`  == Election ==  maybe at the project there should be an election for the co-ordinator of the project, the military history project does that, and it has really made a good impact on the way that it is run. The co-ordinator would obviously answer to a council of members on policy based issues, maybe we could do what they did in rome, and have people elected onto the council, maybe if you were to put that idea onto the newsletter it would give some idea as to the interest that people would have on that subject. Thanks     :Are you saying that people are offering their support in a purely superficial way? By saying they will do something and then just leaving, but there are like 200 or something editors that have joined.    How? ::It is a complete mixture of people who sign up and appear to do little, others sign up and edit article rather than the project pages, some start work and stop, some don't give that much time to it, etc etc. etc. However there are a few who do stirling work and can always be depended on, you can normally tell who they are by the amount of editing they have done to project pages and talk pages. :   /   == Banquo ==  I recently reviewed this article because it was under GA nominations, i received a complaint from a member who said i didn't do it right, could you review it and then tell me what i did wrong, i declined the nomination, this is the talkpage Talk:Banquo     ==Newsletter issues== And how do i distribute to people's talk pages, maybe if we distributed to every talk page of every member of the project, just a suggestion.    :All it would take is some fierce dedication, and as you were saying, you could use more members with that sort of determination, i would set aside the first saturday of each month and do it then. Dedication is the key, and how would i tip to the newsletter? I think the election council is a good idea, maybe i should put it on the general discussion page.    ::I mean how do i contribute to it, and one question, did you start the project? you seem to be the most involved.     :::I have done it, i contributed, although i should probably learn the format a bit better, i mean, i did do english masters in university, so it would do to be thorough,     ::::You didn't tell me how old you were, where did you study, that sort of thing.   , i just posted the definition of literature on that discussion as defined by the oxford dictionary, if you're interested.     == Newsletter March 2008 ==  Added some stuff. Best,     == Sockpuppet ==  I think I may be a suspect of a sockpuppet conspiracy, just because I like the sort of things as , it is quite weird, maybe you can help me out. Go to my user page and look at the top of it. Thanks.     == Reply ==  Are you going to reply to my last post? It is really eating me up inside, I mean, the evidence is purely circumstantial, but still, this is slander, unsubstantiated slander, can I lodge a complaint or something? Because I think that if someone says this sort of thing about another user, there should be a place where I can complain.     == Heirachy ==  Well, I posted a discussion on the heirachy of the council, whether it should be three members and so on. I was also wondering if it should be just a president who has total control and a bunch of people who he answers to, which really stops that one president becoming a dictator in his own right, this would be bad for the project, but I think the main issue is getting enough editors who actually want to be a part of the system in that way, and also, how do I start an election or a voting section? Is it hard. But the response is good on the talk page so far, of the two people that have replied since I last checked it, both agree with me, although, one is you. But anyway, thanks.     == Thanks ==  Thanks, that puts my mind to rest, which is good. It's 12:30AM over here, and i have to get up at like 7:15, got a hard day's drinking ahead of me, so I will probably be asleep when you reply, what did  do anyway?     == DangerTM == moved from  for unified discussion  You could certainly add the  {{Sockpuppet|1=Tom.mevlie|Tom.mevlie}}  to the new user's user page, and note to  that the new user shares at least a few of the puppeteer's typological quirks, including not apparently being able to capitalize the word ``I`` any better than Tom or his other socks do.     :I see no clear evidence that DangerTM is a sockpuppet of Tom.mevlie. That he has ``some`` similar interests and a ``typological quirk`` which in itself is not that uncommon, especially in the world of phone texting, doesn't mean they are one and the same. I think we need more evidence. I have adopted this user who appear very keen, and who appears to be largely constructive in their attitude. There are one or two ideas that run off wiki's philosophical track. However as clearly a new user who is constantly asking for technical advice and procedural guidance I can't see that this is likely to be an existing user ``sockpuppeting``. To that end I am going to remove the Tag, please suggest clearer evidence the the circumstantial. :   /   ::Kevin, I have no problem with you removing the tag considering 's thought that this might be a clean start; however, I would refer you to discussions at  and  for the further evidence you request.  I would qualify this by saying, considering Pax:Vobiscum's comments - posted after I tagged the userpage on John's advice, that this is evidence they are the same user, not that DangerTM is a sockpuppet, since Tom.mevlie is no longer an active user. •    == Literature ==  They want me to start my own task force focusing on great works, which will be hard, expecially in this day and age, considering that if a sample of twenty educated people was taken, and every book that they had ever read was tallied, you still wouldn't have all the great works read, how do you suggest that I go about it?     :Yeah, esentially I am saying that, exactly, do you understand now where I am coming from?    == Newsletter ==  The newsletter looks good, how long do you expect until it will be ready for distribution? And you seem to be missing the point somewhat, it is not about the best books and novels, it is about the ones that are worth most to society on the whole.    :Will you send it to everyone? Meaning everyone who is a registered editor in the project, not just the ones who have said that they want it.     ::Everyone gets it (in link form) unless they have indicated they either don't want it, or want the full expansion of it. Other editor not part of the project sometimes request the newsletter in either linked or expanded form. The exception  qualifications are found on the Project outreach page. :   /   :::How do I start an election? It should more or less begin whenever the newsletter is sent out, it would be good to have a page for candidates to present themselves in time.    ==Please Stop== In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Is_There