`  Admin input: If you were in communication with an admin, and were actively working on it, you (or the admin) should have actually put a valid hangon message on the talk page. Quite frankly, I don't believe the draft article you're working on is ready to go for the following reasons:  There's a number of grammar and spelling errors  Headers should not have caps except for first letter, and should not be wikilinks  Bolding is for the first use of the subject in the lead paragraph only  References shouldn't be generalized like you've put them. Individual facts in the article should be footnoted to the references (see WP:FN and WP:CITET if you don't know how to do this)  The section on ``Search engine submission software`` should be omitted entirely, as it's covered in a separate article. Don't duplicate material, that's what wiki links are for  Move the reasons why its notable (media coverage, awards) to the 1st or 2nd paragraph  Please be aware that wikipedia is not a how-to guide, so instructional information about how to use the software is not appropriate.  You can eliminate the ``further reading``, as the book is in the refs (and get rid of the dummies graphic - it's not relevant to the particular program...it looks like you're plugging the book). AKRadeckiSpeaketh   Retrieved from ``http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Akradecki```