`::I think I understand this sentence, ``Again I am asking you about what kind of projections you think it is rational to make.`` The list you are asking for would be long and is a bit more than I was considering introducing. It will take some time. My intent was only going to say certain proposed explanations of the conspiracy theories (or concerns) came from certain details of the declassification... such as these 3 or 4 examples...as in my very rough draft in Sandbox #3 .   ::I've provided many examples from reliable people and sources that plainly and clearly spell out legitimate concerns past, present and future.  The concerns are considered legitimate because they were expressed by politicians, congress, laws (plus that one bill), national news outlets and affiliates, international outlets, scientific orgs, gov agencies etc, notable authors, rights analysts and orgs, lawyers, federal judges, vet groups, military officials, gov spokespeople, etc.    ::There are limited reliable sources and no books on this subject.  I've provided sources that say almost all contemporary conspiracy theories (involving US gov and CIA) stem from specific declassifications.   ::These declassifications have generated specific concerns and those concerns have been incorporated into theory(s) and projected onto contrails. How exactly this worked might be limited on sources and I've already speculated at length.  ::As I see it, there are two beliefs (or two basic assumptions to the belief), A)a past or proposed program is ongoing- involving the sky above (this limits us to things in the sky: clouds, airplanes, helicopters, satellites, airships, unidentified) and B)something is different and abnormal about contrails (since 1995).   ::You are now asking me for a list of specific rational concerns from legitimate reports of an actual declassification or proposal that I think led to the formation of conspiracy theories that gov has or wants to: conduct tests with aerial spraying, weed out the weak or sick, modify the environment by aerial spraying, Spray barium etc. or that contrails were somehow different after 1995.   ::I'm not trying to legitimize the irrational but even if a theory/proposed explanation is considered irrational, certain parts of the theory may have some original rational basis however remote. I think what you are asking for specific ideas in specific theories and the specific legitimate places where I think these ideas sprung from. Is this right?     `