, 18 July 2008 (UTC)  ::::We are not assessing the truth claims of a religion - we are assessing the historicity of an individual.  I would actually be quite happy for evidence to exist - it would make the subject more interesting and wouldn't cause the least problem for my view that the supernatural is merely wishful thinking.  Proving a certain man existed ~2000 years ago is a long way from turning him in to a god!  I'm pretty certain Michael Travesser exists, but he ain't anything other than a delusional man - despite what he and his followers believe. ::::As for your weak attack on my lack of expertise, it's irrelevant.  I'm as capable of sourcing and quoting expert references as the next person.  Wikipedia would be a desolate place if your reinvention of policy was implemented and only experts were able to contribute.  Your irrationality is beginning to show - 'Jesus historicity' and 'Jesus myth' are very much the same thing.  If you don't wish to participate in discussions that trouble you, you will find Conservapedia.com a far more comforting environment.   19:59