`Message of the Day ==  You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – ('' •    April Fools Day is just around the corner. As such please could you nominate a new motto or comment on existing suggestions at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials? .... facing oncoming traffic for over 5 years    == Alan Gillett ==  Is the surveyor notable? Cos if not there is absolutely no point in having a disambiguation page.    Yes.  I am currently writing the article which will contain adequate references to establish this.      :OK - I've fixed all the broken links to the football coach as well.    == Backwell Karate ==  Hi Andrew,  Thanks for your advice. I've added in references from numerous sources, including websites, newspapers and a magazine. Because of the age of some of the references many of them are not online, but there are quite a number that are.  Hope this helps?     == Editathon ==  Glad you'll be able to make it, should be a fascinating event! Yes, do see what your old tutor makes of the article, and we can talk about strategy and tactics on the day...     ==Elizabeth II==  Thank you, Andrew Davidson!  How reasonably you put your case!      You're welcome.      ::Having got support from 3 other editors, I rewrote, according to the plan I had put forward to the ``owners`` of the page some months ago, using current Jubilee website, and a quote from Boris (God Bless Him!)  It was immediately reverted By DrKeirnan with the every-so-reasonable suggestion that every point needs to be individually discussed.  ::Problem is, today is the day.  It's only 8.45 in London, and the page has had 200,000 hits already.  ::I cannot simply keep reverting to the changes that I have made. Edit warring doesn't work!  ::I need reinforcements!       Still working on this article.  Still being reverted at every turn.  This is my latest message.  I need back-up.        :* I have responded at the article's talk page.     ::Your suggestion that every change should be discussed seems'' perfectly reasonable.  However, it is extraordinarily difficult to achieve; hence my frustration and the lengths that I have gone to.  The editors with whom I am dealing are far from reasonable.  Every improvement to the intro (as it now is) has cost an argument, some of which started a year ago, (often with points being made that are frankly ridiculous)  and multiple deletions.  They only gave way when its was pointed out that several other people had wanted it changed, and even then chopped out a lot of the stuff (including deleting mention of the wars).   ::The same people, particularly DrKiernan, are now being just as difficult over the rest of the article. The preciousness with which they resist change is extraordinary!   ::No-one can afford to be that precious. I know that I can't! ::I usually work on major art/architecture articles and have almost entirely written (or rewritten) a number of them.   See Leonardo da Vinci, Ancient Greek architecture, Romanesque secular and domestic architecture, Renaissance architecture, Italian Renaissance painting.  While this has been happening, I have been working on Thames Diamond Jubilee Pageant which has been in every way pleasantly cooperative!     == Dan Leno == I think you're probably right. Thank you for spotting it. I've just re-added the minor grammatical change I was trying to add before.     Hi, I see you have made a number of edits to the above and I want to thank you for your time in doing so. However, I must stress that as the article is currently today's featured article and any edits go live immediately.  As the co-nominator at it's FAC I ask of you to hold off making any major changes to it and instead take any desired edits to its talk page.  I really don't want warring on such a special day. Everything can be discussed tomorrow with a view of in corporating your contributions if you wish to discuss then.  I will be reverting the article again to its original form as it's that version which enabled it to get to a FA in the first place.   Many thanks and I hope to see you there.    ::Sorry, there was an edit conflict.  Where are we now with this?  I see you have spoken to Tim on the matter. Incidentally, thanks for the stub.  I will happily help expand.    :::* My understanding is that Tim was making a minor grammar change but inadvertently reverted a bunch of other changes too.  We seem to have worked that out already and I have no plans to make any more edits to the article today.    ::::Sorry, it was a result of the edit conflict that things got a bit confusing.  All the best!    :::::Oh, Lord! My hamfistedness has caused a right brouhaha. Apologies all round!     == Dunhuang Project event ==  Hi Andrew,  Good to see you've signed up for the event! It's running over four days, and you're welcome to attend any or all; we're hoping to be working on it more or less continually through the period.  The two specific things we do have scheduled are a group of students from SOAS on the Wednesday afternoon (about 3pm, I think) and a smaller group of MA students from UCL on Thursday morning (about 10am). We'll be quite busy at these points, but if you're interested in helping novice contributors learn to use Wikipedia, this would be a good time to come along.     :Hi there. Are you still interested in coming down? If so, please drop me an email so we can arrange a pass for you...     I'm quite busy with auditions &c.; this week but I'll try to make a flying visit at Thursday lunchtime.  More by email.       ==Images==  As of late 2012 the English language Wikipedia has over 4.1 million articles, and Wikimedia's image library Commons  has nearly 15 million images.  Much of the time the people who write articles will add appropriate images, but in a volunteer based project where everyone chooses their own tasks we sometimes find things that get forgotten.  So we now are producing lists of articles that don't have images but for which images may be available.  Wikipedia:Articles with UK Geocodes but without images is a list produced by computer of articles about things in the UK, these are articles without images, but because they are in the UK we probably have images if anyone looks.  To add an image to an article.  # Open three different editing tabs on your PC. One for this page, one for Wikipedia:Articles with UK Geocodes but without images and one for  searching Wikimedia Commons # On the list find an article without an image. # Search [http://commons.wikimedia.or