` :::I presume so, it has been mentioned in passing that the the albums project, I think it is, had a guideline to use ``1966 (see 1966 in film)`` where appropriate...  or was it films? Regardless that alwasy stuck me as a good way to go, it discourages blind linking (how often is the ``by`` link useful - incidentally I moved ``BY`` to ``Baptist Youth`` a few days back.   On a more generic note it has been said many times that projects do not trump general guidelines. Clearly if they did you would get jurisdiction conflicts.  It is ok I think to provide specialist exceptions ``We italicise scientific titles, becasue that's how it is done`` or ``we use 'mya' instead of BC`` or ``we use IUPC spelling for chemicals, not UK or US.``  What is not ok is what some have tired to do , make OWNed projects a bastion of some idiosyncratic style (over and above ENGVAR type choices that are simply due to the early contributors).   , .`