`That you claim you ``weren't asked`` and yet accuse me of ``wikilawyering`` is absurd.  In what way is ``Further responses by Andyvphil to AN/I section named, contrary to guideline, 'Tendentious editing by User:Andyvphil`` Retrieved from ``http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andyvphil'`` unduly tendentious? Whether or not the guideline is routinely ignored at AN/I, there is no exemption in the guideline for AN/I and as far as I can see you do not argue that the header does not violate the guideline absent such an exemption. My header violates the guideline, of course. But if you don't object to guideline violation at AN/I and Talk:Barack_Obama it's a bit late to object to it here. That individuals are blocked to stop debate is an interesting admission. That you would break your freely offered word in order to stop debate more interesting still.     `