That's kind of ridiculous, don't you think? A video of the full match(that is provided by WWE themselves) should be all the proof you need. What if one of the reliable sources(for example) were to watch the match on the Network and report that Big Show was the first guy eliminated, Cesaro was never in the match and Sin Cara really won because he was never eliminated? Every post by a reliable source is obviously their own interpretation. Another question is why are some places considered a reliable source, but others aren't? I'm not trying to argue, I'm just trying to understand why some of these bizarre rules are in place.    