` If anything, the article deserves a POV tag because it does not give enough detail about Fiorina's biggest disaster: her decisive role at HP to rid the company of its innovative qualities. She wanted to make the company huge, but its products were to be uninspiring commodities, sold for the lowest price. Before Fiorina, HP was a little bit like Apple in that it performed a lot of R&D; to come up with very interesting products. Fiorina cut that stuff out. She also forced a top-down management system, rewarding unquestioning adherence to assigned tasks. Before Fiorina, HP's management system, called the ``HP Way``, was much more democratic and free-form, allowing cooperation between distant departments, supporting decision-making at the ground level, and fostering inventive teamwork solutions. Fiorina purposely shut down the HP Way. See Business Insider ``Everything At Hewlett-Packard Started To Go Wrong When Cost-Cutting Replaced Innovation``, and the Chicago Tribune ``Carly Fiorina's disastrous paper trail``. There's also ``Carly Fiorina wrong for HP, wrong for California``, ``Misleading Claims``, ``Fiorina, Hurd: no practitioners of 'The HP Way'?``, ``Losing the HP way``, ``Carly Fiorina's HP legacy looms over her 2016 ambitions``, ``The rise and fall of the HP Way``, and ``The Rise & Fall Of Carly Fiorina``. I'm not going to fight the POV tag because the article fails to give enough detailed description of Fiorina's disastrous leadership of HP.   `