`  ==BLP tag== I just added a tag alluding to WP:BLP especially for newcomers and those unfamiliar with how it pertains directly to the subject of this article (the book and its author, a living person). Please consult the links in the tag at top and here for further information about special concerns and policies pertaining to editing such articles as this one. Here is a key passage from WP:BLP: Editors must take particular care when writing biographies of living persons and/or including any material related to living persons. These require a degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to our content policies:  * Verifiability * Neutral point of view * No original research We must get the article right.Jimmy Wales. Keynote speech, Wikimania, August 2006. Be very firm about high quality references, particularly about details of personal lives. Unsourced or poorly sourced  controversial (negative, positive, or just highly questionable) material  about living persons should be removed immediately from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, and user pages.Jimmy Wales. ``WikiEN-l Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information``, May 16, 2006 and May 19, 2006 These principles also apply to biographical material about living persons in other articles.  The responsibility for justifying controversial claims in Wikipedia, of all kinds, but especially for living people's bios, rests firmly on the shoulders of the person making the claim.  (Some italics and bold print added.)  These policies are very important to keep in mind when composing and editing this article.  For example, there are some claims currently presented in this article citing sources using words like ``mendacity`` and ``lies`` in relation to what they are regarding as ``inaccuracies`` and ``mistakes`` in Carter's book or making allegations skirting on claims of plagiarism (like the parts relating to derivations of maps of Palestine), which in my view are still highly dubious, as the origin of the maps and Carter's sources of the maps still may not be the book by Ross as Ross claims, despite his claims. [E.g., Carter's source can be the one that he does cite, whereas Carter's source may have used Ross, without Carter realizing that connection.]  Quoting sources making such claims and thus giving them attention and perhaps credence (belief in their value) without giving any support for the allegations of intentional deception on the part of the author, President Carter, is highly problematic and such references might be considered libelous and subject to deletion (see tag at top), given Wikipedia's current editing policies (see the notes to Jimmy Wales). In some instances, the allegations are quoted and then the article goes on to say that no specific evidence has been presented yet by those alleging such claims.  That material may still need to be deleted.  It is not of the ``high quality`` that adherence to current content policy in WP:BLP requires: ``Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard`` (see tagged links above; some italics and bold added).  To new editors: again, as I've stated earlier and in editing history comments: Please do not just toss in external links; if adding material, one needs to provide complete information about the source in a full citation in a note (prevailing format).  Anything less than that is going to be considered either ``unsourced`` or ``poorly sourced`` and subject to deletion (following Wikipedia policy just quoted). One needs to provide both reliable and verifiable sources.  External links are not enough; they do not identify clearly the nature of a source and one needs to know the authority of the source added (who the person is and what the publication is, so that one can verify and evaluate credibility). NYScholar  [Explanation: The W policy phrase ``poorly sourced`` implies a value judgment; one must evaluate sources in determining which ones to cite; not all sources are equal in value; some are more valuable (credible, authoritative) than others.  Knowing the identity of the author of a