  :The site is largely juvenile slander; a twelve year old could make a better site layout, and the main line of attack is to post outrageous claims concerning the organization, puerile insults, and Photoshopped pictures of PW members.  The only part of the site that even makes an attempt at genuine argumentation is the part about the constitutionality of counter-protesting, making the claim that the First Amendment right to freely assemble is only protected when used to petition the government, and not at any other time.  This is, of course, a ridiculous line of argument; either the author is monumentally ignorant or he is intentionally lying, but I suppose one must entertain the view if adhering to Wikipedia's seeming policy of entertaining any viewpoint so long as it's presented on some Web site somewhere.  However, this section of the page is promptly drowned out by all the noise.   