  == s11 work being destroyed ( == The article was at a *REALLY* good quality, well referenced, as good as you are going to get, and then someone (its hard not to use expletives here) came along and destroyed everything, and says its all speculation with no real value.  Can you get some people to help to make sure that it stays in a good form?  They were trying to remove all references to 9/11 conspiracy theories, put simply.  I was pretty upset about the whole thing.  Whilst earlier efforts were vaguely constructive, this last one is verging on vandalism and is very disruptive.  I reverted his edits, but there's a big agenda there somewhere, and they are lying and distorting the truth.  I'd rather see it deleted outright than be abused like this.    Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 