` ::::::::Take a look at Taxpayer March on Washington and Talk:Taxpayer March on Washington.  This discussion has been had.  Negative actions/signs by attendees or semi-organizers are included.  It appears that  has an agenda to keep anything that ``smears`` this organization out, even if it is notable/verifiable.  The FBI is investigating the crime because there have been several ``direct actions`` (i.e. eco-terrorism) at biomass projects throughout New England.  We also do not *know* that 350.org organizers were not behind this.  They simply denied it once a reporter and police officer got on their case.  The anti-biomass activists are motivated by the 350.org-type goal of reducing carbon emissions.  There seems to be a large enough nexus of facts (signs *at* 350.org event, carbon-related, similar crimes, etc.) that it bears inclusion.  Somehow I find a federal investigation being sparked at *this event* to be slightly more notable than some kids with chalk or people with armbands. Again, this article seems like an advertisement from start (the worship of this NASA guy) to the end (gratuitous self-praise).   `