Having glanced through the talk page and history it seems you have failed to gain consensus for your program of fairly extensive re-writing. You are now presenting isolated examples, selectively and out of context, to the RfC board (presumably) in order to achieve consensus and bring about your re-write in piecemeal fashion. That's my take as a neutral outsider who came here through the RfC board, apologies if this is not the desired response.     ::::If there are geniune concerns over recentism perhaps Rangers' sectarianism prior to the 1980s might be addressed in the article. Also the 'efforts to eliminate sectarianism' section has WP:UNDUE and recentism issues since it appears to appertain only to the last 10 years. Perhaps a less POV section entitled 'response to sectarianism' could set these alleged efforts in context with the previous century?     