`  == Copyright violation? ==  Being busy with other things and seeing the wisdom of not becomming too much entangled in the debate about the article I decided to take a step back. I still take the ocasional look from time to time but that's it.   To my surpise I saw that the recent new paragraphs are very reasonable and even very good. So I decided to take a lock at the original source and noticed that the new paragraphs are a simple product of ``cut and paste``. This can be easily verified at .   Now if the text was free to be copied it would be fine by me (my problem is not about the article itself but about the quality of the material - and the new material is very good), however the original page has a clear ``all rights reserved`` at the bottom. I'm pretty sure that to simply copy it is against the Copyright rules in general and against the rules of Wikipedia in particular.   `