F the knife that g shock is way more awesome <| sep |> As others have mentioned , the vagueness makes this fairly pointless . Luckily I found some more insightful figures from the same studyBy gender and ageBy countryIn generalIt provides some worrisome information , though also some possible cases where a feasible ' explanation ' might be possible . e . g . I didn ' t notice their definition of ' consent '. Are they assuming that anyone who is drunk or on drugs is incapable of providing consent ? That might explain some responses . managing to get someone drunk clearly doesn ' t justify sexual intercourse without consent , but I don ' t see how 18 % of the Belgians could agree with a statement like that unless something gets lost in translation . There are clearly people with fucked up ideas out there though . there ' s not much room for interpretation on the ' provocative clothing ' question etc . The regret question in which Belgium is ' leading ' makes me think they might have phrased it strangely , because that plainly doesn ' t make sense . Are we honestly expected to believe that 1 in 20 people really agree that rape is fine if you regret it afterwards ? Here ' s some of their written notesEXCERPT STARTIn 16 Member States , respondents are most likely to say being drunk or using drugs justifiessexual intercourse without consent , with those in Romania 30 %, Hungary 24 %, Bulgaria 21 % and Latvia 20 % the most likely to think this way . This compares to 2 % of respondents in Sweden , Finland , Spain and Denmark . Overall , at least one in ten respondents in 21 countries thinksintercourse without consent is justified in this circumstance . At least one in five respondents in Romania 26 %, Hungary and Latvia both 20 % say intercoursewithout consent is justified if a person voluntarily goes home with someone . Just three percentof respondents in Sweden and Spain think this way . This is the most mentioned circumstance byrespondents in six Member States , and overall at least one in ten in 19 Member States thinkintercourse without consent is justified in this circumstance . Respondents in Romania 25 % are the most likely to say that sexual intercourse without consent isjustified if the person is wearing revealing , provocative or sexy clothing , followed by those inHungary 21 % and Malta 20 %. Just 2 % of those in Sweden , Spain and Denmark think the sameway . At least one in ten respondents in 18 Member States thinks intercourse without consent isjustified in this condition . At least one in ten respondents in 17 Member States thinks sexual intercourse without consent isjustified if the person does not clearly say no or physically fight back . Respondents in Romania 22 %, the Czech Republic 19 %, Bulgaria and Greece both 16 % are the most likely to think thisway , while those in Spain 3 % and Sweden 4 % are the least likely to do so . Respondents in Hungary are the most likely to say intercourse without consent is justified if theperson was flirting beforehand 19 %, followed by those in Romania and the Czech Republicboth 17 %. Respondents in Hungary are also the most likely to say intercourse without consent isjustified or if the person was out walking alone at night 18 %, followed by those in Romania 16 % and Portugal 15 %. Respondents in Romania 20 % and Hungary 18 % are the most likely to say having severalsexual partners is justification for intercourse without consent , while those in Romania 11 % andFrance 10 % say this behaviour is justified if the assailant doesn ' t realise what they weredoing . Except for Belgium 5 %, fewer than one in twenty in any country consider regret on the part of theassailant as a justification for sexual intercourse without consent . Sweden 6 % and Spain 8 % are the only countries where less than one in ten thinks at least oneof these situations justifies sexual intercourse without consent . In 23 Member States at least one infive thinks at least one of these situations justifies intercourse without consent . EXCERPT END You can download the . pdf