`, 25 February 2009 (UTC)  It's nice to see you back, and I saw you did a lot of nice little thing with a few articles in the Honorverse. Thank you for complementing me on by work for the Honorverse.  As far as the Ukrainian Supermen are concerned. I understand you have a problem with the term ``Ukrainian Supermen`` as it would imply that all Ukrainians of that time were changed into some type of supermen. First of all, this is just as true as saying that ``American women`` implies that all women are American. So I actually think that there is nothing wrong with that term. So for me this was no case of ``Keep it, bad as it is``.  Apart from that I think I removed that connotation when I placed Ukrainian in front of the internal link (like this: Ukrainian Supermen). Do you agree with me? Or did I perhaps misunderstand you?  There is no reference to ``Ukrainian Supermen`` in the Honorverse template, see Template:Honorverse. There does exist a redirect from Ukrainian Supermen to List of regions of space in the Honorverse.  As to your changes in the templates of Treecat. This is their common usage and this is what they were designed for. It seems to me that you have been caught up in some in-world - out-world loop, so to speak. Because in the framework of describing fictional work that description needs to be referenced. If you get my point. One other Wikipedian (actually a renomated admin) also expressed his concern about that edit of yours to me, although that didn'tget to me until after I reverted it.  The ``boilerplate issue`` remains, but as far as I am concerned it is obvious that doing so is in the interest of the encyclopedical character of these articles, so unless you'd start a discussion about it and consensus would clearly be otherwise, I will try to maintain the status quo in this aspect.   20:12`