  ==WP:VG assessment== I'm pleased to say this article is definitely beyond stub-level now, and by my reckoning at the higher end of start-class. The overall structure of the article is in place, and there are a good number of images. My main concern is the size of the Gameplay section, which is completely unreferenced and quite game guide-esque. I would suggest trimming it back to the core essentials and sourcing this from reliable sources - have a look at some example articles for some ideas of how best to go about this. Similarly, the Development section is currently unsourced and quite brief - it could do with some expansion on the history of the development on the game, which I'm sure will be documented somewhere. The Reception section is looking good - add a couple of paragraphs summarising what professional reviewers have said about the game and it'll be great. Overall, if you fix these things then you're looking at a strong C or even B class article. Good luck!  