`  ==Constance Cumbey==  Eaglizard, you seem to have objections to the Constance Cumbey quotes about Alice Bailey in the article. In fact I had placed those quotes in the ``Human equality and religion`` section of the article, and Jamesd1 moved them to the ``criticisms`` ghetto at the bottom of the page. It is my intention to return them to where I originally put them to balance the rhapsodic enthusiasm of Jamesd1's presentation of Bailey in that section of the article. The fact is that many people do not see Bailey with the same unrestrained enthusiasm that you and Jamesd1 do. Since there are many who doubt the goodness of the Bailey teaching, and since there are published sources expressing those doubts (such as Cumbey), that needs to be recognized in the article and not just in a remote criticisms section of the article. It need a presence in a main section of the article.  I recently bought a copy of Cumbey's The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow. It says on the cover that it was a ``#1 Best Seller``. If that is correct, far more people have read her book than have read all of Bailey's 24 books combined. That is something that can not be ignored, or flicked off by calling the author an ``evangelical and fundamentalist Christian`` as Jamesd1 attempted to do. The evangelical Christians are the fastest growing religious group in the United States, and have been for quite some time. Many of them are very well educated, intelligent and thoughtful people. Constance Cumbey is a  lawyer who knows what she is doing, who has apparently read all of Bailey's books and taken extensive notes on them. Evangelical Christians are have growing influence, and Bailey people wopuld be wise to learn to live with them.   I think that is enough to explain why I think the inclusion of the quotes from Cumbey are justified. If not, and you still have objections, let me know.     After looking at the present state of the article, which appears rather slimed down, it seems that moving the quotes from Constance Cumbey back to where I had them previously might result in unbalance; so, for now, I will leave them where they are.    :::Wow!  What a freudian slip!  Did you really mean to say the article ``appears rather slimed down``  I think this is what completely disinheartened James.     ::::I do not see any ``freudian slip`` in what I said.    On second thought, I will return the quotes from Constance Cumbey to their previous place in the article.    :Kwork, thanks for taking the time to respond intelligently re: Cumbey; I'm considering whether I want to debate that issue. Just to explain Renee's joke, tho, you meant to write ``slimmed down``, the spelling you used is the verb slime, as in Ghostbusters: ``I've been slimed!``. )    ::Ghostbusters? Never heard of it. If it was on TV, my wife and I have not had a TV since we got married 41 years ago. If it was a movie, I have seen about five in the last forty years. Maybe a book?...    :::Ghostbusters ... from the Wikipedia article:  ``Ghostbusters is a 1984 sci-fi comedy film about three eccentric New York City parapsychologists. After they are fired from a university, they start their own business investigating and capturing ghosts.``  One of the enemies in the movie is a green ghost known as Slimer.   (they call him a  ``focused, non-terminal repeating phantasm``, or a ``class-five full-roaming vapor``).  Here is the use of the word that Eaglizard referred to:   ``Murray's character, Peter Venkman, is struck down by Slimer. Venkman's use of the phrase 'He slimed me...' instantly created a new verb, to slime, which endures as popular slang.``   Not exactly on topic for this article, but it was a very funny scene and the slang term is widely used in pop culture.   `