Flight Crew Instrument; Flight Crew Flight Instructor; Flight Crew Commercial; Flight Crew Multiengine
Flight Crew Last 90 Days 200; Flight Crew Total 9000; Flight Crew Type 200
Communication Breakdown
Conflict NMAC
Flight Crew Took Evasive Action
Human Factors
I had taken a load in the aircraft and taxied to Runway XX at ZZZ. There were 2 airplanes in the pattern for Runway XY; Cessna 172 and a Bonanza. The Cessna 172 was on base for [Runway] XY planning a touch and go and the Bonanza was across midfield for a downwind entry to [Runway] XY. My plan was to taxi into position; wait until the Cessna 172 had passed by and then takeoff. I announced those plans on frequency. I heard the Cessna 172 acknowledge my radio call. I then thought that the Cessna 172 told me that they were on short final and would hold short of [Runway] XX. I acknowledged that call and replied that I was rolling on [Runway] XX. I proceeded with my takeoff and as I crossed runway [Runway] XY I saw the Cessna 172 go over me after taking off on [Runway] XY. We crossed paths and I estimate we cleared by about 150 feet. I later called the pilot of the Cessna 172 by phone to find out what happened. He said that he never said that he would hold short; but intended to do a quick touch and go in order to get past runway [Runway] XX and let me depart. Apparently; I misunderstood his radio call. This was my fault in that I misunderstood his intentions and was only using his radio calls to determine his position. I did not have the Cessna 172 in sight when I started my takeoff. If I would have held position until I had visual contact then this could have been avoided.
Aerial pilot reported an NMAC event during takeoff with another aircraft in landing pattern due to a communications breakdown.