` ::What do you count as modern?  The 19th century Ottoman empire?  The Mandate period?  Or do you only count the period 1948-1967 to be modern?  By drawing the line between ancient history and recent history arbitrarily, you are cheating the readers and giving a cheap POV slant on it.  ``Judaization of Jerusalem``, as it's used in the contemporary arabic-language media, refers to a conspiracy theory about how the Jews are inventing history and how they do not have a historical connection to the city. Moreover, if the return of palestinian refugees is considered a 'return' (as in the right of return), certainly a return of jews expelled from jerusalem should also count as a 'return'.  You can fix the POV by renaming this 're-judaization' or providing adequate background, since as the article stands, it appears to be a piece of agitprop coming from ideologues.  Moreover, Richard Falk is not a reliable source, since he is speaking in his capacity as an activist rather than as an international law scholar (unless ``Judaization`` is now a crime under international law).  Furthermore, even considering the more reliable sources, say, Lustick, the article still fails to provide any references to the majority position within Israel and among Jews generally that the idea of a 'Judaization of Jerusalem' makes about as much sense as an 'Islamization of Mecca'.  No attempt was made to include this POV (there is no Judaization of Jerusalem, and the choice of name is just agitprop).   `