Same for mana tbhMe Don ' t go i n AliveAliveAliveAliveEnemy double kill ! Team Hello ? ??? 8 % mana <| sep |> Definitely add a stop in Ashville , NC , Columbus , OH , and Madison , WI . <| sep |> i play reaper <| sep |> You ' ve probably not met a Brexit voter because they ' re shamed and shouted at by remainers . It ' s why remain got so complacent , you can change what people say but you can ' t change what they think . <| sep |> Most underrated coach ever <| sep |> I personally think the Guardian is so so important at this difficult time , but I wish they wouldn ' t have so many of these ridiculous opinion pieces . <| sep |> Well , then I ' ll just fire back with the district court agrees with me . The district court is an inferior court , the circuit court ' s opinion trumps it entirely making their decision irrelevant . On top of that , as the Circuit court ' s opinion points out , they missed the forest for the trees . The District court did not examine the effects or law as a whole , and instead focused on the law in a vacuum . Jim Crow laws , on paper , weren ' t racist either . Both are subjective opinions and neither are proof of anything . You have a clear double standard for what counts as proof . The opinions of the courts are based off a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data available to them , which overwhelmingly suggests Republican lawmakers requested data on which race used which IDs for the express purpose of barring those . Otherwise you can explain to me why certain IDs were accepted and why certain others weren ' t , why early voting was truncated , and why this just so happened to benefit one group so clearly over the other and be tied to race ? s m o k i n g g u n p r o v i n g n o r t h c a r o l i n a r e p u b l i c a n s t r i e d t o d i senfranchiseblackvotersNo , my entire argument does not boil down to who agrees with me . It boils down to the facts Republican lawmakers in NC created a law that restricted voting specifically along racial lines with the justification that it solved a problem that didn ' t exist . This resulted in them benefitting greatly and their political opponents suffering , because preventing voting from minorities is beneficial to Republicans . We obviously place restrictions on other rights , like firearms , so why not this one ? Because it ' s beside the point , I ' m not talking about whether or not we should have any steps to verify citizenship . I ' m saying voter ID laws are often discriminatory .