`Criticism of Cynefin==  Here's something interesting for you Snowden. I am using the Cynefin model as my strategy over the next few decades to show why this model is pseudoscience. The big problem I face is that you have failed to make this model popular. I ``wish it was popular`` because it would be much more pleasure to tear it apart. For now, this model is mostly championed by you and lesser so by others. ``Schade`` or shame a German would say.  You appear erudite but I notice at least 2 instances of pure mysticism or gobbledygook on your part. [1] Cynefin with Complex quadrant . Even Nobel Laureats do not agree and argue about Complexity Science  - in relation to non-sentient systems like hurricanes and the weather - yet you advance this for human interaction and cognition. Do you not see your own ``cognitive bias`` here ? Are you a fundamentalist about this religion Cynefin? [2] On the page about your beliefs, I was shocked to see you labelling yourself as a Roman Catholic. So you are against the academic reality based wisdom of Darwin and Dawkins ? It would explain how you would advance pseudoscience but it doesn't explain why you insult NLP ! Please help me understand you.`