  :::I agree with the use of mediation.  Also, I suggest that you move the portions of the article dealing with fan clubs onto a new article.  That would help resolve the problem of this being a fan site and also make the article more concise.  I notice that none of you have addressed your obvious bias in favor of the Harley company and its products.    I am not a passer-by.  As a legal professional involved in the area of disability law I am very concerned about the harm caused by this very unsafe form of transportation and the death and disability it causes.  I have not edited the page extensively as I would like to do and I have not reinstalled sections about the hazards of these machines out of deference for the majority of authors on this article.    However, the authors appear to be utterly oblivious to their own biases and unmindful of the high casualty rates for operators of these dangerous devices in comparison to operators of automobiles.  Also, they are oblivious to the social costs, including increased Medicaid and Medicare costs for those crippled and disabled by these awful gadgets. In the same light, because of the marketing and fan base of this product, ridership is higher than it would be if ownership were not encouraged.  As a result, the relative popularity of this product adds to the high social costs.  I want this page to be neutral as required by Wikipedia standards and I do not want it to be supportive of motorcycle ownership.  Likewise, I do not wish to have it biased against the Harley Company.  I want the same thing you do, which is fairness and neutrality.  As it stands the article does not meet those standards.  Let's clean it up and move on.    