Regional Jet 900 (CRJ900)
Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Other / Unknown; Confusion
Deviation - Track / Heading All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Clearance; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Air Traffic Control Issued New Clearance; Flight Crew Became Reoriented
Chart Or Publication; Human Factors
Taking off from okc we briefed the dep hdg 175 on the TRUPR 1 during our takeoff briefing. Before takeoff I pulled up the dep text just to make sure we were doing the correct hdg and I misread hdg 200. Knowing I was correct that's what we did. After turning and then switching to dep we realized I was wrong. No other deviations occurred. When looking at sids make sure you are looking at the correct airport when there are numerous airports with like runways.
While departing from OKC on the TRUPR1 departure; the captain (pilot monitoring) was performing his duties while following our previously briefed takeoff and departure; which included flying runway heading on the RNAV departure. As the captain checked in with departure; he swung the heading bug to a heading of 200 and informed ATC that we were climbing (stating leaving altitude climbing for published altitude) and in the turn to 200. I told him the departure was fly runway heading and went to correct; but by this time ATC had acknowledged our position and issued new instructions. She also inquired as to whether the heading of 200 was assigned in our clearance; to which the captain replied it was. As we turned to a new heading assigned by ATC; I insisted that there was a mistake and as we reviewed the chart he realized that just prior to takeoff; he had enlarged the plate on his ipad and had read only the textual content of the departure for a different airport sharing the TRUPR1. Unfortunately; this airport had a similar runway configuration and he reacted and contacted ATC so quickly; believing that we were doing what we should; that by the time the error was realized we had already checked in and been issued new ATC instructions.Clear communication: we had briefed the departure; but when the captain saw what he thought was a problem with the brief we should have discussed it rather than one pilot taking unilateral action Follow CFM: PM should tend to his duties and not assume control of the flight control panel while the PF has the aircraft. In both of these cases the captain; while mistaken; believed he was doing the proper procedure for the departure.Use Proper phraseology: we were cleared to 'climb via' and on initial contact ATC was informed of our present altitude; our assigned altitude and our heading; rather than stating 'climbing via'.TRUPR1: this departure shares multiple airports on the same textual description. One of these airports has a similar runway configuration to OKC. Should a pilot take a quick glance on a takeoff (as what happened in this case) they may fly the improper departure procedure. Pilots should use caution when flying such a departure. Additionally; texts sharing multiple airports on the same departure can be its self confusing. Clear and specific departures should be considered for individual airports. Clarification on climb/descend via: it seems that such clearances might be better suited only in busy airspace with high traffic volume. Being issued a climb via clearance on a vectored (albeit RNAV) departure may be better understood with further clarification as to the intent of the clearance.
EMB-145 flight crew reports a track deviation departing OKC Runway 17R; when the Captain confuses the initial climb instructions for Wiley Post with those for OKC. An iPad was in use and had been zoomed in to Runways 17L/R for Wiley Post.