`  == List of multiple discoveries (to )== On 8 August 2015 you were so good as to notify me that  had been blocked for 24 hours due to edit-warring conducted by him to restore his ill-conceived edits to the ``List of multiple discoveries`` which showed him to ``seem not to understand the concept of a 'multiple discovery', one that is made by more than one person independently.``  Two months later, on 6 October 2015 (please see here ),  resumed his misguided edits.  A few examples:  He added a section heading, ``15th century``, placing in it Galileo Galilei and Simon Stevin, both born in the 16th century.  In the ``17th century`` section he placed ``link between arteries and veins—Marcello Malpighi``—with no other, independent discoverer mentioned (as required by the article's definition).  In the ``18th century`` section he entered ``Methane (1778)—Alessandro Volta``—again, with no other discoverer mentioned.    Under ``19th century``, he placed ``Avogadro's law—molecular theory of Amedeo Avogadro``—once more, with no other, independent discoverer.  In the same ``19th century`` section, he changed ``In 1876 Elisha Gray and Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent on discovery of the telephone`` to ``In 1871, Antonio Meucci and Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent on discovery of the telephone.``    Under ``20th century``, he placed ``Nerve growth factor (1950)... discovered by Rita Levi-Montalcini and Stanley Cohen``—an ineligible entry, since they made this discovery together, not independently of each other.  In the same ``20th century`` section, he entered ``Technetium of Emilio G. Segrè and Carlo Perriero [sic], an essential material used for the nuclear weapon``—ineligible on two scores:  technetium is not used in ``the nuclear weapon``, and the mineralogist Carlo Perrier (not ``Perriero``), according to Wikipedia, ``discovered the element technetium along with his colleague, Emilio Segrè...``   is single-handedly making a hash of the ``List of multiple discoveries``.  How can the article be protected from him?  Could you please advise me which would be the appropriate Wikipedia administrative forum in which to raise this matter?  Thank you.     :Warned Libesruinssineced. Thank you,    ::Thank you so much.  This should avert further confusion and misinformation for readers of the ``List of multiple discoveries``.    `