`  ::::Let me see if I can get any recognition from you of your self delusion. You say in your most recent post I have also said ``I am sorry if I am wrong`` twice. I've done a search for the word ``sorry`` and guess what? I do not see it anywhere; nor anything approximating it. So where exactly have you said sorry, other than in your benighted imagination?  ::::You have not in any way substantaited your 'bias' rants. You've merely thrown mud and ducked when asked why. You continue to duck a substantive discussion which would involve you specifying unambiguously this supposed bias, and/or responding to what seem to me to be reasonable explanations for the content inserted (normally along the lines of ``the sources back up the assertion``). Why it is you feel okay about making assertions damaging to another wikipedian's reputation, and okay not to substantiate those accusations, is beyond me.   ::::I see you have amended the wording so as to lose the distinctive phrase I objected to; thank you for that. However the source does not support the assertion you are now making - it says nothing about ``learning how to earning a living by gardening.`` And so I'll remove the sentence once again. If you can get something that is a) not plagiarism and b) supported by the source, then the problem will be over. I note that you had no compunction about removing content I added, but you squeal (like a pig?) when I do the same thing to your content additions. I did not re-add the content you remove. You insist on readding the content I remove. Do you see the disparity there? Is any of this getting through to you?     ::::Do pigs snort? Do humans not snort then they read bullshit? Who knows. Hanging your entire thesis on a snort seems like another sad attempt at misdirection, but if it makes you happy, that's fine.   `