`  == Badly written ==  This article is written in a muddy-headed style that is ill-suited for any encyclopedia. Instead of elucidating the nature of this supposed architectural movement in clear language, the article is filled with nonsensical and indistinct phrases that seem chosen to confuse the reader.  The introduction, for example, concludes by informing us that neo-futurism is connected with ``a need to periodize the modern rapport with the technological.`` Got that?  To begin with, the word ``technological`` is an adjective. The noun to which it refers is simply missing from the sentence. The technological what? That problem alone renders the sentence nearly meaningless.  Secondly, a report is a relationship between two or more parties. What is ``the modern rapport``? Who partakes in this rapport? Does the word ``modern`` mean anything in this context? Or is this indistinct phrase meant to confuse the reader more than to communicate anything in particular?  Finally, who exactly has this ``need`` to periodize such nonsense?  And that's just a single quote from the intro. The article is rife with ambiguous and meaningless phrases. It reads as if the authors are deeply insecure about their intellectual prowess, heavily inebriated, and ESL. It does not impart a clear understanding of the subject matter. As such, I heartily second the above suggestion that this article ought to be deleted.    `