`  :I have a problem with the reception section. My problem is that neither the linked citations or the section itself talk about the Raspberry Pi, but rather use the RP as a coatrack for editorials about how best to educate children. Yes, we have a rough balance between editorial opinions favoring or opposing teaching children programming with a Raspberry Pi, but no discussion about actual Raspberry Pi's.   :(Irony / sarcasm = ON) Why, it's almost as if none of the editorials were written by someone who had actually held a Raspberry Pi in their hand! And it's almost as if the Raspberry Pi Wikipedia page was written be a bunch of editors who not only have never actually held a Raspberry Pi in their hand, but cannot find any sources other than the RP foundation written by anyone who has! (Irony / sarcasm = OFF)  :As I have pointed out before, you really can't write a reception section before anyone has received a Raspberry Pi and written about it.  Speculation doesn't count. Editorials about unrelated topics are right off.  I propose that we delete the reception section and write a proper one once we know how the Raspberry Pi is received.  :This reminds me of an old joke. The new wife of an IBM salesman goes to a judge wanting an annulment because he never consummated the marriage. She explains; ``instead he just sits at the foot of the bed every night telling me how great it's going to be!`` That's pretty much the situation with the Raspberry Pi.   `