled to the dsl control system 102 . in addition , the system includes a remote web - based reporting terminal 112 coupled to the internet 110 . the dslam 104 is connected to the internet 110 and connects to a plurality of dsl lines 120 such as illustrated dsl lines 120 , 122 , and 124 . the dsl control system 102 includes evaluation logic 130 and dsl line selection logic 140 . the dsl control system 102 may be implemented as a computer system that includes software to execute the evaluation logic 130 and the dsl selection logic 140 . the web - based reporting terminal 112 may be a computer workstation , or personal computer with a display device that includes an input device and a computer processor . an example is a computer workstation that may be operated by a user for viewing reports as to dsl network performance and statistics . the dsl performance database 106 and the line profile database 108 may be implemented with standard computer database technology . referring to fig2 , operation of the system illustrated in fig1 is described . at step 202 , a problem dsl line selection is made . for example , historical dsl performance data for various dsl lines supported by the dslam 104 may be evaluated to determine those dsl lines that have reduced performance or performance below a defined performance threshold . in this manner , one or more problem dsl lines may be selected . selection logic to determine and evaluate the historical dsl performance data may be performed , such as by using the dsl selection logic unit 104 within the dsl control system 102 . dsl performance for various lines is measured , at step 204 . this step may be performed on all dsl lines or may be performed just on the reduced set of dsl lines that are identified as problem lines . the measurement of dsl performance made on selected problem lines is performed to confirm that the problem dsl line status through an additional measurement . line profiles for the degraded dsl lines are changed , at step 206 . for example , the dsl lines that were initially selected , at step 202 , and then verified as having performance problems at step 204 , would have their line profiles changed , at step 206 . an example of a changed line profile includes a change to a reduced speed profile or to a channel interleaved profile to assist the performance of the problem dsl line selected . a report of the results of problem dsl lines is provided using a web - reporting tool , at 208 . for example , a performance measurement of the dsl line may be taken after the profile has been changed . the performance of selected problem dsl lines may be reported both before and after the profile change . a display report may be reported to an operator , such as via the remote web - based reporting terminal 112 . in this matter , an operator of a network may observe performance measurements for problem dsl lines and may observe and evaluate those problem dsl lines before and after a change of profile has been made . referring to fig3 , a further detailed flow chart that illustrates operation of the system of fig1 is shown . performance of the plurality of dsl lines is evaluated using a computer - based system , at step 302 . an example of such a computer - based system would be the dsl control system 102 . the set of dsl lines is automatically selected from a plurality of available dsl lines , at step 304 . the set of dsl lines having degraded performance characteristics may be determined based on historical performance data that is accessible to the computer - based system , as shown at step 304 . for example , historical dsl performance data 106 may be evaluated by the dsl selection logic 104 within the dsl control system 102 , with respect to a set of dsl lines supported by dslam 104 . a plurality of line profiles is then retrieved from a profile database , at step 306 , and a performance parameter for each of the dsl lines is then measured , at step 308 . a subset of dsl lines that have suitable performance based on the measured performance parameter are then removed from the set of degraded dsl lines , at step 310 . the result of this step is a revised and reduced size set of dsl lines that have confirmed degraded performance , also shown at step 310 . a line profile is then applied to each of the physical dsl lines that are identified by the revised set of dsl lines , at step 312 . for example , a reduced speed profile or an interleaved profile would be applied to each of the physical dsl lines that are identified by the revised set of dsl lines , at step 312 . data associated with the revised set of dsl lines is then stored , at 314 . an example of such data would be performance data measured after application of the new line profile to the dsl lines . the stored data is then reported , such as by using a remote internet browsing tool , at step 316 . at step 318 , an error message is reported if application of the profile to a physical dsl line fails . for example , where a new line profile is attempted to be applied to a physical dsl line and that new line profile is unable to be applied , an error message could be reported at the web - based reporting terminal 112 . the error report provides for operator awareness and allows subsequent action to be taken by the operator . the system and method illustrated with respect to fig1 - 3 above , discloses an automated system and may be used with many dsl lines and multiple dslam units in a deployed network . with this automated system , thousands of lines may be measured and adjusted automatically , including periodically or on a scheduled basis . with automated adjustments , human intervention is either not needed or , is significantly reduced . the processing time to measure and adjust each dsl line typically uses less than one minute of computer time . the same operation performed by a service technician manually , could take half an hour or longer , depending on the skill of the technician and the complexity of the dsl problem . in addition , using manual service technicians may result in one or more truck rolls adding further cost to dsl maintenance in the network . the disclosed system utilizes automated methods and provides for improved dsl line performance . in addition , the system removes a significant level of human influence in the process and provides for enhanced performance at a lower cost . further , line profile adjustment is often a difficult and error prone process and is well - suited to an automated computer control technique as shown . in addition , with traditional manual methods , only those problem lines identified by customer calls would get attention . in the disclosed system , many problem lines are detected automatically and profiles may be automatically corrected to prevent these problem customer calls . thus , customer service and dsl line performance is improved while maintenance costs are further reduced . in this manner , not only are customer complaints taken care of expeditiously , but many problems are fixed where neither the company nor the customer have been formally identified , thus , preventing potential subscriber losses . in addition , using a web - based reporting terminal , reports may be generated that include information , such as a list of problem lines selected , lines that fail in the adjustment process , lines that are adjusted successfully , and a line performance matrix that shows performance before and after the line profile has been applied . thus , a useful reporting tool for network operators is also provided . the above disclosed subject matter is to be considered illustrative , and not restrictive , and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications , enhancements , and other embodiments which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention . thus , to the maximum extent allowed by law , the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the broadest permissible interpretation of the following claims and their equivalents , and shall not be restricted or limited by the foregoing detailed description .