 *Comment This is simply an outside perspective from someone who isn't in any way involved in in this (in fact the only way I'm even aware of this whole situation is because it occasionally boils over into AfD, which I watch fairly closely) and who has no preference for the Right or the Left; except in the case of handedness...  Just a few observations: #Andy Stephenson was deleted because an admin made a judgment call based on the arguments advanced at the original AfD discussion, specifically that it did not meet WP:BIO guidelines (and from an outside view I don't see any evidence the subject meets said guideline.  The admin used his judgement.  You may disagree with this judgement, but articles are deleted every day becuase they don't meet guidelines.  This is why deletion review exists.   #Conservative Underground should not be restored unless someone has additional sources or evidence that establishes that it meets WP:WEB.  Alexa ranking is completely irrelevant, as is Google hits, etc.  Search Engine tests have never been accepted guidelines because they are totally unreliable. # A little WP:AGF and WP:COOL would probably benefit everyone on both sides.  WP:NOT a soapbox and political fighting doesn't advance the project in any way.  That said, I can understand why this is happening as the United States approaches what is probably a very important election.  # If I can offer any advice it would be that you should make absolutely sure you understand the relevant article guidelines at Wikipedia.  Before starting a article on a person, make sure they meet WP:BIO & WP:LIVING and that you have reliable, neutral sources to establish this.  The same goes for websites; make sure they meet WP:WEB before you start an article.  I'm not saying this will necessarily solve some of the POV issues that seem to be happening, but it would certainly prevent articles that have undergone a significant amount of editing from being deleted via AfD. 