` ::listen, this is a blp violation and original research. because they ``collectively represent`` this new movement, that doesn't mean he's a founder. it means that one article states that he ``collectively represents`` the movement. you cannot extrapolate ``represents a movement`` to conclude he's a ``founder``. stop your edit warring, and stop taking liberties in inventing creative interpretations that dont precisely represent the original source. wikipedia isn't the place to include dubious extrapolations; wikipedia only reports what 3rd party, reliable sources unambiguously state.    `