 ::::Lets focus on the task at hand instead of you said he said.  I actually missed my most important point re inclusion of the sensitivity graph.  I invited you to present to discussion other graphs, where you can argue their relevance to the article.  Facts are facts and relevant facts are all good for Wikipedia.   ::::Putting yourself up as the judge of undue weight is silly for any editor, particularly when the concensus disagrees, and especially for an editor who is quite open about his personal pro-circ bias, and who professes devotion to that bias in Wikipedia.  