Can we distinguish the roles of demographic and temporal changes in the incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic search and review. BackgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) represent a major public health issue, affecting more than 40 million European workers in 2017. The overall ageing of the working population is expected to increase the burden of disease, but temporal changes in exposures or diagnosis may also drive global trends in MSDs. We, therefore, sought to review and summarize evidence describing the role of demographic and temporal changes in the occurrence of MSDs.

MethodsWe conducted a systematic search and review of articles reporting temporal trends in MSDs in the general working-age population. Only articles controlling for age in the analysis were included. The risk of bias was assessed. The main indicators extracted were age-controlled time trends in MSD incidence or prevalence.

ResultsAmong 2,680 articles, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, representing 23 results according to the indicators extracted. No study was found with a high risk of bias. Twelve results reported time trends in prevalence and 11 in incidence. After controlling for age, the reported temporal trends varied, mostly between non-monotonic changes (n=12/23) and increases (n=10/23); one article also highlighted an increase among women and non-monotonic changes among men (n = 1/23). Several factors other than ageing were suggested to explain temporal trends in MSDs, main trends in obesity, changing occupational exposures, and cultural factors regarding pain tolerance.

ConclusionThis review shows that different kinds of factors in addition to ageing may contribute to varying or increasing trends in MSDs. This review also highlighted the scarcity of evidence regarding time trends in the burden of MSDs and their underlying causes.
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 case rates between pupils, teachers and the general population: results from Germany Given the inconsistent state of research regarding the role of pupils and teachers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany, statewide and nationwide data of infection case rates were analyzed to contribute to the discourse. Infection data from official sources ranging from mid to late 2020 were collected, prepared and analyzed to answer the question if pupils, teachers and general population differed in active case rates or not. The data showed that pupils and teachers case rates didnt exceeded those of the general population. In conclusion, it seems appropriate to appraise school-related measures to mitigate the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic sufficiently. Data-quality is a yet to overcome obstacle to provide good evidence-based recommendations regarding the management around infection cases in schools.
Alternative Covid-19 mitigation measures in school classrooms: analysis using an agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission 1.The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic continues to have major impacts on childrens education, with schools required to implement infection control measures that have led to long periods of absence and classroom closures. We have developed an agent-based epidemiological model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission that allows us to quantify projected infection patterns within primary school classrooms, and related uncertainties; the basis of our approach is a contact model constructed using random networks, informed by structured expert judgement. The effectiveness of mitigation strategies are considered in terms of effectiveness at supressing infection outbreaks and limiting pupil absence. Covid-19 infections in schools in the UK in Autumn 2020 are re-examined and the model used for forecasting infection levels in autumn 2021, as the more infectious Delta-variant was emerging and school transmission thought likely to play a major role in an incipient new wave of the epidemic. Our results were in good agreement with available data. These findings indicate that testing-based surveillance of infections in the classroom population with isolation of positive cases is a more effective mitigation measure than bubble quarantine, both for reducing transmission in primary schools and for avoiding pupil absence, even accounting for insensitivity of self-administered tests. Bubble quarantine entails large numbers of pupils being absent from school, with only modest impact on classroom infection levels. However, maintaining reduced contact rates within the classroom can have a major beneficial impact for managing Covid-19 in school settings. Molecular analysis suggests oligoclonality and metastasis of endometriosis lesions across anatomically defined subtypes. Endometriosis symptoms are heterogeneous with controversy on whether it constitutes a single disease or multiple distinct types. Our previous work found recurrent somatic cancer-driver alterations in endometriosis; however, these have not been found ubiquitously. A handful of cases spread across studies also suggest mutations might be shared (clonal) between lesions of the same type. As current classification systems correlate poorly with symptoms or outcomes, somatic genomics may improve the current system. Here, we investigate heterogeneity of somatic cancer-driver mutations within patients and across endometriosis types. We examined anatomically distinct types of endometriosis (ovarian, deep infiltrating, and superficial endometriosis) in 27 individual patients all of whom had at least two types of endometriosis. Specimens were analyzed using high-sensitivity targeted sequencing with orthogonal validation from droplet digital PCR and mutation-surrogate immunohistochemistry. Results found 13/27 patients had informative somatic driver mutation in endometriosis, 9/13 had identical mutations across distinct lesions. Endometriomas tended to have a higher mutational complexity, with functionally redundant driver mutations in same gene and within the same lesions.

Our data are consistent with clonality across endometriosis lesions regardless of subtype. Further the finding of redundancy in mutations with the same gene and lesions is also consistent with endometriosis representing an oligoclonal disease with dissemination likely to consist of multiple epithelial clones travelling together. This suggests the current anatomically defined classification of endometriosis does not fully recognize the etiology of the disease. A novel classification should take into account genomic and other molecular features. These findings could further contribute to development of a more personalized endometriosis diagnosis and care. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Lactation: Assessment of adverse effects and transfer of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies from mother to child BackgroundData regarding adverse events observed in the lactating mother-infant dyad and their immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during lactation are needed to inform vaccination guidelines.

MethodsFrom a prospective cohort of 50 lactating individuals who received mRNA-based vaccines for COVID-19 (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2), blood and milk samples were collected prior to first vaccination dose, immediately prior to 2nd dose, and 4-10 weeks after 2nd dose. Symptoms in mother and infant were assessed by detailed questionnaires. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in blood and milk were measured by Pylon 3D automated immunoassay and ELISA. In addition, vaccine-related PEGylated proteins in milk were measured by ELISA. Blood samples were collected from a subset of infants whose mothers received the vaccine during lactation (4-15 weeks after mothers 2nd dose).

ResultsNo severe maternal or infant adverse events were reported in this cohort. Two mothers and two infants were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the study period. PEGylated proteins, were not found at significant levels in milk after vaccination. After vaccination, levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM significantly increased in maternal plasma and there was significant transfer of anti-SARS-CoV-2-Receptor Binding Domain (anti-RBD) IgA and IgG antibodies to milk. Milk IgA levels after the 2nd dose were negatively associated with infant age. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were not detected in the plasma of infants whose mothers were vaccinated during lactation.

ConclusionsCOVID-19 mRNA vaccines generate robust immune responses in plasma and milk of lactating individuals without severe adverse events reported. A Randomised Trial of a Wearable UV dosimeter for Skin Cancer Prevention BackgroundNon-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most prevalent cancer in the United States, affecting 5 million people and costing $8.1 billion per year. Despite well-defined guidelines on ultraviolet radiation (UVR) avoidance, it remains difficult for people to assess their individual exposure, as UVR is invisible and the onset of symptoms due to UVR damage are delayed.

MethodsIn a prospective, randomized-controlled trial, 97 patients with a history of actinic keratoses were enrolled from March 2018 to July 2018 and followed over 6 months. 50 patients were given a wearable device that measured UV exposure and a smartphone application that provided both real-time and cumulative UV exposure information, and 47 patients were provided with UV protection counseling by a dermatologist.

ResultsWe observed a significant decrease in the incidence rate of NMSC in the intervention group compared to the control group over 3 months (p = 0.02). We did not observe a significant decrease in the incidence rate of actinic keratoses (AK) in the intervention group compared to the control group. The observed clinical benefit was not accompanied by psychological side effects such as anxiety and depression.

ConclusionsThis study suggests that providing real-time UV exposure data using a wearable UV dosimeter is a safe and effective behavioral change strategy to prevent NMSC. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, contract HHSN261201700005C; ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03315286.) Prefrontal glutamate neurotransmission in PTSD: A novel approach to estimate synaptic strength in vivo in humans Trauma and chronic stress are believed to induce and exacerbate psychopathology by disrupting glutamate synaptic strength. However, in vivo in human methods to estimate synaptic strength are limited. In this study, we established a novel putative biomarker of glutamatergic synaptic strength, termed energy-per-cycle (EPC). Then, we used EPC to investigate the role of prefrontal neurotransmission in trauma psychopathology. Healthy control (n=18) and patients with posttraumatic stress (PTSD; n=16) completed 13C-acetate magnetic resonance spectroscopy scans to estimate prefrontal EPC, which is the ratio of neuronal energetic needs per glutamate neurotransmission cycle (VTCA/VCycle). Patients with PTSD were found to have 28% reduction in prefrontal EPC (t=3.0; df=32, p=0.005). There was no effect of sex on EPC, but age was negatively associated with prefrontal EPC across groups (r=-0.46, n=34, p=0.006). Controlling for age did not affect the study results. The feasibility and utility of EPC were established. Patients with PTSD were found to have reduced prefrontal glutamatergic synaptic strength. These findings suggest that reduced glutamatergic synaptic strength may contribute to the pathophysiology of PTSD and could be targeted by new treatments.

HighlightsO_LIGlutamatergic synaptic strength is critical for brain function in health and disease.
C_LIO_LIIn vivo in human methods to estimate glutamatergic synaptic strength are limited.
C_LIO_LIWe here propose a new approach to estimate glutamatergic synaptic strength.
C_LIO_LIThe new method employs carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (13C MRS).
C_LIO_LIThe utility of the new approach was demonstrated in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
C_LI Serum proteome analysis of systemic JIA and related pulmonary alveolar proteinosis identifies distinct inflammatory programs and biomarkers ObjectivesRecent observations in systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) suggest an increasing incidence of high-mortality interstitial lung disease, characterized by a variant of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). Co-occurrence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and PAP in sJIA suggested a shared pathology, but sJIA-PAP patients also commonly experience features of drug reaction such as atypical rashes and eosinophilia. We sought to investigate immunopathology and identify biomarkers in sJIA, MAS, and sJIA-PAP.

MethodsWe used SOMAscan to measure >1300 analytes in sera from healthy controls and patients with sJIA, MAS, sJIA-PAP and other related diseases. We verified selected findings by ELISA and lung immunostaining. Because the proteome of a sample may reflect multiple states (sJIA, MAS, sJIA-PAP), we used regression modeling to identify subsets of altered proteins associated with each state. We tested key findings in a validation cohort.

ResultsProteome alterations in active sJIA and MAS overlapped substantially, including known sJIA biomarkers like SAA and S100A9, and novel elevations of heat shock proteins and glycolytic enzymes. IL-18 was elevated in all sJIA groups, particularly MAS and sJIA-PAP. We also identified an MAS-independent sJIA-PAP signature notable for elevated ICAM5, MMP7, and allergic/eosinophilic chemokines, which were all previously associated with lung damage. Immunohistochemistry localized ICAM5 and MMP7 in sJIA-PAP lung. ICAM5s ability to distinguish sJIA-PAP from sJIA/MAS was independently validated.

ConclusionsSerum proteins support an sJIA-to-MAS continuum, help distinguish sJIA, sJIA/MAS, and sJIA-PAP, and suggest etiologic hypotheses. Select biomarkers, such as ICAM5, could aid in early detection and management of sJIA-PAP. Circulating LIGHT (TNFSF14) and Interleukin-18 Levels in Sepsis-Induced Multi-Organ Injuries The novel therapeutic target cytokine LIGHT (TNFSF14) was recently shown to play a major role in COVID19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study aims to investigate the associations of plasma LIGHT and another potentially targetable cytokine, Interleukin-18 (IL-18), with ARDS, acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) or acute kidney injury (AKI), caused by non-COVID19 viral or bacterial sepsis. A cohort of 280 subjects diagnosed with sepsis, including 91 cases with sepsis triggered by viral infections, were investigated in this cohort study. Day 0 plasma LIGHT and IL-18, as well as 59 other biomarkers (cytokines, chemokines and acute-phase reactants) were measured by sensitive bead immunoassay and associated with symptom severity. We observed significantly increased LIGHT level in both bacterial sepsis patients (P=1.80E-05) and patients with sepsis from viral infections (P=1.78E-03). In bacterial sepsis, increased LIGHT level was associated with ARDS, AKI and higher Apache III scores, findings also supported by correlations of LIGHT with other biomarkers of organ failures. IL-18 levels were highly variable across individuals, and consistently correlated with Apache III scores, mortality, and AKI, in both bacterial and viral sepsis. There was no correlation between LIGHT and IL-18. For the first time, we demonstrate independent effects of LIGHT and IL-18 in septic organ failures. The association of plasma LIGHT with AHRF suggests that targeting the pathway warrants exploration, and ongoing trials may soon elucidate whether this is beneficial. Given the large variance of plasma IL-18 among septic subjects, targeting this pathway requires a precision application. Dimensional gender diversity is associated with greater polygenic propensity for cognitive performance and interacts with other genetic factors in predicting health outcomes Both sex and gender are characteristics that play a key role in risk and resilience in health and well-being. Current research lacks the ability to quantitatively describe gender and gender diversity and is limited to endorsement of categorical gender identities, which are contextually and culturally dependent. A multidimensional data-driven approach to characterizing gender diversity will enable researchers to advance the health of gender-diverse people by better understanding how genetic factors interact to determine health outcomes. In N = 450 independent adults with or without autism in the SPARK cohort, we used the Gender Self-Report (GSR), a self-report tool that psychometrically captures two quantitative dimensions of gender diversity: Binary, the extent to which one identifies with the binary gender opposite that of their sex at birth, and Nonbinary gender diversity, the extent to which one identifies with a neutral gender and/or both binary genders. We correlated the two GSR scores with two mental health outcomes and 20 human behavior polygenic scores in a subset of N = 450 participants. Same-sex sexual behavior polygenic scores were positively correlated with Binary ({rho} = 0.12, p < 0.05) and Nonbinary ({rho} = 0.11, p < 0.05). Interestingly, cognitive performance polygenic scores were also correlated with Binary ({rho} = 0.09, p = 0.07) and Nonbinary ({rho} = 0.13, p < 0.05). In agreement with this, an association was also observed in a larger SPARK sample (N = 3,466, with less granular gender identity data), in which the sex/gender discordant group had higher mean polygenic scores for educational attainment (p < 0.05). Binary and Nonbinary were positively correlated with poorer mental health, and accounting for genetic effects had minimal impact on these associations. However, when stratifying individuals by polygenic scores quartiles, we observed dramatic differences in genetic risk and resilience, with individuals in the high risk quartile for schizophrenia and bipolar polygenic risk having strong positive correlations of gender diversity with mental health, whereas the lower quartile had no significant associations. Overall, our results suggest (1) cognitive ability and gender diversity share overlapping genetic factors, (2) greater gender diversity is correlated with poorer mental health outcomes and this effect is not directly explained by neuropsychiatric polygenic risk, but rather an interaction effect, and (3) quantitatively measuring gender diversity facilitates a better understanding of the role of gender in health outcomes. PENet: Continuous-Valued Pulmonary Edema Severity Prediction On Chest X-ray Using Siamese Convolutional Networks For physicians to take rapid clinical decisions for patients with congestive heart failure, the assessment of pulmonary edema severity in chest radiographs is vital. While deep learning has been promising in detecting the presence or absence, or even discrete grades of severity, of such edema, prediction of the continuous-valued severity yet remains a challenge. Here, we propose PENet, a deep learning framework to assess the continuous spectrum of pulmonary edema severity from chest X-rays. We present different modes of implementing this network, and demonstrate that our best model outperforms that of earlier work (mean area under the curve of 0.91 over 0.87, for nine comparisons), while saving training data and computation. Analysis of MRI-derived spleen iron in the UK Biobank identifies genetic variation linked to iron homeostasis and erythrocyte morphology Aging, and the pathogenesis of many common diseases, involves iron homeostasis. A key role in iron homeostasis is played by the spleen, which is the largest filter of the blood and performs iron reuptake from old or damaged erythrocytes. Despite this important role, spleen iron content has not been measured previously in a large, population-based cohort. In this study, we quantify spleen iron in 41,764 participants of the UK Biobank using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We find that epidemiologic and environmental factors such as increased age, higher red meat consumption and lower alcohol intake correlate with higher spleen iron. Through genome-wide association study, we identify genetic associations between spleen iron and common variation at seven loci, including in two hereditary spherocytosis (HS) genes, ANK1 and SPTA1. HS-causing mutations in these genes are associated with lower reticulocyte volume and increased reticulocyte percentage, while our common alleles are associated with increased expression of ANK1 and SPTA1 in blood and with larger reticulocyte volume and reduced reticulocyte percentage. As genetic modifiers, these common alleles may explain mild spherocytosis phenotypes observed in some HS allele carriers. Further, we identify an association between spleen iron and MS4A7, which colocalizes with a quantitative trait locus for MS4A7 alternative splicing in whole blood, and with monocyte count and fraction. Through quantification of spleen iron in a large human cohort, we extend our understanding of epidemiological and genetic factors associated with iron recycling and erythrocyte morphology. Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study ObjectivesGlobal, Covid-driven restrictions around face-to-face interviews for healthcare student selection have forced admissions staff to rapidly adopt adapted online systems before supporting evidence is available. We have developed, what we believe is, the first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) methodology. This study aimed to explore test re-test reliability, acceptability and usability of the system.

Design, setting and participantsmixed-methods feasibility study in Physician Associate (PA) programmes from two UK and one US university during 2019 - 2020.

Primary, secondary outcomesFeasibility measures (test retest reliability acceptability and usability) were assessed using intra-class correlation (ICC), descriptive statistics, thematic and content analysis.

MethodsVolunteers took (T1), then repeated (T2), the automated MMI, with a seven-day interval (+/- 2) then completed an evaluation questionnaire. Admissions staff participated in focus group discussions.

ResultsSixty-two students and seven admission staff participated; 34 students and four staff from UK and 28 students and three staff from US universities.

Good-excellent test-retest reliability was observed with T1 and T2 ICC between 0.62-0.81 (p<0.001) when assessed by individual total scores (range 80.6-119), station total scores 0.6-0.91, p<0.005, individual site (all ICC[&ge;] 0.76 p<0.001) and mean test retest across sites 0.82 p<0.001 (95% CI 0.7-0.9).

Admissions staff reported potential to reduce resource costs and bias through a more objective screening tool for pre-selection or to replace some MMI stations in a  hybrid model. Maintaining human interaction through  touch points was considered essential.

Users positively evaluated the system, stating it was intuitive with an accessible interface. Concepts chosen for dynamic probing needed to be appropriately tailored.

ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that the system is reliable, generating consistent scores for candidates and is acceptable to end-users provided human touchpoints are maintained. Thus, there is evidence for the potential of such an automated system to augment healthcare student selection processes. NSAID use and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A 38-center retrospective cohort study BackgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to reduce pain, fever, and inflammation but have been associated with complications in community-acquired pneumonia. Observations shortly after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 suggested that ibuprofen was associated with an increased risk of adverse events in COVID-19 patients, but subsequent observational studies failed to demonstrate increased risk and in one case showed reduced risk associated with NSAID use.

MethodsA 38-center retrospective cohort study was performed that leveraged the harmonized, high-granularity electronic health record data of the National COVID Cohort Collaborative. A propensity-matched cohort of COVID-19 inpatients was constructed by matching cases (treated with NSAIDs) and controls (not treated) from 857,061 patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome of interest was COVID-19 severity in hospitalized patients, which was classified as: moderate, severe, or mortality/hospice. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), invasive ventilation, and all-cause mortality at any time following COVID-19 diagnosis.

ResultsLogistic regression showed that NSAID use was not associated with increased COVID-19 severity (OR: 0.57 95% CI: 0.53-0.61). Analysis of secondary outcomes using logistic regression showed that NSAID use was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (OR 0.51 95% CI: 0.47-0.56), invasive ventilation (OR: 0.59 95% CI: 0.55-0.64), AKI (OR: 0.67 95% CI: 0.63-0.72), or ECMO (OR: 0.51 95% CI: 0.36-0.7). In contrast, the odds ratios indicate reduced risk of these outcomes, but our quantitative bias analysis showed E-values of between 1.9 and 3.3 for these associations, indicating that comparatively weak or moderate confounder associations could explain away the observed associations.

ConclusionsStudy interpretation is limited by the observational design. Recording of NSAID use may have been incomplete. Our study demonstrates that NSAID use is not associated with increased COVID-19 severity, all-cause mortality, invasive ventilation, AKI, or ECMO in COVID-19 inpatients. A conservative interpretation in light of the quantitative bias analysis is that there is no evidence that NSAID use is associated with risk of increased severity or the other measured outcomes. Our findings are the largest EHR-based analysis of the effect of NSAIDs on outcome in COVID-19 patients to date. Our results confirm and extend analogous findings in previous observational studies using a large cohort of patients drawn from 38 centers in a nationally representative multicenter database. Deceased donor kidney degradomics indicates cytoskeletal proteolytic alterations impacting post-transplant function. BackgroundIn brain death, cerebral injury contributes to systemic biological dysregulation, causing significant cellular stress in donor kidneys that adversely impacts the quality of grafts. Here, we hypothesized that DBD kidneys may undergo proteolytic processes that renders grafts susceptible to post-transplant dysfunction.

Material & MethodsUsing mass spectrometry and immunoblotting analyses, we profiled degradation patterns of cytoskeletal proteins in deceased (n=55) and living (n=10) donor kidneys.

ResultsWe found that in DBD kidneys, key podocyte cytoskeletal proteins had been proteolytically cleaved. Generated degradation profiles were not associated to donor related demographic and clinical factors but were associated to suboptimal post-transplant function. Strikingly, -actinin -4 and Talin-1 degradation profiles were not observed in circulatory-death or living-donor kidneys. As Talin-1 is a specific proteolytic target of Calpain-1, we investigated a potential trigger of Calpain activation and Talin-1 degradation using ex-vivo precision-cut human kidney slices and in-vitro immortalised human podocytes. Notably, we found that Transforming-Growth Factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}) activated Calpain-1 and proteolytically cleaved Talin-1 to generate distinct peptide fragments. These peptide fragments were of similar size and matched the degradation patterns observed in DBD kidneys. Talin-1 degradation was prevented in vitro by Calpain-1 inhibition.

ConclusionsHere, we provide initial evidence that DBD kidneys are susceptible to cytoskeletal protein degradation that impacts posttransplant kidney function. Subsequent studies should aim to further investigate the link between brain death and activation of proteolytic pathways exploring new therapeutic opportunities. How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov BackgroundEarly in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, commentators warned that some COVID trials were inadequately conceived, designed and reported. Here, we retrospectively assess the prevalence of informative COVID trials launched in the first 6 months of the pandemic.

MethodsWe created a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention efficacy trials that were initiated from 2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30 using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. We evaluated trials on 3 criteria of informativeness: potential redundancy, design quality and feasibility of patient-participant recruitment. The study protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fp726/).

ResultsWe included 500 trials in our cohort, 58% of which were Phase 2 and 84.8% were directed towards the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Close to one third of trials met all three criteria and were deemed informative (29.0% (95% Confidence Interval 23.7 - 36.9)). The proportion of potentially redundant trials in our cohort was 4.1%. Over half of the trials in our cohort (56.2%) did not meet our criteria for high quality trial design. The proportion of trials with infeasible patient-participant recruitment was 22.6%.

ConclusionsLess than one third of COVID-19 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first six months met all three criteria for informativeness. Shortcomings in trial design, recruitment feasibility and redundancy reflect longstanding weaknesses in the clinical research enterprise that were likely amplified by the exceptional circumstances of a pandemic. Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: a large-scale cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic ObjectivesThis study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan.

MethodsA cross-sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Interruption to medical care was defined based on the response "I have not been able to go to the hospital or receive treatment as scheduled." The fraction of sickness presenteeism days in the past 30 days was employed as the primary outcome. A fractional logit model was used for analysis to treat bounded data.

ResultsOf the 27,036 participants, 17,526 (65%) were workers who did not require routine medical care, 8,451 (31%) were using medical care as scheduled, and 1,059 (4%) experienced interrupted medical care. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of sickness presenteeism was significantly higher among workers who experienced interrupted medical care (3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04-3.89) than those who did not require routine medical care. In terms of symptoms, the highest aOR was observed among workers with mental health symptoms (aOR: 5.59, 95%CI: 5.04-6.20).

ConclusionsThis study suggests the importance of continuing necessary treatment during a pandemic to prevent presenteeism. Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care with a Focus on Surgery and Black Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Caffeine and Methylliberine: A Human Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study Methylliberine and theacrine are methylurates found in the leaves of various Coffea species and Camellia assamica var. kucha, respectively. We previously demonstrated that the methylxanthine caffeine increased theacrines oral bioavailability in humans. Consequently, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study pharmacokinetic study in humans administered methylliberine, theacrine, and caffeine to determine methylliberines pharmacokinetic interaction potential with either caffeine or theacrine. Subjects (n = 12) received an oral dose of either methylliberine (25 or 100 mg), caffeine (150 mg), methylliberine (100 mg) plus caffeine (150 mg), or methylliberine (100 mg) plus theacrine (50 mg) using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours and analyzed for methylliberine, theacrine, and caffeine using UPLC-MS/MS. Methylliberine exhibited linear pharmacokinetics that were unaffected by co-administration of either caffeine or theacrine. However, methylliberine co-administration resulted in decreased oral clearance (41.9 {+/-} 19.5 vs. 17.1 {+/-} 7.80 L/hr) and increased half-life (7.2 {+/-} 5.6 versus 15 {+/-} 5.8 hrs) of caffeine. Methylliberine had no impact on caffeines maximum concentration (440 {+/-} 140 vs. 458 {+/-} 93.5 ng/mL) or oral volume of distribution (351 {+/-} 148 vs. 316 {+/-} 76.4 L). We previously demonstrated theacrine bioavailability was enhanced by caffeine, however, caffeine pharmacokinetics were unaffected by theacrine. Herein, we found that methylliberine altered caffeine pharmacokinetics without a reciprocal interaction, which suggests caffeine may interact uniquely with different methylurates. Understanding the mechanism(s) of interaction between methylxanthines and methylurates is of critical importance in light of the recent advent of dietary supplements containing both purine alkaloid classes. I wanna live and not think about the future; What place for advance care planning for people living with severe multiple sclerosis and their families? A qualitative study BackgroundLittle is known about how people with multiple sclerosis and their families comprehend advance care planning (ACP) and its relevance in their lives.

AimTo explore under what situations, with whom, how, and why do people with MS and their families engage in ACP

MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study comprising interviews with people living with MS and their families followed by an ethical discussion group with five health professionals representing specialties working with people affected by MS and their families. Twenty-seven people with MS and 17 family members were interviewed between June 2019 and March 2020. Interviews and the ethical discussion group were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

ResultsParticipants narratives focused on three major themes :(i) planning for an uncertain future; (ii) perceived obstacles to engaging in ACP that included uncertainty concerning MS disease progression, negative previous experiences of ACP discussions and prioritising symptom management over future planning; (iii) Preferences for engagement in ACP included a trusting relationship with a health professional and that information then be shared across services. Health professionals accounts from the ethical discussion group departed from viewing ACP as a formal document to that of an ongoing process of seeking preferences and values. They voiced similar concerns to people with MS about uncertainty and when to initiate discussions. Some shared concerns of a lack of confidence when having ACP discussions.

ConclusionThese findings support the need for a whole systems strategic approach where information about the potential benefits of ACP in all its forms can be shared with people with MS. Moreover, they highlight the need for health professionals to be skilled and trained in engaging in ACP discussions and where information is contemporaneously and seamlessly shared across services. USING PHYLOGENETICS TO INFER HIV-1 TRANSMISSION DIRECTION BETWEEN KNOWN TRANSMISSION PAIRS Inferring the transmission direction between linked individuals living with HIV provides unparalleled power to understand the epidemiology that determines transmission. Phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction approaches infer the transmission direction by identifying the individual in whom the most recent common ancestor of the virus populations originated. However, these methods vary in their accuracy but it is unclear why. To evaluate the performance of phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction, we inferred the transmission direction for 112 HIV transmission pairs where transmission direction was known and detailed additional information was available. We then fit a statistical model to evaluate the extent to which epidemiological, sampling, genetic and phylogenetic factors influenced the outcome of the inference. We repeated the analysis under real-life conditions with only routinely-collected data. We found that the inference of transmission direction depends principally on the topology class and branch length characteristics of the phylogeny. Under real-life conditions, the probability of identifying the correct transmission direction increases from 52%--when a monophyletic-monophyletic or paraphyletic-polyphyletic tree topology is observed, when the sample size in both partners is small and when the tip closest to the root does not agree with the state at the root--to 93% when a paraphyletic-monophyletic topology is observed, when the sample size is large and when the tip closest to the root agrees with root state. Our results suggest that discordance between previous studies in inferring the transmission direction can be explained by differences in key phylogenetic properties that arise due to different evolutionary, epidemiological and sampling processes.

Significance StatementIdentifying the direction of infectious disease transmission between individuals provides unparalleled power to understand infectious disease epidemiology. With epidemiological and clinical information typically unable to distinguish the direction, phylogenetic analysis of pathogen sequence data is an alternative approach. However, when these phylogenetic methods have been implemented, their accuracy is highly variable, and the reasons for this discordance is unknown. Here we analyse sequence data from over 100 pairs of individuals for whom both the direction of transmission of HIV is known and detailed epidemiological and sampling information is available. We find that easily quantifiable phylogenetic characteristics discriminate whether a phylogenetically-inferred transmission direction is correct. Our analysis highlights that phylogenetic approaches are unsuitable for individual-level analysis such as forensic investigations. Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction Many clinical datasets are intrinsically imbalanced, dominated by overwhelming majority groups. Off-the-shelf machine learning models that optimize the prognosis of majority patient types (e.g., healthy class) may cause substantial errors on the minority prediction class (e.g., disease class) and demographic subgroups (e.g., Black or young patients). For example, our work found that missed death cases are 3.14 times higher than missed survival cases in a mortality prediction model. In the typical one-machine-learning-model-fits-all paradigm, racial and age disparities are likely to exist, but unreported. What makes it worse is the deceptive nature of widely used whole-population metrics, such as AUC-ROC. We show that some metrics fail to reflect serious prediction deficiencies. To mitigate representational biases, we design a double prioritized (DP) bias correction technique. Our method trains customized models for specific ethnicity or age groups, a substantial departure from the one-model-predicts-all convention. We report our findings on four prognosis tasks over two imbalanced clinical datasets. DP reduces relative disparities among race and age groups, 5.6% to 86.8% better than the 8 existing sampling solutions being compared, in terms of the minority class' recall. Prime hAd5 Spike plus Nucleocapsid Vaccination Induces Ten-Fold Increases in Mean T-Cell Responses in Phase 1 Subjects that are Sustained Against Spike Variants In response to the need for a safe, efficacious vaccine that elicits vigorous T cell as well as humoral protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, we have developed a dual-antigen COVID-19 vaccine comprising both the viral spike (S) protein modified to increase cell-surface expression (S-Fusion) and nucleocapsid (N) protein with an Enhanced T-cell Stimulation Domain (N-ETSD) to enhance MHC class I and II presentation and T-cell responses. The antigens are delivered using a human adenovirus serotype 5 (hAd5) platform with E1, E2b, and E3 regions deleted that has been shown previously in cancer vaccine studies to be safe and effective in the presence of pre-existing hAd5 immunity. The findings reported here are focused on human T-cell responses due to the likelihood that such responses will sustain efficacy against emerging variants, a hypothesis supported by our in silico prediction of T-cell epitope HLA binding for both the first-wave SARS-CoV-2  A strain and the B.1.351 strain K417N, E484K, and N501Y spike and T201I N variants. We demonstrate the hAd5 S-Fusion + N-ETSD vaccine antigens expressed by previously SARS-CoV-2-infected patient dendritic cells elicit Th1 dominant activation of autologous patient T cells, indicating the vaccine antigens have the potential to elicit immune responses in previously infected patients. For participants in our open-label Phase 1b study of the vaccine (NCT04591717; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04591717), the magnitude of Th-1 dominant S- and N-specific T-cell responses after a single prime subcutaneous injection were comparable to T-cell responses from previously infected patients. Furthermore, vaccinated participant T-cell responses to S were similar for A strain S and a series of spike variant peptides, including S variants in the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 strains. The findings that this dual-antigen vaccine elicits SARS-CoV-2-relevant T-cell responses and that such cell-mediated protection is likely to be sustained against emerging variants supports the testing of this vaccine as a universal booster that would enhance and broaden existing immune protection conferred by currently approved S-based vaccines. COVID Outcome Prediction in the Emergency Department (COPE): Development and validation of a model for predicting death and need for intensive care in COVID-19 patients Background and aimCOVID-19 is putting extraordinary pressure on emergency departments (EDs). To support decision making in the ED, we aimed to develop a simple and valid model for predicting mortality and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in suspected COVID-19 patients.

MethodsFor model development, we retrospectively collected data of patients who were admitted to 4 large Dutch hospitals with suspected COVID-19 between March and August 2020 (first wave of the pandemic). Based on prior literature we considered quickly and objectively obtainable patient characteristics, vital parameters and blood test values as predictors. Logistic regression analyses with post-hoc uniform shrinkage was used to obtain predicted probabilities of in-hospital death and of the need for ICU admission, both within 28 days after hospital admission. We assessed model performance (Area Under the ROC curve (AUC); calibration plots) with temporal validation in patients who presented between September and December 2020 (second wave). We used multiple imputation to account for missing values.

ResultsThe development data included 5,831 patients, of whom 629 (10.8%) died and 5,070 (86.9%) were discharged within 28 days after admission. ICU admission was fully recorded for 2,633 first wave patients in 2 hospitals, with 214 (8%) ICU admissions within 28 days. A simple model - COVID Outcome Prediction in the Emergency Department (COPE) - with age, respiratory rate, C-reactive protein, lactic dehydrogenase, albumin and urea captured most of the ability to predict death. COPE was well-calibrated and showed good discrimination in 3,252 second wave patients (AUC in 4 hospitals: 0.82 [0.78; 0.86]; 0.82 [0.74; 0.90]; 0.79 [0.70; 0.88]; 0.83 [0.79; 0.86]). COPE was also able to identify patients at high risk of needing IC in 706 second wave patients with complete information on ICU admission (AUC: 0.84 [0.78; 0.90]; 0.81 [0.66; 0.95]). The models are implemented in web-based and mobile applications.

ConclusionCOPE is a simple tool that is well able to predict mortality and need for ICU admission for patients who present to the ED with suspected COVID-19 and may help patients and doctors in decision making.

CONTRIBUTION TO THE LITERATUREO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIPrediction models have the potential to support decision making about hospital admission of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected COVID-19
C_LIO_LIMost currently available models that were independently assessed contain a high risk of bias
C_LIO_LIPromising models were developed in different patient selections and included predictors that are not quickly and objective obtainable in emergency departments
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIA simple and objective tool ("COPE") is well able to predict mortality and need for ICU admission for patients who present to the ED with suspected COVID-19
C_LIO_LICOPE may support ED physicians to identify high-risk patients - i.e. those at high risk of deterioration and/or death - requiring treatment in the ICU, intermediate-risk patients requiring admission to the clinical ward, and low-risk patients who can potentially be sent home
C_LI