Boeing Company Undifferentiated or Other Model
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Multiengine; Flight Crew Instrument
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 133; Flight Crew Total 14068; Flight Crew Type 1633
Deviation - Track / Heading All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Clearance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural FAR; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Air Traffic Control Issued Advisory / Alert; Air Traffic Control Issued New Clearance; Flight Crew Requested ATC Assistance / Clarification
Chart Or Publication
This incident that occurred on our ZZZ-ZZZ1. As we approached Kabul airspace; our filed routing was from PINAX waypoint V848 to SURVI M881 to DI. Upon checking in with Kabul Control; we were rerouted PINAX P764 LAJAK then flight plan route. This routing was not in the our database and we informed ATC. They asked if we had NOTAM G2465/20. We asked them to standby while we checked. ATC then cleared us to waypoint GULNI then LAJAK. We informed ATC that GULNI was also not in our database. ATC then informed us that V848 airway was discontinued as of 03 Dec 20 per the Notam and replaced with airway P764 and read the NOTAM to us over the frequency. We were then cleared direct to LAJAK and requested to report abeam SURVI intersection. This new routing (and the new airway as well) takes us off of the preferred routing prescribed in the manual. A new route will need to be developed to comply with the new airway - P764. Additionally; this is certainly not an area where we need to be getting vectored off of an established airway because it is not in our database. We were caught completely off guard by this and in reporting it to our dispatcher; she was unaware of it as well. Along with the new airway; the new waypoint GULNI needs to be added as well.
Air carrier pilot reported that the route database for the flight was out of date.