Self-buckling

A column can buckle due to its own weight with no other direct forces acting on it, in a failure mode called self-buckling. In conventional column buckling problems, the self-weight is often neglected since it is assumed to be small when compared to the applied axial loads. However, when this assumption is not valid, it is important to take the self-buckling into account.
Elastic buckling of a "heavy" column i.e., column buckling under its own weight, was first investigated by Greenhill at 1881. He found that a free-standing, vertical column, with density formula_1, Young's modulus formula_2, and cross-sectional area formula_3, will buckle under its own weight if its height exceeds a certain critical value:
where formula_5 is the acceleration due to gravity, formula_6 is the second moment of area of the beam cross section.
One interesting example for the use of the equation was suggested by Greenhill in his paper. He estimated the maximal height of a pine tree, and found it cannot grow over 90-ft tall. This length sets the maximum height for trees on earth if we assume the trees to be prismatic and the branches are neglected.
Mathematical derivation.
Suppose a uniform column fixed in a vertical direction at its lowest point, and carried to a height formula_7, in which the vertical position becomes unstable and flexure begins. There is a body force formula_8 per unit length formula_9, where formula_3 is the cross-sectional area of the column, formula_5 is the acceleration due to gravity and formula_1 is its mass density.
The column is slightly curved under its own weight, so the curve formula_13 describes the deflection of the beam in the formula_14 direction at some position formula_15. Looking at any point on the column, we can write the moment equilibrium:
where the right-hand side of the equation is the moment of the weight of BP about P.
According to Euler–Bernoulli beam theory:
Where formula_2 is the Young's modulus of elasticity of the substance, formula_6 is the moment of inertia.
Therefore, the differential equation of the central line of BP is:formula_20formula_20
Differentiating with respect to x, we get
We get that the governing equation is the third order linear differential equation with a variable coefficient. The way to solve the problem is to use new variables formula_24 and formula_25:
Then, the equation transforms to the Bessel equation
The solution of the transformed equation is formula_28
Where formula_29 is the Bessel function of the first kind. Then, the solution of the original equation is:
Now, we will use the boundary conditions: 
From the second B.C., we get that the critical length in which a vertical column will buckle under its own weight is:
Using formula_34 , the first zero of the Bessel function of the first kind of order formula_35, formula_36 can be approximated to:
Euler's mistake.
The column under its own weight was considered by Euler in three famous papers (1778a, 1778b, 1778c). In his first paper, Euler (1778a) concluded that the column simply supported under its own weight would never lose its stability. In his second paper on this topic Euler (1778b) described his previous result as paradoxical and suspicious (see Panovko and Gubanova (1965); Nicolai, (1955); Todhunter and Pierson (1866) on this topic). In the next, third in series, paper, Euler (1778c) found that he had made a conceptual mistake and the “infinite buckling load” conclusion was proved to be wrong. Unfortunately, however, he made a numerical mistake and instead of the first eigenvalue, he calculated a second one. Correct solutions were derived by Dinnik (1912), 132 years later, as well as Willers (1941), Engelhardt (1954) and Frich-Fay (1966). Numerical solution with arbitrary accuracy was given by Eisenberger (1991).
222 years later, after Euler’s mistake in 1778, in the year 2000, Elishakoff revisited this famous problem and derived closed-form solutions for the first time, for self-buckling problems, by resorting to semi-inverse method. Numerous other problems are treated in his monograph.