`  == Perfunctory discussion ==  There are three references for the entirety of this article, which was created 7 1/2 years ago. There are a ton of date ranges that are unsupported in any way. The content likely doesn't meet WP:V and the burden is on the contributor to provide references. This latest content is unsourced and was challenged. I respect Electricburst1996's contributions and hard work, but I don't think this reversion is sound, and consensus for excluding the content already exists in the guideline and policy cited above. At some point we need to either start demanding references for this questionable content or remove it altogether. Allowing the continuous addition of unsourced date ranges does nothing to strengthen these flimsy ``list of programs`` articles, as there is zero presumption that any of the content is accurate in any way.   `