Responding to the initial question in this section, I said the first time we brought this proposal up that I have no overweening objection to the two images, proposed for the Islamic Depiction section; I do object to the proposal if it's take it or leave it in total: *It is too radical removing multiple images with limited participation, and without consideration for individual images in their sections. *This is the biography of a man, and the multiple images proposed to be removed fit that purpose, and several are images used across the project in many different languages for this purpose. *Again this is a biography, and three of the four images proposed are in ancillary sections, not his biography. *It removes all images from some sections of the biography. *The single image proposed for his biography sections (the purpose of the article) is an image of an event, with multiple people and other subject matter, in which it is very difficult to see anything related to Muhammad. *The objections to the images proposed to be removed, that they are religiously insensitive or culturally unbalanced I find unpersuasive, and the considerations standardless and unworkable. *It appears, that the images in the Islamic depiction section are being held captive to decisions in other sections  this is unfair to that section and those images.    