`  Les Collines... given 5 mins of Google, I could find refs. E.g. .  Actually, policy-wise, there is no defined 'notability' - only guidelines cover that. It's all about V; that is the real purpose of refs. If there isn't RS for info, we shouldn't have it. If that means zero info, we can't have an article.  Policy states,  - full stop. Nothing about any kind of 'inherent notability'.  My personal opinion (as opposed to policy/guideline) is, indeed, that we shouldn't have unreferenced articles for which we cannot find refs; however, I do understand that the community seems to have some bizarre views about 'inherent notability' in regards to schools, geo places, and so on - and therefore I defer to consensus.  But...I ask you - e.g. a school - what about, if I set up ``The School of Chzz``, teaching sausage-making to a couple of mates. Is that, therefore, inherently notable? It might be quite an innocuous article, with no BLP info, and could be written in an Encyclopaedic manner; but...really?  When you wrote that  above, I think we have to be careful to distinguish between common usage of the word 'notable', and the Wikipedia definition. That is a frequent problem; people saying ``Of course it is notable``Worthy of notice; remarkable; memorable; noted or distinguished - Wiktionary`` when really, we're asking if it is ``notableSignificant coverage in independent RS``.  Simplifying slightly, but mostly in any AfC - any topic at all - I disregard all the specific guides such as WP:NSONG, WP:CORP, WP:PORNBIO, WP:ATHLETE, etc and I just say to myself, ``Does this meet GNG?``. If the article, currently, lacks refs, then I look for them. If I am unable to find any, and I think it unlikely they'd be much (in another language, offline, or whatever) then I !vote to delete.  In this specific AfD case, it is a bit unclear if there is signif coverage, in those Spanish sources. As I don't speak the lingo, I asked for clarification. But, at this stage, I'm leaning towards ``delete``. It probably won't actually happen, because there are lots of ``keep`` !votes...but, still.  `