`  == Requested move ==   1918–1920 incidents in Split →  – The current name does not sufficiently describe the subject, the word ``incident`` being so vague as to be virtually devoid of descriptive value, nor is it part of a proper name as used. Unless a proper name exists, we should describe the topic clearly and as unambiguously as possible without introducing POV, and 'incidents' does not accomplish this. 'Unrest' does. Arguments against 'unrest' seem to be based on personal impressions of the word and not the actual definition, which is spot on for this usage, i.e. ``a disturbed or uneasy state: Turmoil``. I would be happy to entertain alternatives, but they all are somewhat problematic. 'Split Incidents' doesn't get around the problem of vagueness, but would be suitable IF it is an accepted proper name, but I don't know that this is the case and there is no point a neologism that is so vague. 'riots in' borders on POV issues.  'bloodshed in' is an option. 'turmoil in' would be another. It has already been at 'unrest' for a week before being reverted, so it couldn't have been too bad.   `