An invitation from Frontiers (Frontiers Research Topics) On 13th August 2013 I received the following email. I  have cut and pasted it below. I haven't bothered to insert back any of the links, but can do so if anyone is interested. I would not normally post private email to a public forum, but this is obviously a form letter, one step up from spam.

At the time I dismissed it as one more attempt by a journal to get me to do something for nothing as usual, but then I got a followup from the same person on 12th February 2014. It is in my experience fairly unusual to get a followup to this kind of invitation.

I thought it would do no harm to ask people here what they thought. I haven't changed my mind on it. I don't see any advantage to the proposed work. They aren't offering any money of course. It is not a publication. It isn't an opportunity to get involved in a collaborative project. It looks like a opportunity to become some kind of unpaid new-fangled Web 2.0 type editor for some kind of new-fangled web research platform. It would probably be lots of work. So, I don't see anything in it for me. I'm not sure what is in it for the journal either.

So, to summarize my questions in a convenient fashion.


Is there any reason anyone one can think of that I might want to be
involved in something like this? Note - I'm by no stretch of the
imagination a senior researcher. Such an invitation might make sense for
a senior researcher, but I don't see why such a person could not simply
create his own web site to showcase his research.
Why is the journal trying to organize something like this? I don't
quite see what is in it for them either. Perhaps just the opportunity
to make money off submissions to an ersatz journal?



  I came across[LINK][LINK] your “SNPpy--database management for SNP
  data from genome wide association studies.” published in “PloS one”
  and thought that it would be an excellent fit for the "Research
  Topics" initiative in Frontiers. We have recently partnered with
  the [LINK]Nature Publishing Group [goo.gl]  to expand our
  researcher-driven Open Science platform, and I would like for you to
  consider suggesting a consolidated topic of the latest research and
  perspectives from your field in a Frontiers journal. 
  
  However please note that our invitation is not restricted to the
  subject of this work. You are free to propose a Research Topic of your
  choice.
  
  This [LINK][LINK]short video [goo.gl] gives you a better overview on
  the potential of Frontiers Research Topics.
  
  You may also want to browse on the [LINK][LINK]Research Topics
  homepage [goo.gl] and [LINK][LINK]here [goo.gl] to check the final
  format of a Frontiers Research Topic as an e-book.
  
  Like in the example above, Frontiers will create a dedicated homepage
  for your Research Topic, where you can manage contributions and
  maintain an ongoing dialogue with post-publication feedback from the
  research community.
  
  If you are interested in pursuing this project, all it takes to get
  started is:
  
   - A title and a short description of your Research Topic;
  
  
  A list of contributors you plan to contact.
  
  
  If you wanted to find detailed information on how to launch a Research
  Topic, please browse [LINK][LINK]here [goo.gl].
  
  Please let me know if you are interested in organizing a Frontiers
  Research Topic, and do not hesitate to contact me by phone or email
  with any questions. I’m looking forward to your reply.
As far as I can tell, a "Research Topic" is a collection of papers on a specialized topic.  It's basically a special issue of one of their journals, although it's presented slightly differently, and they charge publication fees for the papers.

What really turns me off is the publisher's spamming practices.  I've had exactly the same experience you have: they send what's pretty obviously a form letter (populated with your name and one publication title/journal, seemingly randomly selected) and then some months later send a passive-aggressive reminder asking for a reply.  Maybe this is a coincidence, but I also got a follow-up message from them on February 12, so perhaps they sent out a whole wave of them on that day.  In any case, the fact that they feel they have to advertise by spamming makes me suspicious, and the reminder messages are irritating.