`  == film category cfds ==  Hi - One way to read your notes at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_July_28 (and I know you don't actually mean them this way) is that the anon votes are sockpuppets of .  Since this anon (whoever it is) didn't actually add the entries to CFD, I don't think it's inappropriate for him/her to vote.  And, if his/her ISP dynamically allocates IP addresses and the user want to remain anonymous, how would you expect him/her to vote?  Calling these ``sockpuppet`` votes seems a little overly confrontational.  Would you consider changing your note to be a little less insulting (assuming good faith)?  Perhaps something like ``user assumed to be the same as the user who originally added the cfd tag``?  IMO, accusing someone of being a sockpuppet is assuming some level of malicious intent, which I think is perhaps not warranted in this case.  BTW - in case you have any doubt, I assure you I am not the anon in question.       Hi, thanks for your message.  Actually, I had assumed good faith. I will change the notes on the ones that Kbdank71 ``added`` but the anon tagged.  The only reason I used the term ``sockpuppet``, is because if you actually read his votes, he insinuates that he is not the same person, yet they are all the exact same edits by each IP, along with the post on Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts stating he was not the same person.  I have tried to assume good faith, but he continued to remove Cfd tags, have categories requested to be speedied.  The only way I fealt the discussion could be fair, is if all were aware of the activities of the anon, although I'm sure most people realized it was the same.  Have a look at the log I created, if you haven't already .  I am not on a personal vendetta, I was in agreement with the anon about changing some of the cat's, but then it became ridiculous and we had to clean up all the bad-faith stuff that was done.  I will go change the way the comments read now.  Thanks again.   `