` ::(Sorry I'd already started typing this before Spartaz replied - I may as well post it!) Am I allowed a say in the matter? ) It just seems to me that  is the same person as , who I'd encountered before on the Immanuel Velikovsky article. I'd recognise his aggresive editing style anywhere, not to mention his penchant for 'wiki-lawyering'. He seems to have a real bee in his bonnet about deleting ``non-mainstream`` and ``pseudosience`` articles. Anyways, I cast my vote on the deletion of the David Talbott article, if the community majority vote the other way then I'm happy to abide by the decision. I've no interest in fighting about it! `