Three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking and Frankfort horizontal plane construction: reproducibility of conventional and novel landmarks ObjectivesTo assess manual landmarking repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) of a set of three-dimensional (3D) landmarks and to evaluate R&R of vertical cephalometric measurements using two Frankfort Horizontal (FH) planes as references for horizontal 3D imaging reorientation.

MethodsThirty-three landmarks, divided into "conventional", "foraminal" and "dental", were manually located twice by 3 experienced operators on 20 computed tomography (CT) scans of orthognathic surgery patients. R&R of the landmark localization were computed according to the ISO 5725 standard. These landmarks were then used to construct 2 FH planes: a conventional FH plane (orbitale left, porion right and left) and a newly proposed FH plane (midinternal acoustic foramen, orbitale right and left). R&R of vertical cephalometric measurements were computed using these 2 FH planes as horizontal references for CT reorientation.

ResultsLandmarks showing a 95% confidence interval (CI) of repeatability and/or reproducibility > 2mm were found exclusively in the "conventional" landmarks group. Vertical measurements showed excellent R&R (95% CI < 1mm) with either FH plane as horizontal reference. However, the 2 FH planes were not found to be parallel (absolute angular difference of 2.41{degrees}, SD 1.27{degrees}). The average time needed to landmark one CT scan was 14 {+/-} 3 minutes.

ConclusionsThe "dental" and "foraminal" landmarks tended to be more reliable than the "conventional" landmarks. Despite the poor overall reliability of the landmarks orbitale and porion, the construction of the conventional FH plane using 3 landmarks provided a reliable horizontal reference for 3D craniofacial CT scan reorientation.
Deep learning for caries detection using optical coherence tomography Early detection of dental caries has been one of the most predominant topics studied over the last few decades. Conventional examination through visual-tactile inspection and radiography can be inaccurate and destructive to the tooth structure. The development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has given dentistry an alternative diagnostic technique, which has been proven by numerous studies, that it has better sensitivity, specificity, and non-invasive characteristics. The growing popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) also contributes to a more efficient and effective way of image-based detection and decision-making. However, previous studies, which have attempted to employ AI for caries assessment, did not incorporate high-quality ground truth data. Therefore, this study aims to bypass this issue and highlights the importance of high-quality data. A two-phase study was carried out to explore different methods for caries detection. Initially, the comparison of caries detection based on OCT and apical radiography by 5 experienced clinicians was conducted. Then, five convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet-152, Xception, and ResNext-101, in the scope of AI were employed to detect caries and compared with the findings of the 5 clinicians. The data was preprocessed and labeled with the ground truth corresponding to microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) with rigorous definition. The weighted Kappa statistics suggested that OCT ({varkappa}= .699, SD = .090) showed a higher accuracy rate than radiography ({varkappa}= .407, SD = .049), and CNNs ({varkappa}= .860, SD = .049) were rated higher than clinicians ({varkappa}= .679, SD = .113), both at a .05 significance level. The best result was carried out by ResNet-152, which demonstrated a high accuracy rate of 95.21% and a sensitivity of 98.85%. These findings illustrate the importance of ground truth data for AI training and the potential of deep CNN algorithms combined with OCT for diagnosing dental caries.
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition lowers the cholesterol pathway, which influences colon tumors differentiation. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of death worldwide. Up to 70% of CRC patients will metastasize. Identify new biomarkers of progression to prevent/delay disease evolution is urgent. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a major program engaged during metastasis. We aim at identifying a combination of new genes that further identify signs of EMT in cancer tissues. We treated HT-29 cells grown in 3D with an EMT Inducing cocktail, and collect them before during and after treatment. For each condition, pan-transcriptomic analyses were done. Genes that were both induced upon EMT induction and inhibited upon EMT release (mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition or MET) were selected. We identified new genes for EMT-MET programs. These genes were used to build a metagene that, when applied to a database of transcriptomic data from primary colorectal tumors (n= 2,239), had an independent prognosis value. Finally, we submitted this metagene to CMap and identified drugs that might affect EMT-MET programs. Statins, well-known inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis, were among them and effectively delayed MET. These data show that cholesterol and EMT pathways are opposite regulators and impact differently tumor differentiation and outcome.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCEMetastases are the main cause of death of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the major issue in CRC management. Understanding the chain of events that lead to metastasis occurrence is urgent to identify new biomarkers of progression and/or new potential targets. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a major player in cancer dissemination that remains non-targetable due to its broad involvement in tissue homeostasis. Here, we used a relevant in vitro dynamic model to identify the pathways triggered during EMT in CRC and how this might improve tumors classification, prognosis and open therapeutic avenue for this deadly disease. The cholesterol pathway surprisingly popped-out from this model and turned out to be a good prognosis factor of disease-free survival for CRC. Altogether, our results showed that an active EMT program lowers the cholesterol pathway, which further influence the differentiation of colon tumor toward the most aggressive subtypes. Global reports of takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis Background and aimsConcerns have been raised recently about takotsubo cardiomyopathy after receiving COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. The goal of this study was to compile case reports in order to provide a comprehensive overview of takotsubo cardiomyopathy associated with COVID-19 vaccines.

MethodsFrom inception until March 10, 2022, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. The study included individuals who developed cardiac takotsubo cardiomyopathy as a result of receiving COVID-19 vaccinations, regardless of the type of vaccine or dose.

ResultsEight studies, including 8 cases, participated in the current systematic review. The median age was 61.6 years; 87.5% were female, while 12.5% were male. 75% of the patients received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, while 25% received other types. In addition, takotsubo cardiomyopathy occurred in 62.5% of patients after receiving the first dose and another 25% after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, the mean number of days to the onset of symptoms was 2.62 days. All cases had an elevated troponin test and abnormal ECG findings. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was above 50% among all cases. In terms of the average length of stay in the hospital, 62.5% stayed for 10.2 days, and all cases recovered from their symptoms.

ConclusionTakotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy complications that are associated with COVID-19 vaccination are rare, they can be life-threatening. Chest pain should be considered an alarming symptom, especially in those who had received a second dose of the vaccine in the last 3 days. For diagnosis, CK-MB and troponin are better biomarkers to confirm myocarditis than CRP, ESR, and NT-proBNP. All of cases completely recovered. Mitigating Covid-19 aerosol infection risk in school buildings: the role of natural ventilation, classroom volume, occupancy and face masks Issues linked to aerosol physics within school buildings and related infection risk still lack a proper recognition in school safety regulations. In this theoretical work we try to shed more light on the critical role of air ventilation, classroom volume, occupancy, and face mask types (surgical vs ffp2) in controlling airborne transmission risk in educational settings. Limited spaces available in many schools require to precisely assess the occupancy/volume ratio in each classroom and to investigate the specific risk levels from aerosolization of viral loads from infective sources. Moreover, most schools are not provided with mechanical HVAC systems. Fundamental questions are therefore: how the specific classroom volume affects the long-range contagion risk in a given classroom? is linear social distancing the right way to assess a volumetric risk problem? How effective are other countermeasures like reduced speaking volume or equipping teachers with microphones? We present here the results of a numerical analysis based on the Gammaitoni-Nucci infection risk model and the consolidated Wells-Riley like approach, with SARS-CoV2 input data and geometric data from a typical high-school classroom in Italy. We investigated separately the case of infective asymptomatic student and infective asymptomatic teacher as source of viral quanta, taking into account thermal gradient effects on the air ventilation rates. First recommendations based on the volumetric nature of aerosol risk are suggested to extend the linear social distancing approach applied so far. Finally we discuss the concept of "cumulative infection risk" over multiple lesson+break cycles in Wells-Riley-like infection models. We believe that any attempt to proper model infection risk in closed environments with cycled changes of the source and the susceptible individuals, should carefully consider this point, particularly when modelling air ventilation breaks in classrooms. Macular vascular complexity analysis of diabetes mellitus by swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography PurposeTo evaluate the associations of retinal vascular complexity features, including fractal dimension (FD) and blood vessel tortuosity (BVT), with the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) by using noninvasive optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA).

MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study recruited ocular-treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) registered in the community of Guangzhou, China. OCTA was used to obtain the measurements of FD and BVT in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Univariate and multivariate linear regression was used to analyse the correlation of FD and BVT in different layers with DR severity.

ResultsA total of 1282 patients with DM (1282 eyes), with a mean age of 64.2{+/-}7.8 years, were included. FD in the DCP decreased and BVT in the DCP increased in DR patients compared to non-DR patients, even after adjusting for confounding factors (P< 0.05). Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in the FD values as the DR progressed, while the BVT progressively increased with worsening DR severity (P< 0.01). The FD in DCP had a statistically significant positive correlation with FD in SCP and a negative correlation with BVT in SCP and BVT in DCP in all of the participants, including the non-DR group, moderate DR group and severe DR group (P< 0.01).

ConclusionFD and BVT determined using OCTA might be useful parameters for objectively distinguishing DR from non-DR and indicating DR progression. Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care with a Focus on Surgery and Black Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Deceased donor kidney degradomics indicates cytoskeletal proteolytic alterations impacting post-transplant function. BackgroundIn brain death, cerebral injury contributes to systemic biological dysregulation, causing significant cellular stress in donor kidneys that adversely impacts the quality of grafts. Here, we hypothesized that DBD kidneys may undergo proteolytic processes that renders grafts susceptible to post-transplant dysfunction.

Material & MethodsUsing mass spectrometry and immunoblotting analyses, we profiled degradation patterns of cytoskeletal proteins in deceased (n=55) and living (n=10) donor kidneys.

ResultsWe found that in DBD kidneys, key podocyte cytoskeletal proteins had been proteolytically cleaved. Generated degradation profiles were not associated to donor related demographic and clinical factors but were associated to suboptimal post-transplant function. Strikingly, -actinin -4 and Talin-1 degradation profiles were not observed in circulatory-death or living-donor kidneys. As Talin-1 is a specific proteolytic target of Calpain-1, we investigated a potential trigger of Calpain activation and Talin-1 degradation using ex-vivo precision-cut human kidney slices and in-vitro immortalised human podocytes. Notably, we found that Transforming-Growth Factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}) activated Calpain-1 and proteolytically cleaved Talin-1 to generate distinct peptide fragments. These peptide fragments were of similar size and matched the degradation patterns observed in DBD kidneys. Talin-1 degradation was prevented in vitro by Calpain-1 inhibition.

ConclusionsHere, we provide initial evidence that DBD kidneys are susceptible to cytoskeletal protein degradation that impacts posttransplant kidney function. Subsequent studies should aim to further investigate the link between brain death and activation of proteolytic pathways exploring new therapeutic opportunities. Increase in SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA and IgG Antibodies in Human Milk from Lactating Women Following the COVID-19 Booster Vaccination The CDC recommended a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty (BNT162b2) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in September 2021 for high-risk individuals. Pregnant and high-risk lactating women were encouraged to receive the booster to obtain potential prolonged protection for themselves and their infants. This study investigated the ability of the booster vaccine to increase IgA and IgG antibodies specific to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in breast milk compared to levels pre-booster. We found a significant increase in both anti-RBD-specific IgA and IgG antibodies in breast milk following the Pfizer-BioNTech booster and this increase was present in the majority of participants at the study endpoint (60 days post-booster). These results suggest the booster enhances SARS-CoV-2 specific immunity in human breast milk, which may be protective for infants. Serum Vitamin D levels are associated with increased COVID-19 severity and mortality independent of whole-body and visceral adiposity INTRODUCTIONCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with susceptibility to infectious disease. In this study, the association between COVID-19 outcomes and vitamin D levels in patients attending a COVID-19 reference center in Mexico City are examined.

METHODSConsecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 were evaluated. All patients underwent clinical evaluation and follow-up, laboratory measurements and a thoracic computerized tomography, including the measurement of epicardial fat thickness. Low vitamin D was defined as levels <20ng/mL (<50nmol/L) and deficient Vitamin D as a level [&le;]12ng/mL (<30nmol/L)

RESULTSOf the 551 patients included, low vitamin D levels were present in 45.6% and deficient levels in 10.9%. Deficient Vitamin D levels were associated with mortality (HR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.58, p=0.006) but not with critical COVID-19, adjusted for age, sex, body-mass index and epicardial fat. Using model-based causal mediation analyses the increased risk of COVID-19 mortality conferred by low vitamin D levels was partly mediated by its effect on D-dimer and cardiac ultrasensitive troponins. Notably, increased risk of COVID-19 mortality conferred by low vitamin D levels was independent of BMI and epicardial fat.

CONCLUSIONVitamin D deficiency ([&le;]12ng/mL or <30nmol/L), is independently associated with COVID-19 mortality after adjustment for visceral fat (epicardial fat thickness). Low vitamin D may contribute to a pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic state, increasing the risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Overweight-Obesity And Glucose Intolerance In Offspring Of Indian Diabetic Mothers. AimsMaternal diabetes in pregnancy increases offspring obesity and diabetes risk. We investigated body size and composition, and glucose tolerance in offspring born to Indian diabetic mothers (ODM) and to non-diabetic mothers (ONDM), and studied maternal and paternal determinants.

MethodsWe compared the physical characteristics, body composition (Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry) and glycemia of ODMs and matched ONDMs. Overweight-obesity was defined using International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) for 2-18 years (cutoff of BMI > 25 kg/m2) and World Health Oraganization (WHO) criteria for >18 years (BMI > 25 kg/m2). Glycemic measures included capillary blood glucose measurement in children <10 years of age and a 1.75g/kg glucose OGTT in those >=10 years. We calculated separate SD scores for capillary fasting, capillary random and venous fasting plasma glucose. Those above median SD score were classified as glucose intolerant. We evaluated insulin sensitivity (Homeostatic Model Assessment HOMA-S and Matsuda index), beta cell function (HOMA-{beta} and insulinogenic index) and {beta}-cell compensatory response (Disposition Index: [Log (Insulinogenic index) + Log (Matsuda index)]). We studied the association of maternal and paternal body size and glycemia with outcomes in the child.

ResultsWe studied 200 ODMs of 176 diabetic mothers (133 GDM, 21 type 2 diabetes, 22 type 1 diabetes), and 177 ONDMs at an average of 9.7 years after delivery. ODMs were heavier, more adipose and more glucose intolerant than ONDMs. Differences for body size parameters were more prominent in males and they also had a wider spectrum of metabolic abnormalities. Three (4%) ODM were receiving treatment for diabetes (diagnosed between 10-25 years of age). On OGTT, the older ODMs (>= 10 years) had higher prevalence of glucose intolerance (1 DM, 14 IFG, 12 IGT and 4 both IFG and IGT) compared to ONDM, (0 DM, 7 IFG, 9 IGT and 1 both IFG and IGT). None of the diabetic and pre-diabetic ODMs, including children of type 1 diabetic mothers, were positive for circulating GAD or ZnT8 antibodies.

Younger ODMs (<10 years) also had higher capillary blood glucose concentrations compared to ONDM. Overall, ODMs had higher prevalence of glucose intolerance compared to ONDMs, both in younger and older, and in boys and girls. HOMA-S and Disposition index were lower in ODM compared to ONDM. Other indices of insulin secretion and action (HOMA-{beta}, Insulinogenic index and Matsuda index) were similar in the two groups.

Type 2 diabetic and GDM mothers were heavier compared to type 1 diabetic mothers, and their children were more likely to be overweight-obese. Children of type 1 diabetic mothers were glucose intolerant despite lack of overweight-obesity. In addition, fathers had an independent influence on the childs phenotype, especially for overweight-obesity. Maternal hyperglycemia during pregnancy had an overriding influence on offspring glucose intolerance.

ConclusionsODMs were more overweight-obese and glucose intolerant compared to ONDMs. We propose that these two outcomes in the ODMs are independently programmed by respective parental phenotypes. Preventive strategies will need to be informed by these findings. Studies of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms involved in fetal programming of body size and glycemia will further help our understanding.

Research in ContextO_ST_ABSWhat is already known about this subject?C_ST_ABSIndia has experienced a rapid escalation of diabetes in young individuals including diabetes in pregnancy. Short-term effects of maternal hyperglycemia on the offspring are well known.

What is the key question?There is little data on long-term effects of maternal hyperglycemia on offspring body size and cardiometabolic risk factors. We compared these in the offspring of diabetic mothers compared to those of non-diabetic mothers. We also sought differences within types of diabetes (type 1, type 2, GDM) and studied paternal determinants of these outcomes.

What are the new findings?Type 1 diabetic mothers were thinnest and most hyperglycemic; type 2 diabetic mothers were most overweight-obese, GDM mothers were intermediate. Gestational maternal hyperglycemia was the overriding determinant of offspring hyperglycemia. Maternal hyperglycemia predicted offspring glucose intolerance but not overweight obesity; maternal overweight-obesity predicted offspring overweight-obesity but not hyperglycemia, suggesting an uncoupling of these phenotypes often considered congruent. Fathers had an additive influence on offspring size.

How might this impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?Knowing the relative independence of influences on body size and metabolic outcomes will inform strategies of their primordial and primary prevention. Establishing genetic and epigenetic mechanisms will help. Macronutrient mass intake explains deferential weight and fat loss in isocaloric diets Differential weight and fat losses under isocaloric diets of distinct macronutrient composition are well-documented findings in obesity research.1-6 Such data are considered a result of inadequate methodology as it disagree with the energy balance theory.7 A recent mathematical analysis of this paradigm has found, however, serious analytical contradictions in its foundations.8 As an alternative, a mass balance model was proposed to explain the aforesaid body composition alterations. Here, we expand on this observation by contrasting both models. We show that mass balance explains a wide range of fending experiments including those concurring with the energy balance principle. The latter, however, is less flexible and results in poor forecasts in settings consistent with mass balance. The energy balance theory is thus an unsatisfactory model of body composition changes. Consequently, by shifting to a mass balance paradigm of obesity a much deeper understanding of this disease may follow in the near future. A Cross-Sectional Examination of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures of Physician-Authors Publishing in High-Impact US Medical Journals ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of self-reported financial conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosures in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) within the requisite disclosure period prior to article submission.

DesignCross-sectional investigation.

Data SourcesOriginal clinical-trial research articles published in NEJM (n = 206) or JAMA (n = 188) from January 1 to December 31, 2017; self-reported COI disclosure forms submitted to NEJM or JAMA with the authors published articles; Open Payments website (from database inception; latest search: August 2019).

Main outcome measuresFinancial data reported to Open Payments from 2014 to 2016 (time period that included all subjects requisite disclosure windows) were compared to self-reported disclosure forms submitted to the journals. Payments were defined as those not associated with a research study or formal research funding. Payment types were categorized as "disclosed," "undisclosed," "indeterminate," or "unrelated."

ResultsThirty-one articles from NEJM and 31 articles from JAMA met inclusion criteria. The physician-authors (n = 118) received a combined total of $7.48 million. Of the 106 authors (89.8%) who received payments, 86 (81.1%) received undisclosed payments. The top 23 most highly compensated received $6.32 million, of which $3.00 million (47.6%) was undisclosed. Disclosure rates were the equivalent between the top 23 and the entire sample.

ConclusionsHigh payment amounts, as well as high proportions of undisclosed financial compensation, regardless of amount received, comprised potential COIs for two influential US medical journals. Further research is needed to explain why such high proportions of general payments were undisclosed and whether journals that rely on self-reported COI disclosure need to reconsider their policies. The Acute Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose Naltrexone and acetaminophen Combinations and Each Component: Findings of a Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial We tested two low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combinations and each component in the acute treatment of migraine. The patients use a single-dose of the study medication for a moderate or severe pain intensity migraine attack. Patients were adults with migraine with or without aura experiencing 2 to 20 (average 6.4) monthly migraine days. The co-primary endpoints were pain-freedom and absence of prospectively-identified most bothersome migraine-associated symptom 2 hours after dosing. We randomized 92 patients; 72 completed the study (mean age, 43 years; 75% women). Pain-freedom at 2 hours was 10.2% higher than placebo with naltrexone 2.25 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg, 10.9% with naltrexone 3.25 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg, 17.3% with naltrexone 2.25 mg, and 31.3% with acetaminophen 325 mg. The treatment groups migraine burden at baseline was unbalanced due to randomized patients uneven study completion. The acetaminophen group had the lowest migraine burden, giving its results lower credibility.

Saliently, Low-dose naltrexone alone (n=19) had a 17.3% higher response rate for headache pain-freedom at 2 hours than placebo (n=17). The naltrexone and the placebo groups were the largest and had a balanced disease burden, implying higher credibility to the naltrexone group results. We found low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination, low-dose naltrexone, and acetaminophen had higher response rates than placebo in treating headache pain. The most commonly reported adverse events were sedation, nausea, and dizziness. We postulate that naltrexones toll-like receptor (TLR4) antagonism properties prevent pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the trigeminal ganglion averting "overactive nerves" (laymans term) and migraine. Although this trial used low-dose naltrexone (defined as 1 - 5 mg/day), future phase 3 studies will test a range of naltrexone and acetaminophen combination doses. Pre-pandemic mental health and disruptions to healthcare, economic, and housing outcomes during COVID-19: evidence from 12 UK longitudinal studies BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and associated virus suppression measures have disrupted lives and livelihoods and people already experiencing mental ill-health may have been especially vulnerable.

AimTo quantify mental health inequalities in disruptions to healthcare, economic activity and housing.

Method59,482 participants in 12 UK longitudinal adult population studies with data collected prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Within each study we estimated the association between psychological distress assessed pre-pandemic and disruptions since the start of the pandemic to three domains: healthcare (medication access, procedures, or appointments); economic activity (employment, income, or working hours); and housing (change of address or household composition). Meta-analyses were used to pool estimates across studies.

ResultsAcross the analysed datasets, one to two-thirds of participants experienced at least one disruption, with 2.3-33.2% experiencing disruptions in two or more domains. One standard deviation higher pre-pandemic psychological distress was associated with: (i) increased odds of any healthcare disruptions (OR=1.30; [95% CI:1.20-1.40]) with fully adjusted ORs ranging from 1.24 [1.09-1.41] for disruption to procedures and 1.33 [1.20- 1.49] for disruptions to prescriptions or medication access; (ii) loss of employment (OR=1.13 [1.06-1.21]) and income (OR=1.12 [1.06 -1.19]) and reductions in working hours/furlough (OR=1.05 [1.00-1.09]); (iii) no associations with housing disruptions (OR=1.00 [0.97-1.03]); and (iv) increased likelihood of experiencing a disruption in at least two domains (OR=1.25 [1.18-1.32]) or in one domain (OR=1.11 [1.07-1.16]) relative to no disruption.

ConclusionPeople experiencing psychological distress pre-pandemic have been more likely to experience healthcare and economic disruptions, and clusters of disruptions across multiple domains during the pandemic. Failing to address these disruptions risks further widening the existing inequalities in mental health. Substance Use Onset in High-Risk 9-13 Year-Olds in the ABCD Study AimA key aim of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study is to document substance use onset, patterns, and sequelae across adolescent development. However, substance use misreporting obscures accurate drug use characterization. Hair toxicology tests provide objective historical substance use data, but are rarely investigated in youth. Here, we compare objective hair toxicology results with self-reported substance use in youth.

MethodsA literature-based substance use risk algorithm identified 696 ABCD Study(R) participants for hair sample collections between baseline and 2-year follow-up (spanning ages 9-13) for laboratory analysis. Chi-square and t-tests assessed differences between participants demographics, positive and negative hair tests, risk algorithm scores, and self-reported substance use.

ResultsHair testing confirmed that 17% of at-risk 9-13 year-olds had evidence of past 3-month use of one (n=99), two (n=17), three (n=3), or four (n=2) drug classes. After considering prescribed medication use, 11% had a positive test incongruent with self- or parent-report. No participant with a positive result self-reported substance use consistent with their toxicology results. Participants with positive tests under-reported use (p<.001), reported less sipping of alcohol (p<.001), and scored higher on the risk algorithm (p<.001) than those with negative hair toxicology.

ConclusionsAn alarming 11% of tested samples in at-risk 9-13 year-olds were positive for at least one unreported substance, suggesting underreporting in this population when participating in a national healthy development study. The degree of underreporting cannot yet be calculated, as at-risk samples were prioritized for assays. Expanded toxicology testing is key to characterize substance use in youth. Short Practical Regimen of Acupuncture for Melasma: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand BackgroundMelasma is a common skin pigmentation disorder. Acupuncture shows benefits for patients with melasma, although no standardized method or optimal number of sessions have been determined.

ObjectiveTo comparatively assess clinical outcomes of melasma between five vs ten standard acupuncture sessions.

MethodsWe performed a prospective observational cohort study in all melasma patients at the Acupuncture Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. All patients were treated with standard acupuncture procedure twice a week and were evaluated after the fifth and the tenth sessions of acupuncture, with a follow-up one week after the last session. Participants were divided into two treatment groups: Groups A and B received five and ten acupuncture sessions respectively. Melasma outcomes were assessed by using the Melanin Index (MI), Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), patient-reported improvement scores and acupuncture-related adverse events.

ResultsOf 113 participants, 67 received five sessions of acupuncture treatment while 39 received ten sessions. 7 participants did not finish treatment. After five sessions of acupuncture in Group A, the mean MI decreased by 28.7 (95%CI -38.5 to -18.8), whereas the median MASI decreased by 3.4 (-6.9, -1.2) points. After ten sessions of acupuncture in Group B, the mean MI decreased by 31.3 (95%CI -45.0 to -17.6), whereas the median MASI decreased by 5.4 (-9.9, - 3.0) points. The first five sessions of acupuncture had a higher effect on the change in magnitude than the last five sessions, although there was no statistically significant difference. However, ten-session of acupuncture, had not reached the peak benefit on melasma yet. Further studies should be done with a higher number of sessions to determine the optimal rounds of treatment. Twenty-nine participants reported minor side effects, mostly consisting of persistent pain and small hematoma. Group B had RR of having adverse events 1.8 times (95% CI 1.0-3.4) compared to group A.

ConclusionAcupuncture has a potential dose-response effect on clinical and patient-reported melasma outcomes with minor side effects. Patterns of brain degeneration in early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Recurrent neuroinflammation in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) is thought to lead to neurodegeneration, resulting in progressive disability. Repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain provides non-invasive measures of atrophy over time, a key marker of neurodegeneration. This study investigates regional neurodegeneration of the brain in early-stage RRMS using volumetry and voxel-based morphometry (VBM).

RRMS patients (N=354) underwent 3T structural MRI at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up, as part of the Scottish multicentre  FutureMS study. MRI data were processed using FreeSurfer to derive volumetrics, and FSL for VBM (grey matter (GM) only), to establish patterns of change in GM and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) over time throughout the cerebrum, cerebellum and brainstem.

Volumetric analyses showed a decrease over time (q<0.05) in bilateral cortical GM and NAWM, multiple subcortical structures, cerebellar GM and the brainstem. Additionally, NAWM and GM volume decreased respectively in the following cortical regions, frontal: 14 out of 28 regions and 17/28; temporal: 18/18 and 15/18; parietal: 14/14 and 11/14; occipital: 7/8 and 8/8. Left GM and NAWM asymmetry was observed in the frontal lobe. GM VBM analysis showed three major clusters of decrease over time: 1) temporal lobe and subcortical areas, 2) cerebellum, 3) anterior cingulum and supplementary motor cortex; and four smaller clusters within the occipital lobe.

Widespread neurodegeneration was observed in early-stage RRMS; particularly in the brainstem, cerebellar GM, and subcortical and occipital-temporal regions. Volumetric and VBM results emphasise different as well as overlapping patterns of longitudinal change, and provide potential response markers for existing therapies and trials of neuroprotective agents. Strain-resolved analysis in a randomized trial of antibiotic pretreatment and maintenance dose delivery mode with fecal microbiota transplant for ulcerative colitis Fecal microbiota transplant is a promising therapy for ulcerative colitis. Parameters maximizing effectiveness and tolerability are not yet clear, and it is not known how import the transmission of donor microbes to patients is. Here (clinicaltrails.gov: NCT03006809) we have tested the effects of antibiotic pretreatment and compared two modes of maintenance dose delivery, capsules versus enema, in a randomized, pilot, open-label, 2x2 factorial design with 22 patients analyzed with mild to moderate UC. Clinically, the treatment was well-tolerated with favorable safety profile. Of patients who received antibiotic pretreatment, 6 of 11 experienced remission after six weeks of treatment, versus 2 of 11 non-pretreated patients (odds ratio: 1.69, 95% confidence interval: -0.25 to 3.62). No significant differences were found between maintenance dosing via capsules versus enema. In exploratory analyses, microbiome turnover at both the species and strain levels was extensive and significantly more pronounced in the pretreated patients. Associations were also revealed between taxonomic turnover and changes in the composition of primary and secondary bile acids. Together these findings suggest that antibiotic pretreatment contributes to microbiome engraftment and possibly clinical effectiveness, and validate longitudinal strain tracking as a powerful way to monitor the dynamics and impact of microbiota transfer. Time trends, factors associated with, and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in US adults: January-May 2021 ImportanceCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has become a leading barrier to increasing the US vaccination rate.

ObjectiveTo evaluate time trends in COVID-19 vaccine intent during the US vaccine rollout, and identify key factors related to and self-reported reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in May 2021.

Design, participants and settingA COVID-19 survey was offered to US adult Facebook users in several languages yielding 5,088,772 qualifying responses from January 6 to May 31, 2021. Data was aggregated by month. Survey weights matched the sample to the age, gender, and state profile of the US population.

ExposureDemographics, geographic factors, political/COVID-19 environment, health status, beliefs, and behaviors.

Main outcome measures"If a vaccine to prevent COVID-19 were offered to you today, would you choose to get vaccinated." Hesitant was defined as responding probably or definitely would not choose to get vaccinated (versus probably or definitely would, or already vaccinated).

ResultsCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy decreased by one-third from 25.4% (95%CI, 25.3, 25.5) in January to 16.6% (95% CI, 16.4, 16.7) in May, with relatively large decreases among participants with Black, Pacific Islander or Hispanic race/ethnicity and [&le;]high school education. Independent risk factors for vaccine hesitancy in May (N=525,644) included younger age, non-Asian race, < 4 year college degree, living in a more rural county, living in a county with higher Trump vote share in the 2020 election, lack of worry about COVID-19, working outside the home, never intentionally avoiding contact with others, and no past-year flu vaccine. Differences in hesitancy by race/ethnicity varied by age (e.g., Black adults more hesitant than White adults <35 years old, but less hesitant among adults [&ge;]45 years old). Differences in hesitancy by age varied by race/ethnicity. Almost half of vaccine hesitant respondents reported fear of side effects (49.2% [95%CI, 48.7, 49.7]) and not trusting the COVID-19 vaccine (48.4% [95%CI, 48.0, 48.9]); over one-third reported not trusting the government, not needing the vaccine, and waiting to see if safe. Reasons differed by degree of vaccine intent and by race/ethnicity.

ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy varied by demographics, geography, beliefs, and behaviors, indicating a need for a range of messaging and policy options to target high-hesitancy groups. Culture and understanding the role of feedback for health professions students: Realist synthesis protocol. IntroductionClinical education has moved to a "competency-based" model with an emphasis on workplace-based learning and assessment which, in turn, depends on feedback to be effective. Further, the understanding of feedback has changed from information about a performance directed to the learner performing the task, to a dialogue, which enables the learner to act and develop.

In health professional education, feedback is a complex interaction between trainee, supervisor, and the healthcare system. Most published research on feedback in health professional education originates in Europe and North America. Our interest is on the impact of Culture on this process, particularly in the context of Asian cultures.

The (scientific) realist approach of Pawson and Tilley provides a means to examine complex interventions in social situations, and thus is an appropriate lens to use for this study. This is a protocol for a realist synthesis which asks how, why and in what circumstances do Asian Cultures influence health professional trainees to seek, respond to and use feedback given in the clinical environment, if at all.

Methods and analysisAn initial search was performed to help define the scope of the review question and develop our initial program theory. The formal electronic search was carried out in February 2020 and included: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo, and repeated in October 2020.

Retrieved articles were imported into Covidence for screening and data extraction, after which components of the Context - Mechanisms - Outcomes configurations will be sought to refine the initial program theory.

Ethics and DisseminationAs this study is a literature review, ethics approval is not required.

The findings will be documented in line with the RAMESES publications standards for Realist syntheses,[41] and we plan to disseminate the findings by means of a peer-reviewed journal article and conference presentation(s).

Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThe synthesis aims to identify the how and why Asian Cultures may influence feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees, if at all.
C_LIO_LITo our knowledge, there are few studies of feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees in Asia.
C_LIO_LIA Realist approach has the potential to help explain the complex nature of Cultures impact on feedback.
C_LIO_LIOnly studies published in the English language will be included, so transferability of our findings to non-English speaking environments may be lacking.
C_LIO_LIIn addition to formal literature database searches, we will need to conduct citation mining to locate other relevant resources.
C_LI USING PHYLOGENETICS TO INFER HIV-1 TRANSMISSION DIRECTION BETWEEN KNOWN TRANSMISSION PAIRS Inferring the transmission direction between linked individuals living with HIV provides unparalleled power to understand the epidemiology that determines transmission. Phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction approaches infer the transmission direction by identifying the individual in whom the most recent common ancestor of the virus populations originated. However, these methods vary in their accuracy but it is unclear why. To evaluate the performance of phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction, we inferred the transmission direction for 112 HIV transmission pairs where transmission direction was known and detailed additional information was available. We then fit a statistical model to evaluate the extent to which epidemiological, sampling, genetic and phylogenetic factors influenced the outcome of the inference. We repeated the analysis under real-life conditions with only routinely-collected data. We found that the inference of transmission direction depends principally on the topology class and branch length characteristics of the phylogeny. Under real-life conditions, the probability of identifying the correct transmission direction increases from 52%--when a monophyletic-monophyletic or paraphyletic-polyphyletic tree topology is observed, when the sample size in both partners is small and when the tip closest to the root does not agree with the state at the root--to 93% when a paraphyletic-monophyletic topology is observed, when the sample size is large and when the tip closest to the root agrees with root state. Our results suggest that discordance between previous studies in inferring the transmission direction can be explained by differences in key phylogenetic properties that arise due to different evolutionary, epidemiological and sampling processes.

Significance StatementIdentifying the direction of infectious disease transmission between individuals provides unparalleled power to understand infectious disease epidemiology. With epidemiological and clinical information typically unable to distinguish the direction, phylogenetic analysis of pathogen sequence data is an alternative approach. However, when these phylogenetic methods have been implemented, their accuracy is highly variable, and the reasons for this discordance is unknown. Here we analyse sequence data from over 100 pairs of individuals for whom both the direction of transmission of HIV is known and detailed epidemiological and sampling information is available. We find that easily quantifiable phylogenetic characteristics discriminate whether a phylogenetically-inferred transmission direction is correct. Our analysis highlights that phylogenetic approaches are unsuitable for individual-level analysis such as forensic investigations. What delirium detection tools are used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom? Survey results from 91% of acute healthcare organisations. PurposeOur aim was to collect information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive care settings in the United Kingdom (UK).

MethodsWe sent a Freedom of Information request to 169 UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals, trusts and health boards (units) in July 2020 to obtain data on usage of delirium assessment tools in clinical practice and delirium pathways or guidelines.

ResultsWe received responses from 154/169 units (91% response rate). Of these, 146/154 (95%) units reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 131/154 (85%) units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4  As Test (4AT) was the most widely used tool, with 117/146 (80%) units reporting use. The Confusion Assessment Method was used in 65/146 (45%) units, and the Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD) in 52/146 (36%) units.

ConclusionsOur findings show that the 4AT is the most commonly used tool in the UK, with 80% of units reporting use. This study adds to our knowledge of real-world uptake of delirium detection methods at scale. Future studies should evaluate real-world implementation of delirium assessment tools further via (i) tool completion rates and (ii) rates of positive scores against the expected prevalence delirium in the clinical population concerned.

KEY SUMMARY POINTSO_ST_ABSAimC_ST_ABSTo seek information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive clinical care settings in the United Kingdom (UK), and to assess usage of specific delirium assessment tools: the 4  As Test (4AT), Confusion Assessment Method and Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD).

FindingsIn total, 95% of National Health Service (NHS) units (hospitals, trusts and health boards) reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 85% of units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4AT was the most widely used tool, with 80% of units reporting use; the Confusion Assessment Method was reportedly used in 45% of units and the SQiD in 36% of units.

MessageThis study shows real-world, large-scale uptake of delirium detection methods and delirium guidelines in UK hospitals, which contributes to ongoing efforts to improve delirium care. Previous visceral leishmaniasis relapses outperform immunological or clinical signs as predictors of further relapses in patients co-infected with HIV-1 Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and HIV co-infection (VL/HIV) has emerged as a significant public health problem in Ethiopia, with up to 30% of VL patients co-infected with HIV. These patients suffer from recurrent VL relapses and increased mortality. Our aim was to assess whether VL/HIV co-infected patients with a previous history of VL relapses (recurrent VL/HIV) have a poorer prognosis as compared to HIV patients presenting with their first episode of VL (primary VL/HIV). Our results show that recurrent VL/HIV patients have a higher parasite load, higher mortality and that their relapse-free survival is significantly shorter. The poorer prognosis of recurrent VL/HIV patients is accompanied by lower weight gain and lower recovery of all blood cell lineages, as well as lower production of IFN{gamma}, lower CD4+ T cell counts and higher expression levels of PD1 on T cells. Furthermore, our results show that prior history of VL relapse is an important risk factor for future relapse. Both CD4+ T cell count and parasite load were also associated with a higher risk of VL relapse, but neither of these was independently associated with relapse risk after adjustment for previous VL relapse history.

We propose that in addition to the current treatments, novel interventions should be considered at the time of VL diagnosis in VL/HIV patients; and suggest that improved anti-leishmanial and antiretroviral treatments, as well as immune therapy, through PD1/PDL-1 blockade and/or through IFN{gamma} administration, could result in more efficient parasite killing and thereby reduce the relapse rate and improve survival. Problems with Evidence Assessment in COVID-19 Health Policy Impact Evaluation (PEACHPIE): A systematic review of study design and evidence strength IntroductionAssessing the impact of COVID-19 policy is critical for informing future policies. However, there are concerns about the overall strength of COVID-19 impact evaluation studies given the circumstances for evaluation and concerns about the publication environment. This study systematically reviewed the strength of evidence in the published COVID-19 policy impact evaluation literature.

MethodsWe included studies that were primarily designed to estimate the quantitative impact of one or more implemented COVID-19 policies on direct SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 outcomes. After searching PubMed for peer-reviewed articles published on November 26, 2020 or earlier and screening, all studies were reviewed by three reviewers first independently and then to consensus. The review tool was based on previously developed and released review guidance for COVID-19 policy impact evaluation, assessing what impact evaluation method was used, graphical display of outcomes data, functional form for the outcomes, timing between policy and impact, concurrent changes to the outcomes, and an overall rating.

ResultsAfter 102 articles were identified as potentially meeting inclusion criteria, we identified 36 published articles that evaluated the quantitative impact of COVID-19 policies on direct COVID-19 outcomes. The majority (n=23/36) of studies in our sample examined the impact of stay-at-home requirements. Nine studies were set aside because the study design was considered inappropriate for COVID-19 policy impact evaluation (n=8 pre/post; n=1 cross-section), and 27 articles were given a full consensus assessment. 20/27 met criteria for graphical display of data, 5/27 for functional form, 19/27 for timing between policy implementation and impact, and only 3/27 for concurrent changes to the outcomes. Only 1/27 studies passed all of the above checks, and 4/27 were rated as overall appropriate. Including the 9 studies set aside, reviewers found that only four of the 36 identified published and peer-reviewed health policy impact evaluation studies passed a set of key design checks for identifying the causal impact of policies on COVID-19 outcomes.

DiscussionThe reviewed literature directly evaluating the impact of COVID-19 policies largely failed to meet key design criteria for inference of sufficient rigor to be actionable by policy-makers. This was largely driven by the circumstances under which policies were passed making it difficult to attribute changes in COVID-19 outcomes to particular policies. More reliable evidence review is needed to both identify and produce policy-actionable evidence, alongside the recognition that actionable evidence is often unlikely to be feasible.