 :::::Yes, definitely. They are quite different calculations, so it's good to have both. I dropped the Lacerda ones from this context.   :::::If you think we should not round quite so much on the triaxial dimensions, we can increase the number of significant figures; but I'd rather have easy-to-read numbers in the body of the article, and put with them a linked note specifying the numbers+model used from Ra05 and that they have been rounded, and that the exact numbers are in the sidebar.   