` I don't think you understand the point of the discussion. There is only 1! here is the edit that is reverted by you and others: ``largest city and capital of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, a de facto independent republic which is recognized as a part of Azerbaijan.`` Whatever the De-Facto independent state is recognised by whoever, it is not relevant to the article ``Stepanakert``. It is relevant to the article of that state.  For example, if I write in the Article of Königsberg: ``The city-fortress was captured by the 1st Baltic Front and the 3rd Belarussian Front in April 1945, and 2 days later the Northern German Army was totally destroyed by the same 2 Fronts and the remaining forces - captured.`` Even though those 2 events are relevant to each other in in some ways interconnected, because the same German army-division was defending Königsberg and that the same soviet forces, that captured the city in some days forced the Northern German Army succum, the 2nd sentence I write ``...and 2 days later the Northern German Army was totally destroyed by the same 2 Fronts and the remaining forces - captured`` are NOT relevant to the article under the name Königsberg. It is relevant to articles of the North German Army, 1st Baltic Front, Assult of Königsberg etc. but NOT the article of Königsberg as it has no DIRECT relevance.`