`  == ``UN officials have charged`` ==  The lead currently says that ``UN officials have charged that Israel's actions are tantamount to apartheid and ethnic cleansing.`` The body of the article cites two UN special rapporteurs—Richard Falk and his predecessor, John Dugard—as having made the charge. One cannot cite two instance of such statements and create the sort of blanket statement the lead currently contains. If two U.S. Congressmen say ``taxes are too high``, that shouldn't write that ``the U.S. Congress says that taxes are too high``. The same is true here. I tried to resolve this by changing the text to reflect that this was the stated opinion of two UN officials, with the edit summary ``Two officials at the UN do not constitute the UN. If more UN officials than Falk & Dugard make the claim, then this can be rethought``, but  reverted, stating that ``Officials mean officials, they don't give personal opinions``. I didn't mention anything about whether or not the stance was a personal opinion, just that it's unfair to ascribe the stance to an organization as large as the UN, with its thousands of officials, based solely on the statements of two of them. If there are sources that state that this charge is more widespread, please provide them. In the meantime, I'm going to go with a much similar edit of just inserting the word ``Two`` at the beginning of the sentence, as only two examples are cited in the body. ←   `