 ::::Yep, I accidentally deleted the two cites from 538 and IGN; that is on me. I had grown accustomed to you and DM trying to shove your incorrect interpretation of PRIMARY down our throats and didn't pay as close attention. Like I said, mea culpa. I've reinstated them. ::::The entirety of my argument has been, from the beginning of this matter, regards the lack of secondary sources explicitly stating what you want to add. This means a reliable source that talks about what chapters were used in what episode. You get those, and my problem vanishes. We cannot use the primary source of the book because it requires the evaluative effort of a wiki editor to make a comparison. -     