Not intentionally . However , I don ' t think debating this in relation to Australia Day is useful . The High Court said a while ago that that doctrine was dead , so why are people talking about it ? Could it be because they like to have something to cry about about ? <| sep |> Personally I like to get useful information or of the content I watch . I enjoyed his reviews a lot because they were useful and he presented a pretty unbiased and straight forward review . He was willing to call something a pile of shit if it was . His series could be useful if they teach the mechanics or highlight key capabilities or faults of the game . Unfortunately much of what he does now is none of this . It ' s just him playing a game . He ' s entertaining , yes , but not useful in the context of review . He gains some ground with comparisons . However , the current him is nothing like the old him , and the content you get from his videos are very different . He had transitioned from a reviewer to an entertainer and more specifically a lazy one . He puts out a lot of content , but much of it isn ' t fundamentally useful . Now part of this is likely driven by his life and time available to generate a type of product for our consumption . For example , he could take a completes series and make it a single video with some highlights , critical discussion , and meaningful take aways , all specific to the review of the game . However that ' s a massive undertaking for one video . To generate a reasonable revenue stream , that ' s not really possible . Volume becomes a necessity . What he ' s stepped to now is a volume system with low effort per piece of content . The downside is you don ' t really get a high density of meaningful content . You get a lot if casual content . Is it useful ? Maybe . Is it entertaining , yes . He is a good entertainer . I just think the review side of it kind of fell off a cliff . When I say review I mean with substance , discussion , and detail . Yes it still comes , but it ' s a much looser format . The meaningful bits might be spread out across a dozen or more videos . He ' s my point . What does a specific completes video get me ? I watch video 8 of the Fallout 4 completes , what use is that too me ? How does video 8 differ from 12 or 3 ? In the end , none of them are useful as a tool . Rather , their only purpose is entertainment , and casual entertainment at that because it ' s not content driven , not purposeful . It doesn ' t review , discuss game design , mechanics , tradeoffs of development choices , nor is it even used as a base example to tie into another game or discussion point . Instead , it becomes equivalent to watching a sitcom episode on TV but worse because it ' s not driven by a story , a tale , or a point . It ' s just one man playing a game , and we ' re watching it . At the end of the day I still enjoy him as an entertainer . I like watching him . I just think he could do a lot more . All yourself how useful an old episode is beyond the first viewing , a year from now ? What type of use does that content serve ? Is that content meaningful ? Was it worth creating ? The funny thing is I find I get more gaming information out of his podcats than I do watching him actually play the game . He creates the space necessary to step back , analyse , criticize , and compare . He pulls out key details and discussion points . This could be a video planned and tailored to play out specifically to discuss and showcase the points of interest . And , this video would be useful , content rich , and carry long term use . A year from now that video is still useful as a tool . It ' s the type of content that creates a legacy and carries real weight and purpose . That ' s what ' s missing and what ' s oh so necessary , and right now podcats is about the only place you get it , and it ' s random buried in and hour and a half of other content . There ' s also no guide to the information for future consumption , so it ' s largely lost and forgettable .