I don't object to characterizing International Third Position as neofascist or a form of national socialism and think those are accurate terms for the group.  What I was objecting to was (1) the characterizing of International Third Position as part of the Third Way (UK) political party, which is factually inaccurate as they are two different groups; and (2) the characterization of Third Way (UK) as right-wing or neofascist in any sense.  What we have here are two groups which resulted from a split in the British National Front in the 1980s, but that's the only connection.  International Third Position still follows right-wing Strasserite ideology, Third Way (UK) has become essentially a group of the left and its leadership has renounced racism and fascism.  Barring any evidence to the contrary, I'll take their word for it.   