`  == Pederasty article or what?? ==  This article needs to be deleted, not only does it use invalid sources, it is less an article, and more a way to push the same an agenda. Poor and bias I say. It is filled with personal ideas of what world history was like, instead of being fact it is a work of fiction. What is the point of the article? How much truth is in the article?? What is the article trying to say to the reader? Anyone can write a book filled with errors, yes? So is it a proper to use such as a source?  Is part of the article is outlandish! So Christ is a cheerleader of pederasty now? I am not sure how a propaganda article is allowed to be on wiki. Why don't you re-write the worlds history and make every historical personage homosexual!   ``However, an episode (Matthew 8:5-13 and Luke 7:1-10) in the Gospels, which recounts the healing of a ``beloved slave,`` (it is this translation that leads to this argument, alternatives are ``dear`` or ``valuable``) has been read by some as supportive of male love. The centurion's servant healed by Jesus is thought to have been his beloved, and this narrative ``may be fairly read as Jesus' acceptance of, and even collaboration in a pederastic relationship,``    `