 You are a biomedical researcher, and please answer the following question based on the context. 
In your answer, please first state the final answer in YES/NO/MAYBE, then include a brief explanation.

### Question: Is stereotactic radiosurgery under-utilised in the treatment of surgically excisable cerebral metastases?

### Context: 1: Brain metastases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Treatment options included surgery, whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery alone or in combination. There has been a significant increase in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provision in the UK over the last 5 years. We investigated the proportion of surgically resected brain metastases that would be suitable for SRS.
2: We retrospectively collected data on 116 consecutive patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases. Suitable radiological targets for SRS were defined as solid tumours<30 mm maximum diameter with no hydrocephalus and no symptomatic mass effect.
3: One hundred and two cases (88%) were solitary metastasis and fourteen (12%) had multiple metastases. Median maximum tumour diameter was 34 mm (range: 12-70 mm). Approximately one-third of patients (n = 41) had surgically resected brain metastasis suitable for SRS. Median OS was 7.7 months for those suitable for SRS and 5.4 months for those not suitable for SRS (Fig. 3; Log Rank: P = 0.52).


###Response: In surgically amenable tumours, day case SRS could also be used in approximately one-third of cases, thereby avoiding craniotomy and reducing length of stay. These data may be useful in planning service provision, and for drawing up business plans for a new SRS services. Nationally agreed guidelines for SRS for brain metastases have been developed and a full health economic analysis warrants further investigation to determine the cost effectiveness of SRS compared to craniotomy.
 