`  == Throwing accusations around ==  You jumped in and told me ``Calm down. Wikipedia does not allow you to simply throw around accusations anywhere and for any reason you please, and you can only harm the site if you're going to jump into debates to 'save the day'. InShaneee   But this is exactly what happens when Tajik is accused of anything, others are required to support their accusations, but administrators allow unsupported accusations against those accusing Tajik of anything.  Here, for example, E104421 accuses Tajik of something, provides diffs and evidence, but another user who is a friend of Tajik's jumps in, just like they did against me, and accuses E104421 of stalking Tajik, with no diffs, no support, nothing, just throwing accusations around.  As I said, when I provided diffs, when I supported my accusations, I was ignored by administrators, as is currently happening on WP:PAIN, and I was attacked by Tajik's supporters throwing around accusations anywhere and for any reason against anyone who asks for civil behaviour on the part of Tajik.  And, again, administrators simply ignore supported accusations against Tajikand seem to allow, and by allowing, encourage unsupported accusations against anyone who asks for civility from Tajik.   This is exactly what happened to me, I provided evidence, I supported my accusations, I made a proper complaint, but Tajik simply uses a handy administrator, has friends accuse anyone who edits the same page as he does of stalking, and gets away with it time and againWikipedia does indeed allow editors, certain editors, to ``simply throw around accusations anywhere and for any reason.``  The user who posted this stalking accusation against E104421 hasn't been told he's not allowed to throw around accusations, because it appears he is allowed toin fact, anyone supporting Tajik is allowed to throw around accusations on Wikipedia.   `