`  ::::As I've already stated, the WP:BLP expressly states: ``Talk pages are used to make decisions about article contents. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material not related or useful to making article content choices should be deleted, and even permanently removed (``oversighted``) if especially problematic (telephone number, libel, etc). New material should generally be discussed in order to arrive at a consensus concerning relevance, availability of sources, and reliability of sources. Repeated questionable claims with biographies of living persons issues not based on new evidence can generally be immediately deleted with a reference to where in the archive the prior consensus was reached.`` . As I've also already stated, I am not condoning that this be added into the article, but rather that it is suitable, under the WP:BLP, for discussion and not for automatic removal from a party with what appears to me to be a vested interest in the article. You may not agree with the allegations made, that is perfectly fine as neither do I. You must debate this therefore, as stated in the WP:BLP, not simply remove it as if you have something to hide.  ::::As I've also already stated, do not conduct your rationalizations for your reverts on my talk page.  `