` ::What an un-encyclopedic addition!  What relevance does it have? BLP policy is clear ``Editors should avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether the material is being presented as true; and whether, even if true, it is relevant to an encyclopedia article about the subject``. The short answer is that it has no relevance, it is undue weight, it is poorly sourced contentious material. I'm removing it according to BLP policy.  `