`  ===Consensus Can Change=== A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision. ... Wikipedia's decisions are ever-changing, because new people visit every day, and through new information and new ideas, we may gain insights we did not have previously. It is important that there is a way to challenge past decisions, however these decisions were reached. Decisions should therefore practically never be ``binding`` in the sense that the decision cannot be taken back. (Emphasis added)  Also see the flowchart at that page, particularly the first two boxes. I came across the article that was in a previous consensus, and made a change. That should not, no, can not be considered vandalism.  (|)  Furthermore, I'm not actually convinced consensus has been reached here, with regard to the port/spinoff/version/other-term debate. From what I can tell by going through all the comments here,  strongly believes that ``spinoff`` is the only acceptable term;  ``isn't sure`` but believes ``port`` is definitely not the right term, and leans slightly toward ``other versions``; , , and at least one unsigned comment all believe that ``spinoff`` is not appropriate and that ``version`` should be chosen as, while less specific, is not inaccurate by any interpretation;  supports ``spinoff`` but feels there might be some other, better term nobody has thought of;  believes that a variety of terms should be used;  votes for ``spinoff.``  So out of eight contributors, we have one very strong supporter of ``spinoff``, two more moderate supporters of ``spinoff``, three supporters of ``version`` (and one ``slight support``) and one supporter of ``all of the above.``  So I have two questions, #Have I summarized everyone's position accurately? #Is there really a consensus here? (I don't think there is, yet)  (|) `