`  == RF, Starlight problem ==  Dear Slim  I request that you mediate in an issue, Starlight problem where an editor keeps reverting despite violating the rules against providing sources.    Two main things:  #The section Distant Starlight Problem#First attempts to address the problem has no sources.  Those who insist on this section have been repeatedly asked to state which early creationists proposed such a thing, and when.  For example, the statement ``In the early part of the twentieth century most Young Earthers would assert that the stars were not in fact as far away as science suggests`` lacks any reference to a creationist from 1900-1950.  #A section Tu quoque is repeatedly deleted although it was sourced to a creationist who made this argument in one of their publications.  The question is not whether it is a good or bad argument; rather, in a page of a problem for creationists, it is proper to state creationist responses that can be sourced.  `