Apparatus and method for testing dynamoelectric machine rotors
United States Patent 1 1 Sims 1 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TESTING DYNAMOELECTRIC MACHINE ROTORS [75] Inventor: Marion W. Sims, Fort Wayne, 1nd.  
 173] Assignee: General Electric Company, Fort Wayne, Ind.  
  221 Filed: Dec. 20. 197i 211 App1.No.:209,872  
 [52] US. Cl. 324/158 MG, 324/37. 324/55 [51] lnt.Cl. Glllr 31/116,0Ulr33/12 [58] Field of Search 324/158 MG, 158 R, 55.  
 I56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2.353.211 7/1944 Zuschlag 324/37 2.640.100 5/1953 Packer ct a1. 324/158 MG 2.645.753 7/1953 Dubchkc 324/51 2.822.516 2/1958 Raynes 324/51 2.844.794 7/1958 Wright ct ul. 324/158 MG 2.877.406 3/1959 Hochschild 324/37 2.924.773 2/1960 Lykkc 324/158 MG 2.928.038 3/1960 Huddlcston. .lr 324/40 46 SOURCE 1 1 Apr. 1, 197.5  
 2,970,256 1/1961 Sazynski et al. 324/37 2.999.981 9/1961 Probert 324/158 MG FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLlCATIONS 607.942 12/1934 Germany 324/52 Primary ExaminerAlfred E. Smith Assistant Examiner-Ernest F. Karlsen Attorney, Agent, or FirmRalph E. Krisher, Jr.; Joe E. Barbee [57] ABSTRACT g,1 Method and apparatus for the nondestructive testing of the bars and end rings of a cast aluminum squirrel cage rotor. The rotor may be of the single cage or double cage type. The rotor is tested before it is assembled into a stator. Magnetic field generators are placed adjacent the rotating bars and end rings to induce voltages therein, and corresponding magnetic flux receivers are properly positioned to measure the magnetic flux associated with the current caused to flow in the bars and end rings as a result of their rotation through the magnetic fields. The measured flux indicates any defects in the bars or end rings.  
 7 Claims, 16 Drawing Figures 0 48 O as LLDSCOPE &#39;FENTEDAFR H975 3,875,511  
 OOOOOOOOOOO ON 1 EVIDENCE OF PARTIALEE T EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE AR H HHHHU mum HM ml WM nMmmlllWm\uummmluwmm mmmuummu l 1 H05 F k I} HUM 5 4 1O 2 ll 2.3235 z 6% E 02E E3 4 22m l23456789l0lli2l234.56789l0Hl2l END RlNG SEGMENT NUMBER APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TESTING DYNAMOELECTRIC MACHINE ROTORS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention The invention relates generally to the field of testing for defects in the conductors of a dynamoelectric machine rotor before the rotor is assembled with a stator to form a dynamoelectric machine, and, more particularly. to testing for defects in the bars and/or end rings of a cast aluminum squirrel cage rotor of the single cage or double cage type.  
  Previous methods of testing rotors of induction type machines have required the use of the machine stator core. An example of such a prior art method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2.844.794, assigned to the assignee of the present application. Still other rotor quality analysis procedures have resulted in the destruction of the rotor being tested or analyzed.  
  Rotors for many modern small induction motors are basically simple, i.e.. the electromagnetic elements thereof include a stack of steel laminations and an aluminum squirrel cage conductor arrangement, usually formed as a die-casting. Manufacturing techniques have been perfected to the point where these rotors are mass produced with a high probability of uniform and good qualities. There are. however. a number of possibilities for deficiencies. Porosity or impurities in the aluminum casting can interfere with electrical resistance; poor insulation between the squirrel cage conductors. and the iron core can produce intermediate end ring effects tending to nullify skew; open circuits in bars can occur; and various other defects appear from time to time.  
  It thus would be desirable to provide new and improved apparatus and methods that would be useful for economically and reliably testing dynamoelectric machine rotors.  
  Because quality problems are infrequent, it is not economical to perform expensive tests on every individual rotor. However. since hidden defects do occur occasionally. there is a need to perform a very low cost test on each rotor. especially those which are not assembled with a stator to form a complete machine at the time the rotor itself is manufactured.  
 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly. a general object of the present invention is to provide improved method and apparatus for nondestructively testing electrical characteristics of a rotor before it is assembled with a dynamoelectric machine stator.  
 In accordance with one form of the invention, I provide methods and apparatus for nondestructively testing conductive portions of rotors, e.g., the conducting bars and/or end rings of a single or double squirrel cage rotor of an inductive type machine. More specifically, defects or nonuniformities in the conductor bars and end rings of a cast aluminum squirrel cage rotor are detected before the rotor is assembled with a stator to form an induction machine.  
  The nondestructive testing method and apparatus exemplifying the invention reveal quickly and inexpensively a great deal of significant information about a rotor. Even though the preferred test is not a direct measure of motor performance. since the rotor is not operated in a motor during the test, the test is designed to detect those defects which are well-known to cause poor motor performance. Exemplified method and apparatus detect nonuniform resistance of conductive bars of a squirrel cage rotor and also nonuniformity in the resistance of conductive rotor end rings; such nonuniformity being caused, for example. by nonuniform porosity of a cast aluminum squirrel cage.  
  Apparatus in one preferred form includes means in the form of transmitting magnets that produce constant or periodically varying magnetic fields in which the rotor is rotated. Properly positioned receiver or pickup coils measure the magnetic flux generated by the currents resulting from the voltages induced in each of the rotor bars and in the end rings to detect electromagnetic nonuniformities, i.e.. electromagnetic eccentrici ties of the bars and end rings. The apparatus also includes means for moving the conductive rotor portions through the produced magnetic fields.  
  In one preferred method. I generate a magnetic field; rotate a rotor and induce a voltage in the conductive portions thereof as the rotor moves relative to the mag netic field; and measure the effect of the voltage induced in the conductors to detect nonuniformities. e.g.. electromagnetic eccentricities of the rotor.  
  The subject matter which I regard as my invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion ofthis specification. The invention itself, however. both as to its organization and method of operation. together with further objects and advantages thereof may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.  
 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. I is a diagrammatic perspective view of one form of test apparatus for testing squirrel cage rotor bars in accordance with the invention;  
  FIG. 2 is a test waveform illustrating a high resistance bar in a squirrel cage rotor tested in a constant magnetic field;  
  FIG. 3 is a test waveform illustrating short circuited bars in a rotor;  
  FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the test signal amplitude as a function of the distance between the sending and receiving units of the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1;  
  FIG. 5 is a test waveform illustrating an open circuited bar in a squirrel cage rotor tested in a periodically varying magnetic field;  
  FIG. 6 is a partial cross-sectional view of a double squirrel cage rotor having various defects in its rotor bars;  
  FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic perspective view of one form of an apparatus for testing squirrel cage rotors in accordance with the invention in one form thereof;  
  FIG. 8 is a test waveform for a double cage rotor having one pair of conductive bars open circuited;  
  FIGS. 9, I0 and 11 are diagrammatic end views of rotors under test for end ring defects;  
  FIG. 12 is a schematic view showing the position of the receiving unit for an end ring test;  
  FIG. 13 is a diagrammatic view of another form of an end ring test apparatus;  
 FIG. 14 is a test waveform for an acceptable end ring;  
 FIG. 15 is a test waveform for a defective end ring;  
 and  
  FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating the individual IR drops in the end ring segments of two different rotors.  
 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. I is a perspective view ofa preferred form of apparatus embodying the invention and that may be used in the practice of the same. A driving means, such as a variable speed electric motor 10 is coupled to a suitable transmission box 12 having a drive shaft 14 capable of running from 400 rpm in either direction. The shaft 14 is coupled to a driving pulley 16 which through a timing belt, drives pulleys l8 and 20. Pulley 18 is fixed to a shaft l9 which is fixed to a roller 22 supported for rotation in standards 24 and 26 which are in turn fixed to the same base plate 28 on which the motor and transmission box 12 are mounted. Pulley is fixed to a shaft 30 which is fixed to another roller 32 also supported for rotation in the standards 24 and 26.  
  Adjustably mounted on base plate 28 are a pair of support members 34 and 36. The adjustable mounting of these members permits variation in the spacing between them in a direction along the axes of the rollers 22 and 32.  
  A sending electromagnet 38 is adjustably mounted in support member 34. A receiving electromagnet 40 is similarly adjustably mounted in support member 36. As shown in FIG. 1, each of the support members 34 and 36 contains threaded holes 42 in which set screws are received. These set screws are used to establish the desired angular position or alignment of the electromagnets 38, 40. It will be noted that the electromagnets 38, 40 are anchored in holders 38a, 40a, and that the holders are movable along arcuate tracks 44 that have a center of curvature on the centerline of the rotor under test. Thus. the angular positions of the electromagnets 38, 40 relative one to the other may be adjusted and yet maintain a predetermined constant air gap between the peripheral surface of a rotor being tested and the pole tips of the electromagnets 38, 40. In addition, the supports 34, 36 are each provided with a scribed mark or other reference indicia, and the holders 38a, 40a are each provided with a plurality of marks. These marks may conveniently be used to indicate the angular positions of the holders 38a. 40a and thus electromagnets 38, 40 relative to a vertical reference plane passing through the center of the apparatus and rotor 50 supported thereon.  
  In addition to being of use in relatively positioning the electromagnets 38, 40 so that they will each be aligned with the same rotor conductor bar, and especially so with skewed bars; the electromagnets may be adjusted until signals of maximum strength are transmitted therebetween (as will be described in more detail hereinafter) and the above mentioned indicia will then indicate the amount or degree of skew for a rotor being tested.  
  In one form of the invention, the sending electromagnet 38 is energized by a suitable direct current source 46 to produce a constant magnetic field, and the receiving electromagnet 40 is connected to an oscilloscope 48 to display the waveform of the magnetic flux sensed by the receiving electromagnet.  
  In operation, a squirrel cage rotor 50 is placed on the rollers 22 and 32 so that the rotor is rotated by friction when the rollers are rotated. The rotor consists of a laminated core containing slots (not shown) in which are disposed the conductor bars 52 of the squirrel cage which is completed by end rings 54 and 56.  
  The axial position of rotor along the rollers 22 and 32 is determined by the position of an adjustable stop 25 against which the rotor 50 tends to bear during operation of the apparatus. The position of stop 25 in turn may be fixed as desired by clamping mechanism 2] which is used to determine the axial position of the rod 23 which is secured to stop 25. If stop 25 were not provided, the rotor 50 would tend to become centered relative to electromagnet 38 during operation ofthe appa ratus.  
  In operation, rotor 50 is placed on the rollers, as illustrated in FIG. 1, and the longitudinal positions of support members 34 and 36 are adjusted such that electromagnets 38 and 40 are aligned approximately with the opposite ends of bars 52 on the rotor. When the bars are skewed as illustrated in FIG. 1, the angular position of at least one of the electromagnets 38 and 40 is adjusted such that both of the electromagnets are adjacent the opposite ends of each rotor bar as it moves therepast during rotation of the rotor.  
  When it is desired to determine the conductor skew angle in skewed rotors for which this characteristic is unknown (and particularly when the conductors or bars are not externally visible and it is not desirable to destroy the rotor by cutting it apart or otherwise machining), one of the magnets, e.g., the sending or receiving electromagnet, may be set to be vertical and the other variably positioned until a signal of maximum strength (as determined, for example from the oscilloscope) is detected. The relative angular dispositions of the electromagnets may then be measured or determined directly by the alignment or position of the previously mentioned indicia. The difference in angular disposition of the electromagnets, relative to a vertical or other reference plane will then be an indication of the previously unknown skew angle of the rotor conductors.  
  When the drive means l0 is energized to rotate rollers 22 and 32, the rotor is rotated so that the left ends of the conductor bars 52 rotate within the magnetic field produced by the sending electromagnet 38. A voltage is induced in each bar as it passes through the magnetic field, and the magnetic flux produced by the resultant current in each bar is sensed by the receiving electromagnet 40 which produces an electric signal which is displayed on the scope 48. Since the resistance of each bar determines the value of the current therein, the magnetic flux sensed by the receiving electromagnet 40 is proportional to the resistance of each bar.  
  As the rotor 50 and conductors 52 are rotated through the magnetic field produced by the electromagnet 38, receiving electromagnet 40 will sense 21 periodically varying magnetic flux caused by the rotor iron separating the conductor bars. A corresponding periodically varying waveform consisting of a series of peaks corresponding to each bar will be displayed on oscilloscope 48 as illustrated in FIG. 2. The signature or amplitude of the peaks of this waveform will be a measure of the resistance of the bars. However, an important criterion in determining the performance of the rotor is uniformity of resistance of the bars, which uniformity can be determined by noting the relative amplitude of the peaks. For example, in FIG. 2, the peaks and 62 are very low, thereby indicating a high resistance in the corresponding bar. This high resistance could be due to a partially severed bar or by a high porosity bar. With a bar completely missing or completely open circuited. the corresponding peak would be completely missing from the waveform.  
  FIG. 3 illustrates a waveform for a rotor having six adjacent bars which are short circuited together. This short circuit is indicated by the six relatively low peaks 64. In order to identify the actual position of the short circuit, the receiving electromagnet 40 may be moved axially towards the opposite end of the rotor until the peak changes from a relatively low value to a relatively high value. A graph of such a movement of the receiver electromagnet 38 is illustrated by the curve 66 in FIG. 4. The portion 68 of curve 66 shows a relatively low amplitude of the displayed signal when the sending unit 38 and the receiving unit 40 are on opposite sides of the short circuit. The portion 70 of curve 66 shows the relatively high amplitude signal which occurs when the receiving unit 40 is one the same side of the short circuit as the sending unit 38. For comparison, the dash curve 72 shows the amplitude of the oscilloscope signal for a normal bar on the same rotor.  
  The oscillograms illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 were made with three amperes direct current applied to the sending electromagnet 38. The relatively minor variations in peak amplitude shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 are a common occurrence in rotors tested and does not necessarily indicate unacceptable performance of a rotor when assembled into a motor. It does, however, indicate the presence of some form of electromagnetic eccentricity which could be due to bar-to-core iron insulation resistance defects or resistance variations due to porosity or impurities. cage eccentricity, or variation in core/slot thickness.  
  If this variation in the amplitude of the peaks of the waveform is caused primarily by bar-to-iron electrical contact, appreciable variation in the waveform signature with actual position of the receiving electromagnet 40 will occur as it does in a case when adjacent rotor bars are short circuited. In order to eliminate the effect of this bar-to-iron contact on the measurement of the impedance of individual bars. two electromagnet sending units are positioned at opposite ends of the rotor with the receiving electromagnet in the center of the rotor.  
  In the tests described above. the waveforms displayed on the oscilloscope are proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux as detected by the receiving clectromagnet 40. In a variation of the apparatus, the output of the elcctromagnet unit 40 is fed to an integrating circuit 73 whose output is then connected to the oscilloscope so that the oscilloscope displays a waveform proportional to total flux rather than to the rate of change of flux. The amplifying effect of the integrating circuit causes the oscilloscope waveform to indicate residual magnetism effects in the rotor iron. This variation also permits the observation of characteristics such as slot bridge thickness variations and anisotropy in the iron.  
  The waveforms illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 were made with about three amperes direct current flowing in the coil of the sending elcctromagnet 38. As a variation, the sending unit 38 may be energized by alternating current, such as 2.5 amperes at 400 Hz. The resulting waveform for such an energization is shown in FIG. 5 where an open circuited bar is indicated at 74. The  
 construction details of electromagnets 38 and 40 will be described in more detail hereinafter.  
  The previously described method and apparatus related to the testing of a single cage rotor. However, the method and apparatus may also be used to test the conductor bars of a double cage rotor 80. a partial crosssectional view of which is illustrated in FIG. 6. Such a rotor consists of a laminated core stack 82 containing slots for receiving a plurality of bars 84, each consisting of an outer bar 86 and an inner bar 88 joined by an integral web 90. The particular rotor illustrated has 28 slots equally spaced around the circumference of the rotor. In testing such rotors, high resistance defects in the outer bars tend to be masked by the low resistance inner bars which are connected in parallel with the outer bars.  
  For the testing of such a double cage rotor, the apparatus of FIG. I is modified as schematically illustrated in FIG. 7. More particularly, in this variation. two sending electromagnets 92 and 94 are longitudinally adjusted so that they are positioned beneath the opposite ends of the bars 84 of rotor 80. As in FIG. I. the electromagnets 92 and 94 are angularly positioned in accordance with the skew of the bars so that the electromagnets are positioned at the opposite ends of each conductor as the rotor is rotated. A receiving electromagnet 96 is positioned approximately at the center of the rotor. Magnetic shields 98 and 100 are positioned between the receiving electromagnet 96 and each of the electromagnets 92 and 94 in order to shield the receiving electromagnet from the magnetic fields generated by sending electromagnets 92 and 94, thereby assuring that electromagnet 96 senses only the magnetic flux generated by the current flowing in the rotor bars 84.  
  The magnetic structure and winding arrangement of the receiving clectromagnets 40 and 96 were the same. In both cases, a stack of lamination parts (cut from a stator as will be understood) had a stack height of twotenths of an inch. Eight laminations were used in each pole piece. On each of the two legs of each pole piece, 2l5 turns of 0.008 inch diameter copper magnet wire were provided. The 430 total turns so provided had a resistance, at 25C, of about 5.8 ohms.  
  The sending unit 38 was formed of eight laminations also, so as to have a two-tenths of an inch stack height. However, 84 turns of 0.02m inch diameter copper magnet wire were provided on each leg and the I68 total turns had a resistance of about four-tenths of an ohm at 25C. The sending units 92 and 94 were constructcd similarly to sending unit 38 and were wound with the same diameter wire having about the same total resistance. However, 25 laminations were used in each unit 92, 94 to form stacks that were about fiveeighths of an inch in height and the turns per leg were reduced to 50, so that a total of I00 turns per unit were used.  
  For test purposes, different defects were intentionally made in selected ones of the 28 bars of the rotor which is shown in cross section in FIG. 6. The only bars in which defects were introduced were those identified as No. 0, No. 6, No. II, No. 14, and No. 20. In each case, a radially directed hole was drilled into the rotor at the selected bar locations for selected radial depths so as to remove a predetermined amount of the selected bars. These holes were located between the ends of the bars, and the depths of the holes for each bar are indicated by the phantom lines R0, R6, R] 1. R14. and R20, respectively.  
  It should he noted that the dimensional proportions of the actual rotor 80 were not as shown in FIG. 6, and that the bridge dimension B was less than twenty-five thousandths of an inch. This should be kept in mind, since the sensitivity of the illustrated apparatus to rotor bar defects will be dependent upon the thickness of this bridge. For example. the thicker the bridge, the more tendency there will be for rotor bar defects to be masked.  
  Still referring to FIG. 6, the bar No. was open circuited because of the depth of the hole drilled therein. For slot No. 6. the outer bar 86 and web 90 were open circuited. For slot No. II. only the outer bar 86 was open circuited. For slot No. 14. the hole R14 extended about half the depth of bar 86. For slot No. 20. the hole R penetrated only slightly into outer bar 86.  
  The signature ofthe waveform displayed on the oscilloscope connected to the output of the receiving electromagnet 96 is illustrated in FIG. 8. The peaks of the waveform which correspond to slot Nos. 0. 6, ll, 14 and 20 (of the rotor 82) are indicated on FIG. 8.  
  FIG. 8 shows that. except for the completely severed bar in slot No. 0, the effect of the defects in the bars is not particularly severe. Such a result occurs because in a good casting the web 90 between the inner bar 86 and the outer bar 88 forms an effective jumper for a break in the outer bar. Even when the entire outer bar and web are severed, as shown for slot No. 6. there remains a path for current in the outer bar, with only a short detour through the web and a very short length of the inner bar. As shown in FIG. 8, such a defect does not show up as a drastic change in electrical characteristics. either in the rotor test performed by the apparatus and method of this invention or in actual motor performance when the rotor is assembled with a stator.  
  The waveform in FIG. 8 was produced by rotating rotor 80 at 77 rpm with direct current energization of the sending electromagnets 92 and 94 and with their respective energizing coils I02 and [04 wound so that their magnetic fields were aiding. The waveform illustrated in FIG. 8 is that of the voltage induced in the receiving electromagnet 96. and this voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux produced by the current flowing in the individual bars. As previously indicated. an integrating circuit can be connected between the receiving electromagnet 96 and the oscilloscope in order to obtain a display of the total magnetic flux in each bar.  
  In other tests. rotor 80 was rotated at speeds up to 250 rpm. At higher speeds. defects which appear only in the outer bars 86 become more conspicuous, since the masking or shielding effect of the webs 90 and inner bars 88 are minimized at the higher rotational speeds.  
  The sending electromagnets 92 and 94 and the receiving elcctromagnet 96 illustrated in FIG. 7 were cut from the laminations of a 36 slot stator. Improved results are obtained by fabricating the electromagnetic units from the laminations ofa 28 slot rotor. so that the tooth pitch of the electromagnetic units exactly matches that of the rotor under test.  
  The foregoing tests of the conductor bars of a squirrel cage rotor may detect serious defects in the rotor end ring, however, it is possible that a rotor with no bar defects, but with serious end ring defects could pass the rotor bar test. The end rings constitute a part of the bar circuit. but their influence in comparison to that of an individual bar is usually negligible, and defective end rings are not detected unless the flaws therein are extreme. However. nonuniformly distributed porosity of end rings is a fault which can occur, and there follows a description of a method and apparatus for testing the end rings of a squirrel cage rotor, such a test to be used in conjunction with the rotor bar tests described above.  
  FIG. 9 is an end view of a squirrel cage rotor I06 which may be either of the single cage or double cage type and having an end ring 108. The end ring is rotated in a constant magnetic field provided by the poles and 112 of a DC magnet. which may be either a permanent magnet or an electromagnet energized by direct current. Current resulting from voltage induced in a perfect end ring divides equally, and flows in the directions indicated by the arrows 114 and 116 for the direction of rotor rotation indicated by the arrows 118 and for the polarity of the magnet as illustrated. This ideal distribution ofcurrent produces no net axial component offlux to link the closed loop formed by the end ring 108.  
  However, as illustrated in FIG. 10, ifthere is a defect in the end ring I08 in the form of a casting blow hole 120. for example, the end ring current pattern would,  
 then be as indicated by the arrows I22 and 124. That is, the net current would flow in the clockwise direction for the position of the end ring as illustrated in FIG. 10. The net magnetic flux linking such a defective end ring will. as a result of the magnetomotive force from the currents flowing therein, alternate as the end ring flaw I20 rotates with the rotation of the rotor. This fact can be more easily seen by considering the extreme case wherein the end ring fault I20 is a complete open circuit of the end ring. In that case all the current for the position of the end ring as shown in FIG. 10 will be clockwise producing magnetic flux downward into the paper. For the rotational position of the blow hole I20 as shown in FIG. I]. and again considering the blow hole as an open circuit, all the current will flow in a direction indicated by the arrow I26. and, consequently, the direction of the axial magnetic flux will be reversed. For the position of an open circuit between those illustrated in FIGS. 10 and I]. the division of the current will be equal and there will be no net magnetic axial flux despite the presence of the blow hole.  
  Consequently. a single concentrated end ring fault will result in a one cycle per revolution alternating component of flux in the axial direction of the rotor. and this flux will link the end ring. The external magnetic field provided by the magnetic poles 110 and 112 need not be symmetrical as illustrated. A truly round rotor without defects turning at constant speed about its own axis in a DC flux field of any configuration will not give rise to alternating flux at any point in the rotation. The presence of discrete slots and bars. or vent holes in the rotor. is a form of out-of-roundness and can produce pulsations in the axial flux. but as a practical matter such pulsations are highly discernible in the overall axial flux pattern. By contrast. factors which can cause fluctuations in the end ring axial flux are major nonuniformity of bars resistance. laminations not being perpendicular to the axis ofthe rotor and electromagnetic nonuniformity in the end rings. It has been found that irregularities and nonuniformities in the conductive bars of the rotor have relatively small effect on the alternating axial end ring flux as compared to the effects of defects in the end ring per se.  
  Flt i. 12 is a schematic view of a means for sensing the axial flux caused by unbalanced currents flowing in the end ring. For example. a pick off coil I28 or receiver electromagnet is positioned concentrically with the end ring I08 so that the axial end ring flux I29 links coil I28 to induce a voltage therein which is then applied to oscilloscope I30 to display a waveform I32 proportional to the voltage induced in the pick off coil which in turn is proportional to the rate of change of the axial magnetic llux as the end ring rotates in the external magnetic field.  
  FIG. I3 illustrates another form of apparatus for detecting the end ring axial flux. Here a test rotor I4&#34; having end rings I42 and I44 are rotated within a stan dard induction motor stator I46 whose two pole winding is energized to produce a constant or DC magnetic field. The axial flux produced by the circular currents flowing in the end ring I42 is sensed by a pick up coil I48 mounted concentrically with the end ringv This pick up coil is wound with several hundred turns of fine wire on a spool having an inside diameter about equal to the stator bore. The axial length of the coil is approximately the same as the axial dimension ol the end ring. The pick up coil may be mechanically mounted to the stator tooth tips.  
  The magnetic field generating arrangement illustrated in FIGS. 9. I0. II and I2 is preferable to that illustrated in FIG. 13 since the former has the advantage of permitting entry of the rotor from one side. not requiring a rotor shaft. and minimizing the cross field associated with induced bar currents.  
  In a variation of these end ring tests, an integrating circuit is connected between the pick up coil and the oscilloscope to produce on the oscilloscope a signal proportional to the net flux linking the pick up coil.  
  FIG. I4 shows an oscillogram of the output of a pick up coil for a normal. acceptable rotor. FIG. 15 illustrates the oscillogram for a rotor which failed in a motor performance test. In each case. the oscillogram reflects the magnitude ofthe axial flux produced by the circular currents flowing in an end ring. It can be seen from a comparison of FIGS. I4 and I5 that the axial magnetic flux l&#39;or a rotor with a defective end ring is much higher than the axial flux for a good rotor.  
  FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating the individual IR drops for successive end ring segments of two rotors each having a twelve segment end ring 150. Curve 152 reflects the relatively uniform IR drops for an acceptable rotor end ring. and curve I54 shows the relatively nonuniform IR drops in the segments of a defective end ring. Rotor bar tests on both of these rotors had now shown a great deal of difference in the resistance of the rotor bars. However. the axial flux end ring test clearly shows that a rotor corresponding to curve 154 is unacccptablc because of end ring defects. i.e.. nonuniformity in resistance. In other words. the end ring test shows the electromagnetic eccentricity of the end ring of the latter rotor.  
  When the axial flux end ring test detects an electromagnetic eccentricity caused by high resistance in one segment of an end ring. the electromagnetic balance of the end ring can be restored by drilling a hole in the diametrically opposite end ring segment to introduce therein a corresponding high resistance. Since such high resistances in aluminum cast cages are due to variations in the porosity or density in the aluminum. the drilling of such holes to electromagnetically balance the end ring also results in mechanical balancing of the end ring. Such electromagnetic balancing of the end ring improves motor performance from the standpoint of locked rotor torque and noise.  
  While in accordance with the Patent Statutes l have described what at present is considered to be preferred embodiments of my invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention. and it is therefore intended in the appended claims to cover all such equivalent variations as fall within the true scope and spirit of the invention.  
  What I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent of the United States is:  
  I. A method of testing for defects in the conductive bars of a squirrel cage rotor for an induction machine in which the conductive bars extend axially along the rotor and are interconnected at the ends thereof by conductive means. the method comprising the steps of: supporting the rotor for rotation on at least one roller having a surface adapted for supporting an outer periphcral surface olthe rotor generating a magnetic field with magnetic field means adjacent to the conductive bars; relatively moving the rotor and the magnetic field and thereby sequentially inducing a voltage in the conductive bars as they relatively move into and out of alignment with the magnetic means and thus causing current to flow therealong; and sequentially sensing the magnetic flux associated with current flow through each of the conductive bars with sensing means positionable relative to the periphery of the rotor so as to adjustably align the sensing means and the magnetic field means with a given conductive bar to sense magnetic flux associated with current flow in a given bar while the given bar is in at least approximate alignment with the magnetic lield means.  
  2. Apparatus for testing a rotor for an inductive device having a plurality of axially extending conductive portions. the apparatus comprising: first means for generating a magnetic field; second means for supporting a rotor along the outer periphery thereof to enable relative movement between the first means and the rotor so that current is induced in the conductive portions of the rotor; third means for effecting relative movement of the rotor and the first means; fourth means including at least one receiving coil. responsive to a magnetic field associated with the current induced in the rotor. for providing a signal indicative of the conductive condition of the at least one of the conductive portions. said fourth means being adjustably locatable relative to the periphery of the rotor so as to be in alignment with a given conductive portion when the first means is in alignment with the same given conductive portion; and display means for displaying a representation of magnetic flux detected by the at least one receiving coil.  
  3. Apparatus for testing an end ring of a squirrel cage rotor component of an induction machine, said apparatus comprising: means for generating a magnetic field; means for positioning and rotating the rotor end ring in the magnetic field, means for sensing the axial magnetic flux associated with current flow induced in the end ring to detect the conductive condition of the end ring. said sensing means comprising a conductive coil disposed in spaced relation about the periphery of the end ring; and display means coupled with said conductive coil.  
  4. Apparatus for testing the conductive condition of conductive bars of an induction machine rotor. the apppartus comprising: first electrically energizable coil means for generating a first magnetic field; second electrically energizable coil means spaced from said first coil means for generating a second magnetic field; third electrically conductive coil means disposed between said first and second electrically energizable coil in which third coil means electric current may he in duced; magnetic shields disposed between said first, second and third coil means; support means for supporting the rotor for rotation about an axis oriented in juxtaposition with said first, second and third coil means; and display means coupled with said third coil means for displaying a representation of magnetic flux detected by said third coil means upon rotation of the rotor.  
  5. The method of claim I wherein the method includes sensing magnetic flux associated with current flow through the at least some of the conductive bars at different axial positions therealong.  
  6. The method of claim l further including integrating an output signal ofthe sensing means that is indicative of the magnetic flux associated with the current flow through the conductive bars.  
  7. The method of claim 1 further comprising relatively adjusting the spatial relationship of the magnetic field means and the sensing means to determine the degree of skew of the axially extending conductive bars of the rotor.