`  ... however, political support is divided: Labor, Greens and independents support the project while the Coalition opposes it. The Coalition's main objection is the use of government funds; instead they argue for less government intervention to achieve the same benefits.  The political support of the NBN is divided between Labor, Greens[59] and independents who support it and the Coalition who opposes it. Independent politicians Rob Oakeshott, Tony Windsor and Bob Katter—who played a key role in the 2010 Australian Federal Election—support the NBN; Oakeshott and Windsor cited the NBN as one of the key reasons they decided to back the Gillard Government.[60][61] The NBN was initially supported by the National Party, however, the project was later officially opposed by the Coalition.[62] The main objection to the NBN by the Coalition is the A$27.1 billion of government funds used to build the project, instead they argue for less government intervention and additional private sector funding to achieve the same benefits.[14] The Coalition released an alternative policy during the 2010 election; some telecommunications companies were critical of the policy with iiNet labeling the policy as ``focus[ing] on the short term``, whilst two industry analysts back the policy as ``more bang for your buck``.[63][64][65] After the 2010 election, Malcolm Turnbull was appointed as the Opposition Communications spokesman to “demolish`` the NBN.[66] Turnbull has echoed his predecessor in calling for a cost-benefit analysis, however, the Minister for Communications, Stephen Conroy, has ruled out a cost-benefit analysis, instead pointing to the implementation study and business plan as proof of the viability of the NBN.[67][68][69]  Do you even read the text? Over 50% of the political text is about the Coalition's views. So please explain how is this unbalanced? — `