  :The question is of scientific methodology. To say that X is Y without proper argumentation, and rejecting criticism again without arguments but inventing political bias is not scientific. Relationship between Old Welsh oceint and Basque ogei was proposed, debated and rejected with arguments. But why is this worse that *HVxGV of a language Morvan has no time tyo say which is? :And in the same Wikipedia article you can see a reference to relate ogei with Old Iberian orgei (Old Iberian is not Aquitanian) so your theory that any connection theory is rejected is clearly false. :BTW Morvan simply ignores in his dictionary the Iberian  parallels. Why Japanese is a better try for egin that Iberian egien?. It is clear that orgei makes HVxGV clearly unrelated.   