`  == Baffled ==  I'm puzzled by the behavior of the anonymous user that keeps inserting ``detachment``, and ``independence`` into a introductory paragraph of the specified complexity article, making that paragraph practically useless. It is true that detachment and independence were characterizations of specification that Dembski used in earlier versions of his work, but which he subsequently dropped as characterizations. There were lots of reasons for his having done so.  The particular way this user is trying to reinsert these concepts is completely erroneous (even on Dembski's own terms).   I'm not sure exactly how to proceed here.  This cycle of reversion is not very productive, but mainly I don't want to place myself in the position of clarifying Dembski.  `