` :::I agree that the term ``obstacle`` is being debated above, and may be substituted by ``factor`` but don't get why you erase ``the general consensus has not changed``. This was accepted in the discussions above, given that the international community has condemned the settlements as illegal, the ICJ has also condemned the settlements, etc. etc. why won't you accept that there is majoritarian POV  against those settlements? Could you provide any source indicating that there are even more authors and people considering the settlements as legal in order to support the text as it is now? Otherwise I think we should introduce once again that there is a clear majority arguing against those settlements. Whether you call them obstacle or whatever is being discussed above but not whether it is a majoritarian or minoritarian POV, which was already discussed and nobody seems to argue against it. `