` Many thanks, Rick. Back on sources and such, does anyone know of a source that discusses Conservapedia's factual record favorably? I doubt we can find anyone who will claim that Conservapedia has no factual errors (that would be false, anyway, and I would refuse to add it to the article myself), but we could probably find an article in the conservative Christian press that at least claims something like ``Conservapedia is as factually reliable as Wikipedia``. To be clear, I'm not going all pro-Conservapedia here, I'm mostly trying to prove a point. If you search for my username on Conservapedia, you'll find that I offered to do this while being berated by Andrew Schlafly for being a biased, liberal Wikipedian, to prove the point that I harbor no hostility toward them. Does anyone here read the conservative Christian or evangelical press? By the way, has anyone been able to access Conservapedia in the last 8 hours or so? I haven't, and my internet connection seems fine...   `