`::::::# You blocked me immediately AFTER he threatened to retire above, then urged him not to do it on his Talk page – why lie about this? ::::::# Did you once wonder why Jack called his section in my own Talk page ”Reply to Matt from GoodDays talk page”? A bit loud for my Talk page isn’t it? After I ended the conversation, he then threatened to resign, and looked for support. He only had good advice, but unfortunately you came along and vilified me with your warning. He then changed his tune. Why must he be protected like a baby? Mollycoddle children and they never stop crying. He brought it to my Talk page shouting as loudly as he could – and I have got severely punished - not just with a 48 hours block (which in itself I would just have tried to get quashed or made shorter - as my language in my Talk page has been strong) - but with a hugely exaggerated (It's no better when I read it all again) and seriously damaging character and edit-related attack on my name. How can you be allowed to shoot an editor down like that? It was just a huge abuse of power.  ::::::: I have very little confidence in the system - and your underlying confidence in yourself is just a bad sign. The comment you made before your block is clear, whatever you say now - you judged me by one person's threat to retire, and a brief look at my Talk page: you then went to town on my name. Now you say it's my recent behaviour (from when - and what is the difference?) - but you are still effectively supported ‘the other side’ in various arguments on my Talk page - the other sides to me. What right have you got to do that? It simply pays dividends on Wikipedia to complain, 'take offense', and throw out variously-phrased Talk-page 'warnings'! I've really suffered here by not stooping to that tactic myself (despite many an opportunity - including over most of what you think you've read above).   ::::::: It is actually against WP policy to abuse complaints and warnings - they can be in themselves a personal attack. If you act on complaints like this to others you will help wreck Wikipedia, and your talk page will be full of frustrated (nothing more) people queueing for your ``help!`` Don't assume there are that many good editors to spare! You have quoted me some guidelines, I have my own for you: Why do people do complain like this? Is it always because they are so upset? Or maybe they want to get their own way? Perhaps they want to try and put someone off? Maybe they are even laying a track? Admins are supposed to know these 'ins and outs'.  ::::::: I'm still dipping in here to make a last edit to Alzheimers, and then I'm out (and I won't have time to do it now, so I'll have to come back). You have sprung from nowhere to block me - and you are have consistently made errors:  How could you read and remove a personal comment about me by an IP below (I would have left it – it spoke volumes) without noticing a comment by Jack Forbes directly above it? You are hardly the only game player on WP - my problem is that I'm congenitally honest, and too-often Wikipedia is a mug’s game. I feel really ashamed I've spent so much of my time in here, given that so little happens on so many articles.     `