` ::::Yes, understandable... I think that the basic setup is what really drives these issues though. When you get right down to it, ``peer review`` is the core of what Wikipedia is about... which is part of the reason for the recent rename proposal, incidentally. What's tickling around in the back of my brain right now is that ``peer review`` could be as integral to the page editing procedure as Wikiproject banners with Class/importance parameters are. I don't see why the process should be so... formulaic? hopefully this makes sense.—   `