 ::You are right that it is disappointing that Wikipedia editors judge information by platform rather than veracity or whether a work has received peer review.  I thought the bibliography was the most appropriate response because it included both the peer-reviewed works that I cite and the free online non-peer-reviewed “journal” commentaries that Wikipedia’s amateur editors prefer.  It is unfortunate that the external link was deleted because it detracts from the quality of information provided by Wikipedia.   • 