Great channel in general <| sep |> That article itself is pretty disingenuous in that it contains almost no statements from Stein , only from her social media manager , who , even then doesn ' t actually endorse Trump . Instead she hamfistedly criticises Clinton while being blind to her own situation , but nowhere in there is there an endorsement of Trump unless you just make the inference that being against Clinton is the same as being for Trump . Literally the most positive thing in the quoted FB post is this Trump is a product of our society . He is not the root cause . You ' d have to make a damn generous interpretation to see this as ' endorsing ' him when it goes on to talk about how terrible his brand of racism is . Even the one quote from Stein about ' Trump being better ' is specifically in regards to Russia , in the context that he seems to want to be less confrontational with them . She ' s running for president herself , the idea of endorsing another candidate is odd on its own , but the article you linked links to a Scopes piece debunking it . Not really sure what else to say .