`  Zabadab, there is no conspiracy here. Yes I know the guys at the company. Frankly, I think you are close to breaking the COI rules of not harassing me and have already broken the revealing the identity of the editor rule. My fault for using my name. That should probably illustrate I am not trying to hide something here.  Dismissing the 451 Group's reports and other trade magazine articles as not ``true sources`` is a bit harsh. Of course some of the links are press releases for the obvious reason that when a company asserts something publicly it usually comes in the form of a press release.  The definition of conflict of interest is trying to advance a particular interest other than improving Wikipedia. It does not mean being involved with the organization about which one is writing. One can very easily contribute in a fair and neutral manner to a company to which s/he is associated. I am trying to help improve Wikipedia by adding valuable email archiving (a market I know something about) information. That started with Jatheon. Note someone just added mimecast. I plan to help improve that entry too (currently quite advertising-oriented). There are others too - smarsh, datacove, etc - that I would like to add to wikipedia.  I am trying to collaborate here but frankly I am feeling unfairly attacked.    `