`  :Hmm, I still can't use the e-mail this user button, but I manually entered it and sent you an e-mail. (Need help?    == John W. Morgan ==  This page is now listed on the biography of living persons noticeboard.  You could take a break from edit this article and let the rest of us keep an eye on it. Sometimes that's the best way to reduce the stress level.     /   :Thanks!  :: There should be at least 31 hours of relative peace.    == Barnstar ==  {| style=``border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;`` |rowspan=``2`` valign=``middle`` |  |rowspan=``2`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;`` | The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;`` | Thank you for all of your work regarding keeping the John W. Morgan article factually straight despite the team that was working against you and the repeated harassment. Keep up the good work!   |}  == Nova Scotia Wikiproject ==  You were the fastest click away.... How do I join? I have already started 2 stubs, but how do I officially join Wikiproject Nova Scotia?   ==Image copyright problem with Image:Flag of Nova Scotia.svg==   Thank you for uploading Image:Flag of Nova Scotia.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.  If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.    *There is a help desk question at How do I update an existing image? where a user desires to replace the flag you uploaded. Would you please look into this? Thanks.  '''''' ''''   Hi kirk. For whatever reason Wikipedia won't let me update the SVG you uploaded. Would you be able to replace it with this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nova_Scotia_Flag.svg preserving the copyright and fair use information?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by     *This looks great! Glad to have the modern flag up there now.   ==Morgan== Check the edits last night, and the comments on that user's talk page. Does that newspaper even exist? -   *Nevermind, I see you've already been there. -    ==Blue eyes== He is toast. Blocked with a one-edit history. Pretty good, eh? -     Crockspot  What are ya talking about. KO doesn't and didn't check any newspaper before he deletes? The Cape Breton Post is available online so you don't nee to depend on that nut  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     *Do you have a link? The last link to the CBPolitics Weekly didn't work, and appeared to be a fabricated source. I still have not been provided with a working link to this alleged publication, so as far as I am concerned, it's a fantasy newspaper. -    : CB Politics does not exist. The Cape breton post is what we are talking about, and that website is www.cbpost.com. None of the pieces of information are listed there. -   Just to let you guys know, I have been seeing these posts being made for a little while now, and have come to the conclusion that this person posting is just immature and probably gets a kick out of seeing his posts reverted. Its nothing but garbage, so if I happen to see anything I will revert it for you. I noticed some changes to the CBRM page in this manner a few moments ago and reverted them.   Never mind, I was called a vandal for trying to help by reverting a post on Mayor Morgan's page. That idiot had deleted the picture and mentioed the IQ thing again. But as it turns out, I'm the vandal because I reverted back to your last post. Sorry for causing this trouble, if I see this idiot making nonsense posts again, I will just leave them and not risk being labeled a vandal for trying to help.   == John W. Morgan 3RR ==   You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.   I'm in danger of violating it, also.  Perhaps Morgan has fallen off the BLP watchlist?  —  |     :: I left on note on your site. Tried the discussion, when the information was agreed to be excluded, they entered it anyway. Then they vandalised. Then they added crazy stuff and agrued that it should all be left in because one small sentence of what they entered was true. Read the discussion, it is all there. -   OK, so some idiot keeps writing stupid edits and its Kirk that's going to get banned for fixing the edits that the idiot is making. I think you should take a look at some of the edits that were made, and if you still think Kirk is the vandal, than I honestly don't understand wikipedia at all. Its posible this was what the idiot wanted from the start, make Kirk revert his edits so he would break some rule. If Kirk is banned from editing, I'm out of here for good. Why would staying make sense?    :A previously banned editor, keeps putting inaccurate information about John Morgan on pages related to Sydney, Nova Scotia. Unless the articles are locked, we have to keep deleting the information until the editor is banned again.   :::Thanks for the support. It was already decided that he would not report me. I think people are failing to see all of the edits that are being done and focusing on the one or two seemingly positive edits. The people making the chnages are not agruing one point or another anymore, they are just changing and add silly stuff for spite. We need these pages locks to Ips on a perm basis for now so we can control the vandalsim. Its a big step but it must be taken here.-    KO repeatedly violates 3rr rule. He should be banned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by      :: Okay Mr. Ip person, you obviously have kept up to date on the 3RR rule. The reason I am not banned now after that warning is because 3 RR rule does not apply to vandalism or unsourced materal. - 14:03, 6