What do I do if my results are not ready before a conference? My supervisor encouraged me to apply for a conference presentation, as he had funding for me to go.  The problem was that I had no results at the time, since the conference date was six months after the abstract deadline.  At the time I thought I would have results in time so I wrote an abstract (stating what I plan to do and why it is important, but posted no results) and got accepted for a poster presentation.

Now it is 1 week before the conference and I have very poor results.  I was able to complete the experiment, but the the results are much too poor to present.  Unfortunately I have no time to redo anything and do not have any previous research (am a masters student).  Which one of these is worse?:


Presenting meaningless results just so you can present
Presenting a vague poster (show the theory, methodology, importance, but no tangible results) to get around poor data.
Not showing up to the conference and get a partial refund.
I would recommend another option: present the current truth of your work and results. You can get feedback on the methods and approach and somebody may even be able to point out adjustments to your approach that may help the work. Even just talking to people outside of your lab can be an important part of developing as a researcher. Don't try to hide the state of your work or pretend you have more than you have: people will be able to tell and it will not help you. Instead present yourself as you are: an early student looking for interaction around these ideas.

Note, of course, that this is all subject to your professor's approval: they know your community better than random strangers on the internet.

Finally: let this be a lesson for the future. Don't give in to pressure to claim results that you may not get. It is always better to say "And here are some new results not mentioned in the abstract..." than to explain why you can't deliver what you promised.