` ==Edit war== Hallo. There is a big discussion (at least 4 years old) about Marco Polo birhplace. There are 2 claims: *a) Marco Polo is born in Venice *b) Marco Polo is born in a small island, in present day Croatia. *a) is reported by all (I wrote all) works on Marco Polo, includuing all (I wrote all) the scholars. Marco Polo clearry wrote to be ``Venetian``. He refer to Venice as his hometownHi. His father and granfather were Venetians, etc. etc... *b) is a fringe thheory. In about 4 years, not a single valid scientific source, was presented (see talk page).  User Brutal wants to impose a POV. This POV is to present the theory B as trust-able, on the same level of A, but he does not present sources. In the article is written that ``the exact birthplace (of Marco) is unknown``. That is no true: all the scholars says ``born in Venice``. Where does this claim come from? I was just asking a source. That why I've inserted CN tags, which are refused as a ``POV`` by my antagonist. With no discussion! Now, I', going (sadly) to start an edit war. This is the story (check here) :1) I start a new discussion on talk page  :2) Then, I insert CN tags  :4) I am reverted by B. (POV edits)  :5) I inform you :6) I warn the editor in his own talk page, asking to discuss in talk page. :7) I restore my edit  Now my antagonist was supposed to discuss in the article talk page, but he refuse. According to me he broke the rules So that: 8) Brutal revert me without discussion 9) I inform you  (with this message) 10) I restore my edit.  Let me know if I did and if I do something wrong. Sorry for the disturb, but I have no aim to break rules. Thank you again.  `