`  : Maybe unintentionally.  More to the point is that in general, what I enjoy about Wikipedia is much more creating articles than deleting them; arguing over what should or should not be said is not rewarding for me.  The participants in these arguments (including myself) are always hugely dismissive of the topics they oppose, as is true of any asynchronous Internet communications, but they are only ever justified in this in the case of the most frivolous or deliberately fraudulent articles.  I often find myself defending material which is being attacked as ``unencyclopedic``, but which I think is important to any writing on mathematics.  I take this as a sign that I don't get along with the enyclopedia model, and I don't want to have anything to do with the legal wrangling.  I'm through with AfD's.   `