`   {|style=``background-color: #EEEEEE; border: 1px solid #999999; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em;`` |- | |On Wikipedia, I spend a lot of time patrolling recent changes. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note: *I am only human, I sometimes make mistakes. Edits I revert, I generally revert as they appear to be vandalism of some sort. If you believe I have made a mistake, just undo my edit, and leave me a message pointing it out to me here. Please don't leave me a template message, if I've made a bad edit, chances are it was a mistake. And, if I have reverted your edit, whether vandalism or a mistake, please don't abuse me with vandalism here. It will be quickly reverted. |}    {|style=``border:0px solid #e6e1ff; background-color:transparent;`` align=right | |}  Archives1, 2, 3, 4, 5       == Re: Second Intifada ==  Hi Steve. Thanks for notifying me of the RfM case about the Second Intifada. I'm not really involved in the case, although I have indeed participated in that particular discussion in the Second Intifada article by giving my 2 cents. For the record, I am not involved in any dispute with any of the editors in the case, and hold it as low priority. However, I will, again, give my 2 cents on the issue if necessary. On a side note, you might want to add the admin  (a.k.a. Addhoc), who is not involved in the article's dispute itself, but caused controversy when he proposed a one-week topic ban for just one side of the dispute (User:Jaakobou) on WP:AE.      : Hi, thanks for notifying me about this too. To be honest I have no idea how the mediation process works or what I should or shouldn't do in respect of one, or how involved I actually want to get in mediation over one word.  I pretty much set out what my own views are on the article talk page, and others have provided more detailed sources for the debate. I don't see a problem with using this one word in the way it is currently used in the intro, and people objecting to it are simply wrong when they say that the word is inherently biased, or that the intro doesn't cover alternative points of view. Oh and I'm sure people will pick me up for saying this again, but some of those involved in the debate don't have English as a first language - I'm sorry but this is surely significant when debating this sort of issue.     ==Sceptre would like to nominate you for adminship!==    would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then  to accept or decline the nomination. A page  for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.    I chose to decline, I'm just not ready for Adminship yet. But thanks anyway.     :Good move, finish your admin coaching first so that you will pass with a 100%.     Yes, I've made it quite clear that I won't accept any nominations unless it comes from my admin coach. I was a tad irritated to be honest. Also, this is deadlocked. What do you think I should do next?    :Holy crap, uhh... I would have to dedicate an hour to reading all of that before I would be able to make any good suggestions, and to be honest I dont have an hour. If I find some free time I would be happy to help.     ::100%? I highly doubt that.     :::You never know. P     == Happy Easter! ==     Open your card >> >> >>  Happy easter you guys! Have a nice day. Not to much chocolate. P     Credits: This card was inspired by BoL   ==Recovery template== This is the general wording I was telling you about Template:User recovery. It really for things like comparing a new version to an old one, or where there was a bot-tagged deletion (like images), or non-notable CSD deletion. ''''''    ==Thanks==  Thanks.   : Heh... thx again . Isn't huggle great?  I used WP:VandalProof for a long time and it was really nice but huggle is so fast... and less buggy I must say...  BTW - you going for a new one month edit record? -o   ::I have no idea what the record is but I have seen many edit count pages generated here and I have never seen a one month tally as high as yours.  I don't know whether to say ``congrats`` or ``did someone chain you to your computer?``  Either way, great work on WP and the vandal fighting!   :::Heh!  That was nice of you... thanks for the Barn