`  (comment copied from above) GNU/Linux as a title also does not properly cover the scope of the article.  For example, there's an entire section on embedded Linux that mention devices such as Android.  That topic falls well within the scope of the current title, but the group that pushes the GNU/Linux name specifically points out that Android is not GNU/Linux.  It's not as simple as a name change, we'd have to change the scope of the article and ignore what reliable sources say in order to fit the name change, and that's the biggest issue; articles should fit reliable sources, not our preferences to the contrary. -   :It's unclear how Android could be within the scope of the article as this article is not about Linux, but a (group of) operating systems which use Linux as their kernel. Certainly, this usage, while being incorrect, is quite common, so the current article name is possibly appropriate, but then Android doesn't belong as it doesn't share other features with this group of operating systems.    ::...and Android is not an operating system which uses Linux as its kernel?  It falls under the scope you just described perfectly, which means that GNU/Linux would be an extremely inappropriate title for this article given it's scope (as determined by reliable sources) and per the description that you just gave.  Just because an operating system uses Linux as its kernel does not mean it is a GNU/Linux operating system.  That's not my conclusion, that's per the FSF itself. -   :::You don't seem to have read my comment properly. I didn't say that Android was ``GNU/Linux``, in fact the opposite if we are going to use that term.    :::To put it in other terms, if this article is about ``something`` other than the Linux kernel, then Android is not part of that ``something`` even though it uses the Linux kernel. This ``something`` is distinguished by use of certain software packages and architectural features. If you disagree, what is the difference between this article and the Linux kernel article?    ::::No I understood you perfectly, I didn't assume that you said Android was GNU/Linux; you said that this article is about ``a (group of) operating systems which use Linux as their kernel``.  By your own criteria and by what reliable sources have said, that includes Android.  The point I was making is that the name of this article cannot be changed to GNU/Linux without limiting the scope of the article to the detriment of the article and against reliable sources, and that's in addition to the WP:COMMONNAME issue. -   :::::Evidently you didn't. Maybe you misunderstood the meaning of the word ``a``: it is only ``a group``, not ``the group of all``. (I was not arguing for a name change to GNU/Linux.) You say that reliable sources say that Android is Linux but you don't reference them, so this is not convincing.    ::::::The references you're asking for are already found in the article and at Android (operating system).  Android falls exactly within the scope you gave; it is part of that group.  Arguing semantics (in a very unclear manner at that) doesn't really help. -  `