Proving that a quotient space is Hausdorff This question is influenced by Quotient space of unit sphere is Hausdorff. I have slightly modified this to make it somewhat difficult.

 Let $S^1=\{e^{2\pi it}|r\in\mathbb{R}\}$ be the unit sphere. Define $\sim$ on $S^1$ where two points are identified if $t_1-t_2=\sqrt{2}k$, for some $k\in\mathbb{Z}$. It must be shown that $S^1/\sim$ is Hausdorff. 

Define $f:S^1\times S^1\rightarrow S^1$ by $f(x,y)=xy^{-1}$. Clearly $f$ is continuous. Let $R=\{(x,y)\in S^1\times S^1|x \sim y \}=\{(e^{2\pi it_1},e^{2\pi it_2})\in S^1\times S^1|t_1-t_2=\sqrt{2}k,k \in\mathbb{Z}\}$. Also, let $A=\{ e^{2\sqrt{2}k\pi i}|k\in \mathbb{Z} \}$. Then $f^{-1}(A)=R$. $A$ being a countable set implies that $A$ is closed, therefore $R$ is closed since $f$ is continuous. Thus $S/\sim$ is Hausdorff. Is this proof correct? Thank you.
First, $S^1=\{e^{2\pi it}:t\in\mathbb{R}\}$ is a unit circle rather than a unit sphere.
Second, for $t_1,t_2\in\mathbb{R}$ we have $e^{2\pi it_1}=e^{2\pi it_2}$ if and only if $t_2-t_1\in\mathbb{Z}$, hence we can also write $S^1=\{e^{2\pi it}:t\in[0,1)\}$.
Third, in order to correctly define a binary relation $\sim$ on $S^1$ by identifying points $e^{2\pi it_1}$ and $e^{2\pi it_2}$ whenever $t_1,t_2$ satisfy a property $P(t_1,t_2)$, one has to ensure that the property $P$ has the same logical value for all pairs $(t_1,t_2)\in\mathbb{R}^2$ that yield the same pair of points $(e^{2\pi it_1},e^{2\pi it_2})$ on the circle.
Namely, that for any $t_1,t_2,t'_1,t'_2\in\mathbb{R}$, if $t'_1-t_1\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $t'_2-t_2\in\mathbb{Z}$, then $P(t_1,t_2)\equiv P(t'_1,t'_2)$.

Your property $P(t_1,t_2)\equiv(\exists k\in\mathbb{Z})(t_1-t_2=\sqrt{2}k)$ is not such.
Let $t_1=1+\sqrt{2}$, $t'_1=\sqrt{2}$, $t_2=t'_2=1$.
Then $t'_1-t_1$ and $t'_2-t_2$ are integers, $P(t_1,t_2)$ holds true since $t_1-t_2=\sqrt{2}$, but $P(t'_1,t'_2)$ is false since $t'_1-t'_2=\sqrt{2}-1$ and there is no $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ satisfying $\sqrt{2}k=\sqrt{2}-1$, as this would mean that $k=1-1/\sqrt{2}$. So your relation is not correctly defined and it has no sense to ask whether $S^1/\mathord{\sim}$ is Hausdorff.
The only way for points to be equivalent is for k=o so your equivalence relation is the identity (again ) . Try t_1-t_2 =k/2  which would identify antipodal points. Then I think  your argument will work . detail ? If t_1-t_2=2^(1/2)k then e^2(PI)i$\sqrt2$k =1 . Then $\sqrt2$k is an integer so the square root of 2 is rational ( impossible) unless k=0 So k=0 and the equivalence relation is the identity