` :The appeal itself is again a primary source and useless for establishing the relevance of the court case to Cognex' overall history. The HR Comply newsletter is a better source, but again I don't see how it establishes relevance of the case to the company's history. You haven't provided a shred of evidence in compliance with what I've asked for above. :I'll also say now, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Comments such as ``Identifying companies like this one would change the some of the work invironments [sic] engineers are expected to tolerate`` will frankly be taken as prima facie evidence of behavior in direct conflict with that policy by quite a few editors here. Let me further warn not to use this article talk page for posting unsubstantiated claims and hyperbole only tangentially related to improving the article. —//// `