`  :: ``Bottom line here, and this is likely not your fault`` is addressed to whom? So tell me what those intentions were? Don't you see everyone is jumping the gun? My assumption was that content disputes don't give a anti-homeopathy editor rights over a pro-homeopathy editor. Since the probation warning yesterday I have not touched the Deadly Nightshade article. However an anti-homeopathy editor has reverted twice in the span of a few hours without any consensus. He has ignored editors on the talk page that are trying to work towards an agreement. Before yesterday I would have reverted his edit at least once. But due to the warning I avoided the article page and focus my attention on the talk page. Instead of touching the talk page, I brought the issue to AN/I. What have I done wrong?   `