4.  The applicants, father and daughter, were born in 1929 and 1957 respectively and live in Budapest. 5.  On 11 May 1995 the applicants filed an action for the invalidation of a contract in the context of a real-estate dispute. 6.  The Budapest II/III District Court held numerous hearings and obtained the opinions of four experts. The applicants' action was gradually extended to include altogether 28 respondents, three of whom died in the meantime. Pending the identification of their successors, the proceedings had to be interrupted on three occasions, for respectively 7, 12 and 5 months. 7.  On 25 January 2002 the District Court gave judgment and invalidated the disputed contract, but dismissed the remainder of the action. 8.  After several hearings, on 19 October 2004 the Budapest Regional Court amended the first-instance decision in a final judgment. 9.  The District Court rectified and completed the decision of 25 January 2002 on 12 September 2005. 10.  Because one of the plaintiffs did not comply with the final decision, enforcement proceedings commenced before the Budaörs District Court in 2005. This procedure was interrupted on 6 September 2005, since the enforced relocation of a fence would have cut off the debtor from her source of water. The District Court informed the applicants that they should seek a court injunction obliging the debtor to remove her water pipe. The applicants did so on 19 February 2006. 11.  After three hearings, on 19 April 2007 the Budaörs District Court found for the applicants. The debtor appealed to the Pest County Regional Court. According to the information provided by the parties and the elements available in the case file to date, the case has not yet ended.