did you find someone to play with ? <| sep |> Lmao that was actually funny <| sep |> No one is going to listen to the US anymore and the US has never cared about what anyone else thought . FTFY <| sep |> That is the sound of their little engines of fluffy domination recharging . <| sep |> What exactly would you describe as Rowling ' s approach to magic ? There probably won ' t be a book with the exact same magical logic you find in Harry Potter , but there might be books that share elements of magic with the HPbooks . The question now is which elements are most important to you . Magic in Harry Potter is rather widespread and saying the Harry Potter approach to magic can mean a variety of different things . For example Magic in Harry Potter used a variety of folklore , cliches ad superstition and gave them a unique twist brooms , wands , etc . Magic in Harry Potter can be almost scientific and can have clear rules certain spells and their corresponding words and gestures , potions and their ingredients , the logic behind wand conquering , the capabilities and limits of certain magical activities , etc . Magic in Harry Potter can at times not be scientific at all and rather focus on wonder and wacky stuff , that are magical but realisticly make little sense Berty Bott ' s beans , moving stair cases , living portraits , etc . The Harry Potter approach to magic can probably has many more aspects and finding them all to the same degree in a single book might be difficult . Therefor my question is What kind of magic do you want and what aspects and cocepts are most important for you ? Eragon for example would be a book , in which there is a certain logic to spells , because they are cast by using an ancient language that is connected with nature itself . So this might give you the feeling of Harry Potter spells , but not so much of the crazy , illogical magical stuff .