 :::::Batvette, I want to be polite, assume good faith, avoid personal attacks, and be welcoming but in light of your comments, and upon reading your user page, I can't help but tell you that you sound a like a crank. But I reply to some of the issues you have raised: :::::1. Whether or not I agree with Domhoff is irrelevant. On Wikipedia, the sole issue is whether or not a claim can be verified with reliable sources. The fact that Domhoff is a research professor in psychology and sociology who studies theories of power makes him a reliable source. If you can find multiple reliable sources that contradict this claim. The sentence will be altered to reflect that. Lastly, I only suggested people like you read his essay in its entirety in order to better understand the context of his comments.  ::::::2. The fact that Marxism, Socialism, and Communism remains the goal of many people is irrelevant to the point Domhoff is making since he was simply pointing out that conpiracists change their focus from the USSR to the UN when the former collapsed. Nothing more. Nothing less. That being said, what I find perplexing about right-wing conspiratorial thinking about the New World Order is the complete failure to understand that the superclass are not Marxists, Socialists or Communists. They  :::::3. It is true that many academics formulate critical theories about a new world order in international relations. If you are interested in that subject, I suggest you visit the new world order. However, the New World Order (conspiracy theory) article is about paranoid conspiracies theories about the New World Order! Do you understand the difference? :::::::  