`  :::I hardly see how the Conyer's bill can be called unrelated when it is directly related to concerns over neonics and a possible relationship with CCD.  As for Bachman's decision, again directly related.  Regarding the linden bee die off, that should go for two reasons: It appears to be suggesting a relationship when there is none, and I agree that it has little to do with CCD.  And lastly, I'm surprised that you are instructing me about ``aspersions`` - you are an experienced editor and you must be aware that it is not in the spirit of collaboration when you go right ahead and delete material that is being discussed rather than allow discussion.    `