`  == Reverting for no reason ==  I spent quite some time improving an article that was in a poor state.  Now two people have undone all my work with a click of a button.  You didn't have the courtesy to explain why you reverted it, but you still had the fucking cheek to accuse me of leaving an inaccurate edit summary.  No-one's that stupid so you were plainly just out to provoke me.  Well fucking well done, consider me fucking provoked.  I guess you didn't even bother to look at the changes before you put all that shit back.  *Self-arrest refers to various maneuvers employed in mountaineering **It doesn't ``refer`` to that; it is that.  You want to say ``Paris refers to the capital city of France`` or ``Nile refers to a river that flows into the Mediterranean``? *sliding down a snow or ice covered slope arrests (stops) the slide ** You think readers are too stupid to understand what ``arrests`` means in this context? *himself or herself ** You think the single word ``themselves`` is some how better expressed in three words? *and/or ice axe ** You never bothered to read WP:SLASH? * These potentially life-saving techniques must be practiced frequently in order to maintain proficiency ** This website is called wikipedia, not wikimanual.  But you never bothered to read WP:NOT, did you?  That's just the first five, I made many more, I left the article looking considerably better and more encyclopaedic, but then you came along and fucked it all back up again.  Do you feel proud?    `