` :Unfortunately, even if an article has been touched by the hand of ``god``—whichever one you wish to believe in—if unverified content is included, then it needs to be highlighted. While appearance is relevant, Wikipedia is not merely a design forum, or an example of aesthetic excellence—it is an encyclopedic website that seeks to contain verifiable information. The importance of tags is so that copyeditors can easily identify the sections that need to be verified—it is also important that readers know when content is not verified. Yes, I could have sourced the information myself, but given that I am only one person, with finite energy and time, I feel that it is beneficial to highlight gaps in the article while I attend to the multiple other priorities in my life—this also provides other copyeditors with an opportunity to improve the article until I return to the article. I have restored the template, as it is still relevant. Thanks.  `