 :: Thank you!  :: I understand some of the source problems, I think, but: :: Ref 32 is a mainly review in one of Sweden's largest and most reliable newspapers. Is the link to svWP what's inappropriate? :: Refs 43 and 51 were arranged thus the way it was recommended on the talk page by one of WP's bio specialists.  :: It looks to me like the editor who did his best to improve the article for B-class at the time did his best to follow a number of instructions, including that he should quote and translate newspaper articles.  :: Is the bulkiness / quantity of it all what looks bad, in your opinion? :: Unfortunately, I do not know how to use citation templates.   