  == Race and intelligence arbitration ==  I’m sorry to bother you again, but I have another question about the arbitration case for this article.  Last Friday, on the arbitration evidence talk page, you said “I intend to post a proposed decision sometime early next week to give enough time for discussion before committee activity falls off due to Wikimania and summer vacations.”  It’s now Thursday evening, and editors have recently resumed adding controversial material to the History of the race and intelligence controversy article without discussing it beforehand, and reinstating these edits after they’re reverted even though there’s clearly no consensus for them.  This is especially problematic because the reason the material was removed is because it might be a BLP violation—one of the things we’ve been hoping ArbCom would rule on is how BLP policy applies to these sorts of claims about living individuals.  This is now being argued about on the evidence talk page, but since the arbitrators aren’t participating in that discussion, we aren’t making any more progress towards resolving it than we were before the arbitration case.  The arbitration pages seem to just be becoming a replacement for the article talk pages.  Will the arbitrators be getting more involved in this case soon?  I was really hoping that they would begin working on resolving these issues before now.   