 First: Both the Herald and the Times both published the identical piece (as literally 30 seconds of research would reveal).  :::::::::::::: Second: There is no question whatsoever that the 'Herald and the Times are respected sources. All arguments to the contrary are strained at best. Also, reporters routinely report on non-public documents, including government documents, drafts, etc. That is absolutely typical, as a quick glance at any given day's Washington Post'' would reveal. Your approach seems would seemingly presume that reporters don't do fact-checking. The whole point of journalism is that professional editors act as a filter.    