` :I think it's a really bad idea to start listing nicknames, it adds little of value to the article and encourages fly-by editing with tendentious additions of nicknames. (Pretty much the same reason why none of the regular editors think a separate ``criticism`` section is a good idea). As I see it, we should either have one nickname or none. My vote is for ``Darwin's rottweiler`` - it focuses on Dawkins' main intellectual contribution (to evolutionary theory) and alludes to the fact that he can be a fierce/controversial figure. What do the rest of you think?   `