`  We need more people get involved into this discussion. First of all, just because our people may be known as ``Assyrians`` in English-speaking countries doesn't mean we automatically have to promote Assyrianism or Assyrian nationalism on a common Wikipedia page for all Suryoye (Arameans, Assyrians, Chaldeans etc.) no matter if it is called ``Assyrian people``, ``Syriac people`` or whatever. Again we don't know the exact numbers. @Penguins53 ``What are specific problems with the current page?`` You can remove almost the whole content of the history section, e.g. ``Assyrian continuity`` or ``Ancient history``, if we want a neutral base focused on our Christian heritage where we all agree. I say, we will definitely need sub-articles within a common page about the modern groups, e.g. ``Assyrians (present)`` and ``Syriac-Arameans`` about each groups views. We don't have Lebanese, Syrian or Tunisian people forcible redirected to the ``Arabs`` article, so why can't we have these pages then? ``The page is not Assyrian propaganda, it's just facts, evidences etc.`` Of course it is otherwise we wouldn't argue about it! If I want to write an Aramean continuity article it would be probably redirected or removed.  `