`:I'm backing this up with an argument, so I don't expect that you will revert these changes, based on your statement above.  :I take issue with your position that the standard contemporary manner in which Latin is rendered is ``inaccurate.`` In addition, I don't believe that this is ``support[ing] the fiction that letters such as U existed, or that lower-case letters were used in Latin.``  :Any Latin textbook, as well as my copies of Latin histories and poetry in Latin are all rendered with the v/u distinction (but not with j's, and not with macrons over the vowels outside of textbooks) and with lowercase letters, capitalization for the beginning of sentences and proper nouns, and with basic punctuation. It would be counterproductive and nonstandard (and not just for English text with the periodic Latin phrase thrown in now and then) for us to decide that any use of lattin must be in the 24 letter alphabet and in all caps.   :And, by the way, I don't think it's very good form to set terms that must be met by others or else you plan to revert the article, since this isn't your article, Chameleon.   :Thanks, |   `