`Common misunderstandings section ==  The Common misunderstandings section seems like original research to me. If it isn't, then it need citations, and if it is then it should be replaced with a non-original research. I'll see what I can find, but if anyone knows of an sites that specifically cover this topic that would be great.    These are indeed common misconceptions, and not original research. (And each of the points within it are well documented elsewhere, as well as in the article itself.)  However, a ``common misconceptions`` section seems, itself, a little non-encyclopedic in tone; list-ish, rather than encyclopedic-essayish. I think it's probably better to include the material within the relevant sub-parts.  Or, to flesh out this section, and explain that because of the growth of copyright and the related increase in reliance on the doctrine of fair use, a lot of misconceptions and confusion have arisen over time; e.g., X, Y, and Z.  Still shouldn't be list-ish, though.     == `