`  :The rules are not going to be bent for you and they most certainly shouldn't.  The term is non-notable no matter how you look at it, even you admit that you just invented the term yourself.  In order for a term to be notable, there needs to be more than a very tiny number (mostly just you) of people using it.  It's not helpful, it just serves to confuse people since ``inverse ad hominem`` implies that it's opposite to ad hominem, which it's not.  It's just saying ``I have superior credentials`` instead of saying ``You have inferior credentials.``  There is no difference as far as logic is concerned.  8 July 2005 01:20 (UTC)`