`  ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NRSV Catholic.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:NRSV Catholic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ``fair use`` may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.  If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.   == Quitting == Please don't contact me, I'm quitting. Too much effort, not enough worth it.   ::What...what happened?  :::Dont worry about it, it's all good. Thanks.    == We'll miss you ==  I think you were a great editor and sysop.  You are always welcome to come back.     ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Boo - Mario.jpg)==  Thanks for uploading Image:Boo - Mario.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).  If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ```` link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ``Image`` from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.     ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flea (Chrono Trigger).jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Flea (Chrono Trigger).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ``fair use`` may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.  If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.   == Zeitgeist (video) ==  *A draft userspace article has been created.  Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 8.    ==HELP== Many thanks for the tips. Does Presse papier mean cookies (my system is in French) ?    ==Sterling History username block==  I blocked because of this report to UAA. It's in how it's used as well as how it's named. I see a change of username is in progress.     ==  ==  I blocked the above IP recently as being part of a weird POV vandal spree (originating from Australia, apparently), but when I saw in the edit history that there were many good edits from the IP as well I shortened the block considerably.     == Palestinian People ==  Sorry for the late notice but I should let you know I undid your removal of sourced info regarding Arab leaders who have made statements similar to Golda Meir's statement on the nonexistence of the so-called ``Palestinian people.``   My reasoning is that only posting Meir's comment, without the historical context showing that it is a common statement by leaders in the region, is an attempt to paint Meir as a racist and therefore violates the NPOV standards.  If you have suggestions on reformatting it, please be my guest. I'm somewhat new and don't know quite how to do all the formatting especially since some of the documents are things like UN records and decades-old newspapers that are publicly available but not available as web links.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •     == Please ==  do not revert non-vandalism without a proper edit summary, as you did on .  I have re-added my comments - they are legitimate and well-intentioned.     :Sure thing. How's this?     == Saad Attiya == Thanks. My error... and I apologize for misunderstanding... missed the remark as I was working on anti-vandalism and it just looked like a page blank. But your point is quite accurate.  I have attempted... and think I have succeeded... to resolve the copyright issue.  Please have a look at let me know if you feel I need to do more.   :In fact, it still appears to be an almost word for word copy, if not direct word for word copy from that website. I've marked it under the copyright problems page for now. It will need a total rewrite. If you think you can do this without worrying about plagiarism, feel free to remove the tag.    ==  == I saw your note on Ryulong's talk page, and I know that you opened the last RfC on Ryulong's blocks. I opened a request for arbitration last week, but it doesn't look hopeful right now so far as acceptance goes - the consensus seems to be that another RfC may be required since it's been so long since the last one. If I opened another RfC, would you be willing to co-certify?    :I certainly think this will have to be discussed on RFC.  5 people have already rejected the proposal.    ::If I am around, I will sign it. If you look at the original list of people who signed the position, I believe you will find at least one other person who will sign. I also suggest you keep it real simple. Doubtless people will come flying in with accusations of a witchhunt, even if you have legitimate concerns; you will wish to do all you can to make sure those concerns are not legitimate. I would stick to keeping the blocks of people who edited Power Rangers/Anime articles (there are unfortunately a lot), failing to assume good faith, blocks of improper length without any warnings for users who likely are just making newbie mistakes, failing to use proper block summaries (I have been aghast at some of his blocks in the past, only to find out they were socks), and never coming before the community with controversial blocks. I'm thinking you could add to that many deletions out of process (look at the astounding number of times he's deleted an image for failing fair use guidelines, without waiting the required one week: always Power Rangers related) and being 