`Notice that her own widely-read book is not mentioned in References. And look at the reference that is there. Who's behind all this elaborate smear? ``Anti=semitism``?  Accused by whom? why? I wouldn't edit this entry on a dare... [[Wetman}  I agree - I also think this run-on should be deleted, but fear editing it.  ``The state and nature of their marriage has been the subject of much speculation, with some claiming it is a purely political arrangement and widespread stories about their regular arguments, but the fact remains that they have remained together (and whilst spending extended periods apart still vacation together, apparently) long after the political necessity for the marriage to stay together passed.``  I think it's repetitive of the sentence before, and somewhat inappropriate.     ==US Senator==/== Senate Election (2000) ==  Question: has Hillary done anything noteworthy as a senator yet?  01:09 Oct 9, 2002 (UTC) :I did try to include a header on this, but it was removed by Salazar. This does need research & inclusion.    It says in the article that she campaigned heavily in Upstate New York.  She campaigned in heavily Democratic areas of New York, like Albany, but the traditionally Republican areas in Upstate New York really didn't have a candidate: Lazio is a RINO; he likes government-run social programs, he supports abortion, he's antigun, etc.  I remember reading in the Press & Sun-Bulletin (a Binghamton-area newspaper), that her campaign aides had determined that downstate was such an easy sell for her, that she only needed around 30% of the vote in Upstate.  (I think she got 32% or so in my county  Wolfman, obviously I don't object to the editing in principle, and you and I have made some opposite kinds of edits to other political articles, with an appropriate degree of attention to NPOV, but I think with respect to your changes to my Senate section Edit, you kept the facts I inserted that were favorable to Sen. Clinton (ie, ``Two-thirds of the voters dismissed the carpetbagging issue,``) but removed much of the factual information that portrayed her in a negative light (specifically, the objective fact that she returned a $50,000 campaign donation from the Muslim group accused of terrorist connections, and the kissing of Arafat's wife).  These events actually figured into the campaign and they are actual facts, not POV.  And I was careful I thought to avoid implying that these events were evidence of anything (which is a POV), I just stated the fact that they were part of the Republican attacks on her, which is objective.  I'd appreciate some reply but I'll give it some time before attempting to revise my section.     == Page moved ==  See     ==Neutrality== This page doesn't mention Whitewater or her role in the health care plan, two of the things she's most famous for.  Also, some of the prose is fairly fawning; e.g., ``the two were soon inseperablepartners in moot court, political campaigns, and matters of the heart``.  Needs a neutral party to go over this and add facts, NPOV.  I don't know enough to do it.     Again, if you feel it is NPOV, add the White Water and healtcare section.  It is not that hard, it is on the Bill Clinton page.  ChrisDJackson  Well, as I said, I don't really know enough about this topic, I was just drawing attention to this for others who might be able to help the article.     I dispute the neutrality of this page.  Do I know enough to fix it? Not really.  But even so, you have no right to remove the header.  Thank you.     Please do not remove the Neutrality Dispute header.  I'm in the process of finding people to correct this, but you have no right to remove it.    ==Signature== I removed Hillary's signature from the page.  If it's going to be re-added, at least put it off to the side with a caption.  As it was it looked like an attempt at making it look like she signed the page.  But since I'm not sure her signature is relevant in the first place, I removed it rather than fixing it.     ==Naming the husband==N