` ::I guess that there is still more proof that needs to be mentioned or repeated so I will respond to point out several notable facts.  ::Notability - The aircraft you mentioned was an aircraft that was the last of its type that was known to be publicly sold, an aircraft that had prototype modifications made to it before the accident, and has broken a record in the past; 1947 - breaking the record for fastest closed-course speed.  In addition,  pointed out two more points of notability, namely that ``The aircraft was notable in that it has been raced since 1946 and several times won the Unlimited Class Gold Race. No other Unlimited Class racer has a history as long as this.``  This is also ignoring notability that happened due to the crash.  I could be wrong as this currently, but I believe that the article has enough notability to remain, unmerged.   ::I would like to point out here that according to the guideline on notability, Notability (events), that is says the following in the section ``The event``; ``It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable.``  The article is about a recent event and we have yet to see any lasting effects at this point, but the article is being repeatedly considered to be not notable because it was created due to the accident.    `