`::::::One thing I'm not getting, though, is that you guys are trying to tell me that the majority of fans were disgruntled, yet when you add that back to the article, you say ``the initial reception was generally positive [..],`` then you go on to say ``SOME fans felt disgruntled [...],`` if you're going to make an argument, at least be consistent with what you say, and the content you contribute.  I don't know why negative response is considered noteworthy, but positive isn't, but I'm just not going to stand for this, as per POV, it IS taking a negative standpoint on the game, it's starting many unnecessary edit wars, it's not encyclopedic in any way, there's no way you can accurately tell me that the MAJORITY of fans were disgruntled, and it's generally causing a lot of trouble.  I think it should be taken down for the sake of neutrality, consistency, and the god-forsaken edit wars that are going on.      `