   I see the issue Novak was addressing but not the term.  I suspect I'll have to research this further, because it's unlikely that Novak would have been inventing something.  The problem is that if he is right  then YOU are right that Shituf does indeed cover Trinitarianism.  But if he just invented it, then I'm right that it's limited to Arianism.  I got excited when I saw it because Novak was vindicating you.  But I appreciate your honesty there.  Obviously I'll need to read Katz's book as well and follow the sources that both of these authors point to.  