Should one refer to the title of an article or to the title of the magazine when the author is unknown (MLA/APA) I think the title is quite clear.

If the author of an article is unknwon, should one refer to the title of the article, or to the magazine itself? The same goes for electronic sources.

Let's say this is my source.


  “An Interview with Susan Bassnett.” Channel View Publications Blog.
  Channel View Publications. n.d. Web. 5 dec. 2013.


Would I refer (inline) like so:


  Bassnet states that ... ("An Interview with Susan Bassnett").


or like so 


  Bassnett states that ... (Channel View Publications Blog).
According to the MLA Style Manual, which is excerpted on many sites (such as the Williams College Library homepage), they recommend using a partial title as the citation.

So, in the case above, you'd probably write 


  Bassnett states that . . . ("Interview" 201).


unless you have multiple works with unknown authors whose title starts with "Interview." Then you'd need more of the title to distinguish it:


  Bassnett states that . . . ("Interview with Susan Bassnett" 201). Smith responds by claiming . . . ("Interview with Robert Smith" 12).