 I re-looked at the edit history and don't see the obvious template errors that Bzuk says he fixed, other than the addition of the date on Fensch reference and adding accessdate as of the date of the edit.  Am I missing something?  The minor typographical edits (hyphen in re-designate, etc) are certainly unobjectionable. On the other point, the template calls do add something: they add semantic metadata that is easily machine parsable, unlike the hand formatted citations, and they enforce a consistent formatting that might be missed by a human editor.      ::