` ::::* Then my response to you is the same as it was to  BLP, by definition, only applies to ``living people.`` Kyle has been dead for two years. So just like I told him, BLP does not apply. Also the sources I used, all met WP:RS and were both relevant and notable. They also took up a very small part of the total article, so the fact that you believe they were ``weighted heavily negative`` (whatever that means) would be irrelevant, even if it were true. In fact, the Salon article quoted directly from Kyle's own book. So if there is any concern over ``negativity``, then attribute it to the author of the book - the subject himself. But, in an article that is rapidly taking on the form of a ``testimonial`` or some kind of ``tribute page``, those inclusions met WP:BALANCE. But more importantly, the fact that you would, not only defend Mongo's edits, but ignore his behavior - after you ignored the links I provided you - is surprising and disappointing. It suggests that you're not as fair-minded - or impartial - as you led me to believe.   `