Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Situational Awareness; Confusion; Distraction
No Specific Anomaly Occurred All Types
General None Reported / Taken
Chart Or Publication
I have heard from other crewmembers that the charting for CIU does not depict a significant displaced threshold for RWY34. The Jeppesen charting does not depict this closed runway; but on AirNav.com it is discussed in the airport details and it is on the NOS chart. 'VEHICLE TESTING IN PROGRESS DURING WINTER MONTHS ON SECTIONS FO CLSD/ABNDD PARALLEL TWY; SE OF APCH END RY 34. AREA MAY BE PLOWED TO BARE SFC BUT IS NOT AVBL FOR ACFT ARRS OR DEPS.' I believe the Jeppesen chart should depict this closed section of runway to prevent inadvertent landing on this pavement. Please compare the NOS chart to the Jeppesen chart to see what I am referring to. Proper charting of the Jeppesen plate would be a good start; and in the interim add a note to the 10-7 page for crews to use caution.
An air carrier pilot reported that CIU Runway 34 approach end very long displaced threshold is not charted on the Jeppesen commercial airport chart. The NOS chart accurately depicts the environment.