team is 230 K at high prices so would be cheaper if the market does crash . Potential improvements you could choose between if there is a crash , IMO , would be Bacca SIF IcardiImmobile . HamsikBanega Pjanic . De RossiAsamoah Nainggolan . <| sep |> I recently was gilded for helping some people with some Photoshop work . I kept ads on . I was doing the service work out of kindness , not rewards . Thought I ' d also help the site pay for servers still . Now , not so sure . <| sep |> the way it should be . <| sep |> I think deathadder is better <| sep |> In my perception , it ' s mostly that a part of the bitcoin community , those voting for bigger blogs have been too busy chanting their demands and painting the opposition as pure evil as to make sufficient effort to understand the both sides of the argument . Really ? Think about what happened Gavin proposed a floating limit . Some other dev said it will lead to decentralization , and that a limit even as big as 100 mb is needed Gavin proposed his first increase . Other devs said Too big , leads to centralization Gavin proposed his second increase , with smaller limits . Other devs said Too big , leads to centralization Then came Scaling , pw proposed SegWit , everybody cheered for SegWit a small bump , maybe 24 mb . This would have had a strong consensus imho and would have laid the debate to rest for at least 34 years . Than we got only SegWit . Gavin and friends got lower , to 2 mb . Seemed like a fine compromis . But it was rejected . small blockers said , big blocks will affect block propagation and create bandwidth spikes that knock out nodes . An alternative team of devs developed a nice solution to improve both it was rejected . miners and devs meet , agreed on segwit a small increase hf . What happened ? Miners did not run alternative clients , devs did not code a hf . I ' m happy when lejitz and other people are honest and I can understand . but it seems understanding is a one way road . team bigger blocks said they want no fee market . We have a fee market . team bigger blocks said they want blocks not to be full . We have full blocks for ~ 8 month team bigger blocks said we need to increase blocksize with hf to plan for success . We did not . I recently had a correspondence with a small blocker . He begged me to understand his position . I understood and we started to discuss his ideas of economics . Ok . Fine . Then I wanted him to understand that I ' m upset about communication restrictions in main bitcoin media channels which prevent an open discussion and free market decision of the path forward . He did not understand and applied semantics to say there is no c . shipSo , no , I think it ' s your turn to understand . If your message is like that from Lejitz that you will not compromise , on no hf , I can understand and I can accept this . That ' s what I ' m saying .