Social inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake for children and adolescents in Montreal, Canada: a cross-sectional study BackgroundThe success of current and prospective COVID-19 vaccine campaigns for children and adolescents will in part depend on the willingness of parents to accept vaccination. This study examined social determinants of parental COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake for children and adolescents.

MethodsWe used cross-sectional data from an ongoing COVID-19 cohort study in Montreal, Canada and included all parents of 2 to 18-year-olds who completed an online questionnaire between May 18 and June 26, 2021 (n=809). We calculated child age-adjusted prevalence estimates of vaccine acceptance by parental education, race/ethnicity, birthplace, household income, and neighbourhood, and used multinomial logistic regression to estimate adjusted prevalence differences (aPD) and ratios (aPR). Social determinants of vaccine uptake were estimated for the vaccine-eligible sample of 12 to 18 year-olds (n=306).

ResultsIntention to vaccinate children against COVID-19 was high, with only 12.4% of parents unlikely to have their child vaccinated. Parents with younger children were less likely to accept vaccination, as were those from lower-income households, racialized groups, and those born outside Canada. The percent of parents whose child was vaccinated or very likely to be vaccinated was 18.4 percentage points lower among those with annual household incomes <$100,000 vs. [&ge;]$150,000 (95% CI: 10.1 to 26.7). Racialized parents reported greater unwillingness to vaccinate compared to White parents (aPD=10.3; 95% CI: 1.5, 19.1). Vaccine-eligible adolescents from the most deprived neighbourhood were half as likely to be vaccinated compared to those from the least deprived neighbourhood (aPR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.77).

InterpretationThis study identified marked social inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake for children and adolescents. Efforts are needed to reach disadvantaged and marginalized populations with tailored strategies that promote informed decision making and facilitate access to vaccination.
Densely sampled viral trajectories for SARS-CoV-2 variants alpha (B.1.1.7) and epsilon (B.1.429) BackgroundThe alpha and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants have been responsible for major recent waves of COVID-19 despite increasing vaccination rates. The reasons for the increased transmissibility of these variants and for the reduced transmissibility of vaccine breakthrough infections are unclear.

MethodsWe quantified the course of viral proliferation and clearance for 173 individuals with acute SARS-CoV-2 infections using longitudinal quantitative RT-PCR tests conducted using anterior nares/oropharyngeal samples (n = 199,941) as part of the National Basketball Associations (NBA) occupational health program between November 28th, 2020, and August 11th, 2021. We measured the duration of viral proliferation and clearance and the peak viral concentration separately for individuals infected with alpha, delta, and non-variants of interest/variants of concern (non-VOI/VOC), and for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

ResultsThe mean viral trajectories of alpha and delta infections resembled those of non-VOI/VOC infections. Vaccine breakthrough infections exhibited similar proliferation dynamics as infections in unvaccinated individuals (mean peak Ct: 20.5, 95% credible interval [19.0, 21.0] vs. 20.7 [19.8, 20.2], and mean proliferation time 3.2 days [2.5, 4.0] vs. 3.5 days [3.0, 4.0]); however, vaccinated individuals exhibited faster clearance (mean clearance time: 5.5 days [4.6, 6.6] vs. 7.5 days [6.8, 8.2]).

ConclusionsAlpha, delta, and non-VOI/VOC infections feature similar viral trajectories. Acute infections in vaccinated and unvaccinated people feature similar proliferation and peak Ct, but vaccinated individuals cleared the infection more quickly. Viral concentrations do not fully explain the differences in infectiousness between SARS-CoV-2 variants, and mitigation measures are needed to limit transmission from vaccinated individuals.
Comparative immunogenicity and effectiveness of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccines BackgroundUnderstanding immunogenicity and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is critical to guide rational use.

MethodsWe compared the immunogenicity of mRNA-1273, BNT-162b2 or Ad26.COV2.S in ambulatory adults in Massachusetts, USA. To correlate immunogenicity with effectiveness of the three vaccines, we performed an inverse-variance meta-analysis of population level effectiveness from public health reports in >40 million individuals.

ResultsA single dose of either mRNA vaccine yielded comparable antibody and neutralization titers to convalescent individuals. Ad26.COV2.S yielded lower antibody concentrations and frequently negative neutralization titers. Bulk and cytotoxic T-cell responses were higher in mRNA1273 and BNT162b2 than Ad26.COV2.S recipients, and <50% of vaccinees demonstrate CD8+ T-cell responses to spike peptides. Antibody concentrations and neutralization titers increased comparably after the first dose of either vaccine, and further in recipients of a second dose. Prior infection was associated with high antibody concentrations and neutralization even after a single dose and regardless of vaccine. Neutralization of beta, gamma and delta strains were poorer regardless of vaccine. Relative to mRNA1273, the effectiveness of BNT162b2 was lower against infection and hospitalization; and Ad26COV2.S was lower against infection, hospitalization and death.

ConclusionsVariation in the immunogenicity correlates with variable effectiveness of the three FDA EUA vaccines deployed in the USA. Simple risk scores to predict hospitalization or death in outpatients with COVID-19 including the Omicron variant ImportanceOutpatient physicians need guidance to support their clinical decisions regarding management of patients with COVID-19, in particular whether to hospitalize a patient and if managed as an outpatient, how closely to follow them.

ObjectiveTo develop and prospectively validate a clinical prediction rule to predict the likelihood of hospitalization for outpatients with COVID-19 that does not require laboratory testing or imaging.

DesignDerivation and temporal validation of a clinical prediction rule, and prospective validation of two externally derived clinical prediction rules.

SettingPrimary and Express care clinics in a Pennsylvania health system.

ParticipantsPatients 12 years and older presenting to outpatient clinics who had a positive polymerase chain reaction test for COVID-19.

Main outcomes and measuresClassification accuracy (percentage in each risk group hospitalized) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

ResultsOverall, 7.4% of outpatients in the early derivation cohort (5843 patients presenting before 3/1/21) and 5.5% in the late validation cohort (3806 patients presenting 3/1/21 or later) were ultimately hospitalized. We developed and temporally validated three risk scores that all included age, dyspnea, and the presence of comorbidities, adding respiratory rate for the second score and oxygen saturation for the third. All had very good overall accuracy (AUC 0.77 to 0.78) and classified over half of patients in the validation cohort as very low risk with a 1.7% or lower likelihood of hospitalization. Two externally derived risk scores identified more low risk patients, but with a higher overall risk of hospitalization (2.8%).

Conclusions and relevanceSimple risk scores applicable to outpatient and telehealth settings can identify patients with very low (1.6% to 1.7%), low (5.2% to 5.9%), moderate (14.7% to 15.6%), and high risk (32.0% to 34.2%) of hospitalization. The Lehigh Outpatient COVID Hospitalization (LOCH) risk score is available online as a free app: https://ebell-projects.shinyapps.io/LehighRiskScore/. I wanna live and not think about the future; What place for advance care planning for people living with severe multiple sclerosis and their families? A qualitative study BackgroundLittle is known about how people with multiple sclerosis and their families comprehend advance care planning (ACP) and its relevance in their lives.

AimTo explore under what situations, with whom, how, and why do people with MS and their families engage in ACP

MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study comprising interviews with people living with MS and their families followed by an ethical discussion group with five health professionals representing specialties working with people affected by MS and their families. Twenty-seven people with MS and 17 family members were interviewed between June 2019 and March 2020. Interviews and the ethical discussion group were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

ResultsParticipants narratives focused on three major themes :(i) planning for an uncertain future; (ii) perceived obstacles to engaging in ACP that included uncertainty concerning MS disease progression, negative previous experiences of ACP discussions and prioritising symptom management over future planning; (iii) Preferences for engagement in ACP included a trusting relationship with a health professional and that information then be shared across services. Health professionals accounts from the ethical discussion group departed from viewing ACP as a formal document to that of an ongoing process of seeking preferences and values. They voiced similar concerns to people with MS about uncertainty and when to initiate discussions. Some shared concerns of a lack of confidence when having ACP discussions.

ConclusionThese findings support the need for a whole systems strategic approach where information about the potential benefits of ACP in all its forms can be shared with people with MS. Moreover, they highlight the need for health professionals to be skilled and trained in engaging in ACP discussions and where information is contemporaneously and seamlessly shared across services. Clinical observation of high-flow nasal cannula with non-rebreather mask use on severe or critically ill COVID-19 diabetic patients Background and aimsPrevalence of diabetes is a vital factor in COVID-19s clinical prognosis. This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy of High-flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) with/without non-rebreather mask (NRM) use on critical COVID-19 patients with/without diabetes.

MethodsFor analysis and comparison, epidemiological, biochemical, and clinical data were collected from 240 HFNC ({+/-}NRM) treated severe and critical COVID-19 patients (diabetic = 136; non-diabetic = 104) admitted into ICUs of five hospitals in Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Results59.1% of patients with fever had diabetes (p=0.012). ICU stay was longer for diabetic patients (9.06{+/-}5.70) than non-diabetic patients (7.41{+/-}5.11) (p=0.020). Majority of the hypertensive patients were diabetic (68.3%; p<0.001). Majority of diabetic patients (70.4%; p<0.005) had elevated creatinine levels. Partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg) after HFNC (only) administration was significantly (p=0.031) higher in non-diabetic patients (69.30{+/-}23.56) than in diabetic patients (61.50{+/-}14.49). Diabetic (62.64{+/-}13.05) and non-diabetic patients (59.40{+/-}13.22) had almost similar partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg) from HFNC with NRM. Patients with elevated RBS required NRM with HFNC five times (AOR=5.1, 1.2-20.8) higher than others. Besides age, and hypertension were significantly associated with the HFNC+NRM treated diabetic patients. Factors those affected the HFNC only treated patients were fever and impaired glucose tolerance.

ConclusionsThe results of this study imply that oxygen supply with HFNC and NRM may be beneficial for the elderly/hypertensive diabetic patients with COVID-19 associated AHRF; and that increased blood glucose level could be a determinant for the need of HFNC + NRM treatment.

HighlightsO_LIElderly diabetic patients required both HFNC and NRM to increase oxygen saturation.
C_LIO_LIHypertension may be a factor for diabetic patients with COVID-19 requiring HFNC and NRM together.
C_LIO_LI HFNC + NRM-combination therapy might be needed when blood glucose levels rise.
C_LI Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dexmedetomidine in Children using Real World Data from Electronic Health Records and Remnant Specimens AimOur objectives were to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis of dexmedetomidine in children using remnant specimens and data from electronic health records (EHRs) and explore the impact of patients characteristics and pharmacogenetics on dexmedetomidine clearance.

MethodsDexmedetomidine dosing and patient data were gathered from EHRs and combined with opportunistically sampled remnant specimens. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The first stage developed a model without genotype variables; the second stage added pharmacogenetic effects.

ResultsOur final study population included 354 post-cardiac surgery patients age 0 to 22 years (median 16 months). The final two-compartment model included allometric weight scaling and age maturation. Population parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals were 27.3 L/hr (24.0 - 31.1 L/hr) for total clearance (CL), 161 L (139 - 187 L) for central compartment volume of distribution (V1), 26.0 L/hr (22.5 - 30.0 L/hr) for intercompartmental clearance (Q), and 7903 L (5617 - 11119 L) for peripheral compartment volume of distribution (V2). The estimate for postmenstrual age when 50% of adult clearance is achieved was 42.0 weeks (41.5 - 42.5 weeks) and the Hill coefficient estimate was 7.04 (6.99 - 7.08). Genotype was not statistically or clinically significant.

ConclusionOur study demonstrates the use of real-world EHR data and remnant specimens to perform a population PK analysis and investigate covariate effects in a large pediatric population. Weight and age were important predictors of clearance. We did not find evidence for pharmacogenetic effects of UGT1A4 or UGT2B10 genotype or CYP2A6 risk score.

What is already known about this subject{circ} Previous dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in pediatric populations have limited sample size.
{circ}Smaller studies present a challenge for identifying covariates that may impact individual PK profiles.


What this study adds{circ} We performed a dexmedetomidine population PK study with a large pediatric cohort using data obtained from electronic health records and remnant plasma specimens to enable increased sample size.
{circ}xsDifferences in PK due to UGT1A4 or UGT2B10 variants or CYP2A6 risk score are not clinically impactful for this population. COVID-19 vaccine-associated cerebral venous thrombosis in Germany ObjectiveReports of cerebral sinus and venous thrombosis (CVT) after ChAdOx1 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 have raised safety concerns. We aimed to estimate the incidence of CVT within one month from first dose administration and the frequency of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) as the underlying mechanism after vaccination with BNT162b2, ChAdOx1, and mRNA-1273, in Germany.

MethodsA web-based questionnaire was e-mailed to all Departments of Neurology. We asked to report cases of CVT within one month of a COVID-19 vaccination. Other cerebral events could also be reported. Incidence rates of CVT were calculated by using official statistics of nine German States.

ResultsA total of 45 CVT cases were reported. In addition, 9 primary ischemic strokes, 4 primary intracerebral hemorrhages, and 4 other neurological events were recorded. Of the CVT patients, 35 (77.8%) were female, and 36 (80.0%) were below the age of 60 years. Fifty-three events were observed after vaccination with ChAdOx1 (85.5%), 9 after BNT162b2 (14.5%), and none after mRNA-1273 vaccination. After 7,126,434 first vaccine doses, the incidence rate of CVT within one month from first dose administration was 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-9.2) per 100,000 person-years for all vaccines and 17.9 (11.8-26.1) for ChAdOx1 (after 2,320,535 ChAdOx1 first doses). The adjusted incidence rate ratio was 9.68 (3.46-34.98) for ChAdOx1 compared to mRNA-based vaccines and 3.14 (1.22-10.65) for women compared to non-women. In 26/45 patients with CVT (57.8%), VITT was graded highly probable.

ConclusionsGiven an incidence of 0.22-1.75 per 100,000 person-years for CVT in the general population, these findings point towards a higher risk for CVT after ChAdOx1 vaccination, especially for women. An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mortality, Need for ICU admission, Use of Mechanical Ventilation, Adverse effects and other Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin Treatment in COVID-19 Patients ImportanceRepurposing Ivermectin, a known anti-parasitic agent, for treating COVID-19 has demonstrated positive results in several studies. We aim to evaluate the benefit and risk of Ivermectin in COVID-19.

MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for full-text manuscripts published from February 1, 2020, to August 15th, 2021 focusing on Ivermectin therapy against COVID-19. The primary outcomes were mortality, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission; secondary outcomes were - adverse effects, need for mechanical ventilation, viral clearance, time to viral clearance, need for hospitalization, and length of hospital stay. Random-effects models were used for all analyses.

ResultsWe included a total of 52 studies (n=17561) in the qualitative analysis, out of these, 44 studies (n=14019) were included in the meta-analysis. In the mortality meta-analysis (N=29), odds of death were lower in the Ivermectin-arm compared to control (OR 0.54, p=0.009). Although lower odds of mortality were observed in various subgroup analyses of RCTs, they did not reach statistical significance: therapeutic RCTs: mild-moderate COVID-19 (OR 0.31, p=0.06), therapeutic RCTs: severe/critical COVID-19 (OR 0.86, p=0.56), inpatient RCTs: mild-moderate COVID-19 (OR 0.18, p=0.08), inpatient RCTs: severe/critical COVID-19 (OR 0.86, p=0.56). Ivermectin, mostly as adjuvant therapy, was associated with higher odds of viral clearance (N=22) (OR 3.52, p=0.0002), shorter duration to achieve viral clearance (N=8) (MD - 4.12, p=0.02), reduced need for hospitalization (N=6) (OR 0.34, p=008).

ConclusionOur meta-analysis suggests that the mortality benefit of Ivermectin in COVID-19 is uncertain. But as adjuvant therapy, Ivermectin may improve viral clearance and reduce the need for hospitalization.

HighlightsO_ST_ABSWhat We Already Know about This TopicC_ST_ABSO_LICOVID-19 is an ongoing global pandemic, for which Ivermectin has been tried on a therapeutic and prophylactic basis.
C_LIO_LIResults from several clinical trials and observational studies suggest that Ivermectin may improve survival and clinical outcomes with a good safety profile when compared with other treatments; however, the current evidence is limited..
C_LI

What This Article Tells Us That Is NewO_LIThis systematic review and meta-analysis provide a summary of the latest literature on the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin use for COVID-19.
C_LIO_LIBased on our analysis of the latest evidence, we found that Ivermectins benefit in reducing mortality cannot be concluded with confidence. However, as an adjuvant therapy it may help reduce the need for hospitalization, duration for viral clearance while increasing the likelihood of achieving viral clearance.
C_LIO_LIWe need more high-quality data for conclusive evidence regarding the benefit of Ivermectin in reducing the need for ICU admissions, mechanical ventilation and duration of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients.
C_LI What We Learned from COVID-19: From endotheliitis to treatment ObjectiveCOVID-19 may yield a variety of clinical pictures, differing from pneumonitis to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) along with vascular damage in the lung tissue, named as endotheliitis. To date, no specific treatment strategy was approved by any authority for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in terms of endotheliitis-related comorbidities. Here, we present our experience of COVID-19 by evaluating 11,190 COVID-19 patients with the manifestations of endotheliitis in skin, lung, and brain tissues according to the different phases of COVID-19.

MethodsAfter a retrospective examination, patients were divided into three groups according to their repercussions of vascular distress, which were represented by radiological, histopathological, and clinical findings. (Group A: no or mild pulmonary involvement, Group B: moderate pulmonary involvement with clinical risk of deterioration, Group C: severe pulmonary involvement and respiratory failure). We presented the characteristics and disease course of seven representative and complicated cases which represents the different phases of the disease, and discussed the treatment strategies in each group. The current pathophysiological mechanisms responsible from SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related respiratory failure and current treatment strategies were reviewed and discussed in detail.

ResultsAmong 11.190 patients, 9294 patients met the criteria for Group A, and 1376 patients were presented to our clinics with Group B characteristics. Among these patients, 1896 individuals(Group B and Group C) were hospitalized. While 1220 inpatients were hospitalized within the first 10 days after the diagnosis, 676 of them were worsened and hospitalized 10 days after their diagnosis. Among hospitalized patients, 520 of them did not respond to group A and B treatments and developed hypoxemic respiratory failure (Group C) and 146 individuals needed ventilator support and were followed in the intensive care unit, and 43 (2.2%) patients died.

ConclusionDistinctive manifestations in each COVID-19 patient, including non-respiratory conditions in the acute phase and the emerging risk of long-lasting complications, suggest that COVID-19 has an endotheliitis-centred thrombo-inflammatory pathophysiology. Endotheliitis can also explain the mechanism behind the respiratory failure in COVID-19, and the difference of COVID-19 related ARDS from ARDS seen in other critical conditions. In addition, use of early corticosteroid in patients with early symptoms and early tocilizumab in ICU helps to reduce mortality and progression of the disease. Endotheliitis-based pathophysiological mechanisms are known to be momentarily changing and difficut to manage due to their risk of sudden aggrevation. Hence, daily evaluation of clinical, laboratory and radiological findings of patients and deciding appropriate pathophysiological treatment would help to reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19. Substance Use Onset in High-Risk 9-13 Year-Olds in the ABCD Study AimA key aim of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study is to document substance use onset, patterns, and sequelae across adolescent development. However, substance use misreporting obscures accurate drug use characterization. Hair toxicology tests provide objective historical substance use data, but are rarely investigated in youth. Here, we compare objective hair toxicology results with self-reported substance use in youth.

MethodsA literature-based substance use risk algorithm identified 696 ABCD Study(R) participants for hair sample collections between baseline and 2-year follow-up (spanning ages 9-13) for laboratory analysis. Chi-square and t-tests assessed differences between participants demographics, positive and negative hair tests, risk algorithm scores, and self-reported substance use.

ResultsHair testing confirmed that 17% of at-risk 9-13 year-olds had evidence of past 3-month use of one (n=99), two (n=17), three (n=3), or four (n=2) drug classes. After considering prescribed medication use, 11% had a positive test incongruent with self- or parent-report. No participant with a positive result self-reported substance use consistent with their toxicology results. Participants with positive tests under-reported use (p<.001), reported less sipping of alcohol (p<.001), and scored higher on the risk algorithm (p<.001) than those with negative hair toxicology.

ConclusionsAn alarming 11% of tested samples in at-risk 9-13 year-olds were positive for at least one unreported substance, suggesting underreporting in this population when participating in a national healthy development study. The degree of underreporting cannot yet be calculated, as at-risk samples were prioritized for assays. Expanded toxicology testing is key to characterize substance use in youth. Using controlled interrupted time series to estimate the population-level effects of Ontario's recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services BackgroundOntario recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services (OPS/CTS) to stem the harms of the opioid epidemic. We tested whether operating any site improved local opioid-related health service use and mortality rates.

MethodsWe used monthly counts of all opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths between January 2014 and December 2020 for our outcomes. For each public health unit (PHU) that implemented any OPS/CTS, we created a synthetic control as a weighted combination of unexposed PHU. We estimated the population-level effects of operating any site using controlled interrupted time series with segmented regression and adjusted for time varying confounders (i.e. OPS/CTS capacity, naloxone kits distributed, and persons receiving opioid agonist treatment per 100,000 population). We repeated the analysis using a multiple baseline approach to estimate province-wide effects.

ResultsBetween 2017 and 2020, nine out of 34 PHU implemented at least one OPS/CTS. ED visit (RR=0.96, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.99) and hospitalization (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.98) trends declined faster among treated units. Improvements in local ED visit rate trends were observed for the majority of treated units. Hospitalization rates declined faster for London (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.95 - 0.99) and Niagara (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.98); while mortality rates declined faster for Hamilton (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.90 - 0.96), Niagara (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.94 - 0.99) and Guelph (RR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.88 - 1.00).

ConclusionAlthough OPS/CTS are not sufficient to stem the harms of the opioid overdose epidemic on their own, they play a critical role in local harm reduction strategies. Strain-resolved analysis in a randomized trial of antibiotic pretreatment and maintenance dose delivery mode with fecal microbiota transplant for ulcerative colitis Fecal microbiota transplant is a promising therapy for ulcerative colitis. Parameters maximizing effectiveness and tolerability are not yet clear, and it is not known how import the transmission of donor microbes to patients is. Here (clinicaltrails.gov: NCT03006809) we have tested the effects of antibiotic pretreatment and compared two modes of maintenance dose delivery, capsules versus enema, in a randomized, pilot, open-label, 2x2 factorial design with 22 patients analyzed with mild to moderate UC. Clinically, the treatment was well-tolerated with favorable safety profile. Of patients who received antibiotic pretreatment, 6 of 11 experienced remission after six weeks of treatment, versus 2 of 11 non-pretreated patients (odds ratio: 1.69, 95% confidence interval: -0.25 to 3.62). No significant differences were found between maintenance dosing via capsules versus enema. In exploratory analyses, microbiome turnover at both the species and strain levels was extensive and significantly more pronounced in the pretreated patients. Associations were also revealed between taxonomic turnover and changes in the composition of primary and secondary bile acids. Together these findings suggest that antibiotic pretreatment contributes to microbiome engraftment and possibly clinical effectiveness, and validate longitudinal strain tracking as a powerful way to monitor the dynamics and impact of microbiota transfer. Effectiveness of a short term induction regimen of a biosimilar Adalimumab in the long term management of symptomatic Ankylosing Spondylitis Symptomatic Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Community Based Proof of Concept Observational Study IntroductionCost and drug toxicity often deter prolonged therapeutic use of anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A planned study was completed to endorse our clinic based observation of long term relief following short-term administration of anti-TNF agent.

Methods50 consenting patients with symptomatic active chronic AS under rheumatology care in a community clinic were enrolled. They had no past history of anti-TNF use. 40 mg standard biosimilar adalimumab (BS-ADA, Exemptia trade name)was injected subcutaneously every fortnight for six injections (10 weeks). Patients were monitored at several time points. Improvement was assessed at regular interval as per protocol which included standard indices (Bath and Assessment Spondyloarthritis International Society /ASAS). An intention to treat analysis with significant p<0.05 was carried out.

ResultsPatients showed early and substantial significant improvement in pain, NSAID requirement, function and in several indices (ASAS 20 & 40, ASAS partial remission, BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS) which persisted after stopping injections. 84% and 52 % of patients respectively showed ASAS 20 improvement at week 12 and 48: corresponding ASAS partial remission 34% and 24%. Over 50% patients maintained prolonged improvement and provided proof of concept (defined a-priori). Serum Interleukin-6 assay showed a sharp reduction at 24 weeks. None developed TB or serious drug toxicity. 11 patients withdrew (mostly inadequate response). Absence of control was a limitation.

ConclusionA ten-week administration of biosimilar adalimumab in difficult to treat AS showed early substantial improvement which often persisted for 24 weeks. This unconventional strategy was socioeconomically appealing. It merits further validation and acceptance especially in resource strained settings. Development of machine learning models for the prediction of complications after colonic, colorectal and small intestine anastomosis in psychiatric and non-psychiatric patient collectives (PSTUDY) Psychiatric and psychosomatic diseases are an increasingly cumbersome burden for the medical system. Indeed, hospital costs associated with mental health conditions have been constantly on the rise in recent years. Moreover, psychiatric conditions are likely to have a negative effect on the treatment of other medical conditions and surgical outcomes, in addition to their direct effects on the overall quality of life. Our study aims to investigate the impact of preoperative Risk factor, psychiatric and psychosomatic diseases on the outcomes of colorectal surgery and length of hospital stay via predictive modeling techniques.

MethodPatient data will be collected from several participating national and international surgical centers The machine learning models will be calculated and coded, but also published according to the TRIPOD guidelines (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis).

ResultIt is conceivable to arrive at generalizable models predicting the abovementioned endpoints through large amounts of data from several centers. The models will be subsequently deployed as a free-to-use web-based prediction tool using the Shiny environment [47]. The cost for the hosting server and digital infrastructure will be covered by Dr. Anas Taha. The sponsor will store the data for ten years. A novel echo-parameter supersedes the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score in predicting post transcatheter aortic valve replacement mortality ObjectiveTo accurately predict post-TAVR mortality, we proposed a family of new echo-parameters (augmented blood pressure) derived from blood pressure and aortic valve gradient measurements and examined them in this study.

Patients and MethodsPatients in the Mayo Clinic National Cardiovascular Diseases Registry-TAVR database who underwent TAVR between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2017, were identified to retrieve baseline demographics, echocardiographic and mortality data. Augmented blood pressure parameters and valvulo-arterial impedance were evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the model performance against the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score.

ResultsThe final cohort contained 974 patients with a mean age of 81.4{+/-}8.3 years old, and 56.6% were male. The mean STS risk score was 8.2{+/-}5.2. The median follow-up duration was 354 days, and the one-year all-cause mortality rate was 14.2%. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression showed that augmented systolic blood pressure and augmented mean arterial pressure (AugMAP) parameters were independent predictors for 1-year post-TAVR mortality (all p<0.0001). A univariate model of AugMAP1 supersedes the STS score model in predicting 1-year post-TAVR mortality (area under curve: 0.700 vs. 0.587, p=0.0051).

ConclusionAugmented mean arterial pressure provides a simple but effective approach for clinicians to quickly estimate the clinical outcome of TAVR patients. It can be incorporated in the assessment of TAVR candidacy. Capturing Global, Predicting Local for ControllingAntimicrobial Resistance: a retrospective multivariable analysis BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex multifactorial outcome of health, socio-economic and geopolitical factors. Therefore, tailored solutions for mitigation strategies could be more effective in dealing with this challenge. Knowledge-synthesis and actionable models learned upon large datasets are critical in order to diffuse the risk of entering into a post-antimicrobial era.

ObjectiveThis work is focused on learning Global determinants of AMR and predicting the susceptibility of antibiotics at the isolate level (Local) for WHO (world health organization) declared critically important pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus aureus.

MethodsIn this study, we used longitudinal data (2004-2017) of AMR having 633820 isolates from 70 Middle and High-income countries. We integrated AMR data with the Global burden of disease (GBD), Governance (WGI), and Finance data sets in order to find the unbiased and actionable determinants of AMR. We chose a Bayesian Decision Network (BDN) approach within the causal modeling framework to quantify determinants of AMR. Finally Integrating Bayesian networks with classical machine learning approaches lead to effective modeling of the level of AMR.

ResultsFrom MAR (Multiple Antibiotic Resistance) scores, we found that developing countries are at higher risk of AMR compared to developed countries, for all the critically important pathogens. Also, Principal Components Analysis(PCA) revealed that governance, finance, and disease burden variables have a strong association with AMR. We further quantified the impact of determinants in a probabilistic way and observed that health system access and government effectiveness are strong actionable factors in reducing AMR, which was in turn confirmed by what-if analysis. Finally, our supervised machine learning models have shown decent performance, with the highest on Staphylococcus aureus. For Staphylococcus aureus, our model predicted susceptibility to Ceftaroline and Oxacillin with the highest AUROC, 0.94(with SE of 0.01%) and 0.89(with SE of 0.002%) respectively. Deceased donor kidney degradomics indicates cytoskeletal proteolytic alterations impacting post-transplant function. BackgroundIn brain death, cerebral injury contributes to systemic biological dysregulation, causing significant cellular stress in donor kidneys that adversely impacts the quality of grafts. Here, we hypothesized that DBD kidneys may undergo proteolytic processes that renders grafts susceptible to post-transplant dysfunction.

Material & MethodsUsing mass spectrometry and immunoblotting analyses, we profiled degradation patterns of cytoskeletal proteins in deceased (n=55) and living (n=10) donor kidneys.

ResultsWe found that in DBD kidneys, key podocyte cytoskeletal proteins had been proteolytically cleaved. Generated degradation profiles were not associated to donor related demographic and clinical factors but were associated to suboptimal post-transplant function. Strikingly, -actinin -4 and Talin-1 degradation profiles were not observed in circulatory-death or living-donor kidneys. As Talin-1 is a specific proteolytic target of Calpain-1, we investigated a potential trigger of Calpain activation and Talin-1 degradation using ex-vivo precision-cut human kidney slices and in-vitro immortalised human podocytes. Notably, we found that Transforming-Growth Factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}) activated Calpain-1 and proteolytically cleaved Talin-1 to generate distinct peptide fragments. These peptide fragments were of similar size and matched the degradation patterns observed in DBD kidneys. Talin-1 degradation was prevented in vitro by Calpain-1 inhibition.

ConclusionsHere, we provide initial evidence that DBD kidneys are susceptible to cytoskeletal protein degradation that impacts posttransplant kidney function. Subsequent studies should aim to further investigate the link between brain death and activation of proteolytic pathways exploring new therapeutic opportunities. Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Systematic Review Molecular Tumour Boards (MTBs) were created with the purpose of supporting clinical decision making within precision medicine. Though these meetings are in use globally reporting often focuses on the small percentages of patients that receive treatment via this process and are less likely to report on, and assess, patients who do not receive treatment. A literature review was performed to understand patient attrition within MTBs and barriers to patients receiving treatment. A total of 54 papers were reviewed spanning a 6 year period from 11 different countries. 20% of patients received treatment through the MTB process. Of those that did not receive treatment the main reasons were no mutations identified (26%), no actionable mutations (22%) and clinical deterioration (15%). However, the data was often incomplete due to inconsistent reporting of MTBs with only 53% reporting on patients having no mutations, 48% reporting on presence of actionable mutations with no treatment options and 57% reporting on clinical deterioration. As patient attrition in MTBs is an issue which is very rarely alluded to in reporting, more transparent reporting is needed to understand barriers to treatment and integration of new technologies is required to process increasing omic and treatment data. Comparative profiles of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific human milk antibodies elicited by mRNA- and adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines Numerous COVID-19 vaccines are authorized globally. To date, [~]71% of doses are comprised of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, and [~]17% the Moderna/NIH vaccine, both of which are mRNA-based. The chimpanzee Ad-based Oxford/AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccine comprises [~]9%, while the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (J&J) human adenovirus (Ad26) vaccine ranks 4th at [~]2% [1]. No COVID-19 vaccines are yet available for children 0-4. One method to protect this population may be passive immunization via antibodies (Abs) provided in the milk of a lactating vaccinated person. Our early work [2] and other reports [3-5] have demonstrated that unlike the post-SARS-CoV-2 infection milk Ab profile, which is rich in specific secretory (s)IgA, the vaccine response is highly IgG-dominant. In this report, we present a comparative assessment of the milk Ab response elicited by Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and AZ vaccines. This analysis revealed 86% -100% of mRNA vaccine recipient milk exhibited Spike-specific IgG endpoint titers, which were 12 - 28-fold higher than those measured for Ad vaccine recipient milk. Ad-based vaccines elicited Spike-specific milk IgG in only 33%-38% of recipients. Specific IgA was measured in 52%-71% of mRNA vaccine recipient milk and 17%-23% of Ad vaccine recipient milk. J&J recipient milk exhibited significantly lower IgA than Moderna recipients, and AZ recipients exhibited significantly lower IgA titers than Moderna and Pfizer. <50% of milk of any group exhibited specific secretory Ab, with Moderna recipient IgA titers measuring significantly higher than AZ. Moderna appeared to most frequently elicit >2-fold increases in specific secretory Ab titer relative to pre-vaccine sample. These data indicate that current Ad-based COVID-19 vaccines poorly elicit Spike-specific Ab in milk compared to mRNA-based vaccines and that mRNA vaccines are preferred for immunizing the lactating population. This study highlights the need to design vaccines better aimed at eliciting an optimal milk Ab response. The Acute Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose Naltrexone and acetaminophen Combinations and Each Component: Findings of a Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial We tested two low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combinations and each component in the acute treatment of migraine. The patients use a single-dose of the study medication for a moderate or severe pain intensity migraine attack. Patients were adults with migraine with or without aura experiencing 2 to 20 (average 6.4) monthly migraine days. The co-primary endpoints were pain-freedom and absence of prospectively-identified most bothersome migraine-associated symptom 2 hours after dosing. We randomized 92 patients; 72 completed the study (mean age, 43 years; 75% women). Pain-freedom at 2 hours was 10.2% higher than placebo with naltrexone 2.25 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg, 10.9% with naltrexone 3.25 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg, 17.3% with naltrexone 2.25 mg, and 31.3% with acetaminophen 325 mg. The treatment groups migraine burden at baseline was unbalanced due to randomized patients uneven study completion. The acetaminophen group had the lowest migraine burden, giving its results lower credibility.

Saliently, Low-dose naltrexone alone (n=19) had a 17.3% higher response rate for headache pain-freedom at 2 hours than placebo (n=17). The naltrexone and the placebo groups were the largest and had a balanced disease burden, implying higher credibility to the naltrexone group results. We found low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination, low-dose naltrexone, and acetaminophen had higher response rates than placebo in treating headache pain. The most commonly reported adverse events were sedation, nausea, and dizziness. We postulate that naltrexones toll-like receptor (TLR4) antagonism properties prevent pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the trigeminal ganglion averting "overactive nerves" (laymans term) and migraine. Although this trial used low-dose naltrexone (defined as 1 - 5 mg/day), future phase 3 studies will test a range of naltrexone and acetaminophen combination doses. Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction Many clinical datasets are intrinsically imbalanced, dominated by overwhelming majority groups. Off-the-shelf machine learning models that optimize the prognosis of majority patient types (e.g., healthy class) may cause substantial errors on the minority prediction class (e.g., disease class) and demographic subgroups (e.g., Black or young patients). For example, our work found that missed death cases are 3.14 times higher than missed survival cases in a mortality prediction model. In the typical one-machine-learning-model-fits-all paradigm, racial and age disparities are likely to exist, but unreported. What makes it worse is the deceptive nature of widely used whole-population metrics, such as AUC-ROC. We show that some metrics fail to reflect serious prediction deficiencies. To mitigate representational biases, we design a double prioritized (DP) bias correction technique. Our method trains customized models for specific ethnicity or age groups, a substantial departure from the one-model-predicts-all convention. We report our findings on four prognosis tasks over two imbalanced clinical datasets. DP reduces relative disparities among race and age groups, 5.6% to 86.8% better than the 8 existing sampling solutions being compared, in terms of the minority class' recall. Molecular analysis suggests oligoclonality and metastasis of endometriosis lesions across anatomically defined subtypes. Endometriosis symptoms are heterogeneous with controversy on whether it constitutes a single disease or multiple distinct types. Our previous work found recurrent somatic cancer-driver alterations in endometriosis; however, these have not been found ubiquitously. A handful of cases spread across studies also suggest mutations might be shared (clonal) between lesions of the same type. As current classification systems correlate poorly with symptoms or outcomes, somatic genomics may improve the current system. Here, we investigate heterogeneity of somatic cancer-driver mutations within patients and across endometriosis types. We examined anatomically distinct types of endometriosis (ovarian, deep infiltrating, and superficial endometriosis) in 27 individual patients all of whom had at least two types of endometriosis. Specimens were analyzed using high-sensitivity targeted sequencing with orthogonal validation from droplet digital PCR and mutation-surrogate immunohistochemistry. Results found 13/27 patients had informative somatic driver mutation in endometriosis, 9/13 had identical mutations across distinct lesions. Endometriomas tended to have a higher mutational complexity, with functionally redundant driver mutations in same gene and within the same lesions.

Our data are consistent with clonality across endometriosis lesions regardless of subtype. Further the finding of redundancy in mutations with the same gene and lesions is also consistent with endometriosis representing an oligoclonal disease with dissemination likely to consist of multiple epithelial clones travelling together. This suggests the current anatomically defined classification of endometriosis does not fully recognize the etiology of the disease. A novel classification should take into account genomic and other molecular features. These findings could further contribute to development of a more personalized endometriosis diagnosis and care. Spatial Allocation of Scarce COVID-19 Vaccines The COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) is an initiative led by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other partners that aims for an equitable access of COVID-19 vaccines. Despite a potential heterogeneous disease burden across space, countries receiving allotments of vaccines via COVAX may want to follow WHOs allocation rule and distribute vaccines to their jurisdictions based on the jurisdictions relative population size. Utilizing economic-epidemiological modeling, we benchmark the performance of this ad hoc allocation rule by comparing it to the rule that minimizes the economic damages and expenditures over time, including a penalty cost representing the social costs of deviating from the ad hoc allocation. Under different levels of vaccine scarcity and different demographic characteristics, we consider scenarios where length of immunity and compliance to travel restrictions vary, and consider the robustness of the rules when assumptions regarding these factors are incorrect. The benefits from deviating are especially high when immunity is permanent, when there is compliance to travel restrictions, when the supply of vaccine is low, and when there is heterogeneity in demographic characteristics. Interestingly, a lack of compliance to travel restrictions pushes the optimal allocations of vaccine towards the ad hoc and improves the relative robustness of the ad hoc rule, as the mixing of the populations reduces the spatial heterogeneity in disease burden.

JEL ClassificationC61, H12, H84, I18, Q54 Comparison Of respiratory protection during exercising tasks between different wearing methods of replaceable particulate respirators and powered air-purifying respirators BackgroundThis study evaluated the differences in respiratory protection between replaceable particulate respirators (RPRs) and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), with different wearing methods, during exercising tasks.

MethodsTen participants wore either RPR or PAPR according to the recommended method, with a knit cover placed between the facepiece cushion and the face, or with the headband on a helmet. We measured the number of particles inside and outside the respiratory protective equipment (RPE) during exercising tasks for each wearing variation. The exercise state was set to exercise with an ergometer set at 80W load. While exercising tasks, the participants performed five actions adopted from JIS T8150 in 2018 (1. Normal breathing, 2. Deep breathing, 3. Turning head side to side, 4. Moving head up and down, 5. Talking). Each action was performed for 1 min. For measurements of exercise state, after 10 minutes of exercise tasks, we measured while the exercise was continued. The fit factor was calculated by dividing the concentration within the RPE by the concentration outside of it. Data were analyzed after they were log-transformed with a linear mixed model, with fit factor as the dependent variable.

ResultsWe compared the results with experimental data of resting state reported in our previous studies. Fit factor of RPRs in the exercise state was significantly lower (p<0.001) than that in the resting state, indicating inadequate respiratory protection. In contrast, the fit factor of PAPRs during exercising tasks was significantly lower (p<0.001) than that at rest; however, respiratory protection was maintained. PAPR did not show a significant decrease (p=1.000) in fit factor owing to the wearing variations during exercising tasks.

ConclusionsPAPRs were found to be superior to RPRs in terms of respiratory protection. PAPRs are better than RPRs for workers who have to wear RPE inappropriately due to health problems.