Concepcion S. Wabol, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Victorino U. Villacrusis, et al., Defendants/Appellants
Wabol v. Villacrusis
Appeal No. 89-005; Civil Action No. 84-0397
BEFORE: DELA CRUZ, Chief Justice, and VILLAGOMEZ and ATALIG, Justices.
Concepcion S. Wabol, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Victorino U. Villacrusis, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Concepcion S. Wabol, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Victorino U. Villacrusis, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Appeal No. 89-005
Civil Action No. 84-0397
Order of Dismissal April 6, 1994
Motion Concerning Jurisdiction Argued and Submitted November 27, 1989
Counsel for appellants: Theodore R. Mitchell, Saipan.
Counsel for appellants: Marybeth Herald, Saipan (Fitzgerald, Herald & Bergsma).
BEFORE: DELA CRUZ, Chief Justice, and VILLAGOMEZ and ATALIG, Justices.
PER CURIAM:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a judgment on December 6, 1993 , reversing our December 11, 1989, decision and order asserting jurisdiction over the appeal on this matter. The Ninth Circuit ruled that we have no jurisdiction. We have received its mandate with directions to dismiss this particular appeal. In view of that mandate, therefore, it is ORDERED that this appeal be, and is hereby, DISMISSED. The clerk of court shall issue our mandate immediately to the Superior Court.
Wabol v. Villacrusis, Appeal No. 90-15101 (9th Cir. Dec. 6, 1993).
Wabol v. Villacrusis, 1 N.M.I. 34 (1989).