`  :Adminship is not a life-long appointment. Any admin can be revoked if he does things that are not appropriate for an admin to do. For example, you misinterpreting my freedom of speech as being ``incivil`` is not an appropriate thing for an admin to do. You threatening to block me for reminding you of your ``mortality`` is a VERY inappropriate thing for an admin to do. Your statements regarding the WikiProject Hawaii Manual of Style are WAY OFF. You need to take a truth pill, man. There is no violation in editing an article when it specifically invites users to edit it. Have you even looked at it? It's not even an ``article``. It's a mere ``stub``. It's history page had only one entry before I contributed. Nobody has touched that stub in over 7 months. You said I ``changed it completely``. That's FALSE. Making FALSE statements is a VERY inappropriate thing for an admin to do. I did NOTHING that ``goes against the manual of style that was there``. There is NOTHING there that says don't make changes. There is NOTHING at WikiProject Hawaii requiring ``a survey``. There has been NO TALK AT ALL on that MoS since the STUB was created. It's been DEAD, with NO CONTRIBUTIONS, and NO USER INTEREST, for over 7 months. And now you criticize me for participating as a member of the Wikipedia community, and as an expert on the Hawaiian language, for making a positive contribution and bringing some LIFE to a dead, neglected stub? You need to review what Wikipedia is about. It's not about treating admins as a superior race. Admins are subject to the same rules as users. Even the President of the USA is just a man, Ryulong.    ::`