` :: Good point! Which is why I long ago (it seems, i.e. earlier yesterday, as soon as I learned how) bowed to the formality of acquiring the Wikipedia-form permission. - Still, it'll be awhile, I hope, before sueing someone for using a Nobel-laureate's four-line obituary of Hitler will be publicity to ``revel`` in. Even Murdoch (jewish, sadly relevant in this case) might not want to appear ``supporting`` Hitler that way. Or maybe not, who knows, he might want that obituary suppressed from ever being quoted again. Better safe than sorry, I agree. I like following the guide-lines, but it was hard getting easy info on them, and unpleasant getting there. I bite back, sure - but only ``back``. On the issue itself, I cherish being as correct as only possible. Yet in the relevant case, copy for ``educational purposes`` would be validly claimed - until tried and determined otherwise. Better safe than sorry. Though there's always a limit to how little ``risk`` should, and can, be taken. No risk is never an option.`