  == Edit-warring report on Psychonaut ==  Hi there, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. As you may have noticed, the edit warring report you filed on Psychonaut was closed with no violation. Per our usual bold, revert, discuss cycle, when an edit you make is reverted, it is up to you to open a discussion on the talk page to seek consensus, not to keep making the same problematic edit and then report the user who is actually in the right. In this case, Psychonaut's reversions were correct because he was trying to preserve the page history, because all edits should be attributable to the editors who made them. Discussion is the most critical tool you have in your arsenal at Wikipedia, along with assuming good faith, particularly when a more experienced user provides you with guidance. Thanks,   