`  == General ==  Just read through this for the first time. In light of all the discussion I just wanted to say the article seems really well managed. Whoever's handling this is doing a bang up job IMHO. One odd sentence in the intro threw me off however -   ``After working on his father's presidential campaign, he purchased a share of the Texas Rangers baseball team, and in 1994 he was elected Governor of Texas.``  This just doesn't 'roll right'. I think the mention of the baseball team can be left out here, and left to the lower sections. It sounds like the reason he was elected governor was because he purchased the team. Since this is locked, I'll simply leave my comments here and not mess with anything.  :Good call.  I think the Rangers stuff can be removed.  I'd like to sit on it for a bit to gather additional opinions as this is certainly not an egregious violation of policy or anything similar.  In the meantime, I did rearrange the sentences a tiny bit to answer the (correct) charge that the baseball team ownership is too close and appears linked to the election to the Texas governorship.   `