`  sigh, the article is WP:BOMBARDing the reader, saying IT HAS REPEATEDLY BEEN DISMISSED AS A HOAX. What more do you want? In fact, can we get rid of some of the ``bombardment``? The status of this question is quite clear, imo,  the scholarly mainstream has consistently been that this is a hoax, but there were occasional legitimate scholarly minority views saying ``hey, what if it's genuine?`` Wikipedia doesn't lose its honour by giving room to these minority views, indeed it should do so under WP:DUE, as long as it is still made clear that they are just that, minority views.   `