So why isnt that an excessive celebration penalty . ?<| sep |> Feel like I ' d like to see some more physical play . Add some intensity <| sep |> You actually don ' t need to justify moral assertions . We often do , but this is a regress which ultimately has to bottom out at some nonjustifiable terminal value . <| sep |> Yeah , fantastic analytics there . It ' s a true statement that was never intended to be analytical you tried moving the goalposts here rather deceptively . You argue merely to amass consensus like the rselected leftist you are . Except , if you think anything that any of the Democrats have ever done is socialism you have no idea what you ' re talking about . I ' m not going to debate antisocialists if they can ' t even define socialism . You obviously have no idea whatsoever of what you ' re talking about while you care nothing for the truth . I ' ve never had a problem defining socialism while it requires ignorance to claim or imply otherwise this was just another pathetic attempt at consensusbuilding . Socialism is when the state controls the means of production and distribution while the Democrats have long promoted this in a myriad of ways via regulation and taxation . Less economic freedomcapitalism means more socialism which is a transitional phase in Marxist ideology . You can ' t debate or reason with socialists and other rselected people the best you can do is outgroup them to attack and overwhelm their deficient amygdalae . The socialists get culled once resource restriction kicks in .