`  ==Your WT:RFA comment== J.delanoy, you would really ``go around and block/delete/protect/vandalize everything [you] could think of``? I am surprised to hear that. Someone who puts a lot of work and time into improving Wikipedia, like you or me, I don't know why you'd want to wreak havoc on what you had been trying to fix in the first place. Especially when you know that whatever you delete/protect and be undeleted/unprotected in a matter of minutes. However, I do agree with you that if something like EVula's idea for desysopping were to be implemented, there had better be some stringent rules as to who may participate. For example, every !voter would have to have a minimum of 500 edits and there would have to be a really high consensus to desysop, like 90%. I agree that if it was too easy to desysop, admins would indeed fear blocking and deleting and it would hamper our work here. There are relatively few times that an admin needs to be desysopped, so there is no point in making it too easy. I think we do a pretty good job weeding during the RFA process.   `