 May 2011 (UTC)  :I am sorry for the lag in feedback, real life demanded my attention.  I disagree that this is either gossip or Libel.  First off it is widely reported in many WP:RS which makes it more than a self published claim.  Ultimately everything that is published originates with one person's claim, but when that claim is reproduced by reliable sources which are responsible for fact checking then it becomes admissible for wikipedia.  It is not Libel, if it was I am sure Davie would have already sent some lawyers to straighten it out (the church has a reputation for dealing with legal matters efficiently).  And it is not Gossip because it has a source, that source has been checked out by the reliable sources and they have chosen to report on it.  Additionally it has world wide reproduction (published in several languages) so it is also not inconsequential, it is a widely reported story which has such an impact both Davie and the church responded to it and has consequence for both organizations.  20:46, 15