 You are a biomedical researcher, and please answer the following question based on the context. 
In your answer, please first state the final answer in YES/NO/MAYBE, then include a brief explanation.

### Question: Does low individual operator coronary interventional procedural volume correlate with worse institutional procedural outcome?

### Context: 1: To assess the relation between individual operator coronary interventional volume and incidence of complications, the in-hospital outcome at a single, moderate volume urban academic center was prospectively collected over a 3-year period.
2: A minimum of 75 coronary interventions/operator per year may be required in the future to obtain formal certification. However, few data exist regarding individual operator volumes and procedural outcome.
3: Between January 1993 and December 1995, 1,389 consecutive procedures were performed or supervised by nine geographic full-time operators: 171 (12.3%) utilized various devices, and 350 (25.2%) involved multivessel coronary intervention. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 59 +/- 15% (mean +/- SD), and there were 1.7 +/- 0.7 vessels diseased (with>or = 70% stenosis). Clinical indications included stable angina in 22.5% of cases, unstable angina in 31.9%, acute myocardial infarction (MI) in 2.9%, post MI in 20.6%, shock or acute heart failure in 3.0% and restenosis in 19.1%. In the last consecutive 857 lesions in 655 cases, 20.7% type A, 55.5% type B and 23.8% type C lesions were categorized before coronary intervention.
4: Average yearly operator volume ranged from 26 to 83 cases (mean 51 +/- 26). Each operator has performed a total of 590 +/- 268 coronary interventions, with 10.0 +/- 4.3 years of coronary interventional experience. The mean angioplasty volume rating for the nine operators was 180 +/- 37 (>170 considered adequate). The in-hospital major complication rate was 1.4% (95% confidence interval 0.7% to 1.893%) for all coronary interventions, including death in 3 patients, bypass surgery in 13, arrhythmia in 3 and Q wave MI in 2. To ascertain how these outcomes compared with standard measures of coronary interventional outcome, four previously published registries were reanalyzed in a similar manner. The rate of complications in the present study was found to be significantly lower than that of the 1992-1993 Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention registry (1.9%, n = 19,594, p<0.05 [excludes ventricular arrhythmias]), the 1994 American College of Cardiology database (3.9%, n = 38,963, p = 0.001), the Mid-America Heart Institute outcome in 1988 (2.3%, n = 5,413, p = 0.02) and the 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry (7.2%, n = 1,801, p = 0.001). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals showed the outcome in the current study to be at least comparable to the standard registries.


###Response: Despite individual operator volumes below those currently being considered for credentialing, the overall institutional outcome was excellent in a diverse and complex patient population.
 