 :Um, first of all, stop violating WP:3RR. Second, engage in consensus building. Third, act cautiously as this article falls under WP:BLP and therefore must meet a higher standard of proof for claims such as B perpetrated a hoax. I think it's entirely likely that he did. But WP needs to wait for unimpeachably independent sources to make that claim first. And I just don't see the Army document as meeting that criteria since they are an involved party.  