`  == NFC criteria ==  I noticed you comment that you ``wouldn't oppose a full revert``. Why? The draft was posted for 10 days (and two days before that, in fact). This was announced twice on the talk page, with invitations for feedback and complaints. I spent a lot of time producing the new version; why would you revert it after I've done the right thing, going through a rather long consensus period.  To my logic, there is consensus if no one has complained or asked for changes under those circumstances. If not, what do you consider would be consensus? I even asked whether anyone wanted a different timeframe ... nothing.  Thanks for your edits; they're really good.     :I just wanted to state the my edition wasn't necessarily an endorsement of the change. :Some of the concerns I've raised haven't been addressed. Did I missed something? Overall, I like the change. I would only keep backward compatibility with the numbering and, for a while, use a warning at the top explaining  although the page's text has been recently drastically changed, no change in the policy was intended, and that any incoherence found should be automatically settled to the old version's meaning.   `