Political commentator Fatlum Sadiku agrees. "EULEX needs to answer some questions: why he was in Germany, whether he was under protection and why they delayed the process," adding that "witness protection systems require professionalism and to be carried out by a permanent institution, not EULEX, which has a limited time mandate," Sadiku tells SETimes.
Sa time se slaže politički komentator Fatlum Sadiku. „EULEKS mora da odgovori na neka pitanja: Zašto je Zogaj bio u Nemačkoj, da li je bio pod zaštitom i zašto su otezali sa suđenjem“, dodavši da „je za sistem zaštite svedoka potreban profesionalizam i da ga mora sprovoditi stalna institucija, a ne EULEKS, čiji je mandat vremenski ograničen“, kaže Sadiku za SETimes.