`  +++ The proposed content language is generally acceptable.   I would suggest that the jury be identified as a ``grand jury`` and that the word ``special`` possibly be omitted     The content as currently suggested does not provide link references which I do believe are important and suspect would be forthcoming.   There are a goodly number of NYTs articles to choose from regarding the lynching and specifying a ``grand jury,`` some of which can be found here.  http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=port+jervis+lynching&more;=date_all  While I do feel the visual impact and related narrative supporting the previously cited external link reference to the 1920s KKK outfit from Port Jervis now on display in a Liverpool, England, slavery museum is valid, powerful, and worthy of inclusion (http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/ism/collections/legacies/klu_klux_klan.aspx), additional confirming documentation can be found here. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/23/travel/23iht-museum.1.7224242.html?_r=1&scp;=16&sq;=port%20jervis%20ku&st;=cse    As user24 has accepted the proposed content, and I have already added an external link to the Minisink Valley Historical Society, presumably further qualifying language regarding the content's topics will not be included in the entry's narrative with a link to the the MVHS's web page that had previously figured largely in user24's concerns and proposed narrative content.  Other than these observations, I feel user Jonathanwallace's content will adequately serve the purpose.   Thank you.   `