Biofilm Formation of Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Simulated Chicken Processing Environment

This study aims to investigate the mono- and dual-species biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa incubated in different culture mediums, inoculum ratios, and incubation time. The planktonic cell population and motility were examined to understand the correlation with biofilm formation. The results showed that chicken juice significantly inhibited the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the dominant bacteria in the dual-species biofilm formation in the trypticase soy broth medium. The dynamic changes in biofilm formation were not consistent with the different culture conditions. The growth of planktonic L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the suspension was inconsistent with their growth in the biofilms. There was no significant correlation between motility and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa. Moreover, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results revealed that the biofilm structure of L. monocytogenes was loose. At the same time, P. aeruginosa formed a relatively dense network in mono-species biofilms in an initial adhesion stage (24 h). SEM results also showed that P. aeruginosa was dominant in the dual-species biofilms. Overall, these results could provide a theoretical reference for preventing and controlling the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the food processing environment in the future.


Introduction
Biofilms are complex structured bacterial communities that irreversibly adhere to biotic or abiotic surfaces with extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [1]. Biofilms are responsible for the prolonged persistence of the bacteria in the food environment [2]. Once formed, a biofilm can protect bacteria from environmental stresses, antibiotics, and disinfectants and is challenging to decimate. Compared with planktonic bacteria, biofilm formation can protect bacteria from extreme environments, antibiotics, and disinfectants [3]. Biofilms can adhere to the surface of equipment or foods, grow and produce EPS to attach to the food contact surface, and therefore become an irremediable source of contamination that may lead to major disease outbreaks and substantial economic losses [4,5].
Biofilm formation is affected by many factors, such as the type of bacteria and the interaction among bacteria, media, and cultivation time [6,7]. Several studies have shown a significant difference between the amount of biofilm formation in laboratory culture media and food substrates [8]; therefore, the amount of biofilm formation in the laboratory simulating food environment is not necessarily reliable, and extensive studies on natural foods are currently lacking. The complex microorganisms in the food environment can The chicken breasts were homogenized for 4 min and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min to remove chicken debris. The chicken juice was filtrated by 0.22 mm pore-size filters for sterilization. The sterilized chicken juice was stored at −20 • C for four weeks, and the juice was placed at 4 • C one night before the experiments.
Stainless steel coupons (304; 2 cm × 1 cm × 0.2 cm) were soaked in acetone (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) for 3 h and cleaned with kitchen towels. After immersing in ethanol (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) overnight, the coupons were rinsed with distilled water and air-dried. The coupons were autoclaved at 121 • C for 15 min before the experiments.

Biofilm Formation
All the biofilms were formed on the stainless steel coupons in TSB and chicken juice, according to Papaioannou et al. [8] For mono-species biofilm, 300 µL L. monocytogenes or P. aeruginosa was added to 3 mL of TSB and chicken juice in 12-well culture plates. The final concentration of L. monocytogenes or P. aeruginosa with ratios of 1:1 (10 3 CFU/mL: 10 3 CFU/mL), 1:10 (10 3 CFU/mL: 10 4 CFU/mL), and 10:1 (10 4 CFU/mL: 10 3 CFU/mL) were added to 3 mL of TSB and chicken juice in 12-well culture plates. The coupons were incubated at 26 • C under static conditions for 24 h, 48 h, 96 h, 120 h, and 168 h, respectively. TSB and chicken juice were renewed at 120 h.
After incubation at predetermined time intervals, the stainless steel coupons were washed three times with saline solution to remove loosely attached cells. Subsequently, the coupons were vortexed in a 10 mL saline solution with several glass heads to detach the biofilm cells. PALCAM agar medium and King's B medium were used to count L. monocytogenes or P. aeruginosa cells using the drop-plating method. The calculation formula for the difference in the biofilm concentration of bacteria follows Equation (1): Note: ∆N represents the difference in the biofilm concentration of bacteria in different groups (log CFU/cm 2 ), and N 1 and N 2 represent the number of bacteria in the biofilm (CFU/cm 2 ).

Enumeration of Planktonic Cells
The growth of planktonic cells was counted at the predetermined time intervals. One mL of cell suspension was diluted 10-fold in saline, and the drop-plating method was used in PALCAM agar medium and King's B medium to enumerate the colonies.
The calculation formula for the difference in the concentration of planktonic bacteria in the suspension follows: Note: ∆N represents the difference in the concentration of planktonic bacteria in different suspensions (log CFU/mL), and N 1 and N 2 represent the number of bacteria in the suspension (CFU/mL).

Motility
The soft-agar plate assays were used to evaluate the swimming and swarming motilities, according to Cong et al. and Hidalgo et al., with slight modifications [21,22]. The swimming agar and swarming agar contained 1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, 0.25% glucose, 0.6% agar, 2.5% Luria-Bertani, 0.05% glucose, and 0.5% agar (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China). Ten microliters of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa were spotted on the plates. The results were recorded after 24 h, 48 h, 96 h, 120 h, and 168 h at 26 • C as the mean diameter of motility ± SD of replicate values from two independent trials.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
SEM was used to study the changes in biofilm structure and morphology (composed of either L. monocytogenes or P. aeruginosa strains) grown in the chicken juice. Herein, the coverslips were carefully washed with PBS three times and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 • C for 4 h or overnight and then washed three times with PBS and dehydrated with different gradient concentrations of ethanol (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%, respectively) for 15 min. After freeze-drying, the samples were coated with gold film and observed by SEM (Tescan Mira 3 XH, Tescan, Czech Republic).

Statistical Analysis
The mean values were obtained from three independent experiments with duplicate samples. The statistical analysis was conducted by ANOVA, and SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 17.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to determine statistical explanations for differences in growth kinetic parameters of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa among treatment groups. Duncan's multiple range test and Pearson's coefficient were applied to compare means. Differences were considered significant if the p-value was less than 0.05.

Formation of Mono and Dual-Species Biofilms
The biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa are represented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. In TSB, the L. monocytogenes concentration in the dual-species biofilms decreased compared to the mono-species biofilms (3 log CFU/mL) (p < 0.05). Compared with mono-species biofilms (3 log CFU/mL), the concentration of P. aeruginosa in the dualspecies biofilms (1:1) increased by 6.69 and 7.94 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively, at 120 and 168 h, respectively (p < 0.05). The concentration of P. aeruginosa in the dual-species biofilms (1:10) was increased by 6.42 log CFU/cm 2 (p < 0.05) compared to its concentration in the mono-species biofilms at 120 h. The concentration of P. aeruginosa had no significant difference in other mono-and dual-species biofilm groups.
In the chicken juice, there was a difference in the concentration of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the dual-species biofilms. The concentration of L. monocytogenes in the dual-species biofilms (1:1) decreased by 2.87 log CFU/cm 2 (p < 0.05) at 24 h compared to its concentration in the mono-species biofilms (3 log CFU/mL). In the dual-species biofilms (1:10), the biofilm concentration of L. monocytogenes increased by 2.62-3.80 log CFU/cm 2 at 96-168 h compared to its concentration in the mono-species biofilms (p < 0.05). The concentration of L. monocytogenes in the dual-species biofilms (10:1) increased by 3.85 log CFU/cm 2 at 24 h (p < 0.05), while the bacterial concentration decreased by 2.93-4.27 log CFU/cm 2 at 48-168 h (p < 0.05), compared to its concentration in the mono-species biofilms (3 log CFU/mL). However, P. aeruginosa concentration in the dual-species biofilms was inhibited by L. monocytogenes at 24 h. In comparison, its concentration was increased by L. monocytogenes at 96 h (p < 0.05). At 24 h, P. aeruginosa concentration in the mono-species biofilms was 8.33 log CFU/cm 2 ( Figure 2a) and 8.18 log CFU/cm 2 (Figure 2b), while P. aeruginosa concentration in dual-species biofilms (1:1, 1:10, and 10:1) were 7.29, 7.49, and 7.31 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively. Similarly, at 96 h, the concentration of P. aeruginosa in monospecies biofilms was 5.55 log CFU/cm 2 (Figure 2a), and 6.16 log CFU/cm 2 (Figure 2b), while P. aeruginosa concentration in dual-species biofilms (1:1, 1:10, and 10:1) were 6.54, 7.34, and 7.28 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively. In addition, at 120 h, compared to the monospecies biofilms ( Figure 2a) the concentration of P. aeruginosa in dual-species biofilms (1:10) significantly increased by 6.21 log CFU/cm 2 (p < 0.05). In contrast, its concentration in the dual-species biofilms (1:1 and 10:1) significantly decreased by 6.04 and 5.88 log CFU/cm 2 (p < 0.05), respectively.    The biofilm formation in TSB and chicken juice varied. The L. monocytogenes concentration in the chicken juice (2.73-4.26 log CFU/cm 2 ) was significantly lower than those in TSB (3.79-7.92 log CFU/cm 2 ) (p < 0.05), which means chicken juice had a negative impact on the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes ( Figure 1). The different culture mediums also affected the formation of P. aeruginosa biofilms ( Figure 2). In chicken juice, the concentration of P. aeruginosa in the mono-and dual-species biofilms significantly increased at 24 h and 48 h (p < 0.05) but significantly decreased at 120 h (p < 0.05) compared to its concentration in TSB. At 168 h, the P. aeruginosa concentration in the dual-species biofilm (1:1) in the chicken juice was significantly lower than its concentration in TSB (p < 0.05). At 96 h, the P. aeruginosa concentration in the mono-species biofilms (10 3 CFU/mL, Figure 2a) in the chicken juice was lower than in TSB. However, its concentration in dual-species biofilm (1:10) in the chicken juice was significantly higher than that in TSB (p < 0.05). These results showed that the culture medium significantly influences biofilm formation.
The difference in strains also may lead to a difference in biofilm formation. The maximum concentration of P. aeruginosa in TSB and chicken juice were 7.96 and 8.33 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively. The maximum concentration of L. monocytogenes in TSB and chicken juices was 6.73 and 4.26 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively. In TSB or chicken juice, the concentration of P. aeruginosa was significantly higher than L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05) in the biofilms.
Incubation time resulted in the dynamic changes in the L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa biofilm formation. In TSB, the biofilm concentration of L. monocytogenes significantly increased from 6.86 to 8.09 log CFU/cm 2 at 168 h to 7.12-8.10 log CFU/cm 2 at 120 h (p < 0.05). In the chicken juice, the concentration of L. monocytogenes in the mono-and dual-species biofilms (1:1 and 10:1) gradually decreased with the extension of incubation time. Except for the dual-species biofilms (1:10), the concentration of P. aeruginosa in TSB and chicken juice were significantly increased from 7.83 to 8.67 log CFU/cm 2 at 120 h to 7.93-8.81 log CFU/cm 2 at 168 h (p < 0.05).

Competition in Planktonic Cells
The planktonic cell populations of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. After the interaction between L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in TSB and chicken juice, the concentration of planktonic L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension was different from the mono-species suspension. For comparison, L. monocytogenes or P. aeruginosa in the mono-species biofilms with the initial inoculum concentration of 3 log CFU/mL data was used. In TSB, the planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration in the dual-species suspension (1:1) during 48-168 h significantly decreased by 6.65-8.06 log CFU/mL compared to the mono-species suspension (p < 0.05). The concentration of planktonic L. monocytogenes in the dual-species suspension (1:10) was significantly reduced by 6.32-8.52 log CFU/mL during 24-96 h while increased by 7.82 log CFU/mL at 120 h and significantly decreased by 8.03 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) at 168 h, compared the mono-species suspension. When cultured with P. aeruginosa in a 10:1 ratio suspension for 48 h, planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration decreased by 6.86 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) compared with those of the mono-species suspension. Compared with the mono-species suspension, after 48 h of incubation, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1, 1:10, and 10:1) was significantly reduced by 7.21, 7.53, and 7.90 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05), respectively. In addition, compared with those in the mono-species suspension, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1 and 10:1) decreased by 8.30-8.85 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 120 h and 168 h of incubation. In comparison, planktonic P. aeruginosa concentration in the dual-species suspension (1:10) significantly increased by 7.81 and 8.24 log CFU/mL at 120 h and 168 h (p < 0.05), respectively. The concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1) was significantly reduced by 7.32 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 96 h of incubation, compared with those in the mono-species suspension.
aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1, 1:10, and 10:1) was significantly reduced by 7.21, 7.53, and 7.90 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05), respectively. In addition, compared with those in the mono-species suspension, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1 and 10:1) decreased by 8.30-8.85 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 120 h and 168 h of incubation. In comparison, planktonic P. aeruginosa concentration in the dual-species suspension (1:10) significantly increased by 7.81 and 8.24 log CFU/mL at 120 h and 168 h (p < 0.05), respectively. The concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1) was significantly reduced by 7.32 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 96 h of incubation, compared with those in the mono-species suspension.    In the chicken juice, compared to the mono-species suspension, the planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration in the dual-species suspension (1:1) was significantly reduced by 5.47 and 4.84 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 48 h and 96 h, respectively, but was increased by 4.81 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 120 h. Compared to the mono-species suspension, the planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration in the dual-species suspension of 1:10 significantly decreased by 5.49 and 4.65 log CFU/mL at 24 h and 120 h, respectively, but increased by 5.78 log CFU/mL at 96 h (p < 0.05). In the dual-species suspension (10:1), Figure 4. The planktonic population of P. aeruginosa (a-e) in different incubation conditions. Note: The mono-species suspension of P. aeruginosa biofilms with the initial inoculum concentration of 3 log CFU/mL (a) and 4 log CFU/mL (b); the dual-species suspension of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa biofilms with the ratio 1:1 (c); 1:10 (d); and 10:1 (e).
In the chicken juice, compared to the mono-species suspension, the planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration in the dual-species suspension (1:1) was significantly reduced by 5.47 and 4.84 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 48 h and 96 h, respectively, but was increased by 4.81 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) after 120 h. Compared to the mono-species suspension, the planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration in the dual-species suspension of 1:10 significantly decreased by 5.49 and 4.65 log CFU/mL at 24 h and 120 h, respectively, but increased by 5.78 log CFU/mL at 96 h (p < 0.05). In the dual-species suspension (10:1), L. monocytogenes significantly increased by 4.75-5.98 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05) at any time point of incubation compared to the mono-species suspension. The concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:1, 1:10, and 10:1) was significantly inhibited by L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05) after 24 h and 120 h of incubation (p < 0.05). Compared to the mono-species suspension, the planktonic P. aeruginosa concentration decreased by 6.33, 7.82, and 6.60 log CFU/mL in the dual-species suspension (1:1, 1:10, and 10:1) after 24 h of incubation, respectively, and decreased by 6.90, 8.75, and 7.89 log CFU/mL after 120 h of incubation, respectively. Compared with the mono-species suspension, the planktonic P. aeruginosa concentration in the dual-species suspension (1:1 and 10:1) decreased by 7.76 and 7.78 log CFU/mL after 48 h of incubation, respectively. Compared with monospecies suspension, after 48 h of incubation, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in the dual-species suspension (1:10) significantly increased by 7.59 log CFU/mL. However, with a further extension of the incubation time to 96 h, the P. aeruginosa concentration decreased by 8.74 log CFU/mL.
In different culture mediums, the change in planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration in the bacterial suspension was similar to the biofilm concentration change in two bacteria. The biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes reduced (p < 0.05) in chicken juice compared to the TSB medium. The concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in chicken juice was inhibited at 24 h, while the concentration in chicken juice was increased at 48-96 h (p < 0.05) compared to the TSB medium.
In the same culture medium, L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa showed a difference in the planktonic bacterial population. In TSB, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa was higher than L. monocytogenes in several culture conditions (p < 0.05), except for the mono-species suspension (3 log CFU/mL, 48 h; 4 log CFU/mL, 96 h) and the dual-species suspension (1:1, 120 h; 10:1, 48 and 120 h). Similarly, in chicken juice, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa (6.87-8.86 log CFU/mL) was higher than those of planktonic L. monocytogenes (4.85-6.04 log CFU/mL) (p < 0.05).
Incubation time is a factor that leads to a difference in the concentration of planktonic L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa. In TSB, the concentration of planktonic L. monocytogenes showed a decreasing trend from 24 to 48 h (p < 0.05), except for the dual-species suspension (1:10). In TSB, the concentration of planktonic L. monocytogenes showed a decreasing trend from 48 to 96 h (p < 0.05), except for the dual-species suspension (10:1). In TSB, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa showed a decline from 24 to 96 h (p < 0.05) in all the suspensions, except for the dual-species suspension (10:1). In TSB, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa was reduced from 24 to 48 h (p < 0.05) in the dual-species suspension (1:10). In the chicken juice, the concentration of planktonic L. monocytogenes in the monospecies suspension (3 log CFU/mL) and the dual-species suspension (1:10) significantly decreased by 4.88 and 5.74 log CFU/mL, respectively, from 96 to 168 h. In the chicken juice, except for the mono-species suspension group (4 log CFU/mL), the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa showed a significant increase from 24 to 96 h (p < 0.05). From 120 h to 168 h, the concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa showed a downward trend in the mono-species suspension, while its concentration showed an upward trend in the dualspecies suspension; among them, the trend was significant (p < 0.05) in the mono-species suspension (3 log CFU/mL) and the dual-species suspension (1:1 and 1:10).

Motility
The motility of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa is shown in Figure 5. The swimming and swarming motility of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa had similar trends, and the swimming motility increased with the extension of culturing time. At 96, 120, and 168 h, the swimming ability of P. aeruginosa was greater than that of L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05) (Figure 5a). The different initial inoculum levels had specific effects on the swimming motility. The swarming motility of L. monocytogenes with the initial inoculum concentration of 3 log CFU/mL at 96, 120, and 168 h was significantly higher than that of L. monocytogenes with the initial inoculum level of 4 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05). Similar results were observed in the swimming and swarming motility of P. aeruginosa at 120 h. The correlation coefficient between motility and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa is shown in Table 1. In TSB, the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes was not correlated with its motility. In contrast, the biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa was positively correlated with the swimming motility and swarming motility of P. aeruginosa in the dual-species biofilms (1:1) (p < 0.05). In the chicken juice, there was no correlation between the biofilm formation and motility of P. aeruginosa. It was shown that there was a negative correlation between the biofilm formation and motility of L. monocytogenes The correlation coefficient between motility and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa is shown in Table 1. In TSB, the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes was not correlated with its motility. In contrast, the biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa was positively correlated with the swimming motility and swarming motility of P. aeruginosa in the dual-species biofilms (1:1) (p < 0.05). In the chicken juice, there was no correlation between the biofilm formation and motility of P. aeruginosa. It was shown that there was a negative correlation between the biofilm formation and motility of L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05) in the mono-species biofilms (3 log CFU/mL). The biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes was negatively correlated with the swarming motility of L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05) in the mono-species biofilms (3 log CFU/mL) and the dual-species biofilms (10:1).

Biofilm Structure Observation by SEM
SEM was used to observe the structure of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the mono-and dual-species biofilms cultured in chicken juice for 24 h (Figure 6). Listeria monocytogenes in the mono-species biofilms did not form a more prominent structure (Figure 6a), which is in an early adhesion stage. At the same time, P. aeruginosa has a relatively dense and stable biofilm structure with EPS ( Figure 6b). The structure of two bacteria in the dual-species biofilms was similar to P. aeruginosa in the mono-species biofilms. These results showed that P. aeruginosa might be dominant in the dual-species biofilm.
SEM was used to observe the structure of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the mono-and dual-species biofilms cultured in chicken juice for 24 h (Figure 6). Listeria monocytogenes in the mono-species biofilms did not form a more prominent structure (Figure 6a), which is in an early adhesion stage. At the same time, P. aeruginosa has a relatively dense and stable biofilm structure with EPS (Figure 6b). The structure of two bacteria in the dual-species biofilms was similar to P. aeruginosa in the mono-species biofilms. These results showed that P. aeruginosa might be dominant in the dual-species biofilm.

Discussion
In the natural food environment, bacteria mainly exist in dual-species or multispecies biofilms [23,24]. Due to the interaction among bacteria, there are differences in the formation of mono-and dual-species biofilms. Pang et al. compared the mono-and dualspecies biofilm of Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa [25], which illustrated that in the mono-species biofilms, P. aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium were reduced than in dualspecies biofilms (p < 0.05). Most current research focuses on the biofilm formation after culturing at the same concentration [26]. However, bacteria exist in different concentration ratios in a complex microorganism environment than in the mono-species biofilms. This study designed three mixing ratios of 1:1, 1:10, and 10:1 of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa to match the natural environment. Our results showed that different ratios significantly impacted the formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa biofilms. Salmonella typhimurium and L. monocytogenes were mixed in five ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 2:1, 1:3, and 3:1 and showed different biofilm formation [27]. Different culture mediums have a different impact on biofilm formation. Compared with the laboratory media, meat juice can affect the morphology and distribution of biofilms [28]. The study compared the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes in TSB and chicken juice, indicating that chicken juice had a significant inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes. Liu and Shi also found that the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes in chicken juice was weak [29].
Another study demonstrated that Pseudomonas spp. dominated in multispecies biofilms, which could inhibit the population of other species in the biofilms [4]. In this study, P. aeruginosa was the dominant bacteria in the dual-species biofilms in TSB, which inhibited the formation of L. monocytogenes biofilms. In the chicken juice, P. aeruginosa dominated the dual-species biofilms, but it could not inhibit L. monocytogenes. Pang et al. demonstrated that P. aeruginosa was not dominant in the biofilms formed by Salmonella enteritidis and P. aeruginosa in the chicken juice at 1:1 and 0.01:1 [30]. However, in TSB, P. aeruginosa was the dominant bacteria [6]. Aleksandra et al. [31] found that the population of P. aeruginosa was higher than that of L. innocua in the two bacterial biofilms, but P. aeruginosa was not the dominant bacterium. Different incubation times also could affect the formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa biofilms. Moreno et al. found that there was no significant difference in the biofilms after mixing the five species of bacteria, which contained L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa at 25 • C in TSB or meat juice for 48-180 h (p ≥ 0.05) [32]. Our results differed from a previous study. The interaction of the five species in the biofilms is different from that of dual-species biofilms. In addition, the sampling point also could affect the biofilms. The biofilm population of P. aeruginosa declined at 48 h and increased at 120 h and 168 h in the chicken juice (p < 0.05). One of the possible reasons is that the starvation condition resulted in the decrease in P. aeruginosa biofilm concentration [33]. At the same time, renewed culture media at 120 h could support some nutritional components to improve the biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa. Moreover, the composition of the media also affected the formation of biofilms. Therefore, the biofilm formation at different incubation times depends on the culture medium's nutritional conditions.
The interaction between L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the bacterial suspension and biofilm was different. In TSB, planktonic L. monocytogenes concentration was partially inhibited in the dual-species suspension. In addition, planktonic L. monocytogenes was significantly inhibited by chicken juice. The concentration of planktonic P. aeruginosa in TSB and chicken juice was higher than that of L. monocytogenes partially. These changes in L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the suspension were similar to those in biofilms. Wang et al. [5] compared the amount of biofilm formed by different serotypes of Salmonella spp. and found that there was no significant correlation between the biofilm formation and growth of Salmonella. Studies have shown that biofilm formation also depends on the adhesion ability of the bacteria, so the planktonic bacteria in the bacterial suspension could not be used for the evaluation of bacterial biofilm formation [34].
This study showed no significant correlation between biofilm formation and motility. Bonaventura et al. found no correlation between biofilm formation and motility in 44 strains of L. monocytogenes at 4 • C, 12 • C, and 22 • C [35]. Studies have shown that the swarming motility of P. aeruginosa is related to nutritional conditions [36]. The swimming motility of bacteria, which is the characteristic responsible for the movement of flagella, may be helpful in the adhesion and formation of initial biofilms. However, biofilm formation still depends on the culture conditions [37].
Our study of biofilm in the chicken juice incubated for 24 h showed that the monospecies biofilms of L. monocytogenes are weaker than P. aeruginosa biofilms. The reasons for this condition are mentioned as follows: First, chicken juice could inhibit the growth and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes. Therefore, L. monocytogenes was loosely attached to the coupons at 24 h. Second, the initial inoculum concentration of L. monocytogenes was 3 or 4 log CFU/mL, which might be too low to form the biofilm than the high initial inoculum concentration [8]. Third, P. aeruginosa could produce more EPS and was a stronger biofilmproducer than L. monocytogenes [38]. In the dual-species biofilms, the structure observed by SEM is similar to the mono-species biofilms of P. aeruginosa. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed a dominant status and protected the dual species from disinfectants and environmental stress [39].
Although some tryptone (TSB) media are rich in nitrogen and amino acids and can be used as good microbiological media, the complexity of real food matrices (e.g., different nutrient availability and pH) makes it difficult to represent the real situation in the food system. Therefore, some meat juice was used as an ideal culture medium for bacterial biofilm to simulate the growing condition in a meat processing environment. In our study, chicken juice (exudate from frozen chicken breast) was used instead of growth medium to simulate the real situation in a meat processing environment and to better understand the relationship between the chicken environment and pathogenic bacteria. The results will help promote the safety of chicken processing as it mimics the composition and microbiome of chicken for more predictable results in polluted environments. However, considering that our research is performed based on the laboratory, the real environment is often much more complicated than that of the laboratory, and a single treatment cannot completely simulate the complex background of a food processing plant. Therefore, it is necessary to further consider the influence of various factors (such as microbial population, pH, and nutrient composition) to be able to resemble the real food environment more closely.

Conclusions
This article aimed to evaluate the biofilm formation, planktonic bacterial concentration, and motility of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in mono-and dual-species biofilms under a simulated chicken processing environment. The results showed that the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa was significantly affected by multiple factors, including the interaction among bacteria, culture medium conditions, the ratio of two different kinds of bacteria, and incubation time. The chicken juice had an inhibitory effect on L. monocytogenes (p < 0.05). In TSB, P. aeruginosa was dominant in the biofilms. It is difficult to describe the dynamic process of biofilm formation with a particular trend because the biofilm formation mainly depends on the culture medium conditions. The growth of planktonic L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in the suspension differed from those in the biofilms. Thus, the change in planktonic bacterial concentration cannot be used for judging bacterial biofilm formation. Finally, the motility of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa had no significant correlation with the biofilm formation.
This study helps understand the biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa in natural foods and provides the theoretical basis for the prevention and control of L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa biofilms in the future.