` :You haven't been able to demonstrate what made Ryan's speech ``unique``.  On the face of it, common sense doesn't dictate that denouncing Obama for Medicare cuts you supported is worse than pretending to be misquoted when your words are caught on tape, or asserting that Romney left office with his state in 47thrather than 28thplace at job creation.  Did Ryan win Politifact's Lie of the Year?  On the usual scale of 1 to 4, how did Glenn Kessler rate his ``false`` statements?  How many ``lies`` are ``normal`` for a political speech?  In truth, you're not talking about actual fact-checkers; you're talking about bloggers and opinion writers like Sally Kohn.  Did any actual fact-checkers like Politifact describe Ryan's speech as an unprecedented abomination?   ``Opinions pieces are rarely reliable for statements of fact``, according to WP:RS, so any attempt to evaluate the integrity of Ryan's speech by reference to the amount of hyperbole directed at it in whatever opinion pieces you have read is grossly insufficient to establish the notability of the criticism.  None of your opinion pieces are reliable sources, and none of them can be used to verify a single inaccurate claim.  I know (as everyone knows) that you're WP:NOTHERE for the right reasons, but you're going to have to learn Wikipedia policy at some point, and your belief that every sourced opinion deserves inclusion is simply not how things are done here.  `