` ::::Okay, there's a ``decision``, but I'm not seeing a lot of discussion that gives the reasoning against merger.  - I resent that you didn't bother to give a reason. I'm going to decide against the merge, but I'm also going to record why: yes, chromosomal crossover is one of several types of recombination  that alone isn't justification, because all could be covered on one page. I missed this before, but all of these others types of recombination also have their own subpages linked from this main page  site-specific recombination, transposons, and nonhomologous end joining  just as for chromosomal crossover. Now that I realize this, my mind is changed. Here's my ideas on how to edit this article: ::::*Add to each of sections for other types of recombination the same ``Main article: Foo`` note at the top. ::::*Homologous recombination should point here rather than to chromosomal crossover, and there should be information on homologous vs. nonhomologous recombination here. I have to think about how to actually summarize the topic on this page, but the redirect to chromosomal crossover contributed to my initial suggestion to merge. ::::*The category levels of ``crossing over`` vs. ``other types of recombination`` needs to be reconsidered. Perhaps all types of recombination should be categories on the same level. Alternatively, it could be ``homologous`` vs ``nonhomologous`` recombination, with the different types of recombination within each, but since site-specific recombination uses ``partial`` homology this is might just be confusing to the reader. ::::*As  suggested, information specific to chromosomal crossover should be moved to the crossover page such that chromosomal crossover does not dominate the information content of this article.`