`   == Re: Sumburgh ==  Hi, just to let you know that Sumburgh's comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Kirschner is due to a disagreement s/he and I are having on an unrelated article. The gory details (if you're curious) are at  and . Regards,    :Interesting stuff... at times, people can be rather stubborn in disagreements (including myself). What I tend to do when coming across situations like this is to assume the comment (on that AfD) was made in all seriousness, and deal with it as if its the first time such a comment were made, rather than it just being the first time I saw it. Anyways, it is easy to be civil and assume good faith when you are uninvolved. Hopefully the situation is finished unfolding between you two. ·   ::I think that's a great way to approach it. In any case, it seems to have been resolved, although I wonder whether that's just because I've stopped responding (I suggested s/he ask someone else - of their choice - to mediate our dispute and s/he has apparently chosen not to do so). Maybe that's sometimes the best course of action... In any case, thank you for your measured response at the AfD. All the best,    == TbIndustries.png ==  OK, I can see that the image could be classed as ``non-encyclopedic content``. It's my own logo, which I created myself, however according to the policies you pointed out, it doesn't have a place on Wikipedia. The image was intended as a userpic, as I don't like putting my face on the interneet, but I'll remove it and tag the image for deletion anyway.    :If you created it, then the problem can probably be alleviated by releasing it under the GFDL or similar license. The issue is that the image was marked as being copyrighted and claimed as fair use. In this case, Wikipedia strictly confines this usage to articles. I had a MLB baseball team logo removed from my userpage, which is why I'm now familiar with this policy. Anyways, you can probably just change the license, provided you are comfortable with releasing the image. T·   ::I'm not sure if I want to release it or under what license. Could you advise me on this?    ==  De Triomphe ==  Thanks    == Template:User Monty Python ==  I see you've put most of the work into this template. It's got to be userfy'd in the next four or so days or it will be deleted. Since it's your baby, I thought I'd ask you if you wanted to keep it. I'm more than happy to stick it in  and list it at  if you'd rather not have it in your userspace. ·  :Do not under any circumstances userfy or delete this template. This template was created to replace all other Monty Python user templates in an attempt to show that GUS is not the only option available to gain control of user templates. I am violently and vehemently against GUS and the userfication of ANY template no matter how small. Please read my oppositional statement on the GUS. There would be no need for any templates to be moved into user space if there were fewer of them, and right now I am attempting to make that happen.  The other redundant Monty Python templates should have been deleted, however, some users were so vocal that they were kept. Those templates you can do what you will with them. Just leave Template:User Monty Python alone; it stays where it is, where it belongs, in Template space. Do not move this template.  /  ::Wow. Well, good luck with your userbox battle, I think I'll stay out of it. My comments were regarding Wikipedia talk:Userboxes#Userboxes for userfication. Might I suggest taking a small WP:Wikibreak? ·   == Possible Userbox Solution == This is a form letter, please don't reply directly. Do, however, feel free to  this solution I've come up with.   I've made an  for all User Boxes (hopefully) safe from overzealous Admins. Feel free to add any you like, edit any there, or just list your already made userboxes there. Also feel free to edit the main page (the user page) in any way that you think might help. Please note, however, that this is a user page and not an official Wikipedia page, so almost any User Box will be tolerated as long as it's within reason.   :Seems to me that using policy loopholes to dodge overzealous admins will only escalate these ideological disparities. If I wasn't so lazy I might move to boycott this pseudo-userbox namespace practice.    == Duchess Anne ==  Hi and thanks for your message! Actually, I knew that non-sysops can close rfds (I closed a couple of them myself), but since the original nominator wasn't me I thought I'd wait to hear his/her opinion before closing it. But anyway, they can put Duchess Anne up for AfD if they disagree, so yes, closing it was probably the best option.  ''''   == About RfD ==  Thanks for the heads up.  I'll take note of it.     == Thanks! ==  No problem. I try to keep [[Category:Stubs]] cleaned out once a day or so. Doesn't take long to remember the common categories. I was glad to see you'd already tagged it for deletion! Keep it up!   :That's incredibly useful  thank you! I appreciate it.    == Thanks for the welcome == Thanks!   ==100== Yeah, that was a big post. I though about archieving it earlier, but then decided to wait until I had 100 talk page comments. Pretty impressive, huh?   :AS they say in that song: ``Its your thang. You do what you wanna do.``    == Red links ==  I must have missed something. Why does every redlink appear as strikethrough now? This directly takes away from the readability of articles with red links in them. This only started happening today. I'm not sure if it's a change to something in my  or the site in general. A link to why this is happening would be awesome, surely there was discussion on this before it was changed.   :Perhaps you've changed something in your browser settings?  Nothing has been done to change how red links are displayed, as far as I know.    email me  ::Hmm, it doesn't even happen anymore. I guess it only lasted for fifteenish minutes. Weird.   :::What browser are you using?  And does everything appear underlined when this happens?    email me  ::::I always use firefox (for the windows platform). I'm often going between three different computers, and the other two occasionally have all blue links underlined (which usually lasts until a restart but I don't track it closely). I've never noticed the blues being underlined on this one, which I use the least, nor have I noticed the red strikethroughs before on any of them until it happened today on this computer. 