`  ==Funny discourse== The section In search for the island of stability: 298114 maybe tells us established facts, but the patchy style makes the text weird: * first it tells us the shortest half life cannot be longer than 10 minutes, * unless a neutron shell is unexpectedly stabler than thought, and then the reader expects that there is either scanty proof of that, or that there are signs indicating the opposite, but * for which there is some evidence.[citation needed] Why then mention ``10 minutes`` at all, if it is an invalid statement anyways?! Then it goes on: * in addition, 298114 may have an even-longer half-life due to more invalid!!  * .. Qalpha values. and then the final suicidal attack on the sections own neck: * In either case, an island of stability does not represent nuclei with the longest half-lives but ... SCREAM!! Is this section a section full of nonsens? Why dealing with half-lives in the first run, if this is the case? ... said:   `