`== Merge == This article appears to have been created as a content fork to the Robert L. Hymers article; both are about the same person. This article offers a fairly moderate positive bias to the subject, the other article offers a sharp negative bias at the time of this writing. Most of the negative incidents in the other article are listed here (although without some of the references, which I think should be added), while this article doesn a far superior job of relating the subject's full body of work. I propose using this article as a base, and merging the references and other sourced criticism of the subject here, in the hope of creating a truly neutral point of view article.      :Ah, now this is more what the article should look like.  I was concerned about finding this background material to balance out the other article, so its great to find that someone has already gotten in together.  I would strongly support a merge, using the material in this article and adding any sources or sourced statements from the other that are missing here.  My only question would be - which of the titles is more appropriate? (i.e. which name is he more commonly known by?) Thanks for pointing this out Xymmax!       Xymmax and Shell - I see the reason for the merger and I think it will be allright to do so.  Let me give it a shot this evening with the edits.  I am fairly green with Wikipedia editing and I am not sure what can be left out or not.  Anyway, after I integrate the R. L. Hymers page into this page, you can provide your input     The two should definitely be merged; it's silly to have two different articles about the same person. Hi, Kyu! Welcome to Wikipedia!    Xymmax and Shell - As a preliminary:  I hope that the name used to designate Hymers' article is called ``R. L. Hymers, Jr.``  Hymers' website books, and articles have used that title for years rather than Robert L. Hymers, Jr.  He is virtually unknown publicly other than by the name R. L. Hymers, Jr.     :Sounds like a plan unless there are any objections?  Either way, the other article will become a redirect so they'll both eventually end up at the same place.      ::Sounds as if all agree; I will redirect that article here. If anyone needs to access the old article, if you click on the small ``Redirected from Robert L. Hymers`` link on the upper left corner, you will be able to click on the history tab and see the old reversions.      ==Article structure query== Quick question: is the lede supposed to contain a sort of summary of the subject's career, and an assertion as to why he is notable?    :The lead should basically be a short summary of the article.  The style guideline goes in to a lot more detail, which you can read at WP:LEAD.       I tried to do a little copy-editing on this (wanted to boldface Hymers' name on first mention, e.g.), but turned out to be working as Kyu was performing his edits, so I'll make sure he's done before I go back in.  FWIW, is it a good idea to mention the names of Hymers' kids? I never do that on biographies of living people. If we do mention Leslie and Wesley, we should give their nicknames, but I don't know whether it's a hot idea to drag the next generation into this sort of thing: I would think that the twins deserve some privacy, and I would lean toward having their names removed. Just my two cents.    I am finished upgrading the page, as per your suggestions.  I have included all of the information given in the other web page, and added their materials to the footnotes.  I also added a lead as you su