`  :::::Liberty you are so far wide of the mark it's not funny. Guy Fawkes is someone we Brits ceremonially ``burn`` in effigy every year and so, in a play on words, Fawkes is so-named because, as a phoenix, he regularly bursts into flames too. The reason we burn effigies of Guy Fawkes is to commemorate the fact that he didn't blow up parliament which is the exact opposite of why you infer she has socialist/anarchic sympathies! In other words you've managed to grasp exactly the wrong end of the stick.   :::::Further, all your arguments are completely based on original research and are full of holes so big one could drive a bus through. Wikipedia is not a channel for the diffusion of anybody's ideas or agendas - it is an Encyclopaedia - a place for undisputed and verifiable fact.   :::::On a personal note, I'm getting very tired of this whole business. Up until now I've been prepared to take your edits in good faith and to assume that you've been trying to make a valid contribution to Wikipedia but you've been told about the policies here so many times that your continued violations leave me with no choice but to assume you're pushing some bizarre personal agenda. I'm going to lay things out for you here:  ::::::* There is no evidence whatsoever in any of your cited references to support the view that JK has any socialist leanings whatsoever. ::::::* You consistently try to assert that she is a socialist by making quantum leaps between the stated facts and your position by using them to infer that she has certain leanings/supports certain causes/ideologies. ::::::* Many of your arguments and inferences see Fawkes above are just plain incorrect.  :::::I would strongly urge you to please stop grinding this particular axe or I don't how we will resolve this in any way other than asking for arbitration and that's never a fun process. Again, this is not a personal attack - many of the points you have raised are valid and interesting ones when you've backed them up with reliable sources but you seem determined to take things just one step too far by inferring meanings and links that simply aren't there.  `