B767-300 and 300 ER
Maintenance Powerplant; Maintenance Airframe
Communication Breakdown; Confusion; Training / Qualification; Workload
Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural FAR; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Maintenance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
General Maintenance Action
Company Policy; Human Factors; Logbook Entry; Staffing; Aircraft; Manuals
Aircraft X had a BTB for a Captain pitot static amber EICAS warning. We quickly determined it was a probe. We have an FAK with a R/H probe in inventory. We needed an LH probe. We were able to get one from company; we installed the probe; Ops checked probe; accomplished the paperwork. Had multiple conversations with Tech and [Maintenance Control]. Deferred the aerodynamic sealant with a 767 desk. No mention in B767 MM 34-11-01 OF RII . ETOPS was noted for ice/rain (mm 30-31). When I awoke this AM; I had a friend look up in GMM ATA 34 FOR RII and then notified [Maintenance Control] of a possible situation my next step was my report. There was 1 mechanic at ZZZ that was ETOPS qualified; me who accomplished task; [and] we had another who was RII but not ETOPS.
Technician reported not having correct qualifications to perform and sign off the log book for a Captain's Pitot Probe replacement.