Adaptation of HL7 FHIR for the exchange of patients' gene expression profiles High-throughput technologies, especially gene expression analyses can accurately capture the molecular state in patients under different conditions. Thus, their application in clinical routine gains increasing relevance and fosters patient stratification towards individualized treatment decisions. Electronic health records already evolved to capture genomic data within clinical systems and standards like FHIR enable sharing within, and even between institutions. However, FHIR only provides profiles tailored to variations in the molecular sequence, while expression patterns are neglected although being equally important for decision making. Here we provide an exemplary implementation of gene expression profiles of a microarray analysis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia using an adaptation of the FHIR genomics extension. Our results demonstrate how FHIR resources can be facilitated in clinical systems and thereby pave the way for usage for the aggregation and exchange of transcriptomic data in multi-center studies.
Benchmarking saliency methods for chest X-ray interpretation Saliency methods, which "explain" deep neural networks by producing heat maps that highlight the areas of the medical image that influence model prediction, are often presented to clinicians as an aid in diagnostic decision-making. Although many saliency methods have been proposed for medical imaging interpretation, rigorous investigation of the accuracy and reliability of these strategies is necessary before they are integrated into the clinical setting. In this work, we quantitatively evaluate three saliency methods (Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Integrated Gradients) across multiple neural network architectures using two evaluation metrics. We establish the first human benchmark for chest X-ray interpretation in a multilabel classification set up, and examine under what clinical conditions saliency maps might be more prone to failure in localizing important pathologies compared to a human expert benchmark. We find that (i) while Grad-CAM generally localized pathologies better than the two other saliency methods, all three performed significantly worse compared with the human benchmark; (ii) the gap in localization performance between Grad-CAM and the human benchmark was largest for pathologies that had multiple instances, were smaller in size, and had shapes that were more complex; (iii) model confidence was positively correlated with Grad-CAM localization performance. Our work demonstrates that several important limitations of saliency methods must be addressed before we can rely on them for deep learning explainability in medical imaging.
Temporal Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sleep Duration in the United States, 2004-2018 ImportanceMinoritized racial and ethnic groups are generally more likely to experience sleep deficiencies. It is unclear how these sleep duration disparities have changed over recent years.

ObjectiveTo determine 15-year trends in the racial and ethnic differences in self-reported sleep duration among adults in the US.

DesignSerial cross-sectional study of the National Health Interview Survey from years 2004- 2018. Analyses were performed between July 26, 2021 and February 10, 2022.

SettingUS population-based.

Participants429,195 non-institutionalized adults.

ExposuresSelf-reported race, ethnicity, household income, and sex/gender.

Main OutcomesTemporal trends and racial/ethnic differences in short- and long-sleep duration (<7 and >9 hours in a 24-hour period, respectively), and racial/ethnic differences in the relationship between sleep duration and age.

ResultsThe study sample consisted of 429,195 individuals (mean age 46.5 [SE, 0.08] years; 51.7% female) of which 5.1% identified as Asian, 11.8% as Black, 14.7% as Latino/Hispanic, and 68.5% as White. In 2004, the adjusted estimated prevalence of short-sleep duration and long-sleep duration, respectively, were 31.3% and 2.5% among Asian individuals, 35.3% and 6.4% among Black individuals, 27.0% and 4.6% among Latino/Hispanic individuals, and 27.8% and 3.5% among White individuals. Over the study period, there was a significant increase in the short sleep prevalence among Black, Latino/Hispanic, and White individuals (P[&le;]0.001 for each), whereas prevalence of long sleep changed significantly only among Latino/Hispanic individuals (-1.4 points, P=0.01). In 2018, compared with White individuals, short sleep prevalence among Black and Latino/Hispanic individuals was higher by 10.7 points and 2.4 points, respectively

(P[&le;]0.03 each), and long sleep prevalence was higher only among Black people (+1.4 points; P=0.01). The short-sleep disparities were the greatest among women and among those with middle/high household income. In addition, across age groups, Black individuals had a higher short- and long-sleep duration prevalence compared with White individuals of their same age.

ConclusionsIn this serial cross-sectional study from 2004 to 2018, the prevalence of short and long sleep duration was persistently higher among Black individuals. The Black-White disparities in short-sleep were highest among women, individuals who had middle or high income, and among young or middle-aged adults.

KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow have racial and ethnic differences in self-reported sleep duration among US adults changed between 2004 and 2018?

FindingsIn this serial cross-sectional study that included 429,195 adults, the prevalence of both short and long sleep duration were persistently higher among Black individuals over the 15-year study period. The disparities in short sleep duration were highest for Black women, Black individuals with middle or high income, and young and middle-aged Black adults.

MeaningThere were marked racial and ethnic differences in sleep duration that persisted from 2004 to 2018, which may be contributing to health disparities. Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal testing significantly increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical and cost savings benefits of adoption of a carrier screen with reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal test (sgNIPT) in prenatal care.

MethodA decision-analytic model was developed to compare carrier screen with reflex sgNIPT (maternal carrier status and fetal risk reported together) as first-line carrier screening to the traditional carrier screening workflow (positive maternal carrier screen followed by paternal screening to evaluate fetal risk). The model compared the clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness between the two screening methods. These results were used to simulate appropriate pricing for reflex sgNIPT.

ResultsReflex sgNIPT carrier screening detected 108 of 110 affected pregnancies per 100,000 births (98.5% sensitivity), whereas traditional carrier screening detected 46 of 110 affected pregnancies (41.5% sensitivity). The cost to identify one affected pregnancy was reduced by 62% in the reflex sgNIPT scenario compared to the traditional scenario. Adding together the testing cost savings and the savings from earlier clinical intervention made possible by reflex sgNIPT, the total cost savings was $37.6 million per 100,000 pregnancies. Based on these cost savings, we simulated appropriate reflex sgNIPT pricing range: if the cost to identify one affected pregnancy is the unit cost, carrier screening with reflex sgNIPT can be priced up to $1,859 per test (or $7,233 if sgNIPT is billed separately); if the cost per 100,000 pregnancies is the unit cost, carrier screening with sgNIPT can be priced up to $1,070 per test (or $2,336 if sgNIPT is billed separately).

ConclusionUsing the carrier screen with reflex sgNIPT as first-line screening improves the detection of affected fetuses by 2.4-fold and can save costs for the healthcare system. A real-life experience will be needed to assess the clinical utility and exact cost savings of carrier screen with reflex sgNIPT. PBPK-led guidance for cystic fibrosis patients taking elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 BackgroundCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulating therapies including elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI) are primarily eliminated through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated metabolism. This creates a therapeutic challenge to the treatment of COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) due to the potential for significant drug-drug interactions (DDI). However, pwCF are more at risk of serious illness following COVID-19 infection and hence it is important to manage the DDI risk and provide treatment options.

MethodsCYP3A-mediated DDI of ETI was evaluated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. Modeling was performed incorporating physiological information and drug dependent parameters of ETI to predict the effect of ritonavir (the CYP3A4 inhibiting component of the combination) on pharmacokinetics of ETI. The ETI models were verified using independent clinical pharmacokinetic and DDI data of ETI with a range of CYP3A modulators.

ResultsWhen ritonavir was administered on day 1 through 5, the predicted AUC ratio of ivacaftor (the most sensitive CYP3A substrate) on day 6 was 9.31, indicating that its metabolism was strongly inhibited. Based on the predicted DDI, the dose of ETI should be reduced when co-administered with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir to elexacaftor 200mg-tezacaftor 100mg-ivacaftor 150mg on days 1 and 5, with resumption of full dose ETI on day 9, considering the residual inhibitory effect of ritonavir as a mechanism-based inhibitor.

ConclusionsCoadministration of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir requires a significant reduction in the ETI dosing frequency with delayed resumption of full dose due to the mechanism-based inhibition with ritonavir. How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov BackgroundEarly in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, commentators warned that some COVID trials were inadequately conceived, designed and reported. Here, we retrospectively assess the prevalence of informative COVID trials launched in the first 6 months of the pandemic.

MethodsWe created a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention efficacy trials that were initiated from 2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30 using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. We evaluated trials on 3 criteria of informativeness: potential redundancy, design quality and feasibility of patient-participant recruitment. The study protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fp726/).

ResultsWe included 500 trials in our cohort, 58% of which were Phase 2 and 84.8% were directed towards the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Close to one third of trials met all three criteria and were deemed informative (29.0% (95% Confidence Interval 23.7 - 36.9)). The proportion of potentially redundant trials in our cohort was 4.1%. Over half of the trials in our cohort (56.2%) did not meet our criteria for high quality trial design. The proportion of trials with infeasible patient-participant recruitment was 22.6%.

ConclusionsLess than one third of COVID-19 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first six months met all three criteria for informativeness. Shortcomings in trial design, recruitment feasibility and redundancy reflect longstanding weaknesses in the clinical research enterprise that were likely amplified by the exceptional circumstances of a pandemic. Comparison Of respiratory protection during exercising tasks between different wearing methods of replaceable particulate respirators and powered air-purifying respirators BackgroundThis study evaluated the differences in respiratory protection between replaceable particulate respirators (RPRs) and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), with different wearing methods, during exercising tasks.

MethodsTen participants wore either RPR or PAPR according to the recommended method, with a knit cover placed between the facepiece cushion and the face, or with the headband on a helmet. We measured the number of particles inside and outside the respiratory protective equipment (RPE) during exercising tasks for each wearing variation. The exercise state was set to exercise with an ergometer set at 80W load. While exercising tasks, the participants performed five actions adopted from JIS T8150 in 2018 (1. Normal breathing, 2. Deep breathing, 3. Turning head side to side, 4. Moving head up and down, 5. Talking). Each action was performed for 1 min. For measurements of exercise state, after 10 minutes of exercise tasks, we measured while the exercise was continued. The fit factor was calculated by dividing the concentration within the RPE by the concentration outside of it. Data were analyzed after they were log-transformed with a linear mixed model, with fit factor as the dependent variable.

ResultsWe compared the results with experimental data of resting state reported in our previous studies. Fit factor of RPRs in the exercise state was significantly lower (p<0.001) than that in the resting state, indicating inadequate respiratory protection. In contrast, the fit factor of PAPRs during exercising tasks was significantly lower (p<0.001) than that at rest; however, respiratory protection was maintained. PAPR did not show a significant decrease (p=1.000) in fit factor owing to the wearing variations during exercising tasks.

ConclusionsPAPRs were found to be superior to RPRs in terms of respiratory protection. PAPRs are better than RPRs for workers who have to wear RPE inappropriately due to health problems. Serum Vitamin D levels are associated with increased COVID-19 severity and mortality independent of whole-body and visceral adiposity INTRODUCTIONCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with susceptibility to infectious disease. In this study, the association between COVID-19 outcomes and vitamin D levels in patients attending a COVID-19 reference center in Mexico City are examined.

METHODSConsecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 were evaluated. All patients underwent clinical evaluation and follow-up, laboratory measurements and a thoracic computerized tomography, including the measurement of epicardial fat thickness. Low vitamin D was defined as levels <20ng/mL (<50nmol/L) and deficient Vitamin D as a level [&le;]12ng/mL (<30nmol/L)

RESULTSOf the 551 patients included, low vitamin D levels were present in 45.6% and deficient levels in 10.9%. Deficient Vitamin D levels were associated with mortality (HR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.58, p=0.006) but not with critical COVID-19, adjusted for age, sex, body-mass index and epicardial fat. Using model-based causal mediation analyses the increased risk of COVID-19 mortality conferred by low vitamin D levels was partly mediated by its effect on D-dimer and cardiac ultrasensitive troponins. Notably, increased risk of COVID-19 mortality conferred by low vitamin D levels was independent of BMI and epicardial fat.

CONCLUSIONVitamin D deficiency ([&le;]12ng/mL or <30nmol/L), is independently associated with COVID-19 mortality after adjustment for visceral fat (epicardial fat thickness). Low vitamin D may contribute to a pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic state, increasing the risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The effect of stimulus duration on preferences for gain adjustments when listening to speech ObjectivesIn the personalisation of hearing aid fittings, gain is often adjusted to suit patient preferences using live speech. When using brief sentences as stimuli, the minimum gain adjustments necessary to elicit consistent preferences ( preference thresholds) were previously found to be much greater than typical adjustments in current practice. The current study examined the role of duration on preference thresholds.

DesignParticipants heard 2, 4 and 6-s segments of a continuous monologue presented successively in pairs. The first segment of each pair was presented at each individuals real-ear or prescribed gain. The second segment was presented with a {+/-}0-12 dB gain adjustment in one of three frequency bands. Participants judged whether the second was "better", "worse" or "no different" from the first.

Study SampleTwenty-nine adults, all with hearing-aid experience.

ResultsThe minimum gain adjustments needed to elicit "better" or "worse" judgments decreased with increasing duration for most adjustments. Inter-participant agreement and intra-participant reliability increased with increasing duration up to 4 s, then remained stable.

ConclusionsProviding longer stimuli improves the likelihood of patients providing reliable judgments of hearing-aid gain adjustments, but the effect is limited, and alternative fitting methods may be more viable for effective hearing-aid personalisation. The Preventive Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose naltrexone and acetaminophen Combination: Findings of a Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with an Open-Label Extension for None-Responders We tested a low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination for episodic migraine prevention. We randomly assigned patients to naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=6) or placebo (n=6) for a 12-week double-blind treatment. Non-responders continued into open-label treatment with naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) for additional 12 weeks. Patients were adults who experienced 5 to 17 (average 9.7) migraine days at baseline. The primary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was the mean change in the monthly migraine days from the 4-week double-blind follow-up (2nd baseline) to the last 4 weeks of the open-label treatment period.

The magnitude of the treatment effect for the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination observed in the double-blind period was 2.2 fewer monthly migraine days than placebo (p=0.43). Four out of 6 (66.7%) naltrexone and acetaminophen-treated patients experienced 75% reduction in migraine days compared to 1 out of 6 (16.7%) placebo-treated patients (p=0.09).

In the open-label phase, treatment with the naltrexone and acetaminophen combination (n=5) led to 8.2 fewer mean monthly migraine days (from 11.8 to 3.6), representing 69.5% improvement (p=0.03), and 100% of the patients experienced a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient, included dry mouth, fatigue, sedation, nausea, and feeling jittery.

We postulate that naltrexones toll-like receptor (TLR4) antagonism properties prevent pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the trigeminal ganglion averting "overactive nerves" (laymans term) and migraine. Although this trial used low-dose naltrexone (defined as 1 - 5 mg/day), in future phase 3 studies we will test a range of naltrexone and acetaminophen combination doses. Impact of a Multidisciplinary Nutritional Support Team on Quality Improvement in Home Parenteral Nutrition IntroductionHPN is essential for patients requiring long term nutritional support. This Quality Improvement Project for HPN Patients (QIP-PN) studied the effect of a Physician Nutrition Expert (PNE)- led multidisciplinary nutritional support team (MNST) on HPN care.

ObjectiveTo test the effect of an MNST on adherence to protocols, outcomes and QOL in HPN.

MethodsData review was conducted in phases 1a and 1b, observation in phase 2 and intervention in phase 3. In Phase 3 the MNST made recommendations to treating physicians. All long-term HPN patients were offered study participation. 75 signed consent forms. Treating physician study participation agreements were signed for 42 patients (the study group). A random sample of 30 long-term HPN patients comprised the case-matched control group (control). Data were collected on demographics, treating physicians PNE status, HPN care variables, recommended interventions, quality-of-life assessment, adverse outcomes and hospitalizations. Independent samples t-test was used for continuous data between study group and control group. Paired t-test was used for phase 2 and phase 3 patient data. Comparison between the study and control group utilized a negative binomial regression model. Statistical analysis utilized R (https://www.r-project.org/).

Results34 patients were reviewed retrospectively in phase 1a and 197 prospectively in phase 1b. 40 study patients completed phase 2 and progressed into phase 3, of whom 30 completed [&ge;]60 therapy days. Improvements in weight, BMI and QOL were seen in the study patients during intervention. Recommendations made and accepted by treating physicians differed based on PNE status. Study patients had fewer adverse outcomes and related hospitalizations than case matched controls.

ConclusionMNST recommendations improved clinical, biochemical parameters and patients self-reported overall health. It reduced adverse outcomes, hospitalization and hospital length of stay. MNST input could have a significant impact on the quality and cost of HPN care. Factors affecting first return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective observational study in an occupational medicine clinic and single-surgeon practice BackgroundReturn to work (RTW) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) within New South Wales (NSW), Australia, under compensable schemes has not been reported.

AimsDetermine factors affecting RTW status and time in patients treated with aRCR under state-based compensation schemes, compared to those outside such schemes.

MethodsPatients undergoing aRCR by one surgeon with minimum 1-year follow-up were grouped into those under (CP) or outside (non-CP) workers or vehicle accident compensation schemes, matched by age and gender. RTW status and time were assessed using chi-square analysis and multivariable linear regression.

ResultsOf 1054 available patients, 90 CP patients were identified with 29 consented and matched to non-CP (N=29). A higher proportion of CP patients (17.2 vs 0%, P<0.001) never returned to work and a lower proportion resumed pre-injury duties at first RTW (3 vs 52%, P<0.01). Median time to first RTW did not differ between CP and non-CP groups (5.1 vs 4.4, P=0.86). Smoking (P=0.007) and post-injury activity level (P=0.004) were significantly associated with longer time to first RTW, whereas compensation status was not.

ConclusionsCP patients undergoing aRCR in NSW are at risk of not returning to work. For those that return, there is no significant difference compared to non-CP in time to first RTW. Particularly, patient and management factors associated with extended time to first RTW have been identified. Interventions aimed at modifiable factors such as smoking cessation and increasing preoperative activity may improve future outcomes.

What is already known about this subjectO_LIWork-related injury and disease present a significant financial burden to the Australian economy ($AUD61.8billion per annum), with shoulder conditions due to body stressing accounting for 7% of this total cost (>$AUD4.2billion)
C_LIO_LIPatients receiving compensation appear to have poorer outcomes and take longer to return to work than their non-compensated counterparts, but the degree to which this occurs is variably reported in the literature
C_LIO_LIThe effect of modifiable factors on return to work status and time remain unclear, and have not previously been reported for the Australian population under the New South Wales workers compensation scheme
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIPatients receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a compensable scheme in New South Wales are at increased risk of not returning to work compared to patients presenting outside of a compensable scheme and patients in equivalent schemes internationally
C_LIO_LIPatients reporting a longer duration of symptoms and smokers are at increased risk of extended time to first return to work
C_LI

What impact this may have on practice or policyO_LIThe study has identified smoking and pre-surgery activity levels as key targets for intervention in patients receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a workers compensation scheme in New South Wales
C_LIO_LIBy further investigating whether interventions designed to modify these factors are able to favourably affect patient outcomes, there is potential to return patients to their preoperative level of work sooner
C_LI Deep learning for caries detection using optical coherence tomography Early detection of dental caries has been one of the most predominant topics studied over the last few decades. Conventional examination through visual-tactile inspection and radiography can be inaccurate and destructive to the tooth structure. The development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has given dentistry an alternative diagnostic technique, which has been proven by numerous studies, that it has better sensitivity, specificity, and non-invasive characteristics. The growing popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) also contributes to a more efficient and effective way of image-based detection and decision-making. However, previous studies, which have attempted to employ AI for caries assessment, did not incorporate high-quality ground truth data. Therefore, this study aims to bypass this issue and highlights the importance of high-quality data. A two-phase study was carried out to explore different methods for caries detection. Initially, the comparison of caries detection based on OCT and apical radiography by 5 experienced clinicians was conducted. Then, five convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet-152, Xception, and ResNext-101, in the scope of AI were employed to detect caries and compared with the findings of the 5 clinicians. The data was preprocessed and labeled with the ground truth corresponding to microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) with rigorous definition. The weighted Kappa statistics suggested that OCT ({varkappa}= .699, SD = .090) showed a higher accuracy rate than radiography ({varkappa}= .407, SD = .049), and CNNs ({varkappa}= .860, SD = .049) were rated higher than clinicians ({varkappa}= .679, SD = .113), both at a .05 significance level. The best result was carried out by ResNet-152, which demonstrated a high accuracy rate of 95.21% and a sensitivity of 98.85%. These findings illustrate the importance of ground truth data for AI training and the potential of deep CNN algorithms combined with OCT for diagnosing dental caries. The effect of hypersensitivity pneumonitis guideline on pathologic diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and interstitial pneumonia (IP) have several overlapping characteristics, and a high diagnostic concordance rate of HP is rarely obtained. New guideline, highly influenced by pathology, were devised for its diagnosis. We recently reported that the 2020 HP guideline may result in a possible overdiagnosis of fibrotic HP (fHP) through multidisciplinary discussion. Here, we attempted to investigate the impact of the 2020 HP guideline on the pathological diagnosis of cases previously diagnosed as IP. We classified 247 cases with fibrotic IP diagnoses sourced from 2014-2019 into three categories according to the 2020 HP guideline: typical, probable, and indeterminate HP. The original pathological diagnosis and categorization based on the 2020 HP guideline were compared. The clinical data including serum data and pulmonary function tests were compared among groups. The number of cases that changed to HP from an original diagnosis other than HP based on the guideline was 56 (23%). The clinical data of these cases bore a greater resemblance to cases diagnosed as indeterminate for HP than those diagnosed as typical or probable. The ratio of typical and probable HP to the total cases was significantly lower when using a transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Based on the new guideline, the pathological diagnosis of HP efficiently excluded HP cases but increased the rate of HP diagnosis for cases with fibrotic IP that may not suit an HP diagnosis. Thus, a TBLC may not be useful when imparting findings for fibrotic HP diagnosis using the new criteria.

Key messagesO_LIWhat is the key question? >
Does the 2020 HP Guideline improve pathological diagnosis?
C_LIO_LIWhat is the bottom line? >
By applying the new guideline, about 1/4 of the pathological diagnoses were changed from not chronic HP to probable or typical fHP, but most of the changed cases showed a clinical picture closer to not chronic HP.
C_LIO_LIWhy read on? >
To understand that simple application of the pathological criteria of the HP guideline may cause a misleading diagnosis.
C_LI HAT-field: a cheap, robust and quantitative point-of-care serological test for Covid-19. We have recently described a very simple and cheap serological test called HAT to detect antibodies directed against the RBD of the SARS-Cov-2 virus. HAT is based on hemagglutination, triggered by a single reagent (IH4-RBD) comprised of the viral RBD domain fused to a nanobody specific for glycophorin, which is expressed at very high levels at the surface of human red blood cells (RBCs).

One of the main initial goals of this study was to devise a test protocol that would be sensitive and reliable, yet require no specialized laboratory equipment such as adjustable pipets, so that it could be performed in the most remote corners of the world by people with minimal levels of training. Because antibody levels against the viral RBD have been found to correlate closely with sero-neutralisation titers, and thus with protection against reinfection, it has become obvious during the course of this study that making this test reliably quantitative would be a further significant advantage.

Using IH4-RBD based on the original Wuhan sequence, we have found that, in PBN, a buffer which contains BSA and sodium azide, the reagent is stable for over 6 months at room temperature, and that PBN also improves HAT performance compared to using straight PBS. We also show that performing HAT at either 4{degrees}C, room temperature or 37{degrees}C has minimal influence on the results, and that quantitative evaluation of the levels of antibodies directed against the SARS-CoV-2 RBD can be achieved in a single step using titration of the IH4-RBD reagent.

The HAT-field protocol described here requires only very simple disposable equipment and a few microliters of whole blood, such as can be obtained by finger prick. Because it is based on a single soluble reagent, the test can be adapted very simply and rapidly to detect antibodies against variants of the SARS-CoV-2, or conceivably against different pathogens. HAT-field appears well suited to provide quantitative assessments of the serological protection of populations as well as individuals, and given its very low cost, the stability of the IH4-RBD reagent in the adapted buffer, and the simplicity of the procedure, could be deployed pretty much anywhere, including in the poorest countries and the most remote corners of the globe.

Note: This manuscript has been refereed by Review Commons, and modified thanks to the comments and suggestions from three referees. Those comments, and our replies, are provided at the end of the manuscripts pdf, and can also be accessed by clicking on the blue tab found to the right of the MedRXiv window. Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systematic review BackgroundA rapid influx of patients to intensive care and infection control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic required the rapid development of innovative redeployment and training strategies.

MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of 9 databases including key terms related to intensive care AND training AND redeployment AND healthcare workers. Analysis consisted of a narrative synthesis of quantitative study outputs, and a framework-based thematic analysis of qualitative study outputs and grey literature. These results were then combined applying an interpretative synthesis.

ResultsTwenty papers were analysed. These took place primarily in the UK (N=8, 40%) and USA (N=5, 25%). Themes included in the results are Redeployment: Implementation strategies and learnings; Redeployed staff experience and strategies to address their needs; Redeployed staff learning needs; Training formats offered and training evaluations; and Future redeployment and training concerns. Some of the redeployment implementation and training strategies documented in this review are: Skills-based redeployment, buddy support systems, and agreeing on locally-specific principles, rather than strict procedures.

ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges to deliver training promptly while following infection control recommendations and develop flexible redeployment strategies. This study synthesises original approaches to tackle these challenges which are relevant to inform the development of targeted and adaptative training and redeployment plans. Validation of a remote and fully automated story recall task to assess for early cognitive impairment in older adults: a longitudinal case-control observational study BACKGROUNDStory recall is a simple and sensitive cognitive test commonly used to measure changes in episodic memory function in early Alzheimers disease (AD). Recent advances in digital technology and natural language processing methods make this test a candidate for automated administration and scoring. Convenient and low-burden daily assessments may provide more reliable data than one-off lengthy assessments and be suitable for longer-term disease monitoring.

OBJECTIVESDevelop and validate a remote and fully automated story recall task, suitable for longitudinal assessment, in a population of older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild AD.

METHODSParticipants from AMYPRED-UK (NCT04828122) and AMYPRED-US (NCT04928976) studies were asked to complete optional daily self-administered assessments remotely on their smart devices over 7-8 days. Assessments included immediate and delayed recall of three stories from the Automatic Story Recall Task (ASRT), a test with multiple parallel stimuli (18 short stories, and 18 long stories) balanced for key linguistic and discourse metrics. Verbal responses were recorded and securely transferred from participants personal devices, and automatically transcribed and scored using text similarity metrics between the source text and retelling to derive a generalised matching score (G-match). Adherence and task performance differences were examined with logistic mixed models and linear mixed models, respectively. Correlational analysis examined parallel forms reliability of ASRTs, and convergent validity with established cognitive tests (Logical Memory Test, and Preclinical Alzheimers Cognitive Composite with semantic processing (PACC5)). Acceptability and usability data were obtained via remotely administered questionnaire.

RESULTSOut of 200 participants recruited into the AMYPRED studies, a total of 151 participants (75.5%, 78 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 73 MCI/mild AD) engaged in optional remote assessments. In these participants, adherence to daily assessment was moderate, did not decline over time, but was higher in cognitively unimpaired participants (66% MCI/mild AD and 78% CU participants completed at least one ASRT story per day). Participants reported favourable task usability: few technical problems, that the application was easy to use, and the tasks were broadly interesting. Task performance improved modestly across the week and was better for immediate recall. G-match scores were lower in participants with MCI/mild AD. Parallel forms reliability of ASRTs were moderate to strong for immediate recall (mean rho=0.73), and delayed recall (mean rho=0.73). ASRTs showed moderate convergent validity with established cognitive tests.

CONCLUSIONSThe unsupervised, self-administered ASRT task is sensitive to cognitive impairments in MCI/mild AD. The task shows good usability, high parallel forms reliability and convergent validity with established cognitive tests. Remote, low cost, low burden and automatically scored speech assessments could be used to support diagnostic screening, healthcare and treatment monitoring. Substance Use Onset in High-Risk 9-13 Year-Olds in the ABCD Study AimA key aim of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study is to document substance use onset, patterns, and sequelae across adolescent development. However, substance use misreporting obscures accurate drug use characterization. Hair toxicology tests provide objective historical substance use data, but are rarely investigated in youth. Here, we compare objective hair toxicology results with self-reported substance use in youth.

MethodsA literature-based substance use risk algorithm identified 696 ABCD Study(R) participants for hair sample collections between baseline and 2-year follow-up (spanning ages 9-13) for laboratory analysis. Chi-square and t-tests assessed differences between participants demographics, positive and negative hair tests, risk algorithm scores, and self-reported substance use.

ResultsHair testing confirmed that 17% of at-risk 9-13 year-olds had evidence of past 3-month use of one (n=99), two (n=17), three (n=3), or four (n=2) drug classes. After considering prescribed medication use, 11% had a positive test incongruent with self- or parent-report. No participant with a positive result self-reported substance use consistent with their toxicology results. Participants with positive tests under-reported use (p<.001), reported less sipping of alcohol (p<.001), and scored higher on the risk algorithm (p<.001) than those with negative hair toxicology.

ConclusionsAn alarming 11% of tested samples in at-risk 9-13 year-olds were positive for at least one unreported substance, suggesting underreporting in this population when participating in a national healthy development study. The degree of underreporting cannot yet be calculated, as at-risk samples were prioritized for assays. Expanded toxicology testing is key to characterize substance use in youth. A collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a range of unprecedented disruptions to the delivery of maternity care globally and has been associated with regional changes in perinatal outcomes such as stillbirth and preterm birth. Metropolitan Melbourne endured one of the longest and most stringent lockdowns in 2020. This paper presents the protocol for a collaborative maternity dashboard project to monitor perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MethodsDe-identified maternal and newborn outcomes will be collected monthly from all public maternity services in Melbourne, allowing rapid analysis of a multitude of perinatal indicators. Weekly outcomes will be displayed as run charts according to established methods for detecting non-random  signals in health care. A pre-pandemic median for all indicators will be calculated for the period of January 2018 to March 2020. A significant shift is defined as [&le;] six consecutive weeks, all above or below the pre-pandemic median. Additional statistical analyses such as regression, time-series, and survival analyses will be performed for an in-depth examination of maternal and perinatal outcomes of interests.

Ethics and DisseminationThis study has been registered as an observational study with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000878976).

Strengths and weaknesses of this study This project is the first clinician-led, multi-centre perinatal data collection system for metropolitan Melbourne.
 It complements the state government data collection, with the significant benefits of more timely and flexible reporting of outcomes, and granular detail on emerging areas of concern.
 The study relies on primary source coding of exposure and outcomes from each hospital that have not been internally validated during the study period.
 Data from private maternity hospitals, containing 25% of Melbourne births, are not available.
 This resource will support data-informed hospital pandemic responses through to the end of 2022. Intrahost evolution of the HIV-2 capsid correlates with progression to AIDS BackgroundHIV-2 infection will progress to AIDS in most patients without treatment, albeit at approximately half the rate of HIV-1 infection. HIV-2 p26 amino acid variations are associated with lower viral loads and enhanced processing of T cell epitopes, which may lead to protective Gag-specific CTL responses common in slower disease progressors. Lower virus evolutionary rates, and positive selection on conserved residues in HIV-2 env have been associated with slower progression to AIDS. We therefore aimed to determine if intrahost evolution of HIV-2 p26 is associated with disease progression.

MethodsTwelve treatment-naive, HIV-2 mono-infected participants from the Guinea-Bissau Police cohort with longitudinal CD4+ T cell data and clinical follow-up were included in the analysis. CD4% change over time was analysed via linear regression models to stratify participants into relative faster and slower disease progressor groups. Gag amplicons of 735 nucleotides which spanned the p26 region were amplified by PCR and sequenced. We analysed p26 sequence diversity evolution, measured site-specific selection pressures and evolutionary rates, and determined if these evolutionary parameters were associated with progression status. Amino acid polymorphisms were mapped to existing p26 protein structures.

ResultsIn total, 369 heterochronous HIV-2 p26 sequences from 12 male patients with a median age of 30 (IQR: 28-37) years at enrolment were analysed. Faster progressors had lower CD4% and faster CD4% decline rates. Median pairwise sequence diversity was higher in faster progressors (5.7x10-3 versus 1.4x10-3 base substitutions per site, P<0.001). p26 evolved under negative selection in both groups (dN/dS=0.12). Virus evolutionary rates were higher in faster than slower progressors - synonymous rates: 4.6x10-3 vs. 2.3x10-3; and nonsynonymous rates: 6.9x10-4 vs. 2.7x10-4 substitutions/site/year, respectively. Virus evolutionary rates correlated negatively with CD4% change rates ({rho} = -0.8, P=0.02), but not CD4% level. However, Bayes factor (BF) testing indicated that the association between evolutionary rates and CD4% kinetics was supported by weak evidence (BF=0.5). The signature amino acid at p26 positions 6, 12 and 119 differed between faster (6A, 12I, 119A) and slower (6G, 12V, 119P) progressors. These amino acid positions clustered near to the TRIM5/p26 hexamer interface surface.

ConclusionsFaster p26 evolutionary rates were associated with faster progression to AIDS and were mostly driven by synonymous substitutions. Nonsynonymous evolutionary rates were an order of magnitude lower than synonymous rates, with limited amino acid sequence evolution over time within hosts. These results indicate the HIV-2 p26 may be an attractive vaccine or therapeutic target. Croup during the COVID-19 Omicron Variant Surge Croup is a common upper respiratory disease usually associated with parainfluenza virus, resulting in stridor, hoarse voice, barky cough, and variable respiratory distress. Here we examine the data at our center confirming a sharp increase in cases of croup associated with the Omicron variant. Data was retrospectively extracted from patient charts among those seen in the Emergency Department at Seattle Childrens Hospital. Inclusion criteria were patients who were assigned a diagnosis containing "croup" during either 5/30/2021-11/30/2021, a time period correlating with predominance of the COVID-19 Delta variant (B.1.617.2), or the initial phase of the Omicron variant surge (12/1/2021-1/15/2022). Contemporaneous publicly available local data on the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 samples in surrounding King County, Washington, with spike gene target failure on TaqPath PCR assays was used as a proxy for the proportion of infections caused by the Omicron variant. A total of 401 patients were diagnosed with croup during the Delta surge and 107 patients were diagnosed with croup during the Omicron surge. Patients who presented during the Omicron surge were more likely to test positive for COVID-19 (48.2% vs 2.8%, p < 0.0001). Children with a clinical diagnosis of croup during the Omicron surge were more likely to be prescribed racemic epinephrine as part of their care (21.5% vs 13.0%, p = 0.032). There were no differences in presenting age, rate of admission, rate of return to the ED within 72 hours, or admission among those who returned within 72 hours. During the Omicron surge, the incidence of croup nearly doubled compared to the rate in prior months, while at the same time the number of cases of parainfluenza virus identified decreased. Consistent with prior case reports, we have identified a sharp rise in cases of croup seen in our pediatric ED in parallel with the replacement of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by Omicron as the dominant variant in our community. I wanna live and not think about the future; What place for advance care planning for people living with severe multiple sclerosis and their families? A qualitative study BackgroundLittle is known about how people with multiple sclerosis and their families comprehend advance care planning (ACP) and its relevance in their lives.

AimTo explore under what situations, with whom, how, and why do people with MS and their families engage in ACP

MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study comprising interviews with people living with MS and their families followed by an ethical discussion group with five health professionals representing specialties working with people affected by MS and their families. Twenty-seven people with MS and 17 family members were interviewed between June 2019 and March 2020. Interviews and the ethical discussion group were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

ResultsParticipants narratives focused on three major themes :(i) planning for an uncertain future; (ii) perceived obstacles to engaging in ACP that included uncertainty concerning MS disease progression, negative previous experiences of ACP discussions and prioritising symptom management over future planning; (iii) Preferences for engagement in ACP included a trusting relationship with a health professional and that information then be shared across services. Health professionals accounts from the ethical discussion group departed from viewing ACP as a formal document to that of an ongoing process of seeking preferences and values. They voiced similar concerns to people with MS about uncertainty and when to initiate discussions. Some shared concerns of a lack of confidence when having ACP discussions.

ConclusionThese findings support the need for a whole systems strategic approach where information about the potential benefits of ACP in all its forms can be shared with people with MS. Moreover, they highlight the need for health professionals to be skilled and trained in engaging in ACP discussions and where information is contemporaneously and seamlessly shared across services.