`:::I also think that's a very interesting point. I think, though, it goes back to the common name policy. ``The Crucifixion`` is probably (I'm guessing here - I've never done much research on the topic) as common as ``Cucifixion of Jesus``. Is ``The Holocaust`` as common as ``Jewish Holocaust`` or ``Holocaust of the Jewish people``? I've never come across those terms in the reliable sources. Even the source re-printed above in support of changing the article's title only refers to it as ``the Holocaust`` (and ``Shoah`` in parentheses). I think there may be more support with comparison with ``The Virgin birth``, as that probably is more common than ``Virgin birth of Jesus``, despite there being multiple virgin births in religion and mythology. (``The Ressurrection``, though, could be considered to refer to a number of possible subjects, and hence the redirect.)  :::So I guess the proper way to address this is as follows: does the title as it stands now violate NPOV to the extent that it should trump the current policy at WP:NAME? I would answer no - it would need to be an exceptional situation to trump Wikipedia policies (versus, say, guidelines), and this isn't an exceptional situation. At the same time, I can understanding the other side of the debate. If there is enough people who feel strongly about the other side, perhaps an RfC is in order?     `