   ::::::So? why then Richardkeatinge are you and iss246/psyc12 only 'allowing' the 2 OHP society journals to be included in this Wikipedia article? Should we not include other major international journals? That is, other major, reliable published sources like Wikipedia want, particularly in articles relating to medicine and psychology? I would like this Wikipedia article to benefit from us relying only on what the reliable sources say.   ::::::That is why I persist here. I have high regard for Wikipedia, and I feel that this article is very biased and a small 'band' of editors are taking 'ownership' of the article. So RK can we include some major reliable sources alongside the 2 smaller journals just because they are 'associated' with the 2 OHP societies? Surely we could work them into this article as well somehow? That is what Wikipedia want. Why are you and (psyc12/iss246)so against including major reliable sources outside of the 2 OHP societies and not giving industrial psychology credit for the contribution it has and continues to make to OHP?  