`::Ning-ning—woo?  Maybe but she's 2 for 3 so far against the establishment (trans fats, low-fat diet, saturated fats) in the marathon game and going for the shutout.  Looking at the way things are going in research land she might get it and end up looking like Cassandra.  She's not mainstream but from what I've seen of the evidence, her objections are grounded.  She deserved better than the hit job done on her article that I saw when I first came to it.  If all editors avoided minority viewpoints it would undermine coverage of intellectual discourse and complete information, but I appreciate the advice.  ::Parrot of Doom, I was still in the process of collecting sources and I think found 4 that could be called critical of her and they were added to the article but haven't had time to expand them.  She was involved in the lawsuit to ban Oreo cookies because of its trans fats and that hasn't been expanded either.    ::Malleus maybe but I get the feeling Orangemike has expressed a bias on the talk page and his monitoring of it hasn't exactly improved the article.  Wouldn't mind sorting out problems but it is hard to improve an article when editing it is prevented.  I guess I just don't see Ronz's finer points either. Despite his many ``improvements`` on olive oil, the banners he retains probably put off serious editors.  But admins seem to just dig his kind of editing.    ::Thanks again all for your comments.     `