` :::This confirms all that has already been said. You consider it important because of your own analysis of what you think Blair might have meant by it, and what it may indicate about Blair.  Please click on the links in the previous sentence for policy based, real rationale for not including it.  If you were to add this to the article it would be removed for all these reasons, yet without them, there is absolutely nothing to indicate why it is not a trivial event.  Basically you want to hint to the reader that they should read into the event some unsaid significance, and reach the same conclusion you have. :::Notice I am not offering any opinion about your theory.  You could well be correct.  What I am saying is Wikipedia is not the place for speculation. :::As long as this lacks a reliable source that spells out what you are claiming, an authority who is well placed to offer insight into Blair's inner-most thoughts, then you've got nothing.    `