lolyou ' re creative aren ' t you <| sep |> Your username looks about right . <| sep |> You definitely don ' t know the Porsche community at all . Even the people who love the turbo cars the most Magnus for example would never say it ' s not a real Porsche if it doesn ' t have a turbo . That ' s insane . The long time owners are currently scrambling to get NA 991 . 1 s . <| sep |> You ' ll get in no problem <| sep |> Fuck you and that cancer website <| sep |> Ukrainians have Black Army . Best pirates ever ! <| sep |> I ' m fine with the notion of moving location and there ' s no segregationist sentiment in your comment at all don ' t worry . I guess what I ' m trying to say is that you seem to be arguing correct me if I ' m wrong that the Electoral College disproportionately favours the center of the country Though many of the places favoured by the electoral college are urban and coastal like DE , DC , HI , RI , ME and that this is good because otherwise the middle of America ' s politics would be determined by the more populous urban coastal centers . But why does this argument not also fly for having the electoral college disproportionately favour other demographic minorities alongside Wyomingers , Vermonters and Alaskans such as Black Americans or Native Americans or nonChristians ? Even more shockingly the 5 million Americans living in US Territories like Guam and Puerto Rico get zero say in the President . If the electoral college is designed to preserve the say of less populated regions of America surely it should disproportionately favour Guam and American Samoa instead of ignoring them entirely ? I ' m not a Yank but from an outsider ' s perspective it does seem like a bit of a cumbersome system that needs altering