`  :He voted to delete the article-proof template. (No mathematicians voted on this.) Since the template clearly pointed at the multi-year, multi-opinion discussion that lead to the template, the fact that it was deleted with only four votes (one from a banned user) tells me that no one even tried to grasp what it was about  it's drive-by vandalism, in my opinion. I raised this issue on radiant's talk page, and the discussion above pursued. It turns out that radiant is an admin, which I think is a particularly serious breach of duty.  That this admin, who 1) failed to perform even the vaguest due dilligence before voting to delete, 2) threatened bans when challenged, is very far from the norm of expected behaviour of an admin. I expected him/her to say ``gee, I'm sorry, it was an accident, I won't do it again``, or something along those lines. Instead I got a ``I can threaten you so nyah nyah`` response. So I think uncivility is called for in such a case.   `