`==Vandal warnings==  ===One more=== Dear Wb,   Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia.  It is considered vandalism.  If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  yours truly,    ===The others===     |     -      No prob.  Thanks for contacting me.  Believe me, I'd rather help you than block you.  So, here's some reading material:  Wikipedia:Manual of style.  This is an excellent resource for learning how to contribute here.  I'm also as close as my talk page.  Sorry to have come off harsh, but you wouldn't believe the sort of really weird edits from people who mean to harm the site instead of help it.  I'm extremely pleased to help you if you'd like. -    Wiki brah, why did you move a nomination for admin?  I'm not objecting, just confused.  Also, btw, how did you come across that page - it's not a usual page for new users to come across at first. Thanks in advance for your response.    ==Ho cakes==  Uh, right.  )  WB, what are you doing...?  I said I'd help you but if you do another edit like that last one, it'll be a time out.  OK?  No more weirdness?  Thanks. -    Well, in order to stay, your articles really need to meet a certain level of quality.  I'm sure you mean well, but you really need to settle down a tad and get a feel for the site.  You can't treat this like a blog page.  ``Ho cakes?``  I admit, it made me laugh, especially the ``featured article`` header.  But...stuff like that really isn't the best use of the site's resources.  The nice folks who pay for the servers want the best possible return on their investment.  Tell you what:  I have to run, but if you have an idea for an article, why not stop by my talk page and let me know what it is?  Maybe if I show you how to write a good article, you might understand WIkipedia better. -    It's OK.  We'll get you up to speed.  However, you should decide on a single user name.  Right now, you're bouncing between three of them.  How 'bout we just stick with this one here? -    :Last warning.  If you continue to post nonsense, or to disrupt Wikipedia by slapping a delete template on Cindy Sheehan, you WILL be blocked.     Actually, that is exactly what I was coming here to do.  That was uncalled for as was ``Monkey spank.``  Gotta give you a time out for a couple of days for disrupting this site.  Nothing personal.  However, you can still edit this page if you wish to respond to the block. -    == Good Morning ==  so what are you doing and going on?  Why is everyone being mean to me?  I am just trying to help.  I read some guidelines and articles and don't think she is a notable person just like a stuntwoman on tv for brief fame.  I am getting better but still sort of autistic my parents still keep me here.   No one wants to be mean to you.  I had a feeling you were autistic and I'm working with a couple of other autistic users.  We welcome you here.  But, you need to remember that this isn't a playground and that you simply can't edit the way you have been.  I'm giving you one more chance.  I'll remove your block, but only if you do the right thing, OK?  Let us all help you. -    OK, Brah.  I've unblocked you.  Now, please be good and edit like I know you can.  I have to go, but I'm keeping an eye on you.  )  Thanks. -     Hi, WB.  Man, I'm glad it was you and not the vandal I'm dealing with right now who's messing up my page.    If you want, I'll gladly paste that English-speaking template to your user page.  As far as making templates is concerned, they're pretty much like making articles, but I think you have to have the green light from other users before you create one.  I'll look into that for you.  Gotta run after I fix your user page. -    ==Take a look==  Think you'll like your user page now.  ))  Later! -    ==Sarah==  WB, please do not post articles like that.  There isn't a problem with pornography here, but there is a problem with nonsense and near-nonsense.  OK?  Please? -    Digging your user page.  )  What I am referring to is the non-notability of ``Sarah.``  Can't you think of something to write about other than an unverifiable third-rate porn actress starring in a fourth-rate porn movie?  I admit, it made me laugh, though. -    ==Copyright violation==  Hi, WB.  You cannot cut and paste information from other sites.  That's a violation of copyright law.  Not good.  Also, this is the English Wikipedia, not Brazilian Portuguese.  My friend, I don't want to send you for another time out, but this kind of editing is disruptive.  Let's wipe that thing out and start again, this time with a fresh article...one of your own. -    == Phil collins (south park) ==  I didn't vandalize your article, I put it up for VFD for the reasons I stated there. And I'm glad that Lucky is working with you, he's a good guy. That doesn't have much to do with your Phil Collins article, however.    I don't have any opinion about you, I don't know you. You shouldn't take my motion to delete your article as any kind of personal attack. As they say, it's nothing personal, it's just business. And, on a different note, please stop plastering  and related templates on my talk page.    == Templates ==  Wiki brah:   I'm sorry, I'm working on about a dozen other things at the moment that I need to finish. I'd like to be able to help, but I have too many things going on all at once. I really don't know much about porn anyway, I'm a theology professor, and I usually stick to contributing to theology articles or doing admin actions. Perhaps some of the more porn-savvy contributors could be of help?   ·     ==Concerns==  WB, do you realize that you just asked a Roman Catholic theologian - Essjay - for help with a porn article...?  And no, Soltak isn't picking on you.  He's trying to help but I think he's running short on patience.  I hate to say this, but so am I.  You keep on adding the same kinds of edits, you're using sockpuppets in an inappropriate manner (since when are you from Brazil, by the way?), you have yet to respond to a request for comment and now you're attacking other users.  I don't think you're being bad on purpose but your behavior's driving us kind of nuts.  I'd like you to do something for me.  Stay off Wikipedia this weekend.  That's not an order.  Instead, do something else.  Take a ride.  Go on a picnic.  Visit the park.  Go shopping.  Work on your hobbies.  Heck, watch some TV.  I plan on staying away myself.  I plan on spending time with my wife, flying my radio controlled airplanes and, quite possibly, start working on putting my 1965 Ford Mustang back on the street.  Poor little car's been sitting in my garage for six years and the weather should be pretty nice.  Might even tinker with my old '78 Mercedes-Benz 6.9 (that number sound familiar?).  In short, I'm going to do something that doesn't involve sitting by my computer.  You should too. -    I am not being mean to you, WB.  If you really are originally from Brazil, I'm sorry I doubted you.  The ``request for comment`` means that several other users are worried about the kind of work you're making for others to clean up after you.  Soltak told you about it.  If you go to Wikipedia:Requests for comment, you'll see what I mean and you'll have a chance to respond.  Did you read my last note all the way through?  Did you have a chance to enjoy your weekend away from the computer?  I had a rough day myself.  Crashed my model airplane after putting time and money into it (my fault) and my car's alternator blew out, leving me stranded.  So, sadly, I am back on the computer for the time being.  Once again, no one is being mean to you but your edits are causing problems and we all want to help you contribute better.  Otherwise, you may be blocked from editing for good. -    My bad.  I was thinking of another user who has a request for comment posted.  It isn't you and I'm sorry to have concerned you.  As far as the new articles are concerned, they are much better in my opinion than the ones you've done.  The one on the SNL skit 