`  ==Old notability proposals== My experience was that it is very hard to avoid having a notability proposal tagged as ``rejected`` since lots of editors hate ``instruction creep.`` It in no way helps a new proposed guideline to hide a former proposed guideline by redirecting its name to the new one. I like the old one for news stories more than the proposed new one. The most you can reasonably hope for, in the end,  is a tweak to WP:N. The WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS seemed to follow from the earlier effort to establish a guideline for when a news story might justify an encyclopedia article (secondary coverage in books, plays, movies, or societal changes , or new legislation (``Amber's Law``, ``Megan's Law.``) is a bit insulting and contemptuous to hide the work that a number of good editors contributed to the old notability proposal for news stories by replacing it with a redirect to your effort. The proposals are not at all the same. The talk page of the first proposal also includes a pains-taking effort to analyze AFDs about news stories. Just let it be.  There were multiple efforts to create guidelines for schools, and newer efforts did not find it necessary to obliterate older efforts.   `