  :Now that you bring up the subject of changing the article name, I'm inclined to think this might be the best approach. It might enable you to retain the bulk of the existing content - which I'm sure would be your primary aim - whilst removing the main concerns that I and others have expressed about the page.   :If we take the alternative approach - of giving a correct definition to the term at the outset - then I think that is inevitably going to mean major changes to the content to conform to the new definition. And that is obviously going to be a lot more problematic IMO.   