`  : , Thank you for your words, most of these Indian theories conceptualized and worded in a very one-sided basis. Conflict of Interest is an absolute commonplace, and staying neutral is possibly the best means to address such issues and bring-about compromise. I'am no religion-buff myself(and I don't think, I'd develop some interest too), so sadly I won't be able to really see through the pages you have mentioned, and be able to assist dialogue. India WAS a spiritual country, where different cultures co-existed and confluenced across South Asia. But that was long before colonization, that threw up new nations on ethnic and religious basis. From that point onwards, things have never been the same, there are suppressed nations every nook and corner, the Balochs in Pakistan, the Kashmiris and the North-Eastern tribes in India, the Hindus of Bangladesh and of course the Tamils of Sri Lanka(something we have dealt with mutually). Its easy to understand your position, but once you realize how India or Sri Lanka does not broadly define a nation and how numerous individual nations and cultures exist within them, then you would see why such an extent of conflict of Interest arises, and maybe then you won't feel so burdened perhaps. So just get over the reluctance, and resume editing soon mate, for you will be amazed by the things you learn and the experience would really leave you enthralled.  .  . mail) `