` == HADAS ==        Hi - you recently declined my submission on HADAS (Hendon and District Archaeological Society) as failing WP-ORG. The last comment from Fetchcomm seemed to be that if I put inline citations in it would be fine - which I did. Is there something I can do to change the article and resubmit it?      6:26 am, 1 January 2010, Friday (1 month, 4 days ago) (UTC−5)    :Since your a registered user, you could submit the article yourself, and see if it would standup to a possible deletion discussion. ~  | 1:56 am, 2 January 2010, Saturday (1 month, 3 days ago) (UTC−5)    : Thanks. I'll see if I can add some more sources (although it already has 20)and resubmit it. What is a deletion discussion and how does it work?      8:23 am, 2 January 2010, Saturday (1 month, 3 days ago) (UTC−5)    : sorry - wasn't logged in.      8:24 am, 2 January 2010, Saturday (1 month, 3 days ago) (UTC−5)    ::See WP:AFD. Basically in a deletion discussion, editors debate whether the article is notable enough to remain on wiki.        == The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010 ==                    Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe ·   6:03 pm, 6 January 2010, Wednesday (30 days ago) (UTC−5)            == Tactical Unit (film series) rating ==        Hello, I was wondering if you could check some of the links on Tactical Unit (film series) to see what grade it should get. I gave it a B but that might be high. We should also consider WP:DYK as it seems very well-sourced and of decent quality. Certainly not a stub. Thanks,  9:23 pm, 6 January 2010, Wednesday (30 days ago) (UTC−5)    :Thanks. I'm not an expert, but B seems good (though I may have gone with a C). As for DYK, I'm not too familiar with the selection process (more of an ITN guy myself), but I'd say go for it if you can find a suitable hook. ~  | 12:24 am, 7 January 2010, Thursday (29 days ago) (UTC−5)        == E-Mail ==        reply.  7:57 pm, 7 January 2010, Thursday (29 days ago) (UTC−5)    :I replied to your reply. ~  | 1:25 am, 8 January 2010, Friday (28 days ago) (UTC−5)        == Denied because of copyright ==        I had a page about Ervin Marton denied recently by you because of copyright infringement. The page I quoted from is a page that I did write myself. I am not sure where or how I can prove that to you, but I will if needed. Also, if that would help, I will be glad to delete that biographical web page I wrote myself as a Wikipedia page would replace it.    What should be my next step. I am a total newbie with Wikipedia?    Thanks.     It is hard to communicate all of this when I write my proposal. Also, just in case you have any advice, I am not able to input text when I open up the Wiki chat web pages, I see text but am not able to enter text into them. I am using Mac OSX 10.6.2 with latest Safari and Firefox. Thanks.  9:28 am, 9 January 2010, Saturday (27 days ago) (UTC−5)Barkilehet    :This isn't my field of expertise, but I suggest you check out WP:DCM for information. If you still need more help, you can see the WP:HELPDESK. As for the other thing, I assume you're talking about IRC. That's not something I use, but you could see WP:IRC for help. Thanks.   10:38 am, 9 January 2010, Saturday (27 days ago) (UTC−5)        == The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010 ==                    Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe ·   3:23 am, 12 January 2010, Tuesday (24 days ago) (UTC−5)            == Todd Levy photo ==        Hello.        I recently posted an image upload request for a new Todd Levy press photo. You declined it, and I can understand why. However, I am a student of his, and he personally sent me this photo and requested my help in getting his article's image changed. Do you know of any ways I could prove this, or perhaps upload the image in a different way? I was trying to save time by not setting up an autoconfirmed account.        Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by   11:01 pm, 12 January 2010, Tuesday (24 days ago) (UTC−5)     :See the section above this about copyright. Follow the links there for more info.   3:31 am, 13 January 2010, Wednesday (23 days ago) (UTC−5)         == RfA ==        Thanks for pointing that out right away.  |  9:16 pm, 14 January 2010, Thursday (22 days ago) (UTC−5)    :No problem   9:27 pm, 14 January 2010, Thursday (22 days ago) (UTC−5)        == Cross posted from Floquenbeam's RFA ==    Um, the questions on the talk were placed at 16:12 on the 15th January and Flo has not edited since 14:52. So whatever else may concern you please at least give the candidate time to reply. To oppose based on non answers when the candidate is off-line is exceptionally wrong headed.     4:02 pm, 15 January 2010, Friday (21 days ago) (UTC−5)    :Thanks, I responded on the RFA.   4:19 pm, 15 January 2010, Friday (21 days ago) (UTC−5)    ::No worries. It's not your oppose per se, just being fair to the candidate. (And FWIW ``I edited previously`` per Q4 is worth pondering in that previously very much does not mean at the same time. Just a thought.) Thanks for considering reconsidering pending answers if that makes sense!     4:27 pm, 15 January 2010, Friday (21 days ago) (UTC−5)        == Updates to Mary Rose Tully ==        Thanks for your tag to wikify this new page I created. I erred in creating external URLs instead of internal links, and think I've cleaned that up. But if you find I still need more cleanup, please let me know and/or revert your tag. Thanks for your kind editing   2:30 am, 18 January 2010, Monday (18 days ago) (UTC−5)    :It can use some more work, but it's better now. Try adding some reliable sources (like newspaper articles) to the page. I might be able to help later today.  [[User talk:DC|