 Clearly you need to reread your own policies, from WP:Vandalism, vandalism is: * Blanking * Page lengtheningNPOV violations * Spam  * Vandalbots  * Silly vandalism  * Sneaky vandalism  * Userspace vandalism  * Image vandalism  * Abuse of tags  * Page move vandalism  * Link vandalism * Avoidant vandalism * Modifying users' comments * Discussion page vandalism * Repeated uploading of copyrighted material * Malicious account creation * Edit summary vandalism * Hidden vandalism I did not do any of those things. In contrast and from the same page, vandalism is not: * Tests by experimenting users * Using incorrect wiki markup and manual of style * NPOV violations * Making bold edits * Unintentional misinformation * Unintentional nonsense * Stubbornness * Harassment or personal attacks * Policy/guideline/essay/other project namespace page alteration Out of the two lists my edits could only possibly fall into three categories, however I would disagree with two of them: NPOV violation - I am removing POV from the article by ensuring CP is correctly quoted and that an alternative viewpoint is offered to the liberally biased criticism of the project Stubbornness - if standing up for the truth and acting as a barrier to the liberal smears rampant on the project makes me stubborn then so be it, but history will judge me as being forced to engage in edit wars against other stubborn editors who refused to consider anything other than their liberal delusions It is clear that my edits were not vandalism, and in labeling them as such you made a clear personal attack against me for which I demand an apology.  