 July 2012 (UTC) :::There is, technically, ArbCom.  I can't say why I knew, but I knew it was going to be an ArbCom issue. (I have no access to Arb info, btw, I knew from other research and private conversations with the editor in question, and dealings with others close to him.) The block itself, I was already pretty much convinced it was a good block, but was executed poorly, causing the drama.  Wish I could say more, but privacy dictates I don't, and honestly, I don't have the details anyway, just very good ideas about some of the subissues.  -    17:20, 21