`:My first suggestion is get rid of the bold type. Nothing in this should be bold at all my friend. Bold should be for section headings. Now I would again make the suggestion that the hunger strike themselves may be notable the prisoners themselves may not be. I would suggest finding specific sources to draw notability from. In this paticular case and I``m going off the article as I'm not entirely versed with the intricacies there are almost 1500-188 prisoners that were or are on a hunger strike. Does this make them all notable no it truly doesn't. Read the section [] and then look at what you have written. It's a good attempt but the current wording on that article is better, it covers it nuetrally and does acknowledge the concerns that many aid organizations and UN had with the situation. Can you explain how these prisoners are notbale other then just this hunger strike?     `