Routinely , they do not . Let me be clear having your cervix pounded against with a blunt object so hard that the vaginal canal tore behind the cervix as well as all over it indicating the force was beginning to separate the cervix from the vaginal canal could possibly be consensual in a very small number of BDSM cases . For this to not be probable cause , it seems you have to jump over the massive amount of sexual statistics that point to the fact that those extreme BDSM practices make up a tiny fraction of sexual relations , and the statistics that RAPE SURVIVORS AREN ' T LYING . Again , if I said I ' d been hit and had bruises , police wouldn ' t be waiting on DNA evidence or assuming it I ' d asked to be hit until they can prove otherwise . An arrest would be a waste of time ? Tell that to the next person he does this to . I ' m having an incredibly hard time believing you ' ve ever interacted with a survivor knowingly , given this statement . And , I ' ll point out that I never said the evidence pointed the the fact that I was undoubtedly assaulted . I specifically asked about the evidence being probable cause . It ' s in my post twice . So you answered a question about probable cause with all the reasons that there may not be charges brought against him , which I ' m aware of , but I still have to thank you for sharing with the class .