How to write the literature review part of a paper when 'the perfect one' has already been written? Let's say I'm writing an original research paper about the design process in the helicopter industry.

In the literature review (or context/related work) section, I want to talk about:


the various design processes that exists;
specific features of design processes in aviations;
specific features of design processes in helicopter industry;
how to study a design process;
etc.


I have found a major paper that deals with the design process in the airplane industry. This paper is recent (= references are up-to-date), frequently cited and published in a major journal (= acknowledged for its scientific quality). Its literature review is top-notch: clear, concise, well written, etc. It tackled the topics #1, 2 and 4 of the review I want to write.

Question: How to write my review, since this papers does almost all the job in a perfect manner?
I would use the other literature review as a baseline, and focuss on how helicopters are different from airplanes. So I would start with mentioning the other literature review, and saying that the basics are discussed there, and here I will focuss on how those apply and/or differ for helicopters.