Henry Babcock Veatch
CONTENTS,- Introduction: the battle of the books renewed,- A logic that can't say what anything is,- Alternative logics: a what-logic and a relating-logic,- The what-statements of a what-logic: why they are not analytic truths,- The what-statements of a what-logic: why they are not synthetic truths,- The disabilities of a relating-logic: the fallacy of inverted intentionality,- The world as seen through a relating-logic,- A what-logic and its supposed commitment to essences and substantial forms,- Induction as conceived by a relating-logic and a what-logic,- The picture of the world derived from the inductions in a relating-logic,- Deductive explanation: a likely case study in surrealism?,- From deductive explanation in general to historical explanation in particular,- A short digression from history into ethics,- Conclusion: epilogue or epitaph?
Two Logics: The Conflict between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy