A319
Confusion; Communication Breakdown
ATC Issue All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Air Traffic Control Issued New Clearance; Flight Crew Became Reoriented
Human Factors; ATC Equipment / Nav Facility / Buildings
The PDC had a filed route of IAD BUNZZ 2 Ramay.  There was no revised segment.  However; in the REMARKS section it said CAPITAL 8 DEPARTURE.  So that's what we thought we were supposed to load in the FMGC.  After a Tower assigned heading of 230 after takeoff from 19L we were switched to Departure Control.  They cleared us direct to TIICE intersection and the remainder of the BUNZZ 2 Departure.  I told the Controller the PDC said the CAPITOL 8.  There was no deviation on our part but it is confusing from the PDC which departure they wanted us to fly. It is not safe to be heads down reprogramming the box shortly after takeoff; in my opinion.
The filed and cleared route is the BUNZZ 2 SID but the remarks state CAPITAL 8 DEPARTURE.  Tower assigned us a 230 heading with our takeoff clearance from 19L and we departed using the Capital 8 Departure.  Departure Control gave us direct TIICE; the first fix on the BUNZZ 2 SID; which had us scrambling to quickly insert it due to the FMGC not capable of loading both the Capital 8 and the BUNZZ 2 into the box.  This is ambiguous and confusing.  No lateral or vertical deviation occurred but this needs to be addressed as it is a setup for an error and greatly doubled the workload on the initial climbout.
A319 flight crew receives a confusing PDC which they interpret incorrectly and insert the wrong SID in the FMGC.  This is quickly straightened out after departure with no appreciable track deviation.