4.  The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in Ryazan. 5.  She is a military servicewoman. From January 2000 to February 2001 she served in the Russian contingent of the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 6.  Upon her return, the applicant brought proceedings against the head of her military unit to secure payment of her daily allowance for her service abroad. 7.  On 25 July 2003 the Military Court of the Ryazan Garrison partly granted the applicant’s claim and ordered the military unit to pay the applicant 346,050.70 Russian roubles (RUB) in remuneration and RUB 1,000 in expenses for legal advice. 8.  The military unit did not lodge an ordinary appeal, and on 22 August 2003 the judgment became binding and enforceable. 9.  However, following the respondent’s request, on 19 November 2003 the Presidium of the Military Court of the Moscow Command quashed the judgment of 25 July 2003 by way of supervisory review and dismissed the applicant’s claims in full. The reason given for the quashing of the judgment was the “wrongful application of substantive law by the first-instance court”.