3.  The applicant was born in 1971 and lives in Şırnak. 4.  On 8 June 2004 the applicant, an artillery captain at the Turkish Armed Forces, brought a case before the Supreme Military Administrative Court against the Ministry of Defence for the annulment of his transfer to a different garrison. 5.  In their pleadings the Ministry of Defence argued that the applicant’s transfer had been lawful and submitted certain confidential documents in support of their arguments for the Supreme Military Administrative Court’s examination under Article 52 (4) of Law no. 1602. These documents were not communicated to the applicant. 6.  On 15 February 2005 the Supreme Military Administrative Court held that the applicant’s appointment had not been contrary to law and rejected his request. In taking this decision the Supreme Military Administrative Court relied on, inter alia, the confidential documents submitted by the Ministry of Defence by virtue of Article 52 (4) of Law no. 1602. 7.  On 26 April 2005 the applicant’s rectification request was rejected by the Supreme Military Administrative Court.