`  ::::::Well, your reply at least supports my inference about an agenda, nearly soapish, due to your overweighted emphasis on a ``debate`` to fill his legacy with innuendos about Dean. The best you can do is simply evade the topic of the bio by asking, ``I suspect that there is something about LGBT that makes you uneasy.`` But since you made an effort to find some comments I added to Garbo's talk page, you should also explain why you think those comments in any way relate to this discussion. BTW, your Garbo link points to comments by two other editors, not me.   ::::::You re-categorized Dean as LGBT, despite the fact that, as you explained, ``his sexual orientation is highly debated and is not publicly confirmed.`` No one doubts what his closest friend, William Bast,  wrote, ``that their friendship had included some sexual intimacy. . . Jimmy was a dabbler, he was learning through experiment . . . But to say he was gay? That's ridiculous.`` Actually, as his confirmed  personal relationships shows, he was not shy about womanizing at every opportunity. The section doesn't even include most of his other girlfriends from New York or his home town. Need a list? Unfortunately, this isn't the only star bio who's Legacy section has been misused to turn them in a gay icon. Even Judy Garland's Legacy is, like Dean's, half gay icon material, supported by irrelevant trivia, yet similarly undermining her legacy as a singer and actress.   `