`   ====El Nino====  ::The (limited and perhaps maladroit) changes I've made in the first bit of the article (ignoring, please, my snide comment), you may give a sense of where jargon might impede readability of the article.  :However, could be a case in which ``if you have to ask`` then maybe you can't help, or maybe you can.  :I've added article to ``watch list`` for the moment, and may try to marginally contribute. I don't pretend to understand subject with slightest depth, and would be cautious.  :The larger problem is in its organization.   :A general reader wants to know, immediately, what are the potential consequences of El Nino. Instead, the article's lead grafs launch  into a long-winded and seemingly vague description of its history and theory that are more appropriate for deep into its body.    `