Those include expected law enforcement organisations like the police , the military and the secret serviceI don ' t agree with this bill , but I understand why the police and the secret service would have access to this information . But why the military ? If it ' s military police then maybe it makes sense , if they ' re keeping an eye on serving members of the armed forces . But why should they have access to the internet history of civilians ? I ' m talking about within the context of this bill . Obviously noone should have access to the internet records of anyone without a damned good justification backed up with a damned good warrant . <| sep |> Hi , PennyTration , thanks for your submission to rmadlads ! Unfortunately , your submission has been removed for the following reasonsRule 3 Repost from the last 2 months , or from the top 100 . REMINDER We do not punish for removals due to reposting . If you feel that it has been removed in error , please message us % 2 Fr % 2 Fmadlads so that we may review it .