Who is an Azeri according to the article? Guys, I raised this question here previously (which has been archived without being answered or resolved!). The question was “What does the article want to say?”. In that question I asked how were we going to classify/identify Azeris? Would we use language? Race? Culture? History? What?  All these arguments you are having here now is because that question was not answered at the beginning! I can see some people using different cards as and when it suits them! Language becomes the common delimiter when it suits them then race when it suits them, then culture and history when it suits them.  Why don’t we agree on a common delimiter? Is it because there isn’t a good one?  What constitutes in a group of individuals being classed as one people? Language? Culture? Race? History? Or the combination of some or all of these?     