`  == Concerns about Target Audience ==  #First and foremost, the quotations (as per the copyright and usage terms of just about all Biblical translations) must state the translation from which they come.  This is not just for copyright reasons, it would be useful for someone studying the subject. #Second, almost half of these quotations could (and may very well be) used by schools of Arminian thought in defense of their own positions.  This gets into theology, an area of which I have little expertise, so I've not the position to comment more about it.  I think it would be pertinent to at least mention this. #These articles must not be written solely for the purposes of the faithful, but rather for usefulness to someone who is unfamiliar or unbelieving.  Bearing this in mind, the article should probably be reworded in places to improve the ability for non-believers to understand it.  An example from Unconditional election: ``God's choice from eternity, of whom He will bring to Himself, is not based on foreseen virtue, merit or faith in the persons He chooses but rather, is unconditionally grounded in His own mercy.``  This will make little or no sense to someone unfamiliar with the subject matter.  My concern first lies with the use of capitalized prepositions.  From a perspective of showing respect to a (common, but not universal) convention of the faith, this makes sense (akin to not spelling out the name of the deity on articles related to Judaism).  However, from the perspective of neutrality, this is inherently biased.  Someone who does not believe in monotheism (meaning both belief in higher power and belief in one god) will find this offensive and/or contrary to their ability to read the article.  My second concern lies with the wording.  ``[...] of whom He will bring to Himself...`` should probably be re-worded, as it may not be clear what bringing to Himself means.  ``[...] in His own mercy`` will not make sense to a non-believer.  This is, however, a shaky point, and one I do not emphasize too strenuously.  In this way, it shows respect for and reflects the beliefs of the faithful as they believe them.  My concern is its usefulness to those who do not believe and/or do not have experience with the matter. #It may not be prudent to quote the Bible at all.  This is my least strenuous concern, not because it is not a concern, but only because I intend to conjure discussion on the subject, not malevolence or harsh action.  I say this not to offend the faithful, but the article should be written from the perspective of presenting the faith and the arguments behind it (definite gray area), not defending it or proving a point to Arminians and followers of other schools of thought.  Maybe just the references should be listed, allowing others to look up the passages themselves (this follows with WP's no source material policy, among others—see WP:NOT).  I will not make any changes until at least some discussion occurs on the topic.  I do not want to offend those who believe, but WP is an institution whose target audience is everyone.  Discussion of religion is important and necessary, but it needs to be (as close as we can get to) neutral.— `