premise: -- that unless there is a -- the Court is -- because the circumstances change, that we are living in an era now where piracy is a significant problem, there's question of administrative ease, of administering a system where copyrights may be different for one set of authors, or different for another set of authors, there's changes that are taking place internationally, so that what we're saying is that not only could this Court conceive of reasons why Congress thought it was accomplishing the objectives of this clause, but that there are numerous objectives that are entirely legitimate in --
hypothesis: We are living in an era where piracy is a significant problem and that will never change, regardless of copyright laws
reason: The piracy might or might not be a significant problem in the future, so my statement was neither correct or incorrect