` ::::Boy, this is classic: ::::Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. ::::Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. ::::Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. ::::Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. ::::Corollary: Therefore, all ``debate`` over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ``non-scientific`` forums, ``outside the scientific community``. ::::Brilliant reasoning there, MastCell and Nightscream. I wonder how people 20 years from now will read this without laughing their ass off.    ::::``Duesberg doesn't conduct research on HIV. He never has. Neither does Kary Mullis. Neither does the Perth Group.`` ::::``Russian biologists don't conduct research on Michurinism. They never have.`` ::::``Evolutionists don't conduct research on Intelligent Design. They never have.`` ::::``Einstein doesn't conduct research on the photoelectric effect or Brownian motion. He never has.``    ::::``In 1948, genetics was officially declared 'a bourgeois pseudoscience'; all geneticists were fired from work (some were also arrested), and all genetic research was discontinued.`` (from Wikipedia aritlce Lysenkoism).    ::::'''''I THINK MAST CELL AND NIGHTSCREAM'S ``ARGUMENT`` OVER THE POV OR NON-POV NATURE OF THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ``AIDS REAPPRAISAL`` IS INADEQUATE BECAUSE IT IS AS FOLLOWS (PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS CENTRAL TO THE POV-NON-POV DEBATE, NOT A DEBATE OF ``THE ISSUE``, MAST CELL): ::::Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. ::::Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. ::::Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. ::::Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. ::::Corollary: Therefore, all ``debate`` over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ``non-scientific`` forums, ``outside the scientific community``. ::::Mast Cell and Nightscream are using this pathetic ``argument`` as a justification for pushing their POV. So, yes, this comment IS very definitely in reference to ``improving the article``. THANK YOU.   `