`  The article says: Excluding Dacian, whose status as a Thracian language is disputed1, and the footnote says that This is confirmed among others by Benjamin W. Fortson in his Indo-European Language and Culture, when he states that ``all attempts to relate Thracian to Phrygian, Illyrian, or Dacian ... are ... purely speculative`` (p. 90). ``Confirmed among other by...`` Who are the others that state that? Is the Romanian and undoubtably 99% of the foreign historiography wrong, and has been wrong for decades now in clasifying Dacian as a Thracian language? And what is with this tone: ``whose status as a Thracian language is disputed`` Disputed? Disputed by whome? By two nerdy wikipedia editors?  `