` :::  Yes, of course, I had it and it is still there. What is your point regarding it?  That is asking Hindus to come forward and themselves also actually define what a Hindu is. How did you construe that to be a ``Hindu Sikh battleground`` is beyond any comprehension (``no mention of Sikh at all``). I do understand that Wikipedia is not a forum to have this debate (which I myself agreed to, and did not pursue it further). However, coincidentally, you yourself have started a debate there now on ``Hindus' definition of Hindu``.   `