 :Another person says the list is not encyclopedic. They see value in a curated list. I don't. If someone wants to take the time to find the three to five most highly cited papers of Ross, feel free. I'd rather just link to a google scholar profile if one exists. It's too laborious a task for us Wikipedians, in my opinion. We have too many BLPs, and traditional encyclopedias don't make a point of this, as far as I am aware.   pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 