`  I've done that; what's the point? You pick a user name and that's it. There's nothing that particulary identifies me in any way. Thanks, but I really think I'm wasting my time here. Further esearch on the web indicates that the Wikipedia is rapidly becoming a laughing stock due to its ``one-size-fits-all`` editorial policies. The one thing that more people find more offensive than anything else is your automatic asumption that ``the extreme minority view`` must by definition somehow be wrong. Tell that to numerous Nobel Prize winners.   As for Girolamo Savonarola's statement: ``but ones from competitors like Arri and third parties such as Technicolor and Sony: none of them took this idea seriously.`` I don't know who you've been talking to, but there's a vast army of employees of all those companies who can't be taken seriously!  It appears that, as before, **Factual** information on Panavision is only going to be available from one source, and it's NOT this one.`