5.  The applicants are Russian citizens whose names and years of birth are tabulated below. 6.  The fact of the cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarized as follows. 7.  The applicants were claimants in civil proceedings concluded by judgments in their favour. 8.  Subsequently, on the defendants' initiatives, Presidia of regional courts concerned quashed these final judgments by way of supervisory review on the grounds that the inferior courts had incorrectly applied the domestic law or wrongly assessed the evidence. 9.  The judgments' particulars are tabulated below. 10.  In the case of Mr Bobarykin subsequently, on 16 March 2007, the applicant signed an agreement under which the local authorities allocated him a place for a new garage and paid a compensation for demolition of the old one. 11.  In the case of Ms Kolesnikova the regular payments were made under the final judgment up until it was quashed via supervisory review.