  I am most happy to accept this proposal. This is the only way forward, and as a matter of principle, I am always prepared to draw a line and judge editors on their current behaviour, ignoring their past behaviour.  So it is no problem to make a fresh start at any point as far as I am concerned.  It will be helpful to drop any personal angle, since this is entirely unproductive, if not counterproductive.  On your second point, I do invite you to even revert edits of mine just as long as they are not blanket reverts but reverts addressing a single point, a single paragraph or a single reference. Reverts can be constructive, and if reverted on a single point I will always be willing to present an alternative phrasing. I am just not willing to put up with blanket reverts. I will also agree not to revert any of your edits, reserving edits of yours that are themselves reverts, and edits that constitute major blanking of content. Any content warning tags, and any edits on individual points you make I will agree not to revert but simply to mark with a tag if I find issue with them.   I also recognize that you are doing valuable work on Wikipedia, and that you have done a lot to improve our coverage on Germanic topics. Respect where respect is due.   