Changing p-value adjustment method during major revising I want to ask whether changing p-values adjustment method after I receive major revision is acceptable. I have performed some statistical test for like thousands of elements in the manuscript, and initially I used benjamini-hochberg adjustment and wrote the manuscript.
However, upon revising, I realized that there are many spurious results that very subtle change are considered significant. If I changed it to bonferroni correction, the result seems 'reasonable' i.e. spurious results are not considered significant.
Is the change like this accepted for major revision? In my opinion it is acceptable as we are changing to more stringent criteria (not bonferroni to BH) and the conclusion of manuscript does not change, however, I want to hear your opinion that how you feel if you are in this kind of situation as a reviewer.

Thanks in advance
I'm sure you already know this because you have been working with it in your manuscript, but the Benjamini Hochberg procedure is for avoiding false discoveries. So, in other words, Benjamini Hochberg is, I'm sure you know, a procedure you use to reduce Type I errors, where you incorrectly reject true null hypotheses, which are false positives results.

If, upon revising,you discovered "many spurious results that very subtle change are considered significant," it sounds to me as though you may, possibly, have considered some of the results in your latest draft to be false positives, prompting you to change your statistical procedure to Bonferroni for your next draft.

The key point to keep in mind here is that Benjamini Hochberg avoids false positives but Bonferroni tends to produce false negatives.

Therefore, the real question is why your switching statistical procedures. If your hypotheses, your work, and  your  data all indicate that the results are trending toward false positives, then Bonferroni is the way to go.  Otherwise, switching procedures at this point may not be, in my own opinion, the optimal way to proceed.