  #It is reasonably well written. #:a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  #::  #It is factually accurate and verifiable. #:a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  #::  #It is broad in its coverage. #:a (major aspects):  b (focused):  #::  #It follows the neutral point of view policy. #:Fair representation without bias:  #::  #It is stable. #:No edit wars, etc.:  #::  #It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. #:a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  #::  #Overall:  #:Pass/Fail:  #::   Two major and one minor things here: * The images in the Features section should get a caption that points out that they show villages in the museum. * Generally, both the Features and the Facilities section read like promotion for the museum, with words like rich, not only interesting from the tourist angle, high end costumers and interesting gifts. The Facilities part in particular has a tone that is not acceptable for an encyclopedia. * Source wise, the article relies to heavily on the museum itself, and those links are all dead.  A lot to do here, even for such a small article. I am placing it on hold for seven days for now.   