`::Another problem with this content is that we are working on the lead paragraphs of the article on Tibet.  The lead is for a quick summary and introduction, to give readers an overview of the content which they can find in greater detail below, in the main body of the article.  This kind of detailed discussion of different viewpoints does not belong in the lead.  I'm not convinced that LaGrandefr's content has any place in Wikipedia at all, but it certainly does not belong where it is now.  How about we change the wording in the lead from ``...declared independence...`` since LaGrandfr insists (based on his dubious interpretation of dubious sources) it is wrong.  Instead, we can say something like, ``In 1913 the 13th Dalai Lama expelled all Chinese representatives and troops from Lhasa, and Tibet enjoyed de facto independence from then until the 1950 Chinese invasion of Tibet.``.     `