`  :Did you not read my above posts? I was underlining the issue here, that even given the ``scholarly majority`` that does not automatically mean that it has to be mentioned in the lead (can you UNDERSTAND THAT POINT?), as was pointed out by other editors earlier, and this was also pointed out by  in his last reverts on this issue at Illyrians. I notice the editors who are of the opinion that it should be in the lead so far are all Albanians? Also why do you say that you don't care about the lead when you obviously do. I didn't say I didn't care about the lead, at first I was undecided; then I decided it is not something for the lead, but I wasn't that firmly against; and still I prefer a version of the article without that in the lead. It is not a matter of ``OR``, it is a matter of presentation. Your opinion that it should be in the lead-no, your opinion is that it is mandatory that it has to be in the lead-this is your conclusion, Original Research if we want to call it that.   `