` ::Does anybody truly understand what its like to have an IP engage in an edit war with you on an article you worked really hard to produce from scratch, then create a new account and continue to revert and place unwarranted tags on an article, then go back to his old account and pretend to be a different editor, continue to revert, and then request his old admin tools in the heat of an argument even though he hasn't edited for 4 years? And then in a blink of an eye despite the edit warring and context its somehow OK for him to have his tools restored very quickly by an editor I had a tiff with a long time ago after I said Pokemon cruft had no place in an encyclopedia. The editor has done nothing in 4 years, left wikipedia in a dispute back in July 2008 and has shown no evidence of actually why he needs an account let alone the tools again. Its sooo wrong, policies are valued here more than human decency and input. Why is this sort of thing accepted on here? I seriously question how wikipedia is run, I've seen some things during my time on here, but the way this has happened I find most outrageous. I'm not finding fault in admins for sticking to policies, I understand the need to stick to rules which have been made, but I'm finding fault with whatever consensus decided its fine for a desysopped admin to be given back his tools after doing nothing for 4 years and after he was engaged in an edit war as an IP and what appeared to be a sock account and how wouldn't stand a chance in a new RFA.♦  `