I'm puzzled by the reference to 'boilerplate'. We mention bleeding, and bleeding applies to any surgery. We mention infection, and this danger applies to any surgery, too. If golden staph and methicillin resistant golden staph are growing problems in hospitals, and specifically in neonatal wards, then I can't see the problem of mentioning these dangers, especially if we mention that the problem can be controlled by scrupulous attention to hygiene .   :Here is what I suggest we include in the article:  ::Staphylococcal infections are a growing problem  and have affected neonatal nurseries. This has led to speculation that the methicillin resistant strain (MRSA) might be a threat to newly circumcised boys. . However, scurupulous attention to hygiene can mitigate this problem .   Please consider: ::It is in the public interest to draw attention to a growing medical threat. ::It is in the public interest to note that MRSA has infected neonatal nurseries. ::It is in the public interest to note that there is a way of mitigating this threat. ::It is in the public interest to note that there is speculation that methicillin resistant golden staph could be a threat to newly circumcised boys, because it is mentioned in the medical literature.  :If anyone has any objection, please explain.    