 ::1) You're not reading properly. I've asked you what evidence there is I am continuing to engage in WP:Battleground behaviour. ::2) No only some of the content is, the majority of the criticism is about the stuff that the contributors of counterpunch write.  ::3)What? Who is making these vague praises, have you looked at the some websites fences&Windows; have put up, the praise for CounterPunch is substantive. Again, just another excuse for censorship. ::5) What isn't true?  