`  *The book cover (yes, covers are for both sides of books) does not mention ``symptoms``, and we have a high-quality secondary source explaining the claims it makes. Your wish to attenuate the quack claims made for the diet is not neutral. *Gotschall's self-published book is not a reliable source for anything much that is worth mentioning. There may be a case for having a WP:EL for it. *I am always happy to consider specific proposals rooted in sources and WP's guidelines & policy, but unless there are new sources I am not persuaded we should water-down our well-sourced account of the claims made for the diet.  || `