`  :::I have explained in my edit summaries why Gregor Maehle and Manohar Laxman Varadpande (a clearly reliable source for theater, but not for prehistory) fail our criteria at WP:RS. They really should not be used, we should be using qualified academics. Do I really have to raise this at WP:RSN?  As for ithyphallic, although a number of sources state this as fact, others are not quite sure, eg ``Shaivism in Ancient India: From the Earliest Times to C.A.D. 300 Ishwar Chandra Tyagi - 1982 - ?Snippet view - ?More editions The bull was a sacred animal which is clear from the short-horned bull and the humped bull on the various seals from ... Marshall's identification of the deity of the figure with Shiva- Pashupati or a prototype of Shiva raises a problem when ... He himself admits, 'whether the god is intended to be ithyphallic or not is doubtful.`` This says ``appears to be``. This has a list of questions that have been raised, including gender, whether he/she is in a yoga stance, whether there are 3 heads, and whether ithyphallic or not. Then there is Flood who I am guessing is the original source for probably ``The Saiva Traditions``G Flood - The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism, ... The famous “Pasupati” seal shows a seated, perhaps ithyphallic``. Note also about the horns - some suggest this is a headdress. NPOV means we don't state something as fact that is questions, and that we show all significant views. I've raised the whole issue of this seal at the Wikiproject India talk page.   `