  ::My comments were concerned with the people who claimed it should be deleted altogether.  Regarding those people, i think they are not being helpful.  At FFMG, I attempted to address your concerns. The section is now not only about one campaign and I removed the 'see also' section. ::The agenda's of 26 parties have to do with policies and political personalities.  An election boycott has to do with the general election itself.  That is why it is relevant.  Also, your 77% turnout figure regards people who registered and did not vote.  You should also take into account the number of people of voting age who did not register.  Most of the people who boycotted were likely to have decided to boycott before registration even took place.  There are about 7 million people who did not even register.   ::Finally, the relevence of the boycott relates to specific communities boycotting.  While figures are not out yet as such, I am sure after figures do come in, there will be communities where 80 or 90% of the people of voting age did not vote.  ::Regarding Zain's comments, I maintain that theory (regardless of whether it is scientific or social theory) can be considered a fringe theory.  But we are not talking about theories here.  We are talking about events.  This event did happen.  Theres nothing theoretical about it. ::After your comments, i do agree that the last sentence is not so important and might as well be removed. ::I fail to see how it is possible to shorten the second to last sentence without removing relevant list of some of the organisations that are boycotting.  ::I hope that my comments and edits are received in good faith.   