`  :: The claim in the Wikipedia article is that ``Hari's claims that these chemicals are dangerous have been strongly refuted by experts in science and medicine.``  Among the chemicals in question is aluminum, perhaps the most prominent in the CSI source. Therefore by reasons of logic, this claim in the Wikipedia article is that experts in science and medicine refute that aluminum is dangerous... at all. And that is contradicted directly by a source that does meet MEDRS standards. Something is wrong here.   :: What qualifies the idea that aluminum is linked to Alzheimer's as ``fringe``? On what basis are you citing fringe? What exactly are you calling fringe? Are you calling Hari as a person herself ``fringe``? Or are you calling concern for exposure to some chemicals ``fringe``? What exactly? Thanks in advance for clarifying.   `