`  : I agree with Ragesoss.  We already have a quote that says ``A lot of people have used Carson to push their own agendas,`` and the entire section starts out by saying ``some conservatives ... argue that restrictions placed on pesticides have caused needless deaths and hampered agriculture, and more generally that environmental regulation unnecessarily restricts economic freedom.``  I think it'd be okay to include a sentence that there's lobbying involving industrial firms, as long as it's from a neutral source.  But do we need to include a lengthy paragraph from an obviously biased source about speculative claims of the connection between industry and the anti-environment lobby in an already long article?  I think we can do this more neutrally and more concisely as I think Ragesoss is suggesting.  `