`**Logical arguments: ***#A divine being cannot be the original cause of the universe (causation outside of time is incoherent). ***#Omniscience, or at the very least ``having all the knowledge of men``, is not possible for a moral, loving god (due to different forms of knowledge, such as experiential knowledge). ***#Divine freewill and divine omniscience not compatible. ***#``1. If any being is God, he must be a fitting object of worship. 2. No being could possibly be a fitting object of worship, since worship requires the abandonment of one's role as an autonomous moral agent. 3. Therefore, there cannot be any being who is God.`` ***#Various incompatibilities between traits ascribed to gods, including perfection, creator-status, immutability, omniscience, omnipresence, omnibenevolence, transcendence, personhood (a personal being), nonphysicality, justice and mercy. ***#Anything God does is moral, but the Abrahamic god commits immoral acts. **Evidential arguments: ***#Various explanations for the creation/existence of the universe that do not require divine intervention; logical arguments against a first cause. ***#Argument for physical minds; argument that because all evidence points to minds being entirely physical, the conception of a God with a nonphysical mind is baseless. ***#Known facts about the origin of complex life are prima facie evidence against theism. ***#Problem of evil, suffering ***#Divine hiddenness not compatable with omnibenevolence. ***#Contrary claims of different religions; religious diversity.  `