  ::The Anti-Terri people think the 4½ minutes of video is solid gold evidence that Terri was carrying on conversations with her folks, eating food, doing shooters (I might have made that up), practically a few tough rehabilitation months away from going back to school. The Pro-Terri people think the 4½ minutes of video is among the worst cases of media maniupulation since WWII (I don't want to say by whom, lest I Godwin-ize the thread). As a matter of fact, you can line up virtually every single question you can come up with and the results will fall in lock step, one side or the other, but predictably and reliably as to who thinks what. I don't even have to look at the signature on a post to know who wrote it (that's on the talk page; the article is much, much more neutral—as one peer reviewer put it, probably as neutral as it can get). I'm with FuelWagon, this is my first time, too. If there was something that could be mediated, I'd like to see if there's a way to avoid getting a 400-1200  word essay from some parties every time they think they have a thought. I'm not quite so bad—this is only around 200.  