I must have missed that info . I was under the impression it was already in the process of getting released . Well , I don ' t mind the late release for a more polished product ? Thx for the info mate <| sep |> You mean refuse to accept the extremely one sided dealThe deal is not onesided . It gives Palestinians over 95 % of the land they want , and gives land swaps for the rest . Israel ' s offers in 2008 were more than what Palestinians demanded at the start of negotiations in 2000 . Yet Palestinians demanded more , rather than less . that they will not comprise onIn the 1990 s , Israel offered Palestinians 80 % of the West Bank and all of Gaza . In 20002001 , Palestinians demanded 91 % of the West Bank and all of Gaza , as well as land swaps for the rest . Israel ' s offer increased to try and meet near there , offering 91 % and land swaps equal to around 34 %. In 2008 , Israel exceeded Palestinian demands , offering 94 % of the West Bank and all of Gaza , plus land swaps for the rest . That ' s more than what Palestinians asked for prior . So they demanded more , now saying 98 % and land swaps . Who is not compromising ? It ' s not the side constantly offering more and exceeding earlier Palestinian demands . despite Palestinians having an equally legitimate claim to the land ? Sure , they have an equally legitimate claim to the disputed land . And Israel still offers them more than 93 % of it with land swaps for the rest . So why is that onesided ?