`  ::Then let's be consistent. In the DMFC article, remove the two external links ``Startup taking big steps to launching this technology`` which goes directly to a manufacturer's site, and ``World's smallest DMFC``, which goes to Toshiba. Let's not have selective enforecement.  ::In regards to the citation I tried to add to the fuel cell article, the story ran in at least a half-dozen publications online. I had a choice of several links to use, and decided, based upon similar examples in that same long list of citations where the ORIGINAL source document (i.e., Press Release) was cited several times, to chose the link that had the least probability of going dead  that of the original release.  Again, the very Wiki I was editing provided a precedent for what I was doing.   ::Finally, I understand the issues about ``advertising`` for a specific company. But the line gets fuzzy on the bleeding edge of technology, where there might only be one company that is even referenceable, and is, in fact, the center of competence (and information) for that entire field or segment. What do you do? Pretend they don't exist, and deny users the information they could learn from the technical material provided by that company? Thanks.  `