`   ::I will freely admit, anonymous users as a whole seem to disagree with me. I am trying to be fair to the article. It is not entirely unsourced, there is information linked from the CBRM website, lets make that clear. My problem is with the agrument ``Everyone knows it``. I live in Glace Bay, John's home town. I've asked me thinking I was some kind of idoit for now knowing John's IQ score. Apparently every person I ask is also an idoit. It seems clearly placed to bias John as a smart guy because everyone knows he is to an extend. Any accusation, be it accused of being a member of a high IQ society or being accused or taking long walks on the beach is not encyclopedic, espeically if it is policitical and biased. For example, what if someone accuses John of being a bigot, do we include that to? What about if they accuse me of hating poor people? No because while it is fact he was accused, anyone can accuse anyone of anything just to have it included in an article. In fact, I accuse John of eatting Africian babies. There, now it should be added under your logic. I checked Trudeau, Nixon and  Hillary Clinton I CANNOT find an IQ or a High IQ society listed. AGAIN, my challage is still open. By the way, while statsically rare, the amount of people who become policiatins is low as well. I am not trying to be be stubburn, I have a simple test I am employing a simple test that is not being met here. Also, it is not encyclopedic, which is the whole point of Wikipedia. If you cannot understand that I am following Wikipedia policy or disagree with Wikipedia policy, you should not edit Wikipedia. Again I have asked for a third opinion on the subject.  `