`  ::My conflict is with the unjustified elevation to ``facthood`` of unverified theories and speculations extracted from the elements of the controversy.  Nor am I concerned about my anonymity.  It is trivially easy to look me up, and I presume that most interested parties here by now know my real name, credentials, and affiliations.  I have used the screen name ``Moulton`` since 1990, when I began developing science education resources on the Internet as a member of an educational technology research group funded by the National Science Foundation.  The articles I co-authored with Professor Picard were also funded by a grant from the NSF.  My allegiance is to the cause of science and science education, and that is the role I propose to play here.  ::To keep the peace, I will propose below the insertion of an intervening section between the biographical material and the disputatious ``Darwin Dissent Controversy`` that some editors here wish to retain on this page with appalling disregard for the ground truth.    ::My concern is that some of the existing material is based on unwarranted assumptions regarding people whose names appeared on the original 2001 untitled two-sentence petition.  My concern is that the unwarranted assumptions constitute a potentially libelous violation of the WP:BLP ``Do No Harm`` clause by propagating dubious claims of the DI as if they were established facts.  Elsewhere I have managed to highlight the passages where Wikipedia articles have blithely adopted the DI's view of the controversial petition without first examining the evidence for their dubious view with a sufficiently keen and skeptical eye.  ::Please bear with me and extend to me the courtesy of patience and good faith, as I am not conversant with all the Wikipedia conventions regarding resolution of disputatious content appearing on the biographies of living persons.  Please understand that I am here to work for the betterment of Wikipedia, in the name of science, science education, and science journalism.  :: `