`  === Constantine II as pretender ===  Is your objection to the word Pretender, or is it something more substantive?  I'm just asking, as I have no objection to your edit either way.  I believe that we use the term 'Pretender' far too easily.  In our article on the concept, we say: ``The term pretender is applied to those persons on whose behalf a claim to a throne is advanced, regardless of whether that person himself actually makes an active claim.``  While that may be a valid use of the term in a specialist work devoted to royalty, I think that it is misleading in a general work.  But perhaps you are objecting in some other way?  I am just curious.    : My posting ``citation needed``, pertaining to the article ``Constantine of Greece`` and not to the article ``Pretender``, is not an objection but rather a suggestion of a citation to perhaps support the claim that Constantine II is a pretender as it is, as you say, used ``far too easily``.    `