`  ==Family controversy section== :Moved this recent 2013 comment down from 2007-2010 #Rape Allegations thread. ~    This section regarding this allegation previously had its own mealy-mouthed (not to say misleading) heading ``Family controversy``. It has now been moved into the biography section, which is perhaps a sensible place for it. But why should it not have its own frank sub-heading? Whether true or not, the ``controversy`` (not just a family one!) is clearly an important part of his biography and was splashed all over the national newspapers, but it is also a discrete topic in itself.     Taivo, you deleted my assertion that this allegation gained wide-spread publicity together with the quote from The Washington Post about the shocked LDS reaction, on the grounds that this was ``sensationalistic and not really necessary``. On the contrary, it is the very notoriety of these allegations that makes it inevitable for them to be included in the article. And the publicity and LDS reaction is an integral part of that story, given that he was an LDS scholar. Surely, it therefore is ``really necessary``. The allegation made by his daughter may be sensationalist (whether true or not), but my edit doesn't make it any more so. So I hope you will agree to re-revert. Or do you have any other suggestion?   `