`  :::::You did misunderstand. Obviously every opinion is just somebody's opinion. The distinction is, are they stating their opinion about the historicity of Jesus, or are they stating their opinion about the consensus of the historicity of Jesus. Do you have any sources stating something other than virtually all scholars agree he existed? (IE, not ``I don't believe he existed``, but ``nobody believed he existed`` or ``there is significant academic debate about if he existed``, because otherwise we have multiple sources saying the consensus is he existed. (Including one who says he thinks Jesus did not exist, but admits he is in the small minority opinion).   `