` :::::Look, you have asked for scientific sources that define Azeri as a language that existed prior to the twentieth century and you were shown a few. I wonder why those sources do not suffice to state that Azeri was in fact a language, while I must sit here and listen to your baseless original-research claims about some kind of ``Western (Oghuz) Turkic`` (sic) at the end of the eighteenth (!) century. And another thing: the existence of the words ``khan`` and ``kend`` in other Turkic languages does not deny or undo their existence in Azeri. I am not going to argue with you further about Azeri's lingustic status. That the toponym ``Khankendi`` is Azeri is a given. This discussion is one over the relevance of Azeri, and surely languages such as Uzbek or Kumyk are not relevant in the given context.   `