`  Ok, this is a bit much.  Insisting that Janes' exact wording must be used in the article, when it's in fact confusing wording for normal people, is abusive policy legalism here.  Serialcomma, there is a significant difference between ``A reliable source said this and we must quote it verbatim`` (what you're asserting) and ``A reliable source indicated this, so we're going to assume it's correct but paraphrase it in the most unambiguous for non-experts manner that we can`` which is what Wikipedia RS and V are all about, really.  Knock it off.    `