` ::::::: So you agree that the debate is non-notable at all and the section can be removed? Whether absence or presence of something is ``invitation to escalation`` doesn't really matter. Either it's relevant and it stays, or it isn't or it goes away. So far I cannot see any evidence for relevance except for editors themselves doing creative synthesis of tidbits from various sources. No papers, book chapters etc. dealing with the so-called dispute.   `