` ::I scanned the Fishbein book on Google Books, and there's nothing about radionics in it. If you're going to start using books that have nothing about the subject in question as sources, taking it on faith that they ``appear to be a reliable source``, then...well, hang on to your hats, boys, because all bets are off! Look, radionics surely IS quackery, as you and I or any other rational person might  refer to it in conversation. But ``quackery`` is a loaded pejorative, with fairly inflammatory connotations, that many people find offensive, myself included. It's all well and good to have Helwig say ``most physicians dismiss radionics as quackery`` (which is certainly not scientific or definitive, just the man's impression of the situation), and that's appropriate for the discussion. The word ``quackery`` appears there, and if you want it included in the page, there it is. But it really has no place in the main editorial thrust of the conversation, is all I'm saying.`