`  == Protoscience and fringe science == The current heading is Pseudoscience, fringe science, and junk science. To me that looks like fringe is in bad company. To me fringe has a touch of scientific method, which the other two are lacking. Another one is protoscience which I couldn't find at all in the article, so I just added it to ``See also`` for the time being. Odd if this issue has not yet been on the agenda, proto and fringe science being closer to mainstream and worthy of a separate treatment? /   `