`  :``How do you call this?`` ::I call it an admin that doesn't know policy.  Wikipedia:Three-revert rule states: :::``Wikipedians who revert a page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours, except in certain special circumstances, are likely to be blocked from editing.`` :``Saying 15 people edited the page after you before the issue rose up is not a valid excuse.`` ::It's not an excuse at all, just a fact.  People don't edit pages to let others know they approve of existing content — that would require an alteration of the same content, and make little sense. :``5 users…voiced their opposition`` ::Nope.  One brand new user, , opposed it, but admitted he was mistaken, then came up with another inaccurate claim, then went completely irrelevant.  Two anonymous users posted in this section, yes, but not on anything relevant.   didn't comment here until after your protection (though he did nominate the image for deletion on Commons, and his message on your talk page is almost undoubtedly why you involved yourself here — I was aware of these actions, but not obliged to respond in any particular way here).  That leaves only , whose claim, ``it isn't the italian flag``, was completely and hopelessly irrelevant (there are, after all, twenty-two other flags on the page in question, and only one is presented [albeit vaguely] as the official one).  That's practically just one user, with an irrelevant non-justification. :¦   `