`  ==The following is a COMPLAINT AGAINST  for harassing user's about the Police State page==  ==It seems that many users have had problems with  harassment and vandalism==  , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users.  :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have  who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?”  : describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.”  : even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior.  :Dear Administrators: :``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. :Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time.  :Sincerely yours, :User Winston Smith  : describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.”  : had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on  talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings.  has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet  refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war.      is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page  while falsely accusing me of stalking  and sock puppetry.       :: I have to say that Nescio and others had understandable grounds on which to suspect you of sockpuppetry. Fact is, you appeared on scene the day of/shortly after three genuine sockpuppets appeared, and you shared the same POV and short history of editing.    :::Please explain what makes you think that  is a sockpuppet? Can you cite these actions of VinnyCee that are considered to be those of a sock-puppet?    :::: I just did. It turns out that Vinny Cee is not a sockpuppet (at least, of anything we checked), but there was good reason to suspect she was.    :::::So VinnyCee is not a sock puppet. This means that Nescio's accusation of him being a sock puppet is false. Did you ``check`` into whether the other accusations made by Nescio against other users are also false? I would bet that they are.    :It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken.     ::The edit wars have not been between you and only Nescio. They have been between only you and many other users.    :::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again.      ::::Again,  is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion,  has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism.  is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. .     Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why  continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question.     ::    :::Please Stop Removing Warnings.    ::::Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a ``personal attack``?     ::::: I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith.    ::::::In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing  abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view.    Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion?    :The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his ``edits''``.     :: Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses?    :::(a) This is not a ``disruption`` of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that  does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations.  `