` :: First, EWTN is not fringe. Second: please, Roscelese. I don't know the Wikipedia policies by heart (I'm no lawyer), but giving some breathing time to disputed text (assuming it is not a blatant lie or a violation of BLP) is an act of civility and common sense. I didn't mean ``let it lie``. I meant give it some time. The procedure I propose is this: :: * You found some text you think is lousily sourced. But you think that the user who added the text will stand by it. :: 1) Tag it :: 2) Take it to the talk page :: 3) Wait a couple of weeks. In this breathing time, a consensus can arrive, or some other editors can see the tag and bring better sources.  :: Doesn't that just make sense? Please! Much edit warring would be avoided if we did this.    `