` :Clearly not, therwise I would not have been tagging. ::About the references: all your references are press releases or announcements by the organizing committee. In most cases, these are not useful as sources. The article misses independent, reliable third party sources. ::About the copy-editing: the text contain, amongst others, peacock terms, like ``affordably-priced items``, ``Free to attend``, and a list of non-notable performers. Maybe the performers are of huge local interest, they are not relevant for wikipedia. Also, the article lacks internal links. ::About notability: without proper sources, notability can not be judged. A three year old festival with 12.000 visitors is not very convincing. The festivals should show that is more on offer then being just another local festival. :Still, it might by that the festival is notable. That is why I not nominated it for deletion, but that I tagged it. Now you can work on the article, without the immediate threat of removal. I know my comments sounds harsh, but I believe that you can improve the article enough to make even me happy.   `