` Dear Lex, Thanks for your clarification of Judge Learned Hand. I guess I should not trust my memory.  The only times I remember citing blogs were the WSJwhen I cited the article, not the commentary, which was an interview. That was deleted.and when I used them as evidence of pro se dissatisfaction.  I see that you also deleted a quote of a court case that was in a blog.  I am positive that that was an accurate quote of a transcript with a statement by a federal judge.  I will have to go read up on Wikipedia sources again.  Also I am positive that the quote about the federal district court discouraging pro ses from using their mediation is correct, but I will have to check on the link.  Why didn't you just flag the source instead of deleting it?  Please don't insult me.  I am not trying to insult you.  Other than my complaints of censorship, please provide three examples of what you claim was my ``disruptive`` editing.  Or do you just want to go on with the article from where we are?  This is an example of an unsupported statement in the article that I don't believe is true: ``The California rules express a preference for resolution of every case on the merits, even if resolution requires excusing inadvertance by a pro se litigant that would otherwise result in a dismissal. While this rule creates a double standard``.  I think this means ``pro se litigants get an unfair advantage``. Wasn't it you that wrote that? FYI, I was put in jail  for over 4 months solely for engaging in pro se litigation.  The only way I could get out was to agree to withdraw all pro se litigation. My husband was threatened w jail for paying for me to file a complaint while I was in jail and paying for a typist.  And no, I don't believe there is a a history of ``putting people in jail who think the rules don't apply to them and who can't conform themselves to them.``  To the best of my knowledge, in civilized countries people are only put in jail for committing crimes and as far as summary contempt use of jail is very limited.  I saw an article, for instance, about a judge who put a whole courtroom in jail for 2 hours because of an objectionable ringing  cell phone.   `