  Before I answer the above questions -who were clearly brought up out of an obvious POV and bad intent- I'd like to ask the following questions. What sort of a verifiable source/reference are the Turks of/in Bulgaria to provide so that they can mention any related Turkic peoples -who played a role in the history of the land-  in an article dedicated for the Turks in Bulgaria?  Another question is as follows: What do the Slavs, Bulgars, and Thracians have to do with the contemporary Bulgarians given that  # Bulgarians claim to be Slavs but the Bulgars were definitely not a Slavic people.  # There is no proof that the Thracians and the Slavs eve co-existed and intermingled. # There were NO rulers of the so called Slavic Bulgarian population that were of Slav descent. (Please, list any exceptions below.)  :Should any mention of Slavs, Bulgars, and Thracians be removed from the history of Bulgaria?  Answer the above and I will provide the reasons as to why in an article titled Turks in Bulgaria we should be allowed (by insecure Bulgarians) to mention the medieval Turkic peoples who were present in the land that is today known as Bulgaria?  Would you prefer a source from Bulgaria or from abroad? I will try to provide something but let us agree on the rules first since you guys have a not-so great reputation in this area. All three of you -regardless of your so-claimed academic level of education/degree- (Lantonov, Gligan, and Laveol) have been representing yourselves according to the well-known Bulgarian reputation when it comes to history so far. Keep up with the good work after elaborating on the above. The world needs to be informed about this curiosity.  