` :::::::* , quoting such poor sources divelge the mindset you have. The Pioneer source quoted by you is actually a letter to the editor; the source in ToI and ET are infact statement made by a leader of Congress which has been reproduced verbatim. I am surprised at the perseverance and impatience you are showing to put forward a biased view, even mentioning a letter sent to the editor!! Moreover all the sources quoted by you consist of media articles/ opinions, which are not infact a ``fact``. This opinion of any media outlet cannot become voice of Wikipedia, if wikipedia policies are followed sincerely; lest it is hijacked by someone with ulterior motive. I wonder such users can be banned for citing such ``controversial`` sources.  `