`  == A  changing media perspective. The article must change too. ==  In a mainstream Australian source (The Age) today we have an article  (here) titled ``Rolls-Royce takes blame for Qantas engines``. It reads....  ROLLS-ROYCE made running changes to the design and manufacturing standard of its new A380 engines to stop oil leaks, but it had not done so to the engines fitted to the Qantas A380 fleet.  Airbus’s chief operating officer, John Leahy, said the new Roll-Royce engines it would divert from its final A380 production line for Qantas should not leak oil. ‘‘I know they’re [Rolls-Royce] constantly updating their manufacturing standards. We think the engines on the production line will be fine.’’  The new engines ‘‘should not have that issue’’, he said, ‘‘in terms of this one part that seems to have had a problem with leaking oil’’.  European safety regulators identified an oil fire as the likely cause that set off the midair engine explosion on QF32 on November 4 near Singapore.  As a result, Qantas’s A380 fleet remains grounded, three Singapore Airlines planes are each having an engine replaced, while Lufthansa took one A380 out of service temporarily....''  So now we have three airlines involved, and Rolls Royce correctly becoming the centre of attention on this matter. And a cause - an oil fire - has been identified. This article, if it retains its current title and emphasis, will become a side issue. The only long term significance will be that it was the first place this much larger issue became public, and that Airbus planes and Qantas maintenance practices are in the clear. Maybe it also highlights the high skills of Qantas pilots.  Whatever, this article in its current form cannot remain the primary place for discussion of the problem with the RR Trent 900 engines.   `