`  ::And how do you justify calling my valid warning of vandalism a personal attack?  Have you seen Viritidas' multiple instances of edit warring, assuming bad faith, POV pushing and harassing other editors (diff)?  Honestly, I have no beef with you, and I would have no beef with Viritidas if he would stop gaming the system and start actually playing by the rules.  If he would work with consensus there would be no problem to begin with, but his constant WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT arguments do not nullify the stated consensus of ALL the other editors of the article.  He just keeps reinserting his own POV in direct conflict with a strong consensus which, after multiple warnings (which he has opted to erase off his talk page), does constitute vandalism, per WP:VANDAL.  Before you respond, you may wish to review the following diffs: * My first edit to the page  * Viriditas' first edit to the page Formatting references, so far so good.  He makes several more edits dealing with references, some of which may be suspect, but well enough. * The topic of the heading ``Beer Summit`` is first broached on the talk page by Pechmerle. 04:50, 2 August 2009 * Viriditas replaces the ``Beer Summit`` heading per WP:BOLD 09:22, 2 August 2009 * Reverted by Pechmerle 13:54, 2 August 2009 * Viriditas joins in the ``Beer Summit`` heading discussion on the talk page. 08:39, 3 August 2009 * Viriditas replaces the heading again (#2) 11:42, 3 August 2009 * Reverted again by SharkxFanSJ 12:14, 3 August 2009 * I initiated a straw poll on the talk page regarding keeping the heading ``Beer Summit``. 12:59, 3 August 2009 * Reverted back by The Magnificent Clean-keeper 13:33, 3 August 2009 * Reverted again by SharkxFanSJ (#2) 14:07, 3 August 2009 * Viriditas reinserts his heading title (#3) 17:44, 3 August 2009 * Reverted again by Pechmerle (#2) 18:15, 3 August 2009 * Viriditas immediately reverts (#4)  * Reverted again, this time by me (This is the first time I have ever had direct contact with Viriditas.) * Final vote cast in the straw poll: 10-1 to keep ``Beer Summit``. Viriditas is the sole objector. 01:35, 4 August 2009 * Viriditas again reverts the heading name (#5) 19:03, 4 August 2009 * Reverted again by me (#2) Here, Twinkle rolled back both consecutive edits by Viriditas. * Restored 1 good-faith edit by Viritidas Here, I realized the error and restored the valid edit that got swept up with the bad. * Viriditas does it again (#6)  Oddly, he says ``See talk`` in his edit summary, but the discussion is decidedly against him. * Reverted again by Pechmerle (#3) 10:44, 5 August 2009  You can plainly see what he has done to mine and 's talk pages.  You may also be interested in looking into the situation here, which has only recently come to my attention.  I have done nothing to invite trouble from this editor and have only stood up for the consensus clearly stated on the article's talk page.  I certainly have not stooped to making personal attacks, and I don't see where my warning or any of my edits made any personal attack against Viriditas.  I have disagreed with some of his edits, strongly at times, but I have not made any attack against the editor.  In light of all of the above, however, and the constant straw man arguments and IDIDNTHEARTHAT on the article's talk page, I am seeing a pattern develop.  You are welcome to review my many edits (mostly on heraldry-related articles) if you doubt my motives or the value of my contributions here.   `