Got a CTD when browsing wylyndra ' s inventory in riften . I think it was at bound sword . About 3 tomes down the list . I was in riften when I installed it , but not in her cell . I installed mid play through . I know you mentioned it , but I ' m really hoping this gets fixed or that , as you say , it won ' t be a problem later on when inventories get updated . ' Cause it ' s really cool . I found magelight in a treasure chest and have it at 38 % or something now . Still Love this mod . <| sep |> I believe so too , I ' d just like to see it happening P . <| sep |> Pride cometh bitch <| sep |> That was proved back in the 1800 s . It is fact that CO 2 traps heat . Source ? There are no other factors to explain the current warming other than CO 2 . proven fact . I ' d like a source for that considering it ' s complete bullshit . There are other variables , like the ones that caused climate change every other time , and which you ignore . Again , I ' m getting sick of repeating myself since you can ' t grasp any concept more complex that Carbon bad . Warm bad there are many studies that show CO 2 rises as a response to warmingtheiceagesended , and not prior to warming . Care to explain that ? That shits all over your cult mentality where you have faith CO 2 must cause warming and ignore anything else . The world is not a greenhouse . There is no gardener feeding additional water and fertiliser to these plants . And increased CO 2 can increase pests Jesus Christ . Do you have a problem retaining information or do you just ignore everything you don ' t like ? The link you gave DOES NOT claim that higher CO 2 levels increases pests . It ' s talking about higher temperatures , and yes there are more insects in the Amazon and Borneo and Congo where it is warm and wet . That ' s called biodiversity dear . I think you ' ll find your camp are the ones claiming a warmer planet will mean less biodiversity , which is bullshit . Yet again , when CO 2 is higher , plants photosynthesize more efficiently , like how they evolved . PLANTS NEED MORE WATER AT 280 PPM CO 2 the level people like you want the planet to return to because you don ' t have a fucking clue about botany or the systems that had reduced atmospheric CO 2 to dangerously low levels . It takes organisms millions of years to evolve . Plants evolved with high CO 2 . It ' s been high for millions of years . 280 ppm is not normal . It ' s not optimal for life on Earth . Do you care about the facts or are you in some kind of 280 ppm cult ? That is funny ! you are quoting John Cook . Guess his data is ok . Good to know . But the actual quote is . Yes I was quoting him to show you that he lied in his own paper . You didn ' t understand that either . You alarmists aren ' t real sharp . Your quoting the entire paragraph with his results just confirms that the 97 % consensus figure Cook made up and people like you quote all the time is a complete lie . The complete figures you quote don ' t change the fact that this AGW advocate could only get 32 . 6 % of his sample of climate scientists to endorse AGW as a theory with any merit . So you take the opinion that papers expressing no opinion are against AGW . Perhaps , you know , they did not express an opinion . why ? perhaps because they were not on AGW or did not discuss it in the paper so it was not possible to put them in the other camp . Nice lie there . I am sure one of the denier sites would be screaming if they checked those papers and found them denying AGW . But they haven ' t so you can be sure that John Cook is correct . Jesus , I can almost imagine the spittle coming from your mouth from that rabid rant . You didn ' t even read the fucking link , or what I said obviously . I DID NOT state anywhere that those not expressing an opinion opposed AGW theory . I said there ' s no 97 % consensus . There isn ' t . You people claim 97 % of scientists agree humans are causing warming . Cook ' s own data says only 32 . 6 % endorse AGW . No position is no position . It certainly is not a fucking endorsement , which is what the liar John Cook and people like you say . Jesus . Is English your second language ? You realise that is tens of thousands of scientists . And none of them revealed the magic handshake . I find that hard to believe . You really believe in big conspiracies . Fake moon landings too ? And again you missed the point and can ' t understand basic human nature when trying to protect their jobs . It ' s not a conspiracy or a secret handshake . It ' s like how the union that oppose legalisation of marijuana in the US represents prison guards . They don ' t give a shit if weed is safer than alcohol . They don ' t care that under marijuana legalisation in Colorado domestic violence , drunk driving , and crime in general has fallen while state revenue and tourism has gone up . They oppose legalisation because if there is less incarcerations , there are less prison jobs . They have a selfish motivation . A union official will never go to the media in Colorado and comment how it ' s a good thing that there are less people being sent to prison and less crime in general . No , they are going to spin it in a way that will ensure jobs for union members , even if it means not telling the whole truth . There ' s no secret handshake . I ' ve said that before and probably won ' t again since you are so obviously a flaming alarmist and are full of venom for anyone who doesn ' t agree with your silly notion that a 120 ppm increase in CO 2 that ' s 0 . 012 % of the atmosphere is the end of the world . For your own mental health you should do a little research and wind down a bit . The over exaggerated hype from the extreme left who want to deindustrialise the West is propaganda designed to instill panic and an irrational emotional response like what you display every time you make a comment . Get some fucking perspective . You know that brown haze over large cities and the smoke from bushfires that kills people and causes eye and lung irritation ? That ' s called pollution real pollution . It ' s NOT CO 2 .