Each one of these inventions or propagandistic insinuations constitutes a violation of Wikipedia policy; (see Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not).    It's not just the propaganda  even the parts that attempt to be non-propagandistic are sloppy and amateurish, as if the writer(s) had done no research whatsoever. This ought to be re-written from scratch.  Peter_Abelard@ausi.com  I see that Krusty the Clown is still vandalizing the article. Should I protect the page?    I don't think the situation here currently warrants protection. Krusty's edits can be dealt with as they occur.   :Okay. When necessary, I can be called on to protect the page whenever I'm online, as I haven't been an editor of the article.    Regardless of the outcome of arbitration proceedings, how about dealing with some of the disputed points in Krusty's latest list (the NPOV ones, anyway)?     