`  === The informal logic fallacy ref === The intro begins ``An appeal to nature is a type of argument`` and then refs 'argument' to Informal logic > fallacy at Stanford encyclopedia. The ref does not mention appeals to nature, yet is placed where one would think it should be particularly relevant. It is my understanding at this stage, that ``appeal to nature`` is used to refer to arguments of any kind which involve.. an appeal to nature. Have we established that doing so, makes an argument informal? eg. are the appeals to nature discussed by Julia Annas and Cooper formal or informal?  I think either the article should state ``An appeal to nature is a type of informal fallacious argument`` or this ref is misplaced. Any objections to it being removed?  Perhaps the argument link, could be linked to argument (disambiguation) to avoid undue association with formal argument which is the current target.   `