`  == Protection (2) ==  This article really needs to go back under semi-protection.    :Comment/agree - it was previously semi-ed to prevent edit-warring; the events of the last 12 hours or so weren't edit-warring but pure vandalism by the Nimbley-troll.  I'm not necessarily arguing against semi-protection (I think it would be a good idea), just noting that it would need to be protected for a different reason than before, i.e. to prevent Nimbley-vandalism. :Cheers,  `