I ' ve never seen 120 of their varieties . so I haven ' t tried them all if there is 120 . From all the Boxers and many others I have tried they all taste horrible . Watermelon beer ! ? FFS ! <| sep |> Got it thank you <| sep |> OH MY GOD HOLDING . REFS ARE DOGSHIT <| sep |> Don ' t worry your pretty little head about it , you wouldn ' t understand . <| sep |> While I appreciate your passion , I wish you could have found a way to relate it to our exchange . Because thisSomeone asserts something you disagree with , you ask for a source to cite , they provide it , it will never be good enough , or is otherwise flawed . Maybe it really is flawed , so they provide another . Again , not good enough . Essentially the burden of proof is impossible to persuade someone who isn ' t primed to believe it . is not what we ' re talking about . We ' re talking about a specific legal case , and whether or not a user should cite it as evidence in their favour without specifying in any way whatwho they ' re talking about . Think of it this way If I said , I know a case where a woman was raped by a man in broad daylight , and then all of the police officers colluded to protect him , and then the judge actually threw her in jail ! , would you take that at face value ? Or would that be intellectually dishonest of you to ask ?