Vitamin D and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative: A Mendelian randomization study BackgroundIncreased vitamin D levels, as reflected by 25OHD measurements, have been proposed to protect against COVID-19 disease based on in-vitro, observational, and ecological studies. However, vitamin D levels are associated with many confounding variables and thus associations described to date may not be causal. Vitamin D Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have provided results that are concordant with large-scale vitamin D randomized trials. Here, we used two-sample MR to assess evidence supporting a causal effect of circulating 25OHD levels on COVID-19 susceptibility and severity.

Methods and findingsGenetic variants strongly associated with 25OHD levels in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 443,734 participants of European ancestry (including 401,460 from the UK Biobank) were used as instrumental variables. GWASs of COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severe disease from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative were used as outcome GWASs. These included up to 14,134 individuals with COVID-19, and 1,284,876 without COVID-19, from 11 countries. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was determined by laboratory testing or medical chart review. Population controls without COVID-19 were also included in the control groups for all outcomes, including hospitalization and severe disease. Analyses were restricted to individuals of European descent when possible. Using inverse-weighted MR, genetically increased 25OHD levels by one standard deviation on the logarithmic scale had no clear association with COVID-19 susceptibility (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.10; P=0.61), hospitalization (OR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.35; P=0.30), and severe disease (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.17; P=0.53). We used an additional 6 meta-analytic methods, as well as sensitivity analyses after removal of variants at risk of horizontal pleiotropy and obtained similar results. These results may be limited by weak instrument bias in some analyses. Further, our results do not apply to individuals with vitamin D deficiency.

ConclusionIn this two-sample MR study, we did not observe evidence to support an association between 25OHD levels and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity, or hospitalization. Hence, vitamin D supplementation as a mean of protecting against worsened COVID-19 outcomes is not supported by genetic evidence. Other therapeutic or preventative avenues should be given higher priority for COVID-19 randomized controlled trials.

Author SummaryO_LIWhy was this study done?
- Vitamin D levels have been associated with COVID-19 outcomes in multiple observational studies, though confounders are likely to bias these associations.
- By using genetic instruments which limit such confounding, Mendelian randomization studies have consistently obtained results concordant with vitamin D supplementation randomized trials. This provides rationale to undertake vitamin D Mendelian randomization studies for COVID-19 outcomes.

C_LIO_LIWhat did the researchers do and find?
- We used the genetic variants obtained from the largest consortium of COVID-19 cases and controls, and the largest study on genetic determinants of vitamin D levels.
We used Mendelian randomization to estimate the effect of increased vitamin D on COVID-19 outcomes, while limiting confounding.
- In multiple analyses, our results consistently showed no evidence for an association between genetically predicted vitamin D levels and COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, or severe disease.

C_LIO_LIWhat do these findings mean?
- Vitamin D is a highly confounded variable, and traditional observational studies are at high risk of biased estimates.
- We did not find evidence that vitamin D supplementation would improve COVID-19 outcomes.
- Given Mendelian randomizations past track-record of anticipating the results of vitamin D randomized controlled trials, other therapeutic and preventative avenues should be prioritized for COVID-19 trials.

C_LI
Egg-derived anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin Y (IgY) with broad variant activity as intranasal prophylaxis against COVID-19 COVID-19 emergency use authorizations and approvals for vaccines were achieved in record time. However, there remains a need to develop additional safe, effective, easy-to-produce, and inexpensive prevention to reduce the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection. This need is due to difficulties in vaccine manufacturing and distribution, vaccine hesitancy, and, critically, the increased prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with greater contagiousness or reduced sensitivity to immunity. Antibodies from eggs of hens (immunoglobulin Y; IgY) that were administered receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were developed as nasal drops to capture the virus on the nasal mucosa. Although initially raised against the 2019 novel coronavirus index strain (2019- nCoV), these anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgY surprisingly had indistinguishable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay binding against variants of concern that have emerged, including Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529). This is distinct for sera from immunized or convalescent patients. Culture neutralization titers against available Alpha, Beta, and Delta were also indistinguishable from the index SARS-CoV-2 strain. Efforts to develop these IgY for clinical use demonstrated that the intranasal anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgY preparation showed no binding (cross-reactivity) to a variety of human tissues and had an excellent safety profile in rats following 28-day intranasal delivery of the formulated IgY. A double-blind, randomized, placebo- controlled phase 1 study evaluating single-ascending and multiple doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgY administered intranasally for 14 days in 48 healthy adults also demonstrated an excellent safety and tolerability profile, and no evidence of systemic absorption. As these antiviral IgY have broad selectivity against many variants of concern, are fast to produce, and are a low-cost product, their use as prophylaxis to reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral transmission warrants further evaluation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04567810, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04567810)
Diagnostic Model of in-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Used Artificial Intelligence Methods BackgroundPreventing in-hospital mortality in Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a crucial step.

ObjectivesThe objective of our research was to to develop and externally validate the diagnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients used artificial intelligence methods.

MethodsWe divide non-randomly the American population with acute STEMI into a training set, a test set,and a validation set. We converted the unbalanced data into balanc ed data. We used artificial intelligence methods to develop and externally validate the dia gnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients. We used confusion matrix combined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluat e the pros and cons of the above models.

ResultsThe strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, gender, cardiogenic shock, atrial fibrillation(AF), ventricular fibrillation(VF),third degree atrioventricular block,in-hospital bleeding, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) during hospitalization, underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during hospitalization, hypertension history, diabetes history, and myocardial infarction history.The F2 score of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation data set were 0.81, 0.6, and 0.59 respectively.The AUC of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation data set were 0.77, 0.78, and 0.8 respectively. The diagnostic model built by logistic regression was the best.

ConclusionWe had used artificial intelligence methods developed and externally validated the diagnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients.

We registered this study with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (registration number: ChiCTR1900027129; registered date: 1 November 2019). Mutation burden-orthogonal tumor genomic subtypes delineate responses to immune checkpoint therapy Higher-resolution tumor-agnostic biomarkers that predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy are needed. Mutation signatures reflect underlying oncogenic processes that can affect tumor immunogenicity, and thus potentially delineate ICI treatment response among tumor types. Systematic mutational signature analysis on all solid tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas yielded eight distinct tumor genomic subtypes, which were characterized by smoking exposure, ultraviolet light exposure, APOBEC enzyme activity, POLE mutation, mismatch repair deficiency, homologous recombination deficiency, genomic stability, and aging. The former five subtypes were construed to form an immune-responsive group acting as candidates for ICI therapy because of their high expression of immune-related genes and enrichment in cancer types with FDA approval for ICI monotherapy. Under this hypothesis, we developed a software to classify new tumors submitted to whole-exome sequencing. A pan-cancer dataset containing 973 cases treated with ICIs and clinical response was used for validation, where the classified tumor subtypes were significantly associated with ICI response, independent of cancer type and tumor mutational burden high or low status. The new tumor subtyping method can serve as a tumor-agnostic biomarker for ICI response prediction and will improve decision making in cancer treatment.

Structured abstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSIn cancer therapy, higher-resolution tumor-agnostic biomarkers that predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy are needed. Mutation signatures reflect underlying oncogenic processes that can affect tumor immunogenicity, and thus potentially delineate ICI treatment response among tumor types.

MethodsBased on mutational signature analysis, we developed a stratification for all solid tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Subsequently, we developed a new software (GS-PRACTICE) to classify new tumors submitted to whole-exome sequencing. Using existing data from 973 pan-cancer ICI-treated cases with outcomes, we evaluated the subtype-response predictive performance.

ResultsSystematic analysis on TCGA samples identified eight tumor genomic subtypes, which were characterized by features represented by smoking exposure, ultraviolet light exposure, APOBEC enzyme activity, POLE mutation, mismatch repair deficiency, homologous recombination deficiency, genomic stability, and aging. The former five subtypes were presumed to form an immune-responsive group acting as candidates for ICI therapy because of their high expression of immune-related genes and enrichment in cancer types with FDA approval for ICI monotherapy. In the validation cohort, the samples assigned by GS-PRACTICE to the immune-reactive subtypes were significantly associated with ICI response independent of cancer type and TMB high or low status.

ConclusionsThe new tumor subtyping method can serve as a tumor-agnostic biomarker for ICI response prediction and will improve decision making in cancer treatment.

One Sentence SummaryA novel tumor genome subtyping method based on mutation signature analysis can predict response to immune checkpoint therapy orthogonally to tumor mutational burden. Covid-19 Associated Hepatitis in children (CAH-C) during the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Central India: Is it a complication or transient phenomenon. Objective: While pediatric population has largely remained free of severe COVID-19, in some cases SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with complications like Multiple Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C). We mention another unique presentation subsequent to asymptomatic infection of SARS-CoV-2, a unique form of hepatitis designated by us as COVID-19 Associated Hepatitis in Children (CAH-C). The contrasting clinical presentations, temporal association and viral parameters of CAH-C cases, to the MIS-C cases are presented here. Methods: As a retrospective and follow-up observational study we reviewed all children testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during study period. Children presenting with sudden onset of hepatitis, elevated transaminases, non-obstructive jaundice, lacking marked inflammatory responses and without evidence of (a) other known causes of acute hepatitis or previous underlying liver disease (b) multi-system involvement were classified as CAH-C, are described here. Results: Among 475 children who tested positive, 47 patients presented with hepatitis, 37 patients who had features of CAH-C, having symptoms of hepatitis only, with un-elevated inflammatory markers and uneventful recovery following supportive treatment. Whereas remaining 10 MIS-C hepatitis had protracted illness, multiple system involvement, required admission to critical care, and had mortality of 30%. Conclusion: With the emergence of newer variants of concern (VOC) including the Delta variant which predominated the second wave of infections in India and has now spread to more than 142 countries with changing presentations, CAH-C might be one of them. Cases of such new entities need to be identified early and differentiated from other emerging syndromes in children during the ongoing pandemic for preventing adversities by timely intervention. Integrating genome-wide polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk to predict colorectal cancer diagnosis: a cohort study in UK Biobank ObjectivesTo evaluate the benefit of combining polygenic risk scores (PRS) with the QCancer-10 (colorectal cancer) non-genetic risk prediction model to identify those at highest risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).

DesignPopulation based cohort study. Six different PRS for CRC were developed (using LDpred2 PRS software, clumping and thresholding approaches, and genome-wide significant models). The top-performing genome-wide and GWAS-significant PRS were then combined with QCancer-10 and performance compared to QCancer-10 alone. Case-control (logistic regression) and time-to-event (Cox proportional hazards) analyses were used to evaluate risk model performance in men and women.

Setting and participantsUK Biobank Study. A total of 434587 individuals with complete genetic and QCancer-10 predictor data were included in the QCancer-10+PRS modelling cohorts.

Main outcome measuresPrediction of colorectal cancer diagnosis by genetic, non-genetic and combined risk models.

FindingsPRS derived using the LDpred2 program performed best, with an odds-ratio per standard deviation of 1.58, and top age- and sex-adjusted C-statistic of 0.733 (95% confidence interval 0.710 to 0.753) in logistic regression models in the validation cohort. Integrated QCancer-10+PRS models out-performed QCancer-10 alone. In men, the integrated LDpred2 (QCancer-10+LDP) model produced a C-statistic of 0.730 (0.720 to 0.741) and explained variation of 28.1% (26.3% to 30.0%), compared with 0.693 (0.682 to 0.704) and 21.0% (18.9% to 23.1%) for QCancer-10 alone. Performance improvements in women were similar. In the top 20% of individuals at highest absolute risk, the sensitivity of QCancer-10+LDP models for predicting CRC diagnosis within 5 years was 47.6% in men and 42.5% in women, with respective 3.49-fold and 2.75-fold absolute increases in the top 5% of risk compared to average. Decision curve analysis showed that adding PRS to QCancer-10 improved net-benefit and interventions avoided, across most probability thresholds.

ConclusionsIntegrating PRS with QCancer-10 significantly improves risk prediction over QCancer-10 alone. Evaluation of risk stratified population screening using this approach is warranted.

Summary BoxO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIRisk stratification based on genetic or environmental risk factors could improve cancer screening outcomes
C_LIO_LINo previously published study has examined integrated models combining genome-wide PRS and non-genetic risk factors beyond age
C_LIO_LIQCancer-10 (colorectal cancer) is the top-performing non-genetic risk prediction model for CRC
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIAdding PRS to the QCancer-10 (colorectal cancer) risk prediction model improves performance and clinical benefit, with greatest gain from the LDpred2 genome-wide PRS, to a level that suggests utility in stratifying CRC screening and prevention
C_LI Effectiveness of a short term induction regimen of a biosimilar Adalimumab in the long term management of symptomatic Ankylosing Spondylitis Symptomatic Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Community Based Proof of Concept Observational Study IntroductionCost and drug toxicity often deter prolonged therapeutic use of anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A planned study was completed to endorse our clinic based observation of long term relief following short-term administration of anti-TNF agent.

Methods50 consenting patients with symptomatic active chronic AS under rheumatology care in a community clinic were enrolled. They had no past history of anti-TNF use. 40 mg standard biosimilar adalimumab (BS-ADA, Exemptia trade name)was injected subcutaneously every fortnight for six injections (10 weeks). Patients were monitored at several time points. Improvement was assessed at regular interval as per protocol which included standard indices (Bath and Assessment Spondyloarthritis International Society /ASAS). An intention to treat analysis with significant p<0.05 was carried out.

ResultsPatients showed early and substantial significant improvement in pain, NSAID requirement, function and in several indices (ASAS 20 & 40, ASAS partial remission, BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS) which persisted after stopping injections. 84% and 52 % of patients respectively showed ASAS 20 improvement at week 12 and 48: corresponding ASAS partial remission 34% and 24%. Over 50% patients maintained prolonged improvement and provided proof of concept (defined a-priori). Serum Interleukin-6 assay showed a sharp reduction at 24 weeks. None developed TB or serious drug toxicity. 11 patients withdrew (mostly inadequate response). Absence of control was a limitation.

ConclusionA ten-week administration of biosimilar adalimumab in difficult to treat AS showed early substantial improvement which often persisted for 24 weeks. This unconventional strategy was socioeconomically appealing. It merits further validation and acceptance especially in resource strained settings. Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe, and the US and of the literature ObjectivesTo bring together spontaneously reported data from around the world to estimate the reporting rate in different countries and better understand the risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following exposure to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

DesignSystematic review of the literature and systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), and European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA).

Data sourcesSpontaneously reported data for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty) and COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (Spikevax) were obtained using outputs from the UKs Yellow Card scheme (covering the period 09/12/2020 - 20/10/2021), the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS; US; covering the period 23/08/2021 - 21/10/2021), and EudraVigilance (EU/EEA; covering the period 21/12/2020 - 21/10/2021). Systematic searches of PubMed and Embase literature databases were performed with a datalock point of 11 October 2021.

Eligibility criteriaAll publicly available spontaneous reporting data from the three regions of interest were included. Data on events labelled "Myocarditis" and "Pericarditis" were included. No restrictions on age or gender were applied. For the systematic literature review, all pharmacoepidemiological studies of observational design investigating myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines identified by our search were included. No restrictions on language or date were applied. Pre-print manuscripts were included if no peer-reviewed version was available. Studies of non-observational design, case reports, and case series were excluded. Study quality was assessed using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools. All studies were considered of sufficient quality for inclusion.

Data extraction and synthesisOne researcher extracted data from spontaneous reporting systems and published pharmacoepidemiological studies. Spontaneously reported events of myocarditis and pericarditis were presented for each individual data source, and stratified by vaccine, age, sex, and dose where this information was available. Vaccination data were obtained to the same date, and reporting rates were calculated for the events of myocarditis and pericarditis for each population of interest. For published pharmacoepidemiological studies, the study design, participant characteristics, and study results were tabulated.

ResultsOverall, there were 435 reports of myocarditis and 327 reports of pericarditis reported to the UKs Yellow Card scheme up to 20 October 2021. To 21 October 2021, in the US, 1936 reports of myocarditis and 1271 reports of pericarditis had been submitted to VAERS; there had been 2924 reports of myocarditis and 1855 reports of pericarditis submitted to EudraVigilance to the same date. Most reports (73.3%) had been submitted following Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech). Males represented 74.9% of reports of myocarditis and 56.9% of pericarditis overall (for US and EU/EEA populations only), and the majority of reports concerned vaccinees ages under 40 years. Reports were more frequent following the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Reporting rates of myocarditis and pericarditis were consistent between the data sources. Seven pharmacoepidemiological studies were included; results of these studies were largely consistent with results of our spontaneous report analyses.

ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that younger vaccinees more frequently report myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines compared with older vaccinees. These events had mild clinical course followed by full recovery in most cases. Results from published literature supported the results of our analyses.

Strengths and Limitations of the StudyO_LIThis is the first study to bring together spontaneously reported data from the United Kingdom, United States, and Europe on myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
C_LIO_LIResults from this study provide evidence on the frequency of reported events of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines in different age groups, and by sex and vaccine dose. Analyses of spontaneous reports were consolidated with results of published literature, identified by systematic review.
C_LIO_LIResults may have been influenced by biases including different vaccination policies in each region examined, and publicity on events of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines.
C_LIO_LIThe study relied on outputs from spontaneous reporting systems in which the level of detail differed between the systems examined; furthermore, it is not possible to estimate incidence rates using spontaneous reports due to the lack of data on the exposed population, and there is no unvaccinated comparison group.
C_LIO_LIThere is an urgent need for further pharmacoepidemiological studies to be conducted to provide more accurate estimates of the frequency, clinical course, long term outcome, effects of treatment and impact on quality of life, to address many of the limitations of spontaneous reporting.
C_LI Generalized Prediction of Hemodynamic Shock in Intensive Care Units Early prediction of hemodynamic shock in the ICU can save lives. Several studies have leveraged a combination of vitals, lab investigations, and clinical data to construct early warning systems for shock. However, these have a limited potential of generalization to diverse settings due to reliance on non-real-time data. Monitoring data from vitals can provide an early real-time prediction of Hemodynamic shock which can precede the clinical diagnosis to guide early therapy decisions. Generalization across age and geographical context is an unaddressed challenge. In this retrospective observational study, we built real-time shock prediction models generalized across age groups (adult and pediatric), ICU-types, and geographies. We trained, validated, and tested a shock prediction model on the publicly available eICU dataset on 208 ICUs across the United States. Data from 156 hospitals passed the eligibility criteria for cohort building. These were split hospital-wise in a five-fold training-validation-test set. External validation of the model was done on a pediatric ICU in New Delhi and MIMIC-III database with more than 0.23 million and one million patient-hours vitals data, respectively. Our models identified 92% of all the shock events more than 8 hours in advance with AUROC of 86 %(SD= 1.4) and AUPRC of 93% (SD =1.2) on the eICU testing set. An AUROC of 87 % (SD =1.8), AUPRC 92 % (SD=1.6) were obtained in external validation on the MIMIC-III cohort. The New Delhi Pediatric SafeICU data achieved an AUROC of 87 % (SD =4) AUPRC 91% (SD=3), despite being completely different geography and age group. In this first, we demonstrate a generalizable model for predicting shock, and algorithms are publicly available as a pre-configured Docker environment at https://github.com/tavlab-iiitd/ShoQPred. Substance Use Onset in High-Risk 9-13 Year-Olds in the ABCD Study AimA key aim of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study is to document substance use onset, patterns, and sequelae across adolescent development. However, substance use misreporting obscures accurate drug use characterization. Hair toxicology tests provide objective historical substance use data, but are rarely investigated in youth. Here, we compare objective hair toxicology results with self-reported substance use in youth.

MethodsA literature-based substance use risk algorithm identified 696 ABCD Study(R) participants for hair sample collections between baseline and 2-year follow-up (spanning ages 9-13) for laboratory analysis. Chi-square and t-tests assessed differences between participants demographics, positive and negative hair tests, risk algorithm scores, and self-reported substance use.

ResultsHair testing confirmed that 17% of at-risk 9-13 year-olds had evidence of past 3-month use of one (n=99), two (n=17), three (n=3), or four (n=2) drug classes. After considering prescribed medication use, 11% had a positive test incongruent with self- or parent-report. No participant with a positive result self-reported substance use consistent with their toxicology results. Participants with positive tests under-reported use (p<.001), reported less sipping of alcohol (p<.001), and scored higher on the risk algorithm (p<.001) than those with negative hair toxicology.

ConclusionsAn alarming 11% of tested samples in at-risk 9-13 year-olds were positive for at least one unreported substance, suggesting underreporting in this population when participating in a national healthy development study. The degree of underreporting cannot yet be calculated, as at-risk samples were prioritized for assays. Expanded toxicology testing is key to characterize substance use in youth. Factors affecting first return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective observational study in an occupational medicine clinic and single-surgeon practice BackgroundReturn to work (RTW) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) within New South Wales (NSW), Australia, under compensable schemes has not been reported.

AimsDetermine factors affecting RTW status and time in patients treated with aRCR under state-based compensation schemes, compared to those outside such schemes.

MethodsPatients undergoing aRCR by one surgeon with minimum 1-year follow-up were grouped into those under (CP) or outside (non-CP) workers or vehicle accident compensation schemes, matched by age and gender. RTW status and time were assessed using chi-square analysis and multivariable linear regression.

ResultsOf 1054 available patients, 90 CP patients were identified with 29 consented and matched to non-CP (N=29). A higher proportion of CP patients (17.2 vs 0%, P<0.001) never returned to work and a lower proportion resumed pre-injury duties at first RTW (3 vs 52%, P<0.01). Median time to first RTW did not differ between CP and non-CP groups (5.1 vs 4.4, P=0.86). Smoking (P=0.007) and post-injury activity level (P=0.004) were significantly associated with longer time to first RTW, whereas compensation status was not.

ConclusionsCP patients undergoing aRCR in NSW are at risk of not returning to work. For those that return, there is no significant difference compared to non-CP in time to first RTW. Particularly, patient and management factors associated with extended time to first RTW have been identified. Interventions aimed at modifiable factors such as smoking cessation and increasing preoperative activity may improve future outcomes.

What is already known about this subjectO_LIWork-related injury and disease present a significant financial burden to the Australian economy ($AUD61.8billion per annum), with shoulder conditions due to body stressing accounting for 7% of this total cost (>$AUD4.2billion)
C_LIO_LIPatients receiving compensation appear to have poorer outcomes and take longer to return to work than their non-compensated counterparts, but the degree to which this occurs is variably reported in the literature
C_LIO_LIThe effect of modifiable factors on return to work status and time remain unclear, and have not previously been reported for the Australian population under the New South Wales workers compensation scheme
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIPatients receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a compensable scheme in New South Wales are at increased risk of not returning to work compared to patients presenting outside of a compensable scheme and patients in equivalent schemes internationally
C_LIO_LIPatients reporting a longer duration of symptoms and smokers are at increased risk of extended time to first return to work
C_LI

What impact this may have on practice or policyO_LIThe study has identified smoking and pre-surgery activity levels as key targets for intervention in patients receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a workers compensation scheme in New South Wales
C_LIO_LIBy further investigating whether interventions designed to modify these factors are able to favourably affect patient outcomes, there is potential to return patients to their preoperative level of work sooner
C_LI Using controlled interrupted time series to estimate the population-level effects of Ontario's recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services BackgroundOntario recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services (OPS/CTS) to stem the harms of the opioid epidemic. We tested whether operating any site improved local opioid-related health service use and mortality rates.

MethodsWe used monthly counts of all opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths between January 2014 and December 2020 for our outcomes. For each public health unit (PHU) that implemented any OPS/CTS, we created a synthetic control as a weighted combination of unexposed PHU. We estimated the population-level effects of operating any site using controlled interrupted time series with segmented regression and adjusted for time varying confounders (i.e. OPS/CTS capacity, naloxone kits distributed, and persons receiving opioid agonist treatment per 100,000 population). We repeated the analysis using a multiple baseline approach to estimate province-wide effects.

ResultsBetween 2017 and 2020, nine out of 34 PHU implemented at least one OPS/CTS. ED visit (RR=0.96, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.99) and hospitalization (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.98) trends declined faster among treated units. Improvements in local ED visit rate trends were observed for the majority of treated units. Hospitalization rates declined faster for London (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.95 - 0.99) and Niagara (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 - 0.98); while mortality rates declined faster for Hamilton (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.90 - 0.96), Niagara (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.94 - 0.99) and Guelph (RR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.88 - 1.00).

ConclusionAlthough OPS/CTS are not sufficient to stem the harms of the opioid overdose epidemic on their own, they play a critical role in local harm reduction strategies. How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov BackgroundEarly in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, commentators warned that some COVID trials were inadequately conceived, designed and reported. Here, we retrospectively assess the prevalence of informative COVID trials launched in the first 6 months of the pandemic.

MethodsWe created a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention efficacy trials that were initiated from 2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30 using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. We evaluated trials on 3 criteria of informativeness: potential redundancy, design quality and feasibility of patient-participant recruitment. The study protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fp726/).

ResultsWe included 500 trials in our cohort, 58% of which were Phase 2 and 84.8% were directed towards the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Close to one third of trials met all three criteria and were deemed informative (29.0% (95% Confidence Interval 23.7 - 36.9)). The proportion of potentially redundant trials in our cohort was 4.1%. Over half of the trials in our cohort (56.2%) did not meet our criteria for high quality trial design. The proportion of trials with infeasible patient-participant recruitment was 22.6%.

ConclusionsLess than one third of COVID-19 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first six months met all three criteria for informativeness. Shortcomings in trial design, recruitment feasibility and redundancy reflect longstanding weaknesses in the clinical research enterprise that were likely amplified by the exceptional circumstances of a pandemic. Decreased tissue stiffness in glioblastoma by MR Elastography is associated with increased cerebral blood flow PURPOSEUnderstanding how mechanical properties relate to functional changes in glioblastomas may help explain different treatment response between patients. The aim of this study was to map differences in biomechanical and functional properties between tumor and healthy tissue, to assess any relationship between them and to study their spatial distribution.

METHODSTen patients with glioblastoma and 17 healthy subjects were scanned using MR Elastography, perfusion and diffusion MRI. Stiffness and viscosity measurements G' and G'', cerebral blood flow (CBF), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured in patients contrast-enhancing tumor, necrosis, edema, and gray and white matter, and in gray and white matter for healthy subjects. A regression analysis was used to predict CBF as a function of ADC, FA, G' and G''.

RESULTSMedian G' and G'' in contrast-enhancing tumor were 13% and 37% lower than in normal-appearing white matter (P<0.01), and 8% and 6% lower in necrosis than in contrast-enhancing tumor, respectively (P<0.05). Tumors showed both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity. Measurements approached values in normal-appearing tissue when moving outward from the tumor core, but abnormal tissue properties were still present in regions of normal-appearing tissue. Using both a linear and a random-forest model, prediction of CBF was improved by adding MRE measurements to the model (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONSThe inclusion of MRE measurements in statistical models helped predict perfusion, with stiffer tissue associated with lower perfusion values. Economic evaluation of disease elimination: an extension to the net-benefit framework and application to human African trypanosomiasis The global health community has earmarked a number of diseases for elimination or eradication, and these goals have often been praised on the premise of long-run cost-savings. However, decision-makers must contend with a multitude of demands on health budgets in the short- or medium-term, and costs-per-case often rise as the burden of a disease falls, rendering such efforts beyond the cost-effective use of scarce resources. In addition, these decisions must be made in the presence of substantial uncertainty regarding the feasibility and costs of elimination or eradication efforts. Therefore, analytical frameworks are necessary to consider the additional effort for reaching global goals, like elimination or eradication, that are beyond the cost-effective use of country resources. We propose a modification to the net-benefit framework to consider the implications of switching from an optimal strategy, in terms of cost-per-burden-averted, to a strategy with a higher likelihood of meeting the global target of elimination of transmission by a specified date. We illustrate the properties of our framework by considering the economic case of efforts to eliminate transmission of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a vector-borne parasitic disease in West and Central Africa, by 2030.

Significance StatementVarious diseases are earmarked for elimination by the global health community. While the health economic implications of elimination have been discussed before, the combination of uncertainty, cost-effectiveness in terms of cases averted, and elimination in the face of rising per-case costs has not been tackled before. We propose an approach that considers the tension between the dual objectives of cost-effectiveness and elimination while incorporating uncertainty in these objectives. We apply our method to strategies against human African trypanosomiasis in three settings, but this method could be directly applied to simulation-based studies of the cost-effectiveness of other disease elimination efforts. The method yields common metrics of efficiency when stakeholders have different objectives. Survey of Contaminated Percutaneous Injuries in Anesthesia Practitioners BackgroundAnesthesia practitioners are at inherent risk for percutaneous injuries by blood-contaminated needles and sharp objects. These exposures may result in transmission of HIV and hepatitis viruses. Data about this occupational hazard from contaminated needles and sharp devices is limited and decades old. We conducted a web-based survey to assess the occurrence, reporting, characteristics, and outcome of contaminated percutaneous injuries (CPI) in anesthesia residents, fellows, and attendings.

MethodsAfter institutional research board approval, an email was sent to 217 anesthesia practitioners requesting their participation in an online survey about contaminated percutaneous injuries. Responses were collected from February through March 2020. Results are reported as absolute numbers and proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI).

ResultsThe overall survey response rate was 51% (110/217). 59% (65/110) (95% CI, 50-68) of participants reported having one or more contaminated percutaneous injury during their years of anesthesia practice (42% (21/50) of residents, 50% (4/8) of fellows, 77% (40/52) of anesthesia attendings). Prevalence of injuries related to attendings years of anesthesia practice was 69% (95% CI, 44-94) for 5-10 years, 62.5% (95% CI, 29-96) for 10-15 years, and 79% (95% CI, 63- 95) for greater than 15 years of practice.

35% (95% CI, 26-44) of participants reported having one or more CPI within the last 5 years (40% of residents, 50% of fellows, 29% of attendings). Occurrence of CPI within the last 5 years based on attending anesthesiologist years of practice was 57% for less than 5 years, 37.5% for 10-15 years, and 20% for 15-20 years of practice. 75% (95% CI, 65-85) reported the incident at the time of injury. 59% (95% CI, 48-70) of injuries were due to hollow bore needles. 50% (95% CI, 39-61) of total injuries were high risk. 26% of injured anesthesia practitioners received post-exposure prophylaxis and there were zero seroconversions.

ConclusionMost anesthesiologists will sustain a contaminated percutaneous injury during their careers. Incidence of these injuries decreases with years of practice. Occurrence of these injuries is high among anesthesia residents, with the majority reporting their injuries. Half of the injuries are high risk with a quarter requiring postexposure prophylaxis. More education and interventions are needed to reduce percutaneous injuries and improve reporting. Alternative Covid-19 mitigation measures in school classrooms: analysis using an agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission 1.The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic continues to have major impacts on childrens education, with schools required to implement infection control measures that have led to long periods of absence and classroom closures. We have developed an agent-based epidemiological model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission that allows us to quantify projected infection patterns within primary school classrooms, and related uncertainties; the basis of our approach is a contact model constructed using random networks, informed by structured expert judgement. The effectiveness of mitigation strategies are considered in terms of effectiveness at supressing infection outbreaks and limiting pupil absence. Covid-19 infections in schools in the UK in Autumn 2020 are re-examined and the model used for forecasting infection levels in autumn 2021, as the more infectious Delta-variant was emerging and school transmission thought likely to play a major role in an incipient new wave of the epidemic. Our results were in good agreement with available data. These findings indicate that testing-based surveillance of infections in the classroom population with isolation of positive cases is a more effective mitigation measure than bubble quarantine, both for reducing transmission in primary schools and for avoiding pupil absence, even accounting for insensitivity of self-administered tests. Bubble quarantine entails large numbers of pupils being absent from school, with only modest impact on classroom infection levels. However, maintaining reduced contact rates within the classroom can have a major beneficial impact for managing Covid-19 in school settings. HIV-infected patients on combined antiretroviral treatment had similar level of arterial stiffness to the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. PurposeThe cardiovascular disease has become very common among HIV-infected patients. The aim was to compare the arterial stiffness and the endothelial dysfunction in HIV-infected patients to non-HIV-infected patients in week 4 after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

MethodsThe arterial stiffness was calculated by Endo-PAT 2000(ITAMAR(R)) and the endothelial function by Peripheral Arterial Tonometry(PAT(R)). The correct endothelial function was defined for natural logarithm of reactive hyperaemia index (lnRHI)>0.51. Arterial stiffness was assessed as the AI and corrected for heart rate of 75 bpm (AI@75).

ResultsSixty-three patients were recruited to this study, n=34 patients with HIV infection (n=18 on cART) and n=29 HIV-negative patients after recent STEMI. No statistically significant differences for AI and AI@75 were found in STEMI and in HIV on cART group. We observed p<0.05 for AI and AI@75 for patients without cART compared to STEMI and on cART patients. The observed lnRHI results were significantly different p<0.05 in STEMI and on cART patients. We get similar endothelial dysfunction p>0.05 for patients without cART compared to STEMI and on cART patients.

ConclusionsAssessing cardiovascular risk also with non-invasive methods among HIV-infected patients is very important especially in HIV-patients on cART. Endothelial dysfunction is connected with HIV infection and can be similar for STEMI and HIV-infected without cART. Leveraging fine-mapping and non-European training data to improve cross-population polygenic risk scores Polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on European training data suffer reduced accuracy in non-European target populations, exacerbating health disparities. This loss of accuracy predominantly stems from LD differences, MAF differences (including population-specific SNPs), and/or causal effect size differences. PRS based on training data from the non-European target population do not suffer from these limitations, but are currently limited by much smaller training sample sizes. Here, we propose PolyPred, a method that improves cross-population polygenic prediction by combining two complementary predictors: a new predictor that leverages functionally informed fine-mapping to estimate causal effects (instead of tagging effects), addressing LD differences; and BOLT-LMM, a published predictor. In the special case where a large training sample is available in the non-European target population (or a closely related population), we propose PolyPred+, which further incorporates the non-European training data, addressing MAF differences and causal effect size differences. PolyPred and PolyPred+ require individual-level training data (for their BOLT-LMM component), but we also propose analogous methods that replace the BOLT-LMM component with summary statistic-based components if only summary statistics are available. We applied PolyPred to 49 diseases and complex traits in 4 UK Biobank populations using UK Biobank British training data (average N=325K), and observed statistically significant average relative improvements in prediction accuracy vs. BOLT-LMM ranging from +7% in South Asians to +32% in Africans (and vs. LD-pruning + P-value thresholding (P+T) ranging from +77% to +164%), consistent with simulations. We applied PolyPred+ to 23 diseases and complex traits in UK Biobank East Asians using both UK Biobank British (average N=325K) and Biobank Japan (average N=124K) training data, and observed statistically significant average relative improvements in prediction accuracy of +24% vs. BOLT-LMM and +12% vs. PolyPred. The summary statistic-based analogues of PolyPred and PolyPred+ attained similar improvements. In conclusion, PolyPred and PolyPred+ improve cross-population polygenic prediction accuracy, ameliorating health disparities. Applying Benford's law to COVID-19 data: The case of the European Union Previous studies have used Benfords distribution to assess whether there is misreporting of COVID-19 cases and deaths. Data inaccuracies provide false information to the media, undermine global response, and hinder the preventive measures taken by countries worldwide. In this study, daily new cases and deaths from all the countries of the European Union were analyzed and the conformance to Benfords distribution was estimated. For each country, two statistical tests and two measures of deviation were calculated to determine whether the reported statistics comply with the expected distribution. Four country-level developmental indexes were also included, the GDP per capita, health expenditures, the Universal Health Coverage index, and the full vaccination rate. Regression analysis was implemented to show whether the deviation from Benfords distribution is affected by the aforementioned indexes. The findings indicate that four countries were in line with the expected distribution, Bulgaria, Croatia, Lithuania, and Romania. For the daily cases, Denmark, Greece, and Ireland, showed the greatest deviation from Benfords distribution and for deaths, Malta, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, and Luxemburg exhibited the highest deviation from Benfords law. Furthermore, it was found that the vaccination rate is positively associated with deviation from Benfords distribution. These results suggest that overall, official data provided by authorities are not confirming Benfords law, yet this approach is not conclusive; it acts as a preliminary tool for data verification. More extensive studies should be made with a more thorough investigation of countries that showed the greatest deviation. Trajectory of Growth of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Houston, Texas, January through May 2021 Based on 12,476 Genome Sequences Genetic variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are of substantial concern because they can detrimentally alter the pandemic course and disease features in individual patients. Here we report SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from 12,476 patients in the Houston Methodist healthcare system diagnosed from January 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021. The SARS-CoV-2 variant designated U.K. B.1.1.7 increased rapidly and caused 63%-90% of all new cases in the Houston area in the latter half of May. Eleven of the 3,276 B.1.1.7 genomes had an E484K change in spike protein. Compared with non-B.1.1.7 patients, individuals with B.1.1.7 had a significantly lower cycle threshold value (a proxy for higher virus load) and significantly higher rate of hospitalization. Other variants (e.g., B.1.429, B.1.427, P.1, P.2, and R.1) also increased rapidly, although the magnitude was less than for B.1.1.7. We identified 22 patients infected with B.1.617 "India" variants; these patients had a high rate of hospitalization. Vaccine breakthrough cases (n=207) were caused by a heterogeneous array of virus genotypes, including many that are not variants of interest or concern. In the aggregate, our study delineates the trajectory of concerning SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating in a major metropolitan area, documents B.1.1.7 as the major cause of new cases in Houston, and heralds the arrival and spread of B.1.617 variants in the metroplex. Significant Excess Mortality probably due to COVID-19 in Tokyo, Japan until April, 2021 BackgroundNo remarkable mortality attributable to COVID-19 confirmed by PCR test has been observed in Japan.

ObjectWe sought to quantify excess mortality using the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) model.

MethodWe applied the NIID model to deaths of all causes from 1987 up through October, 2021 for the whole of Japan and up through August, 2021 for Tokyo.

ResultsResults in Japan show huge number of excess mortality, up to 10 thousands in the two months, in August and September, 2021. On the other hand, in Tokyo, 1323 excess mortality was detected

Discussion and ConclusionWe detected substantial excess mortality in Japan in August and September, 2021 and in Tokyo in August, 2021. It might be important to continue to monitor excess mortality of COVID-19 carefully hereafter. I wanna live and not think about the future; What place for advance care planning for people living with severe multiple sclerosis and their families? A qualitative study BackgroundLittle is known about how people with multiple sclerosis and their families comprehend advance care planning (ACP) and its relevance in their lives.

AimTo explore under what situations, with whom, how, and why do people with MS and their families engage in ACP

MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study comprising interviews with people living with MS and their families followed by an ethical discussion group with five health professionals representing specialties working with people affected by MS and their families. Twenty-seven people with MS and 17 family members were interviewed between June 2019 and March 2020. Interviews and the ethical discussion group were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

ResultsParticipants narratives focused on three major themes :(i) planning for an uncertain future; (ii) perceived obstacles to engaging in ACP that included uncertainty concerning MS disease progression, negative previous experiences of ACP discussions and prioritising symptom management over future planning; (iii) Preferences for engagement in ACP included a trusting relationship with a health professional and that information then be shared across services. Health professionals accounts from the ethical discussion group departed from viewing ACP as a formal document to that of an ongoing process of seeking preferences and values. They voiced similar concerns to people with MS about uncertainty and when to initiate discussions. Some shared concerns of a lack of confidence when having ACP discussions.

ConclusionThese findings support the need for a whole systems strategic approach where information about the potential benefits of ACP in all its forms can be shared with people with MS. Moreover, they highlight the need for health professionals to be skilled and trained in engaging in ACP discussions and where information is contemporaneously and seamlessly shared across services. Post-viral parenchymal lung disease following COVID-19 and viral pneumonitis hospitalisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis BackgroundApproximately half of COVID-19 survivors present persisting breathlessness, which may include development of pulmonary fibrosis.

Research QuestionWhat is the prevalence of long-term radiological and functional pulmonary sequelae of parenchymal lung disease following hospitalisation with COVID-19 and other viral pneumonia?

Study design and methodsWe performed systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of studies in adults hospitalised with SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, or Influenza pneumonia and followed within 12 months from discharge. Searches were run on MEDLINE and Embase, updated 29 July 2021. Primary outcomes were proportion of 1) radiologic sequelae at CT scans; 2) restrictive impairment; 3) impaired gas transfer. Heterogeneity was explored in meta-regression.

ResultsNinety-five studies were included for qualitative synthesis, of which 70 were suitable for meta-analysis, including 60 studies of SARS-CoV-2 with a median follow up of 3 months. In SARS-CoV-2 the overall estimated proportion of inflammatory changes during follow up was 0.50 (95%CI 0.41 to 0.58, I2=94.6%), whilst fibrotic changes were estimated at 0.29 (95%CI 0.22 to 0.37, I2=94.1%). Inflammatory changes reduced compared with CTs performed during hospitalisation (-0.47; 95%CI -0.56 to -0.37), whereas no significant resolution was observed in fibrotic changes (-0.09; 95%CI -0.25 to 0.07). Impaired gas transfer was estimated at 0.38 (95%CI 0.32 to 0.44, I2=92.1%), which was greater than estimated restrictive impairment (0.17; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.23, I2=92.5%). High heterogeneity means that estimates should be interpreted with caution. Confidence in the estimates was deemed low due to the heterogeneity and because studies were largely observational without controls.

InterpretationA substantial proportion of radiological and functional sequelae consistent with parenchymal lung disease are observed following COVID-19 and other viral pneumonitis. Estimates of prevalence are limited by differences in case mix and initial severity. This highlights the importance of extended radiological and functional follow-up post hospitalisation.

PROSPERO registrationCRD42020183139 (April 2020)