I don ' t think it ' s viable to be spending significant spell slots to benefit from drugs , which generally have rather weak effects which could just generally be emulated with spells . That said , you could do it for RP reasons , andor work with the GM on something more balanced powerful if it ' s weak . <| sep |> Its common enough that police were out in full capacity yesterday . What is disturbing is your idea of one is alright and proceed to add extra excuses . Sounds a whole lot like you are convincing yourself you weren ' t drunk that one night . just rubbeface , right ? <| sep |> You own your diploma and knowledge . <| sep |> Link to website ? <| sep |> I already heard these ones <| sep |> This is the one I want . <| sep |> Problem is all those reasons are actually full of shit . For example , the claim it gives power to rural voters . States in the rust belt with extra power can be won by just their city votes . The top 4 cities in Wisconsin are all that is needed for a majority . This is why 80 % of campaigning in swing states occur in cities . Meanwhile , rural voters in California are completely over powered by city voters , both by inability to win their state and inability to form a bloc with rural voters of neighboring states . The claim it prevents a minority of states from having power , that rests on the naive assumption that every resident of a state hold the same opinion . State borders are not based on buyin to ideology but 200 year old political decisions . This is very similar to the flaws under pinning problems in Africa and the Middle East , where lines were drawn by colonial powers divvying up rewards rather than the ethnic make up of the residents . The top 90 cities in America hold 20 % of the population , however when broken down to the state level smaller cities tend to have most of the voters from smaller states . In a popular vote system , the 80 % of voters outside of the biggest cities may be able to form blocs to match or overcome the big cities that they can ' t do now .