generate questions: On December 20, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in the case of ACLU v. Mercer County that the continued display of the Ten Commandments as part of a larger display on American legal traditions in a Kentucky courthouse was allowed, because the purpose of the display (educating the public on American legal traditions) was secular in nature. In ruling on the Mount Soledad cross controversy on May 3, 2006, however, a federal judge ruled that the cross on public property on Mount Soledad must be removed.
When did the US Court of Appeals rule in the case of ACLU v. Mercer County? {sep_token} What was displayed in Kentucky courthouses? {sep_token} What did a federal judge rule must be removed from public property? {sep_token} When was a ruling handed down on the Mount Soledad cross controversy? {sep_token} Why were the displays of the ten Commandments allowed? {sep_token}