 :::I have no problem if consensus is to include it. What I would have a problem with is if FactCheck is presented as knowing what was in the president's mind when he spoke those words, or being clear on his meaning. I would plan to edit such an inaccurate characterization that would be the exact opposite of what the FactCheck article said. But if the FactCheck material is used to point out that some (not all, according to FactCheck) Republican ads and speeches quoted Obama without context, that's OK by me.   