` == Eric Corbett ==  So, it's alright for your friend Eric Corbett to refer to me as an ``ignorant PITA``, but reporting him for breaking 3RR (for which no one said a negative word to him about) is grounds for discussing how I avoided getting blocked for it (``spared a block``)? Exactly what is going on in your group of Wiki-friends? How long do you expect for your gang to be able to go on this way? (Meanwhile he's free to refer to others as ``coward``s and ``low life``s... )     :Have you actually ever taken the trouble to read WP:3RR? Specifically the part that says ``Considerable leeway is also given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a featured article while it appears on the main page``?     ::I've written a few articles of my own, Eric, and I've been around here nearly as long as Sandy. Meanwhile, that's an interesting way out of the situation: I'm pretty sure that's for purposes of vandalism and not content disputes; not for you to grind your axe towards keeping the word slut in the article without quotation mark or apostrophe.  ::I'm sure you also didn't miss the section below what you quoted that says: ``If you are claiming an exemption, make sure there is a clearly visible edit summary or separate section of the talk page that explains the exemption. When in doubt, do not revert. Instead, engage in dispute resolution, and in particular ask for help at relevant noticeboards such as the Edit war/3RR noticeboard``. Interesting that you chose not to do that.     :::So that's a ``No`` then.   `