` No.      In Yoga, there's a snake called Kundalini who is supposed to live at the bottom of the spine of each individual. During orgasm or an intense meditation, a spiritual entity called ``Samadhi`` is created, symbolising the transcendental union with God. Then the Kundalini is freed and goes up the spine all the way to the brain, where it releases its venom. The mixing of the venom with the brain substance create a union with God.     Next verse, ``The eyes of the Nile are opening``, imply that a whole universe of possibilities is opening as soon as the venom is released inside of you.    So the snake has a constructive value.      Yes, absolutely. In the Bible, it's a representation of evil, whereas in Hindu philosophy, it's the symbol of creation and ecstasy.     In the next verse, there's the expression ``Serpent' Kiss``, something Crowley discussed in length. Then, there's ``The Eye of the Sun``. The Sun is the symbol of the creator; it represents the male side of life. A bit further, there's the female side appearing in the term ``Moonlight``, where the Moon represents the woman. The verse goes, ``Moonlight catches silver tears I cry``; and everything's revealed, because silver is the colour of the Sun. So, you find here the universe, with the male entity and the female entity, both being inseparable.     In fact, the universe, as seen in this philosophy, is dual, binary, and any notion only exists through its opposite. In other words, there isn't any manichean separation like in the Christian way of thinking, where good and evil are dissociated while trying to eliminate evil, only the Christian system of values is monolithic. All the other great philosophies encompass this duality of notions, like the Ying and the Yang in China, or the Jewish Caballah. Well, you know, you have to be careful with all these notions because it's all very complicated.    I suppose that you gather many documents long before you start writing lyrics like 'Revelations'?      Oh, yes. I have a large library with all the main works concerning human mystic.    Don't you think that it's somehow a shame that the audience doesn't always understand what you're singing about, as the meaning is apparently only understood by very few?      No, I think that as long as there is some mental energy coming out, there's nothing to regret. Here, I'm explaining everything in detail, but if only a fraction of the lyrics stands out and touch some people, then I think I won't have wasted my time. You can't convince everyone because many notions that are not used are in fact unknown by the majority of people. What's interesting with this song is that you can take only one verse and you can reconstruct a whole new text, make a brand-new song.  ''  And he only discussed part of the song.  `