`The ``editors`` of the article, which concerns a conservative spokesman who turned out to be a porn actor and a prostitute, have altered the article to refer to the reports of his prostitution  which have be definitively PROVEN  as ``rumors,`` even though the article's subject acknowledged his prostitution in a nationally broadcast radio program and in an article under his own name in Salon.com. At the same time, they insured that material from an unverified ``interview`` by an evangelical ``ex-gay`` blog was included.  When I and others pointed out that none of this is true, one of the editors, a hack who goes by the name ``Elonka,`` replied that Wikipedia is not in the business of telling the truth. That's for damn sure!  `