`  Eh! No. I wrote the section of the article titled ``1969–1970 Resurgence and ``Provisional`` / ``Official`` split`` and none of the text has been disputed. This would be difficult I know because of the number of sources used. Therefore to remove the text as you have done, is simply pandering to the delusions of an editor who offers sound bites that contradict each other. We don't pander to opinions or delusions and that is what you have done. '''' `