the present invention consists of a solid fulvestrant composition showing improved solubility characteristics with respect to the solubility of the solid active principle . the problem of solubility of fulvestrant , as described in u . s . pat . no . 6 , 774 , 122 , in a solution of castor oil and at least one alcohol is solved by the addition of a non - aqueous ester - type solvent miscible with castor oil . the present invention provides a new solution to this technical problem , not by addition of a solvent , but by obtaining dried solid fulvestrant , preferably through a lyophilization process , and preferably amorphous . lyophilization is a drying process , in which the solvent or suspension medium are crystallized at low temperatures and then sublimated directly from solid state to vapor state ( 1 ). the problem we encountered was that fulvestrant is practically insoluble in water ( 3 ) and that the overwhelming majority of lyophilizates of pharmaceutical solutions are lyophilized from simple aqueous solutions ( 2 ). given that fulvestrant is practically insoluble in water , it cannot be used as a lyophilization solvent . we have solved this technical problem , among others , by means of lyophilization with organic solvents or using solvent - non - solvent systems . the use of organic solvents in the lyophilization is not found in the state - of - the - art ( 4 ), and additionally the scientist should keep in mind that the use of organic co - solvent / water systems may cause a myriad of problems ( 2 ). we have developed processes for lyophilizing fulvestrant employing pure organic solvents such as acetic acid , dimethylsufoxide and tert - butanol , and in addition solvent - non - solvent systems consisting of organic solvents and water as non - solvent , for example , acetic acid : water , ethanol : water , tert - butanol : water . the lyophilized solid pharmaceutical compositions of fulvestrant of the present invention have solubility characteristics which are not observed for the solid pharmaceutical active principle . this improved solubility makes it suitable to be used as a pharmaceutical product of rapid dissolution but with no need of using benzyl benzoate as a solvent for castor oil . the lyophilizate should be reconstituted within a reasonable period , typically of less than 2 minutes ( 5 ); if reconstitution time is excessive , that is , more than 3 minutes , the user may get impatient or frustrated ( 6 ). we have compared dissolution time of a fulvestrant lyophilizate to a pharmaceutical active comprising solid fulvestrant and found that the fulvestrant lyophilizate is dissolved in less than 2 minutes , whereas the pharmaceutical active of solid fulvestrant required more than 60 minutes . this comparison was performed by dissolving fulvestrant at a concentration of 50 mg / ml , using a solvent comprising castor oil and benzyl benzoate - free alcohol mixtures . another important fact of the present invention is that when carrying out the methods of manufacturing lyophilizates there was no variation in purity associated to the active principle used in the same , and this consideration is made keeping in mind that the method of usp 34 monograph on fulvestrant is used for determining related compounds . furthermore , it should be noted that there was no degradation either during the process of reconstituting lyophilizates , using a solvent comprising castor oil and benzyl benzoate - free alcohol mixtures . the lyophilizate and its reconstituted form meet the required impurity values established in the ich guidelines for impurities in final products , thus allowing for using this product as an injectable medicament which , given the characteristics of solvents and active principle and that it is administered intramuscularly or subcutaneously , could be used as a sustained - release product of fulvestrant . herein , the term solid refers to non - liquid states , or solutions , but to lyophilization powders or plugs , either in a crystalline or amorphous state . another object of the present invention is a kit comprising two containers , one containing the solid fulvestrant , preferably lyophilized and amorphous , of the present invention and the other containing the solubilizing composition of the present invention . in a first embodiment of the kit , it comprises the containers and a syringe . in a second embodiment , it comprises a prefilled syringe containing said two containers . in a third alternative of said containers , syringe and transfer system , said transfer system connects both containers with the syringe . this third option turned out to be the most efficient , as demonstrated in the examples . the needle - free transfer system allowed for transferring the solvent to the syringe , from the syringe to the lyophilizate and then the reconstituted form to the syringe , rapidly and with a minimum effort . furthermore , the risk of injuries to health workers due to needle manipulation , as well as product contamination , are reduced to a minimum because the solvent vial - transfer system - lyophilized vial system is a closed system . thus , another object of the present invention is the use of a transfer system for connecting the containers containing the solubilizing composition , the container containing the solid fulvestrant of the present invention and a syringe . another object of the present invention is a process for obtaining the composition of claim 1 comprising the following steps of : a . dissolving the active pharmaceutical principle fulvestrant in a lyophilization solvent selected from the group consisting of acetic acid , dimethylsulfoxide , tert - butanol and mixtures thereof , where preferably said solid composition containing less than 0 . 5 % organic solvents is obtained ; further , lyophilization comprises cooling the product obtained in step a to at least − 20 c for at least 5 hours , working under a pressure higher than 500 mtorr . after this time has elapsed , the pressure is lowered to below 500 mtorr . after at least 3 hours , heating of the system is started with a difference of at least 5 ° c . between two consecutive temperatures , the heating being ramp - or step - wise and each step being of an extension of at least 3 hours . the final temperature of the system comprises from 0 to 50 ° c . to a 100 ml beaker , fitted with a magnetic stirrer , 35 ml glacial acetic acid , merck lot k 36685863 , is added . the beaker is placed on an ika model ms2 minishaker magnetic stirrer plate . seven hundred mg fulvestrant from scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 were weighed using an ohaus model adventurer balance . stirring of acetic acid is started and fulvestrant is slowly added which is rapidly dissolved . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes . after this time has elapsed , stirring is stopped and the solution is dosed using a 5000 ul eppendorf research micropipette into 50 ml schott type i glass vials , with a 12 . 5 ml volume . vials are pre - capped with helvoet pharma bromobutyl lyophilization stoppers and lyophilized using a virtis advantage lyophilizer . the lyophilization cycle is shown in table 1 . once the lyophilization process is completed , vials are capped and crimped with aluminum seals . the lyophilizate thus obtained has a very good aspect . titer and purity of one lyophilizate vial are analyzed by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant used in the manufacture of the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on a waters hplc system with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph on fulvestrant . the titer of the lyophilizate was the same as that of scinopharm fulvestrant , 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities were 0 . 1 %. a physical characterization of a sample of lyophilized fulvestrant was performed . the physical characterization was made by x - ray diffraction , differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric assays . the x - ray assay was carried out in a philips x &# 39 ; pert with a pw3710 unity using cukα radiation = 1 . 54 a . records were obtained in the range of 3 °& lt ; 2θ & lt ; 40 °. a step of 0 . 02 ° in 2θ was used with a time counting of 2 seconds per step . fig5 shows a diffraction diagram of the sample which has a typical diffraction pattern corresponding to an amorphous sample . the differential scanning calorimetry assay was performed with a shimadzu dsc 60 . a sample of 2 . 29 mg was placed on an aluminum sampleholder , and heated at 10 ° c ./ min from room temperature to 200 ° c . work was carried out under n 2 with a flow of 30 ml / min the thermogravimetric assay was performed with a shimadzu tg 50 . the sample was placed in an aluminum sampleholder . it was heated from room temperature to 400 ° c . with heating rate of 10 ° c ./ min , under dry air flow of 40 ml / min fig6 shows a differential scanning calorimetry diagram and a thermogravimetric diagram . an endothermic signal characterized by an onset temperature to = 49 +/− 1 ° c . and an enthalpy variation of 11 +/− 2 j / g was observed , which as may be appreciated in the thermogravimetric diagram does not correspond to mass loss . this lyophilizate was made with scinopharm fulvestrant . a comparison of diffraction diagrams of the starting material , diagram 1 , and the lyophilizate , diagram 5 , shows that during the lyophilization process there was a transformation or change of the crystalline state of fulvestrant from crystalline , the state of the starting material , to amorphous , the state of the lyophilized material . when comparing the results of the thermal study of scinopharm and sicor fulvestrant , it is concluded that the melting point of fulvestrant is 102 +/− 2 ° c . and the enthalpy of fusion is 50 +/− 4 j / g . the lyophilizate has an endothermic signal characterized by an onset temperature to = 49 +/− 1 ° c . and an enthalpy variation of 11 +/− 2 j / g , which is different from the crystalline fulvestrant used for manufacturing the lyophilizate . to a 10 ml beaker , fitted with a magnetic stirrer , 2 . 5 ml of tert - butanol tedia lot # 904088 was added and then heated to 30 ° c . the beaker was placed on an ika ms2 minishaker magnetic stirring plate , establishing plate conditions of agitation at 400 to 600 rpm and a temperature of 30 ° c . forty - nine mg fulvestrant from scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 were weighed using an ohaus model adventurer balance . fulvestrant is slowly added . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes a clear solution was obtained . after this time , stirring is stopped and with using a 5 ml syringe and needle ( darling ) the solution is dosed into an 11 ml type i glass vial from nuova ompi . the vial is pre - capped with a helvoet pharma bromobutyl lyophilization stopper and lyophilized using a virtis advantage lyophilizator . the lyophilization cycle is shown in table 2 . once the cycle is completed , vials are withdrawn from the lyophilizator , canned and crimped with aluminum seals . the lyophilizate thus obtained has a very good aspect . titer and purity of the lyophilizate is analyzed by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant used in the manufacture of the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on an hplc waters with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph on fulvestrant . the titer of the lyophilizate was the same as that of scinopharm fulvestrant , 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities were 0 . 1 %. a physical characterization of a sample of lyophilized fulvestrant was performed . the physical characterization was made by x - ray diffraction , differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric assays . the x - ray assay was carried out in a philips x &# 39 ; pert with a pw3710 unity using cukα radiation = 1 . 54 a . records were obtained in the range of 3 °& lt ; 2θ & lt ; 40 °. a step of 0 . 02 ° in 2θ was used with a time counting of 2 seconds per step . fig7 shows a diffraction diagram of the sample which has a typical diffraction pattern corresponding to an amorphous sample . the differential scanning calorimetry assay was performed with a shimadzu dsc 60 . a sample of 3 . 10 mg was placed on an aluminum sampleholder , and heated at 10 ° c ./ min from room temperature to 200 ° c . work was carried out under n 2 with a flow of 30 ml / min the thermogravimetric assay was performed with a shimadzu tg 50 . the sample was placed in an aluminum sampleholder . it was heated from room temperature to 400 ° c . with heating rate of 10 ° c ./ min , under dry air flow of 40 ml / min fig8 shows a differential scanning calorimetry diagram and a thermogravimetric diagram . thermal signals were observed between room temperature and 70 ° c ., probably associated with the mass loss detected by thermogravimetry . other thermal signals were observed from 70 ° c . to 90 ° c . which apparently did not correspond to mass loss . this lyophilizate was made with scinopharm fulvestrant . a comparison of diffraction diagrams of the starting material , diagram 1 , and the lyophilizate , diagram 7 , shows that during the lyophilization process there was a transformation or change of the crystalline state of fulvestrant from crystalline , the state of the starting material , to amorphous , the state of the lyophilized material . when comparing the results of the thermal study of scinopharm and sicor fulvestrant , it is concluded that the melting point of fulvestrant is 102 +/− 2 ° c . and the enthalpy of fusion is 50 +/− 4 j / g . the lyophilizate does not show the endothermic signals which are characteristic of phase change phenomena . to a 50 ml beaker , fitted with a magnetic stirrer , 12 . 5 ml dimethylsulfoxide malinckroff lot # 904088 was added with the aid of a 5000 ul eppendorf research micropipette . the beaker was placed on an ika ms2 minishaker magnetic stirring plate , establishing plate conditions of agitation at 400 to 600 rpm . two hundred and fifty mg fulvestrant from scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 were weighed using an ohaus model adventurer balance . fulvestrant is slowly added . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes a clear solution was obtained . after this time , stirring is stopped and with using a 5 ml syringe and needle ( darling ) the solution is dosed into a 50 ml type i glass vial from schott . the vial is pre - capped with a helvoet pharma bromobutyl lyophilization stopper and lyophilized using a virtis advantage lyophilizator . the lyophilization cycle is shown in table 3 . once the cycle is completed , vials are withdrawn from the lyophilizator , capped and crimped with aluminum seals . fulvestrant is slowly added . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes a clear solution was obtained . then , with the aid of a 5000 ul eppendorf research micropipette , 1 ml of water was added , and after 2 minutes additional 1 ml water was added . after the addition of water the solution is transformed into a suspension . stirring is stopped and with the aid of a 5 ml syringe and needle ( darling ) the solution is dosed into an 11 ml type i glass vial from nuova ompi . the vial is pre - capped with a helvoet pharma bromobutyl lyophilization stopper and lyophilized using a virtis advantage lyophilizator . the lyophilization cycle is shown in table 4 . once the cycle is completed , vials are withdrawn from the lyophilizator , capped and crimped with aluminum seals . the aspect of the lyophilizate thus obtained is not good . titer and purity of the lyophilizate is analyzed by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant used in the manufacture of the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on an hplc waters with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph for fulvestrant . the titer of the lyophilizate was the same as that of scinopharm fulvestrant , 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities were 0 . 1 %. lyophilization of fulvestrant from acetic acid and water at a ratio of 1 : 1 by volume to a 5 ml beaker , fitted with a magnetic stirrer , 1 ml glacial acetic acid , merck lot k 36685863 was added with the aid of a 5000 ul eppendorf research micropipette . the beaker was placed on an ika ms2 minishaker magnetic stirring plate , establishing plate conditions of agitation at 200 to 300 rpm . forty - nine mg fulvestrant from scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 were weighed using an ohaus model adventurer balance . fulvestrant is slowly added . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes a clear solution was obtained . then , with the aid of a 5000 ul eppendorf research micropipette , 1 ml of water was added . after the addition of water the solution is transformed into a suspension . stirring is stopped and with the aid of a 5 ml syringe and needle ( darling ) the solution is dosed into an 11 ml type i glass vial from nuova ompi . the vial is pre - capped with a helvoet pharma bromobutyl lyophilization stopper and lyophilized using a virtis advantage lyophilizator . the lyophilization cycle is shown in table 5 . once the cycle is completed , vials are withdrawn from the lyophilizator , capped and crimped with aluminum seals . the lyophilizate thus obtained has a good aspect . titer and purity of the lyophilizate is analyzed by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant used in the manufacture of the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on an hplc waters with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph for fulvestrant . the titer of the lyophilizate was the same as that of scinopharm fulvestrant , 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities were 0 . 1 %. lyophilization of fulvestrant from ethanol and water at a ratio of 1 : 2 by volume to a 5 ml beaker , fitted with a magnetic stirrer , 0 . 5 ml baker anhydrous ethanol is added with the aid of a 1000 ul eppendorf research micropipette . the beaker was placed on an ika ms2 minishaker magnetic stirring plate , establishing plate conditions of agitation at 200 to 300 rpm . forty - nine mg fulvestrant from scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 were weighed using an ohaus model adventurer balance . fulvestrant is slowly added . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes a clear solution was obtained . then , with the aid of a 5000 ul eppendorf research micropipette , 1 ml of water is added . after the addition of water the solution is transformed into a suspension . stirring is stopped and with the aid of a 5 ml syringe and needle ( darling ) the solution is dosed into an 11 ml type i glass vial from nuova ompi . the vial is pre - capped with a helvoet pharma bromobutyl lyophilization stopper and lyophilized using a virtis advantage lyophilizator . the lyophilization cycle is shown in table 6 . once the cycle is completed , vials are withdrawn from the lyophilizator , capped and crimped with aluminum seals . the lyophilizate thus obtained has a good aspect . titer and purity of the lyophilizate is analyzed by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant used in the manufacture of the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on an hplc waters with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph for fulvestrant . the titer of the lyophilizate was the same as that of scinopharm fulvestrant , 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities were 0 . 1 %. a 50 ml schott , type i , glass vial is placed on an ohaus adventurer balance . then , 3 . 12 g merck ethanol , 4 . 17 g sigma - aldrich benzyl alcohol and 12 . 70 g sigma - aldrich castor oil are added . with the aid of a 1000 ul eppendorf research micropipette , 5 ml of the previously prepared solvent was added into an 11 ml nuova ompi type i of glass vial . the vial is capped with a solution s - additive plug from westpharma and crimped with an aluminum seal . the process for reconstituting a vial of lyophilizate of example 1 with the solvent of said example , using a needle - less transfer system transfer device 20 / 20 w / 150 mic filter sterile from westpharma , fig9 , is as follows : 1 . seals are removed from the containers ( vials ) containing the solid fulvestrant composition of the invention and the solubilizing composition . 2 . the cover of the package containing the transfer system is removed . 3 . the transfer system is placed on the top of the vial containing the solvent and the cap is pierced using one of the punches of the transfer system . 4 . the vial with solvent is inverted together with the transfer device . 5 . the transfer system is placed on top of the vial containing the lyophilizate and the cap is pierced using the free punch of the transfer system . 6 . the protecting cover of the syringe of the transfer system is removed . 7 . the protecting cover of the 10 ml darling syringe is removed , and the syringe is introduced into the luer lock of the transfer system . 8 . the valve of the transfer system is mounted to remove the solvent , which is extracted with the syringe . 9 . the transfer system valve is turned to connect the syringe and the lyophilizate . 10 . the complete content of the syringe is discharged into the lyophilizate vial . 11 . after the reconstituted solution is formed , the transfer system is turned 180 degrees to withdraw this solution with the aid of a syringe . using a sper scientific timer , it was determined that less than 90 seconds were required for reconstituting the lyophilizate . using a 50 ml schott type i glass vial , 250 mg scinopharm fulvestrant lot # 70850aa003 are weighed . with the aid of a 10 ml darling syringe and needle , 5 ml of the solvent of example 7 are extracted and added to the vial containing scinopharm api fulvestrant . it was determined that more than 60 minutes were required to completely dissolve fulvestrant in the solvent using a sper scientific timer . titer and purity of the reconstituted fulvestrant of example 7 are analyzed by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant as used for manufacturing the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on an hplc waters with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph for fulvestrant . the titer of the lyophilizate was the same as that of scinopharm fulvestrant , 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities were 0 . 1 %. stability test of the fulvestrant solution in acetic acid during 6 hours at room temperature to a 10 ml beaker , fitted with a magnetic stirrer , 2 . 5 ml glacial acetic acid , merck lot k 36685863 , is added . the beaker is placed on an ika model ms2 minishaker magnetic stirrer plate . fifty mg fulvestrant from scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 were weighed using an ohaus model adventurer balance . stirring of acetic acid is started and fulvestrant is slowly added which is rapidly dissolved . after all fulvestrant was added stirring is continued for 5 minutes . stirring is stopped and the solution is left at room temperature for 6 hours , then dissolution is analyzed in terms of titer and purity by hplc , and compared to scinopharm fulvestrant as used for manufacturing the lyophilizate . hplc determinations were carried out on an hplc waters with a waters 1525 binary pump , waters 717 autosampler , and a waters 2996 diode array detector ; the hplc column used for determining titer and purity is an agilent eclipse xdb - c8 3 . 5u 4 . 6 × 150 rapid res column ; the chromatographic method corresponds to us pharmacopeia ( usp , 34 ( 2011 )) monograph for fulvestrant . the titer of the solution was 99 . 2 %, the same as the one of scinopharm fulvestrant , i . e . 99 . 2 %. fulvestrant and lyophilizate total impurities in the solution were 0 . 1 %. the sample of fulvestrant to be analyzed was manufactured by scinopharm , lot # 70850aa003 . the physical characterization was made by x - ray diffraction , differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric assays . the x - ray assay was carried out in a philips x &# 39 ; pert with a pw3710 unity using cukα radiation = 1 . 54 a . records were obtained in the range of 3 °& lt ; 2θ & lt ; 40 °. a step of 0 . 02 ° in 2θ was used with a time counting of 2 seconds per step . fig1 shows a diffraction diagram of the sample which has a typical diffraction pattern corresponding to a crystalline sample . the differential scanning calorimetry assay was performed with a shimadzu dsc 60 . a sample of 1 . 68 mg was placed on an aluminum sampleholder , and heated at 10 ° c ./ min from room temperature to 200 ° c . work was carried out under n 2 with a flow of 30 ml / min the thermogravimetric assay was performed with a shimadzu tg 50 . the sample was placed in an aluminum sampleholder . it was heated from room temperature to 400 ° c . with heating rate of 10 ° c ./ min , under dry air flow of 40 ml / min fig2 shows a differential scanning calorimetry diagram and a thermogravimetric diagram . an endothermic signal characterized by an onset temperature to = 49 +/− 1 ° c . and an enthalpy variation of 11 +/− 2 j / g was observed , which as may be appreciated in the thermogravimetric diagram does not correspond to mass loss and presumably corresponds to the melting point , which confirms that the crystalline state of fulvestrant is a crystal . the sample of fulvestrant to be analyzed was manufactured by sicor , lot # 4233500210c . the physical characterization was made by x - ray diffraction , differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric assays . the x - ray assay was carried out in a philips x &# 39 ; pert with a pw3710 unity using cukα radiation = 1 . 54 a . records were obtained in the range of 3 °& lt ; 2θ & lt ; 40 °. a step of 0 . 02 ° in 2θ was used with a time counting of 2 seconds per step . fig3 shows a diffraction diagram of the sample which has a typical diffraction pattern corresponding to a crystalline sample . the differential scanning calorimetry assay was performed with a shimadzu dsc 60 . a sample of 2 . 82 mg was placed on an aluminum sampleholder , and heated at 10 ° c ./ min from room temperature to 200 ° c . work was carried out under n 2 with a flow of 30 ml / min . the thermogravimetric assay was performed with a shimadzu tg 50 . the sample was placed in an aluminum sampleholder . it was heated from room temperature to 400 ° c . with heating rate of 10 ° c ./ min , under dry air flow of 40 ml / min fig4 shows a differential scanning calorimetry diagram and a thermogravimetric diagram . an endothermic signal characterized by an onset temperature to = 103 +/− 1 ° c . and an enthalpy variation of 49 +/− 2 j / g was observed , which as may be appreciated in the thermogravimetric diagram does not correspond to mass loss and presumably corresponds to the melting point , which confirms that the crystalline state of fulvestrant is a crystal . it may be appreciated upon comparing the results of scinopharm and sicor fulvestrant that the x - ray diffraction diagram , the melting point and fusion enthalpy are very similar . syringeability and injectability of different solvents using needles and using a transfer system syringeability and injectability are key parameters for the design of parenteral products . the first term refers to the ability of the injectable to readily pass through a needle when transferred from one vial to another ; the second term refers to the ability to be injected . the syringeability includes factors such as easy extraction , obstruction and foam formation as well as precision of metered doses . the injectability includes the pressure or force required for the injection , flow uniformity and non - obstruction ( 13 ). the syringeability of the solvent and the reconstituted solution of example 7 were assayed using 3 systems : the first system consisted of a 10 ml darling syringe , with 23 g needles , the second system employed a 10 ml darling syringe , with 18 g needles , both needles had a length of 3 . 8 cm , and the last one was the transfer system described in example 7 . the assay consisted in extracting the solvent describe in example 7 , injecting it in the lyophilizate vial , reconstituting the lyophilizate and extracting it from the vial containing it . when the solvent extraction assay was carried out with the syringe and 23 g needle system we discovered that no solvent could be extracted . this is due to the high viscosity of the solvent and the high caliper of the syringe . therefore it was decided to use a syringe with lower needle caliper , i . e . having a greater diameter hole of the needle , performing the assay with an 18 g needle . but the result was the same as before , nothing could be extracted . the selection of a 23 g needle is supported by the fact that the reconstituted fulvestrant , like the original product faslodex , is administered intramuscularly . according to reference ( 14 ), needles comprising from 21 to 23 g and with a length from 2 . 5 cm to 3 . 8 cm should be used for intramuscular injections ; a 23 g needle is used for the original product , faslodex . the use of a transfer system , another object of the present invention , allowed for passing solvent to the syringe , from the syringe to the reconstitution vial and from the latter to the syringe almost immediately and with no need to exert any force . 2 d . l . teagarden , d . s . baker , practical aspects of lyophilization using non - aqueous co - solvent systems ; european journal of pharmaceutical sciences , 15 , 115 - 133 , 2002 . 4 l . rey , j . may ; freeze drying / lyophilization of pharmaceutical and biological products , 3 edition ; informa healthcare ; p . 25 , 2010 . 5 l . rey , j . may : freeze drying / lyophilization of pharmaceutical and biological products , 3 edition ; informa healthcare , p . 325 , 2010 . 6 t . a . jennings : lyophilization introduction and basic principles ; informa healthcare , p . 428 , 2008 . 11 david e . alonso et al . : understanding the behavior of amorphous pharmaceutical systems during dissolution ; pharmaceutical research , 27 , 4 , 2010 12 sharad b . murdande et al . : solubility advantage of amorphous pharmaceuticals : ii ; application of quantitative thermodynamic relationships for prediction of solubility enhancement in structural diverse insoluble pharmaceuticals ; pharmaceutical research , 27 , 2704 - 2714 , 2010 . 13 f . cilurzo et al . ; injectability evaluation : an open issue ; aaps pharmscitech 07 / 005 / 2011 .
the invention relates to a solid pharmaceutical composition comprising solid amorphous fulvestrant , said composition being formulated in combination with a solubilizing composition . the invention also relates to a method for preparing said composition and a kit including the composition .