` ::::::As to the issue of the use of ``all of whom are affiliated with the Discovery Institute, six or seven references are provided, which would be a good place to start research of that matter.  There also is a link to several previous lengthy discussions of the issue of the Discovery Institute in the talk page archives, at the top of this page.  Several times, offers have been made to provide evidence of even one person who could reasonably be characterized as a ``leading proponent`` (or if you prefer, a ``primary proponent``), and not one has been presented who is not affiliated with the DI. Certainly there are other ways of expressing this other than the way it is currently presented in the article.  But any such proposal for a different way of stating the point to the reader should be equivalently accurate and explanatory of this important aspect of ID. ...  `