`  , (CC:  |  | WER ) - I do not know what your angry tone is about. I want no conflict here. What unsourced material have I added to the Wikipedia entry of Charles Aubrey Eaton? I have asked you and Dennis Brown, and I was asking in the Teahouse, for help in finding out why Charles Aubrey Eaton's page was given a ``This article needs additional citations for verification. ...`` tag. I had not received an answer. I do not know who put that tag there or for what reason. Now it seems to be gone. Good.  I was, in fact, a writer for High Times for a few years. I was managing editor, too. I have written more than a few feature stories for them and a few top-selling cover stories between 1991 and 1994. ``You have yet again completely re-added wholly unsourced material,`` you say. I added my name, that's all. None of the other writers listed on the High Times page in that particular writer's section were sourced, except some had links to personal pages on Wikipedia. So my addition was not unusual for that page. Now, you or some else has removed the entire list of writers. If that's Wikipedia policy, then so be it. In my opinion, that move deprives people of useful information. I am not sure why you are so angry with me or singling me out. I asked for a bit of time to get my references/sources prepared in an earlier comment in a talk section in which you were a part. I did so respectfully. I did not want to upset anyone. I will not add anything to the High Times page again unless I have a source or sources prepared first. I get the point. I do not want, nor do I believe that I deserve this kind of anger or threat.  `