` 2006 (UTC)  ==:) Chavista== May go away for some time. But will always come back. Cheers.   :Please see talk:chavista#Blogs are not reliable sources   ::Fyi, the objection to blogs in WP:RS is just a more verbose version of the same objection in WP:V (which is indeed a policy). However, perhaps something in  or a search in a dedicated database of that type might still provide a less disputed source. —  :::Thanks xy -)  WP:V says ``For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources.``  Same weasle as on WP:RS (typically).  I don't think a search will prove fruitful, given the restrictions on freedom of the press in Venezuela and the inattention the international media paid to Venezuela until recently.  I'm going to let JRSP do the homework of getting a policy read on the notion of its use for a colloquialism, as I've grown weary of doing work for him.    ::::Well, I guess it’s a matter of interpretation, then. (I tend to understand the policy as excluding blogs always, except in the cases given below the bit you quoted.) By the way, ‘weasel’? You’ve spent way too much time at WP:FAC. ;) —  :::::No kidding -)  Time to get back to work on *my* stuff!   13:03, 7 August`