`  === Re-review ===  GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria  #Is it reasonably well written? #:A. Prose quality:   #::  #:B. MoS compliance:  #:: {{#if:The lead section is still a bit short and could use some expanding. WP:LEAD recommends that an article of about this size should have one to two paragraphs - I think this one can easily support two. You have done some good work in expanding what the lead covers.|The lead section is still a bit short and could use some expanding. WP:LEAD recommends that an article of about this size should have one to two paragraphs - I think this one can easily support two. You have done some good work in expanding what the lead covers.|}} #Is it factually accurate and verifiable? #:A. References to sources:   #::  #:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   #::  #:C. No original research:  #::  #Is it broad in its coverage? #:A. Major aspects:   #::  #:B. Focused:  #::  #Is it neutral? #:Fair representation without bias:  #::  #Is it stable? #: No edit wars, etc:  #::  #Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? #:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:   #::  #:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  #::  #Overall:  #:Pass or Fail:  #:: {{#if:Well done! This can now be called a Good Article! Keep up the good work, and consider a peer review, and this should be up to Featured Article Status soon! With so much history behind this market, it should definitely be an attainable goal.  (// |Well done! This can now be called a Good Article! Keep up the good work, and cons