 ::*Not all the material in question was previously tagged, and some of it was restored with fixes.  But even beyond that, I find it disturbing that you persistently refuse to discuss your reasons for challenging various statements.  Of course, I hopefully assume otherwise, but your actions make it hard for me to avoid suspecting that your real purpose is simply to remove information.  ::*WP:REDFLAG might apply if the article said in WP's voice that a prophecy had occurred.  But it says no such thing.  That someone claimed a prophecy occurred is hardly extraordinary.  So those tags need to go.  ::*I agree that it is appropriate for the primary sources tags to remain while the RFC continues.   :: / 