`:Re phrasing, I tried to use the ``ex-Muslims`` phrasing in the part of the article that talked about speakers, but was reverted. Nonetheless, let's talk about it: do y'all think it would be a good idea to say that speakers were ``mostly ex-Muslims and Muslims`` (this seems safe, even accounting for Phares and for others I wasn't able to verify who may be Arab Christians) and that CAIR criticized the summit for featuring/being the product of/(we can talk about the verb some more) ``non-Muslims``? :As for weight, it's difficult for me to think about it in terms of numbers as opposed to terms of actual content. I would find it easier if we broke down the criticism into points on which the summit was criticized (non-Muslims, right-wing agenda, non-inclusive of people of faith, anti-Muslim, unscholarly) then decided which ones should be included and how much detail to include (eg. quote or paraphrase in article body).  –  ⋅    `