` :::::``is there any reason to think the article is ACTUALLY biased?`` Yes, there are actually 2 reasons sir: :::::First. The refs have absolutely nothing to back up their statements. Furthermore article uses their opinions and estimations, rather than facts. Hence the wording. E.g. instead of ``X peaces of equipment was of model Y from year Z`` it says ``most of the equipment were relics`` :::::Second and most important. The Spanish and Russian articles about the subject ( the actual involving parties ) have no such negative flavour about soviet involvement. Only the English has it. And as we figured out without any facts behind it. Only opinions of the British myth writers ``acclaimed academics``.   `