`: Looking at that page's revision history, you appear to have ``edit warred`` as much as anyone else.  :I urge you to re-read WP:BRD, specifically this passage:   :``BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring: instead, provide a reason that is based on policies, guidelines, or common sense.``    :Examining the talk page where one would expect to find those reasons, we see multiple contributions from each of the ``edit warring`` editors, even IPs - except you. You raise exactly one objection ``Academic Questions ... does not appear to be peer reviewed``, which in fact it is and proof was presented on the talk page. Did I miss your response? I encourage you to return to the talk page and discuss. Page protection should not be used to settle content disputes.     `