`You seem to be misunderstanding Wikipedia policy.  The threshold of notability is not established whether or not it has been ``thoroughly questioned.``  According to WP:NO ILITY, the threshold of notability is met if an incident has received ``significant coverage`` from sources that meet WP:RS.  From the avalanche of results of mainstream news outlets on a quick Google search, I think it's safe to say the event received ``significant coverage.`` Also, your position is intriguing.  You're, in effect, saying that because ``The Dems`` tried to have an article removed before the election of a Congressman (a practice which you seem to disagree with), you're going to try to do the same thing here even though you don't think it's right as some sort of ``tit-for-tat``. That's not how Wikipedia works.  Just because you received a battle wound from another page doesn't mean you should take that into the discussion on this page. As for ``Please tone down the know-it-all attitude,`` that sounds extremely close to a violation of WP:AGF.      :::::::::`