`  ==RfC: Incompatibility between the standard scientific notation for paragroups, and links ==    :Standard scientific notation for paragroups is to use an asterisk after the name for the haplotype. The very conciseness which makes this a very useful standard, reduces its usefulness as a link :Therefore, currently, there is no standard for both noting a paragroup, and usefully linking to the paragroup article which explains this distinction, without saying, Haplotype paragroup, which in my limited understanding seems to be either a tautology or an oxymoron (I told you it was limited) :I fear my option may be marginally acceptable, and I was hoping someone with a better knowledge of the subject might either endorse them or have a better idea :Current status: * The current status. If you missed that, I can't say I am surprised, it is a link shown as * after the colon and before the word, ``The`` on this line. Paragroups are marked with an asterisk, which is pipe-linked to the redirect page * (haplogroup), creating about 30 or so double redirects :Option: * paragroup My favorite. Might be better to use the abbreviation, 'para', instead, to save space. :Option: your idea here. Including haplotype paragroup, if that works :  `