`   == Ref section ==  Yes, that is exactly what I mean. Whenever you wish to add a reference, the easy way is to type   http://www.ThisIsMyReference.com/whatever.htm   The second part of the trick is adding a new section near the bottom of the article (``See also`` is normally placed after the ref. section):    ==References== {{reflist}}   That's it really. If you wish to quote books, see e.g. an example at Isted Lion for how I normally do it. And thanks for fixing the talk page )    /    :PS. Please don't misunderstand me, but please make sure that you stay clear of violating WP:3RR just in case things get ugly on that page. I'd personally never do more than 2 reverts to a page a day, and I wouldn't do more than 1 a day either if I can in any way avoid it. You are a valuable contributor, and I'd hate to see you blocked for edit warring. Regards.   /   ::Ok, thanks for the update. And if you need proofreading of geographical names, I'll do my best to be of assistance.   /   :::Oh, and btw, I noticed a typo on Image:Danish Army.png. There is one E too many in the Electronic Warfare Coy. (Fredericia, third column).   /    == fr:Modèle:Images ==  Hello,  This template works along with a JavaScript function, which you can find at fr:MediaWiki:Common.js ♦   :To be more precise, it starts at the line ::function toggleImage(group, remindex, shwindex) { :and ends at the line ::addOnloadHook(ImageGroup); :But this template is rather experimental, I am not really encouraging its use for articles since it can cause some accessibility problems (printable version should be OK, but images displayed vertically in it; and moreover, it seems that code is not perfectly working on IE or Safari. Have a nice day! ♦    == Some Important Armies, Non-Present in the 'To Do`` List ==  There are several countries with increased possibility of engaging in combat in the near future, non-present in you plans. First of all these are Iran and Syria. Then, you have Armenia present in your to do plan, while you don't have Azerbaijan there. The only possible opponent of Armenia in the near future is Azerbaijan, so it makes sense to have armies of both of them. Just as in case of Israel and Syria.  Besides, there is Vietnam, the second possible opponent of China after Taiwan.  Also, Egypt - one of the most important and militarily strong players on the Middle East.  What about Ethiopia, whose large army is engaged in combat right now and is likely to be engaged in the future as well?  Anyway, thank you for these beautiful graphs )     Hi.  Well, concerning Iran, I'm afraid you could turn out to be over-optimistic. It is possible that it won't be crushed, if we consider the unhealthy inner political situation in the US and general developments in the Middle East region. Attack is possible, but not inevitable. Even less probable is the attack of such a might that will destroy most of Iran's military. Thus, I'm afraid Iran's military graph may be important in the future.:) Concerning Ethiopia, it's different from the rest of sub-Saharan nations in civilizational, historical and political terms. It views itself (and virtually is) as a bastion of Christianity defending itself in the Muslim surroundings. It's military proved to be quite effective in the resent war against the Islamist regime that was on the way of re-uniting Somalia under its rule.     Then lets hope, tah it will happen, and will happen in a proper way.  Yes, I am from Georgia. I have checked the site. Regretfully, it contains in Georgian absolutely the same information, as in English. And that you already have on your graph.  The only on thing: there is the general structure of the armed forces:     * Land Forces     * Navy     * Air Forces     * National Guard     * Logistic support Department with subordinated units     * Communication and information systems;     * Military Police     * Special Forces Brigade     * Military education and training Department with subordinated institutions and units   which means that a SF Brigade should be added. This brigade is not under the Ground forces Command, and is controlled by the Chief of Joint Stuff directly.    == Applause ==  Good on you mate! -)     == IDF Questions by  == [User:Keiththejarhead] this is my first time on Wikipedia so please forgive me if this does not script out too coherently, I'm going to need some practice at this.  I am the person who created and donated the IDF Ground Forces and General Staff orders of battle on Globalsecurity.  I am an American with no ability to read or speak Hebrew and my sources were all open, English language ones.  The IDF official website, Haaretz, Jerusalem Post, ISayeret.com, WarOnline, IDF Wikipedia, USIDFvets, etc.. I am thrilled at the information that Flayer has provided to correct mistakes on my OOB. All I am interested in is accuracy and I have always intended my IDF oob's as a tribute to the abilities, inovations and sacrifices of the IDF in the past and today.  I do have a few questions for Flayer concerning the IDF that I hope is open source/common knowledge in Israel.  Concerning the logistics regiments discussed above  In Haaretz I believe they discussed that each division does have a logistics regiment, but that the IDF is considering taking the divisional logistics regiments away and concentrating them in regional command logistics super units.  I believe the 36th and 162nd divisions' logistics units are composed of active duty troops. Are the reserve only logistics regiments Regional Command units or divisional units?  Also, does the IDF still have the Regional/District armor bn's [GASHAP] as they did in 1967 and 1973 (181st and 182nd for example)?  Concerning some of the Reserve armor divisions I had heard that two armor divisions were to be deactivated.  In fact I read that the ``Plada`` division had been deactivated (it was the 38th or 48th Division I believe). The 340th Division of Central Command has the 5th Infantry Brigade (they were both in Haaretz with the 2002 operations in the West Bank and the 5th Brigade was the parent unit of the reservists still prisoners of Hezbollah in lebanon). I have the names of several divisions Idan, Eyosh and Felda. First, is the 5th Brigade named ``Givati`` like it was in 1949 (which personnaly i doubt because of 84th Brigade now) and can you tell me what the English translation of Idan, Eyosh and Felda are? In Israeli publications 'formation' is often used for 'division/ugdah'.  I have an 85th Division often referred to in Isayeret.com as ``Otsa Kela David``. An d my references for the 143rd, 146th and 210th Divisions were from Yom Kippur War divisions. So it's pretty obvious my info may be pretty dated or 'speculative'.  On the Territorial Divisions and brigades.  Is the Judea and Samaria Division the 96th Division and the Gaza Division the 90th Division?  It is very interesting to find out the 80th is a Territorial Division. Would the ``Arava`` and ``Sagi`` Territorial brigades be numbered 72nd or 99th?  thanks for any info you can give and for all the great stuff you have already done.  Keiththejarhead  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •     ::     == Ringraziamento (thanks) ==  La ringrazio per il ``Barnstar`` (thank you for the Barnstar).   :And congratulations for the nice design of the barnstar!''''''   == Estonian Army == Thanks for the help and support.I will add your image as soon as I have finished the main frame. I have vision how the page ) Just making it better and more interesting.I have a problem with the Maavägi page. As I am not very advanced about net coding and wikipedia itself I am afraif tht the page wi