`  == sudosh ==  You're incorrect, it was not decided in the EAS AfD that ``Sudosh and EAS will be merged until EAS has its own article``. I can read just fine, and misrepresenting an AfD discussion will not win you any support here. What actually transpired is that one editor, , suggested that ``[until various distros adopt EAS] it should be best that it stay in the sudosh article``. Nobody else supported that motion, and the result of the AfD was not merge, but rather delete. Since a Delete-not-Merge vote is actually support for keeping it out of the article.  I realise you are the main developer and ``should know`` if the project has changed name. However, if the fact of the name change is so insignificant that the only source available so far is your own say-so on various web sites and announcement lists, that fails the verifiabiliy test. Wikipedia isn't about including everything, it's only about including information that is independently verifiable. If or when EAS gets picked up by your userbase and gets recognition as the replacement of sudosh, then there will be enough evidence out there to include it anywhere in Wikipedia. Until then, there is just not enough information out there from an neutral source (i.e., someone other than you) to conclude that EAS really is the replacement of sudosh. After all, it might turn out that nobody likes EAS, or that your entire userbase rejects EAS and continues to develop sudosh on their own. Then the article would be wrong if we kept your edits.  However, that doesn't mean no mention of EAS can be in the article. I'll edit it to reflect what is currently knowable by external sources. —   `