It was alleged that the ex - wife a combined laboratory and x - ray technologist in the Prince Albert Parkland Health Region snooped into the records of the ex - husband and their daughter and also tested the daughter 's urine . However , with respect to the urine , there were no records created , nor data entered into the health region 's computer system , so it 's not a privacy issue , commissioner Ron Kruzeniski ruled April 5 . For that reason , Kruzeniski said the urine case is a worker conduct or misconduct issue . Meanwhile , accessing the documents was ruled a breach of the Health Information Protection Act . Between 2012 and 2014 , in five cases , the employee accessed medical data from the system that contains x - rays , CT scans and MRI scans . Two cases involved her ex - husband 's information , while three involved her daughter 's . ;