`, 9 July 2011 (UTC) ::::At User Mann jess.. ::::::Are you attempting to frustrate contributors here? How is it that you can make the definitive statement. ::::``One problem detailed above is that the article is not about ``a legitimate concept``. ::::::And then respond in your last comment with.. ::::``Whether it is well sourced or accurate is not on the table. Can you please read and address the issues being raised? Thank you.`` ::::Can you not see that you are engaging in a non sequitur fallacy? That legitimate sources impart legitimacy to the term when they use it. You can't understand that? How is it that if policy on Wikipedia states that something is valid as a source and can be used to give validity to an article here in Wiki now no longer can do that because now you have decided that Wiki policy is about valid sources and that does not mean the same to people as legitimate ones? Do you not see that you are making your own policies and acting in a way that you have no authority to act in. And in a way that appears to make apologies for a group of people whom do very bad things?   18:29`