Super King Air 200
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Multiengine; Flight Crew Instrument; Flight Crew Flight Instructor
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 15; Flight Crew Total 3800; Flight Crew Type 376
ATC Issue All Types; Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter
General Physical Injury / Incapacitation
Environment - Non Weather Related; Procedure
I was operating a flight from PHX.  I was issued a taxi clearance to Runway 25L.  I started the taxi to the runway and advised Ground Control that I would need a few minutes at the end of a run-up; the controller said no problem and advised the tower when you're ready.Tower issued me a takeoff clearance; runway heading.  [An A320 NEO] had started the takeoff roll but stayed on the [runway] for about 10 seconds after I started my takeoff roll; and I was about 1000 feet down the runway before [he] took off.  After we rotated I was aware of the wake turbulence but was not expecting the Controller to turn me left into his wake turbulence.  I was given a left turn into the wake turbulence. It was more than I expected and the passengers were thrown around in the back and both complained about their necks being sore and they seemed to be upset. The Controller gave me a hand off to Departure and I advised him that I hit the wake turbulence. The flight continued as normal and once we landed I was advised that the back of the aircraft took a hard hit and threw open a set of cabin doors and tossed all the secured baggage around. I spoke with the passengers the next morning and they complained of some soreness and mostly shook up from the experience. After a lot of thought; as the PIC; I should have declined the take off clearance and waited a few more minutes.  I believe that more separation should be given to the Airbus NEO aircraft.
Reporter stated the A320 NEO appears to have a stronger wake than other similar size aircraft.
Small Turboprop pilot reported encountering wake turbulence departing PHX in trail of an A320 NEO.