in describing preferred embodiments of the invention illustrated in the drawings , specific terminology will be resorted to for the sake of clarity . however , the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terms so selected , and it is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose . a housing for the various trap embodiments of this invention is illustrated at 20 in fig1 and can be formed of plastic , metal or other suitable material . the housing 20 includes a base 25 and a simple cover 30 hingedly secured thereto in a well known manner . the base 25 is divided longitudinally by a separator 35 to provide compartments on one side for reception of the electronic circuitry ( not shown ) at 40 and batteries ( not shown ) at 45 . the specifics of the electronic circuitry and energizing source are not critical to the instant inventive concepts and the &# 39 ; 328 patent may be referred to for preferred embodiments which may be useful in the traps of this invention . however , it is to be understood that other circuitry may be substituted therefore without departing from the instant inventive concepts and , additionally , as an alternative to the use of batteries , appropriate means can be included to energize the trap from an a - c source or even an external d - c source . additionally , as disclosed in the &# 39 ; 328 patent , a pair of contacts ( not shown ) can be incorporated in the base 25 and cover 30 so that when the cover 30 is lifted to access the interior of the base 25 , the circuit is broken to preclude injury to the user . one form of two - diverter trap according to this invention is illustrated in fig2 - 4 and includes a pair of spaced charge plates or electrodes 50 , 52 located in the “ killing ” chamber 55 and electrically connected in a well - known manner to the electronic circuitry so that contact with both charge plates simultaneously by a target animal will actuate an electronic charge to effectively kill the animal . a principle feature of this embodiment of the instant invention is the mechanism by which an animal entering the trap is directed along a tortuous path or maze to make contact with the charge plates 50 , 52 . in this respect , a pathway is defined between the side wall 26 of the housing base 25 and the separator 35 from the trap opening entrance 60 to a bait receiving location 65 , with the charge plates 50 , 52 interposed in this path . openings such as 26 ′ in the side wall , or elsewhere such as the openings 30 a ′ seen in the cover of fig5 and 6 , may be provided to permit the odor of bait , if any , to exude to the atmosphere and attract the animal to the trap . in lieu of the tilting platform trapping mechanism of the &# 39 ; 161 application , this embodiment of the instant invention substitutes at least two fixed barriers or diverter members 70 , 75 positioned between the opening 60 and the killing chamber 55 . the diverter 70 has one end 72 fixed to the side wall 26 of the base 25 , and extends at approximately a 45 ° angle toward the killing chamber , with the end 74 stopping short of the separator 35 to define a space “ a ” therebetween for passage of an animal . the second diverter 75 has one end 76 fixed to the separator 35 , and extends at approximately an oppositely directed 45 ° angle toward the killing chamber , with its second end 78 spaced from the side wall 26 by a distance “ b ”, again sufficient for an animal to pass through . each of the diverters 70 , 75 extend upwardly at least substantially the full height of the side walls of the housing 25 so as to preclude an animal passing over the tops thereof when the cover 30 is closed . as will be seen best in fig2 the end or edge portions 74 of the first diverter 70 and the end or edge portions 78 of the second diverter 75 overlap so that an animal entering the trap opening 60 does not have a clear view along the pathway , but must pass through a “ maze ” formed at “ a ” and “ b ” to reach the bait 65 . since mice and other such small animals are curious and attracted to dark spaces , the pathway from the opening 60 will entice them into the trap housing , whether a bait is present or not . however , placement of a quantity of odoriferous material such as peanut butter at the end 65 of the pathway will further attract the animal into the killing chamber 55 . once the animal passes the first diverter 70 on its way to the space “ b ”, it no longer has a clear view of the opening 60 behind it and is discouraged from reversing its direction . thus , as the animal progresses along the pathway from the opening 60 , through the spaces “ a ” and “ b ” toward the bait - receiving area 65 , it will step onto the charge plates 50 , 52 , which are slightly spaced apart , but close enough that the animal must contact both plates simultaneously before reaching the bait at 65 . upon doing so , the circuit will be closed by the animal &# 39 ; s body and an electrical charge will kill the animal . the barrier 75 also acts as a blocking mechanism inhibiting the animal from retreating from contact with the charge plates 50 , 52 after the initial shock , insuring continued contact until the animal is electrocuted . the cover 30 can then be opened to break the circuit and dispose of the animal , following which the trap can be reused in an obvious manner . although only two barriers or diverters are shown at 70 , 75 and for all practical purposes , this is sufficient to effect both the maze - like pathway and to protect against accidental contact with both of the charge plates 50 , 52 , from a straight element such as a screwdriver or the like ( not shown ), additional barriers can be included to render the path even more tortuous without diverging from the instant inventive concepts . referring now to fig5 and 6 , a modified trap incorporating a third barrier is illustrated . in this trap , parts similar to the embodiment of fig1 - 4 are designated by the same reference numeral followed by the suffix “ a ”. for all intents and purposes , the base 25 a of the trap 20 a is identical to the base 25 of the trap 20 . however , the cover 30 a of the trap 20 a differs from the cover 30 of the trap 20 in having affixed to the underside thereof a third diverter or barrier 80 which is positioned along the length of the cover 30 a to extend into the space between the electrodes 50 , 52 when the cover 30 a is pivoted to its closed position . the height “ h ” of the barrier 80 is less than the height “ h ′” of the side walls of the housing 25 a to provide a limited space between the lower edge 80 ′ of the barrier 80 and the floor of the base 25 a to force a target animal to squeeze under the barrier 80 as it moves toward the bait . thus , at the time the animal &# 39 ; s front paws engage the second electrode and energize the electrocuting circuit , its body is extended and contorted such that withdrawal from contact with the electrodes is rendered more difficult . although the diverter 80 is preferably carried by an openable cover , it could be carried by a fixed cover if access to the chamber for disposing of the electrocuted carcasses is provided elsewhere , or , for that matter , it could be fixed to the sides of the pathway . while it is evident that a diverter such 80 is best used in conjunction with the angled diverters as shown in fig5 and 6 , it has independent utility in minimizing escape from an electric or electronic trap of other constructions . see , for example , the discussion below of the embodiments of fig7 and 8 and fig9 and 10 . the two - diverter trap shown in fig2 - 4 of the drawings was tested both with the diverters illustrated and without diverters . additionally , traps containing a third diverter as seen in fig5 and 6 were tested . the tests were conducted on both male and female wild mus musclus , the house mouse , of varying size and age . mice were collected from wild populations on farms and adjusted in the laboratory for two to three weeks before being used in the tests . five field mice were placed in an arena measuring 4 × 8 × 3 ft ( width by length by height ). within the arena , a shelter containing shredded paper towels was placed at one end . on the opposite end of the arena , a food ( purina lab chow ) and water source were placed . the 5 mice were then allowed to acclimate for a period of 8 hours within this arena . during this period , the lights were left “ on ” to simulate daytime . at the end of this period , the corresponding test traps were placed into the arena for a period of approximately 16 hours . all traps were baited with creamy peanut butter ( shur - fine brand ). during this time , the lights were turned “ off ” to simulate nighttime . five traps were placed in each arena with each arena considered a replication . three arenas were used during each testing period . the traps were evaluated based on three criteria : ( 1 ) kill rate ( the number of mice killed divided by total number of traps ); ( 2 ) escape rate ( where the mouse has triggered the trap but was not killed ); and ( 3 ) interaction ( the total number visited by mice resulting in either a kill or escape ). sample t - tests were used to determine the significant differences between the traps with and without diverters ( windows 2000 , excel , microsoft corporation ). kill rate : the traps with two and three diverters had mean kill rates of 83 . 4 % and 100 %, respectively , compared to 43 . 4 % for traps without diverters . when analyzed using a t - test at 95 % probability , the kill rate of the traps with two and three diverters was significantly greater than the traps with no diverters . ( see tables 1 - 3 ) escape : the traps with two and three diverters had mean escape rates of 3 . 33 % and 0 %, respectively , compared to 53 . 33 % for the trap without diverters . when analyzed using a t - test at 95 % probability , the traps without diverters had a significantly higher escape rate compared to the traps with two and three diverters . ( see tables 1 - 3 ) interaction : the traps with two and three diverters had mean interaction rates of 86 . 67 % and 90 %, respectively , compared to 96 . 67 % for the trap without diverters . when analyzed using a t - test at 95 % probability , the interaction was not significantly different . ( see tables 1 - 3 ) the traps were identical to each other with the exception of the two and three diverters , yet the trap with the diverters performed significantly better , killing more mice with fewer escapes without significantly reducing interaction . although not wishing to be bound by an explanation of these results , there are two theories for why the diverters reduce the escape rate . first , as the mouse is moving through the trap without diverters , it moves slowly . when it touches the second plate and gets shocked , it is able to back off . in the trap with diverters , the second diverter acts as a barrier , preventing the mouse from retreating . in one instance , there was fur observed on one of the diverters of the trap that had an escape , indicating that the barrier did interfere with the retreat of the mouse . the second theory is based on the space in the trap . the diverters restrict the movement of the mouse until it gets close to the second plate and peanut butter . at this point , the trap opens up to the entire width of the tunnel . it is believed that the mouse is more tentative in the confined space in the diverter areas , but once it sees the open space and the peanut butter , it is more willing to commit . with more of the momentum of the mouse going forward , it is less likely for it to retreat once the shock is triggered . finally , traps with three diverters had an even greater kill rate and lower escape rate . results have shown in these tests that mice not only move back away from the electric plates after being shocked , but also move up . traps with a third diverter prevent the mouse from jumping in this upward direction to escape . in fact , dead mice removed from these traps after being shocked have indentations on their back from hitting the third diverter . in conclusion , both traps with two and three diverters are significantly better in controlling mouse populations than traps without diverters . mice have an instinctive behavior to avoid being shocked , however , this behavior can be predicted and prevented through the use of diverters in the trap design . reference is now made to fig7 and 8 , where yet another embodiment of the instant invention is illustrated , with parts similar to those of the previous embodiments being designated by the same reference numeral followed by the suffix “ b ”. again , for all intents and purposes , the base 25 b of the trap 20 b is identical to the base 25 of the trap 20 or the base 25 a of the trap 20 a , with the exception that the angled diverters have been eliminated . in this embodiment , the cover 30 b is identical to the cover 30 a and includes a downwardly extending plate or barrier 80 b positioned along its length to fit in the space between the electrodes 50 b , 52 b when the cover 30 b is pivoted to its closed position . additionally , the trap 20 b includes an upwardly extending plate or barrier 82 interposed between the entrance opening 60 b and the downwardly depending plate 80 b . the height of each of the plates 80 b , 82 is less than the height h ′ of the side walls of the housing 25 b to provide a limited space over the upper edge 82 ′ of the plate 82 and under the lower edge 80 b ′ of the plate 80 b for the target animal to pass . according to a preferred feature of this invention , the upper edge 82 ′ of the plate 82 is spaced from the floor of the housing 25 b by a distance greater than the distance from the lower edge 80 b ′ of the plate 80 b whereby the plates 80 b , 82 together define a barrier blocking simultaneous access to the electrodes 50 b , 52 b from a straight element passing through the entrance opening 60 b . thus , with this embodiment , the limited space between the downwardly depending plate 80 b and the floor of the housing 25 b forces the target animal to squeeze thereunder making it almost impossible for the animal to pull back once its front paws have contacted the second electrode 52 b . the upwardly extending plate 82 also functions to discourage a target animal from reversing its path because of the difficulty in squeezing back through the space between the upper edge 82 ′ of the plate . 82 and the undersurface of the cover 30 b . the embodiment of fig9 and 10 is included to illustrate that , even if an inclined plane or tilting platform assembly is incorporated in a trap according to the instant invention , the inclusion of a cover of the type seen in fig5 including a downwardly extending plate which is positioned intermediate the electrode members when the cover is dosed , enhances the effectiveness of the trap by minimizing the likelihood that the target animal can back away from the second electrode before it is electrocuted . in this embodiment , parts similar to the previous embodiments are designated by the same reference numeral followed by the suffix “ c ”. for all intents and purposes , the trap , 20 c is very similar to the trap 20 a of fig5 and 6 , with the exception that an inclined plane or tilting platform assembly 100 is incorporated adjacent the entrance opening 60 c . the manner in which the tilting platform or inclined plane assembly 100 operates is well known . reference may be had to the &# 39 ; 161 application for further details . as shown , the inclined plane trap assembly 100 includes a platform element 102 having a first end portion 104 juxtaposed to the entrance opening 60 c and a second end portion 106 juxtaposed to the second electrode 52 c . a pivot element ( not shown ) underlies and supports the platform element 102 intermediate its end portions 104 , 106 for tilting movement of the platform element 102 in a well known manner between a first position in which the first end portion 104 is lowered and the second end portion 106 is raised , and a second position in which the first end portion 104 is raised and the second end portion 106 is lowered . a door member 108 is hinged at its lower edge 108 ′ adjacent to the entrance opening 60 c for pivotal movement between a lowered position in which the door member 108 rests on the first end portion 104 of the platform element 102 when the platform element is in its first position to provide access to the passageway by a target animal through the entrance opening 60 c , and a raised position in which the door member 108 is lifted by upward movement of the first end portion 104 of the platform element 102 when the platform element 102 is moved from its first position to its second position . the door member 108 is biased toward its lowered position under the force of gravity , the weight of the door member 108 on the first end portion 104 of the platform element 102 when the door member 108 is in its lowered position normally maintaining the platform element 102 in its first position . however , the weight of a target animal on the second end portion 106 of the platform element 102 tilts the platform element 102 to its second position when the target animal passes from the entrance opening 60 c beyond the pivot element thereby lifting the door member 108 to its raised position , blocking escape through the entrance opening 60 c by a target animal on the platform element 102 . in the embodiment shown , the platform element 102 is connected to the circuitry ( not shown ) to electrify the same to function as a first electrode . an insulator 110 in the form of a plastic or rubber element underlies the second end portion 106 of the platform element 102 so that the target animal is only shocked when its rear paws are on the platform element 102 and its front paws are on the second electrode 52 c . in this embodiment , the platform element 102 , in either of its positions , blocks simultaneous contact with both of the electrodes by a straight element passing through the entrance opening 60 c . when the cover 30 c is closed , the downwardly depending plate 80 c is interposed between the end portion 106 of the platform element 102 and the second electrode 52 c , forcing 2 target animal to squeeze under the lower edge 80 c ′ of the plate 80 c in its attempt to get to the bait . in doing so , it must then step on the second electrode 52 c and , for all intents and purposes , is precluded from pulling back before the circuitry is closed by the animal &# 39 ; s body and the animal is electrocuted . thus , it will be seen that , even if a tilting platform or inclined plane trap is desired , the incorporation of the downwardly depending diverter or barrier plate carried by the trap housing cover as seen in the embodiment of fig9 and 10 adds further advantages in both minimizing the likelihood of escape by a target animal before electrocution and , additionally , by cooperating with the platform element to make it virtually impossible for a screwdriver or a child &# 39 ; s finger inserted through the entrance opening 60 c to simultaneously contact both the platform element or first electrode 102 and the second electrode 52 c . in summary , in each of the embodiments of this invention , at least one diverter member is interposed in the pathway from the entrance opening along the interior of the housing to the second electrodes to discourage a target animal approaching the second electrode from reversing direction . additionally , at least one barrier member is provided to block simultaneous contact with both of the electrodes by a straight element passing through the entrance opening . for the embodiments of fig2 - 8 , there are literally no moving mechanical parts other than the cover so that the animal trap is inexpensive to manufacture , easy to maintain and highly effective in operation . moreover , even with an inclined plane trap , the extra barrier plate enhances its effectiveness . the foregoing descriptions and drawings should be considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention . as noted , the invention may be configured in a variety of shapes and sizes and is not limited by the dimensions of the preferred embodiment . numerous applications of the present invention will readily occur to those skilled in the art . therefore , it is not desired to limit the invention to the preferred embodiments or the exact construction and operation shown and described . rather , all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to , failing within the scope of the invention .
an electric or electronic animal trap wherein the housing includes a pair of spaced electrodes or charge plates in a killing chamber intermediate the trap entrance and a source of bait . interposed in the pathway to the electrodes is at least one diverter which discourages a target animal from reversing direction before it is electrocuted . in one embodiment , juxtaposed to the entrance are at least two diverter members angularly offset relative to each other to define a maze - like path to lead a target animal to the charge plates for electrocution while discouraging reversal of direction and protecting against direct access to the charge plates through the entrance opening by children , pets or non - target species . a diverter or barrier plate may be carried by the housing cover to extend into the space between the electrodes when the cover is closed , the lower edge of the barrier being spaced from the housing floor a limited distance to force a target animal to squeeze under the barrier as it passes to the second electrode making escape before electrocution difficult . this design may be utilized in combination with a spaced , upwardly extending diverter or barrier plate to block direct access to the pair of electrodes from the entrance opening . the effectiveness of an inclined plane trap assembly may also be enhanced by a plate carried by the cover which forces a target animal to stretch itself out before engaging the second electrode .