` :The first question that is important for me is the accuracy of the first block about ``tendentious`` edits in Macedonian Muslims. An administrator with particilar POV om Macedonian question, without warning blocked an editor (i.e. me) with a contrary POV. (Nevertheless that until this moment the administrator didn't made some edits in the concrete article).Then this disputable blocking is an argument against me. :The second problem is why some of the other administrators denied to look profoundly: The only caution by some other editor after my first blocking, until I stop my edits in the article is this - with a very ``substantial`` argument: ``Stop wasting everybodys time!``. Then the other opponent, made his reverts with call to find consensus. Maybe, hasting to defend your colleague Future Perfect at Sunrise, you didn't notice that after it I didn't made some edits - nevertheless that some editors deleted important info with relevant sources. Also maybe you didn't notice, that there were editors who supported my efforts to find more neutral way - , . However, my objections about abuse power of one administrator who is involved in these themes are actual.  `