  == NPOV ==  I notice a strong tendency among commentators on this site to want to remove any hint of controversy connected to Caterpillar's activities.  The result is to align the article with Caterpillar's own corporate interest, and effectively to present the facts from Caterpillar's own POV.  For example, the 'Labour controversy' section is not, as it stands at the moment, the history of Caterpillar's relations with organised labour, but the story of how the company successfully outflanked those pesky unions.  This violates NPOV.  It is a fact that people have protested Caterpillar selling bulldozers to Israel.  Whether those people are right or wrong to do so, is not for us to decide; it's true that the company has been criticised for who it does business with, so it deserves to stay in the article.  Period.    