` :::::::::I've always maintained that MMfA doesn't matter, that their criticism is predictable and planned, so therefore not noteworthy.  However, we seem to be under some asinine directive to provide ``balance`` to this article.  After all, facts like book sales and audience size are positive, so we're supposed to put in critical opinions to balance out the facts.  As I said, asinine.    :::::::::But, Levin did address MMfA multiple times on his show, and has criticized their funding, tax exempt status, and methods.  An argument could be made that this makes MMfA relevant to Levin's show.   :::::::::If you really want to see undue weight, take a gander at John Gibson.  I fought for many months to keep MMfA drones from dictating the content of the page, so they took to citing Olbermann and other liberal pundits to attempt to keep the criticism in.  I was basically outnumbered, so I walked away from it.  As it stands now, MMfA fueled criticism accounts for roughly 3/4 of the entire bio page on Gibson.  So yes, I also agree that MMfA is cited far too often on Wikipedia.   `