`  = OK =  :Regarding your recent message about ``Naked``, my edit is based on the character's arguable status as an anti-hero. It becomes apparent to me that Leigh's intention was to portray someone who, while probably hailing from a higher academic milieu or background (whether conventional or self-taught) uses his eloquence and education in an deliberately overbearing manner. You cannot deny the fact that the film clearly passes judgment on the character on this and other levels. I just wanted to summarize this in a few words.      :Most of the already-existing text (e.g. terms such as ``reckless`` or ``egotistical``) would also qualify as non-neutral if subjected to a thorough scrutiny.     ::Thanks for the reply. I'd suggest finding references for any further changes you wish to make to the article. I also suggest raising any questions in article talk regrading other changes you propose.    :::I'm not going to enter a futile edit war just for the heck of it, especially now that your attention seems to be fixed on my particular edit for this particular article, but I cannot leave this unanswered. There are no references for most of what is already written about this film in the wiki page. I'll say again: if we were to subject this to the same level of scrutiny all along, the summary for the film would be ``A human male flees Manchester for London and has conversations, and some intercourse, with a few characters, gets beaten and leaves``.  Have it your way, I have other things to pay attention to. And please keep these interchanges in your own talk page.   `