Increase in SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA and IgG Antibodies in Human Milk from Lactating Women Following the COVID-19 Booster Vaccination The CDC recommended a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty (BNT162b2) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in September 2021 for high-risk individuals. Pregnant and high-risk lactating women were encouraged to receive the booster to obtain potential prolonged protection for themselves and their infants. This study investigated the ability of the booster vaccine to increase IgA and IgG antibodies specific to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in breast milk compared to levels pre-booster. We found a significant increase in both anti-RBD-specific IgA and IgG antibodies in breast milk following the Pfizer-BioNTech booster and this increase was present in the majority of participants at the study endpoint (60 days post-booster). These results suggest the booster enhances SARS-CoV-2 specific immunity in human breast milk, which may be protective for infants.
Serum but not mucosal antibody responses are associated with pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 spike cross-reactive CD4+ T cells following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly Advanced age is a main risk factor for severe COVID-19. However, low vaccination efficacy and accelerated waning immunity have been reported in this age group. To elucidate age-related differences in immunogenicity, we analysed human cellular, serological and salivary SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein-specific immune responses to BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in old (69-92 years) and middle-aged (24-57 years) vaccinees compared to natural infection (COVID-19 convalescents, 21-55 years). Serological humoral responses to vaccination exceeded those of convalescents but salivary anti-spike subunit 1 (S1) IgA and neutralizing capacity were less durable in vaccinees. In old vaccinees, we observed that pre-existing spike-specific CD4+ T cells are associated with efficient induction of anti-S1 IgG and neutralizing capacity in serum but not saliva. Our results suggest pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ T cells as predictor of an efficient COVID-19 vaccine-induced humoral immune response in old individuals.
Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care with a Focus on Surgery and Black Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Covid-19 Associated Hepatitis in children (CAH-C) during the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Central India: Is it a complication or transient phenomenon. Objective: While pediatric population has largely remained free of severe COVID-19, in some cases SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with complications like Multiple Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C). We mention another unique presentation subsequent to asymptomatic infection of SARS-CoV-2, a unique form of hepatitis designated by us as COVID-19 Associated Hepatitis in Children (CAH-C). The contrasting clinical presentations, temporal association and viral parameters of CAH-C cases, to the MIS-C cases are presented here. Methods: As a retrospective and follow-up observational study we reviewed all children testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during study period. Children presenting with sudden onset of hepatitis, elevated transaminases, non-obstructive jaundice, lacking marked inflammatory responses and without evidence of (a) other known causes of acute hepatitis or previous underlying liver disease (b) multi-system involvement were classified as CAH-C, are described here. Results: Among 475 children who tested positive, 47 patients presented with hepatitis, 37 patients who had features of CAH-C, having symptoms of hepatitis only, with un-elevated inflammatory markers and uneventful recovery following supportive treatment. Whereas remaining 10 MIS-C hepatitis had protracted illness, multiple system involvement, required admission to critical care, and had mortality of 30%. Conclusion: With the emergence of newer variants of concern (VOC) including the Delta variant which predominated the second wave of infections in India and has now spread to more than 142 countries with changing presentations, CAH-C might be one of them. Cases of such new entities need to be identified early and differentiated from other emerging syndromes in children during the ongoing pandemic for preventing adversities by timely intervention. COVID Outcome Prediction in the Emergency Department (COPE): Development and validation of a model for predicting death and need for intensive care in COVID-19 patients Background and aimCOVID-19 is putting extraordinary pressure on emergency departments (EDs). To support decision making in the ED, we aimed to develop a simple and valid model for predicting mortality and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in suspected COVID-19 patients.

MethodsFor model development, we retrospectively collected data of patients who were admitted to 4 large Dutch hospitals with suspected COVID-19 between March and August 2020 (first wave of the pandemic). Based on prior literature we considered quickly and objectively obtainable patient characteristics, vital parameters and blood test values as predictors. Logistic regression analyses with post-hoc uniform shrinkage was used to obtain predicted probabilities of in-hospital death and of the need for ICU admission, both within 28 days after hospital admission. We assessed model performance (Area Under the ROC curve (AUC); calibration plots) with temporal validation in patients who presented between September and December 2020 (second wave). We used multiple imputation to account for missing values.

ResultsThe development data included 5,831 patients, of whom 629 (10.8%) died and 5,070 (86.9%) were discharged within 28 days after admission. ICU admission was fully recorded for 2,633 first wave patients in 2 hospitals, with 214 (8%) ICU admissions within 28 days. A simple model - COVID Outcome Prediction in the Emergency Department (COPE) - with age, respiratory rate, C-reactive protein, lactic dehydrogenase, albumin and urea captured most of the ability to predict death. COPE was well-calibrated and showed good discrimination in 3,252 second wave patients (AUC in 4 hospitals: 0.82 [0.78; 0.86]; 0.82 [0.74; 0.90]; 0.79 [0.70; 0.88]; 0.83 [0.79; 0.86]). COPE was also able to identify patients at high risk of needing IC in 706 second wave patients with complete information on ICU admission (AUC: 0.84 [0.78; 0.90]; 0.81 [0.66; 0.95]). The models are implemented in web-based and mobile applications.

ConclusionCOPE is a simple tool that is well able to predict mortality and need for ICU admission for patients who present to the ED with suspected COVID-19 and may help patients and doctors in decision making.

CONTRIBUTION TO THE LITERATUREO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIPrediction models have the potential to support decision making about hospital admission of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected COVID-19
C_LIO_LIMost currently available models that were independently assessed contain a high risk of bias
C_LIO_LIPromising models were developed in different patient selections and included predictors that are not quickly and objective obtainable in emergency departments
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIA simple and objective tool ("COPE") is well able to predict mortality and need for ICU admission for patients who present to the ED with suspected COVID-19
C_LIO_LICOPE may support ED physicians to identify high-risk patients - i.e. those at high risk of deterioration and/or death - requiring treatment in the ICU, intermediate-risk patients requiring admission to the clinical ward, and low-risk patients who can potentially be sent home
C_LI Chemosensory dysfunctions induced by COVID-19 can persist up to 7 months: A study of over 700 healthcare workers Several studies have revealed either self-reported chemosensory alterations in large groups or objective quantified chemosensory impairments in smaller populations of patients diagnosed with COVID-19. However, due to the great variability in published results regarding COVID-19-induced chemosensory impairments and their follow-up, prognosis for chemosensory functions in patients with such complaints remains unclear. Our objective is to describe the various chemosensory alterations associated with COVID-19 and their prevalence and evolution after infection. A cross-sectional study of 704 healthcare workers with a RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between 28/2/2020 and 14/6/2020 was conducted 3 to 7 months after onset of symptoms. Data were collected with an online questionnaire. Outcomes included differences in reported chemosensory self-assessment of olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal functions across time points and Chemosensory Perception Test scores from an easy-to-use at-home self-administered chemosensory test. Among the 704 participants, 593 (84.2%) were women, the mean (SD) age was 42 (12) years, and the questionnaire was answered on average 4.8 (0.8) months after COVID-19. During COVID-19, a decrease in olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal sensitivities were reported by 81.3%, 81.5% and 48.0% respectively. Three to seven months later, reduced sensitivity was still reported by 52.0%, 41.9% and 23.3% respectively. Chemosensory Perception Test scores indicate that 19.5% of participants had objective olfactory impairment. These data suggest a significant proportion of COVID-19 cases have persistent chemosensory impairments at 3 to 7 months after their infection but the majority of those who had completely lost their olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal sensitivity have improved. Intrahost evolution of the HIV-2 capsid correlates with progression to AIDS BackgroundHIV-2 infection will progress to AIDS in most patients without treatment, albeit at approximately half the rate of HIV-1 infection. HIV-2 p26 amino acid variations are associated with lower viral loads and enhanced processing of T cell epitopes, which may lead to protective Gag-specific CTL responses common in slower disease progressors. Lower virus evolutionary rates, and positive selection on conserved residues in HIV-2 env have been associated with slower progression to AIDS. We therefore aimed to determine if intrahost evolution of HIV-2 p26 is associated with disease progression.

MethodsTwelve treatment-naive, HIV-2 mono-infected participants from the Guinea-Bissau Police cohort with longitudinal CD4+ T cell data and clinical follow-up were included in the analysis. CD4% change over time was analysed via linear regression models to stratify participants into relative faster and slower disease progressor groups. Gag amplicons of 735 nucleotides which spanned the p26 region were amplified by PCR and sequenced. We analysed p26 sequence diversity evolution, measured site-specific selection pressures and evolutionary rates, and determined if these evolutionary parameters were associated with progression status. Amino acid polymorphisms were mapped to existing p26 protein structures.

ResultsIn total, 369 heterochronous HIV-2 p26 sequences from 12 male patients with a median age of 30 (IQR: 28-37) years at enrolment were analysed. Faster progressors had lower CD4% and faster CD4% decline rates. Median pairwise sequence diversity was higher in faster progressors (5.7x10-3 versus 1.4x10-3 base substitutions per site, P<0.001). p26 evolved under negative selection in both groups (dN/dS=0.12). Virus evolutionary rates were higher in faster than slower progressors - synonymous rates: 4.6x10-3 vs. 2.3x10-3; and nonsynonymous rates: 6.9x10-4 vs. 2.7x10-4 substitutions/site/year, respectively. Virus evolutionary rates correlated negatively with CD4% change rates ({rho} = -0.8, P=0.02), but not CD4% level. However, Bayes factor (BF) testing indicated that the association between evolutionary rates and CD4% kinetics was supported by weak evidence (BF=0.5). The signature amino acid at p26 positions 6, 12 and 119 differed between faster (6A, 12I, 119A) and slower (6G, 12V, 119P) progressors. These amino acid positions clustered near to the TRIM5/p26 hexamer interface surface.

ConclusionsFaster p26 evolutionary rates were associated with faster progression to AIDS and were mostly driven by synonymous substitutions. Nonsynonymous evolutionary rates were an order of magnitude lower than synonymous rates, with limited amino acid sequence evolution over time within hosts. These results indicate the HIV-2 p26 may be an attractive vaccine or therapeutic target. Culture and understanding the role of feedback for health professions students: Realist synthesis protocol. IntroductionClinical education has moved to a "competency-based" model with an emphasis on workplace-based learning and assessment which, in turn, depends on feedback to be effective. Further, the understanding of feedback has changed from information about a performance directed to the learner performing the task, to a dialogue, which enables the learner to act and develop.

In health professional education, feedback is a complex interaction between trainee, supervisor, and the healthcare system. Most published research on feedback in health professional education originates in Europe and North America. Our interest is on the impact of Culture on this process, particularly in the context of Asian cultures.

The (scientific) realist approach of Pawson and Tilley provides a means to examine complex interventions in social situations, and thus is an appropriate lens to use for this study. This is a protocol for a realist synthesis which asks how, why and in what circumstances do Asian Cultures influence health professional trainees to seek, respond to and use feedback given in the clinical environment, if at all.

Methods and analysisAn initial search was performed to help define the scope of the review question and develop our initial program theory. The formal electronic search was carried out in February 2020 and included: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo, and repeated in October 2020.

Retrieved articles were imported into Covidence for screening and data extraction, after which components of the Context - Mechanisms - Outcomes configurations will be sought to refine the initial program theory.

Ethics and DisseminationAs this study is a literature review, ethics approval is not required.

The findings will be documented in line with the RAMESES publications standards for Realist syntheses,[41] and we plan to disseminate the findings by means of a peer-reviewed journal article and conference presentation(s).

Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThe synthesis aims to identify the how and why Asian Cultures may influence feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees, if at all.
C_LIO_LITo our knowledge, there are few studies of feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees in Asia.
C_LIO_LIA Realist approach has the potential to help explain the complex nature of Cultures impact on feedback.
C_LIO_LIOnly studies published in the English language will be included, so transferability of our findings to non-English speaking environments may be lacking.
C_LIO_LIIn addition to formal literature database searches, we will need to conduct citation mining to locate other relevant resources.
C_LI A cross-sectional study of infection control measures against COVID-19 and psychological distress among Japanese workers ObjectivesThis study examined the relationship between the status of infection control efforts against COVID-19 in the workplace and workers mental health using a large-scale Internet-based study.

MethodsThis cross-sectional study was based on an Internet monitoring survey conducted during the third wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in Japan. Of the 33,302 people who participated in the survey, 27,036 were included in the analyses. Participants answered whether or not each of 10 different infection control measures were in place at their workplace (e.g. wearing masks at all times during working hours). A Kessler 6 (K6) score of [&ge;]13 was defined as mild psychological distress. The odds ratios (ORs) of psychological distress associated with infection control measures at the workplace were estimated using a multilevel logistic model nested in the prefectures of residence.

ResultsThe OR of subjects working at facilities with 4 or 5 infection control measures for psychological distress was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.34, p=0.010), that in facilities with 2 or 3 infection control measures was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.25-1.64, p<0.001), and that in facilities with 1 or no infection control measures was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.63-2.14, p<0.001) compared to subjects whose workplaces had [&ge;]6 infection control measures.

ConclusionOur findings suggest that proactive COVID-19 infection control measures can influence the mental health of workers. A User Preference Analysis Of Commercial Breath Ketone Sensors To Inform The Development Of Portable Breath Ketone Sensors For Diabetes Management In Young People BackgroundPortable breath ketone sensors may help people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) avoid episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis; however the design features preferred by users have not been studied. We aimed to elucidate breath analysis and design preferences associated with commercial breath ketone devices among young people with T1DM aged 12-16 years and their parents in order to inform the development of a breath ketone sensor prototype for diabetes management.

Research Designs and MethodsTwo commercially available breath ketone sensors, designed for ketogenic diet monitoring, were explored over one week by ten young people with T1DM to get an insight into breath measurements. Participants interacted with the devices at least twice daily for five days, taking breath ketone, blood ketone and blood glucose measurements. Semi-structured interviews were conducted post-testing with the young participants and their caregivers to elicit preferences related to breath analysis and to inform the co-design of a diabetes breath ketone sensor prototype. To validate the results from a professional healthcare perspective, we interviewed two diabetes educators working in pediatric care about their perspective of young people using breath ketone sensors.

ResultsParticipants acknowledged the non-invasiveness of breath sensors as compared to blood testing. Affordability, reliability and accuracy were identified as prerequisites for breath ketone sensors used for diabetes management. Design features valued by young people included portability, ease of use, sustainability, readability and suitability for use in public. The time required to use breath sensors was similar to that for blood testing. The requirement to maintain a 10-second breath exhalation posed a challenge for users. Diabetes educators highlighted the ease of use of breath devices especially for young people with insufficient blood ketone testing.

ConclusionsBreath ketone sensors for diabetes management bear potential to facilitate ketone testing in young people. Our study affirms features for young people that drive usability of breath sensors among this population, and provides a model of user preference assessment.

Highlights/new findingsO_LIPortable breath ketone sensors potentially offer a non-invasive alternative to blood ketone testing in diabetes management, especially for young people with diabetes.
C_LIO_LIA user preference assessment of portable non-medical breath ketone devices among young people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus demonstrates the key values associated with breath ketone devices for diabetes management.
C_LIO_LIThe time to test for breath ketones was similar to that of blood ketone testing.
C_LIO_LIYoung people can and should be engaged in co-creation of medical devices that they will use.
C_LI The genetics of hereditary cancer risk syndromes in Brazil: a comprehensive analysis of 1682 patients Hereditary cancer risk syndromes are caused by germline variants. Most studies on hereditary cancer have been conducted in white populations. We report the largest study in Brazilian individuals with multiple ethnicities. We genotyped 1682 individuals from all regions of the country with Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Most were women with personal/family history of cancer, mostly breast and ovarian. We identified 321 pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 305 people (18.1%) distributed among 32 genes. Most were on BRCA1 and BRCA2 (129 patients, 26.2% and 14.3% of all P/LP, respectively), MUTYH (42 monoallelic patients, 13.1%), PALB2 (25, 7.8%), Lynch syndrome genes (17, 5.3%), and TP53 (17, 5.3%). Transheterozygosity prevalence in our sample was 0.89% (15/1682). BRCA1/BRCA2 double heterozygosity rate was 0.78% (1/129) for BRCA variants carriers and 0.06% (1/1682) overall. We evaluated the performance of the genetic testing criteria by NCCN and Brazilian National Health Agency (ANS). We observed false negative rates of 17.3% and 44.2%, meaning that both failed to detect a substantial part of P/LP positive patients. Our results add knowledge on the Brazilian spectrum of cancer risk germline variants, demonstrate that large multigene panels have high rates of positivity, and indicate that Brazilian testing guidelines should be improved. Alzheimer's Disease Assessments Optimised for Diagnostic Accuracy and Administration Time ObjectiveDespite the potential of machine learning techniques to improve dementia diagnostic processes, research outcomes are often not readily translated to or adopted in clinical practice. Importantly, the time taken to administer diagnostic assessment has yet to be taken into account in feature-selection based optimisation for dementia diagnosis. We address these issues by considering the impact of assessment time as a practical constraint for feature selection of cognitive and functional assessments in Alzheimers disease diagnosis.

MethodsWe use three different feature selection algorithms to select informative subsets of dementia assessment items from a large open-source dementia dataset. We use cost-sensitive feature selection to optimise our feature selection results for assessment time as well as diagnostic accuracy. To encourage clinical adoption and further evaluation of our proposed accuracy-vs-cost optimisation algorithms, we also implement a sandbox-like toolbox with graphical user interface to evaluate user-chosen subsets of assessment items.

ResultsWe find that there are subsets of accuracy-cost optimised assessment items that can perform better in terms of diagnostic accuracy and/or total assessment time than most other standard assessments.

DiscussionOverall, our analysis and accompanying sandbox tool can facilitate clinical users and other stakeholders to apply their own domain knowledge to analyse and decide which dementia diagnostic assessment items are useful, and aid the redesigning of dementia diagnostic assessments. Clinical Impact (Clinical Research): By optimising diagnostic accuracy and assessment time, we redesign predictive and efficient dementia diagnostic assessments and develop a sandbox interface to facilitate evaluation and testing by clinicians and non-specialists. Signals of significantly increased vaccine breakthrough, decreased hospitalization rates, and less severe disease in patients with COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Houston, Texas Genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2 continue to dramatically alter the landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recently described variant of concern designated Omicron (B.1.1.529) has rapidly spread worldwide and is now responsible for the majority of COVID-19 cases in many countries. Because Omicron was recognized very recently, many knowledge gaps exist about its epidemiology and clinical severity and disease course. A comprehensive genome sequencing study of SARS-CoV-2 in the Houston Methodist healthcare system identified 862 symptomatic patients with infections caused by Omicron from late November 2021 through December 18, 2021. Omicron very rapidly increased in only three weeks to cause 90% of all new COVID-19 cases. Compared to patients infected with either Alpha or Delta variants in our healthcare system, Omicron patients were significantly younger, had significantly increased vaccine breakthrough rates, and were significantly less likely to be hospitalized. Omicron patients required less intense respiratory support and had a shorter length of hospital stay, consistent with decreased disease severity. Although the number of Omicron patients we studied is relatively small, in the aggregate the data document the unusually rapid spread and increased occurrence of COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant in metropolitan Houston, and provide information about disease character. Deceased donor kidney degradomics indicates cytoskeletal proteolytic alterations impacting post-transplant function. BackgroundIn brain death, cerebral injury contributes to systemic biological dysregulation, causing significant cellular stress in donor kidneys that adversely impacts the quality of grafts. Here, we hypothesized that DBD kidneys may undergo proteolytic processes that renders grafts susceptible to post-transplant dysfunction.

Material & MethodsUsing mass spectrometry and immunoblotting analyses, we profiled degradation patterns of cytoskeletal proteins in deceased (n=55) and living (n=10) donor kidneys.

ResultsWe found that in DBD kidneys, key podocyte cytoskeletal proteins had been proteolytically cleaved. Generated degradation profiles were not associated to donor related demographic and clinical factors but were associated to suboptimal post-transplant function. Strikingly, -actinin -4 and Talin-1 degradation profiles were not observed in circulatory-death or living-donor kidneys. As Talin-1 is a specific proteolytic target of Calpain-1, we investigated a potential trigger of Calpain activation and Talin-1 degradation using ex-vivo precision-cut human kidney slices and in-vitro immortalised human podocytes. Notably, we found that Transforming-Growth Factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}) activated Calpain-1 and proteolytically cleaved Talin-1 to generate distinct peptide fragments. These peptide fragments were of similar size and matched the degradation patterns observed in DBD kidneys. Talin-1 degradation was prevented in vitro by Calpain-1 inhibition.

ConclusionsHere, we provide initial evidence that DBD kidneys are susceptible to cytoskeletal protein degradation that impacts posttransplant kidney function. Subsequent studies should aim to further investigate the link between brain death and activation of proteolytic pathways exploring new therapeutic opportunities. How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov BackgroundEarly in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, commentators warned that some COVID trials were inadequately conceived, designed and reported. Here, we retrospectively assess the prevalence of informative COVID trials launched in the first 6 months of the pandemic.

MethodsWe created a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention efficacy trials that were initiated from 2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30 using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. We evaluated trials on 3 criteria of informativeness: potential redundancy, design quality and feasibility of patient-participant recruitment. The study protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fp726/).

ResultsWe included 500 trials in our cohort, 58% of which were Phase 2 and 84.8% were directed towards the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Close to one third of trials met all three criteria and were deemed informative (29.0% (95% Confidence Interval 23.7 - 36.9)). The proportion of potentially redundant trials in our cohort was 4.1%. Over half of the trials in our cohort (56.2%) did not meet our criteria for high quality trial design. The proportion of trials with infeasible patient-participant recruitment was 22.6%.

ConclusionsLess than one third of COVID-19 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first six months met all three criteria for informativeness. Shortcomings in trial design, recruitment feasibility and redundancy reflect longstanding weaknesses in the clinical research enterprise that were likely amplified by the exceptional circumstances of a pandemic. Decoding Neural Activity in Sulcal and White Matter Areas of the Brain to Accurately Predict Individual Finger Movement and Tactile Stimuli of the Human Hand Millions of people worldwide suffer motor or sensory impairment due to stroke, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, diabetes, and motor neuron diseases such as ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). A brain-computer interface (BCI), which links the brain directly to a computer, offers a new way to study the brain and potentially restore these losses in patients living with debilitating conditions. One of the challenges currently facing BCI technology, however, is how to minimize surgical risk. Minimally invasive techniques, such as stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) have become more widely used in clinical applications since they can lead to fewer complications. SEEG electrodes also give access to sulcal and white matter areas of the brain but have not been widely studied in brain-computer interfaces. We therefore investigated the viability of using SEEG electrodes in a BCI for recording and decoding neural signals related to movement and the sense of touch and compared its performance to electrocorticography electrodes (ECoG) placed on gyri. Initial poor decoding performance and the observation that most neural modulation patterns were highly variable trial-to-trial and transient (significantly shorter than the sustained finger movements studied), led to the development of a feature selection method based on a repeatability metric using temporal correlation. An algorithm based on temporal correlation was developed to isolate features that consistently repeated (required for accurate decoding) and possessed information content related to movement or touch-related stimuli. We subsequently used these features, along with deep learning methods, to automatically classify various motor and sensory events for individual fingers with high accuracy. Repeating features were found in sulcal, gyral, and white matter areas and were predominantly phasic or phasic-tonic across a wide frequency range for both HD (high density) ECoG and SEEG recordings. These findings motivated the use of long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks (RNNs) which are well-suited to handling both transient and sustained input features. Combining temporal correlation-based feature selection with LSTM yielded decoding accuracies of up to 92.04 +/-1.51% for hand movements, up to 91.69 +/-0.49% for individual finger movements, and up to 80.64 +/-1.64% for focal tactile stimuli to the finger pads and palm while using a relatively small number of SEEG electrodes. These findings may lead to a new class of minimally invasive brain-computer interface systems in the future, increasing its applicability to a wider variety of conditions. Early management of severe COVID-19 coagulopathy should be guided by TEG, microclot and platelet mapping An important component of severe COVID-19 disease is virus-induced endothelilitis. This leads to disruption of normal endothelial function, initiating a state of failing normal clotting physiology. Massively increased levels of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) lead to overwhelming platelet activation, as well as activation of the enzymatic (intrinsic) clotting pathway. In addition, there is an impaired fibrinolysis, caused by, amongst others, increased levels of alpha-(2) antiplasmin. The end result is hypercoagulation [proven by thromboelastography(R) (TEG(R))] and reduced fibrinolysis, inevitably leading to a difficult-to-overcome hypercoagulated physiological state. Platelets in circulation also plays a significant role in clot formation, but themselves may also drive hypercoagulation when they are overactivated due to the interactions of their receptors with the endothelium, immune cells or circulating inflammatory molecules. From the literature it is clear that the role of platelets in severely ill COVID-19 patients has been markedly underestimated or even ignored. We here highlight the value of early management of severe COVID-19 coagulopathy as guided by TEG(R), microclot and platelet mapping. We also argue that the failure of clinical trials, where the efficacy of prophylactic versus therapeutic clexane (low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) were not always successful, might be because the significant role of platelet activation was not taken into account during the planning of the trial. We conclude that, because of the overwhelming alteration of clotting, the outcome of any trial evaluating an any single anticoagulant, including thrombolytic, would be negative. Here we suggest the use of the degree of platelet dysfunction and presence of microclots in circulation, together with TEG(R), should be used as a guideline for disease severity. A multi-pronged approach, guided by TEG(R) and platelet mapping, would be required to maintain normal clotting physiology in severe COVID-19 disease. Deep learning for caries detection using optical coherence tomography Early detection of dental caries has been one of the most predominant topics studied over the last few decades. Conventional examination through visual-tactile inspection and radiography can be inaccurate and destructive to the tooth structure. The development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has given dentistry an alternative diagnostic technique, which has been proven by numerous studies, that it has better sensitivity, specificity, and non-invasive characteristics. The growing popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) also contributes to a more efficient and effective way of image-based detection and decision-making. However, previous studies, which have attempted to employ AI for caries assessment, did not incorporate high-quality ground truth data. Therefore, this study aims to bypass this issue and highlights the importance of high-quality data. A two-phase study was carried out to explore different methods for caries detection. Initially, the comparison of caries detection based on OCT and apical radiography by 5 experienced clinicians was conducted. Then, five convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet-152, Xception, and ResNext-101, in the scope of AI were employed to detect caries and compared with the findings of the 5 clinicians. The data was preprocessed and labeled with the ground truth corresponding to microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) with rigorous definition. The weighted Kappa statistics suggested that OCT ({varkappa}= .699, SD = .090) showed a higher accuracy rate than radiography ({varkappa}= .407, SD = .049), and CNNs ({varkappa}= .860, SD = .049) were rated higher than clinicians ({varkappa}= .679, SD = .113), both at a .05 significance level. The best result was carried out by ResNet-152, which demonstrated a high accuracy rate of 95.21% and a sensitivity of 98.85%. These findings illustrate the importance of ground truth data for AI training and the potential of deep CNN algorithms combined with OCT for diagnosing dental caries. The Preventive Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose Naltrexone/Acetaminophen Combination: Findings of a Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with an Open-Label Extension for None-Responders We tested a low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination for episodic migraine prevention. We randomly assigned patients to naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=6) or placebo (n=6) for a 12-week double-blind treatment. Non-responders continued into open-label treatment with naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) for additional 12 weeks. Patients were adults who experienced 5 to 17 (average 9.7) migraine days at baseline. The primary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days from the 4-week double-blind follow-up (2nd baseline) to the last 4 weeks of the open-label treatment period.

The magnitude of the treatment effect for the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination observed in the double-blind period was 2.2 fewer monthly migraine days than placebo (p=0.43). Four out of 6 (66.7%) naltrexone and acetaminophen-treated patients experienced 75% reduction in migraine days compared to 1 out of 6 (16.7%) placebo-treated patients (p=0.09).

In the open-label phase, treatment with the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) led to 8.2 fewer mean monthly migraine days (from 11.8 to 3.6), representing 69.5% improvement (p=0.03), and 100% of the patients experienced a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient, included dry mouth, fatigue, sedation, nausea, and feeling jittery.

We postulate that naltrexones toll-like receptor (TLR4) antagonism properties prevent pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the trigeminal ganglion averting "overactive nerves" (laymans term) and migraine. Although this trial used low-dose naltrexone (defined as 1 - 5 mg/day), in future phase 3 studies we will test a range of naltrexone and acetaminophen combination doses. The Addiction Risk Factor: A Unitary Genetic Vulnerability Characterizes Substance Use Disorders and Their Associations with Common Correlates Substance use disorders commonly co-occur with one another and with other psychiatric disorders. They share common features including high impulsivity, negative affect, and lower executive function. We tested whether a common genetic factor undergirds liability to problematic alcohol use (PAU), problematic tobacco use (PTU), cannabis use disorder (CUD), and opioid use disorder (OUD) by applying genomic structural equation modelling to genome-wide association study summary statistics for individuals of European ancestry (Total N = 1,019,521; substance specific Ns range: 82,707-435,563), while adjusting for the genetics of substance use (Ns = 184,765-632,802). We also tested whether shared liability across SUDs is associated with behavioral constructs (risk taking, executive function, neuroticism; Ns = 328,339-427,037) and non-substance use psychopathology (psychotic, compulsive, and early neurodevelopmental disorders). Shared genetic liability to PAU, PTU, CUD, and OUD was characterized by a unidimensional addiction risk factor (termed The Addiction-Risk-Factor, independent of substance use. OUD and CUD demonstrated the largest loadings, while problematic tobacco use showed the lowest loading. The Addiction-Risk-Factor was associated with risk taking, neuroticism, executive function, and non-substance psychopathology, but retained specific variance before and after accounting for genetics of substance use. Thus, a common genetic factor partly explains susceptibility for alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and opioid use disorder. The Addiction-Risk-Factor has a unique genetic architecture that is not shared with normative substance use or non-substance psychopathology, suggesting that addiction is not the linear combination of substance use and psychopathology. Serum proteome analysis of systemic JIA and related pulmonary alveolar proteinosis identifies distinct inflammatory programs and biomarkers ObjectivesRecent observations in systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) suggest an increasing incidence of high-mortality interstitial lung disease, characterized by a variant of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). Co-occurrence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and PAP in sJIA suggested a shared pathology, but sJIA-PAP patients also commonly experience features of drug reaction such as atypical rashes and eosinophilia. We sought to investigate immunopathology and identify biomarkers in sJIA, MAS, and sJIA-PAP.

MethodsWe used SOMAscan to measure >1300 analytes in sera from healthy controls and patients with sJIA, MAS, sJIA-PAP and other related diseases. We verified selected findings by ELISA and lung immunostaining. Because the proteome of a sample may reflect multiple states (sJIA, MAS, sJIA-PAP), we used regression modeling to identify subsets of altered proteins associated with each state. We tested key findings in a validation cohort.

ResultsProteome alterations in active sJIA and MAS overlapped substantially, including known sJIA biomarkers like SAA and S100A9, and novel elevations of heat shock proteins and glycolytic enzymes. IL-18 was elevated in all sJIA groups, particularly MAS and sJIA-PAP. We also identified an MAS-independent sJIA-PAP signature notable for elevated ICAM5, MMP7, and allergic/eosinophilic chemokines, which were all previously associated with lung damage. Immunohistochemistry localized ICAM5 and MMP7 in sJIA-PAP lung. ICAM5s ability to distinguish sJIA-PAP from sJIA/MAS was independently validated.

ConclusionsSerum proteins support an sJIA-to-MAS continuum, help distinguish sJIA, sJIA/MAS, and sJIA-PAP, and suggest etiologic hypotheses. Select biomarkers, such as ICAM5, could aid in early detection and management of sJIA-PAP. Complementary frailty and mortality prediction models on older patients as a tool for assessing palliative care needs BackgroundPalliative care (PC) has demonstrated benefits for life-limiting illnesses. Cancer patients have mainly accessed these services, but there is growing consensus about the importance of promoting access for patients with non-malignant disease. Bad survival prognosis and patients frailty are usual dimensions to decide PC inclusion.

ObjectivesThe main aim of this work is to design and evaluate three quantitative models based on machine learning approaches to predict frailty and mortality on older patients in the context of supporting PC decision making: one-year mortality, survival regression and one-year frailty classification.

MethodsThe dataset used in this study is composed of 39,310 hospital admissions for 19,753 older patients (age >= 65) from January 1st, 2011 to December 30th, 2018. All prediction models were based on Gradient Boosting Machines. From the initial pool of variables at hospital admission, 20 were selected by a recursive feature elimination algorithm based on the random forests GINI importance criterion. Besides, we run an independent grid search to find the best hyperparameters in each model. The evaluation was performed by 10-fold cross-validation and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and mean absolute error were reported. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare our proposed approach with classical survival methods.

ResultsThe one-year mortality model achieved an AUC ROC of 0.87 {+/-} 0.01; the mortality regression model achieved an MAE of 329.97 {+/-} 5.24 days. The one-year frailty classification reported an AUC ROC of 0.9 {+/-} 0.01. The Spearmans correlation between the admission frailty index and the survival time was -0.1, while the point-biserial correlation between one-year frailty index and survival time was -0.16.

ConclusionsOne-year mortality model performance is at a state-of-the-art level. Frailty Index used in this study behaves coherently with other works in the literature. One-year frailty classifier demonstrated that frailty status within the year could be predicted accurately. To our knowledge, this is the first study predicting one-year frailty status based on a frailty index. We found mortality and frailty as two weakly correlated and complementary PC needs assessment criteria. Predictive models are available online at http://demoiapc.upv.es. Evaluating the Risk of Psilocybin for the Treatment of Bipolar Depression: A Review of the Research Literature and Published Case Studies Growing evidence suggests that psilocybin, the active ingredient in hallucinogenic mushrooms, can rapidly and durably improve symptoms of depression, leading to recent breakthrough status designation by the FDA and legalization for mental health treatment in some jurisdictions. Depression in bipolar disorder is associated with significant morbidity and has few effective treatments. However, there is little available scientific data on the risk of psilocybin use in people with bipolar disorder. Individuals with bipolar disorder have been excluded from modern clinical trials, out of understandable concerns of activating mania or worsening the illness course. As psilocybin becomes more available, people with these disorders will likely seek psilocybin treatment for depression and have likely already been doing so in unregulated settings. Our goal here is to summarize the known risks of psilocybin use (and similar substances) in bipolar disorder and to systematically evaluate examples of published case history data, in order to critically evaluate the relative risk of psilocybin as a treatment for bipolar depression. We found 17 cases suggesting that there is potential risk for activating a manic episode, thereby warranting caution. Nonetheless, the relative lack of systematic data or common case examples indicating risk appears to show that a cautious trial, using modern trial methods focusing on appropriate  set and  setting, targeted at those lowest at risk for mania in the bipolar spectrum (e.g., bipolar 2 disorder), is very much needed, especially given the degree to which depression impacts this population. Should We Delay the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Order to Optimize Rollout? A Mathematical Perspective. ObjectivesWith vaccination shortage persisting in many countries, adopting an optimal vaccination program is of crucial importance. Given the slow pace of vaccination campaigns globally, a very relevant and burning public health question is whether it is better to delay the second COVID-19 vaccine shot until all priority group people have received at least one shot. Currently, many countries are looking to administer a third dose (booster shot), which raises the question of how to distribute the available daily doses to maximize the effectively vaccinated population.

MethodsWe formulate a generalized optimization problem with a total of [Formula] vaccine doses, that have to be optimally distributed between n different sub-populations, where sub-population ui represents people receiving the i-th dose of the vaccine with efficacy i. The particular case where n = 2 is solved first, followed by the general case of n dose regimen.

ResultsIn the case of a two dose regimen, if the efficacy of the second dose is less than (or equal to) twice the efficacy of the first dose, the optimal strategy to maximize the number of effectively vaccinated people is to delay the second vaccine as much as possible. Otherwise, the optimal strategy would consist of administering the second dose as quickly as possible. In the general case, the optimal vaccination strategy would be to administer the k-th dose corresponding to the index providing the maximum inter-dose efficacy difference (i - i-1) for all possible values of i [isin] {1, ..., n}, with 0 = 0.

ConclusionOur results suggest that although extending the interval between doses beyond 12 weeks was likely optimal earlier in the pandemic, the reduced single dose efficacy of vaccines against the delta variant make this approach no longer viable.