Increasing the chance of being accepted by keeping a Ph.D. Co-Author As a final year student (B.Sc.) I wrote a paper, but didn't keep my supervisor as co-author since he hadn't contributed at all (in research and paper-writing). I am about to submit my paper to a journal(single-blind peer review). 

Does the chance of being accepted a paper to a journal increase if one of the Co-Author is Ph.D./Professor ? 

Should one keep his thesis supervisor as co-author for above? 

I mean, is there a chance that the reviewer will consider my paper a bit differently/lightly/neglectfully ?
Does the chance of being accepted a paper to a journal increase if one of the Co-Author is Ph.D./Professor ?


No, not under normal circumstances. Some reviewers may like a paper just because one of the authors is a great guy, or the paper is coming from a great institute - and a reviewer might suggest to accept a paper even if he doesn't understand it - but this should not be the rule.


  Should one keep his thesis supervisor as co-author for above?


No, one should only keep authors that deserve authorship. There are likely reasons why you should have your supervisor as co-author on the paper. He might have helped you in other ways, and this way, made a significant contribution to your work (discussions for example). However, you should not add someone as author to please them, to make a better impression, or anything else.


  I mean, is there a chance that the reviewer will consider my paper a bit differently/lightly/neglectfully ?


No (except in cases described under the first question). However, it is not unlikely that you - as bachelor student - don't have the experience and overview of the field, the methods, and the art of paper-writing, to create a publishable paper on your own. If you do - congrats.

I would suggest you


think carefully about if your supervisor didn't contribute after all, and
discuss the matter with your supervisor.


He might not even want to be on your paper (because he didn't contribute, or because he thinks it's not good enough). If he does want to be on your paper, but you don't agree with his arguments, you might want to come back here and check other, related questions, for example this one: Should you include your main supervisor as a co-author?