`  == woozle effect ==  Thanks for asking me what ``yelling`` had to do with my edits that were so quickly reverted.  I have a physical disability that makes typing very difficult. So it's frustrating to try and improve a wiki page to see it instantaneously reverted when the edit:  * might have been discussed first on the talk page * discussed on my talk page * improved  * reorganized  I find that sort of instant reversion a violation of what I had thought was the wiki prime directive: assume good faith as well as ``improve don't just delete``.  So I see a few things:  ONE: Woozle effects as seen in popular culture, Stephen Colbert's Wikiality and Elephant Prank are prime examples.  TWO: Woozle effect used in academic research: Google Scholar has 440 examples of that.  THREE: An AFD that is clearly motivated for 'political' reasons, IE, it's feminist vandalism from a Reddit subreddit  FOUR: My desire to improve the article in a way good for WIki, good for everyone.  BUT YES, I AM ABSOLUTELY TIRED WITH WIKILAWYERS REVERTING EVERY LAST LITTLE THING BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER BE JUDGE AND JURY AND NOT BE COEDITORS.  SO:   You tell me.   Where is the best place to place cultural examples of the woozle effect in the article?  Where is the best place to cite its uses in academic papers?  And tell me why anyone would ever want to edit the wikipedia when it's know how swiftly edits are reverted and not first improved?`