4.  The applicant was born in 1961 and lives in the town of Dubna in the Moscow Region. 5.  On 17 June 2002 the Dubna Town Court allowed the applicant's claim against the Dubna Town Administration for provision of housing. The Town Court ordered that the administration:
“...provide Mr Tarasov, whose family comprises three members, with a separate well-equipped flat having a living surface of no less than 61 square metres on the basis of a special tenancy agreement...”. 6.  The judgment was upheld on appeal on 12 August 2002 by the Moscow Regional Court. 7.  Enforcement proceedings were opened. However, the judgment could not be enforced because the town administration possessed no available housing or financial resources to purchase a flat. 8.  On 24 February 2005 the Dubna Town Administration signed a contract with the applicant. According to the contract, the administration was to provide the applicant with a flat in 2005. 9.  On 25 February 2005, upon the applicant's request, the Dubna Town Court discontinued the enforcement proceedings. 10.  In August 2005 the Dubna Town Administration bought a three-room flat for the applicant. It appears that in September 2005 the applicant moved into the flat. 11.  In February 2003 the applicant requested a court to amend the method of enforcement of the judgment of 17 June 2002 and to order that the Dubna Town Administration should pay him the value of a flat. 12.  On 26 February 2003 the Dubna Town Court dismissed the applicant's claim. That judgment was quashed on appeal on 2 April 2003 and the case was remitted for a fresh examination. 13.  On 26 June and 18 September 2003 the Dubna Town Court allowed the claim. Both judgements were quashed on appeal and the matter was remitted for re-examination. 14.  On 10 March 2004 the Town Court dismissed the applicant's claim. The judgment became final on 22 June 2004.