 ::::::::Conceding that this is most likely a primary source, I can only find one passage on the page you mention regarding primary sources that seems relavent to me: Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify are supported by the source.  I note a distinct lack of references to calculations done with the aid of a computer algebra system and I take issue with being accused of original research as well as being accused of wikilawyering without proper context.  Nevertheless, the consensus among editors of this page appears to be that the primary source is insufficient because it is ostensibly the work of a computer algebra system.  Assuming I have that right (and please correct me if I do not), then I concede that the material should be removed until a relaible secondary source can be found.  As a matter of good faith, what I would like to see and still have not, is evidence of this often mentioned prior consensus regarding the exclusion of computer algebra systems.  If such a policy does indeed exist, given all the links the community has been able to provide to other wikipedia policies, it should not be much trouble to provide a link to that policy as well.  