Asymmetric gas separation membranes
BACKGROUND OF THE lNVENTION 
     This invention relates to an asymmetric gas separation membrane which exhibits substantially improved gas separation selectivity and the process to produce such an improved asymmetric gas separation membrane. In another aspect, the invention relates to processes utilizing such membranes for improved selectivity in the separation of at least one gas from a gaseous mixture by permeation. 
     The separating, including upgrading of the concentration of at least one selective gas from a gaseous mixture, is an especially important procedure in view of the demands and the supplies of chemical feedstocks. Frequently these demands are met by separating one or more desired gases from gaseous mixtures and utilizing the gaseous products for processing. Applications have been made employing separation membranes for selectively separating one or more gases from gaseous mixtures. To achieve selective separation, the membrane exhibits less resistance to transport of one or more gases than of at least one other gas of the mixture. Thus, selective separation can provide preferential depletion or concentration of one or more desired gases in the mixture with respect to at least one other gas and therefore provide a product having a different proportion of the one or more desired gases to the at least one other gas than the proportion in the mixture. However, in order for selective separation of the one or more desired gases by the use of separation membranes to be technically feasible the membranes must satisfy several criteria so that the use of the separation procedure has utility. For instance, the membranes must be capable of withstanding the conditions to which they may be subjected during the separation operation. The membranes must also provide an adequately selective separation of one or more desired gases at a sufficiently high flux, that is, permeation rate of the permeate gas per unit surface area. Thus, separation membranes which exhibit a high flux but low selectivity separation are unattractive as they require large separating membrane surface area. Similarly, separation membranes which exhibit adequate selectivity but undesirable low fluxes are also unattractive as they require large separating membrane surface area. Furthermore, membranes which are not capable of maintaining the desired performance of flux and selectivity over an extended period of time in adverse operating environments are likewise undesirable. Adverse environmental conditions include extremes of temperature, pressure and concentration of chemical contaminants. Accordingly, research has continued to develop gas separation membranes which provide improved performance regarding the separation of one or more desired gases for an extended period of time under adverse environmental conditions. 
     The passage of gas through a membrane can proceed through pores, i.e. continuous channels for fluid flow and communication with both feed and exit surfaces of the membrane (which pores may or may not be suitable for separation by Knudsen flow or diffusion); in another mechanism, in accordance with current views of gas separation membrane theory the passage of a gas through the membrane may be by interaction of a gas with a material of the membrane. In this latter postulated mechanism, the permeability of a qas through a membrane is believed to involve the solubility of the gas in the membrane material and the diffusion of the gas through the membrane. The permeability constant for single gas is presently viewed as being the product of the solubility and diffusiveness of the gas in the membrane. A given membrane material has a particular permeability constant for passage of the given gas by the interaction of the gas with the material of the membrane. The rate of permeation of the gas, i.e. flux through the membrane is related to the permeability constant, but is also influenced by variables such as the membrane thickness, the physical nature of the membrane, the partial pressure differential of the permeate gas across the membrane, the temperature and the like. 
     In general, efforts have been directed at providing material of a gas separation membrane in as thin a form as possible in view of the low permeabilities of most membrane materials in order to provide adequate flux while providing a membrane as porefree as possible such that gases are passed through the membrane by interaction with the material of the membrane. One approach for developing separation membranes suitable for gaseous systems has been to provide composite membranes having the thinnest possible superimposed membranes supported on an anisotropic porous support where the superimposed ultrathin membrane provides the desired separation. The superimposed membranes are advantageously sufficiently thin, i.e. ultrathin, to provide reasonable fluxes. The essential function of a porous support is to support the superimposed membrane. Suitable supports are desirably porous to provide low resistance to permeate passage after the superimposed membrane has performed its function of selectivity separating the permeate from the feed mixture. Klass et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,616,607; Stancell et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,657,113; Wasuda, U.S. Pat. No. 3,775,303; and Browall, U.S. Pat. No. 3,980,456 exemplify gas separation membranes having superimposed thin membranes on a porous support. 
     Such composite membranes for gas separations have not been without problems. For instance, Browall discloses that in the fabrication of composite membranes of ultrathin films, fine particles, particles below about 3,000 angstroms in size, may be deposited under or between preformed ultrathin membrane layers and because of their large size in comparison to the ultrathin membranes, puncture the ultrathin membranes. Such breaches reduce the selectivity and thus the effectiveness of the membrane. The Browall patent discloses applying a preformed organopolysiloxane-polycarbonate copolymer sealing material over the ultrathin membrane to cover the breaches caused by the fine particles. Browall also discloses employing a preformed layer of the organopolysiloxane-polycarbonate copolymer between the ultrathin membranes and the porous polycarbonate support as an adhesive. Thus, the composite membranes of Browall are complex in materials and techniques of construction. 
     A major improvement in gas separation membranes is disclosed by Henis et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,230,463 which pertains to particular multicomponent membranes for gas separations comprising a coating in contact with the porous separation membrane wherein the separation properties of the multicomponent membranes are principally determined by the porous separation membrane as opposed to the material of the coating. Such multicomponent membranes for the separation of at least one gas from a gaseous mixture can exhibit a desirable selectivity and still exhibit a useful flux. Moreover, such multicomponent membranes for gas separation can be fabricated from a wide variety of gas separation membrane materials which are advantageous for a given gas separation. The desired combination of flux and selectivity of separation can be provided by the configuration and methods of preparation and combinations of the components. For instance, material having high selectivity of separation but a relatively low permeability constant can be utilized to provide multicomponent membranes having desired permeation rates and desired selectivity of separation through utilization of a porous substrate which contributes to the overall separation efficiency of the multicomponent membrane. 
     Despite such advances in gas membrane separations, it would be advantageous to construct any membrane, including such multicomponent membranes, from materials that have reasonably good flux and substantially improved selectivity of separation while still remaining stable in use. That is, the membrane should have high structural strength, toughness, abrasion and chemical resistance to remain functional under extremes of temperature and differential pressure. In this regard such membranes are often required to operate in pressure differentials across the membrane of at least 2100 or 3500 KPa or higher, for instance up to 13,800 KPa or even higher. In general, operation environments require membrane material which is resistant to hydrocarbons, ammmonia, water, and acid gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and the like. Such chemicals may have a tendency to dissolve or plasticize the material of the gas separation membranes resulting in deterioration of the membrane or densification of an otherwise asymmetric structure. 
     Research efforts continue in the field of gas separation membrane technology to reach economic gas separation performance utilizing asymmetric membranes of materials which have intrinsically high separation selectivity for gases such as hydrogen, carbon dioxide and the like. Attempts to eliminate surface porosity of these membrane materials in an asymmetric state by using either spinning or post treatment techniques have generally resulted in membranes, particularly hollow fiber membranes, that have poor performance gas separations either in low flux or low selectivities or both. With hollow fiber gas separation membranes spun from polymeric materials having high intrinsic selectivities for gas separations such as polyphenylene oxides, substituted polyphenylene oxides, polyimides, polyamides, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, cellulose esters, and the like, these treatments have produced modified fibers with uncoated separation properties of interest compared to those of multicomponent coated polysulfone fibers. We have found that treatment of flat or porous hollow fiber asymmetric gas separation membranes with Bronsted-Lowry bases offers a productive and simple route to uncoated gas separation membranes having desirable separation properties of commercial utility levels. 
     DEFINITION OF TERMS 
     Separation factor (αa/b) for a membrane for a given pair of gases a and b is defined as the ratio of the permeability constant (P a ) of the membrane for gas a to the permeability constant (P b ) of the membrane for gas b. Separation factor is also equal to the ratio of the permeabilit (P a  /l) of a membrane of thickness l for gas a of a gas mixture to the permeability of the same membrane to gas b, (P b  /l) wherein the permeability for a given gas is the volume of gas, standard temperature and pressure (STP), which passes through a membrane per square centimeter of surface area, per second, for a partial pressure drop of one centimeter of mercury across the membrane per unit of thickness, and is expressed as P/l=cm 3  /cm 2  -sec-cmHg. 
     In practice, the separation factor with respect to a given pair of gases for a given membrane can be determined employing numerous techniques which provide sufficient information for calculation of permeability constants or permeabilities for each of the pair of gases. Several of the many techniques available for determining permeability constants, permeabilities, and separation factors are disclosed by Hwang et al, Techniques of Chemistry, Volume VII, Membranes in Separations, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1975 (herein incorporated by reference) at Chapter 12, pages 296 to 322. 
     An intrinsic separation factor as referred to herein is the separation factor for a material which has no channels for gas flow across the material and is the highest achievable separation factor for the material. Such a material may be referred to as being continuous or non-porous. The intrinsic separation factor of a material can be approximated by measuring the separation factor of a compact membrane of the material. However, several difficulties may exist in the determination of an intrinsic separation factor including imperfections introduced in the preparation of the compact membrane such as the presence of pores, the presence of fine particles in the compact membrane, undefined molecular order due to variations in membrane preparation, and the like. Consequently, the determined intrinsic separation factor can be lower than the intrinsic separation factor. Accordingly, a &#34;determined intrinsic separation factor&#34; as employed herein refers to the separation factor of a dry compact membrane of the material. 
     Dense or compact membranes are membranes which are essentially free of pores, i.e. fluid flow channels communicating between the surfaces of the membrane and are essentially free of voids, i.e. regions within the thickness of the membrane which do not contain the material of the membrane. The dense membrane is essentially the same throughout the structure, therefore it falls within the definition of isotropic membrane. On the other hand, porous separation membranes relate to membranes having continuous channels for fluid flow which communicate between the feed surface and the exit surface. Porous regions of such membranes can also extend from the surface skin or compact surface through approximately 90 to 99% of the total membrane thickness. The remaining dense region extends to the opposite surface. Asymmetric membranes have considerable internal void volume; however, this volume is not related to continuous porosity from one side of the membrane to the other. Asymmetric membranes have at least one skinned surface, i.e. a compact layer that is at an internal or external surface which is generally on one or both faces of the membrane. 
     For many purposes it is sufficient to say that an acid is a hydrogen containing substance which dissociates in water to produce one or more hydrogen ions and a base is a hydroxy group containing a substance that in water dissociates to produce the hydroxide ion. More generally, however, acids and bases are defined according to other concepts. The Bronsted-Lowry acid-base concept states that an acid is any compound which can furnish a proton and the base is any compound which can take up a proton or act as a proton acceptor. Non-protonic substances often possess properties such as the ability to displace a weaker acid or base from its compound. Lewis acids and bases are generally defined as a result of their function as electron pair acceptors or donors. It is often stated that the Lewis acids and bases are wider and a more general class of substances that include Bronsted-Lowry acid and bases as a special case. A distinction between Bronsted-Lowry an Lewis definitions is that the acid-base reactions in the Bronsted-Lowry sense are proton transfer reactions since they involve only the transfer of a nucleus without the attendant electrons. 
     For purposes of describing this invention, the bases used are preferably Bronsted-Lowry bases; however, these bases can be in vapor or solution form. Preferably the bases used are volatile at ambient conditions. 
     An &#34;effective amount&#34; of base as referred to herein is used in relation to the amount of base contacted with the asymmetric gas separation membrane. This effective amount can be varied by factors such as base concentration, time of exposure, temperature and the like. An effective amount is herein defined as that base contact amount sufficient to improve the asymmetric gas separation membrane selectivity but insufficient to significantly impair the mechanical integrity, strength, or other physical properties of the polymer which are detrimental to the function of the polymeric membrane as a gas separator. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention provides gas separation membranes comprised of asymmetric membranes exhibiting substantially improved gas separation selectivity. A preformed asymmetric gas separation membrane of material having selective permeation of at least one gas of a gaseous mixture over that of one or more remaining gases of the gaseous mixture has been found to exhibit significantly improved separation factors for the permeating gases after being contacted on one or both surfaces with a Bronsted-Lowry base. 
     In addition, the invention provides for a process to produce improved asymmetric membranes in flat film or hollow fiber form having significantly improved gas separation properties, for example, comparable to or greater than the intrinsic selectivities of the polymer from which the asymmetric membrane is made and with acceptable permeation rates. It has been discovered that by treating asymmetric membranes with a Bronsted-Lowry base results in a modified asymmetric membrane having uncoated separation properties comparable to or higher than commercially available composite membrane separators. In addition, the invention has been found to have applications for composite separation membranes or multicomponent membranes where it is desired to eliminate surface porosity. For example, the selectivity of a multicomponent membrane can be improved by contacting one or both surfaces of the multicomponent membrane with a Bronsted-Lowry base. 
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     Attempts to eliminate surface defects of asymmetric gas separation membranes or even composite or multicomponent membranes have utilized spinning techniques relative to hollow fiber membranes and/or post-treatment techniques in order to improve asymmetric membrane performance. Generally, these treatment techniques have resulted in fibers that have economically poor gas fluxes or selectivities when in fact an improvement in both or at least a substantial improvement in one without seriously adversely affecting the other is desired. For example, the significant increase in α achievable by contacting asymmetric membranes with Bronsted-Lowry bases permits reduction in permeability up to about 50% without lowering practical use efficiencies. Hollow fibers spun from relatively good permeation polymers have been modified in various ways but without achieving significant improvement in the fluxes or selectivities for gas separations. We have found that the treatment of asymmetric membranes in either flat film or hollow fiber form with a volatile Bronsted-Lowry base offers significant improvement in the asymmetric membrane gas separation selectivities. The Bronsted-Lowry base treatment provides a simple route to improving asymmetric gas separation membrane performance to such a level that even uncoated hollow fibers perform at separation levels up to and greater than the intrinsic selectivity of the polymer from which the fiber is spun. 
     The material used for the asymmetric separation membrane may be a natural or synthetic substance having useful gas separation properties. In the case of polymers, both addition and condensation polymers which can be cast, extruded or otherwise fabricated to provide asymmetric separation membranes are included. The asymmetric separation membranes can be prepared, for example, by casting from a solution comprised of good solvent for the polymeric material into a poor or non-solvent for the material. The spinning and/or casting conditions and/or treatments subsequent to the initial formation, and the like, can influence the morphology, i.e. the asymmetry and resistance to gas or fluid flow of the separation membranes. 
     Generally organic polymers, mixtures of organic polymers, or organic polymers mixed with inorganics are used to prepare the asymmetric separation membrane. Typical polymers suitable for the asymmetric separation membrane according to the invention can be substituted or unsubstituted polymers and may be selected from polysulfones; poly(styrenes), including styrene-containing copolymers such as acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, styrene-butadiene copolymers and styrene-vinylbenzylhalide copolymers; polycarbonates; cellulosic polymers, such as cellulose acetate-butyrate, cellulose propionate, ethyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, nitrocellulose, etc.; polyamides and polyimides, including aryl polyamides and aryl polyimides; polyethers; poly(arylene oxides) such as poly(phenylene oxide) and poly(xylene oxide); poly(esteramide-diisocyanate); polyurethanes; polyesters (including polyarylates), such as poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(alkyl methacrylates), poly(alkyl acrylates), poly(phenylene terephthalate), etc; polysulfides; polymers from monomers having alpha-olefinic unsaturation other than mentioned above such as poly(ethylene), poly(propylene), poly(butene-1), poly(4-methyl pentene-1), polyvinyls, e.g. poly(vinyl chloride), poly(vinyl fluoride), poly(vinylidene chloride), poly(vinylidene fluoride), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinyl esters) such as poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(vinyl propionate), poly(vinyl pyridines), poly(vinyl pyrrolidones), poly(vinyl ethers), poly(vinyl ketones), poly(vinyl aldehydes) such as poly(vinyl formal) and poly(vinyl butyral), poly(vinyl amides), poly(vinyl amines), poly(vinyl urethanes), poly(vinyl ureas), poly(vinyl phosphates), and poly(vinyl sulfates); polyallyls; poly(benzobenzimidazole); polyhydrazides; polyoxadiazoles; polytriazoles; poly(benzimidazole); polycarbodiimides; polyphosphazines; etc., and interpolymers, including block interpolymers containing repeating units from the above such as terpolymers of acrylonitrile-vinyl bromide-sodium salt of para-sulfophenylmethallyl ethers; and grafts and blends containing any of the foregoing. Typical substituents providing substituted polymers include halogens such as fluorine, chlorine and bromine; hydroxyl groups; lower alkyl groups; lower alkoxy groups; monocyclic aryl; lower acyl groups and the like. 
     Selection of the asymmetric separation membrane for improved gas separations may be made on the basis of heat resistance, solvent resistance, mechanical strength of the asymmetric separation membrane, as well as other factors indicated by the operating conditions for selective permeation, as long as the asymmetric separation membrane has the prerequisite relative separation factors in accordance with the invention for at least one pair of gases. 
     In making asymmetric hollow filament separation membranes, a wide variety of spinning conditions may be employed. These methods are disclosed, for example, in the preparation of polysulfone hollow filaments by Cabasso et al in Research and Development of NS-1 and Related Polysulfone Hollow Fibers for Reverse Osmosis Desalination of Seawater, supra. In addition, methods taught for preparing the porous separation membrane as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,230,463 are appropriate for preparing the preformed asymmetric separation membranes which when contacted with effective amounts of a volatile Bronsted-Lowry base result in the improved asymmetric gas separation membranes having performance separation factors of levels up to and greater than intrinsic separation factors of the polymer from which the fiber or flat film is produced. 
     One polymeric material utilized in gas separations is polysulfone. More recently polysulfone material has been combined as a porous or asymmetric hollow fiber with various coatings to provide suitable gas separation characteristics. Treatment of polysulfone hollow fibers with, for example, 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole (EMI) as a preferred Bronsted-Lowry base results in membranes with uncoated selectivities comparable to or higher than those possible with untreated silicone coated asymmetric polysulfone membranes. Various Bronsted-Lowry bases will perform in differing ways depending upon the polymer material comprising the hollow fiber membrane; thus, varying concentrations and contact times from one base-polymer system to another will be necessary in order to achieve the more pronounced improved selectivities according to the invention. In addition, the Bronsted-Lowry base is preferably volatile at ambient conditions since residual base removal from the treated asymmetric membrane, for example by vaporization, provides a method for controlling and/or stopping the treatment. The base treated membranes in flat film or hollow fiber form can be further aged or treated in nitrogen or similar sweep environments or by applying a vacuum to the fiber bore of the hollow fibers. 
     The base treatments according to the invention can be carried out under a range of conditions with variations in concentrations, gas or liquid state, time, and temperature. Bundles of hollow fibers can be treated with a dilute or concentrated gaseous base, aqueous base, dilute base solution, or in situ produced bases. As can be seen from examples 4 through 12 of Table 1, the improvements in polysulfone membrane separation properties arising from various base treatments are quite impressive. Short exposure, from about 15 to 20 seconds of a gas separation membrane fiber to a dilute solution of base, can result in fibers that are about 200% or more improved in selectivity as compared to the composite membrane in example 18 of Table 1 with only a 50% loss in permeability. The base treatments are very useful to improve asymmetric hollow fiber or flat membrane selectivity without the need of a coating material. Significant improvement in uncoated asymmetric membrane selectivity is also achieved by treating polyphenylene oxide and SAN [copoly(styrene-acrylonitrile) membranes with EMI(2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole) as shown by the examples of Tables 2 and 3. 
     The base contacted asymmetric membranes indicate some lowering of permeation rates, for example relative to hydrogen-methane and carbon dioxide-methane separations; however, selectivity is significantly improved and in many instances higher than the intrinsic selectivity of the polymeric material comprising the asymmetric membrane. Since the base treatment is not forseen as producing chemical changes in the polymer, such base treatment improvements in selectivity suggest permeation modification effects by the base. 
     The improvement of uncoated asymmetric membrane separation properties for gas separation with a Bronsted-Lowry base treatment is a general phenomenon which has application to hollow fiber or flat film systems other than polysulfone. For example, the treatment of polyphenylene oxide (PPO) fibers with EMI in a methanol solution produces trends similar to those observed with polysulfone when treated with ammonia and similar EMI solutions. In addition, the treatment of SAN hollow fibers with EMI solutions in normal pentane and 1% silicone in normal pentane resulted in a dramatic improvement in uncoated asymmetric hollow fiber selectivity. SAN is not a polyether-like polysulfone or polyphenylene oxide previously discussed which clearly indicates a broad application of the base treatments. For example, an effective amount of base treatment of any asymmetric gas separation membrane which is suitable in the selective permeation of gases is predicted to improve the selective properties of those membranes according to the invention. These observations justify the conclusion that the improvement of uncoated hollow fiber or flat film asymmetric membrane selectivity as a result of base treatment is applicable to many classes of polymeric materials which have gas permeation capabilities. 
    
    
     The following examples are illustrative of the invention but are not intended as a limitation. 
     The base treated asymmetric gas separation membranes were exposed to mixed gas streams in an elongated cylindrical chamber of about 150 cc capacity. Generally, the mixed feed gas pressure was in the range of about 1.70 to about 7.80 atmospheres. The feed gas was introduced to one end of the elongated test module and withdrawn from the other end with flow rates from 1 through about 6 liters per minute. During the performance testing, the bore side of the asymmetric hollow fiber membrane is vacuum pumped from about 5 to 10 minutes until the system reaches equilibrium. Permeate gas is allowed to expand into a calibrated volume for the purposes of measuring rate as a result of pressuring per unit time. The permeate gas samples are then analyzed by gas chromatography methods. 
     The 18 examples illustrated in Table 1 provide asymmetric untreated polysulfone hollow fiber controls (examples 1,4, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17) which are then treated as indicated and in accordance with the invention. Treatments include brief dip contact of the fibers with alcohol solutions of ammonia, pentane solutions of EMI and pentane-isopropanol solutions of Santoflex® 77, Santowhite® and Santovar®. Other headings of Table 1 indicate when the gas permeation tests were run in days after treatment for permeability of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and the separation factors for hydrogen vs. methane and carbon dioxide vs. methane. 
     Examples 14 and 16 of Table 1 are included to demonstrate that under comparable treatment conditions minor improvements in selectivity can also be produced by agents other than a Bronsted-Lowry base but in no way comparable to the improvements produced by the base treatments. The examples in Tables 1, 2, and 3 are one time experiments without any attempt at optimization. Obviously, optimization of concentration and exposure time as well as selection of base vs. polymer pairing would bring the results to a higher order under the effective amount conditions according to the invention. 
     In Table 1, examples 1 through 12 illustrate the treatments of the various controls in accordance with the invention. Example pairs 13-14, 15-16, and 17-18 are for comparative purposes. Example pair 17-18 illustrate untreated asymmetric polysulfone hollow fiber membrane which has been coated with a 1% by weight Sylgard in normal pentane. 
     
                                           TABLE 1                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
UNCOATED PERMEATION PROPERTIES OF BR.0.NSTED-LOWRY                        
BASE MODIFIED POLYSULFONE HOLLOW FIBERS                                   
                           DAYS AFTER                                     
EXAMPLE                                                                   
       FIBER                                                              
            TREATMENT      TREATMENT                                      
                                   (P/l)H.sub.2                           
                                        (P/l)CO.sub.2                     
                                             αH.sub.2 /CH.sub.4     
                                                  αCO.sub.2         
                                                  /CH.sub.4               
__________________________________________________________________________
 1     PS   --             --      78   --   5.0  --                      
 2     Same 20 sec. dip in 5.6M                                           
                           1       48   --   24.0 --                      
            NH.sub.3 /MeOH Bore vac                                       
            overnight                                                     
 3     Same Same           56      39   --   21.0 --                      
 4     PS   --             --      111  --   4.0  --                      
 5     Same 2 × 10 sec. dips in                                     
                           2       40   --   78.0 --                      
            0.5% EMI in n-C.sub. 5                                        
 6     Same Same           4       38   --   70.0 --                      
 7     PS   --             --      131  --   3.0  --                      
 8     Same 2 × 10 sec. dips in                                     
                           2       31   --   129.0                        
                                                  --                      
            1% EMI in n-C.sub. 5                                          
  9    PS   --             --      91   --   4.6  --                      
10     Same 2 × sec. dips in                                        
                           3       27   --   116.0                        
                                                  --                      
            2% EMI in n-C.sub. 5                                          
11     PS   --             --      90   --   10.0 --                      
12     Same 3 × 5 sec. dips in 1%                                   
                           1       67   26   80.0 36                      
            SANTOFLEX®.sup.a 77/n-C.sub. 5                            
13     PS   --             --      91   --   7.7  --                      
14     Same 3 × 5 sec. dips in                                      
                           1       41   --   20.0  1                      
            1% SANTOWHITE®.sup.a /n-C.sub. 5                          
            isopropanol (98/2)                                            
15     PS   --             --      110  --   5.0  --                      
16     Same 3 × 5 sec. dips in                                      
                           1       51   --   16.0 --                      
            1% SANTOVAR®.sup.a A/n-C.sub. 5                           
            isopropanol (98/2)                                            
17     PS   --             --      126  --   4.8  --                      
18     Same 1% SYLGARD®.sup.b in n-C.sub. 5                           
                           --      57   24   69.0 30                      
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.a Registered trademark of Monsanto Company  St. Louis, Missouri     
 .sup. b Registered trademark of Dow Corning Corporation  Midland, Michiga
 
    
     
                                           TABLE 2                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
UNCOATED PERMEATION PROPERTIES OF EMI TREATED PPO FIBERS                  
                 DAYS AFTER                                               
EXAMPLE                                                                   
       TREATMENT TREATMENT                                                
                         (P/l)H.sub.2                                     
                              (P/l)CO.sub.2                               
                                   αH.sub.2 /CH.sub.4               
                                        αCO.sub.2 /CH.sub.4         
__________________________________________________________________________
19     --        --      464  --    2.8 --                                
20     2 × 10 sec. dips in                                          
                 1       105   37  15.2  7.2                              
       2% EMI/MeOH                                                        
21     --        --      482  209   3.1  1.7                              
22     2 × 10 sec. dips in                                          
                 1       253  133  25.0 15.0                              
       1% -02 silicone in                                                 
       cyclohexane                                                        
__________________________________________________________________________
 
    
     
                                           TABLE 3                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
UNCOATED PERMEATION PROPERTIES OF EMI TREATED SAN FIBERS                  
                 DAYS AFTER                                               
EXAMPLE                                                                   
       TREATMENT TREATMENT                                                
                         (P/l)H.sub.2                                     
                              (P/l)CO.sub.2                               
                                   αH.sub.2 /CH.sub.4               
                                        αCO.sub.2 /CH.sub.4         
__________________________________________________________________________
23     --        --      48   --    4.1 --                                
24     2 × 10 sec. dips in                                          
                 1       27    3.4 157.0                                  
                                        16.0                              
       2% EMI in n-C.sub. 5                                               
25     --        --      49   11.0  3.9  1.2                              
26     2 × 10 sec. dips in                                          
                 1       35    5.0 189.0                                  
                                        20.0                              
       1% silicone in n-C.sub. 5                                          
__________________________________________________________________________