Oh , God , let it be Rosie O ' Donnell . <| sep |> Yeah a little . Now gtfo our sub and go troll rnfl <| sep |> I agree that there is a lot of ambiguity in the employed terminology . But I think that makes my point . The alarmist cherry picks the competences and incompetences from our point of view and then turns around to to say Look ! I don ' t see any reason why it would be logically impossible that a machine could have this particular bundle of competences . Don ' t you see how dangerous this would be ! ?! For me , theoretical possibility is by far not enough to get me worried . There just seems to be a host of more plausible scenarios where powerful narrow A . I . s could used by humans create havoc . I usually try to proportion my worries with respect to the actual threat . Also , the WallE scenario would be a pretty great outcome of an intelligence explosion , considering some alternatives ! Exactly !