 ::I kind of agree with you on this one Bongo (although I haven't read what you said at the AfD so I'll have to go look).  But it's not like that article really brings down the encyclopedia.  I think the clearer cut cases are promotional articles and insubstantial articles that don't make any sense.  And there is a case to be made that the coverage in this case amounts to substantial coverage over a sustained (years) time period.  I would prefer we lean towards inclusion rather than exclusion anyway. As I said, I don't think it meets the inclusion criteria, but shit happens.  Sometimes good articles get deleted. You can always try again in a few months if you're determined enough. )  What else is shaking?   