`::::I don't know why you begin with ``no``, since nothing you say contradicts what I say. I fact you just repeat the same illogical argument, which, frankly, I have difficulty believing is what Ruston actually says. He's a racist, but he's not stupid, and this argument is just stupid! Every time a branch splits, then obviously they both split at the same point (assuming that the modelling of the ``branches`` is correct, which is a big ``if``), so it is meaningless to say that one splits ``lower`` than the other or that there is a ``mainstream of human evolution`` from which the branches split. There are only branches. There is no mainstream independent of the branches, otherwise there would be some non-race distinct from raciaslised ``branches``.    `