`, 14 July 2015 (UTC)  ::::::Since we don't see eye-to-eye on the ``following people around`` angle, I'm going to put that aside for now. Your arguments that ``this article has no bearing on WP:MED. This is a sociology issue.`` and ``This article is riddled with feminist POV content`` is similar to what men's rights editors, and similar-minded editors, have argued at the Domestic violence article, which is another article that Jytdog and I edit (the other medical editor of that article is ). Violence concerns health. To argue that domestic violence again men is not a medical topic makes no sense to me, considering the biomedical content it covers. The rate of domestic violence is also a medical topic; I already pointed to epidemiology above. Just like at the Domestic violence article, we have a few editors at the Domestic violence against men article unwilling to accept that the vast majority of the literature on domestic violence concerns women, and cites that women are victims of domestic violence far more than men are, and that we should therefore adhere to WP:Due weight in that regard. I pointed to WP:Valid (false balance) for a reason, because there are always editors complaining about some feminist agenda clouding an article that is covering a topic where women are known to be the majority of victims, when that article is simply reflecting what the vast majority of the literature on that topic states. This includes the Sexism article, where male and female editors have been clear with POV-pushing ``men suffer too`` and/or ``men suffer more`` editors time and time again that sexism is especially documented as affecting girls and women; that is why the Sexism article focuses so much on females. Similarly, that domestic violence is especially documented as affecting girls and women is why so much of the Domestic violence article focuses on females, and is why the Domestic violence against men article is so much about debating the topic of gender symmetry. You speak of ``run[ning] afoul of a variety of Wiki policies.`` I see none of that when it comes to your feminist claims. I am not interested in arguments that would have us give false balance; giving false balance is running afoul of a variety of Wiki policies, and is exactly why this article is a Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation matter.   21:09`