Tennis racket theorem

The tennis racket theorem or intermediate axis theorem is a result in classical mechanics describing the movement of a rigid body with three distinct principal moments of inertia. It is also dubbed the Dzhanibekov effect, after Russian cosmonaut Vladimir Dzhanibekov who noticed one of the theorem's logical consequences while in space in 1985 although the effect was already known for at least 150 years before that.
The theorem describes the following effect: rotation of an object around its first and third principal axes is stable, while rotation around its second principal axis (or intermediate axis) is not.
This can be demonstrated with the following experiment: hold a tennis racket at its handle, with its face being horizontal, and try to throw it in the air so that it will perform a full rotation around the horizontal axis perpendicular to the handle, and try to catch the handle. In almost all cases, during that rotation the face will also have completed a half rotation, so that the other face is now up. By contrast, it is easy to throw the racket so that it will rotate around the handle axis (the third principal axis) without accompanying half-rotation around another axis; it is also possible to make it rotate around the vertical axis perpendicular to the handle (the first principal axis) without any accompanying half-rotation.
The experiment can be performed with any object that has three different moments of inertia, for instance with a book, remote control or smartphone. The effect occurs whenever the axis of rotation differs only slightly from the object's second principal axis; air resistance or gravity are not necessary.
Theory.
The tennis racket theorem can be qualitatively analysed with the help of Euler's equations.
Under torque–free conditions, they take the following form:
Here formula_2 denote the object's principal moments of inertia, and we assume formula_3. The angular velocities around the object's three principal axes are formula_4 and their time derivatives are denoted by formula_5.
Stable rotation around the first and third principal axis.
Consider the situation when the object is rotating around axis with moment of inertia formula_6. To determine the nature of equilibrium, assume small initial angular velocities along the other two axes. As a result, according to equation (1), formula_7 is very small. Therefore, the time dependence of formula_8 may be neglected.
Now, differentiating equation (2) and substituting formula_9 from equation (3),
because formula_11 and formula_12.
Note that formula_13 is being opposed and so rotation around this axis is stable for the object.
Similar reasoning gives that rotation around axis with moment of inertia formula_14 is also stable.
Unstable rotation around the second principal axis.
Now apply the same analysis to axis with moment of inertia formula_15 This time formula_16 is very small. Therefore, the time dependence of formula_17 may be neglected.
Now, differentiating equation (1) and substituting formula_9 from equation (3),
Note that formula_20 is "not" opposed (and therefore will grow) and so rotation around the second axis is "unstable". Therefore, even a small disturbance along other axes causes the object to 'flip'.