Flight Crew Instrument; Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Multiengine
Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Clearance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Flight Crew Overcame Equipment Problem; Flight Crew Took Evasive Action; General Flight Cancelled / Delayed; General Maintenance Action
Aircraft
On final at the final approach fix for Runway XXR at 170 knots we configured aircraft with gear and final flaps of 25. We received and EICAS message of TE Flap Disagree"; the flap indicator was between 20 and 25. We evaluated the situation and discussed how the go around would be executed; then informed ATC and performed a go around without flap retraction not exceeding 137 KTS. We successfully ran the QRH and were vectored back to [Runway] XXC to an uneventful landing with a reference speed of 127 KTS and taxied to the gate. We notified ATC knowing we would be in a non-normal landing configuration. Emergency vehicles were not requested but present for the landing."
On Runway XXR at the final approach fix at 170 KTS we configured aircraft with gear and final flaps 25.  We received an EICAS message of TE FLAP DISAGREE" the flap indicator read between 20 and 25 degrees.  We evaluated the situation; discussed how the go around would be performed not exceeding 137 KTS.  While being vectored back to land we ran QRH successfully and were vectored back to [Runway] XXC to an uneventful landing with a reference speed of 127 KTS and taxied to park.  We did notify ATC knowing that we would be in an abnormal flap configuration.  Emergency vehicles were not requested but present."
Flight Crew reported a Go Around after the Trailing Edge Flaps did not extend due to flap assymetry.