At least he ' s wearing a shirt todayHuh ? <| sep |> Huh , never noticed i do that . <| sep |> There is a man that sees the problem completely instead of just picking out one aspect of it . Based Ben Carson . <| sep |> What would you say are republican policies that are antiminority ? I ' m honestly curious <| sep |> Gosh I love this game . It looks so cinematic . <| sep |> This is absolutely pathetic . This discussion is fucking over your head . Because you say so , again with no evidence . You are fucking hilarious . The article that you cited proves your own conclusion is wrong , you have nothing to say to the articles that I provided showing you are wrong , and you keep pretending that you have any support for your position . You absolute moron , you haven ' t shown me a single thing that suggests my claims are wrong , you ' ve shown me paragraphs you ' ve misinterpreted . More bold claims with no evidence to back them up . I down voted your last comment because you turned nasty . I didn ' t down vote any of your previous comments because you were civil . I only have so much patience for people who are so obstinate that they don ' t mind polluting discourse with their ignorance despite being proven wrong over and over . Again , this is not proof of anything except your own opinion . You really still can ' t understand that there is a difference between what economists believe is inefficient and what they think should be done in the real world ? The discussion we were having was about your claim that most economists believe that corporate taxes should be lowered . Did you mean to say that most economists believe corporate taxes should be lowered IN THEORY BUT NOT IN PRACTICE ? No , that ' s not the point , dumbass economists don ' t make policy decisions you dumb fuck , politicians do . Any economist who believes something should be done in theory also believes it should be done in practice , you fucking idiot . lol , again your attempts to redefine your position are laughable . Your claim was that most economists believe that corporate taxes should be lowered . The article you cited discussed how corporate taxes are inefficient . IN THEORY this would be a sufficient reason to get rid of such taxes , however , as the author of the article goes on to explain , in practice getting rid of taxes on corporations is not supported by most economists . I know you want the article to mean something else , but I ' m sorry for you that it doesn ' t . You but real world concerns shouldn ' t be factored into economic policy decisions , so I ' m still right Real world concerns are ALWAYS factored into economic policy decisions you moron . That ' s why the article concludes that corporate taxes should not be done away with . Pretending not to understand that isn ' t helping your argument . Go sell it to someone else . You know you are wrong , just admit it and stop trying to tell people about things you don ' t understand . The world would be better off if people like you , who think they know what they ' re talking about but actually don ' t , and who speak so authoritatively on subjects they don ' t actually understand so that they sway the alsounlearned , would all go jump off a bridge . No evidence to back up your position . All you have are insults because you know you are wrong .