`  == Mild humor based on facts or accepted facts being unencyclopedic and worthy of nuking. ==  In the intro paragraph to this article, the last two sentences state the following, ``On the DVD commentary for the film one of the commentators claims that George Lucas reassured him that the project would, in twenty years, be seen as a masterpiece. As of the year 2012 the film was still considered one of the worst ever made.``  I did happen to see this movie ages ago, and I remember how terrible it was, and it does rank as one of the worst I personally ever saw, now whether that this is widely accepted fact or opinion, I'm not exactly sure, but, if the rest of the facts check out, that a DVD commentator did state that Lucas told him that the project would be considered a masterpiece in 20 years, if *that* can be fully verified, should this comment be able to withstand encyclopedic muster? Or does it deserve to be nuked as a previous editor chose to do? Thoughts??`