  : I would not myself object to putting the cruxifixion part in the Basilides article; so long as it goes somewhere.  However, I think that the current arrangement concurrs better with the conclusions of Lohr; which in my understanding (my German not being that good) is that the Exegetica is by Basilides (and Isadore his son) and is a commentary on the gospels of Matthew and Luke; while the 'Gospel of Basilides' (as known by Origen) is a distinct mid-second century work, not by Basilides or Isadore, but which circulated amongst the Basilideans from the latter second century onwards.  So three articles - Basilides, Gospel of Basilides and Basilideans - all highly speculative in content.  My own view is that - envisaging a newcomer to all these matters - a text narrating the crucifixion of Jesus is quite properly categorised as a 'Gospel'.   