`*And who are you to go judging whether or not things appear the way they are? It's not like I go around intentionally making up information to put on wiki. There is a lot of documentation floating around, and when you're immersed in it for a certain period of time, things can get mixed up once in a while. So don't pull that HDX2B stuff on me. Quite honestly, looking at your record, you're not much better in the first place. And really? The Faively issue? The article clearly states that the company supplied the mechanical portion of the braking equipment, which includes the brake pads and calipers. Whether the company outsourced those contracts is one, irrelevant, and two, highly unlikely considering an examination of their corporate website at both of these links (http://www.faiveleytransport.com/products/market-segment/locomotive, and http://www.faiveleytransport.com/products/activity/brakes-safety) provide evidence that Faively makes their own brake shoes and other mechanical brake components.  Aside from being extremely anal-retentive on many articles that can arguably be of the low edit category, your attitude when dealing with other editors you disagree with is poor, and, at the very least, at times bordering on unprofessional < (Which I think is a very generous statement, considering that telling someone to ``eff off`` online is usually reserved for teenagers. I'd expect more professional behavior from a top tier ``no frills`` editor that you clearly pride yourself to be). There's an urban dictionary definition for a person who engages this type of activity: Troll; and I, and (I suspect) many other editors that you have come in conflict with are starting to feel this way about you. Whether or not you're intentionally doing this is irrelevant, because it is really starting to seem that you sit around and look for pages that don't meet top tier wiki standards (which I would say millions don't, but I don't see you going after all of those), then you go about modifying them to attempt to meet those standards, all the while tearing out information, both unsourced and sourced (directly or indirectly), aggravating other editors, and then having unnecessary showdowns with them on their respective talk pages, which further aggravates and hinders overall progress. I would expect this kind of activity on a forum, but not here.      `