`51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)  == race and genetics, rewrite  ==  Maunus has claimed, along with others, that the ``race and genetics`` section gives undue weight to a genetic position.  To ``correct`` for this, he and others have tossed in a number of irrelevant and redundant statements.  As a result, the section is, in my humble opinion, incoherent. I suggest that we all collaborate on a rewrite of this section to make it more coherent and to give it the appropriate weight it deserves (perhaps 1/2 of what it has).  To avoid a revert war, we can create two discussion topics below, a ``rewrite of the race and genetics section`` and a ``discussion about a rewrite of the race and genetics section`` topic, and hammer out a rewrite there.  This section can be condensed and simplified quite a bit    Hippofrank (or previously, Chuck) :Hi Hippofrank, I am glad to see that you've decided to register. I basically agree that my solution was unelegant, and that writing a balanced section from scratch would be better. I currently I don't have the time to dig into that old material again. If you write up a section and post it here on the talk page for comments and suggestions for improvements I think that might be a good way to go about it. · 00:`