` :I've restored it.  The image page had a perfectly good fair use justification, which was hardly needed as you point out it is as clear a case of fair use as any.  Steve did indicate that it ``seems`` to not be fair use without actually bothering to indicate why either here or in the edit summary.  From his edit history it is hard to avoid the conclusion that he has an agenda.  In any event, as you point out this is a typical example of Chick's style.  It certainly isn't causing Chick any financial damage to duplicate a single frame of a tract that is handed out by the thousands for free on the street.  Including at least one excerpt of a Chick tract is absolutely necessary, as we could write a hundred pages on what Chick's tracts are like and not convey what a simple quotation like this does.  `