`    == Art Gallery last 2 days in wiki ==   Here is a collection of some of the violations who were never punished but were covereted, and something usefull to compare it with. In reverse chronographical order:    (...) this is entirely in the style of Igor. put your creditials out like Alain Riazuelo did, mr./ms. Parme. otherwise your ``timely`` appearance here can only be considered suspect. Igor is banned from editing an article about him and all sorts of new, unidentified people come out of the woodwork. r b-j      OH  MY  GOD  Alfredine de Parme, YOU there!  It has been such a long time since the ... er, last time we met, hasn't it babe? I'm so glad to have some fresh news of yours, my dear! I see you moved upstairs, you damn little bugger. This is great! You see, I tell you: enjoy your duties, take advantage of everything you can.  I will certainly not be the one who will jump here to remind everyone your responsabilities and failures as the secret occult unknown silent partner of the Rainbow Warrior sabotage. Past is past.  Anyway, you're still in the process of trying to avoid the French (please, please, please remember English grammar rules concerning capital letters and country adjectives) government (let me remind you the math' lesson I taught you once: [first prime number] < [number of e letters in the English translation of the French word 'gouvernement'] < [number of r letters in the French word 'nourrir', translation of the English word 'feed'] - we had so much fun together!) to wash its dirty linen in public. I bet you're the best for that kinda job.  Huge Kisses, my beloved Alfredine, I miss you and your marvelous Thai wheelbarrow as well. Gimme your DotGouv mail, I shall write you! ProfesseurYIN    [Very contributing article to the talk page  ]  this is an absolute riot!! -)    for a while i was really starting to regret getting into this mess, but this moment has redeemed all of the headache and pain in the derrier. thank you, Professeur Yin. thank you very much. (how's Yang doing?) r b-j   - There. That line gets to sit here, I'm removing the rest of her post, anybody who likes can consult it via the History. XAL has been warned many times about insults and irrelevances on this page. I've been tolerating a lot of these things from her for the reason that the overall tone on the page is far from the ideal of civility, with some personal attacks by others, too. But this last post does it, as far as I'm concerned, it's time to free up the page for actual discussion. I'm blocking XAL for three days. Bishonen | talk 18:43, 26 September 2005 (UTC) -  Reaction to 'a journey' by XAL   (no, it's rotflol!!) r b-j   [rjb always very interesting contribution  ]  The problem being, my friend, that you are not a specialist in that field,   (no, it's ROTFLOL!!) r b-j    [YBMs' contributions  ]  You are bastards. Now, why don't you try to address at least some of Alain Riazuelo's comments as well as some of the ones I did when you've proven not even knowing what an algebraïc curve is (for instance), making you Ph.D. a joke. YBM   - C'mon guys. I know this is an emotional issue, but is it too much to ask that the few apparently rational participants refrain from personal attacks and calling each other bastards, or salauds or whatever? Maru (talk)   [no block no suppression of the article, very good contribution to the contain of the talk page   or?] -  (...) did prove you've been using multiple pseudos on Usetnet and on the Web, then you had to admit it.  As you did before you pretend me to do the same, you were wrong then (and you know it, since you've been in contact with all these people supposed to be me), you are still wrong. Noone care about you know or pretend to know, without any evidence to support it, disguish between your delusion or your lies is not our problem, but your psychiatrist's one. YBM     I checked with their administrators, it was a proxy which had been installed on one of their computer without their consent  this is a case of computing ressources hijacking)  Pretending to have degrees at University and working as scientists in several laboratories  Defending you work with no other arguments than authority  You are cheaters, liers, fraudster and incompetent in almost any field. You'd better think twice before lying again in this page. YBM  - LLL is only known for a week on the Internet part of your affair  He/She appeared at the obvious call from Laurence who felt a bit lonely as a fan of two fraudsters who happen to be tv showmen  He/She is a sock puppet.  You'd better not talk about objectivity, honesty, and so on, since you don't even know what this words mean. All of you actions are obviously driven by your interest in shutting down the publication of your dirty tricks. YBM  -  (...) call someone who entered the discussion for a week (LLL) or more than a year (Laurence) and didn't write even once, even a word about the scientific content of the affair or the Bogdanov's behaviour ? Another specific of this affair is that we have to deal with ``fans`` who don't care about science and don't even want to hear a word about the scientific incompetence nor the dishonest tricks Igor and Grichka Bogdanov have been proven to use on a daily basis for years. Just like rock stars, they have some (not much) fanatic bigots making as much noise as possible around anyone contesting their idols. YBM   - And, worst than anything, YBM's invention: the idiom ``human sock puppet``, also in order to feel free to revert me! This guy's dishonesty is not a surprise for me, of course, but the fact that other people support him and that administrators let him act as he wants seems to me to be more serious than the fact that somebody like him exists. Laurence67   - I know this LLL, I correspond regularly with him! So you can think what you want, but he's not a sock puppet! But YOU want to believe it is just in order to feel free to revert him! Yes, he ``appeard``, because he saw that Igor was banned, that you were a lot more numerous than we are, and that according to the 3RR we can't revert more than 3 times per day. So it's easy for you, all you have to do is to take it in turns to revert systematically when we publish. Is it the wikidian neutrality? The majority ``wins``?     ``Sock puppets`` I confirm what Catherine (and even Snowspinner) have said: LLL is a ``real`` person, not a sock puppet.  More generally, I find it is too easy to decide arbitrarily that any contributor who defends the Bogdanovs is a sock puppet, in order to have an excuse for reverting systematically his contributions, ``on sight``, as rbj has written. It is all the more unfair as he knows that the contributor is subject to the 3RR, while he thinks, rightly or wrongly, that he is not.  Besides, I hope it's ``wrongly``: it would be the limit, if the rules were not the same for all contributors, and if some of these ones were protected from the sanctions at the expense of some others... Laurence67    BTW, XAL (or ``Sophie`` or whomever you are), I usually don't read your rantings (I responded to your post above that ended with the sweet ``let's work together as a team`` because it didn't sound like a rant), but this was pointed to me.  In fact, I was blocked for 24 hours along with Igor by Ral315, for 3RR violation. but there is a difference: I submitted to the block, I didn't go unregistered and find another IP to post anyway, but Igor did not submit to it. he refused to abide by and posted to this talk page above ``Dear Marudubshinki...`` This suggests that Igor believes he is above the rules. the 3RR doesn't apply to him, does it?  this reminds me of a time when i was a kid and we were saying ``table grace`` before our meal. my parents told us all that we had to be reverend, bow our heads, and close our eyes when we were praying our table prayer. well, i left mine open and so did my much younger brother and when the prayer was over, he immediately tattled on me saying to our parents that ``Bob didn't close his eyes for the prayer.`` geee, how did he know?  well, it was Igor who made the complaint of the many reversions of mine and the admins decided (correctly) that he was reverting just as often as i was and the blocked us both. but since the rules don't apply to Igor, he went and posted (using IP address for instead of logging in to his account) anyway. it seems to me that the timing of this refusal to abide by his bl