I wouldn ' t even say it ' s the research that is politicized . It ' s the results and consequences . Data ' s and trend shows a change from the standard change observed and it can be linked to the carbon production . <| sep |> Friends have been enjoying the vr stuff I share with them , I bet this would be a hit <| sep |> I know , there is very little makeup discussion these days , just mostly narcissistic princesses who are fishing for compliments . <| sep |> I don ' t disagree with you at all . I ' d prefer to keep it menonly . My reasoning for thinking we need to consider the admission of women can get a bit dicey , but it follows a logical progression I like the concept of spending time with only men , away from my wife and the inevitable ego I can exhibit when I ' m interacting with women . I try to justify that social desire with thoughts like men need to have time with other men , when they can just be themselves , etc . a safe place where we need not waste energy on sexuality . However , I also very much believe , acting on the level , that we should admit gay men and I ' m happy to count a number of such men as brethren in my very own lodge . The problem , then , is that all of my reasoning for spending time with only men is contradictory , in that the admission of gay men into a lodge opens it up to the possibility of the very sexual tension that I believed an allmale fraternity was designed to circumvent . The only ways I can logically resolve that is to a deny gay men admission , or b acknowledge that my reasoning for excluding women is not as logically sound as I had hoped . I know too many good and true Masons that would be excluded by option a , so I ' m left fathoming the eventual inclusion of women or finding another reason why it makes sense to exclude them .