 Thanks for your response. As noted elsewhere, this process is way out of line and seriously muddies the waters, and many commenters new to the subject have not done due diligence, which is why their opinions you value so highly are often worse than useless. They are speaking about matters of which they are ignorant. :* Participants here must see the broader picture, and only those who have seriously done due diligence and/or have participated in the development of the relevant articles, the various RfCs, and the two AfDs, can really see that picture and factor it into their decisions. That's why RfCs and AfDs can be so frustratingly disruptive, because they allow such driveby editors to have any influence. Editors who are new to this situation can still offer comments based on policy, but even then many of their comments reveal that we are way past dealing with and solving those issues. It looks like we'll just have to agree to disagree.     