`  Does continental philosophy deal with ``problems``? I thought continental philosophers were more interested the Freudian and Marxist neo-postmodern psycho-social signification of metaphorisms, although I'm sure that Derrida would point out that such a summary misses the socio-linguistic element of antiredeconstructionist ethics. Seriously, what would the counterpoint to ``Unsolved problems in analytic philosophy`` be? ``Unsolved ramblings in continental philosophy``? There are no ``problems`` in continental philosophy. Continental philosophy *is* the problem.  `