Datasets:
Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
task_categories:
|
3 |
+
- text-classification
|
4 |
+
language:
|
5 |
+
- en
|
6 |
+
tags:
|
7 |
+
- legal
|
8 |
+
size_categories:
|
9 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
10 |
+
---
|
11 |
+
|
12 |
+
This is the **ECHR dataset**, a collection of 11.5K court cases extracted from the public database
|
13 |
+
of the European Court of Human Rights and further annotated by human experts. The dataset was
|
14 |
+
published along with [this paper](https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1424/) (pleae cite it
|
15 |
+
accordingly!) and can be donwloaded in its original form from [this website](https://archive.org/details/ECHR-ACL2019).
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
Each instance in this dataset is a court case. Each court case is annotated with the following properties (the columns of the dataframe):
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
* `partition`: a label indicating dataset partition this court case belongs to ("train", "dev", or "test")
|
20 |
+
* `itemid`: a code which uniquely identifies this court case
|
21 |
+
* `languageisocode`: an [ISO code](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_3166_country_codes) describing the language in which the case is reported
|
22 |
+
* `respondent`: the ISO code of the party being sued or tried (respondents are nation states)
|
23 |
+
* `branch`: the branch of the Court dealing with the case, indicating at which stage of the trial a judgement was made (it can be one out of "ADMISSIBILITY", "CHAMBER", "GRANDCHAMBER", "COMMITTEE")
|
24 |
+
* `date`: the date of the judgement
|
25 |
+
* `docname`: the title of the court case (for example, "ERIKSON v. ITALY")
|
26 |
+
* `importance`: an "importance score" from 1 (key case) to 4 (unimportant), denoting a case's contribution in the development of case-law
|
27 |
+
* `conclusion`: a short summary of the case conclusion (for example, "Inadmissible" or "Violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 10"
|
28 |
+
* `judges`: the name of the judges
|
29 |
+
* `text`: the facts brought to the attention of the Court
|
30 |
+
* `binary_judgement`: a binary label indicating whether an article or protocol was (1) or wasn't (0) violated
|