` :::If my memory serves me correctly it was Justice Hugh Beadle who was instrumental in that ruling. It is an interesting development, which I think supports my view on the entire affair, but unfortunately the duplicitous West simply refused to recognise the judgement of what it saw as the ``rebel`` appellate division (an appellate division is non-partial, but since when did the truth interfere with British government policy?). Perhaps that should be added to this article too, as I do think it is important. — `