`  :::Every editor has a different style. These articles are very touchy for most people. Let me give you an example: If you insist on a text at the van defense, you will see that I will inform you about the issue but not delete your additions. You will also notice that there are points which I think critical, I tried to insist on them. I believe that sentence was a reflection of an editor to an event which there was very strong feeling associated with it, that is all. I respect that feeling. I have a very strong feelings about what happened to Armenians. But the events (period) are not simple and they have many dimensions. And really ``pitchforks, wrenches, pipes`` does not change the factuality of an uprising which forced to retreat 1,500 ottoman soldiers. The most important part is in the article, Ottomans retreat, and they come again, they retreat again which this cycle lasted until 1918 April. Ofcourse there are other issues, such as what happened to Kurdish tribes and their forces. They were living in the same area. Article does not even mention them, and I'm not going to try to add those to the story as a backdrop. Simply, you can only add/delete things that other editors accept. I need to work on another thing have a nice day.  `