On a separate note the following 2 statements made by  in this discussion;  :As I've said before, if you think that statement in the Mercan Dede article is inaccurate, you should address the issue over there, not here.  Criticizing the content of that article here is kind of pointless.       :It's inaccurate according to you; it's not inaccurate according to the Mercan Dede article. It seems it is necessary for me to point out that I am being guided by what the Mercan Dede article says, whereas you are saying that you know better, that your personal opinion trumps what the Mercan Dede article says.  In effect, you seem to be violating the WP principle of no OR (WP:OR).     :*Appear to contradict the following statement made in a previously archived discussion here;   :I'm afraid the statement that his main interests were Aqeedah, Fiqh, Tasawwuf appears only in the infobox. There is absolutely nothing in the article to support it. (Which means it should really be removed from the infobox.)     :Seems  is only interesting in using Wikipedia policies that suit him as he accuses of voilating (WP:OR) in this discussion when he himself is guilty of violating it in the previous discussion.     