`==Hotel Ukrayina== I started on it  nothing much yet, but the link is 100% ace with all those pre-1973 photos. Would give a helping hand?  :I will, but I can't promise a definite time frame. Too much work these days. But thanks!    == SuperDeng == Look at his contributions. What you will see is a POV warrior who has been blocked before for his behavior under this user name and also as DengXiaoPing. So this isn't new. Deng's a user who assumes the worst in users, who thinks he is correct 100% of the time despite evidence to the contrary and who uses personal attacks to try to get his way. He's very good at calling people ``liars`` and telling them that their views are ``irrelevant`` and he often says ``of course you are wrong`` to people who disagrees with. If you would like specific diffs, I can get them for you. He has spent the last few days virtually stalking  and reversing virtually every edit made. And as I said, he's been blocked for this behavior before, so this is hardly an isolated incident. I stand by my block.    :Thanks for your response. I see now that you have quite strict standards in defining what constitutes a PA, and how severe it has to be to become a blockable offence. In the future, if I see POV-pushers who resort to personal attacks, I will know who to contact. I was sick and tired because of some fellows here. I thought that once I don't want to spend time compiling RfC and ArbCom cases, I have to accept that there is little I can do about some some  uncivil and abusive POV-pushers short of starting to write-up RfC's using the time I would rather spend writing articles.  :Now I know that I should have contacted you. I sure will from now on. Regards,    ::No problem. ) Yeah I apologize for the block log. I tried to give the most recent example of his behavior instead of the most representative.    ==Amusing message== === Insidious games at Soviet partisan ===  Irpen, what freacking games are you playing in??? What the hell does this nasty comment mean? And where is fucking logic in your edits to that article? You kept (although biased) my important thesises, but reverted other non-political issues like terms in the lead. So what are you trying to do? Promote some point or just provoke a conflict?  Discuss issues before changing them in the article. Or you'll get a real war till the last drop of my blood you mother fucker!!!  ===Wow=== That's the most amazing message I've ever seen at my talk and I've seen a lot. I regret my first thought to remove it. Better yet, I will keep it. Let it shine! Thanks, Alex!    I figured I place links here to the past messages from the same contributor left at my talk that are now in archives and not in the plain view:  *November, 2005: original, ``modified`` *March 2005 a nice welcoming me to Wiki That's it for now.    === Re: Your request of evaluation ===  Hi. Yesterday you requested my evaluation of your behaviour, and here it is: *you ARE ``the shame`` in Wikipedia *but you can't be ``a shame on the Ukrainian community`` since you don't belong to such  In case if you need assessment of your activities, just use a special purpose register .    :I am moving your entry to a desginated section I specifically marked for you at my talk. I don't remember requesting your opinion of myself since you made it public at your disgusting talk page. Since you expressed it, I stopped caring. If you keep trolling, you visit here will be short. If you somehow undergo a major transformation and manage to stay, this would be just fine as far as I am conserned. I don't feel good though being a subject of your obsession. Not that I care myself, but it is rather unhealthy for your own sake.     Guys, stop it. Irpen, don't call his talk page ``disgusting``. Alex's user page is one of the cleverest I've seen, better than yours. Irpen, don't build a wall.   :His user talk is an attack page as well as most of his entries into the article's and personal talks. I have a wall between myself and people with a filthy mouth. There is nothing to build. When he makes edits or suggestions outside of his crusade venue, I will respond disregarding his past offences, as I did just today at talk:Viktor Yushchenko. When he just plainly trolls, he is just banging his head against the wall. I have enough patience to stand through far worse things than his bad mouth.    ::No, you don't have a wall between yourself ``and people with a filthy mouth``. If you were you would have treated Kuban Kazak differently. ::You are trying to build a wall with AlexPU and came to the point at which you release yourself from any productive articles' discuss with AlexPU. That would be a wrong point.   Dear 134, your comparison of AlexPU with Kuban kazak is totally improper because: *I did chastise KK rather strongly after his spats of incivility (which apparently worked, btw) and if he keeps being uncivil Ezhiki will block him sooner than any other admin and if he gets blocked, I would never interfere (this has been discussed) *Kazak, compared to AlexPU is a teacher in the good manners school. *Most of Kazak's contributions at talk pages are civil while almost all talk entries by AlexPU range between incivil and horrific (like the one above that beats all the records). I don't remember seeing you criticizing AlexPU on the issues (from which I infer that you view him uncivil but with the right POV). At the same time I gad frequent disagreements with Kazak (and Ghirla) on the article's talk pages. Examples are abundant. That said, I do treat each edit from any editor even guilty of whatever trolling in the past based on its own merit. Examples are abundant but if you doubt that, let me know and I will give you diffs. Best,   :AlexPU definitely has some specific knowledge, and he is a journalist, so it would valuable for the project if he is around. He basically created the article on Rudnev, adding that story on Kovpak/Rudnev conflict, which probably the other had no idea of, and on which I actually put “fact” template, as without a reference the story sounds questionable. Also, speaking on who should be a teacher for whom, it seems that AlexPU has got your civility message pretty fast. But we will see…    AlexPU claims that he is a journalist but his Rudniev article is a bunch of unreferenced speculations and conspiracy theories. It also included false claims, like his beeing not a communist. I am writing a replacement now. I would love to see the material restored in the referenced form. He got no message on the civilty whatsoever. I've been here longer than you and I've seen this editor. That he simply makes no edits now is the reason why we don't see his diatribes. As soon as he is back, they will resume. Fortunately, Wikipedia has got much less tolerant to such behavior lately. More often than not we see instant blocks of some fellows without even an ArbCom. If he returns as a civil editor, that would be a different story.        ==Prometheism 2== Sorry I haven't been able to work on the article! If you need help, John Kenney, Slrubenstein, Jtdirl, and Rjensen are also historians and/or social scientists.  |   :Thanks! Will contact them.   ==Hotel Ukrayina update== Look what I found yesterday   Йопт, how was it possible to ruin such a design?     You SHOULD archive a good half you your page   ==Могила== .— •