`  == GA in zh.wikipedia  ==  Please add {{Link GA|zh}} in interwiki section. Thanks!     I propose that Love should be viewed as an active verb and not as a Passive emotion. I would propose that Love is in fact  when one provides for needs and desires of another and is unrelated to the emotions or experience of the one. as in , Love should not be used for example in the phrase `` I Love oranges`` because I do not fulfil any need in the orange  and I do not provide for any desire or requirement of the orange. The orange on the other hand loves me , because it provides sustenance and pleasure and satisfies needs or desires in me. The pleasure or satisfaction I feel at having my needs provided for should not be termed love. If this entire subject is viewed in the light of the recent theories within Genetics on selfish attributes and Altruistic attributes and their Dominance , it makes perfect sense to begin viewing love ( in all forms it may have , romantic, familial , patriotic, platonic) in these terms. Love is when you provide for another Love is when you give time to another Love is when you support another Love is when you put up with another If the other in turn loves you then it is a balanced and sucessful interpersonal relationship.  I believe I should retract this section on Love as an active verb, Due to the No original Research policy. That and the four beers I drank before writing it . Apologies    == 10 Secrets of Love ==  What thhe hell is this section on about? It sounds like the stuff you get in those quack self-help manuals that sell for like $29.95 a month for a year. This is clearly not encyclopedic - it is nothing but POV (unless someone can cite a reliable reference stating categorically that there are 10 'secrets' to love and that these are they). Needs some serious improvement. ( ) :Removed: This section is subject to immediate removal. If someone wishes to re-instate the content, please forward the rationale here and be prepared with substantiation. Thanks.   ::Nice one. Sorry if I sounded a little pushy with that ^ comment, but I'm glad you did something about it. Thanks. ( )  what about adding information from that page? its not refrenced but i think some information is worth mentioning in here * love  :It looks like an interesting website, but you pretty much captured the main problem with it: not referenced. As it stands, it would be a stretch to even link to it, let alone copy content from it into any Wikipedia article.    == ``fagtron`` ==  I'm a wikipedia reader, but I haven't dabbled in editing at all.  Could someone who has kindly remove the word ``fagtron`` from the ``Biology of love`` section?  I'm reasonably certain it isn't supposed to be there.  Many thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   .  ==``Heart`` Image?!== Why there is a silly ``heart``-shaped image on top? Let's stay to scholar sources and avoid pushing western propaganda.  : I would guess that it's because this is a western language wikipedia and scholarly sources state that the heart-shaped image is a well known western symbol for love. It would only be silly to use it in an eastern language wikipedia  as silly as using an eastern symbol for love in a western language wikipedia no doubt. It might be propagandistic to use a western symbol in an eastern wikipedia or an eastern symbol in a western wikipedia but it can hardly be so when the appropriate symbol appears in either type of wikipedia.   |    ==Defining love== How does one define love how do you know that you are in love if you have never felt it before? Bumblebee !!!  :You read our article on Sternberg's Triangular theory of love, of course! That demonstrates that only people who have never had friends, never had a crush on someone, and who have always hated their family have never felt love before.   |  0