Kanbun

A is a form of Classical Chinese used in Japan from the Nara period to the mid-20th century. Much of Japanese literature was written in this style and it was the general writing style for official and intellectual works throughout the period. As a result, Sino-Japanese vocabulary makes up a large portion of the Japanese lexicon and much classical Chinese literature is accessible to Japanese readers in some semblance of the original. The corresponding system in Korean is "gugyeol" (口訣/구결).
Kanbun Kundoku can be classified as some sort of creole language, as it is the mixture between native Japanese and classical literary Chinese.
History.
The Japanese writing system originated through adoption and adaptation of Written Chinese. Japan's oldest books (e.g., "Nihon Shoki") and dictionaries (e.g., "Tenrei Banshō Meigi" and "Wamyō Ruijushō") were written in "kanbun". Other Japanese literary genres have parallels; the "Kaifūsō" is the oldest collection of "Chinese poetry composed by Japanese poets". Burton Watson's English translations of "kanbun" compositions provide an introduction to this literary field.
Samuel Martin coined the term "Sino-Xenic" in 1953 to describe Chinese as written in Japan, Korea, and other "foreign" (hence "-xenic") zones on China's periphery. Roy Andrew Miller notes that although Japanese "kanbun" conventions have Sino-Xenic parallels with other traditions for reading Classical Chinese like Korean "hanmun" () and Vietnamese "Hán Văn" (), only "kanbun" has survived into the present day. He explains how
in the Japanese "kanbun" reading tradition a Chinese text is simultaneously punctuated, analyzed, and translated into classical Japanese. It operates according to a limited canon of Japanese forms and syntactic structures which are treated as existing in a one-to-one alignment with the vocabulary and structures of classical Chinese. At its worst, this system for reading Chinese as if it were Japanese became a kind of lazy schoolboy's trot to a classical text; at its best, it has preserved the analysis and interpretation of large body of literary Chinese texts which would otherwise have been completely lost; hence, the "kanbun" tradition can often be of great value for an understanding of early Chinese literature.
William C. Hannas points out the linguistic hurdles involved in "kanbun" transformation.
"Kanbun", literally "Chinese writing," refers to a genre of techniques for making Chinese texts read like Japanese, or for writing in a way imitative of Chinese. For a Japanese, neither of these tasks could be accomplished easily because of the two languages' different structures. As I have mentioned, Chinese is an isolating language. Its grammatical relations are identified in subject–verb–object (SVO) order and through the use of particles similar to English prepositions. Inflection plays no role in the grammar. Morphemes are typically one syllable in length and combine to form words without modification to their phonetic structures (tone excepted). Conversely, the basic structure of a transitive Japanese sentence is SOV, with the usual syntactic features associated with languages of this typology, including "post" positions, that is, grammar particles that appear "after" the words and phrases to which they apply.
He lists four major Japanese problems: word order, parsing which Chinese characters should be read together, deciding how to pronounce the characters, and finding suitable equivalents for Chinese function words.
According to John Timothy Wixted, scholars have disregarded "kanbun".
In terms of its size, often its quality, and certainly its importance both at the time it was written and cumulatively in the cultural tradition, "kanbun" is arguably the biggest and most important area of Japanese literary study that has been ignored in recent times, and the one least properly represented as part of the canon.
A new development in "kanbun" studies is the Web-accessible database being developed by scholars at Nishōgakusha University in Tokyo.
Conventions and terminology.
The Japanese word originally meant "Classical Chinese writings, Chinese classic texts, Classical Chinese literature".
Compositions written in "kanbun" used two common types of Japanese readings: Sino-Japanese "on'yomi" (音読み "pronunciation readings") borrowed from Chinese pronunciations and native Japanese from Japanese equivalents. For example, can be read as "dō" adapted from Middle Chinese /dấw/ or as "michi" from the indigenous Japanese word meaning "road, street".
"Kanbun" implemented two particular types of "kana": , ""kana" suffixes added to "kanji" stems to show their Japanese readings" and , "smaller "kana" syllables printed/written alongside "kanji" to indicate pronunciation". It is important to note these were used primarily as reinforcements to the Kanbun writing.
"Kanbun" – as opposed to meaning "Japanese text, composition written with Japanese syntax and predominately "kun'yomi" readings" – is subdivided into several types.
Jean-Noël Robert describes "kanbun" as a "perfectly frozen, 'dead,' language" that was continuously used from the late Heian Period until after World War II.
Classical Chinese, which, as we have seen, had long since ceased to be a spoken language on the mainland (if indeed it had ever been), has been in use in the Japanese archipelago longer than the Japanese language itself. The oldest written remnants found in Japan are all in Chinese, though it is a matter of considerable debate whether traces of the Japanese vernacular are to be found in them. Taking both languages together until the end of the nineteenth century, and taking into account all the monastic documents, literature in the widest sense of the term, and texts in "near-Chinese" ("hentai-kanbun"), it is entirely possible that the sheer volume of texts written in Chinese in Japan slightly exceed what was written in Japanese.
Inasmuch as Classical Chinese was originally unpunctuated, the "kanbun" tradition developed various conventional reading punctuation, diacritical, and syntactic markers.
"Kaeriten" grammatically transform Classical Chinese into Japanese word order. Two are syntactic symbols, the | "linking mark" denotes phrases composed of more than one characters, and the denotes "return/reverse marks". The rest are "kanji" commonly used in numbering and ordering systems: 4 numerals "ichi" "one", "ni" "two", "san" "three", and "yon" "four"; 3 locatives "ue" "top", "naka" "middle", and "shita" "bottom"; 4 Heavenly Stems "kinoe" "first", "kinoto" "second", "hinoe" "third", and "hinoto" "fourth"; and the 3 cosmological "ten" "heaven", "chi" "earth", and "jin" "person". For written English, these "kaeriten" would correspond with 1, 2, 3; I, II, III; A, B, C, etc.
As an analogy for "kanbun" "mentally changing the word order" from Chinese sentences with subject–verb–object (SVO) into Japanese subject–object–verb (SOV), John DeFrancis gives this example of using an English (another SVO language) literal translation to render the Latin (another SOV) "Commentarii de Bello Gallico" opening.
DeFrancis adds, "A better analogy would be the reverse situation–Caesar rendering an English text in his native language and adding Latin case endings."
Two English textbooks for students of "kanbun" are "An Introduction to Kambun" by Sydney Crawcour, reviewed by Marian Ury in 1990, and "An Introduction to Japanese Kanbun" by Komai and Rohlich, reviewed by Andrew Markus in 1990 and Wixted in 1998.
Example.
The illustration to the right exemplifies "kanbun". These eight words comprise the well-known first line in the Han Feizi story (chap. 36, 難一 "Collection of Difficulties, No. 1") that first coined the term "máodùn" (Japanese "mujun", 'contradiction, inconsistency', lit. "spear-shield"), illustrating the irresistible force paradox. Debating with a Confucianist about the legendary Chinese sage rulers Yao and Shun, legalist Han Fei argues that you cannot praise them both because you would be making a "spear-shield" contradiction.
Among the Chu, there was a man selling shields and spears. He praised the former saying, "My shields are so solid nothing can penetrate them". Then he would praise his spears saying, "My spears are so sharp that among all things there's nothing they can't penetrate". Somebody else said, "If somebody tried to penetrate your shields with your spears, what would happen?" The man could not respond.
The first sentence would read thus, using present-day Mandarin pronunciation:
A fairly literal translation would be: "Among Chu people, there existed somebody who was selling shields and spears." All words can be literally translated into English, except for the final particle "zhě" 者 'one who, somebody who', which works as nominalizer marking a verb phrase as certain kinds of noun phrases.
The original Chinese sentence is marked with five Japanese "kaeriten" as:
To interpret this, the word 有 'existed' marked with "shita" 下 'bottom' is shifted to the location marked by "ue" 上 'top'. Likewise, the word 鬻 'sell' marked with "ni" 二 'two' is shifted to the location marked by "ichi" 一 'one'. The "re" レ 'reverse' mark indicates that the order of the adjacent characters must be reversed. Or, to represent this "kanbun" reading in numerical terms:
Following these "kanbun" instructions step by step transforms the sentence so it has the typical Japanese subject–object–verb argument order. The Sino-Japanese "on'yomi" readings and meanings are:
Next, Japanese function words and conjugations can be added with "okurigana", and Japanese "to ... to" と...と "and" can substitute Chinese 與 "and". More specifically, the first と is treated as the reading of 與, and the second, an additional function word:
Lastly, "kun'yomi" readings for characters can be annotated with "furigana". Normally furigana are only used for uncommon kanji or unusual readings. This sentence's only uncommon kanji is "hisa(gu)" 鬻ぐ 'sell, deal in', a literary character which neither Kyōiku kanji nor Jōyō kanji includes. However, in kanbun texts it is relatively common to use a large amount of furigana—often there is an interest in "recovering" the readings used by people of the Heian or Nara periods, and since many kanji can be read either with on- or kun-yomi pronunciations in a kanbun text, the furigana can show at least one editor's opinion of how it may have been read.
The completed "kundoku" translation with "kun'yomi" reads as a well-formed Japanese sentence:
Coming full circle, this annotated Japanese "kanbun" example back-translates: "Among Chu people, there existed one who was selling shields and spears".
Unicode.
Kanbun were added to the Unicode Standard in June 1993 with the release of version 1.1.
Alan Wood (linked below) says: "The Japanese word "kanbun" refers to classical Chinese writing as used in Japan. The characters in this range are used to indicate the order in which words should be read in these Chinese texts."
Two Unicode "kaeriten" are grammatical symbols (㆐㆑) for "linking marks" and "reverse marks". The others are organizational "kanji" for: numbers (㆒㆓㆔㆕) "1, 2, 3, 4"; locatives (㆖㆗㆘) "top, middle, bottom"; Heavenly Stems (㆙㆚㆛㆜) "1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th"; and levels (㆝㆞㆟) "heaven, earth, person".
The Unicode block for kanbun is U+3190–U+319F: