` :Semi-protection is not a valid way to deal with the anonymous edits that have been happening lately, as they are not vandalism.  I can see the argument for keeping the International Churches of Christ content in a separate article.  Its degree of significance to the main topic has not been clearly spelled out (does it deserve a whole paragraph in the Churches of Christ article, just a sentence, or a see also at the bottom?) and there are no sources besides the restorationmovement.org website, so strictly speaking, the onus is on those who want to keep it to provide some justification from reliable sources.  It is also any editor's prerogative to edit as an IP rather than creating an account; if disruption becomes unreasonable, the IP can be blocked, but it seems like more of an editorial dispute.  Some aspects of it (for example, the census count versus the unsourced ``anti`` numbers) are clearcut, but in general the problem points are in desperate need of secondary sources. `