4.  The applicant was born in 1945 and lives in Gračanica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 5.  On 18 September 2000 the applicant sought enforcement of a judgment awarding him compensation following an employment dispute with the company G. (“the debtor”). He applied for enforcement on the debtor’s bank account and on its movable property. 6.  On 6 February 2001 the Slatina Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Slatini) issued en enforcement order, which became final on 21 February 2001. 7.  On 24 October 2001 the court made a list of the debtor’s movable property in the applicant’s absence and scheduled a public auction for 25 January 2002. The auction was unsuccessful. 8.  Another public auction was held on 16 April 2002, which was again unsuccessful, as no bids were made. 9.  On 12 August 2002 the court made a new list of the debtor’s movables on which the applicant, who had been duly summoned, did not appear. 10.  On 28 October 2003 the applicant requested an injunction prohibiting the debtor to transfer or encumber shares it held in other companies. 11.  On 19 November 2003 the court held yet another unsuccessful public auction. 12.  On 6 July 2004 the applicant requested the court to order that the debtor should disclose its assets (prokazni popis imovine). 13.  On 23 July 2004 the debtor paid the applicant the principal amount of his claim, stating that it would satisfy the remainder of the claim within eight days. 14.  On 17 August 2004 the applicant informed the court that the claim had not been settled in full. The court forwarded the applicant’s submission to the debtor, for observations. 15.  On 27 September 2004 and 19 January 2005 the court imposed fines on the debtor, for failure to comply with its orders. 16.  On the latter date the court also denied the applicant’s motion for the disclosure of the debtor’s assets. At the same time, the court also dismissed the applicant’s motion for injunction prohibiting the transfer of the debtor’s shares. Instead it instructed the applicant to provide a detailed list and addresses of companies in which the debtor held such shares. On 25 January 2005 the applicant submitted the requested information. 17.  The proceedings are still pending. 18.  Meanwhile, on 10 June 2002 the applicant filed a constitutional complaint concerning the length of the proceedings. 19.  On 2 October 2002 the Constitutional Court (Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske) declared his complaint inadmissible finding that the enforcement order had already been issued.