` *::If ``List of film trilogies`` is moved to ``..series with three entries`` along with everything else, then this isn't an issue.  Only reason it's getting special mention is that it is an accepted word unlike most of the others.  If you were to accept ``octalogy`` as a word, then few of the entries in that category would count as an actual ``octalogy``, merely a series.  Think what I'm trying to say is that all the above moves should be treated the same, even ``trilogy``, which may prove a sticking point for some.    `