no , it should be about choosing the utility you want between multiple items with similar stats . like choosing between phantom dancer and hurricane <| sep |> just listen to it . It ' s 20 minutes . <| sep |> Most people wouldn ' t call a ton of talent and proving yourself at every single level of motorsports to EARN a seat in F 1 at a top team as a rookie luck . I didn ' t claim he was ONLY lucky , or that he made into F 1 by luck . But to say that he hasn ' t been lucky , very lucky even , throughout most of his career , compared to the average F 1 driver , is demonstrably not true . Which was nearly a decade ago . the fact people still characterize everything he doessays now through the frame of him as a rookie is ridiculous . You ' re claiming that ' people ' characterize ' everything he doessays ' through a frame as a rookie , than called it ridiculous . That ' s a strawman argument . I didn ' t say I or anyone does or should do that . A driver that lacks tact is going to get some people to dislike him , if he ' s somewhat successful or very successful . And , in my opinion , he has done and still does lack some tact . That was my statement . Often ? That ' s not true at all . Maybe you ' re new to F 1 . Look at 2007 , 2009 , 2011 specially . Many cases , which I won ' t go into detail here . Even today on the press conference , he made some very interesting , backhanded remarks disguided as fascetious , I believe about the exchange of mechanics between his side of the garage and Nico ' s , though that ' s quite a minor example . Compare that to other drivers on average . You may come to a different conclusion , and that ' s fine . But to act as if the entire idea is proposterous and demonstrably not true is intellectually dishonest .