`  Oh, sorry. I had no intention referring Korea as ``it`` and Japan as ``she``. I didn't even realised since I am not a native English speaker even though I'm living in Australia. I am sorry if I hurt you. I don't think it the islets are Korean territory. The evidence Korea is offering seems that they are too short of evidence that proves that the islands or territories mentioned in it are Dokdo. I also know the situation between Koreans and Japanese.  But I am not talking about it! You say this article should be called Dokdo, but I won't propose calling this article ``Takeshima``. It is because Wikipedia should maintain its neutral point of view. Voltaire said ``I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.`` Calling this article Dokdo is against this policy. As for the ``References``, they make this article seem to support Korean view and to try to call the islets Dokdo, even though the name of the article is neutral, the Liancourt Rocks. The name should be neutral. The contents should be neutral. Of course, links should be neutral and should not give readers an impression that the rocks are Korean territory or Japanese territory. I say once again ``The official sites would be enough. If readers of the article get interested in the issue they will study it themselves. We don't need those POV links here.`` 13:45 19/05/06`