`  Madman2001: learn the difference between asserting notability (``this csubject is notable``) and establishing it  which requires ``significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject``.  Albanese, Miller, Kezzer et al & Hazen all give CoDS the barest of mentions. They are not ``significant coverage``. As for your 'Further reading' list, as I have already stated, it appears to very oddball and tangential to the subject. What does Religious variables, political system characteristics, and policy outputs in the American states have to do with CoDS (beyond it being simply another in a long list of religions)? If they give CoDS ``significant coverage``, then why haven't you cited them for new/existing content (the article being almost entirely uncited/miscited)?  `