EMB ERJ 170/175 ER/LR
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Instrument; Flight Crew Multiengine
Communication Breakdown; Workload
Deviation - Speed All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy; Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach
Flight Crew Executed Go Around / Missed Approach
Human Factors; Weather
A combination of inclement weather on approach; and ATC keeping flight crew at a higher altitude than comfortable in order to shoot a stabilized approach resulted in the flight crew's decision to execute a go-around. Upon go-around PF (FO) (Pilot Flying; First Officer) exclaimed 'missed approach; toga; flaps 2'. PM (CA) (Pilot Monitoring; Captain) immediately began coordination with ATC. ATC instructed the crew to fly runway heading at an assigned altitude. PM failed to stay within SOP of the go around profile while talking to ATC. Simultaneously PF became task saturated to flying the missed approach. ATC issued a new altitude and heading. PM began twisting new heading and setting new altitude. PF then began flying the turn. During the turn PF noticed the airspeed decreasing and the PLI (Pilot Limit Indicator) appear. PF pushed the nose down and exclaimed 'gear up; speed up!' reaching for the gear handle and twisting the speed bug. At this moment the stick shaker occurred and the PF recovered. Following this occurrence the crew shot another approach and discussed what happened on the ground. From this pilots perspective this was a breakdown in CRM and SOP. As PF I was focused on flying the aircraft and relied on my PM to handle his call outs and secondary tasks. Once the 'positive rate' callout was neglected the system collapsed. I would suggest that because missed approaches are not that common; it would be wise to brief the proper callouts and procedures during the approach briefing; I intend to do so moving forward.
ERJ First Officer reported a deviation from SOP that led to stick shaker activation while performing a missed approach.