`  :: Somewhere around 60,000 demonstrators, many from the so-called ``Tea Party`` tax protest movement, gathered in Washington on Saturday, September 12, 2009, to express concerns about President Obama's health care reforms... One reason the Life slideshow is POV is because it attempts to persuade you that most protesters marched for the purpose of calling Obama names: ``. . . while also taking the opportunity to voice their belief that Obama is not really an American; is a threat to liberty; is a ``spoiled brat``; and is a socialist, or a fascist, or a Maoist, or an Islamist, or perhaps all of those things, and more. Their signs say it all.`` But as you know from the Wikipedia, that was not their main reason for coming to DC and marching. If it's not POV, why the sneering words ``so-called 'Tea Party'``? The Life editor is fascinated by the Obama Joker image. In the first 4 photos, we see it 10 times. But, it was not that prevalent at the march. You can review dozens of 912dc photos on Flickr without seeing it. Out of 22 photo captions, 9 captions are negative, 8 are neutral and 5 are questionable/borderline. The negative captions are on slides 1 (the intro comments), 10, 11, 13, 15, 18,, 19, 20 and 21, the most offensive being 20, ``somebody's kids apparently need help``. If the Life editor had been more honest, the piece would have been titled ``Tea Party Protesters Insult Our President``. That's why I describe it as pro-Obama  because it's more concerned with perceived insults to Obama than it is with what most people there were protesting. If you compare the Time photo-essay verbiage with the Life slideshow verbiage, you should be able to see the difference in POV. Time is NPOV, Life is not.    `