`  == ``Vandalism`` ==  ...  Do you even read summaries? Wikistress +10 for me! I removed it because - I AM DAMNED REPEATING THIS THE FOURTH TIME - it's like saying  on the banana article that ``some people add bananas to their cakes and bring them to weddings. Bananas are said to be delicious!`` or on the Sun article that ``many people tend to lay on beaches and tan themselves on the sun.`` ARGH. Caaptaain Caav.. OBVIOUS! Jesus Christ, Wikipedia needs less conservatism.. how stupid it is to mention that there ``is clan-gaming among Counter-Strike players`` like there isn't in any other online-game out there in that manner? Do articles like firearm have to exclusively mention how a projectile kills, and explain that how greatly a gun can be used in warfare, when it's just not obvious enough for the reader to look up on that information seperately?  `