Well , at least Tressel would have the President of YSU on his resume . That ' s good executive experience in my opinion . <| sep |> It was great but I still prefer the Space Invader one , nothing compares to Mothership Gus . <| sep |> I think he is an absolute gem . The kid is a straight baller , has great vision , good speed and is a physical back . I don ' t see how he didnt have some much bigger offers . Great get for us . <| sep |> Ours have nonskid carpet pads underneath . The pads aren ' t too thick , so they ' re unobtrusive . <| sep |> Are people really dismissing Chomsky ? Trump fans really are a cult damn . <| sep |> That seems pretty reasonable as well . <| sep |> Because if you bring Shaman , then either they autoban that and beat your other two decks , which they have teched for because there aren ' t that many top archetypes or they let it through and have their lineup tailored to beat shaman and have a 50 % matchup against most of the rest of the field . By preventing people from covering every angle with their lineup , it enables that kind of metagamelevel counter play . Magic only lets you bring one deck plus a limited sideboard for that exact reason . If you can be one level ahead of the rest of the room on your predictions of what people are bringing , you can gain a huge advantage . Here ' s a prototypical example of next leveling the metagame . A couple of Pro Tours ago , there was a breakout archetype that swept the room a card from it was banned after 3 months , that is how powerful it was . However , part of the reason it did so well is that only a few teams really realized just how powerful it was and so it was not widely played overall . Now , what ' s notable is that there were two versions of the archetype . One did somewhat better against the field , but the other did much better in the mirror match . Predictably , the first put more copies in the top 16 and top 8 , but the second actually won the tournament . If Magic had used a match system more like Hearthstone ' s , someone piloting the first deck would have certainly won instead , because everyone who brought the archetype would still have had to bring other decks that were weak to it . By inherently limiting the impact that a powerful archetype can have on a single match in the current system , they actually increase its prevalence by destroying much of the value of countering it .