Fairy glamours . Looks to be SMNonly in 3 . 5 , so hopefully they can change their mind on that and have something by 3 . 55 ? <| sep |> Pretty dang tasty . It was a 27 pound behemoth of a bird . Got it through the danger zone barely in time . <| sep |> 2 commenters are , there was supposed to be 3 before I commented <| sep |> There always is a relevant xkcd <| sep |> I often leave stuff like this around local walking trails and camping sites , just to freak out gullible people . <| sep |> PLease remind me why damn ? <| sep |> Dak has the benefit of the best Oline the league has seen for quite a long while <| sep |> That ' s awesome . People don ' t realize how hard that can be . <| sep |> No it ' s invalid to somebody who can ' t think about it critically or honestly . Exceptions in the form of infertile hetero couples is not the same thing as an entire category of couples being infertile , it ' s an extra level of specificity which is not feasible or reliable to test for , and would be too intrusive . There is no clear , identifiable line of when somebody fertile or not . Furthermore , think about the absurd position this kind of thinking forces you into . I say that when defining marriage it ' s reasonable to ask WHY the state cares about marriage in the first place , and that procreation is one of those reasons . You say Noooo ! Cause what about exceptions where hetero couples aren ' t fertile ? ? Yes , there are always exceptions to every rule , because we legislate in broad strokes . Exceptions don ' t negate the general rule . Infertile homosexual couples ARE THE RULE . The position you ' re forced into is to say that marriage is about NOTHING and has NO JUSTIFICATION , because every justification or motivation you can give for marriage will have exceptions . So why do my tax payer dollars go to subsidize anybody ' s marriage , gay or straight ? Because they love each other ? Not all couples love each other . Because it makes them more stable ? Not all couples are stable . Because it makes them more prone to longterm thinking ? Some couples are still impulsive . So what you ' re doing is trying to tear down one obvious justification for why marriage exists and is relevant to the state procreation , but in doing so you tear down every other justification , and have made marriage meaningless . Richard Posner bench slapped someone trying to make this very same argument . Please enjoy I missing something ? where is the bench slap ? All I saw was a 30 second clip of him making some off hand remark about incest .