`  ::::::At this point, the assumptive leap is in presuming that the figures we have somehow aren't accurate; we have the budget and the gross, they're cited and not misrepresented, to assume that there's some shadowy extra figure we don't know about. Acting as though something we don't know exists and can't cite is as important as what we do have sources for is as bad as, if not worse than, inaccurate synthesis. What he have is fine, it reflects the sources accurately; if an actual source for some shadowy additional outlay or cost is found then it can be reworked but I see no point in assuming such a cost exists without citing it, especially after opening a thread complaining about XYZ not being cited.   `