nope . I don ' t think a child ' s longing for an imprisoned loved one is race based . it would be normal for anyone . but i ' m no social scientist . <| sep |> Well . I mean he technically has thoughts going . Right ? <| sep |> And if he doesn ' t win he should just shave it off real quickly after the race . <| sep |> Who doesn ' t love it in tight ? <| sep |> Alright , we gotta analyze what you wish to do a bit more . two sets of speakers which are wired in different rooms . you want them to receive audio wirelessly . Either bluetooth streaming or over a wifi casting protocol . By far the cheapest and simplest option would be to just buy bluetooth receivers . R e c e i v e rWirelessCallingSystemdpB 017 IR 0 YKIrefsr 116 ? ieUTF 8 qidtelsr 816 k e y w o rdsbluetoothreceiverThese things add bluetooth receiving functionality to your wired speakers . You could have one in each room . because bluetooth range sucks that way . audio splitters take audio from either bluetooth receiver and deliver the audio to both sets of speakers . That also means that you will get a jumbled mess if both bluetooth devices happen to be playing audio at the same time . This solution will be around $ 20 excluding the wired speakers . And who knows how much wiring you need . Another option would be to get the Amazon Echo Dots . They replace the bluetooth speakers in the graphic but other than that , you would still split the audio signal . You can connect to the Dots via bluetooth or use the Alexa app or use its voice commands to let it play stuff on its own . The Echos unlike the Google Home has a 3 . 5 mm audio out . The Dots are also significantly cheaper and sufficient for your needs .