`, 4 November 2008 (UTC) :Sorry but I prefer the former...    (double edit conflict) Wikipedia policy applies to editing articles. See WP:BURDEN: :Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors may object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references. If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, consider tagging a sentence by adding the  template, a section with , or the article with  or . Alternatively, you may leave a note on the talk page requesting a source, or you may move the material to the talk page. Per the above and WP:PEACOCK I can't see any justification for not changing ``The 1940s in New York City heralded the triumph of American abstract expressionism``, to ``In the 1940's abstract expressionism developed in NYC.``   Additionally the article at the moment is unbalanced. The Renaissance gets a fraction of the space of Abstract Expressionism, for example.  '''''''''' 02`