Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011

The Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 is an Act of the New Zealand Parliament created to replace the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. It was brought in by the fifth National government and creates a property class for the marine and coastal area, in which it is vested in no one. This is in contrast to the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 in which the foreshore and seabed was vested in the Crown. 
Features of the Act.
The Marine and Coastal Area Act:
Results of the third reading.
Māori Party Party co-leader Dame Tariana Turia, who left Labour and established the Māori Party largely as a response to the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, began the third reading of the Bill in the House of Representatives on 24 March 2011. In expressing the support of the Māori Party, she noted "[t]his bill is another step in our collective pursuit of Treaty injustice... This bill was never just about the Māori Party; it started with the leadership of the eight iwi who took an application to the Maori Land Court at the top of the South Island", referring to the "Ngati Apa" case. The bill passed by 63–56. It was supported by the National, the Māori Party, and United Future, while the Labour, the Greens, ACT, the Progressive Party and Hone Harawira voted against it. This Act was the key reason for why Harawira left the Māori Party. In a press statement released on 23 February 2011, in which Harawira announced he was leaving the Māori Party, he stated "I did not lead the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed March from Te Rerenga Wairua to Parliament that gave birth to the Māori Party, to see it destroyed by infighting 5 years later".
Controversy.
Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei opposed the legislation and argued that it represented just "how much of a failure the Maori Party - National negotiations have been over trying to resolve the inherent injustices that were put in place by New Zealand First and Labour in 2004. Those injustices remain. The failed principles are still in place in this legislation... just as they were in 2004. It is a great disappointment." The Act Party also opposed the legislation, and unsuccessfully attempted to delay the passage of the bill by lodging hundreds of questions with the Speaker.
Waitangi Tribunal.
In 2020 the Waitangi Tribunal found the act breached the Treaty of Waitangi.
The tribunal found the Act failed to provide adequate and timely information about the Crown engagement pathway for applicants, and that it had breached its Treaty Duty of active protection by not funding all reasonable costs incurred by the applicant.