` ::I'm with you guys.  It seems to be an archaic term anyway; I've been trying to find a better source for it than the dictionary that is currently referenced, but most of what I find that uses it is from before the 1920s. See, for example , the essay in question was published in 1912 and uses Indianapolitan when discussing financial crashes that occurred in the 1870s and 1890s.  Also,  uses the term. There seem to be a few more recent uses; but most of them seem to be trying to sound pompous and archaic. It might be worth a mention in the history section, but not the lede. ~ ''''|problem solving `