  ::::  That is very interesting.  What is it about the research conducted by BLT that strikes you as pseudoscience?  Is it their methodology?  Because I'd hate to think you are excluding extremely relevant material from this article simply because you don't agree with their findings.  I'm sure you're a very intelligent person, but I think a deeper explanation of what you consider pseudoscience to be and what the criteria are is definitely in order here, especially considering the content you are leaving out based on this judgment.  Later!  Calgarr