`  == Line in intro ==  This line in the intro:  ``Although many Canadian companies had enjoyed enormous profits on World War I contracts, wages and working conditions were dismal and labour regulations were mostly non-existent.``  gives me pause.  While it may be demonstrable that labour regulations were ``mostly non-existant`` (although it hasn't been shown in this article) saying working conditions were dismal seems like a judgment call and a matter of opinion, which is not how an article should be written.  If examples of poor working conditions exist, they should be stated as the facts they are, not described in vague, condemning language.  Does anyone disagree?  Can I remove the sentence or modify it to be less opinion based?    `