OP can ' t lie <| sep |> How will you keep from falling for one of your flings ? More importantly for his to work , how to you convince your wife that you won ' t fall for one of your flings ? <| sep |> I don ' t understand how you can ' t stop and take a good look at it . He looked down but God damn it was close <| sep |> We always go look at the lights that are up at Opryland in the evening with friends . <| sep |> The ol ' good OpTic Gaming quickscope . <| sep |> She ' s out husband shopping . <| sep |> I ' d love to see the victim ' s reaction when his view after his death shows his killer . <| sep |> Honestly , you have more faith in my readers than I do if you expect them to read the footnotes . I wouldn ' t be surprised if half or more saw that the post was long and tried to immediately skip to the tldr . My thought here is really that not putting technical details in footnotes will 1 obscure the intuition for laymen while 2 constraining the level of detail you can provide for the technically inclined , so offloading material to the footnotes is kind of a winwin situation . The people who are going to skip it will skip it anyway , but if the main post is shorter they have a higher chance of reading it and taking away more from it , and the people who are going to pay attention will find the technical details whether or not they ' re footnoted , so I see very little downside . Would you agree then that the difference of orders of magnitude between the one pvalue and the rest is the noteworthy part , and not the fact that the former is below some arbitrary thresholds while the latter are above them ? Yes , I would absolutely agree with this point .