Vandalism and Harassment by Wikipedia. Another problem is that Wikipedia has developed a pattern of harassment [Bauwens 2008, Cramer 2007, Vaknin 2006; Gann 2007; Metz 2007a, 2007c, and 2007d]. The ?God-King? and his minions have absolute power [Bauwens 2008; Metz 2007a, 2007b, 2007d, and 2008a] within Wikipedia. And, of course, absolute power corrupts [Martin 2007c]. Gann [2007] remarked on his reasons for permanently leaving Wikipedia: *1.This was not only one bad experience, but the worst of several - plus the lack of fairness in the implementation of rules, which seem to apply to some and not others. I've quit jobs at paying publications for less provocation. *2.Perseverance would have gotten me further where? What was I trying to achieve? I was doing Wikipedia favors. How many bad experiences should it have taken me to no longer want to do things for them?  *3.If there is a permanent structural problem in using my own research and expertise, what possible incentive could I have to continue? What would I want to write about except my own areas of expertise?  *4.When I see such abundant evidence from the people who have posted here and all those experts who have left Wikipedia that the problems will certainly continue and there is no structural process for avoiding them, why would I volunteer to continue fighting fights in which I have nothing whatever to gain? 