`:::I will appreciate it if/when proponents of ``conspiracy theory`` discontinue the use of non-consensus building tactics. You fail to note it was another editor that actually put the {npov} template in this article before (was that Carbonite?) who changed it to {povcheck}. (Was it also Carbonite that removed {povcheck} a few days later? iterestingly inconsistent). I admit my criticisms of the intro are somehwat minor (we've made some progress) but since your side has apparently stopped debating the only recourse I have is to make readers/third parties aware of the existence of dispute by placing the disputed header at the top. This should be basic NPOV policy.  :::Please respond to my concern that ``commonly believed`` needs some sort of balance/caveat.     `