`  Thanks for your improvements. Per your suggestion, I added a pertinent Proudhon quote: ``By this method of investigation, we soon see that every argument which has been invented in behalf of property, whatever it may be, always and of necessity leads to equality; that is, to the negation of property.`` I guess you haven't read ``What is Property,`` but basically he takes various arguments for property from past luminaries, and argues that they all imply that equality should prevail.  `