` *I think it would be wise if you were to hold off on adding information about your family to Wikipedia's mainspace for the time being. The problem here is that while these people undoubtedly exist, you need to show how they would be notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. Existing as a performer or an athlete does not give notability in and of themselves - you have to show where they pass WP:NACTOR or WP:ATHLETE. For example, in the article you wrote about yourself you mention that you performed in films, however these roles were minor and would not give notability even though the film itself is notable. Notability giving roles are ones where you would have a sizable speaking role, would be one of the major characters, and/or would be mentioned in reviews of the film. You also mention your book, however the book has received no critical notice outside of a Toronto Heritage award, which isn't the type of award that would be considered a major enough one to keep on that basis alone. I looked at your father's IMDb page and neither of the roles he had would be major enough to warrant a keep on that basis either.  :Basically, verifiability isn't entirely the issue here. Yes, we need to be able to verify them, but we also need to be able to prove that they're notable. I know that this must be difficult to hear, but from what I can see neither you nor your father currently pass notability guidelines to where either of you would warrant mention on Wikipedia. This is why it's so highly discouraged for people to edit about people and things that they're directly involved or related with - in many cases the people won't pass notability guidelines and it's hard to hear someone say that you're not notable. People aren't questioning that you or your father aren't related to notable people, just whether or not either of you are notable enough to warrant inclusion in any format on Wikipedia. So far the answer is that no. I hate being so blunt with this since I know that this will just make you angry, but this is per Wikipedia's guidelines, which are incredibly strict. I've had to delete pages on people who have published books that sold exceptionally well, yet they never gained the coverage necessary to warrant an article. :Again, Wikipedia is not a place to keep track of your family history or raise awareness that you and your father are related to notable persons. I understand your frustration, but right now it's really not a good idea for you to continue adding pages on your family to Wikipedia. I'd more recommend going through someplace like Wikia, where you have more freedom in what you can include. You can try creating articles via WP:AfC, however I need to stress that you will have to show where their accomplishments would be considered major per Wikipedia's guidelines. Simply being related to someone notable is not enough and you have to show notability via coverage in independent and reliable sources.  `