`  ==Distortion of sources by by lowering the number of casualties from 6,000 to 35 in the Gemlik Yalova massacres==  * questions all sources which he doesn't like on the other hand he adds (``retaliates``) without hesitation weak sourced massacres (with large numbers)committed by Turks against Greeks in the List of massacres in Turkey.( See, See) This already proves his unreliable POV behaviour, eagerly adding, without questioning the source, info that Turks massacred Greeks but insisting and denying that Turks were massacred by Greeks. (Btw, I don't deny any sourced massacre regardless of the perpetrators and victims)  *From the moment I made this article, Alexikoua started to disrupt the article, he is WP:IDLI from the beginning, very biased he tried to deny it, than shift the blame to others, and finally lowering the death toll from 6,000 to 35 by distorting this source page which does not state that the total killed were 35, it states ``Of the total 177 people (in a refugee camp in Istanbul) responding to a (Ottoman) questionnaire 28 individuals responded that they had family members harmed during the Greek occupation. In total only 35 were reported to be killed, wounded beaten or missing. This is in line with the observations of Toynbee declared that one to two murders were sufficient in driving away the population of a given village``  He misuses this source and claims the total number killed during the events was 35(!). I explained to him,again that in individual cases the number already exceeds 35. Furthermore Toynbee states that in one single  village called Hayriye (Khairie) half of the population was killed, according to a Ottoman document it had 250 inhabitants, at another village called Akköy (Akkeu) 60 people were killed, so the death toll of two villages has already exceeded 100. Furthermore the source never states that 35 is the total number of people killed in the peninsula. It is only the result of a questionnaire to 177 people. Furthermore Toynbee states that there were no large scale massacres in one specific region, not in other areas, his words are again distorted.  But Alexikoua still insists on distorting the source, I explained it countless times, he still insists, here here here, ], here, here and here.  He also amateurishly did original research to deny sourced content. See here, he ignores all other sources and insists on saying ``Toynbee's account about 35 as a total number of reported casualties is the only we have so far``( Which in fact is a lie because it is not Toynbee's account but from the Ottoman questionnaire of 177 people)  Then he does another amateurish original research by multiplying the amount of villages with two casualties per village to brilliantly(!) prove that 35 is actually a fact.  Finally I found an English source where it confirms the high number of death (5,500) (and several others See here and this) that the Turkish document stated (6,000-6,500). Now we have several sources which state that between 5,500 and 6,500 were killed or had ``disappeared``.   Here is another snippet source which states the same amount of 5,500 casualties: ``she(wife of Arnold Toynbee) says: 'Out of a Moslem population in this district — Yalova — of seven thousand, there remain barely fifteen hundred.``  So it is clear that the Turkish source was not false, these new sources should be added to the page, of course Alexikoua and Athenean will unjustly question this source too. It seems they are in denial of a proved massacre, it seems they are trying to cover it up because the perpetrators were Greeks (Both users are Greek) and victims are Turks. (Note that they don't show the same denying/questioning/source attacking behavior when it comes to Turks massacring Greeks See, See)    ==Accusations against the Turkish document and its author==  *This page is about a series of massacres committed by the Greek army (see here there are enough books writing about it). An Inter-Allied Western commission investigated these events and reported about it. I have created the article, which is based not upon one source but multiple neutral sources. These are the online version of Arnold J. Toynbee's accounts and the Allied report and several modern books. I also used a Turkish document which contains exactly the same content as the Allied report, only its written in Turkish (which was already enough reason to demonize it by the two Greek users). Here it states that 6-6,500 people were killed according to the Allied report. I provided a full citation and translation of the Turkish text.  *User:Athenean, became involved he claimed the Turkish source is partisan and that the entire article is based upon that. In fact all sources point back to the Allied report and Toynbee so the article is ultimately based upon that. But he said to the admins with the same cheap tricks they always use when dealing with Turkish sources, ``its not neutral, they are biased``. He claims that the author is ``a denier of the Armenian genocide``, I do not know if this is true but it seems that this is a very easy way to discredit any Turkish author without bothering even with the contents of the work of the author.  I am not a denier of any massacre committed by any party, so everyone can trust me for being neutral. I have read the entire Turkish source, it is 100% in agreement with the online report of the commission and Toynbee, with plenty of footnotes, there is nothing in the content which is non neutral or partisan.  cannot even understand Turkish but still claimed immediately that the entire document together with its author as unreliable WP:IDLI?. Admins should warn him for falsely accusing sources [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff;=555175573&oldid;=55517397