I wear a hijab , so I don ' t think anyone really suspects anything . <| sep |> I mean yes but if you ' re using that argument for one , you must remove the bias and use it for all . Romo was trying to catch up too <| sep |> I work at a coffee shop full of sarcastic college kids . We really do call them this <| sep |> Looks like I ' m fucking you <| sep |> Very interesting stuff . As a matter of fact , I saved it for later reference . I stand corrected on two fronts . First , while I do believe the DNC leaned heavily Clinton from the start and that this was her reward for making nice in 2008 with Obama , I am unsure how that may have affected the outcome of the primaries . That ' s down a bit from where I was previously . In any case , I agree that DNC overt support for Clinton once it was clear she would be the nominee was quite appropriate . Second , the opposition research on Sanders , if accepted even in the light most favorable to Sanders , would have been quite damaging to his chances had he been the nominee . That kind of information , especially the tales of him consorting with antiAmerican communists , would have been all but fatal I think . I saw what the Republicans did with Willie Horton and that was just one picture . I shudder to think what they would have done with Sandanista video . So there you have it .