`== Decrease in quality of the article == What's wrong with this article? Last time I checked it, there was much more information and it was much more valuable information-wise. It doesn't matter if something isn't important! That's not the point of an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia details extensive and detailed information in relation with an article so that others can get detailed information regarding that said topic.  Someone should work out a final, mastered version of the article with as much good information as possible and lock it unless someone suggests (as said about the vandals earlier). A few facts from the trivia could be removed, but not too many. This article should also contain a more extensive/detailed profile of Hinata's personality (is there a psychologist around?).  I think a summary of Hinata's role in the arcs and storylines should be drafted, revised and posted (as there used to be on the article). Also, some of the photos and details were removed because they ``Weren't important`` or were just ``gratitous fan service``? Yeah... someone should put those photos back in right away.   Maybe you could get a fan to do something about this. You know, tell him what to put in and what to leave out etc.etc.  Sorry if I may seem demanding or bossy... just want that old article back (the one that helped me make that essay about characterization in creative writing).     `