`  Addressing: #I'd just call this section ``Opinion`` or ``Decision`` and toss ``of the court`` -JMO, I won't kick if you want to keep it.   ::, per WP:SCOTUS/SG.     #Photos of Souter and Rehnquist are ``sandwiching`` the text, which I hear is the worst wiki-crime you can possibly commit ( /snark)  Maybe right justify Souter and bump Rehnquist down to the dissent section and left-justify his image... ::, per WP:SCOTUS/SG.     #and you should expand the dissent a bit too, it's sketchy...   #I'm going to read the actual decision before I comment further on this section, but while you are doing a copyedit, remember to either expand or merge your one-sentence paragraphs.   #But until then, IMHO, consider that the GA should perhaps be longer than the syllabus of the case itself...  ?  Just saying ;-)   #Consider expanding the ``Subsequent developments`` subsection into a full section and discuss the impact of the case.`