` :Michael, with all due respect, it's over. It may be that you can do math better than me, but it's not the math that's the problem, it's statements like ``I don't know a whole lot about this case, but I tend to think that race may well be relevant here`` and ``My first instinct is it likely should be included as the news accounts likely included the information. But did they or was this simply not an issue?``. I assume you are ``counting`` those as ``in favour of inclusion``really, one can't. They are not unequivocal inclusion votes and raise more questions than they answer. Moreover, I assume you're including comments like ``I agree that race should be included as long as it does not violate WP:UNDUE.`` That's finebut this participant did not address how the inclusion does not violate UNDUE, and since this (as John points out) is not a vote, such a statement can't have the full weight as is carried by the more complete answers of John and Beyond My Ken.   `