`  == Vandalism ==  Under the section 'History of milk' - 'Morgan compton likes cock'  rgds     == Reorganize medical studies section ==  The medical studies section seems very disorganized.  I will admit that I have contributed to it, but it seems like each paragraph starts at some cancer, goes to a brain disease, and then continues to wander a bit.  The paragraphs on white blood cells and rBGH seem to be mostly on one topic, though the rBGH one could be broken up into several paragraphs.   I'm not quite sure what the best way would be to reorganize the rest of the paragraphs.  Maybe the best strategy would be to just break it up by topic and include subheadings - ie, a subheading for cancer, for autism, for allergies, etc.   And rBGH should probably get its own section: the arguments are not about whether the milk itself is (un)healthy, but whether the IGF-1 has an increased presence in milk from rBGH-treated cows and the health effects of that.  That might just be my own peeve, though.     ::This section is definitely in need of a good housecleaning again.  Every once in a while someone comes in and cleans house, then slowly things get cluttered again.  There has been a long standing discussion here r.e. health effects and milk, and much of it probably goes beyond the scope of this article.  It has been suggested in numerous instances to create a separate article for this, and I agree      == Bioavailability of calcium in milk versus veggies ==  The article's section of bioavailability of calcium currently reads ``Calcium from dairy products has a greater bioavailability than calcium from certain vegetables, such a spinach, that contain high levels of calcium-chelating agents.[21]`` From what I've read (Am J Clin Nutr Heaney and Weaver 51 (4): 656), Spinach seems to be the exception rather than the rule.  Kale and other vegetables in the Brassica genus are low-oxalate and high-calcium, which causes them to have better calcium bioavailability than milk.   My previous edit to this effect was reverted.  I assume that this was because I cited notmilk rather than actually looking it up in the american journal of clinical nutrition.  If anyone still objects now that I have the primary source, feel free to revert again.     ::If you can provide a good primary reference for the material please feel free to add this.  I reverted the edits largely due to the reference to notmilk.com which frankly is a terrible cherry-picked collection of scattered and often unrelated materials written from a highly biased POV.  Some of the other points had been debated and decided upon previously here.  If you wish to challenge them it would be best to bring new material to refute the previous decisions.  Cheers     ==WikiProject Food and drink Tagging== This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under Category:Food or . If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging  . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page       == Contradiction ==  Article states ``Most humans lose the ability to fully digest milk after childhood (that is, they become lactose intolerant).`` However, this is contradicted on the lactose intolerant page which claims only 20% of adults are lactose intolerant.     :You should fix it.  There's no way MOST adults are lactose intolerant. [[User:The Founders Intent|'''''THE F