  == Moving images on Millennium Stadium ==  Hi!  I wanted to let you know that I've just reverted your edit to Millennium Stadium, and give you my reasons for doing so.  I did this for a few reasons, but mainly because your edit had moved images about football into the rugby section of the article, making them less illustrative.  Images at the bottom of sections can also cause 'edit-link clumping', in which edit links from consecutive sections all clump together in a group several sections further down, because the images overflowing from previous sections displace them; this makes it harder to edit a specific section later because the link isn't on the same line as the heading.  This is particularly apparent at wider screen resolutions, where text takes up fewer lines.  (For an example, see Emerson Fittipaldi in a window more than 700px wide.)  Unfortunately, the preview doesn't indicate this; however, a quick check after saving (or use of the sandbox for a copy of the article) offers the opportunity to undo.  Finally, though your change may have improved the layout on your screen, it made no difference to any I examined the differences on.  When trying to improve layout it's important to test it in a few different browsers at various screen resolutions: what may make an improvement for one user may make no difference for others, or worse, may be significantly detrimental.  I believe you made a good-faith edit, and I don't want to discourage you from trying to make other improvements to the layout of articles, but please remember that layout is a tricky beast that requires thorough testing, and that it is a secondary concern to content and it's logical arrangement.  If you want to ask me anything, just reply here: I'll put this page on my watchlist. -  