  :::Why not? Shouldn't an article that talks about a dispute have contents related to it? Especially if it is a territorial dispute based on historical evidence & especially if most of the evidence put forth by both parties are maps.... I really don't get how people here expect to convince ppl to take stuffs out because it is not the predominant whatever. So, something doesn't show up on google; then we can't ever talk about it? Because it is not mainstream, we should take it out ? - even in an article that should present those things.... (  )