`  1) With all due respect, this has everything to do with you.  At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Qumran, we read about your film shown at the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit which is exactly what the controversy is about.  You are trying to prevent me from inserting a section into this article describing a current controversy in which your film is involved.  Therefore you have a conflict of interest.  Note: I have not ``criticized`` any exhibitions, nor am I an ``alias.``  All I have done is create a perfectly germane section in this article describing a controversy reported on in a major newspaper, the National Post (but see also the Wall Street Journal and Jewish Week articles).  I have taken no one's side in this controversy.  2) I don't know anything about these aliases, but I don't see any ``adjudicated case`` dealing with this controversy and stating that it's ``tangential.``  Please refer to a specific wikipedia adjudication of that issue.  It's hard to see how a controversy dealing with Dead Sea Scroll exhibits, reported on at length in at least one major newspaper, is not germane to an article on the Dead Sea Scrolls.    3) The ``case`` you are referring to seems to date from 2007.  I am unaware of any news coverage of a Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit controversy dating from then.  Perhaps the issue involved back then had to do with lack of adequate sourcing? Therefore we have a new ``case`` here, involving the National Post coverage of this issue.  The National Post items are clearly germane to this article and I have every right to add the section.  Hence I will continue to undo your deletion of my contribution to this article, unless wikipedia administrators decide the controversy over museum exhibitions of the Dead Sea Scrolls is not germane to the Dead Sea Scrolls.  `