`  *Oppose I was originally in favor of inclusion, but the more that I've thought about, the more I believe that it is WP:UNDUE weight.  There are literally thousands and thousands of articles about this topic.  Not every little tidbit should be in the article.  If this was something important, then you would see a lot more sources covering.  The fact that this has gotten very little attention by reliable sources is a strong indication of its importance.   Aside from the WP:UNDUE, I'm concerned about the sourcing.  The two sources being cited appear to be opinion pieces, not straight news reporting.  WP:BLP says to ``Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources``.  I don't see how this meets the tough sourcing requirements set forth by BLP.    `