` ::::Nope, Andrew, the article doesn't say ``only``, it is clear that ID is a specific version of the argument from design. To put this in context, you've found a few modern cases of ``intelligent design`` being used to describe the theological arguments of Paley, Aquinas etc., generally while comparing to the modern creationist ID. There are clearly multiple examples of modern (post 1989) usage of intelligent design to refer to revamped creationism presented as science, as promoted by the DI when they came on the scene. You seem now to be claiming that the phrase has been used for a modern religious view with no claim to be science: source please. . ,  `