Tbh I like hers more than Alyssa ' s <| sep |> System storage management or something like that . <| sep |> You Like That ! !<| sep |> I ' m definitely biased and I think my criticism is rooted in my disagreement with your final grades , so there ' s that caveat to my response . I ' ve been trying to come up with a better way to do it that ' s completely unbiased but I don ' t think it ' s possible . For instance , FPTP MMP got a D on your scale , but mostly because it ' s as unfair to a candidate as FPTP alone is . I frankly don ' t care too much about candidates . That ' s my personal politics speaking but I think that party proportionality is by far the most important issue and I really don ' t care about the candidates perspective . I could see others in this sub having the complete opposite opinion to mine on that however . That being said , I would also disagree with you giving a 0 for candidate strategic votes on FPTP MMP for instance , I ' d be far more inclined to vote for my favorite local candidate if I know I can also vote for my favorite party without strategic voting . I would also argue that 95 % of the time people ' s favorite candidate and party are one in the same so there shouldn ' t be huge disparities between party and candidate in this metric . Overall though I think it ' s just the chart ' s conclusion that STV is somehow better than FPTP MMP and AV MMP is not the general consensus that I ' ve been hearing about from professionals , mostly those professionals interviewed by the ERRE committee .