` :::::As I said earlier, I think this obsession with the title is a red herring.  The vast majority of sources refer to these things as ``vectors`` without qualification, and something really technically precise like ``vector (contravariant with Euclidean manifold)`` will repel most of the intended audience.  We just have to settle for something more-or-less reasonable like ``Vector (geometric)`` or ``Vector (spatial)``...I honestly don't much care as long as it not directly misleading like ``Vector (three-dimensional)`` or ``Vector (physics)``...and focus instead on making the article text clear.    `