The size of CoNLL-2003 is not consistant with the official release.
@lhoestq Yes, I agree adding a small note should be sufficient.

Currently, NLTK's `ConllCorpusReader` ignores the `-DOCSTART-` lines so I think it's ok if we do the same. If there is an interest in the future to use these lines, then we can include them.
Thanks for the dataset sharing! But when I use conll-2003, I meet some questions.
The statistics of conll-2003 in this repo is  : 
\#train 14041  \#dev 3250 \#test 3453
While the official statistics is:
\#train 14987 \#dev 3466 \#test 3684
Wish for your reply~
The size of CoNLL-2003 is not consistant with the official release. 
 Thanks for the dataset sharing! But when I use conll-2003, I meet some questions.
The statistics of conll-2003 in this repo is  : 
\#train 14041  \#dev 3250 \#test 3453
While the official statistics is:
\#train 14987 \#dev 3466 \#test 3684
Wish for your reply~ 
 @lhoestq Yes, I agree adding a small note should be sufficient.

Currently, NLTK's `ConllCorpusReader` ignores the `-DOCSTART-` lines so I think it's ok if we do the same. If there is an interest in the future to use these lines, then we can include them.