`:: Not to be contrary, but this edit, while fully unconstructive, adverse to our policies on NPOV and our guidelines on tone, is not vandalism. As I believe you know, Vandalism is ``Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.`` (emph. in orig.) In fact, ``test`` edits are not considered vandalism - vandalistic edits require that one be acting in bad faith - specifically ``adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.`` PM is not permitted to remove or restate such, as he is not permitted to edit articles about living individuals. Additionally, if PM intended to alledge he was ``removing vandalism,`` there are a series of steps he should have taken after removing said vandalism - he did not warn the user, and he did not mark the edit as minor. In summary, said edit, however rightful it was, however justified it was under WP:BLP, and all else, was expressly prohibited by PM's probation. If he would like to apply for a modification to that probation allowing him to make good edits to living persons biography, I would have no comments on that application, but untill such time, he is not permitted to edit biographies of living people.     `