`  == Persistent personal attacks ==  As one of the editors on International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence you are aware of the situation there. Well  has opened a new section on talk page of that article singling me out and attacking me left and right without any base in a large piece of text. He previously received a block on commons for heavily insulting me and others but he is doing it again. Is this really per Wikipedia rules? That anyone can take some unfounded accusations and throw them at another user even with history of being abusive towards other editors? Also he is bumping up old discussions for which he disliked the final conclusion. I remember reading on Wikipedia rules that bringing up the same thing on and on until the desired consensus is reached is not welcome. He is also making things up (this just an example of why it is a slander, because he is making things up and attaching them to my back) by saying how no one in Bosnia made a reaction while three out of three presidency members and prime minister reacted. Obviously the article is called ``International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence`` not ``Official documents adopted worldwide regarding the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence`` which means we are using statements not only official acts. He previously said how I never added anything ``pro-Kosovo`` to the article which I swiftly proved to be wrong. He also claimed how I was ``skewing`` the quotes in the article (when asked to point at a single letter I changed he couldn't do it). I am asking for the immediate protection as it is getting unbearable (usually admins get scared away by his pointy text blocks and don't want to interfere and this allows him to get away with it but I hope this time it wont happen). Thank you   `