`  == ``notes``, ``points out`` and other suggestions ==  One of the TFAR commentators has said that the article uses a lot of ``X notes that``, ``X points out that``. Such formulations fall foul of WP:SAY (part of the ``words to watch`` section of MOS).I'd also add that the article names a lot of people (in the lead and throughout the article) but doesn't always tell us who they are - the first paragraph of the main body of the article, for instance, lists 14 names on the trot without explanation and expects the reader either to know who all of them are, or to click a wikilink away from the article to find out who they are, or not care. (Perhaps American readers will be more familiar with them, but I recognise only 4 names on that list). Perhaps something like ``includes commentary from comedians X and Y, journalists P and Q, actors B and C, and musicians V and W`` or something like that? And I'd suggest checking the first mention of every name in the lead and the article to see whether a one/two-word introduction to that person is given, and add one if not.  `