`  :::First, you're dodging the bottom line.  The term, ``For secruity reasons`` is not a supportable statement.  It implies that they knew what Glock was THINKING when they brought it out.  I don't either, but my conjecture is just as good as Janes'.  Now, that makes the statement unsupportable and calls the source into question.  :::Second, are you SERIOUSLY calling one of five sources provided into question when it agreed with the other four?  I believe that this is a case for you to bring up with the WP community board, not here.  If the other four are reliable, and this single source agrees with them, it's reliable also, eh?    `