`:I've restored the ``Background`` section, expanded to include Sarnecki's opinion (and with a slightly shorter account of the shooting). As I said in my edit summary (and as others have said here), when sources differ we note that in the article; we don't excise the explanations we don't think are ``correct``. (I can't read Swedish, by the way, so I may have misrepresented what Sarnecki said – I'd be grateful if somebody could check that for me.)     `