`  == Hello ==  Hi Blu Aardvark, glad to see you did not permanently leave Wikipedia.  I was wondering why my Template:Current event template redirect wasn't working, couldn't see the obvious! )  —  2006-01-15 13:36Z  == Thanks ==  Thanks for taking note of The Arcata Eye and Plazoid pages.   ==Happy Birthday!==   Have a great day )      ==Admin Fighter== That was really funny, gave me a good chuckle. You should have just crossed it out and left it in.     == ``Removing religious and political categories. Recent attempt at vote stacking leaves a bad taste in my mouth.`` ==  Were you referring to this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Catholic Alliance of Wikipedia-like vote stacking?  ( ¦ ⇒✉)   *No. I was referring to a Wikipedia email I recieved earlier today, sent by  in an attempt to stack votes on AFD's related to Christianity. Looks like he's got himself an RfC now.    == policy proposal ==  Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses:  *Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5     == Ubuntu Logo ==  Blu,  I noticed you changed the logo for the Ubuntu Linux User Box.  Why?  The usage policy on Ubuntu's offical site clearly allows for such use. Besides, the logo is just that, a low-resolution image of a logo, which is allowed under fair use.  I am aware that some discussion has been going around about ``fair use`` images in user boxes. If you changed the logo to Tux because I labeled it as a fair use image and not with some other licensing information, I'm sure I can find an appropriate image copyright tag.    *At the time I had changed it, several ongoing discussions had indicated that copyrighted images and logos available under fair use were not to be used in userspace, per Wikipedia policy. The Ubuntu trademark policy may allow it, but Wikipedia policy (per WP:FU is to limit images that are not available for commercial use - which the Ubuntu trademark policy explicity disallows.  |  | (contribs)  The preceding text was copied from   ==WP:NPA==  Please review and adhere to WP:NPA, WP:CIV, and WP:WQT. Please re(?)-familliarize yourself with Wikipedia policy. Thanks in advance.   *I am fully aware of the above policies, thank you. I do not feel that it can be considered a personal attack, or incivil, to call a troll a troll. I'm sorry if you don't agree with me in that - but that does not mean that my statement is a violation of any of the above policies.  |  | (contribs)  *:It is a violation, and you must refrain from it. WP:NPA is non-negotiable.   *::Funny. Nobody considers it a violation of WP:NPA to call  a vandal. Nobody considers it a violation to all  a troll. Why the double standard? Particularly if all I stated was that ``I feel that this user is a troll``? WP:NPA is non-negotiable, but apparently it's open for interpretation, depending on who it is, eh?  |  | (contribs)  *:::``Eh,`` again? Anyway, feel free to request another admin to review this instead.   *::::Anyway, believe me when I say that to say ``I feel he is a troll`` is really one of the nicest things I can really say about him. I apologize if it seems to be incivil, but the fact of the matter is - I feel that strongly, and can think of no other way to express that. Without resorting to actual personal attacks, that is.  |  | (contribs)  *:::::No need to apologize, as I am not offended. You must, however, attempt to be more thoughtful on how to express such an assessment (``trolling,`` ``resembles the conduct of...``, etc.). If you are unable to think of such alternatives, I suggest you refrain from directing such comments until you are able to do so.   *::::::To clarify: let's say that I feel a certain member's Nazi sympathies/apologist leanings impact their edits and interactions with other users, I would rephrase it in terms of this being reflected in editing practices, et cetera, etc., as opposed to the outright, unqualified personal characterization as as a Nazi sympathizer/apologist per se.    == Vandalism to my Userpage ==  Wikipedia Review is not a ``neo-Nazi`` ``Wikipedia hate site``. There are no neo-nazi's on the forum - at least, no open neo-nazis - and it's not a ``hate site`` - it's simply highly critical. You were banned from the site for trolling, no other reason. If you want to hold that as a badge of honor, it's your perogative, but I would request that you at least be honest about it. Oh, and before you call 207.118.103.139 a sockpuppet of Internodeuser, you should do a whois on it. It's a CenturyTel IP, and geolocates to Canyon City, OR. It's not an Internode IP, geolocating to Melbourne, Australia. Seriously.  :It's quite interesting that you know so much about this vandalism. I really don't care if it's Zordrac or not. It's obviously one of the banned users at your little site. I have enough evidence to have the whole IP range banned. Thank you for your assistance.    ::Allow me to politely point out that you have no evidence whatsoever. You have an anon IP removing some trollish statements from your user page. ::Also, allow me to point out that I run Wikipedia Review. By calling it a ``neo-nazi Wikipedia hate site``, you are essentially calling me (and the rest of the members of that forum) a neo-nazi Wikipedia hater - and that could be considered a personal attack. I did not intend to pick a battle with you, or anything of the sort, but I would ask that you calm down. I did see that you tagged this talk page with three templates that had no place whatsoever here - you will see that I removed your blatant trollery, and I would ask that you do not do that again.  |  | (contribs)  :::WP:RFCU is that-a-way, . Tread lightly.    == Banned ==  Hey, why did I get banned from the Wikipedia review? Couldn't you stomach my criticism of your users nastiness about our admins? And how, pray tell, does this give you the high moral ground to complain about blocking on Wikipedia? -   *I didn't ban you - I haven't even checked on the forum or Wikipedia for a couple of days now. I assume this means that Qwerty banned you - I'll have to ask him why when I get a chance. I don't really have the time to look things over at this particular moment, because I'm in the process of moving my stuff out, but as soon as I get an oppurtunity, I'll look into it for you.  |  | (contribs)  :*Having looked over your most recent posts, I see nothing worthy of a ban. Lifted, and apologies.  |  | (contribs) 23:13, 8 Febr