`  ::::: That's a personal attack. You indulge it because you know you can get away with it. You get it away with it because indeed you edit Wikipedia 7/24. I suggest it's only because I put you on the spot that you respond now. You're entitled to your view that I'm infantile and attention seeking, but not to propagate it in this way. If you want ``infantile``, I suggest you look at  from an editor here who runs his his Talk page as some sort of an art club (compare that with the  scholarly notes the uploader took the time to provide at Commons). As for ``attention-seeking``, it is precisely because I seek to avoid attention that I do not operate a Wikipedia account. I contribute regularly to Wikipedia on a (UK) BT internet IP - that is a shared dynamic address which is regularly changed by them (and every time I re-power my system) so my edit history, which would identify me immediately, is concealed. And in truth there are no shortage of infantile and attention-seeking editors at Wikipedia in any case.  ::::: Of course that sentence should be removed from the lead. As for conspiracy theories, this is Strauss-Kahn's BLP and the plausible theory that he was set up for the event that now defines him in the eyes of the world, for a while anyway believed by a majority of French citizens, should be mentioned in it.  ::::: It's clear to me that the management of this page is not fit for purpose. I shall apply for its protection to be removed. As is is so often the case, the cure is plainly worse than the disease. You might care to atone for you gratuitous attack by telling me who the administrator is who protected the page in the first place. I need to apply to them as a first step.   `