`57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)  ::::::I've removed that sentance again as the consensus is that the sentance is wrong.  Scientific strength is not based on the lack or inclusion of supernatural intervention as this sentance implies.  It is a deep misunderstaning used (unfairly) against evolution when all of science (be it right or wrong science) must follow this rule.   :::::::Edit warring is childish and I won't indulge in it here, but rv-ing me and claiming (falsely) there is a consensus to do so on talk is far from kosher. If a person makes an alteration to the status quo & somebody objects, the onus is on the person wanting the change to convince the community the change is necessary.   23:`