  == My experiences on the Shakespeare Authorship Page ==  Smatprt, I read with interests about your discontents on the SAQ page.  I recently made a minor edit on the 17th Earl of Oxford website, adding a reference to show that not all academics reject non-Stratfordian theories entirely.  It was the first edit I ever made on a Shakespeare-related page and the response was quite extraordinary.  I can't be bothered getting annoyed with these people any more or wasting time discussing, in the wider scheme of things intelligent people soon learn to look beyond Wikipedia.  However if there is ever another arbitration on this, or even an investigation by adminstrators, I'd be pleased to give evidence.   I'd not declared any view of my own on the authorship, I simply considered that the fact that a small number of academics question it is significant and should be given a small amount of space.  Please feel free to draw this comment to the attention of anyone else who may feel disappointed by what goes on on that page.   