`:True, Skyeking disagrees with M.Ames's ``context box*`` of interpreting the See Also section as ``something other*``whereas, the :See also section is actually an area to list, ``...related Wikipedia articles...useful for Readers seeking to read...including subjects only peripherally related...``(WP:ALSO)  ::-*-(out-of-context aruguments, misapplication of ``sentences`` from WP:Policies/Guidelines, and more.)  :Previously, I politely asked (negotiation) for ``one exception`` (Essure) to M.Ames's ``umbrella`` idea (his Rule, not Wikipedia's).  :In addition, lest we forget, ``If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.`` (WP:IAR)-a pillar Policy.  :Mitch, why did you fail to list (exclusion of facts, or data) WP:POLL (Guideline) vs. your link ``straw poll`` (merely a project page, languished since year 2009, 7-edits)?  :SOURCE - WP:POLL ::``Polling may be divisive and cause factionalism.`` ::``...polls are generally not used for article development.`` ::``In summary, polling is not a substitute for discussion.``  :P.S. :I am becoming more skeptical and beginning to wonder if M.Ames has a hidden agenda. :Regardless, of ``good faith``, at this time (20-days later) I am allowed to express my personal observation. :My ``...editorial judgment and common sense.``(WP:ALSO) remains the same about the Essure wikilink-M.Ames has not persuaded me that it is vitally important to delete said wikilink.  :Wiki Regards, :    `