`  Your rules are not to be enforced according to a draconian, egregious methodology  that violates the free dissemination of greater knowledge and truth.  By citing the  3-revert rule, that's exactly what you are doing.  If you do, then this militates  against intellectual liberty, and the exposure of factual information regarding  human rights abuses, which involve the entire international community.   This kind of fascism cannot be tolerated.  And incontroveribly, it does not represent the Wikipedia ethic.   If you have changed your values in favor of fascism, human rights abuses, and political correctness, then you are not educating the global community, but rather dumbing down the masses as transistorized automatons.    Once again, the name Rama's Arrow represents Hindu miltancy, and this must be construed as a personal attack against millions who are not Hindus.  I think this is the kind of personal attack that should be most concerning to you, and Wikipedia must address this effectively.  As a result, it would not be ``inappropriate,`` as you worded it, to summarily remove this block.`