`  ::::First of all, where do you get the idea that one must be an ``activist`` in order to be pro-choice or to have a pro-choice position on some issue?  And where is the article edit where I ever said that RCOG is ``activist``?  You seem to be making arguments against a person who does not exist, because I never edited any article to say that RCOG is ``activist.``  ::::In the United States, a CNN poll asked the following question in May of 2007: ``With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?``  45% said pro-choice and 50% said pro-life.  Do you seriously believe that those 50% are activists or consider themselves activists?  I certainly don't think that.  Those 50% are simply saying what their opinion is.  ::::Regarding RCOG, they may well be ``activist.``  I don't know, and I don't see how that is the least bit relevant to whether they are ``pro-choice`` or whether they have taken a ``pro-choice position`` on some issue.  I suspect RCOG is ``activist`` on this issue, since they oppose reduction of abortion time limits.  That is a political position, and not merely a matter of complying with existing law.  ::::And can't you see that I did not edit this article to say RCOG is a ``pro-choice organization``?  I edited it to say that they have taken a ``pro-choice position.`` Can't you see the difference, anymore?  You're the one who pointed out the difference in the first place. `