strings: I have now to take notice of a part of Adams's address which in the order of time should have been noticed before. It is in these words "I have now shown, in the opinion of two competent judges, that the handwriting of the forged assignment differed from mine, and by one of them that it could not be mistaken for mine." That is false. Tinsley no doubt is the judge referred to; and by reference to his certificate it will be seen that he did not say the handwriting of the assignment could not be mistaken for Adams's—nor did he use any other expression substantially, or anything near substantially the same. But if Tinsley had said the handwriting could not be mistaken for Adams's it would have been equally unfortunate for Adams : for it then would have contradicted Keys, who says, "1 looked at the writing and judged it the said Adams's or a good imitation."