the flow - diagram of fig1 . schematically depicts steps i - iv , previously described in some detail . also shown are the novel frying and rapid pre - cooling and degreasing steps v and vi , and the more conventional cooling step vii , filling or topping step viii , and freezing step ix . step v is accomplished with the fryer apparatus 20 , schematically shown in fig2 . an elongated tank 22 is horizontally supported by supporting means ( not shown ) to sustain a bath of cooking oil , or other suitable liquid , 24 , at level 26 . transverse heaters 28 are immersed on co - planar horizontal axes at about mid - depth within the oil bath to provide the oil with a temperature gradient above the plane of the heaters 28 that affords a uniform temperature surface layer 11 / 2 &# 34 ; to 2 &# 34 ; deep beneath the surface level 26 of 360 °- 410 ° f . beneath the plane of the heaters , the temperature gradient lowers to a &# 34 ; cold zone &# 34 ; at the bottom of the tank . particulate matter set adrift , is moved mechanically toward the deeper end , cold - well or trap 30 , into which the bottom of the tank slopes . two belt conveyors 32 and 42 are associated with the tank 22 for immersion in and travel through the oil bath 24 within it . in the schematic depiction of fig2 the belts are between 35 &# 34 ; and 36 &# 34 ; wide , are woven of stainless steel wire , and , though driven coordinately to enter , travel through , and emerge from the oil bath at the same linear velocity , they are tensioned and adjusted independently of each other . a sediment removal belt 42 &# 39 ; of flat flex construction is mounted adjacent the bottom of the tank 22 in its cold zone . this transports crumbs in counterflow movement to well 30 at the feed end of the tank where auger 42 &# 34 ; moves it to a drain and finally to a filter . the top conveyor belt 32 is known in the trade as a balanced - weave belt , a planar fragment of which is illustrated in fig3 while the bottom conveyor belt 42 is known as a flat - flex belt , correspondingly shown in fig4 . both figures are to the same scale , as drawn . the balanced - weave belt 32 is formed of flattened righthand helices 34 , alternated with flattened lefthand helices 36 , both sets of helices having a pitch length of one - inch , as shown . the helices are held together by crimped , transverse wire connectors 38 on 1 . 25 inch centers . this belting bears the manufacturers designation of &# 34 ; b - 12 - 10 - 12 &# 34 ;: &# 34 ; b &# 34 ; for balanced , first &# 34 ; 12 &# 34 ; for number of helical turns ( pitches ) per foot of width , &# 34 ; 10 &# 34 ; for number of crimped connectors per foot of length , and the second &# 34 ; 12 &# 34 ; for wire gauge throughout . ( 12 gauge = 7 / 64 or 0 . 109 inch diameter ). the assembled belt is 17 / 32 ( 0 . 532 ) inches thick . both the right and left - hand helices , as viewed in fig3 are flattened to dispose their respective proximal wire turns essentially tangent to a common plane . the flat - flex lower belt 42 is an assemblage of transverse wire elements 44 of the same , or slightly smaller , gauge as the balanced - weave belt , each of which is identically formed into a series of two dimensional offsets to permit them to be interconnected , as shown , to dispose their preponderating transverse portions 46 contiguous to common transverse axes 48 and nominally tangent to a common plane . the shorter longitudinal components 49 are conformed in two dimensions for mutual accommodation in the configuration of fig4 that can readily flex around support rolls or sprockets , while being flat , stable , and capable of sustaining the planar relationship under tension without sagging in the intended use . a preferred manner of associating the belts 32 and 42 in cooperative relation with each other for the purposes of the present invention will now be described with reference to fig2 : the upper conveyor 32 is mounted on a unitary horizontal frame 50 , only one side of which appears in the schematic drawing , in which are journalled a power input roll 52 , upper guide rollers 54 , lower guide ( submersion ) rollers 56 , and an exit - end roller 58 , the latter of which may be adjustably secured to impart the requisite operating tension to the balanced - weave conveyor belt 32 . as viewed in fig2 movement of the lower flight of the upper belt between the lower roller 56 is from left to right , and is supported against sagging between the rollers 56 by transverse bars ( not shown ) at spaced longitudinal intervals that are incorporated in the belt design , which engage and travel on horizontal tracks ( not shown ) extending along each side of the mounting frame 50 near the oil bath level 26 immersion line . the lower face of the belt 32 is , thus , maintained with all of the adjacent helical half - turns disposed in nominal tangential relationship to a common horizontal plane , that is parallel to the level 26 of the bath oil , throughout its flight through the bath 24 between the submersion rollers 56 . the entire upper conveyor assembly in the frame 50 can be raised and lowered as a unit by hydraulic jacks or screws ( not shown ) to allow for micrometric adjustment in the depth of immersion beneath the bath oil surface , and in relation to the confronting flight of the lower conveyor 42 . the same means allows the upper conveyor unit to be raised a substantial distance for servicing of the equipment . the lower flat - flex conveyor belt 42 is tensioned between a horizontal drive - roll 62 at the lefthand ( entering ) end of the assembly , as viewed in fig2 the drive of which is coordinated with the upper drive roll 52 for uniform inter - belt speed , and an exit - end roller 64 that is adjustably - mounted to regulate the tension of the lower belt . both roll 62 and roller 64 are carried by mounting means associated with the conveyor frame 50 so as to be stationarily fixed with respect thereto . in between the roll 62 and roller 64 , lower belt 42 is supported in its forward ( upper ) and return ( lower ) flights by cross - bars ( not shown ) secured to the inside surface of the endless belt at six foot longitudinal intervals . the cross - bars , at their extremities , engage longitudinal tracks or guides ( not shown ) extending horizontally along opposite sides of the conveyer frame 50 in confronting relation , so as to retain the upper flight of the belt adjacent the surface of the oil bath in level planar relation thereto as it moves between the lines of immersion and emersion with respect thereto . the lower conveyor , thus , provides a stable , level , movable platform that is fixed in its overall position as regards both the tank 22 with which it is associated , and the level of bath oil disposed within it . as shown in fig2 the two conveyors 32 , 42 , are disposed in cooperative relationship to each other . this parallel relationship in the bath and to a degree after the bath , fixes the dough pieces in a horizontal plane as against the buoyancy of the dough pieces during frying . roller 52 is driven ( counterclockwise as shown ) to cause the balanced - weave belt 32 to enter the bath 24 , and move therethrough barely beneath and in parallel relation to such surface between the submersion rollers 56 , thence , upwardly and outwardly from the bath around end - roller 58 , segue beneath upper rollers 54 , back to power roll 52 . the lower flat - flex belt 42 is driven downwardly by driven roller 62 ( turning in a clockwise direction as shown ) toward the bath , which it enters in converging relationship to the upper belt 32 , passing beneath the latter in a position of preselected clearance and parallel movement with it . the clearance between the belts , as they move at the same linear velocity through the bath , may vary between 1 / 8 &# 34 ; to 3 / 8 &# 34 ;, with a preferred setting for the examples given of 3 / 16 &# 34 ; spacing . dough pieces ( not shown ) emerging from proofing at step iv , while at a temperature near 80 °- 112 ° f ., are immediately fed onto conveyor 42 in the direction of the arrow at the lefthand end of the fryer assembly , fig2 . the dough pieces enter between the upper and lower belts , all moving at the same speed in the same direction , in avoidance of relative movement , and are immersed in the oil bath at line im to a depth of 1 &# 34 ; to 2 &# 34 ; over the top surface of the dough . upon entering the bath , surface water from proofing that has condensed on the dough is instantly evaporated , and the cooking starts . the bath temperature is at 360 °- 410 ° f . within the cooking zone near the surface of the bath , as previously noted , and the travel time in the bath , from immersion point im to emersion point em is 40 - 50 seconds . eight - fourteen percent of the formula water is lost during submersion in the oil , and some of the latter is imbibed by the crust in its place . water loss or retention is controlled through immersion time and bath temperature , the lesser of both affording the greatest retention of water and the least imbibition of fat , and vice versa , except that fat transference not due to water displacement is curtailed by higher temperatures over a lesser period of time . the dough pieces are confined between the belts , and their increase in volume , due to leavening gas pressure from within , is more of an upward development into the larger , more open mesh of the upper balanced - weave belt 32 , than downward into the more supportive flat - flex belt 42 , although some corrugating effect of the latter is imprinted on the bottom crusts after cooking . because the longitudinal spacing between crimped connectors 38 of the balanced - weave belt 32 is 11 / 4 &# 34 ;, and that of the transverse components 46 of the transverse links 44 of belt 42 is 1 / 2 &# 34 ;, the longitudinal placement of the one is constantly changing with respect to the other as they move along together , even though both are traveling at the same speed . add to this the variable of the right - and left - hand flattened helices that alternate in opposite directions ( between the eleven o &# 39 ; clock and one o &# 39 ; clock positions , as viewed in fig3 ), and there develops an ever - changing , unpredictable pattern in the location of the cross - over points of the closest spaced elements between the two belts . for instance , if the top belt 32 were lowered until it touched the lower belt 42 , the points of tangency between the adjacent upper elements 34 , 36 and the lower elements 44 define the cross - over points designated x in fig4 . these points shift among on - coming links as the belts continue to move due to lack of registration between the two designs , so as to give a random placement of the cross - over points . the x - points of fig4 were derived from overlaying a tracing of fig3 upon the design of fig4 and marking the points of tangency . in terms of the dough pieces , and finished crusts derived therefrom , these x - or cross - over - points are those wherein the dough is most closely confined , wherein it is required to maintain its raw thickness and homogeneity , forcing leavening gases to be displaced sidewise into adjacent , less confined areas . as the external surfaces form into hardened crusts on the top , bottom , and edges of the dough pieces , the compact dough in the cross - over areas , being at its thinnest point , bakes into a stable bread column that bonds the top and bottom crusts into a unified structure that resists delamination . the cross - over points , thus , become bonding points of homogeneous dough cum bread . these points are indicated in a few instances at 70 on the crust depicted in fig5 of which fig6 is an enlarged cross - section . in between such points , corresponding generally to the interstitial pattern of the upper belt 32 , are the zones of expanded volume , representing bubbles , blisters , or hollow domes 72 , randomly occurring across the topography of the crust . in between both the cross - over points 70 and the elevations 72 , might be found lesser depressions , that correspond generally to the tread of the right - and left - hand flattened helices 34 , 36 , within which only limited delamination has occurred . the conveyor belts 32 and 42 , fig2 from their line of emersion em from the oil bath 26 , are projected from the bath at the same critical spacing to maintain confinement of the dough pieces until sufficiently cool to reduce the pressure differential between gases within the product and that of the ambient atmosphere to a value where delamination will not occur . as the dough crusts emerge from the bath , oil at bath temperature is entrained upon them to prolong the cooking outside of the bath . were the crusts to be released from confinement upon emergence , expansion due to continued cooking would allow an unacceptable amount of delamination to transpire . confinement is , therefore , provided for the dough pieces continuously through the bath and beyond the emersion point em to the roller 58 , at which point the upper belt 32 separates from the lower belt 42 and proceeds on its return flight . positioned at this point or line , is one or more air - jets 69 designed to deliver high velocity air upon the merging crusts to accomplish three things : ( 1 ) rapidly to pre - cool the crusts to a temperature at which gas pressures within and without the crusts attain or approach equilibrium , in avoidance of delamination ; ( 2 ) exert a forceful wiping action upon the crusts , whereby excess oil entrained thereon and its attendant cooking action , will be effectively eliminated ; and ( 3 ) exert a stripping action upon the crusts , some of which , by virtue of protruding into the mesh of the upper belt , will tend to follow it in its course around roller 58 . the air blast will force the crusts away from belt 32 , and allow them to continue on with the lower belt 42 to their point of discharge to the normal , slower cooling of step vii . the apparatus of steps v and vi and related operating conditions , contemplate a tank ( 22 ) 301 / 2 feet long by 37 inches wide , with an immersion zone ( distance between im and em , fig2 ) of 261 / 2 feet . with a prescribed immersion time of 40 - 50 seconds , at bath temperatures of 360 °- 410 ° f ., the crusts , to be immersed 45 seconds , must traverse the 261 / 2 feet beneath the oil at the rate of 0 . 58 feet / second , confined between belts moving at 34 . 81 &# 39 ;( feet )/ minute . at 55 seconds , the crust must move at 0 . 48 &# 34 ;/ second , with the belts traveling at 28 . 8 &# 39 ;( feet )/ minute . step vi , the preliminary rapid cooling down , with air blast , is accomplished in 2 to 3 seconds . at belt speed averaging 1 / 2 foot / second , the confining conveyor from emersion point em to roller 58 must be at least one to one and one - half feet in length . it will be seen from the foregoing that novel method and means are utilized to produce a superior crust product , in which the wasteful practices of too much uncontrolled leavening too early that necessitated perforating or docking the dough , are eliminated , in favor of controlled leavening through the use of both moisture responsive and time - responsive leavening agents in formulation , and through the subsequent time - temperature relationships in the handling of the dough to final cooking . the optimum crust is realized from this dough held in confinement during cooking to afford just the right amount of delamination and volume development in the shortest possible time in an immersion fryer , and , thereafter , until internal gas pressure equals ambient pressure .
a method for producing a laminated , imperforate or non - docked product . the dough is formulated and prepared for cooking by frying , during which partial delamination through the production and coalescence of expanded gas cells within the dough are controlled by the formulation , mixing , sheeting and proofing of the dough prior to cooking , and by the selective confinement of the dough piece during cooking , as in immersion frying and sequentially . the product is suitable for topping , followed by freezing , packaging , and ultimately , for baking into a comestible product , such as pizza .