` ::::::You are conflating hard sciences with social sciences. In the hard sciences, you have peer reviewed studies which can be replicated. This is not a scientific article, it's a biographic article. There's a world of difference between the two. In any case, as I've stated, I am NOT saying that these articles shouldn't be used. I am simply pointing out that they are no more reliable than articles from news sources. Therefore, your repeated calls that we rely primarily on these ``scholarly articles``, as if this label somehow makes them immune from bias, are getting us nowhere. The article is littered with these citations, and what we're left with is a propaganda piece.  `