`  == Unequal emphasis and name spelling ==  As it stands, this article contains some 14 lines (in two sub-sections), just on the Bismark action. Thats quite a lot of detail, including such extracts as: ``The British re-located the Bismark at 10:30 on 26 May`` and ``Her topsides were wrecked, [Bismarks] and a large fire burned amidships``. Is not such detail already covered in the appropiate article?  I would suggest that both sub-sections need drastic pruning (probably into one). Yes, KGV was involved in the Bismark action, but only as a part of the whole. And the Bismark action was only part of KGVs operational career. Therefore, to avoid 'undue weight', this section should be shortened.   Also, how is this German battleship's name spelt? In that ships article, it is spelt with a 'C'; i.e. Bismarck. In this article, it is spelt without. Personally, I prefer it with, (I'm sure I've seen something on the subject of ships ships' names, foreign words and so on, in the MoS, but I can't remember the guideline). For me, consistency' is the name of the game.  What do other editors think?    `