before explaining the present invention in detail , it is important to understand that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the construction illustrated and the steps described herein . the invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in a variety of ways . it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation . referring now to the drawings , wherein like reference numerals indicate the same parts throughout the several views , a representative gunshot detection system 100 is shown in its general environment in fig1 . in a preferred embodiment , a plurality of sensors 102 - 106 are dispersed over a monitored area . preferably , each sensor is placed such that it has a relatively unobstructed acoustic view around its immediate area . by way of example and not limitation , suitable sites include : placed atop a building ; placed atop utility or light poles ; on towers , etc . typically sensors 102 - 106 communicate through a communication network 108 with a centralized processor 110 wherein information concerning acoustic events is processed to provide details of the event , such as the source location of a gunshot , time of the gunshot , the number of detected gunshots , the type of event , and the like . it should be noted that sensors 102 - 106 may be any combination of wired or wireless sensors , that communications paths 112 - 116 may carry either analog or digital signals , and that network 108 may comprise any combination of sub - networks , such as , by way of example and not limitation : a telephone network ; the internet ; a private computer network ; a wireless network , or even a collection of dedicated wires routed to the sensor array . in a military environment it may be preferable that sensors 102 - 106 are man - wearable . in such a system , the host computer 110 and display devices 120 would likely be carried by a squad leader . in such as a system , other ancillary systems may use data collected by the system and reported in real time , or near real time , to higher levels or command centers . as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art , information about a detected acoustic event is typically output to a person of interest such as a police dispatcher or directly to individual officers , as through network 118 to display devices 120 or a computer console . when weapon 122 is fired , the muzzle blast reaches sensors 102 - 106 at different times based on the speed of sound and the distance of each sensor from the shooter . whether the acoustic information is processed at the sensor , or at computer 110 , a time of arrival is determined for each sensor and the differences of the various times of arrival are processed to determine a location of the source of the gunshot . in response to the gunshot , information is provided at device 120 . a preferred embodiment of a sensor 102 is shown in fig2 . typically sensor 102 includes a housing 200 , a support ( not shown ) for mounting sensor 102 , and a windscreen 204 for protecting internal elements from the environment , while allowing acoustic waves to pass through to the interior . if sensor 102 is wireless , antenna 206 is provided for radio frequency communication . with reference to fig3 , a preferred embodiment of a wireless sensor 102 includes : a microphone 210 for receiving acoustic information ; an amplifier and / or other signal conditioning 212 ; a processor 224 , typically a digital signal processor (“ dsp ”), as are well known in the art ; a satellite positioning receiver , e . g . a gps 226 and gps antenna 216 ; and an interface 214 for communication via a communication network . it should be noted that in such a sensor , gps receiver 226 may play two roles , providing positional information as to the sensor &# 39 ; s location and an exceptionally accurate real time clock . in one preferred embodiment , dsp 224 includes an analog - to - digital converter 218 to digitize the audio signal for processing to detect a gunshot and determine the time of arrival of the gunshot . a sensor suitable for use with the present invention is described in co - pending u . s . patent application ser . no . 10 / 248 , 511 now u . s . pat . 6 , 847 , 587 by patterson , et al ., filed jan . 24 , 2003 , which is incorporated by reference hereinabove . as will appreciated by those skilled in the art , if sensor 102 is man wearable , whether for military or law enforcement applications , size and weight are important considerations . in turn , electrical power consumption is likewise of prime concern since it has a direct impact on the size and weight of batteries required to operate sensor 102 . with presently known gunshot detection systems , it is not possible to provide an accurate position of the shooter with a single sensor . as a result , the calculation of a shooter position requires computation based on the outputs of a plurality of sensors . in a preferred embodiment the sensors communicate with a computer or server 110 as shown in fig4 , also referred to herein as a “ host node ”. server 110 preferably comprises : cpu 302 ; an interface 312 for communication via a communication network ; commercial gps receiver 304 ; and gps antenna 306 . if the host node is portable or re - locatable , preferably host node 110 further includes military gps 308 , or other precision position locating system . it should be noted that gps 308 likewise includes an antenna 310 although both gps 304 and 308 can alternatively share a single antenna . with further reference to fig3 , in practice a gunshot is received by microphone 210 at three or more sensors 102 . at each sensor 102 the received audio is amplified by amplifier 212 , digitized through a / d converter 218 , and processed in processor 224 to determine if the sound is indeed a gunshot and , if so , a time of arrival of the event . a position is then retrieved from gps 226 and transmitted via interface 214 to the host 110 . at the host 110 , if three or more sensors report the event , the precise positions of the each sensor are determined by comparing the position reported by receiver 304 with the known position of host 110 and applying the correction to the reported positions from each sensor . after determining precision locations for each sensor , the differences in the times of arrivals from the reporting sensors are used to calculate the source location of the gunshot . turning to fig6 , while the gps system is well known in the art , a brief description of the system and it relationship to the present invention may be helpful . the gps constellation , represented by satellites 504 - 510 , presently consists of 24 satellites in orbits which are not geosynchronous . thus the number of satellites , the particular satellites , and their positions in the sky , relative to a point on earth , is always changing . above the gps satellites 504 - 510 , in a geosynchronous orbit , are the waas satellites 502 . each gps satellite 504 - 510 constantly sends , among other things , timing information on its l 1 carrier . information regarding each satellite and its position in space , sometimes called the almanac , is broadcast to all gps receivers , i . e . 520 - 524 , so that each receiver can determine the position of each satellite in the sky . since the receiver , using 522 as an example , knows the position of each gps satellite 504 - 510 and since it receives time referenced signals from the gps satellites , using the differences in the time of travel of the signal , receiver 522 can determine the distances 512 - 518 to satellites 504 - 510 , respectively . these distances are known as “ pseudoranges .” for receiver 522 , finding its position on earth is simply a matter of finding the intersections of the spheres defined by a satellite at the center and having a radius equal to the corresponding pseudorange . it is generally held that a gps receiver using only the l 1 frequency can normally find its position in two dimensions within 10 meters . a number of conditions exist which are outside of the control of receiver 522 which may affect the accuracy of the calculation . one example is ionospheric delay . as radio frequencies enter the atmosphere , there may be some degree of refraction as the wave strike the ionosphere . as can be seen in fig6 , the incidence angle between a satellite and the atmosphere , relative to receiver 522 , changes with the satellites position in the sky . the resulting refraction slightly distorts the path to receiver 522 , causing the signal to arrive late . another condition is gps clock drift . since pseudo ranges are determined based on time of transmission relative to the speed of light , even slight inaccuracies in the time clocks between satellites will impact the position determination . to overcome such errors , ground stations , represented by station 526 , have been established as part of waas in the united states and egnos in europe . each station is at a precise location and , since the precise locations of the satellites are also known from the almanac , errors in the pseudoranges can be determined . once the errors are determined , the contributing factors are determined , whether from ionospheric delay or clock drift , and the information is up - linked to satellites 502 which return the information to receiver 522 . receiver 522 can then correct its calculated pseudoranges and calculate an improved position . when waas is available to a waas enabled receiver , it is generally held that the normal accuracy is about one meter . gps satellites 504 - 510 also transmit information on an l 2 frequency . since l 2 and l 1 are different , a receiver 512 using both frequencies can determine the differences in the pseudoranges from each signal and determine the degree to which the signals were delayed through the atmosphere . in one preferred embodiment sensors 102 report pseudoranges along with a current position to host 110 . at host 110 , the pseudoranges are adjusted to reflect atmospheric delay or clock drift based on the pseudoranges received at gps receiver 304 and in light of the known position of host 110 . alternatively , atmospheric delay and clock delay values may be transmitted from host 110 to the sensor array such that pseudorange corrections are applied at each sensor 102 before its position is reported . in other preferred schemes , the host position does not need to be known . in one such scheme , as shown in fig5 , a differential node 400 having a military gps 402 , and optionally a commercial gps 404 , is located remote from host 406 . differential and atmospheric delay information is collected at differential node 404 and periodically transmitted to the host 406 via a network interface 408 . host 406 either uses the received information to improve the precision of sensors positions or , alternatively , passes the information on to sensors 410 so that sensors 410 can calculate and report precision locations . it should be noted that ionospheric delay could be estimated within gps 402 without resorting to gps 404 . in another scheme suitable for use where waas signals are available , waas information is collected by the host , either through its local gps receiver , from a differential node , or from any sensor which is receiving waas information . the waas information is then either used by the host to improve the precision of sensor locations or passed on to sensors , which are not receiving waas information directly , where the information is used to improve the precession of reported locations . it should be noted that the term “ differential node ” is used to describe any node , whether also a host or server , a specialized sensor , or a dedicated node , which provides differential position , pseudorange correction , ionospheric or atmospheric delay , gps satellite clock drift , waas information , or other information used to improve the accuracy of a position fix provided by a sensor . it should also be noted that while sensors subject to correction from such differential data should be proximate the differential node , since the gps satellites are thousands of miles above earth , proximate distances between sensors and the differential node may be in excess of one hundred miles . “ proximate ” is used to describe distances where the corrective information provides meaningful improvement in the calculated position of a sensor . it should also be noted that while preferred embodiments of the inventive systems were described with reference to a gps positioning system , the invention is not so limited . the inventive system can also be used to improve the accuracy of positions obtained from other positioning system such as , by way of example and not limitation : gnss , glonass , galileo , msas , look - down , loran , etc . similarly , the term “ waas ” should be construed broadly to include any satellite based augmentation system , such as egnos and the like . such changes are within the scope and spirit of the present invention . it should also be noted that while preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in connection with gunshot location systems , the techniques for providing precision locations from an array of gps based sensor can be applied to other types of systems , such as those monitoring environmental conditions , geophysical data collection , and the like . thus , the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein . while presently preferred embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure , numerous changes and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art . such changes and modifications are encompassed within the scope and spirit of this invention .