And for meta it ' s nothing established . Same as every moba too . You need supports , tanks , marksmen , fighters and one jungler . Junglers can get exp so fast and snowball a lane very hard with one good gank . <| sep |> My issued Kac can was given to me used . I shot 2 barrels out , and was on my third when I turned it in . It was immediately issued to a guy I worked with and he did the same shooting schedule I did before without issue on it . Modern suppressors are extremely durable . <| sep |> interesting article , but the author doesn ' t go deep enough Elon ' s usual recommendation for analysis to consider things based on first principles . This author does not she takes the current pricecapability of things , or the use cases that other providers are planning to use , and decides it ' s unrealistic . Let me lay out some of the assumptions they make without justification there has been no analysis of how technically plausible this proposal actually is . I think questioning this requires some thought or explanation on what motivation they have to lie on an FCC application . Not saying it ' s not true , but needs explanation . In other words this calculation implies a link efficiency of somewhere between 8 . 5 and 11 . 5 bpsHz . For comparison , OneWeb is estimated to achieve a forward link efficiency of 0 . 55 bpsHz with a 30 cm antenna and up to 2 . 73 bpsHz with a 70 cm antenna . Interesting comparison for sure ! SpaceX had planned for pizza box sizedrdconference 20150708 , so that seems about on par with the 2 . 73 bpsHz that the author says OneWeb is aiming for . The lower bound of 8 . 5 bpsHz doesn ' t seem out of the question elon said that the terminals are difficult . Reasoning by comparison doesn ' t mean much when both are fairly unknown . SpaceX ' s system appears much more focused on large expensive terminals , similar to those used by O 3 b , which can cost $ 100 K or more , and are used to connect large cruise ships or even an entire Pacific Island to the internet with hundreds of Mbps of capacity . Again , bad comparison that doesn ' t match what we ' ve been told the user terminals will be at least $ 100 to $ 300 dependingseattle 201520150115 A lot of stuff after this gets more technical , and I don ' t know if it ' s factual or not . the system itself won ' t be particularly low cost , given that each satellite is expected to have a mass of 386 kg taking the Falcon Heavy launch capacity of 54 , 400 kg to LEO and cost of $ 90 M , it would take at least 32 Falcon Heavy launches and perhaps far more given the challenge of fitting 140 satellites on each rocket , costing $ 2 . 8 B or more , just to launch the 4425 satellites . This is talking the customer price of FH launches , not the cost to SpaceX of launches . And doesn ' t account for any price changes , or the possiblity of using a larger rocket MCT , though unlikely . Despite that , the price seems to fit in the cost that Elon mentioned of $ 10 or $ 15 billionseattle 201520150115 so I don ' t quite see what the issue is . continues SpaceX ' s prior efforts to cause problems for OneWebAh , here ' s a possible explanation for the initial assumption business rivals 1122 elonmuskvsthetrolls . nah , the author is a consultant in the satellite industry , and I think he likely writing in good faith , but still reasoning by comparison which may or may not be valid .