Most if not all of the way . You benefit from roads as well even if you do not drive so you should be paying for it as well . Don ' t want to pay for it then don ' t use the benefits . <| sep |> Right on ! Looking forward to it <| sep |> I don ' t use steam to tell u that <| sep |> New Jersey would die first . Wyoming , Montana or Idaho would win . <| sep |> The basic flaw in Huxley ' s view , in my opinion , is that it ' s based on the wrong premise that there is an idea of humanity that is eternal , that our morals are unalterable , and that they should be preserved at all cost . But there is no such thing as this . Evolution proves the contrary . Humanity is not eternal , that is true . That does not make claims about universal morals or ethics impossible . And evolution proves nothing about unalterable morals or the inevitable change . Evolution is just what occurs in domains that allow natural selection . There can be and will be an evolution of ideas , which will go on as long there are bad ideas that can not survive the good ones . That does not mean that there aren ' t some best ideas that maybe survive every other less good ideas that come along . Why is Huxley ' s world a dystopia ? Well , it does not really allow the evolution of ideas anymore . The people are not really happy , they are more or less sedated . There is no vertical mobility in that society . Once an epsilon , always an epsilon . People are engineered to be like that . Where does the ability to influence your own life enter the equation . That is right , you have no control whatsoever over your life . And not all people are happy , you can see that when one protagonist , I forget his name , the alpha who had the monogamous relationship with Lenina in the beginning , is pondering upon staying monogamous instead of happily joining the next somaladen orgyporgy . So you are right , and you are wrong at the same time . Huxley ' s view is limited by the zeitgeist of his own time . As every piece of literature is . The same is true for our prosaic attempts to discuss the subject matter . These limitations do not disprove , however , that there might be some universal moral truth that can be found . If you are really interested in the topic of morality and reason , I highly recommend Sam Harris ' The Moral Landscape . edit Typos and mistakes were unmade .