Actually on further review of the article in my recent fix of a section, I find a VERY strong need for a criticism section.  By separating the raw historical facts, the supporting arguments, the criticism and the political criticism and controversies.  From what I can tell this separation might actually assist [WP:NPOV] not hurt it. The current format does not provide for the ability to easily present anything that isn't neutral in nature without disrupting the neutral point of view.   I am actually inclined to agree that the article needs to be flagged for total reorganization.  