`Okay, so I edit this article so that it matches with Beyonce Knowles', which I was then planning on doing to Jackee Harry's because I like the wording format in Beyonce's article. Fair enough plan, right? Apparently ``not,`` according to this ``Bookkeeper`` person, because then later she/he comes in and reverts it, giving me this: ``Due to the ambiguity of her current last name, we reached consensus to introduce her this way.``  ``Ambiguity,`` huh? What's so ``ambiguous`` about it? Why is this supposedly ``different`` from how Beyonce is knownusually only called by her first name, but still introduced in the 'pedia with ``best known mononymously as Beyoncé``? What's the supposed ``difference`` between knowing Ms. Ciccone publicly by only her first name and knowing Ms. Knowles publicly by only her first name? What supposedly makes Ciccone ``more ambiguous,`` according to Bookkeeper, than Knowles, so much that it was supposedly ``better`` to introduce them differently? Why ``can't we`` just introduce Ciccone the same way as we introduce Knowles?  ``Maxx Fordham``   `