`  ::I don't know if it is because of you asking or not, but it was taken care of while I was sleeping. Thanks anyway. I could have pulled it off, but I needed the ability to perform a history merge. Cheers,      == Protection ==  Looks like your entire userspace is currently protected  userpage indef, archives for 3 days, and talk for some other time period I don't recall. Somebody's been a little too persistent. ;) Let me know if this causes any problems. –     == Thank you == Just wanted to say thank you for the help you provided with the revert war going on at the Battle of Al Qaim  : More sockpuppets are appearing on this article.  I've reverted and blocked a few, but I think it bears close watching.  —     == CAT:RFU contrary review ==  I have posted an weak opposition to a block you issued on .  In summary, although the user needs to improve his collaborative skills, I do not see sufficient evidence to warrant the block you issued.  I am a non-admin and my voice does not count for much, but it is possible you might have jumped to some conclusions.  Of course, I do not know what information you may be able to see that I can not.     :Explained chez you.    I defer to your higher powers.  I am confident that you are properly identifying IP vandalism with admin powers that I am unaware of.  His unblock request and his user talk page would not have lead me to the conclusion you made, but I have no problem with your decision.    :Nice. ``Higher Powers``. I like that... Seriously, you were quite right to question my actions, we are a collaborative project, after all.    :: I see that you found the report on WP:ANI.  The solicitation of warned/blocked users to use their IPs to revert my edits is almost amusing, if it weren't disruptive to others.  However, I'm certainly not going to let a troll/group of trolls keep me from contributing to the encyclopedic content of Wikipedia, nor deter me from reverting vandalism and blocking vandals.  Just a bump in the road.  Thanks for your diligence and for answering TonyTheTiger.  That info was helpful — and I won't make the effort to add this group of edits to a checkuser request.  Personally, I think a community ban is in order for the solicitation of others to vandalize. —     ==  ==  Why did you delete the PlayRadioPlay page?!?!?! I didn't even make that!!!!   :It's a blatant copyright violation taken from the webpage of a non-notable band. Look at the deletion log.    == The Hybrid 2 == Hi. Could I ask a favor of you? I'm thinking about applying for admin sometime in late March, and I would appreciate some advice from someone who is already an admin. Could you flip through my contributions and tell me what I need to improve on? I would really appreciate it. 声援      :Of course!    ::Thanks Yandman, 声援      ==  ==  Wild Carrot (shop): OK, you've deleted it......I ask ``why?`` and it says ``copyvio``......I guess this means copyright violation yah? Well, please could you tell me what was violating copyright? And maybe you could have just edited it out? Please answaer ASAP!  Thanks,    P.S. My mum has worked there (at the Wild Carrot) for years now, and she was there when I wrote it, so I think I'm authorised.......is it because what I wrote is on the site? Well if it is, I'm sorry, but the site has only just appeared and was written very quickly so soon enough it will be re-done, but I was going to leave the Wiki page the same, to prevent this type of thing happening.......talk soon!  P.P.S. Oh dear, my post-script is longer than my original messgae............  It was deleted for two reasons:  #The business is not famous enough to be mentioned in an encyclopedia #The text of the article was clearlt taken from the website of the business in question, which isn't allowed unless the owner of the website in question releases the text under a GFDL license  You could avoid the second problem by changing the text, but I'm afraid the first problem will mean the article will have to stay deleted. Thanks for understanding,    == Work Magazine edit log == I notice that you did the delete for . I am hunting for link spam created by  & Co. and I have found a very interesting correlation that I am trying to figure out. I've retrieved a copy of the article in Google cache and it is the rubish I expected. I am curious about the edit log and I can't see it since the article has been deleted. I assume as an adminstrator that you have access to this information. Could you tell me if there are any editors other than 65.166.218.250 and the individual who added the advertisement tag? This tidbit of information might be a helpful tool to me in figuring out this mystery. The edit dates could be a clue too. Thanks. ( )  :Only bots and editors adding categories with AWB.    :: By AWB do you mean AutoWikiBrowser? Hmmm, no new clues.  Thank you for checking. ( )  ::Yeah, or maybe another automated editing tool. No-one else edited the actual content. No problem.    ==  ==  Would you believe it.. This frenchie threatens to ban me because I talk badly upon Foie Gras. I already said once that this page is protected by lobbyists. That includes frog eaters.   :That's unfair! I hereby swear upon steak and kidney pie, Macclesfield Town FC, Private Eye and Jeremy Clarkson that I'm 100% pure Cheshireman. Please take this small holiday to reflect on what ``civility`` means. Thanks.    ==A request== I dont know whether it is in your line of Wiki duty to do neutrality sanity check. I saw you get involved a while ago on a Sri Lanka relatedd bio article om Kumar Ponnambalam. I cretead a new one called  Mirusuvil mass grave. I need someone to do a neutrality sanity check before I categorize it and link it to other articles. Any directions will be appreciated   ::If I was you, I'd merge it with Mirusivil Massacre. I'm not sure we need two articles for this.    :::OK good idea but how about the quality of the merged article itself from a neutrality point of view ?   ::::Yeah, it looks reasonably neutral.   :::::Thanks will follow your advice   ::::::Can you look into this complaint about neutrality please  also the editor questining neutrality has a history of WP:Stalk my new articles. I  have collected evidence of that too. Can you let me know how I can deal with such editors. Thanks    ==A different request==  I would like to move that user Wrestlinglover420 