Fair enough on my misspelling , it ' s not faith . It ' s what the hell you can prove . You can be wary or whatever , but that ' s speculative . The only facts of reality is the FBI exonerated her twice . You can either mire in whether the FBI is fixed , like the election was supposedly going to be or perhaps accept the reality that MAYBE the emails were a red herring distraction to deflect from the massive personal flaws of Trump . Which is a common PR tactic . And it worked ! So good for him . <| sep |> Wow . I know , right ? After multiple replies and requests , you ' re still avoiding answering the question and are persisting in diverting the conversation away onto some other topic . It ' s very telling . Bit of a disproportionate response . Only to someone who doesn ' t understand or refuses to acknowledge when they ' re wrong . I disagree with almost all of it . Naturally . . but really don ' t care to the same degree tbh . Which is why you ' re still here ? You didn ' t have to reply to the link I put up . You didn ' t have to reply to any of the further comments I ' ve posted . You didn ' t have to do anything , and yet , here you are still replying and , importantly , still being wrong . So , one last time Explain to me , using the Chinese example provided previously , why the absolute difference in votes means anything when determining the will of the people following a referendum .