`         == Redirect from hoax page ``Hamlet of Denmark`` ==  Hello ! I just wanted to point out that the redirect that you created from Hamlet of Denmark should point to Prince Hamlet (which is the article dedicated to the character) and not to Hamlet. Best regards!   * I thought about it, but the play also has King Hamlet, the ghost. (I have no preference either way; if you believe Prince Hamlet would have been a better target, I might reduce the protection for a while, so that you can change it.) -    :* Well, I confess that I have absolutely no idea about how to find whether people who search for ``Hamlet of Denmark`` are more interested in the prince or in the king. I would say the prince, but it would be only a conjecture. Given the ambiguous nature of the expression, your choice seems the most reasonable. Sorry if I didn't give a better thought on it before contacting you. Cheers!    == Why my page has been deleted? ==  I want to know what was wrong about the last page i've created: Making Sense. I want to republish it, what do I have to change?  Thanks.     == Jewish Supremacism (My Awakening to the Jewish Question) == Hi @Mike Rosoft: please explain where the text is promotion of the book and the ideas contained in the book? In the first time is better that define the portion of text that had problem.    : Considering the draft presents a hateful and insane conspiracy theory by a white supremacist as if it were factual?     Hi @Ian.thomson: Please talk about Wikipedia rules and do not tell insult word. I say that this is not a valid reason for speed deletion. The admin must stated it in talk page until solved.     @Mike Rosoft:Please reply to my question. Do is G11 rule in speed deletion?     :The draft presented lies by a known conspiracy theorist as ``meticulously research.``  To call that promotional is better than that deserves. :WP:G11 says that ``Unambiguous advertising or promotion`` is to be speedily deleted.  The lies David Duke wrote were promoted as ``meticulously research.``      @Ian.thomson: You have a personal problem with this book and the idea of the author. Please observe the rules and don't tell loose talk. This is your idea about this book that is a lies but many people in the world are against to your idea. I decided to edit this subject and submit in this page.       @Mike Rosoft: In the content and purpose of book sections, I selected and wrote several sentence from this book. So, I think some people had against idea with it. I want introduce this book just and i had not any goal. please explain about text and say where have problem?    *   already explained to you what was wrong with the article; so did I on your talk page. The article largely repeats the claims made by the book as a fact. And if an article about a books starts by calling it ``a meticulously research`` [sic], it starts wrong. See the policy of neutrality and ``What Wikipedia is not``. -    : I can change this sentence and remove this adverb. Can you restore this page until fix this section?    * No, I am not going to restore the article. In any case, I didn't delete it because of a minor grammar error; I deleted it because it promoted the book and its ideas. Even removing the sentence in question wouldn't change the fact.  As far I am concerned, there is nothing to discuss here; if you still believe that the article shouldn't have been deleted, please go to deletion review. -    * This is a important book in the world about Jewish people but not all Jewish people. This book said about the people that have Supremacism act. Therefore, you must think about introduction of book and help to fix it not delete it. please restore it until edit it.     *  Hey, I write again about this subject and publish it but you can not delete my draft page. You have self interest with this book. I solve this problem and publish this subject again.     :: Actually read the article David Duke.  Notice that he's known as ``white nationalist, conspiracy theorist,`` and ``advocate of antisemitic conspiracy theories.``  That means that he believes that white people are superior to everyone else  so his claims about anyone else being supremacist are going to be lies.  He's also a conspiracy theorist, so his claims about history and sociology are going to be lies, too.  He's also an antisemite, so anything he writes about Jews are going to be lies, too.  Just because he quoted the Talmud does not mean he quoted it in context.  If you refuse to understand this, I will go to WP:ANI and see if we can arrange a topic ban for you.  Mike and I are not the ones with a personal problem here.      *  I read the Duke website and many part of his book  but I tried to stated and introduced the book not Duke's idea. Therefore, I edited the text and try again until introduce the book not Duke's idea.    :: You're still calling it ``influential,`` downplaying the fact that Duke is a notorious conspiracy theorist and white supremacist, and claiming ``Jewish Supremacism must be authentic.``  I'm going to the administrator's noticeboard to request a topic ban because you obviously have a bias supporting the book's hateful lies. EDIT: I've made the thread. ::Mike, I've mentioned you in the ANI thread ``Topic ban on Jews and Judaism needed for AliAkar``.     == Store Twenty One ==  Hello there. I was going to create Store Twenty One, but discovered that it had previously existed and had been removed deleted by yourself (I think). The notice suggested that I contact the administrator who deleted the page. Store Twenty One has about 200 shops in the UK and c.£100m annual turnover and I think is fairly notable chain on the British high street. I wanted to read up on it and was surprised no page existed. Is it possible to see the version of the page that previously existed? I might be able to add more useful content. Thanks.    * I have restored the article, but it's almost devoid of content. -     ==Copyright of government works== Hi   @Mike Rosoft: Thanks for your attention to this matter. If we and also administrator of the website don't know the copyright holder of a photo, what should we do for upload this photo in commons?      == Hi ==  how do I revert edit? I notice some vandalisms.     Thanks. Also, how do I redirect a page?     Thanks, it worked!     ==N game== What do you think about an image I added on an N game article, since it wasn't illustrated?  ([[User talk:The N 