I visited your talk page and I couldn't help commenting on this. I do think you're doing great work, and I know how it seems necessary sometimes to point out the meaning of something even though that meaning may be subjective, or to put two and two together and acknowledge that it makes four. But still...it's good to remember that the rule against OR is not there because all original thinking is crap, but because it's very difficult in a wiki format to separate wheat from chaff.  There is a point sometimes to citing Joe Shmoe, even if he makes the writing less elegant than it otherwise would be.Or clutters up the page with footnotes.  :I have come to believe that most of the best work that gets done at Wikipedia is done by people who sit down and write (or rewrite) whole chunks, not by the accretion of individual sentences added in over time.  So I don't mean to discourage.  But I think there's wisdom in the WP rulesincluding the WP:IAR rule.  The trick is knowing when to apply that one.    