`:::::::::: -  :::::::::: One again, Jeffro77, you are making false statements. As I above demonstrated, Prof. Tipler's Omega Point Theory has been publish in many peer-reviewed science journals, including a number of the leading physics journals. The Wikipedia article on the Omega Point Theory lists seven different scientific journals in which said theory has been published. That is quite a significant amount.  :::::::::: There is no excuse for such a false statements on your part, since even in the section pertaining to it in ``Existence of God`` article, information is provided on Prof. David Deutsch (inventor of the quantum computer) endorsing the physics of the Omega Point. As well, in the hyperlinked ``Omega Point (Tipler)`` article, information is provided regarding the many peer-reviewed science journals that Prof. Tipler's Omega Point Theory has been published in, including some of the world's leading physics journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics journals).  :::::::::: Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper (F. J. Tipler, ``The structure of the world from pure numbers,`` Vol. 68, No. 4 [April 2005], pp. 897-964) was selected as one of 12 for the ``Highlights of 2005`` accolade as ``the very best articles published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68]. Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal Website.`` (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, ``Highlights of 2005,`` Reports on Progress in Physics.)  :::::::::: Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further, Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact factor reflects the importance the science community places in that journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own papers.  :::::::::: Regarding string theory, it has no experimental support whatsoever and it violates the known laws of physics (e.g., in general relativity, singularities are unavoidable with realistic energy conditions [for the Hawking-Penrose singularity theorems, see S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, ``The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology,`` Proceedings of the Royal Society of London; Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 314, No. 1519 (January 27, 1970), pp. 529-548], whereas singularities do not occur in string theory), yet the known laws of physics have been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment to date. Right now, string theory isn't even science, since it makes no predictions that can be tested, i.e., it's currently completely non-empirical. To date, string theory is nothing more than mathematical omphaloskepsis.    `