`  :I see what you mean, but wikipedia articles should represent the mainstream view even on articles about non-mainstream stuff. This has been discussed for a looong time. You will want to see the current arbitration case Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Fringe_science, specially the subpages Workshop and Proposed decision and comment on their pages and talk pages if you want (be careful, the ``proposed decision`` page can only be edited by arbitrators and clerks, you can only edit its talk page, read the headers on the pages).   :The part about how many molecules are there on an homeopathic dilution can surely be shortened, like in Atropa_belladonna#Alternative_medicine.    `