`   * consultant and lecturer in the area of his expertise, cults (bolded words add nothing) ::This seems pretty much ok, this is what he is... correct ? * he is commonly referred to as is imprecise, especially given the quotation marks (and avoids ``exit counseling``/kidnapping controversies) ::This is better version of he claims to be * he maintains an informative database etc inserts unnecessary opinions (see WP:Weasel) ::Respectfully i disagree... this is what it is, we can exclude the term informative and just database, this is one of his works. * he also owns cultnews.com and changing ``blog`` to ``web site`` obscures that these are self-published and not WP:RS ::This page is about a person who control that site, this link is a must in this page, cannot be avoided. * the fact that he is an expert witness in some courts is inarguable but the added phrase in relation to his expert knowledge etc adds nothing ::Agree, this line can be removed.    `