`  :::The problem with quote mining is that someone (you or wyatt or me) decides what and what are not notable quotes.  You are not independent or uninvolved, and therefore pick quotes to suit your purposes.  Wyatt would like do the opposite.  Quote mining in this fashion is tantamount to original research, because individual, anonymous editors get to pick their favourite (often out of context) quotes from primary sources to justify their favourite position.  WP generally wants secondary sources: magazines, newspapers, books, journals who have determined that this or that position or statement of Sungenis is or is not significant enough to be included in the article here. So, if you can find a reliable source that mentions that he said that Jews were an ``infection`` then we are off and running.  If not, including it appears to be giving undue weight to a statement that nobody bar the blogsphere has found notable enough to mention.  :::As you point out, I did make an edit to include some of Sungenis' own statements in denial of some very serious accusations about a living person; I believe that this is appropriate in order to maintain NPOV.  However, if you disagree you can argue your case here at the talkpage, or at WP:NPOVN or WP:RSN and I will happily abide by the resulting consensus.  :::We are also not here to sort out the logic of the various statements of the bishop, Sungenis etc etc and who is righter and who is wronger. If you want to discover the truth about Sungenis, then there are other websites that may more suitable for your contributions and analysis. Or better still write some articles for mainstream newspaper/magazine about him to get the news out. Once these are published we can use them here.  On WP we merely faithfully and fairly summarize what the reliable secondary sources say and let readers make up their own mind. It's very boring really.  `