` ::I see the sources you have added, and I think it's pretty clear that they mostly do not meet the standard of WP:RS.  The main exception is the article from Missiology.  There is a reference to a biography of Sarah Barry, but no author or publisher is indicated, and so I wonder whether this is some sort of unpublished manuscript. ::The main problem is the use of web sites such as ubf-info.de and the like.  If it were acceptable to use sources like that for a ``history`` section, then there would be no need to exclude their use for the expanded ``controversies`` section.   ::You say that there is little published material about UBF.  I think this leads inevitably to the conclusion that an extensive ``history`` of the organization is simply not notable for purposes of inclusion in Wikipedia - there is no apparent way to satisfy WP:V for most of this section.  I propose to scale it back significantly.    `