` ::I'm talking about you making unjustified major changes. In this  edit. Did you just restore ``caused criticism`` in the lede? No. No, you didn't. You reverted to your own preferred wording (removing sources etc in the process) the entire ``Election of Constitutional Court Judges`` section. Does that diff look like you're just restoring two words to the lede? I don't know, maybe somebody slipped something in  my coffee this morning, but that sure as hell does not look like just restoring two words to the lede, so please, cut it out. ::And speaking of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:GAME here is the context: ::I edit the ``Election of Constitutional Court Judges`` section to clarify, provide info and fix some blatant mistakes. ::You blindly revert within minutes claiming it's ``unsourced`` even though most of the text you added to the article was unsourced as well. ::I add sources . You complain about the refs being just bare urls. Which is a valid criticism... if you hadn't blindly reverted within minutes, not even giving me the chance to fill out the refs. ::I, others, fill out the refs. ::You revert anyway with an edit summary ``ce, restore`` , effectively pretending your edit is just some minor grammar corrections, rather than blatant edit warring. ::So. I add text, you complain about lack of sources and revert, I add sources, you complain about formatting and revert, the refs are formatted to your specifications, you revert anyway under the disguise of a ``copy edit``. Now. Who's playing WP:GAMEs and who's got the WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality here?    `