premise: I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.
hypothesis: the reporters would be happy to help
reason: it says the reporters would not testify but it never said they would not be happy to help and therefore it is neither correct or incorrect