` :::::::It's hard to say that moving it to the WP space would find a concensus.  There are certain topics where it's obvious a notability criterion is needed (essentially, to keep out spam/vanity).  But even those have some flexible points to allow for the argument I'm trying to make.  That Science is a rediculously vague topic, and because the number of Geneticists is much larger than the number of Cosmologists, the number of citations for a Cosmology paper to be ``as notable`` (whatever the fuck that means) as a Genetics paper is lower than the number of citations the Genetics paper has.  While the textbook criterion tries to replace that, it does so in a way that hacks at one of Wikipedia's greatest strengths: Being current.  `