  ::But FYI, it can be tricky to put together properly formatted noticeboard or ANI complaints. I should have either just gone to 1) WP:BLPN with content disputes OR 2) just to ANI with POV concerns about alleged (but anonymous so who knows for sure?) academics seemingly out to trash well-known academics and show appropriate evidence. That's why the recommendation from the Admin to go to ANI was ambivalent.  ::Now User:Sageo's complaint about edit warring I thought was poorly formed and ranting, yet he got a result because it was still easy to see what was going on.  It can be a crap shoot, which is why I try to avoid it. (And often depends merely on who is paying attention during any 24-48 hours period.) But one does the best one can to resolve the situation, as one will continue to do, including using noticeboards as necessary. ::Also note continuing to harp on the past, misstate the outcome of the confused WP:ANI which was ruled a content dispute, and putting people's names in section titles, can be seen as harassment and that's cause for another more pointed WP:ANI. Lets not continue behavioral problems with attack section headers . Let's just focus on content and stop the silliness, eh??  '' - 🗽 