` == Re: Laughlin, Nevada article ==  Hi!  Not sure if I'm formatting this message correctly, so bear with me. I see your point on the crime statistics. It hasn't been substantiated since it was put up. As the Town Constable, I feel confident that the numbers are in fact accurate, I just wanted that extra bit of verification which Wikipedia of course encourages. I read your message. Is your objection that the source is from a profit making entity?   Thank you,  Jordan Ross, Constable Laughlin Township www.laughlinconstable.org     — Preceding unsigned comment added by  •    :Yes, my objection to the Realtor's site is that it is commercial.  My suggestion to you would be to look for crime stats in other city articles and see what they sourced them to.  Generally, all information in a Wikipedia article about a city should come from a second party source such as a newspaper , book, or magazine.  The exception would be completely noncontroversial stuff like the city's official address, etc.  It, BTW, isn't MY objection.  You should familiarize yourself with WP:RS, which is the policy on reliable sources.  :Unfortunately, your reply here has raised another issue.  You have a conflict of interest on the article on Laughlin, as you are an elected official of the city.  See WP:COI on what that means to you.  Your edits are borderline promotional, and you, as one with a conflict of interest, have to be especially careful about that.  It is important to remember that a Wikipedia article on a town is not a promotional tool for the town, but an encyclopedia article.  City articles are to be written to a world audience, not a local one.  The last edit regarding social services available is an example of what not to put into the article.  An exception would be if Laughlin had some sort of unique social service program.  Generally, other than the basic statistical stuff, what you want in a city article is what makes the city unique.  The casinos and other things of interest to tourists are a definite for Laughlin.  Looking over the article, it looks pretty good right now except for some ``Weasel words``.  (The description of the librarythe best looking building in town is strictly a matter of opinion and not encyclopedic.)  Also, the section listing the service clubs and churches is not very encyclopedic.  The town I live in in Idaho has all those organizations and only has 2000 residents.  I would lose that whole section.    :Sorry to ramble.  I really like city articles and am glad to help you make yours better.  Please though, before you edit further, read WP:COI.  Thanks.     == Thanks for advice == Hi there,  Thanks so much for your informed and very friendly advice! I have been frustrated because while I was researching pages on other organisations for guidance I'd seen much worse articles on Wikipedia with only primary sources that had not been flagged. What I'm struggling with is at what point are sources really deemed ``independent``? Yes, newspapers, tv, radio etc. are, but these days so much news is online, and I have been sourcing online news sources. So I will continue to look for news sources, but I'm not sure which online news sources are considered credible or not...   Unrelated, I'd left my drafts up on my sandboxes, and someone has informed me that linking images here is illegal... do you know why? It doesn't seem to make any sense to me. But I will go ahead and clear my sandboxes.   Thanks!     == Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle ==  {| style=```` |- ! colspan=``2`` style=``font-size: 110%;`` | Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle  - You're invited  |- |  | style=``text-align: left;`` |  *Date Saturday, December 8, 2012  *Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. *Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library,  1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 *Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. *Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. *Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or useon-wiki regsistration. Yours,    |}   == Vandalism/unauthorized/uncalled for edit on my talk page ==  Any reason why you did this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by   •     Yes.  That page is your to use within guidelines, not yours.  what you are doing is an unauthorized use of both your userpage and your usertalk page.    BTW, this matter is being discussed now at WP:ANI     ==Reviewer==  Hello. Your account has been granted the ``reviewer`` userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes is due to be reactivated on Wikipedia on December 1, 2012. Once activated, the list of articles awaiting review will be located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.  Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor change how you can edit articles.  See also: *Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing *Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes *Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.  If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.'   ==Your request for rollback==  Hi Gtwfan52.  After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account.  Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: *Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. *Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits. *Rollback should never be used to edit war. *If abused, rollback rights can be revoked. *Use common sense. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it.  Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, seeWikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).  I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my  if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback.  Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism.  Happy editing!'   '''   ==You've got mail!==  cheers,  —'''  == Fuqua School ==  GTWFAN52  Thank you for your message.  I welcome the opportunity to seek your advise regarding information for the above mentioned article.  Since, I have documented news articles and books stating that the vision of J. B. Fuqua was to establish the school as a ``model school,`` then how do I go about adding those articles/books as references.  Can you help me?      == Kudelski group article == Hi,  I saw your message. In fact, I understand the problem and you are basically right about the article about the Kudelski gr