 ::@brew, 10x for kind words. ::@nab, I'm not following you. Could you elaborate: :::1. Which relevant info is removed? What new info is added by saying both civilian and security/militant forces? Would not just saying Israelis and Palestinians, like report does, is enough? :::2. Which unrelated ( to what ? )  data is added. Do you disagree with OCHA analysis that those casualties related to conflict/occupation? On what do you base your opinion about casualties distinction in relevancy/relatedness?  ::Generally, I'd like to satisfy all editors concerns.   