per rendere operativo il referendum abrogativo previsto dalla costituzione del ' 47 si dovuta aspettare una legge del 1970 . Guarda qui la legge del 1970 che regolamenta il referendum abrogativo normale che ci voglia una legge dopo , non c ' altro modo in quanto in costituzione ci vanno solo i principi fondamentali . Spero comunque che dopo la vittoria del si , si faccia la regolamentazione del referendum propositivo e di indirizzo non dico subito ma entro la fine della legislatura seguente . <| sep |> I know it was discussed as something that might be a possibility back circa ~ 2011 , but i ' ve never come across anything about it actually being implemented . It hasn ' t been physically done before explicitly tested , but there ' s been no need , both because nobody besides Canada wants it , and because the A and C are identical in inflight geometry from the intakes forward . I can ' t find a primary source stating that it ' s definitely an option there was one cited on Wikipedia , but the website ' s gone and nobody archived it , but there are plenty of sites that reference it , including think tanks like the CDA Institute . You are correct that they scrapped the idea of ordering frankenF 35 s in favour of normal F 35 As , but like I said , it should still be an option should Canada decide not to replace its tankers use civilian allied tankers . Also true about the buddy refueling , though realistically Super Hornet buddy tanking is quite limited simply due to the limited amount of fuel they can offload . It ' ll be interesting though to see how the US Navy ' s MQ 25 turns out though if it ' s large enough , etc they could make a boom variant and use it as a forwarddeployed , relatively expendable tanker for the USAF , etc .