`  ::::::Of course ``ugly`` and ``illegible`` are my opinion (and also the opinions of others). However, are you honestly saying that it is attractive? And easy to read? Would serious publications print a diagram in so small a font?  ::::::As for sources, there has been a huge amount of coverage of the non-test games on this tour. Coverage of previous tours isn't really relevant to this article. I agree that sources give more coverage to the tests, and the article should reflect that in the amount of prose that is used to report on the games. However, every newspaper of record or serious broadcaster has published team lists for every game, with more or less equal prominence. Why should this article have the team lists printed twice, and for only some games?  ::::::To work out who is playing against who, maybe just look across from one team list to the other? It really isn't complicated to ``work it out``. If that's the best argument for keeping the ugly diagram, it's not very impressive.   `