` :OK re the Nerdrum piece, but it was an understandable mistake given the other material. Bear in mind, though, that it needs source attribution: on what published source was it based? :Also I was not aware there was a limit on the number of images! :Yes: it is policy to use as few as possible Fair Use images. Check out Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy. It's quite lengthy, but the simple test at the end covers it: ``Can this image be replaced by a different one, while still having the same effect?``. If the answer's yes, it's viewed unnecessary. I've asked for advice at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#Fair use of images, and so far this view has been confirmed. :On that basis, it doesn't take seven images to convey the flavour of Nerdrum's art - gloomy paintings in a rather classical style of naked people doing weird things in an apocalyptic landscape. I'd recommend just one - Dawn - in that it's a typical work in style and content, and also has the specific informative value in relation to The Cell. :I think a good example of the expected level of image use is the H. R. Giger article. Only three images: one with a Creative Commons license as a self-taken photo, the other two Fair Use but used to illustrate distinctive and important topics.  `