`  :I'm sorry, as you have not made a substantive comment, I must decline to attempt to explain myself to you further.  In the event that someone else is reading this: :#Answer 1.  I cannot recall an example of your edits in the conspiracy theory articles which is not contrary to consensus, or showing a lack of understanding of the English language.  There might be one.  I was being generous in saying ``most``.  I shouldn't have said it, but you still need to explain what you mean by consenus, as there is no possible way that your actions can be seen as not being against consensus. :#Answer 2.  You agreed to not be confrontational as a condition of your unblock.  If you cannot explain what you meant by it, I see no reason why you should not be immediately reblocked for the duration, or until you can explain. :#Amswer 3.  See answer 1.  In quite a few articles, you have continued to add the same material until two editors removed it.   :I had hoped that you would reply in good faith.  I see my hopes were mistaken.  —    `