`  :: the term ``standard model`` is itself less NPOV than I think we'd prefer...  :: if it's ``new-age speak`` then a lot of old-age people speak it - Karl Popper, the Pope, etc.  here's Karl Popper's view of this.  :: The clearest title for this article would be ``particle physics cosmology`` - but as I say that would require broader treatment of issues like the Anthropic Principle, cognitive bias beyond the particle physics zoo, etc.  :: as to accelerators, it's clear that while they are in use, someone is still looking for particles.  So this is not yet a settled ``cosmology`` so certain that we abandon the search... nor is it an arbitrary foundation ontology as you suggest, not subject to question.`