`  Why? Because I have added a FACT and supported it with 16 references? I hope you have issued the same threats to the other editors involved. If you don't accept any of the references because you deem them ``unreliable``, then you are welcome to edit the reflist. But that does not mean the edit is invalid or incorrect. You and the likes of your cohorts you're supporting are making a mockery of wikipedia. I am astonished you cannot recognize this. I am reverting to me edit again, despite your threat, and I suggest you moderate your approach and aggression. Edit the reflist, not the edit itself. If you reply to this, it will be deleted without comment.`