`As I said I don't deny Cyril presided in a sense I don't know what it is you're not reading. Can you show that Cyril presided to the sense that it excluded the Pope because this is some retro-reworking of events? That in fact is your interpretation of events. What's stranger to me is that one can recognise several people can preside without having power, but question this. If anyone wants a statement like ``Cyril presided (in the sense of being a single source of unity without any de jure power over the council), you're welcome to add that into the article Good luck.     `