 ::My main concern with this issue is that any false impression be given that Russell established the Jehovah's Witnesses.  He did not.  It's not complicated.  Any competent historian can demonstrate this.  There are some foundational similarities, but the majority of those things which Russell established and believed in were eliminated wholesale under Rutherford.  They were a new religion, which is a term they've originated, not me.  If we can keep these three articles (CTR, JFR and JW) from conveying false information then I will let it rest.  The three points BFizz has mentioned are a good start.  I'll step back from this for a bit, but will be keeping a very close eye on it, and if it is changed, or censored, as one of these editors has often done, then I will enter the fray again.  References which state, for example, that Russell founded the Jehovah's Witnesses in 1872 or whatnot are blatantly false and while they can be noted, they should never be used to support such a view, a point upon which I'm sure most of us here agree.    