  : That sounds exactly right - good job. My current position is that there were enough reasonably independent editors participating and well-reasoned arguments put forth that a claim of overwhelming consensus is untenable. If only the usual suspects had participated, then possibly mediation would be the best course. Then again, I happen to think that I am correct (always )) that the decent-quality sources are more in keeping with one article than with two. Whether this is truly so will only become more clear as the articles get dragged towards quality. -   