the present invention is specifically described with reference to the following examples , but is not limited to these examples . test example using additive of group ( a ) ( polysaccharides having high formability ) lm pectin ( 10 parts by weight , genu pectin type lm - 102as - j manufactured by cp kelco ) was added and dissolved , by heating if necessary , in purified water ( 989 . 9 parts by weight ). after the mixture was cooled to room temperature , 0 . 1 parts by weight of cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( manufactured by lsl ) was added to the mixture , sufficiently mixed , and dissolved at room temperature . the obtained preparation solution was dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a medicament - containing composition . for a storage stability test , the obtained medicament - containing composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 30 days , and the allergenic activity at day 7 , day 14 , and day 30 of storage was evaluated by the method described below . table 2 shows the results . preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 1 by the same procedure as in test example 1 , and lyophilized to prepare medicament - containing compositions . in test example 2 , hm pectin ( genu pectin type usp - h manufactured by cp kelco ) was used . in test example 3 , dextran 40 ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 4 , dextran 70 ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 5 , starch ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 6 , pullulan ( manufactured by hayashibara co ., ltd .) was used . the medicament - containing compositions obtained in test examples 2 to 6 were subjected to a storage stability test in the same manner as in test example 1 . table 2 shows the results . the allergenic activity of cry j 1 , which is one of the major cedar pollen allergens , was measured using a cedar pollen antigen elisa kit “ cry j 1 ” ( manufactured by seikagaku biobusiness corporation ). the principle of the measurement kit is a sandwich elisa that uses monoclonal antibodies ( 013 and 053 ) specific to cry j 1 , which is one of japanese cedar ( cryptomeria japonica ) pollen antigens . this kit can specifically measure cry j 1 . a standard solution or a sample ( 20 μl ) was added to a reaction buffer solution ( 100 μl ) included in the kit , and a primary reaction was carried out at room temperature for 60 minutes . then , an hrp - labeled antibody solution ( 100 μl ) was added to the reaction product , and a secondary reaction was carried out for 60 minutes . an enzyme substrate solution ( 100 μl ) was added thereto , and a reaction was carried out at room temperature and shielded from light for 30 minutes . finally , a reaction stop solution ( 100 μl ) was added thereto . subsequently , the ultraviolet absorption intensity at 450 nm was measured . a calibration curve was determined based on the absorption intensity of the standard solution at various cry j 1 concentrations , and the cry j 1 allergenic activity ( ng / ml ) of each sample was determined based on the calibration curve . the cry j 1 allergenic activity % was determined after sampling the pharmaceutical compositions subjected to the storage stability test ( at day 7 , day 14 , and day 30 of storage ) and immediately after production ( 30 minutes and 60 minutes after production ). the cry j 1 allergenic activity % was evaluated based on the following scoring criteria . glucose ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was added and dissolved , by heating if necessary , in purified water ( 989 . 9 parts by weight ). after the mixture was cooled to room temperature , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 0 . 1 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to the mixture , sufficiently mixed , and dissolved at room temperature . the obtained preparation solution was dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a medicament - containing composition . for a storage stability test , the obtained medicament - containing composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 30 days , and the allergenic activity at day 7 , day 14 , and day 30 of storage was evaluated by the same method as in test example 1 . table 4 shows the results . preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 3 by the same procedure as in test example 7 , and lyophilized to prepare medicament - containing compositions . in test example 8 , mannose ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 9 , trehalose ( manufactured by hayashibara co ., ltd .) was used . in test example 10 , raffinose ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 11 , maltitol ( manufactured by hayashibara biochemical laboratories , inc .) was used . in test example 12 , isomalt ( galen 800 manufactured by beneo - palatinit gmbh ) was used . in test example 13 , sorbitol ( manufactured by roquette ) was used . in test example 14 , maltodextrin ( amicol 10 manufactured by nippon starch chemical co ., ltd .) was used . in test example 15 , pvp k25 ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 16 , pvp k30 ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in test example 17 , pvp k90 ( wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . the medicament - containing compositions obtained in test examples 8 to 17 were subjected to a storage stability test in the same manner as in test example 1 . table 4 shows the results . cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 0 . 1 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 999 . 9 parts by weight ), and dissolved at room temperature . subsequently , the resultant mixture was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a medicament - containing composition . the obtained medicament - containing composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c ., and the allergenic activity at day 7 , day 14 , and day 30 of storage was evaluated by the same method as in test example 1 . table 4 shows the results . test examples using group ( b ′) ( additives that are sugars but have no stabilizing effect on cedar pollen allergens ) preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 3 by the same procedure as in test example 7 , and lyophilized to prepare medicament - containing compositions . in comparative test example 2 , mannitol ( manufactured by roquette ) was used . in comparative test example 3 , erythritol ( wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in comparative test example 4 , xylitol ( manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in comparative test example 5 , polyethyleneglycol 4000 ( peg4000 manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . in comparative test example 6 , polyethyleneglycol 20000 ( peg20000 manufactured by wako pure chemical industries , ltd .) was used . peg was used as an example to be tested in comparison to pvp , which is also a water - soluble polymer . the medicament - containing compositions obtained in comparative test examples 2 to 6 were subjected to a storage stability test in the same manner as in test example 1 . table 4 shows the results . as shown in table 4 , the sugars and sugar alcohols shown in test examples 7 to 17 were found to act as allergen stabilizers during lyophilization . on the other hand , the results show that the medicament - containing compositions of comparative test examples in which mannitol and the like reportedly capable of stabilizing other allergens and vaccines were used were not necessarily effective against cedar pollen allergens . in regard to the water - soluble synthetic polymers , pvp was found to show a high stabilizing effect on the allergen . guar gum ( 10 parts by weight , meyro - guar csa200 / 50 , manufactured by danisco ) was added and dissolved , by heating if necessary , in purified water ( 989 . 9 parts by weight ). after the mixture was cooled to room temperature , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 0 . 1 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to the mixture , sufficiently mixed , and dissolved at room temperature . the obtained preparation solution was dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a medicament - containing composition . for a storage stability test , the medicament - containing composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 30 days , and the allergenic activity at day 7 , day 14 , and day 30 of storage was evaluated by the same method as in test example 1 . table 6 shows the results . preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 5 by the same procedure as in test example 18 , and lyophilized to prepare medicament - containing compositions . in test example 19 , locust bean gum ( genugum rl - 200 - j manufactured by cp kelco ) was used . in test example 20 , xanthan gum ( echo - gum t manufactured by dsp gokyo food & amp ; chemical co ., ltd .) was used . in test example 21 , tamarind gum ( glyloid 3s manufactured by dsp gokyo food & amp ; chemical co ., ltd .) was used . in test example 22 , tara gum ( mt120 manufactured by mrc polysaccharide co ., ltd .) was used . in test example 23 , ι - carrageenan ( cp gum fa manufactured by dsp gokyo food & amp ; chemical co ., ltd .) was used . in test example 24 , deacylated gellan gum ( kelcogel manufactured by cp kelco ) was used . the medicament - containing compositions obtained in test examples 19 to 24 were subjected to a storage stability test in the same manner as in test example 1 . table 6 shows the results . test examples using group ( c ′) ( additives that are viscous polysaccharides but have no stabilizing effect on the cedar pollen allergen ) preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 5 by the same procedure as in test example 18 , and lyophilized to prepare medicament - containing compositions . in comparative test example 7 , sodium alginate ( kimica algin il - 6 manufactured by kimica corporation ) was used . in comparative test example 8 , κ - carrageenan ( genugel jpe - 126 manufactured by cp kelco ) was used . the medicament - containing compositions obtained in comparative test examples 7 and 8 were subjected to a storage stability test in the same manner as in test example 1 . table 6 shows the results . as shown in table 6 , the gelling agents used in test examples 18 to 24 were found to act as allergen stabilizers during lyophilization . among these gelling agents , guar gum , locust bean gum , xanthan gum , tamarind gum , and tara gum were found to show a high stabilizing effect on the allergen . lm pectin ( 30 parts by weight ) and glucose ( 10 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 90 days , and the allergenic activity after storage was evaluated by the same method as in test example 1 . the pharmaceutical composition was also evaluated for its properties and solubility in water by the methods described below . table 9 shows the results expressed as scores . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was evaluated based on the following criteria . thereafter , it was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 3 months , and evaluated again after storage . table 9 shows the results . purified water ( 10 . 0 g ) heated to 37 ° c . was added to the obtained pharmaceutical composition ( 1 . 0 g ), and the dissolution of the pharmaceutical composition was observed at room temperature and evaluated based on the following criteria . table 9 shows the results . allergen - containing preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 7 by the same procedure as in example 1 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in examples 2 to 10 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . dextran 40 ( 60 parts by weight ) and raffinose ( 10 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 800 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 7 by the same procedure as in example 11 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in examples 12 to 18 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . lm pectin ( 30 parts by weight ) was added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 8 by the same procedure as in comparative example 1 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in comparative examples 2 to 10 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . lm pectin ( 30 parts by weight ) and mannitol ( 10 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 8 by the same procedure as in comparative example 11 , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in comparative examples 12 to 14 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 9 shows the results . as shown in table 9 , the pharmaceutical compositions of comparative examples 1 to 10 consisting of only one additive from group ( a ) or group ( b ) showed poor stability of the allergen and deteriorated properties at day 90 of storage , which would cause problems in use . however , the pharmaceutical compositions of examples showed improvement in the stability of the allergen and the stability of the properties by the combined use of additives from group ( a ) and group ( b ). raffinose ( 50 parts by weight ) and guar gum ( 5 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 90 days , and the allergenic activity and the properties after storage were evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . the solubility in water was also evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . table 12 shows the results expressed as scores . allergen - containing preparation solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 10 by the same procedure as in example 19 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in examples 20 to 28 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 12 shows the results . guar gum ( 10 parts by weight ) was added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 12 shows the results . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 11 by the same procedure as in comparative example 15 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in comparative examples 16 to 20 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 12 shows the results . raffinose ( 50 parts by weight ) and κ - carrageenan ( 5 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 90 days , and the allergenic activity and the properties after storage were evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . the solubility in water was also evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . table 12 shows the results expressed as scores . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 11 by the same procedure as in comparative example 21 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in comparative examples 22 and 23 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 12 shows the results . as shown in table 12 , the pharmaceutical compositions of comparative examples 15 to 20 consisting of only one additive from group ( c ) showed slightly higher stability of the allergen than the pharmaceutical compositions shown in table 9 , which consist of other additives . however , many of these pharmaceutical compositions have poor properties , problems in use , and an unsatisfactory solubility in water . on the other hand , the pharmaceutical compositions of examples showed that the use of an additive from group ( b ) having high solubility in water in combination with an additive from group ( c ) improved the stability of the allergen , the stability of properties , and the solubility in water , thus allowing easy sensitization to the antigen in the oral cavity . lm pectin ( 30 parts by weight ) and guar gum ( 5 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 90 days , and the allergenic activity and the properties after storage were evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . the solubility in water was also evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . table 15 shows the results expressed as scores . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 13 by the same procedure as in example 29 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in examples 30 to 42 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 15 shows the results . group ( a )+ group ( c ′) ( polysaccharides having high formability + additives that are viscous polysaccharides but have no stabilizing effect ) lm pectin ( 30 parts by weight ) and κ - carrageenan ( 5 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 90 days , and the allergenic activity and the properties after storage were evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . the solubility in water was also evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . table 15 shows the results expressed as scores . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 14 by the same procedure as in comparative example 24 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in comparative examples 25 to 29 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 15 shows the results . as shown in table 15 , the pharmaceutical compositions of examples showed that the combined use of an additive from group ( c ) and an additive from group ( a ) improved the stability of the allergen , the stability of properties , and the solubility in water , thus allowing easy sensitization to the antigen in the oral cavity . in particular , the use of pectin and guar gum or locust bean gum ( both are galactomannans ) was found to show high stability of the allergen . lm pectin ( 30 parts by weight ), raffinose ( 10 parts by weight ), and guar gum ( 5 parts by weight ) were added to purified water ( 850 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at a temperature of 40 to 80 ° c . after dissolution , the mixture was cooled to room temperature . separately , cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder ( 10 parts by weight , manufactured by lsl ) was added to purified water ( 30 parts by weight ), and dissolved therein at room temperature . subsequently , an allergen aqueous solution ( 4 parts by weight ) was added to the above - obtained solution ( in such a manner that the amount of the cedar pollen extract lyophilized powder in the solution would be 0 . 1 parts by weight ) and quickly mixed , and it was made sure that there was no re - gelation . using a ph adjuster ( sodium hydroxide ), the ph was adjusted to 6 . 5 . further , purified water was added to the mixture to adjust the total weight to 1000 parts by weight , thereby obtaining an allergen - containing preparation solution . subsequently , the obtained preparation solution was quickly dispensed in 1 . 0 g aliquots into a vial for lyophilization , and lyophilized to prepare a pharmaceutical composition . the obtained pharmaceutical composition was stored at 40 ± 2 ° c . for 90 days , and the allergenic activity and the properties after storage were evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . the solubility in water was also evaluated by the same method as in example 1 . table 17 shows the results expressed as scores . solutions were prepared with the compositions shown in table 16 by the same procedure as in example 44 , and lyophilized to prepare pharmaceutical compositions . the pharmaceutical compositions obtained in examples 44 to 56 were evaluated in the same manner as in example 1 , and the results were expressed as scores . table 17 shows the results . as shown in table 17 , the combined use of all additives from group ( a ), group ( b ), and group ( c ) improved the stability of the allergen , the stability of properties , and the solubility in water , and allowed easy sensitization to the antigen in the oral cavity . the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention contains specific non - gelatin additives in combination with an allergen , and thus has excellent storage stability for preservation and delivery of the allergen . additionally , according to the method for producing the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention , even an allergen known to have very poor thermal stability can be stably maintained during production , and the resulting pharmaceutical composition also has excellent storage stability .
the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition capable of preserving and delivering an allergen having poor thermal stability without using gelatin as a stabilizer , and a method for producing the pharmaceutical composition . the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition containing an allergen and additives selected from at least two groups from among group consisting of polysaccharides having high formability ; group consisting of mono - to hexasaccharides , sugar alcohols thereof , maltodextrin , and polyvinylpyrrolidone ; and group consisting of viscous polysaccharides ; wherein the additives have a stabilizing effect on the allergen .