Please no context menu . We ' ll end up like the even clunkier Arma with that ugly context menu . The pie menu is fine , just clean it up . <| sep |> Do you think he got his three days notice ? <| sep |> They can get pricey with alchemical cartridges and whatnot . <| sep |> No Got acho que era s o Three Eyed Raven . <| sep |> Actually it kind of is . Take government contracting , the rough order of precedence for derived requirements ContractIndustry StandardsAS 9100 QMSCompanies comply with those , for example , at a bare minimum so that they are allowed to sell their product . Unless it is a selling point , they do not often exceed them because it is excessive cost . And then you have companies , or at least PMs , willing to bypass or find loopholes to get it done on time or under budget . Volkswagen appears to have supported bypassing an industry requirement to either get it done on time or make sure the RD cost paid off either way it ' s about money . So no , it is not directly relevant . It ' s an example of a company willing to ignorebypass the minimum requirements to make a sale . Why would they , or any other company , go beyond and shoulder the cost of designing such a system than exceeds the minimum requirements and isn ' t recouped as a selling point ? An automaker could design an engine for a car that could last an owner ' s lifetime , but they don ' t for a reason . It ' s not a rant on ' big bad companies ', it ' s just business and risk assessment . And this is all , admittedly , ignorant of SAEISO requirements on the relevant systems that allegedly failed in this article . After all , you gotta pay like $ 60 for every single paper .