`  ==Article Feedback Tool - notes and office hours== Hey guys! Another month, another newsletter.  First off - the first bits of AFT5 are now deployed. As of early last week, the various different designs are deployed on 0.1 percent of articles, for a certain ``bucket`` of randomly-assigned readers. With the data flooding in from these, we were able to generate a big pool of comments for editors to categorise as ``useful`` or ``not useful``. This information will be used to work out which form is the ``best`` form, producing the most useful feedback and the least junk. Hopefully we'll have the data for you by the end of the week; I can't thank the editors who volunteered to hand-code enough; we wouldn't be where we are now without you.  All this useful information means we can move on to finalising the tool, and so we're holding an extra-important office hours session on Friday, 6th January at 19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. If you can't make it, drop me a note and I'll be happy to provide logs so you can see what went on - if you can make it, but will turn up late, bear in mind that I'll be hanging around until 23:00 UTC to deal with latecomers ).  Things we'll be discussing include: *The design of the feedback page, which will display all the feedback gathered through whichever form comes out on top. *An expansion of the pool of articles which have AFT5 displayed, from 0.1 percent to 0.3 (which is what we were going to do initially anyway) *An upcoming Request for Comment that will cover (amongst other things) who can access various features in the tool, such as the ``hide`` button.  If you can't make it to the session, all this stuff will be displayed on the talkpage soon after, so no worries ;). Hope to see you all there! Thanks,    `