Your posts lately are so hot , it ' s fucking shocking . Nice work . <| sep |> Reasonable to you is being alarmist and refusing to even read the articles from your own citations when you ' re trying to make an indefensible point that hasn ' t been supported by a single piece of peer reviewed literature in the last three decades ? Again Owners of pit bulltype dogs deal with a strong breed stigma , however controlled studies have not identified this breed group as disproportionately dangerous . Pitbulls are not disproportionately dangerous . Underinclusiveness has to do with the fact that all dogs can and occasionally do bite . there are other breeds often suggested as making good family pets that do their share of biting . Bandow , James H . Will breedspecific legislation reduce dog bites ? The Canadian Veterinary Journal 37 . 8 1996 478481 The point of the matter is that you ' re coming into this discussion with both an indefensible thesis and a complete failure to generate an educated opinion with which to support it . Your own sources don ' t even agree with you , how am I supposed to convince you that you ' re incorrect when your own source states affirmatively that you ' re incorrect ?