` *Oppose. I changed my mind, for the following reason.  While I still think it would be a slight improvement to have this article named ``Male circumcision`` with ``Circumcision`` being a redirect to it if it remains a redirect, nevertheless I now realize that what would probably happen in practice is that it would not stably remain a redirect but a variety of people would keep coming along and trying to be helpful by changing the redirect into a disambiguation page or a short article, leading perhaps to edit wars and to instability in the way readers would be able to find this article, and being a disservice to the reader who, in the majority of cases I believe, would have to find the right link and do another page load before arriving at the desired information, and who in many cases might abandon the search before arriving at this article.  One might argue whether it's of much importance to serve the reader who would abandon the search for the sake of a few extra seconds; I argue that it is.  People doing web searches often spend only fractions of a second considering a specific link, and I would much prefer that the reader's reaction be ``Oh, an informative Wikipedia article; maybe Wikipedia is useful after all`` than ``Oh, another short or content-free (i.e. disambiguation page) Wikipedia page; Wikipedia is a waste of time.`` It's not clear to me whether or not Wikipedia needs an article on the human penis specifically as opposed to an article on penes of mammals, but I'm convinced that it is good to have an article on male circumcision, and  that we have a carefully edited and well-organized one here. I believe that the majority of people searching for such information will use ``circumcision`` as the search term (whether in the Wikipedia search box or in a search engine), and I want them to be able to find it as effortlessly as possible; the long page load time is already one barrier.  Therefore, all things considered, I prefer keeping the current title, ``Circumcision``.I didn't intend to start a whole thread or a whole discussion.  Someone inserted the section heading ``Nameing Conventions`` (sic) above my comment, which I had placed on this page at Blackworm's request. ☺   `