`== reply to email ==  Concerning the editor you emailed me about, I see no reason to waste time on the matter if there are no further edits from the account.  Regards,     == Thanks ==  Hi. I very appreciate your efforts for unblocking me. After my last appeal was declined on 18/10/2010, I have become so desperate of Wikipedia, so I hadn't been checking my user account for few months and didn't notice I was unblocked only few days later.     == Witnessing history ==  Standing amongst a crowd demanding Mubarak's downfall, a man who commanded Egypt's Air Force against Israel, with occasional chanting of anti-Israel slogans, and overlooked by crewmen in the very same Patton tanks and M113 carriers the Egyptian army fought against, I couldn't help but feel history imposing its irony in the scene before me.  I guess I'm writing this here because given our knowledge of this region's recent history – however colliding our perspectives may be – I believed you'd be able to conjure the picture I was in and feel the same.    :I kind of share in your feeling, Sherif. I've got to add to the historical perspective Mubarak's injury in the attack on Anwar Sadat. I have also noted Stars of David drawn on abandoned police vehicles... Do you think the regime will fall? If so, will the successors maintain past agreements? JG, sorry for intrusion. -    ::No need to apologise Boris, you're always welcome on my page. Sherif, I agree that it is a bit surreal. I can only add that I hope that all works out for the best in Egypt and that there will be no more bloodshed. Hope all is well for you and your family. Best regards   :::Absolutely Boris. I'll head to your talk page I guess. :::It is quite surreal indeed, JG. Thank you for your words, I really appreciate it.     == email ==   Cheers.   :email checked    == Ford Letter ==  Nice addition! Ha-Am (ve'Dod Shmuel) im Ha-Golan.     == Logan ==  Add the cites, to the talkpage, it is one unnamed report imo     == Civilian casualty ratio ==  You may want to look at the RS:N for it/talk page which rejects that line of thinking. If you want to take it back to RS:N, go for it.     == Enforcement. ==      == FYI ==   Best wishes.    == Stop commenting in AE ``results`` section ==  That section is for uninvolved administrators.  Your commenting there is improper and disruptive.  Supreme Deliciousness said so, you re-posted there.  Any further edits in that section by you will result in a short block.  I am going to move your comments to the bottom of your main response comment.     :No problem George. All I ask is that you read the comments before moving them   ::I did read them, but that doesn't matter.  They absolutely do not belong in that section.      To bolster your argument .  Of course it is of major concern to most of us whether or not Hitler had Jewish roots. Was this edit during a topic ban?   It is more than a little offensive.    :Which edit are you referring to. Many of SupremeD's edits are over the top. Can you point to the specific diff please?    Sorry I thought I had.  His attempt to include the obscure and fringey theory that Hitler had Jewish genes in the main article on Hitler.  It just seems to Jewish me that he is trying to say ``Hitler``=``Jewish.``  This must be disconcerting to the Jewish editors in the I-P conflict area, as I see it is to you.     :::I agree that you shouldn't comment in that section. But the ineptitude of any admin to do what they volunteered to do makes me no care. You wouldn't have to comment there if they would read the diffs you provided in the first place. Hell, you even had to repeat your answer to the same question since they did not read through the conversation. Hey here is an idea for the AE admins: Don't try to judge conflicts for fun. Do it because you want to better the project. They can all rot if they want to play contrary games. Go to law school in your next life if you want to be a defense attorney. And don't cry about being a volunteer when you get off on it. I volunteer to play Mega Man but it does not mean I do not enjoy it.  :::Supreme Deliciousness is the problem just like Nableezy was. And both of them will come back sooner or later and make the topic area even worse. Tag teaming my ass. I have disagreed with you, JJG, enough times that the assertion is absurd. I do like you and agree with your POV, though. At least I can fully man up to that.   ::::You may want to bring up SD wp:forum shopping all over admins talk pages.    ==  ==  Hello. I recommend that you take the matter to AN/I or contact another administrator. I would take action myself, except my activity in Israel-Palestine matters makes me WP:INVOLVED. You can also e-mail  and ask them to permanently delete any edits that reveal confidential information. —  /  :I don't know what this section is about but good form on your part, MS. Thanks for being straight and admitting to being involved. Also, my bad bringing up the GA at AE. Kind of sullied it. And since this is JJG's page: What's up, badass? Hope all is well. Even with all this AE stuff you have turned out to be a perfectly fine editor. I do see your POV but you know that. As long as you keep it on the talk page then it is fine. At least you tried to get an article up to standard instead of focusing on junk. If you do get topic banned (I'm looking at one, too!) I say screw it. No indef (I assume) so we'll both be back and things will work out OK enough. Maybe neither of us will get topic banned but it is a reminder either way to be even more careful in the topic area. It is like pulling teeth but that is the price we pay for not being professional journalists or writers. And just to be honest: if this was an email it would be filled with cussing and even worse... but it isn't. Cheers, dude.   ::Thanks Malik and Cptnono. I appreciate your advice and support. This outing thing has got me really bumed out. I'm thinking of just retiring. It's really not worth all the aggravation. Whatever happens, Wikipedia has got to find a better way to deal with people who have no respect for the personal lives of others. It's quite sad.   :::You aren't going anywhere. Your feelings are too strong and you believe this medium can be skewed too much to allow you otherwise. Maybe you should go away. Take a break and not worry about it. And/or maybe you should alter your editing completely to make sure you are not put in this positions again. Whatever your decision is, SD and Nebleezy trying to out you further (you were already outed before) was bad form. Don;t resort tot that crap.    == Arbitration enforcement topic ban: Arab-Israeli conflict ==  For  misrepresentation of sources and persistent ideological POV-pushing 