  Because there were objections when I did this unilaterally, instead I am going to open the discussion of this merge.  I believe that because they have the same governance structure and that their employees operated under the CNA/NNOC label with very little distinction between the two, that they should be merged into one article.  Also the NNOC article is lacking details which exist on the CNA page about NNOC. On top off all of this, the NNOC site is simply a subsite to the CNA site and appears to be simply a different names of the same organization.  I'm sure that there is at least one person who disagrees with me so could you please explain the rational of keeping the two organizations, which are run by the same people and employ the exact same people and share a common website, in separate articles?       