Large Transport
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Distraction; Confusion; Communication Breakdown
ATC Issue All Types; Conflict Airborne Conflict; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Flight Crew Took Evasive Action
Airspace Structure; Procedure
Takeoff clearance from MIA 26L was fly heading 290; cleared for takeoff.  At about 200 feet pilot flying noticed an aircraft out left window; Aircraft Y on a converging heading and started a right turn away from the aircraft.  At the same time ATC said to immediately turn right to 340 heading.  Later ATC said the other aircraft went around from Runway 30.  No other information was passed.We never heard the other aircraft say it was going around or ATC advise of the other aircraft's converging flight path.  Seems Runway 30 and Runway 26L have different frequencies.
Issued takeoff clearance from MIA Tower for 26L with assigned heading 290. Normal takeoff executed. At approximately 200 feet AGL Captain took evasive action (hard right turn) to avoid Aircraft Y executing a go-around from their approach to RWY 30. As Captain was beginning his hard turn Mia Tower simultaneously directed right turn to 340 in an attempt to prevent conflict with go-around aircraft. Captain's immediate action prevented a possible collision. We may have out climbed and passed above the other aircraft but it would have been very close.Suggest MIA Tower ensure aircraft have landed on RWY 30 before issuing takeoff clearance for aircraft waiting to depart 26L. Suggest MIA develop go around procedures for RWY 30 that do not conflict with RWY 26 takeoffs. Suggest MIA use same frequency for RWY 30 and RWY 26.
Reporters state that while departing and turning to initial heading assigned by ATC; they observed another air carrier in close proximity and took evasive action turning way from it.