 ::::::::You're getting way off-topic and need to calm down.  It doesn't matter whether it's a lithographed fact, or merely your opinion, that mainstream media coverage has been skewed or biased in some way.  It matters even less whether I think you're right or wrong.  None of this matters: Wikipedia is a vehicle for reflecting, not criticizing and questioning, what reliable sources say about topics.  ::::::::None of what I removed as OR/SYN was sourced to reliable sources, so I'm not sure what exactly you're talking about.  Yes, the loss of sovereignty was covered by BBC etc.. that doesn't mean you can just randomly insert an editorial cartoon that you believe reflects those topics; that's OR/SYN.  And where the cartoon is drawing a clear parallel between the IMF and Hitler's invading Nazi thugs, you can better believe it's likely to be challenged and you'll need to back it up with reliable sourcing. Regarding the last edit you mentioned, that was one of my own edits and it wasn't POV-pushing; not really sure what you are talking about.  Finally, as regards talk pages, no editor needs to ask for Talk Page permission to enforce basic 5 Pillar stuff like misrepresentation of sources and removing unsourced stuff that is controversial or likely to be challenged.   