  : Okay, while I agree with the first point, that the previous header title is more appropriate, I must say that I'm kinda alarmed by your second contention. Your POV on Timothy Leary is of course valid in your own right, but to generalize and dismiss him and his ideas from this article doesn't seem to be fair. It is not our duty to figure out what material is subjectively valid or not. I have taken both a literature class and a criminal justice class on the undergraduate level that included a subtantial section about Leary, his reasearch and ideaology; He's defintely notable. Even though I might not susbscribe to all of what he believes, I still think that it would be incomplete to write him off as a crazy just because that's how his image is perpetuated today. To make wikipedia the best resource, we may want to include Leary's conclusions, but ensure that readers can get the complete picture about him, and his work, so they can make up their mind on their own. C'est vrai, non?  