source: [lemma=□] □
destination: [lemma=under] □
spec: The CRE considers that any new comprehensive and coherent approach to equalities requires greater legislative , as well as institutional , coherence to be fully effective and to avoid a hierarchy of equality rights . When a claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C . The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C . It works internally and is sustainable as such . Take a look at an example page at : http://home.earthlink.net/~pmny/itworld/printer_unfriendly.html . If the embodiments are not considered obvious under 35 U.S.C . The prohibition against destroying the function of the design is inherent in the logic behind combining references to render a claimed invention obvious under 35 U.S.C . To define biconditional statement . They do not need anyone keeping score of who did what , when , where .. Surface indicia , per se ( i.e ., not applied to a specific article of manufacture ) , is not proper subject matter for a design patent under 35 U.S.C .