` March 2010 (UTC)  Man, do I sometimes wish I'd just closed it with ``No consensus``. Although, then I would have been hit with lots of questions about how I came up with that. I definitely will carefully consider posting my thoughts/analysis of a closure in the future. It's not that I mind the questions, but  the written statements encourage people to parse all my statements. Anyway...  Re: numbers. I'm not saying whatever the number is suggests the software is popular, awesome, useful, or essential. I think focusing on a number leads to people wanting to define a number that equals notability; I didn't say, ``Dwm has been downloaded 845 times, which is greater than my personal threshold of 750, ergo notable`` or something. (Imagine the irony if after all this if Dwm sticks around, someone who writes for a commonly accepted RS writes an article on Dwm and the afd, and everyone agrees that source is good. I don't know if I'd laugh or cry.) I'd never heard of dwm until March 5 or so. I'm pretty sure I'll never use it on my computer as I'm not a coder.    03:40, 16`