`    ==Reliable Source== Isn't this a reliable source?> ==Victims== * Emily Hilscher   ==What the Heck?==  I edited something on the ``7 may`` page and you keep deleting it, why?? It is constructive and I don't see how it is ``vandalism``. So I plan to re-edit the page. Thank you for causing others more work and frustration.   ==Sorry== i haven't remover anthing of the footballers wives episodes page. And i created the page an just wasn't signed in at the time. i accidently lost the series 4 episode summarys when i was writing them. I put them back up straight away.  == deleting things... ==  thanks for clearing the stuff about deletion up. I'm new to deletion...  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  .        ok and where am i supposed to reply to things you say to me? here?               Thanks for the insight. I agree with you. It's much easier to do it back and forth.     how do I change the title of an article? I want to change St. Peter High School (Ottawa) to St. Peter Catholic High School  never mind - sorry i got it now.     == Dr. Qwert ==  I was not aware that the consensus had changed. I was also under the impression that removing recent warnings from one's talk page was also considered vandalism. I'm sorry if I had erred.    ==Re == I tagged Byron Long for speedy deletion since it appeared to be entirely unreferenced, which, given the controversial nature of the subject matter, would constitute a serious WP:BLP violation.  WP:BLP states that Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and controversial in tone, where there is no NPOV version to revert to, should delete the article without discussion (see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion criterion G10 for more details).  Looking through the page history, however, it appears that there actually was a reference for the article, which I have restored.   :CSD G10 does use the term ``negative in tone``, which is a somewhat unfortunate choice of words.  The more fundamental policy here appears to be Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, which states that ``biographies that are unsourced and controversial in tone`` should be speedily deleted.  The underlying issue is not whether we believe that a description of a living person as a ``porn actor`` is actually negative.  Rather, for WP:BLP purposes, the issue is whether, if an article incorrectly described someone as a ``porn actor``, such a description would be regarded as defamatory for the purpose of Wikipedia:Libel  that is, whether such an incorrect description, if widely believed, might be likely to have a significantly adverse effect on the employment prospects or general reputation of the subject of the article.  I would contend that describing someone as a ``porn actor`` is sufficiently ``controversial in tone`` to invoke WP:BLP concerns for the speedy removal and/or deletion of any unreferenced claims of this nature.    == Deletion of rain check ==  Why has this valid article disappeared?  Please undelete it, and if you feel it is not up to Wikipedia standards, instead nominate it under WP:AfD, to give others a chance to comment on it and/or improve it. Thanks.  –   *I understand that it has been transwikied, however it was enough to be its own Wikipedia article, and can be expanded from a stub to a better article by adding information about how rainchecks are handled and processed by stores.  (For example, some simply hand the user a piece of paper or carbon copy, others take the customer's information, enter it into a computer, and print a raincheck with a barcode, later notifying the customer automatically by phone/email/mail. Also, other offers like rebates may no longer be valid when the raincheck is redeemed.)  –    == Thkxs for the welcome ==  I'm finally making an effort to participate around here. Thanks for the welcome!    == Jen Banbury ==  Thanks for spotting that this was not a proper speedy delete about the same time i first noticed it. I have rewritten and expanded the article significantly, although it could doubtless use further work.     :All of my info and sources came out of the first two pages of a google search on her name  not really tricky research. I agree, lots of people over use A7 and G1, and db-context. That's why I undeleted this and expanded it a bit. The original was not well written, but the key facts were there.    ::Yes, but in this case note that it wasn't just mis-tagged. An admin actually deleted the page, while I was working on my first edit. I undeleted. The admin says that he ``still stands by`` his decision to delete the version as it was when tagged.     == I need a bit of help ==  Could you go ahead and delete Sky2k.com? I think an IP sock of the author is removing the CSD tag. It's obvious spam so I have no qualms about replacing that tag.    :Thank you. 3    == Joss Fritz ==  Fair comment - it asserts notability, I'll ensure I check this in future before doing a db-nn.  I've tagged it for cleanup+wikify for now, as it's rather lacking, the way it stands. Regards,    ==Speedy deletion comment== I, unfortunately, do not know any other tags beside the db-bio to mark a page for possible deletion.  I understand that there is an ``articles for deletion`` list, as I have discussed pages there myself; however, I do not know the tag to mark a page as such, nor do I know the tag for 'proposed deletion.'   :I just wanted to say thanks for the information that I can now use to better help keep Wikipedia free of frivolous articles.  I just stick to my personal motto: ``I got everyone's back.`` ::Sorry about that.  I'm pretty new around here and am currently reading all the many rules on the ``Administrators' Reading List.``  Once I learn all these little 'house-keeping' rules, I hope to apply to be an admin myself.     == hello and wondering how to ... ==  I wanted to put an entry in like spectrum strategy consultants, but when i do i get a deletion thingee. suggestions?  btw Dublin Ireland is a lot different from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Galway Ireland would be a better fit.  looking for help in advance, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  . :comment on location for vacation - cultural fit - just trying to help (worked in MSP for many years in the Hi Tech business in the 90s and Ireland in 00s)  :Down to brass tacks. There is an item for Spectrum Strategy which I based an entry on. So why is my entry deleted and the one for Spectrum Strategy not? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  .  ::I am using the same as spectrum strategy consultants along the lines of what you have suggested, i.e. no daylight. Both entries should be handled the same either accepted or spam deleted. right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  .  :::mmm if you do a search on intercai mondiale you well see a number of proven reputable sources. OFCOM a l