  : If I am understanding you correctly, you are suggesting that any fact should find a place in Wikipedia.  And, I agree!  But the place for the facts in question is on the pages devoted to those programs and bands.  No doubt in my mind, any interesting fact has a place here.  (There are some who disagree, but not me.)  But the Lazarus page is about Lazarus.  How do these facts help the reader understand Lazarus?  That's the question for the Lazarus article. : There is a further comment, which I hope will be more helpful.  The ideal thing to do is to discuss this on Talk:Lazarus, under the section created by the editor who proposed this for that page.  I'm willing to be convinced, if you can explain why these contributions would help in understanding Lazarus, and I expect other editors would be as well. Wikipedia works by consensus, and normally consensus is reached by looking at talk pages and entering into discussion.  I'm glad you're discussing this one with me; it would be even better if we discussed it on the talk page so that other editors could join in as well. : And, finally, I want to thank you for your edits.  I think those particular edits are not the best thing, but your spirit is the right one!  Making bold edits that you think will improve the page is generally the right way to go.  Then, if another editor or editors disagree with one's bold edits, the next step is to start discussing it (as you have done).    