`== Reversion  ==  Why did you revert the page? What didn't you like about my edits?  In my view, there was nothing wrong about my edits. Those people are all alumni of the university. I thought the section was too weak and short, compared to entries of other universities like McGill. - Wisdompower  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •     == Thank you ==  I just wanted to thank you for your excellent anti-vandalism work, and particularly for reverting the vandalism to my talk page yesterday. It was much appreciated.     == The Best Halloween Ever! ==  Hi. I saw where you just tagged this for speedy deletion as patent nonsense and was curious as to why you chose that tag. The page is well-written and doesn't appear to be gibberish.    == Talkback ==      ==A barnstar: you deserve it== {| style=``border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;`` |rowspan=``2`` valign=``middle`` |  |rowspan=``2`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;`` | The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;`` | You've beat me to reverting vandals several times tonight, and when I took a look, I couldn't help but notice the sheer volume of vandalism patrol you've been doing. I think all your hard work deserves a barnstar!    |}  == David Bielkheden ==  Why did you revert the last few changes to David Bielkheden article? Seemed right to me.    :My mistake, I've rectified it and left a note on the IP's talk.     == Emile Durkheim ==   Why have you removed the edit to the suicide section in Emile Durkheim's page which mentioned that egoistic suicide is also known as egotistical suicide?  This is a productive edit, as many editions/translations refer to only one term and not the other.  Readers should be aware of the relation between the terms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     :It's redundant. Egotistic- and egotistical-suicide are the same thing.    ::That is the point to stating that it is ``also known as`` the other term.  The words are not the same: egoistic refers more to a general self-centered nature while egotistical refers more to a self-centered way of thinking and speaking.  Look up the terms and you will see that they are not perfect synonyms.  The implications of both terms on the semantics and the basic message of Durkheim's theory is significant.  This information - a matter of 5 words - should be included in Wikipedia's article.  Both are valid terms with different implications.  It would not be the first time a Wikipedia article lists multiple terms for the same thing. According Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary they're the same words. 'He performed an egotistic suicide for egotistical reasons', same thing.    :Unless that was a typo, you just used exactly the same word twice.  The difference is between EGOISTIC (one 'T') and EGOTISTICAL (two 'T's).  Look up the two words in Merriam-Webster.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     Sorry, that was a typo. Forget the examples, the word has the same meaning (even according to our very own encyclopedia) and so differntiation is not necessary.     ::I support RaseaC's decision. Saying that ``egoistic refers more to a general self-centered nature while egotistical refers more to a self-centered way of thinking and speaking`` is a very, very vague differentiation: even by your definitions I don't see what the difference is. Even we just supposed that the two terms referred to two different things, it would almost logically imply the terms ``egoistical suicide`` and ``egotistical suicide`` have different meanings.  ::For my part, however, I am quite certain that Durkheim did not intend to use two distinct words with different meanings to refer to the same thing. If the two words have been equally used by translators, I believe we can fairly assume that they refer to the same thing. Thus, no need to distinguish between the two words: they mean, and refer to, the exact same thing.     :They may, indeed, refer to the same thing - after all, that is why both are used.  People do interpret what they read based on the literal meanings of words, however, so it should be noted that translations of this book use the terms interchangeably, regardless of etymology.  Further, the main point is this: look at other Wikipedia articles.  Take the ``Simpson's paradox`` as an example.  The article mentions that this concept has gone by at least four different names, each of which is listed.  Those are all names for exactly the same thing.  REAL ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLES MENTION ALL SYNONYMOUS AND RELATED TERMS.  Your discrimination, in this case, is an unnecessary inhibition to Wikipedia's potential.  The addition of five extra words, which acknowledge that this phenomenon has another name, is not detrimental to the Wikipedia article.  On the contrary, it is a simple relation of facts - the very purpose of an encyclopedia to begin with.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     ::Not only do they refer to the same thing, the words are synonyms which is why it is redundant to list both. The Simpson's Paradox example is irrelevant because those are four completely different terms, which use completely different words. If it makes it easier, think of 'egoistic' and 'egotistical' being the same words (as that is, effectively, what they are). It is detrimental to the article as so far as it is redundant wording, which should be avoided so as to improve the readibility of the sentence.    please continue this discussion on the article's talk page   ==afd== just some friendly advicewe don't use pictorial symbols therethe system supports them because they are used here in a few miscellaneous processes, like sockpuppet investigations  '''   :Noted, thanks.    == Help ==    What is the best way of deleting The Ida Funkhouser Roadside Memorialas it is, in my opinion, an implausible redirect. I was unable to find a suitable speedy tag and WP:PROD seems OTT.   :You just changed that to a redirect and now you're requesting deletion because it's implausible?  Please explain your intentions: I don't follow your question, I'm afraid.  [[User Talk:Fleetflame|Fleetf