`  == ``Colored tables because they're pretty`` ==  Could someone look into the work done by 7mike5000, such as the colorful, icon-filled table at Eating disorders#Personality_traits? Do tables like these represent a permissible variation on normal style, or an undesirable cluttering of the page with unnecessary formatting (or something in between)? WhatamIdoing (talk)  ``inquired about the decorative approach at MOS, and the responses can be read here``. WhatamIdoing (talk)     As per WP:Civil, I am asking you in a polite a fashion as possible, to please refrain from making comments such as as the above as it pertains to myself or any contributions I may have made or may make. I believe most people would find that comment to be somewhat disparaging.  And your comment leads to comments like: ``And 7mike5000 would do well not to refer to his colleagues as ``anally retentive`` in his edit summaries``. Tony (talk)  ``anal retentive`` Freud coined the term not me. A comment like that can easily be construed as implying ``or else``.  ``Yes, the ``Skittlepedia`` effect is distracting and unprofessional``. Dabomb87 (talk)  That speaks for itself.  Wikipedia is for everyone, it was not created for a select few to feel like they can call the shots for the other couple of hundred million English speakers, it is not a cabal.  Your initial comments set the stage, others follow. Constructive criticism I do not mind, to purposely make comments such as the aforementioned I do. I wrote Hemoglobin Lepore syndrome to prove a point to someone in a civil fashion. I believe I made a point with the use of exemplia gratia and and id est. I do not make comments to anyone. I keep to myself. I only respond. So to reiterate please refrain from the sarcasm, and going out of your way to dissect everything I do. Thank you. And have an pleasant day.   `