`  == Inverted Ad Hominen is non-notable ==  When I correct the ad hominem article later, I'm zapping the 'inverted ad hominem' term.  It is completely non-notable (86 hits in google) and was invented and inserted into the article by .  Heck, the article itself even attributes it to Layman, a random web user, as having said it.  *Original edit inserting it under an ip address *Edit by User:Layman the same day  There's a reason why the term wasn't invented by logicians too, because ``inverted ad hominem`` is still ad hominem.  There's no ``inverse`` about it.  The so-called ``inverse ad hominem`` is just a case of ad hominem where someone says ``my qualifications are better than yours`` instead of directly saying ``your qualifications suck.``  The meaning is the same and there is no reason for another term.  I really don't think there is any question that this and the silly thing about it being coined should be removed.   6 July 2005 17:19 (UTC)`