` :::Although this list is a scant 4 items, none of its items are older than December. I happen to believe all sorts of edits are happening on Wikipedia, but they are just going undetected.  :::The article on Zarqawi led me to believe this, as references to a years-old CIA report claiming he was dead/missing a leg kept disappearing from the article. I wasn't paying close enough attention then to find out who. :::This ``crusade`` is good for Wikipedia because it will defuse future endeavors by propagandists by making their actions public and documented. Apologizing for Jack or anyone else by saying he's ``just your average biased editor`` is _________.  :::Your ``field of interest`` expression of misunderstanding/classic ``extreme worst case`` argument is addressed repeatedly in the article. See such phrases as ``surrepticious [editing]``, ``investment``, ``direct involvement`` or ``financial or political involvement``, etc. Sure, by some wacky logic you can connect everyone in these ways.  :::  `