`:::::::It takes 2 to edit war and you have not explained how you justify keeping a list that is not encyclopedic in content, and as such can not be verified with sources, is open to original research, and because individual entries will be a matter of opinion is likely not to have a neutral point of view. The list you keep inserting into this article under different names started out as ``Genocide`` and was renamed ``Genocide and Democide`` since we extracted the genocides and alleged genocides from the list, and the items added to the list under ``Genocide and Democide`` were those which were either a democide or genocide in the opinions of the editors who added them, the list has no support from reliable sources. As I said if you would like to convert the list into one that is quantifiable such as ``Crimes against humanity`` and use reliable sources for that list, then we might be able to get somewhere, but just renaming a list of random facts does not solve the innate problems with the list.  :::::::Let me give you an example of why this is very dubious ``state-sanctioned violence against civilian populations,`` Many governments use state sanctioned violence to quell prison riots, do you intend this list to include those? The British government sanctioned used police in London to control protesters during the recent international G20, should that be in the list?   :::::::I have explained, a number of times why I do not think a list of random unsourced   events should be in this encyclopedia, you have yet to explain why you think such a list should be in this encyclopeadia.     `