` :::::::I'm not really interested in your unnamed ``plenty of sources`` to back up your points and assumptions or mine. I'm also not interested in your personal opinions on Aztecs, intermarriages, minorities, etc. We're not here to take sides and carry on the academic debate; leave that to the academics.  If you think something in our article is disputed, you need to produce the reliable source(s) (include the publication, page numbers, etc.) which you say refutes the existing sources, so we can review it and determine if the information in our article needs to be changed.  As for your request that we follow WP:AD, sure, we can do that if you'd prefer.  As instructed at WP:AD, I've marked the section in our article as disputed (so that it gets listed in the Disputed Category) and opened a ``Dispute`` section on this Talk page (see below).      ==Disputed== A concern has been raised that the article contains entries which ``cannot be classified as a war`` because they consist of multiple wars and conflicts, and often span long periods of time. (For example, see the entries on: Mongolian conquests — Conquest of the Americas — Conquests of Tamerlane — Qing dynasty conquest of Ming Dynasty - Shaka's Conquests — Conquests of Mehmed II — etc.) Are entries like these within the scope of this list article?`