Indeed it will be . Already swollen and feeling like crap can ' t wait to get back into ketosis . <| sep |> You should work out the halftime of your particular dose of diazepam , and make sure it ' s out of your system before you drop acid . It will otherwise reduce the experience overall . I would recommend that you take at least 150 ug for a full experience , and it ' s a good beginners introduction to LSD . Check out a vendor called Epicurus or in fact anyone whose known to sell tabs from GammaGoblin . <| sep |> I would much appreciate this feature . <| sep |> I send you a pm <| sep |> No love for Butters Stotch , eh ? <| sep |> Hi , I won ' t be addressing your overall point on science being distorted in political discussion , I just wanted to nitpick really quick on a few misconceptions you appear to have . Hopefully , that should strengthen your point in the future . I ' m talking about the scientific endeavour that has raised us from the caves and huts into what we are now . bound by the scientific method , which is responsible for literally every single breakthrough in the last couple of hundred years . They ' re not the same , and in their ignorance DunningKruger effect in full force they refuse and deny anything that doesn ' t match their views . It ' s actually interesting that you bring up the DunningKruger effect , what you ' ve just said is actually a common misconception that arises due to people knowing a bit about science , but not having the full picture . It ' s very commendable , of course , to have such a passion with regards to science , but it ' s even more so to have a decent amount of passion and a decent amount of understanding . You seem to be arguing for the truthvalue of science through its contributions to technological progress . People who deny scientific findings must be wrong because we have tangible technological breakthroughs as a result of scientific research . However , this is no more an argument for science bringing us things that are true than the fact that agriculture was functional due to being able to predict seasons meant that a geocentric model of the entire universe was true several centuries ago . In other words , a belief that is pragmatic does not equate with a belief that is true . One could deny that the Earth was the center of the universe and still reap the technological benefits of such a theory , understanding the pragmatic value of the theory while denying that it is true , perhaps opting to believe the Moon or the Sun is the center of the entire universe . If someone believes the Earth is flat and infinite while someone else simply believes the Earth is flat , the person who believe it ' s infinite and that you can ' t fall off the face of the Earth is going to have an easier time traveling around . That their beliefs are more pragmatic does not make them true . This gets into the arguments between scientific realism and antirealism , and the view I just outlined can be looked into realism # AntFoiForSciRea if you ' re more interested , but I ' ve laid out the gist . The point is , the fact that we ' ve had some breakthroughs and have been raised from the caves and huts does not work as an argument against those who deny scientific findings . Another thing is your mention of the scientific method . The idea that there is a single , universal , clear and rigorous scientific method is a common misconception , but a misconception nonetheless . Methods that are scientific vary wildly between fields and between scientific goals . Ask an economist , a neuroscientist , a chemist , and a string theorist what methods they use for their findings and you will get wildly different answers . This variety has led to extreme doubt that there is such a thing as the scientific method , to understate the debate . It is quite likely that such a thing doesn ' t exist , and that which distinguishes a method as scientific versus nonscientific leaves room for many methods . You can read more about this method # DisSciMet if you ' d like . Otherwise , what I ' ve laid out should give you some pause before referring to the holy scientific method . Hopefully , this makes your arguments more persuasive in the future and those links provide some interesting reading material for you . Have a nice night .