`  == RE: TFA Protection ==  Hey there Bongwarrior (cool name, btw, haha)!  Yeah, definitely no worries on the unprotection, if you ever think I'm away and have done something out of sorts, revert away mate.  Apologies for the confusion on the edit summary; I had semi-protected the previous three or four day's main page featured articles after they had been vandalised dozens of times, and I accidentally used the same text when typing in the ``other reason`` (my browser saves what I type in those boxes, and I must have just glossed over it).  I figure since the previous several day's featured articles hadn't been vandalised much since I put the semi-protection on, it would be a good idea to semi-protect the main page featured article starting at the beginning of the day.  If you'll look back to the main page featured article's this week, you'll see little to no useful content coming from users hiding behind IP's.    Since the main page featured article is supposed to represent some of the best content we have to offer, it only makes sense that when people click on Learned Hand or any other featured article of the day, they should get to learn about the judge, and not be subjected to silliness regarding the size of a part of this chap's anatomy.    Furthermore, since the article is just about as good as it's going to get, as it's been through the FA process and many volunteers have devoted hours upon hours to this article, it is unlikely that it's going to benefit much from one more day's worth of additional content.  That is, while I don't think we should semi-protect all featured articles, they can definitely do with being semi-protected for one day.  In addition, that guideline hasn't been discussed in months, and I took the opportunity to be bold. D  Thanks for the note mate!  `