 Bhumihar brahmin/babhan are totally distinct community from Rajputs and have ancient brahmnic origin from magadh. Babhan/bhumihar shared only one trait with rajput i.e both were royal and aristocratic class of hindu society. Bhumihar brahmin is a modern name to old babhans which was popularized by many wealthy landlords or kings like kashi naresh. Until 1891 census entire bhumihar brahmin community was named under babhan and put under millitary or aristocratic class of society which is totally evident from link of document i am mentioning [ https://archive.org/stream/cu31924023177268#page/n195/mode/2up ] . It is also a historic fact that babhan is a pali word for brahmin and present in ashokan edicts. Ancient magadh empire like sunga empire and kanva empires were brahmin empires of magadh. Some historians claims gupta empire to be a brahmin empire on the basis of marital alliance. Gupta was a word used by people of many communities like vishnugupta for chanakya unlike present day gupta surnames which is confined to vaishya community. So writing any mythical or framed story of babhans is totally injustice towards a community. Babhans are old aryan people of magadh who were present during ancient ashokan era or even before in magadh. It is a total historical fact that Rajputs came to bihar after advent of islamic force in northwest part of india. Rajputs are warrior community just like marathas of maharastra and sikh and jats of punjab and hariyana.  So telling babhans to be mixture of brahmin and rajput is totally illogical and fictitious. Association of babhans with budhhism might be true but not substantially proven but association with rajput is totally fictitious. Any sensible person can easily rule out this core myth and fiction which has come out of inter community jealousy. So i request all the editors to consider this and put down the derogatory fictitious tales about babhan community.