`  Hm.. Well, with the way the topic ban is written, it is rather tricky. It states that the ban is to pages relating to Connolley, to be interpreted broadly. However, it seems that the two articles you have pointed out are related to global warming instead (which there was no consensus on a ban). That being said, I would tread very carefully on the two articles you have mentioned, since they are in areas which you could have been topic banned in. If an admin is convinced of a connection between WMC and the articles you've mentioned, you could still be blocked. The best I can tell you is if in doubt, don't edit it. If the article has zero to do with WMC as you claim, then there should be no problems. (Both Connolley and RealClimate are mentioned in the article Global Warming controversy, but in completely different sections) Hope I answered your question, I feel like I talked in circles a bit.  `