That was a nice twist answer to this question , made me smile . <| sep |># THAT IS NOT YOUR CHOICE # MOZILLA LOVES DIGGING HOLES # AND HIDING IN THEM <| sep |> lol that knockout was amazing <| sep |> Freemason NASA Photoshop is part of a subscription to Freemason NASA Creative Cloud . Only available to evil photo retouchers . <| sep |> You can ' t just define matchmaking ranks like that . There is a huge mix of people in ranks and the skill varies so much that it ' s pointless . LEM people have the aimI ' ve played with and against globals who have terrible aim relative to me and other people I know , I ' ve seen GE ' s who are worse than LEM ' s , Supremes who are better than Globals . Global doesn ' t mean anything , if someone told me they were global in mm I wouldn ' t even think that meant anything he could be terrible , or he could be really good , that ' s just how varied it is . People can have a mix of aim and gamesense and get to LEM or X rank in different ways maybe they solo queued and actually have really sick aim but otherwise are as dumb as a brick . That guy can get Global . Or you could have 5 people with less than stellar aim who queued as 5 and actually ran strats , or a guy who has really good aim and good gamesense . There ' s just no point saying the difference between x and y ranks is z like that .