` ::No, EA say the original leak was a buggy pre-final version. That's fine. There's no need to essentially say ``but the scene then released one that wasn't buggy or pre-final``. The original leak should be mentioned because it was a big deal and EA commented on it. Subsequent releases and patches are not, regardless of their quality. If this weren't the case, then the Wolverine Origins article should mention the workprint of Wolverine was leaked, then there was a cam, then ts, then an r5 line, then a dvdrip. The workprint leak was notable (notable might be the wrong word to use, I don't mean it in the context of policy), the rest are not. In relation to the Sims 3, the first leak was notable, that it was proper'd (for whatever reason) is not and shouldn't be included in the article. Thanks!  `