  == Advice sought on RM situation ==  Philip, as you and I had a recent discussion related to RMs, I thought I’d ask your advice on this situation.  On January 17, this  RM was initiated.  I watched the discussion everyday.  On Feb 6, I relisted the discussion with this comment essentially saying it’s been a stalemate so far and unlikely to result in anything but a no consensus decision unless one side or the other made significant movement.  On Feb 7, an involved editor opened this tread Closing the move discussion that began discussing how the RM should be closed.  On Feb 8, another thread entitled  218.250.159.25 was opened that began impuning the motivations of various IP editors who contributed to the RM discussion.  I considered all of these threads as connected—RM, closing the move and the IP discussion.  The direction of the discussion was clear, there was no consensus developing and bad behavior on the part of some was making the discussion personal.  On Feb 11, I closed the discussion as no consensus. .  Within 90 minutes, an involved editor (not an admin), reverted my close claiming that I had not let it run for 7 days after relisting.  This was done without discussion or even asking me about it. I engaged the involved editor here on their talk page , but as of now there has been no movement on his part and I doubt there will be.  I don’t think reverting my close without asking me about it is in any way acceptable behavior.  However, I am not going to enter into a revert war about this as there is zero upside to that.  Additionally, I am not going to close this RM again (I actually think the involved editor thinks I am).  My question to you is this. Apart from my close only 5 days after relisting, which may or may not have been a tactical error (there was significant indication that other editors wanted this RM closed), does this behavior on the part of an involved editor in an RM discussion warrant discussion at ANI?  Any advice will be appreciated.  Thanks   