  == regarding Brahma_Kund ==  Dear Vejvančický,   The 'advertisement' notice(s) on the top of article Brahma Kund are worth consideration, as in our humble suggestion, the notice is inappropriate. Originally, the Sihor page when originally created by someone was containing missing reference to Brahma Kund and authentic information on Brahma Kund was required.  We, other than myself - user: Shivnag, are a small-serious team working towards assessment, exploration and verifying-validating the source material for various items/references, which falls under history, faith, beliefs, archaeology and architecture, for eg. to talk about Sihor. We ourselves are seriously concerned over authenticity of any content and the immediate article on Brahma Kund is a result of rigorous efforts invested during a reasonable span of time.  This monument is somehow already under look-after of official regional department/authorities and it carries a significance for the architecture and archaeology. However, creation of page was somehow an automated action while clicking on missing link of the same on Sihor page, and we believed what we did was proper, whereas we are simultaneously learning the wiki etiquette and guidelines and we in no manner or intention, interested in violating the same. We still realized if the Brahma Kund article could have been a stub under a relevant category, but the 'advertisement' notice is worth consideration.  Please treat this request as a humble thought/reply to latest outcome at wikipedia for the subjected page and kindly do the needful or may you please guide us, if we are still missing something important to learn and follow.  Thanking you in advance and kind regards.