   I agree that the citations are overly long and at places unclear. However, this topic is very sensitive and any paraphrasing, deleting, or partial citations can be interpreted as biased editing. For myself, I cannot take the responsibility to giving my view about this question. As per the Wiki NPOV article WP:NPOV, what must be done in this case is to give all views to a problem, pointing to the side which holds the particular opinion, and avoid taking any side, trying to stay neutral. If I paraphrase, edit, or give any opinion, this will be already my POV. All the more, that cited documents are official, have legal status, and are binding to a country, in this case Bulgaria. As for the Skopje report, it is indeed necessary to include it, once cited, and I am searching for it. It is probably minutes of a conference.  And why do you state that Roma do not define the official position? Roma parties are well represented in the Bulgarian parliament, so they partake in every decision which cannot be said for many other countries, not only in Eastern Europe.  