Fibration

In topology, a branch of mathematics, a fibration is a generalization of the notion of a fiber bundle. A fiber bundle makes precise the idea of one topological space (called a fiber) being "parameterized" by another topological space (called a base). A fibration is like a fiber bundle, except that the fibers need not be the same space, nor even homeomorphic; rather, they are just homotopy equivalent. Weak fibrations discard even this equivalence for a more technical property.
Fibrations do not necessarily have the local Cartesian product structure that defines the more restricted fiber bundle case, but something weaker that still allows "sideways" movement from fiber to fiber. Fiber bundles have a particularly simple homotopy theory that allows topological information about the bundle to be inferred from information about one or both of these constituent spaces. A fibration satisfies an additional condition (the homotopy lifting property) guaranteeing that it will behave like a fiber bundle from the point of view of homotopy theory.
Fibrations are dual to cofibrations, with a correspondingly dual notion of the homotopy extension property; this is loosely known as Eckmann–Hilton duality.
Formal definition.
A fibration (or Hurewicz fibration or Hurewicz fiber space, so named after Witold Hurewicz) is a continuous mapping formula_1 satisfying the homotopy lifting property with respect to any space. Fiber bundles (over paracompact bases) constitute important examples. In homotopy theory, any mapping is 'as good as' a fibration—i.e. any map can be decomposed as a homotopy equivalence into a "mapping path space" followed by a fibration into homotopy fibers.
The "fibers" are by definition the subspaces of that are the inverse images of points of . If the base space is path connected, it is a consequence of the definition that the fibers of two different points formula_2 and formula_3 in are homotopy equivalent. Therefore, one usually speaks of "the fiber" .
Serre fibrations.
A continuous mapping with the homotopy lifting property for CW complexes (or equivalently, just cubes formula_4) is called a Serre fibration or a weak fibration, in honor of the part played by the concept in the thesis of Jean-Pierre Serre. This thesis firmly established in algebraic topology the use of spectral sequences, and clearly separated the notions of fiber bundles and fibrations from the notion of sheaf (both concepts together having been implicit in the pioneer treatment of Jean Leray). Because a sheaf (thought of as an étalé space) can be considered a local homeomorphism, the notions were closely interlinked at the time. One of the main desirable properties of the Serre spectral sequence is to account for the action of the fundamental group of the base on the homology of the "total space" .
Note that Serre fibrations are strictly weaker than fibrations in general: the homotopy lifting property need only hold on cubes (or CW complexes), and not on all spaces in general. As a result, the fibers might not even be homotopy equivalent; an explicit example is given below.
Examples.
In the following examples, a fibration is denoted
where the first map is the inclusion of "the" fiber into the total space and the second map is the fibration onto the basis . This is also referred to as a fibration sequence.
Turning a map into a fibration.
Any continuous map formula_5 can be factored as a composite formula_6 where formula_7 is a fibration and formula_8 is a homotopy equivalence. Denoting formula_9 as the mapping space (using the compact-open topology), the fibration space is constructed as
with structure map formula_11 sending formula_12.
Checking the homotopy lifting property verifies this map actually forms a fibration.
The injection map formula_13 is given by formula_14 where formula_15 is the constant path. 
There is a deformation retract of the homotopy fibers
to this inclusion, giving a homotopy equivalence formula_17.
Weak fibration example.
The previous examples all have fibers that are homotopy equivalent. This must be the case for fibrations in general, but not necessarily for weak fibrations. The notion of a weak fibration is strictly weaker than a fibration, as the following example illustrates: the fibers might not even have the same homotopy type.
Consider the subset of the real plane formula_18 given by
and the base space given by the unit interval formula_20, the projection by formula_21. One can easily see that this is a Serre fibration. However, the fiber formula_22 and the fiber at formula_23 are not homotopy equivalent. The space formula_24 has an obvious injection into the total space formula_25 and has an obvious homotopy (the constant function) in the base space formula_26; however, it cannot be lifted, and thus the example cannot be a fibration in general.
Long exact sequence of homotopy groups.
Choose a base point . Let refer to the fiber over , i.e. ; and let be the inclusion . Choose a base point and let . In terms of these base points, the Puppe sequence can be used to show that there is a long exact sequence
It is constructed from the homotopy groups of the fiber , total space , and base space . The homomorphisms and are just the induced homomorphisms from and , respectively. The maps involving π0 are not group homomorphisms because the π0 are not groups, but they are exact in the sense that the image equals the kernel (here the "neutral element" is the connected component containing the base point).
This sequence holds for both fibrations, and for weak fibrations, although the proof of the two cases is slightly different.
Proof.
One possible way to demonstrate that the sequence above is well-defined and exact, while avoiding contact with the Puppe sequence, is to proceed directly, as follows.
The third set of homomorphisms (called the "connecting homomorphisms" (in reference to the snake lemma) or the "boundary maps") is not an induced map and is defined directly in the corresponding homotopy groups with the following steps.
The above is summarized in the following commutative diagram:
Repeated application of the homotopy lifting property is used to prove that is well-defined (does not depend on a particular lift), depends only on the homotopy class of its argument, it is a homomorphism and that the long sequence is exact.
Alternatively, one can use relative homotopy groups to obtain the long exact sequence on homotopy of a fibration from the long exact sequence on relative homotopy of the pair formula_28. One uses that the n-th homotopy group of formula_25 relative to formula_30 is isomorphic to the n-th homotopy group of the base formula_26.
Example.
One may also proceed in the reverse direction. When the fibration is the mapping fibre (dual to the mapping cone, a cofibration), then one obtains the exact Puppe sequence. In essence, the long exact sequence of homotopy groups follows from the fact that the homotopy groups can be obtained as suspensions, or dually, loop spaces.
Euler characteristic.
The Euler characteristic is multiplicative for fibrations with certain conditions.
If is a fibration with fiber , with the base path-connected, and the fibration is orientable over a field , then the Euler characteristic with coefficients in the field satisfies the product property:
This includes product spaces and covering spaces as special cases,
and can be proven by the Serre spectral sequence on homology of a fibration.
For fiber bundles, this can also be understood in terms of a transfer map —note that this is a lifting and goes "the wrong way"—whose composition with the projection map is multiplication by the Euler characteristic of the fiber:
Fibrations in closed model categories.
Fibrations of topological spaces fit into a more general framework, the so-called closed model categories, following from the acyclic models theorem. In such categories, there are distinguished classes of morphisms, the so-called "fibrations", "cofibrations" and "weak equivalences". Certain axioms, such as stability of fibrations under composition and pullbacks, factorization of every morphism into the composition of an acyclic cofibration followed by a fibration or a cofibration followed by an acyclic fibration, where the word "acyclic" indicates that the corresponding arrow is also a weak equivalence, and other requirements are set up to allow the abstract treatment of homotopy theory. (In the original treatment, due to Daniel Quillen, the word "trivial" was used instead of "acyclic.")
It can be shown that the category of topological spaces is in fact a model category, where (abstract) fibrations are just the Serre fibrations introduced above and weak equivalences are weak homotopy equivalences.