`:::::::::Martinvl, you failed to answer the question (How do we know it ``was a lie``?). Was it because another Wiki editor had made their mind up that it ``looked unrealistic to me``, and asserted it entirely unsupported? Well of course it wasn't was it. Additionally even if it was a lie, it's still include in the article, and it can be because it is reliably sourced - not because it's necessarily true. :::::::::Now explain why you think this article is any different. Why do you believe that your personal opinion alone is enough to exclude reliably sourced information from the article - please.   .   `