 ::Just a brief response.  When a page is on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, what is at issue is whether the page is so worthless as to be unworthy of an encyclopedia, and ought to be entirely removed.  Vanity pages, crank theories, confused gibberish, and deliberate vandalism are the chief offenders.   ::Your concerns about what should be at the head page of Norouz and what should be at this one don't fit any of the usual categories.  This is the sort of thing that customarily is addressed at one or the other articles' talk pages.  Likewise, if the page is wrong about the extent or significance of the politicization of the holiday among Kurds, this too is something that belongs on the talk page; flag it for neutrality and accuracy if need be.   ::I have no opinion on any of these issues, and no real basis to form one.  I read the article on Kurdish celebrations, and it seemed to make sense and contain information that, if accurate, should be kept somewhere.  And similarly, since it contained information about songs associated with the celebration by Kurds, it seemed to have enough independent data to no longer qualify as a POV fork, even if it once did.  :: -   :::No, afd is a concensus gathering process. I am NOT trying to get anything deleted,