`  ==This is the chance you've been waiting for! ;)==  ...to do a peer review of the problem of Apollonius. ;)  Won't you be so kind?  I'm sure you'll set a good example for other mathematicians! )     : It will be a pleasure. I've been watching with great interest the lively activity on the page. With Barth, Eppstein, Ozob, Melchoir and R.e.b. involved. not to mention your good self, the article is blessed with expert editors and will surely go far. I guess that means I'd better be a really really tough reviewer -) -) '   I don't mind you being tough, but please be fast?  I have to leave town this weekend to help with my sister's wedding; I'll be gone for a few weeks, so the FAC will have to wait until then.  Thanks muchly for all your help; you know how much I appreciate everything about you,     : You're welcome. Sorry I didn't manage to get it done before you left: I tried to complete it yesterday morning, but RL called before I had time to write up all my comments... Hope you have (had) a nice break. '   Thank you!  I haven't left yet; I'm still packing and all that.  I had to order a duplicate bridesmaid dress, due to what I hope is a manufacturer's defect. P  No rest for the wicked...  Your comments are very good, and of course you caught my egregious editorializing about how difficult it is to solve the poA ``by eye``, having so many degrees of freedom compared to angle bisection.  Your other comments also opened my eyes to the corners I'd cut inadvertently in writing the article, and how much work I have left to do.  Oh well,     : Egregious editorializing is part of your charm -) - indeed I sometimes wish we could do more of that, especially on articles like this. More seriously, if you can source the degrees of freedom issue (three vs. one I suppose), then this is a point worth making. Anyway, hopefully, it will not be you alone dashing round those corners. I'll at least try to help the helpers. (``Those that can, do...`` oh dear...) : I hope the dress turns out well - and that you have some cute shoes to go with it -) Have fun, '   ==Another request for a more flexible transclusion tool== Hello GG, as I a while ago, someone is requesting a tool to tranclude different sections on different pages. I'd like to read your comments.    : I replied there: this is easy to do. '   == PR problems ==  Hi G guy, I am not sure how they did it, but Rio Grande Glaze Ware has no talk page, but has a peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Rio Grande Glaze Ware/archive1. Also Wikipedia:Peer review/The Colbert/O'Brien/Stewart feud/archive1 is listed at  as just The Colbert (assume this is a slash problem).   '  : Fixed. The latter was a problem with the CF templates. In the former case, I guess they followed the link in the preview and forgot to save the talk page. '  ::Thanks so much - I am never quite sure when it is a simple fix like the first case or something more complex liek the CF templates.   '   == PR suggestion ==  Ruhrfisch suggested i ask you about getting this tool thrown onto the peer review pages automagically? It sure helps me check links/etc at FAC.  -    == Updating the WikiProject Systems with fields  ==  Thanks for your adjustments of the Template:Sys rating. I created the 12 categories and it seems to work. I guess it will take a view days before the template updates the categorisation of all articles.      : My implementation isn't particularly robust. In particular, it requires that the fields are capitalized correctly. To make it more robust, a separate template is needed to process variants on the field name. See  for an example of such a template. '   ::I think it is a good start, and a simple solution. I guess I can remove most of the other categories and pages I created, while I was copying the WikiProject Math structure.   ::Now I am still very happy I started working with fields, especially because the fields of systems and systems science is so different. I has given me a better understanding of the separate fields. I have some ideas to improve the situation. But at the moment the variants on the field name doesn't seems to be a problem, because I assessed all articles so far and I check all new assessments.     :::Excellent news and good luck with your work. '   Hi, I still have two questions: # the categorisation of NA class articles doesn't seem to work, see for example here # All non-biographical articles  are listed under the T, see for example Category:Systems articles in Control theory.  Could you take a look at these thinks. Thanks.      ==  Template:GATable ==  Well, it looks wonderful. Which is why parents should never be permitted to pass judgement on the appearance of their children. ;) Quick particulars: # I think the SVG question rune is the better default icon than SVG neutral. Truly, the editor does not know if an article is good or bad regarding a particular criterion at T=0; Neutral means that the editor is initially indifferent. Not quite the right initial frame of mind. If the editor remains ambivalent regarding a particular criterion, then he or she can let the default SVG question rune remain. # I surmise that you synchronize this template with the current state of WP:WIAGA so that it expands to the current criteria, whatever they may be; that makes me an adopter. I do think the use case remains problematical; typing into a table can be prone to error. I tend to type my comments up in a text editor; my interaction with the edit box is a brief paste, then preview. If I've          pasted into the wrong part of the table, making a mess of the markup, then there's no great pain over cancelling the session and then pasting into a newly summoned edit box. Of course, no one is being forced to use this box; editors can take it or leave it, and for those of us who really like the side-by-side presentation of criterion and critique, the extra editing care is of no terrible concern. I may have other comments. But Ciao Bella,  the corgi who runs my life, wishes to have her walk now. I've been summoned...     : I've switched to question runes for all but the overall assessment (lack of knowledge about whether the article meets the criteria => open minded about the outcome). I realised the point about editing tables, which is why I provided a template for each row to hide most of the table code. '   == Housekeeping Reminder ==  Hi G guy, since the end / beginning of the month is on us, I have made the new semi-automated PR archive for July (and did the rest of the year while I was at it).   I have mentioned this before, but with the bot doing most archiving, I would be fine if the translcuded PR pages no longer had links to edit the article or edit the article talk page. I know this would save space and perhaps would allow the check links tool to be added, per Ealdgyth's request above.   Take care,   ''''''   == Re:  VeblenBot ==  I use the page to keep track of new FACs. I'd just like for the page to be working as it was a few days ago again; I don't think the page needs any improvements. It was perfect as it was, at least to me.     : I wish it would go away