Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Maintenance Airframe; Maintenance Powerplant
Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Maintenance
General None Reported / Taken
Procedure; Company Policy; Manuals
I'll try to explain the irregularities in the several different ways. In EASA authority regulations; there shouldn't have been a department named or tagged 'Technical Support Staff;' but in the Company; there is. Also technical support staff and aircraft maintenance engineers work on the exact same aircraft and do [the] same job; but they're still paid [a] different salary.In the company; the AMM (Aircraft Maintenance Manual) is completely ignored. During work; all [of] the technical staff get prevented work with [the] AMM. They always desire to lead by [the] AMM during work on [the] aircraft; but almost all [of] the managers in the company block it. Authorized staff always slack in the boards [and] they never work. Only the non-authorized staff work in the aircraft. Task Cards/NRCs (Non Routine Card) of work are closed without checking by C/Ss.Technical staff are forced by [the] managers to finish work early in almost all [of] the maintenance applications. For example; [one may be] appointed 120 hours of work in Task Cards/NRCs [but] get [it] finished by force in 20 hours. Inappropriate/inconvenient work in AMM have made the technical staff [work] by force by managers. All [of] these irregular elements and more in Cabin Interior Maintenance; Component Maintenance etc. are hidden by the company to [avoid] detection by [the] EASA and FAA.
Individual reported that the Contracted Maintenance provider was not using approved technical data to service aircraft.