Frozen Rain is my top fav from this list . I just love winter themed things it ' s so appealing to my eyes . I barely play TF 2 these days but my inventory could use this effect on a Surgeon ' s Stahlhelm . Already saving up money for it D <| sep |> Man , you have a shitty knife <| sep |> He gets louder after he does a good playgets lucky more often , I ' ve noticed . Case in point THE 2 % CRIT GOD video P Warning Editor amplifies the problem . Turn your volume up at your own risk . <| sep |> A couple of points I ' d like to see covered more 1 Machine cost and depreciation and OPEX more on this below . These are what will be in a companies accounting books and are tied to COGS and overhead for manufacturing companies . 2 100 % of CBD extracted seems far too high . This Study from the Netherlands shows that CO 2 is not nearly as efficient in extracting the cannabinoids as other solvents like alcohol or hydrocarbons . BUT I think there is a bit of confusion between the two as your study seems to imply getting the CBD out of the plant , even if in 50 % extracts , whereas this study just looks at the extract results . So . basically , I ' d like to see the material tested before and after extraction . You are suggesting that before it is processed the material is 10 % CBD , and thus the processed material after extraction would test at 0 . 0 % CBD . I do question that a lot . I ' d think there would still be some left in the material 1 %, but still something . CO 2 is good , not godlike . 3 I would also think clarifying the product further might help . This is CO 2 extract , NOT 99 % CBD . The extract from CO 2 is typically maxed at 50 %, but often far far less . In fact , some companies do 2 runs to get to that level single vs . double pass and things like winterizing removing oils to increase the CBD by volume . e . g . your most efficient producer listed making 3 , 800 gday is actually producing 7 . 6 Kg of extract with 50 % CBD in it most likely . I ' d just point this out so people don ' t compare it directly to 99 % CBD crystal since that is an additional process with lots more work and chemicals and a lot of loss . That 7 . 6 Kgs of extract with 50 % CBD would be difficult to crystalize and would probably lose 13 . So instead of making 3 , 800 g of crystal , you might only get 2 , 500 g 99 % crystal . This is one reason why 99 % CBD costs much more you lose a lot getting there . I know you say extract , but comments here have me thinking people are comparing it to crystal . 4 Some other assumptions might not be getting the full picture . You have labor cost at $ 16 h , but you might want to delve deeper into the definitions of Operational Expenditures OPEX and scale as needed . A small operation might really only have the $ 16 h labor . But the fullscale industry will have management , HR , sales and marketing , etc that should be accounted for . Additionally , the larger units require more skilled employees , and a number of places have PhD ' s or Engineers on staff and they certainly cost more than $ 16 h . I ' d ask a manufacturing industry accountant or CFO to help you define cost assumptions like this further . For example , I don ' t see any money for rent or insurance or anything like that , which really should be included . Essentially I think it is a good start , but I ' d like to see what a CFO of a manufacturing company would say about your assumptions . Plus you might want to stick with a very specific end product under set conditions . A 15 % crude extract will have much lower costs than a 50 % extract that has been winterized . And even things like this from the Apek ' s document make me want to further clarify the endproduct and process Assumptions 50 % increase in run times if plant material is not decarboxylated prior to extractions which would throw your daily operating expenses way off if not accounted for .