`   Wikipedia does not require that I site a source. The information I added was from a first hand source in the company. Also, the reductions were an attempt to remove the information you included in the last paragraph, focusing on some problems the company might have had in the past. I do not think it is very fair and accurate on your part to write something about a company where 80% of the information you included focuses on any sort of ``scandal`` they might have faced. It is not an accurate portrait of their work and it is insulting and demeaning to people that have worked so hard to make that company what it is. It resembles a tabloid article more than a source of information. As far as the sources go, that was a mistake on my part. I did not notice i did that and I apologize. However, as far as the other corrections that I made to the article are concerned, I will sand by them and find a way to change them if you do not reconsider what you have wrote. Please look at your article again and reconsider the information you inputed. Does it seem to be a biased portrait to you?`