 2007 (UTC)  :: His work is still a problem requiring more elaboration.  The personal biographical information is fairly comprehensive, but the controversy, led by a relative small amount of individuals and organizations, and generally not scientists on the main points, is longer than discussion of his work which was so influential in sexology and society (the latter discussed a little more, but often then as part of the controversy).  In a nutshell, the information on his work still should be expanded.   14:03, 23 June