The immunogenicity against variants of concern and reactogenicity of four COVID-19 booster vaccinations following CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary series The CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech) and ChAdOx1(Oxford-AstraZeneca) are two widely used COVID-19 vaccines. We examined the immunogenicity of four COVID-19 booster vaccine: BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm Biotech), ChAdOx1, 30g-BNT162b2 and 15g-BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), in healthy adults who received a two-dose CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 8-12 weeks earlier. Among the 352 participants (179 CoronaVac and 173 ChAdOx1 participants), 285 (81%) were female, and median age was 39(IQR: 31-47) years. 98%(175/179) and 99%(172/173) of Coronavac and ChAdOx1 participants remained seropositive at baseline. Two weeks post-booster, both 30g- and 15g-BNT162b2 induced the highest anti-RBD IgG concentration (BAU/mL); Coronavac-prime: 30g-BNT162b2, 5152.2(95%CI 4491.7-5909.8); 15g-BNT162b2, 3981.1(3397.2-4665.4); ChAdOx1, 1358.0(1141.8-1615.1); BBIBP-CorV, 154.6(92.11-259.47); ChAdOx1-prime: 30g-BNT162b2, 2363.8(2005.6-2786.1; 15g-BNT162b2, 1961.9(1624.6-2369.1); ChAdOx1, 246.4(199.6-304.2); BBIBP-CorV, 128.1(93.5-175.4). Similarly, both 30g- and 15g-BNT162b2 boosting induced the highest neutralizing antibodies (nAb) titres against all variants and highest T-cell response evaluated by interferon gamma released asssays. While all BNT162b2 or heterologous ChAdOx1-boosted participants had nAb against Omicron, these were <50% for BBIBP-CorV and 75% for homologous ChAdOx1-boosted participants. There was significant decrease in nAb (>4-fold) 16-20 weeks post booster. Heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 following CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 primary series is most immunogenic. A lower dose BNT162b2 may be considered as booster in settings with limited vaccine supply.
Can 10x cheaper, rapid air filtration control the pandemic? Public health departments such as CDC and California Department of Public Health (CA-DPH) advise HEPA-purifiers to limit transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in classrooms and community spaces. CA-DPH recommends 4-6 air exchanges per hour often necessitating multiple HEPA-purifiers per room, unaffordable in under-resourced community settings. Pressure to seek cheap, rapid air filtration resulted in proliferation of lower-cost, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) air purifiers whose performance is not well characterized compared to HEPA-purifiers. Primary metrics are clean air delivery rate (CADR), noise generated (dBA), and affordability ($$). CADR measurement often requires hard-to-replicate laboratory experiments with generated aerosols. In this study, we use simplified, low-cost measurement tools of ambient aerosols enabling scalable evaluation of aerosol filtration efficiencies (0.3 to 10 microns), estimated CADR, and noise generation to compare a dozen HEPA-purifiers and DIY purifier designs. DIY purifiers consist of one or two box fans coupled to single MERV 13-16 filters (1"-5" thick) or quad filters in a cube. Accounting for reduced filtration efficiency (%) of MERV 13-16 filters (versus HEPA) at the most penetrating particle size of 0.3 microns, estimated CADR of DIY purifiers using 2" (67%), 4" (66%), and 5" (85%) filters at lowest fan speed was 293 cfm ($35), 322 cfm ($58), and 405 cfm ($120) comparable to best-in-class, low-noise generating HEPA-purifier running at maximum speed with at 282 cfm ($549). Quad filter designs, popularly known as Corsi-Rosenthal box, achieved gains in estimated CADR less than 80% over single filter designs, less than the 100% gain by adding a second DIY purifier. Replacing one of the four filters with a second fan resulted in gains of 125%-150% in estimated CADR. DIY alternatives using lower-efficiency, single filters compare favorably to HEPA-purifiers in estimated CADR, noise generated at five to ten times lower cost, enabling cheap, rapid aerosol removal around the world.
Preexisting diabetes and COVID-associated hyperglycaemia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSAimC_ST_ABSThe aim of the current study was to compare clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and major outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with COVID-associated hyperglycaemia or preexisting diabetes.

MethodsA cohort of 176 adult patients with a diagnosis of pre-existing diabetes (n=112) or COVID-associated hyperglycaemia (n=55) was studied. Clinical outcomes and laboratory findings were analysed according to the presence of the two conditions. The time to viral clearance was assessed during the follow-up after hospital discharge.

ResultPatients with COVID-associated hyperglycaemia had lower BMI, significantly less comorbidities and higher levels of inflammatory markers and indicators of multi-organ injury than those with preexisting diabetes. No differences between preexisting diabetes and COVID-associated hyperglycaemia were evident for symptoms at admission, humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 or autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase or interferon alpha-4. COVID-associated hyperglycaemia was independently associated with the risk of adverse clinical outcome defined as ICU admission or death (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.34-3.31; p=0.001), even after adjustment for age, sex and other selected variables associated with COVID-19 severity. Furthermore, we documented a negative association (HR 0.661, 95% CI 0.43-1.02; p=0.063) between COVID-associated hyperglycaemia and the time to swab negativization.

ConclusionsThe recognition of hyperglycaemia as a specific clinical entity associated with COVID-19 pneumonia is relevant for early and appropriate patient management and close monitoring for the progression of disease severity. Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG system with an interactive assessment tool BackgroundCognitive decline remains highly underdiagnosed despite efforts to find novel biomarkers for detection. EEG biomarkers based on machine learning may offer a noninvasive low-coast approach for identifying cognitive decline. However, most studies use multi-electrode systems which are less accessible. This study aims to evaluate the ability to extract cognitive decline biomarkers using a wearable single-channel EEG system with an interactive assessment tool.

MethodsThis pilot study included data collection from 82 participants who performed a cognitive assessment while being recorded with a single-channel EEG system. Seniors in different clinical stages of cognitive decline (healthy to mild dementia) and young healthy participants were included. Seniors MMSE scores were used to allocate groups with cutoff scores of 24 and 27. Data analysis included correlation analysis as well as linear mixed model analysis with several EEG variables including frequency bands and three novel cognitive biomarkers previously extracted from a different dataset.

ResultsMMSE scores correlated significantly with reaction times, as well as two EEG biomarkers: A0 and ST4. Both biomarkers showed significant separation between study groups: ST4 separated between the healthy senior group and the low-MMSE group. A0 differentiated between the healthy senior group and the other three groups, showing different cognitive patterns between different stages of cognitive decline as well as different patterns between young and senior healthy participants. In the healthy young group, activity of Theta, Delta, A0 and VC9 biomarkers significantly separated between high and low levels of cognitive load, consistent with previous reports. VC9 and Theta showed a finer separation between low cognitive load levels and resting state.

ConclusionsThis study successfully demonstrated the ability to assess cognitive states with an easy-to-use portable single-channel EEG device with an interactive cognitive assessment. The short set-up time and novel biomarkers enable objective and easy assessment of cognitive decline. Future studies should explore potential usefulness of this tool in characterizing changes in EEG patterns of cognitive decline over time, for detection of cognitive decline on a large scale in every clinic to potentially allow early intervention. Decision curve analysis to identify optimal candidates of liver resection for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B cirrhosis：A cohort study BackgroundThe selection criterion for liver resection (LR) in intermediate-stage (IM) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial. This study aims to compare LR and transarterial chemoembolization in the range of predicted death risk

MethodsThe multivariable Cox regression model (MVR) was estimated to predict mortality at 5yr. The cut-off values were determined by a two-piece-wise linear regression model, decision curve analysis with MVR model, and hazard ratio curve for treatment plotted against the predicted mortality.

Results825 IM-HCC with hepatitis B cirrhosis were included for analysis (TACE, n=622; LR, n=203). The 5-yr overall survival rate of LR patients was higher than the TACE group (52.8% vs. 20.8%; P<0.0001). The line of LR and TACE were crossing with predicted death risk at 100% (P for interaction =0.008). The benefit of LR versus TACE decreased progressively as predicted death risk>0.55 (95%CI: 0.45,0.62). When predicted death risk over 0.7, decision curve analysis suggested that LR and TACE did not increase net benefit. Patients were then divided into four subgroups by the cut-off values (<0.45, 0.45[&ge;] /<0.62, 0.62[&ge;] /<0.7, [&ge;] 0.7). The stratified analysis of treatment in different subgroups, hazard ratios were 0.39 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.56), 0.36 (95%CI: 0.23, 0.56), 0.51 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.98), and 0.46 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.80), respectively.

ConclusionsLR reached the maximal relative utility in the interval of 0.45 to 0.62, and both LR and TACE did not increase net benefit at the 5-yr death risk over 0.7. Prevalence of vitamin D is not associated with the COVID-19 epidemic in Europe. A critical update of the existing evidence. BackgroundCOVID-19 has emerged as a global pandemic, affecting nearly 104 million people worldwide as of February 4th 2021. In previous published studies, the association between the mean Vit D status of each country and COVID-19 infection rate, and mortality among the adult population in European countries was examined. The aim of this study was to re-examine the relationship between the Vit D status of each country and COVID-19 infection, recovery, and mortality using updated data and a different methodological approach.

MethodsInformation only form the last decade on Vit D concentration/deficiency for each country was retrieved through literature search on PubMed(R) database. As of February, 4th 2021, COVID-19 infections and mortalities per one million population as well as total recoveries were extracted from the Worldometer website. The association between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 infection, recovery, and mortality were explored using correlation coefficients and scatterplots.

FindingsThe prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among European countries ranged from 6.0 (Finland) to 75.5% (Turkey), with several countries facing more than 50% of vitamin D deficiency among their population. Non-significant correlations were observed between the number of COVID-19 infections (r=0.190; p=0.374), recoveries (rs=0.317, p=0.131), and mortalities (r=0.129; p=0.549) per one million population, with the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency.

InterpretationPrevalence of vitamin D deficiency was not significantly associated with either number of infections, recoveries or mortality rate of COVID-19 among European countries. Thus, it is an important parameter to be considered when implementing preventive measures to face COVID-19.

FundingNone Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Systematic Review Molecular Tumour Boards (MTBs) were created with the purpose of supporting clinical decision making within precision medicine. Though these meetings are in use globally reporting often focuses on the small percentages of patients that receive treatment via this process and are less likely to report on, and assess, patients who do not receive treatment. A literature review was performed to understand patient attrition within MTBs and barriers to patients receiving treatment. A total of 54 papers were reviewed spanning a 6 year period from 11 different countries. 20% of patients received treatment through the MTB process. Of those that did not receive treatment the main reasons were no mutations identified (26%), no actionable mutations (22%) and clinical deterioration (15%). However, the data was often incomplete due to inconsistent reporting of MTBs with only 53% reporting on patients having no mutations, 48% reporting on presence of actionable mutations with no treatment options and 57% reporting on clinical deterioration. As patient attrition in MTBs is an issue which is very rarely alluded to in reporting, more transparent reporting is needed to understand barriers to treatment and integration of new technologies is required to process increasing omic and treatment data. What We Learned from COVID-19: From endotheliitis to treatment ObjectiveCOVID-19 may yield a variety of clinical pictures, differing from pneumonitis to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) along with vascular damage in the lung tissue, named as endotheliitis. To date, no specific treatment strategy was approved by any authority for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in terms of endotheliitis-related comorbidities. Here, we present our experience of COVID-19 by evaluating 11,190 COVID-19 patients with the manifestations of endotheliitis in skin, lung, and brain tissues according to the different phases of COVID-19.

MethodsAfter a retrospective examination, patients were divided into three groups according to their repercussions of vascular distress, which were represented by radiological, histopathological, and clinical findings. (Group A: no or mild pulmonary involvement, Group B: moderate pulmonary involvement with clinical risk of deterioration, Group C: severe pulmonary involvement and respiratory failure). We presented the characteristics and disease course of seven representative and complicated cases which represents the different phases of the disease, and discussed the treatment strategies in each group. The current pathophysiological mechanisms responsible from SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related respiratory failure and current treatment strategies were reviewed and discussed in detail.

ResultsAmong 11.190 patients, 9294 patients met the criteria for Group A, and 1376 patients were presented to our clinics with Group B characteristics. Among these patients, 1896 individuals(Group B and Group C) were hospitalized. While 1220 inpatients were hospitalized within the first 10 days after the diagnosis, 676 of them were worsened and hospitalized 10 days after their diagnosis. Among hospitalized patients, 520 of them did not respond to group A and B treatments and developed hypoxemic respiratory failure (Group C) and 146 individuals needed ventilator support and were followed in the intensive care unit, and 43 (2.2%) patients died.

ConclusionDistinctive manifestations in each COVID-19 patient, including non-respiratory conditions in the acute phase and the emerging risk of long-lasting complications, suggest that COVID-19 has an endotheliitis-centred thrombo-inflammatory pathophysiology. Endotheliitis can also explain the mechanism behind the respiratory failure in COVID-19, and the difference of COVID-19 related ARDS from ARDS seen in other critical conditions. In addition, use of early corticosteroid in patients with early symptoms and early tocilizumab in ICU helps to reduce mortality and progression of the disease. Endotheliitis-based pathophysiological mechanisms are known to be momentarily changing and difficut to manage due to their risk of sudden aggrevation. Hence, daily evaluation of clinical, laboratory and radiological findings of patients and deciding appropriate pathophysiological treatment would help to reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19. Vaccination or restriction?: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccine passports ObjectivesWhile the development of vaccines against the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) brought the hope of establishing herd immunity, which might help end the global pandemic, vaccine hesitancy can hinder the progress towards herd immunity. In this study, we assess the determinants of vaccine hesitancy, reasons for hesitation, and effectiveness of vaccine passports in relaxing public health restrictions.

MethodsThrough an online survey that includes a conjoint experiment of a demographically representative sample of 5,000 Japanese adults aged 20-74, we assess the determinants of vaccine hesitancy, reasons for hesitation, and effectiveness of hypothetical vaccine passports.

ResultsWe found that about 30% of respondents did not intend to vaccinate or have not yet decided, with major reasons for vaccine hesitancy being related to concerns about the safety and side effects of the vaccine. In line with previous findings, younger age, lower socioeconomic status, and psychological factors such as weaker COVID-19 fear were associated with vaccine hesitancy. The easing of public health restrictions such as travel, wearing face masks, and dining out at night was associated with an increase in vaccine acceptance by 4-10%.

ConclusionVaccine hesitancy can be reduced by mitigating the concerns about vaccine safety and side effects, as well as by relaxing public health restrictions. However, the feasibility of vaccine passports needs to be sufficiently assessed, taking the ethical issues of passports and the public health impacts of the relaxation of restrictions into careful consideration.

Strengths and limitations of this study{square} This study includes timely data on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, obtained from a demographically representative sample of 5,000 Japanese adults.
{square}A conjoint experiment allows assessing the effectiveness of easing public health restrictions on vaccine acceptance.
{square}Actual behaviour may diverge from the survey responses or fluctuate due to the pandemic situation and the timing of the survey.
{square}Results may not be applicable in other countries, since the pandemic situation, government responses to the pandemic, and reasons for vaccine hesitancy can vary across countries. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADVERSE EVENTS PREVALENCE, PATIENT SAFETY CULTURE AND PATIENT SAFETY PERCEPTION IN A SINGLE SAMPLE OF PATIENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL AND CORRELATIONAL STUDY ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture and Patient Safety Perception.

DesignCross-sectional, ex post facto comparative study on a single sample of patients.

SettingFour medium-high-level hospitals were included in the study -- two public and two private from Zulia State in Venezuela.

Participants556 medical records and patients were studied for the prevalence and patient safety perception study, and 397 of the healthcare providers involved in the care of these patients were surveyed for the patient safety culture study, at two public and two private hospitals.

Outcome measurementThe primary outcome of this study was the Association between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture and Patient Safety Perception, and according to hospital funding type, private and public.

ResultsAn inverse association was observed between Adverse Events Prevalence and its severity and Patient Safety Culture Index (PSCI: rho=-0.8 p=0.5) (95% CI=0.26-0.10) and Patient Safety Perception Index (PSPI: rho=-0.6 p=0.18) (95% CI=0.10-0.28), which were protective factors for patient safety. No association was identified between Patient Safety Culture and Patient Safety Perception (rho=0.0001). No statistical differences were identified by hospital type (p=0.93) (95% CI=0.70-1.2).

ConclusionsThe analysis of the variable correlations studied (AEP, PSC and PSP) within the same sample offers an interesting and useful perspective. In this sample, although no correlation was observed between the three variables as an interacting set, some correlation patterns were observed between pairs of variables that could guide further studies.

Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThe association analysis of the three main variables (adverse events prevalence, patient safety culture and patient safety perception) in the same sample of patients and health professionals and over the same time period during which the care process and, consequently, the adverse events took place is an unprecedented and innovative approach, which contributes to the body of knowledge on this field of study.
C_LIO_LIThe relational theoretical framework produced provides a "map" that can facilitate decision-taking and which establishes the variables that should be considered a priority. As a result, it is highly likely to have an impact on the clinical efficiency and safety of healthcare institutions and services.
C_LIO_LIThe study was carried out at both private and public hospitals, enabling the behaviour of the aforementioned variables to be compared and analysed at each type of institution. The literature to date on this approach is scarce and offers little information.
C_LIO_LIAlthough the sample of hospitals selected is not representative of Venezuela, it is representative of the hospitals of one of the most productive and populated states in the country.
C_LIO_LIDuring stages 1 and 2, some resistance to collaborating with and completing the evaluation instruments was identified among the health professionals.
C_LI Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of neonatal Spinal Cord in clinical routine Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) has undisputed advantages over more classical diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI), as witnessed by a fast-increasing number of clinical applications and software packages widely adopted in brain imaging. However, in the neonatal setting, DKI is still largely underutilized in Spinal Cord (SC) imaging because of its inherently demanding technological requirements.

Due to its extreme sensitivity to non-gaussian diffusion, DKI proves particularly suitable for detecting complex, subtle, fast microstructural changes occurring in this area at this early and critical stage of development, and not identifiable with only DTI. Given the multiplicity of congenital anomalies of the spinal canal, their crucial effect on later developmental outcome, and the close interconnection between SC region and the above brain, managing to apply such a method to neonatal cohort becomes of utmost importance.

This study will (i) review the current methodological challenges associated with application of advanced dMRI methods like DKI in early infancy, (ii) illustrate the first semi-automated pipeline built on Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) for handling with DKI data of neonatal SC, from acquisition setting to estimation of diffusion measures, through accurate adjustment of processing algorithms customized for adult SC, and (iii) present preliminary results of its application in a pilot clinical case study.

Results of this application agree with findings achieved in a corresponding adult survey, thus confirming validity of adopted pipeline and diagnostic value of DKI in pediatrics. Prospectively validated augmented intelligence for disease-agnostic predictions of clinical success for novel therapeutics Despite numerous superhuman achievements in complex challenges1,2, standalone AI does not free life science from the long-term bottleneck of linearly extracting new knowledge from exponentially growing new data3, severely limiting the success rate of drug discovery4. Inspired by the state-of-the-art AI training methods, we trained a human-centric hybrid augmented intelligence5 (HAI) to learn a foundation model6 that extracts all-encompassing knowledge of human physiology and diseases. To evaluate the quality of HAIs extracted knowledge, we designed the public, prospective prediction of pivotal ongoing clinical trial outcomes at large scale (PROTOCOLS) challenge to benchmark HAIs real-world performance of predicting drug clinical efficacy without access to human data. HAI achieved a 10.5-fold improvement from the baseline with 99% confidence7 in the PROTOCOLS validation, readily increasing the average clinical success rate of investigational new drugs from 7.9%8 to 90% for almost any human diseases9,10. The validated HAI confirms that exponentially extracted knowledge alone is sufficient for accurately predicting drug clinical efficacy, effecting a total reversal of Erooms law4. HAI is also the worlds first clinically validated model of human aging that could substantially speed up the discovery of preventive medicine for all age-related diseases11. Our results demonstrate that disruptive breakthroughs necessitate the smallest team size to attain the largest HAI for optimal knowledge extraction from high-dimensional low-quality data space, thus establishing the first prospective proof of the previous discovery that small teams disrupt12. The global adoption of training HAI provides a well-beaten economic path to mass-produce scientific and technological breakthroughs via exponential knowledge extraction and better designs of data labels for training better-performing AI13. Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care with a Focus on Surgery and Black Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Factors affecting first return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective observational study in an occupational medicine clinic and single-surgeon practice BackgroundReturn to work (RTW) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) within New South Wales (NSW), Australia, under compensable schemes has not been reported.

AimsDetermine factors affecting RTW status and time in patients treated with aRCR under state-based compensation schemes, compared to those outside such schemes.

MethodsPatients undergoing aRCR by one surgeon with minimum 1-year follow-up were grouped into those under (CP) or outside (non-CP) workers or vehicle accident compensation schemes, matched by age and gender. RTW status and time were assessed using chi-square analysis and multivariable linear regression.

ResultsOf 1054 available patients, 90 CP patients were identified with 29 consented and matched to non-CP (N=29). A higher proportion of CP patients (17.2 vs 0%, P<0.001) never returned to work and a lower proportion resumed pre-injury duties at first RTW (3 vs 52%, P<0.01). Median time to first RTW did not differ between CP and non-CP groups (5.1 vs 4.4, P=0.86). Smoking (P=0.007) and post-injury activity level (P=0.004) were significantly associated with longer time to first RTW, whereas compensation status was not.

ConclusionsCP patients undergoing aRCR in NSW are at risk of not returning to work. For those that return, there is no significant difference compared to non-CP in time to first RTW. Particularly, patient and management factors associated with extended time to first RTW have been identified. Interventions aimed at modifiable factors such as smoking cessation and increasing preoperative activity may improve future outcomes.

What is already known about this subjectO_LIWork-related injury and disease present a significant financial burden to the Australian economy ($AUD61.8billion per annum), with shoulder conditions due to body stressing accounting for 7% of this total cost (>$AUD4.2billion)
C_LIO_LIPatients receiving compensation appear to have poorer outcomes and take longer to return to work than their non-compensated counterparts, but the degree to which this occurs is variably reported in the literature
C_LIO_LIThe effect of modifiable factors on return to work status and time remain unclear, and have not previously been reported for the Australian population under the New South Wales workers compensation scheme
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIPatients receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a compensable scheme in New South Wales are at increased risk of not returning to work compared to patients presenting outside of a compensable scheme and patients in equivalent schemes internationally
C_LIO_LIPatients reporting a longer duration of symptoms and smokers are at increased risk of extended time to first return to work
C_LI

What impact this may have on practice or policyO_LIThe study has identified smoking and pre-surgery activity levels as key targets for intervention in patients receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a workers compensation scheme in New South Wales
C_LIO_LIBy further investigating whether interventions designed to modify these factors are able to favourably affect patient outcomes, there is potential to return patients to their preoperative level of work sooner
C_LI Complementary frailty and mortality prediction models on older patients as a tool for assessing palliative care needs BackgroundPalliative care (PC) has demonstrated benefits for life-limiting illnesses. Cancer patients have mainly accessed these services, but there is growing consensus about the importance of promoting access for patients with non-malignant disease. Bad survival prognosis and patients frailty are usual dimensions to decide PC inclusion.

ObjectivesThe main aim of this work is to design and evaluate three quantitative models based on machine learning approaches to predict frailty and mortality on older patients in the context of supporting PC decision making: one-year mortality, survival regression and one-year frailty classification.

MethodsThe dataset used in this study is composed of 39,310 hospital admissions for 19,753 older patients (age >= 65) from January 1st, 2011 to December 30th, 2018. All prediction models were based on Gradient Boosting Machines. From the initial pool of variables at hospital admission, 20 were selected by a recursive feature elimination algorithm based on the random forests GINI importance criterion. Besides, we run an independent grid search to find the best hyperparameters in each model. The evaluation was performed by 10-fold cross-validation and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and mean absolute error were reported. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare our proposed approach with classical survival methods.

ResultsThe one-year mortality model achieved an AUC ROC of 0.87 {+/-} 0.01; the mortality regression model achieved an MAE of 329.97 {+/-} 5.24 days. The one-year frailty classification reported an AUC ROC of 0.9 {+/-} 0.01. The Spearmans correlation between the admission frailty index and the survival time was -0.1, while the point-biserial correlation between one-year frailty index and survival time was -0.16.

ConclusionsOne-year mortality model performance is at a state-of-the-art level. Frailty Index used in this study behaves coherently with other works in the literature. One-year frailty classifier demonstrated that frailty status within the year could be predicted accurately. To our knowledge, this is the first study predicting one-year frailty status based on a frailty index. We found mortality and frailty as two weakly correlated and complementary PC needs assessment criteria. Predictive models are available online at http://demoiapc.upv.es. Using controlled interrupted time series to estimate the population-level effects of Ontario's recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services BackgroundOntario recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services (OPS/CTS) to stem the harms of the opioid epidemic. We tested whether operating any site improved local opioid-related health service use and mortality rates.

MethodsWe used monthly counts of all opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths between January 2014 and December 2020 for our outcomes. For each public health unit (PHU) that implemented any OPS/CTS, we created a synthetic control as a weighted combination of unexposed PHU. We estimated the population-level effects of operating any site using controlled interrupted time series with segmented regression and adjusted for time varying confounders (i.e. OPS/CTS capacity, naloxone kits distributed, and persons receiving opioid agonist treatment per 100,000 population). We repeated the analysis using a multiple baseline approach to estimate province-wide effects.

ResultsBetween 2017 and 2020, nine out of 34 PHU implemented at least one OPS/CTS. ED visit (RR=0.96, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.99) and hospitalization (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.98) trends declined faster among treated units. Improvements in local ED visit rate trends were observed for the majority of treated units. Hospitalization rates declined faster for London (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.95 - 0.99) and Niagara (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.98); while mortality rates declined faster for Hamilton (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.90 - 0.96), Niagara (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.94 - 0.99) and Guelph (RR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.88 - 1.00).

ConclusionAlthough OPS/CTS are not sufficient to stem the harms of the opioid overdose epidemic on their own, they play a critical role in local harm reduction strategies. Measurement of the extent of Anxiety and Depression that has occurred in college students due to the COVID 19 pandemic: A Survey based cross-sectional study. OVERVIEWThe ongoing Pandemic because of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused all the educational institutes including colleges to be closed for a very long time. As a result the students are compelled to remain in their homes for this time. Prolonged stay at home along with excess use of social media and other modes to "kill" the time are quite famous to cause certain health issues in a person, specially the teenagers and adolescents. Mental wellbegin, being a dimension of health as per WHO should not be ignored at all specially in these situations.

METHOD OF STUDYAn Online Questionnaire is prepared based of the ZUNG Self Rating Anxiety and Self Rating Depression Scale (Pre-validated Scales). The Form is circulated digitally among the people and then we have collected the data in excel. Based on the result we have prepared our statistical chart.

RESULTQuite a significant number of candidates were suffering due to the pandemic situation. 17.091% were suffering from mild to moderate anxiety, 1.785% had marked to severe anxiety levels(Constituting approximately 18.9% of the total). On the other hand, 8.673% of the students had mild depression, while 1 candidate (0.255%) had moderate depression and 1 (0.255%) had severe depression, (Constituting approximately 9.20% of the total). We found that candidates in the age group of 23-24 years had the maximum prevalence of depression, it was followed by candidates with age between 21-22 years. We found that the candidates with age between 23 to 24 years were having highest prevalence of significant anxiety levels which is closely followed by candidates having age which lies between 22 years to 23 years. EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ABOUT MEDICAL BILLING: A SCOPING REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. IntroductionThe World Health Organization has suggested the solution to health system waste caused by incorrect billing and fraud is policing and prosecution. However, a growing body of evidence suggests leakage may not always be fraudulent or corrupt, with researchers suggesting medical practitioners may sometimes struggle to understand increasingly complex legal requirements around health financing and billing transactions, which may be improved through education. To explore this phenomenon further, we undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify the medical billing education needs of medical practitioners and whether those needs are being met.

MethodsEligible records included English language materials published between 1 January 2000 and 4 May 2020. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, LexisNexis and Heinonline.

ResultsWe identified 74 records as directly relevant to the search criteria. Despite undertaking a comprehensive, English language search, with no country restrictions, studies meeting the inclusion criteria were limited to three countries (Australia, Canada, U.S), indicating a need for further work internationally. The literature suggests the education needs of medical practitioners in relation to medical billing compliance are not being met and medical practitioners desire more education on this topic. Evidence suggests education may be effective in improving medical billing compliance and reducing waste in health systems. There is broad agreement amongst medical education stakeholders in multiple jurisdictions that medical billing should be viewed as a core competency of medical education, though there is an apparent inertia to include this competency in medical education curricula. Penalties for non-compliant medical billing are serious and medical practitioners are at risk of random audits and investigations for breaches of sometimes incomprehensible, and highly interpretive regulations they may never have been taught.

ConclusionDespite acknowledged significance of waste in health systems due to poor practitioner knowledge of billing practices, there has been very little research to date on education interventions to improve health system efficiency at a practitioner level. Macular vascular complexity analysis of diabetes mellitus by swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography PurposeTo evaluate the associations of retinal vascular complexity features, including fractal dimension (FD) and blood vessel tortuosity (BVT), with the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) by using noninvasive optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA).

MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study recruited ocular-treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) registered in the community of Guangzhou, China. OCTA was used to obtain the measurements of FD and BVT in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Univariate and multivariate linear regression was used to analyse the correlation of FD and BVT in different layers with DR severity.

ResultsA total of 1282 patients with DM (1282 eyes), with a mean age of 64.2{+/-}7.8 years, were included. FD in the DCP decreased and BVT in the DCP increased in DR patients compared to non-DR patients, even after adjusting for confounding factors (P< 0.05). Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in the FD values as the DR progressed, while the BVT progressively increased with worsening DR severity (P< 0.01). The FD in DCP had a statistically significant positive correlation with FD in SCP and a negative correlation with BVT in SCP and BVT in DCP in all of the participants, including the non-DR group, moderate DR group and severe DR group (P< 0.01).

ConclusionFD and BVT determined using OCTA might be useful parameters for objectively distinguishing DR from non-DR and indicating DR progression. Molecular analysis suggests oligoclonality and metastasis of endometriosis lesions across anatomically defined subtypes. Endometriosis symptoms are heterogeneous with controversy on whether it constitutes a single disease or multiple distinct types. Our previous work found recurrent somatic cancer-driver alterations in endometriosis; however, these have not been found ubiquitously. A handful of cases spread across studies also suggest mutations might be shared (clonal) between lesions of the same type. As current classification systems correlate poorly with symptoms or outcomes, somatic genomics may improve the current system. Here, we investigate heterogeneity of somatic cancer-driver mutations within patients and across endometriosis types. We examined anatomically distinct types of endometriosis (ovarian, deep infiltrating, and superficial endometriosis) in 27 individual patients all of whom had at least two types of endometriosis. Specimens were analyzed using high-sensitivity targeted sequencing with orthogonal validation from droplet digital PCR and mutation-surrogate immunohistochemistry. Results found 13/27 patients had informative somatic driver mutation in endometriosis, 9/13 had identical mutations across distinct lesions. Endometriomas tended to have a higher mutational complexity, with functionally redundant driver mutations in same gene and within the same lesions.

Our data are consistent with clonality across endometriosis lesions regardless of subtype. Further the finding of redundancy in mutations with the same gene and lesions is also consistent with endometriosis representing an oligoclonal disease with dissemination likely to consist of multiple epithelial clones travelling together. This suggests the current anatomically defined classification of endometriosis does not fully recognize the etiology of the disease. A novel classification should take into account genomic and other molecular features. These findings could further contribute to development of a more personalized endometriosis diagnosis and care. What delirium detection tools are used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom? Survey results from 91% of acute healthcare organisations. PurposeOur aim was to collect information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive care settings in the United Kingdom (UK).

MethodsWe sent a Freedom of Information request to 169 UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals, trusts and health boards (units) in July 2020 to obtain data on usage of delirium assessment tools in clinical practice and delirium pathways or guidelines.

ResultsWe received responses from 154/169 units (91% response rate). Of these, 146/154 (95%) units reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 131/154 (85%) units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4  As Test (4AT) was the most widely used tool, with 117/146 (80%) units reporting use. The Confusion Assessment Method was used in 65/146 (45%) units, and the Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD) in 52/146 (36%) units.

ConclusionsOur findings show that the 4AT is the most commonly used tool in the UK, with 80% of units reporting use. This study adds to our knowledge of real-world uptake of delirium detection methods at scale. Future studies should evaluate real-world implementation of delirium assessment tools further via (i) tool completion rates and (ii) rates of positive scores against the expected prevalence delirium in the clinical population concerned.

KEY SUMMARY POINTSO_ST_ABSAimC_ST_ABSTo seek information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive clinical care settings in the United Kingdom (UK), and to assess usage of specific delirium assessment tools: the 4  As Test (4AT), Confusion Assessment Method and Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD).

FindingsIn total, 95% of National Health Service (NHS) units (hospitals, trusts and health boards) reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 85% of units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4AT was the most widely used tool, with 80% of units reporting use; the Confusion Assessment Method was reportedly used in 45% of units and the SQiD in 36% of units.

MessageThis study shows real-world, large-scale uptake of delirium detection methods and delirium guidelines in UK hospitals, which contributes to ongoing efforts to improve delirium care. The Preventive Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose Naltrexone/Acetaminophen Combination: Findings of a Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with an Open-Label Extension for None-Responders We tested a low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination for episodic migraine prevention. We randomly assigned patients to naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=6) or placebo (n=6) for a 12-week double-blind treatment. Non-responders continued into open-label treatment with naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) for additional 12 weeks. Patients were adults who experienced 5 to 17 (average 9.7) migraine days at baseline. The primary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days from the 4-week double-blind follow-up (2nd baseline) to the last 4 weeks of the open-label treatment period.

The magnitude of the treatment effect for the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination observed in the double-blind period was 2.2 fewer monthly migraine days than placebo (p=0.43). Four out of 6 (66.7%) naltrexone and acetaminophen-treated patients experienced 75% reduction in migraine days compared to 1 out of 6 (16.7%) placebo-treated patients (p=0.09).

In the open-label phase, treatment with the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) led to 8.2 fewer mean monthly migraine days (from 11.8 to 3.6), representing 69.5% improvement (p=0.03), and 100% of the patients experienced a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient, included dry mouth, fatigue, sedation, nausea, and feeling jittery.

We postulate that naltrexones toll-like receptor (TLR4) antagonism properties prevent pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the trigeminal ganglion averting "overactive nerves" (laymans term) and migraine. Although this trial used low-dose naltrexone (defined as 1 - 5 mg/day), in future phase 3 studies we will test a range of naltrexone and acetaminophen combination doses. Multi-modal investigation of the schizophrenia-associated 3q29 genomic interval reveals global genetic diversity with unique haplotypes and segments that increase the risk for non-allelic homologous recombination Chromosomal rearrangements that alter the copy number of dosage-sensitive genes can result in genomic disorders, such as the 3q29 deletion syndrome. At the 3q29 region, non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between paralogous copies of segmental duplications (SDs) leads to a recurrent [~]1.6 Mbp deletion or duplication, causing neurodevelopmental and psychiatric phenotypes. However, risk factors contributing to NAHR at this locus are not well understood. In this study, we used an optical mapping approach to identify structural variations within the 3q29 interval. We identified 18 novel haplotypes among 161 unaffected individuals and used this information to characterize this region in 18 probands with either the 3q29 deletion or 3q29 duplication syndrome. A significant amount of variation in haplotype prevalence was observed between populations. Within probands, we narrowed down the breakpoints to a [~]5 kbp segment within the SD blocks in 89% of the 3q29 deletion and duplication cases studied. Furthermore, all 3q29 deletion and duplication cases could be categorized into one of five distinct classes based on their breakpoints. Contrary to previous findings for other recurrent deletion and duplication loci, there was no evidence for inversions in either parent of the probands mediating the deletion or duplication seen in this syndrome.