` Whether there is validity in astrology or not is debatable and it has certainly been done here before. In order to be NPOV, however, both views should be mentioned in the article in one way or another. I feel that in most places in this article it is sufficient. Astrology is a huge subject and in order to do that subject justice, by supplying neutral information about it and its practice, there needn't be a red alert saying ``Modern science has failed to prove astrology. Don't waste your time.`` There is a sufficient mention of its validity and a link in plain sight to a larger elaboration and space should be reserved for how astrology is practiced. `