`  :My snap opinion is 'no' to articles in this case under WP:N, however, 'yes' to mentions of the term in other contexts in this article.  I fear a whole section is needed in this article to list these.  :(Note:  My snap opinion above may well be incorrect, the series you refer to may be notable enough to justify an article, I just don't know.)  :One standard that has been used in cases like to show what belongs in this article is a source (any source) showing the linking of the usage of the term to the subject of the article.  Example:  Not every time a singer sings ``I feel like a stranger in a strange land`` is that singer singing about Stranger in a Strange Land, the novel known technically as ISBN 039910772X published in 1961.  In at least one case, a singer does sing about that, the specific novel that is the subject of the article.  :The standard for addition to that article is for the editor to give us a source showing the link from the song to the novel, and not to the common English usage of the phrase meaning simply ``I feel alienated``.  A similar standard might be imposed here to avoid ``listcruft``.  :Another, related issue: How can we know as readers whether the Britannica Learning reference is to the Adam's book or the Asimov book?  I fear it would be poor editing to leave this ambiguous in the instance.  See also List of fictional guidebooks.  :What does one call such a section?  References in other media might work OK.  Not really sure.  —  `