Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP); Flight Crew Multiengine
Situational Awareness; Time Pressure; Workload
ATC Issue All Types; Deviation - Altitude Overshoot; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy; Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT
Flight Crew Overrode Automation; Flight Crew Became Reoriented
Human Factors; Procedure; Software and Automation
We were cleared for the Visual Approach. The FO (First Officer) was PF (Pilot Flying) and briefed a visual backed up with the ILS. ATC brought us in on a 4 mile final from a left base which was inside the final approach fix on intercepting the final/Localizer we were slightly low but as it was a visual I told him he was a little low but I let him continue since we were stable and spooled up just below the Glideslope. At about 800 ft. the FO was still descending and we got a Glideslope aural Emergency Ground Proximity Warning (EGPWS) to which he stated correcting and he leveled off to get back on profile. We continued to a landing.I noticed he was low and called it out and then the EGPWS called it out as well. [The] cause was the First Officer misjudged his height and continued descending. I assumed he would correct expediently but he only shallowed his descent rate slightly. The Pilot Flying took corrective action. I'll be more assertive next time and suggest the FO go outside the final approach fix while doing the visual so he has time and isn't rushed.
An Air Carrier Captain reported ATC vectored them inside the Final Approach Fix and cleared them for a Visual Approach. The First Officer descended early below the glideslope and the aircraft received a Ground Proximity Warning but continued to a successful landing.