` **I'll agree that cycle by itself looks weird.  Even MLB.com, in its list of feats, uses ``hit for the cycle``, rather than just ``cycle``.  It's just a consistency issue.  No other article title on baseball terminology is phrased like that.  I'm not saying that ``cycle (baseball)`` is better than ``hitting for the cycle`` or even ``list of Major League Baseball player to hit for the cycle`` if one wants to make a featured list out of this article (I can see it going either way).  It's just more in line with all the other baseball terminology articles.    `