` :Didn't notice you posted here. So, here's a copy-paste from your talk page: I understand your concerns, but please stop doing that. The article has a NPOV. If ``low`` is highly subjective, than what is ``complexity and thoroughness`` or ``one of the best implementations of medieval combat ever created``. The article just says what the reviewers said, no matter if it is negative or positive, and no matter if the commenters had a positive or negative reaction on it. I also prefer not to use ``dated`` instead of ``low``, since ``low quality`` sounds more formal than ``dated graphics``. Besides that it is inappropriate—the engine is new, just that it isn't very good.  :And I did play the game (since 0.632) and GR's review is indeed one of the worst reviews I have ever read, but that is not of any importance unless some other notable and reliable publication (not blogger or commenter) criticizes the article directly, we can't do that in an article. Normally I wouldn't include that article here, but GamesRadar is quite important, so nothing fair I can do. Please also see other Reception sections of Featured articles about games and/or movies.   `