`:::::I'm not sure that I agree that the case is not worthy of note, for two reasons. First, it is part of the bigger picture which shows Edge trying to claim rights to products it hasn't in any way developed by way of enforcing their supposed trademark (agree or disagree with their approach or its legality, that is what they are doing, and what they did in this case). In that way, any instance in which Edge is engaging in this behavior would be, in my opinion, worthy of mention. And second, the fact that Edge now claims this PC as one of its products on its web page seems to make the fact that they did not develop it important (see here, where it says ``Manufactured under license from Edge``). No, the dispute was not covered in the mass media (as far as I am aware), but the court opinions themselves should represent reliable sources, especially to establish what the court's opinion was.  :::::I also don't agree that the opinion makes it clear that Edge's ``attempts to mislead`` were not as bad as the quotes indicated. The opinion contains numerous quotes that spell out the delay tactics (including outright lies) that Edge engaged in. Where do you see that these really were minor issues? I'm not seeing it at all.  :::::Unless I'm missing something, I would like to add the case back. ''''''  •    `