`[edit conflict]Jayen466, being named a co-conspirator was put up in a single sentence with zero background or context, and sounds rather like a fart in church.  The founders and co-founders and top officials' troubles have their place in this article as well, given that there is a reliable source.  Some legislatures have warned their colleagues about CAIR.   This all seems to me as speaking to the relevance and importance of these charges (or rumors?) against CAIR.  The ADL, has said that their reputation has been tarnished.  It has been talked up and down on conservative talk radio.  It's relevant.  The current status and reputation of CAIR is relevant, and it should be balanced against what it says about itself and what is said about it by others.  It's legal status is relevant.  I may not be doing it as well as might be hoped, (that's why none of us are writing this by ourselves) ), but it should certainly be in the article. Headquarters of the Conservative Underground  was printing the words of a  Representative Frank Wolf from Virginia. He was presumably talking about something of which he had some knowledge, and I would argue that he is RS. As for the rest, if anything of this nature is consistently edited out, it becomes meaningless to bother to put anything at all up! There is much in the article that is [citation needed] but it remains in there, much that is supported only from CAIR itself. But when it comes to anything about CAIR's legal & criminal woes, PelleSmith has reverted wholesale everything I have put up on this subject at least 3 times so far. That doesn't include his long history here at this article or anyone else's edits.  He of course is only gate-keeping to keep any unpleasantness out, while others who do not accept his view are ``POV-pushing``, ``have an agenda``, and are in general, dolts. You apparently agree with him and I don't plan to get into an edit war over it.      `