  ==The case against deletion==  I have already indicated that I believe the information in the ACJC article should be retained on Wikipedia in one form or another.  Now, I will indicate why I believe this particular article should be kept.  Note:  These arguments are not made in a spirit of hostility toward any other contributor.  Debate is welcome, and encouraged.  1.  Wikipedia is founded on the principle that minority voices should receive fair representation.  The ACJC are a small group in terms of membership, and it is safe to say that they do not represent a majority viewpoint in the Canadian Jewish community.  Notwithstanding this, they are actively engaged in debates of concern to the community, and their views have been cited in major community publications (, ).  The group is not insignificant, and the publicity they have received outside of Wikipedia makes them sufficiently notable for inclusion.  2.  The ACJC's relationship with the broader Canadian Jewish community is a matter of some significance, in and of itself.  The Canadian Jewish Congress's recent rejection of the ACJC's application, and the ACJC's appeal, have drawn attention to conflicting interpretations of the CJC's mandate.  ACJC spokesperson Michael Mandel argues that his group has a prima facie right to affiliate with the CJC, and has stated that the CJC cannot claim to speak for Canada's Jewish community if it excludes the ACJC viewpoint.  The CJC took a different position when it first rejected their application (see: Montreal Gazette, 29 October 2006, A2 or Edmonton Journal, 29 October 2006, A11), although it may reconsider when it considers the appeal.  The result of this debate could have serious repercussions for other groups wishing to affiliate with the CJC in the future.  3.  Wikipedia already has articles on organizations comparible to the ACJC, such as the Jewish Voice for Peace and Jews Against the Occupation.  From the other side, we also have articles on the Jewish Defense Organization (a JDL spinoff) and Jewish Task Force, a Kahanist organization whose leader is barred from entering Israel.  I cannot imagine that these groups are numerically large, or command strong community support, but this hasn't stopped us from preparing fairly detailed articles on them.  (One could also mention the Jewish Motorcyclists Alliance, which may be larger than the ACJC but can hardly be described as more notable.)  Precendent, in other words, favours inclusion.     