` November 2012 (UTC) ::::*By the guideline and policy points... ::::**Go back and re-read COMMONNAME. It relates to ALL topics. Refrain from trying to fob it off as only related to real people - or point out how Caffeine, Guinea pig, The Hague, Romeo and Juliet, and the like, all of them in the exemplar list, are ``real people``. ::::**MOS:LEADALT follows from the article title as defined by COMMONNAME. Also, follow through on the entire paragraphs quoted. ::::**# ``By the design of Wikipedia's software, an article can have only one title. When this title is a name, significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the article, usually in the first sentence or paragraph. These may include alternative spellings, longer or shorter forms, historical names, and significant names in other languages. Indeed, alternative names can be used in article text in contexts where they are more appropriate than the name used as the title of the article.``What you quoted is correct. Your splitting it up is not. ``Dick Grayson`` is the nae of the character used as the article title. Additional names for it wold be ``Robin``, ``Nightwing``, ``Batman``, Robin, the Boy Wonder``, ``Boy Wonder``, ``Richard Grayson``, and ``Richard John Grayson`` and possibly others which have been used to identify the character in some contexts. Including all of the permutations makes it awkward. ::::**#Usage in first sentence, the item you sandwiched in between, would cover ``Robin`` and ``Nightwing``. Two alternate names for the character that are commonly used to dientify it in secondary source material. ::::**As for ``official names``... you mean the ones DC uses in the pages at their website: Robin and Nightwing? :::::This also brings up a few other points: :::::*WP:UNDUE - A policy that holds the information be presented to neither over or under emphasize its importance. Arguing that a name associated with a character from a single or minimal use trumps a name or names that it is commonly known by and predominantly referd to by both in common use and in secondary sources steps well beyond that. :::::*WP:Real world - Part of the general MoS and how Wikipedia should be treating both works of fiction and elements of such works. :::::-   02:26, 22`