  == Current editing ==  Well, things seem to have heated up here again!  Regarding the current reverting about the defence documents, while I totally believe that this is the genuine article, (and it is too bad for all that the Nick Baker website isn't in the Wayback machine), I am inclined to say that it might be best not to include the link for the moment. The fact that it is on Sparkzilla's website and nowhere else at present is too bad, but in any case I don't think it adds that much to what can be quoted from other sources, and it is not worth a revert war and getting blocked over.  Having said that I maintain my comments above: this article is not of neutral point of view and needs editing to achieve this. I will try and make this priority in the next day or so.  