your remark did a good job of defeating mine , internet style . but let ' s pretend that this doesn ' t have to be an argumenti ' m suggesting that his history of guests folks like Gad Saad and that other commentator Reich ? the other guy who always questions the regressive left tends to skew toward a certain forms of dialogue . even the outlier guests Milo , and that feminist can ' t remember her name , though she ' s very much a rightwing feminist serve to reinforce this narrativeone of the reasons that i keep listening to Joe is his ability to have what feels like a conversation with his guests . the flip side of this is that he doesn ' t typically challenge them . like he can talk about the dangers of SJWs or the corruption of Hillary or how hunting solves all our problems , but there ' s never almost never going to be a on the other hand . . . i hear that on sam harris , like when sam had andrew sullivan on . they discussed all the problems with hillary . that was really good for me to hear as a hillary supporter , but then they tried to present the other side of the issue . i ' m writing too much , and i have stuff to do . but i ' m trying to get at one of Joe ' s shortcomings with his guests . i ' m not about me , a random internet commentator . it ' s about what he ' s not saying and the guests he ' s not having on . i doubt he ' ll have a feminist on who will challenge him , or a BLM memberwhich is fine . i don ' t want to complain about this free podcast too much . it ' s just not very rigorous or balanced . joe talks about the importance of being kind to one another , and then appears to tacitly endorse trump all the time