` :::::::Speaking as just one WP user, I reject Abd's notion of what ``synthesized`` means in this context. Quoting from WP:SYN): ``Summarizing source material without changing its meaning is not synthesis; it is good editing. Best practice is to write Wikipedia articles by taking information from different reliable sources about a subject and putting those claims in our own words on an article page, with each claim attributable to a source that explicitly makes that claim.`` The claim that, today, GW ~= AGW (+ or - total ``feedback``, of course) is 'not' original synthesis. Indeed it's the overwhelmingly predominant view of the reliable sources today. We're not obliged to pick one and quote it exactly, but rather, it is a completely reasonable and permissible editorial decision to summarize the reliable sources, even in the section on Terminology.  ...   `