 :::Oh. I apologize for that. The changes weren't just for the sake of change. Because all links eventually rot, I end up over time switching gradually to templates anyways, for straightforward inclusion of archiveurl= and archivedate=. I left as many in your style as possible (firstlast, title, pub, date, etc.) rather than (lastfirst, date, title, pub, etc.). We don't use ibid, so the multiple citations a source are usually by last name; so citing lastfirst is used. If it was a purely, or mostly, legal article, I probably would have left all your cites alone save adding URLs. But I've seen so many fundamentally legal articles without Bluebook, that it seemed like an outlier. So reader familiarity, ease of use, multiple cite linking, and likely future linkrot were my motivations. If the current apparent style inconsistency is too disturbing, what the hell, revert it all out and I'll abandon the article. Otherwise, if making them consistent is desirable, and you can stand the way it's going, I'll forge on.    