`  :::I'm sorry, but I still disagree. Strongly.  :::I think you're reading far too much into the fact that they compared them in a chart. Just because the two subjects are related, and some sources may show or look at how they interact with each other, does not mean they are the same thing. We have two separate article because they're two separate subjects. Just because a source compared the results of a poll of the national election to a poll of the European election, does not mean that they are the same thing.  :::Just look a the latest poll by GPO, with ND in the lead in the national election and SYRIZA in the lead for the European election. Clearly, it might be interesting to compare those two results. It's totally understandable to me why some pollsters (or newspapers or networks) would compare them. However, in my opinion, it contributes nothing to the Next Greek legislative election for us to compare them there.   :::The table and chart are supposed to show opinion polls for the national election, and it's precisely because opinion for them is different (the same reason why it's interesting to compare them) that the polls for one should not be in a table that is supposed to show opinion for the other. It's misleading, clutters the table, and contributes nothing (in my opinion.)  :::Perhaps we could include a ``see also`` link to the European article (although it's already linked in the footer), but I don't think it contributes anything to this table, and this article, which is supposed to show opinion polls for a different election.  :::They're different subjects, with different articles, and if people want to compare them, they can. But why should we clutter one article with what is, 1). duplicate information found in a different article, and 2). not directly related to the article anyways?   `