Separating your publications into journals vs. conference/workshop It seems typical in some fields (e.g. engineering) for researchers to classify their publications on their websites and CVs into two groups: journal vs. conference/workshop. This appears to be because journal papers are considered more significant, in some sense.

This doesn't appear to be the case in other fields, such as computer science, where conferences are seen as more significant. With more people in engineering publishing in top CS venues, and the lines between the two fields becoming a bit blurry, the reasoning for separating papers into journal vs. not journal isn't clear.

Question: What is a good strategy for organizing publications in on a website/CV?
I happen to prefer a chronological listing. But it is really up to you. For example, if you work regularly in two different research areas you could even list publications and such separately for the two areas. 

The chronological listing makes it easier, IMO, to follow a thread or trend in research where other divisions don't. 

But, if you have access to examples of how others do it in your field it would probably be best to follow along. 

You are asking here for what amounts to opinion and those opinions may not be valid in your field. Do what is expected, I think.