i be backhome around 1 and half hour from now <| sep |> In the debates , they called him out on it by stating all independent reviewing agencies said he cannot do what he says cut taxes , reduce deficit . And his response was just saying it would . it ' s like talking to an obstinate child . <| sep |> I ' m Florida and I have no idea wtf this is in the picture . Ay but shout out to my 305 niggahs <| sep |> I wish it was a funny joke <| sep |> Here is the post for archival purposes Author vroomDotClub Content I ' m really asking cause i don ' t understand why we can ' t havesegwit and a 2 mb blocksize right now via SF ? and see how that works ? Would that not solve our problems for a while ? Or is the entire debate just about blocking 2 nd layer protocol ? If that is the case it ' s really short sighted and not in the best interested of Bitcoin holders . Miners exist for bitcoin not bitcoin for miners we should do what is necessary for the usersowners . Sometimes I think this is just about destroying bitcoin cause I don ' t see any risk in segwit plus a bump to 2 mb while we hash out the way forward . LN will actually create more transactions onchain in the long run as it has to terminate on chain no ? ? What am I missing ? The price is crashing now meaning the market does not like this block . Us investors miners are not investors they are SUCKing btc not investing in it would like both a small block size increase and segwit now . Does anybody care about the owners of bitcoin ? or is it all about miners and developers ?