`  == the ``technical`` tag ==  The tag says  This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve this article to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. The talk page may contain suggestions.  So I am creating this place for suggestions.  My own assessment is different.  I think there are probably too many ``technical details``, such as critical frequency, non-baseband sampling, non-uniform sampling, undersampling, and multivariable sampling that could be relegated to the See Also list, if we need to make the article less intimidating.  The actual discussion of the theorem itself has excellent figures and is (in my opinion) readily understandable to those with a working knowledge of the Fourier transform, which seems to be a universally assumed prerequisite.   `