`  ::Yah - I get how cite book is meant to be used, but do you get that since it's about books, that someone may expect to find it in one of the categories about books? Better yet, all the main cats about same. I haven't done a lot of footnoting as I'm more into fillng in (sometimes astonishing) gaps of younger editors san my years, so I took a while to realize the actual usage of the template. One of my pet peeves... poor documentation on purposes and usages in a lot of places. Starting with most categories pages (e.g. category:Shared universe— the person who created it hasn't been active in a long while, so I sent them an email last night since it showed up on something I do edit... 1632 series.), and most templates (That at least has historical system software as a causal factor! It wasn't possible until roughly a year ago. SO ... I document for the next editor e.g.:Category:Middle Ages and children) To do otherwise, is to steal time from our co-editors, IMHO!  btw- I reactivated the Wikiproject:Book Series per Peg's suggestion. Can use someone to look over things and add 'standards' from the parent projects - Books and Novels. Get your two cents worth in on the Books notability guideline proposal. Best! //  `