` *Oppose  While I appreciate that the present title has problems, the proposed title would be wrong.  Many of the things on the page are not ``biblical artifacts``.  How is the Sebek-khu stele ``biblical``?  It isn't.  It is on here because its content is relevant to the study of the historicity of the bible. In fact the key feature of most of the content is that it is ``extra-biblical``, which is what the literature calls something relevant to the history but not itself biblical.  `