`  ==20 September 2014== The original issues brought up about this article years ago seem to have been finally laid to rest.   ``#This article is little more than a rather inflated and exaggerated (especially in terms of touting its community service activities, based on what I've seen over the years) promo piece for the fraternity and a tribute to those named in it, and because of this, violates Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). To be sure, the article is almost totally unencyclopedic. #It is mostly unreferenced. #It was obviously written by members and/or alumni of the fraternity, so there is a problem with conflict of interest. #Because of the problems mentioned above, it is in desperate need of clean-up to meet Wikipedia standards.``  Every other sentence has a reference, all personal biases have been diluted away as they should be. Discussion should always continue on the quality of Wikipedia articles; however, this NPOV dispute hasn't seen action in several years. Isn't it time to lay it to rest. (  )  :Agreed. The NPOV template was added one year ago, and while bits and pieces still need work, it seems like it's worth setting it aside for now. We can always re-add it if needed.     :I have reformatted this discussion by moving it to its own section. This will help to keep the talk page's archives clean and readable. If this isn't okay, please don't hesitate to revert.   `