`  ==Since you're around== Can you take a look at Christianity in India? I'm going to head off for a while and don't have time to follow up on WP:AN3. cheers. —'  :Sure. Keeping an eye out.    ()  :I do find  suspicious. Dormant account that resumes editing today and joining the dispute? Seems fishy to me.    ()  ::Thanks, yes, that is a sock, there's another one  also. These three are socks of each other for sure, but there's also a master account that I don't know (alternately, they could all be an off-wiki forum meatpuppet group, we see that in Indian caste articles regularly). I've just been quite low on wiki time recently, so I haven't been able to get these CUed, blocked and tagged. cheers. —'  :::Agree on Sikolia07. It could be meatpuppetry like you said though. Hopefully these accounts can be checked.    ()  ::::All blocked as socks by YM, IP blocked for a few days. —''''''  :::::Thanks for the update. Hopefully things will calm down for a while on that article.    ()   == IP vandalism ==  User:  has been reverting changes on several pages without stating a reason or discussing it on any talk page.  The issue is that this user specifically targets Taiwan related articles and compromises them. The Republic of China (Taiwan) should be listed in the GDP articles as it has an independent economy like that of many other territories, but should not be ranked, as its sovereignty is highly disputed.  It would be in WP's best interest to semi-protect the GDP lists from specific IP vandalism such as this. And this IP user should be temporary blocked from editing, until he or she begins participating in talk page discussions.  Thank you.    :Whatever they're doing isn't vandalism. This is a content dispute. Persistent reverting may lead to 3RR blocks to both sides of the dispute or the page(s) fully protected if needed (It looks like someone else joined in in one of the articles the IP edited).    ()   :: I just wanted to add that this isn't the only dispute going on. There are several articles that Ao333 has decided to unilaterally change including the following (and possibly others): ::*List of countries by GDP (real) growth rate ::*List of sovereign states ::*List of regions by past GDP (PPP) ::*List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita :: It seems the main focus of his edits are to remove Taiwan from the rankings and in the case of the Historical GDP article, to remove the link to India in the article. In the past I have also had issues with Ao333 and while I have no intention of starting, I have some serious issues with Ao333's motives and I'm unsure as to whether he acts in good faith. For one, my belief is that he attempts to push a pro-China POV which seems contradictory to the goals of Wikipedia:NPOV. To cite an example, Ao333 removed several references on the HAL Tejas article and attempted to add his own claims without providing proper references in the article many of which were critical of the Tejas program. When I suggested the user provide reliable sources, he kept reverting my edits. In addition, when I questioned the user about whether he was a member on a forum known as defence.pk, he  the he was also the same user there. I know that claims that a user on the website makes offsite are usually not relevant to the claims a user makes on the encyclopedia but given the similarity of topics and his contributions on both defence.pk and Wikipedia, I am skeptical of Ao333's commitment to impartiality and WP:NPOV. Please see his comments on defence.pk here         . From calling Indians children, idiots or paranoid nuts, it seems pretty clear to me that Ao333 has either a dislike or distrust for them and while normally I would not call into question one's offsite edits but in this case, I think the similarity between his defence.pk and Wikipedia edits is too much of a co-incidence to ignore. If I were to choose one Wikipedia contribution made by Ao333 that best proves my case, I would choose this rather lengthy topic on the Fighter aircraft talk page. ::Thanks, ::    :::I have the pages already watchlisted and will take action if needed. I think you should bring this up on ANI as well.    ()   ::::Vedant, sir, please note that I have never removed Taiwan from the ranking list, but de-ranked it as the Republic of China (Taiwan) is a politically disputed state with an independent economy, like that of many other dependent territories. As for India's historical GDP, it is fiercly debated in the disucssion page, which you are not a partcipant of. I am curious in knowing how I removed a link from an article when the ``Indian subcontinent`` is the original link in the first place? ``India`` was added after a | for redirect. I simply cannot understand why anyone would add a name, which is more misleading (as Pakistan was the center of commerce in the earlier centuries) when the link itself is valid and self-explanatory in the first place? In the case of HAL Tejas, the sources I removed were blogs from individual writers, which are not credible. Have I not convinced you to revert your own edits later on when I presented the radar source, which showed that the HAL Tejas is indeed a half generation lower than what it really is? In fact, it appears that a glance at your contribution history shows that not only do you solely edit Indian and Chinese related articles, you clearly have a pro-India and anti-China point of view on them. Your edits on the Chinese articles are highly disputed by other registered users. As well, your discussion page provides a comprehensive reminder that you have conducted several personal attacks against other well-established users. Complaining and providing off-WP evidence of a certain user goes to show that you are indeed obsessed with me, and your hostile intension should be called in to question.  I won't start a history rollback of what I and Vedant had in the past, but on the contrary to what he or she says, this is a bilateral issue. Please focus on my original request at monitoring user: , as he or she has recently reverted my edits without discussing in the talk page or stating a reason, yet again.    :3RR warning given to the IP. If they revert on the talk page again, they will be blocked for edit warring and disruptive editing.   :Note, you are also at 3RR.    (