Do I need to do revision on my accepted paper? I just received an email of my paper which was submitted to a conference.
The paper submission webpage has the following type of status:


  active (under review),  discuss,  withdrawn,  rejected,  minor
  revision,  major revision,  accepted,  no show,  published


The status of my paper shows "accepted". However, the reviewer of my papers have pointed out some shortcomings of my paper. (Personally, I think what the comments meant is that it would be nice to have things include in my paper). So the question is, do I need to make that adjustment for the "camera-ready" version? Is it true that only if the status says "minor revision" then you will have to adjust according to the reviewer's comment?
I would interpret "accepted" as "accepted in its current form", i.e. you do not have to make any changes.  But in order to be sure, ask the editor or program committee.

If you want to make changes based on the reviewer's comments, that is most likely possible; but again, you should ask the editor to make sure it is okay, and to find out when those changes would be due.