Citing a paper whose title has received errata I recently stumbled upon a published article entitled "ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies," which has an errata stating the following:


  The publisher regrets that in the above-mentioned article the title was changed without the author's approval. The correct title should read:
  
  “ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies”


If I am to cite the paper, should I refer to it by its published title (as I did in the reference list below) or by its corrected title?

References


Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). Erratum to “ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(12): 1334
In this case I'd use the corrected title, and add make sure to note that the paper is corrected, e.g.


Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925


Note that this is also how the paper is listed in Pubmed. I also recommend citing the erratum next to the paper.