5.  The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Positano. 6.  She is the owner of five flats in Castellammare di Stabia (Naples), that she had let to different tenants. 7.  In a registered letter of 24 May 1991, the applicant informed the tenant that she intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 31 December 1991 and asked him to vacate the premises by that date. 8.  In a writ served on the tenant on 14 May 1992, the applicant reiterated her intention to terminate the lease and summoned the tenant to appear before the Naples Magistrate. 9.  By a decision of 20 May 1992, which was made enforceable on 27 May 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 20 May 1993. 10.  On 11 September 1995, the applicant served notice on the tenant requiring him to vacate the premises. 11.  On 23 October 1995, she informed the tenant that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 4 November 1995. 12.  Between 4 November 1995 and 3 December 1998, the bailiff made seven attempts to recover possession. Each attempt proved unsuccessful, as the applicant was not entitled to police assistance in enforcing the order for possession. 13.  On an unspecified date in 1999, the applicant recovered possession of the flat. 14.  In a registered letter of 24 June 1991, the applicant informed the tenant that she intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 31 December 1991 and asked him to vacate the premises by that date. 15.  In a writ served on the tenant on 17 April 1992, the applicant reiterated her intention to terminate the lease and summoned the tenant to appear before the Naples Magistrate. 16.  By a decision of 22 June 1992, which was made enforceable on 17 July 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 22 June 1993. 17.  On 11 September 1995, the applicant served notice on the tenant requiring him to vacate the premises. 18.  On 23 October 1995, she informed the tenant that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 4 November 1995. 19.  Between 4 November 1995 and 28 October 1997, the bailiff made five attempts to recover possession. Each attempt proved unsuccessful, as the applicant the applicant was not entitled to police assistance in enforcing the order for possession. 20.  Following the entry into force of Law 431/98, the enforcement of the evictions proceedings was suspended until 31 January 2000. 21.  In March 2000, the tenant entered into a new lease. 22.  In a writ served on the tenant on 11 May 1992, the applicant informed the tenant of her intention to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 8 December 1992 and summoned him to appear before the Naples Magistrate. 23.  By a decision of 20 May 1992, which was made enforceable on 25 September 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 20 May 1993. 24.  On 11 September 1995, the applicant served notice on the tenant requiring him to vacate the premises. 25.  On 23 October 1995, she informed the tenant that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 4 November 1995. 26.  Between 4 November 1995 and 25 November 1999, the bailiff made twelve attempts to recover possession. Each attempt proved unsuccessful as the applicant was not entitled to police assistance in enforcing the order for possession. 27.  On 24 March 2000, the applicant recovered possession of the flat. 28.  In a registered letter of 24 May 1991, the applicant informed the tenant that she intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 31 December 1991 and asked him to vacate the premises by that date. 29.  In a writ served on the tenant on 7 May 1992, the applicant reiterated her intention to terminate the lease and summoned the tenant to appear before the Naples Magistrate. 30.  By a decision of 20 May 1992, which was made enforceable on 27 May 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 20 May 1993. 31.  On 1 October 1992, I.R. died, F.E. succeeded in the lease. 32.  On 23 October 1995, the applicant served notice on the tenant requiring him to vacate the premises. 33.  On 10 October 1995, she informed the tenant that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 2 December 1995. 34.  Between 2 December 1995 and 27 October 1997, the bailiff made five attempts to recover possession. Each attempt proved unsuccessful, as the applicant was not entitled to police assistance in enforcing the order for possession. 35.  Following the entry into force of Law 431/98, the enforcement of the evictions proceedings was suspended until 31 January 2000. 36.  On 24 March 2000, the applicant recovered possession of the flat. 37.  In a registered letter of 24 May 1991, the applicant informed the tenants that she intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 8 February 1992 and asked them to vacate the premises by that date. 38.  In a writ served on the tenants on 8 May 1992, the applicant reiterated her intention to terminate the lease and summoned the tenants to appear before the Naples Magistrate. 39.  By a decision of 20 May 1992, which was made enforceable on 27 May 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 20 March 1993. 
On 23 October 1995, the applicant served notice on the tenants requiring them to vacate the premises. 40.  On 10 November 1995, she informed the tenants that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 2 December 1995. 41.  Between 2 December 1995 and 28 October 1997, the bailiff made five attempts to recover possession. Each attempt proved unsuccessful as, the applicant was not entitled to police assistance in enforcing the order for possession. Following the entry into force of Law 431/98, the enforcement of the evictions proceedings was suspended until 31 January 2000. 42.  On 17 March 2000, the applicant recovered possession of the flat.