`  In addition, it's a little weird to argue that Oswald was ``put up`` to the assassination by Bannister, Hosty and others, then argue till you're blue in the face that Oswald couldn't have made it down the stairs, the gun wasn't his, etc. So... are we to believe that Oswald, if he didn't fire a shot, would, with his accomplices, do something unusual for him by arranging to stay the night at the house where his rifle was stored, then arrange to take in ``curtain rods`` on that particular day, arrange it so no one would see him during the actual assassination (not standing on the street where numerous fellow employees could see and remember him, and perhaps appear in a photograph as proof of an alibi), instead by his account sitting alone in the lunch room as if there is nothing more interesting going on when the most powerful man in the planet is driving past mere feet away and THEN, when he surely heard shots and screams and general mayhem going on outside, do what every person on the planet would do - go and get a bottle of Coke.(!) If any of these people would take a deep breath and think - try to think - rationally they'd realize just how completely silly most of these claims are. But that will never happen. I'm sure they are loading the guns, so to speak, against Stephen King for daring in his new book to accept the premise that Oswald indeed carried out the assassination, and are readying their delusion retorts when Tom Hanks' pro-lone gunman series comes out over the next few years.   `