`  Come on, let's not have an edit war about this. Eugenics *is* about improving the human genetic pool. The question is as to whether such an improvement is ethical, what it would consist of, and how to implement it. I could understand the commas on something like 'forced sterilization were implemented in order to ``improve`` the gene pool', or 'immigratino was restricted to ``improve`` the gene pool', but I don't think it's meaningful to do that for genetics as a whole. that would be like saying 'this anti-unemployement policy aims at ``reducing`` unemployement'.  If it doesn't result in an improvement, it's not eugenics. We're talking about the *definition* here !  7 July 2005 12:11 (UTC)`