Este tipo es un puto mamporrero , y no vale para otra cosa <| sep |> Retrained '? On how to respond to a customer asking for sliced cheese ? Fucking hell . <| sep |> Even less . Spigen ' s cases routinely sell for sub $ 20 on Amazon . more like $ 14 . 99 or so . <| sep |> Most filming is done through out the month of December when the days are nice and the decorations are out . Resort guests may get inside info as to when this may happen <| sep |> It ' s not . At all . It ' s heavily slanted in our favor . Think it through . Tanaka has an opt out next year . If the Angels are trading Trout , then they ' re rebuilding , not competing , next year . So Tanaka is worthless to them . Same goes for Betances , despite the extra two years of control . The Angels don ' t need a reliever , they need a team . A reliever can come later . Moreover , as valuable as relievers have become recently , you ' ll find that they aren ' t bringing back established talent . They ' re bringing back prospects . That ' s because relievers , like prospects , are not sure things . They ' re very volatile year to year , as proven by Betances ' s own pedestrian season . The value of a reliever simply is nowhere near that of a very good position player , let alone one as good as Trout . And Torres ? Don ' t get me wrong , I ' m excited as all hell for him . But there are two things you always have to remember when it comes to prospects . First , that they ' re never as good as you want them to be . Torres ' s stock seems to have risen since the trade , but remember , when he came to us , he was a grade 55 prospect . Good , solidly above average . But nothing really special . This isn ' t Jeter we ' re talking about , there are others better than Torres out there right now , and there will be others better than him in a year , two years , three years . He ' s not going to be a generational talent , the way Trout already is . And second , prospects bust far more often than they pan out . They are , by definition , prospects . They ' re a chance at a major leaguer . They ' re uncertainty incarnate . We ' ll be lucky to have two or three of our top prospects stick . And we ' ll be incredibly lucky if any of them turn out to be half the player Trout is . Why would the Angels trade Trout for prospects ? If they ' re incredibly lucky , those prospects might turn out to be half as good as Trout . If they ' re not , they ' re left with maybe a solid player or two in exchange for the best in the game . Why make that trade when they could instead keep Trout and work to strengthen the team in other ways ? If he goes , it ' s for a player like Bryant that is able to immediately , and definitely , step in and contribute on a level close to Trout . Prospects make up the difference between their skill levels . They aren ' t the centerpiece .