referring to fig1 , and 3 , shows the most basic embodiment of the knotless fishing jig hook . fig1 shows the initial direction and point of entry of the line 1 , into the sinker 2 , in a direction parallel to the hook shaft 3 , as the initial step in attachment . fig2 illustrates a completed line 1 trace , having passed in sequence through the bite surfaces 4 , wrapped four times around the hook shaft 3 , and finally returning through the bite surfaces 4 in an opposite but parallel direction to initial entry . four wraps of line 1 around the hook shaft 3 are considered an optimum number of wraps , based on test attachments . fig2 also shows the relative optimum position of the hook eyelet 5 as the approximate center of mass of the portion of the sinker 2 in an opposed location to the intersection of the bite surfaces 4 . it should be noted that in none of figures 1 - 5 does the hook eyelet 5 protrude the surface of the sinkers 2 , this serves to enhance stabilization of the hook 6 . however , it is envisioned that the combination of some geometric sinker 2 shapes and hook eyelet 5 sizes , the approximate center of sinker 2 mass , as described , may not be either the optimum or desired location of the hook eyelet 5 . as a matter of individual fishing needs , the desired position of a hook 6 relative to the sinker 2 may determine the location of casting the hook eyelet 5 into the sinker 2 . the laws of physics applicable to stabilizing the hook 6 , when cast , or otherwise , formed to a lead sinker 2 , are recognized as limiting factors in locating the hook eyelet 5 within the sinker 2 . however , it is not intended to imply that the use of hook eyelets 5 are the exclusive means of providing the desired statilization of the hook 6 . the desired level of stabilization can also be accomplished by a variety of methods , such as bending or flattening of the hook shaft 3 or applying adhesive substances to same . further , the sinker 2 is generically referred to as a lead sinker because it is normally constructed of pure lead or alloyed lead . however , none of fig1 - 5 intend to either limit the materials used in the sinker 2 portion , or that the sinker 2 portion is necessairly intended to sink the hook 6 . rather , fig1 - 5 are intended to illustrate method of attaching the line 1 to the integral fishing device . in practical usage the sinker 2 portion may be constructed of lightweight materials meant for fastening but not expressely for sinking the hook 6 , in accordance with fishing needs . fig3 shows a completed attachment with the line 1 pulled free of slack and bite surfaces 4 crimped together with sufficient pressure to prevent line 1 slippage . fig4 illustrates the perferred configuration for reducing the pressure required to properly crimp the line 1 within the bite surfaces 4 , thereby lessening the possibility of damage to the line 1 . the bite surfaces 4 , of fig4 are corrugated to produce a more secure crimping of line 1 , at lower crimping pressure , than would an equal but smooth bite surface 4 . most any treading of the bite surfaces 4 will produce increased resistance to line 1 slippage , as compared with smooth bite surfaces 4 . fig4 also illustrates the use of bite wings 7 , as used to decrease the pressure of crimped bite surfaces 4 on the line 1 . when a pair of bite wings 7 are pressed together the sinker 2 is easily removed . with respect to knotless fishing jig hooks , pressing the bite wings 7 together will remove both the sinker 2 and the hook 6 . depending on sinker 2 configuration and its materials , crimping and uncrimping may be accomplished using only finger pressure . however , at other times , the crimping process will be accomplished with pliers or other tools . fig4 further depicts the rigging of the knotless fishing jig hooks to duplicate the effect of offset hooks , which some fishermen perfer , and are often used in making lead head jigs . these hooks , while not illustrated , have the eyelet situated at a right angle to the hook shaft , by bending the hook shaft and eyelet toward the remaining hook axis . when offset hooks are employed in jigs , it allows the long axis of the hook 6 to assume a position more closely approximating both parallel to the water surface an perpendicular to the long axis of the line 1 . fig5 shows the adaption of knotless fishing jig hook to a bullet lead head sinker 2 . the attachment of the line 1 is shown completed through a corrugated bite surface 4 . the plastic worm bait 8 is illustrated as attached to a weedless hook 6 design , using a wire weed guard 9 . even without a weed guard 9 , the knotless fishing jig hook reduces the chances of accidental snagging of the hook 6 . this is because the hook 6 maintains a fixed position behind the sinker 2 , thereby avoiding man snagging situations . fig5 further illustrates the variety of fishing situations to which the knotless fishing jig can be adapted . the means of attachment illustrated in fig1 - 5 can be used for attaching other types of fishing devices , such casting plugs and spinning baits and lures . the means of attachment used in fig1 - 5 can also comprise , using appropriate scales and materials , a fastening device for other than fishing purposes , although the preferred embodiment is a fishing device to attach fishing line . fig1 - 5 are also intended to comprise a fishing device that is applicable to both saltwater and freshwater fishing .
an eyeletless fishing hook providing for secure attachment of fishing line , by means of a integral configuration of a fishing hook and sinker , eliminating the necessity of tying to an eyelet . the fishing device retains the ability of separate components to be adaptable to fishing needs , by varying the construction of the size , shape , and type of both the sinker and the hook .