Metal-sulfonate/piperidine derivative combination protective coatings
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     The present invention relates to the general field of co-pending U.S. Ser. No. 271,906, filed June 9, 1981, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,388,244, patented June 14, 1983. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to the field of corrosion resistant coatings, more particularly solvent-based coatings comprising corrosion inhibitors, e.g. of the gelled metal sulfonate-type or of the metal soaps of oxidized petrolatums and waxes. 
     2. Prior Art 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,491,535 to Donald D. Carlos and Keith Friley teaches hydrocarbon oxidate compositions comprising the reaction products of (a) hydrocarbon oxidates or their metal salts with; (b) polyamines; and (c) copolymer(s) of olefin and a comonomer of an unsaturated carboxylic acid or a vinyl ester of a saturated carboxylic acid and further comprising a wax oxidate, a petrolatum oxidate or mixtures. Such products have very high viscosity and sinewy characteristics. These &#34;oxwax&#34; products can be employed in the compositions of the present invention. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,344,877 to Nikles et al teaches wax-like bis-1-n-octadecyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl bicyclo [2,2,1]hept-5-ene-endo,exo-2,3-dicarboxylate in his Example 9. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 3,897,427 to Sauter reaches compositions comprising carnauba wax and piperidino compounds. 
     Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 3,888,380 to Gribens et al teaches compositions comprising piperidinium-pentamethylene compounds with paraffin wax in the preparation of polyepichlorohydran aerosol gaskets. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,315,912 to Kalopissie et al teaches cosmetic compositions for application to the skin or hair comprising natural waxes and piperidinyl derivatives. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,277,474 to Kohda et al teaches treatment of allergic symptoms with compositions comprising emulsified wax and piperidinopropiophenone hydrochloride. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,225,703 to Amann et al teaches piperidine derivatives in combination with lubricants such as waxes for molding compositions. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,124,564 to Minagawa et al teaches synthetic resin stabilizers comprising piperidine and wax ester lubricants. 
     U.S. patents on the preferred organic sulfonates discussed in this specification include: 
     U.S. Pat. No. 3,746,643 to Rogers--Continental Oil Company (now Witco&#39;s); 
     U.S. Pat. No. 3,372,115 to McMillen--Lubrizol Corporation; 
     U.S. Pat. No. 3,242,079 to McMillen--Lubrizol Corporation; 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,260,500 to Forsberg--Lubrizol Corporation 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,253,976 to Forsberg--Lubrizol Corporation 
     None of the prior art teaches the discovery of the present invention, that the combination of gelled metal sulfonates with sterically hindered tertiary amines dramatically improves corrosion protection, e.g. weathering, salt spray. 
     SUMMARY 
     1. General Statement of the Invention: 
     2. Utility: 
     The present invention is valuable for a wide variety of purposes to which protective coatings can be put including without limitation, protection of structural metals, vehicles, electrical components, telecommunications devices and other surfaces. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a bar graph showing the relative time to failure for various unpigmented system Example using various absorbing ingredients as measured on a Weatherometer using ASTM Test G-26-83. 
     FIG. 2 is a similar bar graph comparing pigmented system Examples on the Weatherometer. 
     FIG. 3 is another similar bar graph comparing various system of the Examples under salt spray rather then Weatherometer. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     Starting Materials 
     Waxes: 
     Preferably the compositions of the present invention will include refined microcrystalline wax which contains less than 0.1 to about 5 and more preferably 0.1 to about 3 weight percent oil based on the weight of the wax combined with esterified waxes though other types of wax may occasionally be substituted for specialized applications. Preferred wax melting points will be above 50° C. (148° F.), more preferably from 60° to 100° C. (140° to 212° F.), and most preferably from 65° to 90° C. (150° to 194° F.). Such micro waxes can be naturally derived, e.g. those manufactured in the processing of petroleum crude oils, or synthetically manufactured, e.g. polyolefin waxes such as polyethylene or polypropylene waxes. The average molecular weight of the waxes useful in the present invention should be selected so as to provide good film formation and permanence but molecular weight is not narrowly critical and will be easily selected by those skilled in the art. Also, the degree of branching in the wax molecules should be selected so the average degree of crystallinity permits the wax to be easily dispersed and to be compatible with the other ingredients of the particular formulation being produced. Chain branching provides sites for esterification in the case of oxygenated waxes; these are also suitable for use in most applications with the present invention. Oxygenated waxes (oxwax) will preferably have an acid number in the range of from about 5 to about 200, most preferably from 15 to about 45. The wax can contain at least 50% essentially saturated wax based on the total weight of the wax. 
     Specific waxes useful for the present invention include: natural waxes, such as a semi-refined paraffin available from Shell Oil of Houston; petrolatum, widely available; synthetic waxes, such as polyethylene waxes available from Bareco Corporation of Tulsa, Oklahoma or the Epolene brand available from Eastman Kodak of Rochester, New York microwaxes such as &#34;Multiwaxes&#34; available from Witco Chemical, Sonneborn Division, New York, NY 10017, or Polywax 55 (Bareco) and Mobil Microwax 2305 (Mobil Oil); or oxygenated waxes, which can be readily manufactured in petroleum refineries utilizing well-known techniques, or those available from Durachem Corporation of Harrison, New York. 
     The amount of waxes to be utilized with the present invention is not narrowly critical and, in fact, for special applications the wax can even be omitted with additional quantities of sulfonates described below being employed. For most formulations the wax content will be from 0.5 to 30%, more preferably from about 5 to 25% and most preferably from about 5 to about 15% by weight. 
     All percents given herein are percents by weight based on the weight of the total formulation unless otherwise expressly stated. 
     Organic Sulfonates: 
     A particular feature of the present invention is the inclusion in the formulation of organic sulfonates. For best corrosion protection, it has been discovered that the preferred organic sulfonates are over-based (i.e., made with an excess of calcium or other metal carbonate). The most preferred type of organic sulfonate is the Severe Atmospheric Corrosion Inhibitor (&#34;SACI&#34;) available commercially from Witco Chemical Company of New York, N.Y., described in the patents. These over-based sulfonates are the reaction products of an overbased metal salt of sulfonic acid with carbon dioxide, water and alcohols. They impart exceptional corrosion protection and mix well with the other components of the invention. The preferred mixing order is to use the SACI or other organic sulfonates as the first ingredient, thus permitting the other ingredients to interreact prior to the introduction of the piperidine derivatives. 
     The preferable sulfonates are overbased with barium, calcium or sodium, and have sufficient equivalent weight to provide extended rust protection against corrosive environments. The preferable equivalent weights of these sulfonates, which are derived from alkyl benzene, are as follows when overbased with the following metal sulfonates: sodium sulfonate or a equivalent weight preferably 370 to 750, more preferably 400 to 650 and most preferably 450 to 600; barium sulfonate of a equivalent weight preferably 400 to 1400, more preferably 700 to 1300, most preferably 800 to 1200; and calcium sulfonate to a equivalent weight preferably 370 to 850, more preferably 400 to 800, most preferably 500 to 750. 
     The organic sulfonates of the present invention will generally be employed in quantities of from about 10 to about 98%, more preferably from about 50 to about 95% and most preferably from about 60 to about 90% based on the total weight of the formulation. 
     Sterically Hindered Tertiary Amines (SHTA): 
     The invention&#39;s stabilizers against both heat and light degradation are sterically hindered tertiary amines (SHTA&#39;s), most preferably piperidyl derivatives. 
     Preferred derivatives are those obtained by the 4 position substitution of 1,2,2,6,6-penta methyl-piperidin-4-ol with an aliphatic dicarboxylic acid. Examples of aliphatic dicarboxylic acids are those having from 2-20 carbons, more preferably alkane dicarboxylic acids having 6 to 10 carbon atoms such as malonic, succinic, glutaric, adipic, pimelic, suberic, azelaio, sebacic, 1,12-dodecanedioic, 1,18-octadecanedioic, 1,20-docasanedioic acid and N-methylliminodiacitic acid. Molecular weights are generally 100 to 1500, more preferably 200 to 1000. Most preferred ester for this invention is the ester of from sebacic acid (molecular weight=508). Discussion of this and alternate preparations are given in U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,432 to Holt and Randall (Ciba Giegy). Similar hindered amine-type additives are VP Sanduvor® 3050 and 3052 manufactured by Sandoz Chemicals, Charlotte, NC 28205. 
     Particularly preferred are certain piperidines manufactured by Ciba-Geigy under the trademark Tinuvin® especially those designated Tinuvin® 292 (bis (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl 1-4-piperidinyl) sebacate). Most preferred are mixtures of Tinuvins® 292 and 328. The 328 is a substituted benzotriazole and, while valuable as an additive to the compositions of the present invention, does not provide the piperidine or piperidine derivative compound which is an essential component of the compositions of the invention. 
     Substantial technical literature on the preferred piperidine derivatives can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,046,737, U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,432 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,049,647, all to Holt and Randall of Ciba-Geigy. These compounds are also discussed in &#34;Heat and Light Stabilization of Coatings&#34;, publication A2885M70 (1980) (1980). Other brochures include Tinuvin® 292, publication A-3055M71 (1981) and Tinuvin® 328, publication 184A1M13 (1983), all of Ciba-Geigy Corporation, 3 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, New York 10502. 
     While upper limits are primarily limited by economics, the SHTA compounds will generally be used in the inventive formulations at levels of 0.1 to 10 wt.%, more preferably 0.2 to 8 and most preferably 0.5 to 5 wt%. (See SHTA system Examples 1, 3, 5, 15 and 19). 
     UV Absorbers (U.V.A.) 
     Additives found to be surprising less effective, included Tinuvin® 144, publication A2675M109 (1979). of Ciba-Geigy. Other non-piperidine UV light absorber compounds which were found to be much less effective with the present invention were Neville-Synthese Organics Syntase, 100, 800/805, 62, 1200 and 230; American Cynamid Cyasorb UV-531 and UV-9; Thiokol Carstab-700/705; Ferro AM-300 and AM-320; BASF Uvinul-400, -408, M-40, MS-40; Argus Mark-1413 and Eastman Chemical DHBP and DOBP. Table I below sets forth the chemical structure of each of these formulations which, though well known as UV light absorbers proved to be suprisingly less effective in the formulations of the present invention. Zinc oxide is also a common U.V. absorber. (See U.V.A. system, Examples 7, 9, 10, 11 and 17). 
     Antioxidants: 
     In some coating systems, these can act as scavengers for ultraviolet-light-induced peroxides and free-radicals, limiting polymer degradation. Two antioxidants tried were Irganox® 1076 described in publication A276A5M31 of Ciba-Geigy and Neva Stain 21 manufactured by Neville Chemical Company respectively). Neither was noticeably effective with the coatings systems of the invention. (See Examples 18 and 12.) 
     
                                           TABLE I                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
UV Light Absorbers                                                        
(Comparative)                                                             
               Neville-                                                   
               Synthese                                                   
                      American                                            
               Organics                                                   
                      Cyanamid                                            
                             Thiokol                                      
                                    Ferro                                 
                                        BASF  Argus                       
                                                   Eastman                
Chemical Type  (SYNTASE)                                                  
                      (CYASORB)                                           
                             (CARSTAB)                                    
                                    (AM)                                  
                                        (UVINUL)                          
                                              (MARK)                      
                                                   Chemical               
__________________________________________________________________________
2,4-Dihydroxy- 100    --     --     --  400   --   DHBP                   
benzophenone                                                              
2-Hydroxy-4-n-oxtoxy-                                                     
               800/805                                                    
                      UV-531 700/705                                      
                                    300 408   1,413                       
                                                   --                     
benzophenone                                                              
2-Hydroxy-4-methoxy-                                                      
                62    UV-9   --     --   M-40 --   --                     
benzophenone                                                              
2-Hydroxy-4-n-dodecyloxy-                                                 
               1,2000 --     --     320 --    --   DOBP                   
benzophenone                                                              
2-Hydroxy-4-methoxy-                                                      
               230    --     --     --  MS-40 --   --                     
benzophenone 5-sulfonic Acid                                              
__________________________________________________________________________
 
    
     While the piperidinol compounds utilized with the present invention are themselves known to be effective and improving resistance to ultraviolet light, a number of other compounds, also known to be effective against ultraviolet light are suprisingly ineffective in the formulations of the present invention. For example, benzotrizoles, substituted benzophenones (such as the Syntase series discussed below), and other compounds such as those discussed below in BASF Wyandotte Corp., 100 Cherry Hill Road, Box 181, Parsippany, NJ 07054 brochure entitled &#34;Uvinul™ UV inhibitors for Comestics, Plastics, Coatings, Textiles&#34; -400, -408, M-40, MS-40; Argus Mark-1413 or Eastman DOBP*. (Chemical Abstracts Number 2985-59-3), described in publication D-124D of Eastman Chemicals Products, Inc., Kingsport, TN 37662. 
     Diluent Oils: 
     The formulations should preferably contain diluent oils which help to solubilize the formulations and which remain in the finished film to impart flexibility. Examples are: mineral lubricating oils obtained by and conventional petroleum refining procedures, synthetic lubricating oils e.g. polymers of propylene, polyoxyalkylenes, polyoxypropylene, di-carboxylic acid esters, phosphorus esters, etc. The viscosity will preferably be from about 100 to about 700, more preferably 150 to 500 and most preferably 200 to 350 SUS at 210° F. 
     From 0 to 10%, more preferably 3 to 8% and most preferably 4 to 6% by weight of the diluent oil can be used. 
     Resins: 
     Various resins, including alkyd, silicone and linseed oil, were investigated without noting significant improvement in the systems of the invention. (See Example 8, Aroplaz 1266 by Spencer-Kellogg, Buffalo, NY), 13 (Dow Corning Q1-2530 silicone, Midland, MI), 16 (Kelsol 1271 Spencer-Kellogg, Buffalo, NY), 20 (Cargill 5117, Cargill, Minneapolis, MN). 
     Organic Solvents: 
     Several types of solvents can be employed with the invention including liquid hydrocarbon solvents, kerosene and mineral spirits. 
     The solvents of the present invention will generally be employed in quantities of from about 5% to about 85% or more, more preferably from about 25 to about 55%, and most preferably from about 35 to about 50% based on the weight of the total formulation. In addition to acting as a solvent, the solvent will usually be useful during the drying and curing process after application of the coatings composition of the present invention to substrates. 
     Base Number: 
     Base numbers (determined by titration of the formulation with standard HCl) will generally range from approximately 50-200, more preferably from 100-150 and most preferably from 120-140. 
     Pigments: 
     Pigments utilized can be 10X (1-part concentrate to 9-parts base by volume) standard red and 10X extra red concentrates. Preferred color concentrates are manufactured using Tectyl 506EH as a base, available from Valvoline Oil Company, Freedom, Pa. Tectyl® based concentrates are preferred over various resin concentrates available commercially because they are more stable in the system and do not hinder performance. 
     Ranges of addition are 0.5-20.0 weight percent, more preferably 5-15 percent and most preferred 8-12 percent. Reds were chosen in this test work primarily because they offer little benefit to the polymer for weatherability. Other pigmentations can be aluminum, carbon black, iron oxides, pthalocyanine greens and blues, and various others normally used by those familiar with the art. 
     Techniques in Mixing: 
     Apparatus: The apparatus for the present invention will be that conventionally utilized in the preparation of coatings compositions, e.g. kettles and mixing tanks having flow metering or measuring devices and agitation means, e.g. pumps mounted on side-arms connecting with the main vessel, internal stirrers, contra-rotating shearing devices and any of the other available devices which are well known to the art. 
     Temperature: The temperature during mixing may be different during different stages in the formulation. These temperatures are not narrowly critical and will vary to provide faster mixing or better compatability of ingredients according to observation of those skilled in the art. For example, pressure vessels may be utilized for the purpose of lowering ingredient melting and boiling points, where useful, in order to provide better dispersion of difficult-to-mix ingredients. 
     Mixing Procedure: While the formulations of the present invention may be manufactured continuously if desired, batch techniques will be more usually employed. Heating is discontinued after addition of the waxes and pigments. The piperidine derivatives are then mixed in and the finished formulation is allowed to cook with, preferably, constant agitation, after which the formulation is drawn off into shipping containers, e.g. tank cars, tank trucks, drums or smaller cans. Particularly preferred embodiments, the piperidine derivative with or without any other additives such as UV absorbers, are mixed with portion, e.g. 5-15% of the solvent in a separate vessel and this premix is then added to the main mixing vessel as the final ingredient. This technique speeds the dispersion and avoids any agglomeration of the piperidine derivative, UV absorber or other additives. 
     Quality Control: 
     The finished formulation, prior to packaging, will generally be checked for viscosity, solids content, freeze-thaw stability, film build, spray ability, corrosion-protection under accelerated conditions and other tests utilizing techniques well known to the coatings industry. 
     Application: 
     The formulations of the present invention may be applied to substrates to be protected by conventional application techniques, such as spraying, brushing, dipping, flow-coating, electrostatic airless spraying. Coating thickness can be varied by changing the formulation, the number of coats, or the amount applied per coat but in general will be in the range from about 2 to about 5 mils after drying. 
     EXAMPLES 
     Example 1 
     (Formulations according to the invention providing long term corrosion protection) 
     To a conventional mixing kettle equipped with high shear rotary agitator are added, in order: 72.9 parts by weight of SACI calcium sulfonate, an overbased-sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Company and described above under &#34;Sulfonates&#34; and heated to 240° F.; 7.3 parts of molten oxidized petrolatum having an acid value of 15. These components are allowed to be mixed until homogeneous and the acidity of the petrolatum has been neutralized by the overbasing of SACI material. To this mixture is added 7.3 parts of molten microwax manufactured by Witco under the trademark &#34;Multiwax&#34;, continuing agitation. The mixture is allowed to cool to approximately 130° F. temperature and at this point 12.5 parts of a 10X standard red pigment concentrate is added. To this composition is added 1.0 parts of Tinuvin 292,  the SHTA piperidine derivative manufactured by Ciba-Giegy and discussed above under &#34;Piperidine Derivatives&#34;, and 1.0 parts of Tinuvin 328, the UV Absorber also discussed above. Agitation is continued through the addition of all of the ingredients. Heating is discontinued after addition of waxes as shear energy itself is sufficient to maintain temperatures in 43°-60° C. (110°-140° F.) range. Agitation is continued for about 2 hours until the mixture is entirely homogeneous. Viscosity and non-volatile content are adjusted by the addition of Rule 66 mineral spirits due to offset loss during blending. 
     The homogeneous batch is sampled for quality control and the viscosity is found to be about 8,000 centipoises at 25° C. by Brookfield viscometer, using number 5 spindle at 10 rpm. Weight of solids is found to be 50-55%. 
     The resulting product is tested for corrosion resistance by applying to a cold rolled 1010 steel panel. After drying for 72 hours, the test panel is subjected to a 5% salt (NaCl) spray at a temperature of 95° F. (35° C.) according to ASTM Test B-117. The test panel resists failure (corrosion) for over 2,000 hours. 
     A similar test panel coated with the formulation of this Example 1 resists 3,000 hours of exposure to 100% relative humidity at 120° F. (44° C.) according to the techniques of ASTM D-1748. 
     A similar test panel coated with the formulation of this Example 1 resists 2000+ hours of exposure to a Xenon light Weatherometer operated according to ASTM G-26-83. 
     A similar test panel coated with the formula of Example 1 resists 1000+ hours of 5% salt for (ASTM B-117) testing after being exposed for 1000+ hours of Atlas CI65 Xenon Weatherometer (ASTM G-26-83) testing. 
     A sample of the above formulation survived 5 successive freeze-thaw cycles each comprising 16 hours at 0° F. (-18° C.) followed by 8 hours at 77° F. (25° C.) with no separation or other evident deleterious effect. A sample of the above formulation withstands 144 hours at 120° F. (49° C.) without separation or other observable degradation. 
     When a sample as previously described is coated by use of a Gardner drawdown bar with the above formulation and allowed to dry at room temperature (77° F., 25° C.), approximately 50% relative humidity, the coating is cured and dry to the touch in about 2-4 hours. 
     The dry film thickness on the above test panel is approximately 4 mils (approximately 102 microns). 
     Examples 2-18 
     When various formulations are produced and tested according to the techniques of Example 1 but using the respective parameters set forth in Table II, the results are as described in Table II. 
     
         TABLE II
  (Parts By Weight)
   Example  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910  INV COMP INV COMP INV COMP COMP COMP
 COMP COMP
   Run # B1386- B1026- B1026- B1386- B1026- B1026- B1386- B1386- B1026-
 B1026- Wax: 7111 1861A 1861B 71-1 195B 195A 71-7 43A-9 191-1 191-2
 Microwax 7.3 7.6 7.6 7.3 00 00 7.3 8.3 7.3 7.3 Oxpet TAN 15 7.3 7.6 7.6
 7.3 -- -- 7.3 8.3 7.3 7.3 Sulfonate: Ca Sulfonate (60% Rule 66 min
 sprts) &#34;SACl&#34; 72.9  76.4  76.4  72.9  -- -- 72.9  83.4  72.9  Lubrizol
 OS 65417A (1) -- -- -- -- 91.9  91.9  -- ---- Sulfonate: SACl 740 (60%
 Rule 66 mineral spirits)          72.9 Lubrizol OS 65417A          --
 SHTA Derivative: Tinuvin 292 1.0 -- 2.0 -- 2.4 -- -- -- -- Piperidine
 Derivative: Tinuvin 292          -- U.V. Absorbers: Tinuvin 328 UV 1.0
 -- -- -- -- -- 1.0 -- -- -- Syntase 1200 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0 --
 Syntase 800 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0 Syntase 62 -- -- -- -- -- --
 -- -- -- -- Zinc Oxide          -- Antioxidants: Neva Stain 21 -- -- --
 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Irganox 1076 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Resins:
 Dow Corning Q1-2530 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.0 -- -- (silicone resin)
 Spencer Kellogg Aroplaz 1266 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (long-oil
 soya alkyd) Kelsol 1271 (Linseed alkyd) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 Cargill 5117 (alkyd) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Pigment: 10X Red
 Pigment Concen. (Standand) -- 8.4 8.4 -- 8.1 8.1 -- -- -- -- 10X Red
 Pigment Concen. (Extra) 12.5  -- -- 12.5  -- -- 12.5  -- 12.5  12.5
 Total Parts by Weight: 102.0  100.0  102.0  100.0  102.4  100.0  101.0
 102.0  101.0  101.0 Test Results: Storage Stability Pass Pass Pass Pass
 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Freeze-Thaw Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
 Pass Pass Pass Pass Viscosity 8000 CPS 12,000 CPS 11,600 CPS 9,600 CPS
 40,000 42,500 8,400 CPS 7,600 CPS 8,800 8,400 CPS Film Integrity
 Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Firm Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm
 Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Drytime (Hours) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 16 3.0
 3.0 Salt Spray (ASTM B117) or 2,000 -- --   999 -- --   999 999 -- --
 Cold Rolled Steel (Bare) Thickness (mil) DFT 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
 4.04.0Thickness (mil) 4.0 Humidity (ASTM D-1748) 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
 -- -- 3,000 -- -- -- Weatherometer Excellent Poor Excellent Poor
 Excellent Poor Poor Poor Poor 613 (ASTM G26) Hrs.:  2,000+ &gt;560 560+
 750 2,000+ 983 &gt;50 106 613 Sprayability Good Good Good Good Good Good
 Good Good Good Good
  Example  11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  COMP COMP COMP COMP INV COMP
 COMP COMP INV COMP
   Run # B1026- B1026- B1386- B1386- B1386- B1386- B1386- B1386- B1386-
 B1386- Wax: 191-3 191-4 43A-7 43B-23 43A-4 75B 75F 43A-3 43A-2 75E
 Microwax 7.3 7.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.3 7.3 8.3 8.3 7.3 Oxpet TAN 15 7.3 7.3
 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.3 7.3 8.3 8.3 7.3 Sulfonate: Ca Sulfonate (60% Rule 66 min
 sprts) &#34;SACl&#34; Lubrizol OS 65417A (1) Sulfonate: SACl 740 (60% Rule 66
 mineral spirits) 72.9  72.9   83.4  83.4  83.4  72.9  72.9  83.4  83.4
 72.9 Lubrizol OS 65417A -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- SHTA Derivative:
 Tinuvin 292 Piperidine Derivative: Tinuvin 292 -- -- -- -- 2.0 -- -- --
 2.0 -- U.V. Absorbers: Tinuvin 328 UV -- -- -- -- 2.0 -- -- -- -- --
 Syntase 1200 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Syntase 800 -- -- -- -- -- --
 -- -- -- -- Syntase 62 1.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Zinc Oxide -- --
 -- -- -- -- 2.0 -- -- -- Antioxidants: Neva Stain 21 -- 1.0 -- -- -- --
 -- 2.0 -- -- Irganox 1076 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Resins: Dow
 Corning Q1-2530 -- -- 5.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (silicone resin) Spencer
 Kellogg Aroplaz 1266 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (long-oil soya alkyd)
 Kelsol 1271 (Linseed alkyd) -- -- -- -- -- 2.0 -- -- -- -- Cargill 5117
 (alkyd) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.0 Pigment: 10X Red Pigment Concen.
 (Standard) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10X Red Pigment Concen. (Extra)
 12.5  12.5  -- -- -- 12.5  12.5  -- -- 12.5  Total Parts by Weight:
 101.0  101.0  105.0  100.0  104.0  102.0  102.0  102.0  102.0  102.0
 Test Results: Storage Stability Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Failed Pass
 Pass Pass Pass Freeze-Thaw Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
 Pass Viscosity 8,000 CPS 8,400 CPS 8,000 CPS 14,000 CPS 12,800 CPS 7,600
 CPS 8,400 CPS 13,200 CPS 12,800 CPS 7,600 CPS Film Integrity Semi-Firm
 Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Semi-Firm
 Semi-Firm Semi-Firm Drytime (Hours) 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 24.0  3.0 3.0
 3.0 16 Salt Spray (ASTM B117) or -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Cold
 Rolled Steel (Bare)Thickness (mil) DFT Thickness (mil) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Humidity (ASTM D-1748) -- -- -- 3,000 3,000 --
 -- -- 3,000 -- Weatherometer 613 613 154 73.8  207.+ 600 600 106   200
 600  (ASTM G26) Hrs.: Sprayability Good Good Good Good Good Good Good
 Good Good Good
   Notes: (1) Contains Wax and/or Petrolatum Comments on Formulations:
 Example 1: Invention utilizing combination of the SHTA with UVA in equal
 amounts with the Extra Red pigmented sulfonate and wax base of Example
 4. Example 2: Comparative control of Example 3. Standard Red pigmented
 sulfonate and wax base. Example 3: Invention utilizing 2.0 parts of SHTA
 (Tinuvin 292) with components of Example 2. Example 4: Comparative to
 Example 1 utilizing the Extra Red pigmented sulfonate and wax base.
 Example 5: Invention utilizing 2.4 parts of the SHTA (Tinuvin 292) in a
 competitor base to SACl, pigmented with Standard Red as of Example 6.
 Example 6: Comparative to Example 5 utilizing a competitive sulfonate
 base to the SACl pigmented with Standard Red concentrate. Example 7:
 Comparative to Example 1 of invention utilizing only 1 part of Tinuvin
 328 UVA absorber (2(2&#39;-hydroxy-3&#39;,5&#39;-di-tert-amylphenyl)benzotriazole)
 with the ingredients of Example 4. Example 8: Comparative to Example 19
 of invention utilizing 2 parts long oil soya alkyd (Spencer Kellog
 Aroplaz 1265) in substitution for the SHTA in Example 19. Example 9:
 Comparative to Example 1 of invention utilizing only 1 part of UVA
 Syntase 1200 (2-hydroxy-4-n-dodecyl-oxybenzophenone) with the ingredients
  of Example 4. Example 10: Comparative to Example 1 of invention
 utilizing only 1 part of UVA Syntase 800 (2-hydroxy-4-n-oxtoxy-benzopheno
 ne) with the ingredients of Example 4. Example 11: Comparative to
 Example 1 of invention utilizing 1 part of UVA Syntase 62 (2-hydroxy-4-me
 thoxy-benzophenone) with the ingredients of Example 4. Example 12:
 Comparative to Example 1 of invention utilizing only part anti-oxidant
 Nevastain 21 (styrenated phenol) with the ingredients of Example 4, SHTA
 of Example 1 being omitted. Example 13: Comparative to Example 19 of
 invention substituting 5.0 parts of a silicone resin (Dow Corning
 Q1-2530) in substitution for the 2 parts SHTA of Example 19. Example 14:
 Comparative example of the organic sulfonate and wax base as a control
 to invention Example 19. Example 15: Invention example utilizing 2 parts
 of UVA Tinuvin 328 (2(2;-hydroxy-3&#39;5&#39;-di-tert amylphenyl) benzotriazole)
 in conjunction with equal parts of the SHTA of Example 19. Example 16:
 Comparative example utilizing 2.0 parts of a linseed alkyd resin (Kelsol
 1271) in place of the 1.0 parts each of the SHTA and UVA of Example 1.
 Example 17: Comparative example utilizing 2.0 parts of UVA zinc oxide in
 place of the 1 part each of the SHTA and UVA of Example 1. Example 18:
 Comparative example utilizing 2.0 parts of anti-oxidant Irganox 1076
 (Octadecyl 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy hydro-cinnamate) in place of the
 2.0 parts SHTA of Example 19. Example 19: Invention example using 2.0
 parts SHTA (Tinuvin 292) in addition to the ingredients of Example 14.
 Example 20: Comparative example utilizing 2.0 parts alkyd resin (Cargill
 5117) in place of the 1.0 parts each of the SHTA and UVA of Example 1.
 Comments on Test Results: Example 1: Best of all blends of SACI. Only
 slight fade after 2,000 hours in Weatherometer. Example 2: Poor at 560
 hrs. Heavily chalked and film hard and brittle. Example 3: Excellent at
 560 hrs. Zero fade or chalking. Film still soft and pliable. Example 4:
 90-100% rust at 888 hrs. Salt fog. Heavily chalked and flaking in
 Weatherometer at 750 hrs. Example 5: Excellent at 2,000 hrs. in Weatherom
 eter with slight chalking. Competition to SACI 740. Example 6: Poor at
 983 hrs. in Weatherometer. Film chalking and flaking. Competition to
 SACI 740. Example 7: 30% rust at 888 hrs. Salt fog. 25% chalked at 750
 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 8: Discolored at 106 hrs. in Weatherometer
 . Example 9: Chalking heavily at 613 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 10:
 Best of all Syntase additives. Still had chalking at 613 hours in
 Weatherometer. Example 11: Heavily chalked at 613 hrs. in Weatherometer.
 Example 12: Heavily chalked at 613 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 13:
 Heavily discolored brown at 154 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 14:
 Heavily discolored brown at 73.8 hrs. in Weatherometer. Hard &amp; brittle
 film. Example 15: Excellent at 207 hrs. in Weatherometer. Film still
 soft and pliable. Example 16: Mudcracked at 600 hrs. in Weatherometer.
 Very slow dry time. Surface dry only at 24 hrs. Example 17: Chalking and
 Zn O washing out at 600 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 18: Heavily
 discolored at 106 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 19: Discolored at 200
 hrs. in Weatherometer. Example 20: Mudcracked at 600 hrs. in Weatheromete
 r. Slowed dry time considerably.
 
    
     MODIFICATIONS 
     Specific compositions, methods, or embodiments discussed are intended to be only illustrative of the invention disclosed by this specification. Variation on these compositions, methods, or embodiments are readily apparent to a person of skill in the art based upon the teachings of this specification and are therefore intended to be included as part of the inventions disclosed herein. 
     For example, particularly preferred formulations may be prepared to be thixotropic for easy application and handling, may be removed by stripping from the substraight as a continuous film, and will typically permit recoating with additional coats of similar composition without wrinkling or lifting of the base coat. 
     Reference to patents and other literature made in the specification is intended to result in such patents or literature being expressly incorporated herein by reference including any patents or other literature cited within such patents.