`  ::The problem isn't that I disagree with these statements. The problem is that there's no way for an ordinary person to verify these claims without hiring a lawyer. And note that I'm not just nitpicking, WP:NPOV and WP:V are among the most important principles to follow while editing Wikipedia. ::The only good source currently is the SFC one, thanks for adding that. While it could be considered primary source or a self-published source, it's also an expert opinion. There are some caveats dealing with these; if you haven't, please read those two sections I linked. Also per WP:WEASEL, these claims should clearly be attributed to Bradley M. Kuhn. I'd just remove the references to the license file, the GPL and the FAQ entirely. ::The SFC article seems to avoid any concrete statements on non-compatibility. The words ``unclear``, ``ambiguous`` and ``problematic`` are used, I think that's the best way to describe the situation, rather than trying to prove that it's not compatible.   ] `