`  == Was this your Question? ==  Hi Patrick!  No, It was myself who deleted my question on the uncertainty theory, I have done some research on the subject, and now ``partially understand the answer to my question.  Thank you for your brilliant answer, It has confirmed much of my understanding.  I totally agree with your ``non natural units`` Planck's constant is merely the amount of ``Quanta`` in one Joule, which is not a orderly number, because the joule has no relation to quanta (other than it describes the same property of nature: energy)   Right now, I am wondering if the universe is subject to ``non viewable determinism`` or complete ``randomness``  in other words, if ``we don't know what particles are doing, or if they don't ``Know`` what their doing``  Clearly I have a lot more to learn, and once again, thank you for your thorough and informative answer -)  Is it possible that uncertainty, and randomness is just as much of a property of the universe as say; mass, momentum or direction is?   Can I ask one more question of yourself, It is probably absurd, although it seems interesting. Does uncertainty in momentum (providing that uncertainty is a fundamental property of nature) allow for the creation and destruction of energy?  If you have one particle moving at a particular momentum, and it interacts with another particle, and then randomly ``chooses`` a momentum, that could be different from its original momentum, has it ``created`` or ``destroyed``  a small amount of energy?   However, this creation, and destruction would eventually even out, much the same as ``flipping coins`` (the first three coins may yield an uneven ratio, although, when  thousands of coins are flipped the ratio evens out)  Regards, Mike -)  `