`  ::::Thanks, at least, for doing edits one-at-a-time rather than a single block edit.  Now - can I ask you to actually read the sources?   ::::* Malnutrition: There are multiple sources citing malnutrition as a cause of death (I've listed some of them above, twice) - so stop removing references to malnutrition. ::::* Diptheria: The page you list does not mention malnutrition. It does indeed mention use of feeding tubes. It is unclear to me how, if feeding tubes were required to treat children who had difficulty in swallowing, they weren't provided. But I'm not going to speculate. You, however, seem to insisting that all of the children who died from malnutrition actually died from diphtheria - which is a leap neither you nor can I make. So we report what the sources say. Deaths due to malnutrition. ::::* The 1947 report: Thanks for bringing that up - it's been a while since I read the linked source in detail. It doesn't mention diphtheria. At all. The only mentions of diphtheria in the entire article are your own insertions, and that one mention of an inspector visiting ``during a diphtheria outbreak`` - which has no reference. The cited article is very clear on the numbers of deaths in earlier years, though, which will be a useful expansion. ::::* Corless: Not sure of the relevance of her needing to have mentioned malnutrition. ::::* ``Larger issue``: There has not been ``months of investigation``.  Politicians are still arguing about the terms of reference. I'm not going to speculate on what the outcome of the investigation will be, or of the inquests that have been called for, if they ever happen. But as when they report, we can add the findings here.  `