`  You are wrong, my dear Fralembert: Ahunt split the article and achieved what he felt to be a ``balance.`` So we now have an article with a ``snapshot`` of previously hidden park history (Alissa Apostle in her 1997 Queen's University Thesis says the park's history was erased and re-writtenand my research pretty well confirms her conclusion.) as well as a brief discussion of sites and activities. Moreover, there was almost nothing on the ``wildlife, the flora, the forest, the geology, the hydrology and the climate`` before I edited the article. So why did you not make a point of it when the article was very poor/sketchy? Besides, you are free to add such material, should you be so inclined.  And where else, in the whole world will you find such a clear and condensed overview of the park's history as well as threats facing the park? The point of my contribution is to help wikipedia visitors understand what is ``really`` going on in Gatineau Park.`