`  == Rocks and Asteroids ==  I won't bother lengthening the VfD discussion with my somewhat off-beat thread, but I wanted to say that it was not intended by me as supporting the rock article (which is why I labeled it a comment rather than a keep).  I don't view myself as either an inclusionist or deletionship but would like to see some consistency between areas and not just within areas.  I think when we have many, many articles on very minor fictional characters and then argue about a professor who may be on the fringes of notability, that's silly.  Which one is right, I don't know.  When we have hundreds of porn actresses (and they all seem to be ``stars``) and hotly debate non-CEO businessmen as ``not notable`` is just goofy.  And to set up a system which devotes well over a thousand articles to asteroids, lists of asteroids, discovers of asteroids, etc... (and which is set up for the ultimate expansion to all 90,000 if the red links are serious) while arguing about named geographical sites on this planet, seems a bit off.  Since there are thousands of articles on individual episodes of TV shows, British railway stations, and other things that I never would have expected but seem to be well established, I just wanted to raise a comparison that I thought might cause some people to pause and think.  No need to respond, I just like to vent occasionally.   `