4.  The applicant was born in 1945 and lives in Kloštar Ivanić. 5.  On 1 September 1999 the Ivanić Grad Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Ivanić Gradu) adopted a judgment ordering a certain F.P. to pay some money to the applicant. On 18 May 2000 the applicant sought enforcement of the above judgment. 6.  The Zagreb Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Zagrebu) issued an enforcement order on 6 July 2000. 7.  On 20 November 2000 a court bailiff attempted to draft a seizure list of F.P.’s possessions, but he refused to cooperate. 8.  On 19 December 2000 the applicant informed the court that F.P. owned a motor vehicle and proposed to seize it. On 17 April 2001 the court invited the applicant to advance the costs of the bailiff’s intervention, which the applicant did on 25 April 2001. On 12 April 2002 the court scheduled another on-site intervention for 3 June 2002, which was unsuccessful because F.P. once again refused to cooperate. 9.  Pursuant to the applicant’s further motion, on 26 September 2002 the court decided that another on-site intervention would be scheduled after the applicant advanced the costs. 10.  The applicant asked the court to size F.P.’s passport on 20 February 2003. Following that demand, on 1 July 2003 the court asked the Ministry of the Interior whether F.P. was the owner of a certain motor vehicle. The Ministry replied in negative on 22 July 2003. 11.  The applicant then on 8 September 2003 asked for another bailiff’s intervention. 12.  However, on 24 May 2004 the case-file was transferred to the newly-established Zaprešić Municipal Court. 13.  Since F.P.’s wife presented the evidence that F.P. had paid part of the sum due to the applicant during the bailiff’s intervention on 25 October 2004, the intervention was adjourned with consent of the applicant’s legal representative. 14.  However, F.P. did not comply with the rest of his obligation and therefore, on 24 December 2004 the applicant asked for another bailiff’s intervention. The intervention took place on 8 March 2005 and a seizure list was drafted. 15.  On 29 September 2005 the applicant asked the court to schedule a public auction. The auction was scheduled for 22 November 2005. 16.  The enforcement proceedings still appear to be pending before the first-instance court.