` *The article in its current form may give some readers the ``impression`` of going so far as to prefer one definition over the other, but the important thing- and the reason the article has been so stable- is that it doesn't actually assert anything that is not supported by reputable sources, while your definition does.  The only way we can achieve a NPOV in an article this controversial is to strive for verifiability. If you can find sources for any of the assertions listed, then perhaps we will be able to frame the definition in a more informative way.  `