`:``I really am sorry that I let Ultimahero drag me into an argument with him that ended up derailing the WQA.`` :``self-important types like Ultimahero`` :``The guy will pick and argument and monopolize a talk page on just about anything.`` :``The dude would start an argument with a brick wall on whether it is actually made of bricks.``  Now, I will note that all of these are made by Mmyers1976, but it's still your talk page. By not refusing to participate you condoned it. (When Revan was insulting you two I refused to take part in personal speculation). These certainly aren't just edits about the situation. Calling me ``self-important`` is a comment on how I view myself, thus you are speculating on how I think about myself. That's personal. Comments about me arguing about ``anything`` or ``with a brick wall`` are intended to convey that my motive is to only argue for the sake of arguing. Speculating on my motives is certainly personal. Thus, Mmyers1976 was uncivil in talking about me personally, and you went right along with it in implicit agreement. So it was not ``merely [about my] attitude or edits``. It was about me as a person.  You said, ``I don't know why you think we flocked to your page, but I assume we both edited here quickly after your edits on his talk page for the same reason you edited on mine less than an hour after an edit about you was made (and all 3 times in less than 2 hours): because you watched my page and saw the posts.  Revan has attacked me enough that I have monitored his page: I saw your post and thought to encourage your productive activities.  I assume Myers did the same, but I cannot speak for him.  Seeing as you have access to literally all the communications we have ever had together, your accusations of teaming up seem quite absurd.`` You did flock here. That's the best way to characterize it. I edited Revan's page at 21:39 on April 26th and you posted here 22:19 the same day with Mmyers1976 posting here 22:30 the same day. Both of you showed up in less than an hour. That seems pretty quick to me.  There is no question that a ``team mentality`` has been demonstrated thus far. You and Mmyers1976 act as though you are ``against Revan and I``, as evidenced by your mutual ``venting`` about us on your talk page, as well as your both immediately showing up here to ``thank me``. Revan acts as though he and I are ``against you two``, as evidenced by his ``venting`` against you too. This may not be intentional but the behavior is certainly apparent. I, however, have no desire to ``team up``. That's why I felt comfortable coming to you and asking you not to talk about me: I don't believe the different sides we took on WQA need to translate to any other area. I also refused to talk about you with Revan and have condemned his post-WQA behavior. I don't want to ``team up``. I'm interested in what's best for Wikipedia.  You said, ``My tone changed because instead of encouraging unconstructive edits, you begin to encourage constructive ones.  I also don't understand your last statement: it is in everyone's best interests for Revan to be a constructive editor, and for you not to encourage bad behavior.`` I never encouraged ``unconstructive edits``, sir. Not agreeing with your charges on WQA is not the same as intentionally approving of destructive behavior.  That is a clear misrepresentation and to equate those two things is inappropriate. Further, your attitude towards me was more than just not approving and then approving. You and Mmyers1976 had been engaged in a discussion about me personally, one which you refused to stop a mere 4 hours and 21 minutes earlier. (The time between the last post on your page and your first page here.) You had refused to stop talking about me personally. Now a few hours later you were here ``thanking`` me. How do go from refusing to stop personally attacking me to thanking me? It's simply not coherent and your explanation doesn't justify the change. And as far as the last  You said, ``Unless you launch into new justifications for your attacks against me, I really hope not to post here again.`` There you have it, sir. And you certainly do not have to interact with me anymore.    `