` :::::::The ``anchor`` phrase does not imply that, or if it does, it does only for certain people who undertake to interpret it as such. The phrase specifically refers to scientists who disagree with ``some of the main IPCC conclusions``, which refer to the recent warming attribution but also to solar variation and volcanoes effects. I see no problem with this anchor phrase linking to this article despite the mention that this article should not be interpreted as a list of skeptics. And as Nethgirb said, Hansen is not in and most if not this entire article is consistent with A.  `