  ==Contradiction in your addition and deletions of cited  content== Since you are repeatedly deleting my contributions over various articles without discussion (see my contributions page) and talk page strewn with your messages . I find your selective actions  contradictory .   We need to discuss the  serious contradictions in your appropriating the privilege  to add or remove content with citations by other editors .There are instances galore but  I am going to discuss here only two such instances .   Lets take instance  no 1 first regarding a dodgy book  Kshatriyas_and_would-be_Kshatriyas - which is currently citation no 18 on article Khatri . An article which you ostensibly started editing on 23rd September (and subsequently deleted various  valid content and citations) and on which you have done considerable work deleting and adding citations  as well as conflicting with other editors trying to contribute content .   Is this book a valid citation for a Wikipedia article or not ? Because you have been instrumental in both creating  this citation as well as condemning it . Since you have have stated yourself that you are not happy with this citation . *17th September Matthew Vanitas creates an article Kshatriyas and would-be Kshatriyas  *17th September  same day Sitush contributes to the article   and then improve the citation and article over next three edits starting with 25 October 2011 Sitush  *10 October 2011 Sun Quake  introduces Kshatriyas And Would-Be Kshatriyas citation on article Khatri. *User contributions Sunquake only posting on article Khatri .Account created for Sun_Quake Single-purpose account   *14th October 2011 Sitush  states I have never added Kshatriyas and Would-be Kshatriyas as a source, nor am I brilliantly happy with it as such....  *17th October sensing something is odd here I ask Can a wikilink be a citaion  17th October Page Talk:Khatri , See the section at the bottom of the page titled Lets take the case of citation 4 and b  *17th October 2011 On article Talk:Kshatriyas and would-be Kshatriyas I ask Is this book a valid secondary source for a wikipedai article  Whereas you state you are not happy with the citation , and yet it stays on the article inspite of your minute involvement with the article regarding edit contributions by others .   Is this book a valid citation for a Wikipedia article or not ?  Next lets discuss the article Baid and the citations you have provided there that contradict your own statements to others regarding quality of sources and content.    