I removed the comment claiming that the commons scholarly opinion rejects the Gospel of John as reliable.  This is simply not true, and the reference for this statement comes from a single source.  I can give 50 that disagree with the Catholic source cited.  Simply stated, the rejection of John is not at all agreed upon.  Saying as much is against the unbiased POV.  Please quit replacing it.  If you're a skeptic and want to butter the Jesus Seminar up, that's one thing, but don't do so using a single source that contradicts plenty of others.  me  