  == The Last Waltz ==  I think it should easily pass the GA process. As for FA, I'm not as familiar with that process. FA would probably frown on the many fair use images and the lists. They're very careful about the style of the prose. They might also want additional cites. Oh, I just noticed you didn't use cite web or cite news. Both GA and FA will want that so go get them here. (You could also take a look at categories to see if anymore apply (like English language films and American films).)  As for the automated peer review,  is a link to it. It's easy to use once you install it. Here is what it generates when I run it for the article:  The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic , and might not be applicable for the article in question. *Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. *Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. *See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article. *Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006. *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==. *Avoid using contractions like: wasn't, hadn't. *Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also . You may wish to browse through  for further ideas. Thanks,  