That should be on rLifeProTips <| sep |> Will wait with bated breath . You don ' t mind if I actually try to do the actual work of finding the reason for working , do you ? My issue with this argument you have is if you were to tell someone from before 1900 s the basics of airplanes , they would tell you it was impossible except for a few that had thought it not only possible , but probable . Such minds were Leonard Di Vinci . Instead of trying to look to the past to disprove , let ' s look to future tests and devise tests to find out why it works . In doing so we might find it to be very possible and improve the drive as right now we have something that could be considered the demonstration model , not a really effective or efficient drive . My point , how do you want to be remembered ? You want to be Thomas Edison , who is called the innovator of the light bulb , even though he didn ' t invent the light bulb . Or would you rather be the guy that says the light bulb isn ' t possible because a scientist who said something before you were born said it couldn ' t happen ? Newton ' s laws may still be valid and the drive may still work , but if you just sit there and say From the outside looking in , it should not work . So it doesn ' t work . Then that shows the opposite of a scientific mind . Instead let us all go with what we know , this isn ' t just one test done by one organization , we now have a collection of tests pointing to the same conclusion . I don ' t think it matters much if there is differences in the numbered results , the fact is we see force when we put energy into the system . Let ' s find out why and along the way improve the system .