PA-46 Malibu/Malibu Mirage/Malibu Matrix
Flight Crew Instrument; Flight Crew Multiengine; Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 207; Flight Crew Total 8800; Flight Crew Type 477
Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Maintenance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy; Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence
Aircraft Equipment Problem Dissipated; Flight Crew Took Evasive Action; General Maintenance Action
Aircraft; Procedure; Weather
On departure from ZZZ single pilot with no passengers under Part 91; IMC; light rain and smooth air climbing through 11;400 feet to assigned altitude; I encountered microburst. The aircraft indicated a stabilized climb speed of 125 kts the instantaneously indicated about 260 kts (Vne is 188 kts) of PFD 1; PFD 2 and Standby Instruments. What I believe was torsional tail flutter also occurred. The microburst or wind shear event lasted about thirty seconds then normal flight returned.Upon safely landing I contacted Piper; for guidance on appropriate inspection as outlined by Piper factory engineers. The safety issue of potential structural damage to my aircraft; a Piper M500 has never been addressed by Company nor Aircraft Manufacturer after several documented verbal and written correspondence with both parties. With the history of structural failure of the PA-46 series; especially; the turbine powered versions I would expect some form of established Engineering Order readily available for owners and operators of this aircraft because of the performance envelope.We have gone to extremes to find a corrective action in the form of reasonably inspection to assure safety of flight; but Company and Aircraft Manufacturer are refusing to support their product thus creating a safety problem that will most likely present in the future as an inflight structural failure. Their position is that if they handle or touch the aircraft; when there is structural failure both parties will have shared financial liability. As of today; the Companies' position is stating Aircraft X is safe for flight without any further inspections.These Companies are voluntarily negligent in assuring the structural integrity of Aircraft X as is required by CFR's; federal and state law. Please assess the urgency this matter needs.
PA-46 pilot reported an inability to get the aircraft manufacturer to provide technical guidance for required inspection procedures following an in flight structural failure.