` :Dark, that link to the OR page does not determine that your edit was not OR.  It does not support inclusion of the Copernicus text in Austrian School. (Incidentally, did you announce the OR forum case here? If so I missed that. More eyes on that thread might have generated more discussion for you on the OR page.)  Anyway as previously stated, what is OR is your opinion that Mises view is ``commonly known as Quantity theory of money first noted by Copernicus.``  You don't have a secondary RS which states that Mises' view and Copernicus' view are the same, nor that Mises' view is what's ``commonly known as the Quantity theory of money.``  I think if you review the thread on talk here you'll see this covered. On the OR page, two or more comments pointed that out as well.  It does not appear that the OR page thread determined anything in support of your proposed edit. Please leave the opening inflation sentence as it stands unless you can provide a secondary RS to support an edit.  Let's work on improving the Business Cycle Theory section.  It's still unclear and weakly cited.  Thanks.    `