I think that's what's intimidating to many reviewers. Who wants to be the first to support, if Fifelfoo/F&f;/et al come along shortly afterwards and rubbish the article because a journal title isn't in italics, or worse still there's a misplaced comma? In the firm belief that FA =/= perfect, I probably tend to take a more robust view than some others; if I think there's a serious problem I'll oppose, but I'll also support in the face of relatively minor imperfections.     