A321
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Situational Awareness
ATC Issue All Types; Deviation - Track / Heading All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Clearance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Air Traffic Control Issued New Clearance; Flight Crew Became Reoriented; Flight Crew Returned To Clearance
Human Factors; Procedure
Our flight was filed as follows: MCOY1 ORL DCT CRG J53 DUNKN J53 GRADY J53 IRQ SPA J85 HVQ...   Our PDC showed a change to the departure as follows: MCOY1 SAV TRANSITION as filed. This transition does not connect to the filed route. After verifying the box with the filed route; we proceeded to taxi for takeoff.After getting airborne; ATC told us to fly direct to GUANO. When we told him that that fix was not in our flight plan; he had us intercept the 355 degree radial inbound to ORL. We proceeded to do this (backed up with raw data).  This is when we discovered that we never had the MCOY1 SAV transition in the box. The controller agreed with us; that the departure was incorrect in that his information showed ORL as the starting point and ending point for the departure.  We told the controller that we would inform our company of this error in the transition. He mentioned that he would do the same. The departure transition does not connect with the filed route. This should have been corrected on the ground at the gate.
Standardize the PDC so they are ALL the same; especially related to a change in clearance. I expected a change in our flight plan to be dashed and at the top of the PDC.
A321 flight crew reported a track deviation resulted when they incorrectly programmed the FMS after receiving a confusing PDC.