Does the vector space spanned by a set of orthogonal basis contains the basis vectors themselves always? I used to think that in any Vector space the space spanned by a set of orthogonal
 basis vectors contains the basis vectors themselves. But when I consider the vector space $\mathcal{L}^2(\mathbb{R})$ and the Fourier basis which spans this vector space, the same is not true ! I'd like to get clarified on possible mistake in the above argument.
If by "the Fourier basis" you mean the functions $e^{2 \pi i n x}, n \in \mathbb{Z}$, then these functions do not lie in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$ as they are not square-integrable over $\mathbb{R}$, so in particular they can't span that space in any reasonable sense. The functions $e^{2 \pi i n x}$ do span $L^2(S^1)$ (in the Hilbert space sense).

Perhaps you are getting the Fourier transform for periodic functions mixed up with the Fourier transform on $\mathbb{R}$.
I want you guys to understand few things clearly:

1> The dirchlet conditions are "sufficient" not necessary  for F' transform'bility

2> The sinusoid is DEFINITELY in the span of {exp(j2PIft)} this follows from linear algebra! 
However It does not mean that the fourier TRANSFORM exists ! .. however in case of the periodic signals with finite discontinuities , and INTEGRABILITY(ABSOLUTE) WITHIN A PERIOD, the fourier SERIES does exist !!!  .. 

3> for a sine wave , Acos(wt) we (in some engineering contexts) agree that the fourier transform is the delta distribution along +/- w . However strictly we can only talk of the fourier series of such a function ! .

4> the fourier transform is the fourier series , approximated as the fundamental frequency being "epsilon" -->0 ; i.e the funda period being inf. 

lastly ! do remember that fourier transformability is not necessary for SPANNING !! 

This may not really be an answer to the above but is WORTH THINKING ABOUT:  The fourier "BASIS"  definitely does not span L2(r) , consider the simple rectangular pulse which is definitely square integrable over R. However If you do consider the infinite linear combination (of coefficients of a sinc(f) function whose inverse fourier transform is the pulse) , in the limit as we go on taking infinite (uncountable) sums , The result does NOT converge to the rect pulse in the point convergence sense , but only in the norm square sense. !  

In essence , rect(t) is NOT FOURIER TRANSFORMABLE !!   if it were, then all the filter theory we study makes no sense !!!