Hemodynamic Differences Between Women and Men with Elevated Blood Pressure in China: A Non-Invasive Assessment of 45,082 Adults Using Impedance Cardiography BackgroundWhether there are sex differences in hemodynamic profiles among people with elevated blood pressure is not well understood and could guide personalization of treatment.

Methods and resultsWe described the clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of adults with elevated blood pressure in China using impedance cardiography. We included 45,082 individuals with elevated blood pressure (defined as systolic blood pressure of [&ge;]130 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of [&ge;]80 mmHg), of which 35.2% were women. Overall, women had a higher mean systolic blood pressure than men (139.0 [{+/-}15.7] mmHg vs 136.8 [{+/-}13.8] mmHg, P<0.001), but a lower mean diastolic blood pressure (82.6 [{+/-}9.0] mmHg vs 85.6 [{+/-}8.9] mmHg, P<0.001). After adjusting for age, region, and body mass index, women <50 years old had lower systemic vascular resistance index (beta-coefficient [{beta}] -31.7; 95% CI: -51.2, -12.2) and higher cardiac index ({beta} 0.07; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.09) than men of their same age group, whereas among those [&ge;]50 years old women had higher systemic vascular resistance index ({beta} 120.4; 95% CI: 102.4, 138.5) but lower cardiac index ({beta} -0.15; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.13). Results were consistent with a propensity score matching sensitivity analysis, although the magnitude of the SVRI difference was lower and non-significant. However, there was substantial overlap between women and men in the distribution plots of these variables, with overlapping areas ranging from 78% to 88%.

ConclusionsOur findings indicate that there are sex differences in hypertension phenotype, but that sex alone is insufficient to infer an individuals profile.
Diagnostic Model of in-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Used Artificial Intelligence Methods BackgroundPreventing in-hospital mortality in Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a crucial step.

ObjectivesThe objective of our research was to to develop and externally validate the diagnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients used artificial intelligence methods.

MethodsWe divide non-randomly the American population with acute STEMI into a training set, a test set,and a validation set. We converted the unbalanced data into balanc ed data. We used artificial intelligence methods to develop and externally validate the dia gnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients. We used confusion matrix combined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluat e the pros and cons of the above models.

ResultsThe strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, gender, cardiogenic shock, atrial fibrillation(AF), ventricular fibrillation(VF),third degree atrioventricular block,in-hospital bleeding, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) during hospitalization, underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during hospitalization, hypertension history, diabetes history, and myocardial infarction history.The F2 score of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation data set were 0.81, 0.6, and 0.59 respectively.The AUC of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation data set were 0.77, 0.78, and 0.8 respectively. The diagnostic model built by logistic regression was the best.

ConclusionWe had used artificial intelligence methods developed and externally validated the diagnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients.

We registered this study with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (registration number: ChiCTR1900027129; registered date: 1 November 2019).
Distinct patterns of cognitive outcome in young children with autism spectrum disorder receiving the Early Start Denver Model Evidence-based, early intervention significantly improves developmental outcome in young children with autism. Nonetheless, there is high interindividual heterogeneity in developmental trajectories during the therapy. It is currently not possible to predict a childs developmental outcome after receiving an early intervention based on his skills and symptoms at baseline. In this study, we analyze developmental trajectories of preschoolers with autism who received 2 years of intervention using the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) approach in Geneva, Switzerland (n = 47). Our aim was to identify early predictors of response to treatment. We applied a cluster analysis to distinguish between 3 subgroups based on their cognitive level at intake, and rates of cognitive change over the course of treatment. The first subgroup of children only had a mild cognitive delay at intake, and nearly no cognitive delay by the end of treatment (Higher Cognitive at baseline: HC). The children in the two other subgroups all presented with severe cognitive delay at baseline, however, they had two very different patterns of response to treatment. The majority significantly improved developmental scores within their first year of intervention (Optimal Responders: OptR). Whereas a minority of children showed little to no improvement over the course of treatment (Minimal Responders: MinR). Our findings suggest that children who end up having an optimal two-year treatment outcome show rapid developmental improvement. Inversely, less significant progress by the sixth month of intervention may predict a less optimal response to treatment. Signals of significantly increased vaccine breakthrough, decreased hospitalization rates, and less severe disease in patients with COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Houston, Texas Genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2 continue to dramatically alter the landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recently described variant of concern designated Omicron (B.1.1.529) has rapidly spread worldwide and is now responsible for the majority of COVID-19 cases in many countries. Because Omicron was recognized very recently, many knowledge gaps exist about its epidemiology and clinical severity and disease course. A comprehensive genome sequencing study of SARS-CoV-2 in the Houston Methodist healthcare system identified 862 symptomatic patients with infections caused by Omicron from late November 2021 through December 18, 2021. Omicron very rapidly increased in only three weeks to cause 90% of all new COVID-19 cases. Compared to patients infected with either Alpha or Delta variants in our healthcare system, Omicron patients were significantly younger, had significantly increased vaccine breakthrough rates, and were significantly less likely to be hospitalized. Omicron patients required less intense respiratory support and had a shorter length of hospital stay, consistent with decreased disease severity. Although the number of Omicron patients we studied is relatively small, in the aggregate the data document the unusually rapid spread and increased occurrence of COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant in metropolitan Houston, and provide information about disease character. Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study ObjectivesGlobal, Covid-driven restrictions around face-to-face interviews for healthcare student selection have forced admissions staff to rapidly adopt adapted online systems before supporting evidence is available. We have developed, what we believe is, the first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) methodology. This study aimed to explore test re-test reliability, acceptability and usability of the system.

Design, setting and participantsmixed-methods feasibility study in Physician Associate (PA) programmes from two UK and one US university during 2019 - 2020.

Primary, secondary outcomesFeasibility measures (test retest reliability acceptability and usability) were assessed using intra-class correlation (ICC), descriptive statistics, thematic and content analysis.

MethodsVolunteers took (T1), then repeated (T2), the automated MMI, with a seven-day interval (+/- 2) then completed an evaluation questionnaire. Admissions staff participated in focus group discussions.

ResultsSixty-two students and seven admission staff participated; 34 students and four staff from UK and 28 students and three staff from US universities.

Good-excellent test-retest reliability was observed with T1 and T2 ICC between 0.62-0.81 (p<0.001) when assessed by individual total scores (range 80.6-119), station total scores 0.6-0.91, p<0.005, individual site (all ICC[&ge;] 0.76 p<0.001) and mean test retest across sites 0.82 p<0.001 (95% CI 0.7-0.9).

Admissions staff reported potential to reduce resource costs and bias through a more objective screening tool for pre-selection or to replace some MMI stations in a  hybrid model. Maintaining human interaction through  touch points was considered essential.

Users positively evaluated the system, stating it was intuitive with an accessible interface. Concepts chosen for dynamic probing needed to be appropriately tailored.

ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that the system is reliable, generating consistent scores for candidates and is acceptable to end-users provided human touchpoints are maintained. Thus, there is evidence for the potential of such an automated system to augment healthcare student selection processes. Spatial Allocation of Scarce COVID-19 Vaccines The COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) is an initiative led by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other partners that aims for an equitable access of COVID-19 vaccines. Despite a potential heterogeneous disease burden across space, countries receiving allotments of vaccines via COVAX may want to follow WHOs allocation rule and distribute vaccines to their jurisdictions based on the jurisdictions relative population size. Utilizing economic-epidemiological modeling, we benchmark the performance of this ad hoc allocation rule by comparing it to the rule that minimizes the economic damages and expenditures over time, including a penalty cost representing the social costs of deviating from the ad hoc allocation. Under different levels of vaccine scarcity and different demographic characteristics, we consider scenarios where length of immunity and compliance to travel restrictions vary, and consider the robustness of the rules when assumptions regarding these factors are incorrect. The benefits from deviating are especially high when immunity is permanent, when there is compliance to travel restrictions, when the supply of vaccine is low, and when there is heterogeneity in demographic characteristics. Interestingly, a lack of compliance to travel restrictions pushes the optimal allocations of vaccine towards the ad hoc and improves the relative robustness of the ad hoc rule, as the mixing of the populations reduces the spatial heterogeneity in disease burden.

JEL ClassificationC61, H12, H84, I18, Q54 Macular vascular complexity analysis of diabetes mellitus by swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography PurposeTo evaluate the associations of retinal vascular complexity features, including fractal dimension (FD) and blood vessel tortuosity (BVT), with the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) by using noninvasive optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA).

MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study recruited ocular-treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) registered in the community of Guangzhou, China. OCTA was used to obtain the measurements of FD and BVT in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Univariate and multivariate linear regression was used to analyse the correlation of FD and BVT in different layers with DR severity.

ResultsA total of 1282 patients with DM (1282 eyes), with a mean age of 64.2{+/-}7.8 years, were included. FD in the DCP decreased and BVT in the DCP increased in DR patients compared to non-DR patients, even after adjusting for confounding factors (P< 0.05). Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in the FD values as the DR progressed, while the BVT progressively increased with worsening DR severity (P< 0.01). The FD in DCP had a statistically significant positive correlation with FD in SCP and a negative correlation with BVT in SCP and BVT in DCP in all of the participants, including the non-DR group, moderate DR group and severe DR group (P< 0.01).

ConclusionFD and BVT determined using OCTA might be useful parameters for objectively distinguishing DR from non-DR and indicating DR progression. Machine Learning with Objective Serum Markers and Algorithmic Deep Learning Computed Tomography Scan Analysis for Classification of Brain Injury BackgroundBrain injury is pathophysiologically diverse, with many cases presenting with mixed pathologies. Utilizing objective measures to investigate the pathophysiology of injury would aid in understanding prognosis and targeting therapeutics.

ObjectiveThe goal of this study is to develop a traumatic brain injury classification scheme based on open source deep learning computer tomography (CT) analysis and the two serum biomarkers, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal L1 (UCH-L1).

MethodsMachine learning was utilized to develop a novel algorithm capable of classifying the type of brain injury based on a CT scan analysis algorithm and GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations. Injury was stratified into one of four groups: spontaneous hemorrhage, oxygen deprivation, trauma resulting in vascular injury or high-velocity trauma with negative CT scan.

Outcomes100 research subjects were enrolled. Using a combination of CT analysis and serum markers, the subjects with CT positive trauma were distinguishable from those with spontaneous hemorrhage, ischemic injury, CT negative trauma and controls with AUCs of 0.96, 0.99., 0.98 and 1.00 respectively. Ischemic injury was distinguishable from CT positive trauma with an AUC of 0.98. All forms of brain injury could be distinguished from controls with AUC = 1.00.

DiscussionAn open source algorithmic CT scan analysis algorithm and serum biomarkers accurately classified the nature of brain injury across major etiologies. Further implementation of such algorithms and addition of other objective measures will enable better prognostication of injury and improved development of therapeutics. Characteristic and Sex Differences in Auditory Function and Cochlear Pathophysiology in a Noise-exposed Cohort: A Cross-sectional Study BackgroundTo determine the characteristics and sex differences of auditory perception and cochlear function in individuals with long-term occupational noise exposure.

MethodsYoung workers with long-term occupational noise exposure from a shipyard were recruited in the current study as the hidden hearing loss (HHL) risk group. Age-matched office workers in the same shipyard who had no occupational noise-exposure history were enrolled in the control group. The auditory processing ability of speech-in-noise (SIN) score and gap detection threshold (GDT) were further examined by sex. The cochlear function of action potential (AP) and summating potential (SP)/AP values were tested and compared by sex and side. The correlation between the SIN score and cochlear function was studied by sex. The correlation between either auditory processing ability or cochlear function and occupational-noise working length (OWL) was also analysed in the HHL risk group.

ResultsSignificantly decreased SIN scores and a higher GDT of the 4 kHz gap marker were only found in men in the HHL risk group. Although the hearing thresholds of the women in the HHL risk group were slightly but significantly worse than those of the women in the control group, no significant defects in auditory processing or temporal resolution were found between the two groups. Significantly decreased cochlear function and increased SP/AP values in the left ear were only found in men in the HHL risk group. Neither the AP amplitude nor the AP latency differed significantly between the two groups by sex. A correlation study indicated that only the correlation between the SIN score and the AP amplitude of the right ear in men was significant. No significant difference was found between the SIN score and cochlear function in women. The AP latency of the right ear was only significantly correlated with OWL in men.

ConclusionIn long-term occupational working exposure individuals with normal hearing, defects in auditory processing, temporal resolution and cochlear function showed sex differences, none of which were significant in women. In men, a weak correlation between the SIN score and the AP amplitude of the right ear was found. There was only a weak correlation between OWL and the AP latency of the right ear in men. Our findings indicate men are more vulnerable to occupational noise than women. Considering the noise-exposure dose differences between the control and HHL risk groups, our measures are insensitive to cochlear synaptopathy in humans. Background rates of five thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndromes of special interest for COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance: incidence between 2017 and 2019 and patient profiles from 25.4 million people in six European countries BackgroundThrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) has been reported among individuals vaccinated with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines. In this study we describe the background incidence of TTS in 6 European countries.

MethodsElectronic medical records from France, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom informed the study. Incidence rates of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and stroke, all with concurrent thrombocytopenia, were estimated among the general population between 2017 to 2019. A range of additional adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccinations were also studied in a similar manner.

FindingsA total of 25,432,658 individuals were included. Background rates ranged from 1.0 (0.7 to 1.4) to 8.5 (7.4 to 9.9) per 100,000 person-years for DVT with thrombocytopenia, from 0.5 (0.3 to 0.6) to 20.8 (18.9 to 22.8) for PE with thrombocytopenia, from 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) to 2.5 (2.2 to 2.7) for SVT with thrombocytopenia, and from 0.2 (0.0 to 0.4) to 30.9 (28.6 to 33.3) for stroke with thrombocytopenia. CVST with thrombocytopenia was only identified in one database, with incidence rate of 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) per 100,000 person-years. The incidence of TTS increased with age, with those affected typically having more comorbidities and greater medication use than the general population. TTS was also more often seen in men than women. A sizeable proportion of those affected were seen to have been taking antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapies prior to their TTS event.

InterpretationAlthough rates vary across databases, TTS has consistently been seen to be a very rare event among the general population. While still very rare, rates of TTS are typically higher among older individuals, and those affected were also seen to generally be male and have more comorbidities and greater medication use than the general population.

FundingThis study was funded by the European Medicines Agency (EMA/2017/09/PE Lot 3). Prospectively validated disease-agnostic predictive medicine with augmented intelligence Despite numerous superhuman achievements in complex challenges1,2, standalone AI does not free life science from the long-term bottleneck of linearly extracting new knowledge from exponentially growing new data3, severely limiting the success rate of drug discovery4. Inspired by the state-of-the-art AI training methods, we trained a human-centric hybrid augmented intelligence5 (HAI) to learn a foundation model6 that extracts all-encompassing knowledge of human physiology and diseases. To evaluate the quality of HAIs extracted knowledge, we designed the public, prospective prediction of pivotal ongoing clinical trial outcomes at large scale (PROTOCOLS) challenge to benchmark HAIs real-world performance of predicting drug clinical efficacy without access to human data. HAI achieved a 10.5-fold improvement from the baseline with 99% confidence7 in the PROTOCOLS validation, readily increasing the average clinical success rate of investigational new drugs from 7.9%8 to 90% for almost any human diseases9,10. The validated HAI confirms that exponentially extracted knowledge alone is sufficient for accurately predicting drug clinical efficacy, effecting a total reversal of Erooms law4. HAI is also the worlds first clinically validated model of human aging that could substantially speed up the discovery of preventive medicine for all age-related diseases11. Our results demonstrate that disruptive breakthroughs necessitate the smallest team size to attain the largest HAI for optimal knowledge extraction from high-dimensional low-quality data space, thus establishing the first prospective proof of the previous discovery that small teams disrupt12. The global adoption of training HAI provides a well-beaten economic path to mass-produce scientific and technological breakthroughs via exponential knowledge extraction and better designs of data labels for training better-performing AI13. Knee-extensor strength, symptoms, and need for surgery after two, four, or six exercise sessions/week using a home-based one-exercise program: A randomized dose-response trial of knee-extensor resistance exercise in patients eligible for knee replacement (the QUADX-1 trial). ObjectiveTo investigate firstly the efficacy of three different dosages of one home-based, knee-extensor resistance exercise on knee-extensor strength in patients eligible for knee replacement, and secondly, the influence of exercise on symptoms, physical function and decision on surgery.

MethodOne-hundred and forty patients eligible for knee replacement were randomized to three groups: 2, 4 or 6 home-based knee-extensor resistance exercise-sessions per week (group 2, 4 and 6 respectively) for 12 weeks. Primary outcome: isometric knee-extensor strength. Secondary outcomes: Oxford Knee Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, average knee pain last week (0-10 numeric rating scale), 6-minute walk test, stair climbing test, exercise adherence and "need for surgery".

ResultsPrimary analysis: Intention-to-treat analysis of 140 patients did not find statistically significant differences between the groups from baseline to after 12 weeks of exercise in isometric knee-extensor strength: Group 2 vs. 4 (0.003 Nm/kg (0.2%) [95% CI -0.15 to 0.15], P=0.965) and group 4 vs. 6 (-0.04 Nm/kg (-2.7%) [95% CI -0.15 to 0.12], P=0.628). Secondary analysis: Intention-to-treat analyses showed statistically significant differences between the two and six sessions/week groups in favor of the two sessions/week group for Oxford Knee Score: 4.8 OKS points (15.2%) [1.3 to 8.3], P=0.008) and avg. knee pain last week (NRS 0-10): - 1.3 NRS points (-19.5%) [-2.3 to -0.2], P=0.018. After the 12-week exercise intervention, data were available for 117 patients (N=39/group): 38 (32.5%) patients wanted surgery and 79 (67.5%) postponed surgery. This was independent of exercise dosage.

ConclusionIn patients eligible for knee-replacement we found no between-group differences in isometric knee extensor strength after 2, 4 and 6 knee-extensor resistance exercise sessions per week. We saw no indication of an exercise dose-response relationship for isometric knee-extensor strength and only clinically irrelevant within group changes. For some secondary outcome (e.g. KOOS subscales) we found clinically relevant within group changes, which could help explain why only one in three patients decided to have surgery after the simple home-based exercise intervention.

Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02931058. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.07.21254965. Poor neutralization and rapid decay of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated dialysis patients Patients on dialysis are at risk of severe course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Understanding the neutralizing activity and coverage of SARS-CoV-2 variants of vaccine-elicited antibodies is required to guide prophylactic and therapeutic COVID-19 interventions in this frail population. By analyzing plasma samples from 130 hemodialysis and 13 peritoneal dialysis patients after two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines, we found that 35% of the patients had low-level or undetectable IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S). Neutralizing antibodies against the vaccine-matched SARS-CoV-2 and Delta variant were low or undetectable in 49% and 77% of patients, respectively, and were further reduced against other emerging variants. The fraction of non-responding patients was higher in SARS-CoV-2-naive hemodialysis patients immunized with BNT162b2 (66%) than those immunized with mRNA-1273 (23%). The reduced neutralizing activity correlated with low antibody avidity. Patients followed up to 7 months after vaccination showed a rapid decay of the antibody response with an average 21- and 10-fold reduction of neutralizing antibodies to vaccine-matched SARS-CoV-2 and Delta variant, which increased the fraction of non-responders to 84% and 90%, respectively. These data indicate that dialysis patients should be prioritized for additional vaccination boosts. Nevertheless, their antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 must be continuously monitored to adopt the best prophylactic and therapeutic strategy. Benchmarking saliency methods for chest X-ray interpretation Saliency methods, which "explain" deep neural networks by producing heat maps that highlight the areas of the medical image that influence model prediction, are often presented to clinicians as an aid in diagnostic decision-making. Although many saliency methods have been proposed for medical imaging interpretation, rigorous investigation of the accuracy and reliability of these strategies is necessary before they are integrated into the clinical setting. In this work, we quantitatively evaluate three saliency methods (Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Integrated Gradients) across multiple neural network architectures using two evaluation metrics. We establish the first human benchmark for chest X-ray interpretation in a multilabel classification set up, and examine under what clinical conditions saliency maps might be more prone to failure in localizing important pathologies compared to a human expert benchmark. We find that (i) while Grad-CAM generally localized pathologies better than the two other saliency methods, all three performed significantly worse compared with the human benchmark; (ii) the gap in localization performance between Grad-CAM and the human benchmark was largest for pathologies that had multiple instances, were smaller in size, and had shapes that were more complex; (iii) model confidence was positively correlated with Grad-CAM localization performance. Our work demonstrates that several important limitations of saliency methods must be addressed before we can rely on them for deep learning explainability in medical imaging. The effects of modifiable maternal pregnancy risk factors on molar-incisor hypomineralisation: A negative control study ObjectivesO_LITo explore the associations between modifiable maternal pregnancy exposures: pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), pregnancy smoking and alcohol consumption with offspring molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH).
C_LIO_LITo explore for the presence of residual confounding using negative control analyses.
C_LI

MethodsThis study used data from Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a UK prospective birth cohort. We defined offspring MIH using prospectively collected questionnaire data. We used logistic regression to explore confounder adjusted associations between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy with MIH. We included negative control exposure (paternal BMI, smoking and alcohol around the time of pregnancy) and outcome (offspring dental trauma) analyses to explore for the presence of residual confounding.

Results5536 mother/offspring pairs were included (297 MIH cases [5.4%]). We found a positive association between maternal mean BMI and offspring MIH (OR per 1-kg/m2 difference in maternal BMI: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.08). In subsequent analyses, we found evidence that this effect was non-linear and being driven by women in the highest BMI quintiles. In negative control analyses, we found no evidence of association between paternal BMI and offspring MIH (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.00) and maternal BMI and offspring dental trauma (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.02). There was no clear evidence of an association for maternal pregnancy smoking (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.46, 1.22) and alcohol consumption (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.21) with offspring MIH with results imprecisely estimated.

ConclusionIn summary we found evidence of a possible intrauterine effect of high maternal pre-pregnancy BMI on offspring MIH. We did not find robust evidence for an intrauterine effect of maternal pregnancy smoking or alcohol consumption on offspring MIH. Our findings provide further support for women of reproductive age to maintain a healthy weight. Future studies are warranted to explore possible mechanisms on how the pregnancy environment may relate to offspring MIH. The incidence of delirium in an acute geriatric community hospital: an observational cohort feasibility study. ObjectivesDelirium in hospitalised older adults is associated with negative health outcomes. Admission to an alternative care setting may lower the incidence of delirium. The Acute Geriatric Community Hospital (AGCH) was recently opened in the Netherlands and uses a multi-component non-pharmacological intervention strategy to prevent delirium. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of delirium at the AGCH and compare this incidence to existing rates from literature. If a possible effect on delirium is seen in this comparison this would support conducting a larger prospectively controlled study on delirium in this new care setting.

DesignProspective cohort feasibility study; exploratory meta-analysis of proportions.

Setting and ParticipantsThe AGCH is an acute geriatric unit in a skilled nursing facility for patients aged >65 years with acute medical conditions.

MethodsDelirium assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) upon admission and on day one, two and three or until delirium had resolved. Patients charts were reviewed if CAM was missing. In an linear mixed-effects model, the delirium incidence rate in AGCH was compared to pooled delirium incidence rates from six studies found in a high-quality review.

Results214 patients from the AGCH (mean age 81.9 years, 47% male, 12% with a history of dementia) were included in the analysis. Delirium developed in 8% (18/214) (95% confidence interval [CI] 5-13%) of patients during AGCH admission compared to 16% (95% CI 12-21%) in hospitals. Admission to the AGCH was associated with a decreased delirium incidence rate compared to the hospital control group (OR[odds ratio]= 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.98, p-value=0.044).

Conclusions and implicationsThe delirium incidence in the AGCH was low compared to those incidences found in general hospitals in literature. Based on these findings a controlled observational or randomized study measuring delirium in this care setting is recommended. The Preventive Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose Naltrexone/Acetaminophen Combination: Findings of a Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with an Open-Label Extension for None-Responders We tested a low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination for episodic migraine prevention. We randomly assigned patients to naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=6) or placebo (n=6) for a 12-week double-blind treatment. Non-responders continued into open-label treatment with naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) for additional 12 weeks. Patients were adults who experienced 5 to 17 (average 9.7) migraine days at baseline. The primary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days from the 4-week double-blind follow-up (2nd baseline) to the last 4 weeks of the open-label treatment period.

The magnitude of the treatment effect for the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination observed in the double-blind period was 2.2 fewer monthly migraine days than placebo (p=0.43). Four out of 6 (66.7%) naltrexone and acetaminophen-treated patients experienced 75% reduction in migraine days compared to 1 out of 6 (16.7%) placebo-treated patients (p=0.09).

In the open-label phase, treatment with the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) led to 8.2 fewer mean monthly migraine days (from 11.8 to 3.6), representing 69.5% improvement (p=0.03), and 100% of the patients experienced a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient, included dry mouth, fatigue, sedation, nausea, and feeling jittery.

We postulate that naltrexones toll-like receptor (TLR4) antagonism properties prevent pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the trigeminal ganglion averting "overactive nerves" (laymans term) and migraine. Although this trial used low-dose naltrexone (defined as 1 - 5 mg/day), in future phase 3 studies we will test a range of naltrexone and acetaminophen combination doses. Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparisons (MAICs) and Systematic Review: Efficacy and Safety of Experimental Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cells versus Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Despite favorable results of CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL), several challenges remain, including incomplete response, immune-mediated toxicity, and antigen-loss relapse. We delineated the relative clinical benefit of the novel approaches compared to the currently approved CAR T-cell therapies. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons and randomized controlled trials, we performed Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparisons to quantify the relative efficacy and safety of experimental CARs against Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), the first FDA-approved CAR. A total of 182 R/R LBCL patients from 15 clinical trials with individual patient data (IPD) were pooled into eight populations by their CAR T-cell constructs and +/- ASCT status. The study endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS), grade [&ge;] 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and grade [&ge;] 3 neurotoxicity (NT). Tandem CD19.CD20.4-1BB{zeta} CARs indicated favorable efficacy and safety, whereas the co-infusion of CD19 & CD20 with 4-1BB{zeta} showed no clinical benefit compared to Yescarta. Third generation CD19. CD28. 4-1BB{zeta}, and sequential administration of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and CD19. CARs presented statistically insignificant yet improved PFS and safety except for ASCT combined intervention which had suggestively higher NT risk than Yescarta. CARs with modified co-stimulatory domains to reduce toxicity (Hu19. CD8.28Z{zeta} and CD19. BBz.86{zeta}) presented remarkable safety with no severe adverse events; however, both presented worse PFS than Yescarta. Third-generation CARs demonstrated statistically significantly lower NT than Yescarta. CD20. 4-1BB{zeta} data suggested targeting CD20 antigen alone lacks clinical or safety benefit compared to Yescarta. Further comparisons with other FDA-approved CARs are needed.

NOVELTY AND IMPACTAlthough currently approved CAR T-cells demonstrated unprecedently high response in relapsed / refractory LBCL in the salvage setting, lack of outcome durability and toxicity remain. We delineated the relative clinical benefit of the innovative experimental CAR T-cell approaches to Yescarta for insights into the ongoing efforts to address these inadequacies. Tandem CAR T-cells may provide higher efficacy and safer profile than Yescarta. Toxicity attenuated CAR T-cells present remarkable safety but no Progression-Free Survival (PFS) benefit. Airway management, procedural data, and mortality records of patients undergoing surgery for mucormycosis associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) In India, the second wave of coronavirus disease (COVID -19) was associated with a distinct surge in cases of invasive fungal infection with mucormycosis. This disease was seen typically in the sinonasal form in COVID-19 patients. Uncontrolled diabetes, steroid use in COVID-19 treatment, etc. were some of the postulated risk factors for the association of COVID 19 and Mucormycosis. The management plan of these cases included surgical debridement, systemic antifungal therapy, sugar control, and management of antifungal related systemic adverse effects. In this retrospective case record review, we aimed to evaluate the airway management plan, demographics, and overall outcomes in patients undergoing surgical resection for COVID-19 associated mucormycosis. Forty-one (71.9 %) patients had a diagnosis of sino-nasal mucormycosis, fourteen (24.6%) had a diagnosis of rhino-orbital mucormycosis, and 2 patients (3.5%) were diagnosed with palatal mucormycosis. Total 44 (77.19 %) patients had co-morbidities. The most common co-morbidity was Diabetes Mellitus 42 (73.6%), followed by hypertension 21 (36.84%) and Acute kidney injury 14 (28.07%). We used the intubation difficulty scale score to assess intubating conditions. Intubation was easy to slightly difficult in 53 out of 57 patients. In our study, mortality occurred in 7 (12.28 %) patients. The median mortality time was 60 (range, 27-74) days. The median time to hospital discharge was 53.5 (range,10-85) days. Managing COVID-19 on its own is challenging and additional mucormycosis can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite challenges and risks, timely and meticulous interventions can reduce complications. Impact of HIV Infection on COVID-19 Outcomes Among Hospitalized Adults in the U.S. BackgroundWhether HIV infection is associated with differences in clinical outcomes among people hospitalized with COVID-19 is uncertain.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of HIV infection on COVID-19 outcomes among hospitalized patients.

MethodsUsing the American Heart Associations COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease registry, we used hierarchical mixed effects models to assess the association of HIV with in-hospital mortality accounting for patient demographics and comorbidities and clustering by hospital. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), severity of illness, and length of stay (LOS).

ResultsThe registry included 21,528 hospitalization records of people with confirmed COVID-19 from 107 hospitals in 2020, including 220 people living with HIV (PLWH). PLWH were younger (56.0+/-13.0 versus 61.3+/-17.9 years old) and more likely to be male (72.3% vs 52.7%), Non-Hispanic Black (51.4% vs 25.4%), on Medicaid (44.5% vs 24.5), and active tobacco users (12.7% versus 6.5%).

Of the study population, 36 PLWH (16.4%) had in-hospital mortality compared with 3,290 (15.4%) without HIV (Risk ratio 1.06, 95%CI 0.79-1.43; risk difference 0.9%, 95%CI -4.2 to 6.1%; p=0.71). After adjustment for age, sex, race, and insurance, HIV was not associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.13; 95%CI 0.77-1.6; p 0.54) even after adding body mass index and comorbidities (aOR 1.15; 95%CI 0.78-1.70; p=0.48). HIV was not associated with MACE (aOR 0.99, 95%CI 0.69-1.44, p=0.91), severity of illness (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.62-1.50, p=0.86), or LOS (aOR 1.03; 95% CI 0.76-1.66, p=0.21).

ConclusionHIV was not associated with adverse outcomes of COVID-19 including in-hospital mortality, MACE, or severity of illness.

Condensed AbstractWe studied 21,528 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at 107 hospitals in AHAs COVID-19 registry to examine the association between HIV and COVID-19 outcomes. More patients with HIV were younger, male, non-Hispanic Black, on Medicaid and current smokers. HIV was not associated with worse COVID-19 in-hospital mortality (Risk ratio 1.06, 95%CI 0.79-1.43; p=0.71) even after adjustment (aOR 1.15; 95%CI 0.78-1.70; p=0.48). HIV was also not associated with MACE (aOR 0.99, 95%CI 0.69-1.44, p=0.91) or severity of illness (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.62-1.50, p=0.86. Our findings do not support that HIV is a major risk factor for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Substance Use Onset in High-Risk 9-13 Year-Olds in the ABCD Study AimA key aim of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study is to document substance use onset, patterns, and sequelae across adolescent development. However, substance use misreporting obscures accurate drug use characterization. Hair toxicology tests provide objective historical substance use data, but are rarely investigated in youth. Here, we compare objective hair toxicology results with self-reported substance use in youth.

MethodsA literature-based substance use risk algorithm identified 696 ABCD Study(R) participants for hair sample collections between baseline and 2-year follow-up (spanning ages 9-13) for laboratory analysis. Chi-square and t-tests assessed differences between participants demographics, positive and negative hair tests, risk algorithm scores, and self-reported substance use.

ResultsHair testing confirmed that 17% of at-risk 9-13 year-olds had evidence of past 3-month use of one (n=99), two (n=17), three (n=3), or four (n=2) drug classes. After considering prescribed medication use, 11% had a positive test incongruent with self- or parent-report. No participant with a positive result self-reported substance use consistent with their toxicology results. Participants with positive tests under-reported use (p<.001), reported less sipping of alcohol (p<.001), and scored higher on the risk algorithm (p<.001) than those with negative hair toxicology.

ConclusionsAn alarming 11% of tested samples in at-risk 9-13 year-olds were positive for at least one unreported substance, suggesting underreporting in this population when participating in a national healthy development study. The degree of underreporting cannot yet be calculated, as at-risk samples were prioritized for assays. Expanded toxicology testing is key to characterize substance use in youth. A Cross-Sectional Examination of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures of Physician-Authors Publishing in High-Impact US Medical Journals ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of self-reported financial conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosures in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) within the requisite disclosure period prior to article submission.

DesignCross-sectional investigation.

Data SourcesOriginal clinical-trial research articles published in NEJM (n = 206) or JAMA (n = 188) from January 1 to December 31, 2017; self-reported COI disclosure forms submitted to NEJM or JAMA with the authors published articles; Open Payments website (from database inception; latest search: August 2019).

Main outcome measuresFinancial data reported to Open Payments from 2014 to 2016 (time period that included all subjects requisite disclosure windows) were compared to self-reported disclosure forms submitted to the journals. Payments were defined as those not associated with a research study or formal research funding. Payment types were categorized as "disclosed," "undisclosed," "indeterminate," or "unrelated."

ResultsThirty-one articles from NEJM and 31 articles from JAMA met inclusion criteria. The physician-authors (n = 118) received a combined total of $7.48 million. Of the 106 authors (89.8%) who received payments, 86 (81.1%) received undisclosed payments. The top 23 most highly compensated received $6.32 million, of which $3.00 million (47.6%) was undisclosed. Disclosure rates were the equivalent between the top 23 and the entire sample.

ConclusionsHigh payment amounts, as well as high proportions of undisclosed financial compensation, regardless of amount received, comprised potential COIs for two influential US medical journals. Further research is needed to explain why such high proportions of general payments were undisclosed and whether journals that rely on self-reported COI disclosure need to reconsider their policies. Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.