`  ::Enough is left in the article, including three pics, about this. As even you say, it ``may`` add significantly to our knowledge of dinosaurs, or may not. It is very greatly overplayed here, and I will revert your reversions until someone wants to hammer out a compromise.   What is your own position, besides a claim about the recent splash it made?  How is this discovery worth an entire section, while other major discoveries about dinosaurs receive a passing mention at best? You are not seeing the aim of my revisions, which is to focus the article on ``dinosaur.`` `