`  : I wrote most of the original rationale that is at the top of this Talk Page.  : The fact that someone ``doesn't know what they're talking about`` doesn't change the fact that they said it and that they maybe even believe it.  Wikipedia is not interested in truth, it is interested in verifiability.    : I struggled to insert into the Criticism of the Catholic Church text documenting arguments that the Catholic Church is not a Christian church.  It is not appropriate for Wikipedia to say definitively whether or not the Catholic Church is or is not a Christian church.  What it can say is that the Catholic Church considers itself to be a Christian church but some Protestants do not.  : A similar principle applies here.  : If Christians have a misinformed opinion of Judaism, that misinformed opinion should be documented somewhere in Wikipedia.  I suggest that it be done here.  Documenting it doesn't mean that the criticism based on a misinformed opinion is a valid criticism, simply that a significant number of people hold this opinion.  If maintaining an NPOV stance requires a rebuttal, then let's put the rebuttal in.  : I imagine that this article could have both criticism of Judaism leveled by outsiders and criticism of Judaism leveled by Jews.  :  `