"The chamber is satisfied, however, that there is evidence which establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the accused wilfully and knowingly interfered with witness B1 and the administration of justice and that that conduct constitutes contempt of the tribunal," the summary read.
«Međutim, veće je zadovoljno dokazima kojima se bez ikakve sumnje potvrđuje da je optuženi voljno i svesno uticao na svedoka B1 i sprovođenje pravde, i takvo ponašanje predstavlja nepoštovanje tribunala», navodi se u obrazloženju.