  **Basically, the differences from the page organization shown is that I moved the taxonomy section down and the distribution and range section up.  This organization seemed to flow better, as it seems that a lay reader would most likely be first interested in what it looks like and where it lives.  And the taxonomy section is more specialized, which is why I put it at the end.  This organization also seemed to work for other Central American monkeys, such as Central American Squirrel Monkey and White-headed Capuchin.  But its easy enough to change if it is a problem. **I removed the spider monkey comparison.  The reason for making the comparison was that Geoffroy's Spider Monkey is the largest sympatric monkey.  But since that wasn't addressed in the body of the text, and it isn't really necessary, I removed it from the lead.  Alternatively, I can restore it to the lead and note it in the body, if reviewers think it is valuable (although I may not have a ref explicitly stating the comparison, just the body size stats of the 2 species). **I'm not sure about the image placement.  I thought they were supposed to alternate positions to the extent possible and, more importantly, face the text.  I am not finding either of these in the link, but I remember it being an issue during the Primate FAC.  And it probably would not look right facing away from the text.   **That source had a lot of good information readily available.  Some of it overlaps other sources, so I could swap references if necessary, but I don't think it is.  