That was a bit silly <| sep |> Based on what exactly ? 2015 BM . PDF is what a Bill that ' s intended to amend an existing Act looks like . Note that it cites which sectionwordtitleetc . that will be changed and specifies what the change is . The agenda quotes the changes what RUU 355 is supposed to make in the same format . Is there the possibility that more changes will be introduced in the actual text of the Bill ? Yes . However , as I said , the Act the Bill is supposed to amend is very short , and the changes the agenda quotes covers pretty much the entire Bill . Is there the possibility that the text of the Bill will be different from what the agenda says ? Yes . But the data that we have right now is enough to tell us what the Bill as was submitted to the House will do . It already shows that there was a change from the original July version of the Bill , and that ' s a starting point for discussion . And like all other discussions , this discussion will evolve when new information is revealed . Again , an opinion and not fact . No . Under the Syariah penal code , stoning and crucifixion are issued and intended as death sentences . I only said they are likely to lead to death and be de facto death sentences because it ' s possible for people to survive both . However , the possibility of survival doesn ' t change what they are intended to be . And that means , there is no room for those punishments in the Bill .