` :The terminology section is out of balance with the section on ``By culture``, which introduces fragments of various other terminologies. Looking again at the article, I see that history begins in Egypt and the Near East, then moves via Greece and Rome to Europe, culminating in Britain and the United States - a very conventional Anglo view of history. Religion is mostly Judeo-Christian, with a short paragraph on Islam, ditto. In the Arts is almost entirely the English-language arts. The spread of Aryan culture east, evolving into Hindu and Buddhist ideas, and the huge complexity of Asian concepts is not mentioned. Africa does not exist.   :You must have seen one of those maps where they make the size of each country proportional to the population. China gets a lot bigger and Australia shrinks right down. I shudder at the thought of visualizing en.WP bias in this and other articles that discuss a global concept. One way to address the lack of balance would be to introduce more content, expanding the article. The other would be to move out some of the content to culture-specific sub-articles, leaving summaries behind. Maybe the first is more practical?   `