`it perfectly valid to include in the article, giving the sources - although they are mainly human rights organisations - you have to think about the effect of such inclusion have on Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and the public view the information as ``if it included in wikipedia, then it must be true``. Inclusion of rohingya's claim while it was widely disputed and lack historical evidence, would not only make Wikipedia a bias medium, but also endorsing rohingya claims to be true. Wikipedia is `