`Jessica Lindgren Hello. Your edits to this page do not include proper markup; see the tutorial for info too. Also, please cite your sources so we know your info is verifable.  Another thing: Please don't put ``don't touch my work`` on your talk page: since Wikipedia is a wiki, people HAVE to edit your work sometimes!  IF you have any questions, feel free to ask me!. Chicochango    [edit] Jessica Lindgren When you create stub articles such as Jessica Lindgren, please try to find the appropriate specific stub tag(s) on the page WP:STUBS. This saves other editors work in categorizing the page, and makes it easier for editors with experise in the subject to find pages that need work. Thanks, — Swpb talk contribs   ok thanx guys.   [edit] Comment I have nothing against you personally, but one of the key points of Wikipedia is that you absolutely have to source what you say in an article. It doesn't matter if you, I, or anyone else know if something is true... it has to be verified. Please read WP:V and note the bolded text Verifiability not truth. That is what you need to acheive in the articles you contribute to and that is the point you seem to be missing completely.Isotope23    [edit] I restored your user talk page Hi again! It is generally considered bad form to blank one's user talk page, as you did. I reverted the blanking, although even that did not restore all the content you've deleted today; it would be better if you restored all of it. Please review WP:OWN and Wikipedia:User page. Remember that on Wikipedia, even your user page and your user talk page are not yours; they belong to the community. Thanks. Tkynerd   OK, I explained this to you immediately above. I think it should have been eminently possible to figure out that blanking isn't the only thing you shouldn't do on your user talk page (if you examined the links I provided). Other people's comments should generally be left alone (unless they are pure vandalism, which this one wasn't). Rather than removing comments you don't like, you should take them to heart. (Perhaps you are and I can't tell yet, but...) Tkynerd   And once again the page was blanked. So I helped restoring it. Archive it next time, instead. Strangnet   Page blanked YET AGAIN. It is generally considered bad form to blank one's user talk page, as you did. I reverted the blanking, although even that did not restore all the content you've deleted today; it would be better if you restored all of it. Please review WP:OWN and Wikipedia:User page. Remember that on Wikipedia, even your user page and your user talk page are not yours; they belong to the community. Thanks. Dalejenkins    [edit] Your note to me Hi I tried wikifying two of the three articles you wrote to me about, as the third was already quite decent by the time I checked. There was a problem though, the people belong to Sweden and Swedish is like Greek to me; as also there is very little about them in English. Leave a message for me in case...  Bobby Awasthi    [edit] Addis Black Widow I've restored the Article for deletion notice to this article. Please allow the AfD process to complete . Looks like it will be kept anyway. You can edit the article, just keep the notice. Thanks Scott   On a similar note, I also put the notice back on Stefan Andersson, but I've cleaned the article up and I don't think it will be deleted. Feel free to edit, just don't remove the articles for deletion notice. Thanks! GassyGuy    [edit] Cosmo4 If you go to the library and opened an encyclopedia, would you expect to find a poorly-written misspelled article? Wikipedia isn't a blog, but an encyclopedia, that happens to be on the Internet. 90% of the bands put on Wikipedia are deleted. Wikipedian27   Do not remove speedy deletion tags. You will be blocked. Wikipedian27    [edit] Cosmo 4 again Alright. Alright. Stop putting posts on my talk page, and I'll withdrawal the speedy. But promise me you'll put a clean-up tag on it. Wikipedian27    [edit] Comment For starters, is there any particular reason you make comments on my talk page and then delete them? Look, the problem is that you are dumping a rather large quantity of poor quality articles and content here and expecting other people to clean up your mess. It isn't my intent to see you leave Wikipedia. What I want to see is you take a bit of time and read the policies and guidelines here and then follow them. I'd like to see you actually source your articles and learn how to format them correctly so you are not creating sub-standard articles for other people to deal with.Isotope23    [edit] Signing posts Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes (   ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Also, three tildes () produces your name without the date and five tildes () produces just the date. WikiSlasher       [edit] YouTube links Please don't add any more YouTube links of Melodiefestivalen performances into articles. As far as I can tell, those were not officially released by the show and thus cannot be linked here. Please see WP:EL#Restrictions_on_linking for more information.Isotope23    [edit] AfD nomination of Torsten Lilliecrona An editor has nominated Torsten Lilliecrona, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ``What Wikipedia is not``). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsten Lilliecrona and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot    [edit] Please be civil May I please remind you to comment on issues, not on other editors? Thanks! Bonadea   Det är verkligen inte personligt menat. Grejen är den att när någon nominerar en artikel för att raderas, vare sig det är snabbradering (``speedy deletion``) eller radering efter omröstning (``Articles for deletion``, det som hände Torsten Lilliecrona och Addis Black Widow), så beror det på att artikeln inte uppenbart handlar om ett ämne eller en person som är tillräckligt bemärkt för att ha en Wikipediaartikel. Det logiska är då att förbättra artikeln och lägga till uppgifterna som saknas, och inte bli irriterad på den som har nominerat artikeln. Du och jag vet vem farbror Melker är, och du vet vilka Addis Black Widow är, men en Wikipediaartikel finns till för dem som inte redan vet det. Att folk kräver källor betyder inte att de tror att du ljuger! Det betyder bara att de vill kunna bekräfta det som står. (Jag kunde till exempel inte avgöra att Addis Black Widow var så kända innan det kom källor som visade det, och jag förstår ändå svenska.) Sedan är det så att dina artiklar har hamnat i strålkastarljuset senaste veckan eller så. Det i sin tur beror på att du skapade väldigt många artiklar som helt saknade källor (dvs källor som de icke svenskspråkiga förstår) på kort tid. Det skapas hundratals artiklar om små obemärkta amerikanska popband varje vecka, som raderas nästan direkt  det har faktiskt inte med nationaliteten att göra, även om jag mycket väl förstår att det kan kännas så. (En anledning till att jag började redigera i engelska Wikipedia var just att skapa enstaka artiklar om svenska förhållanden och hindra att de raderades direkt, och jag har märkt att jag hade fel; svenska artiklar raderas inte alls direkt, men vår bevisbörda kan ibland vara större.)  Detta blev långt, men jag tycker det är trist att du ska känna dig förföljd, när det enbart handlar om att följa samma riktlinjer som alla andra.  Vänliga hälsningar, Bonadea    [edit] RE:Talk:Grynet Like I said on that talk page, I have one agenda, to see high quality articles on Wikipedia that meet our Manual of Style and make a strong case for meeting our policies and guidelines. Despite your contention that I've offered you no constructive criticism, I've spent the past several d