Hi , Thank you! I am fundamentally in agreement with you on both the length of the discussion and that this article should echo the main. The main article treats the information that is in question as opinion, and attributes it to the sources on which it is based. I suggest that if we are to include the same material here, we need to also attribute it to these sources; but that a series of attributed opinions is excessive for this list page, and it is more appropriate to simply provide a list of the key/core points of the controversy, without judgement or conclusion on them. :I have attempted to demonstrate this by reference to policy and, where necessary, sources. I maintain that I am not discussing the nature of the subject itself (which would be WP:FORUM), but how we should represent it in this list. I have attempted to present a number of compromise alternatives, but these have not been as yet accepted. I have thought that we might seek a third opinion (WP:3O), but am not sure that 's earlier involvement invalidates that option. Would you have any advice on noticeboards or other avenues which might resolve this issue? Regards, -     