`New Pokemon articles== Eric, wasn't trying to be an a-hole on the new Pokemon articles (No matter how much I truly hate and despise Pokemon).  Since it seems unavoidable that the articles are going to be here, they should at least not contain any speculation.  The last edit you made (in the article where we had the little edit war there, I forget it was one of the three), anyhow that was PERFECT.  ``Not known at this time``.  Brilliant!  ) I haven't looked at the other two, but I will.  You seem to be the first of the crowd that ``got it``.  Anyhow peace out....    :Hey hey - it's all right, I'm always ``peaced out``. I always make it a point to avoid any sort of conflict here, and if you say you're not an a-hole, I'll believe it. But you have to know that at the time I made that edit I honestly wasn't aware of your agenda as described on your user page, and in fact it was only yesterday where I learned about Wikipedia's No Original Research policy... believe it.   :Now, several things: You might want to communicate with , one of the principle drivers of the WP:PCP. This guy hates cruft about as much as you do, and he knows how to control it when he sees it. He can probably tell you how you’re society against speculative fancruft should operate so that it works best for the site.  :If you want a similar franchise that is full of potentially undeserving pages... get a load of the Digimon section. There's hundreds of practically empty stub articles there! (Examples including Keramon, Murmuxmon, Gizamon, and Kimeramon, as a sampling) I think it is stubby and perhaps crufty enough to make the Pokemon section look like Encyclopedia Brittanica articles in comparison. But anyway...  :As I said, you're totally right in that speculative fancruft is something to avoid like the plague, because it is not necessary to have a lot of that in articles for an encyclopedia, and that it should be trimmed from any Wikipedia articles that have it in general. If you adopt this outlook and stay at that, your society might be wholly successful. In the meantime, I’ll make sure personally that I don’t include speculative fancruft or original research the next time a new Pokemon comes.    ==`