`  : I wantched all of 's POV pushing edits, His edit is  based on his own original Research and definitely POV Pushing.  : 1. Please prove any credible academic source. (not your own original research) : 2. Your Nohonshoki translation was definitely fabrication. :: Here is the original full text. :: 三年春三月新羅王子天日槍來歸焉將來物羽太玉一箇足高玉一箇鹿鹿赤石玉一箇出石小刀一口出石毛牟一枝日鏡一面熊神籬一具幷七物則藏于但馬國常爲神物也 (一云初天日槍乘碇泊于播磨國在於肉束邑時天皇遣三輪君祖大友主與倭直祖長尾市於播磨而問天日槍曰汝也誰人且何國人也天日槍對曰僕新羅國主之子也然聞日本國有聖皇則以己國授弟知古而化歸之仍貢獻物葉細珠足高珠鹿鹿赤石珠出石刀子出石槍日鏡熊神籬膽狹淺大刀幷八物仍詔天日槍曰播磨國肉束邑淡路島出淺邑是二邑汝任意居之」日本書紀 垂仁天皇紀 三年條  When 垂仁天皇 period, silla prince 天日槍 came. Japanese' king said, ``where are you from?`` ``I am prince of silla, I heard that there was saint's king in nippon.(maybe this sentence also ninhon shoki made fabrication. In that time, there is no ``nippon`` country existed. 2nd, it was impossible that prince go to uncivilized and savage country. 3rd, there is no record that written in korea) I came to Japan with my younger brother. :: I am a prince in Korea(X) = He said, He is a prince of silla.(not korea) :: To become a vassal of the king in Japan(X) = this is 100% your own made fabricated translation. : 3. Originally ninhon shoki was based on Japanese nationalism and not credible source. Because That source is very unmatch with old korean, old chinese sources. for exmaple, There is no 任那日本府 written in old korean, old chinese sources.   `