`  ===Current article assessment by Royalbroil=== There are several glaring things that I see right now that should be fixed before I do a more in-depth review against GA criteria. You'll need to go well beyond what I suggest now if you're looking for FA. Then you'll need to use only highly reliable sources like books by major publishing companies or major newspapers/magazine/etc. Go that route right now to save yourself time later as I learned the hard way. 1) You need to greatly increase the number of citations. GA expects that at least every paragraph has a citation to cover the contents of that paragraph. More if needed. 2) Most of the citations have the form [37]. You need to give a full citation, like what the  templates do. A full citation would include the source's title, the source, date of reference, date accessed. These cite templates are the easiest way to deal with it. 3) Specific controversial facts need citations. For example, you need to cite that Sun Prairie is a bedroom community of Madison. I wouldn't know that if I hadn't been in the city. Any statistic needs a reliable source. I know it's a major chore - been there. 4) There should not be bullets in the article, it should be written as sentences (except for notable residents). 5) Redlinks should either have WP:STUB articles or the wikilinks should be removed. Let me know when you're done with this, and I'll give you a peer review with a laundry list of more specific things to do. I'll be on vacation for the next 2 days, so I won't respond if you reply until later. Do you understand that GA is a formal process where you don't get to pick who reviews the article against the criteria?  `