[ 0043 ] fig4 shows an embodiment of the present invention comprising an interbody spinal implant generally referred by the numeral 100 , inserted in the direction of arrow p from the posterior aspect of a vertebral body v on one side of the centerline m in the lumbar spine . implant 100 has a leading end 102 for insertion into the disc space and an opposite trailing end 104 . in a preferred embodiment , leading end 102 is configured to not extend beyond the outer dimensions of the two vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space proximate leading end 102 after implant 100 is installed , to maximize the area of contact of the implant with the vertebral bone . leading end 102 could be described as being generally configured to generally conform to at least a portion of the natural anatomical curvature of the aspect of the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space proximate leading end 102 after implant 100 is installed . the general configuration of leading end 102 is further described in connection with fig9 below . as shown in fig7 and 8 , depending on the direction of insertion , for example , when implant 100 is installed in the direction of arrow p from the posterior aspect of the vertebral body v , leading end 102 a is adapted to conform to at least a portion of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body v . when implant 100 is installed in the direction of arrow a from the anterior aspect of vertebral body v , leading end 102 b is adapted to conform to at least a portion of the posterior aspect of vertebral body v . trailing end 104 may be symmetrical or asymmetrical from side - to - side along the transverse axis of the implant and can conform to at least a portion of the natural curvature of the aspect of vertebral body v opposite to leading end 102 . trailing end 104 may or may not be configured to conform to the aspect of vertebral body v proximate trailing end 104 after implant 100 is installed . trailing end 104 need only have a configuration suitable for its intended use in the spine . as shown in fig5 and 6 , implant 100 has opposed portions 106 and 108 that are adapted to contact and support adjacent vertebral bodies when inserted across the intervertebral space . in this embodiment , opposed portions 106 , 108 have a non - arcuate configuration transverse to the longitudinal axis of implant 100 along at least a portion of the length of implant 100 . opposed portions 106 , 108 are spaced apart and connected by an interior side wall 112 and an exterior side wall 114 opposite interior side wall 112 . interior side wall 112 is the portion of implant 100 adapted to be placed toward another implant when implant 100 is inserted in pairs into the disc space between the adjacent vertebral bodies to be fused . interior side wall 112 is not the internal surface of a hollow interior of implant 100 . exterior side wall 114 is adapted to be placed into the disc space nearer to the perimeter of the vertebral bodies than interior side wall 112 . side walls 112 , 114 may also include at least one opening for permitting for the growth of bone therethrough . preferably , each of the opposed portions 106 , 108 have at least one opening 110 in communication with one another to permit for the growth of bone in continuity from adjacent vertebral body to adjacent vertebral body and through implant 100 . implant 100 may further be hollow or at least in part hollow . implant 100 may also include surface roughenings on for example , at least a portion of opposed portions 106 , 108 for engaging the bone of the adjacent vertebral bodies . in another preferred embodiment , the opposed portions of the implant can be in moveable relationship to each other to allow for relative motion of the adjacent vertebral bodies after the implant is installed . as illustrated in fig9 implant 100 has a mid - longitudinal axis mla along its length . mid - longitudinal axis mla is bisected by a plane bpp perpendicular to and bisecting the length of implant 100 along the mid - longitudinal axis mla . implant 100 has a first distance as measured from point c at leading end 102 to bisecting perpendicular plane bpp at point e that is greater than a second distance as measured from bisecting perpendicular plane bpp at point f to the junction of leading end 102 and exterior side wall 114 at point b . implant 100 has a third distance as measured from point a at the junction of leading end 102 and interior side wall 112 to bisecting perpendicular plane bpp at point d that is greater than the second distance as measured from point f to point b . while in the preferred embodiment as shown in fig9 the third distance from points a to d is illustrated as being longer than the first distance from points c to e , the third distance can be equal to or less than the first distance . in a preferred embodiment , the first distance measured from points c to e is greater than the second distance measured from points b to f ; the third distance measured from points a to d can be less than the first distance measured from points c to e ; and the third distance measured from points a to d does not equal the second distance measured from points b to f . in a preferred embodiment of the present invention , when implant 100 is inserted between two adjacent vertebral bodies , implant 100 is contained completely within the vertebral bodies so as not to protrude from the spine . specifically , the most lateral aspect of the implanted implant at the leading end has been relieved , foreshortened , or contoured so as to allow the remainder of the implant to be safely enlarged so as to be larger overall than the prior implants without the leading end lateral wall protruding from the disc space . although overall enlargement of the implant is a preferred feature of one embodiment of the present invention , it is not a requisite element of the invention . while a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated and described herein in the form of an implant having non - arcuate upper and lower portions along a portion of the length of the implant , another preferred embodiment of the present invention as best shown in fig1 includes an implant having arcuate upper and lower portions along at least a portion of the length of the implant . all of the features described in association with the non - arcuate embodiments are equally applicable to the arcuate embodiments of the present invention . fig1 - 11 show two interbody spinal implants generally referred to by the numeral 200 , inserted in the direction of arrow p from the posterior aspect of a vertebral body v , one on either side of the centerline m in the lumbar spine . implant 200 is non - threaded and is configured for linear insertion into the disc space in a direction along the mid - longitudinal axis of implant 200 . implant 200 has a leading end 202 for insertion into the disc space and an opposite trailing end 204 . in a preferred embodiment , leading end 202 is configured to not extend beyond the outer dimensions of the two vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space proximate leading end 202 after implant 200 is installed , to maximize the area of contact of the implant with the vertebral bone . leading end 202 could be described as being generally configured to generally conform to at least a portion of the natural anatomical curvature of the aspect of the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space proximate leading end 202 after implant 200 is installed . in a preferred embodiment , less than half of asymmetric leading end 202 is along a line perpendicular to the mid - longitudinal axis of the implant in a plane dividing the implant into an upper half and a lower half . in a further preferred embodiment of either arcuate or non - arcuate implants , more than half of the leading end can be a contour that goes from the exterior side wall toward the mid - longitudinal axis of the implant in the plane dividing the implant into an upper half and a lower half . in another preferred embodiment of either arcuate or non - arcuate implants , the leading end includes a curve that extends from the exterior side wall beyond the mid - longitudinal axis of the implant . the more pronounced curve of the leading end of the implant of the present invention as compared to the chamfer of related art implants advantageously provides for closer placement of the implant &# 39 ; s leading end to the perimeter of the vertebral body , without the limiting corner protruding therefrom , to more fully utilize the dense cortical bone in the perimeter of the vertebral bodies . the configuration of the implant of the present invention provides the use of an implant having a longer overall length as measured from leading end to trailing end for a better fill of the disc space . implant 200 has opposed portions 206 and 208 that are arcuate transverse to the longitudinal axis of implant 200 along at least a portion of the length of implant 200 and are adapted to contact and support adjacent vertebral bodies when inserted across the intervertebral space and into the vertebral bodies . implant 200 can further include protrusions or surface roughenings such as ratchetings 220 for enhancing stability . surface roughenings may also include ridges , knurling and the like . the present invention is not limited to use in the lumbar spine and is useful throughout the spine . in regard to use in the cervical spine , by way of example , in addition to various blood vessels the esophagus and trachea also should be avoided . further , the implant of the present invention preferably includes non - arcuate opposed surface portions that are either generally parallel to one another along the length of the implant or in angular relationship to each other such that the opposed surfaces are closer to each other proximate one end of the implant than at the longitudinally opposite other . for example , at least a portion of the opposed surfaces may be in a diverging relationship to each other from the trailing end to the leading end for allowing angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies relative to each other . alternatively , at least a portion of the opposed surfaces may be generally in a converging relationship to each other from the trailing end to the leading end for allowing angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies relative to each other . the spinal implant of the present invention allows for a variable surface , or any other configuration and relationship of the opposed surfaces . implant 100 may be adapted to cooperatively engage a driver instrument for installation of the implant into the recipient site . for example , in a preferred embodiment trailing end 104 may be configured to complementary engage an instrument for driving implant 100 . while the exact contour and / or curvature of a particular vertebral body may not be known , the teaching of having the implant leading end be arcuate or truncated along one side ( the lateral leading end ) or from side to side so as to eliminate the length limiting lateral leading corner lc or the side wall or lateral aspect junction to the implant leading end is of such benefit that minor differences do not detract from its utility . further , the range of describable curvatures may be varied proportionately with the size of the implants as well as their intended location within the spine and direction of insertion to be most appropriate and is easily determinable by those of ordinary skill in the art . generally for use in the lumbar spine , when the leading end of the implant is a portion of a circle then the arc of radius of the curvature of the leading end of the implant should be from 10 - 30 mm to be of greatest benefit , though it could be greater or less , and still be beneficial . the same is true for the cervical spine where the arc of radius is preferably 8 - 20 mm . while particular preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described , it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects . while specific innovative features were presented in reference to specific examples , they are just examples , and it should be understood that various combinations of these innovative features beyond those specifically shown are taught such that they may now be easily alternatively combined and are hereby anticipated and claimed .
an artificial interbody spinal implant adapted for placement across an intervertebral space formed across the height of a disc space between two adjacent vertebral bodies is disclosed . the implant has an asymmetrical leading end adapted to sit upon the more peripheral areas , such as the apophyseal rim and the apophyseal rim area , of the vertebral end plate region of the vertebral bodies without protruding therefrom . the asymmetrical leading end allows for the safe use of an implant of maximum length for the implantation space into which it is installed . the implant can also include an asymmetric trailing end adapted to sit upon the more peripheral areas of the vertebral end plate region of the vertebral bodies .