  == Kyoto Protocol Bias in Lede ==  I have removed your clarification needed citation,  I have eight sources backing the statement.  Listed here for your convenient reference: :*Al Jazeera :*Reuters :*Huffington Post :*Bloomberg :*Lima Ohio Newspaper :*Yahoo Finance  Might I remind the esteemed editor that s/he is editing unilaterally as well.  If you want to contribute, why not add a section on the 15% in the body and start to provide substance with the multiple sources that I have provided.  I removed the clarification needed because there are 7 sources that I have listed plus the source cited.  Mrfebruary has provided zero support for his statement.  As such, I will remove the clarification needed because it is not and if we deem to need it we can add it in the body where it belongs and not in the lede where it does not.  If you have 20 sources out there that show disagreement by all means please add them, otherwise, please stop vandalizing the page.  I'm not interested in an edit war, you can have the last word if you wish.  I'm getting tired of the POV wrangling going on and with eight sources, I would think that should be enough for even the most cautious of reasonable editors.   Can we be sensible? Very willing to work with you.  Help me understand if you have 20 sources out there that disagree.  