`  == Disambiguation hatnote ==  Hi ,  I noticed that you removed the disambiguation hatnotes I'd recently added to both Easy Living (1937 film) and Easy Living (1949 film) with an edit summary explanation of ``-hatnote per WP:NAMB``[which links to section ``Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous``]. Let me share how/why I came to add the hatnotes and perhaps you'll be able to get a sense of why it might be in the best interest of readers to reconsider whether it's applicable to apply WP:NAMB to the instances at hand.  I came across a passing mention of a film named ``Easy Living`` in a web article. It intrigued me and caught my interest but did not supply a specific release date. When I searched for ``Easy Living (film)`` it was initially—in practice, in a real life experience—ambiguous to me as a reader which Wikipedia article [``Easy Living (1937 film)`` or ``Easy Living (1949 film)``] would relate to the web article I was attempting to follow up on. So to aid future readers who might find themselves in similar circumstances I added hatnotes cross-referencing the two articles.  I considered also adding a link in the hatnotes to the full existing Easy Living disambiguation page but decided such would be 'over-kill', adding length but not substance, as anyone searching just ``Easy Living`` would find themselves led there anyway. The ambiguity being addressed is specifically that which arises from there being two ``Easy Living (____ film)`` articles—so it seemed best to limit it to such.  In the interest of better serving the greater Wikipedia readership, may we please restore the hatnotes? Or replace them with some variation to comparably serve the same purpose (i.e. to offer ``the least surprise`` and most ease of use to future readers interested in films named ``Easy Living``)?    `