5.  The applicant was born in 1968 and lives in İzmir. 6.  On 5 December 1994 the applicant was exposed to an electric shock from the power grid which was placed on the balcony of her house. 7.  On 17 November 1995 she introduced a judicial proceeding before the Uşak Civil Court for damages. In the course of the proceedings the Civil Court requested six expert reports on the partition of liability which were concluded by different experts between 23 October 1998 and 25 December 1999. 8.  On 2 March 2000, the Uşak Civil Court decided on the case in favour of the applicant. 9.  On 4 December 2000 the Court of Cassation quashed the decision. 10.  After the decision was quashed by the Court of Cassation, the Forensics Medicine Institute concluded a new report with a higher rate of working capacity loss. Upon the new rate two more expert reports were concluded between 28 January 2001 and 15 January 2003. 11.  On 1 July 2003 the Uşak Civil Court decided in favour of the applicant. 12.  On 21 April 2004 the Court of Cassation quashed the decision. 13.  On 18 January 2005 the Uşak Civil Court decided on the case and partially awarded the request of the applicant. 14.  On 26 September the Court of Cassation upheld that decision.