`  == Australian media == === US spying on our neighbours through embassies ===  ``The United States is tapping telephones and monitoring communications networks from electronic surveillance facilities in US embassies and consulates across east and south-east Asia, according to information disclosed by intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden...``  http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/us-spying-on-our-neighbours-through-embassies-20131029-2wcvl.html#ixzz2jK5IvN7Y  -    === How Australia spies on its neighbours ===  ``Australia's electronic spy agency is using the nation's embassies to intercept phone calls and internet data in neighbouring countries, according to new information disclosed by intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden and a former Australian intelligence officer...``  http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/revealed-how-australia-spies-on-its-neighbours-20131030-2whpg.html#ixzz2jK5VFn1x  -    :Do you think these should be added? and if so where?  - Reaction, other countries?    ::They could be added to the section under  2013_mass_surveillance_disclosures#International_cooperation, although it may be wiser for us to wait until all these disclosures are over before adding excessive details to an already bloated article. Then again, by now it should be clear that Snowden's leaks have triggered a significant historical event that justifies a large article, albeit with prose instead of lists.    ::-    == Europeans collaborated with the UK on mass surveillance ==  Seems like yet another reason to rename the article as ``2013 Global surveillance disclosure(s)``:  ``Edward Snowden papers unmask close technical cooperation and loose alliance between British, German, French, Spanish and Swedish spy agencies...`` (As well as the Dutch, Spanish, Italian, and probably every other Western spy agency)  http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/nov/01/gchq-europe-spy-agencies-mass-surveillance-snowden  -    :Tend to agree, except that there is a large amount in the article that has nothing to do with ``2013``?    ::That, in a nutshell, could be a good starting point for deciding how to divide this article. We need to clearly delineate the topic of the article to begin with.  `