`  :Almost all of those Gbooks results are uses, not mentions; i.e., no basis for a non-SYNTH article. The concept of ``native Taiwanese`` doesn't have a clear mapping to any Chinese term. The article Taiwanese people✝ already has an adequate introduction to some of the problems with terminology. Taiwan specialists tend not to use this English term ``native Taiwanese``, because it's a politically loaded word relating to the (all, in some sense valid but) conflicting claims of Taiwanese aboriginies, Hoklo nationalists, and Waishengren's children to nativity.  :✝oblig. The term ``Taiwanese people`` itself is problematic, rabble rabble. Its promotion is related to the phenomenon of certain people on Wikipedia being allergic to the idea of a ``Chinese people`` or a ``Chinese language`` (as in, a single language with dialects), even going so far as to create articles like Gan people which predate any real-life ethnogenesis.   `