`  == Incorrect, non-corroborating research citation - DISPUTE ==  Checking, at random, one of the references cited for the statement in the article that: ``Some researchers have also taken issue with the accuracy of the diet's underlying evolutionary logic or suggested that the diet could potentially pose health risks``, I found the reference not only did NOT confirm or justify the statement but actually contradicted it.  The reference source given in the article is unobtainable without a subscription to Elsevier, however the document is freely available here, at the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health site.  The study itself concerns: ``High-carbohydrate diets, particularly in the form of high-glycemic index carbohydrate``, and from what I understand, the paleo diet is not such a diet.  I have not checked the other references in the section but have flagged the article.  IMO it needs to be overhauled by someone with sufficient expertise and time to do so. IMO this task would be made easier if the article were organised to consolidate the different issues eg:  1) Intro (what the paleo is), 2) history, 3) evidence + criticism.  At the moment imo the article reads more like a war zone than an encyclopedic article, with critisism, evidence, theory, history, etc all addressed in all the sections, rendering the wiki structure inoperative and the article almost unreadable.   `