Can I create anonymous repositories for double-blind peer review via GitHub organizations? When submitting a paper to a conference/journal for double-blind peer review, one usually has to anonymize source code, if there is any. In my situation, I have to do it in a form of GitHub repository. I know that people often do it using anonymous GitHub accounts. However, it seems inconvenient to me, and I am trying to achieve the goal using a GitHub organization, created from my main account. My question is: can you identify me given the following setup?

This is me: https://github.com/Yura52
This is my organization: https://github.com/Organizationnnnn
This is the repository with one my commit: https://github.com/Organizationnnnn/first

NOTE: if you want to use this workflow, don't forget to:

remove yourself from watchers right after you created the repository
set user settings after you clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/Organizationnnnn/first
cd first
git config user.name &quot;Anonymous Author&quot;
git config user.email &quot;anonymous@author.org&quot;
touch README.md
git add README.md
git commit -m &quot;anonymous commit&quot;
# you can also anonymize yourself only for specific commits, but there is always a risk of forgetting this
# git commit -m &quot;anonymous commit&quot; --author=&quot;Anonymous Author &lt;anonymous@author.org&gt;&quot;
The fact that you created the repository is visible under your account's activity, so anyone following your account can see it in their feed. This can also be seen later by viewing your activity by subscribing to your RSS Feed.
However, generally this should be a concern for anonymizing for peer review, since the requirements are usually much lower — authors can often be identified by preprints and similar means anyway if someone really wants to find out, and reviewers are expected not to go looking for this information.
But if you have a GitHub account with a lot of followers or want to prevent anyone from checking if your account created the repository, then your proposed method is not sufficient.