`  == GOCE editor doing major work on this article ==  I've posted on this thread before, but would like to clarify exactly what I am intending to do, and how to go about doing it, because there appears to be some ``bad blood`` between 10 people and, honestly, only 2 people (listed below).  About the article: * Created by Illuminatio * based on the work of Regnerus, 2007, in a book entitled Forbidden Fruit: Sex & Religion in the Lives of American Teenagers.  The following users who have posted on the talk page (I may have made one or two mistakes here) seemed to be for Regnerus, his work, using him in this article, this article, the article's tone or its neutrality: * Illuminatio * 70.26.154.163  The following users appeared to be against him, his work, the tone or neutrality of the article or sections:  * 24.19.67.32 * 184.155.89.158 * 83.36.156.187  * Eivind * 98.213.37.188  * 146.115.24.137 * Morphriz * 173.2.88.219 * 174.53.242.228 * Maunus  * Meteor sandwich yum (me)  I haven't included Student7 and Flyer22, who I'm pretty sure are administrators (although Student7 did comment, either from a neutral or seemingly uncritical take of Regnerus).  That's pretty clear consensus. I see that as a go-ahead for me to remove: * ALL of Regnerus' work. * the Kaiser Family Foundation: In my opinion, although they did do a scientific study, they are conservatives, degrading their credibility as researchers (this is why scientists often use the ``double blind`` experiment tests, so as not to skew their results) * probably Fox News * an outdated study (The International Encyclopedia of the [USA] appears to be a c. 1990s analysis of c. 1960s research, back from the time homosexuality was listed as a disease in the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual) * anything else that does not appear to fit or be reasonably impartial  I'm going to edit per a research-removal-replace method, so that the article changes only incrementally. I'm not sure when I'll stop contributing for this page, but I'm sure after I clean it up it will be ready for expansion or further contribution from others.  Also, when that's done it probably would be a good idea for another person (completely uninvolved) to check this work, and protect from vandalism. From there, hopefully this may even be a featured article.   `