` ::Those comments were not present on the discussion page. I now see they are present on the requested move page; however, this is not the proper place to put them.     == Body Snatchers ==  I would like you to take a quick look at the article comparing the Body Snatchers novel to filmed versions before you edit it out as 'vandalism' again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     :It wasn't vandalism it was spam.     If critique is spam, let's get rid of cinefantastique as well, then.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     :Responding on your talk page.     Yes I am affiliated with the site, and I have put a great deal of research into the piece you are editing out, which compares the book's structure and themes to all film versions, with an examination of how the prevalent culture influenced or failed to influence those versions. It is not a tossed-off article written so I could get Google ranking by linking in Wikipedia (not a valid method anyway since Google changed their algorithm late last year), nor was it written with the intent to lead Wikipedians by proxy to the site's front page.   There is no similar article available at the moment on the net. That's not to say I am special, just that no-one else has bothered to write the piece, and as it has something to contribute to the subject, I don't see why it should be excised.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by      ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mileyworld.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Mileyworld.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ``fair use`` may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.  If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. :You have not addressed the major issue here. This is a copyrighted image that does not meet the requirements for fair use. The issues is not about the windows decoration but the use of this image as decoration and not critical commentary about the website. It is only valid in an article about the website.   ::Not true. If there is critical commentary about the page, then it is legit.     == Gun laws in the United States (by state)  Possible copyright infringement ==  You recently tagged Gun laws in the United States (by state) as a possible copyright infringement, ``from various sources, as spelled out below``, but I don't see any specifics.  Where should I look for that?  And, where should this possible copyright infringement be discussed  at Wikipedia:Copyright problems#2008-02-16, or somewhere else?  I am aware of problems with this article, and in fact I participated in a discussion about them  see Talk:Gun laws in the United States (by state)#Material copied from CarryConcealed.net.  I'm thinking that the copied material should be removed, but I'm concerned that the copied material be carefully identified and the original material left in the article, so I'd like to participate in the discussion.  If you reply here I will see what you say.  Thanks.    :Upon further review, I've started a discussion about this at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 February 16/Articles.  Feel free to join in.    ==  ==  Replied over there. BTW - when did I call  a banned editor? -    :You didn't, that's why I rolled back. I thought you did, though, because you removed a section which has his signature, and the last contribution on the page before your removal was by him. Turns out someone else forged the sig.     == RE: February 2008 ==  Which article?    :diff.   `