Do peer reviewers generally care about alphabetical order of variables in a paper? I am wondering if some peer reviewers may nitpick about the choice of variables in a math-heavy paper, namely whether they follow alphabetical order throughout the succession of the presentation of concepts. For example, variable N may be defined, variable K may be subsequently defined in a way that depends on N, and finally variable A may represent a final result based on an operation. Could a very particular peer reviewer suggest a revision or rejection simply based on the naming of variables in this way? has anyone ever experienced this or similar?
Let a be the number of math-heavy papers I have read that use an alphabetical order to introduce all their variables.  Let b be the total number of math-heavy papers I have read.  Let c = b - a be the number of math-heavy papers I have read that did not use said ordering.  Then c = b.