 :Harish, I am sorry you are so frustrated about this. You have now gotten opinions from a half a dozen or more people here; several have made a good faith attempt to help you with it; and they all say the same thing: this man is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article, according to the criteria of this encyclopedia. You need to get the message. It doesn't really matter how the article is written; it's a question of the person himself. Not everybody in the world is appropriate for a Wikipedia article - I'm certainly not, even though I have been mentioned by Reliable Sources now and then. There are other places on the internet where you can put  the information about this man, but it doesn't look as if Wikipedia is one of them. :And some advice: don't take it so hard, or so personally. This isn't a judgment against you or against Mr. Mathew. It's just a judgment about what kind of articles Wikipedia should have. I notice you went out and nominated a bunch of other articles for deletion, out of your frustration, and people warned you not to do that. Some of the article you nominated do need to go, but some of them clearly meet Wikipedia's criteria. Since you don't seem to understand Wikipedia's criteria, you should not nominate articles for deletion.  :Is there anything I can help you with - aside from this one article?   