` Hi - Yes, there are such things still included in the article. 1. ``Arson`` - Sante Kimes was never charged or convicted of arson. Please review the source for that information. I have added a tag to it on the article. 2. The ``slavery`` charges were appealed in 1990. I do not have the actual paperwork in front of me about it, but I will look online. 3. ``Impersonating Elizabeth Taylor``, no documentation to support this. Sante Kimes favored Taylor and that is it. It would probably be best to change this to ``Sante Kimes resembled Elizabeth Taylor`` or something along those lines. But saying `` Impersonating Elizabeth Taylor`` sounds like she was defrauding Elizabeth Taylor in some way. Which is also not documented in any sources. 4.``...delighted in introducing her husband as an ambassador - a ploy that even gained the couple access to a White House reception during the Ford administration`` This statement is just not true. Thanks.  `