The 15 your talking about is refering to the IVs . <| sep |> That ' s a whole lot of people ! <| sep |> 248 years sheesh come to the uk u get like 4 years tops <| sep |> Not according to this <| sep |> There has been many fallacies about professionalism , one of which is , You need to look professional to be professional . <| sep |> Because the Justices are package deals , you can ' t design one to fit your exact philosophy . And they tend to be mostly conservative , or mostly liberal , and to the extent they ' re not it ' s often hard to predict beforehand , or to find one who ' s heterodox in just the right way . Example Obama ' s administration has done various antiprivacy shit . But his two Justices were both generally proprivacy . Because he picked liberals . Similarly , Obama said he thinks the 2 nd Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms , but Sotomayor doesn ' t . Similarly , Trump said he is fine with national gay marriage , but also said he wants to appoint someone like Scalia , who ' s against that . Hillary would have picked a liberal Justice , and liberal Justices tend to be procriminal defendants . And she probably would have wanted to pick one procriminal defendant because that ' s where the party is , and that ' s where she is on other issues of that genre other than encryption . But if you pick someone like that , they ' ll also likely be proprivacy .