`  == Mondegreen ==  Let me refresh your memory, because I clearly see that regulations have somewhat obscured it. Quoting WP:Revert: ``if you feel the edit is unsatisfactory, then try to improve it, if possible - reword rather than revert.`` I have not yet seen a single example of a ``chaste`` veteran Wikipedia editor who actually made the effort to find references for unsourced claims (although I strongly feel that in this case it was fitting the description of the main article subject, so why source the obvious?) rather than ruthlessly reverting, thus making other editors ``run errands.`` Isn't that what Wikipedia should be about – mutual help by equally respected members of the community, regardless of the time they've been here? What I see instead is something like ``I'm just enforcing a policy by assigning a parking ticket. I know I might be wrong, but if you want to avoid paying the fine, better start running around... schnell! Hell, I'm not doing it for you, I got more heads to chop!``   `