Factors influencing self-harm thoughts and self-harm behaviours over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a longitudinal analysis of 49,324 adults BackgroundThere is concern that the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath will result in excess suicides by increasing known risk factors such as self-harm, but evidence on how pandemic-related risk factors contribute to changes in these outcomes is lacking.

AimsTo examine how different COVID-19-related adverse experiences and adversity worries contribute to changes in self-harm thoughts and behaviours.

MethodData from 49,324 UK adults in the UCL COVID-19 Social Study were analysed (1 April 2020 to 17 May 2021). Fixed effects regressions explored associations between weekly within-person variation in five categories of adversity experiences and adversity worries with changes in self-harm thoughts and behaviours across age groups (18-29, 30-44, 45-59, and 60+ years).

Results26.1% and 7.9% respondents reported self-harm thoughts and behaviours, respectively, at least once over the study period. More adverse experiences were more strongly related to outcomes than worries. The largest specific adversity contributing to increases in both outcomes was having experienced physical or psychological abuse. Financial worries increased the likelihood of both outcomes in most age groups, whilst having had COVID-19 increased the likelihood of both outcomes in young (18-29 years) and middle-aged (45-59 years) adults.

ConclusionsFindings suggest that a significant portion of UK adults may be at increased risk for self-harm thoughts and behaviours during the pandemic. Given the likelihood that the economic and social consequences of the pandemic will accumulate, policy makers can begin adapting evidence-based suicide prevention strategies and other social policies to help mitigate its consequences.
Uncovering Survivorship Bias in Longitudinal Mental Health Surveys During the COVID-19 Pandemic AimsMarkedly elevated adverse mental health symptoms were widely observed early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Unlike the U.S., where cross-sectional data indicate anxiety and depression symptoms have remained elevated, such symptoms reportedly declined in the U.K., according to analysis of repeated measures from a largescale longitudinal study. However, nearly 40% of U.K. respondents (those who did not complete multiple follow-up surveys) were excluded from analysis, suggesting that survivorship bias might partially explain this discrepancy. We therefore sought to assess survivorship bias among participants in our longitudinal survey study as part of The COVID-19 Outbreak Public Evaluation (COPE) Initiative.

MethodsSurvivorship bias was assessed 4,039 U.S. respondents who completed surveys including the assessment of mental health as part of The COPE Initiative in April 2020 and were invited to complete follow-up surveys. Participants completed validated screening instruments for symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Survivorship bias was assessed for (1) demographic differences in follow-up survey participation, (2) differences in initial adverse mental health symptom prevalences adjusted for demographic factors, and (3) differences in follow-up survey participation based on mental health experiences adjusted for demographic factors.

ResultsAdjusting for demographics, individuals who completed only one or two out of four surveys had higher prevalences of anxiety and depression symptoms in April 2020 (e.g., one-survey versus four-survey, anxiety symptoms, adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.55, P=0.0045; depression symptoms, aPR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17-1.75, P=0.00052). Moreover, individuals who experienced incident anxiety or depression symptoms had higher odds of not completing follow-up surveys (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.22-2.31, P=0.0015, aOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-2.12, P=0.0046, respectively).

ConclusionsOur findings revealed significant survivorship bias among longitudinal survey respondents, indicating that restricting analytic samples to only respondents who provide repeated assessments in longitudinal survey studies could lead to overly optimistic interpretations of mental health trends over time. Cross-sectional or planned missing data designs may provide more accurate estimates of population-level adverse mental health symptom prevalences than longitudinal surveys.
Using explainable machine learning to identifypatients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments Short-term reattendances to emergency departments are a key quality of care indicator. Identifying patients at increased risk of early reattendance could help reduce the number of missed critical illnesses and could reduce avoidable utilization of emergency departments by enabling targeted post-discharge intervention. In this manuscript we present a retrospective, single-centre study where we created and evaluated an extreme gradient boosted decision tree model trained to identify patients at risk of reattendance within 72 hours of discharge from an emergency department (University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, UK). Our model was trained using 35,447 attendances by 28,945 patients and evaluated on a hold-out test set featuring 8,847 attendances by 7,237 patients. The set of attendances from a given patient appeared exclusively in either the training or the test set. Our model was trained using both visit level variables (e.g., vital signs, arrival mode, and chief complaint) and a set of variables available in a patients electronic patient record, such as age and any recorded medical conditions. On the hold-out test set, our highest performing model obtained an AUROC of 0.747 (95% CI : 0.722-0.773) and an average precision of 0.233 (95% CI : 0.194-0.277). These results demonstrate that machine-learning models can be used to classify patients, with moderate performance, into low and high-risk groups for reattendance. We explained our models predictions using SHAP values, a concept developed from coalitional game theory, capable of explaining predictions at an attendance level. We demonstrated how clustering techniques can be used to investigate the different sub-groups of explanations present in our patient cohort. Significant Sparse Polygenic Risk Scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank We present a systematic assessment of polygenic risk score (PRS) prediction across more than 1,500 traits using genetic and phenotype data in the UK Biobank. We report 813 sparse PRS models with significant (p < 2.5 x 10-5) incremental predictive performance when compared against the covariate-only model that considers age, sex, types of genotyping arrays, and the principal component loadings of genotypes. We report a significant correlation between the number of genetic variants selected in the sparse PRS model and the incremental predictive performance (Spearmans {rho} = 0.61, p = 2.2 x 10-59 for quantitative traits, {rho} = 0.21, p = 9.6 x 10-4 for binary traits). The sparse PRS model trained on European individuals showed limited transferability when evaluated on non-European individuals in the UK Biobank. We provide the PRS model weights on the Global Biobank Engine (https://biobankengine.stanford.edu/prs).

Author summaryPolygenic risk scores (PRSs), an approach to estimate genetic predisposition on disease liability by aggregating the effects across multiple genetic variants, has attracted increasing research interest. While there have been improvements in the predictive performance of PRS for some traits, the applicability of PRS models across a wide range of human traits has not been clear. Here, applying penalized regression using Batch Screening Iterative Lasso (BASIL) algorithm to more than 269,000 individuals of white British ancestry in UK Biobank, we systematically characterize PRS models across more than 1,500 traits. We report 813 traits with PRS models of statistically significant predictive performance. While the statistical significance does not necessarily directly translate into clinical relevance, we investigate the properties of the 813 significant PRS models and report a significant correlation between predictive performance and estimated SNP-based heritability. We find that the number of genetic variants selected in our sparse PRS model is significantly correlated with the incremental predictive performance in both quantitative and binary traits. Our transferability assessment of PRS models in UK Biobank revealed that the sparse PRS models trained on individuals of European ancestry had a lower predictive performance for individuals of African and Asian ancestry groups. Macular vascular complexity analysis of diabetes mellitus by swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography PurposeTo evaluate the associations of retinal vascular complexity features, including fractal dimension (FD) and blood vessel tortuosity (BVT), with the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) by using noninvasive optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA).

MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study recruited ocular-treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) registered in the community of Guangzhou, China. OCTA was used to obtain the measurements of FD and BVT in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Univariate and multivariate linear regression was used to analyse the correlation of FD and BVT in different layers with DR severity.

ResultsA total of 1282 patients with DM (1282 eyes), with a mean age of 64.2{+/-}7.8 years, were included. FD in the DCP decreased and BVT in the DCP increased in DR patients compared to non-DR patients, even after adjusting for confounding factors (P< 0.05). Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in the FD values as the DR progressed, while the BVT progressively increased with worsening DR severity (P< 0.01). The FD in DCP had a statistically significant positive correlation with FD in SCP and a negative correlation with BVT in SCP and BVT in DCP in all of the participants, including the non-DR group, moderate DR group and severe DR group (P< 0.01).

ConclusionFD and BVT determined using OCTA might be useful parameters for objectively distinguishing DR from non-DR and indicating DR progression. Decision curve analysis to identify optimal candidates of liver resection for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B cirrhosis：A cohort study BackgroundThe selection criterion for liver resection (LR) in intermediate-stage (IM) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial. This study aims to compare LR and transarterial chemoembolization in the range of predicted death risk

MethodsThe multivariable Cox regression model (MVR) was estimated to predict mortality at 5yr. The cut-off values were determined by a two-piece-wise linear regression model, decision curve analysis with MVR model, and hazard ratio curve for treatment plotted against the predicted mortality.

Results825 IM-HCC with hepatitis B cirrhosis were included for analysis (TACE, n=622; LR, n=203). The 5-yr overall survival rate of LR patients was higher than the TACE group (52.8% vs. 20.8%; P<0.0001). The line of LR and TACE were crossing with predicted death risk at 100% (P for interaction =0.008). The benefit of LR versus TACE decreased progressively as predicted death risk>0.55 (95%CI: 0.45,0.62). When predicted death risk over 0.7, decision curve analysis suggested that LR and TACE did not increase net benefit. Patients were then divided into four subgroups by the cut-off values (<0.45, 0.45[&ge;] /<0.62, 0.62[&ge;] /<0.7, [&ge;] 0.7). The stratified analysis of treatment in different subgroups, hazard ratios were 0.39 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.56), 0.36 (95%CI: 0.23, 0.56), 0.51 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.98), and 0.46 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.80), respectively.

ConclusionsLR reached the maximal relative utility in the interval of 0.45 to 0.62, and both LR and TACE did not increase net benefit at the 5-yr death risk over 0.7. A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Enhancing the Prediction Power in Large Scale Population Studies: The ATHLOS Project The ATHLOS cohort is composed of several harmonized datasets of international cohorts related to health and aging. The healthy aging scale has been constructed based on a selection of particular variables from 16 individual studies. In this paper, we consider a selection of additional variables found in ATHLOS and investigate their utilization for predicting the healthy aging. For this purpose motivated by the datasets volume and diversity we focus our attention upon the clustering for prediction scheme, where unsupervised learning is utilized to enhance prediction power, showing the predictive utility of exploiting structure in the data by clustering. We show that imposed computation bottlenecks can be surpassed when using appropriate hierarchical clustering within a clustering for ensemble classification scheme while retaining prediction benefits. We propose a complete methodology which is evaluated against baseline methods and the original concept. The results are very encouraging suggesting further developments in this direction along with applications in tasks with similar characteristics. A strait-forward open source implementation is provided for the R project. Problems with Evidence Assessment in COVID-19 Health Policy Impact Evaluation (PEACHPIE): A systematic review of study design and evidence strength IntroductionAssessing the impact of COVID-19 policy is critical for informing future policies. However, there are concerns about the overall strength of COVID-19 impact evaluation studies given the circumstances for evaluation and concerns about the publication environment. This study systematically reviewed the strength of evidence in the published COVID-19 policy impact evaluation literature.

MethodsWe included studies that were primarily designed to estimate the quantitative impact of one or more implemented COVID-19 policies on direct SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 outcomes. After searching PubMed for peer-reviewed articles published on November 26, 2020 or earlier and screening, all studies were reviewed by three reviewers first independently and then to consensus. The review tool was based on previously developed and released review guidance for COVID-19 policy impact evaluation, assessing what impact evaluation method was used, graphical display of outcomes data, functional form for the outcomes, timing between policy and impact, concurrent changes to the outcomes, and an overall rating.

ResultsAfter 102 articles were identified as potentially meeting inclusion criteria, we identified 36 published articles that evaluated the quantitative impact of COVID-19 policies on direct COVID-19 outcomes. The majority (n=23/36) of studies in our sample examined the impact of stay-at-home requirements. Nine studies were set aside because the study design was considered inappropriate for COVID-19 policy impact evaluation (n=8 pre/post; n=1 cross-section), and 27 articles were given a full consensus assessment. 20/27 met criteria for graphical display of data, 5/27 for functional form, 19/27 for timing between policy implementation and impact, and only 3/27 for concurrent changes to the outcomes. Only 1/27 studies passed all of the above checks, and 4/27 were rated as overall appropriate. Including the 9 studies set aside, reviewers found that only four of the 36 identified published and peer-reviewed health policy impact evaluation studies passed a set of key design checks for identifying the causal impact of policies on COVID-19 outcomes.

DiscussionThe reviewed literature directly evaluating the impact of COVID-19 policies largely failed to meet key design criteria for inference of sufficient rigor to be actionable by policy-makers. This was largely driven by the circumstances under which policies were passed making it difficult to attribute changes in COVID-19 outcomes to particular policies. More reliable evidence review is needed to both identify and produce policy-actionable evidence, alongside the recognition that actionable evidence is often unlikely to be feasible. Statistical modeling for quality risk assessment of clinical trials: follow-up at the era of remote auditing BackgroundAs investigator site audits have largely been conducted remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, remote quality monitoring has gained some momentum. To further facilitate the conduct of remote Quality Assurance (QA) activities for clinical trials, we developed new quality indicators, building on a previously published statistical modeling methodology.

MethodsWe modeled the risk of having an audit or inspection finding using historical audits and inspections data from 2011 - 2019. We used logistic regression to model finding risk for 4 clinical impact factor (CIF) categories: Safety Reporting, Data Integrity, Consent and Protecting Endpoints.

ResultsWe could identify 15 interpretable factors influencing audit finding risk of 4 out of 5 CIF categories. They can be used to realistically predict differences in risk between 25 and 43% for different sites which suffice to rank sites by audit and inspection finding risk.

ConclusionContinuous surveillance of the identified risk factors and resulting risk estimates could be used to complement remote QA strategies for clinical trials and help to manage audit targets and audit focus also in post-pandemic times. "If somebody had told me I'd feel like I do now, I wouldn't have believed them"    Older adults' experiences of the BELL trial: a qualitative study ObjectivesThis study examined older adults experiences of participating in the BELL trial, involving 12-weeks of group-based hardstyle kettlebell training.

MethodsIn the BELL trial, 28 insufficiently active older adults (15 women, 13 men, 59-79 years) completed 6 weeks of face-to-face group training, and 6 weeks of home-based training. In-depth semi-structured interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, inductively coded, with themes constructed thematically from patterns of shared meaning.

ResultsFour higher-order themes were developed that reflect older adults experiences participating in a group-exercise program of hardstyle kettlebell training. These included: (1) "Its one of the best things weve done" - enjoying the physical and psychosocial benefits, (2) "Its improved it tremendously!" - change in a long-term health condition, (3) "It put me on a better course" - overcoming challenges, (4) "I wasnt just a number" - feeling part of a group/community.

DiscussionFindings highlight the perceived physical and psychological benefits of participating in hardstyle group kettlebell training, the value attributed to being part of an age-matched community of like-minded people engaged in group-exercise, as well as the challenges participants faced, and the sense of achievement in overcoming them. Implications for program design and delivery, and future research are discussed. Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study ObjectivesGlobal, Covid-driven restrictions around face-to-face interviews for healthcare student selection have forced admissions staff to rapidly adopt adapted online systems before supporting evidence is available. We have developed, what we believe is, the first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) methodology. This study aimed to explore test re-test reliability, acceptability and usability of the system.

Design, setting and participantsmixed-methods feasibility study in Physician Associate (PA) programmes from two UK and one US university during 2019 - 2020.

Primary, secondary outcomesFeasibility measures (test retest reliability acceptability and usability) were assessed using intra-class correlation (ICC), descriptive statistics, thematic and content analysis.

MethodsVolunteers took (T1), then repeated (T2), the automated MMI, with a seven-day interval (+/- 2) then completed an evaluation questionnaire. Admissions staff participated in focus group discussions.

ResultsSixty-two students and seven admission staff participated; 34 students and four staff from UK and 28 students and three staff from US universities.

Good-excellent test-retest reliability was observed with T1 and T2 ICC between 0.62-0.81 (p<0.001) when assessed by individual total scores (range 80.6-119), station total scores 0.6-0.91, p<0.005, individual site (all ICC[&ge;] 0.76 p<0.001) and mean test retest across sites 0.82 p<0.001 (95% CI 0.7-0.9).

Admissions staff reported potential to reduce resource costs and bias through a more objective screening tool for pre-selection or to replace some MMI stations in a  hybrid model. Maintaining human interaction through  touch points was considered essential.

Users positively evaluated the system, stating it was intuitive with an accessible interface. Concepts chosen for dynamic probing needed to be appropriately tailored.

ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that the system is reliable, generating consistent scores for candidates and is acceptable to end-users provided human touchpoints are maintained. Thus, there is evidence for the potential of such an automated system to augment healthcare student selection processes. Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS coronavirus 2 in Belgium - a serial prospective cross-sectional nationwide study of residual samples To assess the evolving SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and seroincidence related to the national lock-down in Belgium, a nationwide seroprevalence study, stratified by age, sex and region using 3000-4000 residual samples was performed during 7 periods between 30 March and 17 October 2020. Residual sera from ambulatory patients were analyzed for IgG antibodies against S1 proteins of SARS-CoV-2 with a semi-quantitative commercial ELISA. Weighted seroprevalence (overall, by age category and sex) and seroincidence during 7 consecutive periods were estimated for the Belgian population while accommodating test-specific sensitivity and specificity.

The weighted overall seroprevalence initially increased from 1.8% (95% CrI 1.0-2.6) to 5.3% (95% CrI 4.2-6.4), implying a seroincidence of 3.4% (95% CrI 2.4-4.6) between the 1st and 2nd collection period over a period of 3 weeks during the lockdown period (start lockdown mid March 2020). Thereafter, seroprevalence stabilized, however, significant decreases are observed when comparing the 3rd with the 5th and also with the 6th period resulting in negative seroincidence estimates after lockdown was lifted. We estimated for the last collection period mid October 2020 a weighted overall seroprevalence of 4.2% (95% CrI 3.1-5.2).

During lockdown, an initial small but increasing fraction of the Belgian population showed serologically detectable signs of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, which did not further increase when confinement measures eased and full lockdown was lifted. A Cross-Sectional Examination of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures of Physician-Authors Publishing in High-Impact US Medical Journals ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of self-reported financial conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosures in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) within the requisite disclosure period prior to article submission.

DesignCross-sectional investigation.

Data SourcesOriginal clinical-trial research articles published in NEJM (n = 206) or JAMA (n = 188) from January 1 to December 31, 2017; self-reported COI disclosure forms submitted to NEJM or JAMA with the authors published articles; Open Payments website (from database inception; latest search: August 2019).

Main outcome measuresFinancial data reported to Open Payments from 2014 to 2016 (time period that included all subjects requisite disclosure windows) were compared to self-reported disclosure forms submitted to the journals. Payments were defined as those not associated with a research study or formal research funding. Payment types were categorized as "disclosed," "undisclosed," "indeterminate," or "unrelated."

ResultsThirty-one articles from NEJM and 31 articles from JAMA met inclusion criteria. The physician-authors (n = 118) received a combined total of $7.48 million. Of the 106 authors (89.8%) who received payments, 86 (81.1%) received undisclosed payments. The top 23 most highly compensated received $6.32 million, of which $3.00 million (47.6%) was undisclosed. Disclosure rates were the equivalent between the top 23 and the entire sample.

ConclusionsHigh payment amounts, as well as high proportions of undisclosed financial compensation, regardless of amount received, comprised potential COIs for two influential US medical journals. Further research is needed to explain why such high proportions of general payments were undisclosed and whether journals that rely on self-reported COI disclosure need to reconsider their policies. Immediate recruitment of dormant coronary collaterals can provide more than half of normal resting perfusion during coronary occlusion in patients with coronary artery disease AimsDormant coronary collaterals are highly prevalent and clinically beneficial in cases of coronary occlusion. However, the magnitude of myocardial perfusion provided by immediate coronary collateral recruitment during acute occlusion is unknown. The aim of this study was to quantify collateral myocardial perfusion during balloon occlusion in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and resultsPatients without angiographically visible collaterals undergoing elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to a single epicardial vessel underwent two scans with 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). All subjects underwent at least three minutes of angiographically verified complete balloon occlusion, at which time an intravenous injection of the radiotracer was administered, followed by SPECT imaging. A second radiotracer injection followed by SPECT imaging was performed 24 hours after PTCA.

The study included 22 patients (median [interquartile range] age 68 [54-72] years, 10 (45%) female). The perfusion defect extent was 19 [11-38] % of the LV, and the collateral perfusion at rest was 64 [58-67]% of normal.

ConclusionThis is the first study to describe the magnitude of short-term changes in coronary microvascular collateral perfusion in patients with CAD. On average, despite coronary occlusion and an absence of angiographically visible collateral vessels, collaterals provided more than half of the normal perfusion.

Graphical abstract

O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=86 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21264445v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1">
View larger version (34K):
org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bc0429org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b5567dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@41589borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@203ecf_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP  M_FIG C_FIG Dormant collaterals are highly prevalent but the magnitude of myocardial perfusion provided by immediate coronary collateral recruitment during acute occlusion in humans is unknown. Patients without angiographically visible collaterals underwent intravenous injection with 99mTc-sestamibi during coronary balloon inflation followed by SPECT imaging. A control scan was performed 24 hours later..Median collateral perfusion during coronary occlusion was 64% of normal. Signals of significantly increased vaccine breakthrough, decreased hospitalization rates, and less severe disease in patients with COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Houston, Texas Genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2 continue to dramatically alter the landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recently described variant of concern designated Omicron (B.1.1.529) has rapidly spread worldwide and is now responsible for the majority of COVID-19 cases in many countries. Because Omicron was recognized very recently, many knowledge gaps exist about its epidemiology and clinical severity and disease course. A comprehensive genome sequencing study of SARS-CoV-2 in the Houston Methodist healthcare system identified 862 symptomatic patients with infections caused by Omicron from late November 2021 through December 18, 2021. Omicron very rapidly increased in only three weeks to cause 90% of all new COVID-19 cases. Compared to patients infected with either Alpha or Delta variants in our healthcare system, Omicron patients were significantly younger, had significantly increased vaccine breakthrough rates, and were significantly less likely to be hospitalized. Omicron patients required less intense respiratory support and had a shorter length of hospital stay, consistent with decreased disease severity. Although the number of Omicron patients we studied is relatively small, in the aggregate the data document the unusually rapid spread and increased occurrence of COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant in metropolitan Houston, and provide information about disease character. Increasing coordination and responsivity of emotion-related brain regions with a heart rate variability biofeedback randomized trial Heart rate variability is a robust biomarker of emotional well-being, consistent with the shared brain networks regulating emotion regulation and heart rate. While high heart rate oscillatory activity clearly indicates healthy regulatory brain systems, can increasing this oscillatory activity also affect brain function? To test this possibility, we randomly assigned 106 young adult participants to one of two 5-week interventions involving daily biofeedback that either increased heart rate oscillations (Osc+ condition) or had little effect on heart rate oscillations (Osc- condition) and examined effects on brain activity during rest and during regulating emotion. While there were no significant changes in the right amygdala-medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) functional connectivity (our primary outcome), the Osc+ intervention increased left amygdala-MPFC functional connectivity and functional connectivity in emotion-related resting-state networks during rest. It also increased down-regulation of activity in somatosensory brain regions during an emotion regulation task. The Osc- intervention did not have these effects. In this healthy cohort, the two conditions did not differentially affect anxiety, depression or mood. These findings indicate that heart rate oscillatory activity not only provides a measure of the current state of regulatory brain systems but also changes emotion network coordination in the brain.

Significance StatementPeople whose breathing makes their heart rate oscillate more (leading to higher heart rate variability or HRV) generally have better regulated emotion. Thus, HRV may indicate functioning of brain networks regulating emotion and internal body states. But heart rate oscillations may not only reflect brain regulatory networks but also help shape these networks. We randomly assigned participants to practice either increasing heart rate oscillations using slow-paced breathing or decreasing them using personalized strategies. Daily practice increasing heart rate oscillations affected brain activity in emotion-related networks even during times when participants breathed no differently than the comparison group. Thus, HRV is more than just an outcome measure--it can help shape the subsequent functioning of emotion-related brain networks. Precision MRI Phenotyping Enables Detection of Small Changes in Body Composition for Longitudinal Cohorts Longitudinal studies provide unique insights into the impact of environmental factors and lifespan issues on health and disease. Here we investigate changes in body composition in 3,088 free-living participants, part of the UK Biobank in-depth imaging study. All participants underwent neck-to-knee MRI scans at the first imaging visit and after approximately two years (second imaging visit). Image-derived phenotypes for each participant were extracted using a fully-automated image processing pipeline, including volumes of several tissues and organs: liver, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, total skeletal muscle, iliopsoas muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), as well as fat and iron content in liver, pancreas and spleen. Overall, no significant changes were observed in BMI, body weight, or waist circumference over the scanning interval, despite some large individual changes. A significant decrease in grip strength was observed, coupled to small, but statistically significant, decrease in all skeletal muscle measurements. Significant increases in VAT and intermuscular fat in the thighs were also detected in the absence of changes in BMI, waist circumference and ectopic-fat deposition. Adjusting for disease status at the first imaging visit did not have an additional impact on the changes observed. In summary, we show that even after a relatively short period of time significant changes in body composition can take place, probably reflecting the obesogenic environment currently inhabited by most of the general population in the United Kingdom. Spatial Allocation of Scarce COVID-19 Vaccines The COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) is an initiative led by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other partners that aims for an equitable access of COVID-19 vaccines. Despite a potential heterogeneous disease burden across space, countries receiving allotments of vaccines via COVAX may want to follow WHOs allocation rule and distribute vaccines to their jurisdictions based on the jurisdictions relative population size. Utilizing economic-epidemiological modeling, we benchmark the performance of this ad hoc allocation rule by comparing it to the rule that minimizes the economic damages and expenditures over time, including a penalty cost representing the social costs of deviating from the ad hoc allocation. Under different levels of vaccine scarcity and different demographic characteristics, we consider scenarios where length of immunity and compliance to travel restrictions vary, and consider the robustness of the rules when assumptions regarding these factors are incorrect. The benefits from deviating are especially high when immunity is permanent, when there is compliance to travel restrictions, when the supply of vaccine is low, and when there is heterogeneity in demographic characteristics. Interestingly, a lack of compliance to travel restrictions pushes the optimal allocations of vaccine towards the ad hoc and improves the relative robustness of the ad hoc rule, as the mixing of the populations reduces the spatial heterogeneity in disease burden.

JEL ClassificationC61, H12, H84, I18, Q54 A Randomised Trial of a Wearable UV dosimeter for Skin Cancer Prevention BackgroundNon-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most prevalent cancer in the United States, affecting 5 million people and costing $8.1 billion per year. Despite well-defined guidelines on ultraviolet radiation (UVR) avoidance, it remains difficult for people to assess their individual exposure, as UVR is invisible and the onset of symptoms due to UVR damage are delayed.

MethodsIn a prospective, randomized-controlled trial, 97 patients with a history of actinic keratoses were enrolled from March 2018 to July 2018 and followed over 6 months. 50 patients were given a wearable device that measured UV exposure and a smartphone application that provided both real-time and cumulative UV exposure information, and 47 patients were provided with UV protection counseling by a dermatologist.

ResultsWe observed a significant decrease in the incidence rate of NMSC in the intervention group compared to the control group over 3 months (p = 0.02). We did not observe a significant decrease in the incidence rate of actinic keratoses (AK) in the intervention group compared to the control group. The observed clinical benefit was not accompanied by psychological side effects such as anxiety and depression.

ConclusionsThis study suggests that providing real-time UV exposure data using a wearable UV dosimeter is a safe and effective behavioral change strategy to prevent NMSC. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, contract HHSN261201700005C; ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03315286.) Substance Use Onset in High-Risk 9-13 Year-Olds in the ABCD Study AimA key aim of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study is to document substance use onset, patterns, and sequelae across adolescent development. However, substance use misreporting obscures accurate drug use characterization. Hair toxicology tests provide objective historical substance use data, but are rarely investigated in youth. Here, we compare objective hair toxicology results with self-reported substance use in youth.

MethodsA literature-based substance use risk algorithm identified 696 ABCD Study(R) participants for hair sample collections between baseline and 2-year follow-up (spanning ages 9-13) for laboratory analysis. Chi-square and t-tests assessed differences between participants demographics, positive and negative hair tests, risk algorithm scores, and self-reported substance use.

ResultsHair testing confirmed that 17% of at-risk 9-13 year-olds had evidence of past 3-month use of one (n=99), two (n=17), three (n=3), or four (n=2) drug classes. After considering prescribed medication use, 11% had a positive test incongruent with self- or parent-report. No participant with a positive result self-reported substance use consistent with their toxicology results. Participants with positive tests under-reported use (p<.001), reported less sipping of alcohol (p<.001), and scored higher on the risk algorithm (p<.001) than those with negative hair toxicology.

ConclusionsAn alarming 11% of tested samples in at-risk 9-13 year-olds were positive for at least one unreported substance, suggesting underreporting in this population when participating in a national healthy development study. The degree of underreporting cannot yet be calculated, as at-risk samples were prioritized for assays. Expanded toxicology testing is key to characterize substance use in youth. Colorectal Cancer Disparities Across the Continuum of Cancer Care with a Focus on Surgery and Black Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ImportanceDespite increases in screening among vulnerable populations, colorectal cancer disparities persist.

ObjectiveTo direct future efforts towards high impact opportunities in addressing these disparities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the colorectal cancer disparities literature with a focus on the utilization of Surgery, the primary treatment for colorectal cancer.

Data SourcesTwo electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on colorectal cancer disparities between 2011 and March 29, 2021.

Study SelectionStudies for the systematic review were selected if: (1) reported on disparities within colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer (2) articles were published in the English language (3) articles used only United States-sourced data.

Studies for the meta-analysis were selected if: (1) reported on at least one of three utilization of surgery outcomes: receipt of colorectal, colon, or rectal surgery, refusal of surgery, or receipt of laparoscopic versus open surgery (2) Outcomes were reported as Odds ratio according to multivariate analysis.

Data Extraction and SynthesisQuality appraisal and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. For the meta-analysis, pooled multivariate odds ratios for the three outcomes regarding utilization of surgery were separately calculated according to fixed or random-effects models. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresSystematic Review: The volume of publications attributed to the following sectors of the colorectal cancer care continuum: (1) Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis (2) Treatment (3) Survivorship (4) End-of-life Care. Meta-analysis: Receipt of Colorectal, Colon, or Rectal Surgery and Black Race, Refusal of Surgery and Black Race, or Receipt of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery and Black Race.

ResultsThe systematic review included 1,199 relevant publications. Among them, 60% were focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, followed by Survivorship (20%), Treatment (15%), and End-of-Life Care (1%). Within the studies reporting on treatment disparities, 46% were focused on Race/Ethnicity, followed by Socioeconomic Status (28%), Age (17%), Gender (6%), Disabilities/Comorbidities (3%), and LGBTQI+ (0%). A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three separate meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Patients of black race were less likely to receive colorectal, or colon, or rectal surgery (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.83), less likely to receive laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), and twice as likely to refuse colon surgery (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.91-3.06).

Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of research, to date, related to colorectal cancer disparities is focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis and a minimal amount is dedicated to treatment. Additionally, all of the limited publications related to colorectal cancer surgery, as a treatment modality, are observational in nature. The application of this knowledge of past efforts and current continuing adverse outcomes is required in order to shift the focus of the research community towards treatment. In particular, research addressing surgical disparities is necessary, as surgery remains the primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Safety and efficacy of Pulmonary physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (PPTCOVID Study): A prospective, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial BackgroundPulmonary physiotherapy (PPT) is an important treatment in the management of patients with different types of pulmonary disorders. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of PPT in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

MethodsIn this randomised, single-blind, controlled trial, we enrolled hospitalized, non-intubated patients (18 to 75 years with oxygen saturation (Spo2) in free-air breathing [&le;]90%) with COVID-19 pneumonia at a referral hospital. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PPT (six sessions PPT with breathing exercises and airway clearance techniques) or basic care. The primary outcomes were venous blood O2 (pO2) and CO2 (pCO2) pressures, Spo2, and three-minute walking test (3MWT) that were assessed before and end of sixth session. Secondary outcomes included level of dyspnea, venous blood PH, one-month mortality, three-month mortality and short form-36 (SF-36) after one and three months. The assessor was blinded to the assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04357340).

FindingsIn April-May 2020, 40 participants were randomly assigned to PPT or basic care groups. While at the end of intervention, pO2 (adjusted mean difference to baseline measure (AMD) 6.43 mmHg [95%CI 2.8, 10.07], P<0.01), Spo2 (AMD 4.43% [95%CI 2.04, 6.83], P=0.0011), and 3MTW (AMD 91.44 m [95%CI 68.88, 113.99], P<0.01) were higher in PPT group and basic care group, pCO2 was not improved (AMD -2.1 mmHg [95%CI-6.36, 2.21], P=0.33). Mortality rate was 20% (OR adjusted to baseline Spo2 .19 [95%CI .03, 1.30], P=.09) and 25% (OR adjusted to baseline Spo2 .16 [95%CI .26, 1.05], P=.056) lower in the PPT group at three-month at one-month and three-month, respectively. There were no significant differences in most SF-36 domains scores after one and three months. No serious adverse event was observed during PPT sessions.

ConclusionEarly PPT can be considered a safe and effective therapeutic choice for patients with severe COVID-19. The effect of stimulus duration on preferences for gain adjustments when listening to speech ObjectivesIn the personalisation of hearing aid fittings, gain is often adjusted to suit patient preferences using live speech. When using brief sentences as stimuli, the minimum gain adjustments necessary to elicit consistent preferences ( preference thresholds) were previously found to be much greater than typical adjustments in current practice. The current study examined the role of duration on preference thresholds.

DesignParticipants heard 2, 4 and 6-s segments of a continuous monologue presented successively in pairs. The first segment of each pair was presented at each individuals real-ear or prescribed gain. The second segment was presented with a {+/-}0-12 dB gain adjustment in one of three frequency bands. Participants judged whether the second was "better", "worse" or "no different" from the first.

Study SampleTwenty-nine adults, all with hearing-aid experience.

ResultsThe minimum gain adjustments needed to elicit "better" or "worse" judgments decreased with increasing duration for most adjustments. Inter-participant agreement and intra-participant reliability increased with increasing duration up to 4 s, then remained stable.

ConclusionsProviding longer stimuli improves the likelihood of patients providing reliable judgments of hearing-aid gain adjustments, but the effect is limited, and alternative fitting methods may be more viable for effective hearing-aid personalisation. Sensitivity of Estimated Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Profile to Inaccurate Assumptions about Dose Timing and Absorption: An Investigation in Real-World and Simulated Data A population pharmacokinetic (PK) study with 363 subjects was performed using real-world data extracted from electronic heath records (EHRs) to estimate the tacrolimus population PK profile. As population PK studies for oral medications performed using EHR data often assume a regular dosing schedule as prescribed without incorporating exact dosing time, we assessed the sensitivity of the PK parameter estimates to assumptions about dose timing using last-dose times extracted by our own natural language processing system, medExtractR. We also investigated the sensitivity of estimations to absorption rate constants that are often fixed at a published value in tacrolimus population PK analysis. There was no appreciable difference in parameters estimates with vs. without last-dose time incorporated in the data and our sensitivity analysis revealed little difference between parameters estimated assuming a range of absorption rate constants. We also conducted simulation studies to investigate how drug PK profiles and experimental designs such as concentration measurements affects sensitivity to incorrect assumptions about dose timing and absorption rates. Our findings suggest that drugs with a slower elimination rate (or a longer half-life) are less sensitive to dose timing errors and that experimental designs which only allow for trough blood concentrations are usually insensitive to deviation in absorption rate. Airway management, procedural data, and mortality records of patients undergoing surgery for mucormycosis associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) In India, the second wave of coronavirus disease (COVID -19) was associated with a distinct surge in cases of invasive fungal infection with mucormycosis. This disease was seen typically in the sinonasal form in COVID-19 patients. Uncontrolled diabetes, steroid use in COVID-19 treatment, etc. were some of the postulated risk factors for the association of COVID 19 and Mucormycosis. The management plan of these cases included surgical debridement, systemic antifungal therapy, sugar control, and management of antifungal related systemic adverse effects. In this retrospective case record review, we aimed to evaluate the airway management plan, demographics, and overall outcomes in patients undergoing surgical resection for COVID-19 associated mucormycosis. Forty-one (71.9 %) patients had a diagnosis of sino-nasal mucormycosis, fourteen (24.6%) had a diagnosis of rhino-orbital mucormycosis, and 2 patients (3.5%) were diagnosed with palatal mucormycosis. Total 44 (77.19 %) patients had co-morbidities. The most common co-morbidity was Diabetes Mellitus 42 (73.6%), followed by hypertension 21 (36.84%) and Acute kidney injury 14 (28.07%). We used the intubation difficulty scale score to assess intubating conditions. Intubation was easy to slightly difficult in 53 out of 57 patients. In our study, mortality occurred in 7 (12.28 %) patients. The median mortality time was 60 (range, 27-74) days. The median time to hospital discharge was 53.5 (range,10-85) days. Managing COVID-19 on its own is challenging and additional mucormycosis can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite challenges and risks, timely and meticulous interventions can reduce complications. Clinical observation of high-flow nasal cannula with non-rebreather mask use on severe or critically ill COVID-19 diabetic patients Background and aimsPrevalence of diabetes is a vital factor in COVID-19s clinical prognosis. This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy of High-flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) with/without non-rebreather mask (NRM) use on critical COVID-19 patients with/without diabetes.

MethodsFor analysis and comparison, epidemiological, biochemical, and clinical data were collected from 240 HFNC ({+/-}NRM) treated severe and critical COVID-19 patients (diabetic = 136; non-diabetic = 104) admitted into ICUs of five hospitals in Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Results59.1% of patients with fever had diabetes (p=0.012). ICU stay was longer for diabetic patients (9.06{+/-}5.70) than non-diabetic patients (7.41{+/-}5.11) (p=0.020). Majority of the hypertensive patients were diabetic (68.3%; p<0.001). Majority of diabetic patients (70.4%; p<0.005) had elevated creatinine levels. Partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg) after HFNC (only) administration was significantly (p=0.031) higher in non-diabetic patients (69.30{+/-}23.56) than in diabetic patients (61.50{+/-}14.49). Diabetic (62.64{+/-}13.05) and non-diabetic patients (59.40{+/-}13.22) had almost similar partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg) from HFNC with NRM. Patients with elevated RBS required NRM with HFNC five times (AOR=5.1, 1.2-20.8) higher than others. Besides age, and hypertension were significantly associated with the HFNC+NRM treated diabetic patients. Factors those affected the HFNC only treated patients were fever and impaired glucose tolerance.

ConclusionsThe results of this study imply that oxygen supply with HFNC and NRM may be beneficial for the elderly/hypertensive diabetic patients with COVID-19 associated AHRF; and that increased blood glucose level could be a determinant for the need of HFNC + NRM treatment.

HighlightsO_LIElderly diabetic patients required both HFNC and NRM to increase oxygen saturation.
C_LIO_LIHypertension may be a factor for diabetic patients with COVID-19 requiring HFNC and NRM together.
C_LIO_LI HFNC + NRM-combination therapy might be needed when blood glucose levels rise.
C_LI