`  == Problems with the ``Legacy`` section ==  Parts of the ``Legacy`` section are poorly organised. :* We have a sub-section called ``Martin Luther`` that says almost nothing about either Martin Luther (just that ML ``rechristened`` him ``Hermann``) and nothing about Armenius' legacy.  The rest of that section is just alternative etymologies of Arminius, which probably should go elsewhere.  Plus, is ``rechristened`` really the correct term to use here?    :* Then there is the ``German nationalism`` section which seems to mash together a load of unrelated things without really explaining their relevance to German nationalism.  ::- An opera, that apparently became unpopular due to Napoleon, but no explanation is given, and this isn't even mentioned in its own article. ::- By the way, the Nazis liked this opera! ::- Also, a football team is named after him (which is relevant to German nationalism how?) :* And finally there is the Popular Culture section, which as usual contains a mishmash of the plausibly important and utterly irrelivent.  (Why are two operas in here, but a third in the ``Nationalism`` section?  Is one scenario in Rome Total War really important enough to mention?  How is a minor character in a novel relevent just because he happens to share the same name?) My suggestion for improvement: :*Scrap the ``Legacy: Martin Luther`` section.  It has nothing to do with his legacy, and very little to do with Martin Luther.  The information there should be transfered to the ``Biography`` section. :*The ``Legacy: German nationalism`` section should be improved.  It is my understanding he wasimportant in this, but unfortunately I don't know enough ot the details to do it myself.  However, I expect the two operas mentioned in ``Popular Culture`` might have a place here, while the football team named after him would be better there. :*The ``Popular Culture`` should be pruned of all examples of ``Someone/something named after him`` - it should only contain examples that actually relate to the man himself.  (I'll leave otehrs to argue whether operas and video-game scenarios are equally worthy of inclusion).   `