` ::::I'm really not sure where you got the idea that Wikipedia editing somehow revolves around a set of rule-driven behaviour.  I was fed up with your nonsense so, an hour and a half after replying I thought better of it and archived the page.  I had nothing further to say about the matter.  It wasn't like we were dicusssing article content - I was foolishly replying to your comments. ::::I have no idea where you get the impression that I am ``supposed to`` engage you in pointless conversation.  You failed to apologise for your insults, you failed to explain why the edit you claim to be a personal attack was, you failed to explain why you had taken a side in the dispute.  There really was nothing left to say.  I have no idea where you got the mistaken idea that I was supposed to keep the discussion open.  I have no idea where you get the mistaken idea that I am supposed to archive your comments on my talk page in the manner of your chosing.  In fact, I quite graciously archived your comment, instead of replacing it with personal attack deleted as I would normally have done with an intentional insult like yours.  And, most certainly, once you chose to engage in harrassment there was absolutely no reason for me to archive your comments.  I am under no obligation to support your policy violation.  And please don't confuse that with a personal attack.   `