`   §   == IP edits ==  In my RFA, you said it was interesting that the IP I used was also used by Willy on Wheels.... well, I was editing from a public terminal then. I had no idea who Willy on Wheels was back then. Hope this helps as an explanation.   :Oh I didn't mean anything by it, I just found it interesting.     ::Well, now you know it's a public terminal IP! Oh well, I'll try harder for my next RFA, this one'll probably fail as it is...    == Scott Johnson (artist) ==  Hi, you voted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Instance. I was wondering if you could also weigh in on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Johnson (artist) and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ExtraLife_%282nd_nomination%29, as they are also up for deletion. Thank you. -    == UNPROTECT ==  Un protect my talk page so the new message ber will go away  ==Debito Arudou==  I kind of liked the cool looking box quotes in the Criticism section. Why did you take those out? They're both accurate and verifiable, actually.  :Add them back with sources then.  None of them were sourced (though a couple were credited but not sourced).     == Ill Mitch Images ==  Metros please tell me why you deleted the images from the talk page version of Ill Mitch I am working on. I sourced them and tagged them. Please tell me what I did wrong and I will correct it. I have added immediate source, description, fair use rationale, and tags. :Fair use images, by copyright law, can only be used for illustrative purposes in encyclopedic articles.  Your ``article`` is a write-up on your user talk page.  If it was in the article space, everything would be fine, but it's the fact that it's in the user space that led me to remove them from your user talk page.    * I am sorry, I was told by BigDT that I should recreate the page in my user space so people on the deletion review page could see it. Should I remove it from there. Oh, wait, I see you already removed the pictures again, sorry, I thought I did the right thing. Should I NOT have it on my talk page like I was told? Did I misunderstand BigDT? I really AM trying to do things the right way, and this is actually beginning to seem like a hostile environment for a new contributor. I just want to contribute my page, and the right way, and I have all these different ADM's telling me different things and deleting my contributions. What should I do? I am getting VERY discouraged.    You know what, I've spent too much of my time on this. I tried to contribute, and it is obvious neither I nor my contributions are wanted here. I am tired of being judged and wasting my time on an article that obviously nobody wants on their wikipedia.  I'm frustrated and I'm done. I truly hope you treat future new users with fair intentions better than I've been treated. If you make us all feel unwelcome and driven away, wikipedia will not work as it was intended. You lost an educated and well-intentioned contributor today, and for what? Is wikipedia better off now without this article? How? You may think so, but I think not. There was an entry here about a silly rapper guy who has a weird cult fan following, odd but noteable. Granted, not on MTV or Time Magazine, but among many people and among several independant, reliable, highly circulated sources. (I can't believe you don't consider Stuff Magazine a mainstream publication? You better delete Stuff's wiki article too becasue it is not notable, right?) Now, it is deleted and anyone who ever wanted to seek information about it on wikipedia is SOL, and I am discouraged and disappointed. Congratulations, you win, but the wikipedia project loses.    == SPAM? ==  Tell me how WikiSheboygan is SPAM...    : Never mind about it. It's Beautiful Day!   ::Because it's your own personal wiki, basically enough said.    ::: Yep! I totaly agree with you.    == Images == Just go and delete the images I upload.    == Your Last Edit ==  Hey, your last edit... the redirection dos not work. You want to tell me why it does not work. It seems like you don't like to reply to my messages. Huh?    :It works for me, it's going to Sheboygan like the redirect is set up to do,    == RFA ==  Sadly, Metros232, I'm not the same as any former user: don't assume that just because I know people who have edited (and introduced me to) Wikipedia, that I am the same as them: I am not. Hope this explains it all.    ==From == You fellers ever heard of     :Yes, why?     ==2 Boob Question== Hello, I noticed that you had made a comment about a page I contributed, 2 Boob Productions, on Lucky 6.9's talk page in regards to the speedy deletion criteria used to delete the page.  I felt that the page was wrongly put up for speedy deletion, and no debate was allowed to discuss the merits of the page in a normal deletion debate.  I am still new to the process here, so I come to you asking how I can ensure future pages I contribute are at the least given a fair opportunity for debate and discussion?  You seem very knowledgable and involved, so any info you offer would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks in advance...    == Thanks ==  Thanks for the reverts to my userpage yesterday. Always appreciated.     == Edits to WP:ANI ==  The thread you closed here... you called it trolling.  I think the descriptive may be a bit inappropiate, and may be construed as slightly NPA.  Please forgive me if I have mis-intrepeted.  Regards,     :The user is ASKING to be blocked for 12 second with a ridiculous block summary.  He also requests that his thread be added to BJAODN to glorify his post, basically.  I don't see it any other way.     :: I may have misintrepeted.  It all appeared in jest to me. Regards,     == mind your business ==  yeah hey u put that i erased someones comments but i didnt so could you please mind youre business? thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  . :ok jerk listen. stay out of my business. he is a triple crown champion. so leave me alone.   ::The role of a Wikipedia administrator is to ``mind other people's business``, so to speak. It is their core duty to make sure that Wikipedia is not damaged by malicious, destructive, or useless edits. Even when editing in good faith, a user may have their article deleted or their contributions reverted. If you wish to contest the deletion of an article that you created, please go to WP:DRV and dissent the deletion there. However, even if you do contest the deletion at DRV, it is possible that your request will be declined. This is because articles must be verifiable, notable, neutral, and well-formatted in order to be kept. Keep in mind that an article that is well-formatted and otherwise desirable may be deleted if its subject is not notable. This decision is only strengthened by a lack of sources and/or content. I hope this answers your query. Thank you for inquiring. ~ '''