 September 2013 (UTC)  :At the time of your edit, I was busy with what would have been the second edit. the edit conflict made it third. It has already been divided into sections - very small ones at this stage. I guess you did not notice that the article had only just been created. (your edit was 6 minutes after the article was created). :Unless I am misinterpreting the purpose of the  it is not applicable to an article which at the time was 4,957 bytes long, ie. very short. If you meant to label the lead section as very long, (at the time about 300 words, not very long in my opinion) the appropriate tag would be .  :This is not a big issue, but I remain puzzled as to why you considered that either the article or the section was too long. If you meant it should be formatted in sections, why not say so? Cheers, • • •   14:46, 7