 :Apparently it comes from the joint website for the trophy started by the supporters groups that started the award. I've seen it before. That said, it's just a poor choice of image, as it gives a false impression that it's the current design of the trophy. It's not. Nor is it the original design. It ideally should be a picture of the current trophy with another image of the original one further down in the history section.  :But, in fact, no where does the article actually mention that the original trophy (which wasn't actually a shield-type design at all) has been retired and replaced with a large round shield/plate trophy. In short, the article contains the records, but doesn't actually cover the trophies themselves, which are the actual subject of the article!! Totally needs fixing.   