`, 3 January 2013 (UTC) ::Cambalachero:   You suggest that you have more sources.  But it is not the quantity of sources that counts, it is the quality.   If you  have additional sources that provide additional support for ``was not a dictator`` viewpoint, I suggest that you limit it to sources that have the following attributes: :::1) Written by a modern historian (after 1960 or so) :::2) Author's primary expertise is Latin American history :::3) Published by a reputable publisher, preferably a University press :::4) Written by an unbiased, neutral scholar ::The sources provided above in the ``is a dictator`` list include books from Stanford Univ press, Harvard, etc.  These are the sorts of sources that are needed.  Spanish-language sources, of course, are fine, but they must meet that same level of professionalism and detachment to outweigh the ``is a dictator`` sources.   05:58`