밑 에 러시아어 보이 시 죠 . .? 번역 이 중간 만 된 건데 밑 부턴 그냥 글 복사 해서 구글 번역기 로 돌린 영문 으로 나타내 겠 습니다 . Could play a role subjective factor . The researchers could not describe the tiger dung to the components of hoofed animals and often recorded with a bear feces components , because they considered them less common . Using two different methods showed that the proportion of the Himalayan bear is 0 , 7 - 5 , 2 % of the annual diet of the tiger . The method , based on an analysis of the victims of the tiger , apparently underestimated the proportion of Himalayan black bears in the diet of the tiger . As is evident from other studies ( Table 19 . 4 ) , this percentage can vary widely depending on local conditions and reach - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- - - - - - ------------------------- Page 10 Page 10 Oct . 10 , in some cases 37 % ( Khramtsov , 1993 ; Tkachenko , 1996 ) . According to calculations , SP Kucherenko ( 1974 ) , in the Amur tiger ' s victims each year is 2 - 2 , 5 % of the total population of Himalayan bears . There is a perception that the proportion of bears in the diet of the tiger would increase during the decline of its main victims - ungulates ( Bromley , 1965 ; Rukovsky , 1968 ; Khramtsov , Zhivotchenko , 1983 ) . According to SP Kucherenko ( 1977 ) , the Amur tiger produces an average of three bears , two species per year and withdraws the rest of its range of 3 - 4 % of the populations of the autumn population of bears . He notes that the weight percentage of bears in the feed a tiger is 12 % and is higher than the frequency of their occurrence , as the average bear greater weight on other victims of the predator . Similar calculations lead EN Smirnov ( 1991 ) , studies that measure the weight of occurrence of residues of bears in the fees above quantitative 1 , 7 times . Tiger within its range in the Far East is the main natural enemy of bears . By opinion on VG Yudin ( 1996 ) , tigers are not the main factor limiting the number of bears , but can affect the population of bears when they are in critical condition . Tiger aggression towards bears is good for the populations of the latter , as it promotes " culling " weaker individuals ( Kostoglod , 1977 ) . Bears are also present in the diet of the Bengal tiger in India , where the victim is a sloth bear ( Melursus ursinus ) ( Schaller , 1967 ) . Extraction and eating tigers bears , the protective properties of dens One way to hunt tigers , bears a production of them in berlozhny period of winter shelters . In this way , tigers mined as brown bears ( Kaplanov , 1948 , Bromley , 1965 ) , and Himalayan black bears ( Gorokhov , 1973 ; Khramtsov , Zhivotchenko , 1981 ; Yudakov , Nikolaev , 1987 ; Seryodkin et al . , 2003 ) . GF Bromley ( 1965 ) indicates that cases of tiger attacks on bears , sleeping in their dens on the slopes of the middle Sikhote - Alin , for 1952 - 1959 . registered more than 15 , mostly in early spring and late time . In In the vast majority of these were brown bears . The author notes that it is not always a tiger can kill a brown bear . The largest bear taken out of the clutches of a predator and being driven from their dens to become rods . Valuable observation , which is described in the footsteps in the snow tigress hunting for brown bears in the den on Feb . 15 , 1940 in the Sikhote - Alin Reserve , contained in the message , LG Kaplanova ( 1948 ) : " Out on the Range , a tigress at a right angle to the direction of his turn turned to the left under the hillside and small steps , stealthily approached the standing 50 meters from the ridge cedar , under which was a den . Den fine , earthy , with one hole to the north . Further happened , probably because : a tigress undermined the opposite side of the den hole and it scared a bear , alternately bouncing it to the brow den , then to dig a hole . Seizing the moment , she grabbed the bear paw blow for one of the front feet , pulled her out , and apparently , quickly and without fuss bit in the cervical vertebrae at the nape . Bear , tiger dragged down a bit and ate a whole for a few days . Cubs at the age of 1 year and weighing 30 kg , were apparently strangled right in the den ( bitten skull ) , because the walls and ceiling were spattered with blood ; cubs warm were demolished down to thirty feet , where he laid untouched under the Christmas tree . " Finding a sleeping bear , tigers do not always work for them to attack . In the border area was marked by the following fact : Tiger ( female ) withdrew without attempting to hunt , and dens of a large brown bear , a male . Tiger saw sleeping in the den open the bear for 25 m , whirled and left its trace back ( Yudakov , Nikolaev , 1987 ) . Preferred brown bears of the Sikhote - Alin mountain lair of the soil type ( Bromley , 1965 ; Yudin , 1993 a ; Seryodkin et al . , 2003 ) on your device are available for the Tigers , but they are usually on steep slopes at elevations average 775 m above sea level ( Seryodkin et al . , 2003 ) with relatively high snow cover , that is , in places where the presence of tigers in the winter is unlikely . Apparently , the position of dens in remote places is a major protective mechanism , safeguard brown bears from their main enemies in winter : a tiger and a man . Himalayan bears , arranging for the winter in hollow trees , available for Tiger , if you are logged into the den is not located in the butt part . But part of the bears ( 22 % in the Sikhote - Alin Reserve ) prefers to spend the winter in a small open recess ( Seryodkin et al . , 2003 ) . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- - - - - - ------------------------- Page 11 Page 11 November 11 Such dens completely protected from the tigers and other enemies of the Himalayan bear . Wintering Himalayan black bears in the Bears on the ground should not affect the on reproductive opportunities , increasing their accessibility , since predators are primarily found in young females ( Abramov , 1972 a ) . In the southern areas of Primorye Territory , as well as in places where fautnye trees suitable for animal bedding , spoiled as a result of logging , forest fires and damage in the process of getting out of them bears the share of land - denning later ( Abramov , 1972 a ; Abramov , Pikunov , 1976 ; Yudin , 1993 a ) . Respectively , below their protective properties , including the threat of an attack tiger . There have been cases of extraction of Himalayan tigers , bears in the ground dens , which were placed under vyvorotnem from the butt end ( Yudakov , Nikolaev , 1987 ) and in the basal hollow ( Gorokhov , 1973 ) . VS VS Khramtsov and VI Zhivotchenko ( 1981 ) report that the Himalayan bears , wintering in rocky dens , easily accessible to the tiger . In the dens , located in the crevices of rocks or niches between the stones , the protective properties depend on the size of the entrance to the den or the presence of additional narrow chamber inside . Small size of the input and otnorkov not allow the tiger to a bear squeeze through and get it . The main part of the bears tigers mined during their waking hours . With larger and more powerful , in contrast to the Himalayas , brown bears tigers frequently come into confrontation . Tigers are not always able to overcome the brown bears . VE Kostoglodom ( 1981 ) described the case of an unsuccessful attempt to hunt a tigress with two cubs the grown . Tigress rushed at the bear when he was climbing the almost vertical steeper riverbank . The bear turned around and jumping across the track . He quickly climbed the steep bank of the river to the other side of its upper third , where it stopped . Squeezed the back of the body between the three small trees , the bear turned toward the enemy , stood on a small ledge at 3 meters from him . They are separated by a small cleft in the steep bank . Animals were in such positions , apparently , quite a long time , since the bear was formed under the ice crust . One of the cubs first rushed to pursue the bear after the tigress , but then fell behind . The tigress is not decided in this situation to attack the bear . In another situation , a tiger rushed for brown bear , but after a short fight with the three - meter cliff jumping down the river on which they fought , and quietly left ( Gorokhov , 1973 ) . GF Gorokhov ( 1973 ) wrote about another battle in which there was no winner . Tiger , seeing a bear coming toward him , lay down for vyvorotnem . Having admitted bear closer , he caught him with the second jump . Bear took the fight . Animals for a long time we fought , and both fell out with blood . Tiger after a collision spitting blood . Brown Bear Brown Bear is able to not only provide decent resistance to the tiger attacked him , but also withdraw from the bout victorious . It is known that out of 44 cases of collision of a tiger with a brown bear ( Kaplanov , 1948 ; Sysoev , 1950 ; Sysoev , 1960 ; Abramov , 1962 ; Bromley , 1965 ; Rakov , 1970 ; Kucherenko , 1972 ; Gorokhov , 1973 ; Kostoglod , 1981 ; Khramtsov , 1993 ; our data ) Tiger was initiated in 1912 , Bear - 8 times , in other cases , the assailant has not been established . 50 % of the cases resulted in the death of a bear , 27 , 3 % in the death of tiger and 22 . 7 % of the animals dispersed . Himalayan bears than brown have less resistance to the attack of tigers ( Gorokhov , 1973 ) . However , VP Sysoev ( 1960 ) reports on the long struggle of these two predators . Tiger hunts Himalayan black bears skradom , attacking at random encounters ( Gorokhov , 1973 ) . More successful hunt ends usually in undergrowth , in the meadows and other places , devoid of large trees , which bear often finds salvation ( Kucherenko , 1974 ) , as well as during the approach , when the bear does not have time to jump into the tree . Often the victims are young tigers bears ( Khramtsov , 1993 ) . Known from the literature eight cases when the Himalayan bears trying to escape from the tiger in the tree ( Bromley , 1956 ; Gorokhov , 1973 ; Kucherenko , 1974 ; Khramtsov , 1983 ; Khramtsov , 1993 ; Seryodkin et al . , 2003 ) . In six cases , they succeeded . In all cases , the tiger was lying under a tree ( up to two days ) , guarding the potential victim , but this time the bear was waiting upstairs . One of the bears escaped from the claws of a tigress with torn skin , did not dare to go down for three days , while the predator has apparently retired . Twice the Tigers manage to pull off the tree bears , and both times they escaped and were again stopped on a tree , and then sacrificed and eaten . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- - - - - - ------------------------- Page 12 Page 12 December 12 , LG Kaplanov ( 1948 ) describes the case when Tiger was staying at the crushed bear at least 8 days , not leaving it all the time from the victim . In December 1959 , p . Bright tiger killed a large brown bear and lived near him for about 10 days until they had eaten ( Rakov , 1965 ) . When at full utilization of the bear tiger is only the head and gnawed bones . In the excrement of tigers eating bears , often their claws and phalanges ( Khramtsov , 1993 , and our observations ) . In some cases , well - fed animal eats away only the juiciest parts of the body , leaving a large part of the whole carcass ( Bromley , 1965 ; Gorokhov , 1973 ; Tkachenko , 1996 ) . Known case where a tiger eating a completely brown bear , did not touch them strangled her two cubs ( Kaplanov , 1948 ) . Tiger as an object of power bears Cases eating tiger Himalayan black bears were not observed . Nevertheless , it is possible that the bears may feed on carcasses or remnants of dead tigers . Brown bears are sometimes attacked tigers . Known 12 cases of killing tigers brown bears ( Sysoev , 1950 ; Sysoev , 1960 ; Abramov , 1962 ; Rakov , 1970 ; Gorokhov , 1973 ; Kostoglod , 1981 ) . six dead tigers were adults , four - cubs , and in two cases the authors of the age was not specified . All the bears had been eaten by tigers . In the famine years in nazhirovochnye feed the bears become aggressive . For example , in 1960 , brown bear knocked down and ate a tiger in Sikhote - Alin Reserve ( Abramov , 1972 b ) . VE Kostoglod ( 1981 ) describes the case of persistent persecution of the tiger ( the width of metacarpal crumb forepaw 10 . 5 cm ) , large brown bear . For more than 14 miles a bear persistently followed the tiger spryamlyaya in some places , meanders its wake . Only when the tiger crossed the ice river channel with numerous traces of the people , the bear stopped the persecution . In another case , found the remains of the tiger devoured by a bear ( Kostoglod , 1981 ) . Floodplain of the river for several kilometers has been trampled by signs of predators . The tiger circled and made a loop , trying to escape from persecution , but was overtaken and torn to pieces bear . With an overall relatively low number of tigers death of individuals can significantly affect the state of the population . However , in such encounters is more likely doom the weakened , including the injured and old animals , so the brown bears can help to eliminate potentially hazardous to human tigers ( Kostoglod , 1981 ) . Predation by brown bear is one of the reasons for the high mortality tiger . Of the 14 established GF Pea ( 1977 ) deaths of cubs ( 1951 - 1972 years . ) Three killed by a brown bear . Brown bears can eat the remains found of their tigers . This can explain the found in April 2001 in the basin . Serebryanka ( Sikhote - Alin Reserve ) excrement brown bear , which contains a small amount of hair tiger ( our data ) . Adherence to bear on the tiger trail brown bears , found traces of tiger , react to it differently . The reaction of the bear , apparently , depends on the old trail , sex , age and physical condition of bears and tigers , which left traces ; the season , the abundance and availability of feed for the bear ; individual inclinations and experience of the bear . Brown bears can move on tiger tracks for different reasons : to facilitate the movement through deep snow , in order to select the abandoned remains of tiger victims , in order to capture his victim and to prosecute the tiger as a potential victim . Mote these reasons combined , depending on the situation . To facilitate the movement of the snow bears use the tiger trail , if it coincides with the direction of their movement , and throw it , if it deviates from its course . In In this case , it does not matter whether the bear while moving the tiger or the opposite direction . Bears often follow the tiger trail in search of remnants of prey tiger ( Kaplanov , 1948 ; Rakov , 1970 ; Kostoglod , 1976 ; Khramtsov , Zhivotchenko , 1981 ; Dunishenko , 1991 , our unpublished data ) . VE Kostoglod ( 1976 ) traced the five tropleny brown bear - rod tiger is the longest course on the trail of the tiger tracked - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- - - - - - ------------------------- Page 13 Page 1313 13 not to end up 22 miles , and the bear did not make any attempts to catch a predator . Anisotropy even bear traces of the old Tiger , and often goes to the heel ( Kostoglod , 1976 ) . In In unfavorable to forage during this behavior bears more common . Such a situation was observed prior to the occurrence of brown bears hibernate in November and December 1999 in the Sikhote - Alin Reserve ( our data ) . Himalayan bears also use the following for ease of movement of Tigers in the snow . In this case , as brown bears , they just stepping into the wells of tiger prints . AG Yudakov AG ( 2000 ) entropy of a large Himalayan bear who freely walked the freshest tracks of a tiger sleeping in Gaina , where the tiger and the tiger ate leftovers . Often Himalayan bears avoid fresh tiger tracks ( Kucherenko 1974 ) . Interesting reaction of avoidance Himalayan black bears traces of the tiger said KN Tkachenko ( personal communication ) in the more - Hehtsirskom reserve on Dec . 4 , 1995 Himalayan Bear left at the fresh tracks of a tigress and two cubs , and was followed by 12 m . He then returned back to its track ( was it the same distance ) , and ran away from the tiger tracks , and by 8 meters climbed a tree . Tigers can also follow the bear tracks . On this case , which occurred April 21 , 1975 in the basin . Kurumi ( Sikhote - Alin Reserve ) said VL Scherbonos . Type Type bear was not measured . NV Rakov , NV ( 1970 ) described a case where a family of tigers ( the female with two large cubs ) in the basin . Matai often walked in the footsteps of the three bears - rods . Collisions between animals were not eaten all but the Tigers killed a bear the boar . Sharing tigers and bears marking trees Amur tigers use trees as a means of intraspecific communication , inflicting on them olfactory ( urine stains , Poches ) and visual ( teaser ) tags ( Matyushkin , 1987 ; Yudakov , Nikolaev , 1987 ) . Brown and Himalayan bears in the southern Far East also leave marks on the trees as Zakusov , scoring , and Poches ( Aramilev , Solkin , 1993 , and our observations ) . Markers for the tigers , and bears may be the same trees , typically along animal trails used by animals . In this case , these trees are not only the media within a species , but also a means of interspecies communication animal ( Aramilev , Solkin , 1993 ) . Himalayan bears are much less likely to brown markings showing activity , but use the trees , which carry information . Food competition tigers and bears , brown and Himalayan black bear is not particularly noticeable amount of trophic competition tiger . Brown and Himalayan black bears feed mainly feed of plant origin - up to 89 . 7 and 99 % of the annual diet of each species , respectively ( Seredkin et al , 2003 ) , while the tiger is a specialized predator . Minor competition tiger may be only a brown bear in the spring , when his predatory activity increases . 예전 에 소개 한 것 도 있 고 내용 도 너무 많 아서 ;; 제 가 잘못 말 한 것 과 대충 눈 에 띄 는 걸로 만 하 겠 습니다 . 예전 에 아무르 지 방 에서 불곰 과 호랑이 관계 글 을 타 파렐 님 이 올려 주 셨 으니깐 그거 검색 하 셔서 다른 내용 좀 더 자세히 보 시 면 됩니다 . 그리고 스 샷 에 찍힌 거 나 텍스트 를 한 거 나 번역기 로 돌린 것 이 기 때문 에 해석 이 정확 하 진 않 습니다 . 그래도 나름 깔끔 하 네요 . 영어 - 한글 변환 보단 훨 나 은 듯 . 무엇 보다 제 가 예전 에 주구장창 떠들 고 다녔 던 . .// 가을 에 낙엽 소리 때문 에 호랑이 가 곰 을 가을 에 더 자주 사냥 하 는 건 헛소리 다 / / 인데 . . 제 가 헛소리 를 하 였 습니다 . 자료 에 정확히 나와 있 군요 . 낙엽 소리 때문 에 가을 에 호랑이 가 곰 을 더 자주 사냥 하 는 게 맞 습니다 . 물론 불곰 이 당한 것 중 에 성체 수컷 은 공식 기론 으론 없 습니다 . 그리고 보 시 면 위 의 표 중 에 호랑이 의 먹이 감 에 포함 된 곰 의 비율 을 보 실 수 있 을 겁니다 . 1 . 5 %~ 37 % 로 다양 합니다 . 특징 이 있 다면 조사 군 숫자 가 많 을수록 곰 의 비율 은 떨어집니다 . 전 에 도 말 했 듯이 반달곰 은 오히려 동면 중 에 불곰 보다 덜 당하 는데 이유 는 반달곰 이 자 는 곳 은 호랑이 가 들어가 긴 힘들 어서 . . 입니다 . 반달곰 이 자 는 곳 중 56 % 정도 가 호랑이 가 들어갈 수 없 다 하 며 나머지 44 % 는 호랑이 가 칩 입 할 가능 성 이 있 는 곳 이 라 하 는군요 . 그리고 예전 에 말 했 듯이 12 known cases of brown bears kill tigers ( Sysoev , 1950 ; Sysoev , 1960 ; Abramov , 1962 ; Rakow , 1970 ; Gorokhov , 1973 ; Kostoglod , 1981 ) . 곰 이 호랑이 죽인 사건 은 12 건 이 있 는데 그중 성체 6 건 미 성체 4 건 신상 확인 안 됨 2 건 인데 성체 6 건 의 내용 을 보 자면 1972 년 에 성체 숫 호랑이 가 곰 에게 당한 사건 , 1960 년 Sysoev 가 기록 한 암 호랑이 가 멧돼지 를 사냥 하 고 새끼 를 둔 채 갔 다가 큰곰 이 난입 하 고 굴 에서 돌아온 암 호랑이 를 습격 하 고 싸움 이 벌어졌 으며 그 결과 곰 이 암 호랑이 를 죽였 다 합니다 . 곰 은 상당 한 부상 임 에 불구 하 고 멧돼지 와 암 호랑이 를 먹 었 다 합니다 . 1913 년 에 도 큰 불곰 이 호랑이 를 쓰러뜨렸 다고 하 는데 . . 이건 신상 이 확인 이 안 된 것 에 들어가 야 하나 . . 그리고 역시 1960 년 Sysoev 가 기록 한 4 살 성체 숫 호랑이 가 불곰 에게 당한 사건 . Another case of predation was reported in Sikhote - Alin in 1960 ( Abramov , 1972 ) : in winter a big brown bear killed and eaten a medium sized male adult tiger . This predation can happen only while the bear is very hungry . » Abramov 가 기록 한 1960 년 에 일어난 큰 불곰 이 중간 크기 의 성체 숫 호랑이 를 죽이 고 먹 은 사건 . 이런 사건 은 곰 이 매우 배 가 고파서 일어난 일 이 라 하 며 In 1981 Kostoglod mentioned the following incident : a brown bear tracked a medium sized male tiger ( or an extremely huge female according to the size of tracks ) in order to kill it . After some hard time the tiger crossed the area close to humans ; thanks to this trick he survived . The next tiger was not so lucky ; he was caught , killed and eaten by the brown bear ( Kostoglod , 1981 ) . 1981 년 Kostoglod 가 기록 한 불곰 이 중간 크기 의 숫 호랑이 ( 아님 아주 큰 암 호랑이 이거 나 ) 를 추적 하 였 는데 이유 는 호랑이 를 죽이 기 위함 이 며 호랑이 는 인간 거주 지역 가까이 있 는 곳 으로 도망쳐 살 았 다 합니다 . 그러나 다음 호랑이 는 운 이 좋 지 못하 여 곰 에게 붙잡히 고 죽임 을 당해 먹혔 다 합니다 . 이 자료 들 은 시베리아 호랑이 프로젝트 이전 에 벌 어 난 일 입니다 . 그래서 2009 년 데일 미켈 박사 왈 " 우리 연구 중 엔 호랑이 가 곰 에게 당한 사건 은 없 다 " 라고 했 죠 . 그러나 2010 년 새로운 두 사건 이 기록 되 었 으니 . . 그 발언 은 이제 못 하 실 듯 . . 그리고 이것 역시 예전 에 말 했 습니다 만 It is known that out of 44 cases of collision of a tiger with a brown bear ( Kaplanov , 1948 ; Sysoev , 1950 ; Sysoev , 1960 ; Abramov , 1962 ; Bromley , 1965 ; Rakov , 1970 ; Kucherenko , 1972 ; Gorokhov , 1973 ; Kostoglod , 1981 ; Khramtsov , 1993 ; our data ) 50 % of the cases resulted in the death of a bear , 27 , 3 % in the death of tiger and 22 . 7 % of the animals dispersed . Himalayan bears than brown have less resistance to the attack of tigers ( Gorokhov , 1973 ) . However , VP Sysoev ( 1960 ) 호랑이 와 곰 의 유혈 사태 는 44 건 . 그 중 22 건 이 곰 의 죽음 , 12 건 이 호랑이 의 죽음 , 10 건 이 승부 안 남 . 여긴 위 의 곰 사건 관 달리 1993 년 의 시베리아 호랑이 프로젝트 자료 도 들어갑니다 . 호랑이 가 곰 을 죽인 건 . . 숫자 도 많 고 자료 수집 도 안 해서 그냥 넘어가 겠 습니다 . 보 시 다시피 호랑이 가 곰 을 죽인 회수 가 훨씬 높 습니다 . 저 는 더 높 을 줄 알 았 는데 생 각외 더군요 . 이제 이 결과 가 왜 이렇게 나왔 는지 분석 해 보 자면 . . 새끼 와 암컷 을 합친 죽인 횟수 는 호랑이 가 월등 합니다만 성체 수컷 간 의 싸움 은 곰 이 확실히 앞섭니다 . 왜 이럴까 요 ? 결론 부터 말 하 자면 불곰 의 체중 이 호랑이 보다 훨씬 무겁 기 때문 입니다 . 1990 년 대 행한 아무르 호랑이 수컷 들 의 평균 체중 은 190 ~ 195 킬로 수준 이 고 2000 년 대 에 행한 것 은 176 킬로 에 지나 지 않 았 습니다 . 그러나 아무 르 불곰 은 수컷 의 경우 가장 많이 살 이 오르 는 가을철 엔 호랑이 수컷 보다 100 ~ 150 킬로 는 더 무겁 고 봄철 에 도 50 ~ 100 킬로 가량 더 무겁 습니다 . 그리고 저 는 개인 적 으론 불곰 과 호랑이 가 동체 급 에서 싸우 면 불곰 이 좀 더 유리 하 다 봅니다 만 은 동체 급 의 불곰 종과 호랑이 종 둘 이 야생 에서 살 다면 그 불곰 종 은 결코 호랑이 보다 야생 에서 차지 하 는 위치 가 높 지 못할 것 이 라 보 고 있 는데 그 이유 는 . . 호랑이 보다 뭉실뭉실 한 곰 의 성격 도 있 겠 고 . . 그리고 바이 코프 의 발언 을 소개 하 겠 습니다 . 그 가 Bears of the Far East ( 저서 이름 인 듯 ) 에서 말 하 길 ' Кроме человека , врагов у медведей почти нет . Только молодые экземпляры подвергаются нападению тигра " 영어 로 돌리 면 Excepting humans , bear do not have many enemies . Only young bears are being attacked by tigers . 인간 을 제외 하 면 불곰 은 적 이 많 지 않 다 오로지 어린 곰 들 만 호랑이 의 공격 을 받 는다 즉 불곰 은 인간 을 제외 하 면 적 이 없 다 라고 말 했 다 보 시 면 되 는 것 이 밑 에 반달곰 에 대해 말 할 때 는 Кроме человека , у черного маньчжурского медведя есть только один враг – тигр , который , при отсутствии другой добычи , охотится за ним , скрадывает его в чаще и в скалах и бросается сверху , стараясь сесть ему на спину и перекусить шею . 영어 로 돌리 면 excepting human , the black bear Manchu there is only one enemy - the tiger , which , in the absence of other prey , hunting for him , it often hides in the rocks and rushes from the top , trying to sit on his back and bite her neck 사람 을 제외 하 면 반달곰 의 적 은 호랑이 밖 에 없 다 라고 말 하 는 걸 보 면 말 이 죠 . 그리고 바이 코프 는 그 의 다른 저서 THE MANCHURIAN TIGER . 에서 말 하 길 A rather big tiger would defeat a bear of almost the same weight . For this purpose , the predator tracks down the bear and makes an ambush , ordinarily on a rock or in wind - fallen trees , taking the side against the wind . Carelessly a bear slowly goes by an ambush , suspecting nothing , and the tiger rushes out on it from above , its one paw claws under the bear ' s chin , the other paw at the throat , and the tiger bites through the neck vertebrae . 큰 호랑이 는 곰 과 비슷 한 체중 이 라면 곰 을 이길 수 있 을 것 이 다 . 라고 말 하 며 예 를 드 는데 호랑이 는 곰 이 올 때 바람 을 안 고 기다리 고 있 다가 부주 의 한 곰 이 아무것 도 의심 하 지 않 고 수풀 을 지나갈 때 곰 을 불시 에 덮쳐 목 을 물 어 죽인다 - 라고 합니다 . 바이 코프 의 이 말 들 이 바로 핵심 인데 호랑이 가 더 빠르 고 , 엄폐 능력 이 뛰어나 기 때문 에 자신 이 주도 권 을 가지 기 에 곰 을 죽이 는데 있 어 숫자 가 훨씬 많 은 것 입니다 . 곰 하 고 부딪히 려다 안 되 겠 다 싶 으면 빠르 니까 도망가 면 되 고 숨 어서 곰 을 지켜보 면서 큰 수콤 이 지나가 면 그냥 넘기 고 상대 적 으로 쉬운 암콤 이나 새끼 가 지나 면 습격 해서 죽이 면 되 니까요 . 아실 분 들 은 아 시 겠 지만 앞서 소개 했 던 곰 사냥 꾼 이 라 불린 데 일 도 이런 방식 이 구요 . 그리고 앞서 말 했 듯이 불곰 이 월등히 무거우 니깐 더 올라갈 데 가 없 는 성체 수컷 간 의 죽이 는 횟수 에선 곰 쪽 이 월등히 유리 한 것 입니다 . 둘 의 관계 는 숫 불곰 이 유리 하 지만 대부분 은 숫 불곰 과 숫 호랑이 는 서로 를 피한다 할 수 있 습니다 . 수컷 아무르 호랑이 가 암콤 만 을 잡아먹 는 것 만 관찰 되 었 듯이 실제 시베리아 호랑이 프로젝트 에서 관찰 된 바 로 는 숫 불곰 은 정기 적 으로 호랑이 먹이 를 빼앗 아 먹 는다고 하 지만 이건 모두 다 암 호랑이 의 먹이 를 빼앗 아 먹 는 것 이 라 하 였 습니다 . 그리고 2000 년 에 호랑이 두 마리 가 의문 에 생명체 에게 죽임 을 당했 다 . . 범인 은 불곰 이 유력 . . 이 라는 사건 은 레어 웹 을 제외 하 면 도통 찾 을 수 가 없 더군요 . 2009 년 미켈 박사 발언 도 그렇 고 . . 레어 웹 특유 의 뜬소문 이 라 보 입니다 . 생전 의 바이 코프 의 모습 입니다 .