`  == ``Peer review`` section; white-screen time ==  (1) I made some changes to ``Peer review.`` I did not make the following one, because it would affect the meaning. Second paragraph, on the absence of ID articles from journals: ``Intelligent design proponents believe that the merit of their writings is rejected for not conforming to purely...`` Well, journal editors don't reject merit, they reject articles. Should it say ``believe that their writings are rejected for not conforming``?  (2) Making even simple changes is becoming an ordeal because pages take so long to appear. From the article to the section-editing page, a wait of 2 min 52 sec. From that page, after pressing ``Preview,`` to an error message, about 10 sec. Back to the editing page, 3 min 48 sec. Second attempt to reach the preview page, 3 min 00 sec. After pressing ``Save page,`` 3 min 22 sec – and the screen that appeared was not the article, but the two versions of the section side by side, with changes highlighted. No other programs were running except Finder, which is always on.  Are these wait times normal? My service is broadband, not the fast, expensive kind, but not dialup, either.  iCab has a feature that shows when a page has bad code. It says Wikipedia pages have bad code. Could that explain the long waits? Are the servers groaning under too much traffic?  `