Citation Excel (C560XL)
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Flight Instructor; Flight Crew Multiengine
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 103; Flight Crew Total 7968; Flight Crew Type 770
Distraction; Situational Awareness; Time Pressure
ATC Issue All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural FAR; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
General None Reported / Taken
Airport; Human Factors
Landing at HEF was not notified that 16L was closed until inside of 10 miles of airport. I had failed to see this in the NOTAMs in preflight planning. We changed to landing 16R. No problem landing however; after the fact; we realized the required FAR 135 landing distance was 300 feet longer than the actual runway. Aircraft FAR 91 landing distance was well inside of runway length.Contributing factors included: a rushed; late night; flight and a late notification from ATC of the runway closure.Corrective actions would include the need to slow down and complete preflight planning and ATC could notify of runway closures earlier to allow time to change airports.
The pilot of a CE650XL failed to note that Runway 16L at his destination was NOTAM'd closed.  When advised on short final he opted to land on the parallel runway which he later realized was shorter than the Part 135 required length which was applicable to his operation.