There ' s still time left in the season ! <| sep |> could buy a better brand instead <| sep |> Man I was hoping for a discount . <| sep |> There ' s still realm forums yeah <| sep |> Why don ' t you just battle it against a few dragonite ' s a see how it fairs , it could do ok but it ' s low hp could be an issue . I still think something like dewgong would be a better prestiger than ditto v dragonite but just it and let ' s us know what happens . <| sep |> Are 23 additive ? I assumed potential to make a straight was a standalone rule <| sep |> I ' m all for a recount , but seriously the electronic vs paper discrepancy argument is trash to the point of essentially being nonevidence . I ' m not just being partisan about this , I ' ve spent a good amount of time reading about election auditing and polling discrepancies and come from a math modeling background . This stuff interests me and I ' m not just pushing an uninformed opinion . The same electronic voting vs paper voting has happened in a bunch of previous elections . I ' m pretty sure the same discrepancies showed up in a few states in the primary in favor of Hillary over Bernie whenever there was electronic voting . I ' m not 100 % sure These sorts of odd correlations happen all the time and given the limited nature of publicly released voting data which doesn ' t include individual voter info , it ' s practically impossible to properly control for possible demographic , political , or electionspecific turnout effects . So again , I ' m behind audits and recounts for transparency , but that doesn ' t mean that bad statistical arguments count as evidence . The best way to verify elections is to implement some sort of well thought out risklimiting audit with a paper trail as recommended by the American Statistical Association . It really sucks , but without some sort of mechanism like that in place , there ' s no reliable way to detect subtle election rigging , and especially when you only look at precinct vote totals . I have serious disagreements with Nate Silver on some other topics , but he ' s 100 % right in being highly skeptical about this argument .