`I've tried to answer it. I think this edit dealing what Sheldrake advocates questioning should be reinstated, both because it reads better and is more appropriate to the summary nature of a lede.   The last paragraph under the ``Lecturing and debating subhed`` fleshes this out, as the prose in the body is supposed to do.   I also think it should be re-instated because it was reverted twice in the period of a couple of hours, in violation of our rules.  I also think it should be reinstated because a sole editor is insisting on the version he WP:OWNs, drumming home his idiosyncratic view that ``advicates questioning such long-standing scientific principle as`` is somehow inadequete, and engaging in a slow motion edit war to keep the phrase out, with little in the way of consensus to support this stonewalling.     `