Why not provide 2 v 2 and 3 v 3 in unranked and 3 v 3 only in ranked ? I think most would agree that 3 v 3 provides better depthmore interesting team play and should be the competitive standard . Personally I enjoy 2 v 2 when I play and I play a lot of unranked matches in 2 v 2 just for fun however as a spectator I like 3 v 3 much better so I can really appreciate the depth of the team play . I don ' t think we need to axe 2 v 2 s because they provide a valuable space to better learn the mechanics of the games and the intricacies of the champions but I think we need to keep competitive games at 3 v 3 s . <| sep |> I wouldn ' t be surprised if some students died after getting drunk and trying to hop in a body of water on a hot day . I know that this is a major problem in some parts with few bodies of water .