` :I understand that small edits in good article must be well constructed in order to be accepted by ``editors``. What i dont understand, why reliably sourced edits with important information rise displeasure. If it is important to you that PSG1 article is good, you must be happy. Instead of ``50 rounds of match-grade inside of an 80 mm circle at 300 meters`` (as i understand this bullshit is suitable and ``professional`` for ``encyclopedia``) now article contains at least some fact about accuracy. To note, probably all match-grade ammunition for 7.62x51 (like M118 match, M852 match) have guaranteed extreme spread about 2 MOA at 300 meters for 50 shots.  `