` :::::::::Resolution 1546 seems a curiously technical way of defining when the Iraqi military occupation ended.  Whenever a foreign power has significant numbers of armed forces in a country who operate essentially outside the governance of that country's government, the country is de facto ``occupied``.  I'm sure you'd accept that whether or not a country is truely occupied is often POV? ::::::::: But regardless, the terms ``occupied territories`` and ``military occupation`` also denote differences in scale.  Whole countries are usually subject to military occupation, while in general ``occupied territories`` refer to lands that arn't distinct or entire countries.  This might sound like POV but I think I can back this up if you give me a moment to research.   `