`  == Go to article ``Bayt Nattif`` at the Talk-Page there (Last section) ==  , Shalom. One of our WP co-editors seems to be pursuing a political agenda bent on defaming Israel by its action in the winter of 1948, when I have insisted that he/she remain neutral, and not to politicize the situation. Specifically, the person prefers to mention Bayt Nattif of October 1948 as a ``Palestinian-Arab village,`` when I propose that it is far better to simply write ``Arab village,`` since in October of 1948 Bayt Nattif was then under the direct governance of the new government of Israel, based on the partition plan relegated to Israeli and Jordanian authorities by the dissolved British Mandate. To suggest that Bayt Nattif was, in October of 1948, a ``Palestinian-Arab village`` is to suggest a sovereign governmental body by the name of Palestine given charge over the village's affairs when it was actually the new State of Israel that had been given charge over its affairs. To avoid this seemingly contentious view, I have suggested keeping the introductory lines neutral in accordance with WP policy of WP:NPOV and by simply writing ``Arab village.`` (For a greater summary, go to WP article's Bayt Nattif's Talk Page,  bottom section. My disputant has also filed a formal complaint at Arbitration. Looking for your advice.  `