  :::::I agree to those terms, and it is not this particular edit which is offensive to me, it is Pete's style of confrontation for the sake of it.  He has a modus operandi of manipulating the policies of wikipedia and trying to constantly divert people's attention from real issues of discussion (such as this nonsense) in order to create legalistic debates where they are not necessary, I consider myself to get along famously with editors on the whole and I believe that my edits are fairly a-political, as much as they can be when writing on political topics.  But I don't want to engage on these issues because that is just playing Pete's games and frankly I couldn't be bothered because I know it gets no where. Cheers,   - 