`  ==Deleted Material & Kripalu P.R. Staff== :Sadly one editor insists on deleting five sentences, neutrally factual & sourced to Mass. Dept. of Environmental Protection, the federal EPA, and the New York Times. This same editor makes unsupportable accusations of ``Conflict of Interest.`` Interesting/ironic that Kripalu article was also somewhat recently edited by a Kripalu executive, who similarly objected to well-sourced & neutral material from IRS documents.  :So, the Kripalu P.R. people are apparently watching.  Here are the deleted five sentences: :The state had reported in 2003 that this subsurface [public drinking water] system was subject to a ``high threat`` of contamination from possible pesticide overuse or potential fuel spills.[9] The federal Environmental Protetion Agency listed nine reporting and monitoring violations for that same system between 1998 and 2001.[10]  :A 2008 report said Kripalu's well-based water-supply system contained one form of uranium and two forms of radium, in amounts below legal limits, but above federal health guidelines.[11][12][13]  :In 2007, the state set an August 2009 deadline for retirement of one of Kripalu's wells, due to health hazards exacerbated by a construction project in the area of the well.[14][15] '''  :Removing neutrally presented factual & relevant material is, of course, harmful to the interests of Wikipedia readers. (to be edited).     :Calamitybrook, you might read some of the many, many responses made over time about these issues.  You might consider wp:dispute resolution or wp:RfC to gather support for your position. However, your abusive behaviour is not likely to draw much in the way of help: see again, guidance on your talk page, this talk page, wp:COIN, wp:WQA. Please follow it.-  `