No . this was at 654 am after being open for nearly an hour . <| sep |> If you want that I mute you , sure <| sep |> I think most NFL quarterbacks would prefer the stands to be quiet . The reality is that feeling a part of the player experience in sports is what makes live events so exciting . <| sep |> It ' s going to rewrite the electoral college map , by blowing California to shreds . <| sep |> I ' d go for a BHA first actually . I find them much more effective against cc <| sep |> Economic immigrants problem who only want to go to rich countries <| sep |> Fuck that guy up ! <| sep |> For a fiscal conservative , the market sets the price and any government interference is going to disrupt the market and lead to inefficient outcomesI think this statement confuses a fiscal conservative and an ideological conservative . Details matter . This principle cannot apply to insurance because the product is an amount of money to pay for things . If the price of those things goes down , there is no differentiation between insurers as they ' d pay out the same amount to pay for the same thing . One response to that is to claim that insurers can act to drive costs down , but that happens in universal insurance systems as well and the singlepayer has a lot more pressure than a bunch of smaller insurers . The costs of treatments , therapies , and pharma are driven down by competition in those markets , not the insurance market . And , universal insurance removes the inefficiency of the competition sales people , contracting , money collection , advertisement , review boards , lawsuits over payment not malpractice , which is unchanged . These are inefficiency of the market itself . Competition isn ' t free . It only makes sense when competition can drive costs down in excess of the cost of competition itself , but the lower limit is the average payout amount plus minimal overhead for processing , which is what universal systems do . A fiscal conservative can easily see the empirical data that universal systems cost much less for equal or better health care outcomes . The problem isn ' t fiscal conservatives , but ideological ones .