, 27 February 2010 (UTC)  I eliminated another supposed source by PICO that indicates there isn't a consensus. Moreover PICO is listing blogs, emags, and not properly documented refs. For instance, his refs do not supply page numbers so that they can be verified. Refs without page numbers will be eliminated if I can't find the supposed source - since two of PICO's refs that I could find did not substantiate his text. This is becoming a real POV problem. I think something should be done if PICO continues to create erroneous refs for his POV.  20:33