` ::That's pretty weird to me, as on the keep side were the author of software with arguments strictly limited to those in Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, the author of two previous versions of the article (speedy deleted before I came to Wikipedia) and previously uninvolved  with ``very weak keep``. On the ``delete`` side there were two previously uninvolved users (me and . Argument-wise, two 50-words-long sources hardly can be considered as ``significant coverage``, as well as accusations that I have some bias. Clear win for ``delete`` side IMHO. Or am I missing something? —   `