`::::That isn't an acceptable response.  You assert that ``consensus`` exists, but fail to supply evidence that a valid consensus actually does exist.  A page full of various discussions, about various aspects of this article, is not evidence of such a consensus.  If the consensus is so clear to you, please present a summary of the discussions supporting that view, so that those of us still struggling to see it may be enlightened.  All I see are refusals to accept the paragraph, but I do not see any well-reasoned reasons or explanations. ::::When considering your response, please note these extracts from WP:CONSENSUS: :::: :::: :::: ::::I challenged any former claimed ``consensus`` that the paragraph should be omitted at  (the start of this discussion section).  Where is the evidence of a supportable reason to omit this paragraph? ::::Consensus may well come into play in the formulation of the precise wording of the inclusion, but a very strong case, supported by reference to appropriate policy extracts, needs to be made to keep any mention of the Top Gear exercise out of this article.   .   `