`:::Basing inferences, which we are not to use anyway, on unnamed web searches is a mockery of orderly academic, WP related, or any cogent evaluation. Nasrallah holds Jews to be ``a cancer which is liable to spread again at any moment.`` You'r welcome to concur or to find that non anti-Semite. However, you're not to mislabel sources because you don't fancy to believe Nasrallah's own words - which happen to be refreshingly clear and unambiguous. And if the New York Times interprets quotes like this: :::* ``if they [Jews] all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.`` :::* ``It is an open war until the elimination of Israel and until the death of the last Jew on earth.`` :::* ``Anyone who reads these texts cannot think of co-existence with them, of peace with them, or about accepting their presence, not only in Palestine of 1948 but even in a small village in Palestine, because they are a cancer which is liable to spread again at any moment.” :::* ``There is no solution to the conflict in this region except with the disappearance of Israel.`` :::as ``genocidal thinking``, as any sane mind, you are free to disbelieve the obvious. I really would appreciate if you'd not deny those of Nasrallah's positions which he happily, proudly, and publicly  holds - it amounts to WP:POINT.     `