PS176 gene encoding nematode-active toxin cloned from a bacillus thuringiensis isolate
CROSS-REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION 
     This is a division of application Ser. No. 07/557,246, filed Jul. 24, 1990, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,281,530, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 07/535,810, filed Jun. 11, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 07/084,653, filed Aug. 12, 1987, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,948,734. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Regular use of chemicals to control unwanted organisms can select for drug resistant strains. This has occurred in many species of economically important insects and has also occurred in nematodes of sheep, goats, and horses. The development of drug resistance necessitates a continuing search for new control agents having different modes of action. 
     In recent times, the accepted methodology for control of nematodes has centered around the drug benzimidazole and its congeners. The use of these drugs on a wide scale has led to many instances of resistance among nematode populations (Prichard, R. K. et al. [1980] &#34;The problem of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes,&#34; Austr. Vet. J. 56:239-251; Coles, G. C. [1986] &#34;Anthelmintic resistance in sheep,&#34; In Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, Vol 2:423-432 [Herd, R. P., eds.] W. B. Saunders, New York). There are more than 100,000 described species of nematodes. 
     The bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) produces a δ-endotoxin polypeptide that has been shown to have activity against a rapidly growing number of insect species. The earlier observations of toxicity only against lepidopteran insects have been expanded with descriptions of B.t. isolates with toxicity to dipteran and coleopteran insects. These toxins are deposited as crystalline inclusions within the organism. Many strains of B.t. produce crystalline inclusions with no demonstrated toxicity to any insect tested. 
     A small number of research articles have been published about the effects of delta endotoxins from B. thuringiensis species on the viability of nematode eggs. Bottjer, Bone and Gill (Experimental Parasitology 60:239-244, 1985) have reported that B.t. kurstald and B.t. israelensis were toxic in vitro to eggs of the nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis. In addition, 28 other B.t. strains were tested with widely variable toxicities. The most potent had LD 50  values in the nanogram range. Ignoffo and Dropkin (Ignoffo, C. M. and Dropkin, V. H. [1977] J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 50:394-398) have reported that the thermostable toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis (beta exotoxin) was active against a free-living nematode, Panagrellus redivivus (Goodey); a plant-parasitic nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Chitwood); and a fungus-feeding nematode, Aphelenchus avena (Bastien). Beta exotoxin is a generalized cytotoxic agent with little or no specificity. Also, H. Ciordia and W. E. Bizzell (Jour. of Parasitology 47:41 [abstract] 1961) gave a preliminary report on the effects of B. thuringiensis on some cattle nematodes. 
     At the present time there is a need to have more effective means to control the many nematodes that cause considerable damage to susceptible hosts. Advantageously, such effective means would employ biological agents. In parent pending application Ser. No. 084,653, there are disclosed novel isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis having activity against nematodes. We have now isolated, unexpectedly and advantageously, four genes encoding novel nematicidal δ-endotoxins from one of the B.t. isolates which was named B.t, PS17. Prior to successfully completing this invention, we could not predict with any reasonable degree of certainty that we could isolate a gene encoding a nematicidal toxin because of the complexity of the microbial genome. The fact that more than one gene was successfully cloned is completely unexpected. 
     BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The subject invention concerns four genes cloned from a novel Bacillus thuringiensis isolate designated B.t. PS17. The genes designated PS17d, PS17b, PS17a and PS17e, encode Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins which have nematicidal activity. The genes can be transferred to suitable hosts via a recombinant DNA vector. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1A-C discloses the amino acid sequence of the novel toxin encoded by PS17a. 
     FIG. 2A-D discloses the nucleotide sequence of PS17a. 
     FIG. 3A-L is a composite of FIGS. 1 and 2. 
     FIG. 4A-C discloses the nucleotide sequence of PS17b. 
     FIG. 5A-B discloses the amino acid sequence of the novel toxin encoded by PS17b. 
     FIG. 6A-J is a composite of FIGS. 4 and 5. 
    
    
     DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION 
     The novel toxin genes of the subject invention were obtained from a nematode-active B. thuringiensis (B.t.) isolate designated PS17. A subculture of B.t. PS17 and the E. coli host harboring the toxin genes of the invention were deposited in the permanent collection of the Northern Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, Ill., USA. The accession numbers are as follows: 
     B.t.PS17--NRRL B-18243--Deposited on Jul. 28, 1987. 
     E. coli NM522(pMYC1627)--NRRL B-18651--Deposited on May 11, 1990. 
     E. coli NM522(pMYC1628)--NRRL B-18652--Deposited on May 11, 1990. 
     The subject cultures have been deposited under conditions that assure that access to the cultures will be available during the pendency of this patent application to one determined by the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to be entitled thereto under 37 CFR 1.14 and 35 USC 122. The deposits are available as required by foreign patent laws in countries wherein counterparts of the subject application, or its progeny, are filed. However, it should be understood that the availability of a deposit does not constitute a license to practice the subject invention in derogation of patent rights granted by governmental action. 
     Further, the subject culture deposits will be stored and made available to the public in accord with the provisions of the Budapest Treaty for the Deposit of Microorganisms, i.e., they will be stored with all the care necessary to keep them viable and uncontaminated for a period of at least five years after the most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposit, and in any case, for a period of at least 30 (thirty) years after the date of deposit or for the enforceable life of any patent which may issue disclosing the cultures. The depositor acknowledges the duty to replace the deposits should the depository be unable to furnish a sample when requested, due to the condition of the deposit(s). All restrictions on the availability to the public of the subject culture deposits will be irrevocably removed upon the granting of a patent disclosing them. 
     The novel B.t. genes of the invention encode toxins which show activity against tested nematodes. The group of diseases described generally as helminthiasis is due to infection of an animal host with parasitic worms known as helminths. Helminthiasis is a prevalent and serious economic problem in domesticated animals such as swine, sheep, horses, cattle, goats, dogs, cats and poultry. Among the helminths, the group of worms described as nematodes causes wide-spread and often times serious infection in various species of animals. The most common genera of nematodes infecting the animals referred to above are Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Ostertagia, Nematodirus, Cooperia, Ascaris, Bunostomum, Oesophagostomum, Chabertia, Trichuris, Strongylus, Trichonema, Dictyocaulus, Capillaria, Heterakis, Toxocara, Ascaridia, Oxyuris, Ancylostoma, Uncinaria, Toxascaris, Caenorhabditis and Parascaris. Certain of these, such as Nematodirus, Cooperia, and Oesophagostomum, attack primarily the intestinal tract, while others, such as Dictyocaulus are found in the lungs. Still other parasites may be located in other tissues and organs of the body. 
     The toxins encoded by the novel B.t. genes of the invention are useful as nematocides for the control of soil nematodes and plant parasites selected from the genera Bursaphalenchus, Criconemella, Ditylenchus, Globodera, Helicotylenchus, Heterodera, Melodiogyne, Pratylenchus, Radolpholus, Rotelynchus, or Tylenchus. 
     Alternatively, because some plant parasitic nematodes are obligate parasites, genes coding for nematocidal B.t. toxins can be engineered into plant cells to yield nematode-resistant plants. The methodology for engineering plant cells is well established (cf. Nester, E. W., Gordon, M. P., Amasino, R. M. and Yanofsky, M. F., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:387-399, 1984). 
     The B.t. toxins of the invention can be administered orally in a unit dosage form such as a capsule, bolus or tablet, or as a liquid drench when used as an anthelmintic in mammals. The drench is normally a solution, suspension or dispersion of the active ingredient, usually in water, together with a suspending agent such as bentonite and a wetting agent or like excipient. Generally, the drenches also contain an antifoaming agent. Drench formulations generally contain from about 0.001 to 0.5% by weight of the active compound. Preferred drench formulations may contain from 0.01 to 0.1% by weight, the capsules and boluses comprise the active ingredient admixed with a carrier vehicle such as starch, talc, nagnesium stearate, or dicalcium phosphate. 
     Where it is desired to administer the toxin compounds in a dry, solid unit dosage form, capsules, boluses or tablets containing the desired amount of active compound usually are employed. These dosage forms are prepared by intimately and uniformly mixing the active ingredient with suitable finely divided diluents, fillers, disintegrating agents and/or binders such as starch, lactose, talc, magnesium stearate, vegetable gums and the like. Such unit dosage formulations may be varied widely with respect to their total weight and content of the antiparasitic agent, depending upon the factors such as the type of host animal to be treated, the severity and type of infection and the weight of the host. 
     When the active compound is to be administered via an animal feedstuff, it is intimately dispersed in the feed or used as a top dressing or in the form of pellets which may then be added to the finished feed or, optionally, fed separately. Alternatively, the antiparasitic compounds may be administered to animals parenterally, for example, by intraruminal, intramuscular, intratracheal, or subcutaneous injection, in which event the active ingredient is dissolved or dispersed in a liquid carrier vehicle. For parenteral administration, the active material is suitably admixed with an acceptable vehicle, preferably of the vegetable oil variety, such as peanut oil, cotton seed oil and the like. Other parenteral vehicles, such as organic preparations using solketal, glycerol, formal and aqueous parenteral formulations, are also used. The active compound or compounds are dissolved or suspended in the parenteral formulation for administration; such formulations generally contain from 0.005 to 5% by weight of the active compound. 
     When the toxins are administered as a component of the feed of the animals, or dissolved or suspended in the drinking water, compositions are provided in which the active compound or compounds are intimately dispersed in an inert carrier or diluent. By inert carrier is meant one that will not react with the antiparasitic agent and one that may be administered safely to animals. Preferably, a carrier for feed administration is one that is, or may be, an ingredient of the animal ration. 
     Suitable compositions include feed premixes or supplements in which the active ingredient is present in relatively large amounts and which are suitable for direct feeding to the animal or for addition to the feed either directly or after an intermediate dilution or blending step. Typical carriers or diluents suitable for such compositions include, for example, distillers&#39; dried grains, corn meal, citrus meal, fermentation residues, ground oyster shells, wheat shorts, molasses solubles, corn cob meal, edible bean mill feed, soya grits, crushed limestone and the like. 
     The toxin genes of the subject invention can be introduced into a wide variety of microbial hosts. Expression of the toxin gene results, directly or indirectly, in the intracellular production and maintenance of the nematicide. With suitable hosts, e.g., Pseudomonas, the microbes can be applied to the situs of nematodes where they will proliferate and be ingested by the nematodes. The result is a control of the nematodes. Alternatively, the microbe hosting the toxin gene can be treated under conditions that prolong the activity of the toxin produced in the cell. The treated cell then can be applied to the environment of target pest(s). The resulting product retains the toxicity of the B.t. toxin. 
     Where the B.t. toxin gene is introduced via a suitable vector into a microbial host, and said host is applied to the environment in a living state, it is essential that certain host microbes be used. Microorganism hosts are selected which are known to occupy the &#34;phytosphere&#34; (phylloplane, phyllosphere, rhizosphere, and/or rhizoplane) of one or more crops of interest. These microorganisms are selected so as to be capable of successfully competing in the particular environment (crop and other insect habitats) with the wild-type microorganisms, provide for stable maintenance and expression of the gene expressing the polypeptide pesticide, and, desirably, provide for improved protection of the nematicide from environmental degradation and inactivation. 
     A large number of microorganisms are known to inhabit the phylloplane (the surface of the plant leaves) and/or the rhizosphere (the soil surrounding plant roots) of a wide variety of important crops. These microorganisms include bacteria, algae, and fungi. Of particular interest are microorganisms, such as bacteria, e.g., genera Pseudomonas, Erwinia, Serratia, Klebsiella, Xanthomonas, Streptomyces, Rhizobium, Rhodopseudomonas, Methylophlius, Agrobacterium, Acetobacter, Lactobacillus, Arthrobacter, Azotobacter, Leuconostoc, and Alcaligenes; fungi, particularly yeast, e.g., genera Saccharomyces, Cryptococcus, Kluyveromyces, Sporobolomyces, Rhodotorula, and Aureobasidium. Of particular interest are such phytosphere bacterial species as Pseudomonas syringae. Pseudomonas fluorescens, Serratia marcescens, Acetobacter xylinum, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Rhodopseudomonas spheroides, Xanthomonas campestris, Rhizobium melioti, Alcaligenes entrophus, and Azotobacter vinlandii; and phytosphere yeast species such as Rhodotorula rubra, R. glutinis, R. marina, R. aurantiaca, Cryptococcus albidus, C. diffluens, C. laurentii, Saccharomyces rosei, S. pretoriensis, S. cerevisiae, Sporobolomyces roseus, S. odorus, Kluyveromyces veronae, and Aureobasidium pollulans. Of particular interest are the pigmented microorganisms. 
     A wide variety of ways are known and available for introducing the B.t. genes expressing the toxin into the microorganism host under conditions which allow for stable maintenance and expression of the gene. The transformants can be isolated in accordance with conventional ways, usually employing a selection technique, which allows for selection of the desired organism as against unmodified organisms or transferring organisms, when present. The transformants then can be tested for nematicidal activity. 
     Suitable host cells, where the nematicide-containing cells will be treated to prolong the activity of the toxin in the cell when the then treated cell is applied to the environment of target pest(s), may include either prokaryotes or eukaryotes, normally being limited to those cells which do not produce substances toxic to higher organisms, such as mammals. However, organisms which produce substances toxic to higher organisms could be used, where the toxin is unstable or the level of application sufficiently low as to avoid any possibility of toxicity to a mammalian host. As hosts, of particular interest will be the prokaryotes and the lower eukaryotes, such as fungi. Illustrative prokaryotes, both Gram-negative and positive, include Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia, Erwinia, Shigella, Salmonella, and Proteus; Bacillaceae; Rhizobiceae, such as Rhizobium; Spirillaceae, such as photobacterium, Zymomonas, Serratia, Aeromonas, Vibrio, Desulfovibrio, Spirillum; Lactobacillaceae; Pseudomonadaceae, such as Pseudomonas and Acetobacter; Azotobacteraceae and Nitrobacteraceae. Among eukaryotes are fungi, such as Phycomycetes and Ascomycetes, which includes yeast, such as Saccharomyces and Schizosaccharomyces; and Basidiomycetes yeast, such as Rhodotorula, Aureobasidium, Sporobolomyces, and the like. 
     Characteristics of particular interest in selecting a host cell for purposes of production include ease of introducing the B.t. gene into the host, availability of expression systems, efficiency of expression, stability of the nematicide in the host, and the presence of auxiliary genetic capabilities. Characteristics of interest for use as a nematicide microcapsule include protective qualities for the nematicide, such as thick cell walls, pigmentation, and intracellular packaging or formation of inclusion bodies; leaf affinity; lack of mammalian toxicity; attractiveness to pests for ingestion; ease of killing and fixing without damage to the toxin; and the like. Other considerations include ease of formulation and handling, economics, storage stability, and the like. 
     Host organisms of particular interest include yeast, such as Rhodotorula sp., Aureobasidium sp., Saccharomcyes sp., and Sporobolomyces sp.; phylloplane organisms such as Pseudomonas sp., Erwinia sp. and Flavobacterium sp.; or such other organisms as Escherichia, Lactobacillus sp., Bacillus sp., and the like. Specific organisms include Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus thuringiensis, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and the like. 
     The cell will usually be intact and be substantially in the proliferative form when treated, rather than in a spore form, although in some instances spores may be employed. 
     Treatment of the microbial cell, e.g., a microbe containing the B.t. toxin gene, can be by chemical or physical means, or by a combination of chemical and/or physical means, so long as the technique does not deleteriously affect the properties of the toxin, nor diminish the cellular capability in protecting the toxin. Examples of chemical reagents are halogenating agents, particularly halogens of atomic no. 17-80. More particularly, iodine can be used under mild conditions and for sufficient time to achieve the desired results. Other suitable techniques include treatment with aldehydes, such as formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde; anti-infectives, such as zephiran chloride and cetylpyridinium chloride; alcohols, such as isopropyl and ethanol; various histologic fixatives, such as Bouin&#39;s fixative and Helly&#39;s fixative (See: Humason, Gretchen L., Animal Tissue Techniques, W. H. Freeman and Company, 1967); or a combination of physical (heat) and chemical agents that preserve and prolong the activity of the toxin produced in the cell when the cell is administered to the host animal. Examples of physical means are short wavelength radiation such as gamma-radiation and X-radiation, freezing, UV irradiation, lyophilization, and the like. 
     The cells generally will have enhanced structural stability which will enhance resistance to environmental conditions. Where the pesticide is in a proform, the method of inactivation should be selected so as not to inhibit processing of the proform to the mature form of the pesticide by the target pest pathogen. For example, formaldehyde will crosslink proteins and could inhibit processing of the proform of a polypeptide pesticide. The method of inactivation or killing retains at least a substantial portion of the bio-availability or bioactivity of the toxin. 
     The cellular host containing the B.t. nematicidal gene may be grown in any convenient nutrient medium, where the DNA construct provides a selective advantage, providing for a selective medium so that substantially all or all of the cells retain the B.t. gene. These cells may then be harvested in accordance with conventional ways. Alternatively, the cells can be treated prior to harvesting. 
     The B.t. cells may be formulated in a variety of ways. They may be employed as wettable powders, granules or dusts, by mixing with various inert materials, such as inorganic minerals (phyllosilicates, carbonates, sulfates, phosphates, and the like) or botanical materials (powdered corncobs, rice hulls, walnut shells, and the like). The formulations may include spreader-sticker adjuvants, stabilizing agents, other pesticidal additives, or surfactants. Liquid formulations may be aqueous-based or non-aqueous and employed as foams, gels, suspensions, emulsifiable concentrates, or the like. The ingredients may include rheological agents, surfactants, emulsifiers, dispersants, or polymers. 
     The nematicide concentration will vary widely depending upon the nature of the particular formulation, particularly whether it is a concentrate or to be used directly. The nematicide will be present in at least 1% by weight and may be 100% by weight. The dry formulations will have from about 1-95% by weight of the nematicide while the liquid formulations will generally be from about 1-60% by weight of the solids in the liquid phase. The formulations will generally have from about 10 2  to about 10 4  cells/mg. These formulations will be administered at about 50 mg (liquid or dry) to 1 kg or more per hectare. 
     The formulations can be applied to the environment of the nematodes, e.g., plants, soil or water, by spraying, dusting, sprinkling, or the like. 
     Following are examples which illustrate procedures, including the best mode, for practicing the invention. These examples should not be construed as limiting. All percentages are by weight and all solvent mixture proportions are by volume unless otherwise noted. 
     Example 1--Culturing B.t. PS17, NRRL B-18243 
     A subculture of B.t. PS17, NRRL B-18243, can be used to inoculate the following medium, a peptone, glucose, salts medium. 
     
         ______________________________________                                    
Bacto Peptone     7.5         g/l                                         
Glucose           1.0         g/l                                         
KH.sub.2 PO.sub.4 3.4         g/l                                         
K.sub.2 HPO.sub.4 4.35        g/l                                         
Salt Solution     5.0         ml/l                                        
CaCl.sub.2 Solution                                                       
                  5.0         ml/l                                        
Salts Solution (100 ml)                                                   
MgSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2 O                                                     
                  2.46        g                                           
MnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2 O                                                      
                  0.04        g                                           
ZnSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2 O                                                     
                  0.28        g                                           
FeSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2 O                                                     
                  0.40        g                                           
CaCl.sub.2 Solution (100 ml)                                              
CaCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2 O                                                     
                  3.66        g                                           
pH 7.2                                                                    
______________________________________                                    
 
    
     The salts solution and CaCl 2  solution are filter-sterilized and added to the autoclaved and cooked broth at the time of inoculation. Flasks are incubated at 30° C. on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm for 64 hr. 
     Example 2--Purification and N-Terminal Sequncing of B.t. Isolate PS17 
     The Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) isolate used as the source of nematicidal toxin protein of the subject invention is identified as B.t. strain PS17. The culture was grown using standard media and fermentation techniques well known in the art. The toxin protein inclusions were harvested by standard sedimentation centrifugation. The recovered protein inclusions were partially purified by sodium bromide (28-38%) isopycnic gradient centrifugation (Pfannenstiel, M. A., E. J. Ross, V. C. Kramer, and K. W. Nickerson [1984] FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 21:39). Thereafter the individual toxin proteins were resolved by solubilizing the crystalline protein complex in an alkali buffer and fractionating the individual proteins by DEAE-sepharose CL-6B (Sigma Chem. Co., St. Louis, Mo.) chromatography by step-wise increments of increasing concentrations of an NaCl-containing buffer (Reichenberg, D., in Ion Exchangers in Organic and Biochemistry [C. Calmon and T. R. E. Kressman, eds.], Interscience, New York, 1957). Fractions containing protein toxic for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (CE), were bound to PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) by western blotting techniques (Towbin, H., T. Staehelin, and K. Gordon [1979] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4350) and the N-terminal amino acids were determined by the standard Edman reaction with an automated gas-phase sequenator (Hunkapiller, M. W., R. M. Hewick, W. L. Dreyer, and L. E. Hood [1983] Meth. Enzymol. 91:399). From these sequence data an oligonucleotide probe was designed by utilizing a codon frequency table assembled from available nucleotide sequence data of other B.t. toxin genes. The probe was synthesized on an Applied Biosystems, Inc. DNA synthesis machine. 
     The above procedure can be readily scaled up to large fermentors by procedures well known in the art. 
     The B.t. spores and/or crystals, obtained in the above fermentation, can be isolated by procedures well known in the art. A frequently-used procedure is to subject the harvested fermentation broth to separation techniques, e.g., centrifugation. 
     Example 3--Cloning of Four Novel Toxin Genes from B.t. PS17 and Transformation into Escherichia coli. 
     Total cellular DNA was prepared by growing the cells B.t. PS17 to a low optical density (OD 600  =1.0) and recovering the cells by centrifugation. The cells were protoplasted in TES buffer (30 mM Tris-Cl, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, pH=8.0) containing 20% sucrose and 50 mg/ml lysozyme. The protoplasts were lysed by addition of SDS to a final concentration of 4%. The cellular material was precipitated overnight at 4° C. in 100 mM (final concentration) neutral potassium chloride. The supernate was extracted twice with phenol/chloroform (1:1). The DNA was precipitated with ethanol and purified by isopycnic banding on a cesium chloride-ethidium bromide gradient. 
     Total cellular DNA from PS17 was digested with EcoRI and separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% (w/v) Agarose-TAE (50 mM Tris-HCL, 20 ram NaOAc, 2.5 mM EDTA, pH=8.0) buffered gel. A Southern blot of the gel was hybridized with a [ 32  P]--radiolabeled oligonucleotide probe derived from the N-terminal amino acid sequence of purified 130 kDa protein from PS17. The sequence of the oligonucleotide synthesized is (GCAATTTTAAATGAATTATATCC). Results showed that the hybridizing EcoRI fragments of PS17 are 5.0 kb, 4.5 kb, 2.7 kb and 1.8kb in size, presumptively identifying at least four new nematode-active toxin genes, PS17d, PS17b, PS17a and PS17e, respectively. 
     A library was constructed from PS17 total cellular DNA partially digested with Sau3A and size fractionated by electrophoresis. The 9 to 23 kb region of the gel was excised and the DNA was electroeluted and then concentrated using an Elutip™ ion exchange column (Schleicher and Schuel, Keene NH). The isolated Sau3A fragments were ligated into LambdaGEM-11™ (PROMEGA). The packaged phage were plated on KW251 E. coli cells(PROMEGA) at a high titer and screened using the above radiolabeled synthetic oligonucleotide as a nucleic acid hybridization probe. Hybridizing plaques were purified and rescreened at a lower plaque density. Single isolated purified plaques that hybridized with the probe were used to infect KW251 E. coli cells in liquid culture for preparation of phage for DNA isolation. DNA was isolated by standard procedures. 
     Recovered recombinant phage DNA was digested with EcoRI and separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose-TAE gel. The gel was Southern blotted and hybridized with the oligonucleotide probe to characterize the toxin genes isolated from the lambda library. Two patterns were present, clones containing the 4.5 kb (PS17b) or the 2.7 kb (PS17a) EcoRI fragments. Preparative amounts of phage DNA were digested with SalI (to release the inserted DNA from lambda arms) and separated by electrophoresis on a 0.6% agarose-TAE gel. The large fragments, electroeluted and concentrated as described above, were ligated to SalI-digested and dephosphorylated pBClac. The ligation mix was introduced by transformation into NM522 competent E. coli cells and plated on LB agar containing ampicillin, isopropyl-(Beta)-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) and 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-indolyl-(Beta)-D-galactoside(XGAL). White colonies, with putative insertions in the (Beta)-galactosidase gene of pBClac, were subjected to standard rapid plasmid purification procedures to isolate the desired plasmids. The selected plasmid containing the 2.7 kb EcoRI fragment was named pMYC1627 and the plasmid containing the 4.5 kb EcoRI fragment was called pMYC1628. 
     The toxin genes were sequenced by the standard Sanger dideoxy chain termination method using the synthetic oligonucleotide probe, disclosed above, and by &#34;walking&#34; with primers made to the sequence of the new toxin genes. 
     The various methods employed in the preparation of the plasmids and transformation of host organisms are well known in the art. These procedures are all described in Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Thus, it is within the skill of those in the genetic engineering art to extract DNA from microbial cells, perform restriction enzyme digestions, electrophorese DNA fragments, tail and anneal plasmid and insert DNA, ligate DNA, transform cells, prepare plasmid DNA, electrophorese proteins, and sequence DNA. 
     The restriction enzymes disclosed herein can be purchased from Bethesda Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg, Md., or New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass. The enzymes are used according to the instructions provided by the supplier. 
     The PS17 toxin genes were subcloned into the shuttle vector pHT3101 (Lereclus, D. et al. [1989] FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 60:211-218) using standard methods for expression in B.t..Briefly, SalI fragments containing the PS17a and b toxin genes were isolated from pMYC1629 and pMYC1627, respectively, by preparative agarose gel electrophoresis, electroelution, and concentrated, as described above. These concentrated fragments were ligated into SalI-cleaved and phosphatased pHT3101. The ligation mixtures were used separately to transform frozen, competent E. coli NM522. Plasmids from each respective recombinant E. coli strain were prepared by alkaline lysis and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The resulting subclones, pMYC2311 and pMYC2309, harbored the PS17a and b toxin genes, respectively. These plasmids were transformed into the acrystalliferous B.t. strain, HD-1 cryB (Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind.), by standard electroporation techniques (Instruction Manual, Biorad, Richmond, Calif.). 
     Recombinant B.t. strains HD-1 cryB [pMYC2311] and [pMYC2309] were grown to sporulation and the proteins purified by NaBr gradient centrifugation as described above for the wild-type B.t. proteins. 
     Example 4--Activity of the B.t. Toxin Protein and Gene Product Against Caenorhabditis elegans 
     Caenorhabditis elegans (CE) was cultured as described by Simpkin and Coles (J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 31:66-69, 1981) in corning (Corning Glass Works, Corning, N.Y.) 24-well tissue culture plates containing 1 ml S-basal media, 0.5 mg ampicillin and 0.01 mg cholesterol. Each well also contained ca. 10 8  cells of Escherichia coli strain OP-50, a uracil auxotroph. The wells were seeded with ca. 100-200 CE per well and incubated at 20° C. Samples of protein (obtained from the wild type B.t. or the recombinant B.t.) were added to the wells by serial dilution. Water served as the control as well as the vehicle to introduce the proteins to the wells. 
     Each of the wells were examined daily and representative results are as follows: 
     
         ______________________________________                                    
       % KILL                                                             
μg toxin                                                               
         pMYC2309       pMYC2311  PS17                                    
______________________________________                                    
100      25             50        75                                      
32       25             50        75                                      
10       50             25        50                                      
 1        0              0         0                                      
______________________________________                                    
 
    
     Example 5--Activity Against the Plant Nematodes Pratylenchus spp. 
     The toxin encoded by B.t. PS17a has been found to be active against Pratylenchus spp. The activity is approximately at the same level as is disclosed in Example 4 against C. elegans. 
     Species of Pratylenchus, for example, P. scribneri and P. redivivous, are known pathogens of many economically important crops including corn, peanuts, soybean, alfalfa, beans, tomato, and citrus. These &#34;root lesion&#34; nematodes are the second most economically damagging genus of plant parasitic nematodes (after Meliodogyne--the &#34;root knot&#34; nematode), and typify the migratory endoparasites. 
     It is well known in the art that the amino acid sequence of a protein is determined by the nucleotide sequence of the DNA. Because of the redundancy of the genetic code, i.e., more than one coding nucleotide triplet (codon) can be used for most of the amino acids used to make proteins, different nucleotide sequences can code for a particular amino acid. Thus, the genetic code can be depicted as follows: 
     
         ______________________________________                                    
Phenylalanine (Phe)                                                       
             TTK      Histidine (His)                                     
                                     CAK                                  
Leucine (Leu)                                                             
             XTY      Glutamine (Gln)                                     
                                     CAJ                                  
Isoleucine (Ile)                                                          
             ATM      Asparagine (Asn)                                    
                                     AAK                                  
Methionine (Met)                                                          
             ATG      Lysine (Lys)   AAJ                                  
Valine (Val) GTL      Aspartic acid (Asp)                                 
                                     GAK                                  
Serine (Ser) QRS      Glutamic acid (Glu)                                 
                                     GAJ                                  
Proline (Pro)                                                             
             CCL      Cysteine (Cys) TGK                                  
Threonine (Thr)                                                           
             ACL      Tryptophan (Trp)                                    
                                     TGG                                  
Alanine (Ala)                                                             
             GCL      Arginine (Arg) WGZ                                  
Tyrosine (Tyr)                                                            
             TAK      Glycine (Gly)  GGL                                  
Termination signal                                                        
             TAJ                                                          
______________________________________                                    
 
    
     Key: Each 3-letter deoxynucleotide triplet corresponds to a trinucleotide of mRNA, having a 5&#39;-end on the left and a 3&#39;-end on the right. All DNA sequences given herein are those of the strand whose sequence correspond to the mRNA sequence, with thymine substituted for uracil. The letters stand for the purine or pyrimidine bases forming the deoxynucleotide sequence. 
     A=adenine 
     G=guanine 
     C=cytosine 
     T=thymine 
     X=T or C if Y is A or G 
     X=C if Y is C or T 
     Y=A, G, C or T if X is C 
     Y=A or G if X is T 
     W=C or A if Z is A or G 
     W=C if Z is C or T 
     Z=A, G, C or T if W is C 
     Z=A or G if W is A 
     QR=TC if S is A, G, C or T; alternatively QR=AG if S is T or C 
     J=A or G 
     K=T or C 
     L=A, T, C or G 
     M=A, C or T 
     The above shows that the novel amino acid sequence of the B.t. toxins can be prepared by equivalent nucleotide sequences encoding the same amino acid sequence of the protein. Accordingly, the subject invention includes such equivalent nucleotide sequences. In addition it has been shown that proteins of identified structure and function may be constructed by changing the amino acid sequence if such changes do not alter the protein secondary structure (Kaiser, E. T. and Kezdy, F. J. [1984] Science 223:249-255). Thus, the subject invention includes mutants of the amino acid sequence depicted herein which do not alter the protein secondary structure, or if the structure is altered, the biological activity is substantially retained. Further, the invention also includes mutants of organisms hosting all or part of a toxin encoding a gene of the invention. Such microbial mutants can be made by techniques well known to persons skilled in the art. For example, UV irradiation can be used to prepare mutants of host organisms. Likewise, such mutants may include asporogenous host cells which also can be prepared by procedures well known in the art.