`  : Sorry - Diaconis' web page doesn't list such a paper and I let the question of what this alleged paper was stand on talk:Erdős-Bacon number for two weeks before deciding to make my ``correction.``  Looking it up now, it was originally a technical report and it was posthomously part of a book of lectures.  Thus it is debatable whether Diaconis ``published with Erdős.``  However, by the definition given on Erdős number, that it merely be a mathematical paper with common authors, in this case a technical report, it qualifies.  `