R v Cook

R v Cook, [1998] 2 SCR 597, is a leading "Charter" decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held that Canadian police located in the United States were still subject to the "Charter" when interrogating a suspect for a murder in Canada.
Background.
Deltonia Cook was arrested by US police in Louisiana at the request of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Initially upon arrest he was read his Miranda rights by the US police officers. He requested access to a lawyer but the police never followed through with the request. When the Canadian police arrived they questioned him but it was not until 20 minutes into the interrogation that they informed him of his right to retain and instruct counsel under section 10(b) of the "Charter".
At trial the Crown sought to admit as evidence parts of the statements Cook made in the interrogation. Cook challenged the evidence as a violation of his rights under section 10(b).
Reasons of the Court.
The court held that acts of any Canadian police force performing duties outside of Canada are subject to the "Charter".
In this particular case, the court found that there was a violation of the accused’s right to counsel and right to silence. These violations were flagrant and the evidence would not have been otherwise been discovered thus rendering the trial unfair. Consequently, the evidence of Mr. Cook’s statement was excluded.
Justices L'Heureux-Dubé and McLachlin dissented, stating that the "Charter" did not apply, and that the police were working as part of an American investigation and were acting under their authority.