`   I don't see where in DRN I used language that was so unclear  that my perspective or views could have been so confused that it was assumed that I never rejected the issue of Sayeed's statement as per what you previously said. I disagree that the issue of the statement is unresolved - that all parties agree on a matter does not mean a matter is not resolved if Wikipedia policy is clear on the matter, which it is - you're attempting to have the opinion of one person that was widely disparaged by others inserted into an article that covers a significant period of time. I'm still an uninvolved editor as I have no stake in this article other than ensuring that Wikipedia's core principles are held to, and often do dispute resolution outside of DRN. Seeing that the edit warring has continued once the DRN was closed I feel it necessary to keep an eye on this talk page, and request the assistance of administrators to keep this conflict under control as needed. I would suggest all involved actually read WP:UNDUE, specifically this passage - ``If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Wikipedia, regardless of whether it is true or you can prove it, [...]. In this situation, the opinion of Sayeed is in the vastly limited minority, so it does not belong on Wikipedia.   Help resolve disputes! `