Connecting Device Calibration to ICC Profiles
CC Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal and non-commercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor and the work or content is shared also in adapted form only under the conditions of this
Behrmann, Kai-Uwe
Moving the drivers colour slider and forget is a worst case scenario for ICC colour management. The talk gives some ideas on, how to preserve the relation of the original colour device calibration with the resulting ICC colour profile. Possible strategies will be discussed using PPD files and the ICC meta tag. Basic terms will be explained.
 Today I want to talk about how to connect the integration state of the device to the device settings to the actual power. I think this has already covered some of the use cases by comparing different native code behavior with different devices, monitor, split-ups, etc. And so, in typical use case, we can often hear as, so it's a binary of the internet, we get a Z-class on the screen and want to do the stuff which has disappeared, and we get the blocks that run, open them, and see if we have different inputs inside because it's in a different color. This is a typical disconnect of conventional and something to avoid, and it has also an economic impact. And the other example is the arts like imaging. You create, you're all created, most creators of arts, and you cannot be sure what is the audience, the user world, the atom, and how it works. For instance, open source wallpapers are typical in green, and on some of the photos, they appear a little bit over-separated, yellowish, and on others, we look green as we expect and on some, we brownish, which is completely off what was in Canada, so. So, with current trends, it's why we try to think these things and get them result, which is comparable and we need a color correction of all these different inputs and different inputs coming out of each device. The goal of connecting device calibrations to ASCII profiles is to make things more automatic so that you can handle things, contribute very much machine-readable data for machine-readable data, so you can handle this like a variable database. And we also have to go to make this data very flexible and, in the same way, robust for the user. So, the final target is to have very easy color management for average users, which have no idea what color management really means, and in the same way, to increase the robustness for professional users, which, by the way, of situations where they are not sure if they have some correct calibration for the actual selected ASCII profile. Systems which include this kind of automatic and flexible resilience can do many things while we are only without interacting much more with anyone as the user and the way it is today needed. I have to just select an example of how we can print as the interface. There are two front-ends for which we print once, coming in campaigns, which is also available in GIMP and Z-WATER application. It is called a print. Both shared with the interface, you can do six inputs of input resolution. Both can do color management with Z-YK and RGD. And this is pretty all of the work we share. Then they do very different skin paints, with an older approach to attempt to do color management with Google print, and it just relies on the print's Q name. It's not much for specific C-S-S. So on the other side, the public print uses presets. These presets include our, so it's a driver state. You have changed the CR or the brightness setting, and this is already covered in these presets. And you have, of course, identification for what you don't mix things up with the print. So the colors, which are kind of from the apps and things are on the HP, of course, make them size. And in KeyBank, again, so the profile selection is manual. You must know a specific color for the print queue, which kind of profile you need. And in full print, on the other side, you have already some logic to piece these things together. And so to fit these pieces together, and the profile is strongly connected to all of these color variations so that you can still go on so easily. And finally, it's calibration and to the proper association is non-existent in the scene print. And this makes it very error-power. You can even change settings in the file and printing user interface, which are color related. And this don't affect any way to the ISOC profile for X-Mesh. So if you do a soft-filling like a small thing, you use all of the basic, which is the calibration basic, which the profile needs to have as a foundation for its final color. And on the full print, it's much more of this kind of fancy. And now we want to go into the key to this means how to get these pieces together. In the full print application, we have just implemented the printing in a very specific manner. We want to scale and flexibly apply to printing, scanning, other input-to-visile cameras, and also to the output to this place, mainly in other projects. And these devices have now natively, normally, no information which of the options are color related. For printing, it's pretty low that you have positioning and sizes of paper, which are clearly not color related. And other options, which are clearly color related like brightness, gamma resolution, and so on, are written for visual. And these later ones must be marked as such. And in order that the system can understand that it's important to keep constant focus with the profile association. We must propose to introduce this more into the QBD. So print description file. And I think we can print as we start to put it in one of our lists. And so it will be the front-end profile association which will be able to correlate the device calibration with the actual profile association without interfering too much with non-related things like OS, animation, positioning, or media stuff. And then we will propose relatively unlikely that it will be applied because of compatibility reasons. Then we will be able to decide to have a very stable physical interface and API. And then incorporate these changed mods already there, but quickly apply the distributions in handy for XO, XTN, library to extract calibration from the edit information. There surely could be more information involved like calibration curves which are possible to put into the monitor itself or brightness settings. There's still a lot to do for camera raw and XF data whereas no such links could be proposed. This would have to be worked out in close connection to the standards. These all these settings should now be made accessible in machine being the way to be exported and be used in other contexts which are far away from native data structures also according to others. So we would like to explore this in our autism and I hope we can find the common format to suggest this stuff with a bit of an update. On the other side we have the ASCII profile, ASCII meter attack which is a pretty generic data structure based on P and value here which can be placed into the ASCII profile, you can mention all the state functions, stabilised phones and devices, calibration data can also be put into the ASCII profile so that we get a pretty compact data where all information is saved. We have just sketched how all these things can work together from the convention inside. This is a calibration at the tribal input which means they realise the data and get some kind of measurement information and we need to preserve this meter and some way and later during the profiling stage this is the stage where it is properly able to apply this calibration data to the ASCII profile and to get finally ASCII profile which contains many information about the device and its calibration still. So we have a pretty compact set of information to continue to work. Something I've learned already in the last 12 years, maybe it's even in the 5th. The last is to easily share ASCII profiles or sentiments or distributions, just put it in place and finally the users can search for these profiles as long as we are in the self-contained, all information which are needed to set up the colour settings for the device and also to identify the device already contained in the ASCII profile. We don't need any special routine to manipulate many parts. Systems can be constructed to do by the self just from the information which is in the ASCII profile. So it's not the case as an outline on the ASCII page, for example. Things have to do, have to be done in a manual way. We hope that this is the way we get more response to these things. If you have a profile selected for your device, you can also make user interfaces in a way that the list of profiles have on top the most matching profile. This can also be the first one which gets automatically applied to the user in the user and the profiles are there in many cases. But it should of course be there for the user to have a chance to see these things. Also it's possible to resolve in a local and notepad the sizes in profiles just like any database request. So it's just an machine how to put profiles into the user database and to have very different kind of data to ensure all work is in the order. Now through the project I'm working on, we have implemented stuff like this for XOR and to come with a lot of profiles selection. Our audience is probably going to see code, we have to solve it not to be our live computer as a statement, we have to get to someone doing a code project and make these stuff accessible for users to interface with or see. In contrast to my phone speaker, the audience is not required to meet new clients, it's a pretty much user thing. We think that we will not build back when XOR develops to the site, we don't want with XS that we now introduce this requirement for our users. So our awareness is also very much modular and flexible solution. We don't need any special things other than to manage the tagging of the last configuration information to use. We don't need much involvement in the other guys' systems. So it's just an open field, architecture, we have tagging systems for different guys' systems. We also have to plug in our backends, for example we have the OZ process, we have to plug in the XOR and we have to do a good run for the users. We have some profiles selection and of course the live ends and probably using other applications. So our vision, I have outlined now in regards to the live profile selection association, we have plans to implement more live classes this stuff. And we have a project this year at the Open Assets, which we are very likely to be printing and there is not too much interfering with cups or other system components. So this is just a machine for us and thanks for your attention. If you have questions, I'd like to know. I was just wondering if you allow users to specify different rendering contents. Yes, of course on the processing level it must be specified and once has also a lot of rules to do, probably conversions has also some application to do, image displaying and where you can see the different things. I think it's not too much related to this special topic of presentation here that's mainly discussing the association of profiles and to us. I think what you want is something like applications which use this profile as well. Also I have a question. So now we have a calibrated profile with settings to make it a certain way. How do you turn this profile on to get different settings? How would you tackle that? Do you want to use the profile as a printer settings to get more visual matching appearance or not know what's different? So my answer is first it depends. I think both things should be possible. Just to give you an insight from managing testing, one of my most important photos is everything. So it's a critical step to do this out in the manner of it. And we are targeting at taking the mass-convasion of superfile and applying it to the surface, especially when printing China, we plan to use as a superfile to set up and drive it for a special calibration system and then for this new product. OK. Let's do some impressions. Is that all? Yes. Thank you. Thank you.
 Today I want to talk about how to connect the integration state of the device to the  device settings to the actual power.  I think this has already covered some of the use cases by comparing different native code  behavior with different devices, monitor, split-ups, etc.  And so, in typical use case, we can often hear as, so it's a binary of the internet,  we get a Z-class on the screen and want to do the stuff which has disappeared,  and we get the blocks that run, open them, and see if we have different inputs inside  because it's in a different color.  This is a typical disconnect of conventional and something to avoid, and it has also an  economic impact.  And the other example is the arts like imaging.  You create, you're all created, most creators of arts, and you cannot be sure what is the  audience, the user world, the atom, and how it works.  For instance, open source wallpapers are typical in green, and on some of the photos,  they appear a little bit over-separated, yellowish, and on others, we look green as we expect  and on some, we brownish, which is completely off what was in Canada, so.  So, with current trends, it's why we try to think these things and get them result,  which is comparable and we need a color correction of all these different inputs  and different inputs coming out of each device.  The goal of connecting device calibrations to ASCII profiles is to make things more  automatic so that you can handle things, contribute very much machine-readable data for  machine-readable data, so you can handle this like a variable database.  And we also have to go to make this data very flexible and, in the same way, robust for  the user.  So, the final target is to have very easy color management for average users,  which have no idea what color management really means, and in the same way, to increase  the robustness for professional users, which, by the way, of situations where they are  not sure if they have some correct calibration for the actual selected ASCII profile.  Systems which include this kind of automatic and flexible resilience can do many things  while we are only without interacting much more with anyone as the user and the way  it is today needed.  I have to just select an example of how we can print as the interface.  There are two front-ends for which we print once, coming in campaigns, which is also available  in GIMP and Z-WATER application.  It is called a print.  Both shared with the interface, you can do six inputs of input resolution.  Both can do color management with Z-YK and RGD.  And this is pretty all of the work we share.  Then they do very different skin paints, with an older approach to attempt to do color management  with Google print, and it just relies on the print's Q name.  It's not much for specific C-S-S.  So on the other side, the public print uses presets.  These presets include our, so it's a driver state.  You have changed the CR or the brightness setting, and this is already covered in these presets.  And you have, of course, identification for what you don't mix things up with the print.  So the colors, which are kind of from the apps and things are on the HP, of course, make them size.  And in KeyBank, again, so the profile selection is manual.  You must know a specific color for the print queue, which kind of profile you need.  And in full print, on the other side, you have already some logic to piece these things together.  And so to fit these pieces together, and the profile is strongly connected to all of these color variations  so that you can still go on so easily.  And finally, it's calibration and to the proper association is non-existent in the scene print.  And this makes it very error-power.  You can even change settings in the file and printing user interface, which are color related.  And this don't affect any way to the ISOC profile for X-Mesh.  So if you do a soft-filling like a small thing, you use all of the basic, which is the calibration basic,  which the profile needs to have as a foundation for its final color.  And on the full print, it's much more of this kind of fancy.  And now we want to go into the key to this means how to get these pieces together.  In the full print application, we have just implemented the printing in a very specific manner.  We want to scale and flexibly apply to printing, scanning, other input-to-visile cameras,  and also to the output to this place, mainly in other projects.  And these devices have now natively, normally, no information which of the options are color related.  For printing, it's pretty low that you have positioning and sizes of paper, which are clearly not color related.  And other options, which are clearly color related like brightness, gamma resolution, and so on, are written for visual.  And these later ones must be marked as such.  And in order that the system can understand that it's important to keep constant focus with the profile association.  We must propose to introduce this more into the QBD.  So print description file.  And I think we can print as we start to put it in one of our lists.  And so it will be the front-end profile association which will be able to correlate the device calibration with the actual profile association  without interfering too much with non-related things like OS, animation, positioning, or media stuff.  And then we will propose relatively unlikely that it will be applied because of compatibility reasons.  Then we will be able to decide to have a very stable physical interface and API.  And then incorporate these changed mods already there, but quickly apply the distributions in handy for XO,  XTN, library to extract calibration from the edit information.  There surely could be more information involved like calibration curves which are possible to put into the monitor itself or brightness settings.  There's still a lot to do for camera raw and XF data whereas no such links could be proposed.  This would have to be worked out in close connection to the standards.  These all these settings should now be made accessible in machine being the way to be exported and be used in other contexts  which are far away from native data structures also according to others.  So we would like to explore this in our autism and I hope we can find the common format to suggest this stuff with a bit of an update.  On the other side we have the ASCII profile, ASCII meter attack which is a pretty generic data structure based on P and value here  which can be placed into the ASCII profile, you can mention all the state functions, stabilised phones and devices, calibration data can also be put into the ASCII profile  so that we get a pretty compact data where all information is saved.  We have just sketched how all these things can work together from the convention inside.  This is a calibration at the tribal input which means they realise the data and get some kind of measurement information  and we need to preserve this meter and some way and later during the profiling stage this is the stage where it is properly able to apply this calibration data to the ASCII profile  and to get finally ASCII profile which contains many information about the device and its calibration still.  So we have a pretty compact set of information to continue to work.  Something I've learned already in the last 12 years, maybe it's even in the 5th.  The last is to easily share ASCII profiles or sentiments or distributions, just put it in place and finally the users can search for these profiles  as long as we are in the self-contained, all information which are needed to set up the colour settings for the device and also to identify the device already contained in the ASCII profile.  We don't need any special routine to manipulate many parts.  Systems can be constructed to do by the self just from the information which is in the ASCII profile.  So it's not the case as an outline on the ASCII page, for example.  Things have to do, have to be done in a manual way.  We hope that this is the way we get more response to these things.  If you have a profile selected for your device, you can also make user interfaces in a way that the list of profiles have on top the most matching profile.  This can also be the first one which gets automatically applied to the user in the user and the profiles are there in many cases.  But it should of course be there for the user to have a chance to see these things.  Also it's possible to resolve in a local and notepad the sizes in profiles just like any database request.  So it's just an machine how to put profiles into the user database and to have very different kind of data to ensure all work is in the order.  Now through the project I'm working on, we have implemented stuff like this for XOR and to come with a lot of profiles selection.  Our audience is probably going to see code, we have to solve it not to be our live computer as a statement, we have to get to someone doing a code project and make these stuff accessible for users to interface with or see.  In contrast to my phone speaker, the audience is not required to meet new clients, it's a pretty much user thing.  We think that we will not build back when XOR develops to the site, we don't want with XS that we now introduce this requirement for our users.  So our awareness is also very much modular and flexible solution.  We don't need any special things other than to manage the tagging of the last configuration information to use.  We don't need much involvement in the other guys' systems. So it's just an open field, architecture, we have tagging systems for different guys' systems.  We also have to plug in our backends, for example we have the OZ process, we have to plug in the XOR and we have to do a good run for the users.  We have some profiles selection and of course the live ends and probably using other applications.  So our vision, I have outlined now in regards to the live profile selection association, we have plans to implement more live classes this stuff.  And we have a project this year at the Open Assets, which we are very likely to be printing and there is not too much interfering with cups or other system components.  So this is just a machine for us and thanks for your attention.  If you have questions, I'd like to know.  I was just wondering if you allow users to specify different rendering contents.  Yes, of course on the processing level it must be specified and once has also a lot of rules to do, probably conversions has also some application to do, image displaying and where you can see the different things.  I think it's not too much related to this special topic of presentation here that's mainly discussing the association of profiles and to us.  I think what you want is something like applications which use this profile as well.  Also I have a question. So now we have a calibrated profile with settings to make it a certain way.  How do you turn this profile on to get different settings? How would you tackle that?  Do you want to use the profile as a printer settings to get more visual matching appearance or not know what's different?  So my answer is first it depends.  I think both things should be possible.  Just to give you an insight from managing testing, one of my most important photos is everything.  So it's a critical step to do this out in the manner of it.  And we are targeting at taking the mass-convasion of superfile  and applying it to the surface, especially  when printing China, we plan to use as a superfile  to set up and drive it for a special calibration  system and then for this new product.  OK.  Let's do some impressions.  Is that all?  Yes.  Thank you.  Thank you.
Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_0_59.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_60_1151.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_1152_3023.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_3024_15983.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_15984_18443.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_18444_20267.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_20268_27899.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_27900_28043.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_28044_28367.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_28368_28487.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_28488_28631.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_28632_28679.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_28680_28775.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_28776_29579.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_29580_30395.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_30396_30443.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_30444_30491.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_30492_30647.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_30648_30719.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_30720_31031.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_31032_31283.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_31284_32135.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_32136_32699.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_32700_33695.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_33696_33803.png Connecting_Device_Calibration_to_ICC_Profiles_33804_33855.png