`  ::::::I reject calling people reliable sources for legal matters when they have no legal background. I also reject the flagrant and widespread misquoting and misuse of WP:RS by both yourself and many administrators. For example, primary sources aren't always bad and can be used in many instances - and yet many make blanket statements on how they can't be used (at least when they don't like the content). For example, why isn't Barack's dual citizenship as a child mentioned in the Barack Obama article? It is definitely notable, but the biased editors who patrol that article would never allow it in the main article - a million excuses would be thrown out and the editor attacked in order to keep it out. As for why am I here - that question is above my paygrade. However, I'm on wikipedia, because I hate to see bias and imbalance - and I see a lot of it on wikipedia. As for an ``incident report``, yes, I'm sure you could file it, and I'm sure one of the liberal admins would agree with you based on the ``evidence`` (their own bias), but we both know I haven't really done anything wrong.   `