Air Traffic Control Fully Certified
ATC Issue All Types; Conflict Airborne Conflict; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Air Traffic Control Separated Traffic; Air Traffic Control Issued New Clearance
Procedure; Aircraft; Human Factors
I pointed out Aircraft Y to MOT approach descending from FL260 to FL200 delaying in the M3 south and M4 south areas.  Aircraft Y was on station at FL200 in M3 South and M4 South; within the lateral confines of MOT Approach.  MOT approach departed Aircraft X.  The LOA between MOT approach and ZMP states departures will be climbing to FL230 or their requested altitude; if lower than FL230.  I took the radar hand off about 15 miles SE of the MOT airport at 100 climbing.  My thought was this would aid the approach controller in separating Aircraft X from Aircraft Y.  To my surprise; Aircraft X checked on out of 113 climbing to FL230.  Aircraft Y was now in a turn into Aircraft X.  I stopped Aircraft X.  This scenario; placed a commercial airliner in unsafe proximity to an unmanned aircraft that could not see and avoid traffic.  Minot approach is a military approach control.  I feel more complete training is needed at MOT Approach.  At ZMP; this is not considered positive separation.
ZMP Controller describes a conflict between a CRJ200 departing MOT and a UAV operating in an MOA at FL200.  MOT Departure had not restricted the CRJ to stay below FL200 until cleared to climb by ZMP but had instead cleared the CRJ to climb in accordance with the LOA without regard for the UAV.