Advantage of Financial Times vs. free news sources for improving own knowledge of finance?
"If you are interested in a career in algorithmic trading, I strongly encourage you to formally study math and computer science.  Algorithmic trading firms have no need for employees with financial knowledge; if they did, they'd just be called ""trading"" firms.  Rather, they need experts in machine learning, statistical modeling, and computer science in general. Of course there are other avenues of employment at an algorithmic trading firm, such as accounting, clearing, exchange relations, etc.  If that's the sort of thing you're interested in, again you'll probably want a formal education in those areas as opposed to just reading about finance in the news. If you edit your question or add a comment below with information about your particular background, I could perhaps advise you in a bit more detail. ::edit:: Given your comment, I would say you have a fine academic background for the industry.  When hiring mathematicians, firms care most about the ease with which you can explore and extract features from massive datasets (especially time series) regardless of what the dataset might represent.  An intelligent firm will not care whether you arrive at their doorstep with zero finance knowledge; they will want to teach you everything from scratch anyway. Nonetheless, some domain knowledge could be helpful, but you're not going to get ""more"" of it from reading any mass market news source, whether you have to pay for it or not.  That's because  Some non-mass-market news sources in the industry are  These are subscription-only and actually discuss real information that real professional investors care about.  They are loaded with industry jargon, they're extremely opinionated, and (in my opinion) they're useless.  I can't imagine trying to learn about the industry from them, but if you want to spend money for news in order to be exposed to the innards of the industry, then either of these is far better than the Financial Times.  Despite requiring a subscription, the Financial Times still does not cover the technical details of professional trading. Instead of trying to learn from news, then, I would suggest some old favorites: and, above all else, Read everything in the navigation box on the right side under Financial Markets and Financial Instruments." I recommend using Morning Brew. They email you a free daily newsletter with the top financial news stories and earnings events. I have subscribed to the Wall Street Journal and Financial Times before. Morning Brew basically covers all of the headlines you would see on those sites.
When you look at the charts in Google Finance, they put the news on the right hand side. The time stamp for each news item is indicated with a letter in the chart. This often shows what news the market is reacting to. In your example:  Clicking on the letter F leads to this Reuters story: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/04/usa-housing-s-idUSWAT01486120110204 I really want people to answer this.  I need to build my general macro repertoire and good news is key.  I was getting the Bridgewater Dailies at my last job and they are *fantastic*.  Unfortunately they are super expensive and only businesses can afford them.  I read a lot of the general economics output of major banks which is free on their websites.  I also read a selection of blogs which have an economics/macro tilt, but tend to be a lot of opinion and academic stuff.  This is what I've been reading recently:    [Krugman](http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/)  [Marginal Revolution](http://marginalrevolution.com/)  [Project Syndicate](http://www.project-syndicate.org/)  [Noah Smith](http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.jp/)  [The Upshot](http://www.nytimes.com/upshot/)  I also read Reuters for economics news generally since there is no paywall.  Hope this helps, and I really hope there is more quality free stuff out there that I've missed. I'm not familiar enough with finance in any capacity to know what the difference is between financial services or a finance department (beyond what you said); my familiarity of the industry extends to trading, rating, and financial law enforcement. But at a glance on mobile, that looks like pretty much exactly what I was looking for. I have no connect to the industry, but habe been on a Wall St media binge lately, and like to understand powerful/influencial sectors of society anyways. Thanks. A lot of business sites are subscription only. Financial Times is the most obvious example. The Economist is the other. At least The Economist is making a very strong, healthy profit.  A lot of other businesses work on a Freemium model, most obviously Bloomberg. The Bloomberg Terminal costs 24k a year to lease, and it has a stronghold on the financial community. But you can get tons of Bloomberg news and data on their site/channel for free. Why? Because having that wide public reach adds value to Bloomberg--they have access to a lot of industry insiders who exchange tips etc. for the ability to leak info to the public, etc. It's a smart business model and works very well.  There are other models that work equally well, but I think a lot of people don't really realize this. ZeroHedge is the best, although it appeals to a particular audience (highly educated economics/business folks with a very negative view of government). They pull articles from all over the web, so you get a really good aggregator with maybe 20 articles/day of high quality work.  Bloomberg I read if there's a good topic. That pops up on facebook for me and I read probably 10/day.  Wall Street Journal is great if you want mainstream (read: delayed) business news. Most of the things that are truly news are long-term in nature and you'd read about them on ZeroHedge far before the WSJ.  I used to read Dealbook a lot, although I've gotten away from it lately due to the lack of mergers &amp; acquisitions activity.  Lastly, I used to have a blogroll of maybe 5-10 investment blogs with truly great writers/thinkers, but alas, most have stopped writing now.  sorry about the delay. forgot I saw your question. No career advice or homework help (unless your homework is some kind of big project and you need an explanation on a concept).   I want to see financial news, legislation concerning the markets and regulation, self posts about financial concepts, opinion articles about finance from reputable sources, etc. My two cents:   I, like many people in finance, got into it for the money. However, I like many other people, found myself liking it for intrinsic reasons once I got into it.   I genuinely enjoy learning about financial theory, economics, understanding how global markets work, following the different story lines for the EU/US/Asian economies, working on financial models, reading the WSJ, keeping up to date on new earning releases, analyzing investments, learning about companies/industries, etc.  But I never would have found out that I liked these things unless I had chosen to study them and the only reason I chose to study them in the first place was because I wanted to make money. I'd take an intro finance class and see if it seems like something that could grow on you. Depends what you mean by business world and finance world.   NYTimes Sunday business section is a good start - mostly for large business.  The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need by Andrew Tobias for how to invest your personal money - and you'll see why no one who says they can predict the market is accurate for very long.   INC Magazine for running a small company Yes, there are very lucrative opportunities available by using financial news releases. A lot of times other people just aren't looking in less popular markets, or you may observe the news source before other people realize it, or may interpret the news differently than the other market participants. There is also the buy the rumor, sell the news mantra - for positive expected information (opposite for negative expected news), which results in a counterintuitive trading pattern. There are all sorts of topics in finance that take a lot of time to learn.  You have valuation (time value of money, capital asset pricing model, dividend discount model, etc.), financial statement analysis (ratio analysis, free cash flow &amp; discounted cash flow, etc.) , capital structure analysis(Modgliani &amp; Miller theories of capital structure, weighted average cost of capital, more CAPM, the likes), and portfolio management (asset allocation, security selection, integrates financial statement analysis + other fields like derivatives, fixed income, forex, and commodity markets) and all sorts.   My opinion of Investopedia is that there is a lot of wheat with the chaff.  I think articles/entries are just user-submitted and there are good gems in Investopedia but a lot of it only covers very basic concepts.  And you often don't know what you don't know, so you might come out with a weak understanding of something.    To begin, you need to understand TVM and why it works.  Time value of money is a critical concept of finance that I feel many people don't truly grasp and just understand you need some 'rate' to use for this formula.  Also, as a prereq, you should understand basics of accrual accounting (debits &amp; credits) and how the accounting system works.  Don't need to know things like asset retirement obligations, or anything fancy, just how accounting works and how things affect certain financial statements.  After that, I'd jump into CAPM and cost of capital.  Cost of capital is also a very misunderstood concept since schools often just give students the 'cost of capital' for math problems when in reality, it's not just an explicit number but more of a 'general feeling' in the environment.  Calculating cost of capital is actually often very tricky (market risk premium) and subjective, sometimes it's not (LIBOR based).    After that, you can build up on those basic concepts and start to do things like dividend discount models (basic theory underlying asset pricing models) and capital asset pricing models, which builds on the idea of cost of capital.    Then go into valuation.  Learn how to price equities, bonds, derivatives, etc.  For example, you have the dividend discount model with typical equities and perpetuities.  Fixed income has things like duration &amp; convexity to measure risk and analyze yield curves.  Derivatives, you have the Black-Scholes model and other 'derivatives' (heh) of that formula for calculating prices of options, futures, CDOs, etc.  Valuation is essentially taking the idea of TVM to the next logical step.  Then you can start delving into financial modelling.  Free cash flows, discounted cash flows, ratio analysis, pro forma projections.  Start small, use a structured problem that gives you some inputs and just do calculations.  Bonuses* would be ideas of capital structure (really not necessary for entry level positions) like the M&amp;M theorems on capital structure (debt vs equity), portfolio management (risk management, asset allocation, hedging, investment strategies like straddles, inverse floaters, etc), and knowledge of financial institutions and banking regulations (Basel accords, depository regulations, the Fed, etc.).    Once you gain an understanding of how this works, pick something out there and do a report on it.  Then you'll be left with a single 'word problem' that gives you nothing except a problem and tells you to find an answer.  You'll have to find all the inputs and give reasons why these inputs are sound and reasonable inputs for this analysis.    A big part that people don't understand about projections and analysis is that **inputs don't exist in plain sight**.  You have to make a lot of judgment calls when making these assumptions and it takes a lot of technical understanding to make a reasonable assumption--of which the results of your report highly depend on.  As a finance student, you get a taste for all of this.  I'm gonna say it's going to be hard to learn a lot of substantial info in 2 months, but I'm not exactly sure what big business expects out of their grunts.  You'll mostly be doing practical work like desk jockey business, data entry, and other labor-based jobs.  If you know what you're talking about, you can probably work up to something more specialized like underwriting or risk management or something else.   Source:  Finance degree but currently working towards starting a (finance related) company to draw on my programming background as well. "You need to understand how various entities make their money. Once you know that, you can determine whether their interests are aligned with yours. For example, a full-service broker makes money when you buy and sell stocks. They therefore have in interest in you doing lots of buying, and selling, not in making you money. Or, no-fee financial advisors make their money through commissions on what they sell you, which means their interests are served by selling you those investments with high commissions, not the investments that would serve you best. Financial media makes their money through attracting viewers/readers and selling advertising. That is their business, and they are not in the business of giving good advice. There are lots of good investments - index funds are a great example - that don't get much attention because there isn't any money in them.  In fact, the majority of ""wall street"" is not aligned with your interests, so be skeptical of the financial industry in general.  There are ""for fee"" financial advisors who you pay directly; their interests are fairly well aligned with yours. There is a fair amount of good information at The Motley Fool" Imagine an internet where the best content was behind a pay wall while the buzzfeed, gawker, and even yahoo were free. You can get your standard journalism plus clickbait for free, but you could also support the greatest content on the web while providing it greater power by generating it revenue. All by choice, of course. If you don't want a premium product, the best journalism and well constructed opinion pieces, don't pay for it.   Of course freemium, such as the way the economist is currently, i.e. 3 free articles a week (or something like that), is the best way to attract new customers. But I strongly feel that the best journalism is worth more than the clickbait garbage despite that I won't click an irrelevant ad simple because I feel the article is better crafted. This, I would be willing to pay more for it even on the internet. "In addition to the information in the other answer, I would suggest looking at an economic calendar. These provide the dates and values of many economic announcements, e.g. existing home sales, durable orders, consumer confidence, etc. Yahoo, Bloomberg, and the Wall Street Journal all provide such calendars. Yahoo provides links to the raw data where available; Bloomberg and the WSJ provide links to their article where appropriate. You could also look at a global economic calendar; both xe.com and livecharts.co.uk provide these. If you're only interested in the US, the Yahoo, Bloomberg, and WSJ calendars may provide a higher signal-to-noise ratio, but foreign announcements also affect US markets, so it's important to get as much perspective as possible. I like the global economic calendars I linked to above because they rate announcements on ""priority"", which is a quick way to learn which announcements have the greatest effect. Economic calendars are especially important in the context of an interview because you may be asked a follow-up question. For example, the US markets jumped in early trading today (5/28/2013) because the consumer confidence numbers exceeded forecasts (from the WSJ calendar, 76.2 vs 2.3).  As SRKX stated, it's important to know more than the numbers; being able to analyze the numbers in the context of the wider market and being aware of the fundamentals driving them is what's most important. An economic calendar is a good way to see this information quickly and succinctly.  (I'm paraphrasing part of my answer to another question, so you may or may not find some of that information helpful as well; I'm certainly not suggesting you look at the website of every central bank in the morning. That's what an economic calendar is for!)" as someone who made a fair attempt at understanding money subjects, I'd like some more writing from you.  I took high school level Marketing; Business economics; commercial law. it took six months on top of my previous High school ( with high level maths).  during those months I got medium grades, and failed  in- can you believe it - marketing. I had a go at The intelligent investor. I made it to page 96. But honestly I felt like I needed a lot of background in order for me to understand it. English is my second language. Sure I can understand  words like liability vs assets. but to this day i still can't remember the difference between a bull and bearish market. I know its about risk assesment on a national/ global level.  So who honestly gave finance a go but got their ass kicked. What would you say?  any books? It depends what you mean by financial knowledge.  Often you will work in a group focused on some aspect of the company's business.  As an example, I work for a company and my group works on econometric models.  Although I have a degree in finance, I don't encounter or talk about corporate or personal finance.  I do talk about investing with a friend, but in general, our group is focused on one aspect of finance and economics for the company.   From another direction, often financial companies will offer financial literacy training through HR and benefits programs where you can improve your knowledge of finance outside of your groups focus.   In the end, you will learn the most by persuing new knowledge through reading on current financial literature.  I hope this helps. Edit:  If you add some specifics to what you would like to learn about I may be able to point you in the right direction.