`  == Quotation in McArthur (1992) reference  ==  Moving the discussion here from my talk, so anybody can chip in:  :I don't want to just revert you again, but what you have done there doesn't make any sense. It is not just that the quote tag produced a surreal result. My objection to the quote template was not that it appeared in a footnote, but that it should only be used for highlighting a particularly important quote in the middle of a paragraph of text - which COULD sometimes occur in a footnote, but doesn't here. But quite apart from the quote template, your quote itself doesn't make sense. A quote has to illustrate what is being said, and it should be obvious to the reader what you want to communicate by quoting it. This is just a fragment of something - looks like a section heading - which doesn't seem to me to add anything to anybody's understanding, and I can't see why it is there at all. If all you want is a reference for the information in the text, you should stop at the page number. If you want to add a quote which tells us something, you have to give enough context that the reader has some benefit from it. At present your quote just says ``Contrasting terms in linguistics``, which makes no sense. Which terms is it that you want to show us are contrasting? Which terms does the source say are contrasting? What is it all about? Apart from that, the word ``quotation`` should not appear here. Just quote marks are enough. As for the entry heading ``Descriptivism and prescriptivism``, this should come before the page number, and the words ``entry for`` are then not required. Please fix this quickly, or if you are unsure, put an explanation here of what you want to achieve. Otherwise I will revert again.     I don't have the time to address this right now.  `