`Welcome!  Hello, Crossthets, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *Tutorial *How to edit a page *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!      ==Political comments on ancient times articles== While it's good that you want to prevent disruption to articles, I would thank you to please not use the talk pages of ancient times stuff to discuss contemporany political stuff as you did on Talk:Alexander the Great. See the WP:TALK wikipedia style guideline on commenting on talk pages     :The point was to address the recurring references that suggest ``Macedonia wasn't Greek`` in the Alexander Talk pages. Clearly their intent is political in nature and some sort of disclaimer seemed in order to prevent unauthentic contributions.   :Although I disagree with your choice to completely remove a disclaimer in the Alexander talk page (not the main article) as I mentioned in your own talk page I will accept the removal( since I'm new here and bow to your wisdom). I only ask that you please consider my concerns that the talk page is heavily politicized already.  :    ::You are right that the talk page can get very politized (it changes with time as old discussions get archived, and new discussions get opened). A warning (not a disclaimer) could be good, but it ought to be at the top of the page (with the other boxes at the top of the talk page) and be very short and neutral, and its rationale should rely on historical sources for ancient times, and not on the current political situation. Sorry for taking so long, but I had stuff to do outside of wikipedia.     Would it be possible for you to add the warning Enric? This way if could be done to your own satisfaction?    :I made a short warning. It's all I could think of. I copied the code from Talk:Homeopathy.     == Macedonia ==  Replied at my talk to keep it together. Cheers,     :And again.     ::If you log in, I think you'll be able to create a page. If you can follow this and this then you should avoid too much trouble. If you don't log in, then you can't create a page.     :::And I left you one more thought on my talk too. Tread lightly!     == Formal warning ==  Just to preserve the warning I gave you yesterday on your . You have been harassing  with vexatious complaints, and you have been editing in a generally tendentious way, trying to maximise and promote the representation of one national viewpoint over another. This is not welcome here.    In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you , you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you.    : The thread at WP:AN has been formally closed by an uninvolved administrator  me. There is nothing that can be done with your report at its current state, and at this point, it appears to be nothing more than a witchhunt done in bad faith. If (and when) your detailed report is ready, feel free to unarchive the thread and post at it, but the continued harassment of an editor is only diluting whatever arguments you may have had.  |  |    As you are still continuing your trolling campaign about BalkanFever's user page despite all warnings, most recently with  (), I've blocked you (both on this account and on the IP) for 24h.       To address the points above by Futper and Seicer.   ``Just to preserve the warning I gave you yesterday on your User talk:209.161.227.67. You have been harassing User:BalkanFever with vexatious complaints, and you have been editing in a generally tendentious way, trying to maximise and promote the representation of one national viewpoint over another. This is not welcome here.``  :I reject your assertion of ``harassment`` and in turn once again suggest your are abusing your admin authority to support the FYROM viewpoint (or someone who's your friend) either by  editting out facts or harassing users.   :Case in point. At the drop of a hat you came running to Balkanfever's help because I simply contacted him on his talk page to discuss some things I disagreed with him on and asked him to remove a link (no name calling.. and this after he had made a MASSIVE edit to the Macedonian naming dispute article without justifying each one ). You then verbally abused me and threatened to block me.... without even responding to any of my concerns.   :While I freely admit I have a strong viewpoint that supports one side... I don't believe it is based on irrationally. You now say that my POV is ``not welcome here`` and yet you seem to conveniently neglect balkanfevers page is one giant anti-Greek agenda with some links to articles being outright lies. (e.g. Greeks want death penelty only for FYROM citizens? A country with no death penelty?)  :And you are still harassing me, despite that you are being officially accused of inappropriate behavior, which is a clear conflict of interest until my evidence is reviewed by someone inpartial.  ``In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ¤ ``  :I would like to record that this additional threat by Futper came a few minutes after I had made an anon complaint about him (without mentioning his name or specific articles) I see this as roughly analagous to me complaining about a corrupt cop... than shortly thereafter that same cop ``accidentially`` pays me a visit and threatens to give me a ticket for speeding. Highly inappropriate.  ``The thread at WP:AN has been formally closed by an uninvolved administrator  me. There is nothing that can be done with your report at its current state, and at this point, it appears to be nothing more than a witchhunt done in bad faith. If (and when) your detailed report is ready, feel free to unarchive the thread and post at it, but the continued harassment of an editor is only diluting whatever arguments you may have had. seicer | talk | contribs ``    :I appreciate your willingness to have someone later review my issue. I will indeed followup in a few days (no more than a week). However, as I mentioned on the (now archived) complaint thread... I don't think it is appropriate for that someone that has used the words ``annoying``, ``witchhunt``, ``harassment`` ...and claims to be ``uninvolved`` with the accussed but on further querings discloses prior dealings with one or both of the accused admins. Perhaps I have irked you in some unintended way by the way I have worded things and your reply is sincere but I believe your involvement at this point is  inappropriate. It makes the situation appear