the article is 'vastly improved'?  I understand that before it was maybe risking copyvio, but with all the links to actors/directors/events in history, the blue hyperlinks I mean , it was , before, something wikipedia was well placed to do. Now it is such that any google search on the book will deliver. Why don't you 'improve' Taking It All In too? why do you leave some articles and 'improve' others? before it had images , and text that gave you a sense of kaels style..now its been neutered. Why don't you improve the books of clive james TV criticism The Crystal Bucket, say or Visions Before Midnight''. is that copyvio? These are rhetorical, exasperated , questions - no reply sought   