` :::It is a tricky problem  when I started working on this, I put in a cut off point to make it possible to aim for a completely inclusive list  mainly because below a certain level, the sheer number of shipwrecks and coal mine disasters becomes unmanageable. But it does lead to some rather odd exclusions, hence the addendum Talk:List_of_United_Kingdom_disasters_by_death_toll#Smaller_disasters. We could include ``Other notable disasters`` or ``Selected smaller disasters`` as a subsection on the main page, but then how do we define ``notable``?  Other options might be (as you say) to reduce the cut-off point slightly, though that still leaves odd omissions, eg Great Fire of London. OR, include only post-19th century smaller disasters ?   Any other thoughts?  `