`  == Criticism Section ==  I really think there ought to be a criticism section in this article. There are many people, most notably research psychologists (that adhere to the scientific method) who question the scientific basis of the opinions of forensic psychologists. And there are definite problems with allowing such a flimsy science to exert such a high degree of influence in criminal court. There are many instances in which ``expert testimony`` in criminal cases is essentially scientifically unfounded but yet still weighs heavily on the court's decision. I think some of these cases, as well as the criticism of both the ``science`` and the influence of forensic psychology should be mentioned. I can gather some of these sources, and contribute to this section, how do others feel about this?   `