`  ==Hirticlavula== Hello, I am just after a little advice please from a more experienced editor, re: the reverts on the Hirticlavula page by  and myself. The two issues I would like your guidance and thoughts on are the citation style. It’s my belief that using a citation template is the preferred style (though I cannot find anything that says so either way). Also, what I think I understand User:J Milburn in implying, is that once a citation style is in place it should not be changed. This is not my interpretation. Indeed,  has been tidying my citations, something I am really pleased he does.  The second point I would like your thoughts on is the tome of  reply. I see this all rather abrupt. And not friendly helpful tone I expect on Wikipedia. Do you read his comments the same way? Do you think I need a just ``man up`` a little?  I am not trying to get Jason Quinn in trouble in anyway, He is doing a lot of great work on Wikipedia and long may he continue to do so.  I am mostly trying to interpret Wikipedia content guidelines, which I find a minefield, and make myself a better editor in the process.  `