`  ==Croatian Women's Cup finals== I stumbles upon a Croatian newspaper archive. http://library.foi.hr/nv/default.aspx?G=1&u;= Those newspapers cover football at like 3 pages per day. I wondered if one is able to find results or at least runner-ups from 1992 to 2001. As i don't speak Croatian and don't know the dates of the finals, i can't come up with good searchterm to create few good results. Maybe you could have a short try at that site? Something like women's cup final, women's football, year final, or cupwinner + final or something. Thanks in advance. -    ==Attendances== Info is taken from annual yearbooks (Almanah YU fudbala) published after each season. I'll add it a as a non-linked source.     == Article importance assessment drive... ==  Whoa! I was this close to raising an issue with the WP 1.0 bot, because it looked like it was almost 100 articles off, and noone is assessing that many articles a day... -)    :All in a day's work ;-) Mind you, 99% of everything I assessed received a low importance rating. It would sure be easier to keep them in check if WP:CRO templates were marked ``low importance`` (and ``stub``) by default, requiring manual input only for quality/importance upgrades. Speaking of which, if one wanted to adapt WP:Germany's version of the table depicting importance scale, where would one paste it at WP:CRO project's page? Should I just put it on talk page until we find a better place for it?     ::From time to time I assess a couple of articles, and usually it's ``low`` because these are easy to pick: villages, barely notable films and such. Yeah, it's a chore, but in this case occasional (or semi-permanent, to be honest) backlogs don't really hurt either... ::Well, the only proper place for the table is surely Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/Assessment, i.e. the assessment subpage (currently used for something slightly different, but this is easily fixable). Maybe the time to introduce it has come... I'm not sure myself, the project might offer an answer.    :::Just noticed you tried to add the quality scale... I've wrapped it in , which prevents it from messing up the main page. Not really a solution - ideally the assessment page and what is displayed in the Assessment frame should be entirely different things - but it works, kind of.     == Re: Maps in infobox settlement ==  There's an intermediate template that you'd have to create, or use a parameter of the existing Template:Location map Croatia. If the coordinates match, the latter could work. But, I don't know offhand if and how this extra parameter fits into Template:Infobox settlement parameters.     == Henlein ==  I found out that while with Građanski Zagreb, the Austrian Karl Henlein was actually a coach/player. He is former Austrian international. Here (3rd paragraph) is says that Gradjanski had 2 Austrian internationals, refering to Henlein and probably Rupec. That makes me doubt if Jaroslav Šifer (Schiffer) ever got to play with Austria, as he played in this same period as well in the club, thus, if Sifer was Austrian international, they would have been 3, and not 2, as mentioned. All sources say that J. Šifer was only Yugoslav international, but the only source claimng he played for Austria, that I know, is RSSSF. Any ideas?     == HČSP ==  Well, I'm sorry that I reverted all of the info, but some of it was either unsourced or non-neutral. I edited the page again, so let me know what do you think.     == Glossary of association football terms ==  Hi Timbouctou. I was wondering if you would be able to use the Football Lexicon to source any of the remaining unsourced terms? They're all tagged with [citation needed], and last time I counted there are about 20 unsourced entries left. I've been trying to cut that down myself, but a lot of the remaining ones are phrases that might be difficult to source the meaning of from anywhere other than a book dedicated to football terminology. For instance, it's easy to find references to layoff and through ball online, but difficult to find anywhere that actually says what they are. ——    ==Battle of Vukovar featured article nomination redux==  Please note that I've renominated Battle of Vukovar for featured article status. You're very welcome to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Vukovar/archive2‎.     == Referencing Croatia ==  Hi! I've expanded and referenced a part of the Croatia article, and by now only the ``History`` section (minus the last subsection thereof) remains to be referenced. Once that's done, I'd like to redo the lead to have a summary of the entire article in it per WP:LEAD. Since you edited the section at hand (along with many others) I thought to let you know. How about we co-nominate the article sometime next week, when the references and lead are in place, for WP:GAN?   :I've noticed the huge work you've done recently and my hats off to you. However, I'm not sure it is ready for GAN yet. The prose needs to be condensed a bit and the ratio of dry statistics vs. flowing prose should be improved in favour of the latter, as some sections are tiresome to read (for example, take the culture section which has too many numbers IMO). I had tried reducing the history part section by section but I didn't get around to doing the earliest (Pre-history and Antiquity) and the latest (Modern Croatia) sections. These may need another pass through. We could also use a section on Etymology. In a nutshell, it still has lots of room for improvement, but if you want to have a go at GAN I'll be happy to lend a hand. I'll get on referencing History for starters, we could be ready for a formal nomination in a week or so. Again, great work so far, keep it up.    ::I agree the article may be ``overwritten`` in some aspects, but I'd still leave further trimming to be performed during GAN review if necessary - moving any excess material to linked articles. I also agree there's quite a lot of stats, but a similar level of statistics is present in Germany which is an FA therefore I added them modeling the section on the FA article - which is not to say that your impression isn't correct one. Again, if that becomes an issue during a GAN review, the detailed version may be moved to Culture of Croatia or elsewhere where appropriate and replaced with a summary passage. As far as the ``Modern Croatia`` is concerned it seems fine to me, but the ``Pre-history and Antiquity`` does feel a bit odd. The ``Etymology`` isn't there, true, but would it be better to have a separate super-short section on that as in case of Germany or position it as ``History`` section introductory text? Anyway I'll prepare it in the sandbox and move it in when it's ready. On a final note - the article right now contains a mix of US and British English spelling and one should be chosen. I don't have any preference, but we should make a choice before the article is a GAN or before a copyedit or proofreading is requested.   :::About etymology, I remember reading some guidelines at WP:COUNTRIES which said that etymology is a good thing to start the article with, but that's not set in stone of course. Since I think expanding the earliest history section might prove to be difficult we can alternatively mention it in there. I don't have a strong opinion about the variety of English to be used. I'd personally prefer BE but if others are more comfortable with AmE I'd be fine with that. Maybe you should raise the issue at the article's talk page and get a wider consensus, so that the  or  template could be placed on top.    ::::Thanks for the pointer. I