`  I agree that there should be some indication of Bach's significance stronger than that second sentence, as it is encyclopedic.  I'm still not happy with the word ``greatest``, because it's vague - and as you say it's an abbreviation, I'd really much rather include a modification of your expansion of the abbreviation above (I may try one day when I've more time).  I don't accept that ``everyone knows what it means`` - ``greatest`` means different things to different people, and there's too much of the peacock and the ``top ten`` about it.  And Britannica doing something is by itself no reason for Wikipedia to follow suit.  For now I modified the page according to this bit of NPOV policy.  Hope it's acceptable.   ♬  `