[Feature request] Add cos-e v1.0
Sounds good, @mariamabarham do you want to give a look?
I think we should have two configurations so we can allow either version of the dataset to be loaded with the `1.0` version being the default maybe.

Cc some authors of the great cos-e: @nazneenrajani @bmccann
I noticed the second release of cos-e (v1.11) is included in this repo. I wanted to request inclusion of v1.0, since this is the version on which results are reported on in [the paper](https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1487/), and v1.11 has noted [annotation](https://github.com/salesforce/cos-e/issues/2) [issues](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.14546.pdf).
[Feature request] Add cos-e v1.0 
 I noticed the second release of cos-e (v1.11) is included in this repo. I wanted to request inclusion of v1.0, since this is the version on which results are reported on in [the paper](https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1487/), and v1.11 has noted [annotation](https://github.com/salesforce/cos-e/issues/2) [issues](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.14546.pdf). 
 Sounds good, @mariamabarham do you want to give a look?
I think we should have two configurations so we can allow either version of the dataset to be loaded with the `1.0` version being the default maybe.

Cc some authors of the great cos-e: @nazneenrajani @bmccann