` :Dear RomânescEsteLatin, there is one statement in your above remarks that I cannot accept: ``a whole population migrated without actual proof``. Actually, there are written sources (actually mostly written by Romanian authors) which suggest that the ancestors of the Romanians lived south of the Danube river and migrated northward in masses: chronicles from the 16th-17th centuries suggest that the Romanians crossed the Danube and immigrated to the territory of present-day Romania. I think the statement that a ``whole population lived on the territory of present-day Romania before the 11th century`` could also be qualified unscientific taking into the fact that all sources written before the 12th century, all archaeological findings from that period and all toponyms suggest that the territory was inhabited by peoples whose vernacular was not a Romance language. On the other hands, sources written in the 9th-13th century and toponyms suggest that masses of a Romance-speaking population (that is the ancestors of the Romanians) used to live on the territory of Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece at that time - and because ``RomânescEsteLatin`` nobody denies that the ancestors of the Romanian people must have been searched among a Romance-speaking population. Therefore, I think we should refrain us from labelling theories ``unhistoric``.   `