generate questions: It is usually recognized that lawbreaking, if it is not done publicly, at least must be publicly announced in order to constitute civil disobedience. But Stephen Eilmann argues that if it is necessary to disobey rules that conflict with morality, we might ask why disobedience should take the form of public civil disobedience rather than simply covert lawbreaking. If a lawyer wishes to help a client overcome legal obstacles to securing her or his natural rights, he might, for instance, find that assisting in fabricating evidence or committing perjury is more effective than open disobedience. This assumes that common morality does not have a prohibition on deceit in such situations. The Fully Informed Jury Association's publication "A Primer for Prospective Jurors" notes, "Think of the dilemma faced by German citizens when Hitler's secret police demanded to know if they were hiding a Jew in their house." By this definition, civil disobedience could be traced back to the Book of Exodus, where Shiphrah and Puah refused a direct order of Pharaoh but misrepresented how they did it. (Exodus 1: 15-19)
If law breaking is not done in a public manor it is not considered what term? {sep_token} Stephen Eilmann asks why show public civil disobedience instead what is a better idea? {sep_token} Stephen Eilmann demonstrates covert law breaking in Nazi Germany.   Citizen's illegally had been doing what? {sep_token} Stephen Eildmann cites the oldest known example of civil disobedience in what part of the bible? {sep_token} What two women were defying the pharaoh in the story from the book of Exodus? {sep_token} What must be done to make non public lawbreaking acknowledged as civil disobedience? {sep_token} What is necessary to disobey? {sep_token} What is sometimes more effective than civil disobedience at times? {sep_token} What dilemma is a good example of moral civil disobedience? {sep_token} What book of the Bible discusses civil disobedience?