`  :Again the word definition does not fit, the translation can be translated as relocation as well. Anyway it really doesn't matter, because 80% of those that were deported/relocated survived, showing that the Ottomans indeed tried very hard in protecting it's minority and was not out to exterminate Armenians. There are thousands of books about ghosts as well, but does that mean ghosts truly exist? There are lots of history books that don't define Armenian massacres as genocide, but yes there are more books by random Armenians that qualify the events as genocide, that doesn't really prove anything, it doesn't prove that ``most western historians recognize the genocide`` this is STILL speculation. And I didn't delete anything about Armenian historians, I deleted something that was lumping Western historians into one boat, when it is not the case. I don't care if you have 2 million books on the Armenian genocide by Armenians, it still doesn't make Armenians the most qualified people, since it is a biased source. When you have an Armenian society that teaches their children from age 5 that the Armenian genocide exists, there is very little chance of Armenians being against it, but with Turks it is not taught from such a young age about these historical issues, since Ottoman history and Turkish history is so vast. There is no surprise that there are so many Armenian authors supporting it, the question is, how good is such research? Also it isn't ``proof`` that Western historians recognize it. Do not compare the Armenian history to the Holocaust either, because the Holocaust is proven, and Jewish historians who support it, are correct to support it because ALL Western historians agree on the Holocaust, only racists do not agree with the Holocaust, and are usually not credible sources. Unless you're telling me that Dr. Bernard Lewis or the many other researchers who publish against Vahakhn Dadrian's thesis are racists, then you shouldn't generalize the West's opinions to fit your ideas. Armenian's are trying to redefine genocide which is defined by the United Nations, and just because Raphael Lemkin coined the term and believed in the Armenian genocide, because we don't go by HIS definition, we go by the United Nation's definition. Raphael Lemkin's definition would also apply to Armenian rebels who massacred thousands of Turks. Anyway I am not here to rewrite the whole Armenian genocide article, I'm not even trying to prove or push Turkish POV, all I'm saying is, there are a couple statements in this article that are COMPLETELY POV or speculation, and need to be removed. And if you don't agree then you are pushing your own nationalistic agenda and do not want Wikipedia to display facts, you want it to display conclusions and opinions.   `