`  Baxterguy, you are so right.  I changed two items.  (1) Daniel 11 as ``proof`` (I changed this to ``evidence``).  What kind of ``proof`` is Daniel 11?  Has it been tested in a laboratory?  When it relates to matters of interpretation, ``evidence`` is a more correct word than ``proof``.  (2) In the section ``Arguments against Antiochus Epiphanes and scholarly objections`` I removed the word ``scholarly``.  It presupposes that those who oppose the Antiochus identification are not ``scholarly``.  What bigotry.  Encyclopedia articles should treat fairly all views without derogatory or loaded terms.`