`  ==Diverting Funds==  There's a section that claims that IBM became concerned with Microsoft diverting funds to Windows development.  I've never read anything reputable that claims this.  Certainly, one could make a case that because OS/2 3.0 became NT, that this could be called ``diversion``, but I don't think so.  IBM got full rights to Windows 3.x in the deal, and Microsoft was legally given rights to the code they'd developed for OS/2 3.0 in the breakup.  Is there any credible source that can corroborate this allegation?`