 :::What accusations?  Seriously, the tactic section directly claims that people involved in the Tea Party protests were the ones making the comments.  If you cannot accept this as a truth then that whole section should be removed as not relevant to the Tea Party Movement.  Just because a large number of MSM sources are not reporting on the response doesn't mean that it cannot go in.  The whole section is already quite biased against the Tea Party Movement, and per weight and NPOV there is no reason that Breitbart's wager cannot go in.  Furthermore, you must be reading something into it if you think that he is only challending Lewis and his 2 cameras.  If people are going to make race baiting statements like that of Lewis, then it is only appropriate that a response to the validity of those statements be included for balance issues.  These are serious allegations that Lewis et al have leveled.  Those to which they have been leveled against have every right to respond.  What would be most interesting is if someone were to come up with video proving Breitbart wrong, and my question then would be is that notable?  I think we know the answer to that.    