 * Sorry, but WP:NPOV states we should represent: :fairly and, as much as possible, without bias all significant views (that have been published by reliable sources).  Now I am presuming that have read all the books cited in the bibliography, because I have - with one exception - Sybille Bedford's book which is out of print. She wrote it the year after the case without access even to the trial transcript - and was therefore unable to analyse the case properly. She was also hampered by liable laws - Adams sued 12 papers after the case, winning each, so she could not speculate and even imply his guilt.   The other books were all published after Adams' death for this reason.   One is by two journalists (Hallworth and Williams) and says Adams was guilty (they had access to the police at the time of the investigation). One is by the judge, Devlin, who said Adams was a 'mercenary mercy killer' - hence a serial killer under law since mercy killing is a crime. Hoskins' book (the author became a friend of Adams) says Adams wasn't a killer, just inept - but Hoskins never saw any evidence at all and just interviewed Adams. Surtees meanwhile sits on the fence: he interviewed Adams (he was a colleague) and various people who knew him, but saw no records. The only book that was written with access to the police records is Cullen's. It states unambiguously that the wealth of evidence shows Adams was a killer - and states that political interference made the prosecution pick a weak case (confirmed also by Hallworth and Williams), lose evidence, hand confidential papers to the defence (allegations made in Parliament), prosecute half-heartedly (a view agreed with by Devlin) and then drop a second indictment - an act the judge called an 'abuse of process'(Devlin's words).   For this reason Cullen's book deserves more weight than the others. At 687 pages it is even as big as the others combined. It is not a breach of NPOV to rely on a book that had access to evidence that the others didn't. It is for these reasons, as the guideline demands, the most significant view. All the others are lesser for the described reasons. Please respond before I reinstate the category you object to.  