   *Oppose per problems with bulk handling of disambiguation pages and differences from WP:NCLANG as already noted.     *Is nobody listening to the point that that guideline was authored by one of the participants in this discussion and that it was written without consultation by affect wikiprojects (Disambig, Ethnic groups, IPNA, WP United States, WPCanada) and who was the same person who disregarded standing convention, creating his own and then applying it across the board?  Including anglicizations that since six RMs in BC overturned them?  Is one guideline, created by one author, over a host of articles he has used to change (and determinedly resist actions to revert his changes, cf his behaviour in those RMs), mean nothing in the face of those precedent RMs, or all the other guidelines of the naming convention?  And of the previous discussions/consensus which created the model for the stand-alone names?  Is one guideline created in isolation from all considerations it affects created by one author who is here, in a somewhat COI capacity no less, going to outweight dozens of other guideline passages?  'Cause that's just not right.  