 :::Here are my suggestions about what changes should be made to the article (loosely based on WP:GACR and WP:MoS): :::#The prose should be clear. At present, it is interspersed with long and perhaps unnecessary quotations, which could be paraphrased in order to lend continuity to the narrative thread. :::#Paragraphs and headings should be modified in line with (1.) above. :::#Due weight should be given to various aspects of Akbar's reign, and for this to happen, the structure of the article needs to change. A few days ago, the article had negligible information on the administrative system, which I have since tried to expand. The sections on religious policy seem to be overemphasised at present, and could be consolidated into ones section and presented in a concise manner. Expansion could be carried out in a sub-article. Also, the section on military achievements is incomplete and should be expanded to include information about his conquests post-1565 in a concise form. Further, I think the sub-section on Akbar's marriage alliances with the Rajputs is significant enough to place it in a separate section of its own, delinking it from the Relations with Hindus - there were several political implications of these relations apart from the religious ones. :::#More references need to be provided as large parts of the article are still unsourced. I had been trying to add information from reliable sources until the present controversy broke out.  :::#The neutrality issue needs to be addressed. I am of the opinion that this should sort itself out once concerns in (3.) above are addressed. However, there does not seem to have been any significant discussion on this in the recent past - discussions on this page have largely restricted to a few generic comments by anons. I am open to participating in a discussion on this ascpect, since it is a crucial part of the article's improvement. :::#The article needs a thorough copyedit - there are several instances of overlinking and other MoS errors prevalent at several places. :::#The section on portrayal in popular culture should be presented as a paragraph, and if possible a section on the legacy of Akbar or his significance in Indian history (as viewed by present-day historians) could be added.  :::Finally, in keeping with my declaration above, I shall not make any further changes or reversions to the article (apart from reverting obvious vandalism) till we sort out this dispute. However, I would appreciate it if you at least refrained from reverting those edits of mine which I have supplemented with references. Regards,   