`  As reliable sources clearly acknowledges, reliability isn't binary: ``The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made…`` The question is whether they're reliable for what they set out to prove. Flannelette Murmurings would be useless as a source if it was for the idea that Potts is a more important violin player than Warren Ellis or Nigel Kennedy, say, but is a perfectly decent source for the proof of a simple, incontrovertible fact, namely that Potts plays in a band called Cuba is Japan. The idea the author made up the band, and therefore the interview, is exceedingly unlikely. ¶ The other source should obviously have been removed regardless of it's reliability, since it seemed to be primarily about a charity cooking event and didn't match the point it was supposed to illustrate.   `