   ::::Bold, all-caps, and italics.  But ::::*in order to make it easier for him to notice the assertion later, ::::*in order to make it harder for him to deny having seen it later, and ::::*in order to make it stand out should this matter be reviewed by an admin later. ::::Grazon has, in the past, justified edits, been rebutted, and then weeks later justified them the same way without addressing the rebuttal.  One explanatory model would have him reading the rebuttal about the time that it were made, but just malevolently pretending not to have seen it; another would instead have him not ever looking for the rebuttal.  And, meantime, as you may infer from things that I've said elsewhere to you, I've had multiple experiences of admins not seeing all the puzzle pieces.  ::::It is hard to believe that Grazon can assemble a list of diffs that will vindicate his restoration; but, unless someone has tried, we cannot know that it is truly impossible.  And, if he tries and fails, perhaps he will be more effectively confronted with what he has done.  He is pursuing a degree in history; he needs, then, to change his ethos, for the sake of everyone including himself.  And perhaps reviewing his diffs will help him to see his ethos for what it has been. — 