`  == 2015 Minneapolis shooting ==  2015 Minneapolis shooting:   You said,  ``User:Mr. Granger was correct that we cannot use eye witness testimony as a declaration of fact. You state that you are simply using the video as a primary source, but that is not what you wrote in the article. You did not say that the video shows someone claiming to be a member of the group and claiming that such and such happened, You simply inserted the person's statement as facts. Meters (talk) ``   While I initially referred to ``the video`` as being a ``primary source``, I later clarified that statement to recognize that once the video was placed on YouTube, YouTube being analogous to a magazine or newspaper, it became in that form a secondary source.  As such, I can quote from that video without it being called ``us[ing] eye witness testimony as a declaration of fact``.  (Besides, it wasn't ``testimony``:  It was not given under oath, but it WAS given before a camera, and the resulting video was placed on YouTube, and thus in that form it was a secondary source.)  Go back and re-read what I subsequently wrote.  I refer to this later.   `