SR20
Flight Crew Commercial; Flight Crew Flight Instructor; Flight Crew Instrument; Flight Crew Multiengine
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 250; Flight Crew Total 2700; Flight Crew Type 1200
Communication Breakdown; Confusion; Situational Awareness
Conflict NMAC; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural FAR; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Flight Crew Took Evasive Action
Human Factors
I had taken my student to CMA for pattern work. During the course of doing pattern work; we had begun doing abnormal landing configuration training. After several patterns; we were cleared for the option Number 3; behind an Arrow joining downwind abeam the numbers. Initially; we did not have any aircraft in sight; and I had my student report negative contact to the Tower. We continued on downwind. Shortly thereafter; due to my student's accent; the Tower did not understand that we did not have the aircraft in sight. He used the verbiage 'aircraft not in sight.' Not fully understanding; the controller asked if we did or did not have traffic in sight. At that point; we noticed a plane landing behind us; and another off our left wing on final. My student reported traffic in sight as we had an aircraft clearly visible passing our left wing on final. At this point; I made the mistake of not having my student verify with Tower that the aircraft at our 9 o'clock was in fact the traffic we were to follow. We turned base to follow traffic as we thought we were sequenced properly. As we began to turn final I saw an aircraft at our 3 o'clock; converging quickly; and took evasive action to avoid a collision. I rejoined the south downwind; and continued in for an uneventful landing. To avoid the scenario; we should have checked final more thoroughly; and should have verified the traffic was the correct aircraft.
SR20 flight instructor reported an NMAC with another light aircraft in the pattern at CMA airport.