` For the record:  *  ::I point out that this is 's personal, chosen edit summary. * 1st unblock request review: (neg)  by  :* Fluffernutter comes back  and tells me not change my own user:talkpage (read that again). But earlier Fluffer wrote this: At any rate, you appear to have been disrupting someone else's talk page to make some sort of point that escapes me. ::My question is: Fluffer, what is wrong with me doing my own talkpage? Was not that your reason to keep the block up when it was about onther persons talkpage? You are an admin that lies to the mirror. Only your position (not your mind or backbone) allows you to get away with this. * 2nd request:  (neg), by . ::Guess wht: again . Now DB says: If you would have disagreed with the block, but simply expressed an understanding that you can't refactor and tweak other's archive settings (which was a bit WP:POINTy), you would have been unblocked (sure). There is always another admin to cover an admin. Because, DB, why did not NW think so in the first place? Why did Fluffer talk totally different? Just because I am dependent on an admins viw. But never, never, never will that admin orrct a fellow admi. DB, you were only seraching an explanation afterwards.  None of your admins did the right thing in the first place. None. Not '''''', not , not . Oh yeah, afterwards you know the right explanation (coincidentally saving admin A/B/C, but that is just a coincidence really). The Admin must be saved, whatever the stupidity. Now link me, you braves, where is NW being spanked? -  `