` I'll weigh in here... I see that there are two different ``controversy`` sections. One section is regarding the price cut that occurred soon after the release of the original iPhone. The second section is regarding the lower price of the 3G iPhone in comparison to the original one, and the simultaneous increase in service price. The first section does seem justifiable as it was a true controversy, there was a lot of complaining from early purchasers who felt like they were taken advantage of. The second section, however, doesn't have anything controversial in it. The prices are different, yes, but who is complaining? Where is the public outcry, the accusations...? Some bloggers think that the price difference is interesting enough to talk about, but it really hasn't been newsworthy. All that the section is really doing is explaining how Apple is trying a different sales strategy than before. It doesn't seem notable enough for inclusion in the article.  '''''' `