`theories about how life on Earth may regulate the planet's biosphere to make it more hospitable to life. This discusses all scientific views on the subject in general, including the views of Drs. James Lovelock, Lynn Margulis, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan, etc.   Gaia hypothesis- A subset of the above article; this is a discussion of Dr. James Lovelock's ideas on Gaia theory.   Gaia theory analogs - A discussion of proto-scientific, mystical and religious views that some people believe are related to Gaia theory.   Gaians - A discussion of the small left-wing radical political and environmentalist group.   (Of course, other articles could be made as well, if needed.)  We must not push mystical, political or religious ideology into our science articles on Gaia theory, Biological evolution, or Quantum Mechanics, etc. All I am asking is that we continue to follow the same disambiguation and NPOV policy that we also have followed.  Is this clear?  22:47 2 Jul 2003 (UTC)   2 quick points. 1) I think everybody here is missing a common scientific manner of using ``Gaia theory``. I believe many use it like ``game theory.`` As in, they don't always talk about ``a game theory`` or ``the game theory.`` 2) Separate articles is not the only precedent on Wikipedia. See neutral theory of molecular evolution. I believe practically one of the first things to say about this scientific theory is that a whole lot of non-scientists took it as a direct challenge to Darwin, even though it appears that it's authors did not mean it to be. I put it in the first paragraph.  00:11 3 Jul 2003 (UTC)`