`  :::According to WP:undue  :::This article is about a minority viewpoint, so it is not undue weight to present precisely what that viewpoint is as understood by those who hold it. :::According to WP:NPOV :::This article is not neutral but highly biased in opposition to it's subject by describing Flood geology ``in the terms of accepted science and academia.`` (as you put it).  AND, the evolutionary geology viewpoint is judged as ``the truth``the correct oneand the creationary view is mentioned only pejoratively, i.e. pseudoscience.  Therefor the editors of this article have NOT been keeping a NPOV.   As you can see, in Wikipedia truth does not matter. All that matters is that viewpoints are presented in a NPOV.  :::From WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience ::: :::This article is about a minor view which is labeled pseudoscience (falsely so I believe, but that is besides the point) and is noted as such.  To talk about this viewpoint in this article does not ``obfuscate`` the main views. This article exists to give the minor viewpoint and compare it with the majority view.    :::As can be seen from above your statement that ::: :::is completely false.  It should give what creationist think and what evolutionists think in a NPOV.`