`I was correcting factual inaccuracies. I more or less rewrote a propaganda piece single-handedly into an acceptable and neutral article. And I have now constructively pointed out massive problems (not just by the way) by an editor who caught my eye at ``Did you Know`` with the very poor ``Nazi talking dog`` story. You clearly were reached to a online pal (who I've discovered writing two error ridden and skewed articles in as many days)-and are now doing their bidding rather than focusing on improving some rather poor content. That is, you have actively harmed your websites mission with your actions. I was pretty sure this would be how it would go done, but fascinating nonetheless.   `