`    WP:BLP ``Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.``  Blanking existing information because one person changed it without a source seems counterproductive, especially as my quick bit of research (not extensive, I realize, because I don't have access to the birth certificate) indicated the info was wrong.  If the now-noisily fled user had posted on the article talk page that they had access to the birth cert, or had referenced it in the first place, I would not have reverted  I would have filed away that it was an interesting choice of names for a newborn.  I guess the thing that really puzzles me here is, here's a new user, whose first edit gets reverted and templated, who then re-reverts and claims on my talk page that WP is hostile to new users and makes a huge deal about wanting their account deleted (when all you really have to do is log out and don't log in again) has gotten so much special attention.  Is there something I am missing?  Were they really a new user, or were they someone who has been around a while trying to make a point about WP's hostility to newbies?  Is it possible, oh venerable one, that you have been duped?   `