`  === , the Consensus is not ``removing the edit``, it is just the opposite:``protecting the edit``=== 15.10.2014:07.43: I added Arbitration Committee's decision ``The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction`` to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind) 15.10.2014:07.48: Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus. ........ 15.10.2014:07.47:  also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that ``edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ``.  But,  distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material! 14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after my first edit  14.10.2014:20.30: an unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that ``This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.``.  14.10.2014, 21.08: I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court.  14.10.2014:21.42: Wikipedian  reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of  ``rv essential part removal``).  is a Hellen, but neutral like me.  15.10.2014:00.37: This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that  opposes to be removed besides me.  15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian  reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.  15.10.2014:00.58: This time,  appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]].  15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected   This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above. *The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under these discretionary sanctions. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable.    *Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable.     15.10.2014:07.45: I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users ,.  15.10.2014:07.47:   reverted with edit summary ``edit-war against consensus``  Till when spam-bombardments from unknown IPs ,  became the definition of the consensus! The drastic Wiki users , strongly opposed the removal of the edit.  , please behave by taking into account the decision of Arbitration Committee (you were rejected by Arbitration Committee).  `