`  ==Things I've learned at en.wikipedia== * When I made a change and I want that the edition appears, I am a user disruptive because I don't respect the previous edition. When I defend the previous edition, the concept ``previous edition`` means nothing. Or the dates are ignored and I'm the disruptive again. The two solutions are good.  * Although it is not written anywhere, exist a rule that says that any offense expires in a few days. If you can not give notice of the offense (because you were blocked, ill or without computer for a mechanical failure...), bad luck for you. Here solutions, not justice. And that Pope Time erases the sins is a good solution.  * Open spaces for dialogue and discussion and pledge to respect the result is not a sign of wanting to do things right.  * Apparently appreciate the intention of a user is not feasible, but ignore two serious violations of the rules is perfectly acceptable.  * Administrators tend to be more ruthless with solitary users than with organized groups.  * If a user with a clean record discuss with another user with a non-clean record the administrator only monitor and punish the user with ``dirty`` record. The other user will not have problems.  Enjoy your toy, friendly and honest gentlemen.  `