This is my new favorite conspiracy theory ever . <| sep |> You can play with my Poke Balls any time <| sep |> The problem is that you actually can ' t reject it at all . Because in the act of rejecting it , you would be rejecting some thing which presupposes the principle identity and principle of noncontradiction . So you literally would not be able reject logic without at the same time presupposing logic in the very act of trying to reject it . That ' s why Aristotle says that anyone who rejects the principle of noncontradiction literally can ' t speak , like a plant . But , even thinking it would be impossible , let alone speaking or arguing for it . Sorry if it sounds like I ' m repeating myself . I do understand your point that the person who rejected logic wouldn ' t be interested in the accusation that he is in a contradiction . But the problem is he wouldn ' t have been able to legitimately reject it in the first place . His rejection of logic would have to ultimately be based in logic , so the rejection of logic can never actually get off the ground . One simply cannot use thought to try to falsify logic . The closest one can get to rejecting logic is by being unconscious !