`  ==One-sided debate?==  I would like to engage Pollinator on his claims that I am ``rewriting`` my opponents viewpoints. The following things should be considered:   1) Wikipedia has one viewpoint, that of an encyclopedia. No part of no article can be said to be off-limits to editting.  2) I have tried to be reasonable with Ungtss (the editor of the article who is trying to impose his own POV). As it currently stands he wants to have a ``counterpoint`` defense against the criticisms section. This is unacceptable because there will be no end to the point-counterpoint style of an article. If he wants to make points, let him do it in the article itself.  3) Two of the arguments are not only specious, they're based on poor research on the part of Ungtss. I have explained this all above.  Therefore, it is unreasonable for you to revert the edit which has added quality to the page.  `