`, 4 October 2005 (UTC)  Fix it, and I'll vote ``keep.``  I've always changed votes if people repair the articles, and so would the other ``deletionists.``  Don't fix it, and you should vote ``delete.``  If it, in its present form, violates the deletion policy, then the only proper vote is ``delete.``  If it is advertising now, you should vote delete until the advertising is gone.  Having faith that someone, somewhere, some time will fix it is a wonderful vision, but you leave irrelevancies and advertising and trash on the site while you wait for that hypothetical person.  The old ``inclusionists`` used to actually fix the articles while they were on VfD.  I have nothing but respect for them.  As for people who won't do any work but vote to ``keep`` anyway...not so much.  The more repair work I see, the greater my respect.  The more ``I don't care! I vote keep because it's on my subject!`` I see, the more I call it disruption.  The more ``Come on, everyone! Let's all show up and vote 'keep' because it's on a subject we like`` I see, the more I consider it vandalism and GNAA-style trolling.  That should explain my reaction well enough.  (In the case of ``Lincoln elementary school is in summitt New jersey,`` there needs to be something about that particular school to make it unique, other than its address and employees.  Otherwise, the corner Texaco station should get an entry.)   20:08`