` :::::::I still concur with Bilcat.  I think there are fundemental differences between the terms ``Military occupation`` and ``Occupied Territories`` that justify seperate articles.  For instance, thinking of Irag and/or Afghanistan; They are under ``military occupation``, but couldn't really accurately be called ``occupied territories``.  If you think a distinction like this one is valid, than it follows that there should be seperate articles.   `