3.  The applicant was born in 1972 and lives in Mersin. 4.  The applicant was discharged from the Turkish Armed Forces in 2003 due to a medical condition and the Retired Civil Servants’ Fund (Emekli Sandığı) granted him simple disability benefits. 5.  Subsequently, the applicant lodged a request with OYAK, the pension fund of the armed forces, for full and permanent disability benefits. 6.  On 25 July 2003 OYAK rejected the applicant’s request, holding that he did not qualify for such benefits under the relevant law (Article 26 of Law no. 205). The applicant requested the annulment of this decision from the Supreme Military Administrative Court. 7.  On 10 June 2004 the Supreme Military Administrative Court held a hearing where it rejected the applicant’s request. The written opinion of the principal public prosecutor submitted to the Supreme Military Administrative Court was not communicated to the applicant. No classified documents or information had been submitted by the administration to the Supreme Military Administrative Court as evidence during the proceedings. 8.  The applicant requested the rectification of this judgment. On 30 September 2004 the Supreme Military Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s rectification request.