  == No it's common sense ==  :Whether or not one believes that a person topic banned in natural sciences should just assume that he has to go back to the committee and ask whether mathematics is covered, that's a power issue and not an improve-the-encyclopedia issue. Wnt (talk) 7:14 am, 20 November 2010, Saturday (11 days ago) (UTC+8) No it's simple common sense. If you're topic banned for editing mathematics articles, even if that topic banned is poorly worded as to suggest you are not topic banned for editing mathematics articles, simple common sense suggests you should seek clarification as to whether your topic ban really isn't intended to cover what you were banned for instead of just presuming it isn't and gettign in to edit wars in that very same area again. If Brews was an idiot, perhaps it really wouldn't occur to him that when he is topic banned for editing mathematics articles his topic ban may actually be intended to cover mathematics articles. But the info we have is he isn't. In fact the only reason this became an issue is because Brews clearly isn't an idiot, otherwise he would have just assumed natural science does cover mathematics. However the problem is he was trying to be too smart by half, since as I said, wikipedia has never liked those who try to get around things by technicalites due to poor wording when it's clear to everyone involved that the wording was just poor.   