`:::::You'll need to explain the humour.  Jesus Seminar ``was organized to discover and report a scholarly consensus on the historical authenticity of the sayings and events attributed to Jesus in the gospels`` - it is the very definition of 'confirmation bias'. It's little different from ``the bible says it is the word of god, the word of god is infallible, so the bible must be the word of god``.  Apart from supposed humour, you offer nothing to explain the difference between one partisan website and another on the opposite side of the argument.     `