`I attempted to edit the ``promotion`` section of this article to explain that recorded music sales dropped 50% from the inception of Napster (and its progeny) in 1999 through 2009, but it was reverted out by several Wikibullies, who do not want that fact set forth. I also disputed the use of the term ``sharing,`` which is a misnomer. Sharing is a computer concept whereby a network of computers share access so that computer A can access a file on computer B, but the file remains resident on computer B. Copying is a simple concept whereby the file on computer B is copied to computer B. Napster was designed to facilitate copying, but the proponents of Napster called it ``sharing`` for propaganda purposes, since the unauthorized copying of a copyrighted work is a civil and criminal offense and morally wrong. ``Sharing`` sounds like something your elementary school teacher wanted you to do. If you share a sandwich, the other person eats half of your sandwich. If you log onto a so-called ``file-sharing`` system, the other person copies your song, but you keep your copy, too. The Courts held that Napster was a giant copyright infringement. However, it was very popular and still has many proponents on Widipedia, who still insist on calling it ``sharing`` and don't want the fact that their ``sharing`` wiped out the music industry (and a lot of recording arists with it), because that makes them immoral people. Now they add CENSORSHIP to their bad acts.     `