`   :As for ``controlled by a committee`` - it really depends on the maturity of the article and how controvertial it is.  This article is both.  By and large it is a delicate compromise between opposing POVs, though some of the pro-ID people still see it as biased against ID.  As for the changes you made - my biggest issue with them is that they read like commentary, not like an encylopaedia entry.  If you can rephrase the sentances in a way that preserves the underlying shades of meaning, and does so without sounding hostile to ID, I would be happy with the changes (though, of course, I can't speak for everyone involved here).   `