`::What it was worth to change the header to reflect the guideline is not the issue. Shem reported me at AN/I for ``tendentious editing`` for changing a header at Talk:Barack_Obama in a way that I am contending was completely unobjectionable. The first step in unpacking the kitchen sink of un-diffed justifications Mastcell offers for blocking me is to establish that the original accusation was unjustified abuse of process. Since I fully expect that Mastcell will again ignore his obligation to provide transparency for his decisions as an admin (he has never justified his assertion that I had performed ``5+`` reverts in his first block of me), and will not be held accountable for that, there is little that I can expect to happen. But I plan to clarify the record insofar as possible and make unremittingly clear my contempt for the pattern of abuse that has taken place and appears to be SOP.     `