B767 Undifferentiated or Other Model
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Multiengine; Flight Crew Instrument
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 144
Communication Breakdown
Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Hazardous Material Violation; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Weight And Balance
General None Reported / Taken
Human Factors
Upon initial departure from ZZZ Aircraft X was forced to return to the same gate due to a cargo loading issue.  Because of the issue; no final weight manifest was delivered to the aircraft; although we had a final DG (dangeous goods) summary. Upon return to gate; some passengers requested to disembark. Cargo was verified and the close out was completed. Departure from the gate was accomplished with the confirmation that no DG was loaded in the bulk pit.  Final weights were delayed due to a computer issue posting the weights to a now out of date flight on the second departure.  Once final weights were delivered; ACARS was unable to retrieve T/O (takeoff) data due to several issues. Re-initialization of ACARS was attempted to fix the problem; unsuccessfully. Dispatch provided final weights; T/O data; and the flight departed. During the flight; the FO (First Officer) requested a final weights manifest for the flight to compare against what he thought was the initial [weight manifest].  Since there was never an initial [weight manifest]; the comparison was against the same document; although a final DG summary printed with this request.  This resulted in a situation where the flight crew was not accurately informed of actual cargo loaded since we were informed there was no DG loaded in the bulk pit; yet still had a Final DG Loaded form with the [manifest].
B-767 First Officer reported during cruise that flight crew was not accurately informed of actual DG cargo loaded after a ground gate return.