   I do not mean to insult you, and if I have, I apologize. However, it would be very easy for someone else to claim to be Geoffrey Landis in the hopes of gaining extra influence in disputes, as I am sure you realize. My background is not so different from that of Geoffrey A. Landis' background, so I have nothing against his background. However,  I  am astounded that you seem to be missing the points of this discussion in several places, if you really are Geoffrey A. Landis.  