source: [lemma=be] [□] □ □
destination: [lemma=be] [□=□] □ □
spec: When the campus doesn ' t live up to that reputation then people want to know . " New Explicit Duty : " Should a supervisor engage in sexual activity with a former supervisee , the burden of proof shifts to the supervisor to demonstrate that there has been no exploitation or injury to the supervisee . There was no cot or louge to add to the sleeping space . `` In times of human crisis , we have an obligation to act to strengthen the ties that bind us as one nation , '' said the President . Assembly in 1967 . Global-scale problems with air pollution threaten large ecosystems and may prove irreversible . Should therapists engage in sexual intimacy with former clients following two years after termination or last professional contact , the burden shifts to the therapist to demonstrate that there has been no exploitation or injury to the former client or to the client ’ s immediate family . All these must be taken together , and possibly they must be supplemented by other agencies . The group spent time in Pueblo , stopped in Colorado Springs where they purchased a Jeep and a motor home , and then made their way to Woodland Park , Colorado , a bedroom community not far from Colorado Springs . " In a spirit of compromise , the African group was willing to join a consensus ; but if there be no consensus or if the text is to be reopened , particularly on the scope of the disease coverage , the African group would make it absolutely clear that any proposals to reduce the rights and flexibility in this context would be unacceptable . The subject of 6 hurries away from association with the subject of it , but does so in the spirit of the hexagram , so that there is no error or blame attaching to him . There is no property or liberty right to such a permit under that law , such that one could sue the officer for refusing to issue it , as a violation of one 's 14th amendment rights under 42 U.S.C . The court decides that there is no property or liberty right in concealed carry of a firearm , so that there is no right ot it under the 14th amendment , and therefore the chief cannot be sued under 42 USC 1983 for denying it ( because no constitutional right is implicated ) .