  ::I am increasingly concerned that this encyclopedic article which is 'only' about the topic of occupational health psychology, (not the 2 OHP societies), is again being biased toward focus only on the 2 OHP societies and published sources by members of the 2 OHP societies. And the journals associated with them? It is not including reference to the significant contributions of Organizational psychology and organizational psychologists? Focusing on content only, this bias should not be occurring. It has nothing to do with whether OHP is a specialization either. It is making this Wikipedia article, very biased, and not adhering to core Wikipedia principles. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view  ::I know I may be personally attacked for saying so, and accused of everything under the sun, for pointing out what Wikipedia wants from its own articles, but it needs to be said. Again. That has been my point all along. Organizational psychology has had a major impact on OHP and if it is relevant to include it should not be immediately deleted. That is not how Wikipedia wants important professional articles in psychology or medicine to be for readers?  