Durability of protection post-primary COVID-19 vaccination in the US: a matched case-control study Background: Intrinsic durability of immune responses elicited by COVID-19 vaccines will drive vaccine effectiveness long-term across settings and may differ by vaccine type. We aimed here to determine durability of protection of three COVID-19 vaccines BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2.S following primary vaccination against breakthrough infections, hospitalisations, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in the United States (US). Methods: Using national claims and laboratory data covering 168 million lives, we conducted a matched case-control study with fully vaccinated individuals between January 1 and September 7, 2021. Odds ratios (OR) for developing outcomes in months two through six following primary vaccination were estimated relative to the first month after primary vaccination for each vaccine separately. Results compare each vaccine to itself and are not directly comparative. Odds ratios were translated into vaccine effectiveness (VE) using assumptions about event rates in an unvaccinated cohort. Findings: Relative to its baseline, stable protection was observed for the single-shot Ad26.COV2.S against infections and severe disease. Relative to their baseline protection waned overtime against infections for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 and against hospitalisations for BNT162b2. No waning of baseline protection was observed at any time for ICU admissions for all three vaccines. Calculated baseline VE was consistent with the published literature. Interpretation: While the starting protection level provided by the primary series may differ by vaccine type and mechanism of action, this study demonstrated by comparing each vaccine to its own baseline protection that the three vaccines in three separate populations may have different durability profiles. Further investigation is required to fully characterize the durability profile of the three vaccines. Moreover, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues, and as more countries and populations implement a standard of care consisting of three doses of the mRNA vaccines or two doses of Ad26.COV2.S, further investigation is critical to understand the level of protection and the durability of response over longer periods, novel variants and in response to homologous and heterologous boosting.
Global epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of standardized population-based seroprevalence studies, Jan 2020-Dec 2021 BackgroundOur understanding of the global scale of SARS-CoV-2 infection remains incomplete: routine surveillance data underestimates infection, cannot infer on population immunity, there is a predominance of asymptomatic infections, and uneven access to diagnostics. We meta-analyzed standardized SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies after two years in the pandemic to estimate the extent of population infection and remaining susceptibility.

Objectives/MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, preprints, and grey literature for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence published between 2020-01-01 and 2021-12-30. Eligible studies - those aligned with the WHO UNITY protocol - were extracted and critically appraised in duplicate. We meta-analyzed seroprevalence by country and month, pooling to estimate regional and global seroprevalence over time; compared seroprevalence from infection to confirmed cases to estimate under-ascertainment; meta-analyzed differences in seroprevalence between demographic subgroups; and identified national factors associated with seroprevalence using meta-regression. PROSPERO: CRD42020183634.

ResultsWe identified 431 full texts reporting 803 distinct seroprevalence studies (43% LMIC), including 398 low/moderate risk of bias studies with national/sub-national scope in further analysis. By July 2021, global SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 45.2%, 95% CI [40.7-49.8%]. Seroprevalence rose steeply in the first half of 2021 due to infection in some regions (e.g., 29.9% to 70.1% in Africa) and vaccination and infection in others (e.g., 5.6% to 94.9% in the Americas high-income countries), but remained low in others (e.g., 2.5% in the Western Pacific). In 2021 Q2, median seroprevalence to cumulative incidence ratios were 2.9:1 in HICs and 45.3:1 in LMICs. Children 0-9 years and adults 60+ were at lower risk of seropositivity than adults 20-29. In a multivariate model using pre-vaccination data, stringent public health and social measures were associated with lower seroprevalence.

ConclusionsGlobal seroprevalence has risen considerably over time and with regional variation, however much of the global population remains susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our estimates of infections based on seroprevalence far exceed reported COVID-19 cases. Quality and standardized seroprevalence studies are essential to inform COVID-19 response, particularly in resource-limited regions.
Serum but not mucosal antibody responses are associated with pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 spike cross-reactive CD4+ T cells following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly Advanced age is a main risk factor for severe COVID-19. However, low vaccination efficacy and accelerated waning immunity have been reported in this age group. To elucidate age-related differences in immunogenicity, we analysed human cellular, serological and salivary SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein-specific immune responses to BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in old (69-92 years) and middle-aged (24-57 years) vaccinees compared to natural infection (COVID-19 convalescents, 21-55 years). Serological humoral responses to vaccination exceeded those of convalescents but salivary anti-spike subunit 1 (S1) IgA and neutralizing capacity were less durable in vaccinees. In old vaccinees, we observed that pre-existing spike-specific CD4+ T cells are associated with efficient induction of anti-S1 IgG and neutralizing capacity in serum but not saliva. Our results suggest pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ T cells as predictor of an efficient COVID-19 vaccine-induced humoral immune response in old individuals. Effectiveness of a short term induction regimen of a biosimilar Adalimumab in the long term management of symptomatic Ankylosing Spondylitis Symptomatic Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Community Based Proof of Concept Observational Study IntroductionCost and drug toxicity often deter prolonged therapeutic use of anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A planned study was completed to endorse our clinic based observation of long term relief following short-term administration of anti-TNF agent.

Methods50 consenting patients with symptomatic active chronic AS under rheumatology care in a community clinic were enrolled. They had no past history of anti-TNF use. 40 mg standard biosimilar adalimumab (BS-ADA, Exemptia trade name)was injected subcutaneously every fortnight for six injections (10 weeks). Patients were monitored at several time points. Improvement was assessed at regular interval as per protocol which included standard indices (Bath and Assessment Spondyloarthritis International Society /ASAS). An intention to treat analysis with significant p<0.05 was carried out.

ResultsPatients showed early and substantial significant improvement in pain, NSAID requirement, function and in several indices (ASAS 20 & 40, ASAS partial remission, BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS) which persisted after stopping injections. 84% and 52 % of patients respectively showed ASAS 20 improvement at week 12 and 48: corresponding ASAS partial remission 34% and 24%. Over 50% patients maintained prolonged improvement and provided proof of concept (defined a-priori). Serum Interleukin-6 assay showed a sharp reduction at 24 weeks. None developed TB or serious drug toxicity. 11 patients withdrew (mostly inadequate response). Absence of control was a limitation.

ConclusionA ten-week administration of biosimilar adalimumab in difficult to treat AS showed early substantial improvement which often persisted for 24 weeks. This unconventional strategy was socioeconomically appealing. It merits further validation and acceptance especially in resource strained settings. A general computational framework for COVID-19 modelling with applications to testing varied interventions in education environments We construct a spatially-compartmental individual-based model of the spread of Covid-19 in indoor spaces. The model can be used to predict the infection rates in a variety of locations when various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are introduced. Tasked by the Welsh Government, we apply the model to secondary schools and Further and Higher Education environments. Specifically, we consider student populations mixing in a classroom and in halls of residence. We focus on assessing the potential efficacy of Lateral Flow Devices (LFDs) when used in broad-based screens for asymptomatic infection or in  test-to-release scenarios in which individuals who have been exposed to infection are released from isolation given a negative result. LFDs are also compared to other NPIs; we find that, although LFD testing can be used to mitigate the spread of Covid-19, it is more effective to invest in personal protective equipment, e.g. masks, and in increasing ventilation quality. In addition, we provide an open-access and user-friendly online applet that simulates the individual-based model, complete with user tutorials to encourage the use of the model to aid educational policy decisions as input infection data evolves (https://bit.ly/CV19_INTER_IBM). Macronutrient mass intake explains deferential weight and fat loss in isocaloric diets Differential weight and fat losses under isocaloric diets of distinct macronutrient composition are well-documented findings in obesity research.1-6 Such data are considered a result of inadequate methodology as it disagree with the energy balance theory.7 A recent mathematical analysis of this paradigm has found, however, serious analytical contradictions in its foundations.8 As an alternative, a mass balance model was proposed to explain the aforesaid body composition alterations. Here, we expand on this observation by contrasting both models. We show that mass balance explains a wide range of fending experiments including those concurring with the energy balance principle. The latter, however, is less flexible and results in poor forecasts in settings consistent with mass balance. The energy balance theory is thus an unsatisfactory model of body composition changes. Consequently, by shifting to a mass balance paradigm of obesity a much deeper understanding of this disease may follow in the near future. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition lowers the cholesterol pathway, which influences colon tumors differentiation. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of death worldwide. Up to 70% of CRC patients will metastasize. Identify new biomarkers of progression to prevent/delay disease evolution is urgent. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a major program engaged during metastasis. We aim at identifying a combination of new genes that further identify signs of EMT in cancer tissues. We treated HT-29 cells grown in 3D with an EMT Inducing cocktail, and collect them before during and after treatment. For each condition, pan-transcriptomic analyses were done. Genes that were both induced upon EMT induction and inhibited upon EMT release (mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition or MET) were selected. We identified new genes for EMT-MET programs. These genes were used to build a metagene that, when applied to a database of transcriptomic data from primary colorectal tumors (n= 2,239), had an independent prognosis value. Finally, we submitted this metagene to CMap and identified drugs that might affect EMT-MET programs. Statins, well-known inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis, were among them and effectively delayed MET. These data show that cholesterol and EMT pathways are opposite regulators and impact differently tumor differentiation and outcome.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCEMetastases are the main cause of death of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the major issue in CRC management. Understanding the chain of events that lead to metastasis occurrence is urgent to identify new biomarkers of progression and/or new potential targets. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a major player in cancer dissemination that remains non-targetable due to its broad involvement in tissue homeostasis. Here, we used a relevant in vitro dynamic model to identify the pathways triggered during EMT in CRC and how this might improve tumors classification, prognosis and open therapeutic avenue for this deadly disease. The cholesterol pathway surprisingly popped-out from this model and turned out to be a good prognosis factor of disease-free survival for CRC. Altogether, our results showed that an active EMT program lowers the cholesterol pathway, which further influence the differentiation of colon tumor toward the most aggressive subtypes. Adjunctive Ketamine for Sedation in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients: An Active-Controlled, Pilot, Feasibility Clinical Trial ObjectiveKetamine has been shown to decrease sedative requirements in intensive care unit (ICU). Randomized trials are limited on patient-centered outcomes. We designed this pilot clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of using ketamine as an adjunct analgosedative compared with standard of care (SOC) alone and determine preliminary effect size on 28-day mechanical ventilation (MV) duration and ventilator-free days (VFDs).

DesignPilot, single-center, active-controlled, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

SettingMedical, surgical, and transplant ICUs at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.

Patients and MethodsAdult patients who were intubated within 24 hours, expected to require MV for the next calendar day, and had institutional pain and sedation protocol initiated.

InterventionAdjunct ketamine infusion 1-2 g/kg/min for 48 hours versus SOC.

Measurements and Main ResultsTotal of 83 patients (43 in SOC and 40 in ketamine) were included. Demographics were balanced between groups. Median MV duration was 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-9.25 days) in ketamine and 5 (IQR 2-8 days) in SOC, p= 0.15. Median VFDs was 19 (IQR 0-24.75 days) in ketamine and 19 (IQR 0-24 days) in the SOC (p=0.70). More patients attained goal RASS score at 24 and 48 hours in ketamine (67.5% and 73.5%, respectively) compared with SOC (52.4% and 66.7%, respectively). Sedatives and vasopressors cumulative doses, and hemodynamic changes were similar. ICU length-of-stay was 12.5 (IQR 6-21.2 days) in ketamine, compared with 12 (IQR 5.5-23 days) in SOC, p=0.89. Consent and protocol adherence rate were adequate. No serious adverse events were observed in either group.

ConclusionsUse of ketamine as an adjunct analgosedative agent appeared to be feasible and safe with no negative impact on outcomes, including hemodynamics. The protocol of this pilot trial could be improved by modifying ketamine dosing regimen. These findings provide a basis for future, adequately powered, multicenter trial to investigate its association with patient-centered outcomes further. What We Learned from COVID-19: From endotheliitis to treatment ObjectiveCOVID-19 may yield a variety of clinical pictures, differing from pneumonitis to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) along with vascular damage in the lung tissue, named as endotheliitis. To date, no specific treatment strategy was approved by any authority for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in terms of endotheliitis-related comorbidities. Here, we present our experience of COVID-19 by evaluating 11,190 COVID-19 patients with the manifestations of endotheliitis in skin, lung, and brain tissues according to the different phases of COVID-19.

MethodsAfter a retrospective examination, patients were divided into three groups according to their repercussions of vascular distress, which were represented by radiological, histopathological, and clinical findings. (Group A: no or mild pulmonary involvement, Group B: moderate pulmonary involvement with clinical risk of deterioration, Group C: severe pulmonary involvement and respiratory failure). We presented the characteristics and disease course of seven representative and complicated cases which represents the different phases of the disease, and discussed the treatment strategies in each group. The current pathophysiological mechanisms responsible from SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related respiratory failure and current treatment strategies were reviewed and discussed in detail.

ResultsAmong 11.190 patients, 9294 patients met the criteria for Group A, and 1376 patients were presented to our clinics with Group B characteristics. Among these patients, 1896 individuals(Group B and Group C) were hospitalized. While 1220 inpatients were hospitalized within the first 10 days after the diagnosis, 676 of them were worsened and hospitalized 10 days after their diagnosis. Among hospitalized patients, 520 of them did not respond to group A and B treatments and developed hypoxemic respiratory failure (Group C) and 146 individuals needed ventilator support and were followed in the intensive care unit, and 43 (2.2%) patients died.

ConclusionDistinctive manifestations in each COVID-19 patient, including non-respiratory conditions in the acute phase and the emerging risk of long-lasting complications, suggest that COVID-19 has an endotheliitis-centred thrombo-inflammatory pathophysiology. Endotheliitis can also explain the mechanism behind the respiratory failure in COVID-19, and the difference of COVID-19 related ARDS from ARDS seen in other critical conditions. In addition, use of early corticosteroid in patients with early symptoms and early tocilizumab in ICU helps to reduce mortality and progression of the disease. Endotheliitis-based pathophysiological mechanisms are known to be momentarily changing and difficut to manage due to their risk of sudden aggrevation. Hence, daily evaluation of clinical, laboratory and radiological findings of patients and deciding appropriate pathophysiological treatment would help to reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19. "What do you mean I can't have a doctor? This is Canada!" - A Qualitative Study of the Myriad Consequences for Unattached Patients Awaiting Primary Care Attachment BackgroundPatient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a patient perspective, an under-studied phenomenon to date.

MethodsA realist-informed qualitative study was conducted with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted and transcribed for analysis. The framework method was used to carry out analysis, which was guided by Donabedians model of assessing healthcare access and quality.

ResultsFive key findings were noted in this study: 1) Participants experienced a range of consequences from not having a regular PHC provider. Participants used creative strategies to 2) attempt to gain attachment to a regular PHC provider, and, to 3) address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider. 4) Participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system, and 5) stress related to the consequences and added work of being unattached and lost care.

ConclusionsUnattached patients experienced a burden of care related to lost care and managing their own health and related information, due to the download of medical record management and system navigation to them. These findings may underestimate the consequences for further at-risk populations who would not have been included in our recruitment. This may result in poorer health outcomes, which could be mitigated by interventions at the structural level, such as enhanced centralized waitlists to promote attachment. Such waitlists may benefit from a triage approach to appropriately attach patients based on need. One Year of Evidence on Mental Health Disorders in China during the COVID-19 Crisis - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis This paper provides a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence rate of mental health issues of general population, general and frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) in China over one year of the COVID-19 crisis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medrxiv at November 16th, 2020, pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence rates, and ran meta-regression to tease out the heterogeneity. The meta-regression results uncovered several predictors of the prevalence rates, including severity, type of mental issues, population, sampling location, and study quality. Pooled prevalence rates are significantly different from, yet largely between, the findings of previous meta-analyses, suggesting the results of our larger study are consistent with yet more accurate than the findings of the smaller, previous meta-analyses. The prevalence rates of distress and insomnia and those of frontline HCWs are higher suggest future research and interventions should pay more attention to those mental outcomes and populations. Our findings suggest a need to examine the prevalence rates at varying levels of severity. The one-year cumulative evidence on sampling locations (Wuhan vs. non-Wuhan) corroborates the typhoon eye effect theory.

Trial registrationCRD4202022059 Airway management, procedural data, and mortality records of patients undergoing surgery for mucormycosis associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) In India, the second wave of coronavirus disease (COVID -19) was associated with a distinct surge in cases of invasive fungal infection with mucormycosis. This disease was seen typically in the sinonasal form in COVID-19 patients. Uncontrolled diabetes, steroid use in COVID-19 treatment, etc. were some of the postulated risk factors for the association of COVID 19 and Mucormycosis. The management plan of these cases included surgical debridement, systemic antifungal therapy, sugar control, and management of antifungal related systemic adverse effects. In this retrospective case record review, we aimed to evaluate the airway management plan, demographics, and overall outcomes in patients undergoing surgical resection for COVID-19 associated mucormycosis. Forty-one (71.9 %) patients had a diagnosis of sino-nasal mucormycosis, fourteen (24.6%) had a diagnosis of rhino-orbital mucormycosis, and 2 patients (3.5%) were diagnosed with palatal mucormycosis. Total 44 (77.19 %) patients had co-morbidities. The most common co-morbidity was Diabetes Mellitus 42 (73.6%), followed by hypertension 21 (36.84%) and Acute kidney injury 14 (28.07%). We used the intubation difficulty scale score to assess intubating conditions. Intubation was easy to slightly difficult in 53 out of 57 patients. In our study, mortality occurred in 7 (12.28 %) patients. The median mortality time was 60 (range, 27-74) days. The median time to hospital discharge was 53.5 (range,10-85) days. Managing COVID-19 on its own is challenging and additional mucormycosis can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite challenges and risks, timely and meticulous interventions can reduce complications. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG antibody responses after second dose of ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 and correlates of protection in the UK general population We investigated anti-spike IgG antibody responses and correlates of protection following second doses of ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the UK general population. In 222,493 individuals, we found significant boosting of anti-spike IgG by second doses of both vaccines in all ages and using different dosing intervals, including the 3-week interval for BNT162b2. After second vaccination, BNT162b2 generated higher peak levels than ChAdOX1. Older individuals and males had lower peak levels with BNT162b2 but not ChAdOx1, while declines were similar across ages and sexes with ChAdOX1 or BNT162b2. Prior infection significantly increased antibody peak level and half-life with both vaccines. Anti-spike IgG levels were associated with protection from infection after vaccination and, to an even greater degree, after prior infection. At least 67% protection against infection was estimated to last for 2-3 months after two ChAdOx1 doses and 5-8 months after two BNT162b2 doses in those without prior infection, and 1-2 years for those unvaccinated after natural infection. A third booster dose may be needed, prioritised to ChAdOx1 recipients and those more clinically vulnerable. How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov BackgroundEarly in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, commentators warned that some COVID trials were inadequately conceived, designed and reported. Here, we retrospectively assess the prevalence of informative COVID trials launched in the first 6 months of the pandemic.

MethodsWe created a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention efficacy trials that were initiated from 2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30 using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. We evaluated trials on 3 criteria of informativeness: potential redundancy, design quality and feasibility of patient-participant recruitment. The study protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fp726/).

ResultsWe included 500 trials in our cohort, 58% of which were Phase 2 and 84.8% were directed towards the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Close to one third of trials met all three criteria and were deemed informative (29.0% (95% Confidence Interval 23.7 - 36.9)). The proportion of potentially redundant trials in our cohort was 4.1%. Over half of the trials in our cohort (56.2%) did not meet our criteria for high quality trial design. The proportion of trials with infeasible patient-participant recruitment was 22.6%.

ConclusionsLess than one third of COVID-19 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first six months met all three criteria for informativeness. Shortcomings in trial design, recruitment feasibility and redundancy reflect longstanding weaknesses in the clinical research enterprise that were likely amplified by the exceptional circumstances of a pandemic. Exploration of interethnic variation in the ibuprofen metabolizing enzyme CYP2C9: a genetic-based cautionary guide for treatment of COVID-19 symptoms Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is a rapidly spreading infectious illness that causes a debilitating respiratory syndrome. While non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may be prescribed for the management of pain and fever, there was early controversy on the use of ibuprofen for symptomatic treatment of COVID-19. P450 enzyme CYP2C9 are known to be involved in the metabolism of NSAIDs. Although no study has been conducted in the setting of population genetics in patients with COVID-19 yet, there are plausible mechanisms by which genetic determinants may play a role in adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this work, we adjusted expected phenotype frequencies based on racial demographic models dependent on population ancestry in drug responses and toxicity events associated with ibuprofen treatment. A cohort of 101 Jordanian Arab samples retrospectively were selected and genotyped using Affymetrix DMET Plus Premier Package, within the context of over 100,000 global subjects in 417 published reports. European populations are 7.2x more likely to show impaired ibuprofen metabolism than Sub-Saharan populations, and 4.5x more likely than East Asian ancestry populations. Hence, a proactive assessment of the most likely gene-drug candidates will lead to more effective treatments and a better understanding of the role of pharmacogenetics for COVID-19. Impact of COVID 19 on the quality of life (QoL) of patients living with Sickle Cell Disorder (SCD) in Lagos Nigeria The study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Quality of Life (QoL) in persons living with Sickle Cell Disorder (SCD) in Lagos, Nigeria and to determine how they coped during the pandemic, particularly during the period of total lockdown with the additional "SHIELDING" measures to which they had to adhere. Data was collected using a standardized protocol PedsQL, Sickle Cell Disease Module version.3.0 designed for youth within the ages of (13-18) years, (19-35) years and their parents/Guardian if underage. The survey captured data on patients pain impact, hurts, management, treatments, communication with their caregivers and their Guardians perception. The survey was performed online, or Face-to-Face/telephone interview if online was not possible. Contacts of patients and parents were obtained from the database of Sickle Cell Foundation Nigeria. A total of 105 (80 patients and 25 parents) participants responded to the survey. The age distribution of respondents was highest at 56 % in the age bracket of 13 - 18 years old. Pain crisis were very common amongst patients. The survey revealed that the type of treatment or care received at these times determined whether or not the patients visited the hospital when they had pain crises. In addition, as patients reports an increase in ill-treatment they experienced in the hands of health care givers, so did the fear of accessing treatment during the COVID pandemic. It was observed that the frequency of pain crises experienced by SCD patients was proportional to the patients quality of life (the higher the frequency of pains, the worse the QoL). As a follow-up, a more detailed study would be required, as this study was limited in the capturing of the demographics, sex and number of participants; Considering the number of persons living with SCD that visit the Sickle Cell Foundation Nigeria, (about 3,000 patients), the number of responses in this study was low (105). It is believed that a higher number of responses would have given more information about the Sickle Cell burden and the QoL of persons living with SCD in Lagos during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lagos was the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe, and the US and of the literature ObjectivesTo bring together spontaneously reported data from around the world to estimate the reporting rate in different countries and better understand the risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following exposure to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

DesignSystematic review of the literature and systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), and European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA).

Data sourcesSpontaneously reported data for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty) and COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (Spikevax) were obtained using outputs from the UKs Yellow Card scheme (covering the period 09/12/2020 - 20/10/2021), the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS; US; covering the period 23/08/2021 - 21/10/2021), and EudraVigilance (EU/EEA; covering the period 21/12/2020 - 21/10/2021). Systematic searches of PubMed and Embase literature databases were performed with a datalock point of 11 October 2021.

Eligibility criteriaAll publicly available spontaneous reporting data from the three regions of interest were included. Data on events labelled "Myocarditis" and "Pericarditis" were included. No restrictions on age or gender were applied. For the systematic literature review, all pharmacoepidemiological studies of observational design investigating myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines identified by our search were included. No restrictions on language or date were applied. Pre-print manuscripts were included if no peer-reviewed version was available. Studies of non-observational design, case reports, and case series were excluded. Study quality was assessed using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools. All studies were considered of sufficient quality for inclusion.

Data extraction and synthesisOne researcher extracted data from spontaneous reporting systems and published pharmacoepidemiological studies. Spontaneously reported events of myocarditis and pericarditis were presented for each individual data source, and stratified by vaccine, age, sex, and dose where this information was available. Vaccination data were obtained to the same date, and reporting rates were calculated for the events of myocarditis and pericarditis for each population of interest. For published pharmacoepidemiological studies, the study design, participant characteristics, and study results were tabulated.

ResultsOverall, there were 435 reports of myocarditis and 327 reports of pericarditis reported to the UKs Yellow Card scheme up to 20 October 2021. To 21 October 2021, in the US, 1936 reports of myocarditis and 1271 reports of pericarditis had been submitted to VAERS; there had been 2924 reports of myocarditis and 1855 reports of pericarditis submitted to EudraVigilance to the same date. Most reports (73.3%) had been submitted following Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech). Males represented 74.9% of reports of myocarditis and 56.9% of pericarditis overall (for US and EU/EEA populations only), and the majority of reports concerned vaccinees ages under 40 years. Reports were more frequent following the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Reporting rates of myocarditis and pericarditis were consistent between the data sources. Seven pharmacoepidemiological studies were included; results of these studies were largely consistent with results of our spontaneous report analyses.

ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that younger vaccinees more frequently report myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines compared with older vaccinees. These events had mild clinical course followed by full recovery in most cases. Results from published literature supported the results of our analyses.

Strengths and Limitations of the StudyO_LIThis is the first study to bring together spontaneously reported data from the United Kingdom, United States, and Europe on myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
C_LIO_LIResults from this study provide evidence on the frequency of reported events of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines in different age groups, and by sex and vaccine dose. Analyses of spontaneous reports were consolidated with results of published literature, identified by systematic review.
C_LIO_LIResults may have been influenced by biases including different vaccination policies in each region examined, and publicity on events of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines.
C_LIO_LIThe study relied on outputs from spontaneous reporting systems in which the level of detail differed between the systems examined; furthermore, it is not possible to estimate incidence rates using spontaneous reports due to the lack of data on the exposed population, and there is no unvaccinated comparison group.
C_LIO_LIThere is an urgent need for further pharmacoepidemiological studies to be conducted to provide more accurate estimates of the frequency, clinical course, long term outcome, effects of treatment and impact on quality of life, to address many of the limitations of spontaneous reporting.
C_LI What delirium detection tools are used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom? Survey results from 91% of acute healthcare organisations. PurposeOur aim was to collect information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive care settings in the United Kingdom (UK).

MethodsWe sent a Freedom of Information request to 169 UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals, trusts and health boards (units) in July 2020 to obtain data on usage of delirium assessment tools in clinical practice and delirium pathways or guidelines.

ResultsWe received responses from 154/169 units (91% response rate). Of these, 146/154 (95%) units reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 131/154 (85%) units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4  As Test (4AT) was the most widely used tool, with 117/146 (80%) units reporting use. The Confusion Assessment Method was used in 65/146 (45%) units, and the Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD) in 52/146 (36%) units.

ConclusionsOur findings show that the 4AT is the most commonly used tool in the UK, with 80% of units reporting use. This study adds to our knowledge of real-world uptake of delirium detection methods at scale. Future studies should evaluate real-world implementation of delirium assessment tools further via (i) tool completion rates and (ii) rates of positive scores against the expected prevalence delirium in the clinical population concerned.

KEY SUMMARY POINTSO_ST_ABSAimC_ST_ABSTo seek information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive clinical care settings in the United Kingdom (UK), and to assess usage of specific delirium assessment tools: the 4  As Test (4AT), Confusion Assessment Method and Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD).

FindingsIn total, 95% of National Health Service (NHS) units (hospitals, trusts and health boards) reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 85% of units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4AT was the most widely used tool, with 80% of units reporting use; the Confusion Assessment Method was reportedly used in 45% of units and the SQiD in 36% of units.

MessageThis study shows real-world, large-scale uptake of delirium detection methods and delirium guidelines in UK hospitals, which contributes to ongoing efforts to improve delirium care. Development of machine learning models for the prediction of complications after colorectal and small intestine surgery in psychiatric and non-psychiatric patient collectives (P-Study) Psychiatric and psychosomatic diseases are an increasingly cumbersome burden for the medical system. Indeed, hospital costs associated with mental health conditions have been constantly on the rise in recent years. Moreover, psychiatric conditions are likely to have a negative effect on the treatment of other medical conditions and surgical outcomes, in addition to their direct effects on the overall quality of life. Our study aims to investigate the impact of preoperative Risk factor, psychiatric and psychosomatic diseases on the outcomes of colorectal surgery and length of hospital stay via predictive modeling techniques.

MethodPatient data will be collected from several participating national and international surgical centers The machine learning models will be calculated and coded, but also published according to the TRIPOD guidelines (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis).

ResultIt is conceivable to arrive at generalizable models predicting the abovementioned endpoints through large amounts of data from several centers. The models will be subsequently deployed as a free-to-use web-based prediction tool using the Shiny environment [47]. The cost for the hosting server and digital infrastructure will be covered by Dr. Anas Taha. The sponsor will store the data for ten years. Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis AimsCardiovascular and renal effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been inconsistent in cardiovascular outcome trials, and factors associated with the efficacy of GLP-1RAs remain to be clarified. Here, we evaluate the cardiovascular and renal outcomes with GLP-1RAs and associations between these outcomes and HbA1c or weight reduction.

Materials and MethodsWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of GLP1-RAs reporting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction) as the primary outcome. We conducted a meta-regression analysis of primary and secondary outcomes with HbA1c or weight reduction following a meta-analysis with a random-effects model for these outcomes.

ResultsWe extracted data of 60,800 individuals from eight eligible studies (ELIXA, LEADER, SUSTAIN-6, EXSCEL, HARMONY, PIONEER 6, REWIND, and AMPLITUDE-O). GLP-1RAs reduced MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.93; P < 0.001) and secondary outcomes including the composite renal outcome (0.80; 0.73-0.87; P < 0.001). In meta-regression analysis, every 1% reduction in HbA1c was associated with 26% and 35% decreases in the logarithm of HR of MACE (P = 0.044; R2 = 0.65) and the composite renal outcome (P = 0.040; R2 = 0.85), respectively. On the contrary, weight reduction was not associated with any outcome, including MACE (P = 0.390).

ConclusionsThe reduction in HbA1c, but not body weight, is associated with cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The magnitude of HbA1c reduction can be a surrogate for cardiovascular and renal benefits of treatment with GLP-1RAs. Associations between COVID-19 transmission rates, park use, and landscape structure The COVID-19 pandemic has had severe impacts on global public health. In England, social distancing measures and a nationwide lockdown were introduced to reduce the spread of the virus. Green space accessibility may have been particularly important during this lockdown, as it could have provided benefits for physical and mental wellbeing. However, the associations between public green space use and the rate of COVID-19 transmission are yet to be quantified, and as the size and accessibility of green spaces vary within Englands local authorities, the risks and benefits to the public of using green space may be context-dependent. To evaluate how green space affected COVID-19 transmission across 299 local authorities (small regions) in England, we calculated a daily case rate metric, based upon a seven-day moving average, for each day within the period June 1st - November 30th 2020 and assessed how baseline health and mobility variables influenced these rates. Next, looking at the residual case rates, we investigated how landscape structure (e.g. area and patchiness of green space) and park use influenced transmission. We first show that reducing mobility is associated with a decline in case rates, especially in areas with high population clustering. After accounting for known mechanisms behind transmission rates, we found that park use (showing a preference for park mobility) was associated with decreased residual case rates, especially when green space was low and contiguous (not patchy). Our results support that a reduction in overall mobility may be a good strategy for reducing case rates, endorsing the success of lockdown measures. However, if mobility is necessary, outdoor park use may be safer than other forms of mobility and associated activities (e.g. shopping or office-based working). Variability in proteoglycan biosynthetic genes reveals new facets of heparan sulfates diversity. A systematic review and analysis Proteoglycans are complex macromolecules formed of glycosaminoglycan chains covalently linked to core proteins through a linker tetrasaccharide common to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPG). Biosynthesis of a single proteoglycan requires the expression of dozens of genes, which together create the large structural and functional diversity reflected by the numerous diseases or syndromes associated to their genetic variability. Among proteoglycans, HSPG are the most structurally and functionally complex. To decrease this complexity, we retrieved and linked information on pathogenic variants, polymorphism, expression, and literature databases for 50 genes involved in the biosynthesis of HSPG core proteins, heparan sulfate (HS) chains, and their linker tetrasaccharide. This resulted in a new gene organization and biosynthetic pathway representation in which the phenotypic continuum of disorders as linkeropathies and other pathologies could be predictable. Moreover, ubiquitous NDST1, GLCE, HS2ST1, and HS6ST1 appeared to generate ubiquitous heparan sulfate (HS) sequences essential for normal development and homeostasis, whereas the tissue restricted NDST2-4, HS6ST2-3, and HS3ST1-6 appeared to generate specialized HS sequences mainly involved in responsiveness to stimuli. Supported by data on genetic polymorphism and clinical variants, we afford a new vision of HSPG involvement in homeostasis, disease, vulnerability to disease, and behavioral disorders. Chemosensory dysfunctions induced by COVID-19 can persist up to 7 months: A study of over 700 healthcare workers Several studies have revealed either self-reported chemosensory alterations in large groups or objective quantified chemosensory impairments in smaller populations of patients diagnosed with COVID-19. However, due to the great variability in published results regarding COVID-19-induced chemosensory impairments and their follow-up, prognosis for chemosensory functions in patients with such complaints remains unclear. Our objective is to describe the various chemosensory alterations associated with COVID-19 and their prevalence and evolution after infection. A cross-sectional study of 704 healthcare workers with a RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between 28/2/2020 and 14/6/2020 was conducted 3 to 7 months after onset of symptoms. Data were collected with an online questionnaire. Outcomes included differences in reported chemosensory self-assessment of olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal functions across time points and Chemosensory Perception Test scores from an easy-to-use at-home self-administered chemosensory test. Among the 704 participants, 593 (84.2%) were women, the mean (SD) age was 42 (12) years, and the questionnaire was answered on average 4.8 (0.8) months after COVID-19. During COVID-19, a decrease in olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal sensitivities were reported by 81.3%, 81.5% and 48.0% respectively. Three to seven months later, reduced sensitivity was still reported by 52.0%, 41.9% and 23.3% respectively. Chemosensory Perception Test scores indicate that 19.5% of participants had objective olfactory impairment. These data suggest a significant proportion of COVID-19 cases have persistent chemosensory impairments at 3 to 7 months after their infection but the majority of those who had completely lost their olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal sensitivity have improved. Current state of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude, practices, and associated factors among Bangladeshi food handlers from various food industries. While people around the world are terrified of the global pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and are dying for a permanent solution, undertaking preventive safety measures are said to be the most effective way to stay away from it. Peoples adherences to these measures are broadly dependent on their knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP). People working in the food industries must be extra cautious during this time because they are in close proximity to consumable items. The present study was designed to evaluate food handlers knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding COVID-19 in different food industries in Bangladesh. A number of 400 food handlers from 15 food industries took part in this online-based study. The information was collected from the participants through a questionnaire prepared in Google form. With a correct response rate of about 90% on average (knowledge 89.7%, attitude 93%, practices 88.2%), the participants showed an acceptable of KAP regarding COVID-19. Education and working experiences had a significant association with the total KAP scores (p < 0.05). The findings may assist public health professionals and practitioners in developing targeted strategies for implementing such studies in other industrial sectors and taking appropriate measures based on the KAP studies.