`  #As this article is essentially a reconstruction of his resume, WP:RESUME would appear relevant. #Per WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, articles are meant to ``be based on reliable, published secondary sources`` in order to provide ``interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims`` about the topic. Lack of any such interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims, is why I described the article as a ``bland and bloodless resume``  not WP:IDONTLIKEIT (as you claimed in violation of WP:AGF). #If the only thing distinguishing him from my ``any random Biblical scholar`` is the adjective ``distinguished``, then we can simply make this article a soft-redirect, with the following text ``Distinguished Biblical scholar``. #I answered your question  citing relevant material from the guideline you based your question on. All that ``stands`` is your WP:IDIDNOTHEARTHAT. ''''(P)  ''''(P) `