 I'd say that it is a reliable source, but it may not be encyclopedic. As the initial addition was reverted because for a bad source, and subsequent reverts did not explain to the poor IP editor why his new source was also bad, I felt adding the new source correctly was a good comprimise.  Feel free to tell me why it shouldn't be added. And why you felt keeping the part that I deleted up until this point was consistent with WP:BLP.   