. ::: QG is indeed an active medical editor, but also one of the most controversial, to the point where I often stay away from articles he edits, which are often my favorite topics, the ones in which I'm a recognized expert in the real world. It's simply impossible to communicate effectively with him. He has a de facto IDHT, very tendentious, form of communication, and merely repeats claims and his own ideas, without addressing the concerns brought up by other editors. That he is usually defending and promoting a scientific skepticism POV (which is usually the same as the mainstream scientific and medical POV) is fine, but collaboration is essential, and his communication needs to be vastly improved. He only gets truly communicative when he's being threatened with a block, and then he suddenly will bend and bow and cooperate to the nth degree, but that stops when he's back into safe territory. When such an editor keeps me from editing my favorite topics, then you know something's really wrong. He gives skeptics a bad name. He has also been known to go on rampages through articles, doing exactly the opposite of what he usually does, supporting fringe POV and destroying mainstream content, the type he usually adds to articles. It's been a while since he did this, but it's been known to happen, making one wonder what type of mind we're dealing with. Wikipedia would be better off without him. A thorough CU would bring to light some astounding things.    