` ::::::::This thread started with your accusation that somehow information was being ``hidden``. That was never the case, and any viewer can see that the original text was retained and moved into a separate paragraph to clearly illustrate that it represents an opposing point of view. The previous entry was a third-party opinion, not fact about NOM: ``prevent the legal recognition and acceptance of marriage and civil unions for same-sex couples``. NOM's reasoning as to their views on civil unions does not necessarily translate into ``prevent recognition and acceptance`` (which is an opinionor ``spin`` to use your wordfor which there is no reference), and is anyway far too hefty a conversation for the intro. Best to keep that in the section about civil unions (where in fact there is far better info). As I mention below, the best approach for the intro is to include the entire quote, unedited, which I have now done. This should satisfy your suggestion that the opening clearly indicate a summary of NOM's views, while meeting the requirement of presenting all significant views.`