That ' s Captain Darling to you , Blackadder <| sep |> By the way , you should really use a small piece of paper like a sticky note for your time stamp because that huge letter paper is obscuring everything <| sep |> Yes . I ' m currently in medical school and I ' m involved in a research lab that actually uses the same assessment of cognition that was used in this study . I ' m curious in what capacity you are presenting scientific literature , because you don ' t seem to understand the differences in some basic concepts in scientific literature . I ' ve pointed out everything that you are wrong about , but you can continue to ignore it without presenting facts for your argument . 1 . You are correct . So its a shit story . But by making this claim , you also invalidate your second statement . 2 . You are correct , except the use of this refers directly to the score that they were just referring to as significant . They also claimed it significantly increased rather than stating the significant increase and relevant P value . I . e . , it ' s written like shit , which is what I ' m saying . 3 . Since it ' s not a scientific paper , they can make whatever claims they want . They sound like idiots though if they or you think that this is correct to say scientificallythat probiotics can improve human cognitionAs you said , its just a fluff article , so that ' s perfectly fine . If you had any real experience you would realize that your or anyone would get severely railed for putting shit like that . Though in all fairness I don ' t work in the field of medical literature , which honestly seems to be held at a much lower standard from what you are telling me .