`  == Re:ANI question ==  Hey Bugs, just as a follow up to this question, there are no Malware in the program. As I answered about the registry cleaner, some people don't understand how much damage ``cleaning`` your registry can do. Not that I've never done it, but I tend to manually remove items these days because I don't trust any ``cleaners``. In any case, it's the 3rd party software that most complaints are coming from. And although those are not Malware either, some of the programs do trigger Avast and some other anti-virus software, but as Adware or potentially unwanted programs. These are installed if you aren't reading the installation and just click ``Next, Next, Next\ etc.. You have the ``Decline`` option, but they don't make it very clear. It's disappointing that CNet now allows this, but it's all about $$$. And they can just say there are options to decline. Which there are. You can delete this whenever, I just didn't want to clutter ANI up with the expansion of this gibberish. heh     == Main Page appearance: Babe Ruth ==  This is a note to let the main editors of Babe Ruth know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 11, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at present, please ask . You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 11, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:    Babe Ruth (1895–1948) was an American baseball outfielder and pitcher who played 22 seasons in Major League Baseball (MLB) from 1914 to 1935. Born in Baltimore, Ruth was sent at age seven to St. Mary's, a reformatory where he learned baseball skills. In 1914, Ruth was signed to play minor-league baseball for the Baltimore Orioles. He began his MLB career as a stellar left-handed pitcher for the Boston Red Sox, but achieved his greatest fame as a slugging outfielder for the New York Yankees. Ruth established many MLB batting (and some pitching) records, including 714 career home runs. In his fifteen years with the Yankees, Ruth helped them win seven American League pennants and four World Series championships. His big swing led to escalating home run totals that boosted baseball's popularity and made home runs a major factor in the sport. Ruth's unprecedented power and carousing lifestyle made him a larger-than-life figure in the ``Roaring Twenties``. One of the first five inductees into the National Baseball Hall of Fame, Ruth is regarded as one of the greatest sports heroes in American culture, and is considered by many to be the greatest baseball player of all time.    You (and your talk-page stalkers) may also be interested to hear that there have been some changes at the TFA requests page recently.  Nominators no longer need to calculate how many ``points`` an article has, the instructions have been simplified, and there's a new nomination system using templates based on those used for DYK suggestions. Please consider nominating another article, or commenting on an existing nomination, and leaving some feedback on your experience. Thank you.     == hi ==  I saw your comment about the kidnapping and indoctrination of boys in Syria. I agree, that would be a good example of violence against men, if we have an article on it it could be added. There have been other atrocities in Syria as well - for example there has been a great deal of sexual violence perpetrated against both civilian men and women. See  ``HRW quoted a man who said he had been held in the Political Security branch in Latakia in a cell with over 70 other people. He said young boys were treated worse than adults, brought back to the cell raped and with their fingernails pulled out. ``One boy came into the cell bleeding from behind. He couldn't walk. It was something they just did to the boys. We would cry for them,`` the man said.`` You said that this category is novelty item, so I'm interested in hearing more about your perspective (without further spamming the CFD page, they've probably heard enough from me). What, in your mind, would make this category workable, and which current contents of the category do you think do not belong. Thanks for your feedback and cheers.   :Something like ``Violence against the vulnerable and/or defenseless``. ← '''' →  ::hmm.. but the sources call it ``violence against men`` - see a bunch here for example. If we assume the name stays the same to match how this is discussed in the literature, which things should be removed that are there now, and which ones should be added in your opinion? Thanks.   :::Do you intend to include characters like John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer? What about whoever killed Ron Goldman? And what about the type violence for which Sandusky was convicted? ← '''' →  ::::Yes, potentially - I'm not sure how it was done usually for VAW, if we categorize serial killers who targeted women. What do you think? But yes, Penn_State_child_sex_abuse_scandal could potentially be placed in  for example.   :::::Were the victims of Gacy, Dahmer, et al attacked just because they were male? Or mostly because they were vulnerable and defenseless? ← '''' →  ::::::That's where it's hard to say. Were the victims of jack the ripper killed because they were female, or because they were vulnerable prostitutes? Gender intersects with many other features in such instances of violence, for example with ethnicity .e.g. Srebrenica massacre. However, when the violence is sexual in nature, it is usually considered to be gender-based violence as well.   :::::::So what the category should really be is, ``Violence against men because they are men``. ← '''' →  ::::::::that's what gender-based violence means. I think the scope should be sexual and gender-based violence against men and boys, that's how the literature talks about it. Does any of this change your mind re: the category? Cheers    :::::::::The term ``Violence against men`` does not inherently mean ``gender-based violence``. ← '''' →  ::::::::::Well, that is how it is used in the literature, to mean exactly that.   :::::::::::Sounds like the Humpty-Dumpty axiom. ← '''' →  ::::::::::::I'm not sure what that means or how it applies here. Should we rename the category to be ? That is the stated scope. It is not intended to capture instances where men were victims of violence for some other reason.   :::::::::::::The Humpty-Dumpty axiom is ``when I use a word it means exactly what I mean it to mean, nothing more, nothing less.`` Or something like that. ``Violence against men`` means ``harm perpetrated against other males.`` That includes every