`. Anyway im pretty sure runescape has 10 million active f2p users, not 5 million —Preceding unsigned comment added by      agreed. i have made the changes to make the appropriate numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •     : It wouldn't be under semi-protection if we didn't keep getting people vandalising the page (at least the talk page isn't protected, so you can still ask for someone to edit for you). As for the numbers, maybe we need an up-to-date source on this.    : Comment: Having looked at it, the source given for that sentence is at least 2 years old, and says 9 million, not 10 million.     http://jagex.com/corporate/Advertisers/general.ws states 5.4m active players. The problem with the calculation of ``active free accounts`` is the definition of active and the fact that one person may have multiple accounts and one household may have multiple people.     : i have a main and 2 free's,. so ya. also, if you wanna edit, make a account, perssonaly ,anybody should be those willing to spend 5 minutes at the most making a account.   ::: In the time it took to make that comment on this talk page you could have registered an account and made whatever edits you wanted yourself (as long as they were constructive and sourced).    ::: It's Semi-Protected for a very, very good reason. Deal with it.    i am sorry to say this but i just looked at the runescape web page and no one is right.... it says that their are currently over 130 million accounts total.    : To me, that's a misleading number - it refers to every account that has ever been created, active or not.     == Riots and Complaints ==  The page used to support the statement ``These changes were criticized by many players,``RuneScape vs. Real-world Trading`` some of whom started virtual (in game) ``riots``, angrily protesting the changes`` does not contain any mention of 'riots' and it does not suggest that the changes were ``criticized by many players``.    I'm guessing these edits were made by pro-Jagex wikiers for some reason or another. If the criticisms are necessary to maintain a neutral article then please add them again.     If a reliable and verifiable source can be used then go for it.    == Runescapeclassic_combat_ranged.gif‎ ==  This is clearly broken, take a look and i think you will agree D (  )  : Broken in what way?    :: If you told us why you think it's broken that would really help. I don't think it's broken. It's a little jerky, certainly, but it's probably supposed to look like that.     Oh for goodness sake! Just look at it! Is it so hard to see the picture is clearly not working? And if it is, it hardly does the article any good. You guys need to learn to take simple criticism. RuneScape players really are a little dull aren’t they? Or just blind?   )  : If you won't explain why, then we can't (and in my personal case, won't) help you. If you believe there is a problem, explain why; we can