referring more specifically to the botanical details of this new and distinct variety of blueberry plant , the following has been observed during the sixth fruiting season under the ecological conditions prevailing at the farm of the inventor , which is located in yanchep springs , yanchep western australia . plant vigor .— strong to very strong . this is in contrast to the closest known variety , that being the ‘ sharpeblue ’ blueberry plant ( unpatented ) and which is the closest known variety and which has a plant vigor characteristic which is considered only average to strong in comparison to other similar varieties . plant growth habit .— generally — considered upright . this is in contrast to the growth habit which is expressed by the closest known variety and which is considered to be average . color .— one year old shoots — considered green . this color is not distinctive of the present variety and is similar to the color as expressed by the closest known variety ‘ sharpeblue ’. internode length .— one year old shoots — considered medium for the species . this characteristic is distinguishable from the same growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety and which is medium to long . leaf length .— considered average for the species . this is in contrast to the closest known variety which has a leaf length which is considered average to long . leaf width .— considered average . this is in contrast to the growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety where the leaf width is considered average to broad . leaf length / width ratio .— considered average . this is in contrast to the closest known variety where the same characteristic is considered average to large . leaf shape .— generally — ovate . this is similar to the same growth characteristic as expressed by the ‘ sharpeblue ’ blueberry plant . leaf color .— dorsal surface — green . this is similar to the growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety . leaf color intensity .— dorsal surface — the present variety has a medium to dark green color . this is in contrast to the same growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety where the same green coloration is considered light to medium . leaf margin .— generally — considered entire . this is similar to the closest known variety . anthocyanin coloration .— considered very weak for the species . this is similar to the same growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety . inflorescence length .— considered average . this is similar to the same growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety . flower shape .— corolla — urceolate . corolla tube .— size — considered average . this is in contrast to the closest known variety where the size of the corolla tube is considered average to large . corolla tube coloration — anthocyanin .— very weak to weak . this is in contrast to the merely weak coloration of the corolla tube as seen in the closest known variety . corolla tube ridges .— present . these ridges are also seen in the closest known variety . fruit cluster density .— considered dense . this is in contrast to the closest known variety where the same growth characteristic is seen as dense to very dense . unripe fruit .— color intensity — considered average for the species . this is in contrast to the growth characteristic as expressed in the closest known variety where the unripe fruit color is considered light to medium green . fruit size .— generally — considered very large for the species . this is in contrast to the fruit size as expressed by the closest known variety and where the fruit size is considered merely average . the fruit shape when viewed in a longitudinal section is considered oblate . this is similar to the closest known variety . sepal position .— considered semi - erect . this is in contrast to the sepal position or attitude characteristics as expressed by the closest known variety , that being , the ‘ sharpeblue ’ blueberry plant and where the attitude of the sepals is considered to be merely erect . fruit sepal type .— considered incurving . this is in contrast to the same characteristic as expressed in the closest known variety and which is considered to be straight . calyx diameter basin .— considered average . this is in contrast to the same characteristic expressed by the closest known variety and which is considered small to medium . calyx basin / depth .— considered average for the species . this is very similar to the growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety . fruit .— bloom intensity — considered strong . this is similar to what is seen in the closest known variety . skin color .— dark blue . this color is similar to the color as seen in the closest known variety . fruit firmness .— generally speaking the present variety produces firm , to very firm fruit . this is in contrast to the soft to average firmness as typically experienced in the fruit produced by the closest known variety . fruit sweetness .— considered medium to high . this is in contrast to the closest known variety where the fruit sweetness is considered merely average . fruit acidity .— generally — low to medium . this is in contrast to the closest known variety where fruit acidity is considered merely average . fruiting portions of the plant .— fruit may be found on one year old and current seasons shoots . this is similar to the same growth characteristics as expressed in the ‘ sharpeblue ’ blueberry plant . time of vegetative bud burst .— generally speaking , the vegetative bud burst is considered to be very early in the season . this time of bud burst is earlier than that observed in the closest known variety . flowering time — one year old shoots .— considered very early in the season , and earlier in time than that as seen in the closest known variety . flowering time on current year &# 39 ; s shoots .— considered very early in the season , and earlier in time than that as seen in the closest known variety . fruit ripening time on one year old shoots .— considered very early in the season for the species . this is in contrast to the same growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety ‘ sharpeblue ’ blueberry plant , and where the time of fruit ripening begins early to medium in the season . fruit ripening time on current year &# 39 ; s shoots .— considered very early in the season and earlier in time than the same growth characteristic as expressed by the closest known variety ‘ sharpeblue ’ blueberry plant . resistance to insects and disease .— no particular susceptibilities were noted . the present variety has not been tested to expose or detect any susceptibilities or resistances to any known plant and / or fruit diseases . although the new variety of blueberry plant possesses the described characteristics when grown under the ecological conditions prevailing near yanchep springs , western australia , it should be understood that the variations of the usual magnitude and characteristics incident to changes in growing conditions , fertilization , pruning , pest control , frost , climatic variables and horticultural management are to be expected .
a new and distinct variety of blueberry plant , which is denominated varietally as ‘ eb 8 - 21 ’ and which produces fruit which are mature for harvesting and shipment early in the season , and which is very large in size and which further displays a growth pattern which is upright when grown under the ecological conditions prevailing in yanchep springs , western australia .