` explained on my user talk page that what he really had in mind is this: when each new issue of Nature comes out, he checks the authors to see whether they see ``notable`` (on the basis of Google hits or whatever, hopefully screening for the fact that some scientists are artful self-promoters) and if so, whether they have wikibios, adding a stub if he finds a ``notable`` scientist who does not yet have a wikibio.  Needless to say, this seems much more reasonable than promoting a policy of creating wikibios of everyone who has ever published a ``notable research paper`` with a very broad if vague definition of ``notable``.  OK, I think we've said enough about this and I'd like to close this discussion, if everyone else agrees that this kerfluffle concerned a misunderstanding on my part about what Robin had in mind. -   `