"EULEX treba odgovoriti na neka pitanja: zašto je bio u Njemačkoj, da li je bio pod zaštitom i zašto su oni odlagali proces," dodajući da je "za zaštitu svjedoka potreban profesionalizam i da se ona provodi od strane jedne stalne institucije, a ne EULEX-a, koji ima ograničen vremenski mandat," izjavio je Sadiku za SETimes.
"EULEX needs to answer some questions: why he was in Germany, whether he was under protection and why they delayed the process," adding that "witness protection systems require professionalism and to be carried out by a permanent institution, not EULEX, which has a limited time mandate," Sadiku tells SETimes.