`  ::::::::::Nymf, every time you say something about this issue you give a different reason for why you think the content about the Mayer song should not be included. First, in your revert edit comment, you said ``Has nothing to do with Hewitt's personal life``, which obviously it does. So that was invalid. Next, in this discussion, you changed your reason by saying it's ``speculation`` and ``rumor``, both which are invalid per WP:VNT. And now you have just taken a third path for objecting to the content. But the problem that stands out most is the fact that you have again failed to address the issue of all the currently-included content about her weight and paparazzi photos, and explain why that content is worthy of inclusion but the Mayer song content is not. So your invalid and changing reasons, and evasion of the significant contradiction issue indicate a lack of open-mindedness, fairness and logic. Simply ignoring a valid point will never go unnoticed.     ::::::::::Torchiest, thanks for the update. I have to check that out. But again, the dates really don't matter (in an encylopedic sense) because the issue is not about whether it's true, but rather if it's verifiable, which of course it is. Jennifer Love Hewitt will always be associated with that song either way, even if she never actually crossed Mayer's mind when he was writing it. ;) Out of more curiostiy (haha), do you have any sources which show when they actually dated? Thanks, Torchiest.   `