`:::The fact is that there was a first declaration and later a second with much more details. That is a fact noted by most of the media. :::Your text describes no facts. That is your, I repeat, nikolito's interpretation of the mexican law. I am sure there are persons, like Florence Cassez, who have another ``clarifications`` for the second testimony. :::Wikipedia has to inform the facts not the editor's view of the facts, like your ``clarification``. We have to abstain to ``clarify`` the reader.  :::If you can contribute reliable references for this interpretation then we can write it there and add the reference and the persons who say that in the text.   :::I will not revert your changes for a while and hope you find the references.    `