`2 :::::::Yes, yes, that much is obvious. Regardless, ``an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area purely in an administrative role``, stressing the ``purely in..``. AN/I discussion is not an admin role, it's a community page, allowing discussion preceding admin action. A ``purely`` admin role is anything requiring sysop tools. Moving, warning, etc, any confirmed bugger can do. Protecting, blocking, deletion, etc is limited to sysops. So no matter how you read it, or attempt to define it, there's no ambiguity. An AN/I response, of questionable integrity, makes the editor not the admin involved, engaged, etc. The views were strong, the determination was discriminatory to the last. And still is.  `