`     In the section ``Reactions`` the line, ``The Northeast Project's historical revisionism on historical Korean kingdoms`` is not neutral. Term ``historical Korean kingdoms`` is Korean ethnocentrism. Neutral dispassionate language must be used that respects the opinions of both Koreans and Chinese equally. The line, ``many other countries including China.`` seems to make grand small points. Using the word ``countries`` and ``including China`` implies national consensus or government statements which is not shown in the citations. In particular citation [17] uses the words ``A Chinese historian`` not ``China``. Instead the wording could be similar to ``...many non-Korean people including at least one Chinese historian...``  :Reactions - It has been discussed extensively to an uneasy consensus at Goguryeo that Koreanness of Goguryeo is not equal to Chineseness. There is a predominance of sources that refer to Goguryeo as a Korean kingdom and of Korean history, with very little connections to China. As for your concern for ``countries``, I will make the appropriate edit that you may address your issue.  :Key terminology - Later on, I'll expand upon this part to explain how the Northeast Project has come to define various aspects of China's historical revisionism and political expansionism with specific cases.     :List of Research Topics - Actually, there is an official website on the Northeast Project, but it seems to be in relatively flux. I'll try to get a fixed website linked ASAP.   `