We just don ' t have the technology for that . There ' s just no way . <| sep |> thats too logical , haha . ive been a vanilla android user since 2010 , so just nexuses and now the pixel XL . im currently testing an iPhone 7 and i am too use to the vanilla android experience . that said , if you loved your s 6 its more than likely the s 7 is a similar experience . it will have touchwiz . but like uriverboi 16 said . try them both out , if not throw the dice and order a 3 t . enjoy ! <| sep |> They could be more forthcoming with what their plan is , even if they only proceed with it next year . No negotiations until next year . Please tell us your starting position in the negotiations . <| sep |> it is similar to a bubble and can suddenly burst at any moment , right ? The Universe is metastable and can decay at any moment into the true vacuum , but vacuum bubble is not the term used for the metastable state , but for the expanding bubble of true vacuum and destruction that is created when vacuum decay happens at a point . With the measured value of the Higgs and top quark masses we know we definitely live in a false vacuum . According to what we have available , and assuming there is no unknown magic around the corner , it seems like this is the case . This means that formally the Universe is always prone to decaying to the true vacuum there is a nonzero probability of transitioning to it , and it is bound to happen in some finite time . However , the probability for creating a bubble in the first place is extremely small because the barrier separating us from the true vacuum is huge . The nucleation of the bubble is understood in terms of quantum tunnelling and essentially the probability of tunnelling goes asexp barrierheight barrierwidth hbar which gets pretty small pretty fast . So you shouldn ' t really worry . The expected time for a bubble is really long . This is really an idea without much controversy to it the only problem was that it depends strongly on the measured values of the Higgs and top masses , which are correlated with the shape of the potential that determines which one of the vacua is the true one the one with lower energy . Before these values were known precisely ~ 2013 I think ? it was possible for the Universe to be either stable , unstable , or metastable which means unstable but with a long lifespan , check out this graphMassMetaStability . svg . Now we know it is really metastable . It ' s a really interesting fact from a theoretical standpoint that we are so close to the divide between stability and instability , for reasons relating to fundamental physics that I can ' t go into now , and that ' s why you ' ll find physicists more excited than worried about vacuum decay .