` :Well, my considered opinion is to put it brutally, that your proposal doesn't have a snowball's chance in a hot place.  Lots of Wikipedia articles get vandalized every day, but if we accept that as a reason for deleting the affected articles, it's giving the bastards a reward they definitely don't deserve—plus it would make Wikipedia a rather empty place.  ``Sugar Puffs`` is by no means the article most affected; have a look at the revision history for ``plate techtonics`` for instance.  The conclusion is that the article remains.  Another editor has already contested the PROD, and I can see that your previous attempt at deletion through AfD failed.  Instead, you can help the community by undoing vandalism to this (and other) articles whenever you encounter it.  Cheers,   `