` ::I spotted this review, and may I advise you to put this on hold instead? Although you have listed 30 points of prose (some of which are contentious enough to invite discussion), this is fairly typical of GA review, and many article writers can fix them in a few days at most - the only serious issue is unsourced content. The GA criteria only mandates five individual areas of the MOS, and while suggestions for other areas are welcome, not adhering to them is not directly a reason to fail the review. It may also be that the ``family and early life`` is not particularly important as documented in sources - the article must be focused as well as broad in coverage. The nominator,  is a highly experienced writer with a strong track record, and while that's not a reason to give a ``free pass``, the odds that she would write an article not conforming to the GA criteria are probably quite slim.    `