`  :``An article about politics cannot be only about the elections.`` - quite true, and in fact the bare listing of election results is pretty worthless, they should really be left somewhere else and summarised in prose as part of a discussion of the, well politics (``politics`` does not equal ``elections``). And indeed in the many ``Politics of...`` articles there are a few which have sections titled ``Political conditions``(search). But the vast majority don't. Anyway, the section in Politics of Gabon is a much better example of the sort of content (whatever the section is called) which should be added, and which is much more common in ``Politics of...`` articles: a summary of the political history. For instance some discussion of Venezuela being an ``exceptional case`` in Latin America for its long-lived democracy (and then the subsequent re-evaluation of that when the partyarchy crumbled). (In fact I've written some content on that today in my userspace draft.) And of course there's much to be said on the nature of the political reconfiguration since 1998, the (changing) relationship between the grassroots social organisations and the Chavista movement and the new socialist party, etc.  :But my concern is (and your most recent edit encourages that concern) that you want to duplicate very similar content as you want to have in Human rights in Venezuela. Duplication aside, that content is even more inappropriate here; you need to ``zoom out`` even further, as it were, and relate those general concerns to the politics, at a very general level. I would find that hard to do; and you've shown no interest in even trying - you're happy to have the small details (``examples``) from primary sources, rather than the big picture from secondary ones. That's even less appropriate in this article.   `