` It can only fairly obvious if you already have some implicit, if not explicit, benchmark against which you measure their ``notability`` in mind. Therefore you must have some criteria to make such a judgement. If we don't have any guidelines I could argue that anyone who has played for Celtic and has their own article (thereby satisfying WP:N) is inherently notable and thus must be included.  We have to ask ourselves, what exactly is the point of such a section? Is its purpose to   # provide a ready link to the key players in Celtic history (i.e. list players particularly notable to Celtic for some reason, irrespective of their wider profile) # provide a ready link to all Celtic's ex-players (i.e. a list of people who meet WP:N and played at least one match for Celtic) # provide a ready link to highly notable (``famous``) players who have worn the strip (i.e. list players with a particularly notable wider profile, irrespective of their importance to Celtic)  I personally think 1. should be the purpose of the section, and with that in mind it shouldn't be too difficult to think up some guidelines for inclusion. I also oppose the inclusion of any player currently playing for Celtic. Those players are included in the squad list and their inclusion again is completely redundant, since the the reader can easily find a link to their article elsewhere in the article. As an aside, if 1. is the basis of the section, there is no reason we can't have links to people without articles (yet). e `