`  ==Fair use rationale for Image:Bigmountain.PNG==  :Image:Bigmountain.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.  Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.  If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.   == Knock it off ==  I stumbled on this page while reviewing the recent changes page, and the silly reverts, chatting, and unsubstantiated additions (from both sides of the ``dispute``, evidently) don't belong.  Discuss stuff on this page, or move on, but stop cluttering up WP with crap. And everyone, again on both ``sides``, needs to read WP:RS, WP:V, and lots of other acronyms I can't think of right now.       Please, please, please stop adding this material unless you can cite the sources.  It is presented in a way that is extremely POV.  If you continue, you will leave me no option other than to invoke the 3RR rule.  This will cause a block to your account which I am sure you do not want and I hate recommending.  Bring your concerns to the discussion page.  Thanks     :I am about to make my one and only revert to this article for today.  If an IP editor reverts this again without discussion, I will ask that this page be protected from editing by editors without an account (see WP:RFPP; this is doable, and I think would be agreed to by the admins working at that page), and I will then revert the POV material.  Use this talk page, and try to create an NPOV article, or all IP editors may lose the ability to edit this article.  :I stumbled upon this page by accident, and have no pro- or con- opinion on the management of this resort, but it is on my watchlist now, and I will do what I can to insist that statements by either camp are verifiable from reliable sources, and not unverifiable opinions.     Will the person who persists in vandalising this page please stop. If you have genuine problems with the article then use the discussion forum, that is what it is there for.  If your problems are with the politics regarding the sale of the mountain, then you are airing your views in the wrong way and in the wrong place.  PLEASE STOP  —Preceding unsigned comment added by      The anon IP vandal is back at it.     == Reasons ==  If you want to discuss reasons, do so in here.  You do not post open discussions in the article itself.     Why do you insist on removing cited material.  The IP of this company had been documented making changes for itself.  Is there some reason to exclude ``bad`` news about this hostile takeover?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:Contr