 ::::: parties from the people's republic or those representing their views are welcome to edit (so long as their edits are well documented). think that's likely to happen any time soon? until then, these are the best sources available.further along that line, and while we strive for npov, this isn't a court of law. we are not bound by rules of evidence. personally, i thought the prk came off about as well as could be expected, i.e. their efforts to counter this behaviour were pretty well described.this is like saying that no documentation of the third reich is cited in the holocaust article. as to the derogatory comments by anonymous,they can hardly be seen as constructive.finally,i would refer him/her to the meta-wiki:don't be a dick. note to midnightblueowl: what constitutes a war crime is NOT subjective. it is well defined ('black letter law') under numerous conventions of international law; to wit, the hague convention, the 4 geneva conventions, the london charter, the international military tribunal for the far east (1946), etc. if (how's that for npov) the events occurred as described, they were, without question, a war crime.  