` ::Sorry, the ``three revert`` thing was my mistake. For the record, the issue it NOT whether the ``hat`` section should be included on the Frank Rossitano, but whether there should be a discussion about it first or, at the very least, whether Jeffrey O. Gustafson should provide an explanation that is actually an explanation and not a sarcastic put-down. (On the talk page he wrote ``We are an encyclopedia. I've linked the word for people who seem to forget what that is,`` which surpasses any of my comments in everything but cleverness.) ::The ``indiscriminate collection of information`` section of WP:NOT does not explicitly cover the issue, as Jeffrey O. Gustafson seems to believe, and I believe there is definitely room for some POV. Again, this could have been settled in a debate, but Jeffrey O. Gustafson was just too good for that. He went on repeatedly deleting the section even after I added a big honkin notice that said not to for the time being. YOU tell me what I was supposed to do.  `