`Oh! Look what I found! An old version of the article with some of these sources in.  However, other scholars do not believe it is a legitimate form of anarchism. [start of reference] Such accounts include: *Peter Marshall, Demanding the Impossible: History of Anarchism, Fontana Press, 1993 *John Clark, The Anarchist Moment, Black Rose Books, 1984 *Albert Meltzer, Anarchism: Arguments for and Against, AK Press, 2000 *Noam Chomsky, Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, New Press, 2002 *David Weick, Anarchist Justice, Anarchism: Nomos XIX, ed. J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman, New York University Press, 1978. *Brian Morris, Anthropology and Anarchism, Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed 45 *Noam Chomsky, Chomsky on Anarchism, Notes on Anarchism, 2005, AK Press, 126 *Peter Sabatini, Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy *Donald Rooum, What is Anarchism? An Introduction, Freedom Press, 1995. *Bob Black, The Libertarian as Conservative, The Abolition of Work and Other Essays, Loompanics Unlimited, 1986 *Colin Ward, Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2004 [end ref]  These were originally inserted by   and later removed by  that ``failed verification``, which basically means that he didn't think they were explicit enough. DTC smells to me like another RJII/BillyEgo sock, but perhaps not. He hasn't edited for many months.  DTC added in more biased sources to the ones already in the article ().  was the first person to start this:  (the editor was a sockpuppet of RJII)  Anyway, shall we add some of these sources in? Or perhaps replace (some of) the existing ones with some of these?  ''''''   `