` :::::::::::Yes, there are reasons here that have been articulated. I don't understand the dismissive stance claiming that there is no reason at all. Wikipedia summarizes coverage from secondary sources, and these exists here to leverage, and WP:FILMRATING does not forbid using this coverage. Whatever consensus we determine should not be bound to that guideline. I find the bar being set too high here. Even Featured Article Prometheus (2012 film)#Post-production summarizes coverage about its ``simple rating applied by a manufactured system``. Ratings can indeed be absurd, but it is up to us editors to document the filmmaking and marketing decisions behind them.   |  (ping me) `