premise: In other words you could have -- right now, if Congress decides to have a law, and this law is going to give copyrights in 1) the Bible, 2) Shakespeare, 3) Ben Jonson, and the reason they do it is that they think that that would lead publishers to produce those and distribute them, and they're right, they will, okay? In your view, that's perfectly constitutional?
hypothesis: if congress decided to have law it doesn't have to give copyrights.
reason: The law doesn't have to have copyrights. it says if the law has copyrights. I tricked it by saying the opposite it said while being a true statement.