  == Promotional tone ==  Hi , Thank you for your efforts to improve this article. It is gradually getting better. In my opinion it still does not read like an encyclopedic entry, however; still more like a news release. The key, I think, is in continuing to find more reliable sources rather than the project's own materials. What would an objective, non-involved observer write about the project? What are its strengths, limitations, accomplishments, challenges...? Regards,   