` == Creationist Chronicles: Wicca? ==  interesting idea...although you'll find that MANY people would be insulted with the idea that the Torah, Bible and Qur'an are rooted in Wicca.     :Never mind...Wetman removed it.      So let me see if I get this straight. I follow the npov guideline on what another groups belief structure is on a particul subject and it gets removed. Yes the idea may insult some but there are those that share these particular beliefs. If google books has no problem publishing the full text of this groups belief structure on this particular subject matter than why should Wikipedia. The fact is there are people that believe this to be true. When Wetman deletes this fact stating ``removed vanity-published anonymously-authored simplistic rant: ``knowledge=books``. Wetman is clearly ignorant on this particular subject matter and those people who hold this particular belief structure.  :I'm sure Wetman's just concerned about WP:NO ILITY.      NO ILITY Nonetheless there is no dictum against any book that is reasonably spread or otherwise well-known or remarkable. Ask yourself if several libraries or bookshops, or a no-subscription website have a copy of the book, so that other wikipedians can easily consult the book, or at least have access to on-line or press-published reviews of the book.  Usually, books with an ISBN-number and/or availability in a couple dozen of libraries and/or a Project Gutenberg type website, and with a notability above that of an average cookbook or programmers manual would qualify.  The book I referred to has LCCN 2003097908 and a ISBN-number 1-4107-9815-1 although the paperback version of the book has been sold out for sometime and only available in secondary markets, the electronic version is available free through google books. The point of the post was not to promote the entire book but only refer to that portion of the book that refers to the subject at hand. The belief structure of a particular group on what the ``tree of knowledge of good and evil`` is.  :Well, there was a dispute over the Church of Reality's views some time back... see Talk:Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil/off-topic. Other than that, I suggest you .    `