`  :::Firsfron, you're right.  I didn't and still don't think that Essjay's 24 edits are likely to have resulted in any problems with this article and so I didn't think the task was that important hence my phrasing.  However, reading your last couple posts has convinced me that we are now saddled with the tedious task of verifying that my assumption rather than just waving our hands and saying ``Nah, not likely to be a problem``.  As I said above, I could forgive puffery on a user page and maybe even stupidly talking to the press while knowing that puffery was on his User Page.  But tainting articles with false claims of expertise is just a royal pain in the butt.  Let's get to work and stop worrying about the factual dispute tag.  It's not the most important thing that we have to do. ::: `