  Internet television and movie databases are contemporary things and primarily for television and movie actors and voice actors fortunate enough to get credit for their work in visual media.  I am only now returning to voice work after 20 years in the legal profession.  I did a number of TV spots for local broadcast  in the 80's, prior to the availability of Internet databases and any real recognition of voice over talent.  We were primarily behind the scenes back then and my work was not reviewed.  I was simply hired or not hired.  And while these exchanges for inclusion in Wikipedia have been a little humbling, they remind me both that voice actors have always struggled for recognition   and that it really isn't something I'm that concerned about in the great scheme of things.     I do appreciate that Wikipedia maintains guidelines to assure that articles provide some value to the Wiki community, but I honestly believe that information should be available and readers should be afforded the opportunity to decide for themselves whether there is value in the material. It may glut the database, but part of the charm of Wikipedia is the ability to find some information on just about anything.  Value, like notability, is a subjective thing, and I would urge that such criteria not carry more weight than it should be afforded in your determination.  Nevertheless, remove this article if it doesn't meet your guidelines.  It won't necessarily bruise my ego or deter me from my work, whether or not it's recognized.  That isn't really an essential part of what I do in providing disembodied voices.  I would still rather be heard than seen or known.