`Gaimhreadhan has moved the following out of context comment by Vintagekit's Mentor, SirFozzie, from his talk page to this page where it can be seen in context: :I recommend that you drop this. You have been asked somewhat nicely twice by Admins to either take it to WP:SSP if you had any further suspicions. Now I am giving you pretty much a final warning. Accusing a new editor of being a sockpuppet breaks WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. There is methods to deal with sockpuppetry on WP. Use them. I also notice several comments aimed at trolling other users and soapboaxing. You are on the edge. Take care not to step over.   ::1. I have not made and am not making any accusations of sockpuppetry. (Please don't confuse Domer48's wrongful and hysterical misunderstanding of my actual words with what I actually wrote.) Allegations of Sockpuppetry are WP's equivalent of a Witch hunt - and I refuse to participate in such silly nonsense. ::My understanding is that neither Tyrenius nor yourself are acting as admins here unless you specifically state that you are so acting. If that is the case I will, of course, follow your advice - even though it seems perverse. ::2. Had you not addressed specific remarks to me, I would have stayed silent - as you both should have done. ::3. This is what I have already stated: ``I think it would be very helpful at this early stage for  to confirm or deny that he previously edited WP using different user names`` (to his current ``new`` user name of Brixton Busters) `` - it's entirely a matter for him whether he chooses to reveal those identities or not....`` ::and ::4. ``However, if`` Brixton Buster ``(and not you or any other members of the team) does so assert,`` (ie that he, BrixtonBuster, is a genuine new editor and has not previously edited on WP using other and different user name[s]) ``then I will say no more and, as I've previously stated, if BB does instead confirm the obvious,`` (ie that BB is not a brand new editor) ``it's entirely a matter for him whether he chooses to reveal those previous identities BB has edited under or not.`` ::and ::5. ``Now why don't we all pause to allow the subject of this discussion to speak for himself?``...(kiwiexile at DMOZ)  •   `