  *The Alberta and Quebec examples look limited. Even the Feature Article Geography of India is not going to win any comprehensiveness awards. Maybe I'm too ambitious but I propose the following structure: **Biophysical Geography ***Terrain ***Mountains ***Water ***Climate ***Ecosystems **Human Geogarphy ***Population ***Migration ***Urban ***Rural **Economic Geography ***Resource Extraction ***Manufacturing ***Service ***Tourism and Recreation **Political Geography ***Municipalities ***Regional Districts ***Federal and Provincial Politics  I'm not confident about Manufacturing and Service as separate sections because they seem too limited. I also not confident about lumping Ecosystems into Physical Geography, because Ecosystems will be (by far) the largest section and this can probably be linked with climate a lot better in a separate Bioclimatic Geography section.  