`  ==Surprised to see an admin say this==  :``I've been pretty busy the last few days and haven't been able to keep up to date with the changes, but maybe it is finally time to request arbitration. I agree that there seems to be a basic misunderstanding of what NPOV actually means, and perhaps arbitration is the way to go. In the mean time, try simply reverting the reverts. I've done that a few times, and if enough people participate, then none of us will be in danger of 3rr. ;^)  wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) ``  This appears to be advice on how to conduct an edit war. Suppose that editor gets 10 others to do the same thing you are proposing; would that be okay too? Aren't there official routes to follow instead? Duke53 | Talk   :Yes, there are official routes to follow, and I (and others) have suggested several times that the dispute will probably end up in arbitration.  The issue is an editor who reverts legitimate edits with little or no comment, apparently because he doesn't like the change.  He seems to have a problem understanding NPOV.  :My comment was meant to convey that just because somebody reverts your change, if you feel it is without merit, then you should feel free to re-revert it, and include a note on why you are doing it.  In this case, the person tends to not participate in any discussion, but then reverts back to some earlier version that he prefers - again with little or no substantive comment about why he reverted.  :I hope that clears up what I meant to say.  I'm running on very little sleep today, so my original comment probably could have been phrased better. ; ^)  Nice hearing from you again, BTW.     `