Widebody; Low Wing; 2 Turbojet Eng
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Situational Awareness; Fatigue; Confusion; Communication Breakdown; Physiological - Other
Deviation - Track / Heading All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Clearance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Flight Crew Became Reoriented; Flight Crew Executed Go Around / Missed Approach; Flight Crew Requested ATC Assistance / Clarification; Flight Crew Took Evasive Action
Chart Or Publication; Human Factors; MEL
Arrived in the terminal area at Chicago O'Hare and we were vectored for the ILS Approach 28C.  We intercepted the localizer and glide slope and contacted tower at the marker.  When I called tower I noticed and verbally said we are on the ILS 28R from reading it off the ND.  Immediately the Captain told me to tell tower we were executing the missed approach and shortly after ATC advised 28R was closed.  At that time we realized we were on the wrong approach.  We executed the missed approach and the subsequent approach to ILS 28C was executed to an Autoland due to weather.The main factor for me was fatigue.  I had been awake for 17 hours and was unable to sleep in the crew rest seats.  Without being able to lie flat and the noise of the bathroom toilet flushing I did not get adequate rest.  The approach to 28R was loaded in the box the whole time however we briefed an Autoland to 28C.
During preflight; I programmed 28R in the FMC. Upon arrival at ORD; ATIS calling for ILS 28C. Briefed approach for 28C; but failed to change FMC approach page to 28C. Executed a go around at the outer marker for 28R and received vectors for 28C; followed by an uneventful landing on 28C.
A crew on approach to ORD Runway 28R executed a go-around when they realized at the outer marker that ATIS reported the runway closed. The FMS had been programmed during preflight hours earlier; but the fatigued crew forgot to change the arrival data.