`  I haven't checked out this article in weeks.  Sad to see it has turned into a virtual campaign pamphlet.  Notable, relevant facts have been buffed away, minimized, and spun  from the number of employees post-merger (``...worldwide``), to her HP years, now made to sound as if she were a lone champion railing against the board's foolhardy and short-sighted opposition... the raw fact she has never held office (a simple fact, right?  Perhaps meriting a statement of six words:  ``Fiorina has never held public office``), it now includes a multiline ``counterargument`` from Fiorina including a Fox news quote including her claim the American people want people outside the ``professional political class``.  What?  Contemporaneous sentiment and commentary on her performance at HP important context has been excised.  Cited facts are pulled from articles without their original context (which is sort of amusing when you go and read the source).  The above-the-fold summary is atrocious and very POV.  This article has no nuetrality indeed.  It reads like there must have been a focused effort to shape this article for her political benefit.  `