`:::Your comment and judgements were obviously made BEFORE I had a chance to complete my response.  The evidence your provide above shows that you left your length ``outside view`` not even half way through my response, which means that you could only have actually seen only a tiny fraction of my side of the story before you began typing your so-called ``outside view.``  And may I ask you again: Were you or were you not previously acquainted with Aeon1006 or any of the UC Riverside article editors prior to leaving your supposedly ``outside view?``  ...or perhaps after egregiously violating WP:NPA and WP:AGF above, along with being proven that you left a partisan ``outside view`` in an RFC, you ``don't believe that dialogue...can be productive anymore.`` (how convenient).    `