` :I know that I used vulgar language, yet Wikipedia policy doesn't consider vulgar language itself to be uncivil. I still maintain that: :*There was no true consensus :*I did not make any personal attacks :*The other editors made claims that, in hindsight, were either rescinded, or admittedly false :*My dialogue was in the interest of achieving neutrality, which as you can see is still a difficult undertaking :*Nothing is achieved by an admin who chooses sides :I still maintain that the block was enacted without a valid rationale. It is not my intention to engage in ``further instances of disruptive behavior,`` so why bring it up?   `