`==New Section entitled ``Origins and Development of the Term``==  I see that yesterday, someone with username ``Strongarm`` added a section to this article entitled: ``Origins and Development of the Term``.  I agree that there is a bit of a deficiency in the article as to the origins of the term, one which I had previously attempted to rectify by writing an article on the Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy within the Presbyterian Church (USA).  I welcome Strongarm's comments as extending my article both temporally and to other denominations.    That said, a couple concerns:  1)  there are obvious NPOV problems with this new section; 2)  It somewhat seems to me that this material would be much more aptly placed in the article Fundamentalist Christianity, and referenced in the Fundamentalism article by link. 3)  I would argue that the relationship of the Five Fundamentals and the series of articles entitled The Fundamentals is more accurately presented in my article, since the Five Fundamentals, after all, were published in 1910, whereas The Fundamentals were published serially between 1910 and 1915.  I therefore would object to characterizing the Five Fundamentals as a ``narrowing`` of fundamentalism as expounded in The Fundamentals, since, chronologically, the Five Fundamentals came first.   4)  As for Strongarm's comment on the Five Fundamentals: ``Another version put the Deity of Christ in place of the Virgin Birth`` - I would note that the Five Fundamentals as a position within the PC(USA) were always constant.  Other denominations (Baptist, I think) ultimately expounded other versions of the Five Fundamentals.  I'm a historian of Presbyterianism, so I'm not as familiar with these other versions of the Five Fundamentals, and I'd appreciate someone who knows about this topic writing about it, but I think that should be done in a way that doesn't conflate the Presbyterian Five Fundamentals with other versions of the Five Fundamentals.   `