premise: On 12 March 2007, Frank Newbery was beaten to death inside his convenience store, Franks Ham & Beef, in the inner-city suburb of Cooks Hill in the Australian city of Newcastle. The murder remains unsolved and the New South Wales Government offers a reward of $100,000 for any information leading to an arrest and conviction.
hypothesis: The New South Wales Government paid $100,000 as a reward for solving the murder of Frank Newbery.
reason: The context says that the murder is unsolved and that a reward of $100,000 is offered. However, rewards are only paid for information that leads to the crime being solved (arrest and conviction). Since the crime is unsolved, it is incorrect that the government has paid a reward. I think the AI was fooled because I only slightly changed the meaning around details that are in the context. E.g., if I replaced "paid" with "will pay", the statement would be true.