Nope no kanto starters <| sep |> People are dismissive of positions they find ridiculous all the time . It ' s just certain positions apparently aren ' t allowed to be dismissed because they are ' marginalizing a groups existence ' or other such bullshit designed to make simple disagreement seem like violence . Gender isn ' t real . <| sep |> I looked it up yesterday . It ' s part of their new international program , legacy plans are $ 15 a MB . <| sep |> However 800 years ago all science pointed to the earth being flat . This is a myth , we have understood the Earth to be round since the Ancient Greeks . Also your post misunderstands the scientific method . Theories aren ' t proven wrong as such , especially in the technical sciences . They are more refined over time . For example Newton ' s laws of motion are not wrong , they got us to the moon . It is just an incomplete description when we reach subatomic scales or want to model something moving incredibly fast . So in that sense they are incomplete but not obsolete . My point is for climate science to be wrong , our understanding of physics would have to be so wrong that we would have to pretty much start again from scratch . The chances that our entire understanding of statistical mechanics , organic chemistry and Quantum Electrodynamics are completely wrong are incredibly slim as they are some of the most rigorously tested theories in science . If they are wrong , the devil is in the details . The overall big picture is very unlikely to change . The Earth being flat was a good theory at the time and isn ' t a bad approximation when you consider small distances . It was never completely disproved it was more refined to take into account the large scale , and much earlier than you give it credit for .